HomeMy WebLinkAbout5 - Corona del Mar State Beach ImprovementsCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 5
April 10, 2007
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Lloyd Dalton, PE
949 - 644 -3328
ldalton@city.newport-beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: CORONA DEL MAR STATE BEACH IMPROVEMENTS — CONTRACT
NO. 3461 — AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AGREEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approve Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement with Robbins
Jorgensen Christopher Architects (now known as Rossetti Jorgensen) for an amount
not to exceed $29,925 and authorize the Mayor City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
DISCUSSION:
On August 9, 2005 the City Council awarded a contract to reconstruct public facilities at
Corona del Mar State Beach. The contract provided for demolishing all existing
structures and constructing a concession /lifeguard /marine life refuge building, two
restroom buildings, a parking lot ticket booth, parking lot and entrance modifications,
beachfront seat walls and walkways, site utilities, and new landscaping and irrigation
systems.
The contract also provided for demolishing, removing, and reconstructing the bottom
portion of the Inspiration Point beach access trail that was undermined during our
January 2005 storms. The trail was extended longer and deeper into the beach sand
and buttressed with grouted rock in an effort to assure that the trail will not be
undermined during future storms.
Construction started on September 6, 2005, the day after Labor Day. All work was to
be completed within 150 consecutive working days, or by May 11, 2006. Working day
extensions due to unforeseen work, labor and materials delays, inclement weather, etc.,
extended the completion date to June 1, 2006; however, actual construction was not
Corona Del Mar Beach Improvements - Contract No. 3461 — Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement
April 10, 2007
Page 2
completed until October 20, 2006, 100 working days after the extended completion date
(see attached Council report dated February 27, 2007).
Amendment No. 4 to Professional Services Agreement:
Architectural design and construction support services for the project were provided by
Robbins Jorgensen Christopher Architects (now known as Rossetti Jorgensen) under a
September 2, 2001 Professional Services Agreement with the City. This Agreement
was amended on December 12, 2002, January 13, 2004, and October 5, 2005 to reflect
changes to Rossetti Jorgensen's original scope of work.
Rossetti Jorgensen has now requested payment for their 100 additional days of
construction support services between June 1 and October 20, 2006 (see attached
letter report dated March 19, 2007). Such services include attending and taking notes
for meetings with the contractor, researching and responding to requests for
information, evaluating field conditions and requests for change orders, preparing
change order plans, etc. Staff has verified the $29,925 additional payment requested
by Rossetti Jorgensen and prepared the attached draft Amendment No. 4 to their
Professional Services Agreement with the City.
Funding Availability:
The City Council approved 10% of the award amount ($400,000) to provide for testing,
special inspections, change orders, and unforeseen costs on the project. Ten percent
is commonly provided for Public Works projects when exact construction costs are
unknown prior to award. Sufficient funds remain in the following account to reimburse
Rossetti Jorgensen for their additional services under proposed Amendment No. 4.
Account Description
Corona del Mar State Beach Improvements
Prepared b
Sig n Engineer
Account Number Amount
7011- C5100569 $29,925
Total: $29,925
Submitted by;
In G. Badum
Works Director
Attachment: Completion report dated February 27,607
Letter from Rossetti Jorgensen dated March 19, 2007
Draft Amendment No. 4
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No.
February 27, 2007
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Marcus Puglisi
949 -644 -3331 or mpuglisi @city.newport - beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: CORONA DEL MAR STATE BEACH IMPROVEMENTS — COMPLETION
AND ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT NO. 3461
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Accept the work.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion.
3. Authorize the City Clerk to release the Labor and Materials bond 35 days after
the Notice of Completion has been recorded in accordance with applicable
portions of the Civil Code.
