The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About28 - Sunset Ridge Park Proposed Concept PlanCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 28 . June 10, 2008 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Recreation & Senior Services Department Wes Morgan, Director— 949 - 644 -3157 — wmoraan acity. newport- beach.ca.us SUBJECT: Sunset Ridge Park Proposed Concept Plan RECOMMENDATION 1. Review the Sunset Ridge Park Proposed Concept Plan presentation by EPT Design Group, 2. Accept public comment regarding the Proposed Concept Plan. 3. Approve the proposed Sunset Ridge Park Concept Plan. DISCUSSION The Recreation Element of the General Plan which was approved by the City Council in 2006 addresses citywide issues and needs regarding park lands. The Recreation Element states that the service area of West Newport has a current deficit of 21.6 park acres. This is based on the standard of five acres of park land for each 1000 of population. Additionally, in Service Area 1 – West Newport, Sunset Ridge Park is designated as an active park which will include ball fields, picnic areas, a playground, parking and restrooms. The planning and outreach process for this project began in November 2007 and continues to move toward an approved concept plan. At the City Council Study Session on March 25, 2008, the City Council received a report on the progress of the outreach and planning for the Sunset Ridge Park. The Council listened to public comment regarding the draft concept plan for Sunset Ridge Park. Issues which speakers brought forth to the City Council included the following: • There is an immediate need for a baseball field for 13 and 14 year olds to play league games for the Newport Harbor Baseball Association in West Newport Beach. • There is a need for more soccer fields for at least 1000 children who play soccer for AYSO 97 in West Newport Beach. • Residents who live adjacent to the park site expressed the following concerns: • Traffic created by park users will be a problem for homeowners. • Noise created by youth sports games will disturb the nearby neighborhood. • Park facilities and athletic fields are being placed too close to homes. • Security for nearby residents will diminish. • There is a potential loss of scenic views. • Trash will be left by park users. • There will be a loss of privacy for homeowners. At the conclusion of the City Council Study Session, the Council directed staff to improve the park design in ways which continue to allow for the active park elements while addressing the concerns of the residents and return the plan to the PB &R Commission for further outreach and review. Sunset Ridge Park Proposed Concept Plan June 10, 2008 Page 2 In preparation for the May 20, 2008 PB &R Commission meeting, staff directed the City's architect to create a buffer zone between the private property owners and the sports fields, restroom, parking lot and playground. The updated draft concept plan now includes a new buffer zone which is 10 ft above the active park areas. The buffer zone creates the opportunity for the sports fields to retain the size needed for youth sports programs in West Newport while maximizing the use of the available land to protect the nearby residents from any potential issues brought on by activities in the park. The elevation of the proposed Butterfly Garden and the Vista Point near Superior Avenue is preserved at the present height of the site. Also all the active park elements have been moved from a distance of 50 ft adjacent to the bordering properties to a further distance of at least 100 ft of clearance. The revised plan was presented and reviewed by the PB &R Commission. Reaction to the plan by residents and youth sports leaders included the following: View preservation is important – staff should deal with the Banning Ranch in order to move the parking lot and save the spectacular views. • The City should talk to the Banning Ranch landowners and move the park to that property and leave this land alone. • Having baseball, soccer, a tot lot, restrooms, and a view area, is too much for this small park. • Baseball fields should be removed from the plan. Soccer should have year -round use of the park. • Walking trails should be included in the park. Staging area for bicyclists would be valuable. • Baseball and soccer groups each spoke of the pressing need for new fields in West Newport Beach. At the conclusion of the public comments, the Commission approved the following recommendation — The PB &R Commission recommends that the City Council approve the proposed Sunset Ridge Park Concept Plan and that the City Council direct staff to address the issues of beach parking, restroom safety, pedestrian access, covered bleachers and portable outfield fencing for baseball. If the City Council approves the Sunset Ridge Park concept plan, staff can proceed with the next two steps in the process for the development of the park. These steps include the refinement of planning for the park through the design development phase. This phase will evaluate solutions for park access, vehicular parking, the park grading plan and construction logistics. Secondly, the environmental impacts of traffic, noise, soil conditions and plant materials will be studied and addressed. These