Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1011-0040STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 1 qz) 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 l tldi Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 v July 12, 2002 (562) 590-5071 Mr. Tony Melum City of Newport Beach P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915 Subject: Condition Compliance — Coastal Development Permit 5-99-282 & Conformance with Consistency Certification CC-078-99 Dear Mr. Melum: Commission staff have received information submitted as evidence of compliance with Coastal Development Permit 5-99-282 and/or as evidence of conformance with Consistency Certification CC-078-99 for the following sites in the City of Newport Beach: City Harbor Permit # Site Address Beach Disposal Q cu. ds Ocean Disposal Qt t cu. ds Cumulative Total* for 2002 "l 011-40 40 Balboa Coves 160 0 105-2700 2700 Shell Street 500 0 �109-1501 300 0 109-1905 1905 E. Bay Ave, 160 0 114-350 350 Buena Vista Blvd. 100 0 130-2888 2888 Bayshore Drive 0 1000 151-1461 200 0 153-213 213 E. Bay Front 100 0 153-300 235-305 E. Bayfront 200 0 154-200 200 0 175-516 536 Via Lido Nord 80 0 175-744 744 Via Ledo Nord 80 0 227-3331 3335 W. Pacific Coast Hwy. 0 200 537-514 514 Thirty Eiahth St. 60 0 Sub -total 2140 1200 Year-to-date total 5190 Commission staff have reviewed the information submitted and determined that the above referenced dredging events conform with Consistency Certification CC-078-99 and that no further federal consistency review is necessary from the Commission for the dredging components of the projects. In addition, the proposed beach disposal events have been reviewed and found by the Executive Director to be consistent with Special Conditions 1, 2, and 3 of Coastal Development Permit 5-99-282. No further review is necessary from the Commission for the beach disposal components of the projects. Please be advised that only the projects described in the materials submitted for the sites listed above have been found to conform with Consistency Certification CC-078-99 and/or conform with the terms and conditions of Coastal Development Permit 5-99-282. Any change in the projects may cause them to lose their status as consistent with CC-078-99 and/or CDP 5-99-282. This certification is based on information provided by the recipient of this letter. If, at a later date, this information is found to be incorrect or incomplete, this letter will become invalid, and any development occurring at that time must cease until a new determination regarding conformance with CC-078-99 and/or CDP 5-99-282 is obtained. If you have any questions, please contact me at (562) 590-5071 or Mr. James Raives at (415) 904-5200. :51 incerely, Schwing Aw Coastal Program Analyst Cc: Mr. James Raives, California Coastal Commission Ms. Cori Farrar, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Not to Exceed 500 cubic yards per dredging and beach disposal event t Not to Exceed 1,000 cubic yards per dredging and off -shore disposal event $ Not to Exceed 20,000 cubic yards per year J ^rr�, REPLY TO ATTENTION OF: Office of the Chief Regulatory Branch DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 532711 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90053-2325 July 22, 2002 City of Newport Division of Harbor Resources Attention: Tony Melum PO Box 1768 Newport Beach, California 92658-8915 RE: Reference No. 200201250-CJF Dear Mr. Melum: This is in reply to your applications of July 9, 2002, for Department of the Army Permits to conduct maintenance dredging, per Regional General Permit No. 54 in Newport Bay, Newport Beach, Orange County, California. This letter authorizes maintenance dredging and beach disposal at eight sites within Newport Bay (see below). USACE !� v City Site Address Volume Area Beach Ocean Site # Harbor (Cubic (Estimated Disposal Disposal Permit # Yards) Square Feet) 1 108-1501 1501-1509 East Bay Ave 300 2128 Yes — No Sul2ratidal 2 114-350 350 Buena Vista Blvd. 100 2700 Yes — No Su ratidal 3 175-516 536 Via Lido Nord 80 900 Yes — No Su ratidal 4 1011-40 40 Balboa Coves 160 3000 Yes — No Su ratidal 5 109-1905 1905 East Bay Avenue 160 1200 Yes — No Su ratidal 6 537-514 514 38`h Street 60 600 Yes - No Su ratidal 7 153-213 213 E. Bay Front 100 600 Yes - No Su ratidal 8 175-744 744 Via Lido Nord 80 900 Yes - No Su ratidal Totals 1040 12028 1040 cy 0 -2- Based on the information you have provided, the Corps of Engineers has determined that your proposed activity complies with the terms and conditions of Regional General Permit (RGP) No. 54. As long as you comply with the general permit conditions of RGP No. 54, an individual permit is not required. This letter of verification is valid until July 24, 2005, when RGP No. 54 will expire. A general permit does not grant any property rights exclusive privileges. Also, it does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others or authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal project. Furthermore, it does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, -State, orlocal authorizations required by law. Thank you for participating in our regulatory program. If you have any questions, please contact Corice J. Farrar of my staff at (213) 452-3296. Sincerely, Mao '- Mark Durham Chief, South Coast Section Regulatory Branch Enclosure POST DREDGING COMPLETION .REPORT The 'ttee shall send one (1) copy of the post -dredging report for each CoMpluted h1dividuol drediing project to the Corps and the CCC documenting compliance with all gom-i-al '11W conditions defined in this permit. The post -dredging report shall be sent within 45 Slays after.cvmpletion of the complete individual dredging project authorizEx{ in this porrr 4. The post -dredging report shall include the following information for the cornplk,Lod in,lividL101 dredl$ng project: 1. P"t Number: 1011-40 2. S W Date: 8�7 0 2 Completion Date: 8 6 02 ... 3. T$W dredged material to Beach: 160 cubic yards to Sea (LA3): I Mode of dredging and transportation, and method and frequenev cif dispu%'al: Hydraulic suction transported through a pipeline_onto adjacent beach. 5. tiq or other vessel logs documenting contact with USCG MSO Long beach hel'ore ca h (np * the LA-3 ocean disposal site. OkG Contact: Yes X No; 6. Dorm of dredged material: Slurry X : Cohesive 7. Procedure and location where the disposal barge or scow was waihud: No washing necessary. 