HomeMy WebLinkAbout4/7/2014 - Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee
This Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. Among other things, the Brown Act requires that the Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee agenda be posted at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance of each regular meeting and that the public be allowed to comment on agenda items before the Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee and items not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee. The Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee may limit public comments to a reasonable amount of time, generally three (3) minutes per person.
It is the intention of the City of Newport Beach to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a
participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City of Newport Beach will attempt to accommodate
you in every reasonable manner. If requested, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as
required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in
implementation thereof. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs
and to determine if accommodation is feasible at (949) 644-3005 or cityclerk@newportbeachca.gov.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee Agenda
Community Room, Newport Beach City Hall
100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California
Monday, April 7, 2014 – 5:00p.m.
Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee Members:
Councilmember Tony Petros, Chair
Michael Alti Greg Kline
Lou Cohen Sean Matsler
John Heffernan Frank Peters
Robert Kahn
Staff Members:
Brad Sommers, Sr. Civil Engineer (Public Works)
Lt. Jeff Lu (Police)
Fern Nueno, Associate Planner (Community Development)
Consultant:
Paul Martin, Alta Planning + Design
Michelle Lieberman, RBF Consulting
____________________________________________________
1) CALL MEETING TO ORDER
2) ROLL CALL
3) PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4) PUBLIC COMMENTS
Public comments are invited on agenda and non-agenda items generally considered to be within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Bicycle Master Plan
Oversight Committee. Speakers must limit comments to three (3) minutes. Before speaking, we invite, but do not require, you to state your name for the
record. The Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee has the discretion to extend or shorten the speakers’ time limit on agenda or non-agenda items,
provided the time limit adjustment is applied equally to all speakers. As a courtesy, please turn cell phones off or set them in the silent mode.
5) APPROVAL OF MINUTES
6) CURRENT BUSINESS
A. Newport Bay Conservancy Letter – Back Bay Drive – Discussion of letter submitted by the Newport Bay
Conservancy regarding Back Bay Drive.
B. Recommendations for Bikeway Programs – Alta Planning presentation and discussion of Bikeway
Programs on 4E’s: Education, Encouragement, Enforcement and Evaluation.
C. Police Department Update – Staff update of recent bicycle statistics and enforcement activities.
7) COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS WHICH MEMBERS WOULD LIKE PLACED ON A
FUTURE AGENDA FOR DISCUSSION, ACTION OR REPORT (NON-DISCUSSION ITEMS)
8) DATE AND TIME OF NEXT MEETING – TBD
This Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee is subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act. Among other things, the Brown Act requires that the Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee agenda be posted at least seventy-two (72) hours in advance of each regular meeting and that the public be allowed to comment on agenda items before the Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee and items not on the agenda but are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee. The Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee may limit public comments to a reasonable amount of time, generally three (3) minutes per person.
It is the intention of the City of Newport Beach to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a
participant at this meeting, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City of Newport Beach will attempt to accommodate
you in every reasonable manner. If requested, this agenda will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as
required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in
implementation thereof. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs
and to determine if accommodation is feasible at (949) 644-3005 or cityclerk@newportbeachca.gov.2
9) ADJOURNMENT
1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Bicycle Master Plan Oversight Committee
Meeting Minutes
Meeting Date: March 3, 2014
Time: 5:00 p.m.
Location: Community Room, 100 Civic Center Drive
1. CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order at 5:00 p.m.
2. ROLL CALL
Committee Members Present – Councilman/Chair Tony Petros, Lou Cohen, John Heffernan,
Michael Alti, Robert Kahn, Greg Kline, Sean Matsler
Committee Members Absent – Frank Peters
City Staff – Lt. Jeff Lu, Sr. Civil Engineer Brad Sommers, Assoc. Planner Fern Nueno
Consultant Staff – Alta Planning and Design - Paul Martin, Brett Hondorp; Stantec- Rock Miller; RBF
Consulting - Michelle Lieberman
3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
4. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Chair Petros noted Committee Members Kahn and Peters submitted written comments on the
Draft Bikeways Plan and that the comments were distributed as part of the agenda packet. Copies
were available on the back table for the public.
