Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05/02/1989 - PB&R Commissionj 3 Item No. 3 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Ft Parks, Beaches .& Recreation Commission May 2, 1989 �T � \��. City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Ex- Officio Member Present: Ronald A. Whitley Staff 'Present: Jack Brooks, Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent Mark Dever, Recreation Superintendent Dottie Plohr, Secretary I. PROCEDURAL MATTERS Item #1 - Call to Order Call to Orde The meeting of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:03 P.M. Item #2 - Roll Call Roll Call Roll call was taken. Commissioners Brenner, Grant, Herberts Konwiser, Springer, Taft and Vandervort were present. Item #3 - Approval of Minutes - Meeting of April 4, 1989 Approval of Minutes Commissioner Herberts amended the minutes under Item #9, Balboa Bay Club Lease, second paragraph, to read ±26 acres, rather than 4.4 acres. Commissioner Herberts then moved the minutes of the April 4, 1989 meeting be approved as corrected. Unanimous. Item #4 - Adoption of Agenda Adoption of Agenda The agenda was adopted as presented. II. ACTION ITEMS Item #5 - Tennis Court Lighting, San Joaquin Hills Park Tennis Court ighting, Mark Deven reported this item was continued from the last an Joaquin meeting and the Commission directed staff to develop ills Park operational procedures, regulations and signage which would relate to tennis participants the seriousness of the pro- posed project. Staff felt that revising the maximum lighting time to 9:00 P.M. and signing in large, red bold letters would serve this purpose. He pointed out that such signing has had some success at certain volleyball court locations where there have been complaints. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 2 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Mr. Deven read the rules and.regulations for the proposed lighted tennis courts and noted that the residents in Jasmine Creek received this information prior to tonight's meeting. He reported he had talked to many of the residents who are not in favor of the project and, as a result, if the Commission has any doubt as to the effectiveness of the proposed regulations, the project should be denied. Chair Konwiser reported the changes made in the conditions have been an attempt by staff to mitigate the situation. He then opened the meeting to Public Testimony to those who favor the proposed lighting project. Candace,Mason, tennis instructor at San Joaquin Hills Park for the City, addressed the Commission. She reported there is no lighted facility in the Corona del Mar area; players would have to go elsewhere or join aprivate club. She said if the courts were lit, revenue could be doubled and -� she could keep all her students. There being no further testimony in favor of the lights, Chair Konwiser opened the meeting to those opposed. Andrew L. Thompson, 4 Jetty Drive, addressed the Commission. He thanked Mark Deven for answering all the calls and ques- tions and stated he was present to urge denial of the project since the courts are too close to the homes. He reported he has looked at other courts in the community and in each case none are as close to the courts as they are in Jasmine Creek. He referred to the constant stream of profanity, loud radios and occasional late ,parties which disturb his sleep. He also pointed out the Planning Commission considered the same idea in 1981 and it was rejected due to the same burdens on the homeowners. The situation has not changed since that time. Richard Haspel, 16 Shoal Drive, addressed the,Commission. Representing the Board of Directors at Jasmine Creek, he reported the Board unanimously backs Mr. Thompson's position. Eugene Hancock, 2 Jetty Drive, addressed the Commission. He passed out a map of the area which he reviewed comparing the court locations in relationship to the homes at San Joaquin Hills, Mariners Park and Las Arenas Park. Homes at Ll �I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH :Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 3 City Council Chambers other parks located 160- 170'.away noise. The Jasmine homes are onl which makes it even worse,. He al Commission hearing in 1981 and th exist, stating he bought his home courts would only be used during 7 P.M. INDEX from courts still have y 25' from the courts so referred to the Planning e problems which still on the premise that the the day. Commissioner Grant asked Mr. Hancock for his view of the problem during supervised instruction versus unsupervised instruction. He replied it is still a problem and he wants the project denied. Judy Hunter, 8 Jetty Drive, addressed the Commission. She stated she is against the project since the lights would face their bedrooms. As it is now, her patios are