4. Release the Faithful Performance Bond 1 year after Council acceptance.
DISCUSSION:
On August 9, 2005, the City Council authorized the award of the Corona del Mar State
Beach Improvements to Weeger Bros., Inc. The contract provided for the demolition of
all existing structures and construction of a parking lot ticket booth, concessionflifeguard
building, two restroom buildings, beachfront seat walls and walkways, site utilities, and
new landscaping and irrigation systems. The contract also provided for the demolition,
removal, and reconstruction of the bottom portion of the Inspiration Point beach access
trail that was undermined during our January 2005 rain storms. The trail extension was
designed to be longer and deeper into the beach sand and buttressed with grouted rock
to insure that the trail will not be undermined again.
On October 25, 2005, the City Council appropriated another $200,000 for additional
design services and for materials observation and testing and geotechnical services.
The contract has now been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Department. A summary of the contract cost is as follows:
Original bid amount: $3,945,000.00
Actual amount of bid items constructed: $3,945,000.00
Total amount of change orders: ($141.52)
Final contract cost: $3,844,858.48
Corona del Mar State Beach Improvements - Completion And Acceptance of Contract No. 3461
February 27, 2007
Page 2
The final overall construction cost includes eight Change Orders representing a savings
of .0035 percent under the original bid amount. A summary of the change orders is as
follows:
Change
Description
Amount
Order
1
Miscellaneous extra work: asbestos removal,
$16,652.03
diseased palm replacement, roofing system
upgrade, added water service, and added
restroom optical flush valves
2
Extra work days
3
Miscellaneous entry booth extra work: additional
$18,042.62
work to accommodate a toilet room, changed entry
door, added countertop plastic laminate end
panels
4
Miscellaneous building extra work: HVAC
$16,166.18
modifications to the Lifeguard /Concessionaire
building, filling of unforeseen void adjacent to the
Westside restroom, ceiling modification to
accommodate ceiling lights
5
Miscellaneous cost deductive items: temporary
<$72,884.74>
concession costs, deletion of new flagpole,
replacement of destroyed stainless steel street
light service, deletion of Abtech catch basin filters,
and deletion of the artistic concrete portion of the
contract
6
Miscellaneous building extra work including such
$19,340.53
items as: substitution of double 2x6 Trex for HVAC
screening, restroom structural steel design
changes, powder coating of skylights, sewer
grease interceptor relocation, and relocation of two
large Washingtonian palms
7
Miscellaneous building extra work: added
$2,287.28
waterproofing to Lifeguard shower wall, switching
the down spout locations for nine roof drains, and
adding venting for lifeguard water heater
8
Final miscellaneous site and building extra work
$254.58
In addition to the Change Orders approved by the City, the Contractor has an
outstanding claim. The Contractor contends that it is entitled to additional
compensation due to alleged extra days and the performance of extra work. Staff has
reviewed the claim and has determined that the Contractor's claim is without merit. The
City has cross - claims against the Contractor for liquidated damages resulting from the
delayed completion of the project.
The City has retained $193,089 of contract funds within a third party escrow account for
the resolution of liquidated damages ($150,000) and stop notices on file ($43,089.)
Corona del Mar State Beach Improvements - Completion And Acceptance of Contract No. 3461
February 27, 2007
Page 3
Additionally, approximately $180,000 of unspent monies set aside for contingency will
be returned to the General Fund. The total construction Cost was $3,944,858.48.
Other Project Costs:
In addition to the primary construction contract, this project involved other project
expenses from the following funding sources, General Fund, American Trader Oil Spill
Remediation Fund, FEMA contribution, and Proposition 12 Bond Act of 2000 — State
grant contribution. Total project expenses are summarized as follows:
Construction
Architectural Services
Preliminary Design
Various Trades
Materials Testing /Geotechnical
Construction Inspection
Surveying
Portable Toilets
Incidentals
Lifeguard Facility FF &E
Total Project Cost
Environmental Review:
$3,944,858.48
$ 259,650.10
$ 25,265.39
$ 56,479.55
$ 63,618.00
$ 9,445.05
$ 8,404.00
$ 39,200.05
$ 9,643.76
$ 49,000.00
$4,465,564.38
This project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA per Section
15061(b)(3), pertaining to the reconstruction of existing structures and facilities on the
same site with substantially the same purposes and capacities as the existing structures
and facilities. A Notice of Exemption has been filed with the County Clerk.
