No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutExhibit 5 - Exhibit 5 - 4-9-08 Fluor ReportExhibit No. 5 Fluor report dated April 9, 2008 S-( THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY BLANK s. City of Newport Beach FLUOR, Hoag Hospital Cogeneration Facility Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Option 3A - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger (ACHE) Design/ Implementation Report PROJECT NO.: 0OA3YZ This document has been revised as indicated below. Please replace all pages of this document and destroy the superseded copies. Rev. Date Description By Chk'd Approval Disc Lead Fluor City of Newport Beach 0 09Apr08 Final Report FN N1W FN FN .c Rl Entire Document Issued this Revision Remarks: ❑ Revised Pages Only Issued this Revision Revised Page Nos. r-3 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. OOA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Table of Contents FLUOR, DATE 07Apr08 PAGE 2 OF 7 Rev A 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 PURPOSE OF PRE -SCHEMATIC DESIGN........................................................................................... 3 1.2 SCOPE OF PRE -SCHEMATIC DESIGN................................................................................................4 2.0 COOLING TOWER RETROFIT- OPTION 3A PRE -SCHEMATIC DESIGN.............................................4 ExistingSystem Description..............................................................................................................................4 2.1 PROPOSED SYSTEM............................................................................................................................4 2.2 VALUE ENGINEERING ITEMS................................................................................................................ 6 3.0 APPENDICES: ............................................................................................................................................ 7 A Construction budget estimates........................................................................................................... 7 B. Basis of Design Narrative.................................................................................................................... 7 C. Drawings and sketches....................................................................................................................... 7 D. Cooling Tower Manufacturer (Marley) —ACHE sizing and performance analysis ............................... 7 E. NCWD and Air2Aif hybrid tower systems..........................................................................:................ 7 F. Sound attenuating louver..................................................................................................................... 7 G. Trending Data and plume observation photos for 18 events in January and February 2008 — Report date March 5, 2008 (update of the February 21, 2008 report)........................................................................ 7 H. Plume mitigation measure summary — Syska Hennessy, April 9, 2008 ............................................. 7 City of Newport Beach_ Hoag Hospital_optlon implementation review—Rev Oa_4_09_08.doc s•y City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. OOA3YZ Design! Implementation Report 1.0 INTRODUCTION FLUOR® DATE 07AprO8 PAGE 3 OF 7 Rev A Fluor Enterprises, Inc. was requested by Newport Beach City Planning Department to provide a pre - schematic design and budget estimate for tower plume abatement system, option 3A as it was described in Fluor's study repot "Plume Mitigation Review" issued on 19MarO8 (refer to paragraph 2.1 for option 3A scope description). Hoag's engineer (Syska Hennessy Group) and Fluor were assigned the task of providing engineering services for a pre -schematic design and preparation of a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) construction budget estimate for option 3A On 03Mar08, a phone conference was held to kick off the pre -schematic design effort. Subsequent to the telephone conference, the team met on 31 Mar08 at Hoag Hospital for a site visit, face to face discussion of the basis of design narrative and the criterion and Hoag's requirement for the budget estimate. Note that during the meeting, although not in the scope of work, the issues of heat plume and two (passive and fan assisted) solutions were discussed but the team agreed to postpone further investigation of these issues to a future date. In the first week of April 2008, the design team was asked about SPX Cooling Technologies new wet/dry package tower and Ai12Air plume abating system and their applicability to Hoag Hospital's cooling tower retrofit project for mitigation of water vapor plume. Our assessment of these new systems by SPX is as follows: Air2Air technology: AI2Air technology application to Hoag Hospital's existing towers, due to seismic and structural issues, is not feasible. The existing cooling towers would need to be replaced making OPTION 3-1 a better choice. (See Appendix E) NCWD (wet/dry) package tower system NCWD (wet/dry) package tower application for Hoag Hospital is an option similar to OPTION 3-1 (installing new towers with plume mitigation system) which was discussed in Fluor's previous study repot "Plume Mitigation Review" dated 19MarO8. The advantage of a NCWD tower is that they are factory fabricated and assembled package units, fairly small (24' H X 22' L X 14' W), and cheaper than a field erected tower. (See Appendix E) Utilization of field erected towers with integrated plume mitigation system (option 3-1) is recognized as the most effective solution. However its estimated construction budget was highest of all options ($9.3 MM) that were reviewed. Although a budget estimate for NCWD tower system has not been prepared, it is our belief that this system installation would not be much cheaper than the previously discussed hybrid system in OPTION 3-1. 1.1 PURPOSE OF PRE -SCHEMATIC DESIGN The purpose of the pre -schematic design is to provide adequate information to the estimators enabling them to provide a Rough Order of Magnitude (ROM) construction budget estimate (+1-30%) for the City of Newport Beach_ Hoag Hospital option implementation review—Rev Oa_4_09_08.doc 5--S' City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. OOA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report FLUOR. DATE 07Apr08 PAGE 4 OF 7 Rev A implementation and construction of option 3A. The budget estimates have been prepared by three firms (McCarthy, Syska Hennessy and Fluor). (See Appendix A) 1.2 SCOPE OF PRE -SCHEMATIC DESIGN The scope of the pre -schematic design is to: • Provide pre -schematic Basis of Design (See Appendix B) • Provide preliminary selection and sizing of equipment (See Appendix D) • Provide an equipment arrangement/Layout (See Appendix C) • Determine space requirement for equipment installation (See Appendix C) • Determine efficacy of the system • Provide Rough order of Magnitude (ROM) budget estimate (+/-30%) associated with implementation of the design option 3A (See Appendix A) 2.0 COOLING TOWER RETROFIT -OPTION 3APRESCHEMATIC DESIGN Existing System Description The existing coding tower system consists of a Marley (SPX Cooling Technologies) Class 400,4 -cell mechanical, FRP field erected, counter flow cooling tower and the associated pumping system for delivering cooling tower water (Condenser Water) to remove heat from engine lube oil cooler, engine intercoolers, electric chiller and absorption units. The warm condenser water return passes through the cooling towers, rejecting the heat to atmosphere. This heat removal is accomplished mostly by water evaporation, which at times, due to atmospheric conditions such as high relative humility and low temperature, forms a thick water vapor plume. 2.1 PROPOSED SYSTEM Proposed design option 3A provides solution to the aesthetic issues associated with formation of the vapor plume as described in this section. This option entails design/modification to mechanical, automation, structural and architectural systems and has an impact on the cost and operation of cogeneration plant. Refer to Appendix A for affected trades and ROM construction budget estimate. Proposed System Design and Operation Option 3A system consists of a side stream air to water heat exchanger (HX) with three HX sections and six VFD driven fans, two VFD driven condenser water pumps and associated controls. This system is designed to remove most of the heat load from the cooling tower by rejecting the heat using an Air Cooled Heat Exchanger (ACHE). The ACHE is sized to fit within the proposed mechanical yard (50'X 40') area located next to the existing cooling towers (See Appendix DD). The ACHE is piped to the existing tower piping system in series so that the condenser water is first passed through the ACHE, removing approximately 65% of the overall heat load. Then condenser water through cooling tower rejects the remaining 35% of the heat load through cooling tower. The reduction of heat load on the wet cooling tower reduces water evaporation/condensation as well as the City of Newport Beach_ Hoag Hospital_option implementation review—Rev Oa_4_09_08.doc S•b City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 0OA3YZ Design! Implementation Report FLUOR® DATE 07AprO8 PAGE 6 OF 7 Rev A tower discharge air temperature. Discharge air temperature and relative humidity results in substantial reduction in the plume formation. Note that originally this option also intended to incorporate outside air intake openings with motorized dampers in the fan section of each cooling tower cell. However, due to structural issues of the existing towers and the potential for costly structural upgrades, this design feature was deleted from the scope of work with minimal effect on the proposed design performance. This design also requires revision and changes to the Building Management System (BMS) in both programming and hardware. The BMS new control points are associated with the new heat exchanger, pumping system controls, the new weather station and methane sensors. The condenser water supply temperature will be reset per design conditions in the basis of design narrative and the ambient temperature/relative humidity information from weather station will be used to energize or de -energize the plume abatement system. Energy efficiencyfconsumption All engineered solution requires some form of energy to produce useful work In providing engineering solution, the first step is to define the need and/or the problem and then the engineer using the best available technology provides an energy efficient solution - such as an energy efficient air conditioning system for cooling of an office or hospital building. The solution proposed for plume abatement, OPTION 3A, also will require additional energy in form of electricity to run the VFD driven fans and the pumps. A well though sequence of operation and post installation fine tuning of the system is a must in order to minimize energy consumption. (See Appendix H) Sound and noise issues A detail sound study of this system has not yet been performed. However in the,pre-schematic design of this project, we have assumed and priced installation of sound attenuating louvers at the ACHE outside air intake (See Appendix E for sound attenuating louver). Impact ongoing operation Based on conversation with Hoag's representative and engineers, it is possible to interrupt condenser water system during winter time and/or yearly maintenance shut down to install the new pipes and valves without any adverse effect on the ongoing operations. Note that if required, there are both temporary tower and chiller system that could be rented for longer shut down and/or emergency backup. System efficacy and performance Marley's analysis of the data and sizing of the equipment indicates that the ACHE as designed is capable of reducing the quantity and occurrences of plume by more than 50% over a wide range of ambient conditions, when operating at winter load of 12,600 gpm/8 degree F range. This load is 100% of the winter system capacity. The ACHE manufacturer also indicates that during current winter operation of approx. 