very close to the courts and tennis balls hit her roof and also go into their patios which is very frightening when the players look for their balls on their premises. At present, it is too noisy and annoying; profanity is bad and radios are at full blast, which she feels should be prohibited. She stated they, too, bought their home on the assumption the courts would not be lit. Carl Bergkvist, Attorney for Nellie Carter at 6 Jetty Drive, addressed the Commission. He thanked Mark Deven for all his assistance and reported he reviewed the courts at other locations which are not in close proximity to the homes. His client lives only 40' away from the courts and the nuisance and noise are taking away from the enjoyment of her property. He suggested other parks would be more suited to lighting and that it would be an unfair burden to light the courts at San Joaquin Hills when there are better alternatives. During discussion, Commissioner felt the developer was negligent built so close to the courts, he Due to all the arguments against the loud profanity, he suggested Taft stated that since he in allowing homes to be would abstain from voting. the project, particularly a better location be sought. Commissioner Herberts stated she was in favor of denying the project. nmissioner Grant stated he favored the project of having lighted court for public use upon certain conditions and g,gested looking at Grant Howald and Irvine Terrace Parks r possible lighting. S11 I I I 1 1 (Commissioner Brenner arrived at 7:30 P.M. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 4 City Council Chambers " 7 p.m. INDEX Chair Konwiser advised the Irvine Terrace courts were approved on the condition they would never be lighted. Director Whitley advised the San Joaquin Hills courts are the only ones where a conduit was built during initial construction so that the courts might be lit in the future. the other courts could not be proposed because there is no underground structure to allow lighting at a reasonable cost Commissioners Springer and Vandervort agreed the situation is not workable due to the close proximity of the homes. Commissioner Vandervort recommended the courts be signed as to hours of play and no ,radios. Commissioner Brenner stated there is probably no location in this area where courts can be lit. Commissioner Grant agreed, noting that lights were installed at Corona del Mar High School but are not used since the public is against " -� them. Director Whitley advised the City paid for the lights at Corona del Mar High School which were shielded and adjusted to everyone's satisfaction, however, when Proposition 13 was passed in 1978, the School District decided they couldn't afford the utility bill. The $20,000 allotted for lights at San Joaquin Hills could pay the energy bills at the high school as a compromise. Motion x Commissioner Herberts moved to deny the proposed lighting Ayes K x x x x x project at the San Joaquin Hills tennis courts. Motion Abstain x passes. Staff was instructed to review a possible alternate site, such as Corona del Mar High School. Item #6 - Dock Construction, Newport Aquatics Center ock Constri ion., Newpoi Director Whitley gave a brief background of the Aquatic quatics Center facility. The property is co -owned by the City and enter County with the City being the lead agency in administering. The local homeowners didn't want anything that would attract a large number of people. The Dover Shores Community Association wanted the fingers dredged on North Star Beach for dock purposes which was denied and precedent set that ( ? dredge material should not be placed on a public beach. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 5 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Mr. Whitley referred to the report submitted, noting a need for a dock at the facility, however, the problem involves the dredge material, not the excavation material. Chair Konwiser opened the meeting to Public Testimony for those favoring the project. Mr. Curtis Fleming, One Whitecliffs and President of the Aquatic Center Board, addressed the Commission. He reviewed the non - profit organization's many benefits to the community and explained they cannot operate without a dock. They have received approval and permission from the Army Corps of Engineers acting as the lead agency and the Coastal Commission to excavate and build a dock. He explained the area to be dredged and excavated which would be distributed on site resulting in no net gain of material. They just received the soils report which shows the material compatible - 12% silt and 88% sand at the lowest level and similar to existing materials. The material would simply be distribute ( 1 from one place to another on site. Commissioner Herberts questioned the involved agencies' approval to put the