HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-04-1984 - AgendaCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
• REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD TUESDAY, DECEMBER 4, 1984
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
7:00 P.M.
AGENDA
I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
1 '
1. Call to Order
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of November 6, 1.984
4. Adoption of Agenda
II. ACTION ITEMS
5. Review and Recommendation on the Open Space and Recreation
Element of the General Plan (Memo Attached)
6. Capital Improvement Proposals for FY 1985 -86 (Report Attached)
• 7. Landscape /Maintenance Agreement, Newport Center (Report Attached)
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
8. Renovation of Lincoln School Athletic Field (Letter Attached)
9. Board Surfing Regulations (Report Attached)
10. Development of Back Bay (Letter Attached)
11. Joint Meeting with City Council - December 10, 1984
(Agenda Attached)
V. INFORMATION REPORTS
12. Recreation Division (Report Attached)
13. Park and Street Tree Division (Report Attached)
VI. SPECIAL, URGENT, OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS
VII. ADJOURNMENT
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Moti60
Seconded
Ayes
Motion
Seconded
Ayes
•
Item No. 3
arks, Beaches. & Recreation Commission
November 6, 1984
City Council Chambers 7 o.m. INDEX
Ex- Officio Member Present: Ronald A. Whitley, Director
Staff Present: Tom Line, Recreation Supt.
Dottie Flohr, Secretary
I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS
Item #1
Call to
Order
The meeting of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
was called to order at 7:05 P.M.
Item #2
Roll Call
Roll call was taken. Commissioners Cohen, de Boom, Hopkins,
King, Springer and Wolfe were present. Commissioner
Capretz was absent.
Item #3
Approval of
x
x
Minutes
x
x
x
Motion was made by King and seconded by Wolfe to approve
x
the minutes of the October 2, 1984 meeting. Unanimous.
Item #4
Adoption of
x
Agenda
x
The agenda was adopted as presented with the addition of
x
x
x
x
the Recreation and Open Space Element and Marinapark.
II. ACTION ITEMS
Item #5 - Proposed Mariners Multi- Purpose Room
Proposed
Mariners
Chair Cohen announced the Commission's Ad Hoc Committee
Multi -
met with certain members of the Library Board of Trustees
Purpose
and Frank Eastman, Mariners Branch Librarian, on October 22
Room
to discuss the concept of adding a multi - purpose building
at Mariners Park. The Library would like to take over the
use of the existing multi - purpose room adjacent to the
Library. They propose to transfer funds to the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department to be used to build
another building which is not attached to the Library.
They have also proposed using their funds to have an
architect draw up preliminary plans which would be sub-
mitted to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission for
their consideration and approval.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
Page 2
City Council Chambers 7 D.m. INDEX
Ron.Whitley pointed out that the original concept was to
expand the existing facility, however, since this would
encroach into the trees /picnic area or the ball field,
staff is opposed to the idea. Should the proposed building
be suitably located and financing equitable, staff feels
that a new building would be a good idea since the recrea-
tion programs do, in fact, infringe on the Library. He
suggested it be a larger room than the present•building and
built to the Department's needs and specifications. The
Library has offered to fund the feasibility study which
would then be transmitted to the Commission. The consultant
would be hired by the Public Works Department in accord
with Council Policy.
Commissioner King asked that the memorandum written by Mary
Richmond, dated October 24, 1984, to Rae Cohen be rewritten
to more accurately reflect the items discussed and to -re-
move existing irregularities.
M0>0
x
Commissioner de Boom motioned the Ad Hoc Committee send a
Seconded
x
letter by November 12 to the Library Board of Trustees
Ayes
x
x
x
asking them to clarify their letter of October 24 and to
Nay
x
clarify the purpose of the meeting. Seconded by King.
Motion passes. Commissioner King requested that this
letter be sent to each Commissioner.
The Ad Hoc Committee, consisting of Cohen, de Boom and
Wolfe, discussed the proposed new building and agreed that
they were in favor of it provided it is in a suitable
location and the majority of the funds are provided by the
Library.
Motion
x
Following discussion concerning the design of the new
Seconded
x
building and its financing, King motioned the Library
Ayes
x
x
x
x
Board of Trustees underwrite the expense of having an
architect prepare a schematic design for a new addition
which would then be used for cost estimating and further
detailed study by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission. Seconded by Wolfe. Unanimous. Ron Whitley
will transmit this motion to the Public Works Director.
Item #6 - Westbay Park Proposal - Natural History
Westbay
Park
Foundation
Proposal
Moj�i
x
Ron Whitley reported the Westbay Ad Hoc Committee's
Se ed
x
meeting was cancelled by the Natural History Foundation
Ayes
x
x
x
x
due to the fact the Foundation does not have the funds
to proceed, nor are they environmentally ready to,proceed.
Mr. Whitley will meet with their Board next week to help
them formulate a letter to be transmitted to Council
concerning their plans.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
•
1J
arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
Page 3
City Council Chambers 7 D.M. INDEX
-
,
Commissioner. de Boom motioned the Commission acknowledge
receipt of the Natural History Foundation's communication
and thank them for their interest in the project. Seconded
by Hopkins. Unanimous.
Item #7 - Joint Meeting with City Council Scheduled for
Joint Meeting
with City
December 10, 1984
Council
Ron Whitley announced the joint meeting with the City
Council is December 10, 1984 at 2:00 P.M. and that the
agenda should be determined at this time. Following
discussion, the items listed below were agreed upon:
1. King will discuss the safety problem at San Miguel Park.,
2. de Boom and Springer will discuss the beach restrooms.
In addition, de Boom will prepare a photo presentation.
3. Hopkins and Wolfe will discuss the conditions of the
beach and West Newport areas.
4. Cohen will recap the Commission's accomplishments during
this past year.
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Commissioner Hopkins reported there are some residents upset
concerning surfers who stay too long and ignore enforcements
Ron Whitley will ask the Marine Department for a report,on
surfing policy.
Commissioner King noted the excellent job that staff has
done with the restrooms and the children's area at San
Miguel Park.
IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Item #8 - Capital Improvement Proposals for FY 1985 -86
Capital
Improvement
Ron Whitley and Chair Cohen reviewed the process for
Proposals
implementing capital improvements. Mr. Whitley reminded
the Commissioners that if they have any projects they
wish to have considered, now is the time to let staff know ..
so that background information can be gathered.
Chair Cohen appointed Hopkins to chair the Capital Improve-
ments Subcommittee and.King and Wolfe volunteered to serve
on the committee. The committee will meet with staff to
formalize a tentative list to be presented at the December
meeting. At the January 8, 1985 meeting the Commission will
adopt a priority list which will be submitted to the
City Manager.
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
„ Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
"0
2 Page 4
010' City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX
V. •INFORMATION REPORTS
Item #9 - Park and Street Tree Division
Park and
Street Tree
Commissioner Hopkins noted that the landscaping around the
Division
new City Hall building is exceptional. This was done under
Jack Brooks' direction and he is to be highly commended for
this outstanding project.
Item #10 - Recreation Division
Recreation
Division
Tom Line reported the Corona del Mar Fall Five Miler was
very successful. There were close to 600 runners compared
to 700 last year.
The Newport Beach Golf Tournament held at Irvine Coast
Country Club was a big success with 131 golfers participatin
.
Mr. Line suggested Woody Smith be honored with a Special
Recognition Award for his extra efforts over the past few
years on the annual tournament.
VI. SPECIAL, URGENT OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS
Ron Whitley reported the Recreation and Open Space Element
report has been finalized and is in draft form. The report
has been mailed to each of the Commissioners from the
Planning Department. A joint meeting with the Planning
Commission,will be held in the Council Chambers on
November 15 at 7:00 P.M. At this meeting the consultant
will present necessary information to the Commissions and
the public.
Ron Whitley reported that the Marinapark issue has been
finalized. The City Council Ad Hoc Committee will make a
report to Council on November 26 and the Commissioners are
welcome to attend.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Parks, Beaches and
Recreation Commission adjourned at 8:30 P.M.
Dottie Flohr-, Secretary
Item No. 5
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
• Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
DATE: November 29, 1984
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Open Space and Recreation Element of the
General Plan
We will have the opportunity to further review the Open Space
and Recreation Plan for recommendation purposes. The Planning
Center will be in attendance to assist in this objective.
Please bring your three copies of the plan as provided at our
last meeting on this subject.
4941 -
• Ronald A. Whitley
•
1
1-14:G
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
DATE: December 6, 1984
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
SUBJECT: REVIEW OF THE OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION ELEMENT
OF THE GENERAL PLAN
On Tuesday, December 4, 1984, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
reviewed the draft of the subject Element. As a result of public input
and review by the Commission with the consultant and City staff, the
following recommendations are made for consideration by the Planning Com-
mission as corrections or changes:
1. Program 1.1.5, Page 30, should refer to the Open Space District as
Open Space Zoning District.
2. Program 1.3.1, Page 31, should read "Adopt and implement the recommenda-
tions of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Marinapark Study Committee."
• 3. Under heading 6, Recreation and Open Space.Plan Service Areal - West
Newport, Item 9 located on Page 43 would better be identified as
"West Newport Park."
4. Service Area 2 - Balboa Peninsula, Marinapark, Page 43, should refer
to the Marinapark study group as the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission Marinapark Study Group.
5. Service Area 11 - Harbor View, Item 5, located on Page 46, should be
referred to as "Jasmine Creek Open Space."
6. Intensification Projects, Number 1 - North Star Beach, located on
Page 47, should read "The beach is proposed to be upgraded in quality.
Existing sensitive resources should be taken into consideration in any
site improvement effort. Development of an Aquatic Center should'be
permitted on this site consistent with the expressed desires of the
Newport Beach electorate as voting in November of 1982."
7. Item 2 located on Page 47 should be referred to as "Santa Ana River
Park" for identification and clarification purposes.
8. Item 4 - Peninsula Park should read "Alternate recreational uses or
reconfiguration of the sports field area at this park is proposed for
further study.. Options are installing updated field improvements
changing to a different recreational use."
is
-2-
9. Item 6 - Grand Howald CYC - OASIS, located ,on Page 47 should be
• reworded to read "Total area should be consistent with current
�•. development and master plan studies now being done for this public
area."
The Commission has appreciated the opportunity to work on the development
of this amendment to the Recreation and Open Space Element. We would like
to thank the Planning Commission for their staff support on preparing a
plan that will benefit residents of this community for years to come.
We have scheduled a general review of the Implementation, Plan and technical
portions of•the study which will be transmitted to you in January.
Rae Cohen, C air
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
Is
0
r, s
•
Planning Commission Meeting. December 6, 1984
0
Agenda Item No.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission V
FROM: Planning Department-
2
SUBJECT: Recreation and Open Space Element Revision, GPA81 -2(£)
Suggested Action
If desired,
1) Open public hearing
2) Take public testimony and discuss the proposed
General Plan Amendment
3) Direct staff to prepare appropriate findings and resolution; and
4) Continue the public hearing
Background
On June 4y 1981, the Planning Commission initiated General Plan Amendment
• 81 -2, an eight component amendment that included a comprehensive review of the
City's park and open space system. However, the City Council declined to fund
the proposed park study until the 1982 =83 fiscal year. On May 11, 1983, the
City of Newport Beach contracted with the Planning Center to .prepare the
proposed revision to the Recreation and Open Space Element of. the General
Plan.
As a part of the comprehensive park study., three documents have been prepared:
the Technical Supplement, the Plan, and the Implementation Handbook. Of the
three, only the Plan will be adopted as the Recreation and Open Space Element
element of the General Plan. The Technical Supplement summarizes the
background information and methodology used in developing the Plan. The
Implementation Handbook provides guidelines and funding, suggestions for
implementing the Plan at a level of detail which wound be inappropriate for
inclusion in the General Plan. The implementation program presented
represents one of many possible schemes to implement the plan.
In order to maintain consistency among the City's various planning programs,
it is recommended that the City's Land Use Element and Local Coastal Program
be amended concurrently with the Recreation and Open Space Element for those
areas where a conflict with the Recreation and Open Space Element might
otherwise be created. In addition, it is recommended that the City's
Circulation Element be amended to include the Master Plan of Bikeways and
appropriate policies in accordance with the suggestion of the Bicycle Trails
Citizens' Advisory Committee (BCAC) , which has expressed a desire to place
• greater emphasis on the transportation function of bicycling as opposed to its
recreation function.
TO: Planning Commission - 2.
• The study, was coordinated jointly by the City's Planning and Parks Beaches and
Recreation Departments. Input was also provided by the Ad Hoc Recreation and
Open Space Committee which was comprised of two members each from the City
Council, Planning Commission, and Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission.
The Committee met five times through the course of the study to review the
various work products and provide feedback to staff and the consultant. In
addition, meetings were held with major landowners whose property could be
directly affected 'by the proposed amendment. These included Newport Mesa
Unified School District, West Newport Oil Company, The Irvine Company, and Cal
Trans.
Public opinion was solicited early on in the planning process through a
Community Forum, a special presentation to SPON, and a random sample survey.
A joint public meeting with the Planning and PBR Commission was held on
November 15, 1984, to present the draft plan and invite any questions or
comments from the Commissions or public. The PB &R Commission will be
reviewing the plan formally at their December 4th meeting. This is the first
public hearing on the plan.
Recreation and Open Space Element Changes
Highlighted below are new programs and park proposals which are recommended in
the Draft Recreation and Open Space Element revision, but are not contained in
the existing Element. In many cases these changes reflect current City
• planning programs such as the Local Coastal Program or the General Plan Land
Use Element. In some cases these are new proposals.
Element Changes
Source
1. 'Amendment of the Park Dedication Ordinance to provide for land New,
appraisals on a case by case basis and to clearly provide for
land dedication or in -lieu fees at a rate of five acres per one
thousand population.
2. Revision of the City's existing Open Space District so that it New
will function both as a primary zone and an overlay zone and
develop management guidelines for properties with this desig-
nation. Initiate change of zone proceedings for appropriate
properties to receive the overlay designation such as lower
Buck Gully, lower Morning Canyon and Environmentally Sensitive
Areas incorporated within a development.
3. Designation of a portion of theNewport Village site for a New
neighborhood park.
4. Specific designation of a previously "floating" neighborhood New
.park on the Banning/West Newport Oil Company area for location
at Ticonderoga and Fifth - teenth Street.
• 5. Designation of CalTrans East for only a small view park, rather LCP
than leaving the entire site in open space per the existing
` Land Use Element. The remainder of the site should be desig-
nated for Governmental, Education and Institutional Facilities.
V V
TO: Planning Commission - 3.
• Element Changes Source
6. Provision of expanded view parks on Castaways and Newporter New
North which may serve some neighborhood park and view park
functions on each site.
7. Development of a twenty acre community park in the Banning New
oil fields rather than a series of smaller parks as currently
shown.
8. Designation of the Bayview /North Bay area for only a mini- New
park rather than a regional park as shown in the existing
element, leaving the remainder of the area designated Low
Density Residential.
9. No additional mini -parks designated on Balboa Island in con- New
trast to the existing element which showed five, including the
existing Beek Park.
10. Provision of a view park on the parcel at Fifth Avenue and New
Marguerite. Previous plans designate the site for open space
use but do not specify use as a view park.
11. Removal of the alternate residential use from Buck Gully New
is north of 5th Ave. designating the site solely as open space.
12. Designation of Semeniuk Slough for open space use. LCP, Land
Use Element
13. Revision and addition of greenbelts to reflect current Land GPA 76 -3B
Use Element and Planned Community texts.
14. Eliminate mapping of an additional neighborhood park north Land Use
of Cameo Highlands, outside of the City limits. Element
15. Eliminate future park site at 32nd and Balboa (Max Morgan LCP, Land
site). Use Element
16. Provision of an aquatic facility at North Star Beach
17. Indicate existing parks in Spyglass Hill and Harbor
View Hills.
18. Relocate the Master Plan of Bikeways from the Recreation
and Open Space Element to the Circulation Element.
19. Provision of a boat ramp at the Coast Highway bridge.
20. Adopt policies and programs for the use and acquisition
. of school sites to facilitate continued recreational use
of such sites in accordance with state laws pertaining to
surplus school sites.
City Referendum
Existing
Conditions
New
LCP
New
\J
T0:
Element Changes
Planning Commission - 4.
21. Designate the following additional locations as scenic
Drives:
a. Bluffs at the Castaways site
b. Jamboree Road, south of San Joaquin Hills Road
c. Marine Avenue
d. Irvine Avenue between University Drive and
Santiago Drive
e. MacArthur Boulevard, south of San Joaquin Hills
Road
f. Marquerite Avenue
22. Adopt policies and programs to reduce sedimentation in
Upper Newport Bay.
23. Allow short term beaching of small craft in designated
areas.
24. The proposed Recreation and Open Space Element revision
designated Marinapark as a neighborhood park. This is
consistent with the existing Recreation and Open Space
Element, the Land Use Element, and the Local Coastal
• Program Land Use Plan maps, all of which designate the
entire Marinapark site for open space uses. Language
in the Local Coastal Program does, however, indicate that
"It is the intent of the City to preserve the
mobile home park use ."
The Local Coastal Program also contains the following
language regarding leasing of public land:
1. In the leasing or re- leasing of publicly owned
land, full consideration shall be given to the
public's right of access to the ocean, beach,
and bay and to the provision of coastal- dependent
uses adjacent to the water.
2. At the time the leases are negotiated or
renewed, careful consideration shall be given to the
consistency of the proposed use with the public
interest. If a positive determination is made, the
property shall be leased at fair market value, unless
it is clearly in the public interest to do otherwise.
3. All new leases and lease renewals of publicly owned
land shall be considered by the City Council at a
• public hearing.
4. When tidelands leases are renegotiated, they shall be
at full market value and the monies shall be segre-
Source
New
208 Plan
New
i1 J
TO: Planning Commission - 5.
• gated in a separate fund and shall be used for main-
tenance and related visitor - generated services and
acquisition of coastal properties to provide uses
consistent with the Coastal Act,, such as small boat
launching facilities, acquisition of environmentally
sensitive habitat areas, and other uses which may be
consistent with the tidelands trust provisions.