9,000 gpm 18 degree F range, the ACHE will take the full load and there would be absolutely no chance of plume formation. City of Newport Beach_ Hoag Hospital option implementation review_Rev Oa_4_09_08.doc City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 00A3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Construction Budget Estimate (Rough Order of Magnitude) FLUOR® DATE 07Apr08 PAGE 6 OF 7 Rev A McCarthy, Syska & Hennessy and Fluor prepared three separate ROM construction budget estimates. All estimators adhered to the following criteria, requested by Hoag Hospital representative, to prepare their estimates. (See Appendix A) 1. Alternate Add cost to cover additional sound attenuation and roof above ACHE $1.00 MM 2. Landscape allowance $75 K 3. Site electrical work (Southern California Edison) — XFMR installation $250K 4. Permitting fees (City, OHSPD, Calif. Coastal Commission...) 5% of total const cost 5. Escalation 6. General Conditions 7. A/E Fees 8. Soft cost ( Hoag's PM) 9. Contingency 10. Fee/Insurance/Bond 80/o/year (1.5 years) 9-12 months 10% 2% 5% $0.714 MM Comparing the three ROM budget estimates, excluding the allowance for sound mitigation, they are $5.1 MM (Fluor), $5.8 MM (Syska) and $6.7 MM (McCarthy). (See Appendix A) Note that until a sound study is done, it would be difficult to say what the cost associated with sound mitigation would be. Note that McCarty has an allowance of $0.56 MM for sound mitigation (Altemate Add) compared to Fluor and Syska assumption of $1 MM. Due to uncertainty and large variance in sound mitigation budgets, these cost are shown below the line and are not included in the above ROM budget costs. To obtain a more accurate estimate, 60-90% design documents are required. 2.2 VALUE ENGINEERING ITEMS There are equipment and systems that could be deleted or numbers be reduced as the design progresses forward. These items are as follows: 1. Reduce number of VFDs for ACHE from six to two 2. Revise number of control points associated with items in line "1" 3. Delete Stainless Steel support for ACHE City of Newport Beach_ Hoag Hospital_ option implementation review—Rev Oa_4_09_08.doc S.81 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 00A3YZ Design/ Implementation Report 3.0 APPENDICES: A Construction budget estimates B. Basis of Design Narrative C. Drawings and sketches FLUOR, DATE 07Apr08 PAGE 7OF7 Rev A D. Cooling Tower Manufacturer (Marley) —ACHE sizing and performance analysis E. NCWD and Ai2Air hybrid tower systems F. Sound attenuating louver G. Trending Data and plume observation photos for 18 events in January and February 2008 — Report date March 5, 2008 (update of the February 21, 2008 report) H. Plume mitigation measure summary — Syska Hennessy, April 9, 2008 City of Newport Beach_ Hoag Hospital_ option implementation review—Rev Oa_4_0g_08.doc s•9 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. OOA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix A Construction Budget Estimates • Fluor Enterprises, Inc. • Syska & Hennessey Group • McCarthy A- Appendices City of Newport Beach—Budget Est Rev0 4AprO8.doc FLUOR. DATE 8AprO8 Rev 0 5-10 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cogen Building Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Option 3A - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Originator: CS FLUOR 'ROM- Master Planning 4/2/2008 Approvers: MS 8 FN Rev.'1 (419108) DESCRIPTIONS SCOPE -TASKS QT UM I Manhours Unil To., Labor$ Rate Cost Material$ I Unit Pdce Cast Subcontract$ Unit Rate I Cost Engr Equip $ I Unit Prise I Cost Total$ Unit I Cost CONCRETE Concrete work. 300 EY' :5 1500 $110.00 $165;000 $ 150 $45,000 3. - so $ - $0. $0.00 $210.000 F0m1Wefk 1 LOT 750 750 $110.00 $82,500 $ 7;500 $7,500 $. - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $90,000 Methene, Membrane 1 LOT 10 10 $110.00 $1;100 $ 100.000 $900,000 $ - so $ - $0 '$0100 $101,100 Grading and Excavation 166 CY .0.25 42 $110:00 $4,565 $ 50 $8;300 $ - $0 $ - $0 .$0.00 $12,B65 Survey Area 2 MEN 4 8 $110.00 $880 S - $0 $ - $0 $ - $0 50.00 5880 Install Erosion Barder 330 LF 0.05' 17 $110.00 $1,815 $ 2 $660 $ - '$0 $ - $0 $0.00 $2,475 Front. End Loader, Diesel 170 HP, articulated, 3V2'yd 1 WK Rental 0 $0:00 so S 1,500 Si.500 $ - $0 $ - $0 '$0.00 $1,500 bucket Case 821 103CONGRETErw Tutel - F 1 ++ +v +i.i lr, 255 860? .--Z „ .. STRUCTURAL/A RCHITECTU RAL Rebar 12 TON 20 240 $110.00 $26,400 S 1,000 $12,000 S - SO S - $0. .$0.00 $38,400. Wall Louvers 1 LS 60 60 $110.00 $6,600 S 104',000 $104,000 $ - $0 $ - $0. '$0.00 $110,600 33000�ST„n.'?t,,.,,gt�?116000�IIIj[t.+-;p,�O;U�I�1uijk�u'pr;,-,Oa 1rp �t�.,11,P+S149-000: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT .Air Cooled Heat Exchanger 1 EA 300 300 $125.00 $37,500 S - $0 $ - $0 $ 856,900 $856;900 $0:00 $894,400 Walkways and Ladders 1 LS 100 900 $125.00 $12(500 $ - s0 S - $0 $ 12,000 $12,000 $0:00 $24,500 Condenser Water Booster Pumping System 2 EA 20 40 $125.00 $5,000 $ - $0 S - $0 S. 25,000 $59.000 $0.00 $55,000 'RigginglCrane 1 LS 40 40 $125.00 $5,000 $ 50,000 .$50,000 S - $0 $ - so $0.00 $55,000 VFD 150 HP 2 EA. 50 '100.0 $115.00 $1.1,500 S 20;000 $40,000 S - $0 S - '$0 $20,000 $51,500 VFD 40 HP 6 EA 24 144.0 $115.00 $16,560 $ axo $Si,000 'S - $0 'S - so $8,500 $67,560 40 MECNANICALEgIIIPMENT Total;'lj, ],, i.1�i[_u„ ;, is �f,;;5340�,4r 724.O�ipg7300�1�'�8808D r 71 7e,50p�;4{4+iW,0�,ayi;1:'00�_�I„t.ji4�ijRB�,�..__ry�°918�900�I$78500 ye;r$174719803 „e....�....._.___. .._a._ .. y„il PIPING 24" Condenser Water Pipe STD. 400 LF 0.8 320.0 $115.00 $36,860 $ 62 $24,800 S - $0 I$ - 'S0 $0.00 $61,600 20" Condenser Water Pipe STD 40 LF 0.8' 32.0 5115.00 $3;680 $ 41.00 $1.640 $ - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $5,320 18" Condenser Water Pipe STD 150 LF 0.7 105.0 $115.00 S12,075 $ 36.00' $5,400 $ - $0 $ - 'so $0:00 $17,475 14" Condenser Water Pipe STD' 70 LF 0.6' 42.0 $115.00 :$4,830 $ 27.00. $1,800 $ - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $6;720 24" Couplings 30 EA 9 270 $115.00 31050 $. - $0 S - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $31,050 20" Couplings 8' EA 7.9 63.2 $115.00 7268 $ - $0 $ - $0 $' - $0 $0.00 $7,268' 18- Coupling. 10 EA 7.1 71 $115.00 8165 $ - $0. $ - $0 $' - $0 $0.00 $8;165 14" Couplings 8 FA 4 32 5115.00 3660 $ - $0 s - $0 $' - so $0.00 $3,680 24" ELL 90 STD 6 EA 1B 108 $i15.00 12420 $ 600.00 $3,600. $ - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $16;020 24" Flange 150 RF 10 EA 9 90 $115.00 10350 $ 450.00 $4.500 S - $0 $ - 'so $0.00 $14,850 24 X 20 reducer ECC 1 EA 16.9 16.9 5715.00 9943.5 $ 800.00 $Boo $ - $0 It - $0 $0.00 $2,744. 20 X 14 reducer ECC 1 EA 13.7 13.7 $115,00 1575.5 $ 1,350.00 $1,350 $ - so $, - $0 $0.00 $2,926 24' Tee STD 2 EA 12 24 $115.00 2760. $ 1.950.00 $3,900 $ - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $6,660 24" Control Valve 3 EA 25 75 $115.00 6625 $ 9,000.00 $27,000. $ - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $35,625. 14" Manuel Valve 6 EA 12.5 75 $115.00 8625 S' 2,350.00 $14,100 $ - $0 $ - $0 $0.00 $22,725 Pipe Support 12 EA 14 468.0 $115.00 $19;320 $ 150 $1,800 $ - 50 $. - $0 '$0.00 $21,120 Plumbing 1 LS 0 0.0 $0.00 $0 '$ 50,000 $50,000 $ - SO $ - $0 50.00 $50,000 (Storm Water Drainage, Trench Drain, Tle-ins) 53Y PIP1_NG xmTotal uS?eb='9'a,��b20L€a.:jil�. ;Pii+.', y� II�1'.I�1;1u7520��"TL_i 506�.y,,.,,�.�.,,: {v: b,1773 id.1!j1: aaafl512"j1140780I3._...:,,.N� 111;1,MOT uffO B�Ii+�Y�.:,�a•'_,%s"'�e0�{�;ji�!,�1.0,Rr-..'IL''.74 a`�.5,3139471. Haag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian - Cogen Building Coaling Tower Plume Mitigation Option 3A . Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Originator: CS �b ROM -.Master Planning 412/2008 Approvers: MS & FN Rev. 1 (419108) $81,312 DESCRIPTIONS I SCOPE -TASKS CITY I UM Marthare Unit Total Labor$ Rate Cast Material $ Unit Price Cost Subcontract Uni[ Rate Cost Engr Equip '$ Unit Price Cost Total $ Unit Cast ecce i eoeAL Bulk Material and Equipment Freight (of material and 5 % _ $81,312 equipment cost) Sof. Coal (Hoag's PM) 2 % :Single -ended Main Switchboard 1 FA 8 8.0 $115100 $920 $. 20,000 $20,000 $ - $0 $ - '$0 $20;000 $20,920 Grounding System 1 LS O4. 64.0 $115.00 $7.360 $ 10;000 $10,000 '$ - $0 $ - so $10,000 $17,360 PVC U1G Conduit 1 LS 16 16.0 $115.00 $1.840 $5.60 $6. $' -. $0 $ - $0 $6 $1,846 Name 12 Pull Box 424x3 1 EA 26 26.0 $115.00 $2,990 $1.631.25 $1,631 $ - $0 $ so $1,631 $4,621 Wre and Cable 3.300 LF OA8 264 $115.00 $30,360 $3.10 $10,230 $ - $0 $ - i$0 $3 $40,590 Light Fixtures 12 EA 4 48.0 $115.00 $5,520 $250.00 $3,000 S - $0 $ - so $250 $8,520 Receptacles and Switches 6 EA 4 24.0 $115.00 $2,760 $40.00 $240 $ - $0 $ - $0 $40 $3,000 %FMR Transformer 45KVA 480-120V 1 EA 20 20.0 $115,00 $2.300 $2,500 $2,500 $ - $0 $ - I$0 $2,500 $4,800 Distribution Panel Board 3R w/mainbreker I EA 8 8.0 $115.00 $920 $1,200 $1.200 $ - $0 5 - so $1,200 $2,920 Site Electrical Work 1 LS 0 0.0 $0.00 $0 $ - 30 $ 2500,,,000 $250,000 S - '$0 $250,000 $250,000 fiO ELEGTRICALajary Total 2.v60� �+2,a ;? �'; 54970 _1 ''T ^� g,,.;,48807� � 250000�i�µIWW�.J'. i.?�}D'U�B ;? ?tE353-777. �`t-478x,, .,y;;j1 INSTRUMENTATION 'Direct Digital Control (DDC) 30 EA 2 60.0 $100.00 $6,000 $ 3,000 $90,000 S - $0 S. - 50 $0.00 $96,000 Methane Sensors. 3 LS 8 24.0 $100.00 $2,400 $ 2,600 $7,600 $ - $0 S - So $0.00 $10,200 AO'INSTRUMENTATION'"'y Tafals 1 3. il',npn Py" �.."?m 9,40U�'s:y®, f�.vt �iFt00�.$ij;l�+ 7062001_. ......:u:.�...�r,100��,,.,.:ue4',Df"� : t.`ry."t`�li)i�}7-97800�!3-[j!.t'.,... uY.ss,:i,00�'15.�u�tii,Lr�f� ni5„a1x',`�,"s.?' MM E9,12�"g$ 414970a INDIRECT COST (OTHER COST) Bulk Material and Equipment Freight (of material and 5 % $81,312 equipment cost) Sof. Coal (Hoag's PM) 2 % $49,794 Escalation (an direct field labor and material) free first 8 % $108,417 yr, 8% second yr, 4%half of the third year Permit cost(OSHPD. City. CCG_ (5% of total 5 % $124,485 construction cost) ) ArchitecturaVEngineering Fees (10%) 10 % $248.970 Landscape 9 LS $. 75;000 $75,000 $75,000 General Conditions 9 months 9 MONTH $100.000 $900,000 g TOTAL-IIJDIRECT„COST;'.,..',d!?$PedH�i��l1f).trC:v.I``�r_......::�_t00�_lwL.TS y$�900.000 �t y� inn $4,07718B,3, Contingency 5% 5 % $203,BB4 .��" '�4..:.':.�li: ..Flaw ,• ,.s, -,a. " ">aa''LSi�'T-£E�..za,4a©' .$,,.w'- stcon noan- +elln sr, ^ '- w ` TO$A��Includingcontingend�lF,aeI1n90Sance78ud'd�, Allowance for Stainless Steel support for ACHE $. 125,000.00 P n -.1,7_0",,,, x1.n.�-w:n�la lti Haumw * :."m,,+l,neamns> arc c:G�en 3v j "1 1G ARDI,TOTA4�ilq 'u igg koMingencylFeel,InsurarceSBontllta'{ $talntes teee�''IaupPnrf�hartlwa[e[for Ir„CoolpdWeet c an90 �, I.5 -W '1 1 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cogen Building Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Option 3A - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Originator:. CS FLUOR ROM—Master Planning 412/20D0 Approvers: MS & FN Rev. 1. (419108) DESCRIPTIONS SCOPE -TASKS. OTY I UM I Manhours Unit To[el tabor$ Rale Cos[ Material Unit Price I Cost Subcontract$ Unit Rale I Cast Engr Equip$ I Unit Price I Cost Tota l$ I Unit I Cost r Adds (Allowance; if sound miHigation Is then a. concrete enclosior with roof and Senuator devices might be required: Roof enclosure Inlet/oullet sound affeneuator 'Fire sprinkler system TOTAL oe(wlow,oerRosasf±Ecowsrrtucnoncosr=-';:1 aura ]iSKA I IENNESS • CIknC' Prol.'£t t f MEF, E G l vkL F( ,,445 BootEstldwA tl�1.N Pnc wwYCNgMtd By om:.'Hrii -r LhL. tltti H..g trfgmhl HoaQrW:P EyMrM E. CogE BUIIdhy C IlrpiaxwPo.01dBoghn y 30.`MM Cad iHea4EicAwB -''�_a"�n M tc ), peo,1p cund IM i i1 Mi'+'� 3$u'g { I- 2i5 so -17,4 ,,r}tx it r t yI ` ' eTi k. L" � ,4 ni.:, it v /'S4 f jr .. .,� `Fi L '. % I{.° Mahal lamr E'w,rrwnl Tom INm No. asarlm peacrl Ion puantl Unh 6w1 ace, .11 Cast f CMI GrudmO-d vroiion cirn.1 F LS 5 40.900 2. Stewasy M. N.Wollen.11.nce 1 LS 'S 200A00 MCliwepurol C -c iee new f., ecce. vett alloxan[. 1 LS $ Zmem A-usal louvers all—ece 1 L6 S'. imam Tweetlava u 1 is 5 Addeo A"A'"'A -un".f LG 5. 15.000 Pipe..-BeMnrzW-allowanm.. 'T LS 5 25000 3 LaMaape Ir.,A.n.,t.w f LS 5'. 7,,500 See pareina I Ls 5 6o,oa0 A Mswon, C.Mna.ee uns,lorl, denno wnsweston l Ls s 20,Ooo Fowdat on memlxme and senilrq eWem + Ls s s0,00o Delesaw, sula. slows f. Ls '.5 40mo 5 Meonandol Ni Caged Heal E..Mr,w I EA StwlesSteel AEmM1menl Henwvwa Moxa.. I LS 5 .5 an 5 211;250 S 50,Oo0 5 1.1'£250 SiAniss 4nl S.,uO Sywan Add Allvxance 1 LS 5 15.400 $ E. - 3. 15,000 vv,gNw,wwo m 1 LS 5 11;900 5 11.900 E. - 5 23,600 150 HP Cars—Wawa Pump 0 EA 5 WX0 5 15.00 5 S. '30,000 W"MEMA N. Bypass 1 LS 5 100.000 5 30,000 $: 130000 Red, 21 mntlmar-cora soppy. 