8. A certified report from the dredging site inspector and the captain of any tub; or odwr uted to transport and dispose of dredged material at LA-3 indicating all general Ond shk•ri0i permit conditions were met. Any violations of the permit shall be explained in .Iowd. conditioning permits were met: Yes X No 9. Pbet-project surveys of Eel -grass beds potentially affected by lhc �ir� �ll;inl Not necessary as no eelgrass was identified in'dredging area. 10. the post -dredging report shall be signed by a duly authorized repro-sonlatIVc of th,• ;*rmittee. The permittee's representative shall make the following certification: I oertify under penalhl of laru that this docatment and all attachments were prepared im,A,), mil d�ction or supervision in accordance Toith rt 5ijstew designed to ertsure that qualiricd p-rsomirl pitoprrly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based oil rrl f i.nq tin/ of tho PCV:';on ptrsons who manage the system, or those directly responsible for yatlu:ri„ g thr 1*,t;01'111rrho,i. thr iybrmation submitted is, to the best of ruy knozoledge and belief trite, acc:irrrrtr, ,ni,t ('nnrt)h•h- ! ,/,,, a"re that then are significant penalties for submitting false inforinntion, uzchidiu',; the ow;.,,r,ilir11 , f*e and imprisonment for knoruing violations. It V­_ '- . 'kff'� Sigi ure PERMIT NO. �Q �l-_U_.---- Project Location: DREDGING APPLICATION 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach Latitude/Longitude: N 3 3' 3 7 ' 12.9 " W 117' 5 5 ' 5 8.6 /400 Cubic Yards to be Dredged: * cubic yards Method of Dredging: hydraulic suction Nature of Dredged Material (Grain size data): report enclosed Disposition of Dredged Material: pump onto adjacent beach w _ Method of Material Disposition: pipeline Effect of Dredging on Contiguous Bulkheading and Beaches: restores beach and reinforces bulkhead Will schedule when we receive permit. Project Begins: Project Ends: 1, Lorenzo C . Mi 11er,(Applicant/Applicant's agent), hereby certify that I have read the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit, RGP#54 and the California Coastal Commission permit #5-99-282 for maintenance dredging in Newport Harbor and that I will comply with a I of the conditions of those permits. I will further hold the City harmless from and indemnify them against any claim for damages arising out of the exercise of these permits. In addition, I,as the applicant shall reimburse the City of Newport Beach for all attorney's fees and other casts expended by them in defending any claim, lawsuit, or judgement arising out of the activities of the applicant carried on under the authority of such permit. James Westling Applicant - Please Print June 12, 2002 Date Shellmaker Inc. _ Contractor - P1 c Print Signed �� __....... Applicant/,Agent .WF dil�bsAC dre� �`� �- o•b . rnnGh or �I/cr- M►i 1 - v rCAL 6DA LAN D A C ;w t t. w�. - DEL MAR. v/cIAl/rY S/rEYcf/ i JeM -- — za:. rl- WPOFT BAY, GALIPORNIA y 'J•'M��r� GRAr—C SCALE .+11cs � PROF/L E Sound.�gs ore e rPress�d.� Feef Oral dGr�ofC dePfhs '"1e 3a f5G/ow Meion Lower Low Wofer. A47,rh-n4✓ 7 tong-- of !'.ix scw16 i,. FAre7^ opo�'ox�.rno%/y /O fee% U.S. Norbor Lhas are mot % I esrob//s.bed in this seC A/or7 of New,00r r Boy. V � . EEL GRASS INSPECTION M NO EEL GRASS WITHIN 15' OF PROJECT p. ' 1. d i9p). •' F/00i 0 �fh Lin I% 2/ S A/o � ,PCSLr✓4iion /^I P.4QPOSEO /vEw�o.Q r B,a r .VEv!/.P0.4T BtrRCN, CAL/F'J.P.v/A .Ipp✓icn/ion 6y � .T4111P�j Pi$ 1 !i r , Bo/boo coves ASSOCIATES, GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING ENGINEERING GEOLOGY Ms. Lisa Miller June 10, 2002 SHELLMAKER, INC. 875 B West Fifteenth Street Newport Beach, CA 92663 Our Project: K02.039.00 SUBJECT: Phi Grain Size Test Results for the Soil Samples Obtained from the Westling Property, located at 40 Balboa Coves, NewportBeach, California. Dear Ms. Miller: Presented herewith are the results of our grain size analyses performed on the soil samples provided to us by your firm. The test procedures were in accordance with ASTM D422-63 (1998) and U.S. Army Corp of Engineers Report Number CETA 79-7 criteria. Please do not hesitate to call if you have any questions after you have reviewed the attached data. Respectfully submitted, Distribution: Addressee (1) IlOhlasrvlserverdatafPROJECTSUCO2.039.00UCO2039.00 Phi Grain Size Letter. wpd Seive Opening Particle Diameter in U.S. Standard % Material Cumulative Percent (mm) Phi Units Seive Size Retained by Weight Retained ------------38.1 --- -5.25 --- 11/2" --- 0.0 0.0 19 -4.25 3/4" 0.0 0.0 Gravel 9.5 -3.25 3/8" 0.0 0.0 4.75 -2.25 4 0.4 0.4 2.83 -1.50 7 0.4 0.9 2 -1.00 10 0.9 1.8 ----------------------------------------------------------- 1.41 -0.50 14 1.5 3.3 1 0.00 18 2.5 5.8 0.71 0.50 25 4.3 10.1 0.5 1.00 35 12.7 22.7 0.35 1.50 45 19.3 42.1 Sand 0.25 2.00 60 26.9 68.9 0.177 2.50 80 13.6 82.6 0.125 3.00 120 8.7 91.3 0.088 3.50 170 3.9 95.2 0.075 3.75 200 0.8 96.0 0.063 4.00 230 0.3 96.4 ----------------------------------------------------------- Silt-Clay <0.063 <4.00 <230 3.6 100 A sample was provided to David H. Lee & Associates, Incorporated in a sample bag by Shellmaker. The sample consists of a POORLY GRADED SAND (SP): olive gray (5Y 412); moist; fine to medium sand; trace of fine gravel; scattered shells and shell fragments. The sample was obtained from the Westling Property, 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach, California at a depth of 0.0 feet to -2.5 feet MLLW. H. Lee & Associates, Inc. La 53 � .:� .. ,'CLIENT: non nor 111151 In IIIDavid ono F ��������maloofn� u� m® SHELLMAKER, INC. DATE: Seive Opening Particle Diameter in U.S. Standard % Material Cumulative Percent (mm) Phi Units Seive Size Retained by Weight Retained ------------38.1--------5.25 11/2" 0.0 0.0 19 -4.25 3/4" 0.0 0.0 Gravel 9.5 -3.25 3/8" 0.7 0.7 4.75 -2.25 4 1.0 1.7 2.83 -1.50 7 1.4 3.1 2 -1.00 10 1.3 4.4 ----------------------------------------------------------- 1.41 -0.50 14 2.0 6.4 1 0.00 18 3.1 9.5 0.71 0.50 25 4.5 14.0 0.5 1.00 35 11.1 25.1 0.35 1.50 45 16.1 41.2 Sand 0.25 2.00 60 22.5 63.7 0.177 2.50 80 12.8 76.5 0.125 3.00 120 10.7 87.2 0.088 3.50 170 6.7 93.9 0.075 3.75 200 1.7 95.6 0.063 4.00 230 0.7 96.3 ----------------------------------------------------------- Silt-Clay <0.063 <4.00 <230 3.7 100 A sample was provided to David H. Lee & Associates, Incorporated in a sample bag by Shellmaker. The sample consists of a POORLY GRADED SAND (SP): olive gray (5Y 4/2); damp; fine to medium sand; trace of fine gravel; scattered shells and shell fragments. The sample was obtained from the Westling Property, 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach, California at a depth of +2.0 feet to -0.5 feet MLLW. �, Laguna Hills, CA 92653 .90 .SUMMARY nnn-mnw � CC� (ACOE Permit No., RWQCB Order or Ce7No.) Hydrographic System: (bay, estuary, lagoon, or V harbor) Specific Location: (UTM, Lat./Long., datum, accuracy level, attach electronic survey area map if possible) Was Caulerpa Yes, Caulerpa was found at this site and Detected: (if Caulerpa is.,,found, please has been contacted on date. immediately contact the permitting agency project staff and NMFS or CDFG No, Caulerpa was not found at this site. personnel identified above) Description of Permitted Work: (describe briefly the work to be conducted at the site 2 under the permits identified ^ 1 above } p S Pd5►4 Yy\C�-r`ak Description of Site: epth range: (describe the physical and biological conditions within / the survey area at the time of -. the survey and provide insight into variability, if known. Please provide units for all numerical information). F= Substrate tyPe� �Jl'Y�. Temperature: ij'1 Salinity: .e S Dominant flora: Dominant fauna. - Exotic species ' encountered: Other site description notes: Description of Survey Effort: y date me reriod: C ll > l b Z lease describe the surveys � Y conducted including type of G survey (SCUBA, remote video, etc.) and survey methods employed, date of work, and survey density (estimated percentage of the bottom actually viewed). Describe any limitations encountered during the survey efforts. Horizontal visibility in water: .