5. Public access 'shall be required when the City issues
new leases of public land, or renews existing leases.
This requirement shall be understood to apply to
beaches leased to the Lido Isle Association, as well
as to all other public leaseholds in the City's
Coastal Zone. Public access shall be required only
where it would not jeopardize public health and
safety.
Marinapark was developed as a travel trailer park in 1945
and redeveloped as a mobile home park in 1955. In 1971,
the City Council commissioned a study of potential uses of
the Marinapark site, anticipating termination of all
leases in 1974. This study recommended that the site be
redeveloped as a recreation center. In 1973, the City
Council extended the leases of the mobile home park
• tenants to 1977. Later the leases were further extended
to 1985.
In 1982, the Marinapark Study Committee comprised of Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission representatives, local
citizens, and city staff, was formed. The Committee
recommended that the site be used for a community center
and other recreation purposes including a sailing center,
small boat launching, volleyball, basketball and tennis.
The Draft Recreation and Open Space, Element recommends
that this plan be adopted.
In February, 1984, the City Council Marinapark Mobile Home
Ad Hoc Committee was created. The Ad Hoc Committee
recommended extension of the mobile home leases for
fifteen more years, conversion of the lawn bowling green
at 15th Street to parking, and possible development of a
boat launching ramp just west of the American Legion
facility. On November 26, 1984, the City Council voted to
explore this recommendation in more detail. This is not
consistent with the Draft Plan. A copy of the Ad Hoc
Committee report is provided as Attachment 1.
25. In addition, the Implementation Handbook, which will not New
be part of the adopted Element, contains suggestions
. for financing including increasing the Building Excise Tax
and utilization of tideland revenues for park purposes.
U
TO: Planning Commission - G.
• Land Use Element Amendment
In order to maintain conformity between the revised Recreation and Open Space
Element and the Land Use Element of the General Plan, it will be necessary to
amend the Land Use Element be amended as follows:
1. Designate the currently undesignated City -owned property adjacent to the
Santa Ana River as Recreational and Environmental Open Space.
2. Designate a four acre site north of Newport Crest as Recreational and
Environmental Open Space rather than a mixture of General Industry;
Administrative, Professional and Financial Commercial; and Governmental,
Educational and Institutional Facilities. Amend language in the Land Use
Element to allow development of this park prior to, rather than
concurrent with, construction of adjacent residences.
3. Designate the public beach at Tenth Street for Recreational. and
Environmental Open Space use.
4. Delete the Recreational and Environmental Open Space designation from all
but a portion of CalTrans East, designating that remainder of the site
for Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities.
5. Designate the currently undesignated sites of the Sea Scout Base and
• Orange Coast College facility as Governmental, Educational and
Institutional Facilities.
6. Extend and increase the area designated Recreational and Environmental
Open Space on the Castaways site.
7. Delete the primary use designation of Recreational and Environmental Open
Space for the bulk of the Bayview /Peters site.
8. Designate additional Recreational and Environmental Open Space on the
Newporter North site. j
9. Designate Newport Village for a mixture of Recreational and Environmental
Open Space and currently proposed uses.
10. Delete alternate residential use on the Buck Gully site.
11. Delete alternate residential use on the Oasis site.
Local Coastal Program
In order to maintain consistency between the Local Coastal Program and the
proposed amendments to the General Plan, it will be necessary to amend the LCP
as follows:
• 1. Map Beek Park on Agate Avenue as Recreational and Environmental Open
Space.
TO: Planning Commission - 7.
• 2. Designate a portion of the former Corona del Mar School site as
Recreational and environmental Open Space.
3. Designate only a portion of CalTrans East as Recreational and
Environmental Open Space, with the remainder of the site designated
Governmental, Educational and Institutional Facilities. Although this
will entail revision of Local Coastal Program Land Use Plan mapping, it
is consistent with language in the LCP which provides for expansion of
Hoag Hospital or a parking facility on the site.
4. Designate the easterly portion of the Castaways site as Recreational and
Environmental Open Space.
5. Add Recreational and Environmental Open Space striping to the residential
portion of'the Westbay site.
6. Designate the open space area at Hampden Road in Cameo Shores as
Recreational and Environmental Open Space.
7. Designate the northeasterly corner of the Jamboree Road /Coast Highway
intersection as Recreational and Environmental open Space rather than
Retail and Service Commercial as at present.
S. Add Recreational and Environmental Open Space designation to additional
areas on Newporter'North site.
9. Designate a four acre parcel north of Newport Crest as Recreational and
Environmental Open Space.
Circulation Element
In accordance with the recommendation of the Bicycle Trails Citizen's Advisory
Committee, it is suggested that the Master Plan of Bikeways and appropriate
policies pertaining to bicycling be relocated into the Circulation Element.
Material to be added to the Circulation Element is summarized in Attachment 2.
Environmental Documentation
Policies incorporated into the proposed Recreation and Open Space Element
revision would successfully mitigate any environmental impacts that can be
determined at this time. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is
included as Attachment 3 to this report.
Errata
Subsequent to the circulation of the recreation and open space study
documents, a number of typographical and arithmetical errors have been
• detected. These errors will be corrected in the final documents, and
corrected pages are included in Attachment 4.
TO: Planning Commission - S.
• PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER Director
By
Sandra L. Genis
Associate Planner
SLG:jm
DOC: Rec & Open Rev
DISK: MISC2
Attachments: 1. Marinapark Mobile Home Ad Hoc Committee Report
2. Bikeways Plan
3. Negative Declaration
4. Errata
171
•
ATTACHMENT N0. 1
r) til COUNCIL AGENDA NO.I -1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
November 26, 1984
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Marinapark Mobilehome Ad Hoc Committee
SUBJECT: MARINA MOBILEHOME PARK ALTERNATE USES
INTRODUCTION•
On January 23, 1984, the Newport Beach City Council received a
request from the President of the Marinapark Homeowners Associa-
tion to create a City Council Ad Hoc Committee to study the'future
uses at the Marina Mobilehome Park. If the future use is to in-
clude a mobilehome park, the owners requested permission to nego-
tiate with the'Committee the extension of the current leases. On
Feb2ivary'28, 1984, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 84 -15
creating a Marinapark Mobilehome Ad Hoc Committee and charged this
Committee with the responsibility of meeting with the representatives
of the.Marinapark Homeowners Association to review and make recom-
mendations back to, the City Council on the future use of the•mobile-
home park area. The Committee was to also interview representatives
of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission and.other'groups
as_hecessary to complete the Committee's assignment. Lastly, the
Committee is to report back to the City Council with.a final report
on or'before January 1, 1985. The Resolution appointed the Manager's
Office as staff to the Committee.
The Committee met on Tuesday, March 20th, Thursday, March 29th.,
Thursday, May 3rd, Thursday,,,May 31st, Wednesday, June 27th.j-Thurs-
day July 26Th, Wednesday, September 5th -, Thursday, October 25th and
Tuesday, 06tober'30th. The Committee has received presentations by
the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission,; by the Marinapark Mobile -
home representatives,. and'by interested individual residents. The
purpose of this memo is to present a status report. to the City Council.
HISTORY:
The City acquired the nucleus of the Marinapark property between
15th and 18th Streets from the Pacific Electric Land-Company on
July 7, 1919, for $1.00. The parcel was originally utilized as a
City - operated, short -term visit campground',until 1944. On Match 6,
1944, a one -year lease was granted to the South Coast Company for
the .purpose of installing wharfs for boat berthing and repairing.
On'December 26,'1945, the City Council approved a plan for the camp
` -�
'ground to be converted.and operated as a ;travel trailer park. On
May 9, 1955, the City Council adopted a revised plan-providing for
a further redevelopment of the travel trailer park as a mobilehome
park and also a public beach between 16th and 19th Streets. From
1955 to the present, various improvements, such as public sidewalks
Q
' - • 1To': Mayor and City ,Council
Page -2-
0.; ...
adjacent to the public •beach area ;;_,tennis courts, tot lot, and
parking facilities have been provided. In 1972,.a study was com
pleted by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission recommend -
ing that the parcel be converted',to, public usage and th'a't the
mobilehome park be eliminated,
On June 25, 1973, the City'Council, after, considering the'Com-
mission's report and�,other informations .granted 'a.lease•.ex'tension
to the tenants of the mobilehome park to September 30, 1977. With
this lease extension, a greater public access was , p
provided ,:between
the Marina Mobilehome Park and the American Legion roperty and
additional tennis court facilities were provided between,the:
mobilehome park and Balboa Boulevard: On January 26,:'1976, the
Newport Beach City'Council granted, an additional extensiori to
the tenants.of the park until September'30, 1985. The berms of
the agreement required a minimum rental with'said' rent being ad-
justed-annually,based on the'Consumer Price Index (all items) for
the Los Angeles /Long Beach, California area. Currently the monthly
rent is $409 for the spaces adjacent to the beach, and'$347,for
the interior spaces,.
The lease also provided that "Should the City,Council find and
determine on or before the expiration of this lease the Newport
Marinapark is not required for any public trust purposes or other
public purpose, lessees shall have the option to extend this lease
for five years following the expiration of the term upon "the same
conditions herein contained. "" Finally, the lease provided''that
the City "may give 90 days written,notice to vacate said premises
to all lessees of Marinapark. Said notice shall not be given by
City until City has allocated necessary funds, approved necessary
plans, and obtained 'all necessary governmentai approvals, includ-
ing environmental requirements, zoning requirements,, and any other
requirements to-achieve the conversion of the Marinapark,into,a
public recreation area." There 'are 25 spaces froriting,,on the
beach- and 33= interior spaces 'for a total, of '59 mpbilehoMfa spaces.
There . are, 26:Tull- .t•ime tenants and 3B "second- home" tenants. The
park is-producing gross revenues of $2701000 ±, with expenditures
running $57,000 annually, for a net annual revenue to the City of
$213,000. This revenue is used by the City's General Fund and
the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Fund.
LEGAL REQUIREMENTS IF CONVERSION OCCURS:
The Committee reviewed the legal requirements for land use con-
version, and determined that state statutes for conversion of:
mobilehome parks exist in the Civil'Code', primarily addressing
tenant /landlord relations, and in the Government Code, primarily
addressing the responsibilities of the'governing'body to ensure
that certain actions are taken. In this case, the City fulfills
both the role of landlord and that of the governing body. It
must, therefore, meet the responsibilities of both.
-,.-To:
Mayor and City-Council,
Page -3-
Under ;Section 798.56 of the Civil Code a mobilehome park owner
must provide homeowners in the park with a•notice of change'of
use
l•
as follows:
•1.
The management gives the homeowners at feast 15 days written
notice that the management will be appearing before a local
- governmental boards commission or body to request, permits
fora change of use of the mobilehome park.
2.
After all required permits requesting a change of use have
been approved by the local governmental boarde commission,
or body, the management shall give the homeowners six months
or more written notice of termination of tenancy.
If the change of use requires no local governmental permits,
then
notice shall be given 12 months or more prior to the
'a'
management's determination that change,of use will•occur.
The management in the notice shall disclose and describe. in
detail the nature of the change of use.
3. The management gives each proposed homeowner•written notice
thereof prior to the inception of his tenancy that the
Management is requesting a change of' use before local govern-
, mental•bodies-or•-that a change of use request has been granted.
Under Section 65863.7 of the Government Code, prior to converting
a mobilehome park to another use, the project proponent must,
file a report describing the impact conversion will have on the
residents of the park. The report is to address the availability
of adequate replacement space in mobilehome parks.. In addition,
as stated in the statute:
"The person proposing such change in use•shall make a
copy of the report available to'each resident of the
mobilehome park at least'15 days prior to the hearing
,on the 'impact report by the' advisory agency, or if
there is no advisory agency, by the legislative body.
The legislative body, or its delegated advisory agency,
shall review0such report, prior to any change of use,
and may require, as a condition of such change, the .
person or entity to take-steps to mitigate any adverse
impact of the conversion on the ability•of displaced
mobilehome park residents to find adequate space in a
mobilehome park."
Thus, the City must prepare a "resident impact 'report ", circulate
(J -the report to the park residents, and consider the report in
reaching its ultimate decision regarding conversion.
Additional requirements pertain if the conversion involves the
filing of a tentative or parcel map.
' r
-To: Mayor and, City Council
Page -4- w„
S
` 1 �
Section 65590-of -the. Government,; Code; .regulates "`tlze; - remoyal''`of
hoiiirig;iinits''in ,tlie' Coasta ?1•.Zone..• rxThe; iNtarinapa`rK 'is" ='iii the -'
Cbast'al' 'Zone, but, because the P, B & R Commissions S' proposed
..Use is considered coastal dependent, portions of the Section
regarding replacement housing, would "not- ,apply. ::The,--Mello' Bill
� rid, "Co{iric'i]:'Policy B =l generally. require .A> property °owner to
provide` rep'lacemen't housing;for_persons , or families of low in-
come 'dr:splaced'ny;
V
P
To: Mayor and City Council
�} Page -5-
}
Concept 2. Redevelop the.subject. area
Parks, Beaches and Recreat
Advantages
N,.a) Redevelopment will provide better
public access for use.
b) Boat sailing interests will be en-
hanced.
c) A community center will be provided
for use by homeowner groups.
_Concept 3. Redevelop the site with he
improvements to return mast
Advantages
a) Would provide for maximum revenue -
return.
b) Visitor serving facilities would be
enhanced.
Concept.4.
,
recommended by the
, Disadvantages '
a) City will lose substantial
revenue.
b) City maintenance responsi-
bilities will increase.
c) Some housing accommodation
will be displaced.
d) Automobile traffic will be
increased.
taurants
Disadvantages
a) Additional traffic would b
generated.
b) Housing accommodations wil
be displaced.
c) 'Is in conflict with P,B &
Commission plan._
new master_.nlan for
Advantages
a) This plan'would'implement some of
the P,B & R Commission's recommenda-
tions while retaining mobilehome
park'use.
b) Plan would not displace housing ac-
commodations.
c) Community Associations would gain
meeting facilities.
d) Girl Scouts, Power Squadron could
be accommodated.
a.,
e) Financial return to City could be
maintained and increased.
Z9
e
Disadvantages
a) Complete public use would
not be accomplished.
•b) Temporary displacement
'of some-activities would
occur. '
c) A one -time capital outlay
cost would be required.
V(
;e
To: Mayor and City Council
Page -6
The' Ad: 'Hcc.'GOmmitte'e cori'sideied,all ,four concepts above;,~ �x= tiding,
alterna'tes',of`.' the= '.cbnceptsr The "precise, number` ~of plans considered
will be displayed at the City•Council meeting...Alternates 3 -A and
9 =A. %6 '',Concept 4 were the two final alternates considered by the
Committee.
On October 25th the'Committee met with representatives•of' the Mobile-
, Park'and'a representative 'of the Parks, Beaches and. Recreation
Commission: 'It appeared to be the consensus of those`itte'nding that
Alt ernate -3 -A -,,provides the-greatest advantages' to the'City: Com-
ponents of this•plan would be: -- ;
A. Co'nve'rt former lawn bowling green into trailer parking
td facilitate hand - launching of boats on 15th Street.
B. Widen from 8' to either 15' or 18' the area between the
Park and"'the•'American Legion to-facilitate a greater view
of the bay, better access to the bay,' and possibly the
launching of some boats.
C. The kobilehome Park would remain substantially the same.
s
D. A new agreement with the Mobilehome Park tenants,-would
provide for not more than a fifteen year lease with defin-
ite termination language and with requirements that tenants
within a phasing period become residents of the City.
E. Inasmuch-.as the American Legion 'lease expires on March 15th
in the year 20001'it may be advantageous to terminate the
Marinapark lease on the same day.-
F. Specific details, including rent increases, width of walk-
way, length of lease, etc., would be determined in phase II
by the-'Committee if authorized by the City Council.'
G. The,current City buildings on Balboa'Boulevard would be
demolished and after input from the Homeowners Association,
the Power Squadron and the Girl Scouts, would be're 'placed
with one multi - purpose building to hopefully accommodate
all needs. Parking and necessary landscaping Would�be pro-
vided•as required.
The costs for this alternate would be,as follows:
1. 43 parking spaces on 18th Street and 20 parking
spaces on 15th Street. $ 45,000
2. 18' or 15' concrete boat launch 10,00b
3. New water service 43,000
4. Multi- purpose building (8,OOO.sq. ft. at
$70.00) 560•, 000
658,000
/1
( ^) -"o: Mayor and &City Council
Page -7-
In the opinion of the Committee; the alternate selected provides a
compromise containing some elements of all proposals presented to
'\•the Ad Hoc Committee. Housing accommodations as requested by the
tenants of the Marinapark would be maintained; City revenues would
be increased; a sailing center as proposed by the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Commission would be accommodated; a community center
building and facilities for the Girl Scouts and Power Squadron would
be provided, as.suggest'ed by-the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Com-
mission. ,_••, ° 1 `.
It is proposed that the Committee be,authorized by the City Council
to negotiate the details of Alternate 3 -'A with the impacted parties.
A proposed lease renewal for instance, with Marinapark would re-
quire detailed negotiations with representatives of the tenants.
These negotiations would parallel the components of Plan 3 -A as out-
lined above. Also, the details on the sailing center and the com-
munity center building will require additional discussions•to "flesh -
out" the concept of Alternate 3 -A. With Council authorization, the
Committee will,:proceed and report back to the City Council.
MARINAPARK MOBILEHOME CITY COUNCIL
AD HOC COMMITTEE
' i ^147 ':�•.l.' ' ;13 � ?�y F: �`, � Mp�r
r�. „ ti. :,. I r-. "i "i I 't {: "'� 7:'+7rr.' .� I• �:t.t:! r i .fit', 1 ..:t �,r {! r1L
r r h in r!� ?. {: . •.�.�1f� pppj .'_,1�` r• I ,'. -. 'o' .. ,. - .. ,
+ .. ." "l, fl '. il'• ,} 'SI ,:3. ei li a''i�':YS�i.ITd.(i• :' ".. >.'. 'r ft',"
t' _ 'I . .r! �^ t(�. , a, ::..r •'i�. <... , n! .. ,l:L ,Y , �Y "'..° J.4:.�:: .c %J
Pf
I .� ': _ .'.I - I Z F : tie •_: , ° ..' .'�+ a 'S;. r:5 1 ( •' ^..i :: ,
s. _ ' , '•a ..'t'. "C° � w. I� •5 ..• � C: �I-!jt "i.. r3S .(i J:I ,i.l
II L
�I
i I
N
1� 1
II I, I I
I
1
N
s
�..J
x
x
D
�:E,g
\l
� Q
0
U
I
O
m
�aa
U3tl1B Yi0i
I
O
m
�aa
n
BIKEWAYS
LOCAL NEEDS
Attachment No. 2
The needs of bicyclists will vary with the function of the trip and
the speed of the rider. In addition, children riding bicycles for any
purpose will have special needs in terms of safety.
