No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS2 - City Hall Space OptionsCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. ss2 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Homer L. Bludau, City Manager DATE: July 24, 2001 SUBJECT: Review of City Hall Space Options During the July 10th Study Session, staff presented City Hall space options for a FY 2001 -2002 CIP Project. The options included the following: 1. An expansion of the Engineering wing by adding offices toward parking lot by Administrative Services and the City Clerk; 2. A temporary trailer at rear of Prof Tech building; 3. Expansion of Prof Tech lobby into covered walk -way area; 4. Permanent second story addition over Revenue offices; 5. Demolition of old City jail and installation of a temporary module. Council expressed the desire to deal with the City Hall space needs on a permanent, rather than a temporary basis, and did not care for the utilization of temporary structures. The City Hall space needs requirements are both of an immediate and a long- term duration. But the short-term accommodations are dependent on how the long -term needs are addressed. Therefore, the City Manager believes the best way to wade into the issue is to raise and answer some basic questions. 1. Does Council envision City Hall remaining at its current location long term? Staff believes it is unrealistic to think the relocation of City Hall would not be controversial. Although a case could be made for a more central location, staff sees the current location as being the long -term site location. 2. If City Hall will remain at its site, what needs to be done to plan for its continued use over the long term? City Hall • 3300 Newport Boulevard • Post Office Box 1768 • Newport Beach, Califomia 92659 -1768 Review of City Hall Space Need Options Page 2 Many repairs and additions to City Hall have been made over the past 15 years; however, few have been made with the intention of the current City Hall lasting for another 40 -50 years. If City Hall is to remain at the current site, the City Manager recommends moving towards making a commitment by providing a plan for a City Hall that will serve the community over time. The City has a master plan for sewer line and water line replacement; it appears to be time to look at our City Hall as a City infrastructure need that serves the public and is deserving of master planning. If Council desires to move towards making a long -term City Hall commitment, there are a number of actions which could be considered as a part of such a process. Below are only some of the alternatives identified by staff: Space Needs 1. Accept staff's preliminary space needs analysis of 1,800 square feet. This analysis is based on current needs only and not on long term space needs. 2. Do a City Hall space needs assessment by a professional space planner for the short-term needs of City Hall. 3. Do a City Hall space needs assessment by a professional space planner for the long -term needs of City Hall. Master Planninq Based on Space Needs 4. Hire a professional to develop a concept for meeting current City Hall space needs. 5. Hire a professional to develop a concept for future City Hall space needs incorporating the current structure. 6. Hire a professional to develop a concept which retains some existing structure space, demolishes some space and adds additional space. 7. Hire a professional to develop a concept for a new City Hall in its current site. These action options are being presented in order to stimulate thinking regarding ensuring the community has a City Hall that functions efficiently and effectively from a space allocation, adjacencies and public access standpoint. The City Manager believes the current site offers sufficient space to do most anything we would like to do in meeting future City Hall space needs. The current older structures within the City Hall complex are inefficient in terms of storage space, heating /air conditioning /energy requirements, adequate office and meeting room space, adjacencies, security needs and public Review of City Hall Space Need Options Page 3 accommodations. Parking for City Hall is another problematic issue which is a part of the overall long -term requirements for a City Hall. After today's discussion, Council may want to consider a Council subcommittee to further review options and make recommendations to the full Council. 3 PAUL J. RUFFING AIA A R C H IT EC T U R E / P L A N N I N G ® CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBER PRELIMINARY FEASIBILITY REPORT April 19, 2000 PURPOSE: The City of Newport Beach wishes to add a second floor of approximately 1060 square feet into the existing space that at one time was the City Councils chamber. The building currently houses office for the city's finance department on the ground floor. There is also a small mezzanine, approximately 360 square feet that is used for mechanical equipment and storage. The space has a clear height of approximately 19'- 6" from first floor slab to the underside of the roof structure. There is a ceiling for the existing offices at 8' - 0' ". The building is built of poured -in -place reinforced concrete with a wood truss roof system, supported on concrete piles. The city has requested that an analysis be prepared to determine the feasibility of constructing the additional second floor. This analysis is to be prepared in phases so that the city staff may evaluate the probability of the projects success before extensive engineering and design cost are expended. This is the first preliminary report of the analysis and findings by the consulting architect and engineers. PROCEDURE: Several preliminary meeting were held between the city staff and the consultants to define the scope and limitation of the study. It was decided that the study should focus on; structural capabilities to support and additional floor, access to the new space and the total cost including; demolition, staff relocation, construction and city operational disruption. Along with Lloyd Dalton, City Engineer Department, the consultants reviewed the buildings existing features to compare with the as -built drawing supplied by the city. This included the space above the first floor ceiling, mezzanine, mechanical equipment and electrical service. Preliminary sketches were prepared to illustrate the proposed second floor. Structural calculation have been made at on typical column and supporting pile location to determine the additional loading. The city retained a geotechnicai engineer to evaluate the addition loading on the existing pile footings. A review meeting was held with Lloyd Dalton and Faisal Jurdi of the city to discuss these findings. It was decided that this Progress Summary report should be prepared for the city's review and determination as to whether the project is still appears feasibG1. CONSIDERATIONS This phase of the analysis has considered the major effects of adding a second floor without researching smaller details that may not effect the project proceeding. I /; r G�al, I.,) Cct�ji l`Rlc�1u. ��� �CC)G � � TF1. /FAX 949.660.8062 I . Structural: The ability of the existing structural system to support a second floor is the primary consideration. If the existing structure or foundation system required extensive modification this may be the most costly part of the project that would cause the city not to proceed further with the analysis. It is considered that the new floor would be a truss joist system with light weight concrete floor. The truss joist would be supported on the existing concrete columns which are supported by the concrete piling foundation. The structural analysis and geotechnical evaluation are attached as part of this report. 2. Accessibility: The second floor will have city offices that will be accessible by a new stairway from the lobby of the city hall. The existing concrete stairway does not meet current building codes so it will be removed and a new stairway constructed. The new stairway is shown on the preliminary drawings attached. The existing mezzanine would have a short corridor constructed to connect the stairway to the new second floor offices. 