HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-05-1996 - Agenda•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AMENDED
PARKS, BEACHES AND RECREATION COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING TO BE HELD TUESDAY, MARCH 5, 1996
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
rII ' u
I. ORDER AND ROLL CALL
II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of. February 6, 1996
III PUBLIC COMMENTS
Members of the public are invited to comment on non agenda items.
Speakers are limited to three minutes.
IV. CONSENT. CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under ConsenYCalendar (1 -5) are considered by
the Commission to be routine and will all be enacted by one motion
• in the form listed below. The Commission members have received
detailed' staff reports on each of the items recommending approval.
There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time
the Commission votes on the motion unless members of the
Commission, staff or the public request specific items to be
discussed and /or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
Members of the public who wish to discuss a Consent Calendar
item should come forward to the lectern upon invitation by the
Chair, state their name and Consent Calendar Item Number, and
complete the sign -in card provided at the podium. Speakers are limited
to five minutes on agenda items.
Communication (Letter Attached)
• Letter from Jane and Ralph Parks opposing the removal of the new
bench at West Jetty View Park.
Bench Removal Request (Report Attached)
Deny request to remove one donated bench at Poppy Avenue and
Ocean Boulevard in Corona del Mar.
3. Bench Removal Request (Report Attached)
• Delay decision on bench removals at West Jetty View Park until
subcommittees of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
and Arts Commission can assess the alternatives.
4. Park and Tree Division (Report Attached)
Report of Park and Tree Division activities during February and
upcoming projects in March.
2
• 5. Recreation and Senior Services (Reports Attached)
Report of activities during February for these two divisions.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Tree Donation for Peninsula Park (Report Attached)
Review donation, of one specimen Chamaerops humilis tree, concrete
mow strip and 5" x 7" plaque with appropriate verbiage.
7. Tree Removal Request (Report Attached)
Review tree removal request at 243 Heliotrope Avenue.
8. Tree Removal at 1009 East Balboa Boulevard (Report Attached)
Review removal of one Ficus nitida tree.
9. Tree Removal Appeals at 1516 and 1536 Miramar Drive
(Report Attached)
Review appeal to retain two Ficus nitida trees scheduled for removal
due to hardscape damage.
10. Tree Appeals (Reports Attached)
Review nineteen tree appeals in Harbor View Hills South at the
following locations:
a. 986 Sandcastle Drive
r b. 1420 Sandcastle Drive
C. 915 Sandcastle Drive
d. 1436 Key View
e. 1456 Key View
f. 919 Sandcastle Drive
g. 1200 Seacrest Drive
h. 1300 Sandcastle Drive
I. 1026 Sandcastle Drive
j. 1001 Sandcastle Drive
k. 1018 Sandcastle Drive
I. 1547 Sandcastle Drive.
M. 894 Sandcastle Drive
n. 1009 Sandcastle Drive
o. 1520 Sandcastle Drive
P. 1441 Sandcastle Drive
q. 1432 Sandcastle Drive
r. 1539 Sandcastle Drive
S. 907 Sandcastle Drive
11. Peninsula Park Athletic Field (Verbal Report)
Status report on activities at Peninsula Park.
12. Proposed Amendment to Municipal Code (Report Attached)
• Discussion regarding parking in and use of public parks.
13. Castaways Park (Verbal Report)
Status report from Park and Open Space Committee.
14. Budget Committee (Verbal Report)
Status report on 1996/97 draft Recreation Division budget.
3
} 15. California State Games (Verbal Report)
Discussion of waiver of fees for one venue of the California State
Games.
16. California and Pacific Southwest Recreation and Park Conference
(Report Attached)
Brief overview of.sessions attended by Chair Vandervort and Vice
Chair Schonlau.
VI. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Matters which Commissioners may wish to put on a future agenda or raise for
discussion.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH Item II
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
\Oe-
G
February 6, 1,996
City Council Chambers 7 p.m.
Staff present: LaDonna Kienitz, Community Services Director
Marcelino Lomeli, Park and Tree Maintenance
Superintendent
Dave McConnell, Recreation Manager
Todd Alvarez, Recreation Coordinator
Dottie Flohr, Secretary
I. ORDER AND ROLL CALL
The Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission was, called to order
at 7:00 P:M.
Roll call was taken. Commissioners Beek, Bonner, Compton,
Demmer, Glasgow, Schonlau and Vandervort were present.
Il. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion
x
Commissioner Compton moved the minutes of the January 2, 1996
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
meeting be approved as presented. Unanimous.
•
III. PUBLIC COMMENTS
Yvonne Houssels, President of Harbor View Hills South Homeowners
Association, addressed the Commission concerning the City parkway
Eucalyptus trees in the Association's common area where adjacent
homeowners have experienced damage. Ms. Houssels stated that in
December she had requested a list of tree removals be addressed by
this Commission due to liability created by wind storms. Ms.
Houssels explained their concerns and presented pictures showing
the hazards, the Association's letter and 40 letters from homeowners
requesting removal. The Association maintains the common areas
and will pay 'for the costs of removal and replacement: She
requested the removals be addressed and approved at this meeting.
Martha Jones, 1220 Seacrest Place, addressed the Commission and
stated that the Eucalyptus trees are so tall that the tree trimming
equipment can hardly reach the tops of the trees. She urged the
trees be removed since the limbs have fallen and- the curbs and
sidewalks have been damaged by the roots.
Chair Vandervort advised that the Commission cannot vote on a non -
agenda item.
•
Marcy Lomeli explained that Director Niederhaus has requested tree
removals be individually addressed. Staff will meet with Ms.
Houssels and report back at the Commission's March 5 meeting.,
CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
G
February 6, 1996
Page 2
Citv'Council Chambers 7 p.•m.
tems be approved
ar. Unanimous.
Balboa Peninsula
nt and responses
;s during January
.rk system.
:omply with City's
1996.
mmunity Services
and 6 would be
3ames have been
for a 5 -man flag
I so that the ball
IV. CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion
x
Commissioner Compton moved that the following i
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
except for those removed from the Consent Calenc
Item #1 - Communications
Accept and file communications received from the
Point Association and Fire and Marine Departure
from the General Services Department.
Item #2 - Park and Tree Division
Approve report of Park and Tree Division activiti,
and upcoming projects in February.
Item #3 - Removed from Consent Calendar
Item #4 - Removed from Consent Calendar
Item #5 - Flag Pole Locations
Approve inventory report of flag poles in the City p,
Item 46 - Removed from Consent Calendar
Item #7 - Tree Appeals
Property owners withdrew their appeals and will
request to have hardscape repairs made by April 1
Item #8 - Removed from Consent Calendar
Item #9 - Removed from Consent Calendar
Item #10 - Five Year Plan for Capital Projects
Approve five year, capital projects submitted for Cc
buildings.
Item #11 - Removed from Consent Calendar
ITEMS REMOVED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
The Commission determined that Items 3, 4
addressed following Item 14.
•
Item #8 --Peninsula Park Athletic Field
Dave McConnell reported that rugby and soccer
scheduled for March 2 as well as tentative plan:
football game. Flag football requires no kickinc
should stay in the park.
tems be approved
ar. Unanimous.
Balboa Peninsula
nt and responses
;s during January
.rk system.
:omply with City's
1996.
mmunity Services
and 6 would be
3ames have been
for a 5 -man flag
I so that the ball
CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH
'Parks , Beaches & Recreation Commission
G
February 6, 1996
0 0 o i o y
Page 3
o� oI& G o^ City Council Chambers 7 P.M.
Commissioner Schonlau reported that the events scheduled for
March 2 will be videotaped to provide an opportunity to determine the
extent of liability. One potential hazard, i.e., proximity to the
boardwalk, has been solved with the field's relocation. Installation of
a 4' fence to stop balls traveling onto parking lots may not be
implemented due to financial problems.
Commissioner Demmer stated she feels it is important that the park's
plans meet all active recreation concerns and she suggested a back
stop be installed for softball.
Chair Vandervort opened the meeting to public hearing.
Douglas Boyd, 2101 E. Balboa Boulevard, addressed the
Commission. Mr. Boyd explained that the Peninsula is represented
by two Associations and he will suggest they raise $1,900 for a
permanent fence to accommodate a safe field.
Virginia Herberts, 2290 Channel Road, addressed the Commission
and stated the Balboa Peninsula Point Association appreciates the
work the Commission has done on the park. She recommended the
appropriate groups be notified that the park is available:
There being no further public testimony, Chair Vandervort closed the
meeting to public hearing.
Motion
x
Commissioner Scholau moved to accept staff's report as submitted.
Ayes
x'
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unanimous.
Item 49 - Marian Bergeson Aquatic Center
Todd Alvarez explained the City's joint use of the facility with the
School District and pointed out that the City adjusts its schedule
around the School District. Mr. Alvarez clarified the groups that
would use the pool along with the respective rates during both
normal operating and non - operating hours. In the past there has
been confusion regarding a structured fee schedule for the use of the
pool.
Todd reported that all pool user groups will be reviewing the new rate
schedule are aware of its cost impact to their organization in, the
coming year. Mr. Glasgow reiterated that it is the desire of the City
and Commission to promote their cooperation with special user
•
groups like the U.S. Olympics Water Polo team since this is their
home pool.
Motion
x
Commissioner Glasgow moved to approve the fee schedule for
Ayes (0
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
submittal to City Council. Unanimous.
CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commi.ss i on
G
\90e)- February 6, 1996
`o r Page 4
City Council Chambers 7 P.M.
wring.
i, addressed the
�m the President of
rpt. John Westren
tested this item be
ciation, businesses
Municipal Code is
, addressed the
ars ago there was
an and at that time
ed traffic. Parking
parking in the area
a Plan which the
)ved to establish a
Attorney and the
endations to the
Nil] serve on the
General Services
J 30+ trees due to
youth area and has
The nine appeals
with a value of
epresent present
Department does
ntly under a 3 year
cods to open trees
<e the area more
aring.
1 the Commission.
al and replacement
t has damaged the
Item #11 - Parking in Parks
Chair Vandervort opened the meeting to public he
Dona Colombero, 1003 E. Balboa Boulevar
Commission. Ms. Colombero presented letters frc
the Balboa Peninsula Point Association and Q
concerning parking on Peninsula Park. She regi
postponed until there is more input from the Assc
and residents 'before an amendment to the I
drafted.
Douglas Boyd, 2101 E. Balboa Boulevard
Commission. Mr. Boyd explained that several ye
an effort to redo the Central Balboa Community P
there were suggestions on how to handle increas
on Peninsula Park would increase the demand for
and would require amending the Specific Are
Association would'be reluctant to do.
on
x
Following discussion, Commissioner Compton mi
subcommittee to discuss the matter with the Cit
community with transmittal of their recomm
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Commission. Unanimous.
Chair Vandervort and Commissioner Bonner
committee along with representatives from the
Department and Recreation Division.
V. DISCUSSION ITEMS
Item #12a , Tree Appeal - 3430 Seabreeze Lane
Marcy Lomeli reported that the City has remove
public property damage in the Harbor View Hills ;
replaced them with the designated street tree.
before the Commission represent 15 trees
approximately $25,000. These trees do not r
damage to private or public property and the Fin
not feel they pose a fire hazard. The area is curre
trimming program using corrective trimming met[
up and remove any deadwood. This will ma
esthetically pleasing.
•
Chair Vandervort opened the meeting to public he
William Dana, 3430 Seabreeze Lane, addresse
-j
Mr. Dana reported he has been requesting remov
of the Brazilian Pepper Tree since 1981 because
wring.
i, addressed the
�m the President of
rpt. John Westren
tested this item be
ciation, businesses
Municipal Code is
, addressed the
ars ago there was
an and at that time
ed traffic. Parking
parking in the area
a Plan which the
)ved to establish a
Attorney and the
endations to the
Nil] serve on the
General Services
J 30+ trees due to
youth area and has
The nine appeals
with a value of
epresent present
Department does
ntly under a 3 year
cods to open trees
<e the area more
aring.
1 the Commission.
al and replacement
t has damaged the
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
February 6, 1996
•
c � Page 5 p r
City Council Chambers 7 m.
sidewalk and block wall and would likely cause further damage to the
curb, gutter and pavement. In 1992 the City replaced the sidewalk
and pruned the roots, result of which it has become unsightly. Mr.
Dana stated he would be willing to pay the costs for removal and
replacement and requests the tree be removed before it causes
further damage and liability suits.
In response to a question from Commissioner Compton, Marcy
Lomeli stated that planting a 15 gallon tree costs $95 and removal
depends upon the tree trunk which could cost $100 -$300. Mr.
Lomeli explained that the Concrete Supervisor inspects all the City's
sidewalks for private and public property damage as part of an •on-
going process. The Urban Forester and Utilities Department, when,
requested, also evaluate entire potential tree removal sites for
damage. Judgment is made on an individual basis. A tree must be
causing sufficient current private and/or public property damage in
order for it .to be removed. Property owners may •submit a claim for
damage that they feel is caused by a •City tree.
•
Commissioner Demmer commented that we can assume every tree
may eventually outgrow its location, and that she respects the Urban
Forester and Concrete Supervisor's evaluations. She stated she
feels the current program is satisfactory and removals should only
occur when necessary; and that trees should be saved and retained,
as much as they can.
Motion
x
Commissioner Demmer moved to deny the appeal for tree removal
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
at 3430 Seabreeze Lane. Unanimous.
Commissioner Bonner commented that he feels the Commission
should base their recommendations on the evaluations by
professional staff.
Chair Vandervort advised Mr. Dana he can appeal the Commission's
decision to the City Council.
Item #12b - 901 Sandcastle Drive
Chair Vandervort opened the meeting to public hearing.
Wanda Flynn, 901 Sandcastle Drive, addressed the Commission and
submitted pictures showing the property damage sustained in
February 1993 by the Eucalyptus tree prior to its being trimmed. She
•
filed a claim at that time which was denied by the City Council,
thereby requiring them to pay for the damage to the vehicle and the
tree, which is now disfigured. The tree was planted when the
community was developed and has now outgrown its location. Since
the tree is dangerous and she is liable, she requests its removal.
CITY OF NEWPORT
Parks, Beaches & Recreation
G
• m O° C+ O C s do February 6, 1996
Page 6
BERCH
Commission
o
ti
v4 City Council Chambers p.m.
In response to a question from Commissioner Schonlau, Marcy
Lomeli explained that during the last storm on January 1, 1996 eight
incidents were reported City -wide, four of which involved private
trees. Mrs. Flynn's tree breakage occurred prior to trimming in
March 1993 and the Association area is currently being trimmed to
complete the 3 year trimming cycle. Due to budget constraints, tree's
are generally trimmed every 3 years, however, certain species and
locations of trees require more frequent trimming. This Association
area is currently on the 3 year trimming cycle.
In response to a question from Commissioner Beek, Marcy Lomeli
explained that if a homeowner observes a potential tree hazard, staff
reviews the situation immediately whether or not the tree is within the
3 year trim cycle. Trimming due to a hazard may occur as needed.
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission and stated their
Association stands 'behinds the homeowners. The tree is
unattractive and its large falling branches place the Association,
residents and City.in jeopardy.
Commissioner Schonlau stated'he would support removal of the tree
'based upon its past problems and that the homeowner is willing to
pay for removal and replacement of the tree.
Commissioner Demmer stated removals should not be based upon
who is paying for removals /replacements, but rather on the
recommendation of the professional Urban Forester who is trying to
protect public property and our beautiful environment.
Moti on
x
Commissioner Demmer moved to remove the tree at 901 Sandcastle
Drive.
Motion
x
Commissioner Glasgow amended the motion to state that the tree be
Ayes
x
X'
x
x
x
x
x
removed at no cost to the homeowner. Unanimous.
Commissioner Beek pointed out the City has a removal policy and
stated she assumes the Commission's decisions are based upon
policy along with staff's recommendations and the homeowner's
input. Chair Vandervort concurred.
Item #12c - 1543 Sandcastle Drive
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission and requested the tree
be removed due to the same problems such as falling branches.
Motion
x
Chair Vandenvort moved to retain the two Eucalyptus trees at 1543
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Sandcastle Drive. Unanimous.
CITY OF NEWPORT
Parks, Beaches & Recreation
February 6, 1996
• �� ���^ �i o��d ^c�d� °o, ��io^`o Page 7
BERCH
Commission
o
d4 - City Council Chambers I P.M.
Item #12d - 1017 Sandcastle Drive
Beverly Schuberth, 1017 Sandcastle Drive, addressed the
Commission and reported there was a trip and fall hazard two years
ago when the tree uplifted the sidewalk. Ms. Schuberth stated she
-lives in fear of falling branches and feels the sidewalk will be uplifted
again.
Motion
x
Commissioner Schonlau moved the Eucalyptus tree be removed and
replaced with the designated street tree in order to reduce liability
and solve the problem permanently.
Commissioner Demmer stated every tree has a potential liability and
that in this case the sidewalk and curb are in good condition.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
Motion passes.