� b Survey type and methods:iE6 � F7F F I Survey personnel:- �i1 Y� r Vy CA S0YN � Survey71 density: Survey limitations. To l� h Other Information: (use this space to provide any additional information or references to attached materials such as maps, reports, etc.) Caulerpa Survey Reporting Form (version 1.0, 9/18/01) Caulerpa Eradication in Southern California 0 Southwest Region Home Pam CITY OF ;WPORT BEACH FIRE MARINE DI XRTMENT HARBOR P091UPPLICATION,(Please print all information) James Westling, 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach (949)631-5001 1. XGAMant (Pronarty Ahrnarl e.ioiraa* 40 Balboa Coj/es, Newport Beach 3. New Construction _. Revision Mair"nancs 4. Foe 4 0 7.0 0 Check No. 2274 Dredging x Date 6/3/02 5. Brief Dsseripdon of Proposed Work: maintenance dredging Submit 8 M" x 1t" Drawings (3), Include: 1). Location and dimension of proposed structure including piles and Location of existing structures. on adjacent properties. 2). Location of bulkhead, pierhead and project lines. 3). Location of property lines. 4). Location of channel markers within 200 fret. 5). Lot suns and lot numbers, if available. 6). Existing ground profile beneath proposed structure. 7). Elevation of top and bottom of bulkheads and piles with respect to M.L.L.W. 8). Area and profile of any proposed dredging with elevations showing depths with respect of M.L.L.W. 9). Any special conditions affecting the construction or affecting boating operations. 10).Complete all information required in information black, bottom of sheet. Note that the OWNER. of the property Is the applicant 11). Drawing site shall be 8 -12" x 11 ". 12).Scale shall be adequate to clearly show the above information. 13).Existing structures shall be shown in light dashes. New work shall be shown in heavy solid lines. 7. Owner•Sulkler Declaration must be completed (on reverse side of this sheet) 8. AppileariVe/Agent's Signature: Date: June 12, 2002 Joint Pennktee Signature (if appl) )•. Date: 9. Work can begin once the City has received evidence of the following additional approvals and you have been notified to proceed. It you begin prfor to the notice you will be in violation of the Newport aeach Municrpal Code and subject to penalties. 10. Your permit will not be final until we have conducted an on site inspection once construction is completed as per Municipal Code, Section 17.24, if we have not been contacted for a final inspection. OFFICE USE ONLY Approval in Concept Approval of the City Of Newport Beach Council_ Approval of the Army Corps of Engineers Approval of the C81111omla Coastal Commission. Approval of the City's Public Works Department Approval of the Chy's Building. Department Approval of County of Orange. Electrical and/or plumbing permit (Building Department) hwued. (Parmk Is stumped drawing) Sib Inspection. (call 644-3043 for appointment) Sib Re -Inspection CondkIons: Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date Date I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the .contractor's license law for the following reasons: (Sec. 7031d.5, Business and Professions Code). Any City or County which requires a permit to construct, alter, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance,,also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provision of the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or:that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil penalty for not.more than five hundred dollars ($500). I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as their sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions'Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees, provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold, within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the purpose of sale.) I, as owner of the property, am exclusively contracting with licensedcontractors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, Business and Professions Code: 'The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon; and'who contracts for such projects who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a Contractor'(s) License pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Sec. of Business and Professional Code for this reason: Owner's Signature:, xxxxxxxxxxxx Date: xxxxxxxx Contractor: Shellmaker Inc. Telephone: (949) 548-5359 Address: 875 B West 15th Street, Newport Beach, CA 92663-2701 License class A&B State Board No. 561434 City License No. 96002210 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed under provisions of Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and5�rjDfessions Code, ang4by license is in full force and effect. Contractor's Signature f Date: June 12, 2002 ri O IL 1 fa uN seAr //1'SJ' arc'o, .. �• 1,f/ -4 v...re.t r �• eALedA a ;w t .L w Ar-ps' .0 ti. W�Z'Ii•LG` \ l �o l�O DEL MAR F� —_ 20 • _ I 9 ,— V/ C //V / r Y SirE Ne WPOI'iT BAY, CALIFORNIA Jst/y _3..MlGk/ 69AP—C SrAL�S PROF/L E Sound/hgsor•c e.�',or-�ss�din f��f o.�d dc�o% d�Pfi�s Q ,a ,�. as f�c/ow /Y1ee�n Lower Low lNofe/ flux/inure /or�gG oftroc scsic� rr o iAr f�ei- 000rox�fnot�'/y /O feel. U. S /!or•bo r- L /:was owe /- �� � � /- / eS/ob//shed in th./'s sect/'ors of Newpo/-t B,�y. p U EEL GRASS INSPECTION _ - - A ---NO EEL GRASS WITHIN 15' OF PROJECT EEL GRASS IN THE PROJ CT AREA AT URE _ 3,9 '-,,�PER1 T # 42 IIa r. j �i�' I1`. .. I I iiPC JG r✓d r/On Exs finy Sco Hite �I - - z Olta G� �rcL+ o F rn9 � roc ---- -.--- ✓"IAL'ne - - So'aff+G/�� of /Can Nigh T. d'C /nJ �.p�f/ PrPOPOSEO /vEwvo,Q r 49A y I P'L A /V NErSi.oORT Bl ACN, `AL/F(J'.Pn//A 2e 2p -ft ro . JeAL d /A'rAPICr APP•!co/,'o.. Dj .uT4(x/tQ,S �PiS 1 H i . Bo/boo Gov�s Project Location: DREDGING APPLICATION 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach PERMIT NO. Latitude/ Longitude: N 3 3' 37, 12.