5eh A0: Nd 250 LF S 311 S 121 S - $ IDZeia 1@'conde --in,-„;San 40, Ma 100 LF S 225 5 a. $ � S 31,100 '"'elbow 5 EA 5 3',335 S 10 5 - 5N.S00 19 nw— 20 LS 5 1] 54 5 109 5 - 5 372 60 ,4lee A EA 5 3.270 S 205 5 5 13.929 1H'lee 10 EA E 1.495 S 149 5 - 5 16,434 Nec. pigs, albs..¢ (van;chin; f4l.d.) 1 LS S Mon Sw.w. n.9sn d4feenr 2' EA S10.350 5 S6 S 5 30,573 ButlpAy raNm 21". 55 [nm '4. EA E 10,724 S f63 5 5 43,516 awdwdyv Ne 10": 55 tun e. EA. E 6,490 S 137 5 S 53,075 CliteRvaNe 2. EA S ],791 S 799 S - 5 17,161 Bray Aduakrs 3 EA 5 1,725 S 575 S - S 6.0. Flm newer i LS 5 3.400. S 315 5' - 5 3.795 Tawuu wrc lMlawo 'e EA S 175 S 17 S - S L536 P,.,.,. lndw.. 2. EA { '.SO S 14 S E 146 Fl- cw,pn, (. EA S 259 { 67 5 5 1.421 EIeLMwI SCE Normal Paver Sem- Pll.na 1 LS 5 250.4" BU 6S S,A Weer Nlavanm 1 LS 5 'made Grandin9 syscre 1 LS E 5.000 P—n LS S Beac Lipson'ayes. w6wt24ing. 1 LS S" Wand P.,sondwson and wndulh t LS 5' 20.000 Pluuww, .-dw, eewerMsaina6e system aCnwance 1 LS 5 15.000 OIIM2kr edl.m Mo se I LS E 2,000 Wag, cwm well eyewash Callon 1 L6 E 5,000 Conrtds WDI/0-6"wo 48 EA S 96,000 ..Men,erwalc1 temp l/0-2 polms 2 EA $ -4,000 Weaihn slw.n VO-2 instals D EA $ 4.000 Fl ox anuol valve -:3 laina*a9u' 9' EA S'. 18am Neu— deteeion anti alarm 2' EA 5'. 4,000 Arbu ecw Penuche Auld NTeinate' 1 LS S 1,003,000 Inkl air menuesom AM'lJkr EPMusl Ni wlenuawn, Flie praktionsystem Cetlud 3%bndosurer 'Subtotal { 3.176.470 12 Nordin General Loudwons 1832.WG CongMW ConsU itlon Contingency Q 5% But S 151,823 Escalation 1.5 yews @6%lymr S 361176 Hong PM Cos” 2%Sswoud S'. 63,520 OSHPD?umlung Fees ". of 5rrbbW S 150023. AS Fees®f0%S.woodS 317.04T Cenuae¢ Fensa..enunsoA.Ma S T14.6o0 OPTION TOTAL (Nets 1) s' 5.00.000 SuhINN MAwust.1 Add S 4176,470 13Monfi Gmeml Cmdltlans S 032000 C,,.., Construct— Conan" MY 0 M 5u 5 300,621 Bwounu nl.5ymr. Q y%".S 5011T6 Hoeg PM Costs ®2%Subtcbl S 63,52. GSHPOIP-ndid.g F¢a 05%.I SuNMal {' 2086" ArE Fees a Is%.Sualwal i At7,6rt7 Cwft... FeaOnsur:-ensnds 5 714000 OPTION TOTAL IN. 1) 5 7140AW Notes: 111 Spies H nosey Group's opinionbfpebah, consussimn cossA bases wu ea''maleources suOu as News Can, admaling Guide,. I penence.ma duWcquipnenlaol nDYe lolM gela4le nature a11a68r.minaleM puipment pnong and onferesaantla Atlas .-engin--tntlion no., 5yulm do. nut .,,wed, se lmplMy -ward wrep,.wl the.—ra, Gael se Ow eelimwed to tie lb.... l cost .1 .—sucew. 5.1 Hoag Energy Plant Cooling Tower Plume Reduction Mechanical Work ROM Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Heat Exchanger $923,370 Pumps & Hook -Up $50,000 VFDa $735,000 Flow Control Valves $75,000 24" Condenser Water Piping $780.000 Piping Rack & Supports $700,000 Rigging $50,000 Controls $250,000 Electrical Work $750,000 Duct Bank Power & Feeders Lighting, Conduit & Branch Distribution Panel Plumbing (Storm Water Drainage, Trench Drain, rwbns) $50,00D Subcontractor Contingency @ 5% $98,768 Subcontractor Mark-Up @ 75% $58,908 Total Subs $2,778,384 Other Cost Building Addition (5071417) C $45D/sf (Open Root) $900,000 Louvers $100,000 Methane Barder $100,000 SCE Transformer $250,000 Landscape $75,000 Generol Conditions (9 months @ $100,000/monih) $900,000 Sub Total $4,443,384 A & E Cost @ 10% $444,338 OSHPD Pemdlis @ 5% $222,169 Escalation @ 8%Iyr (7.5 years) $533,206 Contingency @ 5% $222,169 Soft Cost (Hoag) Q2% $88,868 FeeAnsurante/Bond $714,496 Total ROM $6,666,630 Mote, From the information that has been sham and our experience as a Contractor we have attempted to provide a "Rough Order of Magnitude' Budget for the "Plume Reduction" of the existing coding towers at Hoag that serve the Energy Plant This budget is not to be used or considered as an actuate cost of work or an offer to provide services. Alternate to provide roof on addition. 2,000 sf roof $200,000 Sprinkler System $20,000 Sound Traps for Louvers $300,000 Added HP on Heat Exchanger Fan Motors $72,000 Additional Power Requirements $70,000 Roof Drain System $15,000 Total $857,000 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 0QA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix B Basis of Design Narrative B - Appendices City of Newport Beach—BOD RevO 8APRO8.doc FLUOR, DATE 8AprO8 S. 1 (P Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 2.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — CIVIUSTRUCTURALIARCHITECTURAL 3.0 BASIS OF DESING —MECHANICAL 4.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — ELECTRICAL 5.0 BASIS OF DESIGN— INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS 6.0 BASIS OF DESIGN —RELATED DOCUMENTS SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 1 9.17 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A 1.0 GENERAL DESIGN CRITERIA 1.1 Design Philosophy Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 1.1.1 The design requirements contained in the document describe the minimum acceptable standards for the Lower Campus (LC) Cogen Plant Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Project as a whole and for certain individual components. 1.1.2 The design life of the system will be a minimum of thirty (30) years assuming normal operating and maintenance practices, including replacement of equipment components as recommended by the manufacturers. 1.1.3 The design philosophy applicable to this project will emphasize the goal of attaining high factors of reliability, availability and maintainability, consistent with, or exceeding industry standards. Examples of factors contributing to this goal include application of the following: • Spare terminals and distribution points will be provided for future use. • Provisions to isolate equipment for repair without affecting system or overall plant operation. • Standardization of equipment specified throughout the site to the extent practical. • Monitoring provisions for bearing of major auxiliaries to give pre -warning of incipient problems. Alarm management system. • Fail-safe controls. • Facility layout and lifting and handling equipment design. 1.2 System Design — Basis of Operation 1.2.1 System Design — Basis of Operation 1.2.1.1 The proposed air cooled heat exchanger system will be operated automatically during conditions of low ambient air temperature and high ambient relative humidity to mitigate the existing LC Cooling Tower plume condition. 1.2.1.2 At present Cooling Tower loading conditions, the air cooled heat exchanger system is estimated to fully mitigate the existing cooling tower plume when operated in series with the existing Cooling Tower. 1.2.1.3 At anticipated future Cooling Tower loading conditions, the air cooled heat exchanger system is estimated to mitigate the future plume conditions better than 50% when operating in series with the existing Cooling Tower. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 2 e Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 1.3 1.4 1.2.2 Cooling Tower Design Conditions A. Cooling Tower: B. Percent Tower Loading: C. Operating Period: D. Condenser Water Supply Temperature: E. Condenser Water Return Temperature: F. Condenser Water Range: G. Condenser Water Flow: H. Cells in Operation: I. Cell Fan Speed: 1.2.3 Ambient Design Conditions MARLEY 4 -cell F433A Counterflow Cooling Tower 75% Winter months 78°F 86°F 8°F 12,600 GPM four As required to maintain set point 0 —100% speed A. Dry Bulb Temperature: 50°F B. Percent Relative Humidity Range: 11-88% RH C. Wind Speed: 4 MPH System General Arrangement Utility Tie -Ins and Interfaces 1.4.1 The following tie-in and interface points with the existing Cogen Plant and site utility systems are included within the scope: utility Tie -In Location Remarks Mechanical, Plumbin 3 and Fire Protection 1. Condenser water Existing condenser water Interconnect size(s) TBD return header upstream of towers — two locations 2. City Water Cogen Plant Equipment wash down. Connection point to be determined. 3. Water treatment Existing system 4. Stormwater TBD Provide new stormwater drainage and retention system for displaced swale SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 3 5.11 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A fz7 W Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 5. Sanitary Sewer Site location TBD Provide new floor drains, oil/water separator, etc. in enclosure 6. Methane For enclosure Provide gas abatement system, membrane, sensing and alarm system, vents, boot plates, etc. 7. Fire Protection Existing Cogen Plant Wet sprinkler system — head location to be determined. 8. Irrigation TBD In support of landscaping Electrical 1. 15 kV New 15 kV SCE pad mounted Distribution transformer and 480V new (underground) outdoor switchgear Environmental/Design Considerations 1.5.1 Noise Emissions A. To comply with local ordinances. Sound power level not to exceed 55 dBA weighted average at site property line. 1.5.2 Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan A. Required. Plan to be determined. Technical Assumptions and Clarifications 1.6.1 The following technical assumptions and clarifications apply to the basis of design: A. Project assumes a continuous, uninterrupted flow of work during regular work hours. All system shutdowns will be minimized and may be required during off -hours. All system shutdowns to facilities utility interconnection, startup and commissioning to be scripted by Contractor, submitted and approved by Hoag 72 -hours in advance of shutdown. B. There shall be free and clear access to the project site at all times. C. Marley air cooled heat exchanger as the basis of design. D. Oil/water separation will be required for new drains. E. Final enclosure dimensions and height to be determined. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 4 5. Zo Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN F. Compliance with OSHPD Testing, Inspection and Observation Program required. G. OSHPD deferred approvals as follows by Contractors (as applicable): 1. Fire alarm 2. Enclosure lowers and seismic anchorage 3. Seismic bracing by ISAT 1.7 Codes and Standards 1.7.1 Applicable Codes and Regulations for OSHPD: • 2007 California Building Standards Administrative Code (Part 1, Title 24, CCR) • 2007 California Building Code (2005 and 2007 California Amendments) • 2007 California Electrical Code • 2007 California Mechanical Code • 2007 California Plumbing Code • 2007 California Fire Code 1.7.2 Federal Regulations, Standards and Specifications: • Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 1.7.3 Local Municipality — Codes and Regulations 1.7.4 Coastal Commission — Codes and Regulations 1.7.5 Southern California Edison (SCE) Requirements 1.7.6 American Concrete Institute (ACI) 1.7.7 American National Standards Institute (ANSI) 1.7.8 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) 1.7.9 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) 1.7.10 American Welding Society (AWS) 1.7.11 Illuminating Engineers Society (IES) 1.7.12 Instrument Society of America (ISA) 1.7.13 Manufacturers Standardization Society of the Valve and Fitting Industry (MSS) 1.7.14 National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 5 5.2f Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 1.7.15 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1.7.16 Underwriter Laboratories (UL) SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 6 E. 22 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 2.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — CIVILISTRUCTURALIARCHITECTURAL (C(S(A) 2.1 Construction Type 2.1.1 Type 1 2.2 Occupancy Group 2.2.1 H-3 2.3 Description of Use 2.3.1 General Acute Care Hospital Building — Cogen Building Addition 2.4 Sprinklers 2.4.1 Fully sprinklered if enclosed 2.5 Project Square Footage 2.5.1 Addition: 50 feet length, 40 feet width, 24 feet height — 2,000 SF 2.6 Project Description 2.6.1 Construction of a new Cogen Building Addition to house equipment associated with mitigating the Cogen Building Cooling Tower plume. 2.7 Type of Approval to be Issued by OSHPD 2.7.1 Full 2.8 Site Conditions 2.8.1 Geotechnical 2.8.1.1 The underlying conditions of the soil will be verified during the design phase geotechnical investigation. The soil bearing capacity will be determined using geotechnical investigation, and Geotechnical Engineer recommendations will be used to design the foundation, equipment pads and other support locations. 2.8.2 Land Grading and Surfacing 2.8.2.1 Ground surface cover to be determined. 2.8.2.2 Exterior finish grade to be determined. 2.8.2.3 Pavement and aggregate base to be determined. 