Nays
x
x
Item #12e - 1406 Sandcastle Drive
•
Harold Doyle, 1406 Sandcastle Drive, addressed the Commission.
Mr. Doyle reported there has been damage to his concrete planter;
the trees shed throughout the year; they exceed height limitations;
and.are hazardous during wind storms.
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission and stated that
Eucalyptus, trees are the wrong species for Sandcastle which is
along Buck Gully due to the winds that become very strong.
Virginia Herberts addressed the Commission and stated she feels
the tree scape is beautiful and the trees belong to the entire
community.
Motion
x
Commissioner Demmer moved to retain the two Eucalyptus trees at
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
1406 Sandcastle Drive. Unanimous.
Item #12f - 1505 Sandcastle Drive
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission,and presented pictures
of the two Eucalyptus trees from the last wind storm. Since the trees
could cause serious damage and the concrete is cracked, she
requested they be removed.
Motion
x
Chair Vandervort moved to retain the two trees. Unanimous.
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Item #12g - 1201 Outrigger Drive
'p
George Hoops, 1201 Outrigger Drive, addressed the Commission.
'Mr. Hoops stated the two Eucalyptus trees have caused sidewalk
CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
• ' p ��
February , 1996
Page 8
d4 City Council Chambers 7 P.M.
damage that will occur again. In,addition, there has been damage to
'his•pool and yard from the falling leaves and.branches.
Joan Hoops, 1201 Outrigger Drive, addressed the Commission and
presented pictures of the trees' falling leaves which also create a fire
hazard. She stated she- feels the potential hazards and lawsuits
outweigh the reasons to retain the trees.
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission and also commented
on the damage done to the Hoops' pool and decking. Since the
trees do nothing for the landscaping, she requested they be
removed.
Motion
x
Commissioner Compton moved to remove the southerly tree, closer
to the back line of the property and to retain,the northerly tree closest
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
to Outrigger Drive. Motion passes.
Nays
x
x
Item #12h -1307 Seacrest Drive
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission and read a letter from
Ron Richmond, requesting the Carrot Wood trees be removed due to
substantial hardscape damage. The Association supports Mr.
Richmond's request.
Motion
x
Commissioner Bonner moved to deny the request 'for removals.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unanimous.
Item #12i - 1219 Seacrest Drive
Yvonne Houssels addressed the Commission and reported the ,two
Carrot Wood trees have been, seriously damaged in the past. Ms.
Houssels pointed out that the Association appreciates having
attractive trees, however, the trees became a problem when budget
constraints forced ,the tree trimming cycle to be lengthened.
Moti on
x
Commissioner Schonlau moved to retain the two Carrot Wood trees.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unanimous.
Chair Vandervort explained that the Commission's decisions can be
appealed to the City Council.
Item #13 - Bob Henry Park and Castaways Park
•
Commissioner Compton, Chair of the Park and Open Space
Committee, reported the committee has met for the past two years
with representatives from the community, Purkiss•Rose and the
11
General Services Department to formulate the designs for the parks.
CITY OF NEWPORT
Parks., Beaches & Recreation
• O C' O C S' o
February 6 1996
Page 9
•Comm i ss i on
ti
v4 ^ City Council Chambers I p.m.
Emmet Berkery, consultant and project manager for the project,
reported bids will be open February 27 and will be awarded by the
City Council• in March. Construction will commence in April and be
completed in November 1996.
Mr. Berkery gave an overview of the conceptual plans and explained
the reconfigured parking lot which is a result of the land exchange
with the Newport Lutheran Church. Special conditions were imposed
by the Coastal Commission which require that there be no impact to
the wetlands. Mr. Berkery clarified the emergency and, public access
areas which will join a network of trails and meet ADA requirements
as to grade.
Steve Rose from Purkiss•Rose explained the first phase of the
project which includes drainage, grading, erosion control and
planting.
Commissioner Compton advised that a report was received today
from the Police Department addressing their concerns and
•
conditions, which will be incorporated into the final plans. In addition,
SPON has formed a committee to recommend plantings for the park.
The budget allocation is $900,000 for Bob Henry Park and $300,000
for Castaways Park.
Chair Vandervort opened the meeting to public hearing.
Dr. Jan Vandersloot addressed the Commission and reported that
Don Webb and Council Member Glover requested SPON create a
committee to discuss plantings. They are working with staff to
prepare a preliminary plan that will keep the natural California plants
and retain the natural features. Dr. Vandersloot stated he hopes the
money will be used wisely and that their plans are acceptable to the
community and the Commission.
Commissioner Compton suggested the Park and Open Space
Committee meet with SPON's committee. Both Dr. Vandersloot and
the Commission concurred.
David Prather addressed the Commission and voiced his concerns
over the concentrated wildlife, primarily the squirrels, which will have
no place to go. He stated this affects future generations of species
and the coastal• bluffs area critical habitat. He feels it is important to
keep this open space and incorporate native plantings.
•
In response to a question from Commissioner Beek, Mr. Prather
explained that site studies are being done to relocate critical animal
�ti
species.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
G
February 6, 1996
Page 10
City Council Chambers 7 p.m.
Billy Prather, 1202 Las Serenas Way, addressed the Commission
and stated he feels the environmental- community is getting the "short
end of the stick." He feels most people in the area prefer open
space, rather than active fields, and such space is limited in Orange
County.
There,being no further public testimony, Chair Vandervort closed the
meeting to public hearing.
Motion
x
Commissioner 'Compton moved that the Park and Open Space
Committee meet with the SPON committee and the General Services
Department; and that their report be submitted to the Commission for
their March 5 meeting and then forwarded to the City Council.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Unanimous.
Item #14 - Bench Donations
Chair Vandervort recommended a committee be formed with
representatives from the Arts Commission to meet with
•
representatives of homeowner associations in order to.set guidelines
for bench donations. Recommendations for designated benches for
certain areas could then be reviewed by this Commission. She
presented a report by the Arts Commission on a park bench study.
Commissioner Beek recommended areas be described and bench
options offered based upon usage, vandalism, traffic, etc., to ensure
that benches fit the area.
Chair Vandervort opened the meeting to public hearing.
Pat Buderwitz, 221 Sapphire, addressed the Commission and
questioned the process of 'bench donations which might affect
Balboa Island. Commissioner Vandervort explained that bench
placements are reviewed by this Commission and that the committee
is being formed to recognize and recommend benches for different
areas of the City. This will not affect the teak benches that have
been approved for Balboa Island.
Virginia Herberts addressed the Commission and recommended
homeowner associations be included in the committee review
process.
There being no further public testimony, Chair Vandervort closed the
•
meeting to public hearing.
Chair Vandervort and Commissioners Bonner and Demmer will serve
on the Bench Committee along with staff representation from the
General Services and Community Services Departments.
r CITY OF NEWPORT BERCH
Parks, Beaches & Recreation Commission
G
�• o C� d�� ,February 6, 1996
Page 11
v4 City Council Chambers 7 P.M.
Motion
Ayes
•
Motion
Ayes x
•
A
se to review the Recreation
scat, year. The committee•
mmissioners Demmer and
alude Review Recreation
•uary. Unanimous.
imissioner Glasgow, Pat
the Commission. Ms.
)rovement Association will
tnce of the teak bench
e the teak benches, they
he donated benches will be
Br which the benches on
ive staff's recommendation
is from the Balboa Island
cation will assume all future
cents; and that the donor
nanimous.
on parks where flag poles
rk will be addressed at the
s, Beaches and Recreation
January 30, 1996 at 3:00
3uilding.
Item #3 - Recreation and Senior Services
The Commission appointed a subcommitl
Division's draft budget for the 1996/97 f
will consist of Chair Vandervort and Cc
Schonlau.
Item #4 - Commission Calendar
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
Commissioner Demmer moved to in
'Division Draft Budget in the month of Feb
Item #6 - Balboa Island Benches
In response to questions from Cor
Buderwitz, 221 Sapphire, addressed
Buderwitz stated the Balboa Island Im
accept responsibility for the mainten+
donations. Although the merchants IiH
cannot afford them at the present time. 7
installed on the Island's perimeter, aft
Marine Avenue will be replaced.
x
Commissioner Compton moved to appr(
to accept the five teak bench donatior
Improvement Association; that the Assoc
maintenance and replacement requiren
x
x
x
x
x
x
plaques conform to City Council policy. h
VI. FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Commissioner Beek will prepare a report
can be installed. Status of Peninsula Pa
March 5 meeting.
VII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Part
Commission adjourned at 11:15 P.M.
The agenda for this meeting was postec
P.M. outside the City Hall Administration I
se to review the Recreation
scat, year. The committee•
mmissioners Demmer and
alude Review Recreation
•uary. Unanimous.
imissioner Glasgow, Pat
the Commission. Ms.
)rovement Association will
tnce of the teak bench
e the teak benches, they
he donated benches will be
Br which the benches on
ive staff's recommendation
is from the Balboa Island
cation will assume all future
cents; and that the donor
nanimous.
on parks where flag poles
rk will be addressed at the
s, Beaches and Recreation
January 30, 1996 at 3:00
3uilding.
Item 1
FEB 2 1996
°OA'MUNjrysr��,c�`�
w: tu
�4pva�
•
Agenda Item No.?
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Bench Removal Request at Poppy Avenue and Ocean Boulevard in
Corona del Mar
Recommendation
To deny the request to remove one donated bench at Poppy Avenue and Ocean
Boulevard in Corona del Mar.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Don Rosen of 200 Poppy Avenue sent the attached
correspondence, dated January 30, 1996, requesting the removal of the newly
installed donated bench at Poppy Avenue and Ocean Boulevard in Corona del
• Mar.
The bench was donated by Mrs. Nancy S. Muir and approved by the
Commission at the December 5, 1995 meeting. The new bench replaces three
metal benches at this scenic location. One of the three benches was destroyed in a
vehicular accident and the other two were corroded beyond repair. Mrs. Muir
selected this location and donated the bench for her brother who is a resident of
Corona del Mar.
lG
Mr. and Mrs. Rosen and Mrs. Muir have received a copy of this report and a
notice of the March 5 meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
E
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 -8915
Mr. and Mrs. Don Rosen
200 Poppy Avenue
Corona del Mar, California
92625
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Rosen,
February 15 1996
This letter is in response to your correspondence dated January 30, 1996
regarding a bench at Poppy Avenue and Ocean Boulevard in Corona del Mar.
The bench that you have requested to be removed was recently donated- and
approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. The concrete
• bench replaces three metal benches, two that were very corroded and one that
was damaged in a traffic accident.
Your request for the bench removal will be placed on the next meeting agenda
of the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. The meeting is scheduled for
March 5, 1996 at 7 P.M. in the City Council Chambers. You will be notified in
writing of the meeting by the Secretary of the Commission.
•
Please contact me at 644 -3055 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
David E. Niederhaus
General Services Director
DEN /mgl
VI 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
__.�_ .._ -_ it
•- -t
- - �
-- - --
���i
- �__ -_�;
__ - l�
� - - - -�
�/ / _I _ � t S! � / / ri h.
vv - - -- - � -- - -- -- � -- -- - --
�o� ___�,._.-- _ —___._
_I- - -- - -- - -- \ - - - - - - --
- - -- ---- .o`�p!�- - - - - -- - - - - - - - --
J
--,� '1...�x..
-�
r•
. C �,- w�, -g.,Y -dam-
r^^
� . , �
- �'--� � . - -�J - i__
_ _�• ' =.�'
'A � r' A. w1 : 4Y.`� .
e
_
__.�_ .._ -_ it
•- -t
- - �
-- - --
���i
- �__ -_�;
__ - l�
� - - - -�
�/ / _I _ � t S! � / / ri h.
vv - - -- - � -- - -- -- � -- -- - --
�o� ___�,._.-- _ —___._
_I- - -- - -- - -- \ - - - - - - --
- - -- ---- .o`�p!�- - - - - -- - - - - - - - --
J
•
•
`G
Agenda Item No. IV -3
December 5,1995
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Bench Donation
Recommendation
To approve the donation of one concrete bench from Mrs. Nancy S. Muir. Donor
will also provide plaque with appropriate City verbiage.
Discussion
Mrs. Nancy S. Miur contacted staff per the attached letter to request a bench
donation. The concrete bench would replace an existing metal bench at Ocean
Boulevard' and Poppy Avenue that is very corroded. The concrete construction is
very appropriate since the seacoast condition and vandalism are a significant
problem for maintenance of benches at this location. The donor will also provide
a plaque with the appropriate verbiage per City Council policy.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
P.O. BOX 826, BALBOA, CALIFORNIA 92661
a
SC� CO
SO iygs
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission f cg`s
Subject: New Concrete Bench - West Jetty View Park
Agenda Item:
February 5th 1996 PBRC Meeting
Dear Commission Members:
The Board of Directors of the BPPA wish to bring to your attention a
significant oversight on the part of the PB &R Department. Recently,
PB &R accepted the donation of two concrete benches, one of which
was installed in the West Jetty View Park. The location /destination
of the second bench is presently unknown. to us.
•
The, acceptance of these benches was done automatically by Consent
Calendar. There was no. notification or presentation by PB &R staff
that would, have allowed for review by the BPPA Board or Peninsula
Point residents. In short, the concrete bench was installed and the
second bench .approved without our knowledge.
This is indeed a lamentable situation in light of the outpouring of
protest among Peninsula Point residents regarding the overpowering
modern style of the bench. Numerous unfavorable descriptions have
been offered by residents which reveal a consensus of opinion that
the style of the bench is offensive, incompatible with the existing
traditional style benches and does not conform to the general
aesthetic of the West Jetty View Park. There is a classic, timeless
beauty at the entrance to the harbor into which the modern bench
intrudes.
At the January meeting of the BPPA, the Board voted unanimously to
vigorously pursue the removal of the bench from the park and to
arrest the installation of the second bench, if it is scheduled for
location at West Jetty View Park. The Board found it regrettable
that the city would assume it unnecessary to inform the residents in
our community of actions it was taking.
From another source in the city we learned that one of the main
concerns of the PB &R was the prevention of vandalism and graffiti
• on park benches. The majority of the existing benches in West Jetty
View Park have been there for 10 or more years and residents have
had little problem with random carving over these many years. We
would like staff to present the facts regarding the frequency of
replacement of benches in West Jetty View Park during the past 1.0
to 20 years.
We also learned that there is a "crushed milk carton" alternative
material that can act as a replacement for the wood slats of the
existing benches and that braces can be applied to preserve the
seven foot length of the benches. We would like to discuss the use
of this new material with staff in our attempt to ,preserve the
traditional style of benches throughout Peninsula Point parks.
We understand that Balboa Island residents have had the privilege of
dialogue with PB &R regarding a "designated" type of bench that the
community deemed appropriate for the island's parks. Point
residents also would appreciate the opportunity to work with city
staff to arrive at a "designated" bench style for our area. If the
• PB &R would meet with us and discuss this issue, allow us the
privilege of knowing their concerns and vice versa, we are certain
that we can arrive at a mutually acceptable resolution.
We therefore request that the commission reverse the prior decision
to locate new concrete benches in the West Jetty View Park or on
any other locale on Peninsula Point. ,Like the Balboa Island
Improvement Association, we strongly oppose the introduction of a
new style concrete bench to our area and wish to preserve the long -
established traditional bench style uniformly in all of our parks and
sitting areas.
We hope (since we have had to look at the bench and sit
uncomfortably in it) that we will be quickly informed of its removal
or that a, dialogue can begin with PB &R staff to facilitate its
removal.
Many thanks for your consideration.
• Sincerely,
Mary Ann Javelera
President
row
Mr, Marcelino Lomeli
City of Newport Beach��
General Services Department - --
-------------
P.O, Box 1768
Re: Bench Donation
Dear Mr. Lomeli,
I am requesting to donate to the City of Newport Beach one;new
concrete bench for the Corona del Mar Park on Poppy and Ocean Blvd.,
overlooking Little Corona Beach by the drinking fountain. I have
spent time on Little Corona Beach, my favorite. My brother Vincent
S. Salerno has been a resident of Corona del Mar since 19789 and I
would like his name on it. This location is a short walk from his
home. We will enjoy the bench there, and other people can enjoy
it too.
• Thank You,
i//I " Kvv i4
0
2�
Q Nw�
$11, ,% ' v`z-11
Agenda Item• No. 3
• March 5, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Bench Removal Request at West Jetty View Park
Recommendation
To delay any decision on bench removals until the subcommittees of the Parks,
Beaches and Recreation and the Arts Commissions can assess the alternatives.
Discussion
Staff received the attached correspondence from the President of the Peninsula
Point Association requesting the removal of the two donated concrete benches
at West Jetty View Park.
The first replacement bench was donated by Ms. Norma C. Taylor and approved
by the Commission at the October 3, 1995 meeting (copy attached) . The concrete
bench replaced an existing wood bench at this Park. Ms. Taylor selected this
• location and donated the bench for her husband.
The second concrete bench was donated by Mr. Rick Crook on behalf of Mr.