-91, W 117' 5 5' 5 8. Rf C E I VE D_ South Coast Region Cubic Yards to be Dredged: 4* cubic yards ME `7UO2 Method of Dredging: hydraulic suction NTA . Nature of Dredged Material (Grain size data): report encloseeQASTAL COMMISSION Disposition of Dredged Material: pump onto adjacent beach Method of Material Disposition: pipeline Effect of Dredging on Contiguous Bulkheading and Beaches: and reinforces bulkhead Will schedule when we receive permit. Project Begins: Project Ends: restores beach I, Lorenzo C . Mi 11er,(Applicant/Applicant' s agent), hereby certify that I have read the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permit, RGP#54 and the California Coastal Commission perrnit #5-99-282 for maintenance dredging in Newport Harbor and that l will comply with all of the conditions of those permits. I will further hold the City harmless from and indemnify them against any claim for damages arising out of the exercise of these permits. In addition, l,as the applicant shall reimburse the City of Newport Beach for all attorney's fees and other casts expended by them in defending any claim, lawsuit, or judgement arising out of the activities of the applicant carried on under the authority of such permit. James Westling Applicant - Please Print June 12, 2002 Date Shellmaker Inc. _ Contractor - P1 c Print 4 Signed• Applicant/ Agent STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURCES' NCY PETE WILSO:., Govemor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office Page 1 of 3 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 Date: December 10, 1998 (562) 590-5071 Permit No: 5-98-262 COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT On 9 December 1998, the California Coastal Commission granted to James R. Westling Coastal Development Permit 5-98-262, subject to the attached Standard and Special Conditions, for development consisting of: Demolition and removal of an existing damaged concrete seawall and construction of a new 37 foot long concrete seawall and a 15 foot long side wall at the same location. The height of the seawall will be raised to conform with the City of Newport Beach codes. More specifically described in the application file in the Commission offices. The development is within the coastal zone in Orange County at 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach. Issued on behalf of the California Coastal Commission on December 10, 1998. PETER DOUGLAS By: Q �q6 — &A3 Executive Director Title: Coastal Program Analyst ACKNOWLEDGMENT The undersigned permittee acknowledges receipt of this permit and agrees to abide by all terms and conditions thereof. The undersigned permittee acknowledges that Government Code Section 818.4 which states in pertinent part, that: °A public entity is not liable for injury caused by the issuance ... of any permit ..." applies to the issuance of this permit. IMPORTANT: THIS PERMIT IS NOT VALID UNLESS AND UNTIL A COPY OF THE PERMIT WITH THE SIGNED ACKNOWLEDGMENT HAS BEEN RETURNED TO THE COMMISSION OFFICE. 14 CAL. ADMIN. CODE SECTION 13158(a). Date Signature of Permittee Please sign and return one copy RECCIV���Yo the Commission office at the above address. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH om 16 1998 AM P CVASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT No. 5-98-262 Page 2of3 STANDARD CONDITIONS 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date on which the Commission voted on the application. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special conditions set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 4. Interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the project during its development, subject to 24-hour advance notice. 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. Construction Materials Disturbance to harbor bottom and intertidal areas shall be minimized. Local sand, cobbles, or shoreline rocks shall not be used for back fill or construction material. The applicant agrees not to store any construction materials or waste where it is subject to wave erosion and dispersion. The applicant shall remove from the beach and seawall area any and all debris resulting from construction. In addition, no mechanized COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT No. 5-98-262 Page 3 of 3 equipment, with the exception of the crane/barge, is allowed seaward of the seawall at any time. Document2 Printed on December 10, 1998 RMR: 5-98-262 westling permit FF PIEWPORT CITT OF NEWPORT SERCH pRC11-IC VICINITY MAP MDra 1 p f. OL1/944A BEACH U'Fat 4 }C)Orr Jun � KM WNLL ST. OOt�1C.1�� k. Wat�^cC� WNLL -+- R.6E C �n �-- i QCISr $`� CORC WNL.. 1 TO l E UZ) CED �cl � o4sT:6R�E i� 38 UNE cF lNA'rE�LWAy .: •FIRE &MARINE DEFY. 39 C'TY OF N=ORT CH 40 4-$0�� "T1�T IOII Ev«'. WALL -1 G 8E o �(,r�� ...J South Coast Distr o 0 t 11 C3Clsi'•L1 1 APPROVED Permit No. L_ By: —win. E.XtSr. EFFECTIVEtea Vl-' NOE �MGTAGS X29 E>Qmssm ti,� T6-0- D I c t /44"z 'Dtt�OTU euz\�A-noQs -b� a.a H D i46N-'l tO� L 04,1 \,,Qk�. JUL 1998 CAM: Ml'L MtZS .to� �eg- CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 5,.15-ok, e STATE OF CALIFORNIA - THE RESOURC AGENCY PETE WILSON, Governor CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION South Coast Area Office 200 Oceangate, Suite 1000 Long Beach, CA 90802-4302 (562) 590-5071 Filed: 08-19-98 49th Day: 10-07-98 180P Day: 02-15-99 Staff. RMR/LB QPk Staff Report: 11-13-98 Hearing Date: 12/ 8-11/1998 Commission Action: STAFF REPORT: REGULAR CALENDAR APPLICATION NUMBER: 5-98-262 APPLICANT: James R. Westling AGENT: Shellmaker, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION: 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach, Orange County PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Demolition and removal of an existing damaged concrete seawall and construction of a new 37 foot long concrete seawall and a 15 foot long side wall at the same location. The height of the seawall will be raised to conform with the City of Newport Beach codes. SUMMARY OF STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Commission approve the proposed development with a special condition regarding disposal of construction materials and protection of water quality. ISSUES OF CONTROVERSY: There are no issues of controversy. The applicant agrees with the special conditions of this staff report and concurs with staffs recommendation that this hearing item be moved to the consent calendar. LOCAL APPROVALS RECEIVED: Approval in concept from the City of Newport Beach Fire and Marine Department SUBSTANTIVE FILE DOCUMENTS: City of Newport Beach Certified Land Use Plan, Letter of approval from the Regional Water Qualilty Control Board dated 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 2 August .17, 1998, Letter from Marine Consulting & Design dated August 13, 1998, Letter from Shellmaker Inc. dated August 19, 1998 RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends that the Commission adopt the following resolution: - I. Approval with Conditions The Commission hereby grants a permit, subject to the conditions below, for the proposed development on the grounds that the development will be in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 3 of the California Coastal Act of 1976, will not prejudice the ability of the local government having jurisdiction over the area to prepare a Local Coastal Program conforming to the provisions of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, is located between the sea and the first public road nearest the shoreline and in conformance with the public access and public recreation policies of Chapter 3 of the Coastal Act, and will not have any significant adverse impacts on the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act. II. Standard Conditions: 1. Notice of Receipt and Acknowledgment. The permit is not valid and development shall not commence until a copy of the permit, signed by the permittee or authorized agent, acknowledging receipt of the permit and acceptance of the terms and conditions, is returned to the Commission office. 