2.8.3 Utilities SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 7 5. 2 3 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 2.8.3.1 Potable water will be extended from the existing Cogen Building. 2.8.3.2 Sanitary sewer service will be extended from the site. Floor drains shall pass through a drain pit and oil interceptor. 2.8.3.3 Stormwater sewer service will be extended from the site. 2.8.3.4 SCE normal power service will be extended from the site. 2.9 Reinforced Concrete 2.9.1 Requirements to be determined. 2.10 Structural Steel and Miscellaneous Steel 2.10.1 Requirements to be determined. 2.11 Design Loads 2.11.1 Dead, live, wind and seismic load requirements to be determined. 2.12 Separation of Structures 2.12.1 Requirements to be determined. 2.13 Foundation Requirements 2.13.1 Requirements to be determined. 2.14 Architectural Design Criteria 2.14.1 The architectural design of the building addition will be designed to comply with City of Newport noise limitation requirements. 2.14.2 Walkways 2.14.2.1 Minimum of T-6" wide for general and maintenance use. Minimum headroom clearance of 7'-0" or more. 2.14.3 Stair and Platform 2.14.3.1 2.14.4 Roofing 2.14.4.1 2.14.5 Siding 2:14.5.1 SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Requirements to be determined. Requirements to be determined. Requirements to be determined. Page 8 S.Zq Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 2.14.6 Finishing . 2.14.6.1 Requirements to be determined. 2.15 Landscape Design Criteria 2.15.1 To be determined. Provide landscape planting and irrigation consistent with Hoag campus standards. 2.16 Permitting 2.16.1 Plan check and permitting will be required from: • OSHPD • City of Newport Beach Planning Department • City of Newport Beach Building Department • City of Newport Beach Fire Department • City of Newport Beach Public Works Department • California Coastal Commission • Compliance with City of Newport Beach Environmental Impact Report Measures SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 9 5.Z5 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 3.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — MECHANICAL 3.1 Introduction 3.1.1 The mechanical system for the building addition will be designed based on the criteria presented herein. Scope will include complete design, engineering, procurement, permitting, construction, OSHPD testing, inspection and observation, and commissioning, based on the design criteria. 3.1.2 Specific design capacities, ratings, arrangement of equipment, etc., as described herein and as shown on related documents, will be considered representative, and may be modified based on prudent and responsible, application of the design criteria as the design is developed. 3.2 Major Mechanical Equipment 3.2.1 Silencers 3.2.1.1 Provide air inlet acoustical wall louvers in perimeter walls. 3.2.1.2. Provide 85% minimum efficiency air inlet filters and water barrier for perimeter wall louvers. Frame to be stainless steel. Filter size to be determined. 3.2.1.3 Provide air inlet sound attenuators and baffles — size to be determined. 3.2.1.4 Provide exhaust sound baffles — size to be determined. 3.2.2 Air Cooled Heat Exchanger 3.22.1 Provide SPX/Marley horizontal mechanical forced draft air cooled heat exchanger rated to cool 12,600 GPM of condenser water from 78°F to 86°F at 50°F ambient dry bulb temperature. Air cooled heat exchanger to be equipped with six (6) 40 HP, 480V, forced draft fans. Fan motors to be premium efficiency, invertor rated. Provide variable frequency drives for fans in NEMA 3X weather tight, air conditioned, enclosures. 3.2.2.2 Provide structural support frame and bracing system for air cooled heat exchanger. Support frame, bracing system, and field -erected air cooled heat exchanger components will need to comply with 2007 California Building Standards Administrative Code (Part 1, Title 24, CCR) and required OSHPD approval prior to erection. 3.2.2.3 Reference Section 6.0 — Related Documents for preliminary equipment selection. 3.2.3 Condenser Water Booster Pumping System 3.2.3.1 Provide two (2) new condenser water booster pumps sized for parallel operation to support the air cooled heat exchanger system. Provide space for future N+1 spare condenser water booster pump. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 10 5.260 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 3.2.3.2 Condenser water booster pumps to be split case horizontal pumps, each rated at 6,300 GPM, 60 feet head, 70% minimum efficiency, 480V, 150 HP each. Pumps to be located within air cooled heat exchanger enclosure, under the heat exchanger. Pump motors to be premium efficiency, invertor rated. Provide variable frequency drives for pumps in NEMA 3X weather tight, air conditioned, enclosures. 3.2.3.3 FLOWSERVE industrial grade pump selection as basis of design. 3.3 Condenser Water Distribution System 3.3.1 Provide mechanical makeup.water fill system. 3.3.2 Provide mechanical drainage system. 3.3.3 Provide mechanical expansion tank system. 3.3.4 Provide pressure relief valves as required from heat exchanger condenser water piping system to existing cooling tower basin. 3.3.5 Modify cooling tower basin water level control settings to accommodate additional condenser water system overflow volume in event of system drain down. 3.3.6 Provide system vents at high points and drains at low points. 3.3.7 Slope all piping to provide proper drainage. 3.4 Water Treatment System 3.4.1 Existing Cogen Plant water treatment system will be utilized. 3.4.2 Existing treatment program to be adjusted to accommodate increase in condenser water system volume. 3.5 Plumbing System 3.5.1 Enclosure and floor drains will be included in the foundation design to a covered sump. Sump to be equipped with an oil/water separator. 3.5.2 Provide perimeter daylight drains for the enclosure to accommodate stormwater drainage. 3.5.3 Provide roof drains as required for the building addition. 3.6 Fire Protection System 3.6.1 To consist of extension of existing Cogen Building wet sprinkler system. 3.7 Methane System SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 11 S, -z-7 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A 3.8 3.9 Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review—March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 3.7.1 Provide methane gas abatement system Including: • Foundation membrane. • Gas electronic sensing and alarm system. • Planter vents • Trench seals Piping 3.8.1 The piping interfaces are described in Section 1.0 - of this document Pipe sizes are shown on Related Documents. 3.8.2 Schedule of pipe and fitting materials: Valves and Strainers 3.9.1 Reference P&ID's for valve and strainer sizes and locations. 3.9.2 Valves on condenser water services shall be as shown as follows: CONDENSER WATER SERVICE Pipe Material For Type of Fitting Pressure Rating Service Weight Joints Material psi swp. or Isolation Full Port '/:'-2" Bronzerreflon Wei ht Condenserwater Steel Screwed Malleable 150 2" and under Schedule 40 Iron locking Condenserwater Steel Welded Steel Schedule 40 2-112" to 10" Schedule 40 Condenserwater Steel Standard Welded Steel Standard Weight 12" and above Weight Cold water Copper Soldered Wrought 125 Type L Copper Full Port %%2" Vents Galvanized Steel Screwed Malleable 150 2 pc. Schedule 40 Iron Valves and Strainers 3.9.1 Reference P&ID's for valve and strainer sizes and locations. 3.9.2 Valves on condenser water services shall be as shown as follows: CONDENSER WATER SERVICE Maximum 150°F and 150 psig ('/1'-12" N125 psig (14"-24") Specialty Application T Type Size BodylSeat Bo /frim Connection Minimum Ratan "' Ball Valve Isolation Full Port '/:'-2" Bronzerreflon Sweat 400 psig WOG (with 3 -pc. locking handle) and Modulation Full Port %%2" BronzeJieflon Threaded 400 psig WOG 2 pc. Globe ATC Control Valve %%2" BronzelMetal Threaded 400 psig WOG Valve Modulation Butterfly Ilsolation I General 21/."-12" Ductile Threaded 175 psig CWP Valve and Service Iron1EPDM Lug 150 psig bi- Modulation directional shutoff 150 pelt; dead SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 12 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A 151111] 3.11 Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN Insulation and Lagging 3.10.1 As required. Pipe and Valve Labeling 3.11.1 Per Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Standards. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 13 E. 29 end service General 14"-24" Ductile Threaded 150 psig CWP Service Iron1EPOM Lug 150 psig bi- directional shutoff 150 psig dead end service Plug Value Manual Non- 3"-12" Steel/Iron Flanged Class 125 IFIalancing 1 lubricated Check Pumps Silent V"-2' Bronze/Bronze Threaded 200 psig WOG Valve Sllenl Globe 2V"-24' IranBronze Flanged Class 125 Piping Y-Paaem Y"-2" Bronze/Bronze Threaded 200 psig WOG Swing 2V"-24" Iron/Bronze Flanged Class 125 Strainer Control Y -Type 1/2'-2" Bronze/Stainles Threaded 200 psig WOG Valves and s (1/16" dia.) Flow Meters 21/2'4" Iron/Stainless Flanged Class 125 (1/16" dia.) 5"-24" lmn/Stainless Flanged Class 125 (116" dia.) Pump In -Line V"-2" Bronze/Stainles Threaded 200 psig WOG Suction Y -Type s 1/16" dia. 21/2"4" Iron/Stainless Flanged Class 125 (3116" dia.)' 5"-24" Iron/Stainless Flanged Class 125 (Y.." dia.)' Angle Suction Ddfuser End 2"-12" Iron/Stainless Flanged Class 125 Suction Pumps (3/16" dia.)' Start Up Strainer= 16 Mesh Bronze 1. These are minimum ratings for ASTM A126, Class B and ASTM 8-61 and 62. For higher pressures and temperatures, adjust these values to include static head plus 1.1 times pressure relief valve setting plus pump shutoff head pressure. For actual matdmum allowable valve and strainer ratings, refer to "Pressure -Temperature Ratings - Non Shock" tables and "Adjusted Pressure Ratings' for copper tube, soldered end valves [and strainers]. 2. SWP=Steam Woridng Pressure CWP=Cold Water Working Pressure WSP=Woridng Steam Pressure WOG=Water, Oil or Gas 3. Class=ANSI Standard. Insulation and Lagging 3.10.1 As required. Pipe and Valve Labeling 3.11.1 Per Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Standards. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 13 E. 29 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A 3.12 Pipe Painting Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 3.12.1 Per Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Standards. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 14 5.36 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 4.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — ELECTRCIAL 4.1 Introduction 4.1.1 The electrical system for the building addition will be designed based on the criteria presented herein. Scope will include completer design, engineering, procurement, permitting, construction, OSHPD testing, inspection and observation, and commissioning, based on the design criteria. 4.1.2 Specific design capacities, ratings, arrangement of equipment, etc., as described herein and as shown on related documents, will be considered representative, and may be modified based on prudent and responsible application of the design criteria as the design is developed. 4.2 480V Power Distribution 4.2.1 New mechanical equipment will be served with electrical power from SCE provided transformer located at the service yard. This project will provide feeder trenching, conduits, and transformer pad while SCE will provide the service transformer and 15 kV feeder. 4.2.2 Electrical equipment will distribute power to loads as follows: 480V, 3 phase, 3 wire Motors 1/2 HP and larger 208Y/120V, 3 phase, 4 wire - Receptacles, lights, motors under 1/2 HP and small equipment 4.2.3 480Y/277 volt, three phase, four wire power from the service transformer will be supplied via concrete encased underground feeder to a single -ended main switchboard. 4.2.4 The main switchboard will feed 480V motors via VFDs and dry type 480- 208Y/120 volt transformer located adjacent to the main switchboard. This transformer will feed 208Y/120 volt panelboard for local lights and receptacles. 4.2.5 Local 120V maintenance receptacles will be installed within 25 feet of mechanical equipment. 