Funding Availability:
Funds for the project were expended from the following accounts:
Description
General Fund
Proposition 12 Bond Act of 2000 — State Grant
FEMA reimbursement for beach access trail repair
American Trader Oil Spill Remediation
Account
7011- C5100569
7251- C5100569
7251- C5100569
Amount
$2,819,762.48
472,290.00
29,648.00
7295- C5100569 623.158.00
Total $3,944,858.48
All work was completed on October 20, 2006, 100 days after the scheduled completion
date.
Prepared by:
Marcus Puglisi
Senior Public Works Inspector
Submitted by:
Stephen G. Badum
Public Works Director
AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
WITH JORGENSEN ARCHITECTS
FOR CORONA DEL MAR STATE BEACH IMPROVEMENTS
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, entered
into this day of %. , 2007, by and between the, CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and
ROBBINS JORGENSEN CHRISTOPHER ARCHITECTS (now known as ROSSETTI
JORGENSEN), a California corporation,., whose address is 2800 Lafayette, Newport
Beach, California, 92663 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant'), is made with reference
to the following:
RECITALS:
A. WHEREAS, City has constructed a new concession stand, restrooms,
parking booth, and other improvements at Corona del Mar State Beach; and
B. WHEREAS, -on September 10, 2002, City and Consultant entered into a
Professional Services Agreement, hereinafter referred to as "AGREEMENT," for
Consultant to provide the architectural services for the Corona del Mar State Beach
Improvements (hereinafter referred to as "Project'). Under AGREEMENT, City agreed
to pay Consultant $111,670.00 for architectural services; and
C. WHEREAS, on December 17, 2002, City and Consultant entered into an
amendment to AGREEMENT for additional professional services needed for Project, as
requested by City (hereinafter referred to as "AMENDMENT NO. 1 "). Under
Amendment No. 1, City agreed to compensate Consultant an additional $31,330 for
their additional services; and
D. WHEREAS, on January 13, 2004, City and Consultant entered into a
second amendment to AGREEMENT for additional professional services needed for
Project (hereinafter referred to as "AMENDMENT NO. 2. "), and City agreed to
compensate Consultant an additional $71,500.00 for their additional services; and
E. WHEREAS, on October 5, 2005, City and Consultant entered into a third
amendment to AGREEMENT for additional professional services needed for Project
(hereinafter referred to as "AMENDMENT NO. 3. "), and City agreed to compensate
Consultant an additional $40,502.00 for their additional services; and
F. WHEREAS, Consultant has provided additional professional services to
complete Project not included in AGREEMENT or AMENDMENTS NO. 1, 2 or 3. Said
additional services include architectural services connected with the delayed completion
of construction of the beach improvements and are more fully described in a March 20,
2007, letter from Consultant to City (hereinafter the "March 20, 2007 letter') attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated in full by this reference; and
G. WHEREAS, City desires to compensate Consultant for the additional
professional services that were not included in AGREEMENT or AMENDMENTS NO. 1,
2 or 3. Accordingly, City and Consultant mutually desire to amend AGREEMENT, as
provided herein (hereinafter referred to as "AMENDMENT NO. 4 ");
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Consultant shall be compensated for the additional services it has
provided on Project, as outlined in March 20, 2007 letter to City
2. Total additional compensation to Consultant for the services performed
pursuant to AMENDMENT NO. 4 shall not exceed Twenty Nine Thousand, Nine
Hundred Twenty five Dollars ($29,925).
