No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSS3 - Group Residential Uses — Discussion with Special Counsel (Richards Watson Gershon) of Proposed Ordinances - CorrespondenceCentral Newport Beach y.. t{ F.._ °' -'i�l✓ r:Ell:li iiVCi +IN Community .association P.O. Box 884 • Newport Beach, Califomia 92661 December 7, 2007 o n ;—i -- Honorable Steven Rosansky, Mayor c 2 Members of the City Council _y City of Newport Beach - I 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 w Re: Study Session Agenda of December 11, 2007 - Group Home Ordinance Dear Mayor Rosansky and Members of the City Council: The Central Newport Beach Community Association would like to express their sincere thanks for the time, attention and investment in legal advice your Council has expended on the subject of group homes in Newport Beach. We look forward to a group home ordinance that will give the City the ability to curtail the proliferation of group and sober living homes. Central Newport Beach, the area between the piers, has been adversely impacted by the proliferation of drug and rehabilitation facilities and sober living houses. Your Council has already received and heard extensive written and oral testimony on the subject from Central Newport Beach residents and from other community associations that likewise have been impacted. Rather than reiterating what others have already said, the Central Newport Beach Community Association request that your Council adopt any new ordinances or amendments to existing ones that regulate to the greatest extent of the law, drug and alcohol rehabilitation facilities and sober living houses in all their forms. Very truly yours, Louise Fundenberg, President Howard F Ahmanson 3 December 2007 Steve Rosansky Newport Beach City Council 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 Dear Steve: Z,07 FTC r , In some ways I remember the old Boy Scout days, though I haven't done much along the same lines since! I see that the building has been reconstructed to be fireproof! I've been seeing in the paper a little about the group home situation on the Peninsula. I do support the state law, because left to the "marketplace of municipalities" to make these decisions, there wouldn't be any group homes at all. However, an acquaintance of mine at Christian Community Development Association, Bob Lupton, has made an interesting suggestion. He proposes that those trying to help people in need think also of community development. How he would handle a rehab home is this: Require everyone in it to come from, or have resided within, the local community before they move into the rehab home. Therefore the rehab home is serving the immediate neighborhood and not a bunch of outsiders. If you were to apply this rule in Newport Beach, anyone who moves into one of these homes has to have resided within one mile radius for at least a year beforehand, or something like that. The whole idea is laid out in a book which I am enclosing. Now, there will still be a market for some rehab homes; Newport Beach is a hard - drinking town! But this idea will greatly change how they impact the community. Sincerely yours, Howard Ahmanson Enclosure Cc: (without enclosure) Doug Swardstrom Tom Tait David Benavides Tom Karako Brian Kennedy Post Office Box 18552, Irvine, California 92623-8552 Telephone: (949) 474 -9142 Fax: (949) 474 -1847 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, "RECEIVED AFTER AGENDA PRIM . 3 We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and l - fj _© persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach we have become aware of a , significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. c� Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following eletlients: I . That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the. residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units. are.aeting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. sincerely, Name:��� T r \ddress: S 1' KA�A� Ails", -i� _ J E :J Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects as all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or-fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: 4W/ // Address: 4,f,� c-f 77-663 Hon Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the Presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the followiogelements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encounbered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. lntraluce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team. to enforce current and future ordinances. 6Ye strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to e-rercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. , 1l Sincerely, L Name: " % k& Address: 'a�5 1�'zc.� tKna�s A-6 iii l�t,ack C>4 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of.Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operator: who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to e-rercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: 4�- tVI Ntvw 6rcl o C/)X- . 01166 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the Presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the. units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and ?. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the stale to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of 'group {homes '. Sincerely ,�� (C�� 1 �l Name: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as requited by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Name: Address: "fXv=V Ic A -1:2 (A3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative andregulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Name: �J Address:?i (� v6-,, c'�£ rr IZ6 c 3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights.. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Ccor\r�g Address: S l l \vpx s2 PN� `Iw Nk,uj �r} c P ,C fj �21do3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the aver - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program tbmugh the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in life area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: C C-* cicyc--,Cc�� Address: \ 1��,p�S \c�� P-,"e- C-C C � C 0.9 2-4.Lf Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, � l l Name: Lo._..,, r� vv V Ji l Address: (s., l g c: Ayf� 0 ,VZ"t CA�Z�C�3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I . That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the. City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincere Name: Z4 uRU G Address: (� /� T/JSih cc kt,, '2A:r3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincere / Name:,e�j Address: �4 944 Q. 92b6o � Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes % Sincerely, Name: Address: ArlrtE. 190 ( GA- Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify' the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I . That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Vd,& V ` b/ f " (M,y� V i� , `' Address: / Agh vQ U)9 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future rdinances. tVe .vtrongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. ')' i ncerely, Name: J. Address: !2, F-OcYt A„ Q, Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober Jiving residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach. to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to evercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group !tomes'. *Sine relyY7 Name: V of d L. �,atil7W ,address: 5?j9 Fgjl ff4l Ae Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: JO& LL"t Address: 5,�t Wkw �f� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. Thmt the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and the area of `group homes'. Smc�rely�/ Name: Address: CA Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the open of `group homes'. (� Sincerely, Name: Address: ►ne�,.�po r� r�� . Cp 0[2�6 G3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge a City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities thro g lout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in t e area of `group homes'. j/ D Sincerely l -,gc e ,— Name: Address: �S2` VMSrc� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly serge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. ,' 1 Sincerely, ' Name: j %1d� wQ LLae e- ; , Address: 5-1 � i' U P r S l' cl/ 2. Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% Sincerely, Name: Address (hC- i.t §iA 13A(ZA/ -> � � r2 � �� -,r7- C , ✓1 NiEwP60- Wt d , (4 � 21" ? Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council tofactually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: P1 zi-,� Address: V% LC*A -O- 6410-AA S G-F+ Rw,�ws,ne jf N6 YWO2 T Rao 4, CA `124 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforpement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: fn.�� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses; unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables titles throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: UtfeY alli rs Address: S(0 R(}1e{/BCtQ It Alec v po v% q4W Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hand work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in th ,areh of `gro homes'. Sincerely, r Name: C xris/ ///tee / Address: L�3G a fie A) ecew c4 U0 3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program tbrough the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Namn�rs Sv��r�4'� Address' Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and fixture ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Z&Z6i Address 6t4iRL� LLIVAAJ 2 -(S H49t(_X (.n( A)F_lt! AOlZT F EA-C-1 CA '?2_ 64,& Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentratian of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% Sincerely, Name: Address: e)h n X �owf 142a vim. ✓fie dti /�vt 4�6tf3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: r ra.. km I Address: 1 g P / U -e ne wr4s� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer, residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area f `group homes'. Sincere Name: Address: J 022, c .A ja'COU-5 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: V l�kd�� A�itut� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities ffiroughout t e state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement n the area o roue homes'. � Sincerel , Name: C I V V1VVl9 Address: 2-z Z N - jam'"" � u06 3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: C-V\Yi� Address: I'�w�t� C�cu� Car Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name:�� a ®� Address: zoo/ ihlr'b' i3t H `T 6� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober Jiving residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it. is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council top ursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to e_vercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, ^Larne: �bA9- 1 0 ! C-14 �� ;Address: Z.ZdO "oL�- LAO, Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of.the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are. being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group /tomes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. r r ' / r Sincerely, Name: 6ardes L.%ckdpl` ��/ / ��✓�� Address: X03 Lw Teen I�J`itJE Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the aver - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the . residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, /��C Name: Address: yZG `rb(5 -r1AJ 1>V�— IVg&jP6r -r O�,V N 64 '?&663 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and . penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Since r Name: Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factuaily assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: / �� C �� f T� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. �' Sincerely, Name: �l m fm( Address: (� ro&h 0 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: t. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: �116h&-Q- Address: �Z�� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, -- Name: Address: : Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify' the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband. those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. �1 Sincerely, Name: Cc G c Address: ��� [� LA Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group houses) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5.. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Since • ly, Name: F�t2�Crp (,Ctyc Address: Z4b(7 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position conceming the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: . That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Natne:--Mark a- Q _G�CtSSJ° w— Address- .20 1 14a1l f/ L1111 1V,9 w�r•t BP:zcA C'A Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -tern rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% Sincerely, D {1„ Name: 84T-614-9 � ` ✓ Address: 2 sot Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and I That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: - 1__&UM ► Y I Address: 2-L4 C(DGCG Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: W-HT— 1 Nr1— SM I-T-TA Address: aS 1Lo �LL� LANC WD � PJGPU 0 A - q O-bt9B Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sin ely, Name: CDN � VN Address:�rLq R)�4 LASE N +9 �1 , M- s� , Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factuaily assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I . That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, ,,I Name: 5 ,� l.�6cHSI� ,t�/ � Wes_ Address: �3 LfhT lip ,,bp Neer- lsz I) 64- Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-tern rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and fixture ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, W" 11,�Ik Name: i.QI SQ44 Address: 7Vt 7 l,i(,(i�f IVY Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and Abe development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, � Name: 61 gu. e& (b, i't t Address: 2.qq 6r, N& TZW Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify' the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of flue problems flue City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: MAQ-V LO*ft /�/] Address: &Of)o3eACLW `31 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Name' C N C�_ tin Address:1\ Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout t e state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area o group homes'. Sincerely, Name: l"'/ Address: 3 2-6- �� �� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: � Address: [ j �,p x Are., Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living - residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. / Sincerely, Name: (J�a rt t e�a ��r Address: jw -- // �t w� hoa Hon. Mayor Rosanskv and City Council Members_ ..F czGh,� all d4e i We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober Jiving residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. /dic S Sincerely, Name: �/f <QrAIS -Afll �p ep. Address:20/ Atot- �Y Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council tofactually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-teem rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program tiuough the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and fixture ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Name: P^—Px Address: � �� COk V�45 Sincerely. Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term . regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, `lame: y IS "A^ f Address. d �% nds 51 CI lee, /. /& c) �� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober Jiving residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the .state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, dame: Address: N c. fA Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of'group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerel , U� Name:1� Address. Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. `sincerely, Name: Address: PY IZ6 06,4114�r eq-Vff S ���3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with. the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. `sincerely, Name: �Ijjieammec Address: cI p� is J ke 1�.7 I.�\a's�F Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the . presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I_ That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We .strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. S i nc Name: � " ' (( I' Cv L Q� Address: -�-,6R Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the .state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: B Address: ty1 Dre, -l� {? D. &k 31U A), 5- 9 .44� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, totally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. ` We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the tree of `group homes'. `iimerely, yame:SGaT-Y— \ddress: .)A C-05TA Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of '6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% Sincerely, Name: �/�cy /4 lour 4- ,Address: � 3 � lle,,l k J Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses. in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon.the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of•the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and arc licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities Throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. `sincerely, Name: /J� 64 /��/�' ;address: 6 �?! /ZrOcgvoSo}v� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability ofthe City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, �/ INante: Address: t� PRLc1 �3r14 �'Sp''t CA Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Si cerely, Name: 0 CT % /- -- W El 5') Address: �Z�,yZrl/� 42 DEW N Q U4 G3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the.City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing.loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: C Q�GtE� Address: L a Vii, /�C. +L`� r \V OY� /�L Cg q Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential use (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of flue problems flue City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, 6* Name: (1! &,o)vt O Address: 3pg L a bll a S N6t ci}— Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and fixture ordinances. tVe strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the :state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. /fSincerely, Name: `Ct VD( 4 11 r) Alu l ,�V \ddress: ',Z 3 DO ( h ✓-M6 -O kf-q'— Dk! K , �?Zio�3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factuaiiy assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a.. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the .state to rwvercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. tiinc Name: Address: KjtmbeNby Cc nIL R 2b�3 lion. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the .City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residers*'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally�upervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. sincerely, Name: A4 ,et2 ia+nl PCdzlz t,v Gt/r�Cvx.�i Address: o?.Tl s INN iz`i /+a&7 r L212, /v./3 g2G63 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober Jiving residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `;group homes'. Sincerely, Name: •1n—, • `�"�^^^(�� C^� T ;address: { Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. jj�� Cow Sincerely, Name: �(�'�S �� ` Address: 31ir tj 4 d Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that e=nables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforeem ni in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely Name: ,address: :5-1k Z bt-ok Os Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of'the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. 6 -eo � Sincerely, "-lame: Sa i ooU'l�o (�l Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address:y4S ""0 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- cancentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (gmup homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. 1Ve strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to encercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% sincerely, dame: Giet�ngn Address: yU S 1eea,11,r4,-,- 0 4 � ' GC�) ea 9�6 �3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. `sincerely, � Name: V44A--,,k Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the.state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group !tomes % n ` `sincerely, Name: 04 ,, ,� f w, FU4 Address: ;Vj W' �& 2 �?��( Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse Impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fms and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: .Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (gronp homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We :strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to erercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% 2��2 Sinc Name: Address: 1�' y Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factuatly assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to avercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely Name: Address: ��S tied -�a�nd s lion. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. `iincer ily, Name AA L1 R A"' I Address: l j k o L mo JC k c N.8. ILA U6G 3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements I. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of '6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. �/ sincerely, Name: r' iddress: Z3a3 /.ALIR+7- PG , ea uz:lr iUAc(►t eA 5'266) Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required . licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to e-rercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. `iincerel CE��� Name�� lddress� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability ofthe City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to evercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. ` Q{ Sincerely, "Jame: �cidress: nn,J� " C1 6b3 "" -"�� ��JS K.t- P/i Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators.who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing. loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council top ursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to evereise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. I I�, x o6qSine game: iY11Ne1 9 ;Address: 17)C5 V11 uy'Ae *elt n,�O %� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of '6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in t e area of `group homes'. Sincerely, ' Name: REn1E Address: 5�i NectJ,�f P ac6i Ci+ C%Z 2 Hon. Mayor Rosmsky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hand work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincere Adress: 5� �' �hti �►' ,�o � •,i�C�e,j�t Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council tofactually.assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincer100- Name:'reV-?5A CUI(th Address: 5AA �(itdt PY, wwp t fj6p(e-4 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, W Name: Address: 6z5 Cgtaji(V br. %AWA 8WA, CARZU&S Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: I . That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincere[ y, /�, l Name: VQYmt(C✓/41kh �`An Address: 5 n Cac�mkkvl� r�IJ J,� Bch, 012_1 63 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hardwork and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and fixture ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of ` up homes'. Sincerely Name: Address: Ike -w�m�r Ae:4,ctl� 014IrP43 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Name:J�ljnv �ry ►�t0,.► `a Address: Q J/i,•',,'��� I !/t j�,�J &or+ e�eO C�-� Si erely, (4N J 'rYl Tob� Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincere Name: Address:p -�H Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and f persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the.6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program enables cities throughout the state to exercise local felign, license enforcem t in the area of group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: M Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability ofthe City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. rd-, Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. 'That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. tiincerely, Name: Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability ofthe City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and , 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. tiincerely4 F�� game: ki1t6w`% WacsH lddress:22oB M/"440eETpOtdE (91q) 230-70aa Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council.Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue; specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: -5f Evf Address: N Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and I That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: V 4 W Y--a - Address: LZ is S l�- �z��3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including foes and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City. Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group !tomes% Sincerely, Name: 1 N I Address: 30� �U /Y�,cV\44-� — a``� N �, V Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council tofactually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program througb the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: n / Address: 3//� Sr Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of 'group homes'. Name:.(! Address:: ( G/ / &Z Sincerely, �lt � X14 �- - - -- Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the ea of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: ��(1 Address:2g0� 31-Oa Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and ?. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations; implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Ice Name: ' 11 a Address: Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify' the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including foes and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Ulf/ Name: hArAH Mr6 Address: , Z MOO Nib, 6P� 0�--D1O Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: ivy C(nitl I Address: �- �Ot CR 60663 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us A. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. l Sincerely, ( Name: d t Z Address: a 1 &o [, J- ti - Cl�) LN� q I U C.c d Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and S. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, ( � Name: -2020 - /� Efbak J� Address: q a� �3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short -term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and I That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name:,V� le. l6�\fryy,(Yn Address: 3Z t ` 0 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery at sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group.homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely,,a Name: --7) (2 kTt,�a "e4e,F'i z Address: ;z C750/ q %dad Sf ilea C 9,���'j Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Q � Address: x327 O c� gLr,�3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the aver - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence ofgroup homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: Rtrc-ke7* Address:0 /�y LpNt- j%Nw�cre f 13c act C.4 ct Z663 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We .strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. sincerely Name: Address: gr?�aN'1�7 sJ r\ \/j i.Jd q��3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over - concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We .strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to exercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes'. Sincerely, Name: ,Address 9,�(�3 Hon. Mayor Rosansky and City Council Members, We are residents of the community of Newport Heights. Due to the hard work and persistence of the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach, we have become aware of a significant issue that affects us all. We are writing to express our position concerning the over- concentration of residential recovery or sober living residential uses (group homes) and related uses in Newport Beach. We strongly believe it is incumbent upon the City Council to factually assess and identify the presence of group homes and the negative impacts on Newport Beach, to urgently prepare a legislative program that returns the ability of the City to plan and contains a long term regulatory and code enforcement program. Specifically, we urge prompt and decisive actions including the following elements: 1. That the City commit resources to identify the actual number and location of the residential recovery or sober living residential uses; to confirm the units are acting consistently with existing laws and are licensed, and 2. That the City vigorously pursue regulations and code enforcement to address the adverse impacts of the problems the City has encountered with short-term rentals, boarding houses, unauthorized group residential uses and residential recovery facilities, and 3. That the City adopt regulations to oversee the licensing process including fees and penalties to the operators who are not complying with the state required licensing program, and 4. That the City disband those uses that are being operated in violation of the 6 or fewer residents as required by state law, and 5. That the City pursue the previously adopted policy to develop a comprehensive legislative and regulatory program to deal effectively with the recovery homes issue, specifically a. Introduce key legislation at a statewide level to control group homes including but not limited to; the elimination of existing loopholes being exploited by operators of `6 or fewer residences'; the development of realistic design regulations, implemented and enforced by the City; securing the support of other cities; and the development of an effective, locally supervised enforcement program through the organization of an interdepartmental staff team to enforce current and future ordinances. We strongly urge the City Council to pursue an effective program that enables cities throughout the state to evercise local design, licensing and enforcement in the area of `group homes% Sincerely, 1111,11 , 11 Name: VAbkZ j L-4C1kMAV\ Address:2�y'�� t I)u+�a�/,f IV���J lJ President Emeritus: Alan Silcock President.- Paul Watkins West Oceanfront 7141556 -0800 Vice President: Elliot Leonard West Oceanfront 9491515 -4911 Secretary /Membership: Chris Garber Lido Peninsula Resort 9491246 -8383 Historian: Mike Johnson Numbered Streets 9491642 -3125 Treasurer: Ann Krueger Newport Shores 9491642 -2646 Directors.' Craig Batley Absentee Owners Liaison 9491293 -4630 Sharon Boles Superior Ave. Liaison 949645 -4752 Ken Bryant Numbered Streets 9491644 -6266 Mary Bryant Numbered Streets 9491644 -6266 Joann Larson Numbered Streets 9491650 -5533 Jim Miller Newport Island 9491933 -9827 Ann O'F1ynn Balboa Caves 9491645 -8233 Everette Phillips Newport Shores 9491650 -7528 Robert Rush Rwer/Neptune 9491645 -2977 Barbara Thibault Newport Shores 9491642 -5843 WEST NEWPORT BEACH ASSOCIATION POST OFFICE BOX 1471 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92659 -0471 www.westnewport.org VIA E -MAIL December 10, 2007 Mayor Steven Rosansky and City Council Members City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92663 SUBJECT: Proposed Ordinance On Group Residential Uses Dear Mayor Rosansky and Honorable City Council Members: At a Board of Directors meeting held on Wednesday, December 5, 2007, the West Newport Beach Association ( "WNBA ") voted unanimously to urge the City Council to enact an ordinance that will restore the integrity in the peninsula coastal communities (beach character of the neighborhood) to its pre- 2004 -16 ordinance status. We ask that you eliminate 800 beds added by drug and alcohol rehab businesses over the past three years. Our coastal community had more than its fair share pre - ordinance in 2004 and now we have approximately 1,000 beds in the peninsula neighborhoods. We believe the City will acknowledge that there exists an over - concentration of licensed (by the California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs ( "ADP"]) facilities in our beach community. Using an average concentration of all licensed facilities as a ratio to State population, Newport Beach should have no more than 110 beds in our city, which is about one -half of what we had pre - ordinance. The strong sentiment of the WNBA Board (which represents several hundred members) is to craft an ordinance that prohibits any new drug and alcohol rehab business from entering R -1, R -1.5, and R -2 zones in the peninsula coast communities, and eliminates those facilities that began operating in our nerighborhoods post- ordinance 2004 -16. Our previous letter dated July 5, 2007 does not appear to have been given serious consideration. It is our hope the Council will choose to phase out these post- ordinance 2004 -16 drug and alcohol Rehab facilties. We urge the Council to include the following provisions in the 2008 ordinance: 1. UNLICENSED FACILITIES. Notice and abate immediately all unlicensed facilties which should NOT be permitted to operate. There should be no exceptions to this abatement action. 2. INTEGRAL FACILTTIES. The definition of integral facilties needs to include the state definition with further clarification as previously recommended by the Concerned Citizens of Newport Beach ( "CCNB ") to address particular local issues (including issues with meeting and treatment facilities) to prevent continued over - concentration and operators taking advantage of a system badly in need of stricter controls. Mayor Steven Rosansky and City Council Members December 10, 2007 Proposed Ordinance On Group Residential Uses Page Two 3. OVERLAY ZONE. Due to the extreme over - concentration in our area, a remedial plan is necessary to address proper land -use planning given the neighborhood characteristics unique to the Peninsula. For example: • No permitted use in R -1, R -1.5, and R -2. In Multiple - Family Residential zones ( "MFR "), subject to Conditional Use Permit ( "CUP"). • 1000 foot separation between facilities to eliminate institutionalization, minimize impacts. No facilities within 1000 feet of schools and nurseries, parks, and bars. • No over - concentration of group homes in our neighborhoods because of intense density in our neighborhood as well as unique lot characteristics including already - existing stresses and impacts on infrastructure systems. • Overlay zone should be defined to include: West Newport, Balboa Peninsula, Peninsula Point, Lido Isle, Lido Peninsula and Village, Cannery Village, Balboa and other islands, old CDM, and Newport Heights (except the area on the north side of Newport Boulevard closest to Hoag Hospital on the Superior Avenue side). 4. BUSINESS LICENSES. Require all "group home" businesses to obtain a business license. 5. CUP. Require all "group home' businesses of seven and greater (stand alone/ integral) to apply for a CUP within sixty (60) days of the effective date of the 2008 Ordinance. 6. REVIEW PROCESS. Post - effective date of 2008 Ordinance businesses known to be integral should be evaluated first, i.e., a) SLBTS /CRC Health Group; b) Newport Coast Recovery; c) Ocean Recovery; d) Morningside Recovery; e) Kumar; f) Pacific Shores; g) Miramar, h) Kramer, and i) Yellowstone. (There may be other operators which should be added to this list.) 7. COMPLIANCE. Operators in good standing (no ordinance or code violations) undergo CUP first /immediate notice and CUP in 90 days. Encorcement actions to remove any non- comforming use should take place within 180 days from the date the ordinance takes effect or upon expiration of the operator's occupancy lease, whichever first occurs. The West Newport Beach Association believes that unlicensed facilities take advantage of a system badly in need of stricter controls. The WNBA is concerned that unlicensed facilities may house the criminally convicted, may provide illegal treatment, may lack adequate treatment supervision, and may create liability /risk to the community and to the City. In our view, unlicensed facilities should not be a permitted use. Mayor Steven Rosansky and City Council Members December 10, 2007 Proposed Ordinance On Group Residential Uses Page Three The proliferation of group home uses in our coastal communities threatens the very quality of life which makes Newport Beach literally the envy of the world. Please do not ignore this opportuity to establish fair but strict standards of control which will preserve that quality of life for present and future generations of Newport Beach residents. Sincerely, West Newport Beach Association Paul K. Watkins, President cc: West Newport Beach Association Board of Directors WN,9WGroup Home I.ssvelUr DR4F1171007.doe 11iCr2 _in rte' L. raw i » nn Jn 'l'R l-. AT]1 Y1 N'I AL,rEltNa'rtv t:s Home Contact Us Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications /Licenses SOBER LIVING Facilities Activities STAFF Profiles LEGAL. Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation wrti ;R House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI/DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Alternatives Program Located in Newport Beach, Orange County California, (close to the Communities of Huntington Beach, Irvine, Costa Mesa Lagune Beach and the South Coast Metro areas), the Alternatives Program* provides carefully monitored treatment programs for alcoholism and drug addiction recovery. At the same time, we play an important role in alternative sentencing programs and work release throughout California and the U.S., by assisting persons needing support and counseling when confronting serious legal issues, job continuation concerns and family maintenance matters. The program is a licensed and State Certified, Court and Probation - approved drug and alcoholism treatment facility. We send monthly progress reports and urinalysis results to the courts and probation Departments, upon request. Established in 1987, we operate a long -term residential treatment facility for alcohol and chemically dependent individuals. We have successfully helped hundreds of clients through our Program, individuals who have remained clean and sober, and who are now productive members in their communities. We have a staff of 40, with varying levels of academic qualifications (MD, Ph. D, MA, CADC, CACDC, CCGC, CEDC, CADE, CATS). We offer a Treatment Program for individuals who need a very Structured and supportive environment. If you are interested in enrolling in one of our alternative sentencing programs, clearing up your record, and avoiding spending time in jail, don't wait. Call us today. Financing available. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address State: -- Select One Phone 1: Problem: -- Select One Type: -- Select One V 1- 840 -6ATOW I'11ZP A'I'MFN'I' RN ATIV RS Home Contact Us Intensive inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative sentencing Drug Testing Certifications /Licenses Sf BI,'R LIVING Facilities Activities STAFF Profiles LEGAL V. All 1: liti V. IN 1. r Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation 0T11t,it House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI/DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Work Release Program The Work Release Program is a highly monitored program that allows the client the opportunity to work and participate in treatment while satisfying the requirements of the court. Clients live in a monitored therapeutic community. Day and evening groups are available as desired or needed. Also available are court progress reports, updates, letters of completion, and drug test results as required by courts and attorneys. "Sober Living individualized my treatment plan so that I could continue working and still get the treatment the courts required." -Paul A. Located in Newport Beach, Orange County California, the Alternatives Program provides carefully monitored treatment programs for alcoholism and drug addiction recovery. Not only do we play an Important role in alternative sentencing programs in Southern California, the Work Release Program allows clients to serve their court- ordered sentence while remaining employed and maintaining frequent contact with their families. This program has been highly successful in helping numerous men and women out of legal troubles and into recovery. The Alternatives Program is a licensed and State Certified, Court and Probation - approved drug and alcoholism treatment facility. We send monthly progress reports and urinalysis results to the courts and probation Departments, upon request. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address State: -- Select One Phone 1: Problem: -- Select One Type: - -Select One UA 2N "M z ., 1 -800- 647 -OOA2 'I'It 1, A'l NI F N'I' A L:rI'?RNA� rIVleS Alternative Sentencing Home Contact Us The Criminal Justice System Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications /Licenses SOBER LIVING Facilities Activities S'I'AFI` Profiles LEGAL Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation OTRER. INFORMATION House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI/DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated There are four aspects of the criminal justice system that shape its philosophy: Retribution, Deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. In this day and age, retribution and incapacitation have become the cry of the innocent and the political platform on which to stand. But do they work? Are they effective? Countless studies have proven that retribution and incapacitation do little if anything at all to deter violent crime and illicit drug use in society. Yet, despite the facts, we as a society continue to focus on incapacitation and retribution. The scales of Lady Justice are unbalanced. Only the right combination of deterrence, rehabilitation, retribution, and incapacitation will balance out the scales of the criminal justice system. For this reason, there is a renewed hope for rehabilitating drug and alcohol offenders confined to jails and prisons throughout America. Today, courts are recognizing the ineffectiveness of incarceration and retribution and leaning more toward Alternative Sentencing Programs in lieu of jail or prison terms. The Orange County Criminal Justice System is keenly aware of incarceration's inability to reform the drug and /or alcohol offender. Orange County's progressive and hopeful attitude toward the success of drug and alcohol rehabilitation makes the Orange County criminal justice system a courageous forerunner of Alternative Sentencing Programs. The Idea Behind Alternative Sentencing Offenders are eligible for Sentencing Services if they are eligible to receive an Intermediate punishment based on their class of offense and prior record level and they face an imminent and substantial threat of imprisonment. Sentencing Services programs develop comprehensive, community -based sentencing plans for eligible offenders. Plans include results of assessments and background investigations, as well as recommendations for the judge to consider such as: • Special probation (split sentence) - short imprisonment or weekends in jail • Probation - regular, intensive or electronic house arrest • Counseling - drug, alcohol, mental health, consumer credit • Volunteer community service • Victim restitution • Employment or vocational training • Education - college, high school or literacy . Ctnvrf sari Rccirlcntial Trontmant • Outpatient treatment V Work Release Treatment • Family Treatment Located in Newport Beach, California, the Alternatives Program is a Court and Probation approved program in Orange County, San Diego County, Los Angeles County, Riverside County and San Bernardino County. We have been approved by criminal courts in San lose, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz. We provide extensive information to any criminal court in the world seeking an alternative approach to incarceration. The Alternatives Program provides carefully monitored treatment programs for alcoholism, drug addiction and dual diagnosis afflictions. Currently, we play an important role in alternative sentencing programs throughout California, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, New Jersey, Utah, Colorado, and Missouri. Most importantly, we assist persons needing support and counseling when confronting serious legal issues, job continuation concerns, professional certification issues and family maintenance matters. SLBTS Alternatives Program is a licensed and State Certified, Court and Probation approved drug and alcoholism treatment facility. We send monthly progress reports and urine analysis results to the courts and probation departments, upon request. We have a staff of 72 personnel with varying levels of academic qualifications to include M.D., Ph. D., J.D., M.A., B.S., B.A., CADC, CACDC, CCGC, CEDC, CADE, CATS and CARS. We have been established since 1986 and have helped hundreds of clients become productive members of their communities. If you are interested in becoming one of the many clients who have avoided serving time in jail and have found a life of recovery, don't wait. Call today. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address : State: -- Select One Phone 1: Problem: -- Select One Comments : Submit Form Type: - -Select One The Alternatives Program is one of the family of programs offered by Sober Living By The sea 12 t 0 CT a :4 ![ 1.800 -647 -0042 11R VAF'SI ENT a L'I "T 11 ,1`Fly FiS Home Contact Us ,ar Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications/Licenses S013FR LIVING Facilities Activities STAFF Profiles I,I GAI. Px11E K r'.V LC. Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense . Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation 0 "r III %R IS\F0RA7 A'rI0.N0 House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI/D W I Restricted License Court- Mandated Choosing an Attorney If you are facing criminal charges in Orange County, and are interested in seeking alternative sentencing, it is important that you choose an attorney who is familiar with the Orange County Courts and with the many sentencing options available to judges. The Alternatives Program has many contacts with distinguished professionals in the legal field such as criminal defense attorneys, family attorneys, bonding companies, and mediators that are able to help you resolve your legal troubles and avoid serving time in jail. All of the attorneys and legal professionals that we work with have excellent rapport with local judges, have years of experience in the field of alternative sentencing, and are very successful at resolving both misdemeanor and felony cases with no jail time served. The Alternatives Program staff has successfully intervened and obtained alternative sentencing for cases involving: • Assault • Domestic Violence • Driving Under the Influence • Possession of a Controlled Substance • Theft • Shoplifting • White Collar Crime and much more Many individuals facing court proceedings are worried about maintaining their confidentiality. The Alternatives Program is aware of this issue and always exercises the utmost discretion when handling clients' cases. We always make certain that our clients' information remains completely confidential. It is important that you understand the charges against you and what the ramifications are of conviction. Our experienced court liaisons and our partnered attorneys will take you through the proceedings and make sure you are well- informed at all times. With the Alternatives Program team on your side, you can minimize the losses suffered by you and your family and avoid spending time in jail. Additionally, the treatment programs available through the Alternatives Program can help you find a clean and sober way of life and you can avoid any future legal troubles. Call us today and let us help you get out of trouble and into recovery. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address : State: -- Select One Phone 1: Problem: -- Select One Comments : Submit Form Type: -- Select One _. ...... The Alternatives Program is one of the family of programs offered by Sober Living By The Sea ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 1- 800 -647 -0042 11R I -A I'. \I FNT A V!, FRN.rrn -r.S Criminal Defense Home Contact US Drug Treatment, Not Jail Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Altemative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications/Licenses SOBER I.IVING Facilities Activities STAFF Profiles LEGAL %AV1%K11'_NL Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation o'rHHR INFORMATION House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI /DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Since November 2000, which marked the passing of California's landmark Proposition 36, thousands drug offenders have been able to attend drug treatment in lieu of being incarcerated. A recent report released by UCLA found that not only is Prop 36 saving California taxpayers money, but the program is yielding excellent results among participants. If you are currently experiencing legal troubles, you may be a candidate for Prop 36 or another diversion program. With our team of court liaisons and our partnered attorneys, many people have been able to avoid criminal prosecution for drug offenses through alternative sentencing and drug diversion programs. When our clients successfully complete our program, alternative sentencing often leads to complete dismissal of charges. The Alternatives Program is a State - licensed, court and probation - approved program. Our alternative sentencing programs all meet state requirements and include the following: • Court Liaisons to appear in court with you • Letters of acceptance in our program • Random or periodic drug testing • Progress reports for judges and probation departments • Program completion and follow -up letters The Alternatives Program staff has years of combined experience in the legal and drug treatment fields as well as numerous contacts within the Orange County Court system, including judges and prosecutors. We are well- suited to helping you resolve your legal problems with a minimum of consequences and to help you find a new way of life, clean and sober and out of jail. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address : State: -- Select One ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 1 -800- 647 -0042 -I•Rr.nI IIENI AI:rI R% \1 11 1 5 Expungement Home contact us Getting It Off Your Record OUR PROGRADis Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certificetions/Licenses SOBER LIVIXG Facilities Activities S "PANT: Profiles LEGAL Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation o"ruER House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI/DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Once you have completed an alternative sentencing program through the Alternatives Program, you may also be eligible to have your record expunged. There are many good reasons to clear your record including application for employment, applying to schools, and for your own personal peace of mind. Upon successful completion of your program, the Alternatives Program staff can work with the Orange County Courts to have your record expunged. This means that all accusations against you will be dismissed and that you will be released from all court- ordered penalties resulting from the offense. It also means that, after expungement, you can truthfully assert that you have not been convicted of that offense. Often times the arrest it self will be wiped from your record. Similarly, no conviction will show up on your record if a potential employer, government agency (with some exceptions), or educational institution conducts a background search of your public records. In many cases, it is possible to have felony convictions reduced to misdemeanors and then they may be expunged. It is also possible to obtain a certificate of rehabilitation, another way for you to clean your record. All of these options are available to you through the Alternatives Program. Call us today and we can help you to decide which course of action is best for you. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address State: Phone 1: Problem: L41171-11THMEW -- Select One -- Select One Type: --Select One ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM - 800 - 647 -0042 1-1r : RN .� N' 1 rF:aN Penal Code 1000 (PC 1000) I n Fa Nome Contact US California Drug Court Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.CH. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications/Licenses SOIL F:H idCING Facilities Activities S'I'A PF Profiles I,I;C, A t. t rr.n Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation oT1IFIt INFOX IA'rioN House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI /DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated The Judicial Council adopted section 36 of the California Standards of Judicial Administration, Guidelines for Diversion Drug Court Programs, effective January 1, 1998, which provides clarification specifically for diversion drug courts under Penal Code section 1000.5. The Diversion program, or commonly referred to as "PC 1000" allows criminal proceedings to be suspended while the defendant participates in a program involving counseling, drug testing, education, or other requirements. If the defendant successfully completes the program, like the Alternatives Program, the criminal charges are dismissed. In addition to these minimum standards, courts are encouraged to look to the nationally accepted guidelines from the National Association of Drug Court Professionals (NADCP) Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components, which elaborate on drug courts' purpose and performance measurements. The guidelines include the following: • Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug- treatment services with justice system processing. • Using a non - adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel promote public safety while protecting participants' due process rights. • Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug court program. • Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug, and other related treatment and rehabilitation services. • Abstinence and use of alcohol and other drugs are monitored by frequent drug testing. At the Alternatives Program, we test every 72 hours. • A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants' compliance. • Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential. • Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness. • Effective drug court operations require continuing interdisciplinary education. • Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and community -based organizations I.e. The Alternatives Program. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 1 -800 -647 -0042 r ISATNI P: N'r A LTF. RNAT IV Es Home Contact Us Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications /Licenses SOBER I.IVINf) Facilities Activities srnrr Profiles 1,EGAI, enrcr<rr•. c�a r. Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession. Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation 01, 1117 It 1 NFORMNFION House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUUDWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Court and Probation There are several possible sentences that may be imposed on convicted drug offenders. At the less severe end of the spectrum, offenders may be court- ordered to pay fines and court costs and then be released. Another possible outcome is for the defendant to be placed on probation. Our staff at the Alternatives Program have a great deal of experience working with clients who are placed on probation and are effective at helping clients meet the terms of their probation. You may ask, "what will happen if I am placed on probation ?" Under normal circumstances, defendants will be required to periodically report to their probation officer who monitors the individual's case and makes sure that individual is remaining crime -free. Clients of the Alternatives Program will get the benefit of having experienced counselors and court liaisons on their side who can provide regular reports to the Probation Department and can assure probation officers and court officials that the client is complying with the court orders. At the end of the probationary period, defendants are usually asked to provide proof that he or she has successfully completed all the terms of their probation. The Alternatives Program, a probation- approved treatment facility, is well- equipped to provide the necessary documentation of program completion and, if necessary, attendance records for court- ordered Alcoholics Anonymous meetings. Another common requirement is for probationers to remain abstinent from drugs and alcohol during their period of probation. As a world -class alcohol and drug treatment facility, the Alternatives Program is especially well- suited to help our clients remain clean and sober. However, if our clients need extra incentive to remain clean, the Alternatives Program conducts a policy of scheduled and random drug testing of all our clients. Probation Departments often require documentation of clean drug tests and we are certainly able to provide that as well. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address : ALTER PR(GRAjkA 1- 800 - 647 -0042 TR Ii A'I -]'1 f. N ACrERN A'FIV ES Home Contact Us Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Living T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications /Licenses SOBER l.IF'ING Facilities Activities ST:\ P P Profiles Lr•.cAI. Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation O'll ER INUORMATION House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI /DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Extended Care The Alternatives Program offers extended care for individuals needing the continued support of treatment specialists, drug and alcohol testing, structured groups and lectures, and a monitored environment. We have 20 years of experience in developing transitional treatments that fit the needs of the individual in recovery. Since we are the leader in transitional recovery, we take pride in our ability to develop programs that help people in recovery slowly and comfortably transition back in to the mainstream of life. Extended Care is designed for individuals who have completed our 90 -day treatment or have received in- patient treatment at another facility. Clients are continually monitored; drug and alcohol tested three times per week and live in a sober environment on or just steps from the beach. In addition, clients attend specialized groups, lectures, and meetings designed to build upon the foundation of recovery they have already established. In addition, the Alternatives Extended Care Program conforms to specific court requirements as needed. Legal issues are addressed and assistance can be provided to aid the individual in any outstanding judicial matters he or she may have incurred before entering treatment. Family Counseling groups are also provided in our extended care program to address family issues and concerns. Kids, parents, loved ones, are all welcome and encouraged to attend the Alternatives Family Program. Individual family counseling can also be provided with one of our many family treatment specialists if desired. Lengths of stay vary according to the individual needs of the client. From long- term aftercare treatment to short-term structured recovery, the Alternatives Extended Care Program provides a safe and structured support system to aid the individual in their transitional process. ALTERNATIVES PROGRAM 1 -800- 647 -0042 :\ L'r 1. R N. k I I\ -I S Home Contact Us a�ux rx.ary n.y is v. Intensive Inpatient Extended Care Transitional Uving T.E.A.C.H. Program Dual Diagnosis Work Release Outpatient Treatment Alternative Sentencing Drug Testing Certifications /Licenses 80RER LIVING Facilities Activities STAVF Profiles LEG:V. EX 1'E It I FN CE. Choosing an Attorney Criminal Defense Drug Court Drug Possession Prop 36 P.C. 1000 Expungement Certificate of Rehabilitation Court and Probation IITIiER House Arrest Electronic Monitoring Orange County Courts DUI /DWI Restricted License Court- Mandated Defending Strike Cases The "Three Strikes" system in California is a sentencing scheme that drastically increases punishment for individuals convicted of repeat offenses. It Is important, if you or someone you love is currently charged with a felony and has prior convictions, that you talk to an experienced attorney about your options and the proper way to defend against a strike case. Under the current system, any person convicted of a felony in California who has already received two or more prior strike convictions will be sentenced to a term of at least 25 years to life in State Prison. Any person convicted of a felony who has one prior strike conviction will be sentenced to a doubled term on the current felony charge. It is important to understand that the current felony does not have to be a violent crime to be counted as the third strike. A strike conviction is a very serious matter and we strongly recommend that you consult an experienced attorney who can provide you with a strong legal defense. When the current felony that an individual is charged with is a drug offense, it is often possible to convince judges and prosecutors to consider drug diversion or other alternative sentencing options. It is always best to attempt such matters with the aid of a qualified legal defense team. Our court liaisons and partnered attorneys have years of experience in the field of criminal defense. If you or someone you love is facing a strike conviction, please call us today. We may be able to help you get your loved one out of jail, and into recovery. Contact us by calling the toll -free number below or by completing the following: Confidential Online Assessment Your First Name: Your Last Name: Email Address State: -- Select One Phone 1: Problem: — Select One Type: -- Select One 10 -Q 1 d10q.htm FORM 10-Q Table of Contents �s3 - 9-P- p7 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10 -Q (Mark One) x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2007 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 333 - 135172 CRC HEALTH CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 73- 1650429 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 20400 Stevens Creek Boulevard, Suite 600, Cupertino, California 95014 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) (877) 272 -8668 (Registrant's telephone number, including area code) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes M No ❑ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non- accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer ❑ Accelerated filer ❑ Non - accelerated filer Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ❑ No There is no market for the registrant's equity. The total number of shares of the registrant's common stock, par value of $0.001 per share, outstanding as of November 12, 2007 was 1,000. CRC HEALTH CORPORATION INDEX Part I. Financial Information rtem 1. Financial Condensed Corvi December 11� La-(,d erations for tWAV� months ended Sputember 30. 