3. Disruption: During the construction period the offices on the first floor will need to be relocated to a temporary location. This may be to portable trailers or off -site offices. The adjacent Office of the Maier, and the lobby may remain but will be impacted by noise and dust. J A construction area on site will be required by the contractor for material storage, office, parking and maneuvering. Depending on the construction method some landscaping will be destroyed and need replacing. 4. Air Conditionina: The current air conditioning equipment located on the mezzanine will not be adequate for the second floor addition and the first floor. The condensing equip "" "m"''''''e'at� ,,��tt located outside on the ground appears to have enough capacity for the additional srue¢t!( atf however qui ent will be required on the mezzanine. !� An additional 8 ton air conditioning unit will be needed on the mechanical mezzanine to supply the second floor. New ducting will be required for both floors. Existing first floor ducting will be removed to make room for construction of the second floor. 5. Electrical: The city is currently up grading the electrical services to the city hall. Along with this up -grade additional service can be brought to this area of the building to supply the second floor addition. It is considered that a 200 amp service will be needed for lighting, mechanical, power and communications. This could be combined with the replacement panel for the first floor. 6. Demolition: The original council chamber construction is still existing above the ceiling of the first floor. The original ceiling, light fixtures, air conditioning duct, etc. will be removed. Window openings that were closed will be reopened for the second floor First floor ceiling, lighting, mechanical ducts and some partitions will be removed. Concrete stairs to the mezzanine will be demolished. J CONCLUSIONS Based on the preliminary structural evaluation, he Ja tonal loads, the existing columns and walMwill support the new loading. There additional investigation of seismic loading, as well as structural connec"0 sat the roof diaphragm and wall connections. The geotechnical consultant revie he added loading on the existing pile foundations. He compared the pile foundation o the adjacent engineering building with those of the city hall, and determined that the piles have the capacity to support the load. He has recommended that a review of the possible liquefaction effect on these piles. From the above evaluation it appears that the building structural system and the foundation have the capacities to support the new second floor. Access can be accomplished by rebuilding the concrete stairway. Another option may be to leave the existing stairway and construct a new stairway within the office area. 3. Disruption to the city operations and personnel will need to be evaluated by the city. It should be anticipated that the construction time may be 6 months. 4. Cost has bee estimated at this very preliminary stage based on the knowledge and experience of the consultants. A more detailed cost estimate should be prepared as part of the next phase. Cost Estimate is attached at the end of the report. This report has been prepared for review by the City of Newport Beach staff to determine if further design and investigation should continue. The consultants are available for review of theirfindings and recommendations. Attached to this report are: Schematic Drawing of the First Floor, Second Floor, and Building Sections Preliminary Construction Cost Estimate Structural engineers letter of findings and structural calculations. Geotechnical Consultant report letter to the City. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call me or any of the consultants. Respectfully Paul J. Fluffing, AIA xc Mark Tomita, Peyton Tomita Engineers Ken Bagahi, Bagahi Engineering 4 I 0 �l l .G _ __©, AUL I.RUFIN A A G NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL OPF, N P ARCHITECTURE UL F / G, N IA SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION I 7 NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL' PAUL .E'RUEEI "G, °'o SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION I m ag gg,g b I I m Z 4 n r n r r x r.- r rn n 0 z NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL' • ° "D1. RAF I PLA AA L FL V FING I MN A SCHEMATIC SECTIONS PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION m 0 PAUL J. RUFFING AIA A R C H I T E C T u R E / P L A N N I N G N CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR ADDITION CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBER PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE April 19, 2000 OFFICE RELOCATION Portable Building Rental: 24'x 40' = 950 square feet Set -up Rental $700 /month for 5 mos Tear -down Tax 7.75% Moving: To Portable Building From Portable Building Total DEMOLITION First Floor $6,000.00 3,500.00 4.000.00 $13,500.00 $1,050.00 $1,800.00 1.800.00 quantity unit cost $14,550.00 _$3.600.00 $18,150.00 total Remove Window for access 1 ea 500 Ceiling 1750 sf .50 870 Partitions/doors 95 If 3.50 330 Electrical/lights 1750 sf .75 1,310 Carpet 195 s 1.00 195 Dust Barricade 1 ea 2,500 Second Floor Ceiling 1080 sf 1.00 1,800 Lights 1080 sf .90 980 Ducts /Conduit/etc 1080 sf .90 980 Window Openings 3 ea 1,500 Opening at storage wall 40 sf 35.00 1,400 Stairs 18 risers 85.00 1.534 Total ICI ICAV GAG AAA QnAC (1:1 Q uor nn Second Floor Partitions quantity unit cost total CONSTRUCTION 3 ea 550 1,650 Site 2015 sf .65 1,310 Repair /Replace Landscape 2000 sf 1.50 3,000.00 Foundations 140 s y 32.00 4,480 No Change 3 ea 1,500 4.500 Floor Slab $16,740.00 No Change 1100 sf .95 $1,040.00 Structure Beams 75 If 19.50 1,460 Floor Joist 600 If 9.70 5,820 Decking, plywood 1130 sf 2.10 2,370 Lightweight concrete 1130 sf 1.75 1,980 Shotcrete walls 1200 sf 6.60 7,920 Stairs 1750 sf 5.50 9,620 Steel pan filled I fit. 7.50 7,500 In -Fill Wall 150 sf 11.80 1.770 Total 1050 sf 2,25 $28,820.00 First Floor $20,990.00 Partitions 95 If 24.00 2,280 Doors/Hardware (reinstall) 3 ea 150.00 450 Painting 2580 sf .65 1,680 Ceiling 1750 sf 2.10 3,670 Carpeting 195 s y 32.00 6,240 Replace Window 1 ea 250 Total $14,570.00 Second Floor Partitions 95 sf 24.00 2,280 Doors/Hardware 3 ea 550 1,650 Painting 2015 sf .65 1,310 Ceiling 1200 sf 2.10 2,520 Carpeting 140 s y 32.00 4,480 Windows 3 ea 1,500 4.500 Total $16,740.00 Roof Insulation 1100 sf .95 $1,040.00 Mechanical HVAC lstflr. 1750 sf 3.50 6,120 2nd fir. 1050 sf 7.50 7.880 Total $14,000.00 Electrical Primary Service Existing Lighting 1st fir. 1750 sf 5.50 9,620 2nd fir. 1050 sf 7.50 7,870 Power lstflr. 1750 sf .75 1,130 2nd fir. 1050 sf 2,25 2 370 Total $20,990.00 Sub -Total $99,160.00 Sub - Total; Demolition + Construction $113,055.00 GENERAL CONTRACTOR General Conditions Is 12% 13,567 Overhead Is 7% 8,863 Profit Is 8% 10"839 Sub -Total $33,269.00 CONSULTANTS Architect and Engineers $19,800.00 SUMMARY: Office Relocation $14,550.00 Demolition $13,895.00 Construction $99,160.00 General Contractor $33,269.00 Consultants $19.800.00 GRAND TOTAL $180.674.00 , ,1pp��'� c�� S¢'cu� c�cta ` ICt2 41-tT, lT on- Tomita & Associates April 13, 2000 Paul Ruffing, Architect 1101 Dove Street Suite 140 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Attention: Mr. Paul Ruffing Subject: Feasibility Study for New Second Floor Addition Newport Beach City Hall Complex Newport Beach, CA Gentlemen; Per your request, Peyton - Tomita & Associates has reviewed the feasibility of adding a second floor in the City Council wing of the Newport Beach City Hall complex. Our professional services are performed with the intent to meet the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by reputable structural engineers under similar circumstances. No other warranty, expressed or implied is made as to the professional opinions presented in this report. The study is limited to the structural