HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-04-13 AHTF_Agenda Packet CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
m AFFORDABLE HOUSING TASK
FORCE
P
�ciFORN�- Newport Beach City Hall - 100 Civic Center Drive
Crystal Cove Meeting Room (Bay 2D, Room 2115)
Monday, April 13, 2015 - 3:30 PM
Committee Members:
Edward Selich, Mayor (Chair)
Kevin Muldoon, Council Member
Scott Peotter, Council Member
Staff Members:
Kimberly Brandt, Community Development Director
Brenda Wisneski, Deputy Community Development Director
James Campbell, Principal Planner
Jaime Murillo, Senior Planner
Melinda Whelan, Assistant Planner
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. PUBLIC COMMENT ON NON-AGENDIZED ITEMS (comments limited to 3 minutes)
III. CURRENT BUSINESS
a. Discussion regarding Request for Proposals for Use of the Affordable Housing Fund (attached)
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT
V. ADJOURNMENT
THIS COMMITTEE IS SUBJECT TO THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT.AMONG OTHER THINGS,THE BROWN ACT REQUIRES THAT THE
COMMITTEE'S AGENDA BE POSTED AT LEAST SEVENTY-TWO(72)HOURS IN ADVANCE OF EACH REGULAR MEETING AND THAT THE
PUBLIC BE ALLOWED TO COMMENT ON AGENDA ITEMS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE AND ITEMS NOT ON THE AGENDA BUT ARE WITHIN
THE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION OF THE COMMITTEE.THE COMMITTEE MAY LIMIT PUBLIC COMMENTS TO A REASONABLE AMOUNT
OF TIME, GENERALLY THREE(3)MINUTES PER PERSON.
IT IS THE INTENTION OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA)IN ALL
RESPECTS. IF,AS AN ATTENDEE OR A PARTICIPANT AT THIS MEETING,YOU WILL NEED SPECIAL ASSISTANCE BEYOND WHAT IS
NORMALLY PROVIDED,THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WILL ATTEMPT TO ACCOMMODATE YOU IN EVERY REASONABLE MANNER.
PLEASE CONTACT LEILANI BROWN,CITY CLERK,AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING TO INFORM US OF YOUR PARTICULAR
NEEDS AND TO DETERMINE IF ACCOMMODATION IS FEASIBLE(949)-644-3005 OR CITYCLERK@NEWPORTBEACHCA.GOV).
O� IPO�T
NEWPORT BEACH
U � ?
aK
cq�iFoaN�P_
ITEM TITLE: Discussion regarding Request for Proposals for Use of the Affordable Housing
Fund (attached)
ATTACHMENTS:
Description
DRAFT-Proposal No. 15-55 AHD
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
tiWPo
o
V �
LI FOR
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 15-55
AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
RFP Due Date: [INSERT DATE]
RFP Administrator: Anthony Nguyen, Purchasing Agent
T: 949.644.3080 F: 949.642.7072
anguyen@newportbeachca.gov
(Email the RFP Administrator to be added to the Contact List for this RFP to
receive updates regarding addenda to this RFP)
Interested parties may obtain a copy of this RFP by contacting the Purchasing Office or by
accessing the City of Newport Beach PlanetBids portal:
http://www.newportbeachca.gov/bidderportal
SECTION 1 :
RFP OVERVIEW
V \ Z
�c
cqC! Fp RNP
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE:
The City of Newport Beach is issuing this Request for Proposals (RFP) for the development of affordable housing
within the City. Approximately $4.2 million in funding is available from the City's Affordable Housing Fund (fund)
to support the creation of new units, or rehabilitation and/or preservation of existing units. The fund was
created from payments of an in-lieu housing fees required of certain development projects within the City and
intended to fill the financing gap between a project's total development cost and other available financing
sources.