3. The term of Agreement shall be extended to December 31, 2007.
4. Except as expressly modified herein, all other provisions, terms, and
covenants set forth in AGREEMENT and in AMENDMENTS NO. 1, 2 and 3 shall
remain unchanged and shall be in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed AMENDMENT NO. 4 on
the date first above written.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:_j an�' C
AssIstant City Attorney
for City of Newport Beach
ATTEST:
By:
City Clerk
for City of Newport Beach
Attachment: Exhibit A
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
A municipal corporation
By:
Mayor
for City of Newport Beach
CONSULTANT:
ROSSETTIJORGENSEN
0
(Corporate Officer)
Title:
Print Name:
By:
(Financial Officer)
Print
ROSSETiTJORR11NSW.ARCNR6CTVR5. [MR=$. RRARRICS. PLMIXDRS
2800 LAFAYETTE. CANNERY VILLAGE. NEWPORT BEACH. CA 92663
Tataphona. 969.566.0080 ROSSETTIM10EN5EN.CON Fax. 949.566.0082
MARCH 19. 2007
MR. LLOYD DALTON, P.E.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS
3300 NEWPORT BLVD.
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658
RE: Corona Del Mar State Beach Improvements
City of Newport Beach
Contract #3461 Plan #P- 5189-5
Dear Lloyd,
This letter is to request your consideration of additional construction administration services on
the Corona del Mar State Beach Improvements project due to the Contractor's schedule
overruns.
The original contract completion date was May 11, 2006. The actual completion date as
agreed upon by the City and Weeger Bros. Inc. was October 20, 2006, more than 5 months
later. The completion of site improvements and punch list Items extend considerably beyond
that date. At the City's request, we continue to be involved, now more than 10 months later
(nearly double the170 working days established by the original contract) providing support
during negotiations to determine the amount of liquidated damages that will be assessed upon
Weeger Bros. While our original contract required that we get approval from the City before
providing additional services, we have continued Our support in good faith, based on our
conversations with you along the way that we Will eventually be compensated for our
additional services. Because our contract was an hourly, not to exceed agreement and was
not tied to phased completion of the job, we invoiced 100% of the contracted fee on June 30,
2006 for time spent through May 31, 2006. Following the payment of that invoice, we have
worked without compensation for over 9 months. While we hope that our dedication to this
project speaks as a demonstration of our commitment to provide quality service and enduring
Architecture, we are currently realizing a significant financial loss on this job and we hope we
can recover the income proportional to our efforts.
As t mentioned in a letter to Marcus Puglisi nearly a year ago, most projects, especially those
with a combination of new and existing amenities, phased construction, and occupancy during
construction have unforeseen conditions that have to be resolved during construction and thus
cause delay. On this project, some examples of unforeseen conditions which occurred were
unknown existing underground utilities locations, discovery of asbestos in existing buildings
and delayed move out of the concessions tenant. Some trade Coordination issues had to be
addressed in the field, such as the detailed interrelationship of steel columns embedded in
masonry walls. These are ordinary hurdles in most projects and are the reason that project
schedules typically include contingency time.
Construction of this project extended far beyond what anyone would have anticipated as a
reasonable time contingency however and the Contractor is responsible for the extreme
delays in completion. As early as pre -bid and at pre - construction meetings, everyone involved
(Owner, Contractor, and Architect) discussed that the construction schedule was critical and
cooperation and communication would be important to meet the completion date. It was
ROSSI& EXHIBIT A
_ IGEQaRalR -
Page 2
anticipated by the City that this schedule would be reflected in the bids and indeed this was
the case. Typically, when construction time is critical, there will be larger work crews of
various trades conducting simultaneous activities on the site. Instead, the job site was
lackluster on most days. It was surprising that many work tasks which could have been
scheduled concurrently instead occurred sequentially: Concurrent scheduling typically means
that some trade work has multiple starts and stops, thus increasing subcontractor costs. On
this job, it appears that the Contractor scheduled subcontractor work in order to minimize his
expenses and maximize profit versus scheduling the job to be completed by the contract
completion date.