aspects of the project only. Any issues related to the mechanical, electrical, or plumbing disciplines are beyond the scope of this evaluation. Although the scope of work is limited, it should serve the intended purpose. If the anticipated structural work outlined by this preliminary study is still within the construction budget, an additional study can be completed to determine more precise requirements. PROJECT'S OBJECTIVE Our understanding of the city of Newport Beach objective is to add second floor office space in the City Council wing of the Newport Beach City Hall complex. This area is currently a high open volume space. The floor addition is to be accomplished by best utilizing the available funds. t3 Paul Ruffing, Architect Newport Beach City Hall Second Floor Addition April 13, 2000 Page 2 BUILDING DESCRIPTION The existing building is a reinforced concrete building with steel roof trusses and wood rafters and a 1x solid diagonal sheathing diaphragm. The lateral system consists of reinforced concrete shearwalls. The building is supported on precast driven pile foundations. The clear ceiling space is approximately 21 feet to the bottom side of the roof framing. The original construction was completed around 1946. GENERAL ENGINEERING OBJECTIVE This initial study is to indicate whether the existing building framing system can support the new floor for both vertical and lateral loads without requiring substantial retrofit work. The objective of this study is to obtain a minimum confidence level that the floor addition can be completed without requiring structural work beyond what is required for the actual floor construction only. The evaluation will determine if a more in -depth evaluation is warranted. It is suggested that a construction company be consulted if a cost estimate is desired. Sketches can be provided upon request to aid in the cost estimating process. ANALYSIS ASSUMPTIONS The engineering evaluation is based upon the requirements of the 1997 Uniform Building Code. It is our understanding that the upcoming 2000 code is significantly different. It is not possible at this time to determine what impact the new code would have on our current recommendations. The evaluation was completed using the information identified on the available construction documents. It is assumed that the building was constructed as specified on these drawings. It is also assumed that the second floor addition will be utilized as office space only. Thus, in determining the seismic loads, a standard occupancy factor was employed. The construction of the new second floor framing is assumed to consist of open web wood or steel joists and plywood floor diaphragm with a lightweight nonstructural concrete floor fill. The floor fill is provided to mitigate sound transmission and to maintain a level floor surface. The new floor joists are assumed to span between the existing exterior concrete walls without interior columns or girders. New beams and columns would be introduced at the exterior wall openings to support the new floor. The depth of the joist is approximately 18 to 20 inches deep. A 12 to 13 diameter duct 1� Paul Ruffing, Architect Newport Beach City Hall Second Floor Addition April 13, 2000 Page 3 can be routed through the joist webs. This diameter does not account for any insulation which may be required and which would reduce the maximum duct diameter which may pass through. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A preliminary analysis was completed to determine if the proposed addition could be completed within the established construction budget. The analysis was limited to rough estimates in order to minimize the evaluation costs. The existing concrete walls and columns appear to be capable of supporting the imposed dead load and live loads as well as the imposed seismic forces. At some walls, the overturning jamb reinforcing steel may not be adequate. This can be strengthened as required. No significant structural reinforcing is anticipated for this portion of the structure. The existing concrete walls appear to, for the most part, conform to the minimum reinforcing requirements with the exception of hooks and some tie requirements. Due to age of the building, it is anticipated that the wall to roof anchorage would require supplementing. Areas of shear transfer between the roof diaphragm and shearwalls should also be investigated. In addition, the solid diagonal sheathing has a lower diaphragm capacity than plywood and may not be capable of restraining the concrete walls for out -of -plane forces nor the lateral forces in resisting the building seismic and wind forces. This portion of the analysis is beyond the scope of the evaluation. A structural survey is recommended to ascertain the existing condition of the structure, which may identify areas where the structure has deteriorated over the course of time. The most likely areas of damage would be in the wood roof areas, especially if there is a history of roof leaks/ water damage. In addition, it has been our experience that steel member connectors, especially sheet metal type connectors, have proven to be susceptible to corrosion in areas in close proximity to the ocean. Our preliminary evaluation found that the imposed vertical loads overstressed selected piles based upon the pile capacities shown on the drawings. A preliminary evaluation by Bagahi Engineering Inc., Geotechnics & Foundations, has found that the existing piles may have vertical load carrying capacities on the order of 2.5 times the drawing defined capacities. Refer to their report for additional information. If this is true, then the existing foundation can accept additional loads from the new floor addition without requiring the addition of any new foundation elements. In conclusion, the existing building appears to be capable of supporting the new second floor loads without requiring significant structural upgrade work. The concrete shearwalls appear to have sufficient capacity to support the imposed lateral loads 6 Paul Ruffing, Architect Newport Beach City Hall Second Floor Addition April 13, 2000 Page 4 except some walls may require jamb steel strengthening. The roof structure and connectors still require evaluation to determine their level of compliance with the current code requirements. This work is recommended should the city proceed with the floor addition. Please contact us if you should have any questions or if we can be of additional service. We would be pleased to submit a proposal for structural engineering services on this project. Very truly yours, Peyton - Tomita & Associates Mark Tomita, S.E. Principal IU Project: Mnl pall-r � <ACN G! ?r fhWz,L Peyton - Tomita & Associates client: tF/ yl Structural Engineers Job No. P/Lu o d v l Date: 3113101 Eng: '^r lLC 8 "q LiATrLl = 6(81y)f 0�//Z)( /I- /�z) = 44,s 1'i oor- %�fl,or pL = /Spy f (?cf ) = 26 oc. zi- �b41 a/ /7'SPc/- (4, -)(l Z) = 7330 ds ,Flo L P, ` /Zj = 1441,4 1 - p« 2K : Saor1(//0) � 7200 p 'lop /Y lI Li44') � 78d'O -4 / Fc 2 to _ /I %3S7 d / 3� b� = 3 /� /S 'Y �nr.LOw =' 2v UV plt 954 Town & Country Road Orange, CA 92868 Tel: (714) 245 -4930 Fax: (714) 245 -4933 \11 F lm /m BAGAHI ENGINEERING INC. GEOTECHNICS & FOUNDATIONS April 7, 2000 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 Attention: Mr. Lloyd R Dalton SUBJECT: FEASIBILITY STUDY 2 °d Floor Addition City Hall City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, CA Dear Mr. Dalton Proposal No. 104y -200 -00 Pursuant to our telephone conversation we have examined the pile capacity for a 16 -inch diameter pile, based on the soils report by Action Geotechnical dated October 10, 1983. Our analysis indicates that such piles driven to a minimum depth of 20 feet would carry close to 50 kips of load based on a factor of safety of 2 and 3, for side friction and end bearing, respectively. Based on structural computations, it is our understanding that the maximum anticipated column load is 31.4 kips. Assuming the soil parameters used are applicable to the site and pile