HomeMy WebLinkAbout16 - Proposed Assessment District No.103CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. 16
July 28, 2009
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Public Works Department
Iris Lee, Senior Civil Engineer
949 - 644 -3323 or ilee @city.newport - beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: PROPOSED ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 103 — AREA GENERALLY
BOUNDED BY G. STREET, E. BALBOA BOULEVARD, CHANNEL ROAD,
AND OCEAN BOULEVARD - FOR UNDERGROUNDING UTILITIES AND
DESIGNATION AS AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT
Recommendations:
1. Open public hearing on the formation of Assessment District No. 103,
2. Hear testimony from those who desire to speak.
3. Close the public hearing.
4. Count ballots.
5. If greater than or equal to 50% of weighted "Yes" votes versus "No" votes are
submitted, then a majority protest by ballot procedure does not exist and the District
may be formed. If it is desired to form the District, take the following actions:
a. Adopt a resolution overruling protests, approving final engineer's report,
levying assessments without modification, approving and ordering the work
and improvements for the utility underground project, and authorizing and
directing related actions with respect to Assessment District No. 103.
b. Adopt a resolution approving contracts with certain utility companies for utility
improvements for Assessment District No. 103.
C. Approve a Budget Amendment in anticipation of the formation and approval
of Assessment District No. 103. The proposed Budget Amendment of
$6,220,752 will provide $5,847,356 for the design, construction, financing
and incidental contingencies, $373,396 to establish a bond reserve. The
Budget Amendment will increase revenue estimates by $5,847,356 and
increase expenditure appropriations by $5,570,556, where $25,000 has not
been expended, but is encumbered for anticipated future use. The
difference of $276,800 will be utilized to reimburse the City for past
assessment engineering and design expenditures related to this district.
6. If desired, abandon the proceedings,
Proposed Assessment District No, 103 — Area Generally Bounded by G. Street, E. Balboa Boulevard,
Channel Road, and Ocean Boulevard —
for Underground Utilities and Designation as an Underground Utilities District
July 26, 2009
Page 2
Discussion:
On June 9, 2009, City Council accepted a Preliminary Engineer's Report for proposed
Assessment District No. 103, and adopted a Resolution of Intention in order to form the
District, and set a public hearing on July 28, 2009 for the Assessment District. The
locations of the proposed District and overhead facilities to be removed are shown on the
attached boundary map.
Public Notice for this Public Hearing was mailed out on June 12, 2009 to provide a
minimum 45 -day noticing to property owners within the proposed district boundary. Two
modifications have been made to the Engineer's Report since June 9:
1. Assessment No. 310's preliminary assessment was calculated based on an
incorrect lot area, which is less than what it actually should be. Spreading the
assessments based on the correct lot area causes all other parcels to realize a
0.39% reduction in their assessment amounts. As a result, the reduction amount of
$24,248 was deducted proportionately from the construction and incidental
contingencies, and financing costs. Since parcel assessments may not increase
above what was noticed, Assessment No. 310's assessment remains at the amount
that was stated in the preliminary engineers report. Therefore, neither Assessment
No. 310, nor any other parcel within the Assessment District, is paying more than its
proportional share of the special benefits attributable to it from the improvements
being constructed by this Assessment District.
2. As a result of the 0.39 % assessment reduction mentioned in Modification #1, the
total cost of the district has lowered from $6,245,000 to $6,220,752.
On June 30, 2009, a formal public information meeting was held with property owners in
the City Council Chambers to discuss the proposed.
The procedure being used for the formation of this District is the Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913. The project will be financed by municipal bonds over a period of 15 years.
Plans and specifications for the project were prepared by the respective public utilities,
which will own and operate the underground facilities that will be paid for by the
Assessment District.
The proposed District will underground all overhead electrical, telephone, and cable TV
lines; however, each property owner will be responsible for the costs of connecting the
main service conduit in the public right -of -way to the property owner's home or business.
The total cost of the District of $6,220,752 excludes the Federal Income Tax Component
of Contribution (ITCC) Tax, similar to Assessment Districts No. 101 and 99 -2. To date,
Underground Utility Districts have not been assessed this tax as underground utility
districts are viewed as providing public benefit by increasing community aesthetics and
public safety.