Another critical aspect to successful communication during all construction projects is the RR
process.. This too was discussed during pre -bid and pre-construction meetings. It was noted
that while we as the Architect would respond to issues quickly, that the contract allowance for
processing issues is 20 working days. We requested that in order to decrease the response
time to RFI's, the Contractor take a proactive, cooperative, problem solving approach when
submitting questions. As one with global knowledge of the project and as the overall
coordinator of the project construction, the Contractor's role is to review their subcontractors'
issues, resolve them if possible, and then if still necessary, pose a question to the Owner
Architect / Engineer in a comprehensive manner. In our opinion many of the RFI's that came
to our office were so basic that they should have never been submitted. Seldom were RFI's
posed with a suggested resolution. There are many possible reasons for this, however, in our
opinion the problem' resulted primarily from a combination of inexperienced personnel and
failure to review subcontractor questions prior to submitting them to the Architect.
Contractor submittals also became an issue. Despite numerous reminders to the Contractor
to include submittals / shop drawings on their project schedule as required by their contract,
neither the City nor the Architect ever received such a document We also reminded the
Contractor that the Architects responsibility in reviewing submittals is limited to verifying their
general compliance with the contract documents. The Contractor is required to review all of
their subcontractor's submittals before sending them to the Architect Additionally, detailed
review of dimensions, full compliance with the specifications, etc. is the responsibility of the
Contractor prior to submittal to the Architect Despite numerous discussions and reminders of
the standard of practice, we continually received submittals which had not been reviewed by
the Contractor, did not comply with the specifications, or were not required by the contract
documents. The Contractor did not stamp and sign submittals indicating to the Architect that
they had been reviewed by them prior to submitting to Architect In many cases, we spent
considerable time discovering inconsistencies which should have been filtered out by the
Contractor prior to being submitted to us.
Substitutions must be allowed for public contracts. However, in order to be approved, they
should be dearly marked as a substitution and submitted to the Owner / Architect along with
the necessary comparison and backup information to indicate that the equivalency of the item.
Because review of substitutions is time consuming, our specifications typically list multiple
acceptable manufacturers, sometimes up to seven. Despite this, we received many submittals
which were not by one of the listed manufacturers and were not indicated as a substitution.
This created additional review time because we not only had to discover for ourselves if the
product was a substitution, but then incurred additional time to review for equivalence.
Whereas the contract and standard of practice suggest that such submittals be rejected, in
F:W23. CdVXCA lB STft Pmgp OISICA MN Vv 03.15-0r.0
Page 3
most cases, we reviewed what was submitted in order to keep the project moving without
delay.
Our contract with the City is unclear as to the number and frequency of meetings that we were
expected to attend during construction. On many projects, we attend construction meetings
on an every-other week basis. Nevertheless, when we were requested to attend weekly
meetings, we agreed in order to aid in keeping the project moving. This has been a large
commitment of time and resources for us and is compounded now by the schedule extension.
Because the City continued request our involvement, we are confident that you found our
additional services beneficial the during the extended construction period and recent
contractor negotiations. During this time, we made every effort to work efficiently while still
providing the City with the support needed to complete the project. At the time of our last
discussion regarding our additional time on this project, you requested that we keep track of
our time until the completion of the project and submit it as a fixed cost at the completion of
the project rather than project an inaccurate fee at that time. While that seemed reasonable
then, none of us imagined that the 'completion' was so far away. Our resulting unpaid time
has become a significant burden to this office and our contribution to the overall performance
of the firm. We hope that you can help us to come to a resolution quickly. We request
compensation in the amount of $29,925 for 204 labor hours recorded during the 9 months
since our last invoice dated June 30, 2006 for time spent through May 31, 2006. Attached is a
summary of our time spent for that period.