diameter and lengths are as assumed or greater, it is our opinion that the existing piles can carry the anticipated column loads under static condition. Next step in the evaluation would be the response of these piles under seismic condition and in particular, their lateral capacity if subsoil liquefies. Boring logs from adjacent site show several 3901 WESTERLY PLACE, SUITE 109, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 TEL(949)252 -8292 FAX(949)252 -8293 6 Mr. Lloyd R. Dalton Project: City of Newport Beach City Hall, Newport Beach, CA Proposal No.: 104y- 200 -00 /April 7, 2000 Page 2 feet of non - liquefiable clayey soil just below the water table underlain by sandy soils. The sandy soils may potentially be liquefiable, specially for low blow counts. Potentially liquefiable zones requiring analysis are about 15 to 30 feet below the surface. Should you desire to proceed with liquefaction analysis, please let us know. We trust this information is adequate at this time. Very truly yours, BAGAHI ENGINEERING INC. Ken H. Bagahi, Ph.D., 08 Principal KHB\rk Distribution: (1) Addressee (1) Paul Ruffing, AIA, 1101 Dove St. #140 NB 92660 ppr-104y Bagahi Enginering Inc \I\ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR 'DR44 w 4�. r FACILITIES SPACE UTILIZATION AND NEEDS ANALYSIS The City of Newport Beach requests proposals from qualified firms to perform a comprehensive space utilization and needs analysis. Proiect Background and Description A. City Hall Complex: The City's current City Hall complex is located at 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, California. The City Hall site is approximately 4 acres, with 167 off - street parking spaces. Exhibit A illustrates the facilities at this location. Building 1 is the main City Hall facility. This facility was originally constructed in 1948 and has been modified and altered substantially since its initial construction. Building 1 originally housed the City Manager, City Council Chambers, City Clerk, Finance, Public Works and a portion of the Police Department, until the construction of the new police facility in 1974. Building 1 currently houses the operations of the City Manager, City Clerk, Administrative Services, Community Services Administration and the Engineering Division of the Public Works Department. To date, the main City Hall building has been remodeled/altered to accommodate the space needs of various City operations including the Human Resources and Revenue Divisions of the Administrative Services Department. Building 1 contains approximately 12,000 square feet. Building 2 currently houses Planning, Building and the Administration and Transportation & Development Services Divisions of the Public Works Department. The facility is a two -story building consisting of 13,500 square feet and was originally constructed in 1984. To date, there have not been any substantial alterations to this facility. Building 3 currently houses a portion of the Community Services Department, City Attorney's offices, Fire Administration, and the Management Information Systems and Telecommunications Divisions of the Administrative Services Department. A section of the Building was originally constructed in 1948 as the City Jail and Police facility. Subsequent sections of the Building were constructed in 1957, 1961, 1972 and 1980. The section of the Building now occupied by the City Attorney, Fire Administration, MIS Division and the City's print shop operation has been altered and expanded many times over the years. Building 3 contains approximately 14,300 square feet. Building 4, originally constructed in 1975, contains approximately 3,600 square feet and currently houses the City Council Chambers. 9,0 Request for Proposal For Facilities Space Utilization and Needs Analysis B. City Hall Operations: The current City operations which are housed at 3300 Newport Boulevard include the City Manager; City Clerk; City Attorney; Administrative Services (Human Resources, Finance, Revenue, MIS, Telecommunications, Print Shop); Community Services; Fire Administration; and Public Works (Administration, Engineering, Transportation & Development Services). Approximately 170 employees are housed at this location. 2. Scope of Services The Scope of Services consists of two primary components: Space Utilization Assessment and Needs Analysis. The City may, at its option, elect to proceed with a Phase II Options and Recommendations study. However, this determination will be decided at a later time. The space utilization component shall provide a comprehensive assessment of current space utilization and allocation for existing operations and staffing at the City Hall complex. This component shall include, at a minimum, the following tasks: A. Preparation of an analysis and findings of the current space allocation for existing staff, by building and functional use. B. Preparation of an illustration which represents the current space allocation for visitors and customer service operations. C. An analysis and findings of the current space allocation for visitors and customer service operations. D. Preparation of an illustration which represents the current space allocation for shared needs such as conference rooms, lunch rooms, restroom facilities and parking. E. An analysis and findings of the current space allocation for shared needs such as conference rooms, lunch rooms, restroom facilities and parking. F. Preparation of an illustration which represents the current space allocation for specialized equipment such as, computers, telecommunications, HVAC, and electrical facilities. G. An analysis of the current space allocation for specialized equipment. H. Identification and analysis of current space constraints and /or inefficiencies. Formulation of recommended space standards based on acceptable industry standards. J. Formulation of a comparison of the city's current space allocation in relation to acceptable industry standards. 2 2t Request for Proposal For Facilities Space Utilization and Needs Analysis K. Formulation of benchmark comparisons between the city and private sector. L. Formulation of benchmark comparisons between the city and other cities of similar population. The needs analysis component shall include, at a minimum, the following tasks: A. Evaluation of the individual work space needs for existing and future services and staffing. B. Analysis of the specialized equipment space needs, i.e. computer network, telecommunications and HVAC. C. Evaluation of current infrastructure condition, life expectancy, replacement schedule, and cost of buildings and utility systems. D. Modifications designed to enhance service delivery and increase the efficiency of space utilization. E. Formulation of standards for housing functions which require interface and /or proximal location to one another. F. Development of recommended standards for the city's space needs. G. Application of the recommended standards to existing staffing functions. 3. Consultant's Representative The Consultant shall assign a primary representative and an alternate to perform the services described within the Scope of Services. Both shall be identified in the proposal. The Consultant's representative shall remain in responsible charge of all duties from contract negotiations through project completion. If the primary representative is unable to continue with the project, then the alternate representative shall become the primary representative. 4. Additional Consultant Responsibilities The Consultant shall be responsible for completing the specified services in accordance with the City's standard "Professional Services Agreement" which shall be prepared by the City. A copy of the standard agreement is attached. Services specified in this agreement shall be in accordance with Consultant's proposal, and this "Request for Proposal ". The primary components and provisions of the agreement shall include liability insurance coverage and errors and omissions insurance coverage in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000). The City must be named "additional insured" on all required policies. 