4.3 Lighting System 4.3.1 The lighting system will be designed to provide minimum luminance values for the various areas as follows: • Maintenance Areas — 40 FC • Walkways, Stairways and Platforms — 20 FC • Outdoor Area/Enclosure Surroundings — 2 FC SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 15 5.31 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A 4.3.2 Lighting Fixtures Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN A. Enclosure emergency lighting system shall be provided from battery packs. B. For enclosure interior and exterior lighting, wall -mounted type fixtures with metal halide lamps, integral ballasts and photocells will be used. C. Single/double face emergency exist signs will be provided at all suitable locations. D. All lighting fixtures to be UL listed for wet location. 4.4 Grounding System 4.4.1 Grounding system will be designed in accordance with CEC article 250. 4.4.2 System resistance to ground will be 5.0 ohms or less. System ground resistance will be tested at the main service entrance to ground by means of a three point "fall -of -potential" testing method. 4.4.3 All conduit terminations at switchboard, panelboards, cabinets and gutters will have grounding bushings with bonding jumpers interconnecting all conduits and panelboards, gutters etc. 4.4.4 Grounding system will extend from service transformer to the branch circuit load or device. Grounding electrode system will include, structural steel and concrete encased electrode (UFER) ground. 4.4.5 A code sized unbroken bond leader will connect switchboard ground bar to Xo terminal of the local transformer. 4.5 Power and Control Cable 4.5.1 All conductors will be copper. 4.5.2 Minimum conductor size will be #12 AWG. Minimum neutral size for all shared circuits will be #10 AWG. 4.5.3 Homeruns will be limited to (6) eight current caring conductors. 4.5.4 Circuits of different panels or different voltages will not be installed in the same conduit. 4.6 Fire Alarm System 4.6.1 The fire alarm system extension will include alarm -initiating and alarm -sensing devices, conduits, wires, fittings and all accessories required to provide a complete operation sy;tem extension, meeting the applicable requirements of NFPA. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 16 5.32 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 4.6.2 The fire alarm system will be installed and wired in strict accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations and in co-ordination with overall facility interface requirements. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 17 5.3 3 Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Syska Project No. HOG06007 Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A DRAFT Issue for Review — March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 5.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS 5.1 Furnish and install complete expansion of the existing Energy Management System (EMS) by NALAR Controls. Fumish and install all software, hardware, and power wiring required to expand the existing NALAR control system from the Cogen Building such that it will accomplish the control sequences (to be determined) and accommodate the control points as shown on the Drawings. 5.2 Direct Digital Control (DDC) components shall be capable of proportional -integral - derivative (PID) control. 5.3 Sequences shall include automatic and hand motor starter operation. 5.4 Indication and status shall be via the existing front-end Workstations 1, 2, and 3 video terminals through the existing Hoag WAN. 5.5 All equipment controlled by the control system shall be capable of manual operation through HOA switches in motor starters. SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Page 18 5-.3q Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure 3A Syska Project No. HOG06007 DRAFT Issue for Review— March 18, 2008 BASIS OF DESIGN 6.0 BASIS OF DESIGN — RELATED DOCUMENTS Drawing M1.3 Drawing M1.4 Drawing E1.1 SYSKA HENNESSY GROUP Mechanical Plan View Drawing Mechanical Single Line Diagram Electrical Single Line Diagram Page 19 5.35 - y P MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN - COOLING TOWER. M-1:2 ��r�rmOw�aa®w 'HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL <c 'PRESBYTERIAN : F w ' co P; NI kv..+ p'�� SYSCC F�II1f.RY rr r j 1 t L' z m. �^ ®_ mm _ 0 . - y P MECHANICAL FIRST FLOOR PLAN - COOLING TOWER. M-1:2 W J MET WHO: rp .. �� ue.o mrmu HOAGMEMORW HCSPRAL PRES13"ERIAH. SYSYw N0VN854T ELECTRICAL SINGLE LME VApl1 HOSG MEMORIAL nWyRl©�IApI HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN r wr SISYAl6HI1°SSY m i6 0 wb 7m^a' ;VA ». k a a4 A k 4.u.» LPrvEfl CNAPU5CWl1_NG i%YEP PL E EMIT10K 110N _ OWPiIGNUDONCE » w MECHANICAL SINGLE SINE MECHANICAL SINGLE LINE �1 1 ' a (� M-1.4 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 00A3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix C Drawing and Sketches C -Appendices City of Newport Beach_RevO 3_19_08.doc FLUOR, DATE 8Apr08 Rev 0 5.39 4 � 1 k-A"o �� •4/Zk Br lr cxx•o eu.ou"wnorm ma s�a�.s exe�r xo. POC*Z ,..._ — r °p�`t L3p�6'a Ey 6 �Is _1. 1 �rstsu�, iTY e � w�R + are FFX (gCHE-t)85ok 4.,td -r * 2.K ' 2 Two ftvAPS 63aoGpM@6o�{t5UNP6aZ*4K ' P�PQ (ne iMSNte��NA ) , 14' E iZ) %so Hr 4Fb,. $or 6) io )ir YFDe ter fxtie-1 ' N W JUAHOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN [ { t ( m,rnaw .x yYSKA1�YNfl61' ^ � � l'JU LJ ll e •- 0 lww Po LOWENCAMPNSCOWNGT0 R 'PLUNEMrtIGMIW oPTIONMCGNCEPT. Lim w.r m••✓- MECHANICAL SAGLELINE NECHANICAL.3INGLE UNE ��� M-1.4 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. OOA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix D FLUOR® DATE 08Apr08 Rev 0 Cooling Tower Manufacturer (Marley) • ACHE Performance analysis and selection criteria with reference Psychometric chart and Event 2 Trending Data • ACHE equipment selection and budget price D Appendices City of Newport Beach_5PX pert analysis and equipmt budget prim 8Apr08.doc S. Ll q Design Parameter for ACHE selection and condenser water cooling load handling by Tower vs. ACHE Design Parameters: Winter Desiqn Conditions: Flow Rate = 12,600 gpm HWT=86F CWT =78F DBT = 50 F ACHE Desitin (2/3 heat rejection): Flow Rate = 12,600 gpm HWT=86F CWT = 80.6 F Range = 5.4 F # Bays = 3 Fans / Bay = 2 Motor Size = 40 hp Total Power = 235 hp (max) # tube rows = 8 # tube passes = 2 Dimensions = 40 it x 40 ft Cooling Tower Desiqn (1/3 heat rejection): Flow Rate = 12,600 gpm HWT=80.6F CWT = 78F* (assuming a 45F WBT / 68% RH) Fan Speed = 10-25% (extrapolated approximation). 4 Cells in Operation (other operating configurations are also possible) Results: By diverting 2/3 of the heat load to the ACHE, the reduced heat load on the cooling tower will prevent the formation of plume during most of the anticipated Winter design conditions. If we utilize the resulting ACHE/CT configuration and approximate the results during the ambient conditions that correspond with the attached Plume Event Condition #2 (i.e. DBT=49.8F / RH=83%) and compare the results with the "cooling tower only" operation, it will provide a good indication of the benefit achieved. The attached psychometric chart shows two lines ("AB" is the CT/ACHE operation and "AC' is the cooling tower only operation). Line AB indicates the psychometric path of the exit air from the cooling tower as it leaves the fan stack at B and shows how much it crosses the saturation curve while reaching the ambient condition at A. Likewise, line AC indicates the psychometric path of the exit air from the cooling tower as it leaves the fan stack at point C and crosses the saturation curve while reaching the ambient condHion at A. Note that line AB (with ACHE operation) crosses into the saturation area to a much lesser extent and it should be noted that this is at a higher flow rate of 12,600 gpm instead of 7,800 gpm used for line AC and a higher overall range of 8F instead of 6.5 used for line AC (i.e. Line AB with ACHE operation actually reflects the operation with over twice the heat load as what is present during Event 2 that is represented by Line AC). 5 • q,5 Furthermore, the ACHE is designed such that it would be able to reject the full heat load (without the cooling tower in operation) when the heat rejection is approximately less than 40000 MBH at ambient temperature less than or equal to 50 deg. F. This corresponds to the winter heat load of the currently installed equipment. Summary: Adding the above described ACHE wilt reduce the quantity and occurrences of plume by more than 50% over a wide range of ambient conditions when operating at the future winter load of 12,600 gpm & 8F range. During current Winter Operation of approx. 9,000 gpm / 8F range, the ACHE will take the full load and there would be absolutely no chance of plume. , y(o Fm t �11rl�l�Jy, lr��. rSYL;It?Jirl�tt?IL LrlrJt!t Coel�� 'T.ry wA RC 81 ,mac ENTHALPY IM -M PER W NNS MY NR so �a J q V Lai Comutting + Englh�erinq + Technolbgy + Construdidh e"� 2 .DELL OPERATIPM CIO A' TREND DATA. PATE: Ja,nuaty -101,"2,008 TME;: E TeI)MIlpl-, e -l', r- a -fu re,,. "deg: -F Rel.Humidity:;'83*0 kH Winclipeed, 2 etiph -000ir + ktan "sw izest, rjurapop., ConS1 tifateK'Retui W-WaW'S - Up Heat Fte�ectibri - RIO Ot coo0ty '30,minutes; Temp : 0616g:.F. Temp. 79.-6 86A 7-,'S -2 3 -: G P M, 26,,400'MBH -49.0/6 SPX Page 1 of 5 Date: March 28, 2008 MCT Ref. N--. ` 1821R1 E -Mali? To: Hoag Hospital Fax Ns: Attention:: From: Rajesh Gupta Subject: Budget quote for Air Cooled Heat Exchanger Dear Sir, As per your recent request, SPX cooling technologies is pleased to provide its budgetary quotation for an Air Cooled Heat Exchanger propose our standard technical and commercial scope. We trust that the provided information supports the your immediate needs and we look forward to speaking with you to see if our design selection and price in line with expectations and to further assist in the development effort. Please feel free to call if you have any questions regarding our proposal. Sincerely, SPX cooling technologies Rajesh Gupta Application Engineer— Dry Cooling Rqfesh.gupta@spx.com Q✓k CYilbL�W1-GCF5FlSiA�dif ^ztk[ wp'$' i9E3a aHk: �9;_twp �&4rt. YA�3ry f�2Cs TEL 819 _.864 ',. 9490 VAX;813 884 7495 1 5. y9 ACHE DESIGN CONDITION Fluid. Water Total Fluid Flow: GPM 12,600 Inlet Temperature °F 93 Outlet Temperature . F 66.5 'Design he duty:, MM Btu/hr 41.0 Inlet Air Dry Bulb Temperature: °F 50 Tube side pressure drop psi 13.5 Site. ,Elevation = ft 100 ACHE DESIGN SELECTION: . Number of Bays/cells per unit 3 Plot Arrangement Unit Length: it 40'-0" Unit Width: it 41'-0' Drive Equipment Number of Drive motor 6 Fan Diameter (Forced Draft): it 12 Motor Size HP 40 Sound Pressure Level 0400' d6(A) 56 from ACHE Perimeter Total Design Fan Power @ Fan HP 240 sheft (all Fans Full) SP)( SCOPE OF SUPPLY FOR ACHE • Forced draft design, horizontal finned tube bundles • Modular design of Tube Bundle • Galvanize carbon steel plenum, fan rings, fan guards, support structures • Zinc metal spraying of Header boxes as per specification •. Single- Speed, 1.15 service factor, IP 55 Electric Motors with space heater • V -Belt Drives • Mechanical equipment to be coated with manufacturers' standard coating • Hydrostatic Test on Tube Bundle per ASME Section VIII, Div. • Vibration cut off switch for each fan to trip the motor in case of excessive vibration • The tubes will be SA249 Gr 304 welded stainless steel, 1.0" diameter with 0.04" minimum wall thickness. The fin type will be an L type fin. The Carbon Steel header boxes will be fabricated from SA -516-70 and supplied with carbon steel plugs. The tube -to -tube sheet joints will be roller expanded. Vis! SIX Price- FOB Tulsa OK USA Description Air Cooled Heat Exchangers (3 bays, 3 bundles, 6 fans per unit) Ex Works FOB Tulsa OK. Optional price adder for one end walkways and 2 -ladders. Unit price qty Total Price USD USD $845,000 1 $845,000 $11,900 1 $ 11,900 Terms: SPX Terms & Conditions (Available upon request) Price Basis: Budget +/- 10% Quotation Validity: 30 days Material Delivery: Within 32-36 weeks from Approval of Basic Engineering Documents Payment: Down Payment and Progress Payments based on engineering and material deliverables, net 30 days, essentially as follows: • 15% Upon Submittal of Basic Engineering Documents (GA, FL) • 35% Upon Receipt of Tube and Fin Materials at Shop • 60% Payments against bill of lading 5.52 1 k' W W -a yY f i A 8 W -Y I lfb I J b 000 b END VIEW b A 0 000 7X.. x x 1, 1 r ar 1 V b o- ,f� PRELIMINARY FOR BID PURPOSE ONLY SECTION A -A anxeonw, .. a aura a m mmm �uT � I I City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 00A3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix E SPX Cooling Technologies (Marley) • NCWD and Air2Air hybrid tower system • ACHE air to water heat exchanger E -Appendices City of Newport Beach_SPX-NCWD_A2A_ACHE.doc FLUOR, DATE 8Apr08 Rev 0 5.5q Plume Abatement and Water Conservation Solutions l We're pulling the plug on the plume.. / +� y For decades, cooling towers' cold -weather condensation plumes have been a major problem. At best, they're unsightly; at worst, they impair visibility and waste water. Which make them a particular worry around airports and other environmentally sensitive areas. At SPX Cooling Technologies, we've made it our mission to eradicate as much of the plume as possible — while conserving significant amounts of water along the way. And we've succeeded. t Two Ways to Tame the Plume For years, SPX's coil based hybrid cooling towers have been a highly popular choice. Now, our NCWD tower represents our most advanced application of this technology. SPX's hybrid technology adds a heated dry air stream to our coil system, keeping the plume undersaturated. even upon mixture with the ambient air. Therefore; visible plume is practically eliminated. Another option is our new Air2Air" technology, which comes at plume abatement from a slightly different, but similarly effective, angle. Air2Air uses heat exchanger packs to radically reduce condensation and keep the plume in check. Both solutions can also conserve substantial amounts of water. And no matter which solution you choose. you'll be helping to make "plume history" — by helping to make the plume, well... history. 