steps will take place concurrently and require approximately 15 months to complete. Staff will implement the direction of the City Council. Prepared & Submitted by: Attachments: 1. General Plan Recreation Element 8 -10 2. General Plan Recreation Element 8 -15 3. General Plan Recreation Element 8 -40 -41 4. Minutes from March 25, 2008 City Council Study Session 5. May 20 2008 PB &R Commission Special Meeting Minutes 6. May 20 2008 PB &R Commission Special Meeting Public Notice PIRA.o;.C-h rn eri t Recreation Element CITYWIDE ISSUES AND NEEDS Parks and Recreational Facilities In dune 2005, it is estimated that a total of 415.6 acres of parklands are needed within the City to accommodate the current population of 83,120 residents (utilizing the City standard of 5 acres per 1,000 population). As shown in "fable 1, below, there are an existing total of 286.4 acres of parks and 90.4 acres of active beach recreation within Newport Beach with a combined total of 376.8 acres. Thus, this represents a total deficit of 38.8 acres of combined park and beach acreage ciq- %Vide. Seven of the twelve service areas are experiencing a deficit in this combined recreation acreage. Three planned parks in West Newport, Neurport Center. and Newport Coast would help alleviate the citywide park deficit. In addition to a deficit in combined park and beach recreation acreage, there is also an overall shortage in active playfields throughout Newport Beach. Many of the service areas within the City, as discussed in greater detail below, may have a park surplus but are still experiencing a deficit in active playfields. Also, it is difficult to provide playfields because of the large amount of land required for sports fields, the lack of suitable vacant land, and the high cost of such land within the City-. The citywide parks and recreation facilities needs described below have been identified through the following: (1) community surveys (administered from December 1996 to February 1997), (2) data shown in Table R1 (parkland Acreage Needs), and (3) monitoring of the use of recreation programs and facilities. 12. Newport Coast` 50 58.1" l 0 50 C Totals 1 4116 a 286.4 90.4 h 376.8 1 - 38.8" Newport Coast k6ades public and private parks, inducing 14 am of Newport Ridge park dedicated far public use upon City acceptance. "Private Park Area is 58.1 ac. Newport Coast parks use and maintenance are subject to the tents of the Pre•Annexalion Agreertmit "Oefficitfexom acreage c no additional parks are Wilt =83.120 x 5 ac. per thousand = 415.6 ac. b Includes beach area where active recreation takes place (i.e.. brocalty wi0wn 100 feet of the waler). In addition, there are 174 acres of passive beach open Space. 136 acres of open space land in the Upper Bay Ecological reserve, and an undetermined amount of water open space in the Upper Bay am Newoort Hadmu- - a Newport Beach General Plan Ptlrk Acre3 .'.EXISrI Y. iA.i:rRU9e ;: tane'.a .W': -. !?tick Acres i Acth+e'308iich 'bm9her Park/ .:E. De fied Semee,Are4 1JY.:Ad t! t :'.i4id31t 9 .'; Racild 7pn Ac =9eeeb AGiesi a: '; Excess +' 1 West Newport - - - - 64.7 9.1 34 431 -21-6 2. Balboa Peninsula - - -- . 25.5 - 6.5 - - -- 44 50.5 .. _ -. - ----------- +25.0 - 3. Newport Heights/Upper Bay 64.3 - 50.2 0 - -- 50.2 .__ ....... -14.1 4. Santa Ana Heights 32 6.8 1 0 6.8 5. Lower Bay 17 3 0.1 - 0 0.1 17 2 6. Balboa Island 17.9 -- 0.3 l -' -1 - 1.3 16.6 7 Eastbluff 8 Big Canyon 31.3 13.9 r 71.0 j 0 0 0 1 710 I 0 +39.7 -13.9 9 Newport Center - 10.9 T- 19 -- 0 19 _ -- 1 +81 ------- 10. Corona del Mar 444 23 11.4 I 35.3 -91 .9 ---- -- -99,5 -11. Harbor View 72.2 99.5 j 0 +27.3 12. Newport Coast` 50 58.1" l 0 50 C Totals 1 4116 a 286.4 90.4 h 376.8 1 - 38.8" Newport Coast k6ades public and private parks, inducing 14 am of Newport Ridge park dedicated far public use upon City acceptance. "Private Park Area is 58.1 ac. Newport Coast parks use and maintenance are subject to the tents of the Pre•Annexalion Agreertmit "Oefficitfexom acreage c no additional parks are Wilt =83.120 x 5 ac. per thousand = 415.6 ac. b Includes beach area where active recreation takes place (i.e.. brocalty wi0wn 100 feet of the waler). In addition, there are 174 acres of passive beach open Space. 136 acres of open space land in the Upper Bay Ecological reserve, and an undetermined amount of water open space in the Upper Bay am Newoort Hadmu- - a Newport Beach General Plan A-Lt& a) rneflt Recreation Element Identified issues and Needs Service Area 1 —West Newport. Most of West Newport's recreation land is in beaches. There is a deficit of 21.6 acres, and a need for sports fields within a new community or neighborhood -level park. There is a future park site identified in this service area, Sunset Ridge Park which is designated as an active park to include ball fields, picnic areas, a playground, parking, and restrooms. Additionally, an active community park (possibly lighted) should be developed in Banning Ranch, regardless of the ultimate development of the site, to accommodate the Service Area and Citywide needs for active sports fields. Service Area 2— Balboa Peninsula. Like West Newport. most of the peninsula's recreation area is in beaches. This area has little vacant land for development and the population is expected to remain stable_ Although there is currently a surplus in park acreage, any future park needs can be satisfied via the renovation and upgrading of facilities, such as those nt ]as Arenas Park and Peninsula Park. Additional active park facilities are desirable, along with support facibues such as restrooms, showers, and drinking fountains. There is also a need for additional boat launching and mooring facilities, as well as pedestrian pathways to and along the Bay. Future development of the City's Marina Park property could provide for the existing community center and the City's current sailing and boating facilities on the site to be renovated and expanded. Service Area 3— Newport Heights /IIarbor Highlands. This area is largely built out and contains several important park and recreation facilities. Substantial school recreation facilities, including Newport Harbor High School, Ensign Junior High, Mariners Elementary, and Newport Heights Elementary, compensate for the deficiency in total park area. Service Area 4 —Santa Ana Heights /airport Commercial. There is currently a park surplus, and the present two -acre Bayview Park and the proximity of the Upper Bay recreation area provide substantial recreational opportunities for this area. There is also a planned pocket park and the City is planning a joint use community center project with the YMCA and there is the possibility that the Caltrans site may be a future park location. However, this service area is experiencing a shortfall in active playfields. In addition, the population within this service area is expected to increase under the General Plan. Future development however will be subject to special provisions that require the provision of on -site recreational amenities, and dedication of land or payment of in -lieu fees. Service Area 5 —Lower Bay. This area contains Lido Isle and the Bayside Drive area and is largely built out. Although there is a deficiency in park area, the service area has substantial private recreational and boating facilities. It is also adjacent to Area 3 (Newport Heights) where there are .extensive recreational facilities. Because.of these factors and the fact there is little or no vacant land suitable for park use, the provision of additional parkland is probably not feasible in this area. Service Area 6—Balboa Island. This area is similar, in terms of recreation needs and conditions with a deficiency in park area, to Area 5 above. However, Balboa Island contains more public recreational facilities in the form of public beach area, the Carroll Beek Community Center, and Balboa Island Park (a mini - park). The acquisition of additional parkland is probably not feasible in this area. Service Area 7— Eastbluff /North Ford. Although there is a numerical excess of existing parkland in this area, most of the land is limited to passive use, such as Big Canyon Park. Additional sports fields and other active facilities will be needed to satisfy the recreational demands from new development. Newport Beach General Plan Rb-- i -uV-) menj 3 _.__ ..._. Racrect,cn Eiemer. .., c. �Che preservation of sutural rcS��urce:;, I. tc,tie and ailntral nrca cl l.a c ul icces dxln} lfatbilri� '.rf proposed pvt t,trjds c.m t.ir:ring ropogtrahh� °aiul e,thc, l:tndit,r!'rt cun,tr �.nts i. l ".:on t tcnrc %61h estabh5htd park and recrc Gut] a C oal g. I`isC.d itnpacr on CSencral Furld for anv i.nittifhaeo]t' ne.edrei returht hnx-nt, and on wny mahlverance h. ice .r \rc Irrp:i t) 11le crt mllce t t &'feiuwj in puicular tict R 1.6 Sotplu; School Site Suit thitity In the c�ertt that cuq�lus c1uM site bcccmit �� t Itble i��x i >nrklatnii uytttstuon, site dt..3cahiliir should 4>e e�•nlnatcd �� ut thr; k 11 nev i et net i +: a, l-)ot, the �<hool site c u.renrlg provide rccrtmwllas lacifiucs that have been uleuuteed 10 nxct i(,)cal �,i cr�m�num,, �visle rn� k e h. :1re nelu'^ public' lat,d� in the vi rut. of ri hcva tiadet.i i ir< u� meet he icicntitr�d eeisting ut h>resezablc uceci, 'A con muntt� ,i recrearu:.n or open space Purposes? c. Is the -school site a more economical or oncctwisc more feasible alternatave than other parcels which are available a potential sites in the arca? (Imp ?33 R 1.7 Private Parkland Goordinam with the appropriate hmne O%ncrs s „ociaticrn to coacher City recrcadon proLnranrs on Private parkland. !imp 39 221 One Ford Road commundy Dark R 1,8 Passive Parks Use underutilized (itt righis- of -wav tocawd on Ocean 130ulevard and $ayside t)riv e in C:brtsna del i!lat at passive Parks that are accessible for public use (ImP at.23._) R 1.9 Priority for Facility Provision Provide additional park and recrclnon faciltnes that meet the needs as iilentifed by direct feedback tron resid nr,; ana]N ats of future trends, and through dxenairnis by RrcreaLnon and Senior Ser ice staff; as shown in Ti re It •+ Newport Beach General Plan Recreotion Element Parks 1. Newport Center Service Area: Develop Newport Center Park as a passive park 2. 