Donald W. Carr, a friend of the Crook family, and approved by the-Commission
at the January 2, 1996 meeting (copy attached). Additionally, the concrete bench
will replace an existing wood bench.
0
1`
Historically, staff has not contacted the public, adjacent park property owners,
nor community associations in the process of replacing existing benches in the
City Park system.
Ms. Norma Taylor, Mr. Crook, and the President of the Peninsula Point
Homeowners Association have received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
Agenda Item No. IV -5
• October
3, 1995
•
2..
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Bench Donation
Recommendation
To approve the donation of one concrete bench from Norma C. Taylor for West
Jetty View Park. Donor will also provide plaque with appropriate City verbiage.
Discussion
Norma C. Taylor contacted staff per the attached letter to request a bench
donation. The concrete bench • would replace an existing wooden .bench and be
the first concrete bench at this location. The concrete construction is very
appropriate since the seacoast condition and vandalism are a significant problem
for maintenance of benches at this location. The donor will also provide a plaque
With the appropriate verbiage per City Council policy.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
0
0
S
saute,•,= 3, 1995
39r. Marc A ir;o Lomeli
CITY OF NEEWORT BEACH
General Services Department
P.O. Box 1768
N_vport Beach CA 92658 -8915
RE: Bench Donation
Dear 21r. Lomeli
1 n�u11LLRC'i-�
j Il�ll� 1ZF'
iJ lY� t-u -%J ua, 1
Thank you for your letter of August 4th and confirming our 'phone
conversation of Septsni 7th.
IMy family and I have an interest in donating to the City of Newport
Beach one new concrete bench at the West Jetty Park. - My husband,
George, always loved the ocean and this particular spot overlooks
China Cove where he did carpentry work on the China House some years
ago.... He loved the history attached to this house.
It would give this family a great deal of pleasure knowing that this
resting spot was in his honor.
Also, if and when the bench is approved, we would like to arrange for
an appropriate inscribed plaque.
Thank you again for your kindness and help.
Very sincerely,
Norma C. Taylor ✓ ✓ ✓✓
1845 Anaheim #17C
Costa Mesa CA 92627
Tel: (714) 646 -2115
2 �:
0
Agenda Item No. IV -6
January 2, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Bench Donation
Recommendation
To approve the donation of one concrete bench from Mr. Rick Crook. Donor will
also provide plaque with appropriate City verbiage.
Discussion
• Mr. Rick Crook contacted staff per the attached letter to request a bench
donation. The concrete bench would replace an existing wooden bench at West
Jetty View Park. The donor will also provide a plaque with the appropriate
verbiage per City Council policy.
u
11
Very respectfully,
C -Plfs .L
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
•
•
•
12 -16 -1995 02:42PM FROM QUICK CRETE PRODUCTS TO 17146427072 P.02
P. I
QVICR CIRME V3i0DVC'T8 CORP.
mEESA49xv
RI mnctr "
QUICK CF=H WOULD BRUCE dB
NEWPORT BEACH TO PFACED At TJW WEST�r2 PARK.
WE WOULD LIFX TAB PL3QUE 'PO SAY:
FIB LESEO XH LOVING ZEX=X OF
SECOND LEHR: DONALD W. CUM
PLMgR (VVX X% A d"T, 11 YOU H&VE ANY QDSS420N. RA7DY
EIMIDAYS:
TSAVE YOU FOR Cw'Jl i6 QBICK CRETE PRODUCTS CORP.
NO. OF IZAGES_1_,
P.91
TOTAL P.02
P.O. BOY 639
None }r c2m. .91760
PHONE:
9091737 -6240
FAX:
909/737 -7032
DATRI
]320MMn 12, Aaas
Tot
SCI LONELLI
CITY OF 83AFORT BEACH
V2OX:
RICK CROOK
AE:
CONCRETE SITS 80Ri}ISHI' ma ,
mEESA49xv
RI mnctr "
QUICK CF=H WOULD BRUCE dB
NEWPORT BEACH TO PFACED At TJW WEST�r2 PARK.
WE WOULD LIFX TAB PL3QUE 'PO SAY:
FIB LESEO XH LOVING ZEX=X OF
SECOND LEHR: DONALD W. CUM
PLMgR (VVX X% A d"T, 11 YOU H&VE ANY QDSS420N. RA7DY
EIMIDAYS:
TSAVE YOU FOR Cw'Jl i6 QBICK CRETE PRODUCTS CORP.
NO. OF IZAGES_1_,
P.91
TOTAL P.02
0
General Services Department
Parks and Tree Divisions
February, 1996 Activities Report
Park Division Activities
Agenda Item No. 4
March 5,1996
1. The cleaning, polishing and sealing of all plaques continues throughout the
Parks system.
2'. Staff continues coordinating construction projects regarding Mac Arthur
Boulevard, Bob Henry Park, Castaways Park and Maiming Tract Park with the
• Public Works Department.
3. Staff performed ballfield renovation work at San Miguel Park consisting of
grading and brickdust installation.
4. The annual turfgrass renovation program continues throughout City parks
and facilities.
5. Representatives from the Toro Company presented an irrigation product,
safety, and maintenance training program at the City Yard to staff. Also in
attendance were maintenance personnel from the Cities of Costa Mesa and
Huntington Beach and Commissioner Beek.
6. A donated bench was installed at Ocean Boulevard and Poppy Avenue in
Corona del Mar.
7. The replacement of shrubs and ground covers was performed at various sites
throughout the City.
8. Staff has completed the coordination of baseball infield improvements with
the Newport Beach Little League and Community Services Department at
Lincoln Athletic Center and Buffalo Hills Park.
9. The planter boxes on the 'Goldenrod Avenue footbridge were painted by
contract and new geraniums were planted by staff.
4
0
Upcoming Activities for March
1. The turfgrass renovation program will continue throughout the City.
2 The plaque refinishing project will continue throughout the Park system.
3. The planting of replacement shrubs and ground covers will continue Citywide.
4. Staff will continue to perform ballfield renovation projects for the upcoming
baseball season as weather permits.
5. Staff will complete the annual inhouse Pesticide Safety Training Program that
is required by the Orange County Agricultural Department.
6. A donated bench will be installed at Cliff Drive Park.
Tree Division Activities
• During the month of February, 404 trees were trimmed, 5 trees were planted, 5
trees were root pruned, 6 trees were removed, 7 emergency calls were
responded to regarding trees and 146 tree maintenance requests were received
by the Urban Forester. A significant amount of staff's time (beyond the Urban
Forester's efforts) were expended on tree revoval issues in Harbor View Hills
South Homeowners Association area.
1. Tree removals were performed at these various locations during the month:
2216 Pacific Drive -1 dead tree removed due to palm disease(pink bud rot) a
replacement tree will be planted in March.
2123 Anniversary Lane -1 tree due to property damage, 1 replacement tree
planted.
Additionally, as part of the Reforestation Project and Sidewalk Replacement
Program in the Harbor View Hills South area a total of 4 trees were removed
and 4 replanted. Attached is a report from the Urban Forester regarding a
summary of the activities relative to tree removals and tree plantings in the
Harbor View Hills South area.
2. The Urban Forester per the attached report evaluated the condition of the
•
King palms on Riverside Drive.
E
•
•
30
3. The City tree trimming contractor, West Coast Arborists, completed scheduled
work within Buffalo Hills and Westcliff areas. Additionally, tree trimming has
been completed throughout the Harbor View Hills and Harbor View Hills South
areas.
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent
MGL /ml
Attachments
•
LI
0
3l
February 20, 1996
To: Park and Tree Superintendent
From: Urban Forester
Subject: Harbor View Hills South Tree Activity Summary
The following is a summary of tree removal requests, tree removals, tree planting
and tree trimming that has occured in the Harbor View Hills South area:
67 Tree Removal Requests
39 Trees Removed due to hardscape damages at a cost of $ 8385
41 Trees Planted at a cost of
595 Trees Trimmed at a cost of
John Conway
Total Expended
$ 3895
$23,205
$35,485
0
r
February 20, 1996
To: Park and Tree Superintendent
From: Urban Forester
Subject: Riverside Drive Palm Trees
The following is a summary of the current status of the King Palm trees on Riverside
Drive:
Trees dead and will need to be removed
10 Trees healthly and in good condition
John Conway `
F, 'I
L-A
III-
Agenda Item No. 5
0 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: March 5, 1996
TO: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: LaDonna Kienitz, Community Services Director
SUBJECT: Monthly Commission Report
Playground Equipment
Play equipment is being reinstalled at Spyglass Hill Reservoir Park.
The previous wooden equipment was removed earlier in the year for
safety reasons, .resulting from aging and damage to the equipment.
• Neighborhood residents were involved in designing this replacement
project. Installation is scheduled for the beginning of April and will
include ADA accessibility. This unique site, built on top of a
reservoir, required that the Utilities Division be involved in all phases
of the project; they have been extremely helpful.
The next replacement project will be Newport Island Park. The
present equipment has old wood, rusty hardware and a variety of
substandard conditions. Staff has met with the homeowners
association and used their input in securing design. bids.
Repairs to existing equipment were made at Cliff Drive, Buffalo Hills,
CYC and Mariners Parks.
Oasis Remodel
The contract for remodeling the old Oasis administrative wing into a
game room and computer classroom was awarded by the Friends of
Oasis to Tenant Works, at $38,000. The Friends of Oasis are
• funding the project from a gift received from a charitable remainder
trust. Construction began on Monday, February 26.
Youth Sports Commission - Athletic Fields
Opening days are set:
Pacific Coast Bobby Sox - March 2 at Bonita Creek Park
Pony Baseball - Newport East - March 4 at Eastbluff Park
Newport Beach Little League - March 9 at Lincoln Athletic
Center
Newport Harbor Baseball -West - March 9 at Mariners Park
Adult Sports
Rain, rain, go away! Adult softball started the spring season on
January 29 and has not received much of a break from rain related
game cancellations. In four weeks we have shut down on six nights
of play. Staff is busy rescheduling the over 50 games that have
been canceled ... so far!
The 1996 Newport Beach grass volleyball tournament schedule is
established, with some variations this year. In recent years doubles
grass volleyball has become saturated with tournaments almost
every weekend. To seek a competitive edge, Newport Beach is
hosting less tournaments than previously (eight), but six will be for 4-
person teams. This has become ,a very popular format. More
people are involved, so the social atmosphere is increased.
The tournament can be held in a smaller area. Sites for the
tournaments will be Mariners Park, Peninsula Park and Eastbluff
Park. These tournaments, as well as the six CdM summer sand
tournaments, are conducted by independent contractors.
Corona del Mar Scenic 5K
Plans are underway for the CdM Scenic 5K on Saturday, June 1.
Artist interviews were conducted last week for the selection of the
poster artist.
Senior Recreation Manager
I am pleased to announce the appointment of Steve Hunt as Senior
Recreation Manger, effective March 2.
The selection process of this position included a three - person
screening panel, with the Chair of the Parks, Beaches and
Recreation Commission participating, and a written supplemental
application.
34
• COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: February 26, 1996
TO Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
FROM: Celeste Jardine -Haug
SUBJECT: Senior Services Division - Monthly Commission Report
Thanks to the Friends of OASIS and their support of this Center, the old Administrative
Wing is getting a face lift. The walls came down this month and will be re- modeled into a
game room for billiards and other games and a computer classroom. The project was
designed by Lyle Hutson and the contractor is Tenant Works. The project is expected to be
completed in 44 days.
Staff has written a grant proposal to procure six computers and one printer in order to offer
computer classes at OASIS. Accessing Internet is also a goal thatwe are working on. Six
proposals were sent to Corporations and foundations.
• OASIS now is offering a computer networking group which we refer to as "Computer
Friends ". Sixty people are now attending a monthly meeting at which time they share
information, learn new programs and advance their capabilities. It is a growing group of
enthusiastic participants.
One hundred people attended the "Over 80's party on February 26th. This is an annual
event that we hold each year. Entertainment and refreshments were provided
The staff of the Senior Services Division have all been involved in planning for the
American Society on Aging (ASA) Conference being held in Anaheim this year in, March.
Celeste Jardine -Haug is the chairperson of the local Arrangements Committee which
incorporates nine sub - committees. ASA is a national gerontological Association.
F- 1
L
•
LJ
•
3�
OASIS SENIOR CENTER
January 1996
MONTHLY AC rWITIES/UTILIZATION REPORT
CLASSES /GROUP
3972
LONG.TRIPS
Mystery Trip
46
SERVICES
Mexico Cruise
30
Another Passage
31
DAY TRIPS
Rose Parade
14
Blood Pressure
86
Nautical Museum
12
Braille
59
Les Miserables
20
Caregiver Support Group
7
Salute to Artie Shaw
28
Case Management
90
O.T. Trolley - Miramar AFB
25
Chair Exercise
36
Palm Springs Follies
28
Counseling
85
Around the Workd in 80 Min. 26
Eldercare
4
Employment
36
MEETINGS
Information/Rental
1255
Legal Assistance
6
Board•ofDirectors
10
Life On Your Own
39
Executive Committee
8
Medicare Assistance
3
Long Range Planning
7
Shared Housing
37
Newsletter Collating
29
Telephone Reassurance
481
General Membership
96
Visual Screening
5
VOLUNTEER HOURS
2539
VANTRANSPORTAILON
Care-A-Van 468
Shuttle 1
1622
Sunday Movies 62
Pancake Breakfast 220
•
Agenda Item No. 6
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Tree Donation for Peninsula Park
Recommendation
To approve the donation from the Newport Ocean Lifeguard Association of one
specimen Chamaerops humilis (Mediterranean Fan Palm) tree, concrete mow
strip and 5" x'7" plaque with appropriate verbiage.
Discussion
Staff received the attached correspondence from the President of the Newport
Ocean Lifeguard Association regarding the donation, on behalf of Greg Lunde of
• one Mediterranean Fan Palm. The Association is requesting that the palm tree be
planted at their expense per City specifications behind the Peninsula Park sign
(photo attached). The Association would also install a concrete mow strip per
City specifications to define and protect the palm tree. Additionally, the donor is
requesting that the dedicatory plaque be 5" x 7" with name, date and appropriate
text per the correspondence.
Staff feels the donation would enhance Peninsula Park and the attached photo
taken at City Hall depicts a similar palm tree with a mow strip. The estimate by
staff places the value of the donation at $4000, this includes labor and materials.
Additionally, per the attached G -5 City Council Policy donors of major park
improvements may elect to provide a plaque not exceeding 5" x 7" with verbiage
not exceeding 25 words.
The Central Newport, Balboa Merchant's and Peninsula Point Associations have
received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5 meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
• DEN /mgl
Attachments
31
Marcelino G. Lomeli
Park and Tree Superintendent
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768
Dear Mr. Lomeli:
Newport Beach Ocean Lifeguard Association
70 Newport Pier, Newport' Beach, CA 92663
Chapter of The United States Lifesaving Assoc.
February 8, 1996
Thank you for your recent letter answering my questions regarding tree
donations to the City. I have had a meeting with the Newport Beach Ocean
Lifeguard Association board members and the Association is proposing a tree
donation to the community.
The donation is on behalf of Gray Lunde who was a member of the Newport
Beach Junior Lifeguards and a student at Newport Harbor High School. Gray
passed away at a very young age and his ashes were sprinkled in the ocean near
• the Balboa Pier. Since Peninsula Park is an area that Gray frequented often, a
tree planting at this site would be very appropriate.
The Association is proposing, at no cost to the City, the planting of one specimen
Mediterranean Fan Palm tree that is valued at approximately $1500.00. We
propose that the tree be planted as a backdrop to the Peninsula Park sign and
that a mow strip be installed per the attached sketch to enhance and protect the
planting. The value of the concrete work is approximately $1000.00 This
installation would also be at no cost to the City. The last item I am proposing is
that our Association would furnish and install a 5" x 7 °plaque at the base of the
palm tree. This plaque would read as follows:
" This palm tree was donated by the Newport Beach Ocean Lifeguard
Association in memory of Gray Lunde (present date)"
The Association understands that this donation requires the approval of the
Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission. Please contact me at 644 -3047 if you
have any questions regarding this donation.
Yours truly,
Josh Van Egmond, President
Newport Beach Ocean Lifeguard Association
3 fi nwuNGADDRESs
b NEWPORT LIFEGUARD ASSOC,
P.O. Box 1768, Newport Beach, CA 92659 -1768
714. 644 -3047 Bus. 714. 673 -3360 Emerg. 714.673 -3056 Fox
•
�Rt�,NG
)q
I
rl
0
-X�cv?
0
0
W0
"i�UZ
•
G -5
PARK IMPROVEMENT DONATIONS
The City Council recognizes the need to provide residents with the opportunity
to donate trees, benches, drinking fountains or related park items. This policy
establishes criteria for donations to assure attractiveness, usefulness and the
capability Io be maintained.
Tree Donations
The tree -lined walkway at Oasis Passive Park beginning at 5th Avenue and
Marguerite in Corona del Mar shall be identified- as one area where a tree with a
bronze plaque can be installed. Other trees with plaques can be donated and
installed at locations recommended by the General Services Director and
approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission.