Those residents who use bicycles daily as their primary means and mode
of transportation are concerned with utilizing the most convenient and
direct route available to reach their destination. Consequently,
there is a general aversion and reluctance to any significant
out -of- direction travel. Inconveniently situated bikeways will not
normally be used. Studies have shown one to three blocks out of the
direction of travel is about the limit, depending upon the distance to
be traveled. These bicyclists normally will select a route along a
primary or a major highway. in contrast, the recreational rider might
choose a route for its scenic interest such as a harbor view or for
its open space character. Saving time does not appear to be an
important route selection criterion for these cyclists. Thus, it is
necessary to provide bikeways for bicyclists along major
transportation corridors and as well as residential and scenic areas.
Fast cyclists ride at 15 -25 miles per hour. They are usually
experienced riders, and mix poorly with pedestrians, children and
recreational cyclists because of their speed. Slower cyclists ride at
average speeds of B -12 mile per hour. They mix well with child
cyclists, fairly well with pedestrians, but poorly with motor
vehicles. It is thus necessary to provide bikeways which separate
faster cyclists from pedestrian travel and children, integrating
bicycle travel more closely with vehicular traffic, and bikeways which
separate slower cyclists from motor vehicle traffic. Children would
also be expected to utilize the latter routes.
REGIONAL NEEDS
Several regional bicycle trails pass through the City of Newport
Beach. These trails provide alternate circulation routes and access
to areas of interest on a regional basis. Bicycle trails are an
important component of the local recreation and transportation
spectrum. Some potential sites have been identified as those which
are appropriate for trails or have already been designated to be
served by such a trail. The City can work closely with regional and
other local governments to coordinate regional bicycle trail
connections to local bikeways and to popular destinations for
-bicyclists which are located in the City.
9_A
n CLASSIFICATION OF BIKEWAYS
Bikeway is the term used to designate all facilities which provide for
bicycle travel. The Master Plan of Bikeways include various types of
facilities to provide for both transportation and recreation cyclists,
faster and slower cyclists, and children. In order to serve varying
needs, the City of Newport Beach provides the following types of
facilities:
Bicycle Lane A lane in the street, normally the parking lane, or
a separate lane, designated for the exclusive or semi - exclusive
use of bicycles. Though travel by motor vehicles or pedestrians
is not allowed, vehicle parking may or may not be allowed.
Crossflow by motorists to gain access to driveways and parking
facilities is allowed. Separation from the motor vehicle
traveled way is normally be a painted solid stripe (bicycle lanes
and bicycle routes together are also known as Class 3 bicycle
trails).
Bicycle Route A shared right -of -way for bicycle operation,
whether or not it is specified by signs or markings. All main
streets and highways by authority of the California Vehicle Code
include bicycle routes as defined herein (bicycle lanes and
bicycle routes together are also known as Class 3 bicycle
trails).
Bicycle Trail A pathway designated for the use of bicycles which
is physically separated frommotor vehicular 'traffic. Pedestrian
traffic may or may not be excluded. (Also known as Class 1
bicycle trail.)
Backbone Bikeway Backbone bikeways are major throughway trails
that connect to regional trails. They are primarily on major
roads and serve the functional and recreational cyclist. (May be
a bicycle lane, route or trail.)
Secondary Bikeway Secondary Bikeways connect to backbone trails
and serve cyclists and children riding to and from school. (May
be a bicycle lane, route or trail.)
POLICY AND PROGRAMS
Policy 1.6: The City shall insure implementation of a bikeway
system to encourage cycling as an alternative mode
of transportation consistent with the Master Plan
of Bikeways.
Program 1.6.1: The Master Plan of Bikeways shall be implemented
concurrent with highway and street improvements,
consistent with the City's financial ability to do
so and the availability of alternative funding
(� sources.
Program 1.6.2: Appropriate bikeway improvements may be required
,/0-A
as a condition of development approvals.
Program 1.6.3: The City will work with surrounding agencies for
development of connecting,bikeways.
IMPLEMENTATION
Bikeways projects could be financed: using the City's General Fund or
SB 821 Funds. SB 821 Funds are of State origin and are disbursed by
the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) . They are
allocated for bikeway projects, including but not limited to signs,
striping, staging areas, bridges and bike lanes. Candidate projects
must be a part of an adopted plan. The funds are disbursed annually.
50% of the County's funds are allocated to cities on a population
basis. The remaining 50% are discretionary funds granted after a
prescribed nomination process and technical evaluation.
BICYCLE TRAILS CITIZEN'S ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The Bicycle Trails Citizen's Advisory Committee should be directed to:
-- review planned expansions or changes to the City's bikeway network
for advisory input to the Department of Public Works and the City
Council.
-- research bikeway implementation, education and safety techniques.
-- report to the City Council annually on report findings and progress
in expanding the bikeway network.
-- coordinate with bikeway committees in adjoining communities.
-- develop public information materials as directed by the City
Council.
Consideration should be given to reducing the number of members so as
to create a smaller technical advisory board.
/ /-�
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
TO: Secretary for Resources
1416 Tenth Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
n Clerk'of the Board of
Supervisors
P. 0. Box 687
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
P.O. BOX 1768
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 -8915
NAME OF PROJECT: • General Plan Amendment 82 -1 -- Recreation an
PROJECT LOCATION: citywide
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Adoption of comprehensive amendment to the Recreation and Open
Space Element of the Newport Beach General Plan.
FINDING: Pursuant to the provis"'I"ns of City, Council Policy K -3 pertaining
procedures and guide Ne's to'implemeht the California Environmental Quality
Act, the Environmental Affairs Committee has evaluated the proposed project
and determined that the proposed project will not have a significant effect
on the environment.
MITIGATION MEASURES:
See Attached List.
INITIAL STUDY PREPARED BY: City of Newport Beach
INITIAL STUDY AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW AT: 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach, CA
TE RECEIVED FOR FILING:
Patricia Temple
.Environmental Coordinator•
Date: November 20. 1984
4. The City of Newport Beach will coordinate with other agencies to
implement the Newport Bay Watershed /Sand Diego Creek
Comprehensive Stormwater Sedimentation Control Plan.
5. The City shall preserve beaches, surf action, and coastal
shoreline in a manner that will maintain their aesthetic and
natural value.
6. Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall be preserved and protected.
This shall include the following:
a. Areas supporting specie's which are rare, endangered, _of______
limited distribution, or otherwise sensitive `
b. Natural riparian
C. Freshwater marshes
d. Saltwater marshes
e. Intertidal areas
f. Other wetlands
g. Unique or unusually diverse vegetative communities
7. That a grading plan, if required, shall include a complete plan
for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to minimize any
potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants.
8. The grading permit shall include, ifirequired, a description of
haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping
program designed to minimize impact of haul operations.
9. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if required, shall
be submitted and be subject to the approval of the Building
Department and a copy shall be forwarded to the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
10. The velocity of concentrated run -off from the project shall be
evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the
project design.
11. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared
by a Civil Engineer and based on recommendations of a soil
engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the
completion of a comprehensive soil' and geologic investigation of
the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as
Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished
to the Building Department.
12. That erosion control measures shall be done on any exposed slopes
within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading
Engineer.
MITIGATION MEASURES
1. The scenic resource piovided'by coastal "1' 'shall be 'protected
and preserved,: "Bluffs" are defined as any landform. haying an
average slope of 26.6 'degrees (50%) or greater, with a vertical
rise '7bf`'25 feet `or greater consistent with existing City
ordinances.
2. Grading: •Per`mitted'development shall be designed to minimize the
alteration of natural landforins along bluffs and cliffs. In
areas of geologic hazard,,the City may require that a development
permit not - be ' issued until an applicant has signed' a waiver of
all claims against the public for ;future liability or damage
resulting from permission to build. All such waivers should be
recorded with the County Recorder's office.
3. The following regulations apply to all new tracts and
subdivisions. If development is residential in nature, this
policy will apply to new development of 4 or more units.
Setback Requirements: A bluff setback adequate to 'provide safe
public access, taking into account bluff retreat and erosion,
shall be provided in all new development. As a general
guideline, the property line setbacki from the edge of a bluff
should be no closer to the edge of the bluff than the point at
which the top of the bluff is intersected by a line drawn from
the solid toe of the bluff at an angle of 26.6 degrees to the
horizontal. A greater setback distance shall be required where
warranted by geological or groundwater conditions, but in no case
shall a property line be closer than 40 feet to the edge of a
bluff.
In addition, no part of a proposed development shall be closer
than 20 feet to the bluffside property line. This required
building setback 'may be increased or decreased by the Planning
Commission in the review of a proposed site plan consistent with
the purposed of this section.
Subdivision Design: In preparing• a development plan, natural
bluff areas' shall not be included in development areas as
designated on the site plan. The design of any subdivision shall
not include any bluff face or bluff edge as part of any
residential lot or building site.
Grading: Grading, cutting and .filling of natural bluff faces or
bluff edges shall be prohibited in order to preserve the scenic
value of bluff areas, except for the purpose of 'performing
emergency repairs, or for the installation of erosion - preventive
devices or other measures necessary to assure the stability of
the bluffs. Any plan involving grading of the bluff face or
bluff area shall be approved by the Planning Commission,
including such measures designed to control urban runoff,
erosion, and groundwater conditions.
1 13. The landscape plans shall be subject to the review of the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Department and approval of the Planning
Department.
14. The landscape plans shall include, a' maintenance program which
controls the'use of fertilizers and pesticides. 1
15. The landscaped areas shall be irrigated with a system designed to
avoid surface runoff and over - watering.
16. Landscaping shall be regularly maintained free of weeds and
debris. All vegetation shall be regularly trimmed and kept in a
healthy condition.
17. A qualified archaeologist or paleontologist sha11 evaluate the
site prior to commencement of grading or construction activities,
and that all work on the site be done in accordance with the
City's Council Policies K -5 and K -6.
18. Any park project with night lighting shall be so designed to
minimize light and glare spillage on adjacent residential uses.
ill I ! !
t
;t
M
,,agencies 'to'
ego Creek
1.
Thelac'City shall i, preserve beachesi . surf„ action,,, and;coastal
shoreline. in, a _manner that, will maintain their aesthetic and
natural value.
. •,fi'�. �� dpi .' b: C:
6. Environmentally SensltiVe,Ar'eas shall be preserved and protected.
This shall include the' followa.ng:
a..' Areas ,supporting species; which ,are rare,. endangered,' of
limited distribution, or'otherviise sensiti "ve
b. Natural riparian
C. Freshwater marshes
a.k Saltwater marshes
e. Interti;dal' areas ,1
'j. Other w6tlands
g. Unique or unusually diderse vegetative communities
7. That a grading plan, if required, shall include a complete plan
for temporary and permanent drainage facilities, to`'minimize any
potential impacts from silt, debris, and other water pollutants.
8.. The grading permitiishall include, Y required, a description lof
haul routes, access points to the site, watering, and sweeping
program designed to minimize impact of haul operations.
9. An erosion, siltation and dust control plan, if required, shall
be submitted and be subject to the approval) of the Building
Department and a copy shall be forwarded to the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region.
10. The velocity of concentrated run -off from the project shall be
evaluated and erosive velocities controlled as part of the
project design.
11. That grading shall be conducted in accordance with plans prepared
by a Civil Engineer and based on recommendations of a soil
engineer and an engineering geologist subsequent to the
completion of a comprehensive soil and geologic investigation of
the site. Permanent reproducible copies of the "Approved as
Built" grading plans on standard size sheets shall be furnished
to the Building Department.
12. That erosion control measures shall be done on any exposed slopes
within thirty days after grading or as approved by the Grading
Engineer.
X
M
APPENDIX H
Date Filed
Environmental Information Form
(To be completed by,applicint)
GENERAL aNFORMATION
H1.
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
044.1
2. Address of project: 61!° j - Lutlk
Assessor's Block and Lot Number
3. Name, address, and telephone number of ,Person to be contacted
concerning this project: u,•t P• Una rJ,, AJ�L6Aac �lw���V�kincs nfrr
>umdf0.� Gems p�SSCC (�lGwne�(i<k lawprr13-'a Pit sp •� i3/on(Piv�i &4,d,
A W f �((ach,Ca . 9dlo�oD (714)!O•IAJ-
4. Indicate number of the permit application for the project to
i� which this form pertains: Not Algal, cubes
5. List and--d-e—scribe any other related permits and other public
approvals required for this project, including those required by
city, regional, state and federal agencies: 00f .4)Vbca4e4_
6. Existing zoning district: h/,,* */"C -Z
7. Proposed use of site (Project for.which,this.form is filed):
G PA 00
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
8. Slte size. A/A
9. Square footage, AM-
10. Number o2 floors of construction: N�
11. Amount of off- street parking provided. /M,
12. Attach plansig4
13. Proposed scheduling.
111. Associated projects,
15. Anticipated incre•eental development. eJA
I-A
t
FIN
16. If residential, include the,number,•of units, schedule of
unit sizes,. range of sale prie'es`or rents, and type of household
size expected. ,u4-
17.- If commercial, indicate the - .type, whether - neighborhood; city
or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading
facilities.
18. If industrial•, indicate type, estimated employment per shift,
and loading facilities. /UP
19. If institlitiohal; indicate the major fanc'tion, "estimated
employment .per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities,
and community benefits to be derived from the project ./(,)g.
20. If the project involves a variance, conditional use or rezoning
application, state this and indicate clearly why the application
is required. Al
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
Discuss'beiow all items,checked yes (attach additional sheets as
necessary). •
YES NO
Y
21.. Change in existing.features of any bays; tidelands,
beaches, lakes or hills, or substantial alteration of
ground contours.
22.. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing
residential areas or public lands or roads.
23. Change in,pattern; scale or character of general
area of- project.
24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
i
25. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in
vicinity.
LIN
26. Change in'oeean, bay, lake, stream or, ground water
quality or quantity, or alteration of•existing drainage
yy patterns. •
_ 11 27. Substantial change in existing•noise or vibration•
�( levels in the vicinity.
(` 28. Site on filled land or on slope of 10 percent or more.
_ 29• Use of disposal of potentially hazardous materials,
such as toxic substances, flammables or explosives.
'A
C)
YES NO
H3
X 30. Substantial change.in demand for municipal services
(police, fire, water, sewage, etc.).
X 31. Substantially increase fossil fuel consumption
-- (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.).
32. Relationship to a larger project or series of
projects.
ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
33• Describe the project site as it exists before the project,
including information on topography, soil stability, plants and
animals, and any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Describe
any existing structures.on the site, and the use of the'structures.
Attach photographs-of the site. Snapshots or,.polaroid photos will
be accepted.
34. Describe the surrounding properties, including information
on plants and animals and any cultural, historical or scenic
aspects. Indicate the type of land use (residential, commercial,
ets.), intensity'of land use (one - family, apartment houses, shops,
department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height,
frontage, set -back, rear yard, etc.). Attach photographs of the
vicinity. Snapshots or polaroid photos will be accepted.
CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that the statements furnished
a Fove a-na' n the attached exhibits prescut the data and infor-
mation required for this initial.evaluation to the best or my
ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented
are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief..
Date o o .'/ •f
For
r
tbignaturej
APPENDIX H
13. Implementation of the proposed Amended General Plan will commence
immediately following adoption and will proceed until City
buildout.
14: Implementation of the proposed Amended General Plan will entail
amendments to the City's Open Space Zone and Park Dedication
ordinance and will ultimately result in the development of
additional parks in the•City.
21. Depending on ultimate site design, grading might occur at some
individual parks'. However ;'the extent "(if any) 'of such grading
cannot be determined at this stage. It is anticipated that
landform impacts will be limited due to.existing City policy and
the following policies and programs contained in the proposed
Amendment:
Policy 3.3: The scenic resource provided by coastal bluffs
shall be. protected and preserved. "Bluffs" are
defined as any landform having an average slope of
26.6 degrees (50 %) or greater, with a vertical
rise of 25 feet or greater consistent with
existing City ordinances.
Program 3.3.1: Apply the following regulations to all building
sites:
4
Grading: Permitted development shall be designed
to minimize the alteration of natural landforms
along bluffs and cliffs. In areas of geologic
hazard, the City may require that a development
permit•not'be issued until an applicant has signed
a waiver of all claims against the public for
future liability or damage resulting from
permission to build. All such waivers should be
recorded with the County Recorder's office.
Program 3.3.2: Apply the following regulations to all new tracts
and subdivisions. If development is residential
in nature, this policy will apply to new
development of 4 or more units.
Setback Requirements: A bluff setback adequate to
provide safe public access, taking into account
bluff retreat and erosion, shall be provided in
all new development. As a general guideline, the
property line setback from the edge of a bluff
should be no closer to the edge of the bluff than
the point at which the top of the bluff is
intersected by a line drawn from the solid toe of
the bluff at an angle of 26.6 degrees to the
horizontal. A greater setback distance shall be
required where warranted by geological or
`t -/�
groundwater conditions, but in, no case shall a
property line be closer than 40 feet to the edge
of a bluff.
In addition, no part of a proposed development
shall be closer than 20 feet to the bluffside
property line. This required building setback may
be increased or decreased by the Planning
Commission in the review of a proposed site plan
consistent with the purposes of this section...
Subdivision Design: in preparing a development
plan, natural bluff areas shall not be included in
development areas as designated on the site plan.
The design of any subdivision shall not include
any bluff face or bluff edge as part of any
residential lot or building site...
