HomeMy WebLinkAbout01 - City Council PrioritiesCity Council Priorities First Cut Jan 11, 2008
city Council Priorities Weighted
Method
Rank
Priority
Selich
Daigle
Webb
Henn
Curry
[Rosansky
Gardner
Total
1
City Hall
3
3
3
3
3
3
18
2
Facilities Financing Plan .
2
2
1
2
1
6
3
Implement Group Homes Ordinance
1
1
2
1
1
4
3
Water Quality
1
3
4
3
Benchmarking
2
1
1
1
4
6
Banning Ranch Appraisal & Acquisition Plan (New)
1
2
3
7
Traffic Management Implementation
2
2
8
Make City More Energy Efficient (New)
1
1
City Council Priorities Unweighted
Method
Rank
Priority
Selich
Daigle
Webb
Henn
Curry_Rosansky
Gardner
Total
1
City Ha41
1
1
1
1
1
1
6
2
Implement Group Homes Ordinance
1
1
1
3
2
Facilities Financing Plan
1
1
1
3
2
Benchmarking
3
5
Water Quality
1
1
2
5
Banning Ranch Appraisal & Acquisition Plan (New)
1
1
2
7
Traffic Management Implementation
1
1
7
Make Ci More Energy Efficient (New)
1
1
COUNCIL PRIORITY DETAILS
RESOLVE THE CITY HALL ISSUE BY JUNE 30, 2007
April 10"
Approve contract for assessment of OCTA site and
neighboring site for city hall and OCTA station with DMJM
Design — City Council (approximately $45,000)
May 22nd
Review DMJM site assessment report, discuss cost
implications, schedule, etc — City Council
May 28"-June 6"
Potential discussions with OCTA officials regarding
station relocation — Council Building Committee, staff
June 12"'
Decision regarding OCTA site for city hall location and
Site for OCTA relocation. Provide further direction to
staff regarding this site or other sites — City Council
Potential issues:
OCTA's desire to participate, the cost of both projects, potential ballot
initiative on another site, traffic circulation in area, Greenlight vote on one or both
projects, The Irvine Company's permission needed for use of site for OCTA's relocation.
MINIMIZE THE ADVERSE IMPACTS OF JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT THROUGH THE
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY'S AIRPORT POLICY
April 301h
Draft "Corridor Cities Policy Statement" as written
document to be adopted by Corridor City councils. Have
Aviation Committee City Council Members approve —
Webb, Selich, Daigle, Bludau, Burnham
May 23`d
Meet with AWG and AirFair to discuss draft policy —
Webb, Selich, Daigle, Bludau, Burnham
June 22 "0
Meet with Corridor Cities to discuss policy, obtain
agreement to adopt policy resolutions. — Webb, Selich,
Daigle, Bludau, Burnham, Clauson
July 101h
Newport Beach City Council adopts "Corridor Cities Policy
Statement' — City Council, Bludau
July- October
Meet with AirFair and AWG to further communication —
Webb, Selich, Daigle, Bludau, Burnham
August -Nov
Meet with Corridor Cities on regular basis to strengthen
relationships, share communications, develop strategies
for opposing future expansion of JWA, planning
transportation strategies to get OC passengers to other
regional airports —Webb, Selich, Daigle, Bludau,
Burnham
Potential issues: Developing agreement locally on issues and strategies; developing
consensus with Corridor Cities on Policy Statement; money for transportation studies,
including obtaining grant funding; staff time to pursue regional meetings and grant
funding applications.
transportation program and if so what kinds of transportation programs seem to make
sense.
DEVELOP AN EFFICIENT TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLAN AND BEGIN
IMPLEMENTATION
August 2007 Obtain completed traffic signal system design by Iterus
(consultant) — Badum, Brine
October 2007 -May 2008 Phase 1 installation at MacArthur Blvd., Coast Highway,
Avocado, San Joaquin Road and interim TOC at city hall
— Badum, Brine
July 2008 Phase 2 installation in airport area (19 intersections)
July 2009 Phase 3 installation along Jamboree (11 intersections)
Potential issues: Timing involved in successfully calibrating and sequencing signals to
work in tandem; working out the "bugs" on Traffic Operations Center at City Hall.
Phase 2 includes the installation of new signal controllers at 14 intersections along
Measure M funding for Phase 2 design and construction.
ALIGN THE CITY'S CODES, REGULATIONS AND POLICIES WITH THE NEWLY
ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN
June 260' City Council adoption of Strategic Plan for Fiscal and
Economic Sustainability
June 29th HCD Certification of Housing Element
July 24" City Council adoption of Inclusionary Housing Ordinance
and In -Lieu Fee
City Council approval of Airport Area.lnfrastructure Study
August 28th City.Council adoption of updated Fair Share Fee. and
Airport Area Infrastructure Fee
August Public workshop
September 11th City Council adoption of code amendment re: residential
subdivisions
September 25`h City Council approval of Harbor Area Management Plan
October - November Public workshop
November 16th Coastal Commission approval of revised Coastal Land
Use Plan
December 28th Completion of land use database refinements
January 22'd City Council adoption of Zoning Code
February 260 City Council adoption of LCP Implementation Plan
April 2008 City Council adoption of code amendment re: property
maintenance standards
May 2008 City Council approval of amended policies on historic,
archaeological and paleontological resources
June 2008 City Council adoption of revised Planned Community
texts
Potential issues: Extended public review and input on Fair Share and Airport Area
Infrastructure Fees, extensive review and revisions of Zoning Code and LCP
Implementation Program, Coastal Commission approval of CLUP amendment and
Implementation Program, need for extensive rewrite of Specific Plans or Planned
Community texts.