The City is seeking project proposals from development teams or service providers (Proposers) who are
experienced and can demonstrate their ability to finance, design, build/rehabilitate and manage affordable
housing. The Proposer shall be responsive and able to maintain excellent working relationships with City
residents, businesses, government officials and City staff. Respondents to this RFP must be able to demonstrate
their experience and their ability to provide affordable housing units that meet the criteria in Review Criteria. As
part of the selection process, development teams will be required to submit a Statement of Qualifications
(SOQ).
In order to be considered, a development team must have a proven track record of successfully constructing,
financing, completing and managing similar projects. Development teams must also have experience complying
with federal, state and local affordable housing fund constructions, occupancy and reporting requirements.
Funding will be awarded by the City on a competitive basis to the project(s)that provide the best opportunity to
address the City's affordable housing needs. The City reserves the right to request that Proposers submit
additional information as may be requested by staff to clarify submitted information. Also, the City reserves the
right to reject any and all proposals for any reason, and at its sole discretion.
ELIGIBLE USE OF FUNDS:
The City's in-lieu housing fees were collected and deposited into an Affordable Housing Fund account and can
be used to construct, rehabilitate, or subsidize affordable housing or assist other governmental entities, private
organizations or individuals to provide or preserve affordable housing. The fund may be used for the benefit of
both rental and owner-occupied housing. Allowed uses of fund moneys include:
0 Assistance to housing development corporations;
• Equity participation loans;
0 Grants;
• Pre-home ownership co-investment;
• Predevelopment loan funds;
• Participation leases;
21 Page
5
• Other public-private partnership arrangements;
• The acquisition of property and property rights;
• Construction of affordable housing including costs associated with planning, administration,
and design, as well as actual building or installation;
• Costs of rehabilitation and maintenance of existing affordable housing when needed to
preserve units that are at risk of going to a market rate or at risk of deterioration [an
inventory of the City existing affordable housing units is included as Exhibit A;
• Other costs associated with the construction or financing of affordable housing;
• Reasonable administrative charges or related expenses; and
• Reasonable consultant and legal expenses related to the establishment and/or administration
of the fund.
EXAMPLES OF PAST USE OF FUNDS:
In 2004, the City provided approximately $1.5 million in funds to help subsidize the construction of the Bayview
Landing senior affordable housing project. This development provided a total of 120 units: 95 low-income units,
95 very low-income units, and one manger's unit. In 2009, the City granted $140,000 in funds for the
rehabilitation and conservation of 100 senior housing units at Seaview Lutheran Plaza Apartments that had a
deteriorating water delivery system. The project consists of 50 extremely low-income and 50 very low-income
senior housing units. In exchange for the monetary assistance, the owner agreed to extend the affordability of
the units for a total period of 30 years (March 2039).
DEFINITIONS:
The following is an explanation of terms frequently referred to in this document:
■ "City": Refers to the City of Newport Beach.
■ "Request for Proposal (RFP)": Refers to the solicitation process wherein the City is seeking proposals for
the use of Affordable Housing Funds.
■ "Proposal": The formal response to this solicitation submitted to the City by a Proposer or Proposers.
■ "Proposer": Refers to the individual, partnership, or corporation that is submitting a proposal in
response to this RFP process.
■ "Project": Affordable housing provided through a program or project with new units, preservation or
rehabilitation of existing units.
■ "Shall": Refers to a mandatory requirement.
3 1 P a .ge
0
GENERAL INFORMATION:
A. The top proposals will be selected by City staff and presented to the Affordable Housing Task Force
(AHTF), a committee of three City Council Members tasked with identifying, evaluating, and
implementing affordable housing projects to satisfy community needs and achieve regional housing
goals. The AHTF will select the best proposal(s) and recommend funding to the City Council for approval.
B. When determined appropriate, the City will provide information in its possession relevant to
preparation of required information in RFP. The City will provide only the staff assistance and
documentation specifically referred to herein.
C. The developer or service provider shall be responsible for retaining data, records and documentation for
the preparation of the required information. These materials shall be made available to the City as
requested by the City.