2. Expiration. If development has not commenced, the permit will expire two years from the date this permit is reported to the Commission. Development shall be pursued in a diligent manner and completed in a reasonable period of time. Application for extension of the permit must be made prior to the expiration date. 3. Compliance. All development must occur in strict compliance with the proposal as set forth in the application for permit, subject to any special conditions set forth below. Any deviation from the approved plans must be reviewed and approved by the staff and may require Commission approval. 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 3 4. interpretation. Any questions of intent or interpretation of any condition will be resolved by the Executive Director or the Commission. 5. Inspections. The Commission staff shall be allowed to inspect the site and the project during its development, subject to 24-hour advance notice. 6. Assignment. The permit may be assigned to any qualified person, provided assignee files with the Commission an affidavit accepting all terms and conditions of the permit. 7. Terms and Conditions Run with the Land. These terms and conditions shall be perpetual, and it is the intention of the Commission and the permittee to bind all future owners and possessors of the subject property to the terms and conditions. III. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. Construction Materials Disturbance to harbor bottom and intertidal areas shall be minimized. Local sand, cobbles, or shoreline rocks shall not be used for back fill or construction material. The applicant agrees not to store any construction materials or waste where it is subject to wave erosion and dispersion. The applicant shall remove from the beach and seawall area any and all debris resulting from construction. In addition, no mechanized equipment, with the exception of the crane/barge, is allowed seaward of the seawall at any time. IV. Findings and Declarations: The Commission hereby finds and declares: A. Project Description The proposed development consists of the demolition and removal of an existing damaged concrete seawall and construction of a new 37 foot long concrete seawall and 15 foot long side wall at the same location (see Exhibit 3). The height of the seawall will be raised to conform with the City of Newport Beach codes and concrete coping will be placed atop the new wall. Pieces of the old bulkhead will removed by barge and taken to a site for recycling into road materials. The project site is located in the private, gated residential community of Balboa Coves in the City of Newport Beach (see Exhibits 1 and 2). The private community is located between Pacific Coast Highway and Newport Harbor north of the intersection of Newport Blvd. bridge. Ingress to the community is provided 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 4 from Pacific Coast Highway. The lot in question is situated on a side channel in Newport Harbor. There is no public access to the harbor across the site, however, there is a public recreational area on the northwestern boundary of Balboa Coves (see Exhibit 2). There are no sensitive biological resources which would be affected by the proposed development. There are several reasons for this. First, at low tide the old wall will be removed by a crane mounted on a barge. The bulkhead and harbor bottom will be exposed at low tide. No retaining walls or other construction measures are necessary. Then the interlocking panels of the new bulkhead will be installed at the already disturbed footing location of the old bulkhead. The panels will be jetted into place directly against the dirt embankment behind the old bulkhead. Therefore, disturbance to any biological resources would only occur if the resources are directly attached to the bulkhead or immediately in front of it. B. Shoreline Protective Structures Section 30235 of the Coastal Act states: Revetments, breakwaters, groins, harbor channels, seawalls, cliff retaining walls, and other such construction that alters natural shoreline processes shall be permitted when required to serve coastal -dependent uses or to protect existing structures or public beaches in danger from erosion, and when designed to eliminate or mitigate adverse impacts on local shoreline sand supply. Existing marine structures causing water stagnation contributing to pollution problems and fish kills should be phased out or upgraded where feasible. Section 30253 of the Coastal Act states: New development shall: (1) Minimize risks to life and property in areas of high geologic, flood, and fire hazard. (2) Assure stability and structural integrity, and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability, or destruction of the site or surrounding area or in any way require the construction of protective devices that would substantially alter natural landforms along bluffs and cliffs. The proposed development consists of the demolition and removal of an existing damaged bulkhead and construction of a new bulkhead at the same location. The project is located in Balboa Coves which is situated on a side channel of Newport Harbor (see Exhibit 2). The existing seawall consists of a 15 foot long side wall and a 38 foot long 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 5 bulkhead on the main channel. The existing bulkhead will be removed entirely and the new bulkhead will be located in the same location as the old bulkhead. - The new bulkhead will be constructed using precast concrete tongue and groove panels with a concrete coping on top of the panels. The existing poured in place concretre wall will be removed in chunks by crane and the debris will be taken to Ewles Materials to be recycled into road base. Exhibit 5 is a letter from the consulting marine engineer. In this letter the engineer states that the existing bulkhead is failing. Exhibit 4 includes photographs of the bulkhead. Exhibit 5 shows photographs of cracks in the bulkhead. The marine engineer states: 1 have examined the subject seawall and found it to be failing from a structural standpoint, i.e., seriously cracked in numerous locations, portions of the wall failing out of plumb in the direction of the waterway due to internal structural failure, exposed and deteriorating reinforcing steel, and flooding