Grading: Grading, cutting and filling of natural
bluff faces or bluff edges shall be prohibited in
order to preserve the scenic value of bluff areas,
except for the purpose of performing emergency
repairs, or for the installation of erosion -
preventive devices or other - measures necessary to
assure the stability of the bluffs. Any plan
involving grading of the bluff face or bluff area
/ } shall be approved by the Planning Commission,
including such measures designed to control urban
runoff, erosion, and groundwater conditions.
25. Construction of park facilities could result in minor temporary
degradation of local air quality in the form of fugitive dust
from construction. This will largely be controlled by
implementation of existing City policy.
26. Depending on ultimate park site design, drainage patterns could
sustain minor alterations. The extent, if any, of such
alternations cannot be determined until such time as the proposed
parks proceed to the design stage. The proposed project could
also result in positive impacts through the implementation of
proposed Policies 4.1 and 4.2 which call for the preservation and
protection of wetlands and implementation of the Newport Bay
Watershed /San Diego Creek Comprehensive Stormwater Sedimentation
Control Plan.
28. Some of the proposed park and open space sites could consist of
fill or steep slopes. However, steep slopes would be disturbed
only for maintenance purposes and, in fact, the presence of the
slopes is, in a number of cases, the raison d'etre for the 'open
space designation on a site. It is not known at this time which,
if any, of the proposed parks would be constructed on fill.
33. The "project site" consists of the incorporated City of Newport
Beach and the unincorporated oil fields just east of the Santa
5--A
Pna River. ,,,,,This coastal 'community of 66.,,000 people is largely
built out with�,a mixture, of residgA ial,;,,commercial, industrial,
and institutional uses. Unique -, -- resources include several
archaeological sites, coastal bluffs,, the shoreline of the ocean
and.bay,�and- coastal, wetlands,, which :support a number of rare,
endangered and ,otherwise high interest species. The geological
structure.,of the City consists primarily of alluvium and marine
terraces-
34. The City of,Newport Beach is surrounded by the developed areas of
Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, Irvine, and' the unincorporated
coastal area of Orange County. It is largely located in the
Newport Bay watershed.
9
( P
C
Lei
�\ APPENDIX I
1 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECYLIST FORM
Environmental Checklist 'Form
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
I. Background
1. Name of Proponent c , &tj
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent Proponent
3. Date of Checklist Submission
4. Agency Requiring Checklist �� j/iy 4
5.. Name of Proposal. if applicable (b V4 3 -W)
II. Environmental Impacts•
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached
sheets.)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
a. Unstable earth conditions or in
changes in geologic substructures?
b. Disruptions, displacements, com-
paction or overcovering of the soil?
c. Change in topography or ground
surface relief features?
d. The destruction, covering or modi-
fication of any unique geologic or
physical features?
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake?
73
i
YES MAYBE ND
X
g. Change in the quantity o£ ground
waters,,either through direct addi-
tions or.withdrawal", or through
interception of an aquifer •by. cuts
or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount
of'water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
74
o
x.
X
X
w&0 .Y
YES
MAYBE
g.
txposure.of ,people oi'property to
geologicai hazards such as earth -
qdikes, landslides;'- mudslidet, ground.
-failure, or similar hazards?
/
2. Air.
Will the proposal result in,:
a.
Substantial air.emissions'or'de[erl-
oration'of ambient air quality?
b.'
The creation of objectionable odors?
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture
or temperature, or any change in
v
climate, either locally or regionally?
/
3. Water. Will the•proposal result in: y
a.
Changes in cuerents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters?
1�
b.
Changes in absorption rates,, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
/
surface runoff?
c.
Alterations to the course of flow of
/
flood waters?
x
d.
Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body?
e.
Discharge into surface waters or in
any alteration of surface water:
quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen or
turbidity?
I.
Alteration of the direction or rate
\,
of flow of ground waters?
'
g. Change in the quantity o£ ground
waters,,either through direct addi-
tions or.withdrawal", or through
interception of an aquifer •by. cuts
or excavations?
h. Substantial reduction in the amount
of'water otherwise available for
public water supplies?
i. Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
74
o
x.
X
X
t 1
a
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any'species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
c. Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a barrier
to the normal replenishment of
existing species?
d. Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
YES MAYBE NO
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals
(birds, land animals including reptiles,
fish and shellfish, benthic organisms,
or insects)?
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
c. Introduction of new species of ani-
mals into an area, or result in a
barrier to the migration or movement
of animals?
d. Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat?
X
WN
X
x
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels?
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels? —x
7. l.ipht and Clare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
R. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
6q 75
X /0
76
d. i
YF.S
'MAYBE
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal
result. in: ,
a. Increase, in. the „rate 'of use.of any
natural•resourcesll'
X
b. Substantial depletion of any non-
renewable natural resource?
.10.
Risk of Upset. Does the proposal involve•
a risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to, oil „pest•icides, chemicals br
radiation) in.the event of an accident or
v
upset conditions ?
11.
Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of an area?
12.-
_Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
i
13.
Transportation /Circulation. Will-the
proposal result in:
kJ
a. Ceneration of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
b. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and /or goods?
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic?
f. Increase in traffic hazardous to
notor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
14.
Public services. Will the proposal have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered Rovernmental services in any of the
foliowi.ng areas:
/
76
b. Exposure of people to potential v
health hazards? f�
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
-- to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically
/
-offensive site open to public view?
[ / 77
-PPE -2A:24
YES MAYBE
NO
.a
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c: Schools?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? X
�_
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads?
X
f. Other governmental services?
'
15.
Energ Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
"
energy?
j(
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources of energy, or require
the development of new sources of
energy?
16.
Utilities. 'Will the proposal result in a
(
need for new systems, or substantial
„
alterations to the following utilities:
a. Power or natural gas?
b. Communications systems?
c. Water?
d. Sewer or septic tanks?
e. Storm water drainage?
�v
f. Solid waste and disposal?
17.
Human Health. 'Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or
potential" health hazard (excluding
mental health)?
b. Exposure of people to potential v
health hazards? f�
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
-- to the public, or will the proposal result
in the creation of an aesthetically
/
-offensive site open to public view?
[ / 77
p c4
b. Does the project have the,potential to
achieve short -term, to the disadvantage
of long -term, environmental goals? (A
short -term impact on, the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively brief
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well igto.the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which ,
are 'individually limited,, but cumu-
latively considerable? '(A•project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource is relatively, small, but
where the effect of the 'total•of
those ,impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have. environmental
effects which with cause subs,tanCial.
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly ?,, �(
-III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
IV. Retermination
(4o be completed ''by the' Lead Agency)
78'
S
3
YES FAYBE N0_
�a'r.'.t;
19. Recreation. Wili•the"proposal result
in an .impact upon. the'quality or quaInti,tyYu
-- - ---• of exi'st'ing recreational opportunities?
spy'•,, * f-,
20: Archeological /Historical. Will tN!
-
• ?Iir'i
propgsal result in an alteration .of a
" ""signific'ant archeological or historical
site, structure, object or building?
x
• „'
21. Mandatory Findings .of Significance.,,
' 'a. "Dot's the, project have the potential to
degrade the quality o'f the environment,,
-substantially reduce the habitat of a
,
fish or wildlife 'species, cause. a ,fish ;
or wildlife population to drop below
self- sustaining •levels, ,threaten- .,to•,
eliminate a plant or animal' community,,,,,
'reduce the number or restrict the
range of a rare or,endanger,ed plant,
or animal or'eiiminate„ important
examples of•the major periods of
California hfstoiy or prehistory?
�( .
b. Does the project have the,potential to
achieve short -term, to the disadvantage
of long -term, environmental goals? (A
short -term impact on, the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively brief
definitive period of time while long-
term impacts will endure well igto.the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts which ,
are 'individually limited,, but cumu-
latively considerable? '(A•project
may impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on each
resource is relatively, small, but
where the effect of the 'total•of
those ,impacts on the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have. environmental
effects which with cause subs,tanCial.
adverse effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly ?,, �(
-III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
IV. Retermination
(4o be completed ''by the' Lead Agency)
78'
S
3
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Q I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] I find that although the proposed project could .have a significant
effect 'on the environment, there will not be a significant, effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached
sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will
be prepared. '
0 I find the proposed project MAY have a significant -effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I) (Note: This is only a suggested- form.
their own format for initial studies.)
79
b �AA / /ir T
Signature
For y '6 aq
Public agencies are free to devise
a � o
.Appendix I
lb. Development of a, park' site could result in the described
disruptions of - •the, Soil;:", 'The,`precise,,, extent i if any;; of such
impacts' cannot 'b determined .until" plans for,,`•individual parks
reach the design stage. If necessary, appropriate mitigation'
measures will 'be applied at that :time.
lc. Development of an individual park site could result in.grading
" and changes 'in- 'ground surface relief.. Impact's and appropriate
mitigation cannot be determined until individual parks - proceed to
the design stage.. However, landform impacts will be
substantially 'limited .due' to ..existing City policies and the
following policies and programs` contained in. the proposed
Amendment:
Policy 3.3: The scenic resource provided by coastal bluffs
shall be protected and preserved. "Bluffs" are
defined+as, any landform having an average slope of''
26.6 degrees (50 %) or greater, with a vertical
rise of 25 feet or greater consistent with
existing City ordinances.
Program 3.3.1: Apply the following regulations to all building
sites:
Grading: Permitted development shall be designed �1
to minimize the alteration of natural landforms �J
along bluffs and cliffs. In areas of geologic
hazard, the City may require that a development
permit not be issued until an applicant has signed
a waiver of all claims against' the public for
future liability or damage resulting from
permission to build. All such waivers should be
recorded with the County Recorder's office.
Program 3.3.2: Apply the following regulations to all new tracts
and subdivisions. If development is residential
in nature, this policy will apply to new
development of 4 or more units.
Setback Requirements: A bluff setback adequate to
provide safe public access, taking into account
bluff retreat and erosion, shall be provided in
all new development. As a general guideline, the
property line setback from the edge of a bluff
should be no closer to the edge of the bluff than
the point at which the ,top of the bluff is
intersected by a line drawn from the solid toe of
the bluff at an angle of 26.6 degrees to the
horizontal. A greater setback distance shall be
required, where warranted by geological or
groundwater conditions, but in no case shall a
/Y
property line be closer than 40 feet to the edge
of a bluff.
In addition, no part of a proposed development
shall be closer than 20 feet to the bluffside
property line. This required building setback may
be increased or decreased by the Planning
Commission in the review of a proposed site plan
` consistent with the purposes of this section...
Subdivision Design: In preparing a development
plan, natural bluff areas shall not be included in
development areas as designated on the site plan.
The design of any subdivision shall not included
any bluff face or bluff edge as part of any
residential lot or building site...
Grading: Grading, cutting and filling of natural
bluff faces or bluff edges shall be prohibited in
order to preserve the scenic value of bluff areas,
except for the purpose of performing emergency
repairs, or for the installation of
erosion - preventive devices or other measures
necessary to assure the stability of the bluffs.
Any plan involving grading of the bluff face or
bluff area shall be approved by the Planning
Commission, including such measures designed to
control urban runoff, erosion, and groundwater
conditions.
Any need for addition mitigation measures cannot be determined
until park plans reach the design stage.
Is. As soils are temporarily exposed during park development, minor
increases in erosion may occur. $xisting City policies regarding
erosion control should substantially mitigate this impact. If
necessary, additional mitigation measures will be applied to
individual development projects at the design stage.
If. This is a positive impact that would occur due to. the
implementation of the following policy:
Policy 4.2: The City of Newport Beach will coordinate with
other agencies to implement the Newport Bay
Watershed /San Diego Creek Comprehensive Stormwater
Sedimentation Control Plan.
3b. Development of walkways, basketball courts, and other paved
surfaces will result in a minor decrease in absorption rates and
slightly increased runoff. However, depending on site design, it
would be anticipated that at least a portion of increased runoff
would flow to vegetated portions of the park site where it would
be substantially absorbed. The extent of any changes in
absorption rates, site runoff, or drainage patterns would depend
/J
on <park site design, -and- -final location Arid cannot be determined
until park planning proceeds to the design state, at which time
appropriate mitigation measures will be applied.
3e. Construction activities associated, with park development could
-lead to minor temporary increases,•in erosion,, sedimentation and
turbidity. Agricultural chemicals used on park landscaping could
be carried from park sites in storm runoff leading to a small but
incremental increase in water pollution loads. The extent of
this impact will depend on final park design and landscape plans
and cannot be determined at this time. Implementation of Policy
4.2, which is stated above, would actually lead to improvements
in water quality as sedimentation is controlled.
4a. When natural or adventitious vegetation is replaced by park
landscaping or other improvements, species diversity would
change. The extent of any such impact will depend on final park
site location and design and cannot currently be determined. In
many cases the change would be,,•merely conversion of a weedy field
to a landscaped area, which ',is'',not considered a significant
impact. Potential impacts wo"uld'be substantially reduced by the
following programs in the proposed Recreation and Open Space
Element Amendment.
Policy 3.2: The City shall preserve beaches, surf action, and
coastal shoreline in a manner that will maintain
their aesthetic and natural value.
Policy 4.1: Environmentally Sensitive Areas shall be preserved
and protected. This shall include the following:
a.
b.
C.
d.
e.
f.
g.
Any need for additions,
more precise plans for
Areas supporting species which are rare, en-
dangered, of limited distribution, or other-
wise sensitive
Natural riparian
Freshwater marshes
Saltwater marshes
Intertidal areas
Other wetlands
Unique or unusually diverse vegetative
communities
L mitigation measures cannot be determined until
individual parks are developed.
4b. It is not known whether any unique, rare or endangered species of
plants will be affected. This will depend on precise park
locations and site plans, .and cannot currently be determined.
Implementation of Policy 4.1 as stated above will substantially
minimize this impact as appropriate siting and design techniques
are incorporated into park development. Any need for additional
mitigation measures cannot be determined until park plans reach
the design stage.
16
� . V
n
4c. Landscape plants will, to some extent, replace existing species
l J on proposed park sites. The significance of this impact will
depend upon the nature of existing vegetation in those -areas to
be landscaped and cannot be determined until park design and
landscape planning occur. At this time appropriate mitigation
measures will be applied. `
5a. Species diversity could be altered as individual park sites are
developed., The extent of any such impact will depend on specific
park location and design and cannot be determined at this time.
In many cases similar species 'would be expected' to utilize the
site in both its existing and altered condition. For example,
ground squirrels and urban adapted avifauna such as sparrows and
housefinches, have been observed in the City's currently
developed parks as well as the weedy areas where new parks are
anticipated. It is anticipated that potential impacts would -be
minimized by the previously stated policies. Any need for
additional mitigation measures cannot be determined until park
plans reach the design stage.
5b. It is not known whether any unique, rare or endangered faunal
species will be affected. This will depend on precise park
locations and site plans, and cannot currently be determined.
However, this impact would be expected to be minimal due to
implementation of Policy 4.1 of the proposed Recreation and Open
Space Element amendment which is stated above. Any need for
additional mitigation measures cannot be determined until plans
for individual parks reach the design stage.
5c. Development of a particular park could conceivably impair
movement of faunal species along existing wildlife corridors,
although the proposed plan has been designed to preserve such
corridors as Buck Gully. Implementation-of the previously stated
policies should also minimize impacts. Any need for additional
measures cannot be determined until plans for individual parks
reach the design stage.
5d. Wildlife habitat adjacent to park areas could be degraded due to
runoff containing fertilizers or pesticides or due to increased
human activity. This would be minimized by Policy 4.1 which
calls for the preservation and protection of sensitive areas.
Any need for additional mitigation measures cannot be determined
until plans for individual parks reach the design stage.
6a. Noises from activities at local parks could potentially drift
into neighboring areas. The extent and significance, if any, of
this impact would depend on the type of activities for which the
park was used, park design, local terrain and surrounding land
uses. Any need for additional mitigation measures cannot be
determined until plans for individual parks reach the design
stage.
7. If park facilities were night - lighted, light and glare could
project into nearby areas. Park lighting is a specific design
17
,freaturer. and any need for specific .mitigation measures ,cannot be
determined ,,until plans ,for , lighting•,'indigidual„ parks are
developed,
13a.,Generally' speaking, neighborhood parks and view parks would not
be expected to generate any substantial amounts of traffic.
However, the proposed community parks would be anticipated to
generate, larger amounts of traffic.. General Plan level, impacts
of- the North Ford community park- were ,examined,; in the
Environmental Impact 'Report (EIR) for .General Plan Amendment
82 -2. Impacts of the community park •on the Mobile /Armstrong
property adjacent to• the Santa Ana. River are impossible to
'determine until future circulation systems are delineated in the
Specific Area Plan for this locale.
13b. It is anticipated that any significant demand for parking would
occur only in the cases of community parks. As , stated
previously, General Plan level impacts for the North Ford park
have been examined in a previous EIR. Impacts of the park at
Mobile /Armstrong cannot be determined until planning for the area
is more precisely defined. In any case, offsite parking impacts
should largely be reduced by the implementation of Policy 2.2
which mandates that adequate support facilities be provided for
recreational facilities.
14d. The stated goal of the proposed action is the provision of a
recreation and open space system which meets both the active and
passive recreation needs of the citizens of Newport Beach and
which maintains and enhances the unique recreational and
environmental resources of the City of Newport Beach.
Implementation of the proposed Recreation and open Space Element
will therefore have a positive effect on the City's parks and
recreation system.
19. As the proposed General Plan Amendment implemented, the quality
and quantity of recreational opportunities in the City will be
enhanced.
Doc: GPA 82 -1 Appen. H &I
Disk: PARK1 I
1
C
•
3.
•
Bikeways: Relocation of the bikeways segment
cu ation Element has been recommended and is
Government Code which includes bikeways as a
Element.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
of the Element to the Cir-
somewhat supported by the
part of the Circulation
Business Demand: The demand of business sports teams has been tapping
the supply of active sports fields at the neighborhood level. This has
created an apparent need.for additional fields at peak periods. Addi-
tional active field areas under City jurisdiction is a solution to this
need.