2) City Council adoption of the Strategic Plan for Fiscal and Economic Stability,
3) update of the inclusionary housing in -lieu fee studv.
4) completion of the engineering studies to update the Fair Share Fee,
5) amendment to the Development Agreement Ordinance to reflect General Plan
model,
DEVELOP A LONG TERM MASTER PLAN FOR CITY FACILITIES, INCLUDING
ESTIMATED COSTS AND REVENUE REQUIREMENTS
May -June 2007 Council Finance Committee reviews and updates cost
estimates, facility sequencing, and financing assumptions
of the existing plan and makes recommendations to the
City Council. .
July- August 2007 Council reviews, adjusts (if needed) and adopts the long
term financing plan as a tool to work towards the
prioritization of City facility projects and development of
the funding capability to move forward with these projects.
October, March Council reviews and updates plan every 6 months on an
ongoing basis.
Potential issues: Escalating costs of projects; doing space needs studies for facilities;
cost of space needs studies; accurately estimating cost of projects; commitment of future
Councils to plan; developing fiscal discipline to adhere to facilities funding plan; deciding
facility priorities.
INSTITUTE AN ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT EFFORT
THROUGH THE IDENTIFICATION OF SERVICE BENCHMARKS AND DATA
GATHERING TO MEASURE ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS
April /May Define ultimate goal and prepare a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) for consultants to base proposals
against. Review with City Council and obtain Council
approval - Daigle, Curry, Henn, Danner, Kurth, Bludau
June Make RFQ available to consultants — Danner, Kurth
July RFQ responses received, Finance Committee reviews
and develops recommendation to Council, Council
approves consultant hiring — Daigle, Curry, Henn, Danner,
Kurth, Bludau
August- December Council Finance Committee and staff work with consultant
to capture and provide data, assess organizational
effectiveness, develop service performance benchmarks,
consultant provides updates to Finance Committee —
Daigle, Curry, Henn, Danner, Kurth, Bludau
February 2008 Consultant.provides findings at Council Study Session,
Council accepts study and provides direction to City
Manager .
Potential issues: Consultant cost to do benchmarking for City services; staff time
demands to gather and assist in interpreting data with consultants; comparison of
service quality and quantities with other cities; definitions of service level expectations
from Newport Beach residents; availability of service benchmarks.
incorporate efficient practices into all services provided by the City.
PROVIDE MORE PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES, WITH EMPHASIS
ON ACTIVE AND WATER- ORIENTED FACILITIES, WHERE APPROPRIATE
May 2007 PB &R reconsideration of Newport Center Park
concept/uses
August 2007 Review Marina Park plan concept with Council prior to
concept development
September 2007 Begin concept development of Marina Park site
September 2007 Newport Coast Community Center and Newport Ridge
Park ball fields — community center expected to be
opened with programs, ball fields an issue as to whether
City assumes ownership.
October 2007 OASIS space needs assessment and cost estimate
provided by consultant, reviewed by City Council
November 2007 Design development phase begins for OASIS
January-March 2008 Public outreach effort for Sunset Ridge Park to gather
public.input, identify concept
February 2008 Mariners Park baseball /soccer fields open for use.
June 2008 Council reviews Sunset Ridge Park concept
August 2008 Sunset Ridge Park conceptual development begins
Spring 2008 Coastal Peak Park turned over to City, begins operational
use
September 2009 Marina Park residents vacate site
Potential issues: Adhering to planning and construction schedules; staffing for new
facilities; escalating project costs; staff time needed for public outreach efforts; role of
Hoag in OASIS project; ingress /egress issues for Sunset Ridge Park concept; Marina
Park tenants relocation process; City ownership of Newport Coast ball fields?
budget.
IMPROVE THE METHODS AND FREQUENCY BY WHICH THE CITY
COMMUNICATES WITH ITS RESIDENTS .
April /May Review budgeted position with City Council
Communications Committee, develop job description and
announcement — Kill, Bludau
June 26th Council consideration of budgeted position to coordinate
City's press releases, newsletters, update web site,
develop e-mail addresses. — Council, Kiff, Bludau
July /August Develop job description with Council Communications
Committee, recruit for position — Curry, Daigle, Gardner,
Kiff, Bludau, Ramsey
August Hire position — Bludau, Kiff
September- December Send out two community newsletters, update /refresh
City's web site information, develop communication plan
for the coordination of all the City's communication forms.