over the top of the wall at high tides. The only changes that the applicant is making is to raise the height of the bulkhead to +9.68 feet from +8.60 feet in conformance with City of Newport Beach Code requirements and to install a concrete coping or cap on top of the new bulkhead in conformance with accepted bulkhead design. The existing wall is in place and was constructed prior to the Coastal Act. In addition, the site is located on a side channel of Newport Harbor and the development will not have an adverse impact on shoreline processes. Additionally, the bulkhead will be replaced in the same location so there will be no additional adverse impacts. The proposed development does not increase the length, size, or location of the existing wall. The height will be increased to bring the development in conformance with City of Newport Beach codes. The proposed development is designed to protect the soils behind the seawall from eroding and undermining the primary residence and accessory residential development. Section 30253 of the Coastal Act requires that new development minimize risks to life and property in areas of high geologic, flood and fire hazard, asssure structural stability and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion. The proposed development consists of the replacement of a failing concrete bulkhead with a new concrete bulkhead at the same location. The bulkhead is designed to prevent bay water from infiltrating under the wall footing, eroding soils and undermining a rear yard deck and possibly the residence. Section 30235 of the Coastal Act stipulates that shore protection structures which alter shoreline processes shall be permitted when required to serve coastal -dependent uses or to protect existing structures or public beaches in danger from erosion. The existing 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 6' wall does not serve a coastal -dependent use but is necessary to protect an existing structure, i.e., patios, rear -yard decks and ultimately the residence. - The proposed development will protect existing property and will not create nor contribute significantly to erosion, geologic instability or destruction of the site or surrounding area. Any adverse effects would have been created during the original construction of the bulkhead. No additional adverse impacts would be created by replacing the bulkhead in the same location. There is no seaward expansion. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed development conforms with Section 30253 and 30235 of the Coastal Act. C. Coastal Access and Recreation Section 30212 of the Coastal Act states in part: (a) Public access from the nearest public roadway to the shoreline and along the coast shall be provided in new development projects except where: (1) it is inconsistent with public safety, military security needs, or the protection of fragile coastal resources, (2) adequate access exists nearby, or, (b) For purposes of this section, "new development" does not include: (4) The reconstruction or repair of any seawall; provided, however, that the reconstructed or repaired seawall is not seaward of the location of the former structure. Section 30604(C) of the Coastal Act requires that permit applications between the nearest public road and the shoreline of any body of water within the coastal zone shall include a public access and recreation finding. The proposed development is located on the water in -the Balboa Coves area of Newport Harbor. Balboa Coves is a private, gated subdivision. The development consists of the replacement of a concrete seawall with a new concrete seawall at the same location. The existing seawall is damaged and evidencing large cracks. The closest public access point is located at Channel Place and River Ave to the west of the the Balboa Coves community (see Exhibit 2). - 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 7 In this situation, the development is located between the sea and the first public road, however, the proposed seawall does not impact access either directly or indirectly to the ocean. The project site remains a single-family residence use and will not result in an intensification of use. The applicant is proposing to remove the damaged bulkhead and replace it with a new bulkhead at the same location: The new development will not extend seaward. Therefore, under 30212(b)(4) the development is not considered "new development" and not required to provide access as per 30212(a). Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed development is consistent with the public access and recreation policies of the Coastal Act. D. Water Quality Section 30231 of the Coastal Act states: The biological productivity and the quality of coastal waters, streams, wetlands, estuaries, and lakes appropriate to maintain optimum populations of marine organisms and for the protection of human health shall be maintained and, where feasible, restored through, among other means, minimizing adverse effects of waste water discharges and entrainment, controlling runoff, preventing depletion of ground water supplies and substantial interference with surface water flow, encouraging waste water reclamation, maintaining natural vegetation buffer areas that protect riparian habitats, and minimizing alteration of natural streams. The proposed development consists of the demolition and removal of an existing concrete bulkhead and the construction of a new concrete bulkhead at the same location. The process for removing the wall and installing the new wall is simple. At low tide, the bulkhead panels are removed by a crane mounted on a barge. Once the panels are removed, the new panels are jetted at about 7 or 8 feet below bay grade. The panels are 15 feet high, are interlocking and are secured with grout. No. mechanized equipment or other construction is necessary. The barge then takes the old panels, loads them onto trucks which taken them to a site to be recycled for road base. However, with any construction there is the potential that some materials will be left or end up in the bay. For this reason, the Commission finds that the applicant shall comply with a special condition which requires that all debris and construction materials be removed from the construction site. In addition, no mechanized equipment; other than the crane mounted on the barge, be used seaward of the existing seawall. Only as conditioned, does the Commission find that the proposed development conforms with the water quality provisions of Section 30231 of the Coastal Act. 5-98-262 Westling, Newport Beach Page 8, E. Land Use Plan Section 30604(a) of the Coastal Act provides that the Commission shall issue a Coastal Development Permit only if the project will not prejudice the ability of the local government having jurisdiction to prepare a Local Coastal Program which conforms with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act. The Newport Beach