Protect ESA's /Open Space: There are general ESA's and open space areas,
not a ,7acent to t e pper Bay, which should be protected and open to some
level of public access.
Service Area Needs
Service Area '1 -...West Newport: Conceptual undersupplies have been noted
or most activity categories in Service Area 1 indicating a general need
for recreational and open space areas such as a community or neighborhood
level park area- feeds- 3}2- ti_aeres or ReErea�}��
itlfld- t1$- �t13�d -9tl1;: The axea needs 39.2 additional acres of Recreation an(
Open Space Land at buildout.
Service Area 2 - Balboa Peninsula: This area is largely static with
minima deve opment in proportion to the total area,. At buildout, under
the current.General Plan Land Use Element, the area would need 3.5 addi-
tional acres. However, the area currently exceeds the 5 acres per 1000
population which means there is no need for new facilities from that
standpoint.
Service Area 3 - Newport Heights - Harbor Highlands: This area-is large -
y static wit minima nee s, ew eve opment is expected to generate a
need for 7.8 additional acres.
Service Area 4 - Santa -Ana Heights /Airport Commercial: The future of
this area, as no a ear ier, is unknown due n pen ing public decisions
regarding ultimate land uses. . As such, the recreation and open space
needs of the area are unknown except for the regional staging area /trail
link at Bayview /North Bay.
Service Area 5 - Lower Bay: This area is largely static with no signifi-
cant eve opment. ew evelopment is expected to generate a need for .2 "
additional acres.
Service Area 6 - Balboa Island: This area is largely static with no sig-
nificant eve )opment. ,ew evelopment is expected to generate a need for
2.1 additional acres.
• Deletion: ebe
Addition: abc
5
14
OI OI I.I N'ZI.
• MIMI �� �i�i
`J
•
CM h C" CO aJ au
cm
�-1 at d• whm
•Jf_ Ih. O # N -V #
L N
vV
ur M o
u ai r
0 •r
N LI.
Of
c
1 I M to #
1 r1
rn
r N h
to 0)
0 to Lo CD
O N h
O Ln t#o
N �
r
r �
ro N
alb L h to 1 N Ln O
aJ 3 to co 1 0) d' CO
r O to
r U
0
VI
Y
b i
al ro
a7 ro
al d
a1 d N
Z
Z r
r
r O
Y ro
Y ro O•
1--w
C-
ou
c.
aii
to
OO)
N N
C C 0 C
Y
•r •r •r
u u u
u u u u
'
7
N N N
ro• r) ro
•r •r •r
0•
r O Or
X X X
ro L i ro
W W W
m d d m
L N
vV
ur M o
u ai r
0 •r
N LI.
Of
c
1 I M to #
1 r1
rn
r N h
to 0)
0 to Lo CD
O N h
O Ln t#o
N �
r
r �
ro N
alb L h to 1 N Ln O
aJ 3 to co 1 0) d' CO
r O to
r U
0
aR 2R
r
N
0 m Cl)
GOr#
.•..
++
.0+3
n
to
-1
n
n
aii
to
r
r
'
7
#
I 1
O
O
M
1 I 1 I
Y O
O
cF
1
to
at
M
N U
4-
4-
Ch
Cl)
ro
LO
d
C
O
#
m
r
v
v
C'
N
o
to
¢
ro
N
N
�
QD
i
aJ
N
N
3
Ff-
N
U u
U
u
=>
¢
N
N
\
X
X
'a
N
+1
W
�
W
W
U
r
r a)
H
r
J
c
¢
ro u
1-
ar
L
I
T
r•1
V
W
•r
�•'•�
•r
h
M
I
I
O
. . c L L +
c
O>
J
4-
E
N
1
M
N
co
<
d
c
r Y Y
C
p
n
p 2
ro
r
N
W
N n
¢
ro
4J
N
r rl
r r
U
O
W
m
'
o.
ro o
o
>
>
ro
>
d
I I
0 0
J
•L
>
r
0
r
u
O
K
CC
Q
U
N
0-
I—
N
Z
W
(A
N N
'
•r 4.>
O
h
C 7
N
r�l
N I
tL
G1'
to
'-1
rl
d•
�
1y U
aR 2R
0 m Cl)
GOr#
.•..
n
n
-1
r
r
c
c
u
u
1 I 1 I
O
•r
•r
4-
4-
Ch
Cl)
LO
d
C
O
#
a
r
v
v
o
to
N
N
�
QD
•r
N
N
3
N
U u
U
u
\
X
X
'a
+1
N
W
W
U
r
J
c
v
v
u
U
L
C
T
C
L
. . c L L +
c
N
F-
a
E
C
O
O
al
d
c
r Y Y
C
p
n
p 2
ro
N
ru to h ¢
4J
N
r rl
r r
O
'—
>
o.
ro o
o
>
>
ro
>
d
I I
0 0
J
•L
0
r
u
O
K
o. O to
1— Q6
U
N
0-
I—
N
Z
N
a)
t
U
ro
v
a
N
ro
r
r
a)
3
N
ro
N
ro
ar
L
ro
C
O
•r
a••.
ro
m
L
u
d
L
v
>
r
N
N
ro
CL
C
ro
aJ
•r
u
ro
N
a)
u
c
!6 s
A
L N)
o
N
N 0
°
•
u°
o
o
i t
o
+
r~
U N
I
V
V
O •r
N U..
tb' O d•t r•I N
.f}NO.HN n0
C4
N LC) CZ V N
n O N 01 rt N
O)
rl
C
N
•r N
r•'
l.f)
C
E r
O
O
N.
rt
•
E o
r,
rt
co
o
E
E
CL
(n Y
3' d
O
Y L
to
r
OL a) ro
d
d ro v a
>
a) o. N z
a)
Z r r
O
r- O Y ro
r
Y ro O L iJ
to
r•t
O
3
• L Y ro O
ro N
i
m
•
•
a)
u d h
O
M
N
M
C
0-H N
a L
Cl)
1
r
b b
a) 7
O
O) O) O a) a)
r• O
+ +
u
U
C C C N 4..) a)•
. U
L
U
•r •r •r u U U U
0
O
a)
ro
'
N N N C M n 7 ro
O
•r •r •r r O Or-
N
X X X ro i L ro
N
C
wwwmacm
d
to
a
m
H
ro
n
ro
r
'
4J +J
tf7
I
to
rt
to
ro
(
U
C) 7
N
O
1
N
r•I
Y O
V
n
V
N U
M
C
ro
ro
}
m
p
0
O
O)
N
¢
¢
C
a)
E
r
r
L
C
ro L
N
N
t0
tq
0
a) O
W
'O
h
N
ro
.
L
H
r
O
D
O
(V
m
0
1]
LLJ
cu
.1
C
a) Z
J
4-
1
V
V
•r
O
ro
•r 4J
U
r
•r
4J
r-
W
> <n
¢
ro
U
G
r
U
L a)
LL
m
ro
0
a/
m 3
4-
E
3
:I-
N
d
K
Y
O
N
w
i
ro
to
n
ro
a)
N N
^
O
d
>
N
r iJ
d•
O�
co
N
•
a)
ro
CO'
M
-0
'p
a)
F
v
b
ro
tO
N
C
C
C
•
O
O
•r
4J
r
41
4J
ro'
ro
a)
3
a)
L
L
u
N
U
N
ai
00 C)
O
n
A
n
L
•�
L -
>1
4J
4J
z
r
•r
•r
r
N
c
u
u
ro
r
>
I t 1 I
C)
•r
•r
U
•r
•r
4-
4-
O
U
N
m LO
m
a)
a)
r
ro
N
N t0
C
O
G1
4-
ro
a• N
•r
V
V
r
d
O 00
N
N
ro
'O
a
3
>
ro
N
u
u
u
u
0
O
O
w
'O
4J
(A
'W
a
t1
>
a)
U
r
O1
•r
.IJ
•r
C
'O
'O
ro
U
L
C
a
L
C
N
u u
VI
ro
C N 4J 'n c
O
N
F%
G
v
E
O
4J
O L L r 00
v
•c
•r }} L •r
c
o
0
b
c
h
a)
•
4J a c 4J
LO
a)
V)
¢
to
N
L.
r .^••I r• r•
O
ro
r
ro
t
d
CL 1 I 4J a
4a)
.1
4J
L
N
O.
C
o
d
Z
r-•�
0. O to F0-
U
N
G.
10-
N
Z
O
it
!6 s
u
Y
ro
c
ro
w
O
Y N
C V
E . C
O
r a)
a) 'O
>
a) 3
O T
3
a U
O N
Y E
a)
3 O
'i7 Ln
N ro
al
u c
ro
to
O -G
L
v ro
a
O ro
•O C
Q
L
ro N
• E a
(D t
m Y U
ro ro
r a
r •r N
U ,Y ro
ro
4-
r r
N U a7
•r ro 3
C ,4-
C N
Y J c ro
O
L N b
°- () c-
v
L ro
a u
a) (U c
a) L O
C •r
r Y
v u ro
0 0 a)
N r U
v
a) (D L
u a a)
c c >
ro ro
I d N
(o x (n W
a) a) ro
r d
c v ++
•O •r iy
r r C
>> > •r ro
r O U
r L ro
d LI- >
ro >
Cl) ua
N Y
(A r N
W C a)
4 v
Y 3
L r
V c c
Z O
iL
L N
al O
1
/
0
/
n
ur
o
0
1
I
0
uo a)
1
v
v
rI tI
Ln
N LL
(Y! 0 Lip N L+1 rL
LP)-It NO1NM
N d' CV N N
v1
.
N N rl rl
C
A
A
•r VI
II
n
Cl)
O
O
OI
O
V
V
* N
O
N Y
3 d
�C L
N
ai
N N d
W o. (A z
Z r r
r O Y ro
r
~
O Ol O a) (D
r O
C C C a) Y Y a)
r U
•r •r •r U U U U
O
Y 4J 4J C a)a)C
?
N N N (O •rl'r) ro
•r •r •r r O Or
X X X ro L L ro
W W W m d d m
r
r
a Y
II
M
OM O
v
m
O
.4- r
1
ri
Y O'
U
ro
r
C
Q
ro
f
N r
i
7
ro
N
N
a) C
a
W
�
L •r
ry
W
a)
-+
•r
rl
N
1
N
•
O
d'
d
J
N-•
i
Q
u
U
nr
r
w
> o
¢
to
U
L O
LL
co
N ro
m
W ui
N
n
n
N
N
LL)
•r Y J
V'
O
M
Il
C L'
M
C O
V
V
v
FO- U
ae ae ae ae
C)
>)
Y
Y
r
•r
•r
1 1 1 1
C)
r
r
u-
4-
LO LC)
c
0
0
Ln 4C)
r
V
V
co
LO Ln Ln
N
N
3
N
u U
u U
\
X
X
N
W
W
u
u
J
r
c
p
O
U
u
L
C
L
C
N
m N
Y
a)
r
ro
ro
c Y n C
N
~dN
O L L 0 0
O•
•
. r } } L
d Y
3
a)
fn
ro
Y
D
(0 Ln n ¢ (O
O
m
r( rr
o
ro
CL 1 1 Y a
Y
L
•>
Y
d
L
~
Li 0 Le) 0..
U
N
a
h
Z
V)
17
9
u
Y
ro
c
ro
w
O
Y N
C V
E . C
O
r a)
a) 'O
>
a) 3
O T
3
a U
O N
Y E
a)
3 O
'i7 Ln
N ro
al
u c
ro
to
O -G
L
v ro
a
O ro
•O C
Q
L
ro N
• E a
(D t
m Y U
ro ro
r a
r •r N
U ,Y ro
ro
4-
r r
N U a7
•r ro 3
C ,4-
C N
Y J c ro
O
L N b
°- () c-
v
L ro
a u
a) (U c
a) L O
C •r
r Y
v u ro
0 0 a)
N r U
v
a) (D L
u a a)
c c >
ro ro
I d N
(o x (n W
a) a) ro
r d
c v ++
•O •r iy
r r C
>> > •r ro
r O U
r L ro
d LI- >
ro >
Cl) ua
N Y
(A r N
W C a)
4 v
Y 3
L r
V c c
Z O
iL
• 4
V1
N
N
L L
• w
C
L[)
ro
a,ai ro
r
Q
L
Y
O)
a'
•r
Q
2
f
M
�
L
�
ro o
V1
d .O
N
L L
• w
Q=
L[)
N
a,ai ro
v a
Q
U N
Z r
r Y
W
> L
U
L OI
..
N .r
�
N d
z
x
W
O O
to
J N
C C C a1
L
•r •r •r J
O
Y Y Y c
fl.
N N N ro
3
•r •r •r
al
X X X ro
m
Z
1-0
r, cl A cD n
W r 00 to t0 d"1 �••,
• M)
N m •-•1 i� O -Ct N
tO M�J'N lid' V
V
a•4 a2 ax a'E
O N to N
O O
N
1 1 1 I
N
N
Y
Y
L
L[)
N
a,ai ro
v a
a1 a N
Z
Z r
r
r 0
Y ro
Y ro 0
L Y
L Y r
ro o
C
'a~
to
'•OJ C
O L L r
O O
0/ 0i Cf
J N
C C C a1
Y Y
•r •r •r J
J J u J
Y Y Y c
v v c
N N N ro
ro
•r •r •r
3.n
O O r
X X X ro
m
L L ro
W W WmaaO]
t_ 0.
a
a•4 a2 ax a'E
O N to N
O O
N
1 1 1 I
N
N
rl
1�
M
L[)
N
N
C
rl
N
V
N
a1
•r
Y
U
C
C N N Y
'•OJ C
O L L r
O O
r
o
Y
•
a Y
rotnl�¢
ro
r r
4-
ro C
O 1 I
Y C
0
N
O 1n
t_ 0.
a
•
L N
U al
�oU_
Ol
C
II O O
1 d'
1 r.l M
r NI O W tci
E r rl 00 11
C
E O 1A all
N d
r
r
a Y rl co I I I.
T L N
N 1 N to r•1
d =5
r 0
0
r
r
a Y' I I tp In
N O to 1 rl V' N
N V
ro
CO
of
N
I
n
n
W
'O
Y
Y
N
•r
•r
•r
C
U
U
r
o
o--�
•r
•-'� of
t
O
4-
4-
1
1
N
LA
In
n•a
r
C
im
O
U
r
V
V
Q
ro
E
LL
O]
N
N
N
3
A
v
d
N.N
N
I�
O
•r Y
' N 00
•-•�
.••�
X
Y
C L
N
N
in
•r
C =
V
v
N
O
O
L
C
L
H C.
_T
Mil
ro
(U
L
Y ro
C
N N
n 4J
C Y
r
a)
'13 U
� C
N N
C •r
U
O •r
Y
a) a)
m O
V T
c
N ro
a)
L a)
U Y
ro r
O E
O •r
N r
a�
TS N
Q 'O
L
ro
T
N
I ro
JE O r
U D
N r
O
O O
C u N
•r U a)
Y N .0
N U
r ro
X • 0
a) N a
C)
•r N
0
O Y ro
r
W r r
N r r
o J v
ro ro 3
U 4-
a) N
a v ro
N
N O N
a7 r ro
•r > a)
Y O L
r L ro
r O.
U Y O
M U
F r Y
L ro
r Y N
ro N L
C •r' U
O 1
•r L
Y r
M O
N O > >
L L r
J U N
al N N
L ro
C O
1
O' ro O
Y C
T c ro
r m
a ro >
a f >
tn r
N Y
U
CD c aNi
7 TJ
. L =s
•O O u
v a
Z O •k
I
n
n
T
Y
Y
r
•r
•r
C
U
U
O
•r
•r
4-
4-
an
al
a)
C
im
O
•r
V
V
E
N
N
N
N
3
v
d
N
U
J
\
X
X
Y
N
W
W
U
•r
r
C
O
O
L
C
L
C
_T
V
N
v
G
•O
E
E
W
CL
o
ro
o
V)
N
4J
r
4J
T
d
4J
L
•1
Y
L
U
In
C
1O
2
N
Mil
ro
(U
L
Y ro
C
N N
n 4J
C Y
r
a)
'13 U
� C
N N
C •r
U
O •r
Y
a) a)
m O
V T
c
N ro
a)
L a)
U Y
ro r
O E
O •r
N r
a�
TS N
Q 'O
L
ro
T
N
I ro
JE O r
U D
N r
O
O O
C u N
•r U a)
Y N .0
N U
r ro
X • 0
a) N a
C)
•r N
0
O Y ro
r
W r r
N r r
o J v
ro ro 3
U 4-
a) N
a v ro
N
N O N
a7 r ro
•r > a)
Y O L
r L ro
r O.
U Y O
M U
F r Y
L ro
r Y N
ro N L
C •r' U
O 1
•r L
Y r
M O
N O > >
L L r
J U N
al N N
L ro
C O
1
O' ro O
Y C
T c ro
r m
a ro >
a f >
tn r
N Y
U
CD c aNi
7 TJ
. L =s
•O O u
v a
Z O •k
•
v
f
Olol�,
N rl rl
L yl'
U r
O
rl
1
r1
ct
n
U N
I
O •r
N LL
A n
M C,
O O M t'�) •
NO O N cI!Ti
.-1 O O ri V
OI
V
C
•
O
O
d-I
O
O
M
co
* ut
•E
W Y
3 0-
Y t7 L
V)
LL a)ro
a) ro m a
N N Z
7i
z r r
ro
V
r O Y I
r
a
Y to O L Y
r
L
L }a L ro O
ro N
1
n
n
+.1
`
d F--
a
O
O
O
LO
LO
d H to
L
1
'G 77
N C
v
V
Z
m O1 tT a) a)
r O
\
C C C a) 4J 4� a)
r U
3
•r •r •r U U U
O
N
C a) N C
4J 4J 4J 0
.�
•r
W.W.0
N N N ro •0 ro
>
•r •r •r O O T
a)
a
M
W W WwG. o.m
toil
m
r
O
r
r
Y
ro
ro
r
ro
•r
J
a +.
I
n
n
ro
U
4.1 L
1
I
O
.-1
In
•r
ro
L
a) O
O
O
1
•
•
Y
a)
V
V
E
N U
N
ro
r
Y
OE
m
tT
cz
L)
N
C
N
tc
f
V• 4-1
L
tT
L
to
V r
a) O.