Proposed Assessment District No. 103 — Area Generally Bounded by G. Street, E. Balboa Boulevard,
Channel Road, and Ocean Boulevard —
for Underground Utilities and Designation as an Underground Utilities District
July 28, 2009
Page 3
The method of assessment is determined by an analysis of benefit a property receives from
the proposed undergrounding of the existing overhead utilities. This assessment
methodology assigns benefit factors based on three separate criteria: aesthetics, safety, and
connection. To assess benefits equitably, it is necessary to relate each property's
proportional special benefits to the special benefits of all other properties within the District.
The method of apportionment established for most districts formed under the Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913 utilizes a weighted method of apportionment known as an
Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) methodology that uses lot size as the basic unit of
assessment. Collectively, the three categories of special benefit listed above reflect the
overall proportional special benefits that properties within the District will receive from the
undergrounding of the overhead utilities, and the overall cost of the project will be evenly
apportioned to these three categories of special benefit. The costs were then prorated to
each parcel based on the number of benefit points assigned. The assessments range from
$6,258 to $55,784, with 52 percent of all the properties assessed $14,360 or less.
The following is a summary of each property with special consideration:
1. Assessment Nos. 55, 223, 238 275 and 354. The poles, wires and guy wires to be
undergrounded are in close proximity to these lots, although not directly adjacent;
therefore, these properties are assigned 1/2 Aesthetic Benefits. However, because the
poles and wires are close enough to encroach on the property should they fall, these
properties are considered to receive full Safety Benefits. Therefore, these parcels
receive 2 -1/2 of 3 benefits and their rounded property area is multiplied by a factor of
5/6.
2. Assessment Nos. 54 and 286. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded
are not in close proximity to these properties and do not provide significant aesthetic
benefits to these properties, nor would they encroach upon these properties should
they fall. Therefore, these properties are assigned 0 Aesthetic Benefits and 0 Safety
Benefits. Therefore, these parcels receive 1 of 3 benefits and their rounded property
area is multiplied by a factor of 1/3.
3. Assessment No. 325. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded are in close
proximity to this parcel, although not directly adjacent; therefore, this property is
assigned 1/2 Aesthetic Benefits. Excluding guy wires, which are support structures to
the overhead facilities and poles, the poles and wires to be undergrounded are not in
close proximity to this property, and would not encroach upon this property should they
fall; therefore, this property is assigned 0 Safety Benefits. Therefore, this parcel
receives 1 -112 of 3 benefits and its rounded property area is multiplied by a factor of
112.
4. Assessment Nos. 97 304 and the park property adjacent to Assessment No 54.
These properties are small neighborhood pocket -parks with no potential for
development that are not in close proximity to the poles and wires proposed to be
undergrounded, nor are they connected to the system to be undergrounded.
Proposed Assessment District No. 103 — Area Generally Bounded by G. Street, E. Balboa Boulevard,
Channel Road, and Ocean Boulevard —
for Underground Unites and Designation as an Underground Utilities District
July 26, 2009
Page 4
Therefore, these properties are assigned 0 Aesthetic Benefits, 0 Safety Benefits and 0
Connection Benefits.
If no majority protest exists, staff recommends adoption of the attached Resolutions
designating the area as an Underground Utilities District per Municipal Code Chapter
15.32, approving the Final Engineer's Report, confirming the assessments, and approving
Utility Improvement Contracts with SCE and AT &T.
Environmental Review:
This project qualifies for a Class 2 California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) exemption
under Section 15302, item "d" of the Implementing Guidelines as follows:
"Conversion of overhead electric utility distribution system facilities to underground
including connection to existing overhead electric utility distribution lines where the surface
is restored to the condition existing prior to the undergrounding."
Funding Availability:
Upon formation and approval of the District, funding will be provided by property owner
contributions and bonded assessments. See attached Budget Amendment.