5'.56 NCWD: Assembled on Our Site, Not Yours The new Marley8 NCWD package cooling towers are configured for applications of 500 tons or greater — yet, remarkably, are factory assembled. This significantly broadens the usability of wet/dry towers from "critical applications only" to more mainstream projects and installations. By combining direct contact (evaporative) and indirect contact (dry) heat exchangers in a parallel arrangement, the NCWD's crossflow system can result in water savings as high as 20%' versus conventional cooling towers — while markedly limiting visible plume. In addition, the NCWD line offers: • Energy-efficient operation • Lower maintenance requirements • Cost-effective installation • For those using chemical water treatment, less blowdown and thus less chemicals 'Davendent on system gating c diarns and local weather conditom . Air2Air: Saving Water, A Lot of Water Our new, patented Air2Air system uses a series of PVC heat exchanger packs in the tower plenum to condense moisture before it escapes. The result: A substantial reduction in plume emission. But there's more good news. Air2Air can reduce your cooling tower's water consumption by up to 30% annually`, making it the obvious choice anywhere that water conservation is a prime concern. And Air2Air can be used on either new or existing towers. Because Air2Air is a fully integrated system, it's more reliable than exclusively coil -based systems, which means: Simpler hydraulics for simpler operation • Fewer moving parts, requiring less maintenance • No freezing worries For a personalized economic payback analysis of the impact Air2Air can have on your planned or existing facility, and to sign up for updates on new Air2Air installations, visit www.spxcooling.com/a2a. If you're concerned with reducing visible plume or saving water, let SPX Cooling Technologies show you how to make our solution, your solution. Visit for all the details. ,.S7 SPX Cooling Technologies is a world -leading full -line cooling tower and air-cooled condenser manufacturer. The company provides the highest -quality evaporative cooling towers, air-cooled condensers, fluid coolers and evaporative condensers under the Marley, Recold and Balcke brand names. ��yVILDI,yC O G f` _n a' fMBF.P M1 ® Cooling Technologies 906:4e I Hamon Dry Cooling I M.* 7491 W129 Street averta..d Park, KS USA 66213 .1913 664 7499 spxcoolinq 31cLspx.Coll vvww.aplowoling.eom In me merest of techwiagical progress, a8 products are subject to dasgn andjor matanal clsange without notice. ISM SPX Coaling Tachnmiogies, me Prinwd:n LISA I Clear04 ,.58 1, N fier i §Of i t FLIPP i t.}I'M id l:ua. �j4 u ��y', � tn � *tx,L •x.,"' }s3 'FM1@ Si S �'' rpt i- '- 3 WU 'q _ a 5.5111 Q2, R zal _..A—. 1, N fier i §Of i t FLIPP i t.}I'M id l:ua. �j4 u ��y', � tn � *tx,L •x.,"' }s3 'FM1@ Si S �'' rpt i- '- 3 WU 'q _ a 5.5111 AirFin HEAT EXCHANGERS ----------------- AIRFIN OBJECTIVES ADVANCED RESEARCH AirFin Heat Exchangers have been designed, AND TECHNOLOGY manufactured, and supplied worldwide for AirFin benefits from the advanced research over 40 years. Our satisfied customers include facility at SPX Cooling Technologies in the chemical, petrochemical, oil and gas, process, and porter generation industries. SPX Cooling Technologies' AirFin heat transfer engineering team works with a set of concise objectives • Commitment to the customer to provide the most advanced technology available • Promote innovative Value engineering designs" • Custom designs with optimized heat transfer surface and pressure drop • Laxer fan power consumption and lower fan noise criteria • Overall guaranteed performance Competitive cost, reduced operating and maintenance cost thereby providing a simple, clear choice for all your heat exchanger needs WORLDWIDE MANUFACTURING CAPABILITIES AirFin derives maximum advantage from its international manufacturing and service organization. As a result of this worldwide sourcing, customers derive economic benefits from advanced product design and cost optimization. SPX Cooling Technologies offers prod. ucts manufactured at our own facilities in Germany, South Africa and China. Additionally, our alliance partners in North America, South America and other countries provide a 'competitive edge and a unique flexibility in meeting our clients' requirements. Germany. Ongoing, aggressive research and development assures the division's position as a market leader in technology. The primary marketing objective is to identify new markets and opportunities for which creative solutions and advanced technologies can be applied. At AirFin, our mission is to provide our customers with the finest quality heat transfer equipment in the industry. Our objective is to be your worldwide, preferred partner. QUALITY ASSURANCE AND QUALITY CONTROL Quality Assurance and Quality Control programs are certified to ISO 9001, TUV. and others. The testing and verification process is rigorous, while our certified inspection programs meet or exceed industry standards. Testing includes hydrostatic, pneumatic, and/or submerged underwater leak testing, as well as nondestructive and specific testing per project specifications. In addition, all materials are inspected upon receipt, in -process, and at final assembly stage. Additionally, AirFin quality programs include third -party independent inspections when necessary. Fabrication facdiN at Zhangliakcu, Peoples Republic of China XCtiANGER S THE FIN -TUBE BUNDLE. AiPFIN DESIGNS AND CUSTOM -BUILDS .; F.SF, ENSURING',S"TRfCTADHERFN,-,: �UALiTY STANDARDS AND 1 1CATI0NS. Petrochemical application 465 MWCCCP plant, El Dorado Energy. Nevada 5.106 GE frame 7EA gas turbine closed coaling wafer module with pump skid HeidTranster Hesea,�h c. OUR MISSION IS TO PRaVi DE CUSTOMERS WITH THE FINEST QUALITY HEAT TRANSFER EQUIPMENT IN THE INDUSTRY. OUR OBJECTIVE IS TD BE YCt;R WORLDWIDE, PREFERRED PARTNER. Oil and gas application INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY HEAT EXCHANGERS SPX Cooling Technologies has Over 40 years of experience in the design and manufacturing of air-cooled heat exchangers. Our thermal designs are based on SPX Cooling Technologies' pro. prietary computer programs, and are, as standard procedure, verified to the latest version of widely accepted HTRI thermal design software. The AirFin air-cooled heat exchanger is designed and manufactured as a forced draft or induced draft type. Each tube bundle is constructed, tested, and stamped in strict accordance with the following rigid standards • ASME Section VIII, Division I, with 'U" stamp • API 661, when applicable (recommended design practice for Refinery Application) • TEMA, when applicable • Additional world standards: DIN, British, AS, AD-Merkblatt, REGELS • Chinese standards: 313-150, BR1, GB/ T15386, JB 4730 Project planning and Implementation processes utilize ultramodern computer software for engineering, design and manufacturing. AirFin designs can be completely shop - assembled, or pre -assembled in modular pieces for easy onsite field erection, the choice contingent upon optimum transportation cost benefit to the customer. For export projects, to ensure that your shipment arrives in perfect condition, we offer seaworthy packing, with nitrogen fill for longterm storage. yield erecter` modules Process industry application Completely factory assembled modules 5.0 FINNED TUBES, HEADERS, AND DESIGNS FINNED TUBES Finned tubes are available in several configurations, including "L" footed • Extruded • Embedded (G -fin) • Elliptical — Galvanized FIN MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE IN • Aluminum • Copper • Hot -dipped galvanized steel TUBE MATERIAL IS AVAILABLE IN THE FOLLOWING METALS AND ALLOYS • Carbon steel • Stainless steel • Duplex stainless steel • Copper • Copper nickel • Titanium •Inconel/Incoloy • Hastalloy and other exotic alloys Bolted cover type header HEADER TYPES CAN BE DESIGNED IN MULTIPLE CONFIGURATIONS, INCLUDING t Bolted cover header i 1 Bonnet head- Manifold head - DESIGN CONFIGURATIONS • Forced draft • Individual draft • Horizontal • Vertical • A -frame DESIGN PRESSURES INCLUDE • Full vacuum • Up to 300 bar (4,500 psi) "L' tooted Extruded Embedded(G- fin) Process air cooler and "A.Frame' condenser in a chemical plant 5.(2 Galvanizing workshop Q=UALITY , WELDING. PROCESSES AirFin uses state-of-the-art welding processes, including • S.A.W. multi -pass • G.T.A.W. manual and automatic • G.M.A.W. •. F.C.A.W. • Manual or automatic tube.to-tube. sheet seal welding, or strength welding (when required) MACHINING CAPABILITY, QUALITY CONTROL, AND TESTING -Use of high -tolerance, computer controlled (CNC) machining, centers • All materials are inspected upon receipt, in process, and at final assembly stage • Testing includes hydrostatic, pneumatic and/or submerged .underwater • Nondestructive and other testing per project specifications • Quality programs include third, party independent inspections, when required BENEFITS OF=AIRRN HEAT EXCHANGERS' • Value engineered, optimized design • Hot -dipped galvanized structure • Mechanical equipment and fan run - tested in -shop for factory assem _ bled units • Thermal, hydraulic, vibration, and mechanical guarantee Welding of a plug;type header 5.G3 / Full Service Local Representation / The Global Network of Dry Cooling Belgium SPX Cooling Technologies Belgium Twin House, Rue Neerveld 107 B - 1200 Brussels, Belgium Phone: +32 (0)2 761 61 11 Fax: +32 (0)2 761 61 86 infobeBcts.spx.com www.spxcooling.com France SPX Cooling Technologies France 3, promenade de Is Bonnette F - 92238 Gennevilliers, France Phone: +33 (0)1 47 99 60 40 Fax: +33 (0)1 47 99 60 50 infofr@cts.spx.com www.spxcooling.com China SPX Cooling Technologies Co. Ltd. B-701, Guomen Building, No 1 Zuojiazhuang, Chaoyang District 100028 Beijing, China Phone: +86 10 6462 1188 Fax: +86 10 6461 9162 infocn®cts.spx.com www.spxcooling.com Germany SPX Cooling Technologies GmbH Ernst -Dietrich -Platz 2 D - 40882 Ratingen, Germany Phone: +49 (0)2102 1669 0 Fax: +49 (0)2102 1669 215 infode®cts.spx.com www.spxcooling.com Italy SPX Cooling Technologies Italia SpA Via Raffaello Sanzio 2 (Corpo A) 1- 21013 Gallarate (Va), Italy Phone: +39 0331 2484 11 Fax: +39 0331 2484 12 infoit®cts.spx.com www.spxcooling.com United States of America SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc. 1200 U.S. Highway 22 East Bridgewater, N.J. 08807, USA Phone: +1 908 450 8008 Fax: +1 908 450 8050 infousa@ct.spx.com www.spxcooling.com United Kingdom SPX Cooling Technologies Gregory's Bank, UK - Worcester. WR3 8AB, Phone: +44 (0) 1905 720 241 Fax: +44 (0) 1905 720 201 infouk®cst.spx.com www.spxcooling.com SPX Cooling Technologies Bakke I Homon Dry Cooling I Marley 5-(4 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No.00A3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix F Sound Attenuating Louver F -Appendices City of Newport Beach_ SAD_08.doc DATE 8Apr08 Rev 0 5.