W
N
a)
•
�.
L L
—
\
a
Q
Q •r
I—
a)
1
n
r
W
Q
`••�
•r
O
e-1
1
rl
M
C C
•r
N
1
•
O
r
ro
ro
Q
u N
t'Jy
r
V
ro
L
r
4
W
>
m
aEi
I
U
L O1
LL
ca
L
r
a1
a) •r
S
w
Nly
ro
c
N
O
y
LLI
ro
V)
ro
b
O)
C
N N
n
n
N
0
¢
•r 4-1
O
O
O
I
O
O
O
a)
L
ro
4J
a)
t0
C 7
co
N
M
L.
V
V
ro
C
FN u
4-
•Y
r
�'
V)
O
a
to
L
U1
ro
•r
7
a)
7
L
i
Od-' N�
al
L
m
n
n
L
ro
t L
O rt 0
C
C
u
u
r
r
?
I 1 1 1 3
O
•r
•r
ro
•r
,o
4-
4-
Y
u
N
C
tT
a)
a)
L
O
N
C)
o
o
ro
ro
to
r
v
v
a
o.
It 141
E
a)
(n
U)
r
C
V
N Z
r
N
N
ro
'r
C
N
ro
U
u
O
E
r
b
4J
t\/1
W
W
U
?
N
U
r
r
•r
4J
r
C
'a
b
4J
U
L
C
L
C
ro
U
4J
CD
_a
ro
C UI N 4-1 n C
'O
0
h
O.
'C
E
N
4
O L L. r 00
v
d
C
al
•r
VI
Y Y O L.r
r
C
3
ro
D
¢
C
a)
•
4J •O f1 +1
tfi
gCg
0)
H
N
T7
to 1, ¢ ro
O
r
L
11 r-1 r r
O
ro
r
N
••
r
ro
�'
L
R
O. 1 1 +) t1
•1
4J
L
ai
d
C
i
90.
L.
t1 O to
U
V)
d
FO-
Z
V)
Z
O
-K
fq 11
t'
b
C
N
n
L A
N C
it
A
A
O
U •—
O
O
1
O
M
M
N � ICI
U N
I
)
N
O •r
V
V
>
>
A
N LL
y
vro °:) O•
-Vkoo
3
• > • . h
y
0
00 •r W Nr/r -1
C
rl L O r1 ri y
O7
CL V
C
O
•r N
t0
Ol
4.J
M
M
N
N
y
•11 N
•r O
3
Id Y
3 C
�
•O L
N
•O L aJ ro
N
Z r r
U
r O Y ro
r
ro
Y ro O L 9
r
A
Lt ro O
ro
1
N
A
N
rag C' F--
G J
O
O
O
CO
N
T L
;
�
O L
N O
V
V
6
01 CJ C1 N CJ
r• O
C c N
U
•r •r U U U U U
U
O
0
Zu
}a 4.1 C OJ d C
7
VI N N to to
•r •r •r O
O p
IA
X X 0 L L 0
y
W W W LC C.am
.r
r
�
�.
ro N
r
01
d 41
t
A
A
r
41 L
1
O
d'
N
U
•yr
O1 0
O
O
1
ro
L
Y O
V
V
4-
CO
fu
N
_
r
Oro
C
ro
a
N
>
N
E
E
In
i
4J
L
>,
W
°
N
N 10
•C
0
N
L co
¢
r•
A
-P
V
.0
W
L
H
a)
r
O
O
I I
1
O
A
to
to
c
N
w
N N
J
4-
1
•
rf
C
ro
Q
u 3
N
r
V
V
u
W
> J
ro
Q
V-
r
r
N
W
m
:z
ro 3
N
N
C
c
W
ro
ro
N
A
r
'
N N
wi
•r .I..1
O
O
LO I
to
Ci•
ro
O
ro
C
7
V
CU
L
I�
(0
c°
y
y
rn
c
+1
0
y
r
r
7
r
}1
O
r
ro
u
aJ '
to
L
1
4-
u
O N
^
A
A
•1
N
L
.M•I W
>I
4-1
4•1
4•1
N
r
r
r
r
C
U
U
,—
3
>
>
1 1 1 1
O
•r
•r
4-
4-
4-
u
a -1
N
OI
y
N
to
r
N
N
C
O
O
4-
u
(0
W
r
v
v
a
h
u
v
•
M M
N
N
•r
•C
'S7
3
d
v
n
>
ro
N
U
u
7
O
a
' tJ
4f
N
W
W
a
>
'4J
u
•r
4-
•r
u
•L
C
>I
L.
C
u
/U ••
C N N
4••1
N
r
ro
ro
Y
ro
+-1 •mac
r�
W
v
a
b
E
u
N
O L L r O O
N
•r
a
c
N
ro
r
VI
•r Y> O L •r
• .N d }I
C
O
UJ
VJ
n
Q
�I
c
ro n h Q ro
'•'1
GGG3
r
4-1
N
N
L
r•
C ro
O
ro
0
••
u
I I 4J CL
O 0 0
r
U
L
O
at
7
QI
a
�ci
C• O N C.
U
V)
a
F-
Z
N
Z
O
•k
PO 12
a 13
1a
ro
a)
O
O
I
O
U 0)
I
v
v
a)
1I1IODI' rl
O•r
u
O ,
In U-
N
O to O, O W If)
L
• • N
N
'
W W 00000•+1
r O NN v
tm
v
r y
O)
E r• '
O
O
rl
rl
O
C)
E O
a)
*in
...
Y
3 CO.
Y O L
n'
ro
al ro a) d
L
a) d y Z
r O Y ro
r
N
d
L 4J t ro o
N y
1
O
C. F
,C
O
O
I
O
ro
12 N
T L
1
N
•••1
'O •O
a)
v
v
,a)
C
'
C C C a) 'i•) Y a)
r• U
•r•r•r u u
O
-
C
Y d•/ 4•1 C a) a) C
>
•r
y y y ro •n." ro
,
•r •r •r r O O r•
y
X X X to L L ro
a)
W w W mC. CL
•r
Y
,-
n
n
r
N
U•)
r
.p •N
to
CD
i t
LC)
•U
•
4J L
1
•
rl
V
a)
v
ro
•
Y O
4-
y U
Y
'CO
Y
y
r�
U
u
01
S
t0 V '
O
S
C
r
u
U
V)
ro
N
w
r
)
•
L N
n
n
y
Q H
W
�"'�
•r
O
O
1
O
•
L
y
-1
4-
1
N
e•i
y
ro
ro
v
v
(1)
d
W
> r-
Q
ro
Y
a)
r
L.
w
m
MU'1
a) m
r
7
V)
r
r
D
u
u
y
W
ro
a)
10
N
n
n
4-
L
y VI
O
C)
d
y
•r -0•)
O
O
O
I
O
Y
ro
C L
m
N
L
V
a)
c
v
v
ro
c
L
ro
ro
U
•
C
O
O
4
r
Z;
4J
4�
•
ro
ro
d
M
d
L
ro
L
J
u
U
N
L
(U
O .�••1 n
n
n
n
C'
O rt O
•.1
r
ro +1
a)
C
u
u
ro
>
1 1 1 1
O
4
4-
G
4J>
N
r•
O co
C
O
m
r a)
ro
M LL')
•r
v
v
•r y
d
n r
E
�
•
w
E
y
0
o
ro
rt) O
•O
M ch
•r
a)
y
r •{.)
C
3
4-
•r
ro
N
u
U
u
U
O
ro,
a)
u
r
Q)
r
i
au)
c
N
v
ro
ro
>1
ro
y W a..) •n c
'a
V)
F-
d
'a
E
O
4J
O L L r• 00
a)
a)
L
•r
y
•r Y Y L •r
C
O
7
to
m
N
C
a),
•
41 d
N
O
'O
b L n Q b
N
O
)—
4J
i)
7
N
••
L
r
0
d
a
d 1 1 .+.) d
•r
Y
L
a)
d
C
.1
u
C O LO 90.
U
1!
C_
H
Z
(A4
Z
O
•11
a 13
•
r II
4 O
n LL
� ros
to a) I.1
W ¢ Z
4 U 44- -
-,4-
LLI > 7
U L r
. da
Cn 4J
Q' N
W ro
N W
VI rz
� M
I, O O PL c i
Co to TCO 1u�,
C CM 9b Cl Ub c4)
N V N m V
it N
Y II L
II L a) ro
Z
�- o Y io
L t ro
N 0. ~
-
tT tT OI N N
c c c al 4� 4J W
•r •r •r U U U u
4J 4J 4J C a/ W G
N N N ro
0 • • 0 ro
r•r •r r• O Or
•X X X ro L L ro
W W W m C 1 m
ak �A I�z �A
L N
U - N
L) v
O •r
N LL
co n
M
N N
r N f� W
E r O •--I O I rl
E O r1 r pn O
r O -+
3 a
N
i
a 41 01 .0 M t l M -d' b
>> L rl I rl N N
C r .1
r O
0 U
O
r
r
ro N
a 4 L
a) O M
ad 7
Y r
O
N U
ro
An
1I
M n N
1
i •-•� N N
rl H
N
N
W
V
t-r
4J
4�
.-
i--•
a1
I
to
12•)
r
r L i
o
I
b
c
G
J
4-
1 1 1 1
O
r
U
r
-
4r
¢
ro
to
Ll.,
m
a1
^
C
LA
D
O
N
O
4J
O co m
n
V
V
Cl
G L
r1I
N
O;
to
^
M
l[1
aJ O
F— U
C;2.2- 14
3
N
C
L
O
O.
v
U
X
N
>1
C
O
N
CD
•r
•r a)
U iT
ro ro
4- al
L
(D u
II ro
c 3 G
a) r
Q. •r N
O U N
r• W
a) N U
> II X
ar r y
II >
0,
3 L ro
al G •r
C 4.1
o ai ro
4 L 4J
a) N
V 3
II a) N
N
a) aJ
L O
N
O U N
rl a) 7
L A
II •r •r
¢ +•+
a) C
O
• U
N C
ro ro N N
ro N 4 t i
CU ro
r •r r
N •r C
ro •� u O
r ro •r
c r 4- (o
•r U ro
ro a)
II V- o O L-
a O U
ro 3t a)
� C N L
II N
L >
4- • r
O 4- - N
C N
N al E CL
a) u a
u L O II
X 7 r C
w O a7 ro
N >
N a) a)
C O >
•r
r U
CL 4 ro
N c a1
� II
L r•
II O U
Z O i
T
4J
4�
.-
r
r
c
G
u
u
1 1 1 1
O
-
4r
to
()
'a)
a1
^
C
D
O
b
Lo
V
V
Cl
C
E
^
M
l[1
E
•r
N
N
N
N
3
N
V)
u u
U
II
i
N
W
W.
N
u
r
U
G
II
II
L
�'
0 In
v • •
4J
aci •
ro
ro
C 4J
•r7 G
II
N
v
M.
II
E
O L 1.. r
00
a.,
c
o
ro
m
i�ra�
al
N
{
ro be¢
ro
r•
4-1
N
ro 0
O I 1
4t d
4�
L
•.>-
4%
d
L
d
H d
O b
U
to
C
H
Z
N
C;2.2- 14
3
N
C
L
O
O.
v
U
X
N
>1
C
O
N
CD
•r
•r a)
U iT
ro ro
4- al
L
(D u
II ro
c 3 G
a) r
Q. •r N
O U N
r• W
a) N U
> II X
ar r y
II >
0,
3 L ro
al G •r
C 4.1
o ai ro
4 L 4J
a) N
V 3
II a) N
N
a) aJ
L O
N
O U N
rl a) 7
L A
II •r •r
¢ +•+
a) C
O
• U
N C
ro ro N N
ro N 4 t i
CU ro
r •r r
N •r C
ro •� u O
r ro •r
c r 4- (o
•r U ro
ro a)
II V- o O L-
a O U
ro 3t a)
� C N L
II N
L >
4- • r
O 4- - N
C N
N al E CL
a) u a
u L O II
X 7 r C
w O a7 ro
N >
N a) a)
C O >
•r
r U
CL 4 ro
N c a1
� II
L r•
II O U
Z O i
}
r
C
Y
Q
p L
E
0) L
f
d
o
N
ro�
N G
Z r
r
W
Q U
Y U O
L
0
ro O
Q
u r-
.1 O
w
> a
U
L 3
••'�
OJ N
�
N Z
C
G N W G
w
10 •n•" CO
rn
X X X
4!
ro
N� ICI
N L
cb idi O O n
••` O
O ro O Ol t 0)
L1'1 •r O LO
rl 0 O
LO ,Cj . N
n v
rn v
N
r
rl r1
Y
Y
p L
a) L
IV ro
Iv ro
d a
N Cl. 0
Z
Z r
r
r O
Y ro
Y U O
L
0
ro O
co 0 u
groin
aF-
G UI N 46.1
•r) G
rn rn rn
aOi a°i
G G G
N 4J ++ N
•r •r •r
u u u u
d-• 4J 4J
G N W G
N N VI
10 •n•" CO
•r •r .•r r 00 r
X X X
ro L L ro
w w w m d d m
3C 3Y Sfl A4
O O O O
O O
r
rl r1
I 1 1 t
n
cF
d'
o
�
O
Oi
i+i
ui
O
r
iti
G UI N 46.1
•r) G
O L L r
0
•V
•
J"
a
roLOP, ¢
v o
I ri
r r
G
O
.I 1
4% O.
d
N
Oln
FO-a
4;0
C-0
u-0 0 0
u d
O •r
rn w
m
c
II O O M
1
V
r nI v rn
E r O O N I N
O N r r rl
N � rl rl
r
r
ro N I A
0 O o O v
- o
r U
FO- U
r
I
n
n
>1
r
4J
Y
'
r
ro 'N
O
•V
v o
0
0
I
O
o
Lf)
01
N
C
p
O
r
V
V
V
U
E(n
(0
ro
m
N
N
u
u
�.
w
X
4a
N
w
w
u
•r
r
G
O
'O
L
c
>>
L
G
ro
A
J
Ql
V
a
I
E
O
O
t
O
O
3
U
4-
g
i
N
Q
r
4J
N
V
LL
r
v
o
>
ro
ro
� i-I
L
•r
i�
d
L
m
U
LO
0.
N•NI
Z
N
i�
In
•r i-1
O
O
lO
l0
C
l
7
dO
u
FO- U
I i
m
4J
.r.
r
r
u
to
W
W
a
G
v
iV
3
r
u
N
41
•r
O
L N
n v
r
3 u
o ro
c N
cz a
N • N
41 d ro
L d r
ro c r
d
al
a 3
G G
W •r N
CL N
O r N
N N co
> L-
a) }• ro .
•O N
N G
3 E o
v
c 3 (0
o ro
o c v
41 L
N u
N d N
C1 •r L
•r }J
i• r >
•r >
r r
r u N
u ro N
ro w. ro
4 Q
N
r ro O
G
u >
u > ro
O r
r L >
d >
d •r
u
o 4J
L •r N
a c d
L J O
9 O u
N CL 0. G
Z O i~c
I
n
n
>1
4J
Y
r
r
O
•V
Y-
4-
C)
01
N
C
p
O
r
V
V
E(n
a
N
u
u
�.
X
X
4a
N
w
w
u
•r
r
G
O
'O
L
c
>>
L
G
ro
ro
y
V
a
O
E
C
p
3
10
O
g
N
r
4J
N
o
ro
r
v
o
>
ro
� i-I
L
•r
i�
d
L
U
LO
0.
1—O
Z
N
I i
m
4J
.r.
r
r
u
to
W
W
a
G
v
iV
3
r
u
N
41
•r
O
L N
n v
r
3 u
o ro
c N
cz a
N • N
41 d ro
L d r
ro c r
d
al
a 3
G G
W •r N
CL N
O r N
N N co
> L-
a) }• ro .
•O N
N G
3 E o
v
c 3 (0
o ro
o c v
41 L
N u
N d N
C1 •r L
•r }J
i• r >
•r >
r r
r u N
u ro N
ro w. ro
4 Q
N
r ro O
G
u >
u > ro
O r
r L >
d >
d •r
u
o 4J
L •r N
a c d
L J O
9 O u
N CL 0. G
Z O i~c
th
a
ro
•
L
ro•
v
L N
r
v •o
1
A
>
•
u r
O
N
1
I
N
M
O
L
NI l��
O ^J
1
V
rl
N
V) LL
cb 010 OhOM I�
Im
C
In ti O 10 07 d' M
•r
• •
C
lO OHO rt LOCO t.0
•r
V ch o In ct v
m
O
c
•n
rE A
O
O
O
N I
N
to
LO
ro
• E 00
�L (L)ro
d to v a
c
Cu d N Z
•r
Z—
N
r O Y as
r
N
••'�
Y ro O L {J
al
L .c o
ro to
a
1
0
0
ro
M.
ro 0I) a F-
a +1
W
Cl
1
O
r-1
a)
C. F-(n
9
a L
1
M.
N
•r
L
Z7 V
al
r
Q
'
Of O 01 a) a)
0 r 0
•r
C C c •
r U
U
•r •r •r U U u
u U u u
u
O
,
rd
U
4•1 41 C a) (3)• C
4-
•r
N to N H ro '•']' to
>
•r •r r 00,
N
1-
'
X% X ro L L 0
a)
•
W W W m C. 4- m
O
to
r
L
r
a)
c
a 4J
1
In
o
�
v
+.1 L
.-+
o
I
I
r
.
c
u
a) =
1
v
ti
ro
Y o
v
4J
n
to
a
ro
>-
m
N
al
N
c5
ai
S
L
+1
c
f
ro
O
ro S
N.
N
r
C
ro
N•
0
W
r
•r
a)
•
r
t••1
n
n
r
L
a
Q
Q al
I—
(3)
I
m
Iti
u
it
W
'0
H
•r
rl
N
1
I
N
C
a)
J
4-
1
N
t�0
4%
3
Q
u ro
.-+
r
v•
v
V
r
W
> O
Q
ro
O
a)
U
L L
LL
m
•r
1-t
a) o
4J
3
N U
to
N
C
a)
N
W
n
n
L
C
ro
N
to
u
O
N N
•
a)
N
•r 41
O
O
C)
O
01
dr
L
'O
ro
C L
N
v
a)
a)
C 7
v
r
0
L
•>
al
F0-
u
0
o
c
r
L
O
D
v
15
E
v
to
o
a
a)
N
L
c
u
o m LO
c �l
.-.
n
n
o
u
c0.