Park Amenities
Items such as benches, drinking fountains, tables, etc., can be donated to be
included in the public park system. Recognition on the donated item shall be �a
2" x 6" plaque and limited to Donated by (Name) or Donated for (Name) as a
• means of identifying the donation.
Donors of major park improvement gifts may elect to provide a dedicatory
plaque not exceeding 5 "x7" with name, date and appropriate text not exceeding
25 words.
0_
�I
All donations must be approved by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation
Commission. The cost of a donated item, including identification plaque, shall
be borne totally by private funds. The City will assume ownership and
maintenance if accepted and placed in a public park The City will not assume
responsibility for replacement due to vandalism or theft
Adopted - 7/22/1992
Amended - 1/24/1994
Amended - 6/27/1994
Formerly I -15
.s
yL
Agenda Item No. 7
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and' Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Tree Removal at 243 Heliotrope Avenue
Recommendation
To approve the request, to remove one Pinus torreyana (Torrey Pine) tree at 243
Heliotrope Avenue in Corona del Mar.
Discussion
Staff received the attached correspondence from Ms. Jane A. Hilgendorf of 245
Heliotrope Avenue and Mr. and Mrs. Grant Howald of 243 Heliotrope Avenue
requesting removal of the parkway street tree.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report
recommending that the tree be removed. Staff feels that there is currently
significant private property damage to walls and hardscape that warrants this
tree removal.
The pine tree has a mature root system that in the past has damaged public and
private hardscape. The City sidewalk was replaced in 1988 due to the root
damage from the tree. The existing roots appear to be extending into the
Howald's and Ms. Hilgendorf's front yards. These roots may eventually cause
structural damage to the residences.
Mr. and Mrs. Howald and Ms. Hilgendorf have received a copy of this report
and a notice of the March 5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David" E. lliedeka/us
DEN /mgl
Attachments
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
n,jr- �di�9tNd'q�,
Address a2/S �vyid fit. AU' (7i� af" 1-1413 /Jc olw�c )
Phone Number 673- -731S-
Request Lgak+x
Botanical Name 7L61.A2 �1aNC+,.
_ ( Common Name r d CSC¢
Designated Street Tree ntNaSet AA </1^+ 1�wy p,'de
Estimated Tree Value dti 8 917 -7 2— /b
Damage ,(�S��ylzYL
•
•
y3
Parkway: Concrete ///�--Brick Turf
/. other
comments Fe l9 i:JSAe�,- 04 rJ' 4eAM�NeA1P*•9e' �f �jad4lt /y 42e,,i/.tt,J
aForn -/. �,rlv�� - �-^�d• %/tee- ow' nJOlm�ti
Inspected by� _
eee.e,L fs2. rrvz•ai•
a —i3—R4
- A,-
Reviewed by Date
X
I
x
s
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 -8915
February 9, 1996
Mr. and Mrs. Grant Howald
243 Heliotrope Avenue.
Corona del Mar, California
92625
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Howald,
This correspondence is in response to your letter dated January 25, 1996
regarding a request for a tree removal at your residence.
Mr. John Conway, the City Urban Forester, will complete a Tree Inspection
Report and make recommendations to the Park and Tree Maintenance
Superintendent, Marcelino Lomeli who in turn will make recommendations to
me on the removal request. The report will consider several factors as outlined in
• the attached City Council Policy G -1.
A staff report including a recommendation will be made to the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Commission and included in the Commission meeting agenda of
March 5, 1996. The secretary of the Commission will provide you with a copy of
the report and agenda prior to the meeting. Please contact me at 644 -3055 if you
have any questions.
•
4-1
Sincerely,
David E. Niederhaus
General Services Director
DEN /mgl
Attachments -
gPOz t1Az kD � 5
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
P.O. BOX, 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92659 -1768
Ms. Jane Hilgendorf
245 Heliotrope Avenue,
Corona del Mar, California
92625
Dear Ms. Hilgendorf,
January 22, 1996
This correspondence is in response to your letter dated January 7, 1996 regarding
a request for a tree removal at 243 Heliotrope Avenue. The Torrey Pine (Pinus
torreyana) tree that was planted many years ago was a poor selection for the
limited growth space in the parkway.
Mr. John Conway, the City Urban Forester, will complete a Tree Inspection
Report and make recommendations to the Park and Tree Maintenance
• Superintendent, Marcelino Lomeli who in turn will make recommendations to
me on the removal request. The report will consider several factors as outlined in
the attached City Council Policy G -1.
A staff report including a recommendation will be made to the Parks, Beaches
and Recreation Commission and included in the Commission meeting agenda of
March 5, 1996. The secretary of the- Commission will provide you with a copy of
the report and agenda prior to the meeting. Please contact me at 644 -3055 if you
have any questions.
Sincerely,
David E. Niederhaus
General Services Director
cc: Mr. and Mrs. Grant Howald
DEN /mgl
• Attachments
4 S/ 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
.................. ..................
-2L
AV,
2h,
Ja
A4
• 245 Heliotrope Ave.
Corona del Mar, CA 92625
January 7, 1996
Dave Niederhaus
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, CA 92658
Dear Hr. Niederhaus_
Enclosed are several letters sent to John Conway. He did respond
to my letter but did not respond to the letter sent by the Howalds.
His response to my letter is also enclosed.
I am again requesting that the tree in the parking strip in front
of 243 Heliotrope be removed for the following reasons:
1.
This tree is a safety hazard as it is way too large for the
narrow strip in which it was planted. It is pushing the curb
out into the street (at least 6 inches); it has lifted the
concrete parkway strip at least 4 inches (and is a safety
hazard to those stepping from the street onto the sidewalk).
2.
The residents, the Howalds, paid for the replacement of the
•
sidewalk in 1992 to correct a safety problem, and correct
the damage done to their patio wall. (According to the
the Policy about the Retention or Removal of Park and Parkway
Trees, this tree has a consistent history of damaging public or
privately owned property such as sewers, water mains, sidewalks,
curbs, wall, fences, foundations, etc., as indicated by City
records or by competant authority as a structural engineer,
general contractor, or qualified City official.)
3.
I have discovered that the tree in the parking strip at
243 Heliotrope has impacted my own property. I have tracked
this tree over the years and have now recognized that the
roots of this tree have passed under the concrete, have caused
damage to the patio and wall at 243 Heliotrope, and have then
surfaced in my- yard at -245 Heliotrope, resulting in some
permanent damage.
4.
I would like to arrange an appointment with you to discuss
this tree situation. Please call me for an appointment to
meet to resolve this problem tree..
Sincerely,
• --SANE �LG�NAo/LF
L`
Ll
Agenda Item No. 8
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Tree Removal at 1009 East Balboa Boulevard
Recommendation
To approve the removal of one Ficus nitida (Indian Laurel Fig) tree at 1009 East
Balboa Boulevard.
Discussion
Staff received the attached correspondence from Mr. Jesse Sell Jr. requesting that
one Ficus tree be removed due to significant private and public property
damage.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should be removed due to major private and public
hardscape damages. The trees cannot be retained due to the significant amount
of root mass that must be removed in the hardscape replacement process.
Additionally, this location was identified by the General Services Department's
Concrete Crew Supervisor as a location that presents a liability to the City
relative to hardscape damage and has been included in the upcoming hardscape
replacement program.
Mr. Sell Jr. and the President of the Peninsula Point Homeowners Association
have received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5 Commission
meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
• Attachments
y�
T
•
•
e�w
Balboa, CA
Jan. 22,96-
City of Newport Beach,
Public Works Dept,
Maintenance Dept,
Tree Pruning Dept, (J ,SAN �ggg
Dear Sirs,
r.�usvFF%
I was out of town for a couple of weeks and when I ___ r
returned-to my home at 1009 E. Balboa Blvd., I observed that
the sidewalk in front of my property and that at 1011 had
been painted, I assumed identifying it as a replacement
project.
The Ficus tree responsible for the lifting of this side
walk, is the largest parkway tree in Newport Beach, and in my
opinion should be considered a risk to life and property and
should be replaced with a reasonably sized tree.
(1) It's trunk is 8 feet in circumference measured at.2
feet above ground, in a parkway 6'8" wide.
(2) The effect on it's lifting has caused damage to 400
sq. ft. of Street, Sidewalk, both driveways and the curb
(3) It is over 40 ft. tall and has a 30 ft. diameter,
thus giving it a wind surface area of 1200 sq. ft.
(4) All the power lines, telephone lines and cable tv
lines go through it, which makes it very difficult for
the tree trimmers to trim it and has caused telephone
service disruptions on several occasions. Both
properties.
(5) Damage to the street has caused much ineffectiveness
for the street sweeper.
(6) 2nd and 3rd floor views from both properties have
been totally obscured.
(7) The water line to 1011' had to be replaced recently,
and the valve access box had to be replaced at 1009.
(8) Roots have been a problem in the sewer line from the
property at 1009.
(9) To properly replace the sidewalk, much of the root
system will have to be removed, and with the weakening
of the root system, and the intensity of "Santana Winds"
the power lines present a serious fire hazard. I will
check with Lorna, the Risk Mgr., to see if this presents
any problems to the City of Newport Beach.
I like trees as much as those persons who drive down our
tree lined Blvd., but there can be too much of a good thing.
I am available at any time to discussthis problem or to help
with the solution of it. My number is 714 -673 4724
Jesse Sell Jr.
`II 1009 E. Balboa
r
(I 141IYYWyIYWLfYWYWLYYNy WIYY�YWYIUiW, WIi1Y11l YYIYRII�IYlY4�f1• �! �WyYYY4iYl�MM1.. II• YIWWWIIyp[YLF511N4�Vy��yV1LUIJK yW�•IyyyLL
„r+�.� Rr nl I m .. „ 1?'""'S`"""'•.,rY . �. I , . .. - - .._\_f_y YYI�i�.T..i ,��
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name JeSSa
Address �4�� �• ���'OZ"
Phone Number f073-- 4/ 7oZ�i
Request OLO�44 Ao-ole, , gee,,*— klk�L!•
� T I
i
Botanical Name F %cvS
Common Name
Designated Street Tree
Estimated Tree Value l�� "�� /Sa /�� x-79174-7
• Damage '7�^� S Si /C- i S �yeS; q,Ja -/e.� � Gotti�, r5; �a /l;/ � �� �.,r�,�,,,ti�-
Parkway: Concrete, Brick Turf Other
Comments AL9= 21CS; re /�o o l /Yw �i�yy% Gcccoin a �ri�z fts-
'J�
fr�z Y
va/ (dx-l"Nv� -6 A--A9e- f n�,< ou�lS/ �cf 4-•
Inspected by
Date
Reviewed,by /,16 a i Date "7- '7- O -11,
06 -95
•
Agenda Item No. 9
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From : General Services Director
Subject: Tree Removal Appeals at 1516 and 15$6 Miramar Drive on the Balboa
Peninsula
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to retain two Ficus nitida (Indian Laurel Fig) trees located at
1516 and 1,536 Miramar Drive.scheduled for removal due to hardscape damage.
Discussion
Staff received the attached correspondence from Ms. Kay Mortenson requesting
that the two Ficus trees noted above not be removed,as proposed by staff.
The Urban Forester received'tree removal requests from the property owners at
these locations and completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached). The
Or Park and Tree Superintendent concurred with the report that recommends that
the trees should be removed due to major private and public property damage.
The trees cannot be retained due to the significant amount of root mass that will
be removed in the hardscape replacement process.
Additionally, this location was identified by the Concrete Crew Supervisor of the
General Services Department as a location that presents a liability to the City
relative to hardscape damage and has been included in the upcoming hardscape
replacement program.
0
S�
The property owners at 1516 and 1536 Miramar Drive, Ms. Mortenson, and the
President of the Peninsula' Point Homeowners Associations have received a copy
of this report and a notice of the March 5 meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
5, .
•
SEW PoRT
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
u Z P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658.8915
do
cq��FOaN�r
February 5, 1996
Ms. Kay Mortenson
1530 Miramar Drive
Balboa, California
92661
Dear Ms. Mortenson,
This letter is in response to your correspondence dated January 31, 1996
regarding the Ficus parkway street trees on Miramar Drive. Staff will be
preparing a report to the Parks, Beaches and Recreation for the March 5, 1996
meeting agenda regarding tree removals at 1516 and 1536 Miramar Drive.
. The property owners at these locations that initiated these removals will be
informed that the trees will not be removed pending a decision by the
Commission.
Please contact me at 644 -3055 so we can schedule a meeting to discuss the
concerns expressed in your letter. I will be away from my office this week, but
will be available next week.
Sincerely,
David E. Niederhaus
General Services Director
DEN /mgl
S �-
3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach
e,
•
0
0
PgRKS, l3�iCN�S, �ECkTla�c
e 17•Y ,,c A.;&u% a,er 8 }CN
ca7y7mox;,7,y SFxLIGES /� f.
3,300 N &ZuPdRT 6� vD -
/U.t'7.�PORT B�rey, c� '9a6 5P • 8yis
/s3 0 /y�i,e�ym rv-,t nab
B11- -4964- Ci9•.
J�Pw. 3/. /994
l�nc a- a
1S3
j'Y� 4 Ia ..Ic�
L
U
C
-a-
Q�44,�-
. ,c "v 3
1534 " 1516 /0�
ari a
-e,,l
KAy `Y1 oR r,E�so,v
-py. 675. 7569
• - CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
'GENERAL SERViCES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name M1`/ V�cr1 T�rtnnnl9M — ltid5 (- CO. OT cae-.
Address 00
Phone Number 4/3 8 - 36 (q
Re uest. L9,M fi� 64�e -/v 5;, -Jalk CVA6 ^zfadog U//XK
Botanical Name f�j "ins
Common Name "At-� R2
Designated Street Tree
yEstimated Tree Value? "�G� ysO�'�l e78I7, V%
Damage a4lts5 ,S Gurt� �' -51cx a� tvp �, �/C Lo (A�al ✓
,%j 114a461 r
Parkway: Concrete Brick f _ Turf other_ Q
Comments Qie�✓ �NS�t¢L�Jon77Gtir��r/ /���9��c ���%
fin• -,•. C4-114
r�ir &/mil e_ as Q �e s�.l F o �e ✓�. f k6ew r
4v ,gyp ;, ^ p Q/� �j
Inspected by -Z- W � Date
_ - - • Pfcommendation
Reviewed b / Date_ f— 1(,
06 -95
55
J
U.S.TRUST
US. TRUST COMPANY 600 ANTON BOULEVARD GARY L. VAN ARNAM, CFP
OF CALIFORNIA, N.A. SUITE 150 VICE PRESIDENT
COSTA MESA, CA 92626 -7147
TELEPHONE: 714 438 -8614
FAX: 714 708 -3477
January 10, 1996
John Conway
Urban Forester
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658 =8915
Re: 1536 Miramar Street
Dear Mr. Conway:
Thank you for your prompt attention and assistance. This will confirm our
conversation and agreement that the Ficus tree located in the parkway of the
• referenced address should be removed.
As you have observed and we have discussed, the tree is causing damage to the
curb and sidewalk as well the short masonry wall. Because of the fast growth
and surface soot system of this type of tree other measures, such as root pruning,
will not correct the growth pattern. The tree will continue to lift and disjoint the
sidewalk and we are also concerned with potential liability for injury to
individuals who may trip or fall.
You mentioned that neighbors may object to the removal of this mature tree. I
would be happy to assist in answering their concerns to explain that a Ficus tree,
though beautiful, is a ,poor selection for a parkway tree.
I trust you will be successful in securing approval for removal of the tree. I
understand that the sidewalk is scheduled for repair at the end of March to correct
the current damage. It may make sense to remove the tree before that work is
started.
Sincerely,
• :GVA
cc: Betty Delamater
s Lynn Noah
" i i "n is �� n. -� .•.-s � „ , . ,. c. __ .:. ._ -
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name d7Trl/,
Address
Phone Number U 7 S' 3 Y� 3
Request Aw,-A 9P.,
Botanical Name FiGVS /NrUAUw�t( �,r!fr
Common Name
Designated Street Treee "�
Estimated Tree Value p7 4��a� ia5.i) �78'17,V7
Damage j �� eKfi/+� �iloclf j s & &AI,f -FV f(cU „W/,cc
A'd -� A.S. a p ✓4Y/(/ G.iH.G_S'o�' /N.tS C�'V f " 'JY 64 ca4-:
1572 -rn; -? j 565. a�af� o � fcus �;�l as /f 1/d"e, of ��{y, oosS'/o ,
Parkway: Concrete Brick ✓ _ Turf Other
Comments 4p"Ae.0 -* aCC00L[+1L,474z./6t. ,a-
a-t"'NV-vi S
J+ A( rte-°-- joss. i1+c us Q. e cu; F�;d d &r ,X %1o"' s/y"ti` L �' -3 �� w1 /(c1—
Inspected by
A .
—6 -0
Reviewed by1 , , -e Date Z-2-1-1C.