200 ?,ad i Y m Part U. Other Information Item IA. Item 5. Item 6. Forward - Looking Statements Page No. 3 4 5 29 36 36 37 37 37 38 39 This Quarterly Report on Form IO-Q, including "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Item 2 of Part I of this Quarterly Report, includes or may include `forward - looking statements. " All statements included herein, other than statements of historical fact, may constitute forward - looking statements. In some cases you can identify forward - looking statements by terminology such as "may, " "should" or "could " Generally, the words "anticipates, " "believes, " "expects, " "intends, " "estimates, " "projects, " `plans" and similar expressions ident fy forward - looking statements. Although CRC Health Corporation ( "CRC') believes that the expectations reflected in such forward - looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to be correct. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward - looking statements include, among others, the following factors: changes in . government reimbursement for CRC's services; our substantial indebtedness; changes in applicable regulations or a government investigation or assertion that CRC has violated applicable regulations; attempts by local residents to force our closure or relocation; the potentially dicult, unsuccessful or costly integration of recently acquired operations and future acquisitions; the potentially dicult, unsuccessful or costly opening and operating of new treatment programs; the possibility that commercial payors for CRC's services may undertake future cost containment initiatives; the limited number of national sunplfers of math., ane used in R 'r oug=knt treatment clinics, the failure to maintain established relationship c �r in qualified healthcare workers; natural disasters such as hurricanes, earthquakes and floods; competition that limits CRC's ability to grow; the potentially costly implementation of new information systems to comply with federal and state initiatives relating to patient privacy, security of medical information and electronic transactions; the potentially costly implementation of accounting and other management systems and resources in response to financial reporting and other requirements; the loss of key members of CRC's management; claims asserted against CRC or lack of adequate available insurance; and certain restrictive covenants in CRC's debt documents and other risks that are described herein, including but not limited to the items discussed in "Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed on April 2, 2007, and that are otherwise described from time to time in CRC's Securities and Exchange Commission filings after this Quarterly Report. CRC assumes no obligation and does not intend to update these forward - looking statements. 2 CRC HEALTH CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS SEPTEMBER 309 2007 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2006 (In thousands, except share amounts) September 30, December 31, 2007 2006 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents $ 3,112 $ 4,206 Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8,951 in 2007 and $8,235 in 2006 34,487 33,805 Prepaid expenses 5,859 7,675 Other current assets 2,448 2,261 Income taxes receivable 11,692 6,496 Deferred income taxes 8,231 7,052 Total current assets 65,829 61,495 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT' -Net 120,541 94,976 GOODWILL 720,650 702,425 INTANGIBLE ASSETS -Net 392,688 400,714 OTHER ASSETS 26,109 29,178 TOTAL ASSETS $ 1,325,817 $ 1,2882788 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable $ 5,788 $ 6,714 Accrued liabilities 24,955 34,827 Current portion of long -term debt 53,816 10,743 Other current liabilities 27,960 27,941 Total current liabilities 112,519 80,225 LONG -TERM DEBT -Less current portion 616,305 615,785 OTHER LONG -TERM LIABILITIES 2,526 5,526 DEFERRED INCOME TAKES 143,420 149,827 Total liabilities 874,770 851,363 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 9) MINORITY INTEREST 544 251 STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY: Common stock, $0.001 par value -1,000 shares authorized; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 Additional paid -in capital 437,337 433,652 Retained earnings 13,166 3,522 Total stockholder's equity 450,503 437,174 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY $ 1,325,817 $ 1,288,788 See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. CRC HEALTH CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 309 2007 (SUCCESSOR), THREE AND EIGHT MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 309 2006 (SUCCESSOR) AND ONE MONTH ENDED JANUARY 319 2006 (PREDECESSOR) (In thousands) NET REVENUE: Net client service revenue Other revenue Net revenue OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and benefits Supplies, facilities and other operating costs Provision for doubtful accounts Depreciation and amortization Acquisition related costs Total operating expenses INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS INTEREST EXPENSE, NET OTHER FINANCING COSTS OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT) MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME OF A Three Nine Three Eight Months Months Months Months Ended Ended Ended Ended September 30, September 30, September 30, September 30, 2007 2007 2006 2006 $ 120,623 $ 341,489 $ 64,290 $ 163,071 1,746 4,603 17210 3,163 122,369 346,092 65,500 166,234 (44,971) (11,184) 55,443 167,131 30,397 77,262 36,557 100,677 17,698 44,413 2,036 5,064 1,176 3,295 5,397 16,310 2,320 6,246 99,433 289,182 51,591 131,216 22,936 56,910 13,909 35,018 (15,169) (44,971) (11,184) (28,099) (1,217) (800) (1,544) (34) 6,550 1,502 11,139 3,375 1,181 742 6,885 3,694 Predecessor One Month Ended January 31, 2006 $ 19,360 490 19,850 9,265 4,561 285 361 43,710 58,182 (38,332) (2,505) (10,655) 55 (51,437) (12,444) SUBSIDIARY NET INCOME (LASS) 427 275 $ 4,621 $ 7,489 $ 439 $ 3,191 See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. 4 $ (38,993) CRC HEALTH CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 (SUCCESSOR), EIGHT MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 309 2006 (SUCCESSOR) AND ONE MONTH ENDED JANUARY 319 2006 (PREDECESSOR) (In thousands) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Successor Nine Months Eight Months Predecessor One Month Ended Ended Ended September 30, September 30, January 31, 2007 2006 2006 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income (loss) $ 7,489 $ 3,191 $ (38,993) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization Write -off of debt discount and capitalized 16,310 6,246 361 financing costs — — 10,655 Amortization of debt discount and capitalized financing costs 3,356 1,982 162 Loss (gain) on interest rate swap agreement 744 15 (55) Gain on disposition of property (10) (36) (1) Provision for doubtful accounts 5,064 3,295 285 Stock -based compensation 3,203 2,586 17,666 Deferred income taxes 3,747 (391) — Minority interest 275 — — Changes in current assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (5,745) (7,962) (1,271) Income taxes receivable (2,605) 3,841 (9,041) Accounts payable (926) 26 (2,997) Accrued liabilities (10,037) (24,832) 25,641 Income taxes payable — — (3,384) Other working capital accounts (3,578) 5,695 842 Other assets and liabilities 832 (39) 1,331 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 18,119 (6,383) 1,201 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Additions of property and equipment (24,239) (7,115) (316) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 67 36 1 Acquisition of business, net of cash acquired (33,602) (36,626) . — Prior period acquisition adjustments 979 (14) — Payment of purchase price to former shareholders — (429,190) — Net cash used in investing activities (56,795) (472,909) 315 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Equity contribution from Bain Capital — 294,475 — Capital contributed by parent 500 — — Payment of transaction related costs — (5,354) — Stock options exercised — — 7 Debt financing costs (611) (22,981) (547) Net borrowings (repayments) under revolving line of credit 41,900 27,500 (5,000) Proceeds from issuances of long -term debt — 442,022 — Repayment of long -term debt (4,207) (255,200) — Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 37,582 480,462 5,540 NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (1,094) 1,170 (4,654) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period 4,206 423 5,077 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS —End of period $ 3,112 $ 1,593 $ 423 SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Payable in conjunction with the addition of property and equipment $ — $ 225 $ 95 Payable in conjunction with acquisition contingent consideration $ 4,625 $ 1,744 $ — SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Cash paid for interest $ 47,342 $ 22,652 $ 1,336 Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds $ 2,235 7'225 $ — See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements. Table of Contents l I D►\ 11� 1 .7�71�_It C17�1 NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) ORGANIZATION CRC Health Corporation (the "Company" or "We') is a wholly owned subsidiary of CRC Health Group, Inc. referred to as (the "Group') or (the "Parent "). The Company is headquartered in Cupertino, California and through its wholly owned subsidiaries provides substance abuse treatment services and youth treatment services in the United States. The Company also provides treatment services for other addiction diseases and behavioral disorders such as eating disorders. The Company delivers its substance abuse and behavioral disorder treatment services through residential and outpatient treatment facilities, which we refer to as our residential and outpatient treatment divisions. We deliver our youth treatment services through our residential schools, wilderness programs and weight loss programs, which we refer to as our youth treatment division. As of September 30, 2007, we operated 107,residential wd outpatient treatment facilities in 23 states and treated approximately 26,615 vati is . As of September 30, 2007, our youth treatment division operated programs at 38 facilities in 13 states and one in the United Kingdom. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation —The date of the Bain Merger (see Note 3) was February 6, 2006 but for accounting purposes and to coincide with its normal financial closing, the Company has utilized February 1, 2006 as the effective date. As a result, the Company has reported operating results and financial position for all periods presented prior to February 1, 2006 as those of the Predecessor Company ( "Predecessor ") and for all periods from and subsequent to February 1, 2006 as those of the Successor Company ( "Successor") due to the resulting change in the basis of accounting. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ( "GAAP ") and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC ") applicable for interim financial information. The Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CRC Health Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, and, for the periods through January 31, 2006, CRC Health Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company, its results of operations, and its cash flows. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006. , Use of Estimates —The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB ") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment to FASB Statement No. 115 ("SFAS 159 "). SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use fair value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available- for -sale and held -to- maturity securities, equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. Other eligible items include firm commitments for financial instruments that would otherwise not be recognized at inception and non -cash warranty obligations where a warrantor is permitted to pay a third party to provide the warranty goods or services. If fair value is elected, any upfront costs and fees related to the item must be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue costs. The fair value election is irrevocable and may generally be made on an instrument -by- instrument basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to fair value. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and is required to be adopted by the Company in the first quarter 2008. The Company is currently determining whether fair value is appropriate for any of its eligible items and cannot estimate the impact, if any, which SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated results of operations and financial condition. R In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ( "SFAS 15T). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute; however SFAS 157 does not apply to SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share -Based Payment ( "SFAS 123(8) "). SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. SFAS 157 is required to be adopted by the Company on January 1, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on its financial statements. The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ("FIN 48 ") on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income taxx law recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. See Note 7 for additional information, including the effects of adoption on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. 3. ACQUISITIONS 2007Acquisitions In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company completed four acquisitions and paid total cash consideration of approximately $32.7 million, including acquisition related expenses. The acquisitions are intended to provide expansion of its residential and youth services into new geographic regions in the United States. The Company recorded $23.5 million of goodwill, of which $22.4 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Goodwill assigned to the Residential and Youth treatment segments was $21.9 million and $ Lb million, respectively. The acquisitions were accounted for as a purchase in accordance with SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations. Under purchase accounting the purchase price for each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. The purchase price was allocated using the information currently available. As a result, the Company may adjust the allocation of the purchase consideration as we obtain more information regarding the asset valuations, liabilities assumed and purchase price adjustments. The Company has included the acquired entities' results of operations in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations from the date of the acquisition. Pro forma results of operations have not been presented because the effect of the acquisitions was not material. Prior Period Acquisitions In connection with an acquisition which closed in October 2005, the Company is obligated to make certain additional payments of up to $2.0 million upon the achievement of certain performance milestones. As of September 30, 2007, the entity has achieved the second year performance milestones and as a result the Company recorded additional goodwill and a liability of $2.0 million. Payment was made by the Company in the fourth quarter of 2007. Certain acquisition agreements acquired in the Aspen Acquisition (as defined below) contain contingent earnout provisions that provide for additional consideration to be paid to the sellers if the results of the acquired entity's operations exceed negotiated benchmarks. As of September 30, 2007, four of the entities exceeded the benchmarks, the Youth treatment segment recorded additional goodwill and a liability of $4.5 million of which $1.9 million was incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2007. The additional consideration consists of a combination of cash and notes payable issued to the seller. During the three months ended September 30, 2007, the Company paid $1.8 million under the contingent eamout arrangements and expects the remaining cash payments to be made in the first quarter of 2008. Aspen AequisWon— In November 2006, the Company acquired substantially all the outstanding capital stock of Aspen Education Group, Inc., a California corporation ( "Aspen Education Group"), which is referred to as the Aspen Acquisition, for approximately $272.6 million in cash purchase price consideration, the assumption of approximately $20.6 million of indebtedness as defined per the merger agreement (includes the buy -out of minority interest of $4.2 million), and the payment of costs associated with the acquisition and the related financing of approximately $1.6 million and $10.8 million, respectively. Aspen Education Group provides educational services to youth who have demonstrated behavioral issues that have interfered with their performance in school and life. Aspen Education Group offers its programs through its residential division (boarding schools), outdoor division (outdoor education programs) and healthy living division (weight management programs for children and teenagers). Among other benefits, the Aspen Acquisition offers multiple revenue and cost synergies. The Aspen Acquisition further enhances the Company's private pay mix and business diversification, thereby reducing business risk from any one aspect of the Company's operations. In addition, the Company is expected to benefit from increased cross - referral opportunities. 7 The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, the purchase consideration was allocated to the assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values. The consideration remaining was allocated to the Company's intangible assets with finite lives and is being amortized over that life, as well as to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives, which will be evaluated on at least an annual basis to determine impairment and adjusted accordingly. Bain Merger —On February 6, 2006, investment funds managed by Bain Capital Partners, LLC ( "Bain Capital ") acquired CRC Health Group for a total cash consideration of approximately $742.3 million (including acquisition and financing transactions related fees and expenses of $28.5 million). As a result of the acquisition, Bain Capital received control of the Company. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, the purchase consideration was allocated to the assets and liabilities based on their relative fair values. The consideration remaining was allocated to the Company's intangible assets with finite lives and is being amortized over that life, as well as to goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives, which will be evaluated on at least an annual basis to determine impairment and adjusted accordingly. 4. BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS Balance sheet components at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consist of the following (in thousands): September 30, December 31, 2007 2006 Other assets: Capitalized financing costs —net $ 24,374 $ 26,899 Deposits 895 1,078 Note receivable and accrued interest 840 1,201 Total other assets $ 26,109 $ 29,178 Accrued liabilities: Accrued payroll and related expenses $ 7,271 $ 13,227 Accrued vacation 5,944 5,376 Accrued interest 4,051 9,288 Accrued expenses 7,689 6,936 Total accrued liabilities $ 24,955 $ 34,827 Other current liabilities: Deferred revenue $ 17,713 $ 15,343 Other liabilities 4,258 5,434 Client deposits 5,051 4,347 Interest rate swap liability 635 — Insurance premium financing 303 2,817 Total other current liabilities $ 27,960 $ 27,941 Accounts receivable: Accounts receivable $ 43,438 $ 42,040 Less allowance for doubtful accounts (8,951) (8,235) Accounts receivable —net $ 34,487 $ 33,805 5. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consists of the following (in thousands): Land Building and improvements Leasehold improvements Furniture and fixtures Computer equipment Computer software Motor vehicles Field equipment Construction in progress Less accumulated depreciation Property and equipment-net September 30, 2007 $ 21,323 47,547 19,026 9,011 7,044 4,346 4,709 2,046 18,940 133,992 (13,451) $ 120,541 December 31, 2006 $ 19,031 41,886 12,011 7,074 5,766 3,078 3,687 1,423 6,208 100,164 (5,188) $ 94,976 Depreciation expense was $2.7 million and $8.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, $1.2 million and $3.2 million for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 and $0.3 million for the one month ended January 31, 2006, respectively 6. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS Changes to goodwill by segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 are as follows (in thousands): Goodwill - December 31, 2006 Goodwill additions (Other Acquisitions) Goodwill additions related to earnouts Goodwill adjustments related to purchase price allocations Goodwill - September 30, 2007 Residential Outpatient Youth Total $ 267,631 $ 208,179 $226,615 $702,425 21,942 - 1,611 23,553 2,000 - 4,471 6,471 (2,940) (2,678) (6,181) 1( 1,799) $ 288,633 $ 205,501 $226,516 $720,650 The goodwill additions for the Other Acquisitions relate to the acquisitions completed in the current and prior fiscal year. The goodwill adjustments are for the prior fiscal year Other Acquisitions and Aspen Acquisition and relate primarily to revisions of the original estimates. Intangible assets at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consist of the following (in thousands): Amortization September 30, December 31, Lives 2007 2006 Intangible assets subject to amortization: Referral network 20 years $ 45,400 $ 45,400 Accreditation 20 years 24,400 24,400 Curriculum 20 years 9,000 9,000 Government, including Medicaid, contracts 15 years 35,600 35,600 Managed care contracts 10 years 14,400 14,400 Core developed technology 5 years 2,704 2,704 Covenants not to compete 3 years 152 152 Registration rights 2 years 200 200 Student contracts 1 year 2,241 2,241 Less: accumulated amortization (12,955) (4,929) Total intangible assets subject to amortization 121,142 129,168 Intangible assets not subject to amortization: Trademarks and trade names 183,725 183,725 Certificates of need 44,600 44,600 Licenses 43,221 43,221 Total intangible assets not subject to amortization 271,546 271,546 Total intangible assets $ 392,688 $ 400,714 E Table of Contents Amortization expense of intangible assets subject to amortization was $2.7 million and $8.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, $1.1 million and $3.1 million for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 and $0.02 million for the one month ended January 31, 2006, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense related to the amortizable intangible assets at September 30, 2007 is as follows (in thousands): I W771 W 2007 (remaining 3 months) $ 2,395 2008 8,318 2009 8,293 2010 8,293 2011 7,798 Thereafter 86,045 Total $121,142 7. INCOME TAXES The Company determines income tax expense for interim periods by applying the use of the full year's estimated effective tax rate in financial statements for interim periods. The estimated effective annual income tax rate is 40.2 %. The income tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 was $1.5 million and $3.4 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 229% and 30.3 %, respectively. The effective income tax rates for the three and nine month periods were positively affected by the release of $1.1 million of tax reserve under FIN 48 during the third quarter as further discussed below. The income tax expense for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 was $0.7 million and $3.7 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 62.8% and 53.7 %, respectively. The income tax benefit for the one month ended January 31, 2006 was $12.4 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of 24.2 %. The tax benefit for the one month ended January 31, 2006 was primarily the result of $31.9 million of acquisition - related expenses that are deductible for tax purposes. The effective tax rate for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 includes a benefit of $0.1 million due to a reversal of net deferred tax liabilities resulting from the adoption of a new Texas state law. During the second quarter of 2007 a study of the deductibility of transaction costs incurred in connection with the Aspen Acquisition was completed. As a result of the study the Company revised its previous estimate of the amount of acquisition related expenses that are expected to be tax deductible by $1.8 million. This resulted in an increase in 2006 net operating losses ( "NOL's ") which can be carried back to offset income in prior years. An income tax receivable of $0.7 million and a corresponding decrease in goodwill associated with Aspen Acquisition was recorded in the second quarter to reflect changes in the previously estimated deductible transaction costs. During the third quarter, the Company recorded an income tax receivable of $3.3 million with an offset to goodwill based on the tax return filed associated with the preacquisition earnings of Aspen. During the third quarter of 2007 a separate study of the deductibility of transaction costs incurred in connection with the Bain Merger was completed. As a result of the study the Company revised its previous estimate of the amount of acquisition related expenses that are expected to be tax deductible by $15.8 million, which correspondingly increased the NOL's for 2006. The Company carried back $6.0 million of the 2006 increase in NOL's to offset income in the prior years and recorded an income tax receivable of $1.7 million. In addition, $9.8 million of NOL's were carried forward to future years. A deferred tax asset of $4.1 million was recognized to reflect the expected benefit of those carryforwards. The Company reduced goodwill associated with Bain Merger in the amount of $5.8 million during the third quarter to reflect the changes to previously estimated tax amounts recorded in purchase Accounting. Adoption of New Accounting Policy The Company adopted the provisions of FIN 48 on January I, 2007. The cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48 was a decrease in tax reserves of $1.5 million and an increase of $2.2 million to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. Upon adoption, the liability for income taxes associated with uncertain tax positions at January 1, 2007 was $2.1 million. This liability can be reduced by $0.2 million of offsetting tax benefits associated with the correlative effects of potential state income taxes and other timing adjustments. The net amount of $1.9 million, if recognized, would favorably affect the Company's effective tax rate. In addition, consistent with the provisions of FIN 48, the Company reclassified $0.7 million of income tax liabilities from current to non- cuttent liabilities because payment of cash is not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date. These non - current income tax liabilities are recorded in other liabilities in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. 10 The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax audits by taxing authorities for years through 2003. As a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations, the Company released an income tax reserve of $1.1 million under FIN 48. During the second quarter of 2007, the Company recorded a FIN 48 liability in the amount of $0.4 million associated with transaction costs incurred in connection with the Aspen Acquisition. During the current quarter the Company considered the need for a FIN 48 reserve for transaction costs incurred during the Bain Merger and concluded none was necessary. & LONG -TERM DEBT Long -term debt at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 consists of the following (in thousands): Term Loans and Revolving Line of Credit —On November 17, 2006, the Company amended and restated the Credit Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement"). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for financing of $419.3 million in senior secured term loans and $100.0 million of revolving credit. Effective April 16, 2007, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 ( "Amendment") that amends the Company's Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Per the Amendment, the Term Loan interest is payable quarterly at 90 day London Interbank Offered Rate ( "LIBOR") plus 2.25% per annum (previously 2.50% per annum); provided that on and after such time the Company's corporate rating from Moody's is at least B 1 then the interest is payable quarterly at 90 day LIBOR plus 2.0% per annum. Term Loan Aggregate commitment of $419.3 million matures on February 6, 2013. The term loan is payable in quarterly principal installments of $1.05 million per quarter through December 31, 2012, and the remainder on February 6, 2013. Interest is payable quarterly at 90 day LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum (7.48% at September 30, 2007). The principal balance outstanding at September 30, 2007 was $415.1 million. Revolving Line of Credit ("Revolver')— Maximum borrowings not to exceed $100.0 million. At the Company's option, interest is currently payable at LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum or monthly at the Base Rate (defined as the higher of (a) the prime rate or (b) the overnight federal funds rate plus 50 basis points) plus 1.50% per annum. Principal is payable at the Company's discretion based on available operating cash balances. The revolving line of credit commitment expires on February 6, 2012. At September 30, 2007, there was $45.5 million of principal balance outstanding under the Revolver, the Company classified this on the Balance Sheets as Current portion of long -term debt. The Company had historically and currently intends to make payments to reduce borrowing under the revolver from operating cash flow. In addition, the Company expects that future financings will serve not only to partially fund acquisitions but also to repay all or part of any outstanding revolver balances then outstanding. September 30, December 31, 2007 2006 Term loans $ 415,083 $ 418,227 Revolving line of credit 45,500 3,600 Senior subordinated notes, net of discount of $2,483 197,518 197,295 Seller notes 11,959 7,145 Capital lease obligations 61 261 Total long -term debt 670,121 626,528 Less: current portion (53,816) 10,743) Long -term debt —less current portion $ 616,305 $ 615,785 Term Loans and Revolving Line of Credit —On November 17, 2006, the Company amended and restated the Credit Agreement (the "Amended and Restated Credit Agreement"). The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement provides for financing of $419.3 million in senior secured term loans and $100.0 million of revolving credit. Effective April 16, 2007, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 ( "Amendment") that amends the Company's Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. Per the Amendment, the Term Loan interest is payable quarterly at 90 day London Interbank Offered Rate ( "LIBOR") plus 2.25% per annum (previously 2.50% per annum); provided that on and after such time the Company's corporate rating from Moody's is at least B 1 then the interest is payable quarterly at 90 day LIBOR plus 2.0% per annum. Term Loan Aggregate commitment of $419.3 million matures on February 6, 2013. The term loan is payable in quarterly principal installments of $1.05 million per quarter through December 31, 2012, and the remainder on February 6, 2013. Interest is payable quarterly at 90 day LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum (7.48% at September 30, 2007). The principal balance outstanding at September 30, 2007 was $415.1 million. Revolving Line of Credit ("Revolver')— Maximum borrowings not to exceed $100.0 million. At the Company's option, interest is currently payable at LIBOR plus 2.50% per annum or monthly at the Base Rate (defined as the higher of (a) the prime rate or (b) the overnight federal funds rate plus 50 basis points) plus 1.50% per annum. Principal is payable at the Company's discretion based on available operating cash balances. The revolving line of credit commitment expires on February 6, 2012. At September 30, 2007, there was $45.5 million of principal balance outstanding under the Revolver, the Company classified this on the Balance Sheets as Current portion of long -term debt. The Company had historically and currently intends to make payments to reduce borrowing under the revolver from operating cash flow. In addition, the Company expects that future financings will serve not only to partially fund acquisitions but also to repay all or part of any outstanding revolver balances then outstanding. From time to time the Revolver may include one or more swing line loans at the Base Rate or one or more letters of credit ( "LCs'). At September 30, 2007, there was no outstanding balance on the swing line loans. LCs outstanding at September 30, 2007 was $5.6 million with interest payable quarterly at 2.50% per annum. The LCs secure various liability and workers' compensation policies in place for the Company and its subsidiaries. 11 Senior Subordinated Notes — Concurrent with the Bain Merger, the Company issued $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of 10 3/4% Senior Subordinated Notes (the "Notes ") due February 1, 2016. Interest is payable semiannually beginning August 1, 2006. The Notes were issued at a price of 98.511 %, resulting in $3.0 million of original issue discount. The Company may redeem some or all of the Notes on or prior to February 1, 2011 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Notes redeemed plus a "make - whole" premium or at the redemption prices set forth in the indenture governing the Notes. The Company may also redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes using the proceeds of one or more equity offerings completed before February 1, 2009. If there is a change of control as specified in the indenture, the Company must offer to repurchase the Notes. The Notes are subordinated to all of the Company's existing and future senior indebtedness, rank equally with all of the Company's existing and future senior subordinated indebtedness and rank senior to all of the Company's existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated basis by all of the Company's subsidiaries. Seller Notes — Represents notes payable for amounts owed by Aspen Education Group arising out of achievement of certain earn out obligations per the terns of the underlying purchase agreements and to fund acquisitions made by Aspen Education Group prior to the acquisition of Aspen Education Group by the Company. Interest rates on these notes range from 6.75% to 10.25% per annum. Principal and interest are payable quarterly through January 2012. Capital Leases — Principal and interest are payable monthly at various dates through September 2011. Interest rates range from 5.00% to 12.20% per annum. Interest expense on total debt was $15.2 million and $45.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, $11.2 million and $28.2 million for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 and $2.5 million for the one month ended January 31, 2006, respectively. Interest income was approximately $0.05 million and $0.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, $0.03 million and $0.06 million in the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 and $0.0 million for the one month ended January 31, 2006. 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation —The Company is involved in litigation and regulatory investigations arising in the ordinary course of its business. After consultation with legal counsel, management estimates that these matters will be resolved without material adverse effect on the Company's future financial position or results from operations and cash flows. 10. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY Common Stock The Company's Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation authorizes the Company to issue 1,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock, all of which are issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and are held by the Group. Voting —Each share of common stock is entitled, on all matters submitted for a vote or the consent of the holders of shares of common stock, to one vote. Capital Contributed by Parent In November, 2006, the Company received a capital contribution of $135.7 million from the Group to fund the Aspen Acquisition. The Group funded such capital contributions by a combination of $36.2 million resulting from the sale of its equity securities to certain of the Group's equity holders and by the issuance of a PIK loan of $105.0 million issued at 1% original issue discount for net proceeds of $103.9 million. The Group incurred $4.5 million of financing costs in connection with the issuance of the PIK loan which was treated as a reduction in the capital contribution. The interest payable per annum for the PIK loan is 180 day LIBOR plus 7.0% per annum for the first year, 180 day LIBOR plus 7.5% per annum for the second year and 180 day LIBOR plus 8.0% per annum for the years thereafter until the maturity date. Per the PIK loan agreement, the interest is accrued through an increase in the principal amount. The aggregate principal amount inclusive of the accrued interest matures on November 17, 2013. This senior unsecured PIK loan is not guaranteed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In August 2007, the Company received a capital contribution of $0.5 million from the Group. The Group funded the capital contribution with the proceeds from the sale of equity securities. 12 11. STOCK -BASED COMPENSATION EXPENSE Adoption of New Accounting Policy On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 123(8) using the prospective transition method, which requires the application of the accounting standard to awards granted, modified or settled subsequent to the date of adoption. Results from prior periods have not been restated. The Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 and the one month ended January 31, 2006 reflects the effect of SFAS 123(8). Stock option -based compensation expense related to employee stock options granted by the Group subsequent to the date of adoption recognized under SFAS 123(8) was $1.1 million and $3.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, $1.0 million and $2.6 million for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for stock - based compensation expense was $0.4 million and $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and $0.4 million and $1.1 million for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. There was no stock option -based compensation expense recognized in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 and one month ended January 31, 2006 related to the options granted prior to the date of adoption of SFAS 123(8). Stock option -based compensation expense of $17.7 million and tax benefit of $7.3 million was recognized in the 2006 Predecessor Company consolidated statement of operations and is included in the acquisition related costs. Stock Option Plans On February 6, 2006, following the Bain Merger, Group adopted the 2006 Executive Incentive Plan and 2006 Management Incentive Plan, or the "Executive Plan" and the "Management Plan," respectively. In September 2007, Group amended the 2006 Executive Incentive Plan to provide that any unvested Tranche 3 Options — options that vest over a S year period upon the Company's EBITDA reaching certain levels — vest upon the first anniversary of an initial public offering, each six month anniversary thereafter or the date of a sale transaction if the value per unit (nine shares of Class A and one share of Class L) equals or exceeds $360 on such date. In September 2007, Group adopted the 2007 Incentive Stock Option Plan or the ("2007 Incentive Plan") and collectively, with the Executive Plan and the Management Plan, the ( "Plans. ") The 2007 Incentive Plan is mirrored after the Executive Plan. The Plans provide for the granting of stock options to the Company's key employees, directors, consultants and advisors. Options granted under the Plans may be either incentive stock options or non - incentive stock options. Options granted under the Plans represent units. One unit consists of nine shares of class A and one share of class L common stock of the Group. 