The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPresentations and Handoutsr. I f . y.y �.� I.V ;v l.i� 11A vv r h � f I 1 �.� I.V ;v l.i� 11A vv r h � f I PEPSI ------ WIN LL n' gdr r w, AM'M' j ./0!/� i iL7 s1= 00 EXTENT OF g 8 „m TIDELANDS = n w.. �a 1' `w m i , jig ! . N ijLU low r� _ ,. , F ♦ ,rte' - ' _ i •1 • ' F .7y W • a jfs�• 'r � m W z ' RAi imm i VD [ Q ° Wro . Z i w PRITT RESIDENCE o0 TIDELANDS EXHIBIT ma rj 2X6 GAP (SHAPED TO MATCH EXIST'6) 2X4 HORIZONTAL BOARDS SPACED SO THAT A 4" SPHERE DOES NOT FA55 THROUGH THE 6UARDRAIL 4x4 ....,.:�.. \(E) PILE ISEGTION A SCALE. 1/4" = 1• - O" EXISTS BULKHEAD SAND BEACH EXIST'6 FENCE 2' -O" NEW CONCRETE BEAM 20' -O DEMO EXIST'G STEPS } (W 24" DEADMAN PILES, TYP. EXISTING RESIDENCE 1 / / (F.F. = 923) NO CHANGE P7APMAN EADMAN / 1 , PLAN r, n1 \- DEMO EX151'6 FRANK PRITT L L 1114 BAST BALBOA BLVD. WOOD LEDGER S1 CONTACT: BRION JEANNETTE ARCH. EXIST'6 PILE O i EXISTING CONCRETE DECK LINE OF EXI ST•6 (FS. = 900 FBULKHEAD WALL BRON 5 JEANNETTE 15 THE OPIRC. _ THE -- _________ __\ --- ----- ____________ ___J__________ -------- - -,�`1 — N64°09'00 "6 _60.00' _. LOTS 8 8 9 RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND A. P. NUMBER 045 - 151 -50 AREA: BAL50A PENINSULA CITY: NEWPORT BEACH } (W 24" DEADMAN PILES, TYP. EXISTING RESIDENCE 1 / / (F.F. = 923) NO CHANGE P7APMAN EADMAN / 1 , PLAN (E) BULKHEAD j� TIE NEW BEAM INTO EXIST'6 - - - - � STRUCTURE r1 r1 F1 L� L� LL DEMO PORTION OF EXIST'6 RAIL NEW CANTILEVERED BEAM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ TYP. — — ------------ _ ___ 1\ J/ / 1 1 / EXISTING PATIO NO CHANGE SCALE: 114" = I'- O" VICINITY MAP No TM N rs. SITE PLAN BULKHEAD I - EXIST N5 cl eTI �, ENCp PATH (NO 6.XA E) 1 O 1 1 m A BLVD• Qd w » lu k) IS) M 111 W a4� W O aW� (L ,t Ul a x D cm a a �3 3" c G e i O — a �«+XO MOO QOz Revlslon: R naam. IFa -xrl C8012 ' REN. 4/E A -I LEGAL OWNER CONSULTANTS FRANK PRITT 1114 BAST BALBOA BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92661 CONTACT: BRION JEANNETTE ARCH. (949) 645 -5654 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BRON 5 JEANNETTE 15 THE OPIRC. _ THE REGISTERED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE SHALL BE PROLECT ID: BAYFRONT SECTION LOTS 8 8 9 RESPONSIBLE FOR REVIEWING AND A. P. NUMBER 045 - 151 -50 AREA: BAL50A PENINSULA CITY: NEWPORT BEACH COORDINATIN6 SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY OTHER$, INCLUDING PHASED AND DEFERRED SUBMITTAL ITEMS, FOR COMPATIBILITY WITH THE DESIGN OF THE COUNTY: ORANGE I SUILDIN6. SCOPE OF WORK REMOVE EXISTING, STEPS DOWN TO THE BEACH AND EXTEND CONCRETE DECK TOWARD THE BAY. NO CHANGE TO EXI5TIN6 RESIDENCE. (E) BOAT DOCK DESIGN DATA CITY: NEWPORT BEACH ZONE: R -I CODE. 3010 CRC, 2010 CBC, 3010 CPC, 2010 CEO, 3010 CMO, (E) 6AN6EWAY 2005 BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS (BEES), 2010 CAL GREEN BUILDIN6 STANDARDS USE: CONSTRUCTION TYPE: I OCCUPANCY: R -5N SETBACKS FRONT: 6' -0" (2' -6" AT 6ARA6E) REAR: O' -O" SIDE: MAXIMUM HEIQHT . SQUARE FOOTAGE GALLS. LOT SIZE: 5,520 S.F. J J F.A.R.: 1.5 S.F. EXI5TIN6 NEW TOTAL (E) WOOD RESIDENCE: 3.52250 S.F. O S.F. 3,522.50 SP. FIER GARAGE: 141.15 S.F. 0 S.F. 141.15 S.F. NO CHANGE TOTAL STRUCTURE: 41510.25 S.P. 0 S.F. 4570,25 5.F, TOTAL RAISED DECK: 955 B.P. 305 SP. 1,256 5.P. C7 LJ SHEET INDEX A -1 DECK PLAN, SECTION 4 INFORMATION (E) BULKHEAD j� TIE NEW BEAM INTO EXIST'6 - - - - � STRUCTURE r1 r1 F1 L� L� LL DEMO PORTION OF EXIST'6 RAIL NEW CANTILEVERED BEAM _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = _ TYP. — — ------------ _ ___ 1\ J/ / 1 1 / EXISTING PATIO NO CHANGE SCALE: 114" = I'- O" VICINITY MAP No TM N rs. SITE PLAN BULKHEAD I - EXIST N5 cl eTI �, ENCp PATH (NO 6.XA E) 1 O 1 1 m A BLVD• Qd w » lu k) IS) M 111 W a4� W O aW� (L ,t Ul a x D cm a a �3 3" c G e i O — a �«+XO MOO QOz Revlslon: R naam. IFa -xrl C8012 ' REN. 4/E A -I EEL GRASS EXIST'G STAIRS ON BEACH TO BE REMOVED „m = O PIER PERMIT LINE - ry ui .. EXTENT OF PIER LINE Q �o m W N 9 W w w �-II �... •` r • i z o� ' f r p Sa ;@ 5 L w r I 6 I ~ � 4 da �..._ wm N BAL OA 8LV0 E H O U zm Z lu PRITT RESIDENCE o0 PIER PERMIT LINE & EEL GRASS EXHIBIT m° HARBOR COMMISSION /CITY COUNCIL LIAISON PAIRINGS SUBCOMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS September 11, 2013 District Council 1 Henn 2 Petros 3 Hill 4 Daigle 5 Selich 6 Gardner (Paired with) Commission Girling Stapleton McIntosh West Rhyne Blank 7 Curry Avery Public Slip at Balboa Yacht Basin 1 t�� 4 F� ��- �- it -. ra�� ' "''�., .. }f'�rAA�i��',.•,T�, , riC �- ��- �- it -. ra�� ' "''�., .. }f'�rAA�i��',.•,T�, , riC :41 119nnx1■ii1 ON 2010 • 2 HOUR MAX NBMC 17.25 • SIDE TIE ONLY NBMC 17.25 • CLOSED 8PM -6AM NBMC 17.25 • NO DIVING OR JUMPING NBMC 11.12 • NO LOUD NOISES NBMC 10.28 • NO DISCHARGES INTO BAY NBMC 11.20 • NO FISHING NBMC 11.20 DIAL 911 FOR EMERGENCIES Sept. 11, 2013 Harbor Commission Agenda Item Comments from: Jim Mosher ( iimmosher(aa yahoo.com ), 2210 Private Road, Newport Beach 92660 (949- 548 -6229) 4) PUBLIC COMMENTS The items I might wish to comment on include: 1. Invictus/Maramar temporary anchorages a. I would like to call the Commissioner's attention to Newport Beach Municipal Code Section 17.25.020: "A. Location. No person having charge of any vessel shall berth or anchor the same in Newport Harbor except within the designated areas." And Section 17.05.070: "All channels, turning basins, anchorage areas, and pierhead and bulkhead lines in Newport Harbor shall be as established by the Federal Government or by the City Council upon recommendation of the Harbor Commission. A map thereof shall be kept on file in the offices of the City Clerk and the Harbor Resources Division for public inspection." b. Although Section 17.25.20 goes out to define legal means of anchoring in channels and turning basins, the map on file with the City Clerk does not currently designate any legal anchoring or mooring areas in them. In fact the only designated anchorage shown within the entire harbor is the small one mentioned in the Harbor Guide, off the east end of Lido Island. c. The Assistant City Attorney believes NMBC Sections 17.60.040(A) and (B) give the Harbor Resources Manager the authority to permit temporary anchoring and mooring outside designated areas. I find this interpretation extremely doubtful. 