1X%est Newport Service .area: Develop Sunset Ridge Park, an active park Nvith playfields, picnic areas, a playground, and other facilities 3. Newport Coast Service Area: Develop an active park located at the end of Ridge Park Road; and develop a community center and a gymnasium d. Santa Ana Heights /Airport Commercial Service Area: Develop a pocket park in Santa Ana Heights 5. West Newport Service Area: In the Banning ranch area develop an active community park of 20 to 30 acres with consideration of night lighting G. Balboa Peninsula Service Area: Develop the Nfarina Park site for marine and /or recreational facilities Recreation Facilities 1. Complete the Santa Ana Heights and Newport Coast Community Centers in a manner that allows the provision of a variety of recreational programs while meeting the needs of the community 2. Renovate the Oasis Senior Center to continue to function as a multipurpose senior center that meets the needs of the senior population 3. Renovate the existing recreation facilities to ensure they are a safe environment and offer quality programs and services (Imp 23.1, 23.2) R 1.10 Update of Priority for Facility Provision Review the list of identified community park and recreation needs on a regular basis, and update them as priorities for facilities change. (Imp 23.1) R 1.11 Update of Priority Usage Review policies regularly for priority usage of facilities to ensure fair and balanced assignments. Priority hierarchy shall be weighted for programs that are inclusive in nature and provide for the recreational enrichment of community's youth, adults, groups, and businesses. Scheduling shall be done in a manner that accommodates both the needs of organized activities as well as casual use by residents. Consideration shall also be given to the proper maintenance and revitalization of facilities when scheduling programs and activities. (Imp 23.1) R 1.12 Aircraft Overflight and Noise Require that all public parks located within the noise impact zones as defined in the 1985 JWA blaster Plan for John Wayne Airport be posted with a notification to users regarding aircraft overflight and noise. (Imp 23.2) Newport Beach General Plan IBM City Council Study Session CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Council Minutes City Council Study Session March 25, 2008 — 3:30 p.m. 1. ROLL CALL Page 1 of 5 9- Present: Council Member Henn, Council Member Rosansky, Mayor Pro Tern Daigle, Mayor Selich, Council Member Webb, Council Member Curry, Council Member Gardner 11. CURRENT BUSINESS I. CLARIFICATION OF ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR. In response to Council Member Henn's question regarding Item 9 (Marina Park), Public Works Director Badum stated that Marina Park is in the schematic design phase then will move into the design development phase and production of construction bid documents. Mayor Selich clarified that the footprint and square footages of the buildings will not change, only the height. City Attorney Clauson asked that Item 3 (Kennels in West Santa Ana Heights) be continued to April 22 to allow for changes in the type of facility that will be operated. 2. PRESENTATION OF SUNSET RIDGE PARK CONCEPT PLAN. [731100 -20081 Staff Report Recreation and Senior Services Director Morgan reported that the General Plan called for Sunset Ridge Park to be an active park that contained an athletic field, restroom, parking lot, walkways, and vistas. He stated that he understands the residents concerns and that the preparation of the concept plan has been an open process. Rick Vanderwood, EPT Design, utilized a PowerPoint presentation to display the existing conditions, site constraints, proposed site plan, a sectioned key map, and the overall plan. In response to Council's questions, Recreation and Senior Services Director Morgan indicated that staff's position was to honor the General Plan and seek Council's direction. He stated that the standard size of a backstop is 30 feet, 13 • 14 year old children will play at the field, there will be no lights, and the parking lot will be locked at dusk. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Daigle's question, Mr. Vanderwood stated that the outfield fence will be four feet to contain balls and homeplate is about 500 feet from Pacific Coast Highway. Council Member Rosansky stated that he understands the concerns of the residents; however, the General Plan called for the site to be an active park, and the City bought the property and legislature was passed with the understanding that the park would be active. He encouraged Council to visit the area and added that the field may need to be repositioned to another corner and only used for soccer, the 30 foot backdrop may need to be eliminated, or the City may need to do away with the 13 -14 year old age group playing at the park. Recreation and Senior Services Director Morgan stated that there is a need for recreation fields for all age groups, but the 13.14 year old age group can be accommodated elsewhere. Lantz Bell, Newport Harbor Baseball Association Vice President, stated that the http: / /newportbeach. granicus.comIMinutesV iewer.php ?view_id =21 &clip_id= 715 &event_id... 5/7/2008 City Council Study Session Page 2 of 5 association's biggest need right now is for the 13 -14 year old division since there are 17 teams. In response to Council's questions, Mr. Bell stated that the equipment at Ensign is inadequate, the outfield is awkward, and the field should be used only for practices. He indicated that Bob Henry Park is currently being used for 10 year olds. He suggested changing the backstop