HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-38 - In Support of Proposition 13RESOLUTION NO. 2015 -38
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN SUPPORT OF
PROPOSITION 13
WHEREAS, on June 6, 1978, Proposition 13, officially titled the "People's Initiative to
Limit Property Taxation," and popularly known as the "Jarvis -Gann Initiative," was
overwhelmingly approved by California's voters, reducing property tax rates on homes,
businesses and farms, and capping the rate of increase in the future;
WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, California's high inflation had
increased property tax bills in California to a level that forced many families to sell their
homes because they could not afford to pay their taxes;
WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of Proposition 13, property tax assessments showed
wider divergences than assessment disparities under the current acquisition -value system;
WHEREAS, with the approval of Proposition 13, real property values were adjusted to
a base value equal to the 1976 assessed value of that real property, thereby introducing an
objective standard upon which real property would be taxed and ending the previous
subjective standard for assessment that engendered the property tax assessment abuses
that occurred in the 1960s and 1970s;
WHEREAS, with the passage of Proposition 13, taxpayers, for the first time, were
provided a measure of certainty with respect to their property taxes;
WHEREAS, following the passage of Proposition 13, the average homeowner has
saved tens of thousands of dollars in property tax payments, money that was able to be spent
in the economy to create jobs and foster economic development;
WHEREAS, following the passage of Proposition 13, renters also benefitted as the
reduction in taxes reduced upward pressure on rents;
WHEREAS, the volatility of income and sales tax revenue to the state and local
governments is a major flaw in California's tax system, while Proposition 13 has rendered
California's property taxes as a stable and predictable source of public revenue, even during
economic downturns, which has provided a major benefit to local governments throughout
California;
WHEREAS, since the passage of Proposition 13, proposed alternatives to Proposition
13 would have had a variety of unwelcome effects, including substantial tax increases for
low- income and elderly homeowners;
WHEREAS, voters intended Proposition 13 to protect all property owners, and they
had rejected previous attempts to impose higher taxes on small businesses, knowing that
these so- called "split roll" proposals would inflict irreparable harm on California's economy;
and
WHEREAS, Proposition 13 has become a nationwide symbol for taxpayer revolt and
for citizens exercising control and power over their governance.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as
follows:
Section 1: In recognition of the positive impact Proposition 13 has had on the State
of California, we formally reaffirm our support for Proposition 13 and the benefit that it
provides to individual homeowners, renters, local governments and to the state's overall
economy.
Section 2: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is
for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity
or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby
declares that it would have passed this resolution and each section, subsection, clause or
phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences,
clauses and phrases be declared unconstitutional.
Section 3: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are
incorporated into the substantive portion of this resolution.
Section 4: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution in support of
Proposition 13 is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA ") pursuant to
Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect
physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined
in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter
3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly.
Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City
Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution.
ADOPTED this 26 day of May, 2015.
Mayor
ATTEST:
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA }
COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH }
I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the
whole number of members of the City Council is seven; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution
No. 2015 -38 was duly and regularly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a
regular meeting of said Council, duly and regularly held on the 26'" day of May, 2015, and that the same
was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Council Member Peotter, Council Member Petros, Council Member Curry,
Council Member Duffield, Council Member Muldoon, Mayor Pro Tern Dixon,
Mayor Selich
NAYS: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of
said City this 27`h day of May, 2015.
�"- J J L�'I ' Y Vim---_._
City Clerk
Newport Beach, California
(Seal)