5. City Responsibilities A. City will provide a plan drawing of the City Hall complex. The plan may also be obtained in CD ROM form. 3 71 Request for Proposal For Facilities Space Utilization and Needs Analysis B. City will provide an illustration which represents current space allocation for the operations and staffing within the entire City Hall complex. C. City will provide as- builts, to the extent that they are available. D. City will provide a copy of the 1990 Feasibility Study for Newport Beach City Hall prepared by The Blurock Partnership. 6. Organization of Proposal The Proposal shall include the following: A. Introduction and understanding of the project. B. Project schedule, including task start and completion dates. It is the City's intention to negotiate an agreement with the successful Consultant and issue a Notice to Proceed within approximately forty -five (45) days of the proposal due date. Time is of the essence in completing all elements of work included in the agreement. C. Scope of work, including proposed methodology. D. Brief company profile, including number, location, and size of offices. E. Consultant's experience with at least three projects of similar scope, including references with contact person and telephone number, and participation of staff being proposed on this project. F. Identification of the project team, including organizational chart and resumes of each team member. The Consultant's primary representative shall be available on all occasions for discussion with City staff. Specific responsibilities of each team member shall be detailed along with indication of percent of overall time available to work on this project. G. Estimation of number of hours each job classification will expend on the work product. H. Identification of any subconsultants. Recommendation of additional tasks and /or cost savings measures. J. A not -to -exceed amount for the services to be provided, including current fee schedule for each job classification (these items shall be submitted in a separate, sealed envelope). The fee shall be itemized according to tasks and shall include miscellaneous costs such as travel, duplication, clerical support, etc. The City reserves the right to eliminate any tasks from the scope of work, and reduce the not - to-exceed amount by the cost of the task eliminated. a 23 Request for Proposal For Facilities Space Utilization and Needs Analysis 7. Submittal Requirements Three (3) copies of the proposal must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m., XXXX, 1998. Proposals shall be titled "RFP for Facilities Space Utilization and Needs Analysis" and addressed to: Public Works Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 8. Selection Procedure A committee comprised of City staff will review the proposals. The successful Consultant will be selected on the basis of project understanding, previous firm experience, expertise of the project team on similar projects, and proposed project schedule. 9. General Information A. This Request for Proposal does not commit the City of Newport Beach to pay costs incurred in the preparation of a response to this request. Services shall not commence until the "Professional Services Agreement" is executed and a Notice to Proceed is issued by the City. B. All data, documents, and other products used or developed for this project shall remain in the public domain upon completion of the project. Similarly, all responses to this Request for Proposal shall become the property of the City of Newport Beach. C. The method of payment, upon negotiation of a contract, shall be monthly payments based upon satisfactory progress and the submission of requests for payment. D. Questions regarding this Request for Proposal may be directed to Luci Romero Serlet at (949) 644 -3311. f: \users \pbw\shared \facilities \rfp.doc 67 2`( 1 ,V Ir w m W w U) �,L J CL U) J Q TT ¢ i W D J Z H_ ar 0 F- WQ Z 0 O U zi-o F-a LL U Qzz ¢Wa CL Q Faa Y¢ I- W =z U "'m 0Fa 0 i 1- H N =LL y 0 (9 v J O W Z z 5 W F- m q Z;5 CL J_ oU) m2 W ¢am ° WV LL Q W Z IL ¢ O W LL 2 0c Q �,L u Z 0 N SZ 0 WX 0. m W F J R J 04 IL= w� ZV m d c c m a N U m L Q a L `m r m a U O m m L H c m `O m v m IL N m m m O r ca ca ca j m L L L C Q °ca LL LL LL E Er E c c c c m C] TO 0- m m m co m m E 0)da as x >. _m caapm0 00w N0 v .r c m 00 -0- O � o o E N c 3 LL O ca a I-L [L- � L° 0 LL m 0 O "O ° "0 "0 E m m J M V Y m 0-0 LL — LL c c c Q c Co — U O O O Q` LL c .- O c m LL ° m C= m —000 `m -- om m W— ID FD LL LLCO NmcO O OO _ -�aunLLcn-0-0-0-0 0-o ca Nv `m C 0 g q 010) -N U O) C1 C1 m m m m m c N c c c O O O O o o o E Y 0 0 0 m 0 0 j a m p, O X X X 0 0 j m D- D- cn >aacnma m LLOinwwwLLD- m LL O 0 �N C* CO h N C* H CO h cD CD � � � � � N Z 0 N SZ 0 WX 0. m W F J R J 04 IL= w� ZV m d c c m a N U m L Q a L `m r m a U O m m L H T V to T a m W m LL W H Q O U W J W 2 O to S2 UQ as W X M W 1- J cc J Oa a= W ~ 2U 9 m V m m m O m m m o o a m �¢ T j u C 0 m m p9 D m — > m 0 U m �0 O c 7 W O fU co o_ moo E E ao EEE 0 Ci Ci E MCC U C'a «_ mmQ a Q; m _T U m m c 0 U U U m c c O m m a c m Q N N m N V > - N � TM m� m L (n D CC— m m C U J'E E � amEL v om 5~ c c m c m E 6 U> Q m R >_wH c m c `m E u.'m ¢ cv mu m � c `n 7 F m m `m m c - >ocm .000 C O IL a > E°m> D�a¢ c c m rn `m E w rn a y C N C J C m coo c 0 IL UJ ¢ a C N c 0 p c c v C-0 vmv'o —L —m 9COam C ap c � m _ a O m m O m C = 0° OE _ 3 m m - E 7 3woo m H rn m c i Y Oly C O � m �ma m m m U > m O p n �Ea�o tv U ¢ v m rn oc tea` � c e8 m �Na c c m m o C 0 a da m c > my U m N m C m t O 3 c U=� O m m a m e m 0 YSNcc mad N c c— T O � m m m p N t M, m U m f c m mmo o m co I t 1 1 I 1 I CQi N m C C m o_ U m t U O. t m C m o_ Y U 0 D m m t H Q S U J Q Z O Q N_ Z Q 1 l 1 T 9 w T c m 0 LL z oG zz UQ WX mW F"j QJ OQ CL= 3'- wF zU to S Q U J J Q tl) Q U W h S M to cc Q U } U I W U 4W yW cc } OO a O2 YJW W U a w c. O O J LL w W W } O J a f W 2� C O C n 00(7 NtD<N tpNO !, 1� � N W 0 r n 00(7 NN(7t2 NNO W 1� O O 000 0.--N •-00 c7 O N C 0 C r OON .-NN � NNO f0 C7 W N W V O 000 OOON 000 O O O C 0 O N W W r C z zz0 O G Q G m W c7 O « Q N O N O Z ZZN —�z < W N NN Z ZZ Z W N C O OZ0000000 000 00000 O O W O Zl��tp�N N W r. W W W N" O N C6 �N tpN C <N ANN .- V O 000 O.-ON NOO OON O N C O N W W O O-C7 (7NN� <NO OOtp tO � � T � S — Win` mp�a r!� Eo •e U :a mO�O��� LU cc >TWENC i T 'O 7 T _ D m m LL 2 O y UQ 6 W W CO F -J 2 J Oa 6 = 3> 2U C 0 0 0 O N Q O N p N O p .-00� c7 l��O N NC7 c7 m m A ^ o^ c7 In 'A v v w ^ N C7 N I O N m °D c7 In rn w � rn C O N �! A A r O O O OO) Ot7 � C O Z 7 O - OS vc0 m C O Q c7 01 1[I N t0 01 � t0 O ZN t7. N C7�� O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O OfOO�v�j OtON t0 N O O 01 Oc71[I 01 t7O�Q c7 t0! _ O tO�O czL[I�O O� to to to^ W O (h p1 O fO O �+�j O tO N t0 O to 0 O N a oco .n rn�.;m lnv wn c�1nwm LQ ww wfO (h Im C 0 7 ° m m N m Z a m o U I —° m LL E �; oTj 2 _ LL 0-- Co m 00 E MCC y x op 0 c f � 4C 1 oz; ca 02 Lmm N aO QC QC U° � w y O Z > a .u2LL , m m mr ap r c m °c oC; mO mo m mLL =_ mD.6 Q G G LL H U 2 to a 6 Co Q y d C C ro a N U N L Q O L y ro C ro d Y U O _j Lil N L O Y Q MW Cc m J U^^ V/ Q 7 1 1 1 1 I I 1 J J J 1 v m a a W m 2 O m UQ WX IL m W F J 2 J Oa IL= 3r 2U U C O O O N W b W U C O O O N W v C O O O N W W W U C O O O N W W W U C O N W f U ' C O O ' N Q N N N W N b b N b b b b Q Z Q Z Q Z O O O O O O Q�UN b N 0 O O W W O b i b Q cq C4 N ') � b f7 N m Q Q U N OO W Ucq y v C MN- b 7 N Q C O N '1 m O CD O C o O o Q n LL C v C y o i a p ° m h m 0 0 W � W i C c0 y Wp Woo 3 aoo� p amt ainLL ~ 0� 'Zi N d a Qn VW J U l U O d O V I A L i c 0 m� ILy N m m W vV m nm m n I Da m' r UU I1 I �I m A I81HOd M3N Q W a w 2 LL AVM VIIIA w r m a z n D H e p � b O M Q J CL w N L_Z r N X W \ 32 r c m a mh`o ay m 0 �y m c o o. o v m (� n g � � � ¢m Y a m 1 °ti ma L1 MIJ) l 5 n 1 m mE h 0 n o a i m`¢ 3! n I Z Q J CL W. 0 0 J LL H N I LL $ Z E p o N 0 l�L W 33 Q e I o W1 w CD c C (0 d y U CD t O Q Q L y CD C (0 d Y O O m CD t F Z Q J IL W. O O J G Z O U w U) a Z H N X w 0,� O 1 U O d O V I A 'OA