&5 RUSK/N" 3900 Dr. Greaves Rd. Kansas City, MO 64030 (816) 761-7476 FAX (816) 765-8955 ACL1245AF STATIONARY ACOUSTICAL LOUVER FORMED STEEL STANDARD CONSTRUCTION FRAME 12' (305) deep, 16 gage (1.6) galvanized steel channel. BLADES 18 gage (1.3) airfoil shaped galvanized steel exterior surface, with 22 gage (.9) perforated steel interior surface that cov- ers insulation. Blades positioned at 45• angle and spaced approximately 12" (305) center to center. ACOUSTICAL INSULATION Ruskatherm blanket. SCREEN r/i mesh x 19 gage (13 x 1.1) galvanized bird screen in removable frame. Screen adds approximately +h' (13) to louver depth. FINISH Mill. MINIMUM SIZE 12'w x 24"h (305 x 610). APPROXIMATE SHIPPING WEIGHT 10 lbs. per sq. ft. (48.8 kg/m'). MAXIMUM FACTORY ASSEMBLY SIZE Shall be 64 sq. ft. (6m'). Maximum single section size shall be 48" x 96' (1219 x 2438). Louvers larger than the maximum single section size will require field assem- bly of smaller sections. FRAME CONSTRUCTION 3 A' A- FCB r — Varies Standard Integral Flange 12' (305) Dimensions in parenthesis ( ) indicate millimeters. FEATURES The ACLI245AF offers: • 23% Free Area. • Insulated blades which provide effective sound attenuation and weather protection. • Published performance ratings based on testing in accordance with AMCA Publication 511. • Architecturally pleasing appearance. VARIATIONS Variations to the basic design of this louver are available at additional cost. They include: • Extended sill. • Front or rear security bars. • Fitter racks. • Installation angles. • A variety of bird and insect screens. • Selection of finishes: prime coat, baked enamel (modified fluoropolymer), epoxy, Peadedize, Kynar, clear and color anodize. (Anodize finish available only on aluminum construction. Some variation in anodize color consistency is possible.) • Formed aluminum frame with .100' (2.5) nominal wall thickness and .080' (2) blade with .040' (1) perforated aluminum interior surface. Octave Band Frequency (Hz) Free Field Nolse Reduction (db) Ruskatherm Blanket 2/125 13 3/250 13 4/500 14 5/1000 20 6/2000 20 7/4000 20 8/8000 23 To calculate Transmission Loss (db), subtract 6 db from Free Field Noise Reduction (db). 'Units furnished 1/: (6) smaller than given opening dimensions. SIZE TAG CITY. FRAME VARIATIONS A• -WIDE B' -HIGH PROJECT LOCATION ARCHJENGR. CONTRACTOR REPRESENTATIVE DATE Spec ACL12<5AF89NReIacea ACLIMAF898 ALL STATED SPECIFICA17ONS ARE SUBJECT To CHANGE wrTNOUT NOTICE OR OBLIGATION ORuslrn Company Januan•1998 5• & SUGGESTED SPECIFICATION Furnish and install louvers as hereinafter specified where shown on plans or as described in schedules. Louvers shall be stationary acoustical type contained within a 12" (305) frame. Louver compo- nents (heads, jambs, sills, blades, and mullions) shall be factory assembled by the lower manufacturer. Louver sizes too large for shipping shall be built up by the contractor from factory assembled louver sections to provide overall sizes required. Louver design shall incorporate structural supports required to withstand a wind - load of 20 In. per sq. ft. (.96kPa) (equivalent of a 90 mph wind 1145 KPH] wind - specifier may substitute any loading required). PERFORMANCE DATA AMCA Standard 500 provides a reasonable basis for testing and rating louvers. Testing to AMCA 500 is performed under a certain set of laboratory conditions. This does not guarantee that other conditions will not occur in the actual environment where lowers must operate. .30 (3.23) 25 (2 69) Q 20 f2.151 U. O C 15 E E r m m 0 (1.06) MI O .05 (54) Louvers shall be Ruskin Model ACL124SAF constmction as fol- lows: Frame: 16 gage (1.6) galvanized steel channel. Blades: 18 gage (1.3) galvanized steel exterior surface, 22 gage (.9) perforated steel interior surface that covers insula- tion. Blades are positioned at 45° angle and spaced approximately 12' (305) center to center. Screen: 1/2" mesh x 19 gage (13 x 1.1) galvanized steel in remov- able frame. Finish: Select finish specification from RuskinNalspar Finishes Brochure. Published lower performance data bearing the AMCA Certified Ratings Seal for Air Performance and Water Penetration must be submitted for approval prior to fabrication and must demonstrate pressure drop equal to or less than the Ruskin model specified. The louver system should be designed with a reasonable safety factor for louver performance. To ensure protection from water carry-over, design with a performance level somewhat below maxi- mum desired pressure drop and .01 oz./sq. h. of water penetration. WATER PENETRATION Test size 48" wide x 48" high (1219 x 1219) Beginning point of water penetration at .01 ozJsq. ft. is 1126 fpm (343 m/min). Ruskin Manufacturing Com- pany certifies that the louver shown herein is licensed to bear the AMCA Seal. The ratings shown are based on tests and procedures per- formed in accordance with AMCA Standard 511 and comply with the requirements of the AMCA Certified Rat- ings Program. AMCA Carti- tied Ratings Seal applies to air performance ratings and water penetration ratings only. 1000 1100 1200 1300 (305) (335) (366) (396) Free Area Velocity in feet (meters) per minute Standard air.075 Hatit'(1.2 kg/m') 5.("7 FREE AREA GUIDE Free Area Guide shows free area in fN and m' for various sizes of ACL1245AF Width - Inches and Meters 1.00 X2469) 90 (224.01) .80 1189.12) .70 1174231 .60 049.36 .501124.451 .40199.581 m Q.. 20174.611 Ch 3 20(49781 of d t u c c 10(24M) a 44A4 18.81 �z244; C M(1742) Y A6(14.93) 1�q .0411245) p 44(998) 8 CL mt7471 v N42(4.981 -01(2.49) PRESSURE DROP INTAKE Air Velocity in feet (meters) per minute through Free Area Ratings do not include the effect of a bird screen. 5. CDs" 12 /8 24 30 36 42 48 54 60 66 72 78 84 90 96 0.30 0.46 0.61 0.76 0.91 1.07 1.22 1.37 1.52 1.68 1.63 1.98 2.13 2.29 2.44 18 0.59 0.99 1.38 1.78 2.17 2.57 2.96 3.36 3.75 4.15 494 4.94 5.33 5.73 6.12 0.46 0.06 0.09 0.13 0.17 0.20 024 028 0.31 0.35 0.39 0.42 0.46 0.50 0.53 0.57 24 0.40 0.56 0.93 1.19 1.46 1.72 1.99 225 2.62 2.78 3.05 3.31 358 3.84 4.11 0.61 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.21 0.23 0.26 026 0.31 0.33 0.35 0.38 30 0.72 120 1.68 2.16 2.65 3.13 3.61 4.09 457 &05 5.53 6.01 SAS 6.97 7A6 0.76 0.07 0.11 0.16 0.20 0.25 029 0.34 0.38 0.42 0.47 0.51 am 0.60 0.65 0.69 36 057 0.95 133 1.71 2.09 2.47 2.85 3.27 3.61 3.99 4.38 4.76 5.14 5.52 5.90 0.91 0.05 0.09 0.12 0.16 0.19 0.23 0.27 0.30 0.34 0.37 0.41 OA4 0.48 0.51 0.55 42 0.89 1.49 2.06 2.68 327 396 4A6 595 SAS 624 6.84 7.43 8.03 8.62 922 1.07 0.08 0.14 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.36 0.41 0.47 0.53 0.58 0.64 0.89 0.75 0.80 OAS 48 0.74 123 1.73 232 2.71 320 3.70 4.19 4.68 &18 6.67 6.16 6.65 7.15 7.64 122 0.07 L 0.11 L 0.16 0.21 0.25 0.30 1 0.34 0.39 0.44 0.48 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.661 0.71 54 1.06 1.77 2,48 3.19 330 4.51 522 6.03 &74 7.45 LIS 8.87 9.58 1029 11.00 1.37 0.10 0.16 023 0.30 0.36 0.43 0.49 0.56 0.63 0.69 0.761 0.82 0.89 0.96 1.02 60 0.91 152 2.13 2.74 3.35 3.95 456 5.17 5.78 639 7.00 7.60 821 892 9.43 1.52 0.08 0.14 0.20 0.25 0.31 0.37 0.42 0.48 0.54 0.59 0.65 0.71 0.76 0.82 0.88 66 123 2.06 2.99 3.70 452 5.35 6.17 6.99 7.81 8.64 9.46 1028 11.10 11.93 12.75 1.68 0.11 0.19 0.27 0.34 0.42 0.50 0.57 0.65 0.73 0.80 0.88 0.96 1.03 1.11 1.19 72 1.09 1.80 2.52 3.24 3.96 4.68 5.41 6.13 6.85 7.57 839 9.01 9.73 10A5 11.17 1.83 0.10 0.17 0.23 1 0.30 0.37 0.44 0.50 0.57 0.64 0.70 0.77 0.84 0.91 0.97 1.04 78 1.41 234 328 422 6.15 6.09 7.03 7.99 &90 9.64 10.77 11.71 12.65 1358 14.52 1.98 0.13 0.22 0.30 0.39 0.48 0.57 0.65 0.74 O.B3 0.91 1.00 1.09 1.18 126 1.35 84 125 2.09 2.93 3.76 4.60 5.44 627 7.11 7.94 8.78 9.62 10.45 1129 12.13 12.96 2.13 1 0.12 1 0.19 0.27 0.35 0.43 0.51 0.58 0.66 0.74 0.82 0.89 097 1.05 1.13 1.21 90 1.58 263 3.68 4.73 5.79 6.84 7.89 &94 9.99 11.04 12.10 13.15 1420 1535 1630 2.29 0.15 0.24 0.34 0.44 0.54 0.64 0.73 0.83 0.93 1.03 1.12 1.22 1.32 1.42 1.52 96 1.42 237 332 127 522 6.17 7.12 &O6 9.01 9.96 10.91 11.86 1281 13.76 14.71 2.44 0.13 0.22 0.31 0.40 0.49 0.57 0.66 0.75 0.84 0.93 1.01 1.10 1.19 1.28 1.37 1.00 X2469) 90 (224.01) .80 1189.12) .70 1174231 .60 049.36 .501124.451 .40199.581 m Q.. 20174.611 Ch 3 20(49781 of d t u c c 10(24M) a 44A4 18.81 �z244; C M(1742) Y A6(14.93) 1�q .0411245) p 44(998) 8 CL mt7471 v N42(4.981 -01(2.49) PRESSURE DROP INTAKE Air Velocity in feet (meters) per minute through Free Area Ratings do not include the effect of a bird screen. 5. CDs" TYPICAL INSTALLATION DETAILS CMU Caulk (by other Louver Extendec SIII Masonry Wall Caulk (by other Lauver Corrugate Metal Drip C Insulation Loi Extenoe SIII Metal Panel Wall Wood Flange Installation Mount 3800 Gr. Greaves Rd. RUSK/N`� sw»S� w: Flang Fram Louver Anchor (by others) Accessories at additional cost. 5.G9 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 0OA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix G DATE 8AprO8 Rev 0 Trending Data and plume observation photos for 18 events in January and February 2008 — Report date February 21, 2008 (Update) G -Appendices City of Newport 8each_Trending Data and photos_RevO 8Apr08.doc 5.70 5. 7l £p F4 1 pg 6U u ¢°u iry _ Z s s eI a si sass ss s ss --- s ¢xssss�samssaaa: ossssss Psm- sass ese - ss =s�se 8 - 8 8 i 8 - 21 - $ s - i o` o o` a` o' o` o` o` o°o` i 1 6 0 6 `o € '0 6 `0 8 0 6 c 6 0 6 0` 6 8 6 0$ 0 8 8 8 0 6 to 8 `0 6 '01 8 `a e 0 8 8 8 6 - 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 E 8 5 6 6 a`I o` 6 8 8 6 0` 6 6 6 0` 0 0 0` o` 0` m` o` 6 6 6 0` 6 6 0` 8 6 8 8 0` 8 8 8 8 8 6 8 0` 6 8 0` o` o o` 6 a` 8 8 - -sa s s saes 3 � s e SS m 5. 7l a SYSKA if,,„ :.NE? S)' G"Ou. Consulting + [ngineerinq + Technology + Con�truction I t! -D �Qopu,m,e--n-'iLowerQampus,,,Cooling�to\A/�br4oXhau�st,co:n'�d.ens. events and eff6otofig a$utos at' nme Roord E e- e v OtW atherDO sr Outdo-ortem1per-pture I - Relative humidi Windi,speed and direction Record Eyont To wer Load — Condenser water supply and — Condenser water flow — Fan speed Isolation-, v'alve- position - Heat reject Percent. capacity return temperature I e Consulting + Lngineering + Technology + Construction SYSKA I It"'N'NE-SSY *Hoop Abstract. Ogf-aph T e Ph� ot OW'r Rhaust Condition Event Three" photo angles Location., I On',grade parking lot Location 2* Hillside property libe, narthwest-torner tower enclosure Location 3. Hillside property line; northeast corner C-pgen Plant Location..2 j 74,i ...... E; Consuking + Engineering + Tcchnology + ConstructiOn GROUP Mitigation Moasures.: Threetellr to r pe, p " ration v4r'suiE06,ur ore r operation= - we Const0twoather conditions - Constantcooling touter load Condenserwater reset - 5 deg. Average condenser waiter supply temp. reset No load 'shift to Upper Campus 6=S�V� Ht IW��WV �W. Ul 4 a Sl,x-\ I tv.,mm'ss), ofloop 3.. CELL,OPERATION Consulting + Engineering + Technology + Contiuctlon 4 -CELL OPERATION TRIE.N.D. DATA • DATE: Jarivary%2008 TIME7, 7-308:16AM VVEAT—HER,,CONDITIPNS,, Temperature : 62.4 deg, P Rel Humi,dit:'V,:, 86% RH Wiqd,,oeedt CWm NIA . AVERAGE TOWEkCOAD: -, Test,Duraiion 46'thinUtes Coad. Water S:Up *Temp�:r 7,5:5 deg. F bqd.-`W rF 8-38600M: Heit n-- m, 45.0, , M6H , Pir.ceptotipacity,-, 61% om,Fka He tiasomp, lie. 5 rig 3 CELL OPERATION Consultirig + Engirteering, 4, Technology + ConStrLlCtion :4 CELL OPERATION I 9® S a 3 • PATEf January 10,;2008 f-21ME:- 7,15 —7:46 AM Ternoriture,! 49';e deg, F R6,1; m y,. 8A. kH Win'&SO 2 mph ?Wind Di SW AVERAGE :T,.0W,ER-,L Tett!Duraffbil-,', 301mihutes Gond.. Water -Retumlemp: 86 deg.;F Cond. -',WkWt-jSup'ft Temp, 791 dog; F ddrid'. WAMKFIOW 7t23"GPM, Hwd Rojet ' tfib 26,400, MBH Por!�,OntCapacity: 49% R rim 4y% -)KA I it NIN, FIN -SI, 4000P 3,CELL OPERATION FeCftary 21, 2m& CIQ Consulting, + Erigioeerfng + technology + Construction 4 CELLOPERATION TREND QATA- • DATE: January 10, 2008 • TIME: 7:00 — 7:30 AM: • WEATHER -CONDITIONS: Temperature* 61.4 deg. F Rei: Humiditv..