D. This RFP does not commit the City to pay costs incurred in preparation of a response to this RFP. All
costs incurred in the preparation of the proposal, the submission of additional information and/or any
aspect of a proposal prior to award of a written contract will be borne by the respondent. The City
reserves the right to accept or reject the combined separate components of this proposal in part or in its
entirety or to waive any informality or technical defect in proposal.
E. All data, documents and other products used, developed or produced during response preparation of
the RFP will become property of the City. All responses to the RFP shall become property of the City.
Proposer information identified as proprietary information shall be maintained confidential, to the
extent allowed under the California Public Records Act.
F. The City reserves the right to reflect, replace and approve any and all subcontractors. All
subcontractor(s) shall be identified in the response to the RFP and the City reserves the right to reject
any subcontractor(s). Subcontractors shall be the responsibility of the developer or service provider, and
the City shall assume no liability of such subcontractors.
PROJECT/PROPOSAL REVIEW CRITERIA:
Immediately following the submission deadline, the Community Development Department will create a review
panel with appropriate staff. Each member of the panel will evaluate and rank each proposal using the
evaluation criteria listed below. The order in which the criteria are listed does not imply their rank of
importance.
• Site control;
• Housing units must remain affordable for at least 30 years;
• Projects must have reasonable acquisition and construction costs, the ability to compete well in securing
other/competitive funding sources and be soundly underwritten;
• Projects must leverage other financing sources;
• Projects must incorporate high quality design and amenities;
41 Page
7
• Projects should incorporate "Green" building practices and materials in building design and
construction;
• Projects must be compatible with neighborhood settings from a massing and design perceptive;
• Projects must incorporate appropriate community spaces, amenities, and services for the target
population;
• Proposer must have demonstrated experience with successful affordable housing projects and the
capacity to work cooperatively with the community in the design and development of the project;
• Proposer must demonstrate the readiness of the proposed project to proceed;
• Proposer must demonstrate ability to manage affordable rental units so as to insure both ongoing
compliance with affordability requirements and long term financial solvency;
• Projects must be consistent with the goals, policies, and programs of the Housing Element of the City's
General Plan—http://www.newportbeachca.gov/PLN/General Plan/06 Ch5 Housing web.pdf;
• Projects should target extremely low-income households (30% or less than the area median income),
very low-income households(50% or less than the area median income), or low-income (80% or less than
the area median income);
• Projects should consider a range of households, including veterans, large families, persons with
disabilities, or seniors; and
• Projects should include supportive services appropriate for the expected tenant population of the
project.
PROJECT/PROPOSAL SELECTION PROCESS:
Once the panel has completed its review of the submitted material, it may invite the top rated proposers to an
interview with the panel. Based on the responses to the RFP and the interviews, the panel may present all,
some, or none, of the proposals to the AHTF. The AHTF may request additional interviews. Proposals that
receive favorable AHTF review will be presented to the City Council, with funding recommendations, for further
consideration and for a final funding decision. Once the City Council has made a final decision, the City and the
approved team(s) will enter into an exclusive negotiation agreement (ENA) with funds reserved for a project
51 Page
2
INSTRUCTIONS
Submittal Information:
In an effort to comply with environmentally-friendly practices, Proposals are due by 11:00 A.M. on XXX XX, 2015
in electronic format only via email to the email address of the RFP Administrator indicated below.
RFP Administrator: Anthony Nguyen, Purchasing Agent
T: 949.644.3080 F: 949.642.7072
Email: anguyen@newportbeachca.gov
(Please mark all submittals "RFP No. 15-55 Affordable Housing Development")
It is the responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that their Proposal is received before the stated deadline. The
Purchasing Office may be contacted at (949) 644-3080 to verify receipt of proposals. Postmarks will not be
considered as a valid excuse for delayed or missing proposals. In the event Proposers either cannot submit
Proposals electronically or the Proposals are too large to transmit, Proposers must contact the RFP
Administrator to make arrangements for hard copy delivery.