5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chair Petros noted Mr. Jim Mosher submitted written comments regarding the February Meeting
Minutes and copies of the comments were available on the back table for the public.
ACTION: Motion by Committee Member Cohen to approve the minutes for the February 3, 2014
meeting, as amended, to incorporate comments received by Mr. Mosher. Motion Second by
Committee Member Alti. Motion passed (AYES – 6, NAYES - 0, Member Frank Peters absent).
6. CURRENT BUSINESS
A. Draft Bikeways Plan
2
Mr. Paul Martin gave a brief overview of the community outreach activities that have occurred
to date.
Mr. Martin presented the Draft Bikeways Network recommendations and various methods used
to solicit public comment, including the public survey, outreach events, workshops, interactive
draft bikeways network website and project website.
Mr. Martin presented proposed global recommendations:
Improve signage and wayfinding on Class III facilities;
Improve treatments at free right turns and right-turn pockets;
Coordinate with Caltrans at state-managed facilities; and
Add buffered bike lanes where width allows.
Member Cohen asked if the “Begin Right Turn Lane, Yield to Bikes” signs were part of the
improved sign plan at right-turns. Sr. Civil Engineer Sommers noted the signs are a Caltrans
standard and are installed as part of improvements at dedicated and free right turns.
Chair Petros commented he would like specific information about how the City would proceed
to coordinate with Caltrans for improvements in their Right-of Way.
Committee Member Heffernan asked if there are examples where cities have successfully
worked with Caltrans to implement changes/facilities for bicycles. Mr. Rock Miller noted
Caltrans was cooperative when working with the City of Long Beach to incorporate new bikeway
treatments.
Committee Member Kline asked if there were recommendations to remove free right turns. Mr.
Martin responded the focus is to improve the existing facilities.
Committee Member Heffernan asked if stops for cyclists were being considered at areas such as
Newport Coast Drive at the SR73 Off Ramps. Mr. Sommers responded the Citizen’s Bicycle
Safety Committee considered a design that stopped cyclists prior to crossing the SR73 Off Ramp,
but the Citizen’s Bicycle Safety Committee chose not to pursue that option.
Mr. Martin noted buffered bikes would be a consideration where new bike lanes are proposed
or when existing bike lanes are being modified through roadway projects. Chair Petros
suggested Bayside Dr. from Coast Hwy. to Jamboree Rd. be considered for a demonstration
project for buffered bike lanes.
Committee Member Matsler asked if the consultants had identified segments where buffered
bike lanes would be appropriate. Mr. Martin responded arterial roadways such as Newport
Coast Drive and Irvine Avenue would be considered.
3
Committee Member Kahn suggested buffered bikes lanes should be considered for San Joaquin
Hills Rd., Jamboree Rd. and Macarthur Blvd. Mr. Sommers said the City considers buffered bike
lanes whenever retrofitting or rehabilitating roads. He also noted the current project will install
buffered bike lanes on Jamboree Rd. but there was not sufficient width on San Joaquin Hills Rd.
for buffered bike lanes.
Committee Member Heffernan asked if colored striping is used at right turn lanes in other cities.
Mr. Martin noted some cities have installed green striping in conflict zones. Mr. Heffernan
suggested this striping may be beneficial at intersections such as Coast Hwy. at Bayside Dr. Mr.
Sommers noted colored paint treatments have been discussed with Caltrans and the City has
evaluated use of colored paint previously, but there are drawbacks to consider including
maintenance costs and surface texture.
Committee Member Cohen commented that the signage on Bayside regarding sidewalk riding is
confusing noting conflicting signs. Mr. Sommers noted Bayside is highlighted on the
recommendations map for possible improvements.