O rl GO
a
+1
Y
N
r
r
0
N
c
u
u
rntn
m
> >
1 1 I I
O
•r
•r
(0 a)
•r
•r
'
V
4-
}.1 m
N
N
O
Ol
0
a)
L ro
r
N
CD
C
�
0
O •f •1
r
ro
O 01
m
•r
V
V
L
•r
O.
M
EE
N O
A
U
E
N
N
L
to
'0
ON
r
N
N
r N
4-
C
lu
.
to
u c0)
ro
= m
3
x
X
4•) M
a/
0
'O
iJ
0
W
W
0.4J
z
a)
U
r
•FI
•r
C
L
u
a)
L
C
a
C
U
••
U
.
a) • •
•
(0
(0
O
0
O
a
a)
U
o L L O O
a)
d
C
a)
a)
.}1
•r
0
•r Y Y L r
J C J
a)
V7
N
O
Q L
j
0
'0
n Q
L
10
r
N
••
ro
d 9
o h 00.
. U
N
tl
H
2
(=)
Z
O
it
,p y 17
r•
•
T
C
N
E ~ 3
ro N
N N •r
Q Q >
C N O
Q um
•r L
W > to
Wx
N
w
N
tD 01 ch •{1 O O1 O1
0 0' V' dolls •--i 0 01
M M 01 LO Cr) n
to ct m M V to t0
t-z' IIYR"A
O C d N
O N n
N
I I I i
u
M
Y
� L
O L L.
•
O O
uro
ua
N d N
Z
m U') r._ Q
b
O
Y ro
Y ro O
i }�
9-4J
log
rl
�
O%FO - tn
F- CL
fU
rnrnrn
a a
C G C
+•1
N N
•r •r •r
u
V U U U
}I •1-1
C d N C
(A
•N N N
ro •n •r) ro
•r •r •rm
O Or
x
L W
L L t J O
m d m
t-z' IIYR"A
O C d N
O N n
N
I I I i
u
M
0toL -+>
n
O L L.
•
O O
N
tp
4J
O
m U') r._ Q
b
n
o
d
r,
•-y
a
rl
0
Otn
F- CL
fU
O
•r
a 5'
N
LU
F-
J_
u
4
LL
L N
U � N N
u d)
N LL
I f` O
1 I d•
1 V M
•r N to
E O O O OI O
r rl LO 0)
.10
In a-
a r
0 N
41 o rn
v L-
0
r U
r
r
ro N
L N
N 7 . N
Y O rt
Nv•
ro
m
N
b
Q)
•r 4_ M t0
rO
CO
m
I I In O
1 al
I to d to
I
N e�•I N
I' 'A to
A
tn'N M O
•r 4J tp O d'I O
C L N N n LO
C 7 V rl
FO- COQ
u
0toL -+>
n0
O L L.
•
O O
>1
L •r
4J
1
m U') r._ Q
b
r
r
d
to
1 1
a
d
0
Otn
F- CL
a 5'
N
LU
F-
J_
u
4
LL
L N
U � N N
u d)
N LL
I f` O
1 I d•
1 V M
•r N to
E O O O OI O
r rl LO 0)
.10
In a-
a r
0 N
41 o rn
v L-
0
r U
r
r
ro N
L N
N 7 . N
Y O rt
Nv•
ro
m
N
b
Q)
•r 4_ M t0
rO
CO
m
I I In O
1 al
I to d to
I
N e�•I N
I' 'A to
A
tn'N M O
•r 4J tp O d'I O
C L N N n LO
C 7 V rl
FO- COQ
O
r--I
c
ro
0;
t0
N
ro
N N
}J L
C Q
N
O N
•r U
N r
m >
L L
N
O N
H
L
ro 0
N 4--
Q N
N
N r
u +l
•r •r
> r
L
to u
V) ro
T ,
v-
a �
N
� N
d N• ro
N N tU
7 C L
ro
N v c
r r p
U > r
ro O (+
CL L ro
ro a to
V L
O V
N 41 tU
N L
N d
U .0 N >
x n
v ro
r N
3 •r N
ro
O > > a
c ro
a
to N, c
u a ro
C .1
ro N
r h >
ro •r
a u
U
0 a ro
O •I1
O r N
C6 7 aj
L O
V O V
w a C
Z C) it
9
A
n
>1
i•1
i-1
r
r
r
c
u
u
O
•r
a=
v-
tT
N
N
C
O
O
r
V
V
E
E
N
N
3
N
N
N
u
V
\
x
x
LJ
LLA
tN
V
•r
•r
C
'O
'O
L
C
a
L
C
W
F•O-•
o.
'rop
E
v
o
�
�
p�
gc
y
N
O
N
O
ro
N
ro
C
4J
.1
L
U
tt,1
u
d
Z
n
FO-
is
O
r--I
c
ro
0;
t0
N
ro
N N
}J L
C Q
N
O N
•r U
N r
m >
L L
N
O N
H
L
ro 0
N 4--
Q N
N
N r
u +l
•r •r
> r
L
to u
V) ro
T ,
v-
a �
N
� N
d N• ro
N N tU
7 C L
ro
N v c
r r p
U > r
ro O (+
CL L ro
ro a to
V L
O V
N 41 tU
N L
N d
U .0 N >
x n
v ro
r N
3 •r N
ro
O > > a
c ro
a
to N, c
u a ro
C .1
ro N
r h >
ro •r
a u
U
0 a ro
O •I1
O r N
C6 7 aj
L O
V O V
w a C
Z C) it
9
5 ` `.
L N
n
•
H .
O
O
ko CV M
m
I
U
N
d•
I I
b
u
I
N
d
•m
r_
v
a1
N V
0ls• O N N
17, LO 10
1• • I.
01 of * OlNr/
OOIM V O rl
Oy
N r
C
r N
M
O
E
O
O
NI
N
E O
N
N
n
N
v
r+
Y
3 d
Y p L
N
OL a)ro
W 4 N Z
Z r
r O Y ro
r
Y ro O L '})
L 4J M ro O
ro N
1
•
T
ro p u 0-
.0 .v
m
r
r l
�.
N
c.H N
TL
I
rM
O
N 7
fT fT OI al a)
r O
C C G N N
r U
u
•r •r •r u U u U
U
O
ro
C
'
N N N ro • ro
•r •r •r r O Or
0 0
X X X ro L L ro
p
W W W m 0- CL
p
r
C
r
U
N
N
a ++
0
to
1.
n
rn
Lo
3
L
M
1
a)
a) D 7
N
1
I
N
N
N
r
•r
Y O
.--1
rl
N
rl
}
N U
V
••-f
ro
c
r
r/ L
m
•,-
O
J
N
d
C
L
t
4J
u
N
•,
O �
LLJ
-0
•
' 3
d
r
N
�
.--1
lf)
W
ro ro
r~i
•r
d'
n
i
N
•ro
O
N
L
4-
/
N
M
M
4J
ro
Q
L
IJy
r
p
Q
U
r
r
C
r
W
LL
m
r
ro
r
U
a)
01
3
::-
•U N
�
n
N
W
L
N
b
ly
N
a) ro
r
N C
N N
b
O
•r 4J
b
O
a
C)
t`
C
ro
ro
L
C L
ra I
N
M
O
a)
a)
a) '
O
C 3
V
rl
H
m
a
m
c�
L
C
+J
u U
O
X
r
ffil
Ql
L
ro
L
a)
a)
O
N
L
t2 S2 3C SC
w
N
Oath Lo
n
n
b
O
L
O N W
>)
41
+1
a)
•"1
r
•r
a)
N
a)
C
u
u
C
b
>
I I 1 1
O
•r
a)
•r
rn
a) ro
c
E
N
00
c
G
O
O
ro
C Ch
•r
V
V
N
4J
O.
w
a)
N
C
r' N
N
ro
u
u
C
c
\
X
X
ro
to
a)
i•)
N
W
W
r
U
>
a)
u
•r
ro
•r
' 1-1
•r
C
'O
_0
-0
Y
N
L
C
T
L
C
u
4-1
al
r
ro
ro
T
ro
0
O L L O O
a)
r
d
C
N
O
N
•r >} p L •r
O
7
to
O
C7
c
a)
Q Yp
n
O
f;' In n a'
O
•N
h
J
O
ro
r
N
••
L
r
ro 7
O Y 1 1 p
Y
L
,r
4J
d
L
m
p.
c
0 00
'
a 0 In f-• 0-
U
N
CL
H
Z
N
Z
O
if
�6
19
t 7
Recreation
and Open Space
Inventory* (Continued)
Name
Designation
Size
Facilities -
Peninsula Beaches
P8
137.0
ac.
Volleyball
Peninsula Park`
NP
3.8
ac.
Field Sports
Playground
Restrooms
Picnic
Beach
10th Street Beach
.81
ac.
-N Street Beach
.58
ac.
15th Street,Beach
PB
.2
ac.
- --
West Jetty
VP
:5
ac.
Benches
Beach
Total
149.32
ac.
Service Area 3 - Newport Heights /Harbor Highlands
Cliff Drive
VP
4.2
ac.
(includes only
•
usable area)
Community building
Picnic
Restrooms
Benches
Ensign School 1
.SC
7.73
ac.
Volleyball
Basketball
Field 'Sports
Ensign View
VP
1.73
ac.
Picnic'
Benches
Turf
Galaxy Park
VP
.95
ac.
Benches
Kings Road View Park
VP
.4
ac.
- --
Mariners Elementaryl
SC
6.24
ac.
Basketball
Field Sports
l Includes open space /play
areas only, not
entire site.
"
•
22
a7
R I 1,
U
•
Recreation and Open Space Inventory* (Continued)
Name
Designation
Size
Facilities
Mariners Park
NP
7.36
ac.
Community Building
Playground
Vol.l eybal 1
Tennis
Picnic
Handball
Newport Harbor High Schools
SC
22.63
ac.
Tennis
Vol l eybal•1
Basketball
Field Sports
Swimming
Newport Heights Elementaryl
SC
5.22
ac.
Volleyball
Basketball
Field Sports
North Star Beach
PB
11.45
ac.
- --
Westbay Park
NP
6.07
ac.
Not improved
Westcliff
VP
3.01
ac.
Benches
Total.
76.99
ac.
Service Area 6 - Balboa Island
Balboa Beaches PB 7.9 ac. - --
Beek Park MP .28 ac. Community'Building
Restrooms
-Basketball
Total 8.18 ac.
Service Area 7 - E•astb.luff. /North Ford
Corona del Mar High Schooll SC 20.0 ac. Tennis
Volleyball
Basketball
Swimming
Field Sports
I Includes open space /play areas only, not entire site.
W
t. 4
1J
L,
Recreation and Open Space Inventory* (Continued)
Name Designation' Size Facilities
Harbor View Elementary) SC 14.0 ac. Field Sports
Lincoln School) SC 17.0 ac. Volleyball
1 Includes open space /play areas only, not entire site.
*SOURCE: City of Newport Beach, Planning and Public Works Departments, 1984.
25
Basketball
Field Sports
Nature Park
NP
7.75
ac.
Walkways
Oasis
NP
5.97
ac.
Picnic
Community Building
San Miguel
NP
7.32
ac.
Picnic
Basketball
Field Sports
SJ Hills
NP
4.06
ac.
Tennis
Lawn bowling
Spyglass Hills Park
MP
1.0
ac.
Playground "
Spyglass Hills Reservoir Park
MP
.96
"ac.
Playground
Total
77.53
ac.
1 Includes open space /play areas only, not entire site.
*SOURCE: City of Newport Beach, Planning and Public Works Departments, 1984.
25
SS
Program 1.3.6: Allow dinghy launching at all safe street ends
• and beaches in lower Newport Bay. 'Por purpose
of this Element, a.dinghy shall be defined as
a single -hull craft with a maximum length of
12'6" and a maximum beam of 5'.
Program 1.3.7: Allow short -term beaching of small crafts in
designated areas.
Program 1.3.8: Continue to.maintain and operate existing City
piers and docks.
Program 1.3.9: Continue to maintain and operate existing pub-
lic bay and ocean beaches.
Program 1.3.10: Provide and maintain appropriate support
facilities such- as exterior showers, rest -
rooms, drinking fountains, and concessions at
the following locations:
a. West Jetty Park
b. Las Arena Park
C. Between Orange. Avenue and the Santa Ana
River
d. All proposed park and recreation facili-
ties.
• Program 1.3.11: Initiate a .study of Lower Newport Bay marine
opportunities including comprehensive facility
inventories.
Program Examine proposals for construction. of anti -
1.3.12 erosion structures, offshore breakwaters, or
marinas, and regulate the design of any such
structures to harmonize with the natural
appearance of the beach. (Same as Program
3.2.1)
Policy L.5: In view of the City's attraction as a regional
1_4 and statewide recreation area, the growing
regional and statewide demand for water -
oriented recreational facilities, and the
limited capacity of the City's harbor and
ocean front resources to full satisfy such
�J
KYl
3o
-1 •)
demands, the City shall encourage the opening
• and development of adjoining ocean and water-
front areas outside Newport Bay, so long as
any adverse environmental impacts are miti-
gated, in a manner which may best serve to
distribute the increasing public need for
water- oriented recreational facilities.
Program 1.b.1: Initiate a study of Lower Newport Bay'marine
4 opportunities including comprehensive.fa_cility
inventories.
Program 1.5.2: Continue to express support for the provision
4 of a small craft harbor in the West Newport/
Santa Ana River area as described in the
City's Local Coastal Program. (Also Program
1.3.5)
Program 1. -5.3: The continued provision of private facilities
4 is encouraged.
Policy 1.6: The City shall insure, implementation of a
5 bikeway system to encourage cycling as an
alternative mode of transportation consistent
with the Master Plan of Bikeways.
• Program 1.6.1: The Master Plan of Bikeways 9hal'1 be imple-
5 mented concurrent with highway and street
improvements, consistent with the City's
financial ability to do so and the avail-
ability of alternative funding sources.
Program 1.6.2: Appropriate bikeway improvements may be
5, required as 'a condition of development
approvals.
Program 1.5.3: The City will work with surrounding agencies
5 for development of connecting bikeways.
OBJECTIVE 2: Convenient and safe public access to open space and recrea-
tional facilities consistent with the protection of natural
resources, public safety, and private property rights.
Policy 2.1: Recreational facilities within a reasonable
service radius for each type of facility shall
be provided.
Program 2.1.1: Continue to operate and maintain existing City
recreational facilities at "the existing level
of service. (Same as Program 1.1.1)
33
3/
1J it IT%
•
E
3. Northbay Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) - Open Space
These ESA's have not been precisely mapped but should be protected when
development proposals are reviewed. Where consistent with the preserva-
tion of environmental values, public access to these areas should be pro-
vided.
Service Area 10 - Corona del Mar
Corona del Mar Mini Park - .24 acres
Service Area 11 - Harbor View
1. Lincoln School - 17 acres
The seventeen acres of playing fields at the Lincoln School site is pro-
posed to transfer to neighborhood park use. The existing building
improvements are proposed to remain in this situation. However, intensi-
fication of the facilities in the fields is recommended.
2. 'Oasis Expansion - 2 acres
An expansion to the north of the existing Oasis Senior Center is proposed
to provide needed parking facilities.
3. Buck Gully - 49.4 acres
Protection of this environmentally sensitive area is proposed consistent
with the Local Coastal Plan. Public access facilities are not recom-
mended due to difficulty in maintenance, fire protection and police
supervision.
4. Marguerite View Park - 1 acre
This small view park is proposed 'for the enjoyment of unusual ocean
views.
5. -Marguerite Open Space - 2.6 acres
A passive open space area with a wal'kway is proposed to be located in
this riparian corridor. Linkage of the walkway to Grant Howald Park is
proposed. The area is proposed to be available to public access via an
easement.
Intensification Projects
. The following projects involve intensification of underutilized or not used
existing recreational facilities. Many recommendations involve further study
which is addressed in the Implementation Handbook.
46
U
1a W;
•
n
LJ
33
TABULATION OF PROPOSED
RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
Recreation Open Space
Facility
Acres
Acres
Service Area 1 - West Newport
Banning Community Park
20.0
Banning View Park
1.0
Banning ESA Open Space
Unknown
Banning Neighborhood Park
4.0
Semeniuk Slough ESA
20.0
Semeniuk Slough Mini Park
2.0
CalTrans West View Park
2.0
Cal Trans East View Park
,8
Pacific Coast Highway Mini Park
7.7
Subtotal
37.5
20.0+
Service Area 2 - Balboa Peninsula
Marinapark 4.0
Subtotal 4.0
Service,Area_3 -_ Newport Heights /Harbor Highlands
Castaways 10.0
Westbay View Park .5
Westbay ESA Open Space Unknown
Subtotal 10.5 Unknown
Service Area 4 - Santa ana Heights - Airport Commercial
Northbay Mini Park 1.•0
Subtotal 1.0 0
49
I
Tabulation of Proposed
• Recreation and Open Space (Continued)
Recreation Open Space
Facility Acres Acres
Service Area 5 - Lower Bay
PCH Mini Park 1.0
Subtotal 1.0 0
Service Area 7 - Eastbluff - North Ford
San Diego Creek Open Space 22.0
North Ford Community Park 12.0
Eastbluff Remnant 4.7
Mouth of Big Canyon 5.0 45.0
Subtotal 17.0 71.7
Service Area 9 - Newport Center
• Bayview Mini Park 1.0
Newpo� ter North View Park 4.0
Newport,Village Neighborhood Park 4.0
Northbay ES Open Space Unknown
Subtotal 9.0 Unknown.