Questions,Answers and Addenda to RFP:
Prior to the RFP submission deadline questions may arise regarding the specifications and procedural or
administrative matters. By XXX XX, 2015 all questions pertaining to this RFP shall be directed to the RFP
Administrator only; Proposers shall not contact any other City staff with questions. The RFP Administrator will
draft a formal response to all questions stated and post answers on the City website. Changes to the RFP itself
shall only be made by the City via formal written addenda. Addenda will be published on the City's website. All
addenda shall become a part of the RFP document requiring response by the proposer where indicated.
It is the sole responsibility of the Proposer to ensure that they have received the entire Request for Proposal,
including any and all questions, answers and addenda by visiting the City's website prior to the RFP submission
deadline. Proposers may also email the RFP Administrator to be added to the Contact List for this RFP to receive
updates on any addenda.
Proposal Format:
1. Cover Letter. The proposal must include a signed cover letter. This cover letter must include a
declaration that the only person, persons, company, or parties interested in the proposal as
principals are named herein; that the proposal is made without collusion with any other person,
persons, company, or parties submitting a proposal; that it is in all respects fair and in good faith
without collusion or fraud, and that the signer has full authority to bind the proposer. It must also
include an email address and contact information for the signer. The letter must be signed in blue
ink. All proposals submissions shall be on 8-1/2" x 11" white paper
2. Statement of Qualifications (SOQ). The SOQ must include the following components:
a. Developer or Service Provider Team. An organizational chart showing lines of responsibility, as
well as a list of team members and their duties as part of the team.
61 Page
9
b. Developer or Service Provider Experience. A narrative describing recent affordable residential
development and management experience, with an emphasis on experience gained in the last
five years on projects similar to the one being proposed.
i. Include project name and type (special needs, senior, large family, etc.), project address,
developer team members, unit count and bedroom type, affordability requirements, funding
sources, and project schedule in your description.
ii. Include a description of how neighborhood input was solicited and utilized in the
development of these projects.
c. Financial Capacity. Description of financial strength and ability to obtain project financing, and to
provide sufficient equity for the successful completion of the proposed project.
i. Include a description of current relationships with major lending institutions.
ii. The developer which is selected for recommendation to City Council, or if a partnership the
team members who will retain an ownership interest in the project, will be required to
submit complete financial statements for the last three years. Because of the possibility of
public records requests, the City cannot guarantee that these statements will remain
confidential.
d. References. Include a list of at least three references from public agency partners and
professional lenders and investors with full names, contact information, and identification of the
project(s) worked on.
3. Amount of Funds Requested
4. Project Description. Detailed and concise narrative describing the proposed project, including at a
minimum and as appropriate:
a. The development concept for the site or a description (with photographs) of the site, building,
proposed building square footage, number and size of units/bedrooms, total parking spaces,
proposed ingress and egress, proposed rents and tenant incomes, any special needs groups to be
served, amenities to be provided to the tenants, and resident manager's unit. If there will not be
a resident manager for a rental project, describe in detail how the project will be managed.
b. Provide basic site information such as property address, lot area, existing uses, current General
Plan designation and zoning, consistency with zoning or if rezoning is required.
c. Describe the property location, neighborhood, transportation options, local services, and
amenities within close proximity to the site.
d. Provide a graphic depiction of the proposed project consisting of a preliminary site plans and
elevation.
71 Page
�D
e. Description of how the project will be managed.
f. Provide evidence of site control. Site control must be maintained until the property is acquired.
g. Provide a plan for conducting community outreach to the neighbors of the proposed project and
community groups. The outreach plan should describe how the proposer intends to build
support for the project and address community concerns. The outreach plan should also discuss
any anticipated community concerns and how they will be handled.