on the concept plan by running a net along home plate for safety. Tom Greeley expressed support for the project. He suggested that Council ensure a safe crossing at Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. Dr. Jay Westphal indicated that he is impressed with how Council and the community are working together. He questioned the maintenance of the trees and expressed his concern for pedestrian traffic and safety, and privacy for the residents of Newport Crest. Ginny Lombardi extended an invitation to Council to visit her home. She expressed concern that there is no buffer zone, road, distance, or soundwall between the park and residents. She noted that the General Plan can be amended and the decisions were made prior to community outreach. Kristi Flusfleg expressed concern about the obstruction of views, the tot lot, noise, and park hours. She urged Council to conduct an accident analysis on Pacific Coast Highway and questioned the parking demands and how it is monitored. She asked Council to conduct a proper analysis of other fields in the City that could be used for sports. Jeff Braun, Commissioner ofAYSO Region 97, stated that there are 1,000 children in the Newport Beach region who participate in soccer, but there are only two soccer fields in the City. He noted that soccer games are usually scheduled Monday through Friday from 4:00 p.m. to dusk, and Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Freid Ganem expressed concern about park access, parking, safety, and hours of operation. Robert Orbe commended the design but questioned why the existing parking lot is not used in the concept plan. He suggested that the field be moved closer to Pacific Coast Highway. Steve Porter expressed his concern about parking, safety, traffic, and the removal of the soundwall. In response to Mayor Sefich's question, Public Works Director Badum stated that the traffic signals at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Superior are currently controlled by Caltrans. Fred Cornwell, President of the Newport Harbor Baseball Association, stated that they have a need for an active field and agreed adjustments can be made to the backstop, since the netting to the backdrop can be adjusted according to conditions. He also stated that parking is not an issue because each game consists of 24 children, which allows for plenty of parking for parents and spectators. Jane Drew expressed concern about noise and safety. She stated that she knows that there is a need for active parks, but believed that Sunset Ridge Park should be a passive park. Gloria Quirk expressed concern about the proximity of the park to Pacific Coast Highway and Superior Avenue. Byron Dearicle, Soccer Families 4 Newport Fields, expressed support for the concept plan and believed that Council should respect that the area is dedicated as an active park. He 'stated that the demand for youth soccer is growing in the-City. Tom Anderson, Newport -Mesa Soccer Club, gave statistics on soccer and stated that he is an http://newportbeach.granicus. corn /MinutesViewer.php ?view_id =21 &clip _id= 715 &event_id... 5/7/2008 City Council Study Session Page 3 of 5 advocate of active parks because there is a need for fields for the adolescents in the City. Brian Hold expressed concern about noise and dust. He suggested that the City purchase some of the land in the Banning Ranch area. Elizabeth Farisfurd thanked Council and the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission for acquiring Sunset Ridge Park. She encouraged Council to dedicate a memorial at the park to Louise Greeley. Jim Caras urged Council to consider another location for the field due to safety and legal liability to the City'and stated that there is too much need in such a small space. Kristine Adams expressed concern about the obstruction of views, noise, size of the land, parking issues, and the closeness of the fields to existing homes. She believed that most residents did not get a full understanding of what an active park entails. Dr. Jan Vandersloot requested that there he native landscaping on the bluffs and slope's, and asked Council to consider utilizing Banning Ranch for sports fields instead. Waldemar Moosman expressed concern about the parking and removal of existing plants and flowers. He believed that Sunset Ridge was previously planned to be a passive park and claimed that residents had no communication with Council Member Rosansky. Mike Lombardi expressed his concern about the noise impact and the proximity of the fields to the buildings. He also suggested that there be a buffer zone and that the parking area be moved. Matt Irwin asked Council to visit the area before making a decision because the park will take away the views of the Bay. Council Member Rosansky stated that Council will be sensitive about the height of the trees and stated that research was done to ensure that there is enough parking. He indicated that, if the final decision is made to have a field, staff will portion out the field between soccer and baseball and figure out which one will be better for the area. He informed the residents that the land in the parking area near the entrance is owned by Banning Ranch who will not sell or give the area away. He assured residents that staff will work