Service Area 10 - Corona del Mar
Corona del Mar Mini Park .24 0
Subtotal .24 0
Service Area 11 - Harbor View
Lincoln School
17.0
Oasis Expansion
2.0
Buck Gully
49.4
Marguerite View Park
1.0
Marguerite Open Space
2.6
Subtotal
20.0 52.0
•. TOTAL 100.24 143.7 plus
unmapped
ESA acreage
50
sy
•
0
0
Item No. 6
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
DATE: November 29, 1984
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Capital Improvements Subcommittee
Robert Hopkins, Sterling Wolfe, Earle King
SUBJECT: Capital Improvement Proposals for 1985 -86
The Capital Improvements Subcommittee met on Tuesday, November 27, 1984,
to assimilate and prioritize all proposed projects for next fiscal year.
Attached is a listing of these proposals for your review and action.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
• CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROPOSALS
FY 1985 -86
1. West Newport P.E. Right of Way $250,000
A continuation of the P.E. Right of Way to include
landscaping, parking lot, restrooms and basketball
court.
2. CYC, Second Phase $125,000
To finish project including play areas with equip-
ment and landscaping.
3. Irvine Terrace Park $100,000
Playground equipment, new basketball court and
minimal landscaping.
4. Little Corona Study $ 91000
To acquire marine consultant to identify problems
at Little Corona.
5.
San Joaquin Hills Road Traffic Median
$157,000
•
Marguerite to Spyglass Hill Road
6.
Restroom Refurbishment at OASIS North Wing
$
15,000
Will complete job started this year.
7.
Theatre Arts Center
$
50,000
New stage, Room 3 and hallway refurbishment for
this facility.
8.
Park Facility Improvement Fund
$
40,000
To accommodate miscellaneous projects that arise on
an emergency basis during the year.
9.
Cliff Drive Park - Design
$
20,000
To develop a master plan of the existing Cliff
Drive Park area.
•
1
Item No. 7
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
is Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
•
• q
DATE: November 29, 1984
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Landscape /Maintenance Agreement, Newport Center
The staff has been working with The Irvine Company for some time to
bring about a new landscape look and corresponding maintenance
requirements in the Newport Center area. The attached material
describes these changes and provides the mechanism by which the
changes can be implemented.
The Irvine Company and the City are providing landscape service on a
different level. The proposed agreement will' improve a high visibility
area in a way that will benefit the community.
e
•
0 law my BI• . V DID 0 IN
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
LUP
THE IRVINE COMPANY
The purpose of this agreement is to establish the responsibilities
of and for maintenance and maintenance related items at Newport Center
as a result of the installation of palm trees replacing the sycanares.
The current arrangement is that The Irvine Company maintains the parkway
on each side of Newport Center Drive, and the City maintains the center
median strip. As a result of The Irvine Company's project to completely,
replace all trees in the parkway and median strip, the following agree-
ments are in effect:
1. The Irvine Company will assume responsibility for maintaining the
landscape at the ground plane, to include the median parkway turf
on Newport Center Drive and Circle. Any additional ground cover,
shrubs, planters, etc., will also be maintained by The Irvine Company.
2. The City of Newport Beach Parks and Recreation Department will assume
the responsibility for maintaining all the palm trees to include, but
not be limited to pruning of the fronds at least annually; all other
trees in the right-of-way should be tr5mred annually, pest control,
fertilization, etc., regarding the palm trees.
3. The Irvine Company will,purchase a one year warranty on the palm trees
at the time of installation. Additional warranties from the contractor
maybe forth coning.
JA
• Page 2.
P.greement. continued...
4. The City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Company will each retain their
current responsibility with regard to electricity and water for the areas
they are currently maintaining. ( Refer to Maintenance Proposal
Clarification Map 4 4 for exact location of the City's responsibility for
utilities )
5. The City of Newport Beach and The Irvine Canpany will share all costs
associated with replacement of each palm at a rate of 50% to City of
Newport Beach and 50% to The Irvine Company. If a discrepancy of opinion
to replace a palm should arise, an independent Horticultural Palm
Consultant will be asked to judge the need for replacement.
6. The Irvine Company will be responsible for the operation, installation,
• repair and scheduling of the irrigation in the median parkway strip.
This includes all palms and turf in the Newport Center area.
7. This agreement is binding on both parties until awnded or jointly agreed
to cancel its provisions.
• II
City of Newport Beach
November 26, 1984
The Irvine Company
Ll
•
8
0
m
R
0
01 H
N
0 z
p +� *04
44
0.
dA N ri
00 44 n UI s
:
oEn W n�''t O gam.; N Ng
0 4J
In H 104 �+ z3 44 X
0 o
o
4-) ;-1
'JY N N 'Jr rl
U p pp N' ,,
U
LH
0 14
H H H •�-1 N Ln O N 4-1
}J
L Ln
N
o
4 04
z z Uw°
0
ul
N
N
4-4H '41
go �
4-3 � m
o 8
�4-1
o u+�
A
0
w
rA
S
dp
> 8 R�
A
144 w >1
rA
O U
~ H H U N H
s E I t A w
461 1
4.
n
LJ
l®
III
I,
�1 :Ha
FF
:c
Item No. 8
r
November 12, 1984
Dr. John W. Nicoll
Newport -Mesa Unified School District
1601 16th Street
Newport Beach, California 92663
Mr. Ron Whitley
Department of Parks, Beaches and
Recreation
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92660
Re: Renovation of Lincoln School Athletic Field
Dear John and Ron:
•
As you know, Taylor Grant and I were involved behind
the scenes in the combined City /School District /Community effort
to renovate the City's Buffalo Hills and the District's Andersen
School athletic fields. The Buffalo Hills project is 100%
complete. Taylor has indicated that the Andersen project will be
completed within the next couple of months -- apparently we are
waiting to install the grass until after the rainy season. The
renovation work on each of these fields consisted of the removal
of the top 12 to 18 inches of hard - packed clay, a revamping of
the sprinkler system, the installation of a perforated pipe
underground drainage system, the importation of new top soil and
the installation of a top - quality grass designed specifically for
athletic field use.
I propose that the School District and the City now
take up the issue of a similar renovation project on the grass
athletic fields located at the Lincoln School. This renovation
project should include the following:
1. Widening of the existing field closest to the
Lincoln School buildings. This would involve the conversion of a
portion of the presently black- topped area to grass.
• I�
rALcan DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 100 MONACO COURT • P.O. BOX 278 - PLEASANTON, CA 94566.415/845 -8890
• Dr. John W. Nicoll
Mr. Ron Whitley
Page 2
November 12, 1984
r, UDD OEVELOPMEWCOMMY
2. Installation of a block retaining wall on the
westerly property line adjacent to the apartments. Once the
block wall is installed, fill dirt needs to be imported which
will bring the edge of the field to the block wall. Presently,
there is an approximate five -foot downward sloping berm at this
property line.
3. Complete renovation of the top soil and sprinkler
system, together with the installation of an underground perfo-
rated pipe drainage system (similar to the Buffalo Hills and
Andersen Field projects).
4. Installation of new temporary goal posts similar
to those purchased for the Buffalo Hills, Andersen and San Miguel
fields.
5. Installation of additional baseball backstops at
appropriate locations - -this will create an overlay of baseball
• fields and soccer fields.
Clearly, the Lincoln renovation project will be on a
much larger scale than either the Buffalo Hills or Andersen
renovation projects. The encompassed area (if properly regraded)
should yield approximately five soccer fields plus at least that
many baseball diamonds (with backstops). As with any proposed
project, there needs to be an initial feasibility analysis, the
purpose of which is to evaluate whether it makes practical,
economic or political sense to embark upon the project. Accord-
ingly, I propose the following Phase I feasibility analysis on a
joint basis between the City and School District:
•
1. Prior to any meaningful dialogue rega -rding the
number of fields which can be generated, the scope of the work
which must be undertaken or the cost of the work, it is impera-
tive that certain basic engineering maps of the subject area be
prepared. The City has on staff the appropriate engineering
personnel to prepare a boundary survey which would include a
designation of the various contour elevations of the subject
project. I propose that the City provide its engineering staff
on a gratis basis so that this raw data can be prepared.
Iq
Dr. John W. Nicoll
Mr. Ron Whitley
Page 3
November 12, 1984
rALcan
2. Once the raw data is prepared, it can then be
turned over to Dave Fennell of Design- Construct -Inc. for prepara-
tion of the boundary survey and topographical map. Dave was used
to prepare the plans and specifications for the renovation of
both the Andersen and Buffalo Hills fields. Additionally, Dave
is a former employee of the City who is entirely familiar with
the renovation of athletic fields.
The cost of Dave's work would probably not exceed
$5,000. I envision that he would prepare a master set of speci-
fications for the renovation of the entire subject property.
Once these plans are prepared, we could then move into Phase II
which would be the obtaining of rough cost estimates to install
the improvements recommended on Dave's plans. Phase III would be
an evaluation of the cost effectiveness of these expenditures and
a prioritization on a time -line basis of when the expenditures
would be made and the improvements actually installed.
In conclusion, it is my request that the City and
• School District join together as outlined above in Phase I of the
renovation of the Lincoln School athletic fields. The actual
field work by the City's crews should take no longer than two to
three weeks and Dave Fennell's plans should take no more than
four to six weeks for completion. Thus, by January 1, 1985, we
should have completed the master improvement specifications for
the project which, in turn, could then be evaluated as we move
into subsequent phases of this project.
After you and Ron have had an opportunity to review
this matter and discuss it between the two of you, please give me
a call so that we can discuss a future course of action.
Thanks very much.
Yours very truly,
FALCO 77NT COMPANY
Bruce E. Harrington
beh /jh
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Ray Schnierer
Mr. Taylor B. Grant
Mr. W. Michael McKinley
COR87 �(�
,A
Item No. 9
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Marine Department
November 21, 1984
TO: PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FROM:
Buddy
Belshe,
Marine Safety
Captain
SUBJECT:
BOARD
SURFING,
WEST NEWPORT
BEACH, 1984
History
Surfing areas were first established in the early 1960s. On
July 12, 1976 the present Surfing Regulations were adopted with
the exception of establishing the body surfing area between 40th
and 44th Streets (Resolution 8844). In October of 1978 the City
Council adopted a resolution setting aside a body surfing area
between 40th Street and 44th Street from May 1 through October 31
(Resolution 9362). This proposal originated with the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Commission in 1977.
Background
• The Marine Department has, since 1960, enforced the surfing regulations
by education, with public address systems, with use of both beach units
and lifeguard towers and by the issuance of citations. If serious
or volatile situations resulted, then police assistance was requested.
Over the years, diversion of personnel to issue citations or to make
arrests has influenced staffing and has, as a result, taken attention
from safety problems on the beaches.
•
!6
Based on the current surfing regulations, and with the exception of
40th through 44th Streets, from June 15th through September 10th
boardsurfers have the opportunity to surf 71% of the daylight hours
during the summer months and, based on the total year, can surf 91%
of the time.
The City has used and considered many ways to control surfing over the
years and we have found the present system (yrith the inclusion of the
40th to 44th Street body surfing area) to be far superior for ease of
enforcement and fairness to all groups using the water.
Surfing 1984
This year was a low surf activity year, with fewer west swell conditions
than usual. Even so, in the West Newport area, half the guards time
is spent on surfing control. In a normal surf year 70 to 80% of guards'
M
. time would be spent enforcing surfing regulations. A total of seven
citations were issued by the Marine Safety staff in 1984. The use and
assistance of the Police Department's new ATCs has provided better
enforcement when they were used.
•
u
Recommendation
We will recommend no changes to the current surfing regulations. We
do not have facts or statistics to warrant making any changes at this
time.
Buddy G elshe, Captain, Marine Safety Division
Attached: Surfing Regulations
:=...
I
Item No. 10
Natural History Foundation of Orange County
*— 17752 Skypark Blvd., Suite 245 P.O. Box 7038
Irvine, CA 92714 Newport Beach, CA 92660
(714) 545.8967
NOVEMBER 19, 1984
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
C /OF MR. RON WHITLEY, DIRECTOR
3300 NEWPORT BLVD.
NEWPORT BEACH, CA '92663
SUBJECT: WESTBAY INTERPRETIVE CENTER
HONORABLE COMMISSION MEMBERS:
THE INCREASING IMP.LEMENTATION'COSTS ALONG WITH THE IMPORTANCE
OF MAXIMIZING THE SCIENTIFIC,.EDUCATIONAL.AND RECREATIONAL'
VALUES OF THE BACKBAY HAS LEAD US TO THE CONCLUSION THAT WE
SHOULD LOOK AT THE OVERALL LONG RANGE PICTURE — NOT JUST FOCUS
ON THE WESTBAY SITE WITH RELOCATABLE FACILITIES.
WE WOULD LIKE TO MEET WITH THE COMMISSION AND DISCUSS THE .
• APPROPRIATE METHOD OF COALESCING THE GOALS OF ALL INTERESTED
PARTIES INTO AN OVERALL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. THESE PARTIES
INCLUDE:
C.ITY.OF NEWPORT BEACH
FRIENDS OF THE BACKBAY
DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION
COUNTY OF ORANGE
PACIFIC COAST ARCHAEOLOGY SOCIETY
PALEONTOLOGY ADVISORY COMMISSION
NEWPORT /MESA SCHOOL DISTRICT
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRVINE
PLEASE LET ME KNOW OF WHEN WE CAN MEET.
0
VERY
RON YEf%, NHFOCp DIRECTOR OF FACILITIES AND MUSEUM PLANNING
RY:SE
CC: WESTBAY COMMITTEE
•
l�
Item No. 11
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
• ~, Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department
�1
December 10, 1984
STUDY SESSION
ITEM N0.
TO: Mayor and City `Council
FROM: Parks, Beaches and'Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Agenda for Joint Meeting with Parks,
Beaches and Recreation Commission
The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission has determined that they i
would like to discuss the following items:
1. Safety and access to San Miguel Park - Commissioner King
2. Beach Restrooms - Commissioner de Boom
• 3. West Newport, P.E. Right of Way - Commissioner Wolfe
4. Overview of Projects and'Programs - 'Commission Chairperson Cohen
The Commission appreciates the opportunity, to meet with the Council and
feels this is an excellent way to discuss and determine common goals for
the improvement of Newport Beach.
F_ IL
mr
Item No. 12
RECREATION DIVISION
• NOVEMBER, 1984 PROGRESS REPORT
Special Activity and Classes
Fall class schedules are winding down -and work is beginning on the Recreation
Division's winter program.
The Rent -A -Santa reservations are going quite well. Not only are people
interested in this program, but the Department is really pushing to make it
the best Christmas program yet. The scheduling of Santa Claus will take
place this week.
On November 17 the City conducted an excursion to the Los Angeles Garment
District. The bus was full and everyone had a good time buying gifts.
On December 15 the City of Newport Beach and Corona del Mar High School will
be holding a 5K. All the proceeds from the Run will go to the Girls Athletic
Fund at Corona del. Mar High School. Expected attendance is 700 people.
The City's recreational brochure is due to be mailed out December 6. Registra-
tion for classes and programs for winter begins December 20, 1984, and we
are looking forward to an excellent registration.
Senior Citizens
• Classes and programs are going great guns. Classes are registered to a maximum
and this should continue since the OASIS membership is also enlarging.
OASIS has just submitted their capital project list which will be reviewed.by
staff and then prioritized. The list was a joint project of the Executive
Committee of the Friends of OASIS and the Long Range Planning and Finance
Committee.
Group W Cable has completed its filming ,of 12 OASIS programs. These shows will
be aired in January and February and they should give a great deal of notoriety
to OASIS and the City's Senior Citizen program.
Coming in future months are several new classes for seniors. Those classes
being considered are arts and crafts, computers and ballet.
Meetings that took place at OASIS in November included:
Orange County Advisory Council
Blood Pressure
Fund Raising Committee
Executive Committee
Long Range Planning
CASO
• OASIS is planning a Fund Raiser Kick Off "Christmas Party" on Sunday, December 9.
Expected attendance is 200 and all will share champagne and hors de'oeuvres.
-2-
Aquatics
• Problems have just been resolved concerning the Card Keys at Newport Harbor
High's 50 Meter Pool. Staff is now getting into the facility on time and
classes are running smoothly. However, for a period of time there was
unsatisfactory service by the NMUSD.
Sailing
The fall sailing program is off slightly. Sabot registration is down along
with the Hobie Newport program. The Lido 14 program is up slightly while the
Newport Sailing Club is doing quite well.
Maintenance and Facilities
Our three man maintenance staff is doing an excellent job. Special attention
is being given to the Theatre Arts Center in order to make sure it is especially
clean on performance nights. Special attention is being given to all multi-
purpose rooms in order to keep them in excellent shape for all' classes.
Continual evaluation is going on concerning the use of School District facilities.
Bills are coming to us incomplete and cost is much higher than it should be.
Further evaluations will be forthcoming.
Adult and Youth Sports
• Adult Softball and Basketball Leagues will continue through December. Basketball
fliers for the winter leagues have been mailed out to all managers and are now
available in the Parks, Beaches and Recreation office.
Registration will be accepted through December 7. Practice games begin December 17.
Youth Sports
The City Championships for Boys Flag Football will be completed this month.
The City of Newport Beach's championship team will compete against the City of
Santa Ana December 1 at Buena Park in the Orange County Championship Tournament.
The Cross Country program is due to begin in December. Fliers have gone out to
the schools and registration has begun. The Meet will be held at Eastbluff
Park on December 15 beginning at 9:00 A.M.
The youth basketball program begins December 10 at all of the local schools.
Registration and the league set -up are currently taking place.
M
Tom Line
Item No. 13
PARK AND STREET TREE DIVISION
NOVEMBER, 1984 PROGRESS REPORT
Our Park Crews performed the following tasks in addition to normal
maintenance during the month of November:.
Built retaining wall around restroom at San Miguel
Park plant hedge.
Set up tables, chairs, traffic cones and returned them
for Corona del Mar 5K Run.
Installed moulding in dressing room at Theatre Arts
Center.
Installed Japanese statue and landscaping at City Hall.
Fertilized all turf areas.
Our Street Tree Division performed the following:
• Trimmed 286 trees.
Removed 12 trees.
is
W
Root pruned 3 trees.
Completed 10'Work Requests.
Areas being trimmed are Balboa Peninsula, Westcliff and Newport Heights.
W 1 H