l81UOd M3N f i W J 'w I � w F 1y 0 Z N 1 � C� AVM Vll1A \ O EE 4l m C C (11 a Cd 6 m t U Q d y CD S m a s v 0 m m t 1- Z Q J CL CL 0 c W co Oz a- 0F a °c i lop 3� 1 ! U--I!x� 'OA l81UOd M3N f i W J 'w I � w F 1y 0 Z N 1 � C� AVM Vll1A \ O EE 4l m C C (11 a Cd 6 m t U Q d y CD S m a s v 0 m m t 1- Z Q J CL CL 0 c W co Oz a- 0F a °c i lop 3� 1 ! '� <rN a 3(6 m LL sm '::,mug g ,7, do Z CL X 0 0 -j LL LL O W U) 0 CL ol ir I CL i r I 1\ Cd O LL 0 Z 0 w W U) 0 CL � o U O LL 0 Z 0 w W U) 0 CL � o U Z 0 w Cl) ... " I m m C C W d . W m t U Q CL . L m co IL Y 0 0 m m F m m Z 0 U w CO) IM I O � Q , 0 I 9 n < 1 e 1 } y m a y v m L U n a s v 0 5 m m L F T m m J J fY Z W U LL 0 W_ 7 1-4 c mm 10 ii"''. T 2 co CC p 1 � 88 z CL 0 W. 0 -j U. LL O LLJ (0) 0 0. C. o CL CD c I _`. CD mm CO 0- E 0 CD co CC p 1 � 88 z CL 0 W. 0 -j U. LL O LLJ (0) 0 0. C. o CL I 1s � h o. m 0 m W m U W W m J F KI. LL �? �c x � , a O � O O U w Cl) 0 s w s O m N s Oy ®o d a N C C N a N 0 m L 0 a n t N m C itl a U O _J ED CD L F- L1� m W m U W W m J F KI. LL �? �c x � , a O � O O U w Cl) 0 s w s O m N s Oy ®o d a N C C N a N 0 m L 0 a n t N m C itl a U O _J ED CD L F- L1� i /1 1 OlkfOdO VIA co i oN w w p = w w O z . Q CIA Q wp w� a mw 1 m_ w S� S4 4� a0 z OAl81yOdM3N W _2. LL r� W W y Z n AVM V 7 7 1 A m s A N O 9 m C C a 4l U m L Q n L m N a U O 7 co m H z _O N z Q a w 2 a LL 0 Cc a N 10 T 17 N a m m LL z 0 w x Ua w m W F J 2 J 0a ILx w ~ zU 00 O t0 GO T N m OJ m L m U U— O U) c O c�U my Uo° vE ¢¢ IT m m E O m C y :2 O C n 3 - o m- m o^ m U L (D U " m co m of c E y m X co m L m m fi 0 3 m N O m m m d m - M C m O m (D �-t�2 0 0 0 H W 0 0 0 C N D � J0 m U Q m U) C cb C m C O m m'� v E 0= o Em U c Er o -a iL D t CO 0 >2 N o'm m N N U N O CO m �` O O� U CO CO m m O E N m m rn> - c m � v m m m m m am 0 C 0 c '- -o `m C O C O �) CO m NO 1 7 f 1 1 1 0 0 o, C; W m m m U i0 CD N C y N O N 3 U U `O oa O m n m� m a3o 0 0 Em CO ¢ °� m m N CO L C a0 O c N N m C N m m Ea m C um m a ID ID `2 m m fi m (D �I;m >_ m O z C4. MEEM E O m O U o(D O N m O y m U c c m o U mUy�y w3 m °O N O N yZLL NILN - c c � O N C ma� N 0 0 0 N N 00 00 00 GO GO 7 N C c N O N U m U =a` C m N m L) UZ 00 0 c O m m a U, F E N D (D m�a 0 0000 0 0000 0 0000 C N O m t n m n - vcn r cH cH cH M O O G O m m @) G�p 0 0 @) o0 O r f C y 0 O m O CDLL `D c N m O m U O3 oyii 0Z.0 `oD LL - 0 U o v E 3 E NJ¢Z¢ L C m O U i 1 I 1 1 1 I a J Q Z Q F- O U _Z 0 J_ m O O O O O O O O O O O_00 O C 00 O O 1D O C O N V n N N � m N .- cn cn cn w cn co 1 r+ w m U O O O o N G s GO m !�� m @) 0 J _ O Uoo ° m m E o a0 N °o vN`n 60 ° c �� m p L ° Uc a° m0 c Q m m 0 U Q °c U c v o O� O °Z% `t W= d m d 0 0 W O U��v QID mom (D C) m�voGo '- c�cOiN c0E33 of oc�.cimoio W T C T �L —L m m m m �¢ m 0 m > m 0 00 m ¢ Z Z Q LL Q OZ V IL 2 -j � m r ti ai i 1 I 1 1 1 I a J Q Z Q F- O U _Z 0 J_ m ,_A Fn x U¢ ¢ o. W X m W F J ¢ J O¢ ax 3> W ~ z N O Cl) O W N O O O O O O O W 0 C. C. N O O O OO O O 000 V r O c U r <0 O m o O (0 00 N N m FAO FA W m W 0 N CJD A& Ix N U 0 m m t O O O 0 O U @/ Q v v v m 0 N O 7 Q m w c c a O _ _ o 0 to c LL U a m — ~ O C C o U W O .�. E E N Q o > m j_ c m m O N N p� c a C O c c m y 3 W c m c c L 7 m O a ¢¢ m mz¢U ,_A Fn x U¢ ¢ o. W X m W F J ¢ J O¢ ax 3> W ~ z N O Cl) O W N Q c N c W � N Cl) a U 4l V m c U m a a o m c p m 0 0_ Ix s U 0 m m t Cl) Cl) J Q Z Q H Cl) O U Z 0 J_ D m I I 1 1 1 I > w CX M L) (D (D MM— c as V CL Ime — (D Z 0 ye E IL rA cc zi CO 0 C 0 0- 0, ca LU Ga o 1 Z z COI c3I RE co LU a 0 0 0 I I IV/ co C%j GO 41%. > w CX M L) (D (D MM— c as V CL Ime — (D Z 0 ye E IL rA cc zi CO 0 C 0 0- 0, ca LU Ga o 1 Z z zo 0 RE co LU a 0 0 0 CO .w C), C), 01HOdO VIA • O cli co A-, AN VIISA B O CL w. q C13 0 2 ED (D MQM z 0 z 0:9 cc ad �- co ♦13 LLI Z 0 LU Ix 0 4 J July 10, 2001 STUDY SESSION ITEM NO. SS4 TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: CITY HALL SPACE OPTIONS RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. DISCUSSION: Two surveys have been distributed to Department Heads requesting information regarding current office space requirements and the condition of those spaces. The data contained in both of these surveys indicate there is a deficit of space for employee work areas on the City Hall Campus of approximately 4,300 square feet. There is an immediate need to provide additional space for existing employees, some of which are working in aisle ways. Many work areas are already overcrowded and have limited storage or work surfaces. The following summary additional floor space needs was developed from the survey information received from each of the Department Heads. A detail of the space needs by area is included as an attachment. Several of the surveys indicated there was a need for even more space for conference rooms, temporary staff, and file storage and those items are included in the Comments column of the detail sheets. A summary of the shortage of space is identified by building in the following table : Summary Additional Floor Space Needs Total Building B (AccVCityMgr) 1,800 otal Building C (Prof/Tech) 1,700 otal Building D (MIS/Atty) 840 Grand Total 4,340 On Page No. 4 of the FY 2001 -02 Preliminary CIP Budget, there is a project entitled City Hall Space Expansion — Phase I. This project will provide $345,000 to address the office space shortage that exists on the City Hall Campus. Five possible expansion opportunities have been identified as follows: SUBJECT: CITY HALL EXPANSION July 10, 2001 Page 2 A. Engineering expansion B. Temporary office buildings at rear of Prof/Tech Building C C. Expansion of lobby area into walkway of Prof/Tech Building C D. Addition of a 2nd story over the Revenue offices E. Demolition of the old City Jail and installation of temporary office buildings Staff has reviewed each of these options and recommends the selection of both B and D as the most cost effective and the quickest to implement. These alternatives would provide an additional 1,344 square feet of office area. The mobile office spaces can be installed quickly and easily, possibly within sixty days. The offices would not be provided with water or wastewater services, but would have electricity, phone, and data lines. The mobile offices would be made to order for the City and painted to match the City's other buildings. Attractive landscaping and skirting will be installed to create the look of an actual office site. Mobile office spaces can be installed at a cost of approximately $60 per square foot. Construction of a permanent office space could not be accomplished for less than $200 per square foot, making the mobile office space a viable consideration. Staff has analyzed the cost to lease versus the cost to purchase and the break -even point is at four years. If installed, it is unlikely the City would not utilize the office space for less than four years, so staff recommends the City consider purchasing instead of leasing. The total cost of purchasing four mobile office units, including setup, skirting, tie - downs, landscaping, and ramping is estimated at less than $90,000. Mobile offices are most suited to staff that are not in the office area for the full workday. Construction Inspectors, Surveyor Crews, and Building Inspectors could be likely candidates for this type of office use. As these staff members are relocated to the mobile offices, work areas will be made available in the City Hall Campus. Resp c Ily submitt PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Don Webb, Director By: Lois Thompson Administrative Coordinator Attachment: Detail of Space Needs — City Hall Space Analysis Q a) M Q U) M m d V aN N O Z O X m P ca m 0 m U c m N C O U U m m c O N Q LO LO m m C%j N C E ctl Q N m O o ol _ > n Z f/1 Q > c N Q Z A Q E 'O Q d O y m E U °� (d U m U Q m U m O v� m U > N � W ¢ 2 O N .0 c d ' m > c m W Z Ui E Q 'm > Z Ui E Q N m w U Z Ui E Q c E Q Z Ui E Q 00 ro 0 0 mN O n O N C Q d as 0. as TZ U d m ay y O N O Z E �p O N V O ci v 0 m S LO c H o m mo cuN m- m+ c— O oN �LO a(1) °o r °o 00 00 0 c m E CL O m m 0 a � m c H - c W o CL Y v' 0 9 O Q LL s 0 cli 0 0 U _>1 C Q U U' c0 Q Cn ca 2 p m � U ay CL 