3. Development Pro Forma that identifies the sources and uses of all funds necessary to complete the
project, and that includes the project's anticipated cash flows over a period of years equal to 15
years and 30 years. The pro forma should identify important underlying assumptions that govern the
cash flows.
4. Proposed Implementation Plan. Taking as a starting point City Council approval of use of the fund,
provide a proposed development schedule or implementation plan. For development projects,
include the following milestones: site acquisition, additional funding from all other funding sources,
zoning change approvals if necessary, preparation and approval of construction plans, start of
construction, completion of construction, and lease-up.
The proposal must be completely responsive to the RFP. Incomplete proposals will be deemed as
nonresponsive and will be rejected. The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals submitted
and no representation is made hereby that any contract will be awarded pursuant to this RFP or
otherwise.
81 Page
1Z
SECTION 2
,r
Po��
U 1
Cq�!
FOR
PROGRAM SCOPE
The City of Newport Beach has an Affordable Housing Fund that will reach a maximum of approximately $4.3
million in 2015. The City is soliciting proposals to find the best project(s) and/or program(s) to develop,
preserve, or rehabilitate affordable housing units within the City from developers or service providers who are
experienced, financially creative and capable of developing, managing and maintaining high quality housing.
The City will entertain proposals for the following types of projects:
• Construction of new affordable housing units within the City.
• Rehabilitate and preserve existing affordable housing units on one or more sites. Existing affordable
housing sites located in the City are attached as Exhibit_XX.
• Acquire market-rate units on one or more sites and convert them to affordable units.
• Subsidizing housing costs for lower-income households or special needs groups.
The selected developer or service provider will also have a demonstrated history of working cooperatively
with surrounding neighborhoods in all phases of project development. Both nonprofit and for profit
developers are eligible to apply, either individually or in a partnership with other entities.
The City is not making any parcels it owns available for development through this RFP, and it will entertain
proposals for suitable properties located anywhere in the City.
Consultant Representative
The Consultant shall assign a primary representative and an alternate to perform the services described in the
scope of work. Each shall be identified in the proposal. The Consultant's representatives shall remain in
responsible charge of all duties from contract negotiations through project completion. If the primary
representative is unable to continue with the project, then the alternate representative shall become the
primary representative.
City Responsibilities
The City shall provide the following items to assist the Consultant in completing services:
• Primary City representative;
• Current inventory of affordable housing sites in City and housing agreements;
• Housing Element Site Inventory and Analysis identifying potential housing sites in the City and
allowed density
10 Page
�3
SECTION
PROPOSAL ATTACHMENTS
ATTACHMENT A: PROPOSER INFORMATION FORM
Instructions:Complete the form below and remit as part of your Proposal as Attachment A.
PROPOSER INFORMATION
PROPOSER/FIRM NAME:
ADDRESS FOR NOTICES:
MAIN CONTACT(NAME AND TITLE):
CONTACT NUMBERS: TELEPHONE: FAX:
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
FIRM SIGNATURE AUTHORIZATION AND CERTIFICATION
Per the California Corporate Code,Business and Professions Code,the Consultant's Bylaws/Operating Agreement and/or the attached Board
Resolution(if applicable),I/we hereby verify that I/we am/are(an)authorized signatory(ies)for the aforementioned Consultant and as such am/are
authorized to sign and bind the Consultant in contract with the City of Newport Beach.
1. CONSULTANT AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY(IES):
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME TITLE DATE
SIGNATURE PRINT NAME TITLE DATE
2. SIGNATURE AUTHORIZATION IS PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH:
❑ Proposer's Bylaws/Operating Agreement Section ❑ Copy Attached
❑ Board Resolution ❑ Copy Attached
❑ Corporate or Business and Professions Code**
**If Consultant is a corporation,two(2)authorized signatories will be required on all documents submitted, unless
specified in the organization's Bylaws or corporate resolution.