materials on site and Mark Deven advised the environmental approval process did not see a problem excavating on site; the concern is over the dredging material. Director Whitley advised that the permit for the constructio of a dock has been approved by Council, however, the permit does not address the dredge and excavation material to make a lagoon. Commissioner Brenner inquired as to costs and Mr. Fleming stated it would cost $125,000 to haul to sea and $60,000 by land. He also advised the excavation /dredge material is basically the same as that on site and that the dredge material is like that in the preserve area. Tony Melum, Tidelands Administrator for the City, addressed the Commission and explained the dredge and excavation material. Commissioner Grant suggested the excavation material be spread and the dredge material could be hauled away and then it could legally be later put under the building pad, so _ why not just put it there. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 6 City Council Chambers . 7 .p.m. INDEX' Bruce Ibbetson, 424 San Bernardino and member of the Aquatics Board, addressed the Commission. He stated they are proposing to spread the material, which is the same, on site. The beach was built of dredge fill and they won't be adding to it, but will be re- distributing what is there. He pointed out the Center's benefit to the community for the handicapped, teaching and Olympians; and that the dock is vital to sustaining their activities. He asked the Commission to consider the approvals and reports of the professionals. There being no further testimony in favor of the project, Chair Konwiser opened the meeting to those opposed. Lane Kolnvek, 610 Tustin Avenue and President of the Friends of the Newport Bay, addressed the Commission. He reported their organization has 1500 members and it has always been their interest that the Bay be used for the public. They supported the Center originally and also support the dock. They are opposed to placing the dredge and excavation material on the beach that is too high now. Excavation of the lagoon would be shallow and the sediment would'be put on the beach again. When the dredge material comes up, it smells and should not be put on the beach. Ray Williams, Environmental Biology Teacher at Rio Hondo College, addressed the Commission. Mr. Williams presented an analysis of different sand using sieves and showed that the sand at North Star Beach is not of good quality and should not be added since it would not enhance the environ- ment. There would also be a maintenance problem and he suggested that if the beach is to be improved, good sand will have to be put on it. Frank Robinson, 1007 Nottingham Road, addressed the Commission. He clarified the conditions of the nature of the approvals from the environmental agencies which regulate activity in the Upper Bay. The project was approved with the exception of grading and dredging permits to be authorized by the City. None of the agencies involved conditioned the removal of the excavation and dredge material from the site, The option to dispose of the material on or off site was left to the discretion of the Aquatic Center or the City and /or the County as joint owners of the property. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 7 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX He stated the material in question would never be approved for other beaches. Proper use of the public.beach requires a master plan to develop an improvement program. He pointed out that on the east side there is a 100' x 200' pa area. Should the excavation material be taken out, some material could be put on the pad site and eventually used as the foundation for the Phase 2 building. Mr. Robinson stated he supports the dock except for the proposed accom- modation of excavation and dredge material which should be removed from the site. Mr. Gary Lovell, 1201 Dove Street, addressed the Commission. He voiced his concern over possible toxic substance and stated that, if approved, no dredging or excavation material be put on North Star Beach; if so, there should be a monitoring program. Bruce Ibbetson, 424 San Bernardino, addressed the Commission again and gave his background in environmental science. i He referred to the muck and mud which is silt from standing water. Since the material is the same as on the beach, they want to redistribute it on the beach. He reported' that Permit #88 -305 from the Army Corps of Engineers states they could spread over the remaining portion of the site. Bob Cannon, 19552 Sierra Canon in Irvine, addressed the Commission. As a member of the Aquatic Center Board, he stated there are times when precedents should be modified. There is a prospective use for a beach and the true bene- ficiary of the project is the community as a whole. Following close of Public Testimony, there was some discus- sion over the precedent issue. Commissioner Grant asked Tony Melum of the City if, when the Dover Shores project was refused permission to dump on the site, if in fact, this would be bringing in non - similar material from off site. Mr. Melum, answered yes, this was true, however, this case is.different because it is similar material already on site. Commissioner Taft stated he favors a dock but the question is the disposal of the dredge material which he prefers to be off site. t Commissioner Springer concurred and suggested a fundraiser or user fee be used to pay for removal. Eventually the beach will have to be improved as it gets more crowded. 'CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 8 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Commissioner Grant stated he would approve with certain conditions, namely, any future dredging should be removed off site; and that the dredge material be put under the building pad subject to soil tests pursuant to the City Building Codes. Commissioner Herberts agreed the Aquatic Center is of great benefit, however, she would like to see a lovely beach and would not vote for it as a dump site. Eventually the land will be developed as a beach for recreation purposes and there would be costs to the City for the material to be removed. She said she supports staff's recommendations Items #1 and #2 and agrees with Commissioner Taft that a master plan is necessary for the whole area. Director Whitley advised the Dover Shores homeowners feel comfortable with what exists; they are not in a hurry for public enhancement due to congestion problems. } Chair Konwiser stated that North Star Beach, although a valuable piece of land, doesn't resemble a beach and is not obstructive to homeowners. Since the City gets benefits from the Center, they could be asked to help pay for the removal. The material could be used'under the proposed building as a compacted fill later. Motion x Commissioner Herberts moved to support the building of a Ayes x x x dock; prohibit the depositing of dredge material on the Nays x x x x beach; allow the excavation material on the leased property as long as it isn't-built any higher than the Phase 1 building pad,, balance to be removed off site. Motion fails. Motion x Commissioner Grant motioned the following conditions regulat Ayes x x x x the construction of a dock on North Star Beach: (1) Permit Nays x x the Aquatic Center to deposit dredge material on the portion' of the site which forms the pad under 'the building expan- sion designated as Phase 2. Deposited dredge material shall not exceed 1500 cubic yards. (2) Prohibit grading within 15' of the existing block wall contiguous with North Star Lane. (3) Permit the Aquatic Center to grade excava- tion material within the limits of fill upon verification of its compatibility with the existing material as determined by soils analysis. The extent of grading will be limited to an elevation change within the limits of fill I not to exceed 12 ". (4) The material resulting from any future maintenance dredging shall be accommodated off site at the Aquatic Center's expense. (5) All material to be deposited on site shall be monitored by appropriate state and u CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 9 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX federal agencies and that documentation shall be available for public inspection. Motion passes. Commissioner Brenner left the meeting at 10:00 P.M. Item #7 - Appeal of Street Tree Committee Decision, 504 Appeal of Redlands Street Tree Committee Director Whitley referred to Mr. and Mrs. Winter's letter Decision appealing the Street Tree Committee's decision to remove two Silk Oak trees. Chair Konwiser opened the meeting to Public Testimony and Mrs. Freda Winter, 504 Redlands, addressed the Commission. She stated she is appealing the removal of the trees and was never informed as to why her request was denied. She presented a petition from her neighbors on the 400 and 500 blocks of Redlands supporting her request. She noted Redlands used to be lined with Silk Oaks but now there are j only four, two of which are at their property. She feels the trees are unsightly and wants them removed for their landscape project. She would like the trees replaced further back since they are now too close to the curb. Commissioner Herberts reported the Designated Tree for Redlands is the Southern Magnolia. She would have no ob- jection if the trees were replaced by the City within City boundaries and the owner pay for removal and replace- ment. Chair Konwiser stated he supports the removal and replace- ment with the Designated Tree. Commissioner Herberts explained that, should another species be desired, it can be requested of the Street Tree Committee and approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. Commissioner Taft asked if a deposit should be required to guarantee installation and Commissioner Springer explained this has never been required and should be discussed later. Chair Konwiser suggested the money be paid before removal and replacement. ( Commissioners Grant, Herberts and Vandervort agreed that should the Designated Tree be changed, 75% of the neighbor- hood agree subject to staff approval. Director Whitley 1I advised this can be implemented into Department policy. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 10 City Council Chambers . 7 p.m. INDEX potion x Commissioner Herberts motioned to approve the removal and Oyes x x x x x x replacement of the two City trees at 504 Redlands, type to be determined by the June 6, 1989 meeting, and that no removal occur until a decision is made as to the type of tree to be planted. Unanimous. Commissioner Herberts explained to Mrs. Winter that the trees will be removed after June 6, 1989. She recommended the neighbors be solicited for their input should a species other than Southern Magnolia be desired. If nothing is heard from them by June 6, the trees will be Southern Magnolia as designated on the street tree list. Staff was requested to review policy regarding payment and changing tree types for the next meeting. Item #8 - Beach Volleyball Applications Beach Volle ball Commissioner Taft reviewed the Beach and Oceanfront Application Committee's recommendations and announced that Recommenda- tion #2 be limited to Lugonia, not Colton Street. Following Commissioner Taft's summation of the volleyball court application process, Chair Konwiser opened the meeting to Public Testimony. Dona Colombero, 1003 E. Balboa Boulevard, addressed the Commission as to Recommendation #1 at 1011 E. Balboa Blvd. She stated she does not want additional volleyball' courts in this area. If necessary, they should be located further 3 down at 1017. Her reasons included problems with drinking; courts too close to the Pier, fire rings and park; and there are already enough courts in the cfrea. Bill Mais, 1013 E. Balboa Blvd., addressed the Commission. He stated the court at 1009 was moved and he would like it replaced at the level area which is a good place to play. The court at 1017 is dirty due to ice plant and sticker weed. Mark Deven advised he received a call from Mrs. Everett at 1011 E. Balboa Blvd. who wants the court in front of 1009 120' out from the sidewalk. 1 Leslie Williams, 1013 E. Balboa, addressed the Commission and referred to the "semi private" court at 1017 where she witnessed the owner asking other players not to play at this site. 1 l� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 11 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Motion x Commissioner Taft moved the.court be no closer than 100' Ayes x x x x 'x x from the nearest residents and between the easterly boundary line of 1009 and westerly of 1013. Unanimous. Commissioner Taft referred to Recommendation #2, Lugonia at Oceanfront, and stated discussion should be limited to Lugonia. If Colton Street is to be considered, the proper , volleyball application process must be followed. Helen McNair, 6510 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission. She recommended another site since a new play park was just built and there will be problems with children crossin at the same site as volleyball players. Joan McNair, 6510 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission. She agreed no court should be installed due to the children's play area. Doug Cortez, 6606 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission to oppose the Lugonia court. He said there are three tandem courts at 66th -69th Streets which attract large crowds and are used every day from morning to dusk, resulting in overflowing trash cans, etc., which is unfair to those who live there. Other courts a block down are not as heavily used. He referred to Tom Christensen's letter wherein the West Newport Beach Association supports opposition to courts proposed at Lugonia Street. He said he would like to work for rules that more fairly distribute volleyball activity and nuisance along the beach. Steve Foley, 5505 Seashore, addressed the Commission. He feels the problem is with the tandem courts which allow congregation and draw huge crowds. The more professional players now play at Colton and a community member can't get on. 'Doug Edlund', 6604 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission. He stated he can see ten courts from his house and the tan- dem courts are used regularly; the rest are not. He suggested one court at Lugonia and posting of volleyball rules. John Tyree, 208 Lugonia, addressed the Commission. He felt players should be reminded of the rules of challenging play. He recommended one court at Lugonia and decentralization of �J the courts along the beach. Madeline Lottes, 6601 Seashore, addressed the Commission. 