.e 5-f, C^f- - J�l`/o`l
06 -95
John Mr. Otting is requesting a Ficus tree removal. He indicates there is white paint on
hardscape, for 'replacement he presumes & feels the tree should come out at the same time. I
told him you would start the process with a Tree Inspection, thx.
cc: Larry Kobo
•
5-1
Page ,1
Phone Message for Conway, John
• From:
Lomeli, Marcy
Date:
Tue, Jan 23,1996 10:30 AM
Name:
Mr. Harry Otting
Company:
1516 Miramar
Phone:
675 -3403
• Telephoned
• Please call
To:
Conway, John
Cc:
Kolbo, Larry
John Mr. Otting is requesting a Ficus tree removal. He indicates there is white paint on
hardscape, for 'replacement he presumes & feels the tree should come out at the same time. I
told him you would start the process with a Tree Inspection, thx.
cc: Larry Kobo
•
5-1
•
•
sI
Agenda Item No. l Oa
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 986 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 986 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. MacArthur sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. MacArthur has received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
r�
LJ
August 15, 1995
a-v rove o- Chc- - emo•lai .. _ _ e c,^ , -wai;a
in guy parkway. Yes.--LZ yo
• 1 would like the rew City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes _� No
I
Name:
986 SANDCASTLE OR.
Address: CORONA DEL MAR, CA 92625
LJ
Signature: -4�Z..—
The Emunon. C.. rnpsrr+ i r:nicadlontp Alsnaye:::e:rt A +x•.ru::5 ia•:.
VO P.O ^p,(�S••i I`ll , ... �'_ ?: =i ;�3: 75'•:�. ^.0 •��_ 7C.� :�^
•
•
_• r v.. ra.x ��..r.. n�a _ n �
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Phone Number
Request /`t.A..asw_. Ge yr
Botanical Name uta/yn /yS rL6,uA/Qe,
i
Common Name �/�^� qu&x
Designated Street Tree i¢ld" %c`f�e GPM
Estimated Tree Value
Damage /JP �u Y ° �e fa �i Ike cowG� }arti1,
Parkway: Concrete V Brick Turf
Comments Q -Frey j��pee Fray �F�e+th+ir�eQ —ci S
�dc�l� -i3y lo. S.�e7nc�frJ C�cu �.✓�U;d
Inspected by
Recommendation %2e--��
dot
Other
Date
Reviewed by (�r UV �/ Date �,I'r1�
z -Zo -I6
06 -95
i
i
i
•
Agenda Item No. l Ob
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1420 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1420 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Hollman sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus, tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. Hollman has received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 Commission meeting.
0
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl'
Attachments
bL
•
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17550 Gillette Avenue. Suite 101, Irvine. California 92713
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes_ No
I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
• Dlagnolia. Yes z No
Name: Douglas and Alice Hollman
Address: 1420 Sandcastle
Signa
Corona del Mar, CA 9,2625
vim- - - ---
• Professional Management Associates. P.O. Box 19530, Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752.2225 Fax 1714) 757.6396
0
.! q�wmwNV�eKRMSttPR1 {nn:,p�t4tl11[4�.lYrYWI .. r t. W YO�r,•tti••;•
11
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Phone Number 111A p /
Request l^tC/l -a/`¢- �v�0. y4, ✓4 �t-¢/lQoy�f Wi � /�'."°�.Jo i0., ��Yi; !f%, Gen n
Botanical 'Name (P.ws Gi`E
Common Name
Designa
Estimat
Damage c) igk-P w14N i
t)04- /Z."-k l
Paikway: Concrete Brick__ Turf r/ Other
Comments ,0
Inspected
Inspected by
Reviewed by
0
Date a -/3 -q6
4L Date � 'tie -11I
.Z -z'D -1,6
06 -95
•
•
6�
5
Agenda Item No. l Oc
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 915 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association,Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 915 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Travers sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the 'hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. Travers has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March
5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
•
17300 Redhtll Avenue, Suite 210, Irvine California 92714
August 15, 1'995
I approve of the removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes Ywt� No
I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
• Magnolia. Yes No
Name: Cv a4ld J rr-4UY VPte(S
u
Address: /l.r�
Signature:
U/ w
The Emmons Company / Professional Management Associates Inc.
P.O. Box 19530 Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225, Fax (714) 798 -0367
I �
_ Wsmu�:w�e�amnWnr+ma�1M44 .hugs...
1I 11
u
•
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name AA; fA � 4x4lwy- / % /R�Uvn S
Address 9/S � Ga &wp-
Phone Number dIA
Request R6/-Ore- w Y Ac� W,-(-A /,rc
Botanical Name G� /e��` //� W 9 C,4A, °AI.A,
Common Name q U✓
Designated Street Tree
a V fi4 Gem
Estimated Tree Value /3 "(�(31d ( /sa, /� ^ �� i 3 •OS
Damage �jU oir7�(� p?J q�{(cJ �1ar� �ge.QQ r� ui, lditJ GVKId,
Parkway: Concrete Brick__ Turf Other
Comments Q -P-i 2l a Nsp- e-AcoJ AA4M;.4e)2 "k2c 4L
Inspected by Date
Recommendation Re4- +,'FAM-,
Reviewed by k v Date 2 4C —qloo,
P-g = /C� /
Z_ '-2- �� 06 -95
r
I
•
0
6
FROM : Panasonic FAX SYSTEM PHONE NO. :
Feb. 15,1996
David Niederhouse, General Services Director
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, California 92663
Feb. 20 1996 10:45PM P1
Dear Mr. Niederhouse,
I am writing to request the removal of two Eucalyptus trees. 'These trees
stand in front of our home at 915 Sandcastle Drive, CDM.
For the pasts= months we have in the process of "improving our property ";
installation of a new roof - new garage doors - redoing the courtyard stucco
wall and new entry gate. We will also be painting the house exterior and
upgrading the landscape. •
The two trees located on the parking strip are extremely tall, ugly,
messy and are constantly discarding limbs, bark and leaves onto our
house•and surrounding areas. In addition, these trees are extremely
hazardous to our property and surrounding area. It is a known fact that
Eucalyptus Trees are quite brittle and easily blown down in windstorms,
not unlike a storm which just occurred last month in an inland city in
which many Eucalyptus trees were blown dowry causing much
property damage to surrounding homes and automobiles.
In addition, there is nothing redeeming, from an aesthetic sense, about
these trees - they create a serious eyesore on Sandcastle Dr...
bare trunks, reminiscent of "wooden telephone poles" and most of the trees
are seriously "deformed "due to improper pruning.
We are asking that these trees be removed as preventive measures
before the surrounding sidewalk cracks and these trees are blown
down upon our roof and yard.
It is beyond our comprehension why the Park department of the City
of Newport Beach is being so intractable about havipg these trees
removed. Especially when we understand that our association would
bear a portion of its cost.
We request that this matter be placed on the March agenda.
Anita Travers , alf�— '%'eo ..
915 Sandcastle Dr.
Corona Del Mar, Ca 92625
714 644 0185
cc:
Kevin Murphy, City Manager
Yvonne Houssels, Association President - Harbor View Hills South
Sue Conley, Senior Manager, Emmons Management Co.
Dear 'Da V; J)
P /eas -c.
61 J en ! 69
j d c .P-. a n 7' /-la r c h
r( ha � VDuI
6 PR R
•
Agenda Item No.l Id
March 5, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1436 Key View in the Harbor View Hills
South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove three Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
trees at 1436 Key View.
Discussion
Mr. Peter Spataro sent the attached letter requesting the removal of three
• Eucalyptus trees located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing .a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. Spataro has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mg1
• Attachments
V
0
E
I
August 150 1995
*-, approare of the remo••tal
in my parkway. Yes, v/Z
No
I would like the rew City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes I/ No
Name
Address%
Signature:
• 1
O The =-.Unons I
Vany I 9n,"'fisl0=4 'Managem!m in.;.
P.0. Box 19110 " I.
a
0
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name I e4w " '0
Address 14 3 (F �!
Phone ,Number ^j1,�
Request -7/- S am- C L S /72 S L 0-A `'` 4-V^O
�� ,/Vg �; ENO L -L, : ��,
Botanical Name
Common Name
Designated Street Tree A OLIWd
Estimated Tree Value -7 (38.19 S6 d66Se(d
��,•._., fw.racst So�H� a�v,� ._. 1139aa•Sy
Damage !1
v L � J�J Pan-a e a+ `v-• k4A4- ftc-
in-94 CYLInCYC L* /Jo 4ACAP Aw "fly a- /ALLt'z- /Xkk,, S/;, 4* C00,6 ufp-
tea-+ /Jo &-o, V Parkway: Q C ¢on; c2 r�D e tie e �S Brick_; , Jz �T� u r/k f Ji /rs nx O thl Learn � p�l%SC�wd^�/QiR
q
i°^-
Comments .: -V J
10a4- -o,90 A/LP�, n1D-f" MBiI U'xO�- M-✓/�- e�A -vlS . %M�n'��'J` i'cb. r(O
Inspected by
Reviewed
-11
-,(a
�#� Ay-
Date a 7 Le
Date
2- 20 -16
5
Agenda Item Nol Oe
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1456 Key View in the Harbor View Hills
South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove three Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
trees at 1456 Key View.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Nielsen sent the attached letter requesting the removal of three
'Eucalyptus trees located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete ' Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. Nielsen has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March
5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
—1-2�
4 -�
•
U
0
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17550 Gillette Avenue. Suite 201, Irvine, Calilirrnia 92713
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal
in my parkway. Yes
I would like the new Ci y
Magnolia.
Name:
Yes JL
of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
No
replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
N
i�
Address:
(2 nq 61WIS
Signature: G1 �cA/J�— 6 161?�-411C�
1,tV 4aw7
JU Z,
Gzl
Pml'essiona Manament Associates. P.O. r�trd 19530. Irvine. CA 92713 (714) 752.215 Ex (.71.117 7 -6396
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name- - 06,v-. & (-C� J,eiSe,
Address 1 &S � �/e.v V; etj
Phone Number dlA
/
Request /�o..mV e, �0. �Y JS �tR/,ZQ� -cn- W,`•%�i A-eL ""IA- 6e A /
Botanical Name i 444S Cr7-/t.2a b°0-L+
Common Name ��� qt//K
Designated Street Tree L
/z n Estimated Tree Value i1
'r-
l2"— .A4-u., .4U „1L 111T.I
tr Z•� %en //
U 3gaa
n /sru, •z �.
Comments �•p.M
Parkway: Concrete Brick Other �ti.
r Q itJ � SCw3'LQ --
Inspected by _
Recommendation
U;&ZC1N P2 -Via. 66cf 6.2.
Date
JJ//�An /
Reviewed by_T��/t� U! /V y Date
/kpJ /Z-- 2-0 --1,,6, 06-95
q
L
Agenda Item No. l Of
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 919 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 919 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. MacPherson sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents.a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. MacPherson has received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
• Attachments
1�
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17300 Redhill Avenue, Suite 210, Irvine California 92714
•
August 15, 1995
I approve of the removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes L-� No
I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
• Magnolia. Yes No
Address: '7 /9- 'v
; t
- Q M
Signature:
U
The Emmons Company/ Professional Management Associates Inc.
P.O. Box 19530 Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225, Fax (714) 798.0367
•
._..ma•nnnom�..,...... ..._.. .... -:. ... _ ... - . - ...., -..,. .._. s, .....i ' [C `�i;_ .:Ci �"e _•ems - _- ._ •Si ?:i`:v}
.1
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name /lA/>, /y125.�A 1e/ s /uGe-NyAg j
Address qjq
Phone Number A)
Request
{r2Rhov`t � ReA e- a,44,
Botanical Name �bCANP PV4
Common Name �2/v�
Designated Street Tree
Estimated Tree Value 13"AgN /3a.7) �� ?93•os /
• Damage si�W6L(kdta�9e- /1d�l/?�z /f�eM 1e1 44,ta,
•
Parkway: Concrete Brick Other kx-F
Comments
To OGCaJA. �fD �iJal� �,- nl , f'✓f/1'+'S�i/ M"^^`
rtie sop w; bed G S ✓b dr ��IJ ,:: .
Inspected by _� Date a- 13-9
Recommendation 47klL�
r
Reviewed by w" vDate// 2
ID— 1 0 06 -95
C�
Agenda Item No.lag.
March 5, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1200 Seacrest Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove three Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
trees at 1200 Seacrest Drive.
Discussion
Ms. Jan Keane sent the attached letter requesting the removal of three
Eucalyptus trees located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
•
`l
Ms. Keane has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mg1
Attachments
h Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17550 (iiIIcite Avenue, Suite 201. Irvine. CaItfornia 92711
J
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes_ No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes No
Name: -✓
Address:—
0
Signatux
7q
J
Professional Maneement Associates. P.U. Box 19530. Irvine. CA 92713 (714) 752•2225 Pax (714) 757.6396
• Damaae
Y
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT 1 i
Phone Number /J /,4.
Request Re -� 9�u /l /0 S f•t,+.s /Jd
Botanical Name p-Ay-S G-- it.a&v- elj
Common Name
Designated Street Tree "• /`e" , �,A; �� �A-.I/
P6 7V -_--. st S+� 39• N6GS
Estimated Tree Value 6y— y 4ff.5'b
10 u- #1356•yt'
Parkway: Concrete Brick Otnher) (/�y
Comments ,e-i
•
Agenda Item No. 10Oh
March 3, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1300 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1300 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Overman sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. Overman has received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 Commission meeting.
0
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
"ugust '150 1 995
approve a the _•em vai
in my parkway. Yes,
_he cat", C. aed S:aca _ =-;t:; :Zce
No
I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
• Magnolia. Yes Al No
•
Name
I
WAV-1 _ .�_LLi0,
Signature:
;6c Envnons Compaw!i P:oi =selonal Stanage:rant hssociaws irv.
� L P.O. Box 191101rvi'le ",19271? r?140"42:!5 ra-L O!•1;
0.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name •J- 4(aN�e Ore tN ��I
Address ( �t 00
Phone Number � R
Request sic-.,(y,
Botanical Name �y�4,js C'i4,+ -DAJ�
Common Name
Designated Street Tree C;QM
Estimated Tree Value eh&1f(r76,7) #3o5.3,37
Damage RaaAb(- gzt� f' E ;h jea�a ¢X wY/ l'it a�i�a vYCc�2i a�(iP%
Parkway: Concrete Brick__ Turf Other
Comments �'`elQ �n1��e- {z`flnl �/�, �e�QaO G0 am�'1 p
- Inspected by _ �n/� ���` ,,�-dw� Date
Recommendation i"�471` Y.4.,, -
•
Reviewed
Date
` = /2� / z -zb -`l6
06 -95
•
Agenda Item No. 10 i
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1026 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1026 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Ms. Melba Figge sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Ms. Melba Figge has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
0
1�
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
•
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17550 Gillette Avenue. Suite 201. Irvine. California 92711
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes X No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes � No
Name:
Address:
Signature: ]i 0,,0(!XlL� ec,•
•
Pmfcssional "'I"ement Associntes, P.O. Box 19530, Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752.2225 Fax 1714) 757.6396
S
•
l0
6
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i,
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
i
Name
Address Gcc441e-
Phone Number N /{4
Request �h O"2 �vcc ��n �d5 IWAQe- t 0;4-� A q M hci ��'r l �le Ge.k rr
Botanical Name P• 0S 0 "4/t- .o0•1-T �
Common Name VM
Designated Street TreeT!i
Estimated Tree Value _IY °al?�1laP3S��8 98. SS
Damage Au * C/)&a �ul�/ LtL�rte, A cvx/.•,� AZ-Ac
Parkway: Concrete Brick n Turf // Other
Comments C(' ; elr/' N t�(yo �q {2nn� Jeri /�a U
Inspected by
FM
Date a -/3-16
Reviewed by_`SA Cg�l "wV Date
06 -95
PJ
n
LJ
0
Agenda Item No, l0 j
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1001 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1001 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Ms. Bahran Ghassemi sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The 'tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Ms. Bahran Ghassemi has received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mg1
Attachments
u
17.950 Gillette Avenue. Suite 201. Irvine. Calilurnm 92711
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal f the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes —Z No
0
Name:
Address: / 00
Signature:
i �
- S l.E_ ,
! V Professional Mannnement Associates. P.O. Box 19530. Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752= 2225 Fax ( 714) 757.6396
0
LJ
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
G A4SS2M
Address 100( S "C.ez4te.