IMPORTANT NOTE: If the signature authorization status of any individual changes during the term of the contract, it is
the responsibility of the Consultant to contact the City Administrator for the Consultant regarding the change and to
complete and submit a new Signature Authorization Form. Incorrect information on file may delay the processing of
any of the documents submitted.
12 1 Page
15
SECTION
ERMS
. �
• s
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
I. Acceptance of Terms and Conditions
Submission of a proposal indicates acceptance by the company submitting the proposal of the terms,
conditions and specifications contained in this RFP, unless clearly and specifically stated otherwise in the
completed Statement of Compliance.
II. Public Record
Upon submission of a proposal and other materials for consideration by the City, such proposals and materials
shall become the property of the City of Newport Beach. Proposals may be subject to public inspection and
disclosure pursuant to state and federal law after the award of a contract for this Project. Prior to the RFP
deadline, proposals may be modified or withdrawn by an authorized representative of the Proposer by written
notice to the Purchasing Office.
III. Availability of Records
All relevant documents pertaining to this RFP and procurement process shall be made available by the
Purchasing Office upon successful conclusion of the entire procurement process.
IV. Late Proposals
Any proposal which is not received by the City's Purchasing Office prior to the deadline date and time set forth
in this solicitation shall not be considered. The City assumes no responsibility or liability for the transmission,
delay,or delivery of a proposal by either public or private carriers.
V. Specificity of Information
No verbal or written information which is obtained other than through this RFP or its addenda shall be binding
on the City. No employee of the City is authorized to interpret any portion of this RFP or give information as
to the requirements of the RFP in addition to that contained in or amended to this written RFP document.
VI. Errors and Omissions
This RFP cannot identify each specific, individual task required to successfully and completely implement this
Project. The City relies on the professionalism and competence of Proposers to be knowledgeable of the
general areas identified in the scope of work and to include in their proposals all materials, equipment,
required tasks and subtasks, personnel commitments, man-hours, labor, direct and indirect costs, etc.
Proposers shall not take advantage of any errors and/or omissions in this RFP document or in the firm's
specifications submitted with their proposals. Where such errors or omissions are discovered by the City,full
instructions will be given by the City in the form of an addenda.
VII. Proposal Validity
Unless otherwise noted by the Proposer,all proposals shall be held valid for a period of 180 days.
141 Page
17
VIII. Right of Rejection
The City reserves the right to: (1) Accept or reject any and all proposals or any part of any proposal, and to
waive minor defects or technicalities in such; (2) Request clarification of any information contained in a
proposal; (3) Solicit new proposals on the same project, or on a modified project, which may include portions
of the original RFP as the City may deem necessary; (4) Disregard all non-conforming, non-responsive, or
conditional proposals, (5) Reject the response of any proposer who does not pass the evaluation to the City's
satisfaction, (6)Allow for the correction of errors and/or omissions; (7) Select the proposal that will best meet
the needs of the City, and (8) Negotiate service contract and terms with the successful Proposer.
IX. Non-Compliance
Proposers and/or proposals that do not meet the stated requirements may be considered noncompliant and
may be disqualified, unless such noncompliance is waived by the City. During the evaluation process,the City
reserves the right to request additional information or clarification from those submitting proposals, and to
allow corrections of errors and/or omissions.
X. Determination of Responsiveness and Responsibility
The City shall have sole authority in determining the responsiveness and responsibility of any and all
Proposals. For Proposals containing exceptions to specifications and/or requirements,the City shall have sole
authority in determining the extent to which exceptions affect the responsiveness and responsibility of any
and all Proposals.
XI. Obligation to Award
The City of Newport Beach is not obligated to enter into a Contract or Agreement on the basis of any proposal
submitted in response to this RFP. City reserves the right to award multiple contracts if is deemed most
advantageous to the City.
XII. Bidder Reimbursement Prohibition
The City will not pay for any information herein requested, nor are they liable for any costs incurred by any
vendors prior to award of the fund. The City may require the finalist proposer(s) to provide on-site
presentations and demonstrations of the project(s) proposed by the proposer(s). All costs associated with the
demonstrations or follow-up interviews are the sole obligation of the proposer(s).