Lloyd, thank you for your consideration of this request Please call Roberta Jorgensen or me if
we can answer any questions regarding this matter.
F50223- Cr%TTCNAmcisV:ee Pmpo 10CP..Vdsery W- 15 -0i.doc
Project Detail Report
Monday, March 19, 2007
ROSSETTI
Transactions for 611106 - 31
6/1412006
Hours
Description
Reg
2006206.00 Corona Del Mar State Beach Im Type:
BAKER, HAROLD
Pdncipal:
7/17/2006
Project Manager:
3
Client:
50100
Contract Type:
E +0:
'1
Building Type:
Labor
50100
E C/A OFFICE '
1 PROJ MGMT
12 :42:00 PM
Amount
Ovt Total Reg Ovt
Regular
ROBERTA JORGENSEN Comp: 108,675.01) Budgeted OH Rate
J J BRISCOE Consult Fee: 0 Revenue Meth:
Reimb 0 Multiplier/Amt:
Fixed Fee Start Date: Percent Compl: 0
Office Bldg End Date: Labor Pct Comb 0
Expense Pot Compl: 0
B
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
6/1412006
3
3
F
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
7/17/2006
3
3
F
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
7/31/2006
'1
1
F
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
8/1 /2006
2
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/7/2006
2
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/14 /2006
4
4
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/15/2006
4
4
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/1 /2006
4
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/5/2006
0.5
•
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/8/2006
6
"
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/16/2006
3
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/19/2006
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/2012006
2
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/21/2006
2
.2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/2212006
3
3
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/23/2006
1
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/2612006
0.5
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6127/2006
2
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/28/2006
3
- 3.
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/29/2006
2
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
6/30/2006
1
1
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/32006
2
2
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
71512006
1.5
1.5
'
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/6/2006
2
"
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/7/2006
2
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/12/2006
2.5
2.5
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/1312006
4
4
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/14/2006
1
1
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/1812006
1
1
F
50400
BRISCOE. J J
7/19/2006
9
9
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/20/2006
8
8
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/21/2006
1.5
1.5
F
50400
BR&OE, J J
7/24/2006
1.5
1.5
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/26/2006
2
2
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
7/27/2006
5
5
"
B
50400
BRISCOE. J J
811 @006
3
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
81212006
4
4
F
50400
BRISCOE, J J
at4/2006
2
2
F
50400
BRISCOE. J J
6/10/2006
7
7
Selected By: Project: 2006206. 00, Pdorpedod overhead missing
2006206.00 Corona Del Mar State Beach lmpr (RJ, v8.0e (tract' lantto) - Page 1
Project Detail Report Transactions for 611106 - 31, March
19, 2007 -12:42 PM
Hours
Amount
Description Reg
Ovt
Total
Reg
Ovt
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
8/15/2006
9
9
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
8/162006
3
3
• B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
8/1712006
3
3
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
8/232006
2.5
2.5
B ..
50400
BRISCOE, J J
61242006
2.5
2.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
81312006
4
4
B
50400
BRISCOE. J J
9172006
3
3
B
50400
BRISCOE. J J
91142006
1
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
91182006
2
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
9/192006
0.5
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
9202006
1
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1013112006
0.5
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
11!1!2006
2
B
50400
BRISCOE. J J
11!9!2006
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
11 /10 /2006
1.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
11 /16 /2006
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
11 /17 /2006
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
11122!2006
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1216!2006
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
12/11/2006
3
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
12/20/20156
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
12/21/2006
3
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1/2/2007
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1/5/2007
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1/9/2007
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1/17/2007
4
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1/18/2007
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
1/24/2007
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
2/6/2007
0.5
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
2/1612007
1
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
2/28/2007
3
F
51100
JORGENSEN,
7/19/2006
1
3 TECHNICAL
B
50100
BAKER,HAROLD
6/262006
3
B
50100
BAKER,HAROLD
628/2006
4
Subtotal for BAKER, HAROLD
7 7
296.73
•
F
50300 BRANDT,
6/122006
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
9/12/2006
3
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
9/1312006
2
Total TECHNICAL
12.5 12.5
515.99
8 CONTADMIN
B
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
6/6 /2006
2
B
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
6172006
2
B
5040Q
BRISCOE, J J
10/162006
2
B
50400
BRISCOE, J J
11212006
0.5
2
2
1.5
1
2
1
0.5
3
0.5
3
0.5
1
1
4
2
0.5
0.5
1
3
1
3
4
296.73
0.5
3
2
515.99
2
2
2
0.5
'
Subtotal for BRISOOE, J J
2.5
2.5
103.2
103.2
Selected By: Project 2006206.00, Prior period overhead missing
2006206.00 Coruna Del Mar State Beach lmpr (RJ1 v8.0e (tract' larrdo) -Page 2
Project Detail Report
Transactions for 611106 -31'
March
19, 2007 - 12:42 PM
i
!