Take policy to Council Communications Committee for
discussion and approval. Have policy adopted by City
Council. — New Position, Kiff, Bludau, Council
Communications Committee
Potential issues: Approval of new position; adequate salary range for position; work
space for position; obtaining Council consensus on communications plan.
work was 1/7. One of her earlv responsibilities is to review the City's existing
communications plan and recommend additions /revisions within two months on the job.
This position reports directly to the City Manager.
DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY PROGRAM TO
DEAL EFFECTIVELY WITH THE RECOVERY HOMES ISSUE
March - August 2007 Write, introduce, amend and support key legislation in
Sacramento regarding giving local governments more
control over group homes issues; work to get other cities
supportive of this legislation so that a strong local
government coalition is formed to lobby on behalf of this
legislation.
April- December 2007 Work directly with Cal. Dept. of Alcohol & Drug Programs
(ADP) to elicit cooperation in limiting impacts and over
concentrations, obtain agency support for legislative
changes to provide local government more authority over
group homes. Obtain agency support in making
determinations that local needs have been met.
March -July 2007 Adopt an ordinance allowing the City to limit local group
home and over concentration impacts.
Ongoing Develop an interdepartmental staff team to enforce
current ordinances for the purpose of protecting
neighborhoods.
Ongoing Continue to educate the community, obtain community
input regarding recovery home laws, regulations, citizen
concerns and City efforts and programs.
Potential issues: Current federal and state laws, dealing with State agencies, educating
the public as to what regulation can be accomplished legally, staff time required of issue,
cost of legal assistance, building strong local government coalition to lobby, potential of
lawsuits claiming discriminatory treatment of group homes.
IMPROVE AND PROTECT WATER QUALITY IN OUR BAYS, THE OCEAN AND OUR
DRINKING WATER
Water Qualitv
July 2007 Prepare status of current projects and programs
August 2007 Establish goal & objectives
September 2007 Retain consultant, work scope to fully explore potential
projects and programs, schedules, research funding
mechanisms including grants and the potential to
establish a water quality enterprise fund.
February 2008 Present draft master plan to City committees /City Council
May 2008 City Council approves Water Quality Master Plan.
November 2008 Ballot measure to establish Water Quality fee and
enterprise fund.
Drinking Water
July 2007 Retain consultant to update Water Master plan and rate
study.
January 2008 City Council approves updated Water Master Plan and
initiates rate adjustment process.
Potential issues: Water Quality — Political will to establish a new enterprise fund and fee;
availability of grant funds; new regulations and cost of meeting them.
Potential issues: Drinking Water— Comparisons to other agencies, IRWD factor.
on -going work on water conservation and run -off reduction issues.
This Spring the Reqional Water Quality Control Board is expected to approve a $10M
made.
In Spring 2008 the Council will consider retaining a consultant to research the potential
to establish a water quality enterprise fund.
The HAMP will be reviewed by the City Council, with potential adoption in June.
In July. Staff will present to Council the Central Orange County Integrated Reig_o_ nal
Water Management Plan.
later than February, 2008.
DEVELOP A WAY TO REGULARLY REVIEW AND UPDATE CITY FEES IN ORDER
TO ENSURE MOST FEE SERVICES PAY FOR THEMSELVES
Public Resource Management Group began the preparation of a cost allocation plan and
model and a cost of services study and model in December. That portion of this priority
is well underway and will also involve Finance Committee participation. Satisfying this
priority will require completing the PRM study and, prospectively, staffs annual update to
the models.
April 27, 2007 Consultant to complete data collection from departments
May 18, 2007 Consultant to complete staff review of worksheets
June 8, 2007 Complete staff review of consultant's draft cost allocation
plan and cost of services worksheets
June 13, 2007 Consultant to present final cost allocation plan, cost of
services study and demonstrate the associated models to
City departments
June 26, 2007 Consultant to present final cost allocation plan, cost of
services study and demonstrate the associated models to
Finance Committee
July 10, 2007 Consultant to present final cost allocation plan and cost of
services study at Council Study Session
July 10, 2007 City Council to adopt master fee schedule and introduce
associated ordinance revising Chapter 3.36
July 24, 2007 City Council second reading of ordinance revisions
August 23, 2007 Chapter 3.36 ordinance revisions become effective
Potential issues: Short of contracting for annual studies, ensuring costs are accurately
identified prospectively will require additional efforts from .departments to update the cost
models.
of agencies Oncludinq the County of OrangeLusing the valuation basis for development
fees have lost legal challenges to that methodology resulting in a costly change to
charged fees were included in the consultant's review.