-'w 510 RH Wind ;O Direction: Sw n. Te -40 minutes Return T -=06g,'f r Conti. VMfaterf Supply Temp: 75 de6l, F abridlwater-Flow. 7,257 GPM Neat Refection;_ 25,400 MBH Percent Capacity: 02W26"na He w"Yontp, [to. Consulting + Pngfnci�rjng + Teclinology,+ Construttion SYSK,\ I It: NNEsSYll 3 DELL OPERATION 4 CELL'OPERATION. TREND DATA 0 DATE- 4,arivary 16;1009 TIME: 7*1r6-7-,45,,AM 0i WEATHER -CONDITIONS - t6mperkuev,; 49JAeg. F - 'R MR% RH 7-Uifind Speed:Jllmioh Wind Dir, 4#qhNE AVERAGETOWERLOAD - TestDuration:;;.3 0 minutes Cond;:}iYaterrn, T mp ;deg; F c on er", 6,3,6a G PM -: Heat Rejection: 22;300 MBF! Percent C. ity: 0,',ac 460 021126}¢N3 Ht rresyGtnip,f�c. � SYSKA I I 1-,NfNEvS'SY anoup Event 5 3 CELL OPERATION Consulting + bigineering + Technology + Constructi6r) 4 DELL OPERATION TRENP,PATA DATE.' January -I,—;2008 TIME: 7:00 — 7:30 AM urr�pe�lr. 55.7 tim F I . Rei: Humidity-'*' "10%AH lfliind:Speedi '4 -mph WindVr. i.'Q"n"--,.,'ENE AVERAGE .TOWER ILOAD: TeStVuratiow- -ketun C er u Gond. WIter Flow* Pleic"erit-CfaO , acity: .30 minutes 816 deg. F 75 den. F- 22poo: MBH 40%- OR% W-1 LN 51`5 1:.1 I 11 N, -N, l'-% s '5 eRoup 3 -CELL OPERATION' Consulting + Engineering + Terhnology + Construction -- ---- 4 CELL OPERATION TREND DATA • DATE: January 2.2,2008 • TIME: 8:00 -8130 AM YVI:RTHt:K.UVNUIIlVrWb,Temperature d '. F. deg: 6g. F R_ 'e. Hu'llftildft-n I 'RH V Wirid n --S5 I I AYERAit T6WEFt LOAD-. G-J. F, T6sfburabon! '30 minutes 66,nodl.Wdor Return u t., m Temp: 82 6 deg. F Cl 75,deg, F -6 4er c n&W -..'FloW: 6,,2W6PM I I H6itR'6jedtlbo,, 19,-900-,MBH- peeeofitca a ity 40% 10 Constilfing + Engineering + Technology + r"o,astruction Yq kA I I S 3 CELL OPERATION 4 CELL OPERATION 0011- -1---- ftDmw ' 21.2W TREND DATA • DATE,: January 23,2008 TIME:, 7-:00 -m7:30,AM WEATHER G 00 b`ITIQN S'_1 oigUfbi: 49.8. deg. F R81. Humidity:`' 79°Jo RH 7-, --Wih d'Soed': 7 mph Wind,.Directions ti ESE ., _.- e LeSX Wuraponi, tond.Waterketun c ond.v bond.Water"Fl-low', Watkoheection: Porcpnitl;-apacity.' '30 minutes Temp: 81.6 deg, F Temp: '76deg. F 5,644 GPM 18,000.MBH ;36% ONE LN SYS" I 6KOUP Event 8 3 CELL OPERATION Cqnsultincl + Enoineering + Technology + Construction 4 CELL.OPERATION TREND DATA • DATEf Jqnuary 24; 2008: TIME; WE HER CQNDif108S�. Temperature:- emipkitueo-.- 482 deg, F RI.0 'HUiiifdfty:. 84-0/6, RH - 7- Wirtd:S§eed& 11 Mph e Gond. IWater - R e-1tu1i Cdhd. Water . SUPO C06& -Water" Flow Heat Rejerction. P.OrcOnf-;Opacity r I 02IM26)cra IIA tbUSVGMPU*. .30.,mihUtes Temp:, -9.1 dog: F Temp: 75 deg. F 7,214 GPM 21,600 MBH 45,0/6 1.2 V undo, Consulting + Engineering + I'Lchzloliogy + Cotistrulftion 3CELL OPERATION 4 CEILLOPERATION TREND DATA January 29,- 2008 YVWH -'IC ER Qd..NbiT' PkS:+ Tir'r!-p'e`rafue6:. 6624eg. F Rel; HUffildfly:. 620/6 RH 1 7 mphnd, Wind Plr'f,"qtkdh'-,SSW AVERAGE --TQWE-�R-LOAD - Test uration, '30 minutes — Concl.'Water Return Temp: 84 deg: F — Cond. ,Water 'Sup' Supply Temp: 78 deg; F Cond.-Water 'F'10- Wl' 8,768; GPM Heat Rej ktibfv 263001'MBH : PericentiQ'Oadip-... U Sl SKA I I1NN4,'lSSY anoup 3 CELL OPERATION ConsulLing + Enginciering + Technology + t-.onstruction ,4, CELL. OPERATION Fednafy27; 2m$ TREND DATA, • DATE,'. Janory30;.2008 • TIME:: T.-30 — 0:00 AM TVO*ratbW' 49`.17409: F .1. Rel HUmIdii , lko-RH „tpeedi. ,2--rhph -Wind :Dii b -� n. redfi ' - NE AVERAGE 'TOWER .-LOAD: — Test Duration: 30 minutes — Cond., iiter Return Temp. 83 deg. -F Cond.-.--W46rtuppjy Temp', 78 deg. F ond'., #k -T o 8;500'GPM, H'6tR'qje On�-'! 4l;60,0 -MBH percenv 0 'Adity, 47/6 0=2 SWn He 77 W -q GMIP':40. 14 Consulting + bigineering, + Technology + Construction SYSKA I ll"-lN-Nli:SSY 13 'C.ELL OPERATTIPIS! 4. CELL OPERA11ON TREND PATA. DATE: Janua,ry,3.1,.2008 7,1 TIME: 6-8:00AM I - - WEATHER ddNbIt-6.Nt-, Temperature: 48A dog. F kU HU'- Midliv.'� 660/o RH Wir(&'.S,-' d�' 2 mph peoA; %*d.:bl'rettjt'oin''NNW, AVERAGE TOWER ,116AD. Test Duration:. 45 minutes C'qr4.V'a'ter Return Temp: 84-.6r deg.; F L " i 14" ' '� 'C6i-,i,��'.,-tit6tt7SUp'oiyTemp, 78:5 &-ai F t6!i&WAkFI,6w- 9,425 GPM' Heat R"ecSn., je [o, 28,278 MBH Percent r.,Q 659 OQ 15 V=S-VSNa me lk USOM go. bo. adeuk Event 12 3..GELL OPER ,qN c� J �� � IYbrlaFp�1.22�i8 Consulting + Engin(�erie i + Technology + Construction 41, ELLOPERATION; e _'%REND LATA, DATE,Fekiruary 5,,2008 TIME 7:15 — 7:45 RM Tamperaturei' 49Z deg. F — Rel. El arrddity 44°!o RH — VUin&Speed.': 5 mph Wind Gijrection> NNE Heat F2e�ecti. on ParcentrCapacty QMNS�pKa Ht kiessyGmlp; lie. 30' m inutes 85 d!pq. F 191d'eg: F %t83. GPM 26350 MBH W% v�. C19 OR Wom Lai SYSKA I EI NP',, SY a,1aus Event 13 3 CELL APERATION Fe011ary21.2CG$ Consulting + Engineering + Technology + Corlstructi r) 4 CELL'OPERATIQN, 1 TREND DATA., • DATE,: FOr"U ry 6; 2008' TIME.' 7.00;' -7:45 -AM WE ATHER',CG1hiDlTiON3> Temperature'- 47A deg. F Re Humidity 709/6 RH Wind„$peed: 1 mph Wind f3irecEiori S AVERAGE TOW, ER�L'QAD: i,es� uurat�vn;; — Goad .Water Retui 'co — c0h,-lfUater,F[aw Heat ReJectton: F?,erceret Capadiity o2D2S�aka tle elassgGiasp: (w. 45” minutes Temp: 80,deg .F Temp.. 7,W -deg: -F` -8;803;GPM. 24,200WBH 47% 17 I S)',',K,\/A EISSY OAOUV Event 1.4 4,CELLOPERAMPN Consulting + Engineering + I'echnology + CoilstruCtion *CELUOPERATION. TRgNps T. DATE: Februa,ry7,2008 TIME, 7:00 — 7M AM WPAT-HER't,61\61TI, L 1 1. mper'�Iu r'e: 4*57 de� F Re[Mumidi�n6/o . RH 7 -mph W.in,,q-lpire,dtlo.m -,W.,Sw AVERAG I E t#SR LOAD: 30 minutes eturn-Temv 815 deg. F Upoly., Ternp: 77.5 deg. F In my LFA sv��N I lit'NNIS.S), QPoGUn Event 15 3,rPELL-OPERATION' ConsUltiho +,Ergineering + Technology + ConstrucUon A CELL OPERATION TREND DATA • DATE F6kiruft 12;2008, • TIME T*30 — 8,00 AM "i WEATHE'RiC6ND"[TIONS':: ye- mperku r -e-- 652 deg. F — ROLHumidity. 949/,DRH — Wir&SP'eed: 1 mph — Win -dT �Di're N , qUon P.Or'doorc4adit"w 36minuies Temp: _86 'deg:'F Temp' 771 F .6 ,8,004 GPM >t 4\ lfl;;NNIl.SSY GAOQ* 4 -CELL OPERATION 1, , Cop5ujtj,jg + Engineerit,,q Technology + Construction 4 CELL OPERATION, TRENIJ DATA • DAT-E;lF6bVuaiy 14,;2008 • TIME: 7:15_-=7:46 Am, WEA T HER':QQNDI'TIQNS-. Temperature; 62.7. deg. F Rel -HUfbidityo,. 56%. RH W.16d,!§ d mph Wind NE . AVEFZAdET­0WER'-.L­OkD T0tLD4ratiqn:'- 30 minutes C'on&: Water Return Temp: 86.5 deg. F Cond-Water-SupPIV. Temp: 78 deg:F 7 Conoi:Water l'FI , ow -8j2 11 GPM ' Heat Rejiictfibrf- 34;900MBH- T , — Percent 68% 1 20 0=26VO He I �klssvlo 1p. Im. mozam EA SYSKA Ingoun Ev"ent. 177 3,GELL OPERATION Consulting + Enqino&ihg 4- Tpthnology + Construction 4 CELLOPERATION, TREND DATA. DATE: February TIME. 7A5 — TAB,Am WEATHER "CONDITIONS, -." Tifter, fc, 64S deg, F Rel. Humidity: , 54% RH WJnd-,'Sp'*e,,d.: 13.lmph VVir-W. Direction ENE Test Duraiiow, :30 minutes C'ond,,later 'Return Temp: .86 deg> F Cond.v pk. op01YTemp-1-'TT.6 deg , F -9ol GPM Heig-R-qjpq 10 "ri, 133�'7W MBH P#e Capacity: 66% 29 V3 f rN Consulting + 5ogineerMg,+ Technology + Construction GROUP EVent TO 3 CELL.OPERATIPM 4 CELLOPERATION, 4 TREND DATA RATE: Ftbrwkry 21,, 2008 TIME: 7,3Q'— 8:00 AM D , I , tftt. EA f— Tirnperaturw: 54,2,cleg. F k6LHLffiildi*72% RH Wind Speed 7 -mph WindE. Test 30.mfilutes -Gond ,UUater-Ak6rwremp: 9 77:deg. F d -VV` aiter Flow 9,021 'IjPM Heat Refection:: 31.,600'MBH Rif nrVp*oj*Itv: '61% 22 City of Newport Beach Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Project No. 0OA3YZ Design/ Implementation Report Appendix H Rev 0 Plume Mitigation Measure Summary —Syska Hennessy, April 9, 2008 H - Appendices City of Newport Beach_Syska Plm Milg Summary 9Apr08.doc 5.99 �me�o S: c, I;taltirg + Er_(ineer na. 4- lechnoloc)y 4 ons rf =:i1Y' - - Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure.Surnmary � T_ J_ -.-:r3:.Hu 3� �Measurer�S! � .>IyT2 fx�a�ii �..Descnpflon�)���Apprhz '� �I Ilfk w � 1�- fn,vs�^tu*Ar' �i1i�IlTim�ell�ne,fo 'ii � � 1rT� I nv 1n 2ih - fgOPi�nof, ip }� n aillt{9f �"' n Apptox� i•4f,3:„v u f ImplaG lox Lam, ^�' Inufa "� . �Appflo��}.j � 5,�,=,T 5i f ' �'r t f 7 �,' "y�.vl.""`� ^I`'i �, -M. ��1-Cons h�#;��, nt ; � t� 3 '•titin >�Ihri,�4. rr< s;y v},;� iii >r� -. ., �* '^�-: � - i i p y�� ,�. � �- k 1 Modify Cooling 10-15% Immediate $0. None Incremental' $12,000 • Increase in electrical demand, Tower Operation, Increase - (note 3); consumption and costs.. " • Hospital "carbon footprint" increased. Emissions Increased by :approxi: > 67,500'ilblyear Carbon Dioxide '- 2 Cooling Tower 15-20% _'' 2009 - $0.5 million None Incrementah $24,000/yr • Iriterruption oUutility services to Hospital. Basin Pump (note 7) Increase (note 4)` • Increase:in electrical.' demand, System consumption and costs. • Hospital "carbon footprind' increased. Emissions Increased. by approx.: . > 135,0001blyearCarbon Dioxide 3 New Tower with >70% 'Wnter2010 $7.9-9.3 Tower Incremental $843001yr • Interruption of utility services to Hospital. Plume Mitigation (note7)million height Increase (note 5) - • increasetl boiler emissions from Plant,, System Increased • Increase In electrical and natural gas. by 10'd. - demand;: consumption and costs. • Hospital"carbon footprint" increased. - - Emissions increased, by approx.: > 160;000 Iblyr Carbon Dioxide >.500'-Iblyear Nitrous Oxide 3A Air Cooled Heat >'50% Winter 2010 $5.8-7.2 None Incremental $62,5001yr • Interruption of utility services to Hospital. Exchanger (note 7) (million - Increase. (note;6) • Electrical energy. input System required to modify for plume mitigation •.Hospital "carbon footprint" increased. Emissionsincreased. by approx.: - > 111,000 Ib/yr Carbon Dloxlde ApNI%2003' 1 Z —. ib2CO2:eYska Y,enaeSsy GrcvP. Inc r -.__ I,. I i RU 4i slux I ll"-\. ?ti s5Y ..doom. Cr,, surItir:g •H I:r_iirw. r rtes .i, I echno Ic gy + 4;cin5} i atit>•. Cooling Tower Plume Mitigation Measure Summary Table Notes: 1. Includes design. OSHPD plan check (permitting), Coastal. Commission review and construction, 2. Syska's opinion of probable construction cost is based upon traditional sources, actual experience, or an actual equipment quote. Due to the volatile nature of labor, material and equipment pricing and unforeseeable factors affecting the construction industry, Syska does not expressly or implicitly warrantr or represent the accuracy- of the estimated cost to be the actual cost of construction. 3. Approx. annual increase in electrical consumption cost due to measure implementation — equivalent to power use of 40 residential homeslvear. 4. Approx. annual increase in electrical consumption cost due to measure implementation equivalent to power use of 80 residential homes/year. 5. Approx. annual increase in natural gas and electrical consumption and cost due measure implementation— equivalent to power use of 300 residential homes/year. 6. Approx. annual increase in electrical consumption and cost"due measure implementation — eguivalent.to power use of 222 residential homeslvear: 7. Assumes concurrent implementation of Measure/Option 1,. April a, 20015 02002 Syaka:Hannessy Group,, 1.s I Engine -r ny r- Technology + Cr rn5tn i -icy SYS KA k IENNF. SSY 6 i1 Cal C r ptin it pled eat Ean Sustem ® Reduce the condenser water return temperature to operating towers by p it cooled heat rejectingcondenser water heat to the atmosphere viva a exchanger system_ • Used in conjunction with modified' operational sequences outlined under Option 1. ® Scope of Work: - New air cooledheat exchanger system and fan(s) - located on grade - Side steam condenser water pumping piping system - Instrumentation and controls - Building penetrations - Structural pad and foundation - Screening walls/enclosure for heat exchanger, - - Normal power system feeders _ .-.............. amu a. xoo6 ! --- 0 2002 $ySY.G Henressy Groap, In,.. I Ci.,- :+,a#ir3 r- Frqine-r ny + Technology a. cenar tion 3A ®it Coolied HeatCool Exchanger System Awn19, - en'haey�R .-v... V �� �RH:�ClGtFJrA' "r4u a� R S 1 ; tiewr uaw. Awkr fi ,{3 ,i3 IF! I' { in {' Awn19, - en'haey�R .-v... V �� �RH:�ClGtFJrA' "r4u e A"^iY 1"C 1 ; tiewr uaw. Awkr fi M42 I a S c Rir + Er_�inc.=r ns -I- `C r: ,nal[ -j + %' )r - n - i, - -- _-- evc�4 Option 3 it Cooled Heat Exchanger System G a e I k a T f.w t'Y"' - -_ h �°'m+ 4 �!ry 4 �* haw 1 i 9 a r ➢ `tizg� i:, E it -. _x WE";j W I VC.`� 3 ��}e;ss :i t LN C..,;,rj%ulfirg -i- Er.jinm,,r no + lechriology + Cofishrk,thw- caauo Option 3A - 'Air Cooled Heat Exchanger System April C,^r,}. Itir9 + l r=aific, f,r n c.i- "I c (.f;no Ir qy .i- C r)ris,:rk ..i.:" euauo - pion 33A ® it pled eatr s — Greater then 50% reduction in cooling tower water plume density, height and length when used is combination with Option 1. • Cons — $5.8 — 7.2 million estimated construction cost — OSHPD plan check and permitting required, — Air cooled heat exchanger system located outside of cooling tower enclosure — new screened yard required — New electrical service required — Condenser water service curtailment interruption of Hospital Operation during construction — Energy inefficient — increases. Hospital's "carbon footprint' — Increases the sound -power level (noise) at property line. mlb3, 2309 0200SYSY.0 Henressl GmnP:)nc. � ,. •.,'-•-.. •.. W