Prepared by:
I
enior Civil Engineer
Submitted by:
f(Stephen G. Badum
Public Works Director
Attachments: June 9, 2009 Council Report (without attachments)
District Boundary Map
Resolutions
Final Engineer's Report
Budget Amendment
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. A3
June 9, 2009
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Department
Iris Lee, Senior Civil Engineer
949 - 6443323 or ilee @city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Proposed Assessment District No. 103 —Area Generally Bounded by
G Street, East Balboa Boulevard, Channel Road, and Ocean
Boulevard
Recommendations:
Adopt the following Resolutions for Proposed Assessment District No. 103:
a. Resolution No. 2009 - Adopting a Map Showing the Proposed
Boundaries of, and Making Appointments for, Proposed Assessment District
No. 103.
b. Resolution No. 2009- _ Declaring Intention to Order the Conversion of
Certain Existing Overhead Electrical and Communication Facilities to
Underground Locations in Proposed Assessment District No. 103,
Describing the District to be Assessed to Pay the Costs and Expenses
thereof by Reference to Approved Boundary Map, Providing for the Issuance
of Bonds, and Declaring Intention to take Several Related Steps in
Furtherance of Implementing the Proposed Underground District.
c. Resolution No. 2009- _ Giving Preliminary Approval to the Report of the
Assessment Engineer for Assessment District No. 103 and an Underground
Utilities District, Setting a Time and Place for a Public Hearing thereon, and
Directing the Mailing of Notices of Hearing and Assessment Ballots to the
Affected Property Owners.
2. Approve the Professional Service Agreement with Meyer Nave to provide bond
counsel services at a not to exceed price of $25,000 and authorize the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute the Agreement.
History:
Owners of property located in Proposed Assessment District No. 103 submitted
petitions to the City, in Spring 2005, requesting the formation of a special assessment
district to underground overhead utilities. On April 25, 2005, the assessment engineer
certified that owners representing approximately 62 percent of the assessable property
area within Proposed Assessment District No. 103 had signed a petition for
undergrounding overhead utilities.
Proposed Assessment District No. 103 -4or Undergrounding Utilities and Designation as an Underground Utilities District
June 9, 2009
Page
Discussion:
Assessment District No. 103 is being proposed for the conversion of existing overhead
utilities to underground locations. The property owners within the boundary of the
proposed Assessment District will bear the cost of the improvements and their
associated proceedings.
The Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 governs the procedures used to create the
Assessment District. Bonds issued under the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 carry .up
to a 40 -year term and are issued to finance assessments not paid in cash within 30
days after confirmation of the assessment. Staff is recommending a 15 -year term for
this District.
Federal Income Tax Component of Contribution Tax (ITCC) has been eliminated
pursuant to Council direction. The ITCC is a tax assessed whenever private patty
contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) are made. To date, Underground Utility
Districts have not been assessed this tax as underground utility districts are viewed as
providing public benefit by increasing community aesthetics and public safety.
To date, City Council has approved a total appropriation of $301,800 for the preliminary
stages of this project, including $64,000 to retain the firm of Harris & Associates as the
assessment engineer, and $135,800 and $102,000 to SCE and AT &T, respectively, to
prepare the engineering drawings for the District. If the District is formed, these costs
will be incorporated into the project costs. If the District fails to form, the City will be
responsible for these costs.
The total assessment for Proposed Assessment District No. 103 is estimated as
follows:
ITEM COST
Cost of Design and Construction $5,084,887
Incidental Costs and Expenses $348,113
Financing (Bond) Costs $812,000
Estimated Total Cost: $6,245,000
Estimated cost does not include the Federal Income Tax Component of Contribution
(ITCC) tax, which is a betterment tax. Bond Reserve for this district is estimated at six
(6) percent. Property owners paying their assessments in full during the 30 -day cash
payment period waive the financial cost of issuing and servicing the bonds and receive
a discount of approximately 13 percent.
In an effort to reduce costs and minimize disruptions in the area, City staff is planning
on a concurrent project to replace water lines within District limits. The timing of these
projects will enable a savings to both the assessment district and the City because of
shared repaving costs.
In addition to the payment of the assessment, each property owner will be responsible
for the costs of connecting the main service conduit in the public right -of -way to the
Proposed Assessment District No. 103-for Undergrounding Utilities and Designation as an Underground Utllitles District
June 9, 2009
Page 3
property owner's home or business. The cost to the property owner for this conversion
varies depending on the condition and location of the current electrical service. Each
property owner is encouraged to contact a licensed electrical contractor to assess the
particular property needs.