FAC6T'PFPVrCE]IDI]MHXM � WORNL �if200B eMwlu I
ru uuam uu {N a u.v n uuury ,+acorn ,unm �Ymuca - ,rrluu arryT�'� — rwlnw ,umur �pTivan a,u,a mwa m9,w mmaa mm,u mmq comer
coma, rwu
SMxlfm a4BP.Wl ie.IM.W, atYU01 i0.Wm m}t2N+ KW.wf mWW+ mq{N, a46tt}m a[yWl aWOW, i6inmf a]}WM. agyE}Bf agYVAf itRW6'JI. i6,fw.Wf atp4wf i4Vl}ir m.Y4f0f iL,ml.i01 aPytpf S5mYf0f iaeN.W AWIDI• i{Wmf m.W.WI ie,Wg49f �.
aunm asw}P. aunm uWmt s4Wmt aPmm isAm.m aemum mwxm mmam asmam asAVUw mmam aepmm atAnm. suw.m s4wum assmm uAn]m aumm aumaoe as}mm. uwvm Jum}n i{em,m i2mB.m aaW,mt umam aawa
avn.}m iamr+ a4entn msYm iawm unum uw4m uBwv umtwx uAnw maKm alae.]m s)m}m uWm maamz u.aum uWtmt mvum' c,Wm m.WAP comae. avwm m,WPt i2W}ox mAP}W. m}K
.nWB}9{ s m}v uuam. � { msum i ...amt. a W a2Y],w .msm}W slssvW iusa
a .:ux rm ixNCU+ :cWm+ - s+rrw:o i+, }a }+B. a:r}KBro .:r:A -acm :r.}:us r .s++ase+r .).,•:awr zrs.+nw ...vaa ::xe ra.u, ...awoi.: a.w: ,..w.e.eq:..o�.aux..io.:awi .. , aAU .:o.z:oAa im :.ro,,.e {er "f.os..ocw .sosww ...s.exw..v.a,.iai .se.s -.eu> sm.�Aa aros.oc� : ...
:ooPn.»sm nunmme,azaAAn{,Aw} +BP!4mt}ti �motnnP, con: nnn{. mPn. fe{ Aro.{ raWm. PmAV. W. Pw. in] s.. n1+ Px, mrz, w. iY:,tmwm'- W.xw+.m.'W.w.m.vnmws Peme,Y]W}wwe:Wm,.m. WSfemr ursfum PUw]m.W.mAm. ®. >rmw.n,mAV Wrra,tanim�.t tp..w rm
+iq m W}10. r§ the W. m WonW m:f+uP m wus,.m w w P w eo m w w w w. W m W m n W
ma N940PN.1 nns]q ,..,w m4>mn > .� ..,®:con PAWrn w w m P
PMYY Pm2W m.x14,P P}P,Pt PAPNt P.wa},4 nAK,tl P.+P¢e. f4e:].W Kn4W n]m}n YA:4)P nWAn PAttAP P.ImAP PAY.fm NCiKYt 6,eµe.]u P4,re }P Oe }IR1K WSY }Y WArAn PfAnm, PCUaFN {6rTgs Pni:p• tVAWYA lfy,tbu. tnfie }m tuyµlm'.:Pr,r. P,W P
1w Pm1dT P10.fY p1.tm.1P P ;1wW P.,i.ui W}m.tm P2,m{P P W tPWwt i,>.iK® PfNf }q Amlm.rP Wye@r W,rWp P.'Imdm WPY.Iq. fl0.1p.W iw0.]P PRYe.W POJI0.]m P iu.W}P PI.{9.N1 tilu4uu W.II1m P2]a+m:. WAV]m P]Amb11 PIl:4{m iuib].M MAyti{ {Klm
O.Im. + f1ey1M
m iLL)n¢i aa.Yf.® a4,OnC MLin+m im, ®W mm1.m TI.Wm m4]P.nf m.,mlm a3Pgw1 aw}Pp, L.ftl}n �ffi,Y .. I. m m 0 W m W R W P. m. m w m W W W
D
�Aftm
Nes
im1.,0 ��fm_4,t
msu
mi,.Y
miY
mVW mien SLti1
mnm mPiB'
Pa+n
n
}u
,mAm .YrxiBm
..
�
- _• r_
t4rWm T«wl w+.smau
+rAn
aamo
—'•••
•. t4f}n.
tum}m
n}Y.W
eiaemr
nn,IW
tW.n m.ia,W a m
mnd
NW.®
v.+nv+ nm.m
_ PY " n lP �O ®e1i �_
-
�
'I
it
—�
rWeam+rmiom..
n
P,w
n.
m
Si
—faT'f
idi
6
6.
_
u »..e
--
tvwm.
w„4mW, m
>Mrn.t
e
T
r
,
. rnw
+
oe.,
v, mrs
cS�4di �+
A rm to %fBm m,Y P,
Me4,m W +m +m imP +im
nem{Aro
IR
Aam+
K Sm eZeS+RY APW
N
N N N 0 e0
N W
ru uuam uu {N a u.v n uuury ,+acorn ,unm �Ymuca - ,rrluu arryT�'� — rwlnw ,umur �pTivan a,u,a mwa m9,w mmaa mm,u mmq comer
coma, rwu
SMxlfm a4BP.Wl ie.IM.W, atYU01 i0.Wm m}t2N+ KW.wf mWW+ mq{N, a46tt}m a[yWl aWOW, i6inmf a]}WM. agyE}Bf agYVAf itRW6'JI. i6,fw.Wf atp4wf i4Vl}ir m.Y4f0f iL,ml.i01 aPytpf S5mYf0f iaeN.W AWIDI• i{Wmf m.W.WI ie,Wg49f �.