0 rs d 0 Z Q LL 0 0 iz w O Op m c at > CO NCY C.) =3 (0 = a N 0O a 0 O � c c N O '- N m CD N U) r O O O O O O LO 2 P c 0 Q m C O o in tU to U c c c d E N E m m m V) cl F m U O ¢ C7 E N EO CO m U c U) U c 00 t E U) E c d U Q c E E — c �E ` m U ¢ oC 2 ai1 ¢ C W W a o v 9 00 Z . LL O r O V aD a C7 a m LL 0 2 P 0 Q m C ¢ o in tU to U c c c E E m m m V) F F F 0 d U W O (n O O d Z Q LL 0 0 C N O C Oa0 O O c E m LL 0 Q m tU O O Q O 9 �ay \o I - ss-#k a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Public Works Department Memorandum DATE: January 10, 2001 TO: Steve Badum, Public Works Director FROM: Lois Thompson, Administrative Coordinator iW SUBJECT: Blurock Report Building Cost Analysis — Cost Update Staff has reviewed the December, 1990, Blurock Report and have updated the cost analysis presented on page 21 of the report. Phase IB Project Budget $1,117,340 Phase 2 A & B Project Budget $4,307,175 Total Expansion Project $5,424,515 Estimates were made using the Engineering News Record (ENR) Building Cost Index data to extrapolate the cost from 1990 to 2001. The index increase over the eleven years has been 36 %. The following observations were made by Engineering Staff: • The costs used by Blurock in 1990 appear to be low. • The number of employees in the 1990 Blurock Report projected for 2000 was 191. • The actual number of employees on the City Hall campus in 2000 was 195. • Council Staff offices have been added in the lobby since 1990. • Parks, Beaches, and Recreation Department have been combined with the Library Department. • The office locations of Engineering, Personnel, Business Licenses, Administrative Services, MIS, City Manager, and City Attorney have changed since 1990. • There is no longer a Traff ic Fines office or Purchasing Office on the City Hall campus. SCOTSNIAN Mobile Offices • Storage Products And More July 24, 2001 Ms. Norma Glover Newport Beach City Council Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Ms. Norma Glover, WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN, INC. 11811 Greenstone Avenue Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 800 - 782 -1500 562- 903 -9200 FAX 562- 903 -9210 �J��101— ssti With this letter, I would like to introduce myself to you as the Williams Scotsman senior sales representative in charge of your area and account. I am always ready to discuss any of your mobile space needs, whether you have comments or questions about a current unit or would like information about additional space. Please do not hesitate to call me if I can be of any assistance to you. As a Williams Scotsman customer, you already know about our fast delivery and the wide range of standard products that we offer to you: mobile offices, storage units, office /storage combinations and specialty units. We can also provide single- and multi -unit buildings that are specially designed and custom -built to meet your specific requirements. And whether you want to lease or purchase your space, Williams Scotsman has the financing options that will fit your financial situation. As a sales representative for Williams Scotsman, I am proud of our company's record for customer service and satisfaction. I look forward to maintaining that record - -and serving you- - in the future. Sincerely, Rodman Muller Senior Sales Representative RM/SFA SCO® ® Rodman Muller Mobile OM= -SWIW P du Senior Sales And Mm Representative WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN, INC. 11811 Greenstone Avenue Customer Service Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670-4734 800-782- 1500 562- 903 -9200 FAX:562- 903 -9210 CELL: 562 - 577 -9631 E -mail: rmuller0willseot.com t ww.wllbem.tom Website: http: / /www.willscot.com a E -mail: info@willscot.com • • •�� • • 1 G 1 • • b • • It's never been easier to solve your space problems. just ask Williams Scotsman. Now, you can meet any space challenge. i "It's simple. Williams Scotsman has what I need, and they do all the work. I just sit back and wait for the space I need to arrive on time." Project Manager for a National Construction Firm _ V - 5 When your organization needs additional space — whether temporary or permanent — trust the name that's preferred by thousands of businesses and institutions nationwide: Williams Scotsman. No one offers a wider choice of solutions, including mobile space, modular buildings, storage space, and even turnkey construction services. And no one makes it easier to get the right solution for your needs, so you can focus on your growing business. A national company with local experts — where you need them. Headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland, Williams Scotsman is a national company that provides mobile space, with local expertise, through over SO offices across the US and Canada. We've been a leader in the business for over 50 years, serving customers of all sizes from the Fortune 500 to local start -ups, in all kinds of industries, including construction, manufactur- ing, education, healthcare, government, and recreation. n ,j�} - I:9 -s C i.t.-a R,q 'r -•,9 {c .:, ,I:c!:rf:' rri:- ;I _.. •,7 ,. i�'. 'cC�;,Lil ?frp,' •l'i[9p. "'u>:. -l.. `'� : ,'cii �,'? re y(?t+r 'x:'•ra:= '?:>,)-ii. i4�'.- n ,j�} -s C i.t.-a R,q 'r -•,9 {c .:, ,I:c!:rf:' rri:- _.. ri.'. A n ,j�} Mobile space is the fast, flexible answer to so many needs. So close, you can have delivery in 48 hours. In a world of constant change, mobile space is an ideal answer, providing you with productive space wherever and whenever you need it. Our nationwide inventory of more than 70,000 mobile space solutions includes single -wide and multi -wide units in standard and custom floor plans to meet size, configuration, or style requirements. All ready for delivery to your site in 48 hours, in most cases. Use it, then move it. When your needs shift and change, your mobile space can follow along. Williams Scotsman provides complete relocation services — whether you're moving across the lot or across the state. a« II' �� � - r•�.��,'�- r1�wYkirU�.2.. .. it l ,,. .. .�•. -_ ���� AN For greater challenges, the answers are still simple. And modular. Adapt to today's demands. When you need larger or more customized space, count on Williams Scotsman to deliver innovative, affordable solutions. Our multi - sectional modular buildings give you the flexibility to create virtually any configuration you need — in a fraction of the time of conventional construction. Expand or relocate for tomorrow's needs. Williams Scotsman modular solutions give you the great looks, solid construction, and long - lasting quality you want in a temporary or permanent structure. Yet they offer the freedom to expand, relocate, or remove at any time. Perfect for growing companies, educational institutions, and other organizations that need fast, affordable solutions for today — and tomorrow. "By the time the students returned from summer break, our expansion was complete. In fact, the new building matched the campus so well, we had kids doing double - takes." Headmaster of a Preparatory School k w ufY There's a faster process to create a better building. Concurrent Construction– is a turnkey approach. Williams Scotsman is also your best source for full -scale construction projects. Our unique Concurrent Construction process can trim precious months from your building sched- ule, because the most critical steps proceed simultaneously — including site preparation, foundation, utilities, and off -site manufacturing of the complete modular structure. As shown in the chart below, you can begin using your building sooner. Timeline for Traditional Construction Design I Engineering Timeline for Concurrent Construction ----------------------------- Design Engineering Time savings A unique design to suit your requirements. And your budget. You'll also have your choice of a wide range of architectural styles and materials. So you can select the building that suits your requirements, tastes, and budget. There's no better way to get a high- quality building — in record time. �l R M, I In:j . One call