with Caltrans to make the intersection as safe as possible and trails have been created for people to access the park. He indicated that they will look at using artificial turf for dust and maintenance reasons. He emphasized that he has had a significant amount of contact with residents and has visited homes in the area. In response to Council Member Gardner's question, Recreation and Senior Services Director Morgan stated that the draft concept suggested removing the soundwall and replacing it with mounding and berms, which is more effective than a soundwall. Council Member Henn stated that he relied on staff and experts to make estimates regarding parking and encouraged the concept planners to discourage access to Newport Crest. He suggested that the Parks and Recreation Department do a strategic review of the active parks used for baseball, to determine how their use could be rebalanced to accomodate 13 -14 year old baseball, and what enhancements would be recommended to allow for that. He suggested that staff explore enhancing pedestrian safety at the intersection of Pacific Coast Highway and Superior, look into retractable backstops, and work to reduce noise. Council Member Curry believed that the park is an excellent idea and supported the suggestions relative to tree heights. He stated that he wants to gnsure that parking issues are not created and suggested that staff look at technological options for the field. http:// newporibeach .granicus.com /MinutesViewer.php ?view id= 21 &clip_id= 715 &event_id... 5/7/2008 City Council Study Session Page 4 of 5 Council Member Webb pointed out the wall between Newport Crest and the park is consistent and tall enough to discourage people from hopping over and that the park is set up to only have one game at a time to allow for parking. He noted that Banning Ranch is not .a guarantee and that this project cannot be delayed. Mayor Pro Tem Daigle stated that Council can accommodate some changes and asked that staff continue with public outreach. She noted that there are new wall treatments and additional methods to explore. Mayor Selich stated that Sunset Ridge Park is needed and most concerns can be worked out by redesigning the park. He expressed concern about losing the baseball field and urged staff to change the backstop to minimize the view impact. Recreation and Senior Services Director Morgan stated that the concept plan will be reviewed by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Committee and come back during a Study Session. He assured Council that they will take the issues that were brought forward into consideration. 3. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODERNIZATION MASTER PLAN - PEER REVIEW BY JOE FAUST. (100 -20081 Staff Report Joe Faust reported that the new traffic modernization system is justified and needed. He assured Council that the Econolite system is reliable and reported that the manufacturer of the equipment is local. To further improve traffic, he suggested that the City use surveillance or a closed circuit television system to improve delays and performance. He also suggested that the City use a fiber optic system, conduct before and after evaluations of the traffic, and scale the project to less phases. In response to Council's questions, Mr. Faust stated that the traffic signal modernization performance testing should produce a 3% to 5% overall improvement. He discussed the importance of the timing pattern and how surveillance will provide a big picture to help simulate traffic flows. He suggested that the City go from Ti to T3 wires or a fiber optic system and explained the difference between a traffic responsive system and an adaptive system. He believed that, in terms of traffic, the adaptive system is more effective but requires a lot of maintenance, staff time, and funding. In response to City Manager Bludau's question, Public Works Director Badum stated that staff looked at the corridors and tried to phase the intersections accordingly. He noted that Pacific Coast Highway is a missing section because it is owned by Caltrans, but he is currently working with them in order to control the signals. Council Member Rosansky emphasized that traffic is one of the main concerns in the City and agreed with Mr. Faust that there needs to be less phases. In response to Council's questions, Public Works Director Badum stated that adding more surveillance cameras in Phases Two and Three can be accomplished. Council Member Henn emphasized the need for the surveillance cameras and indicated that there needs to be a full understanding of the system in the early phases to be able to learn and modify during later phases. He requested that the prioritization of all phases after Phase III be reviewed and approved by Council, and that the criteria for later phases include measures of congestion, safety and emergency access, in addition to traffic volume. Mayor Selich reminded - Council that, as part of the General Plan, intersection improvements and traffic synchronization might help the critical intersections. http:// newportbeach. granicus. com /MinutesViewer.php ?view_ld =21 &clip_id= 715 &event_id... 5/7/2008 City Council Study Session III. PUBLIC COMMENTS -None IV. ADJOURNMENT - 6:15 p.m. Page 5 of 5 The agenda for the Study Session was posted on March 19, 2008, at 4:00 p.m. on the City Hall Bulletin Board located outside of the City of Newport Beach Administration Building. Recording Secretary Mayor City Clerk http: / /newportbeach. granicus. com /MinutesViewer.php ?view_id =21 &clip_id= 715 &event_id... 5/7/2008 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Parks, Beaches l3 Recreation Commission Special Meeting May 20, 2008 - 6 .