Committee Member Alti suggested physical barriers or devices should be considered for bike
lanes on higher speed roadways. Committee Member Kahn noted barriers dividing the vehicle
lanes and bikes lanes could be a hazard to cyclists.
Mr. Martin presented the following draft global/citywide recommendations:
Consider sidewalk riding policy citywide, and
Review bicycle accommodation/detection at signals
Committee Member Heffernan asked if bike lane detectors, such as the recently installed sensor
at Jamboree Rd., are being considered. Mr. Martin responded yes.
Committee Member Kline commented that the clearance times at the Coast Hwy. /Balboa Blvd.
intersection are not long enough for cyclists to cross the intersection and that there is new
technology available that recognizes the presence of cyclists in the intersection. Mr. Martin
noted the technology is still evolving.
Mr. Martin presented the following draft global/citywide recommendation:
Review pathways through parks for bikeway designation
Committee Member Cohen asked if all of the paths shown on the map are paved. Mr. Martin
responded they represent paved, off –street paths or sidewalks where riding is allowed.
Committee Member Matsler asked how users would be accommodated on these paths and if
striping would be used. Mr. Martin said that striping and etiquette signs may be considered.
Committee Member Kahn asked if detailed improvements to off-street paths would be provided
in the master plan. Mr. Martin said the plan will include recommendations for off-street paths
4
including where center line striping should be used. Committee Member Kahn commented that
there are some good examples in Shady Canyon.
Committee Member Heffernan suggested that bollards be used to prevent motorists from
making certain movements, such as illegal turns.
Committee Member Alti commented that integrating things like bollards into the roadway
makes them less unexpected and less likely to be a hazard.
Committee Member Heffernan suggested a global policy to incorporate bicycle safety into the
planning and project approval process.
Committee Member Kline suggested the plan include guidelines for temporarily blocked bike
lanes. Mr. Martin responded the plan could also address bike lane closures and detours during
construction activities.
Mr. Martin provided an overview of the draft bikeway network recommendations specific to
geographic areas of the City.
Committee Member Matsler commented the Avon St. extension recommendation was a good
alternative.
Committee Member Alti noted the existing path through Sunset View Park above Coast Hwy.
could be used as part of the plan.
Committee Member Kahn requested sharrows be considered on Balboa Blvd. Mr. Martin
responded that the consultant team intends to provide City staff with criteria to evaluate and
implement sharrows in appropriate places throughout the City.
Chair Petros noted that the consultant will be giving a presentation to the Balboa Village
Advisory Committee on the draft recommendations for this area. Ms. Nueno noted the meeting
is scheduled for March 12, 2014 at 4 p.m. at Explore Ocean.
Chair Petros noted he would like to see improvements to increase safety for students on Irvine
Avenue.
Committee Member Matsler suggested Westcliff Dr. /17th St. should be considered for
improvements. Mr. Sommers noted that 17th St, west of Irvine Ave, is in the City of Costa Mesa.
Committee Member Kahn asked if there are any planned bikeway linkages from Costa Mesa into
this area. Mr. Miller noted Costa Mesa has not completed that section of their plan.
Committee Member Heffernan suggested focusing on Orchid Ave. as an alternative route to
Coast Hwy. due to the existing signs and width.
Committee Member Kahn suggested Marguerite Ave. should be considered for improvements
such as sharrows.
5
Committee Member Kline commented that Poppy Ave. may have more bicycle usage than the
other streets since Ocean Ave. ends at it.
Committee Member Heffernan noted there used to be a bike lane on Pelican Hill Road, but it
was removed.
Committee Member Heffernan suggested improvements be considered for southbound
Newport Coast Drive at SR73. Mr. Martin noted improvements that were listed in the draft
bikeways plan and that work on this segment would require coordination with Caltrans and the
City of Irvine.
Committee Member Matsler asked for more information about the route on the edge of the
landfill. Mr. Martin noted that the potential for paths along the Coyote Canyon landfill came up
in comments from community members and that the facility is operated by the County.
Committee Member Heffernan suggested Bonita Canyon Dr. at SR73 be considered for
improvements.