aunm asw}P. aunm uWmt s4Wmt aPmm isAm.m aemum mwxm mmam asmam asAVUw mmam aepmm atAnm. suw.m s4wum assmm uAn]m aumm aumaoe as}mm. uwvm Jum}n i{em,m i2mB.m aaW,mt umam aawa
avn.}m iamr+ a4entn msYm iawm unum uw4m uBwv umtwx uAnw maKm alae.]m s)m}m uWm maamz u.aum uWtmt mvum' c,Wm m.WAP comae. avwm m,WPt i2W}ox mAP}W. m}K
.nWB}9{ s m}v uuam. � { msum i ...amt. a W a2Y],w .msm}W slssvW iusa
a .:ux rm ixNCU+ :cWm+ - s+rrw:o i+, }a }+B. a:r}KBro .:r:A -acm :r.}:us r .s++ase+r .).,•:awr zrs.+nw ...vaa ::xe ra.u, ...awoi.: a.w: ,..w.e.eq:..o�.aux..io.:awi .. , aAU .:o.z:oAa im :.ro,,.e {er "f.os..ocw .sosww ...s.exw..v.a,.iai .se.s -.eu> sm.�Aa aros.oc� : ...
:ooPn.»sm nunmme,azaAAn{,Aw} +BP!4mt}ti �motnnP, con: nnn{. mPn. fe{ Aro.{ raWm. PmAV. W. Pw. in] s.. n1+ Px, mrz, w. iY:,tmwm'- W.xw+.m.'W.w.m.vnmws Peme,Y]W}wwe:Wm,.m. WSfemr ursfum PUw]m.W.mAm. ®. >rmw.n,mAV Wrra,tanim�.t tp..w rm
+iq m W}10. r§ the W. m WonW m:f+uP m wus,.m w w P w eo m w w w w. W m W m n W
ma N940PN.1 nns]q ,..,w m4>mn > .� ..,®:con PAWrn w w m P
PMYY Pm2W m.x14,P P}P,Pt PAPNt P.wa},4 nAK,tl P.+P¢e. f4e:].W Kn4W n]m}n YA:4)P nWAn PAttAP P.ImAP PAY.fm NCiKYt 6,eµe.]u P4,re }P Oe }IR1K WSY }Y WArAn PfAnm, PCUaFN {6rTgs Pni:p• tVAWYA lfy,tbu. tnfie }m tuyµlm'.:Pr,r. P,W P
1w Pm1dT P10.fY p1.tm.1P P ;1wW P.,i.ui W}m.tm P2,m{P P W tPWwt i,>.iK® PfNf }q Amlm.rP Wye@r W,rWp P.'Imdm WPY.Iq. fl0.1p.W iw0.]P PRYe.W POJI0.]m P iu.W}P PI.{9.N1 tilu4uu W.II1m P2]a+m:. WAV]m P]Amb11 PIl:4{m iuib].M MAyti{ {Klm
O.Im. + f1ey1M
m iLL)n¢i aa.Yf.® a4,OnC MLin+m im, ®W mm1.m TI.Wm m4]P.nf m.,mlm a3Pgw1 aw}Pp, L.ftl}n �ffi,Y .. I. m m 0 W m W R W P. m. m w m W W W
D
FACILITY REPLACEMENT PLANNING WORKSHEET )08
44
Llbrarlas
Parks; Park
Dwslopmeflt
Projects; 6
Community
'Wotan (M
Very Long Term Projections (such as City Yard Structures, Piers, Other Library
1. Only General Fund projects are addressed.
2. Contingency, Stabilization, and Designated Reserve Requirements must be maintained.
3. Service levels supported by the Operating Budget should not be adversely Impacted.
4. Construction costs will Increase an average of 3% per year over the long run.
5. COP interest rate will be 4.7% for the First Issue, 4.8% for the second issue, and 6% thereafter.
6. COP Reserve requirement will be approximately one year's debt service.
7. COI will be $200.000 per issue. plus 20bps of Debt Service for Insurance, plus $7.50 per Certificate
for Underwriters Discount
8. The term will be 30 years In each case, but the last year will be paid by the Reserve Fund.
9. City earnings on temporarily idle funds will be 4% for 2 years; 4.5% for 3 years, and 5% thereafter.
10. City will increase Annual Budget Contribution by 2.5% each year.
11. Construction expenditures for a project will take place over three years as follows: 10% first year;
55% second year: 35% third year.
12. All expenses must be absorbed by the General Fund, except for one time infusions and projected
usage fees (for enterprise operations) as indicated on the worksheet. Potential develooment related
13. Funding for replacement of facilities not expected to be initiated within 15 years is not specifically
quantified. but continuation of annual budget contributions from General Fund in the pattern
established should be adequate to fund existing facility replacements over the long term. New
facilities are not included.
14. Potential expenses for dredging are not included In this analysis. Whatever portion of such
expense that is not covered by outside Grants will have to be budgeted as part of the ongoing annual
Capital Improvement Project program.