Land Use Plan was certified on May 19, 1982. As conditioned, the proposed development is consistent with the policies contained in the certified Land Use Plan. Therefore, approval of the proposed development will not prejudice the ability of the City of Newport Beach to prepare a Local Coastal Program [Implementation Plan] that is consistent with the Chapter 3 policies of the Coastal Act as required by Section 30604(a). F. Consistency with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 13096 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations requires Commission approval of Coastal Development Permits to be supported by a finding showing the permit, as conditioned by any conditions of approval, to be consistent with any applicable requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Section 21080.5(d)(2)(A) of CEQA prohibits a proposed development from being approved if there are feasible alternatives or feasible mitigation measures available which would substantially lessen any significant adverse effect which the activity may have on the environment. The proposed project has been conditioned in order to be found consistent with the water quality protection policies of the Coastal Act. A mitigation measure; a special condition requiring removal of all construction debris and materials will minimize all adverse effects. As conditioned, there are no feasible alternatives or feasible. mitigation measures available, beyond those required, which would substantially lessen any significant adverse effect which the activity may have on the environment. Therefore, the Commission finds that the proposed project, as conditioned to mitigate the identified effects, is the least environmentally damaging feasible alternative and can be found consistent with the requirements of the Coastal Act to conform to CEQA. I 8tptd�' . BY 3 , r9t _ TT pYtm it m 006i •� ,. - -' ! •�:"..:•Onl • - -�_ 4Tjj�S. ,.• u ° is tl3NIN� TIM ffi `3 L06t G dA N 2`. XMYgcd ,�i AY i Q. •ry l a�'L = ._�,� is AV 37d,M AV N13ww t r � - N 1♦ 't9i '• tNAA TioM � M •- a3A3M '" G n taq � 9 W N � H *a � ylOIA '• � � 9 '� � l4 f _ C� �i g � - ` "�'% tSI JL h_ ,M yy g IIS�$ �'�tpQ�tp. ..NN,i �' ' .Ff•e' 7z,,:� u � � �• ,.',a -� j ~ � �' m �® b' $ AV thaNtlV T06I �- � � LS9t .�y l� l y r Q _ �r $.�*tc AV Y?:1NOd AQ in 3 AV 37it1Vn 37M4 f^.' 1i • toll Mgt '_ F tOStr y. ♦„Q AV 1 I_ yIlNfl7Ytd dl l 1 - 3 Y _ r $ Z L[o2 r h < TY"IlAt17 £!8t [Ott ISO 5 � O V � A 11/W zF AY H IAQtlP✓LId � GO � /r' ''Ss''•.•$f 3 1 NO oIOU t - AY 31Y15 •• AY 1131111HA I ___- —a�_ -- Tr• fr t- —,zr �"` ai '� ._ _ r...� '�ffi.<L� �11 7..a3 v�a-•�.V. �!'3�- ��Y rr,a�'"..__ ( i 6° c 5r L• �$ a5! ffiv is cow CC Egg is L-1--912 S air. � bb n'zr(ct:�`t=-= --�'� •�: , � �a n S3j ijt � e �- n trwllL*�; maoini- 3 n, - I I .1 A a r w...s .,, `'i11. O°» nlears - . ':13, .'�.id. �..0 ro ur�r•eff fflml , e , 4 • � n nua+s � a 9qa n �ag' v � t a: ,� Sa O1�.��• � , ff 8 •ff��x i, � �� E`er _ i'si� »� nu9orsl� �'�pd, � _.%/ C - � �a nat•'w+w g i' m I I ' i «� ? tr717�s ... v , u+tn . _ sae_- », no•4 _ n m,il �!'• � n"^ in 3e13n (O'/1-Yl_ rr ���.• - ��i M NL 1331i g/ ONIM n w+t rQ �coram ,.1.1 ml All n at v ■ �i l� asttz SI .,ot» a VV NA rr/i IONSYW M110 } n SMW. 5i ryy"� , n Nuorra ;��•• u � .c �tff W I � nLStlM3t 0^�OSL2 S 1S �ff a pNYlFU YH @ g3$ IMa'c��8t� Zia vf!- 9 4 gS�ff9ff a in � _ a x J u 2 �_ an1e EXHIBIT ®. r= ` n Application Number: j 5-98-262 t ' •� �3 r 1 q 1 Vicinity Map W /00 zz.^ ray ..._........•.. - _-- om� --- •u� { 1 ; , California Coastal Commission 0 I I Ee P] dbe. Marine Consulting & Design 324 EL MODENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, CA 9266 ® t u�,l (6 41 AUG 2 41998 August 13, 1998 CALIFORNIA OASTA� COMMISSION C- I have examined the subject seawall and have found it to be failing from a structural standpoint, i.e. seriously cracked in numerous locations, portions of the wall falling out of plumb in the direction of the waterway due to internal structural failure, exposed and deteriorating reinforcing steel, and flooding over the top of -the wall at high tides. The homeowners have taken it upon themselves to seek approval to replace the wall, in its present location, with a newly engineered, properly constructed seawall built to the City of Newport Beach's height requirement before any further damage to the wall occurs© It is likely that -the wall will fail in the future, leading to washout and erosion of the existing retained sand and possibly undermining an existing structural retaining wall at the end of the existing residence® Sincerely, Roland S. Hor nby RSH/bh RECEIVED BY PLANNING— DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AM t,10\1 2 4 1998 PM CITY OF NEWPORT BERG CITY OF R Ek{PO R T B ERCH Y YICINITY mnp ATTY Y ID�t, CR1ta�CR K' ?-L�- 1 aEWE WP\UL 'x\si-. CCKG EX )I A� Cl C�NG \NA LL TO E CED l 2 MST 6pDE� WIN L-. KIE CIF 1�41 �WNy GIST WALL i O ZZ r9-P !1\l/ Extsr. �Ept-� Lo\L34J \�j PT`� . sq Sam 41 I I a 0161. 1 0 mt Xa;2,s • ,� 1 33 t _ g .4 J , F , /rr J y r 46 v97 / ttoe Cff �/OCZ 01,170 t /7 Jo 38IV .So ll�lLP1 b m IN WA 7 1 MARIINJE,' CONSULTIN' & DE"IGN rm C-�' �1�: 1.1L. k L=,� -1 g1�1�1 `�. w %L SC 1//- rA57A)- ., q, t�40 t m31 c� C iLL� �i 'l�'L1 OF — I.577 EZX� D .1w=: 1 1 17"YMeip • I ' , ' o 47 _a � t W +�` Oy^ d•413�4� -c•_ �t � Q4v -, �,G "(,.--o.i�• y 37� 32 a o 33 hob 4`® 34 Ta' t \ 35 �� h — — �. 5t0 � r SEE SHEET F 6 - :_®` =I"' ��,cy5 , l '*`v ® • t w 4' fj" �' h 5 a_ 1,52 t - , � ® h i � �'= i _ .\ 4 6° \.•:. ,,` r •``� Q8s to ''�. s,,.� My"T' F��t� c~v ° �� �_ t N� P � �o ���� o ti �v�? \� ��� � Q \°�\ ba a`,34 { it % 1 P % 44 1 � C° Z2 ` a \ � ®° k ..Q, a •rp { q4' d,t4 fg�• ( t h � S, 1 `��\i' G3 �• Gaut B \ p �,t� 't'� L r S - ta-j43 38 r E'7i; ® t qP^ 1 69` a tT Q. `�r Q5 s o r 0 WM tta qo 0 � d``.-°7 jI1 vl` 15' • � 42 3.9 a t� � V .- — �` a \ z.S�Bei • __.- _ , � Z 1 � °' � G. �, � ��4 �p9�# � ; � � �° v t � �- fin. • tqc \� � A• � 3g � � ft_ tom° • G ®•�� z1� t` i t •�.- �;� •�s^,,,, \�\�_ '' Q � ti� 1 � \ 0 a• L •�°�', \ � � ! YP,��1�� I'fa-�f • 0 '' t°�' tt�3 t t e'? -• �0. a,�%' 'v� t \\\,ta ---__ 4' 4qt�. � ��} �,� � �r(i� � tQ \\ .3� i ay6$` `�•,� p � '� � j 4 ;' � � 4 � N v'lA b p �r I Q 40 - 3 � y' on), ./ •� ''� i '.' +q. s' ".,,,-.,, ,. c\t a t ` '`°? ...----4�`.�L � .,.. ..,,. g {, f^°; f. t J t J f f f J d d \®_ \ UNtg r$F td►p3t4 t3 m E -?a' t t- m C i°�`f 34 i'!` \ l Ito � 1, ` Q� `I N G p' 1$ I� q Q �? 6 N ?Sw�sC' tf`/RrS R S9S-TJ` J f r02 S ?N8T !rsp z37.ar p� r~' �, . �w I t RkE Tre', �' r ; \ _ _. i _ tt �" Lk \ \ \ �P' 3it�• � � P. 'MBB.r7 Hr"' � F 4`3-Q�e ,..> i �,, a$ �„,.� d ,,�^• � j m.-, Vt P \ � r \ ��' � t p ` � Ccae,,,. �� Tides. t t y , •.. _ .. � +`,�,' � . o ._, r'"� l r•``a' Lu'a ,.^�`r c.,� t . f � „ ''° �� ►" p 4 ?lIl. Q �assc Me �S�s,�,?�� Coar�i" .. ',9'\\� r1 N z p 1 '� �' a�� 3 B� ,a �y nlea•zT'w acBo!` r 71 . � ate' •° \� � a 'ti _ � �ccarpt• �` 1! I T�c� �"! ', c� (`51 V a . ZZ. a ny 1 q n '? i ,�'✓� n t~.t'4c. �� •�.