13 The Company estimated the fair value of share based payments awards using a Black - Scholes valuation model for Management Plan grants and tranche 1 of the Executive Plan grants. A Monte Carlo simulation approach was used to determine the fair value of the Executive Plan tranche 2 and tranche 3 awards. The following assumptions were used to calculate the weighted average fair value of employee stock options granted during the periods presented below. Weighted- average estimated fair value of units granted Expected volatility — tranche 1 and management awards Expected volatility — tranche 2 Expected volatility — tranche 3 Risk -free interest rate Expected term — tranche 1 and management awards in years Expected term — tranche 2 in years Expected term — tranche 3 in years Expected dividend to be paid over the option period Estimated forfeiture rate over the effective vesting period Weighted - average estimated fair value of units granted Expected volatility — tranche 1 management awards Expected volatility — tranche 2 Expected volatility — tranche 3 Risk -free interest rate Expected term — tranche 1 and management awards in years Expected term — tranche 2 in years Expected term — tranche 3 in years Expected dividend to be paid over the option period Estimated forfeiture rate over the effective vesting period Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 $ 54.52 45.3% 54.3% 54.3% 4.18% Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 $ 53.50 56.6% 56.6% 56.6% 4.85% 6.33 5.00 5.02 6.25 6.01 5.00 0.00 $ 0.00 5% 5% Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 $ 54.91 46.7% 54.6% 49.7% 4.65% 6.33 5.24 6.22 $ 0.00 5% Eight Months Ended September 30, 2006 $ 53.30 56.5% 56.5% 56.5% 4.81% 5% As of September 30, 2007, $18.9 million of total unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.9 years. Activity under the Executive and Management Plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is set forth below: Weighted - Weighted- Average Average Remaining 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS In connection with the Bain Merger, Bain Capital and the Company's management entered into a stockholders agreement. The stockholders agreement contains agreements among the parties with respect to the election of the Company's directors and the directors of the Company's direct parent company, restrictions on the issuance or transfer of shares, including tag -along rights and drag -along rights, other special corporate governance provisions (including the right to approve various corporate actions), registration rights (including customary indemnification provisions) and call options. Three of the Company's directors are employees of Bain Capital, the Company's principal shareholder. Upon the consummation of the Bain Merger, the Company entered into a management agreement with an affiliate of Bain Capital pursuant to which such entity or its affiliates will provide management services. Pursuant to such agreement, an affiliate of Bain Capital receives an aggregate annual management fee of $2.0 million and reimbursement for out -of- pocket expenses and any additional fees incurred in connection with the provision of services pursuant to the agreement. In addition, pursuant to such agreement, an affiliate of Bain Capital also received aggregate transaction fees of approximately $7.2 million in connection with services provided by such entity related to the Bain Merger. Of the $7.2 million, approximately $2.9 million were for acquisition related expenses and $4.3 million were for financing related expenses which are capitalized and recorded in other assets. The management agreement has a five year, evergreen term, however, in certain circumstances, such as an initial public offering or change of control of the Group, the Company may terminate the management agreement and buy out its remaining obligations under the agreement to Bain Capital and affiliates. In addition, the management agreement provides that an affiliate of Bain Capital may receive fees in connection with certain subsequent financing and acquisition transactions. The management agreement includes customary indemnification provisions in favor 14 Exercise Contractual Options Price Term (in shares) Per Share (In Years) Options outstanding at December 31, 2006 6,310,558 9.02 4.81 Activity from January 1 through September 30, 2007 Granted 1,281,023 7.76 4.30 Exercised — — — Forfeited/cancelled/expired 165114 9.93 — Outstanding— September 30, 2007 7,426,467 S 7.76 4.30 Exercisable -- September 30, 2007 2,248,050 $ 4.24 4.30 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS In connection with the Bain Merger, Bain Capital and the Company's management entered into a stockholders agreement. The stockholders agreement contains agreements among the parties with respect to the election of the Company's directors and the directors of the Company's direct parent company, restrictions on the issuance or transfer of shares, including tag -along rights and drag -along rights, other special corporate governance provisions (including the right to approve various corporate actions), registration rights (including customary indemnification provisions) and call options. Three of the Company's directors are employees of Bain Capital, the Company's principal shareholder. Upon the consummation of the Bain Merger, the Company entered into a management agreement with an affiliate of Bain Capital pursuant to which such entity or its affiliates will provide management services. Pursuant to such agreement, an affiliate of Bain Capital receives an aggregate annual management fee of $2.0 million and reimbursement for out -of- pocket expenses and any additional fees incurred in connection with the provision of services pursuant to the agreement. In addition, pursuant to such agreement, an affiliate of Bain Capital also received aggregate transaction fees of approximately $7.2 million in connection with services provided by such entity related to the Bain Merger. Of the $7.2 million, approximately $2.9 million were for acquisition related expenses and $4.3 million were for financing related expenses which are capitalized and recorded in other assets. The management agreement has a five year, evergreen term, however, in certain circumstances, such as an initial public offering or change of control of the Group, the Company may terminate the management agreement and buy out its remaining obligations under the agreement to Bain Capital and affiliates. In addition, the management agreement provides that an affiliate of Bain Capital may receive fees in connection with certain subsequent financing and acquisition transactions. The management agreement includes customary indemnification provisions in favor 14 of Bain Capital and its affiliates. The Company under this agreement paid management fees of $0.5 million and $1.5 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, $0.5 million and $1.3 million for the three and eight months ended September 30, 2006, respectively, which is included in supplies, facilities and other operating costs. In addition, under a separate management agreement with two of the former stockholders of the Predecessor Company, the Predecessor Company paid management fees of $0.1 million during the one month ended January 31, 2006, which is included in supplies, facilities and other operating costs. This agreement was terminated as part of the Bain Merger. In connection with the closing of the Bain Merger on February 6, 2006, and pursuant to a rollover and subscription agreement, certain members of the Company's management converted options to purchase stock of the Predecessor Company into options to purchase stock of the Group with an aggregate value of $9.1 million. In connection with the closing of the Aspen Acquisition and pursuant to a rollover and subscription agreement, certain employees of Aspen converted options to purchase stock of Aspen Education Group into options to purchase stock of the Group with an aggregate value of $1.8 million. 15 13. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION As of September 30, 2007, the Company had outstanding $200.0 million aggregate principal amount of Notes due 2016. The Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed, jointly and severally on an unsecured senior subordinated basis, by substantially all of the Company's subsidiaries. The following supplemental tables present unaudited condensed consolidating balance sheets for the Company and its subsidiary guarantors as of September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, the unaudited condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), three and eight months ended September 30, 2006 (Successor) and one month ended January 31, 2006 (Predecessor), and the unaudited condensed consolidating statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 (Successor), eight months ended September 30, 2006 (Successor) and one month ended January 31, 2006 (Predecessor). 16 Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2007 (In thousands) ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable -net of allowance Prepaid expenses Other current assets Income taxes receivable Deferred income taxes Total current assets PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - Net GOODWILL INTANGIBLE ASSETS -Net OTHER ASSETS INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES - At cost TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Current portion of long -tern debt Other current liabilities Total current liabilities LONG -TERM DEBT -Less current portion OTHER LONG -TERM LIABILITIES DEFERRED INCOME TAXES Total liabilities MINORITY INTEREST STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY: Common stock Additional paid -in capital(') (Accumulated deficit) Retained earnings Total stockholder's equity TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CRC 7,897 Subsidiary 1,619 Health Subsidiary Non - 93,941 Corporation Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated $ - $ 2,724 $ 388 $ - $ 3,112 1 33,795 691 34,487 2,270 3,528 61 5,859 19 2,413 16 2,448 11,189 503 11,692 7,052 1,179 8,231 20,531 44,142 1,156 - 65,829 5,291 113,354 1,896 120,541 720,650 720,650 392,688 392,688 24,449 1,645 15 26,109 615,609 615,609 $ 665,880 $1,272,479 $ 3,067 $ 615,609) $ 1,325,817 $ 3,273 $ 2,428 $ 8,266 15,543 49,693 4,123 2,954 24,104 _ 64,186 46,198 608,408 7,897 907 1,619 105,193 38,227 778,694 93,941 112,814 84 87 $ - $ 5,788 1,146 24,955 53,816 902 27,960 2,135 - 112,519 616,305 2,526 143,420 2,135 - 874,770 460 544 (93,633) 1,144,420 2,159 (615,609) 437,337 19,181) 34,034 (1,687) 13,166 112,814 1,178,454 472 615,609 450,503 STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY $ 665,880 $1,272,479 $ 3,067 $ 6( 15,609) $ 1,325,817 (1) Includes intercompany balances 17 Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2006 (In thousands) TOTAL LIABILITIES AND CRC Subsidiary Health Subsidiary Non - Corporation Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS: Cash and cash equivalents $ - $ 4,167 $ 39 $ - $ 4,206 Accounts receivable -net of allowance 4 33,309 492 33,805 Prepaid expenses 3,977 3,676 22 7,675 Other current assets 152 2,096 13 2,261 Income taxes receivable 6,110 386 6,496 Deferred income taxes 5,873 1,179 7,052 Total current assets 16,116 44,813 566 - 61,495 PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT - Net 4,258 89,835 883 94,976 GOODWILL 702,425 702,425 INTANGIBLE ASSETS -Net 43 400,671 400,714 OTHER ASSETS 26,953 2,205 20 29,178 INVESTMENT IN SUBSIDIARIES - At cost 577,739 5( 77,739) TOTAL ASSETS $ 625,109 $1,239,949 $ 1,469 $ 577,739 $ 1,288,788 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES: Accounts payable $ 3,990 $ 2,662 $ 62 $ - $ 6,714 Accrued liabilities 13,473 20,544 810 34,827 Current portion of long -term debt 7,793 2,950 10,743 Other current liabilities 332 27,215 394 27,941 Total current liabilities 25,588 53,371 1,266 - 80,225 LONG -TERM DEBT -Less current portion 611,329 4,456 615,785 OTHER LONG -TERM LIABILITIES 90 5,436 5,526 DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 109,992 39,835 149,827 Total liabilities 746,999 103,098 1,266 - 851,363 MINORITY INTEREST 66 185 251 STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY: Common stock Additional paid -in capitalM (118,916) 1,130,185 122 (577,739) 433,652 (Accumulated deficit) retained earnings (2,974) 6,600 (104) 3,522 Total stockholder's equity 1( 21,890) 1,136,785 18 577,739 437,174 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY $ 625,109 $1,239,949 $ 1,469 $ 577,739 $ 1,288,788 (1) Includes intercompany balances 18 t.I • i •i!._i.` Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 (Successor) (In thousands) NET REVENUE: Net client service revenue Other revenue Management fee revenue Net revenue OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and benefits Supplies, facilities and other operating costs Provision for doubtful accounts Depreciation and amortization Management fee expense Total operating expenses INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS INTEREST EXPENSE, NET OTHER INCOME (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME OF A SUBSIDIARY NET (LOSS) INCOME CRC Subsidiary Health Subsidiary Nou- Corporation Guarantors Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated $ 6 $ 113,874 $ 6,743 $ - $ 120,623 3 1,528 215 1,746 11,489 11,489 11,498 115,402 6,958 11,489 122,369 3,079 50,453 1,911 55,443 2,221 31,092 3,244 36,557 2,017 19 2,036 130 5,179 88 5,397 9,942 1,547 (11,489 5,430 98,683 6,809 11,489) 99,433 6,068 16,719 149 (14,947) (222) 1,220 3 (10,099) 16,497 152 (2,317) 3,784 35 427 $" (7,782) $ $ (310) 9 22,936 (15,169) 1,217 6,550 1,502 427 $ 4,621 Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 (Successor) (In thousands) NET REVENUE: Net client service revenue Other revenue Management fee revenue Net revenue OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and benefits Supplies, facilities and other operating costs Provision for doubtful accounts Depreciation and amortization Management fee expense Total operating expenses INCOME (LOSS) FROM OPERATIONS INTEREST EXPENSE, NET OTHER (LOSS) INCOME (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE MINORITY INTEREST IN INCOME OF A SUBSIDIARY NET (LOSS) INCOME CRC Subsidiary Health Subsidiary Non - Corporation Guarantors Guarantors $ 21 $ 328,756 $ 12,712 8 4,363 232 36,343 36,372 333,119 12,944 Eliminations Consolidated $ - $ 341,489 4,603 (36,343 ) (36,343) 346,092 9,901 152,637 4,593 167,131 6,466 87,159 7,052 100,677 5,034 30 5,064 1,217 14,891 202 16,310 33,400 2,943 (362343) 17,584 293,121 14,820 36,343 289,182 18,788 39,998 (1,876) 56,910 (44,345) (625) (1) (44,971) (789) (13) 2 (800) (26,346) 39,360 (1,875) 11,139 (7,984) 11,927 (568) 3,375 275 275 $ (18,362) $ 27,433 $ 1,582 $ - $ 7,489 20 Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006 (Successor) (in thousands) CRC Health Subsidiary Corporation Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated NET REVENUE: Net client service revenue $ 4 $ 64,286 $ - $ 64,290 Other revenue 3 1,207 1,210 Management fee revenue 14,072 14,072 Net revenue 14,079 65,493 14,072 65,500 OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and benefits 3,028 27,369 30,397 Supplies, facilities and other operating costs 1,606 16,092 17,698 Provision for doubtful accounts 1,176 1,176 Depreciation and amortization 158 2,162 2,320 Management fee expense 14,072 14,072) Total operating expenses 4,792 60,871 14,072 51,591 INCOME FROM OPERATIONS 9,287 4,622 13,909 INTEREST EXPENSE, NET (11,189) 5 (11,184) OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME 1,549 5 1,544) (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (3,451) 4,632 1,181 INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE 2,168 2,910 742 NET (LOSS) INCOME $ 1,283 $ 1,722 $ - $ 439 21 Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations For the Eight Months Ended September 30, 2006 (Successor) (In thousands) NET REVENUE: Net client service revenue Other revenue Management fee revenue Net revenue OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and benefits Supplies, facilities and other operating costs Provision for doubtful accounts Depreciation and amortization Management fee expense Total operating expenses INCOME FROM OPERATIONS INTEREST EXPENSE, NET OTHER (EXPENSE)INCOME (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE NET (LOSS) INCOME CRC Health Subsidiary Corporation Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated $ 22 $ 163,049 $ 8 3,155 36,492 36,522 7,822 4,176 1 667 12,666 23,856 (28,112) 40 (4,296) (2,305) $ 1,991 22 166,204 69,440 40,237 3,294 5,579 36,492 155,042 11,162 13 6 11,181 5,999 $ 5,182 36,492 36,492 36,492) 36,492 $ 163,071 3,163 166,234 77,262 44,413 3,295 6,246 131,216 35,018 (28,099) 34 6,885 3,694 Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations For the One Month Ended January 31, 2006 (Predecessor) (In thousands) CRC Health Subsidiary Corporation Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated NET REVENUE: Net client service revenue $ 5 $ 19,355 $ — $ 19,360 Other revenue 1 489 490 Management fee revenue 1,110 1,110 Net revenue 1,116 19,844 1,110 19,850 OPERATING EXPENSES: Salaries and benefits 666 8,599 9,265 Supplies, facilities and other operating costs 324 4,237 4,561 Provision for doubtful accounts 285 285 Depreciation and amortization 40 321 361 Acquisition related costs 43,710 43,710 Management fee expense 1,110 1,110 Total operating expenses 44,740 14,552 1,110 58,182 (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS (43,624) 5,292 (38,332) INTEREST EXPENSE, NET (2,505) (2,505) OTHER FINANCING COSTS (10,655) (10,655) OTHER INCOME 55 55 (LOSS) INCOME FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES (56,729) 5,292 (51,437) INCOME TAX (BENEFIT) EXPENSE (13,723) 1,279 12,444 NET (LOSS) INCOME $ (43,006) $ 4,013 �� $ 38,993 23 Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 (Successor) (In thousands) CRC Health Subsidiary Corporation Guarantors CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Additions of property and equipment --net Proceeds from sale of property and equipment Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired Prior period acquisition adjustments Net cash used in Subsidiary Non - Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated $ 11,467) $ 29,550 $ 36 $ — $ 18,119 (2,247) (20,776) (1,216) (33,602) 67 979 . investing activities (35,849) 19,730 1,216 CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Intercompany transfers Capital contributed by parent Debt financing costs Net borrowings under revolving line of credit Repayments of long -term debt Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS -- Beginning of period CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS —End of period 9,540 (11,069) 1,529 500 (611) 41,900 4,013) (194) 47,316 11,263 1,529 (1,443) 349 4,167 39 $ — $ 2,724 $ 388 (24,239) 67 (33,602) 979 56,795 500 (611) 41,900 4,207 — 37,582 (1,094) 4,206 $ — $ 3,112 PZI I Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows For the Eight Months Ended September 30, 2006 (Successor) On thousands) CRC Health Subsidiary Corporation Guarantors Eliminations Consolidated CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $ (12,736) $ 6,353 $ — $ 6,383 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Additions of property and equipment — net (991) (6,124) (7,115) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment — 36 36 Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired (36,626) (36,626) Prior period acquisition adjustments (14) (14) Payment of purchase price to former shareholders 4( 29,190) 429,190 Net cash used in investing activities (466,821) (6,088) — 4( 72,909} CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Equity contribution from Bain Capital 294,475 294,475 Payment of transaction related costs (5,354) (5,354) Intercompany transfers (905) 905 — Debt financing costs (22,981) (22,981) Net borrowings under revolving line of credit 27,500 27,500 Proceeds from issuances of long -term debt 442,022 442,022 Repayments of long -term debt (255,200) 255,200) Net cash provided by financing activities 479,557 905 — 480,462 INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 1,170 1,170 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS — Beginning of period 423 423 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS —End of period $ — $ 1,593 $ — $ 1,593 25 Table of Contents Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows For the One Month Ended January 31, 2086 (Predecessor) (In thousands) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Additions of property and equipment — net CRC Health Subsidiary Corporation Guarantors $ (3,563) $ 4,764 (30) (286) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment I Net cash . used in investing activities (30) (285) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES- Intercompany transfers 4,187 Stock options exercised 7 Debt financing costs (547) Repayments of revolving line of credit (5,000) Net cash used in financing activities (1,3 (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (4,946) CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT'S- - Begiming of period 4,946 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENT'S —End of period $ — 26 (4,187) 4,187) 292 131 Eliminations Consolidated $ 1,201 (316) (315) 7 (547) (5,000) (5,540) (4,654) 5,077 $ 423 $ — $ 423 14. SEGMENT INFORMATION Pursuant to SFAS No. 131, for periods through September 30, 2007, the Company has reported in three segments: (1) residential treatment division ( "Residential "), (2) outpatient treatment division ("Outpatient ") and (3) youth treatment division ( "Youth"). The Company began reporting for Youth as a result of the Aspen Acquisition. Based on a realignment of the Company's operations and internal organizational structure, The Company is currently reviewing its reportable segments for periods after September 30, 2007. Reportable segments are based upon the Company's internal organizational structure, the manner in which the operations are managed, the criteria used by the Company's chief operating decision -maker to evaluate segment performance and the availability of separate financial information. The Company's chief operating decision -maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The financial information used by the Company's chief operating decision -maker includes net revenue, operating expenses, income (loss) from operations and capital expenditures. Residential —The Residential segment provides chemical dependency and other behavioral health disorders treatment services both on an inpatient, residential basis and on an outpatient basis. Services offered in this segment include: inpatient/residential care, partial/day treatment, intensive outpatient groups, therapeutic living/half -way house environments, aftercare centers and detoxification. As of September 30, 2007, the Residential segment provided services to patients at 46 facilities located in 12 states. Outpatient —The Outpatient segment provides substance abuse treatment services on an outpatient basis. Substantially all of the services are provided to individuals addicted to heroin and other opiates, including prescription painkillers. Services include medication assisted treatment, counseling and physical examination. As of September 30, 2007, 46 of our 61 clinics were certified to provide at least one additional comprehensive outpatient substance abuse treatment service. Such additional services include outpatient detoxification and intensive outpatient services for individuals addicted to drugs or alcohol. As of September 30, 2007, the Outpatient segment provided services to patients at 61 facilities located in 18 states. Xouth —The Youth segment provides a wide variety of therapeutic and educational programs through settings and solutions that match individual needs with the appropriate learning and therapeutic environment. Its programs am-offered in therapeutic boarding schools, experiential outdoor education programs, weight -loss residential schools and summer weight -loss camps. As of September 30, 2007, the Youth segment operated 38 educational and therapeutic facilities in 13 states and one in the United Kingdom. Corporate/Other —In addition to the three reportable segments as described above, the Company has activities classified as Corporate/Other which represent revenue and expenses associated with eGetgoing, an online treatment service and certain corporate -level operating general and administrative costs (i.e., expenses associated with the corporate offices in Cupertino, California, which provides management, financial, human resources and information system support) and stock option -based compensation expense that are not allocated to the segments. Major Customers No single customer represented 10% or more of the Company's total net revenue in any period presented. Geographlc Information —The Company's business operations are primarily in the United States. 27 Selected segment financial information for the Company's reportable segments was as follows (in thousands): Successor Predecessor Three Nine Three Eight One Months Months Months Months Month Ended Ended Ended Ended Ended September 30, September 30, September 30, September 30, January 31, 2007 2007 2006 2006 2006 Net revenue: Residential $ 50,069 $ 146,184 $ 42,315 $ 106,130 $ 12,693 Outpatient 26,034 76,466 23,136 59,803 7,125 Youth 46,173 123,106 - - - Corporate /other 93 336 49 301 32 Total consolidated net revenue $ 122,369 $ 346,092 $ 65,500 $ 166,234 $ 19,850 Operating expenses: Residential $ 36,510 $ 107,086 $ 30,912 $ 77,902 $ 9,112 Outpatient 17,967 52,400 15,738 40,223 4,447 Youth 39,490 112,071 - - - Corporate /other 5,466 17,625 4,941 13,091 44,623 Total consolidated operating expenses $ 99,433 $ 289,182 $ 51,591 $ 131,216 $ 58,182 Income (loss) from operations: Residential $ 13,559 $ 39,098 $ 11,403 $ 28,228 $ 3,581 Outpatient 8,067 24,066 7,398 19,580 2,678 Youth 6,683 11,035 - - - Corporate/other (5,373) (17,289) (4,892) (12,790) 44,591 Total consolidated income (loss) from operations $ 22,936 $ 56,910 $ 13,909 $ 35,018 $ (38,332) Income (loss) from operations before income taxes: Total consolidated income (loss) from operations $ 22,936 $ 56,910 $ 13,909 $ 35,018 $ (38,332) Interest expense, net (15,169) (44,971) (11,184) (28,099) (2,505) Other financing costs - - - - (10,655) Other income (1,217) (800) (1,544 (34) 55 Total consolidated income (loss) from operations before income taxes $ 6,550 $ 11,139 $ 1,181 $ 6,885 $ (51,437 Capital expenditures: Residential $ 5,930 $ 14,606 $ 1,509 $ 4,876 $ 336 Outpatient 883 1,581 471 1,395 45 Youth 1,879 5,805 - - - Corporate /other Total consolidated capital expenditures Total assets: Residential Outpatient Youth Corporate/other Total consolidated assets 579 2,247 202 1,069 30 $ 9,271 $ 24,239 $ 2,182 $ 7,340 $ 411 28 September 30, December 31, 2007 20% $ 587,971 327,425 360,344 50,077 $ 1,325,817 $ 545,110 331,491 361,319 50,868 $ 1,288,788 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. Unless the context otherwise requires, in this management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, the terms "our company, " "we, " "us, " "the Company" and "our" refer (i) for periods prior to the consummation of the Transactions, to CRC Health Group, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and (ii) for periods following the consummation of the Transactions, to CRC Health Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries following the mergers described below under "The Transactions. " O VA—Du We are a leading provider of substance abuse treatment services and youth treatment services in the United States. We also provide treatment services for other addiction diseases and behavioral disorders such as eating disorders. We deliver our substance abuse and behavioral disorder treatment services through our residential and outpatient treatment programs, which we refer to as our residential and outpatient treatment divisions. We deliver our youth treatment services through our residential schools, wilderness programs and weight loss programs, which we refer to as our youth treatment division or Aspen Education Group. We have three reporting segments: residential treatment division ( "Residential"), outpatient treatment division ( "Outpatient") and youth treatment division ( "Youth"). Our residential treatment division, which currently operates 31 inpatient and 15 outpatient facilities in 12 states, treats patients for addiction to alcohol and drugs and other behavioral health disorders..As of September 30, 2007, our residential treatment division treated approximately 1,475 patients per day. Our outpatient treatment division, which currently operates 61 outpatient treatment clinics in 18 states, provides services to individuals addicted to opiates, including heroin and prescription painkillers. As of September 30, 2007, our outpatient treatment programs treated approximately 25,200 patients per day. Aspen Education Group currently operates 38 education facilities in 13 states and one facility in the United Kingdom and enrolled approximately 4,300 new students during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Activities classified as "Corporate %thee" represent revenue and expenses associated with eGetgoing, an online treatment service, and general and administrative expenses (i.e., expenses associated with our corporate offices in Cupertino, California, which provides management, financial, human resource and information system support) and stock option -based compensation expense that are not allocated to the segments. The Transactions On February 6, 2006, investment funds managed by Bain Capital Partners, LLC ( "Bain Capital ") acquired CRC Health Group, Inc. for a total cash consideration of approximately $742.3 million (including acquisition and financing transactions related fees and expenses of $28.5 million). As a result of the acquisition, Bain Capital received control of the Company. We refer to our acquisition by Bain Capital and the related financings as the "Transactions." Basis of Presentation As a result of the Transactions on February 6, 2006, a new basis of accounting has begun. However, for accounting purposes and to coincide with our normal financial closing dates, we have utilized February 1, 2006 as the effective date of the Transactions. For the purpose of presenting a comparison of our 2007 operating results to 2006, we have presented the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as the mathematical addition of our operating results for the one month ended January 31, 2006 ( "Predecessor Company ") to the operating results for the eight months ended September 30, 2006 ( "Successor Company "). This approach is not consistent with GAAP and may yield results that are not strictly comparable on a period -to- period basis primarily due to the impact of purchase accounting entries recorded as a result of the Transactions. For purposes of this management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, however, management believes that it is the most meaningful way to present our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Acquisitions 2007 Acquisitions In the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we completed four acquisitions and paid approximately $32.7 million in cash, including acquisition related expenses. The acquisitions are intended to expand our range of residential and youth treatment services into new geographic regions in the United States. These acquisitions are not expected to materially impact our results of operations. 29 2006 Acquisitions In November 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding capital stock of Aspen Education Group for approximately $278.5 million in total purchase consideration, including acquisition related expenses of $1.6 million. We refer to this acquisition as the Aspen Acquisition. We believe Aspen Education Group is the largest for -profit provider of therapeutic educational programs to troubled youth and its offerings include boarding schools, experiential outdoor education programs, weight loss residential high schools and summer weight loss camps. The Aspen Acquisition is intended to diversify our business into other service offerings and geographic regions. This acquisition will further enhance our overall self payor mix revenue and offers multiple revenue and cost synergies. A new reportable segment Youth has been formed after the Aspen Acquisition. In 2006, in addition, to the Aspen Acquisition, we completed five other acquisitions for which we paid approximately $36.6 million in cash, including acquisition related expenses. These acquisitions are intended to expand our range of treatment programs into new geographic regions in the United States. In addition, they contribute to the continued building of a nationwide network of specialized behavioral care services. SUMMARY We generate revenue by providing substance abuse treatment services and youth treatment services in the United States. We also generate revenue by providing treatment services for other specialized behavioral disorders. Revenue is recognized when rehabilitation and treatment services are provided to a patient. Client service revenue is reported at the estimated net realizable amounts from clients, third -party payors and others for services rendered. Revenue under third -party payor agreements is subject to audit and retroactive adjustment. Provisions for estimated third -party payor settlements are provided for in the period the related services are rendered and adjusted in future periods as final settlements are determined. Revenue for educational services provided to youth consists primarily of tuition, enrollment fees, alumni services and ancillary charges. Tuition revenue and ancillary charges are recognized based on contracted monthly /daily rates as services are rendered. The enrollment fees for service contracts that are charged upfront are deferred and recognized over the average student length of stay, approximately eleven months. Alumni fees revenue represents non - refundable upfront fees for post graduation services and these fees are deferred and recognized systematically over the contracted life, which is twelve months. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we generated 85.7% and 86.1% of our net revenue from non- governmental sources, including 71.2% each period from self payors and 14.5% and 14.9% from commercial payors, respectively. Substantially all of our government program net revenue was received from multiple counties and states under Medicaid and similar programs. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, our consolidated same - facility net revenue increased by 6.1 % each period as compared to the same periods in 2006. "Same - facility" refers to the comparison of each facility owned during 2006 with the results for the comparable period in 2007. Our operating expenses include salaries and benefits, supplies, facilities and other operating costs, provision for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization and acquisition related costs. Operating expenses for our residential, outpatient and youth treatment divisions exclude corporate level general and administrative costs (i.e., expenses associated with our corporate offices in Cupertino, California, which provide management, financial, human resources and information systems support), stock option -based compensation expense and expenses associated with eGetgoing. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES The accompanying discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ( "GAAF). We have based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our senior management has reviewed our critical accounting policies and their application in the preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures and discussed the development, selection and disclosure of significant estimates. To the extent that actual results differ from those estimates, our future results of operations may be affected. Management believes that there have not been any significant changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to the items that we have previously reported in our critical accounting policies in management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006. kill RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ( "FASB ") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment to FASB Statement No. 115 ( "SFAS 159"). SFAS 159 expands the use of fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require assets or liabilities to be carried at fair value. Under SFAS 159, a company may elect to use fair value to measure accounts and loans receivable, available- for -sale and held -to- maturity securities, equity method investments, accounts payable, guarantees and issued debt. Other eligible items include firm commitments for financial instruments that would otherwise not be recognized at inception and non -cash warranty obligations where a warrantor is permitted to pay a third party to provide the warranty goods or services. If fair value is elected, any upfront costs and fees related to the item must be recognized in earnings and cannot be deferred, e.g., debt issue costs. The fair value election is irrevocable and may generally be made on an instrument -by- instrument basis, even if a company has similar instruments that it elects not to fair value. At the adoption date, unrealized gains and losses on existing items for which fair value has been elected are reported as a cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are required to adopt SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS 159 will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements. In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements ( "SFAS 157 "). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute; however SFAS 157 does not apply to SFAS 123(8). SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are required to adopt SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effect of the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on our condensed consolidated financial statements. We adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 ( "FIN 48 ") on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting and reporting for uncertainties in income tax law recognized in an enterprise's financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. See Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information, including the effects of adoption on the Company's condensed consolidated statement of balance sheet. 