1 She stated players don't want courts moved toward the river bed due to the windy t conditions. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches .& Recreation Commission Page 12 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Bill Thomas, 6604 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission. He recommended a balance of courts so as not to cause over- crowding and favors one court at Lugonia. Bill Bennett, 226 Lugonia, addressed the Commission. Due to more players, he feels more courts are needed and•favors two at Lugonia. Mark Deven reported,he received a call from Mr. Dawson, 6506 West Oceanfront, favoring installation at Lugonia. He received a.call from Gina'Watkins, 6408 W. Oceanfront, and Mr. and Mrs. Lightner opposing the courts at Lugonia. Motion Commissioner Taft movedithe application for the two courts at Lugonia be denied. Motion x Following discussion, Commissioner Vandervort made a Ayes x x x x x x substitute motion to approve one court at Lugonia to be f located 150' out. Unanimous. Commissioner Herberts recommended consideration be given to eliminating tandem courts. This will be reviewed by the Beach and Oceanfront Committee. Commissioner Taft referred to Recommendation #3, 12th Street and Oceanfront, and reported the original court was placed too -close to the School Yard and basketball court, therefore, they are recommending installation at the end, of 12th Street and Oceanfront. Bruce Torczak, 1228 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission. He stated two metal poles were removed last winter and he would Tike them reinstalled. In the application being presented, the School Yard is 200' away. Phillip Quarre, 1440 W. Oceanfront, addressed the Commission opposing the location at 12th Street. The courts at 12th Street resulted in large crowds, litter and profanity, denying him peaceful use of his home. Since there is a recreation facility at 13th Street, he suggested putting the courts in east of this 150 -200' from the sidewalk where they wouldn't interfere with children's activities. Mr. Deven advised that he was contacted by Roy Lewis, 1200 W. Oceanfront, who indicated his support for the court --A location at a minimum 150' seaward at the 12th St. end. Motion x Commissioner Herberts moved to install a court between 1224 Ayes x x x x x x'and 1228 W. Oceanfront 125' out from the sidewalk. Unanimous. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 13 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Request for Funding for Orange Coast College Sailing. Bas, Participati� in Santa An. River Corridor Master Plan Item #9 - Request for Funding for Orange Coast College Sailing Base Director Whitley reported the Department has been fortunate to use the Sailing Base over th-e past 20 years for classes at no cost and, as such, the request for funds is reasonable. David Grant, Director of Marine Programs at Orange Coast College, addressed the Commission. Mr. Grant gave a back- ground of the facility and explained they don't have a budget for the project which the state has mandated be sprinkled for fire protection. He explained the 8" water line that can provide service and need for a fire hydrant. Commissioner Grant recommended staff work with Public Works and /or Council to solve the problem. lotion x Commissioner Vandervort motioned the Commission authorize aye' x x x x x x staff to work out a way to get an additional line at City expense. If-this is not feasible, no more than $30,000 of shared funds be recommended toward this project. 40tion x Commissioner Springer substituted the motion to direct Mr. ayes x x Whitley to pursue action with the Public Works Department lays,. x x x x to install a fire hydrant. Motion fails. The vote was called for Commissioner Vandervort's motion. Unanimous. Item #10 - Participation in Santa Ana River Corridor Master Plan Director Whitley reviewed the multi- agency project which will terminate in Newport Beach at the 'Santa Ana River Jetty. During discussion, Commissioner Taft stated he would want the City named in the agreement should funds be dispersed. ommissioner Grant voicdd his desire to instead spend the oney to study our open space. Motion x ommissioner Herberts moved to recommend to the City Council Ayes x x x x hat a budget amendment of $6,000 be approved that enables Nays x x he Ci.ty of Newport Beach to participate with other public gencies in the planning of the Santa Ana River Corridor. t ) J11T, otion carries. Request for Funding for Orange Coast College Sailing. Bas, Participati� in Santa An. River Corridor Master Plan CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3.rks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 