XIII. Gratuity Prohibition
Proposers shall not offer any gratuities, favors, or anything of monetary value to any official, employee, or
agent of the City for the purpose of influencing consideration of this proposal. Submission of a Proposal
indicates Proposer certifies that they have not paid nor agreed to pay any person, other than a bona fide
employee, a fee or a brokerage resulting from the award of the contract.
XIV. Contact with City Personnel or Entities
During the RFP procurement process, proposal evaluation process and proposal selection process, the RFP
Administrator is to serve as the primary point of contact for any and all matters pertaining to this RFP and
Project. Proposers shall not contact any City personnel or entities other than the RFP Administrator or those
from the City's Purchasing Office for matters regarding this Project until conclusion of the entire procurement
15 1 Page
-g
process, which shall be defined as Agreement Award. Unauthorized contact may result in disqualification of
Proposals.
XV. Indemnification
Proposer, at its own expense and without exception, shall indemnify, defend and pay all damages, costs,
expenses, including attorney fees, and otherwise hold harmless the City, its employees, and agents, from any
liability of any nature or kind in regard to the delivery of these services. Submission of a Proposal indicates
Proposer waives the right to claims for damages of any nature, whatsoever, based on the Proposal solicitation
and/or selection process.
XVI. Compliance with All Applicable Laws
Proposer declares that it shall comply with all licenses, statutes, ordinances, regulations and requirements of
all governmental entities, including federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter
enacted, including, but not limited to,appropriate contractor licensing and business licensing.
XVII. Subcontractor/Joint Ventures
The selected Consultant shall be the Prime Contractor performing the primary functions of the Agreement. If
any portion of the Agreement is to be performed by a subcontractor, this must be clearly set forth in the
Proposal submittal as to what part(s) is/are to be delegated. The City reserves the right to reject any Proposal
wherein use of subcontractors significantly affects the ability of the Proposer to function as the Prime
Contractor on the awarded Agreement. The Prime Contractor will at all times be responsible for the acts and
errors or omissions of its subcontractors or joint participants and persons directly or indirectly employed by
them. Acceptance or rejection of a Proposer's request to use subcontractors is at the sole discretion of the
City.
16 1 Page
-9
EXHIBIT A
Inventory of Existing Affordable Rental
Housing Units
17
�o
City of Newport Beach Assisted and Affordable Housing Inventory
Earliest
Possible
Date of
Project Name/Location Type of Assistance Received Change Number of Units/Type
Section 8(rental assistance vouchers)
Newport Harbor Apartments Density Bonus 2020 26 Low-Income
1538 Placentia Avenue Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG)
Section 8
Newport Harbor II Apartments Density Bonus 2023 10 Low-Income
1530 Placentia Avenue CDBG 4 Very Low-Income
In-Lieu Fee Funds
Section 8
Newport Seacrest Apartments CDBG 2016 20 Very Low-Income
843 15th Street Fee Waivers 45 Low-Income
Tax Credit Financing
Pacific Heights Apartments Section 8
2019 7Low-Income
881-887 W. 15th Street Density Bonus
Newport Seashore Apartments Section 8 2018 15 Low-Income
849 West 15th Street Fee Waivers
Newport Seaside Apartment Section 8
1544 Placentia CDBG 2017 25 Very Low-Income
Fee Waivers
Seaview Lutheran Plaza(Seniors) Section 202(federal grant) 100 Extremely Low and
2800 Pacific View Drive Section 8
2039 Very Low—
Income Senior
Bayview Landing(Seniors) In-lieu Fee Funds 24 Very Low
1121 Back Bay Drive Fee Waivers 2056 95 Low-Income
Tax Credit Financing
SOURCE: City of Newport Beach Planning Division
18 1 Page
21