Chair Petros commented the bikeways on Jamboree Rd. should be connected from the existing
bike trail to MacArthur Blvd. and that wayfinding signage should be considered for the Bonita
Creek path.
Committee Member Kahn suggested lane reductions in the airport area be implemented to
install striped bike lanes. Mr. Martin noted the draft bike plan notes lane reductions, but the
roadways would need to be reviewed to ensure the roadways could operate with a reduced
capacity.
Mr. Martin described the following next steps for the draft Bicycle Master Plan:
The deadline for input on the draft bikeways network on the project website is March
17.
The project team will present the draft recommendations for education,
encouragement, enforcement and evaluation program elements at the planned April
BMPOC meeting.
Public Comments
Kelly Gast noted the NACTO Urban Bikeway Design Guide includes discussion of green coloring
and suggested it be considered for free right turns.
Ron Wortman suggested improvements be made at the dual right turn lanes to eastbound
Bristol St. at Jamboree Rd. and Campus Dr. Mr. Sommers noted the eastbound Bristol St.
approach to Campus Dr. is within County right of way.
6
Ms. Brenda Miller suggested using a different designation for bicycle sidewalks versus Class I
paths such as the Santa Ana River Trail. She also suggested a Class I path be placed in the
median along Coast Highway.
Stacy Kline noted she rides in the through lane when approaching intersections with right turn
pockets to increase her visibility to motorists. She also expressed concern with installing k-rail
or bollards along bike lanes as it can make it difficult for cyclists to avoid hazards. She
commented that buffered bike lanes where the buffer is between the bike lane and parking can
help cyclists stay out of the door zone, but she would also like to see sharrows and signage to
indicate that bikes may use the full lane.
A member of the public commented there needs to be an enforcement component on the
Peninsula to educate cyclists that ride the wrong way on the sidewalks.
Chair Petros noted the March 17 deadline for comments on the interactive website and
encouraged the public to use the site if they wish to make additional comments.
Committee Member Heffernan asked how the Committee should provide additional comments.
Mr. Sommers said the Committee should send additional comments directly to him.
Ms. Miller suggested the Committee members provide their comments on a private Google map
and email it to Mr. Sommers.
ACTION: None
B. Police Department Update
Lt. Lu provided an update regarding bicycle-involved collisions within the City. He noted seven
bicycle involved incidents in February 2014, while there were three in February 2013. The
actions of the cyclist were determined to be the cause of the seven bicycle-involved collisions
reported in February. There have been 15 bicycle-involved collisions reported to date in 2014,
while there were eight in 2013 for the same time. Of the 15 bicycle-involved collisions reported
to date in 2014, none of the incidents have been determined to be caused by the driver of a
moving motor vehicle.
Public Comments
Ms. Miller asked if the Newport Beach Police Department conducts extra training with officers
to interpret accidents involving bicycles. Lt. Lu responded officers go through collision
investigation training.
Ms. Kline commented that educational programs may help reduce the number of collisions
when the cyclist is at fault.
7
Lt. Lu encouraged cyclists to be aware of their surroundings, noting cyclists traveling at higher
speeds with their head down may have difficultly seeing and avoiding obstacles.
Chair Petros asked Romeo Estrella from Caltrans to provide an update on projects in Newport
Beach. Mr. Estrella noted the application for state funding for bicycle improvements will be
coming out shortly. He said the City should be able to use the draft Bicycle Master Plan as
support for funding applications. He also noted Caltrans is still evaluating how to implement
Coast Hwy improvements.
ACTION: None
7. COMMITTEE ANNOUNCEMENTS OR MATTERS FOR A FUTURE AGENDA
Committee Member Heffernan commented that he ordered bicycle lights similar to those handed
out by the City and has been giving them to cyclists and joggers out at night.
8. ADJOURNMENT - The meeting was adjourned at 6:53 pm.
Minutes Approved:
____________________________________________ ___
Chairman / Tony Petros Date