gets you everything you need. In over 50 years, we've seen it all. So we offer it all to you. The minute you call Williams Scotsman, your space worries are as good as gone. Your local representative will handle every detail, from specifications to bid submission, from project management to financing, from installation to relocation. Our service offering is complete, as well. Williams Scotsman is your single- source provider for every amenity associated with your mobile unit, modular building, or constructed space. We can help you with a wide range of interior and exterior finishes — including custom designs. And we offer a vast array of ramps, steps, decks, security systems, and furniture. You'll get the space you've always wanted, ready for use in less time than you ever imagined possible. "My Williams Scotsman representative was always one step ahead, offering steps, a deck — even furniture. All my questions were answered before I put the phone down." President of a Manufacturing Company It �l "Yes." Williams Scotsman has the answers. Affordable financing. Financing your space is simple, thanks to a variety of flexible lease, lease -to- purchase, purchase, or purchase programs. For multiple units and ongoing needs, you can take advantage of our National Account or Master Lease programs. Both programs streamline the space leasing process. As a National Account customer, you will have centralized control of all the mobile space your com- pany uses throughout North America. As a National Account or Master Lease customer, you negotiate only one lease. Thereafter, every unit you lease is covered. That drastically cuts paperwork, adminis- tration time, and legal involvement. And that's just A team you can trust. The Williams Scotsman team consists of a nation- wide network of space professionals. Our sales representatives typically have eight or more years experience so you get expert advice. And thanks to our unique local- office structure, you're never far from the services and solutions you need. Backed by a strong warranty. If you choose to purchase your new space, it will be backed by a warranty program that guarantees your satisfaction. Or, if you choose to lease, you can enjoy our maintenance program. We take care of the maintenance of your leased unit. Simply put, your only responsibilities are for light bulbs and filters for the heating /cooling equip- the beginning of the advantages. You owe it to ment. Now that's coverage. yourself to find out more. FOR MORE INFORMATION Call or write Williams Scotsman 8211 Town Center Drive, Baltimore, MD 21236. Visit the Williams Scotsman Website at www.willscot.com; E -mail at info@willscot.com; or request a Fax -On -Demand 877- 677 -7778. 800 - 782 -1500 Local Offices Nationwide SCOTSMAN Mobile Offices • Stomp Products And Mooc Williams Scotsman's Promise SCOTSMAN. To Architects.. .A Modular odular Buildings And 'Vlore. Building Partnership r• W i. -- ■ 1 a Have you thought about partnering with the modular building company voted "Easiest to do Business With" by the readers of Engineering News Record? By partnering with Williams Scotsman, Architects can save their clients time and money. We can provide you with modular units, entire complexes, or just partial units —such as steel frames and flooring. UbMWilliams Scotsman has a team of experienced local sales professionals to service all your building needs: • Over 50 years experience in the modular building industry. • Over 85 offices throughout North America. • Turnkey Services — planning, design, project management, installation and maintenance. • Speed — Immediate delivery on In -stock units ranging from 1,000 to 100,000 sq. ft. • Flexible Financing Terms — lease, purchase, or lease- purchase plans to 6 fit any budget. • Temporary Structure — lease space during a renovation or expansion. • Expertise In Many Industries — including health care, education construction, government, recreation, manufacturing, and much more. • Some customers include: • BF Goodrich • U.S. Navy • V.A. Hospital • U.S. Marine Corps • University of Connecticut • NBC Television • E.I. Dupont • Ortho Pharmaceuticals • IBM Corporation • Lucent Technologies • Grumman Aerospace • CSX Transportation When choosing modular construction over traditional construction, you have a variety of architectural styles and materials to choose from —and, it saves you time and money. Williams Scotsman's Concurrent Constructions' process allows manufacturing of the modular building and completion of site work to occur simultaneously, reducing on -site construction time and costly construction financing. Let us help save your customer's time and money on their next building — call us today at 800 - 782 -1500. 180' -0" 1 I I I I r— r-- r� —r —r I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I L,• i � _J I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I n I L_J 56' -0" I 59'-3-i" 1 56' -0•' Williams Scotsman s Corporate Headquarters First Floor Williams Scotsman's corporate office consists of 70 modular units. M Williams Scotsman has the space you need, when you need it. Our courteous and knowledgeable Sales Representatives are waiting to help you serve your client's space needs. Call us today to find out why Williams Scotsman is one of the most prominent modular building distributors in North America. Call us today for more information at 1- 800 - 782 -1500. Your call rings in directly to the branch nearest you! www.willscot.com info @wiliscot.com ARCH00 25M 1100 SCOTSMAN Modular Buildings And More. 3 i � F3 M .z Space Solutions For Club Management. s MI Mobile ORcea • Swrage PWuas And Mnm ADAPTABLE • ECONOMICAL • FUNCTIONAL • IMMEDIATE • R CLUBHOUSE _OCATASLE SHOWER /LOCKER PAN FAA, FinnnnMnnnnnm 1011 BID I PAZ III Mobile space systems are practical, economical and convenient solutions Mal allow club managers, golf course owners and developers fo: • Promote club facilities through preview centers and sales offices • Operate efficiently during renovation or reconstruction • Open club for business during construction of permanent facilities • Plan and design permanent facilities based on actual needs that are determined while club operation is observed in preconslruction stages • Get back in business quickly after a disaster such as fire, flood or earthquake • Add space for specific applications like snack bars, pro shops and locker rooms ■ Set up temporary space, such as media buildings and concession stands, on shod notice for special events and tournaments ■ Generate start -up capital from membership dues and usage fees prior to building a permanent clubhouse Additional floor plans are available and special requests are never a problem. Contact Williams Scotsman for more Information on purchasing, affordable shod- and long-term leases, last delivery and customized applications. W 'ants Scotsman delivers nationwide with over 80 locations throughout the United States and Canada, 1 -800- 782 -1500 Rings into the office nearest you! Fax-on-demand: 877.677 -7778 Visit our web site: www.wiliscot.com E-mail us at: info ®wiilscol.com SCOTSMAN Mobile Offices • Storage Products And More GB 99 OOM) ' rn T ac a. Boston Minn ,palls • nib Prov e C Casper • Grand R pi • enttgown • . elphla . calls amis0ua H Berlin . ayne • are - • 1•. Omaha • Indianap Its P m6ui�•bu In [on, OC chmall ahem Maryland • Downer Kansas Ci • C r . • R mood '�' • Grand Junction St. Louis - Laul Norialk • Our e • rlatie •Tulsa B • Memphi reemllle a • Ca Is • Albuquerque u. Ali nta • Peek • Birml ham arlestan "` • Tacton • Dalla&M. Warts •Jac an Alba • or flesh x El Paso • Austin Tall acksamille Iwurleans Hands •San Antonio • To a ' • . Houston • Fart Mye set Palm Beach .+ ^+airy ad Lauderdale • SALES LOCATIONS W 'ants Scotsman delivers nationwide with over 80 locations throughout the United States and Canada, 1 -800- 782 -1500 Rings into the office nearest you! Fax-on-demand: 877.677 -7778 Visit our web site: www.wiliscot.com E-mail us at: info ®wiilscol.com SCOTSMAN Mobile Offices • Storage Products And More GB 99 OOM)