The following is a tentative schedule for proposed Assessment District No. 103:
Resolution of Intention
June 9, 2009
Formal property owner information meetinq
June 2009
Public Hearing
July 28, 2009
Public utilities commence work
September 2009
Property owners notified to install service connections
June 2010
Property owners complete conversions
October 2010
Public utilities begin to remove overhead structures
January 2010
Public utilities finish removing poles and overhead
structures
March 2010
The assessment engineer used a lot size methodology to apportion assessments within
this District, considering that all properties are receiving the same Safety, Connection
and Aesthetic benefit. The special benefits from undergrounding the overhead utilities
were defined as follows:
Improved Aesthetics Benefit. This benefit relates to the improved aesthetics of the
streetscape due to the removal of overhead wires and utility poles. The removal of
guy wires and other support structures related to the overhead facilities are included
in the definition of improved aesthetics. Properties that are adjacent to, or in proximity
of, overhead facilities receive an aesthetic benefit.
Additional Safety Benefit. This benefit relates to the additional safety of having the
overhead distribution wires placed underground and having the power poles removed,
which eliminates the threat of downed utility lines and poles due to wind, rain and
other unforeseeable events. Falling facilities can lead to personal injuries and
damage to structures, including fire. Properties immediately adjacent to the facilities
usually have a greater risk. Furthermore, in compact communities like Balboa
Peninsula, the negative effects of falling lines and poles are more widespread
including blocked roadways and alleys, and property damage due to impact.
Properties that are adjacent to, or in proximity of, overhead facilities receive a safety
benefit.
• Connection Benefit. This benefit relates to the enhanced reliability of service from the
utilities being underground, due to having all new wires and equipment and having
that equipment underground, which reduces the threat of service interruption from
downed lines. When compared to overhead systems, fewer outages occur due to
various acts of nature, traffic collisions and obstructions (such as trees). Properties
that are connected to, or have the ability to connect to, the facilities proposed to be
undergrounded receive a connection benefit.
Proposed Assessment District No. 103—for Undergrounding UEllitles and Designation as an Underground Utilities District
June 9, 2009
Page 4
The range for the estimated assessment costs per parcel is $6,282 to $56,002, with 52
percent of all the properties assessed $14,416 or less. Assessments vary over a wide
range due to the variation of property sizes.
The following is a summary of each property with special consideration:
Assessment Nos, 55, 223, 238 275 and 354. The poles, wires and guy wires to be
undergrounded are in close proximity to these lots, although not directly adjacent;
therefore, these properties are assigned 112 Aesthetic Benefits. However, because
the poles and wires are close enough to encroach on the property should they fall,
these properties are considered to receive full Safety Benefits. Therefore, these
parcels receive 2 -1/2 of 3 benefits and their rounded property area is multiplied by a
factor of 5/6.
.2. Assessment Nos. 54 and 286. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded
are not in close proximity to these properties and do not provide significant aesthetic
benefits to these properties, nor would they encroach upon these properties should
they fall. Therefore, these properties are assigned 0 Aesthetic Benefits and 0
Safety Benefits. Therefore, these parcels receive 1 of 3 benefits and their rounded
property area is multiplied by a factor of 1/3.
3. Assessment No. 325. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded are in
close proximity to this parcel, although not directly adjacent; therefore, this property
is assigned 1/2 Aesthetic Benefits. Excluding guy wires, which are support
structures to the overhead facilities and poles, the poles and wires to be
undergrounded are not in close proximity to this property, and would not encroach
upon this property should they fall; therefore, this property is assigned 0 Safety
Benefits. Therefore, this parcel receives 1 -1/2 of 3 benefits and its rounded property
area is multiplied by a factor of 1/2.
4. Assessment Nos 97 304 and the park property adjacent to Assessment No 54.
These properties are small neighborhood pocket -parks with no potential for
development that are not in close proximity to the poles and wires proposed to be
undergrounded, nor are they connected to the system to be undergrounded.