15. No expenses for land acquisition or revenue from long term lease of vacated land are included.
"Debt Service to OpBud" muca
for Orange County Cities
surveyed am as follows: Newpon
Baach..56 %; Cost Mass, 3.51 %:
Anaheim, 14.97 %: GardanGrove,
1.5%; Irvine, 9.73 %; Huntington
Beach, 5.11 %; Fullerton. 6.3%;
Mission Viejo, 77_41 %.
The Avenge of .118 Cities
(Including Newport Beach at.56 %)
Estimate for
-n Related E1
$5.166,481 $33,915,647 $21,582,684
$663063 3, 6,844 $2,320.719
5-16
1 -22
2 -13 $742630 $4,084465 $2,599105
8-19
1 -22
5-16
8-19
2 -13 $318.270 $1750,485 $1,113,945
5-16
$445,578 $2,450,679 $1,559,523
4,380 $2,333.980 $1,485.260
Community Centers, and other currently newar facilities that are not listed above.)
Estimated opal xleeaw Use 0% average over long -arm)
1.000 1.0.90
1.081
1.003
1.126
Project Management (5%)
$393,600
$2,184,250 1111,377,250
-
$498,016
$2,409,105
51,53307
Construction Costs
Cash Flow ProIsobon
Worksheet
coPPayrnmfs
4565,000
- 58,183,655
_
COP Financing
A
$4613,759
J3
$2,220,031
41.569,897
Amount
$82,635,000
1.64%
$81,375,008
Ratio of Level Payment Plan to Annual General Fund Operating Budget
Reserve
$5,825,768
4.24 t.
$5,793,901
416%
4.12%
Other COI
$985,033
$158,875,000
$973,063
$166,918,047
$171,090,998
Total
$89,445,800
$8_8,141,972
WWI 1,. e
35.825768
55825.768 56.825168
31619.668
511,614688
311,619,688
COP Payments A
4.32%
- $5,621,125 45,686,601
- $5,686,601
- $5,686,601
35,686,601
8
- $5.603,709
- $5,603,709
C
$20,000,000 $127,385,031
COP Proceeds
$82,835,000
$C
Other Cash Infusions
$23 700.000
3ual Budget Contribution
$6,700,000
$6,867,500
Total $113,035,000
Cash Out
$5,13W.50C
Construction Costs
- 87,870,000
- $43,285,00C
coPPayrnmfs
4565,000
- 58,183,655
Inlener Eemings an Fund 9efarice
$2,785,01
$4613,759
Net COP Financing Cost
$2,220,031
41.569,897
$69,397,834 572,425,322 $157,350,710 $116,932,279
$0 $81,375,008 $0 $0
$7,039,188 $7,215,167 $7,395,546 $7,680,435
$13,409.188 $94,980,175 $13,785,548 $7,580,435
327,545,000 - $8,780,382 548,182,100 330,881,338
- 58,251,01 44132,084 411,B5A769 ,111,974.056
$3,414,682 51,977,858 5680.ew 54,904,569
32,836,499 - $1,274,408 - $8,001,878 37,280,385
Projected General Fund Operating Expendituresa LIPS "OpBud"(upper band) - 4%increase $165,004000 $161,200.000 S167.648.000 $174,353,920 $181,328,077 $188,581,200
I Cr S
3,5M from TIC for City Hall: 52.3M ban Hoag. S5.8M from TIC. 4 $2.3M from Friends for Oasisl
1313 5M for Gty Hall and S` fi51'a Pan, G Pam r 1
Ratio of Level Payment Plan to Annual General Fund Operating Budget
4.32%
4.26%
4.20%
4.14%
4.08%
4.02%
Projected General Fund Opsratng Expenditures 8 CIPa "(56ud" %midd /e Gand) - 3.6Y /rrcrerrse
51657W0,000
5180,625,000
5166,039,875
3171,861,271
> 11TI 8085
1187081,377
:r Ann,
1.64%
Ratio of Level Payment Plan to Annual General Fund Operating Budget
4,32%
4.28%
4.24 t.
4.20%
416%
4.12%
Projected General Fund Operating Expendltum ClPa "OpBud" pow bond) -2.5 %Increase
$155,000,000
$158,875,000
$162,846,875
$166,918,047
$171,090,998
$175,368,273
Anrvinl r;.,.