Hours
Amount
Description
Reg
Ovt
Total
Reg Ovt
Total CONTADMIN
6.5
6.5
354.96
354.96 •:
9 GENERAL
8
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
6/1312006
3
3
F
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
7/3/2006
1
1 ....
F
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
7/5/2006
4
4
F
50100
BAKER, HAROLD
7/6/2006
1
1
8
50400
BRISCOE, J J
2/21/2007
2
2
Labor Total
204
204
Account Totals
Reimbursable Expenses
Project Totals
204
204
Breakdown of hours:
Name
Title
Rate
Hours
Subtotal
Total
Roberta Jorgensen
Prinicpal
175
2
350.00
Jason Briscoe
Senior Associate
150
173
25,950.00
Hal Baker
Director of Construction
125
29
3,625.00
204
$
29,925.00
Iii
I i ijorgeR§,en
June 26, 2006
Mr. R. Gunther
City of Newport Beach
Public Works
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Re: Fee for Additional Services: CDM State Beach, Construction Meeting Minutes
Dear Mr. Gunther,
Thank you for the continued opportunity to provide architectural services to the City of Newport
Beach at Corona del Mar State Beach. Per your request, Jorgensen Architects will record
meeting minutes for the weekly construction meetings. The duration for this service shall
commence on February 09, 2006 and will continue through July 25, 2006
Meeting minutes shall be prepared for each weekly meeting and distributed the following week at
the construction meeting. Minutes will be provided in hard copy as well as electronic, Microsoft
Word format at the completion of construction.
This service can be provided for a lump sum fee of $4,862 including reimbursable expenses.
If the ,construction schedule is extended significantly beyond what is currently scheduled,
additional meeting minutes can be prepared on a time and material basis according to the
attached rate schedule.
We would be happy to discuss any details of this proposal in order to negotiate an agreement
that suits your needs.
Sincerely, _ -L-
g
2800 LAFAYETTE
CANNERY VILLAGE
NEWPORT BEACH
CA 92663
949 0080 TEL
949 566 0082 FAX
www.JWCH.com
Jorgensen Architects"
Table of Hourly Rates
June 1, 2005
Principal
Senior Associate / Director
Associate / Project Manager
Project Architect
Interior Designer
Designer / Job Captain
Intermediate Drafter
Clerical Staff
$175.00 /hour
$150.00 /hour
$125.00 /hour
$110.00 /hour
$100.001hour
$90.00 /hour
$80.001hour
$50.001hour
Reimbursable Rates
Reproduction / Copy Expenses 1.15 x Cost
Photography / Developing 1.15 x Cost
Delivery / Overnight Expenses 1.15 x Cost
Travel Expenses f.15 xCost
Mileage 0.40 / mile
2800LAFAYETTE
CANNERY VILLAGE
NEWPORT BEACH
CA 92663
949 566 0080 TEL _
949 566 0082 FAX
www.jaARCH.00M _