31 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following tables illustrate our results of operations by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (dollars in thousands, except for percentages; percentages are calculated as percentage of total net revenue). Each period has a different basis of accounting and, as a result, they are not comparable. For the purpose of presenting a comparison of our 2007 results to 2006, we have presented the nine months ended September 30, 2006 as the mathematical addition of our operating results for the one month ended January 31, 2006 to the operating results of the eight months ended September 30, 2006. This approach is not consistent with U.S. GAAP and may yield results that are not strictly comparable on a period -to- period basis primarily due to the impact of purchase accounting entries recorded as a result of the Transactions. For purposes of this management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, however, management believes that it is the most meaningful way to present our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Operating expenses: Residential Outpatient Youth Corporate / other Total operating expenses Income (loss) from operations: Residential Outpatient Youth Corporate / other Income (loss) from operations Interest expense, net Other financing costs Other (expense) income Income (loss) from operations before income taxes Income tax expense (benefit) Minority interest in income of a subsidiary 36,510 Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30, 107,086 2007 % 2006 % 2007 % 2006 % Net revenue: 32.3% - 0.0% 112,071 32.5% - 0.0% 5,466 4.5% 4,941 7.5% Residential $ 50,069 40.9% $ 42,315 64.6% $146,184 42.2% $118,823 63.8% Outpatient 26,034 21.3% 23,136 35.3% 76,466 22.1% 66,928 36.0% Youth 46,173 37.7% - 0.0% 123,106 35.6% - 0.0% Corporate / other 93 0.1% 49 0.1% 336 0.1% 333 0.2% Total net revenue 122,369 100.0% 65,500 100.0% 346,092 100.0% 186,084 105r/o Operating expenses: Residential Outpatient Youth Corporate / other Total operating expenses Income (loss) from operations: Residential Outpatient Youth Corporate / other Income (loss) from operations Interest expense, net Other financing costs Other (expense) income Income (loss) from operations before income taxes Income tax expense (benefit) Minority interest in income of a subsidiary 36,510 29.8% 30,912 47.2% 107,086 30.9% 87,014 46.8% 17,967 14.7% 15,738 24.1% 52,4+0 15.1% 44,670 24.0% 39,490 32.3% - 0.0% 112,071 32.5% - 0.0% 5,466 4.5% 4,941 7.5% 17,625 5.1% 57,714 31.0% 99,433 81.3% 51,591 78.8% 289,182 83.6% 189,398 101.8% 13,559 11.1% 11,403 17.4% 39,098 11.3% 31,809 17.0% 8,067 6.6% 7,398 11.2% 24,066 7.0% 22,258 12.0% 6,683 5.4% - 0.0% 11,035 3.1% - 0.0`/0 (5,373) -4.4% (4,892 } -7.4% (17,289) -5.0% (57,381 ) -30.8% 22,936 18.7% 13,909 21.2% 56,910 16.4% (3,314) -1.8% (15,169) (11,184) (44,971) (30,604) - - - (10,655) 1,217) 1,544 (800) 21 6,550 1,181 11,139 (44,552) 1,502 742 3,375 (8,750) 427 - 275 - Net income (loss) $ 4,621 3.8% $ 439 32 0.7% $ 7,489 2.2% $ 35,802 - 19.2% Quarter Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Quarter Ended September 30, 2006 Consolidated net revenue increased $56.9 million, or 86.8 %, to $122.4 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 from $65.5 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Of the $56.9 million increase, the youth treatment division contributed $46.2 million and the remaining net revenue growth was driven by net revenue increases of $7.8 million, or 18.5 %, and $2.9 million, or 12.5 %, in our residential and outpatient treatment divisions, respectively. Of the $7.8 million and $2.9 million net revenue increases in the residential and outpatient treatment divisions, respectively, $4.2 million and $0.9 million, respectively, was contributed by the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions that were not included in results of operations for the third quarter of 2006. In addition, same - facility revenue growth in residential and outpatient treatment divisions of $2.8 million, or 6.9%, and $1.0 million, or 4.5 %, respectively, and start-up facilities revenue increases in residential and outpatient treatment divisions of $0.8 million and $1.0 million, respectively, contributed to the net revenue growth. Our same- facility residential growth was driven in part by a 5.5% increase in patient census and a 1.4% increase in revenue per patient day. Our same - facility outpatient growth was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of patients receiving treatment at our outpatient treatment clinics. On a same - facility basis, outpatient treatment clinic census increased 2.9% from an average daily census of 21,877 in the second quarter of 2006 to an average daily census of 22,516 in the third quarter of 2007. Consolidated operating expenses increased $47.8 million, or 92.7 %, to $99.4 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 from $51.6 million in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. Of the $47.8 million increase in operating expenses, the youth treatment division incurred $39.5 million in expenses that are mainly attributable to salaries and wages and other general operating expenses. The increases in our residential treatment and outpatient treatment division operating expenses before divisional administration expenses were $6.8 million, or 23.8 %, and $2.3 million, or 17.3 %, respectively. The increase in residential treatment operating expenses was mainly attributable to $3.3 million in expenses related to the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions and partially attributable to a $3.1 million, or 11.5 %, same - facility increase in operating expenses. The increase in outpatient treatment operating expenses of $1.0 million, or 7.8 %, was attributable . to same - facilities, $0.8 million, or 67.7 %, was attributable to start-up facilities and $0.5 million in expenses related to the 2006 acquisitions. Division administration expenses decreased $1.2 million, or 46.1 %, in our residential treatment division and decreased $0.08 million, or 3.4 %, in our outpatient treatment division. Corporate/other expenses increased $0.5 million, or 10.6 %, and expressed as a percentage of consolidated net revenue, corporate/other expenses decreased to 4.5% in the third quarter of 2007 compared to 7.5% in the same period in 2006. Our consolidated operating margin declined to 18.7% in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to 21.2% in the quarter ended September 30, 2006 due primarily to lower operating margins associated with the Aspen acquisition. On a same - facility basis, our consolidated operating margin decreased to 35.6% in the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 38.1% in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The decline in our same- facility operating margins was impacted by a one -time reclassification of incentive compensation expense recorded in the third quarter of 2006. This reclassification did not impact the operating margins of CRC or our individual segments for any period reported. Excluding the impact of the one -time reclassification of incentive compensation expense recorded in the third quarter of 2006, our same - facility operating margins were 36.9 %. Increases in labor costs and other expenses in the third quarter of 2007 resulted in a decline in same - facility operation margins of 1.4% from the same period in 2006. Our consolidated net income as a percentage of consolidated net revenue increased to 3.8% in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 compared to 0.7% in the quarter ended September 30, 2006. The increase in the net income percentage in the third quarter of 2007 compared to 2006 was primarily due to a reduction in interest expense as a percentage of consolidated net revenue. Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 Consolidated net revenue increased $160.0 million, or 86.0 %, to $346.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $186.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Of the $160.0 million increase, the youth treatment division contributed $123.1 million and the remaining net revenue growth was driven by net revenue increases of $27.4 million, or 23.1 %, and $9.5 million, or 14.3 %, in our residential and outpatient treatment divisions, respectively. Of the $27.4 million and $9.5 million net revenue increases in the residential and outpatient treatment divisions, respectively, $16.0 million and $3.7 million, respectively was contributed by the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions that were not included in results of operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. In addition, same - facility revenue increases in residential and outpatient treatment divisions of $8.0 million, or 6.8 %, and $3.1 million, or 4.9 %, respectively, and start-up facilities revenue increases in residential and outpatient treatment divisions of $2.1 million and $2.7 million, respectively, contributed to the net revenue growth. Our same - facility residential growth was driven in part by a 4.5% increase in patient census and a 2.2% increase in revenue per patient day. Our same - facility outpatient growth was primarily attributable to an increase in the number of patients receiving treatment at our outpatient treatment clinics. On a same - facility basis, outpatient treatment clinic census increased 3.3% from an average daily census of 21,438 in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 to an average daily census of 22,151 in the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Consolidated operating expenses increased $99.8 million, or 52.7 0/0, to $289.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 from $189.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The increases in our residential treatment and outpatient treatment division operating expenses before divisional administration expenses were $19.2 million, or 23.5 %, and $7.3 million, or 19.0 %, respectively. The increase in residential treatment operating expenses was mainly 33 Table of Contents attributable to $12.6 million in expenses related to the 2006 and 2007 acquisitions and partially attributable to a $5.5 million, or 6.9 %, same - facility increase in operating expenses. The increase in outpatient treatment operating expenses of $2.8 million, or 7.8 %, was attributable to same- facilities, $2.2 million in expenses related to the 2006 acquisitions and $2.4 million, or 76.6 %, was attributable to start-up facilities. Division administration expenses increased $0.9 million, or 16.5 %, in our residential treatment division and increased $0.4 million, or 6.9%, in our outpatient treatment division. The youth treatment operating expenses of $112.1 million are attributable mainly to salaries and wages and other general operating expenses. Corporate/other expenses decreased $40.1 million, or 69.5 %, and expressed as a percentage of consolidated net revenue, corporate/other expenses decreased to 5.1% in the nine months ended eptember 30, 2007 compared to 31.0% in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The corporate /other expenses in 2006 was primarily attributable to non - recurring expenses of $43.7 million related to the Transactions and the corporate /other expenses in 2007 was not impacted by such non - recurring expenses. Our consolidated operating margin was 16.4% in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to (1.8) % in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Non - recurring expenses of $43.7 million related to the Transactions impacted the nine months ended September 30, 2006 operating margin. The nine months ended September 30, 2007 operating margin was not impacted by such non - recurring expenses but was partially impacted by lower operating margins associated with the Aspen Acquisition. On a same - facility basis, our consolidated operating margin increased to 36.3% in the nine months ended September 30 2007, as compared to 36.9% in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. Our consolidated net income as a percentage of consolidated net revenue was 2.2% in the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to (19.2)% in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The nine months ended September 30, 2006 net income percentage was mainly due to the operating margin decline as described above. The net income percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, was not impacted by non - recurring expenses related to the Transactions. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Our principal sources of liquidity for operating activities are payments from self pay patients, commercial payoffs and government programs for treatment services. We receive most of our cash from self payors in advance or upon completion of treatment. Cash payment from commercial payors and government programs is typically received upon the collection of accounts receivable, which are generated upon delivery of treatment services. Working Capital Working capital is defined as total current assets, including cash, less total current liabilities, including the current portion of long -tern debt. We had negative working capital of $46.7 million at September 30, 2007 and $18.7 million at December 31, 2006, respectively. The decrease in working capital of $28.0 million from December 31, 2006 to September 30, 2007 was primarily attributable to an increase in Revolving Line of Credit of $41.9 mill ion to fund acquisitions and make interest payments partially offset by an increase in income tax receivable, a decrease in accrued liabilities, and other changes in working capital accounts. Sources and Uses of Cash Nine Months Ended Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities Net cash used in investing activities Net cash provided by financing activities Net (decrease) increase in cash September 30, 2007 2006 (In thousands) $ 18,119 $ (5,182) (56,795) (473,224) 37,582 474,922 $ 1,094 $ (3,484) Cash provided by operating activities was $18.1 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to cash used in operating activities of $5.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The cash used in operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was primarily due to the net loss in the January 2006 Predecessor Company statement of operations resulting from the payment of non - recurring acquisition related expenses incurred in connection with the Transactions. 34 Cash used in investing activities was $56.8 million in the nine months ended September 30 2007, compared to $473.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The cash used for investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was due primarily to acquisitions and payments to former shareholders in connection with the Bain transactions, partially offset by lower capital expenditures in 2006 compared to 2007. Cash provided by financing activities was $37.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $474.9 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The cash provided from financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2006 was due primarily to an equity contribution of $294.5 million from investment funds managed by Bain Capital and the increase in net issuances of long -term debt of $186.8 million, partially offset part by the payment of $28.8 million for debt financing and transaction costs. Financing and Liquidity We intend to fund our ongoing operations through cash generated by operations, funds available under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facility and existing cash and cash equivalents. As of September 30, 2007, our senior secured credit facility is comprised of a $415.1 million senior secured term loan facility and a $100.0 million revolving credit facility. At September 30, 2007, we had $45.5 million of principal balance outstanding under the revolving credit facility. In addition, the revolving credit facility had approximately $5.6 million of letters of credit issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007. As part of the Transactions, we issued $ 200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated notes. We anticipate that cash generated by current operations, the remaining funds available under the revolving portion of our senior secured credit facility and existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet working capital requirements, service our debt and finance capital expenditures over the next 12 months. In addition, we may expand existing residential treatment and outpatient treatment facilities and build or acquire new facilities. Management continually assesses our capital needs and may seek additional financing, if necessary, including debt or equity, to fund potential acquisitions or for other corporate purposes. In negotiating such financing, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital on terms satisfactory to us. Failure to obtain additional financing on reasonable terms could have a negative effect on our plans to acquire additional residential treatment facilities, outpatient treatment clinics and youth treatment facilities. We expect to spend an approximately $5.0 to $8.0 million for maintenance related expenditures and an additional $20.0 to $30.0 million over the next 12 months for expansion projects, systems upgrades and other related initiatives. At September 30, 2007, we have borrowed $45.5 million under the revolving credit facility and have classified this on our Balance Sheets as Current portion of long -term debt. We have historically and currently intend to make payments to reduce borrowing under the revolver from operating cash flow. In addition, we expect that future financings will serve not only to partially fund acquisitions but also to repay all or part of any outstanding revolver balances then outstanding. Under the terms of our borrowing arrangements, we are required to comply with various covenants, including the maintenance of certain financial ratios. As of September 30, 2007, we are in material compliance with all such covenants. Please reference Part II, Item 5 of this document for further discussion. Effective April 16, 2007, we entered into an amendment to our amended and restated credit agreement dated November 17, 2006. Per the amendment, the term loan interest is payable quarterly at 90 day LIBOR plus 2.25% per annum; provided that on and after such time our corporate rating from Moody's is at least B 1 then the interest is payable quarterly at 90 day LIBOR plus 2.0% per annum. Funding Commitments In connection with an acquisition which closed in October 2005, we are obligated to make certain additional payments in the amount of up to $2.0 million upon the achievement of certain performance milestones for the second year period ending October 2007. As of September 30, 2007, the entity has achieved the second year performance milestones and as a result we recorded additional goodwill and a liability of $2.0 million, respectively. These additional payments earned will be paid by us in the fourth quarter of 2007. Certain agreements acquired in the Aspen Acquisition contain contingent earnout provisions that provide for additional consideration to be paid to the sellers if the results of the entity's operations exceed negotiated benchmarks. As a result of two of the entities exceeding the benchmark, the Youth treatment division recorded additional liability of $4.4 million, of which $ l.9 million was incurred during the three months ended September 30, 2007. The additional consideration consists of a combination of cash and notes payable issued to the seller. 35 Table of Contents Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk For quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting us, see "Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk" in Item 7A of Part II, of our Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which is incorporated herein by reference. Our exposure to market risk has not changed materially since December 31, 2006. Item 4T. Controls and Procedures Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a -15(e) and 15d -15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")), as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based upon this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that material information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a -15(f) and 15d -15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision - making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. RR PART U. OTHER INFORMATION Item IA. Risk Factors There have been no material changes to the factors disclosed in Item IA Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10 -K for the year ended December 31, 2006. Item 5. Other Information On August 241', 2007, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Bayside Marin LLC. and is in the process of determining whether such acquisition constitutes a significant acquisition under regulation SX. In the event this acquisition constitutes a significant acquisition under regulation SX, the Company is required to file audited financials and other information regarding the acquisition pursuant to an Form 8 -K. Item 6. Exhibits The Exhibit Index beginning on page 40 of this report sets forth a list of exhibits. 37 SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Date: November 13, 2007 W CRC HEALTH CORPORATION (Registrant) By /s/ KEyiN HooGE Kevin Rogge, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Offieer and duly authorized signatory) CRC HEALTH CORPORATION EXHIBIT INDEX 4.1f Form of Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of July 26, 2007, by and among CRC Health Corporation, the Guarantors named therein, the New Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to the 10 3 / 4 % Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 $ 10.28 Form of SUPPLEMENT NO.7 dated as of duly 26, 2007, to the Security Agreement dated as of February 6, 2006 among CRC Health Corporation (f/k/a CRC Health Group, Inc.), CRC Health Group, Inc. (Wa/ CRCA Holdings, Inc.), and the Subsidiaries of the Borrower identified therein and Citibank, N.A., as collateral Agent for the Secured Parties, as defined therein. $ 10.38 Form of SUPPLEMENT NO.7 dated as of duly 26, 2007, to the Guarantee Agreement dated as of February 6, 2006, among CRC Health Group, Inc., CRC Health Corporation, the Subsidiaries of the Borrower, as defined herein and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent. 10.11b Form of Amended and Restated 2007 Executive Option Certificate 10.1 lc Form of Amended and Restated Executive Option Certificate 10.17 CRC Health Group, Inc. 2007 Incentive Plan * 10.18 Form of 2007 Incentive Plan Option Certificate 10.19 Agreement dated September 20,2007 by and between Elliot Sainer, CRC Health Group, Inc., CRC Health Corporation and Aspen Education Group, Inc. * 31.1 Rule 13a- 14(a) /15d -14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer 31.2 Rule 13a- 14(a)/15d -14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer $ 32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Principal Executive Officer t 32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer Filed herewith. Furnished herewith. Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. 39