-30pm Convened 6:30pm ROLL CALL Present: Tim Brown, Chair Debra Allen Bill Garrett Phillip Lugar (arrived 06:51 pm) Marie Marston Cristine Trapp DR&F Absent: Greg Ruzicka Staff: Wes Morgan, Recreation l3 Senior Services Director Sean Levin, Recreation Superintendent Teri Craig, Admin Asst PUBLIC COMMENTS None. �t0.U/1 rn�rrt� 5 SUNSET RIDGE UPDATED DRAFT CONCEPT PLAN Director Morgan stated that following the outreach that has been done beginning last November, it was all put forward to the City Council on March 25. The City Council returned the plan to the PB &R Commission to improve the park design and for further outreach. He stated that in working with the architect since that time a new concept plan has been designed for your review. He went on to say that the major concern was view and so most everything was moved 100 ft away from the property line with a berm that would be built to provide a safety zone. Director Morgan stated that the park is still active but with the public input the plan has been improved. He went on to say that EIR is mandatory and take about 15 months to complete. He asked Ric Vanderwood.from EPT to present the plan. PowerPoint presentation provided to the Commission. Mr. Vanderwood stated that the maximum height of the fill on the cross section would be 18 -20 feet and the they will probably export about 50,000 cubic yard of dirt. Chair Brown opened the public discussion The following people spoke: Stan Rosenthal Jim Cassidy Matt Irwin Fred Marsh Gia Frendenberg Mike Lombardi Jeff Braun Raylene Miracle Byron De Arakal Jenny Lombardi Fred Cornwall Jim Karris . The following comments and /or concerns were made: • Parking lot will be used by beach goers • Traffic will back up because of the entrance location • Access to the Crest Leslie Rosenthal Barb Taylor Chris Adams Carl Cheadle Lantz Bell PK Phillips • View preservation is important - staff should deal with the Banning Ranch in order to move the parking lot and save the spectacular views • Believes City should talk to Banning Ranch to move park there and leave this land alone • By having baseball, soccer, tot lots, restrooms, view area, etc, it it way too much for this small park - eliminate some of it • During baseball primary season no fields can be shared because of the fencing Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Regular Meeting May 6, 2008 - 7pm Page 2 Baseball should be moved off the park - Soccer should have primary use of the park If bleachers are covered - will the Crest have input 15`h Street extension regarding egress and ingress Walking trails Staging area for bicyclists Likes the idea of berm - vegetation could cause view problems • Get rid of the baseball field - cramming too much into park • Will restroom be locked at night • Safety is an issue • There are other types of organized sports - why just baseball or soccer • Security for parking lot • Type of fencing House is less then 100 feet - it should be the same for all homes. Baseball and soccer groups each need new fields in West Newport Beach. Director Morgan stated that the restrooms and the parking lot will be locked. Access for the Crest can be discussed with coded access. He stated that specific decorative type of fencing has not been selected but believes that it will be something that you can see through but would be about 5 -6 feet. He noted that the bleachers will be covered but can discuss how they will look with the Crest. Chair Brown closed the public discussion Chair Brown stated that the final decision for the park rests with the City Council. Discussion ensued regarding the need for active parks and why it was designed for both baseball and soccer. Motion by Commissioner Lugar to forward the design to City Council for their approval. Commissioner Allen seconded the motion but requested we add to the motion that City Council address the issues of beach parking, restroom safety, pedestrian access, covered bleachers and portable outfield fencing for baseball. Motion carried by acclamation. ADJOURNED- 8:10pm Submitted by: Teri Craig, Admin Assistant PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE RkAZJD-c Y-Y) tilt to Newport Beach City Council TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2009 — 7pm City Council rhmnka"e - 2300 Newport Sou I levard The City Council will consider the approval of the Sunset Ridge Park updated concel plan on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 7prn. qrpg&ftd o0taft Concept dy" -q Sunset Ridge Park EPT londseope orthimnure u.bo� design plm� ng Newport Beach, California role i URBAN ZESOURCE Existing Conditions Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA Site Constraints Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA -- 1- Pacific Coast Highway Initial Proposed Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA 1 ,;«► • ,, P 4erue ' �1 %o< �' Simper �1 Future Park Development North r 1 I Parking Vehicular Access �\ M.WN Entry Plaza Walking Path Play Area Overlook with Shade Structure Restroom Baseball Field Soccer Fiel8. !r/ 'J � kLV2 GorJ6 (285' outfield) (33Q' x 195' ) j rde 4 . ` 1 X ve e. Soccer Field Future Park Development — Park Sign R North Pacific Coast Highway Initial Proposed Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA EPT rvai2ft xv M1 1vk1,rv1%i MIm �e I t 0 Initial Enlarged Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA — Entry Plaza f— Play Area Restroom O Soccer Field (240 X 150') EPT � Walking Path tr- -1 �. -00, £ Future Park k _ _ J Development ` < ` C'W Q Pacific Coast Highway New Proposed Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA EPTDESIGN \ t56 y {,r ,. Vehicular Parking 75 Spaces Access , . _ l ,t�1 135 Play Area =� Picnic Area J + 12 Pedestrian Access — Entry Plaza Retaining Wall — Restroom Walking Path 'y +^ ttZb75 I +'40 Baseball Field (285' outfield) Soccer Field (330'x 198') K +,s73 d Overlook with Shade Structure Memorial Garden tQg81 62 ; LPedestrian Access ..� 3 J 0e ov Soccer Field 30 –V% 1270'x 135'1 a Future Park Pedestrian Development Access Y >i r Pedestrian - – +-t0 Stair Access Pacific Coast Highway Park Sign North New Proposed Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA EPT V \ <. l� L. U_ - 1v� \� 165' t I• ' Parking �� , (75 Space Play Area —= , Picnic Area New Enlarged Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA A I Entry Plaza Walking Path Restroom FFT Retaining Wall N�o 125' - �l Soccer Field ('e j (330'x 198') aseball Field Soccer Field (270' x 135') EPT F Walking Path T--1 Retaining Wall r qT 1 170' Soccer' (330' x 198')ir, \ ye I New Enlarged Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA C Overlook with Shade Structure Pge%%%,e Memorial Garden / I Future Park Development r� North Ima Loa Court J • w • a B e' a s+ s y � r Land Fall Court C Swift Court ■ I■ Encore Court Trig D �F E ure Coup r r� Future Park Development North Section Key Map Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA EP's Line of c Fence m o M '}7�yyy,,s�t.,,�� CID 0 Q. -. Existing Wall co i TW 48 *' Retaining Wall Existing Grade i _— ___ - - - -- --------------- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- — 50' Proposed Parking Lot Area 100' Landscape Berm Location of Section MEMM" I i 1 I m i F i 4', DECK -462.76 Building Section A Line of Sight �..,_. Fence DECK ii ,-a a $ +62.93 ,N lw +56. 9 fLJ�� ., -' � TW - ^}..' -- -- Existing Wall 1 It +42 Existing Gracie i Retainin ❑7g wall I r I � I Area Restroom I Entry Plaza Landscape Area Location of Section 165' Landscape Berm i Court / Building Section B Land Fall Court, Newport Beach, CA EPT Line of Location of Section a, fml Section C Land Fall Court, Newport Beach, CA EPT 1 ��' , d .. 1 _. Fence ` +64.74 'd �• o Gk.�+ 677 k°� IO w Existing Wall I O 3: co 113 ; Retaining Wall „* - -- ExistingGrade — — — - — — _ — ' tv — -- — —r— - - -� -- --- - - - - -- to 0 1 IE Baseball Field Dug- Landscape Walk Landscape Landscape Berm I Land Fall out Area Area I Court I Building 125' Location of Section a, fml Section C Land Fall Court, Newport Beach, CA EPT Line of R 0 41+ N rr 3 a X Field (Dug- out r 01 3 �0 o' �o .a 00 - -r- Area Area 125' 100';eydd�"` Fence Existing Wall Existing Grade _ _ _ _ _ . —' Landscape Berm Section C - Backstop Imagery Land Fall Court, Newport Beach, CA + ECK +64.74 I ITw tv I� I t I Land Fall I Court I Building Line of n "3 80 Fence 1 '•�{, +66.91 1 �� a_I7 a_I� ,( °T�'Y.f.'i'�! 60.E ,.J rn,� � , m, CO m n M , nn n m , n I Existing Wall - -- -- �i - - - -� --- Retaining wall - ----------- Existing Grade — � - - - -- — o m ________ ,.s:..... 3.6+ .-.. r m Soccer Field Landscape ' Walk Landscape Landscape Berm i Swift Court Area Area i Building 90, Location of Section Section D Swift Court, Newport Beach, CA EPT Line of Shatudre e a Existing Wall Struc °o �"'' �"�_` a - - 72+ - - - -- - --- - - - - -- — - - - ^` ` Existing Grade Landscape' Overlook I Landscope'Walk Slope I Area 20' idscape Area 150' Location of Section DECK I� Encore Court t Building Section E Encore Court, Newport Beach, CA EPTDESIGN I" Vehicular Access Parking Area r i' Road l Entry Plaza 1 f and Restroom ' Ballfields Overlook with Shade ~5 F "Y Retaining Wall Structure s.at Memorial Walking Path Garden Vehicular Access Pedestrian 'fie Access Q Ods�y�g Play Area \/N. Superior AV @nU n 0 pedestria hay Pedestrian Pedestrian Access Stair Access Access Future Park Development Proposed Site Plan - Topography Model A Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA nl . n I A _ _. r nl I n__._____ r :. Vehicular Access Road Play Area ,,T, Paci ff^ Coast Highway , Proposed Site Plan - Topography Model C Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA Parking Area Entry Plaza and Restroom Ballfields Retaining Wall T Superior Avenue Pedestrian Stair Access ur' as Pacific Co st HighW aY Proposed Site Plan - Topography Model D Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA Overlook Pedestrian Access Memorial Garden 0 ' y Pedestrian Stair Access EPT t�f it 3 i lvl t A s t= r Ao< P C;, , gvPet Future Park ~ Development s Pacific Coast Higf)Way North New Proposed Site Plan Sunset Ridge Park, Newport Beach, CA The End