Ratio of Level Payment Plan to Annual General Fund Ooeratma Budget
4.32%
4.32%
4.32%
4.32%
4.32%
4.32%
I Cr S
3,5M from TIC for City Hall: 52.3M ban Hoag. S5.8M from TIC. 4 $2.3M from Friends for Oasisl
1313 5M for Gty Hall and S` fi51'a Pan, G Pam r 1
2015 -16 2016 -17 2017 -18 2018 -19 2019 -20 2020 -21 2021 -22 2022 -23 2023 -24 2024.25
528
349
$866,739 $4,877,065 $3,103,587
$1,358,649 $7,461,021 $4,747,922
$886,739 $4,877,065 $3,103,587
$968,964 $5,489,178 $3,597,908
$760,062 $4,180,341 $2,660,217
0
$760062 $4,180,341 $2.660,217
$1,038,175 $5,709,955 $3,633,614
1.159
$153.894
IA"
$848,476
1.250
$536,828
1.157
$208,187
1.80.5
$1,145,029
f
$728,655
1.384
$209,711
1.428
$1,161,407
1.489
$744,317
1.513
$0
C
D
E_
$50,866,048
$36.118,652
544,057,721
$3.580,970
$2.582,494
53,150,127
$683,227
$543,127
5618,548
$66,130,246
539.244.263
S42926, 397
515.200635
SI5,300638
Sf5.100638
517,753,122
517,753.122
$17.783,122
520,933,249
S20.953, 249
520.933,249
510.839.249
45,686,601
- $5,688,801
- $5,6861801
- 55,6881601
- $5,886,601
45,686,601
- 55,686,601
- 55,688,601
45,886,601
- $6,8861801
- 55,603,709
- $5,603,709
. $5,603,709
- $5,603,709
- 55,603,709
- $5,603,709
. $5,603,709
- $5,603,709
- $5,603,709
- $5,603,709
- $3,586,302
- $3,586,302
- $3,586,302
33,586,302
33,586.302
- $3,586,302
.$3,686,302
43,586.302
- 53,686,302
- $2,552,896
- $2.5 -,.
.$2,552,896
- 53 .III ITS
2029 -30 2030 -2031
r s56 '.605 1.811 1.702 1.761 two
$o $0 $0 so $0 - $o
35,888,601 - $51886,601 - $5,688,601 45,686,601 - $5,686,801 - $5,686,801
- $5,603,709 - $5,603,709 . $5,603.709 - $5,603,709 45,603,709 - 55.603,709
33,686,302 43,688,302 33,686,302 43,586,302 - $3,586.302 - S3,686,302
- $2.1 '.. .'.552,896 52,562,896 - S2,652,89j
.$^ - 111,176 - 53,111.176 S3, 111.1
$86,870,982 $138,107,014 $121,549,764 $111,368,473 $142,941,005 3120,854,952 $104,778,354 $141,486,361 $112,944.415 $92,009,565 $85,667,522 $79.324,092 $72,885,525 566,658,481 $60,350,049 $54,067,763
$50,868,048 $0 $0 $38,118,852 $0 $0 $44,057,721 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
S753.5281 $4144,4051 S2637.3191 $760.0621 $6.180.3411 $2660,2171
$7,769,946 $7,964,195 58,163,299 $8,367,382 $8,576,566 $8,790,981 $9,010,755 $9,236,024 $9,466,925 S9,703,598 59,946,188 $10,194,842 $10,449,713 $10,710,966 $10,978,730 511,253,198
$59,389,522 $12,108,599 $10,800,648 $45,246,096 $12,758,908 $11,451,198 $53,088,476 $9,236,024 $9,486,925 $9,703,598 $9,948,188 $10,194,842 $10,449,713 $10,710,958 $10,978,730 $11,253,198
43,077,873 416,928,300 410,772,554 44,183,740 322,800,571 - $14,573,081 - $4,194,229 - $23,228,138 - S14,B86,335 SO so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
511,874,956 ,116,481,265 415.IBI.256 -S/8481,268 417.992,661 - 817992.661 417,982,664 420.610.883 $W.W.693 420.510.683 - 520,610,683 420.610,663 - 820,610,883 420.810,888 320.640.683 - 120610.883
56,099,827 56,723107 58271,872 58881.132 $886,166 $4237,849 $6,626.313 56.990,646 $6,025.213 $4,496W $4, 251.065 $4,007,271 $3,781.926 53,621,291 33.179.657 53,039.366
- $,775,027 49,738,150 - $10,189,385 49,629,824 412,042,389 412,754,706 - $12,166.241 - $14,549,834 415,515,440 - $16,045,640 418,289,818 416,533,409 418.778,757 417,019,389 417,261.015 - $17.501.328
-to OL9 0nn -t9N NNP dd0 -R9n am 036 -t1A 701 5P5 t%i Ode 00.n -t97 3T7 708 -tIH %AA I7n Ri77T 07n -Rin 601 974 -510. mig 94n S1P IRR R19 .518 533.409 518 776 757 512019.389 - $17.261 015 - $17.501,328
1
. 6.29`1° -
3.96°/ 3.90°/ 3.85; 3.79% 3]4% 3.68% 16TY„ 3.58% 3.53% 3.48% 3.43% 3,38% 3.33% 3.28% 123% 3.19%
134,678 5197,203,288 $iO-Z.l rSAO 7 $211,269,090 3218,862,808 $288,285.306 5234,215,862 $262,613.189 5250.897751 5259,879,089 $288,767,878 3278,176,710 $287,910,986 $897,897,784 {709,417,274 5319,86 43%
'o dl "b
4.08% 4.04% 4.00% 3.96% 3.92% 3.88% 3.85% 3.81% 3.7796 3.74 3.70% 3.66% 3.63% 3.59% 156% 3.53%
$179,752,480 $184,246,292 $1a,882µ9 $193,573,760 31911,413,104 $203,373,432 $208,457,768 $213,669,212 $219,010,942 $224,486,216 $230,098,371 $236,850,830 $241,747,101 $247,790,779 $263,986,548 $260,336,187
8.19`,.