2. The September 10 City Council meeting a. With Item 3, legislation was adopted modifying "the Harbor Commission's Purpose and Responsibilities." Oddly, although in effect no more than a simple amendment (the addition of a new paragraph of responsibilities), the original enabling legislation will be repealed. So technically, when this goes into effect in 30 days, one might say the 'old" Harbor Commission will be dissolved and a new one created, but no changes in membership or terms of office will be involved. b. Council member Gardner reported that one of the mooring holders whose permit was revoked at the last Harbor Commission meeting claimed to have not received notice of the hearing due to a defective address on file with Harbor Resources. The City Attorney, however, said the owner learned of the hearing in time to appeal, but failed to do so. c. In connection with the encroaching piers issue, the Council continued, as Item 21, to struggle with a proposed amendment to NMBC Section 17.35.020(F), which requires Harbor Commission "approval" of the permit when a change in ownership of the upland property occurs. Some of the council members wish to exempt inter - family transfers from this requirement, but the matter was continued to a future meeting. September 11, 2013 Harbor Commission agenda comments - Jim Mosher Page 2 of 2 i. Further details have emerged regarding the closely related 508 South Bay Front situation on Balboa Island. In response to a Public Records Act request, most of the documentation related to the June 19, 2013, administrative appeal hearing held on this matter has been released. As it turns out, the purpose of the hearing was to establish if Chris Miller had properly interpreted the NMBC as requiring that the transfer in question be processed pursuant to Section 17.35.020(F). The retired judge who presided over the hearing concluded Chris was correct. ii. The purpose of the subsequent July 9, 2013, City Council closed session meeting on "anticipated litigation" related to 508 South Bay Front remains obscure. 5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES - August 14, 2013 Minutes The following minor changes to the passages from the draft minutes shown in italics are suggested in strikeout underline format. 1. Page 1, middle of longest paragraph: "Consideration will be given to internal inconsistencies and whether adjustments are needed." 2. Page 1, line 2 of next paragraph: "... the Harbor Commission's purpose and responsibilities where a new responsibilities were added..." 3. Page 5, line 9 of longest paragraph: "... noting that it will not set precedence precedent, ..." 4. Page 5, line 3 from end: "... and there is precedence precedent in the Harbor for ..." 5. Page 6, line 2: "... and setting p °� °n^° precedent." 6. Page 7, in three places: "Public comments were invited, but here there were none." 7. Page 7 last line of paragraph 7: "... vessel mowrhand overhang regulations." 8. Page 9, line 2: "He addressed options for the site and noted that the process is moving along." 6) 2. Review and Approve the Proposed Harbor Commission Objectives for Fiscal Year 2013 -14, and Approve Commission Pairings with Council Members The Commission should be cognizant of the fact that to avoid Brown Act requirements, in addition to being composed solely of less than a quorum of the main Commission, the subcommittees need to be both ad hoc (that is, having a definite goal and end objective) and strictly advisory. If they do not meet both these requirements (for example, if a responsibility for action on behalf of the Commission is delegated to them) then all meetings have to be noticed, and a conversation between even two of the subcommittee members is regarded as a meeting.