Phone Number r1
Request /{4 4,V� Uy- k �do( ;,z
Gc x `
Botanical Name �xa��/l�vb �lfiuo�a�w
Common Name
Designated Street Tree �/�d� i0. i Q�
Estimated Tree Value " #,! 3Y /� I1
Damage /Jo p$, a��I cux6 d'J 1 u0 �u�q.e -. Jo u19- w--t/S a-J Q,Se c -,
Parkway: Concrete Brick / Other
Coomments - a 1pQ t�4p,--P4 3 �nf(enM; Jo� �D og;- 'co-,t LA-08 ce q�-2.,
QC.cVV ±111,
n �
ora r10 �,p 1i� �a �'Du -++e�e nth . />�rz. A� -kLi x,-e0—k4• `YiP
Inspected by Date
Recommendation A'%?e" / 1 LLL,
Reviewed by°-14 WV 444// Date
06 -95
0
3
•
Agenda Item Nod Ok
March 5, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1018 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1018 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mrs. Abbott sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds, available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. Abbott has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March
5 Commission meeting.
E
qD
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
J
August '15, 1'995
rove :� Lh _�as�•vai - -
in my parkway. Yes No
• Z would like the new City -replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes \ No
U
n
LJ
Name:
Address: ����f�inC -F.L Ur;
gz
Signature:
The C: unow. i;p!npanv / ?:n;c5.lu!t.,1 Ml naig'c : ^. =:.1 AaWc=.-3 1IIC. '
IP.O. COL :o;tn It x ,. utry:3 ; ; ?' ._ rW. •f;'4F•C3S?
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name /uti` /NM1S. A%/14a'`I
Address (0!$ d�sf�C
Phone Number Alh
Request Ae#"y - G ua(yn (,is �p�Qo w� u:l_k /;A-A Na AA- '( rT -i`te, Gee, �
Botanical Name �7jc.",Jyq�E r, % 0
-- - -; Common Name orve-k�
Designated Street Tree A4 it
Estimated Tree Value 4uBg1�• — �Q R �S�
• Damage �odCca�� Dran -�r�/ do Wes o iJ Jai SRC se .
is
l�,
Parkway:
Comments
Concrete Brick_ Turf(/ Other)
Al m.<4 � 4 Ccnt. x •�,:,tc wJda it ab
Inspected by nn Date
Recommendation A4--�
Reviewed by,
F'� /e� / 2. —q-6 06-95
Agenda Item No.10 0 )
March 5, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1547 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove two Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
trees at 1547 Sandcastle Drive
Discussion
Ms. Lynn Mosich sent the attached letter requesting the removal of two
Eucalyptus trees located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
•
r�
Ms. Mosich has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
ti
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
• 17550 Gillette Avenue. Suite 201. Irvine. California 92713
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal) of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes ✓ No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes 1/ No
Name
Address: 154-1 -D2106
CV �1-�A DEL, MAIL CIIVZ
S
Sp 2 71995
Professional Management Associates. P.O. Box 19530. Irvine. CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225 Fax (714) 757 -6396
r µ
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name 14�,,l�0/4�tk�inS /Y`+isi�
c
Address—/,5'z/,7
Phone Number N ( /bt
s � & wi -�-A /I^a� �1;� 11�& Cem r1
Botanical Name _Qe,.te S
G",- //L:a�p�o�,
Common Name 4,a.4-�-,
J M
Designated Street Tree
/
qu A81d
Estimated Tree Value /J. -" D614 (15349
3'GZ.
i� ss
.39
1
R gftc:111449 ,
Damage
• -ia Ll� -go.J �i:,a -e-' ��igli- fcJa -a-, ,r• fin.- , -,�° -J �-� -zc-,
Parkway: Concrete ✓ Brick Turf Other/" °�0
Comments Q ),e1PfJ—Q2ee-41aJ A4e,10t;,,1ztQ- oZ -��S aig S- �
- �j��/. �/��, /,�;�; ��q��, [. A (1..�, tx:/�[. -T(/V ceY, c, - &1 rd•d, e g A1V dig rJrr
e.
Inspected by 64r-,� Date r- /�4a
Recommendation
�a- �e�
•
f
G
Reviewed by
y�xxL�
Agenda Item No .1 Om
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 894 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 894 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Ms. Marcia Vasquez sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
is Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Ms. Vasquez has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
•
0
r1
LJ
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17300 Redhill Avenue, Suite 210, Irvine California 92714
August 15, 1995
I approve of the removal the City .owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes No
I would like the new City replacement tree — the "Little Gem"
• Magnolia. Yes (// No
N
Ai
S
• The Emmons Company / Professional Management Associates Inc.
G P.O. Box 19530 Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225, Fax (714) 798.0367
I
Gq
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
TaACia Vas91a2
Address q ! C-", C+j L fdj "OL S" '
Phone Number_ N/A
Request % e/;,044 (ac,&(yp s j /vC. IN v j jeb& �lMe 6e. "
Botanical Name 7NGa rv5 �iYffLO"
Common Name ",j n
Designated Street Tree IkLet9�O &CL �- i fi� o !`�" (e CC A (r
Estimated Tree Value /�(�3
Damage /10 $7 a(� vU Cun J` _4 O-&24. CAA" -(C U),V -4 ,J
�lwfv .
Parkway: Concrete Brick Turf V Other n
Comments Q ,elD i`� fiQ� c�k[�1 M%n!%/waQ ".g y .
�4p.- .tC�p,F /N;nliP`/�� -Q- i,� f�c 7�c 5ft¢� �st'e.J a'� �� a.t�u2�r�¢ �l �'�'�'•
CeTC Jae Suy�wwi &e u a3 nldl�a2�'
j ttR . Re��l1cannn%ir f ,n ad' of Fe.(o.
Inspected by Date
Recommendation �4a.41 41U" t
Reviewed by CAR JU
/rte Date 2
06-95
Trees are the tallest, most massive,
longest - living organisms ever to grow on
earth.
Trees, like other plants, cannot move.
owever, trees, unlike other plants are
ig, woody and perennial, which means
they are easy targets for living and non-
living agents that could cause injuries.
Trees cannot move away from potentially
destructive conditions. Wounding agents
and destructive conditions do destroy
trees, but somehow, trees have grown in
ways that give them super survival pow-
ers.
The big question is, how do trees do it?
The answer lies in concepts of biology
and mechanical engineering.
The purpose of this paper is to exam-
ine the question of tree survival power
more from the concepts of biology, but
also to be aware of.concepts of mechani-
cal engineering.
I will focus on subjects that need more
clarification. Details on all subjects given'
here are in my books.
Because different disciplines often use
similar terms that have different meanings
for their work, it is important to start with
some definitions of terms I will use. You
May not accept my definitions, but you
ill know what I mean when I use a term.
I believe if a person cannot define a term
in 25 words or less, they should not use it
because they probably do not understand
it.
Keyword Definitions of Terms
(Keyword definitions give the most
important words that define a term. Com-
plete sentences are not necessary.)
Capacity - What you'have as a result
of your genetic code; a potential source
for some future action or product.
Ability - What you are doing with what
you have; a dynamic or kinetic process.
System - A highly ordered connection
of parts and processes that have a prede-
termined end point - product, service.
Stress - A condition where a system,
or its parts, begins to operate near the lim-
its for what it was designed. '
Strain - Disorder and disruption of a
system due to operation beyond the lim-
its of stress.
Vigor - The capacity to resist strain; a
genetic factor, a potential force against
any threats to survival.
Vitality - The ability to grow under the
conditions present; dynamic action.
Health - The ability to resist strain.
Disease - A process that decreases the
order and energy of a living system to the
point of strain.
Survival - The ability to remain alive
or functional under conditions that have
the potential to cause strain.
Generating system - New parts and
processes form in new spatial positions;
plants.
Regenerating system - New parts and
processes form in old, or preoccupy, spa-
TREECARE INDUSTRY - ]FEBRUARY 1996
tial positions; animals.
Wood - A highly ordered connection
of living, dying and dead cells that have
walls of cellulose, hemicellulose and lig-
nin.
Symplast - The highly ordered connec-
tion of living axial and radial parenchyma
in wood and bark.
Apoplast - The highly ordered connec-
tion of dead cells and cell parts that make
,up the framework that holds the Symplast.
Quality - The characteristics that de-
fine a product, service or performance;
quality can be low or high.
Hypothesis for survival
Because trees cannot move away from
potentially destructive agents and condi-
tions, they have grown in ways that give
them the capacity to adjust rapidly after
being threatened by agents or conditions
that could cause strain or death.
The capacity to adjust is a genetic fea-
ture called vigor. The program of vigor
of an organism is defined by the limits of
factors essential for survival. For ex-
ample, one tree may have broad limits for
water utilization. When drought occurs,
it will still survive. Another tree may have
very narrow limits for water utilization.
Even the slightest disruption in availabil-
ity of water would lead, to strain or even
death.
A vigor code then determines the lim-
its for such essential factors as space, water, elements, tempera-
ture and soil pH.
The vigor of an organism cannot be measured until a life -
threatening stimulus contacts the organism.
When any potentially destructive stimulus occurs, the ability
of the tree to adjust will be due not only to its vigor, or genetic
code, but to its vitality. A tree that is very vigorous by nature of
its genetic code may be growing on a rock. It would not be very
vital. What this means is that for survival, both the vigor and
vitality of a tree must be optimized.
Forest tree, city tree
Trees became tall, massive and long - living plants as they grew
in groups. Trees not only connect with other trees by way of
root grafts but also by way of She fungi that are associated with
non -woody roots, the organs are called mycorrhizae. Trees also
connected with many other organisms, very large to very small,
in ways that benefited the trees and their associates. Synergistic
associations are important parts of the tree system.
A forest is a system where trees and many associates are con-
nected in ways that ensure survival of all members.
It is important to remember thatthe genetic codes for survival,
or vigor, came from trees growing in forests.
When the forest -coded tree is brought into the city, the fac-
tors that affect vitality become extremely important. The
architecture of most city trees as they,grow as individuals is -dif-
ferent from most of their relatives in the forest where trees grow
in groups. Forest trees have,group protection and group defense.
The individual tree has neither.
The good news, the bad news
The good news is that most of our city trees have strong vigor
codes that have made them super survivors for hundreds of mil-
lions of years.
The bad news is that many human actions and mistreatments
affect vitality and undo all the benefits of wondrous vigor code.
It is only because most trees have such strong vigor codes that
they still survive in cities.
There is no doubt in my mind that the greatest threat to sur-
vival faced by city trees are mistreatments by humans. Many
trees tolerate mistreatments. Too often their tolerance.is per-
ceived as justifications for the mistreatments. I have.heard it said
many times that the tree did not die, so therefore the treatments
must have been correct.
How do trees adjust?
Trees have two basic adjustment codes.
1. After injuries, boundaries form that resist spread of infec-
tions. By resisting spread of infections, the boundaries protect
and preserve the water, air and mechanical support systems of
the tree. Two types of boundaries form: reaction zones and bar-
rier zones. The reaction zone is a chemically altered boundary
that forms within the wood present at the time of wounding. The
barrier zone is an anatomical and chemical boundary that forms
after wounding. The barrier zone separates the infected wood
from the new healthy wood that continues to form in new spa-
A typical cracking pattern associated with multiple stems. The wil-
low oakwas growing in a city. Cracks that separate multiple stems
often lead to fractures. The tree shown here was one of many that
was a victim of Hurricane Hugo.
tial positions. The tree is a generating system. The tree has no
mechanism to form new, healthy cells in the same positions as
those that are infected. Regenerating systems in animals do re-
store, repair, replace and regenerate parts in the same spatial
positions. Animals have a process call apoptosis, which means
programmed cell death followed by lysis, and new cells form-
ing again in the same positions of those that died, lysed, and
were eliminated. This normal process of apoptosis accelerates
after animals are injured and infected. This accelerated restora-
tion process is then called healing. In this sense, trees have no
healing process.
Trees are highly compartmented, woody, shedding, perennial
plants. Trees are generating systems. Every growth period, trees
form new compartments over older ones. Trees grow as their
apical and vascular meristems produce cells that differentiate to
form all parts of the tree. The important part to remember is that
TREE CARE INDUSTRY - PEBRUARY 1996
root of red spruce. The tree root did com-
partmentalizethe infection, but in doing so
the volume of root wood that could store
energy reserves was decreased.
trees grow as new parts form in new spa-
tial positions.
loTrees cannot "go back" to restore, re-
t, replace or regenerate parts. You do
not restore a church by building a new one
next to it. All words in English that start
with `Ye "mean that new parts will go back
in previously occupied positions or back
to an original state. These words have no
meaning for trees. These words have been
the basis for great amounts of confusion.
A tree cannot function in the same ways
as animals do after injuries or threats to
theirsurvival. The continuing use of such
meaningless words for trees is a strong
indication why tree basics should be un-
derstood by people who work with trees.
2. Now for the second adjustment fea-
ture of trees. After, wounds or threats to
their survival, trees also grow in ways that
will maintain their mechanical structures.
Now we come to the mix of biology and
mechanical engineering.
There are two basic ways trees adjust
to maintain and strengthen their structural
stability: reaction wood and woundwood.
Reaction wood can be of two types.
Compression wood forms on the down
Qe of leaning trunks and tension wood
rms on the upper sides. Compression
wood is common in conifers and can be
seen on a transverse dissection as dark
bands in the wood, usually resin soaked.
Or the growth increments could be larger
Sweden that was felled because of exten-
sive root and trunk rot. As trees grow older,
the rate of growth of the fungi that cause
decay maybe more important as asurvival
factor than the rate of growth of the tree.
in width and still be dark and resin soaked.
It is not possible to see tension wood
because the changes take place in the cell
walls. A gelatinous layer forms in the cell
walls, and this layer can only be seen
when properly stained and viewed' under
a microscope. The important part here is
to know that these altered cell formsoc-
cur and that they occur after a stimulus
that threatens survival mainly because of
a lean in the stem thatcould lead to a frac-
ture.
Woundwood is altered wood that forms
about the margins of wounds. When
wounds release the pressure of the bark,
some of the still living parenchyma in the
symplast begin to divide and produce new
cells in new positions. These new cells no
longer are held in place by the pressures
of the bark or of the apoplast. The new
cells become rounded and have a thin,
primary cell wall. The cells exercise their
ability (now) to divide and divide and
divide. Because they are thin - walled, di-
viding cells, and because they contain the
genetic -codes for forming all parts of the
tree, some of the cells begin to differenti-
ate to form sprouts, prop roots, roots or
flowers. This 'capacity for division and
differentiation is called meristematic.
Meristems are groups of cells that have
the ability to divide and differentiate to
form all parts of the tree. There are api-
cal meristems that increase the length of
TREE CARE INDUSTRY - rEBRUARY 1996
stems and roots, and also produce flow-
ers, and vascular meristems - cambial
zone - that increases the girth or circum-
ference of a tree.
The symplast is a meristematic tissue.
This means that the parenchyma in the
symplast have the capacity to divide and
to differentiate. However, they are not
able to exercise this capacity so long as
they are "trapped" in place by the strong
apoplast and the pressure of the bark.
When wounds "release" the symplast,
then the capacity to divide and to differ-
entiate is converted to an ability.
Callus is the name given to the thin -
walled, mostly round; meristematic cells
that first form after wounding about the
edges of the wound. Callus has very little
lignin, the tough "natural cement" that
gives cell walls great strength.
After callus cells continue to form, the
pressure begins to build again as internal
round callus cells begin to squeeze against
other callus cells. As pressure increases
internally, the shape of newly formed
cells begins to change.
Within a few weeks to a few months
after wounding during the growth period,
callus formation begins to diminish and
woundwood formation begins.
Woundwood has fewer vessels than
"normal" wood. The cell walls are usu-
ally thicker than normal and usually
contain more lignin. The woundwood
cells cease to be meristematic. A new
vascular cambium forms and continuesao
form woundwood. These woundwood tis-
sues are seen as ribs about the margins of
wounds. The woundwood ribs also add
new strength to the weakened side of a
stem, branch or woody root.
When woundwood closes wounds, then
normal wood continues to form. The in-
ternal boundary - forming processes of
compartmentalization are separate from
the processes of callus and woundwood
formation.
What can go wrong?
It appears that trees could live forever.
Of course, that is not so because the tree
system, like all systems, mustobey natu-
ral laws. And, again, the laws bring
together biology and mechanical engi-
neering.
Because a tree is a generating system,
it is bound by its genetic codes to increase
constantly in mass. The second law of
energy flow begins to take its toll. The
" second law states that no system can re-
main in an orderly condition without a
continuous supply of energy. As the tree
system begins to increase in mass, the
•demands for energy to maintain order in
the system begin to increase at.exponen-
tial rates.
The tree still has ways of living within
the limits of this law. The tree is a shed-'
ding organism. It uses and sheds
non -woody and woody parts as they die.
Decayed wood that develops within
boundaries is even a form of shedding.
Also, as trees age, the percentage of the
entire tree that is symplast begins to
change. The ratio of apdplast to symplast
increases. So, the'tree 5askoth dynamic
mass - symplak- afd-apoplasL.
As -the inner cells in the symplast die,
the inner apoplast that now has all dead
cells is called -protection'wood.
Protection is a static feature. Defense
is a dynamic action. Proiection wood is
more protective than the sapwood because
protection wood often contains substances
called extractives that resist decay. Pro-
tection wood may, also be so altered that
its water, pH and available elements may
not - support growth of microorganisms.
Sapwood has a symplast. When sap-
wood is injured aricNi fected, dynamic
processes take place. There are two types
of sapwood: sapwood that conducts free
water, andsapwood that.has its vessels
plugged and does not conduct free water.