�g. ^���'.�.'•a"_'-- ��+ j/ PO C. SHEET NO. -. - - - DRAWN BY - - Ho. oa�� ��vtsrarv: _ .. . DATE.. SCA 324 ELC}QENA AVENUE NEWPORT BEACH, GA 92663 N � ?14 642 2206 - ® s - - MEETS of HP-UX dpG50 A.09.04 D 9000/887 (ttyg8) login: wes Password: Please wait... checking for disk quotas (c)Copyright 1983-1993 Hewlett-Packard Co., All Rights Reserved. (c)Copyright 1979, 1980, 1983, 1985-1990 The Regents of the Univ. of Californ (c)Copyright 1980, 1984, 1986 Unix System Laboratories, Inc. (c)Copyright 1986-1992 Sun Microsystems, Inc. (c)Copyright 1985, 1986, 1988 Massachusetts Institute of Technology ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PEI - GOVERNMENTAL RESOURCE SERIE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. FUND ACCOUNTING DISPLAY BUSINESS RECORDS: DISPLAY EXIT DISPLAY BUSINESS RECORDS 05/21/ BUSINESS NUMBER RP11714041 TOTAL DUE 0.00 BUSINESS NAME HIND, HOWARTH SERVICE ADDRESS 1404 BAY AVE W APT NEWPORT BEACH, CA ZIP 92663 BILLING ADDRESS P O BOX 662 CYCLE A TAX Y PENALTY PROPERTY ID BALBOA, CA UNAPPLIED CREDIT 0.00 92661 SERVICE TITLE BILL REF DATE BILLED PAID DATE PAID RES 1996-02 02/01/96 75.00 75.00 03/01/96 RES 1995-02 02/13/95 70.00 70.00 02/21/95 RES 1994-02 02/05/94 65.00 65.00 02/08/94 PRESS ESCAPE FOR NEXT SCREEN Please mail permit to. Shellmaker Inc 875 B. West 15th Stre, HARBOR PERMIT APPLICATION Newport Beach, CA 926 City of Newport Beach Fire & Marine Department Please Print: (Front & Back) James Westlinq 40 Balboa Coves. Newport Beach (714) 631-5001 1. Applicant (Property Owner) Address Telephone dA 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach ���� � T — . Project Address street address) Harbor ermlt # 3. New Construction Revision Maintenance x Dredging 4. Fee $351.00 Check No. 7364 Date 11/18/97 5. Brief Description of Proposed Work: Replace a failing portion of existing bulkhead. The failing portion is wood and does not conform to City of Newport Beach height requirements. 6. Submit Drawings(3) Include: 1. Location and dimension of proposed structure 2. Location of bulkhead 3. Location of property lines and lot size 4. Location of channel markers within 200 feet of proposed project 5. Existing ground profile, and area and profile of any dredging with elevations showing deppth relative to MLLW 6. Elevations of top and bottom of piles and bulkheads with respect to MLLW 7. Any special conditions affectinv the construction or affecting boating operations. 7. Owner Builder/Contractor Declaration/Insurance Information 7. Applicant's/Agent's Signature �� �- Date 11/24/97 8. Work can begin .once the City has received evidence of t e following additional approvals and yeu have b notified to proceed: - OVApproval CE USE ONLY in ,Concept . Date Approval of the City of Newport Beach Council. Date Approval of the Army Corps of Engineers. Date ►� Approval of the California Coastal Commission. Date 1 - Approval of the City's Public Works Department. Date Approval of the City's Building Department. Date 2 County of Orange. Date Issued. (Permit is stamped drawing) Date Site Inspection. (call 644=3043.for anointment) Date Site Re -Inspection. �' ; ,� Date Conditions: OWNER -BUILDER =,ARATION I hereby affirm that I am exempt from the contractor's license law for the following reasons: .(Sec.7031d.5, Business and Professions Code) Any City or County which requires a permit to construct.,alte.r, improve, demolish, or repair any structure, prior to its issuance, also requires the applicant for such permit to file a signed statement that he is licensed pursuant to the provision of the Contractors License Law (Chapter 9, commencing with Section`7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code) or that he is exempt therefrom and the basis for the alleged exemption. Any violation of Section 7031.5 by any applicant for a permit subjects the applicant to a civil pernalty for not more than five hundred dollars ($500). I, as owner of the property, or my employees with wages as t- ee- r sole compensation, will do the work, and the structure is not intended or offered for sale (Sec. 1044, Business and Professions Code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who does such work himself or through his own employees provided that such improvements are not intended or offered for sale. If, however, the building or improvement is sold within one year of completion, the owner -builder will have the burden of proving that he did not build or improve for the prupose for.sale.) I, as owners of ,the proerty am exclusively contracting with, icensed contr etors to construct the project (Sec. 7044, B'usine-s�`'sfi& `Professions code: The Contractor's License Law does not apply to an owner of property who builds or improves thereon, and who contracts for such projects with a Contractor'(s) License pursuant to the Contractor's License Law). I am exempt under Sec. of Business and ro essions Code for this reason: Owner Signature Contractor Shellmaker Inc. Date Telephone (714) 548-5359 Address 875 "B" West 15th Street, Newport Beach, CA 92663 License Class A&B State Board No.561434 City License No.96002210 LICENSED CONTRACTOR'S DECLARATION I hereby affirm that I am licensed .under provisions of. Chapter 9 (commencing with Section 7000) of Division 3 of the Business and Professions Code, and licens is 11 force and effect. Contractor Signature Date 11/24/97 PAA4 . ve) City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 714/673-2110 March 28, 1975 Mr. Richard Long 2 Winged Foot Lane Newport Beach, CA 92660 Dear Mr. Long: Pier Permit #1011-40 for the slip facility located at 40 Balboa Coves, Newport Beach is registered to Andrew Nelson. Mr. Nelson, after receipt of the pier registration billing, advised this office that the facility had been sold to you. If this is correct, we will need a harbor permit transfer application and corresponding $100.00 fee as required by City Ordinance 17.24.030. At your earliest convenience, please advise this office if you have acquired this property so that the necessary transfer can be accomplished. Sincerely, Glen E. Welden Tidelands Operations Marine Department GEW:1f Coordinator 6'7 i fr vsw A�ir...rn�t OQ r '. ew�eow - ,oiop°sedch' - ISLwu D BAL Bay MLLW �Ar-W '� a coRONA� Wee�Po DEL MAR V / C /N / T Y .$'irE TC H W..t ✓etty e°est - - �-i�---- , NewPOFr BAY, CALIFORNIA iRA/WIC tCAL! "MES - PROF/L E .aodenoJ--dGfafisS o a Zs 30 aG/ow AL1emn Lower-I.ow W'7'ee/:Of t"A7L- rc,�Le .a fast 000raxirs�o%e/y /O Acet- U.S. Nor'bor" L,e7es o/'e not" e'stob/fished .n this section' of New,oaf-t �{c�y, TRA C T . \_ �� /1/ o /O/ / 39 - 42 + 1 3 a y n .f6 N 11 - i--24�i✓.g% T.Sc ✓ACir S. RAU49 CANO StiRv6Y0.7 L. Cl vSE NJ ZSIZ .RO. sOx /17 CGLfrA MQSA, CAL/fOWAf/A - .- _ SOaIf{r Line of ,LJeO� }/%yis TidL -- PRQPOSEO FLOAT - P L A /V OVEw,00.4T B--.4 CArBC G /FCRN/A srwce /Niisr AP�✓•eo/:o+,by SidCross/ey Dote: May.. /954 36 By/bceCovas Job N8 9372 Al,.-por/ dead, ZZ? A - / 7.4