14 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Item #11 - Facility Use Request, IMUA Canoe Club Facility Use Mark Deven reviewed the IMUA Outrigger Canoe Club's annual Request, request, pointing out that they are exemplary users of the IMUA Canoe facility. Club Motion x Commissioner Grant motioned the request for seasonal Ayes x x'x x x storage of Outrigger Canoes at North Star Beach by the IMUA Canoe Club be approved subject to the conditions presented. Unanimous. Item #12 - Ad Hoc Oceanfront Encroachment Citizens Ad Hoc Ocea Advisory Committee front Encroachmen Director Whitley reported the City Council established a Citizens subcommittee to address physical encroachments on the Advisory Balboa Peninsula oceanfront. Chair Konwiser offered to Committee Motion x participate and Commissioner Taft so moved he be this Ayt ''! x x > x x x Commission's representative. Unanimous. Commissioner Grant requested we monitor this process so we can use a similar one in other areas where there are like problems. III. PUBLIC COMMENTS IV. DISCUSSION ITEMS Item #13 - Status of Capital Projects Status of Capital Commissioner Grant and Chair Konwiser stated they preferred Projects the previous form of reporting capital projects as long as it is more legible. Item #14 - 1989 -90 Budget 1989 -90 Budget Director Whitley reported the City Council will be con- sidering the budget at their May 22 Study Session. The Commissioners are invited to attend. Item #15 - Commission Committee Reports Commission Committee (a) Capital Improvements - No report. Reports (. ! (b) Street Tree - Chair Herberts reported Arbor Day was a wonderful success and complimented staff on planning 4� and implementation and suggested a thank you note be written to the school. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Cammiss.ion Page 15 City Council Chambers . 7 .p.m. INDEX She reported Mrs. Hoffman requested a Coral Tree at 1444 Santiago be removed. It has been removed without authorization and Director Whitley will investigate and report back. Commissioner Grant recommended the Designated Tree Lis be formalized, updated and approved as an official street tree list. Commissioner Herberts reported developers and remodele s are taking out trees, as an example, on Begonia, cementing and not replacing them. Director Whitley will investigate. (c) Recreation Program - Chair Vandervort reported the new programs for summer are presented for the Commission. (d) Oceanfront and Beach - No report. 1 % (e) Budget - No report. (f) Open Space Acquisition - Chair Grant asked that this be brought back for formal direction and approval. (g) Chair's Report - No report. Item #16 - Commission Liaison Reports Commission Liaison (a) Friends of Oasis - No report. Reports (b) Friends of the Theatre Arts Center - Commissioner Herberts reported, the play, Lu Ann Hampton, is great and runs until the end of this week. She passed out the new schedule, pointing out that Zorba the Greek will run from June 2• -July 2. (c) CYC Booster Club - No report. Item #17 - Park and Street Tree Division Park and Street Tree Commissioner Grant questioned the path and gate to be Division installed at Grant Howald Park to the school. Director Whitley advised this is being done through the capital improvement process. 1 ) Commissioner Grant asked that the gate be put in now since 1� people want an access to open playing space. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH arks, Beaches & Recreation Commission Page 16 City Council Chambers 7 p.m. INDEX Item #18 - Recreation Division Recreation Division Director Whitley reported Mark Deven will be leaving the City for the City of Anaheim to further his career. He has 'done an outstanding job with the City and we will be sorry to see him leave. Mr. Deven said that it was a difficult decision since the City has meant a lot to him since he has been here. Chair Konwiser, on behalf of the Commission, congratulated him and pointed out the great job he has done here. Item #19 - Future Agenda Items Future Agenda Due to the Fourth of July Holiday, the Commission's Items July meeting will be held July 11, 1989. V. INFORMATION ITEMS Item #20 - Communication Received re. Inspiration Point Communicati Received re Letter received and filed. Inspiration Point Item #21 - Facility Inspections Facility Inspections Director Whitley reviewed the facility inspection process identifying areas that need work. Staff will recommend a formalization and schedule for future field closing for renovation. VI. SPECIAL, URGENT OR LAST MINUTE ITEMS VII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission adjourned at 12:55 A.M. The agenda for this meeting was posted on April 24, 1989 at 9:30 A.M. outside the City Hall Administration Building. Dottie F oh'r, Secretary