When protection wood is injured and
infected, the intrinsic characteristics'of
the wood resist spread of infections. There
are four types of protection wood: heart-
wood, false heartwood, discolored wood
in early stages and wetwood. (See Tree
Anatomy for details.)
The biology of fractures .
Trees, like all organisms, die in three
basic ways: depletion, dysfunction and
disruption. -
Depletion means that energy decreases
to the point where disorder increases and
the survival of the system is threatened.
Examples are infections and starvation.
Dysfunction means that highly ordered
parts and processes begin to become dis-
•ordered to the point where survival is
threatened. Some examples are genetic
problems and toxins.
Disruption means that the highly or-
dered structure of a system,, is disordered
to the point where survival is threatened.
Some examples are storm injuries and
wounds inflicted by large machines.
Trees grow as increments of new cells
envelop older increments. In a sense, trees
grow as cones of tissues envelop older,
smaller cones. The tough structural parts
of a tree are aligned in axial or vertical
arrangements of thick - walled fibers or
fiber tracheids, and vessels or tracheids.
Every park of the tree framework is self -
supporting, unlike animals that have
thin- walled cells- that.are held in position
by a boundary called ikin•and an internal
framewor%,of bones. The - animal system
allows movement -as evasive defense
against some destructive agents.
The tree also has a- radial arrangement
of parenchyma cells. -Remember thai -the
parenchyma cells usually have thin walls
with little lignin.'Bands of radial paren-
chyma cells are called rays.'They'are
often the sites of internal cracks.
No absolutes
There are no absolutes. -There are no-
perpetual motion machines: Every system'
has its limits for survival. The tree sys-
tem also has its limits for survival. As it
increases in mass and gets older, the like-
lihood for injuries increases. A mature,
healthy tree may have thousands of com-
partmentalized infections. Yet, there
comes a time when even -the limits of a
super survivor begin to be approached.
There.are no absolutes.
When trees are young, depletion and
dysfunction are the major causes of death.
As trees get older and Have survived thou-
sands of injuries and infections, disruption
becomes the greatest threat for high -qual-
ity survival. When a branch fractures and
falls, it dies. When a trunk spliis and,falls
to the ground, it dies. And, as larger and
larger wounds result from -such fractures,,
the likelihood of more fractures increases
greatly.
When the pattern of fractures begins in
city trees, not only are the trees in poten-
tial trouble, but so is the property near the
trees. Also, people who go near the trees
could have problems if trees or their parts
fracture and fall.
The tree's architecture
A tree is a central beam with second -
ary lateral beams called branches and -
twigs. The tree is unique as a living sys-
tem because it connects living and dead
cell's, and, in a sense, still maintains some
control over the dead parts. The cell walls
of dead fibers still hold bound water that
acts as a strong protection feature against
infection by microorganisms. So long as
the bound water and the free water in the
lumens saturate the wood, infection will
be resisted. It is possible also that -some
of the bound water could be "released"
and used as free water in living processes.
Thisis probably the case in tissues behind
buds where high amoti'nts !of starch are
stored'during the end of the growing sea-
son. In spring the stazch.is enzymatically
converted back to glucose, which greatly
increases the osmotic pressure, and may,
"pull" bound-water from cell walls. Wa-
ter does not flow from tissues behind buds
when cuts are made very early in the
spring, often before soils are thawed in
areas where they normally freeze.
Because trees are constructed of living
and dead parts,- the concepts of biology
and mechanical engineering are ail the
more appropriate. They are connected.
We say trees do not move, and in the
sense of changing spatial positions, this
is correct. Yet trees are cdnstantly in
motion. As they, sway, new tissues that
form in new positions constantly adjust
to potential weakness.
. If all this is so, why do tree failures
occur?
Now, back to the idea that there are no
absolutes. There are limits to'all parts and
processes that make up -a system. As the
limits are approached, we have increas-
ing stress. When the limits are exceeded,
we have strain. When the strain is physi-
ological, we have,`a:disease. When the
x�.:
strain is structtn-al, -iwe .r h.ave a fracture.
Branch attachments
Branches are subdominant stems. As
buds grow, some develop as leaders that
extend the central trunk or beam. Other
bud's that do not grow as central leaders
become subdominant lateral branches.
For example, if a young tree is pulled
partially out of the soil and tied horizon-
tal to the ground, soon a series of leader
trunks will form along the procumbent
trunk. They would be called trunks, not
branches. However, if the tree was not tied
down, the usual leader and branch archi-
tecture would develop.
As the branch grows, branch tissues at
9base of the branch turn abruptly about
e branch base and then continue down-
ward on the trunk. The trunk tissues grow
around the branch tissues at the branch
base. The branch tissue forms a collar
called the branch collar and the trunk tis-
sues form a collar called the trunk collar.
For ease of reference, the two collars are
collectively called the branch collar.
The tissues of both collars usually mix
and mesh to form a swollen.place about
the branch base. When branches die, pro-
tective chemical zones form in these
swollen basal tissues; The protective zone
within the branch base resists infection
into the tree from microorganisms that
grow in the dead branch.
A better understanding of branch at-
tachment has led to adjustments in
pruning. Cuts should be made as close as
possible to the branch collar, but the col-
lar should not be injured or removed.
Removal of branch collars -flush cuts -
are major starting points for many seri-
ous tree problems - cankers, rots, cracks,
&ct infestations.
A brief look at decay
Decay is usually considered the major
cause of tree failures. I do not believe this
is entirely 601rect. I'believe that cracks
are much more of a problem, and I will
discuss them after a few words about de-
cay.
Decay is a process that increases the
disorder of any highly ordered,system.
Tree decay is the breakdown bf the highly
ordered structure of cell walls. Tree de-
cays are the •inost serious' and, most
common group of. tree diseases;: world-
wide. Decay is a disease because ii affects
the healtli.of the entire organism. Pathol-
ogy must considerthe entire organism, not
only its parts.
For many years, decay was not consid-
ered a disease because the
microorganisms infected only dead parts.
Two of the most serious myths that
have held back understanding of a tree,
d consequently our understanding of
ect tree'treatments, are that wood is
cad and that decay is not a disease.
The entire myth of wound paints to stop
decay was built on these two myths. Sad,
but these myths are still alive and eco-
nomically active today. (It is more pro-
ductive to talk about decays.)
Trees have grown in ways that greatly
decrease the potential impact of decays.
Trees compartmentalize decayed wood.
Compartmentalization is the tree's de-
fense process. The tree is a living system
that has -many associates. When trees are
injured, they will always be infected.
There is no tree process that prevents in-
fection. After wounding, the tree responds
in ways that ensure continual survival.
The-original concepts of decay did not
treat the tree as a living, responding or-
ganism. The so- called tree decay concepts
were really wood decomposition con-
cepts: All wood darker than the sapwood
was considered heartwood or a type of
heartwood'- wound heartwood, pathologi-
cal heartwood Hearrwoodwas considered
a dead tissue that was invaded by decay -
causing fungi after wounding. Tree decay
was the breakdown of the - heartwood.
Many differenrtypes of decay patterns and
decay - causing fungi were identified.
Wood product researchers took over the
study of wood decay. This is the time the
"wood is.dead" myth started. It was true
for products, but not for the tree. Wood
anatomy-was studied by many researches.
To this day,-many people confuse wood
anatomy with•tree anatomy. Tree.anatomy
is about a living organism. Tree decay and
compartmentalization are about living,
,responding organisms.
Decay and tree failure
Decay is usually considered the major
cause of tree failures. This may be so in
parts of the world where digging into cavi-
ties is a regular practice. In the digging
process, natural protection boundaries are
destroyed. Also, the strong woundwood
ribs are removed. Then, decay is cited as,
the cause of failure.
.Harsh pruning cuts that remove the
branch collar have been major starting
points for cavities. Thick coatings of
wound paints over such wounds greatly
increase the spread of decay.
Cutting branches flush to the trunk -
flush cuts - painting wounds and digging
out decay have been the three major treat-
ments of the industry. There is no doubt
in my mind that these three mistreatments
have caused more tree problems than all
the diseases, fires, floods and insect in-
festations added together.
Modern arboriculture means that tree
treatments are based on tree biology.
Trees are living systems.
In the U.S.,.the practice of digging into
cavities is rarely done. The use of wound
dressings has decreased greatly. The cor-
rect pruning of trees is increasing greatly.
More and more, people are basing treat-
ments on an understanding of tree
biology.
Now, back to trees and decay. Decay
was the greatest threat to the plants that
were developing as tall, Ion; living,
woody plants. Decay had the potential to
break down the framework for the devel-
oping tree. If the framework was broken
down as wounds were inflicted and as
branches and woody roots died, the tree
as we know it today would never have
developed. Some combination of pro-
cesses and structures "had io happen" or
the plant would never have become a tall,
massive, long living tree. Or, you could-
say, the mechanical design of the tree .
.developed in" such away that decay was
usually resisted. For these reasons, I -see
decay to the point of failure in the natural
forest as a last stage process in the life of
a tree. Decay has become a major cause
of tree failure in younger city trees mainly
because the mistreatments of humans has
occurred at rates much faster than the
trees' ability to adjust And to addinsult
to injury, the trees' adjustment tissues
were,the first to be destroyed.
For these reasons, I see tree decay as
an increasing problem in cities where
mistreatments have routinely destroyed
the trees' systems for defense and protec-
tion. It will take:a complete new
generation of trees and modern arborists
at work before this problem is corrected.
In many cities of the world the problems
have been corrected. To start, I invite you -
to my town of Durham, New Hampshire,
where you will see full-.crowned beauti-
ful trees. You will not see topped and
mutilated trees, no wound dressing and no
cavities that haveheen dug into. In fact,
you will rarely .fmd a cavity, even on the
largest and oldest trees. So, I am optimis-
tic; it will take time.
Cracks
Just as trees.developed as highly com-
partmented, systems that compartmental-
ized decay, they also developed in ways
that sustained survival after cracks
formed:
There are two basic types of cracks in
wood. Ring shakes are cracks or separa-
tions along the circumferential growth
increments. Ray shakes, or radial cracks
are separations along the radial plane.
I see tree decay as an
Wcreasing problem in
cities where Mistreat-
meats have routinely
destroyed the trees'sys-
tems for defense and
protection.
Ring shakes occur commonly along the
prone of the barrier zone that forms after
wounding. The barrier zone is a strong
protective zone that separates infected
wood from healthy wood that continues
to form after wounding.Suberin forms in
the cell walls. In a sense, barrier zones are
like an inside bark. The barrier zone is
weak in a structural way.
Ray shakes orradial cracks usually start
from ring shake's. Ray shakes also start as
0 rtwoundwood ribs curl inward at the
ical margins of wounds: When the
woundwood ribs grow rapidly, the likeli-
hood of cracks forming at the wound
margins increases. Wound dressings that
'stimulate woundwood formation also in-
crease the chances for cracks.
Compartmentalization was the trees'
"answer" to decay. What did the trees
"do" about cracks? Fast, the tree "pro-
duced" more cracks, and second, it
"invited" anaerobic bacteria into the
cracks. Now for some details.
Rarely have I found forest trees with
only one or two-radial cracks. I have'dis-
sected thousands of trees that had internal
cracks. Usually there are many cracks, and
theyform at different positions around the
base of the stem: There appear to be two
survival benefits to multiple cracks. First,
the trunk continues to bend as a vertical
'multiple beam. And, when a radial crack
does rupture the cambium, then
woundwood formation starts. The
woundwood.then adds strength to that
r'ion of the trunk. As radial cracks
pa ate towaid the cambial zone, the
new ray tissues that form appear, thinner.
The survival benefit would be that the
radial crack would propagate e4eti faster
when it approached the thinner ray tissues.
Then, the likelihood for disrupting the
cambial zone would increase, and then the
formation of woundwood would begin.
Woundwood 'cannot begin to form until
the cambial zone i.s.ruptured. For years I
was aware of this phenomenon, but I did
not understand how it could be beneficial
for survival. Now it makes sense.
The second way trees "deal" with
cracks is to have the cracks infected by
anaerobic wetwood- forming bacteria. The
cracks are perfect sites for the bacteria. It
was common to have water and wetwood
fluids flow from dissected trunks that had
cracks. Research has shown that wetwood
resists decay.
Cracks are not major causes of failures
in forest trees, but they are major causes
of failtiies 'in city trees. Why? In forest
trees, multiple basal cracks with wenvood
are common. Forest trees rarely have large
low branches. City trees that have'been
topped and mutilated have cracks form-
ing in higherpositions on the trunk. Large
low, branches often have cracks.at the
point where the branches bend downward.
The architecture of city trees and the
mistreatments they receive often leads, to
cracks and failures. Also, when long, hot,
dry periods dry-the wetwood in the cracks,
failures often result.
Summary -
Trees are living systems. They are
unique living systems because they have
the capacity to add strength to their struc-
ture at exactly the most effective places.
This capacity is built into their genetic
code. As generating systems, they are al-
ways building in front of themselves..
When any part of the structural frame-
work is weakened to thd point where
survival 'is threatened, the'new parts that
form in new positions form in ways that
add strength to the weakened place.
Having the capacity to respond' effec-
tively to survive is dependent on having
the energy, conditions and other ingredi-
ents necessary to turn the capacity into an
ability.
Both capacity as a vigor ingredient and
ability as a vitality ingredient are'neces-
sary for long term, high - quality survival.,
Vigor without vitality, or vitality withoui
vigor will not support long -term, high -
quality survival.
The vigor codes for trees have mei the
test of time in forests. Many trees in many
cities of the world are having great diffi=
culties in expressing their vigor codes
because-human activities and treatments
have affected their vitality. .
There are no absolutes. No system, or
its parts, will survive when stress goes to
strain.
It is time to•reexamine the tree system.
It is time to start basing tree treatments
on tree biology.
It is time for modem arboriculture!
Dr. Alex Shigo is a noted authority in
the field of arboriculture. An author, lec-
turer and consultant, he is the owner of
Shigo, Trees & Associates in Durham,
New Hampshire.
Fax 714- 760 -0107 Mar 04 13:29
'• To: Mr. Niedwhaus
From: Greg and Christa.Preston
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 907 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View Hill South
Homeowners Association Area
I am disappointed that I have received this letter to deny removal of the Eucalyptus trees_ in front
of 907 Sandcastle Drive. We actually have two trees that need removal. They are unsightly
and dangerous. I have lived here six years and have experienced several large branches falling
from these trees, When I fast purchased my new car, I parked in front of my house only to have
a Eucalyptus branch fall on the hood of my car, This incident occurred on a perfectly calm day
during no wind at all and caused $746 damage (which was not covered by my insurance): - The
branch falling was witnessed by my neighbor Wanda Flynn. Additionally, my two small
children were gathering on the sidewalk under the other Eucalyptus tree only to have a large
branch fall next to my daughter. This incident could have been disastrous. We have discovered
numerous large branches on our front yard and roof from these trees. I realize that from a
business perspective the trees do not have disease or sidewalk damage but these trees do pose a
risk to my guests, their cars, my cars and most importantly to my family. I believe that this risk
• is unacceptable and unnecessary.
We truly regret that we are unable to attend the City Council meeting on March 5, 1995. In light
of this information, I trust that you will reconsider your decision and notify us in the near future
regarding the removal of these trees.
•
c
Kate Stuhr -Mack, Ph. D.
• 1432 Sandcastle Drive
Corona del Mar, CA 92625
714/759 -1812
3/4/96
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
Re: Recommendation of the General Services Director to deny the appeal to
remove one Eucalyptus citriodora tree at the above address.
The conclusions drawn from the inspection of the damage to the hardscape
around the tree are short - sighted and hard to reconcile: "...damaged but not
marked for repairs." Therefore, it appears, a decision has been made to allow
the hardscape damage owing to the presence of the tree to worsen.
The concrete next to the tree has already risen an inch above grade, the curb
and gutter are cracked,_fhe asphalt in the street is cracked and what's more
(and not mentioned in the inspection report) the tree is leaning out over the
street at a 70 degree angle! Branches break off and fall all over our property,
• during storms. This tree creates a dangerous situation which will only get
worse with time. Retaining the tree would mean that the city is willing to
court a serious liability. In additon to the dangerousness, the tree is a
nuisance because the leaves blow into our pool and clog our filter.
There is no logical reason to retain this tree and we would like it removed
and replaced by a Magnolia "Little Gem ". Please reconsider your decision.
Sing rely,
Kate and Charles Mack
0
r7
LJ
Agenda Item No.10n
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1009 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1009 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. David Herzlinger sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents.a liability to-the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
•
qq
Mr. David Herzlinger has received a copy of this report and a notice of the
March 5 Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
•
•
•
August '150 1995
_n my parkway. Yes,
No
I would like the rep+ City replacement tree - the "little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes � No
Name
U
h `1 e- V/
(� v
Address:, D � C( J
C Z) y- -S5 t-1 ay,
Signature: _ S ^� s,
I x C.^.'11:1on% C.: mpany / 97n-,,ana ::V Et5p1C: ._:il h >)v`IUYS I °;.
r .). BC.t Lam,... jis �i.• "',1'';'• ".); iS•S -i:?S?
u
•
r 1
�J
(b '
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name IOW 60
Address 100
Phone Number N�f!