from Marina Use Fee$ to Offset Project Cost
1Funoing Ran G618couts to Off9M Pmjea Cori
)
4.32% 4.32% 4.32%
2031 -32 2032 -33 2033 -34 203435 2035 -36 2036.37 2037 -38 2038 -39 2039 -40 204041 2041-42 204
Appmimate time name to begin replacement of other City Faci ifles not on this list
1,M0 1.916 1974 . 2,= ;594 2221 2288 2V-- 242; 2.500 2575 2662
so - -so $0 $0 so $0 ao ao $0 so $0 $0 $0
$20,033,249 520.033,240 $20.933.249 $20.933.249 $20.933.149 S20933.249 $20,933,249 520.933.218 $15.101461 $16.107,481 515.104481 $9,313,590 59313580
36,686,601 36,888,801 - $6,688,801 - 65,686,601 - $5,888,601 35,888,601 46,688,601 - $5,686,601 done
45,603,709 - $5,603.709 - $5,603,709 45,603,709 - 55,603,709 - $5,603,709 - $5.603,709 - $5.603,709 - $5,603,709 - $5,603,709 45.603,709 done
43,588,302 43,686,302 - $3,586,302 - $3,586,302 - 53,586,302 - $3,586,302 43,686,302 - $3,586,302 - $3,586,302 - $3,586.302 - $3,586,302 43,686,302 $3,586,302 1 more yr
- $2.552,896 - $2,552' „ - ebb 52,552 x:96 - $2,55:, .'396 - $2,552.896 - $2,5:-
-53 111176 - S1.111 '.'fi .$3.1 ^.'. _F :? 11 17F - 55111 176 43 -'
$47,819,634 $41,614,162 $35,480,369 $29,367,820 $23,346.649 $17,407,588 $11.561,995 $5.821,886 $199,981 $276.946 $722,407 $1.560,218 $8,2
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 so $0
$11,534,528 $11,822,892 $12,118,464 $12.421,425 $12,731.961 $13,050,260 513,376,517 $13.710,930 $14,053.703 $14,405,045 $14,765,171 $15,134,301 $15.5
$11,534.528 $11,822,892 $12,118,464 $12,421,425 $12,731.961 $13,050,280 $13.378,517 $13.710,930 $14,053,703 $14,405,045 $14,765,171 $15,134,301 $15,5
so 50 so $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 s0
420.540683 - $20.510683 -320.510683 -$20,SW,683 420.540683 420,540.663 - 520,510683 - 520.540.683 314.654082 -S 14.854081 414.861.082 -S9, 250,373 -$e
$2.800683 $2.663.998 S2.329.670 $2.09$066 sl e".66f 81,8".630 $1,424,057 51,207,829 $877,364 $804.497 $926 .721 SB56.318 $1
$17,740.000 317,978,884 418211,013 - $18,442,597 - $18,671,022 - $18,895,853 - $19.118,826 - $19,332,854 313,978,718 413,959,585 313,927,381 - $8,395,058 48,1
$17.740.000 - $17.975.884 - $18.211,013 - $18.442.597 478.671.022 418.895.853 - 519.118.828 - 519332.854 - 513.976.718 411959.585 413.927.361 48.395.068 48,1
$357,337.413 3352,030,909 3397,312,148 W3,104,531 W9,732,817 $446,922,129 $464,799,014 3483,390,975 $502,726.614 3522,835,579 3543,749,105 $555,499,579 $555.1194
3.14% 3.09% 3.05% 101% 2.96% 2.92% 2,88% M4% 2.80% 216% 2.72% 2.88% 2.64
$330,384,284 $3N,947,744 $363,916,918 $388,702,973 Sfl9,123,677 5392,392,902 f408,126,fl57 5420,-341,068 543b,Ob7,024 5450,279,880 $188,W8,878 $482,361,OM 5499,23-3.3!
1.92%
3.49°/ 3.46% 142% 139°/ 336% 3.33% 3.29 % 3.26% 3.23% 3,20% 3.17% 3.14% 3.11
$268,843,567 $273,514,656 $28D,352,522 $287,361,335 $294,546.389 $301,909,003 $309,456,728 $317,193,146 $325,122.975 S333,251,049 $341,682,325 $M,121,883 $350,874,9:
4 34,6
4.32 % 4.32% 4.32% 4.32% 4.32% 4.32% 4,32% 4.32% 4.32% 4.32% 4.32% 4.32% 4.32
3 0{ 3
Honzontal Totals
$281,028,847
$14,051,432
$319,788,677
3164,848,963
- $162,507,558
- $100,416,444
40aeW5,212
- S7J36.187
$295.052,430
$368,018,990
$721,017,322
3281,028,647
m.mpkfe 44".288.907
- $725,315,554