Request /eA -0&�-Ficai�fl�S
Botanical Name 1i06AIVAN
Common Name
Designated Street Tree
J /V)
46e� le
Estimated Tree Value q "�81d--
Damage 4,01W 4MR
Parkway: Concrete Brick
Comments
Turf Other
,1G,
Inspected by X �0 y^—� Date a-13- 4
Recommendation
I mole -tom
3
'i
t
Reviewed b Date
z.,((P-q�
/ -1 06 -95
•
Agenda Item No. 10 (o )
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1520 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1520 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. Arthur Lacoste sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
• Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. Lacoste has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
• Attachments
16V
•
•- s t
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17550 Gillcue Avenue. Suite 201. Irvine. Cultfurma 92713
September £3; 1995
I approve of the remo\val of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
Vin my parkway. Yes " No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes V No _
U
Name: 6�7w ) Y, 1 —r-
Address: ( 5 bCj,�s 72- IZ-
Signature•
0�
Professional Management Axttuiates. P.O. Box 19530. Irvine. CA 92713 (714) 752-2225 Fax 1714) 757.6396
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INS , PECTION REPORT
Name AK,
Address tS'�
Phone Number tilit
Request in ke- 4,e,-0,.14Q4vS
1, .e 6 (x
Botanical Name t�)C,0-11144VS
Common Name
Designated Street Tree 06 (Ze" a.
Estimated Tree Value Vb64 (;L9-;L-7) e� OR, C&
Damage , Ao S,,Aeljatk �,rj PO4fe'i —�= e,
Parkway: Concrete Brick Turf---V—/ Other
Comments e')- -- .-. -
Inspected by ---� L- Date
Recommendation n 4"+
Reviewed bjSk�Lft Date
06-95
104
•
Agenda Item No..1 OP
March 5, 1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1441 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1441 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. Gordon Clemons sent the attached letter, requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
•
SOS
Mr. Clemons has received a copy of this report and a notice of the 'March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
r
L i
n
U
August '15, 1995
approve r,- she cemovai ^. a i. Wr a 7*4c- _ -,-,Iz .zee
in my parkway. Yes.r No
I would like the new City re acement tree - the "ZitLle Gem"
Magnolia. Yes � No
Name:
Address:
Signatur
Tj c En-unm ','Crnpv! / P:O.C5,f0!1 U managem.,zit ,,4b iaWs jm ;.
?,n. EcY lSa,n! :• +tea ..,'t P ?..? r^ la; 75'•Z_. ^.5 Ps..:; �•t; 7vs•C35;
•
[61
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name �joCD�a ii�enOn1S
Address
Phone Number
Request PCA -rra ��1�✓s Rep�a w��I JDlict �t/ i��¢ Geinr,
Botanical Name �occ�f (�{T/S GiTn�a pe Uti
Common Name k"-Yo , Gantt
Designated Street Tree 41-etBljdr.c
Estimated Tree Value IS It A,;,4 /7G. 30.5 3n.
7'
/3�
• Damage (',-VA.4 gJf%eu �iR•/ -�ar9e
//004
oST�ai lL off+; nM1,rj -�a QK{�+�t/ �`�'�'- sc*�•�,e., l; Fe .
, 4
Parkway: Concrete Brick Othery iv
// /
Comments Cpl t,,y lJ- !^� S�lec- -'f7'�J� A•n�r �GY— /�'tiJr� /y`e�- Y`.'ti.J'. ' -/�_
ell 6�
_ - �.�•� -- Via: .�</�,'q�
�- _ .
Inspected by Date
Recommendation
GV ✓✓
Reviewed by Date
-72� —
1 06 -95
i
•
[61
0
Agenda Item No.1 0Q
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1432 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1432 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. and Mars. Mack sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
• Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. and Mrs. Mack has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgt
• Attachments
0
•
y �
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
17550 Gillette Avenue. Suite 201. Irvine. California 92713
September 8, 1995
I approve of the removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes -.Z— No
•
fNET Lit � WFIIJFJW �
Address:
Signatur
I0`1
Professional Management Associates. P.O. Box 19530. Irvine. CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225 Fax (714) 757.6396
/ XzeJ
•
•
,jo
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name tfj�l25 t " IVL6 ,
Address ,(432^ &4U4(e-
Phone Number NIA-
Request 4/�.4vQ �wca �y��✓? �N ^� Wi{�� ftno(?a S¢m
Botanical Named
Common Name 2h aa�AAU ""✓ ""�
Designated Street Tree p �no %a i �(aut << {-g(e &,n "
Estimated Tree Value ` �'tC63.Gy� fl off.
3�
Damage CN.L QdvK4,j9�- -1vr IJ
Parkway: Concrete V / Bricnk Turf Commentsa ae �(n %r�2/tiinlih
Inspected by
-f,,-� +441
Reviewed bye a "4, wt�
Date P -13 -94
Date�� .
06 -95
1
a
s
•
Agenda Item No.i nr
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 1539 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 1539 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. Robert Mathuny sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
. Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
location that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. 'There
are currently no funds available for 'any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
Mr. Mathuny has received a copy of this report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
. DEN /mgl
Attachments
Harbor View Hills South Homeowners Association
•17.550 (iilleue Avenue. Stine 201. Irvine. California 92713
September 8, 1995
I approve of the`removal of the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes No
• I would like the new City replacement tree - the "Little Gem"
Magnolia. Yes __z No
0
Name: S . r7/` - HUANr
Address: l5�� g/J� 49SrLL 1>/�
Signature:
j l)
Profentonal Management Associate. P.O. Mix 19530. Irvine. CA 92713 (714) 752 2225 Fax 171'4) 757.6394
/ '—Ce. —
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Phone Number N
Request lZgrk4,-4^ in/cd -fi -I+15 � nz/�n�' W; !" �w1a�a r G i��e GeM ft
)
Botanical Namewps
- - „
Common Name✓ �" CU✓I�
-_
Designated, Street Tree�rbl��
/J /�///�
c
Estimated Tree Value
•
rS� 4� F n agx (N6�6 c�sd% 1 1 A) 1w
damage n A
MA-
rr„ri/'r`r��'-FD
Parkway: Concrete Brick /Turf O/therr�_
,
Comments a�rzto:�i S�sec�io J p evY�e�M
�i+s�o�llC_
�j "U. 4- =r`.- �,c.�.e..
-
Ire �/rG.
L.........
Inspected by � Date
Recommendation
i
Reviewed by ////'(/lam Date
06 -95
•
)
•
Agenda Item No' 10s
March 5,1996
To: Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: General Services Director
Subject: Appeal of Tree Removal at 907 Sandcastle Drive in the Harbor View
Hills South Homeowners Association Area
Recommendation
To deny the appeal to remove one Eucalyptus citriodora (Lemon Scented Gum)
tree at 907 Sandcastle Drive.
Discussion
Mr. Greg Preston sent the attached letter requesting the removal of one
Eucalyptus tree located in the parkway adjacent to her residence.
• The Urban Forester completed a Tree Inspection Report (copy attached) and the
Park and Tree Maintenance Superintendent concurred with the report that
recommends that the tree should not be removed. The tree is not causing a
significant problem to the hardscape. Additionally, this location was not
identified by the General Services Department's Concrete Supervisor as a
I that presents a liability to the City relative to hardscape damage. There
are currently no funds available for any further unscheduled tree removals and
replacements in the current budget.
•
IN
Mr. Preston has received a copy of this 'report and a notice of the March 5
Commission meeting.
Very respectfully,
David E. Niederhaus
DEN /mgl
Attachments
17300 Redhill Avenue, Suite 210, Irvine California 92714
�ROFES�1
August 15, 1995
I approve of the removal of.-'the City owned Eucalyptus tree
in my parkway. Yes_�� No
Name
Addr
Sign
• The Emmons Company / Professional Management Associates Inc.
P.O. Box 19530 Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225, Fax (714) 798.0367
I would like
the new City
repla6ement tree - the "Little Gem"
•
Magnolia.
Yes
� No
Name
Addr
Sign
• The Emmons Company / Professional Management Associates Inc.
P.O. Box 19530 Irvine, CA 92713 (714) 752 -2225, Fax (714) 798.0367
ynr„w�uuwrw. u,wu>•w ueawar wr.wuwwwr .> „
a
a
MA
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH F
GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT i
TREE INSPECTION REPORT
Name G ^y PfD�
Address g107S�i�
Phone Number /J//>L
Request 41y',orer sowxl(YP49 _4 /LP4Z6 -e_ us //�k �d�nb�ctn %y% ze
Botanical Name //1f+15 G,'Fn oQ6 r�
Common Name (`ems
Designated Street Tree _ /Tl a y �o 0. ! 7 ° °_ rr l ; � «
M
Estimated Tree Value /g 9131��aS/,S>
Damage f10 d;9z�SallC�cvo-bz�J cf�J �aja,
Parkway: Concrete Brick__n Turf V Other
Comments CL4e19��15 n of �I(ur.rebc /N�o ta�2,Qv^Q�2� Ja u� _
- ,a'��o�S rl't) � /S�•e�sn -•. /i�N�BnSI�/ /1%�!iewe6C � �'S'� %Kac-/o,J � GrnG+2%e..
7m^"r;6e-1) as iJo Az,- ?o9 4iUk4eg fe%. "16 .
Inspected by
Recommendati
a -13- q �
Date
06 -95
I
i
t
.1w
i 1 it ..� PERIN9IIGA �.. Fi.
PARR f _
VIC
4� t
PEN NSULA� el
�y ylY rtti_ s PARK n..
s° G
Item 12
• City of Newport Beach
Community Services Department
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1996
TO: PARKS,-BEACHES AND RECREATION
FROM: DAVE MCCONNELL, RECREATION MANAGER
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 11.04 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE
R'econunendation
To recommend to the City Council the revisions as noted in the attached draft
Ordinance regarding Chapter IL04 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Backtround
• Commission directed staff to meet with community members and Commissioners to
discuss the issue of parking in public parks. Such a meeting took place on Monday,
February 26. After discussion of the issue, Chair Vandervort directed staff to draft
an Ordinance allowing certain activities such as classic car shows to display
automobiles -on public parks. These events, as stated in the amendment, would be
regulated by the special event permit process.
n
U
ORDINANCE NO.
. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
t NEWPORT BEACH AMENDING CHAPTER 11.04 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONDUCT IN PARKS.
SECTION 1: Section 11.04 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code is hereby amended
to read as follows:
11.04.020 Prohibited Conduct.
No person shall do any of the following acts, or engage in any of the following specified
conduct, within any park:
B. Drive, propel, ride, park or leave standing any bicycle or any vehicle propelled by a
motor except in areas designated for such purposes, provided, however, this section shall not
apply to an employee of the City engaged in such conduct in the course and scope of his or her
employment, or activities approved oved by_asoecial event permit under the provisions of Chanter
LM
This Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting ofthe City Council of the City of
•Newport Beach held on March 11, 1996, and adopted the _ day of 1996, by
V the following vote, to wit:
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
MAYOR
Item 15
• Speech given by Jo Vandervort at the Annual Dinner of the
California Association of Park and Recreation Commissioners
and Board Members, February 9, 1996, San Diego.
FELLOW PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSIONERS AND BOARD MEMBERS:
My purpose tonight is to thank you, Park and Recreation
Commissioners and Board Members and your families. You are
doing a job of paramount importance, of enhancing the quality
of life of your friends, your neighbors, your relatives, your
fellow citizens, and many of them will not notice, nor ever
give you the credit you deserve.
The field of Recreation is mainly measured by subjective
criteria, which are, of course, the hardest to measure. What
is it worth to you to relax, to "hang out" or "chill out" as
my two sons would say? What is it worth to you to have fun?
What is it worth to you to renew your meanings of life? What
is it worth to you to have your healthy competitive juices
flowing, and I use the word "healthy" carefully. Certainly
Recreation is not as necessary as food and lodging in the
immediate -need sense, but it deserves a close third as it
truly, in the broadest sense, is the food and rest for our
human souls.
• The world of Recreation is undergoing tremendous change
as we are now trying to quantify the subjective. Words such
as "Benefit- driven" now spring up when trying to assign costs
and create income from the fueling of our souls. The example
has been given of paying $75,000 a year, including benefits,
to hire one policeman or paying that same amount to hire
three Recreation Coordinators to maintain an ongoing
relationship with the same segment of the community.
One choice is clearly after the problem exists, and one
choice can avert the problem. Yet we, in Recreation, have a
difficult job to sell the "pay now rather than later"
concept. We have a unique ability to build those bridges of
trust and understanding to our troubled youth, because we are
not a threatening or intimidating force. Unfortunately, we
are not perceived as the problem - solvers of the community by
enough of the decision - makers or the voters.
Happily, this seems to be experiencing the beginnings of
change. There are examples springing up all over of how some
people are starting to get the message. People are embracing
new, unique methods of creative problem - solving. Volunteers
in raising both funds and in -kind donations are springing up
as this quality -of -life message is gradually becoming more
understood. Collaborations to achieve what some would
consider to be unreachable goals are becoming more
commonplace. Business is joining with our cities, and non-
profit and ethnic groups are joining with our cities, to
achieve tremendous results.
I'll page 1
• Long Beach has a beautiful new multi - cultural Arts
Center built with collaborative funding. In Prescott,
Arizona, "Pioneer Park, is a four - ballfield complex that was
bid out at $2.3 million, but it was built for one 'half of
that with the use of volunteers and in -kind donations. And
there are so many other examples of this starting to happen
when cities and districts are going to non - traditional
partnerships.
How can we as Commissioners and Board Members promote
creative thinking and unusual alliances? We need to be open
and creative, while remembering the goals to which we strive.
Future Park and Recreation Systems must have their benefits
clearly compiled, clearly stated, clearly promoted and
clearly campaigned for.
What are these intangible benefits? Almost anything and
everything you can think of! Recreation is so very broad a
concept that one is not limited in his or her scope. Games
may define Recreation to some -- playing hopscotch or handball.
Competition may define Recreation -- striving to win at
softball or soccer. But what about a walk in an Open Space
Area. What about bird - watching? What about observing a
family of squirrels? What about just lying on grass, or a
park bench, and watching some clouds drift by? What about
• that wonderful luxury of having the time to smell the flowers
or watch the ocean waves or even drive by a park and from
your car watch kids on a swing set? That magical infusion of
peace (and it can be obtained with or without a sweat) which
renews your spirit and your soul is truly the epitome of
Recreation.
Recreation does touch the whole person - -it impacts your
mind, your body and your spirit. It strengthens families,
builds neighborhoods, enriches all our lives by giving us
diversions from our daily routines. The concept of
Recreation, RE- CREATION, implies that very same total
catharsis of ourselves.
WOW! What a gift we are privileged to promote to our
communities! And what a crucial concept that must be
embraced by our communities! And thus, as Board Members and
Commissioners, this is our most important purpose. It could
be considered as selling an intangible item,, that of quality
of life, or it could be considered as teaching and expanding
the human experience. It is not an easy sell, not in these
days of tightened budgets and benefit - driven services. But
when you succeed in bringing Recreation to your communities
or enhancing or expanding the Recreation that you have
available, you will have truly made a difference in so very
. many lives.
I am honored to thank you for your efforts, not as the
first person to do so and certainly not as the last.
1 l � page 2
I thank you as one who has won some fights and lost some
others and still cares enough to fight some more to promote
Recreation. I thank you for our Seniors who have earned the
right to enjoy their retirements and for our children who
deserve an opportunity for a healthy mind and body and spirit
in their future. And I thank you for those of us in the
middle who need those times of play, of competition, of
exercise, of renewal and of experiencing the peace and
education of nature.
This Park and Recreation Conference in San Diego will
help to give us all some more tools to become more effective,
but you are already dedicated or you would not be here. From
all of us on the CAPRCBM Board who work alongside of you,
thank you.
Jo Vandervort
Director, CAPRCBM State Board and
Chairman, PB &R Commission, City
of Newport Beach
•
P. S.
Since the City of Newport Beach no longer pays for Training
Conferences, I paid my own way.
\�� page 3
0
To: Park, Beaches and Recreation Commission
From: 935 Goldenrod Avenue, Corona del Mar
Subject: Parking Tree Restoration Program Appeal
May I provide the following Facts:
1. For 36 years I have never had a tree problem with
my utilities
2. For 36 years I have never had a dainage problem
3.For 36 years I have never seen or heard of a problem
or of any work being done on the utilities in front of
my home.
4. The tree is now a mature tree
5. The tree has not affected my re- taining wall adjacent
to the alleged damaged sidewalk
6. The sidewalk was last repaired (band aid style)
approximately ten years ago. I feel that if a
better and more complete job had been done similar
to what you are demanding now, this problem would
not be with us•;today. _
This date destroys my New Years plans but I will be.there.
Is this going to be an in -house decision or is my input
going to be considered 1