Therefore, these properties are assigned 0 Aesthetic Benefits, 0 Safety Benefits and
0 Connection Benefits.
Drawings and specifications for this assessment district were prepared by SCE, AT &T,
and Time Warner Cable.
Ballot Tabulation Procedures:
All assessment ballots submitted to the City Clerk prior to the close of public hearing will
be tabulated per the ballot tabulation procedures that are being drafted by the City
Attorney's Office. These procedures will be presented to City Council for consideration
at the June 23, 2009 Council Meeting.
Proposed Assessment District No, 103 -far Undergrounding utilities and Designation as an Underground UIIIIBes District
June 9, 2009
Page 5
Public Notice:
At the proponents' request, City staff held an informal Public Information Meeting for the
property owners on May 28, 2009. The formal Public Information Meeting is
tentatively scheduled for June 30, 2009 at the City Council Chambers. Property
owners will be notified in their ballot that they receive in June 2009.
Environmental Review:
A Notice of Exemption was completed May 18, 2009 and filed with the County
Recorder. The recorded copy has not been returned to the City.
Funding - Availability:
Funds will be provided by property owner contributions and /or bond proceeds if the
assessment district is approved.
Prepared by:
nior Civil Engineer
Attachments:
Submitted
t en G. Badum
lic Works Director
1. Resolution Adopting a Map Showing the Proposed Boundaries of, and Making Appointments for,
Proposed Assessment District No. 103.
2. Resolution Declaring Intention to Order the Conversion of Certain Existing Overhead Electrical and
Communication Facilities to Underground Locations in Proposed Assessment District No. 103,
Describing the District to be Assessed to Pay the Costs and Expenses thereof by Reference to
Approved Boundary Map, Providing for the Issuance of Bonds, and Declaring Intention to take Several
Related Steps in Furtherance of Implementing the Proposed Underground District.
3. Resolution Giving Preliminary Approval to the Report of the Assessment Engineer for Assessment
District No. 103 and an Underground Utilities District, Setting a Time and Place for a Public Hearing
thereon, and Directing the Mailing of Notices of Hearing and Assessment Ballots to the Affected
Property Owners.
4. Notice of Exemption
5, Preliminary Engineer's Report
6. Professional Service Agreement with Meyers Nave
VIN �31YIS
U0
3ONV 30 XIN 1008QN 30 AID
(p..jpAolnog w0000/PD08 lauuaqo Inog ooqloe j5o3/3aa)4,S
/ppAa
EOT 'ON IDIHISICI IN3NSS3SSV
2IOJ dVVq AUVONnou
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OVERRULING PROTESTS, APPROVING FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT, LEVYING ASSESSMENTS WITHOUT
MODIFICATION, APPROVING AND ORDERING THE WORK
AND IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE UTILITY
UNDERGROUNDING PROJECT, AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING RELATED ACTIONS WITH RESPECT TO
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 103 (G St/E Balboa Blvd /Channel
Rd /Ocean Blvd)
WHEREAS, in response to petitions submitted by the owners of various parcel of land
with this proposed "Assessment District No. 103 (G SUE Balboa Blvd/Channel Rd/Ocean
Blvd)" (the "Assessment District "), which petitions have been accepted by prior action of this
City Council (this "City Council "), the following further actions have been taken by adoption of
the following resolutions by this City Council on June 9, 2009, in furtherance of considering
formation of the Assessment District and implementing the proposed project (the "Project ") of
undergrounding existing overhead utility facilities within or adjacent to the boundary of the
Assessment District:
a. Resolution No. 2009 -35 — approving and adopting a boundary map for
the Assessment District (the "Boundary Map ") and directing the recordation of the
Boundary Map in the official records of the Orange County Recorder; and
b. Resolution No. 2009 -36 (the "Resolution of Intention") — among other
things (1) declaring the intention of this City Council to establish the Assessment
District and implement the Project; (2) directing Hams & Associates, as the designated
assessment engineer (the "Assessment Engineer ") for the Assessment District, to prepare
and submit to the City Clerk the engineer's report required by law for consideration by
this City Council; (3) declaring the intention of the City to issue limited obligation
improvement bonds (the "Bonds ") to finance a portion of the cost and expense of the
Project; and (4) declaring its intention to designate the area within the Assessment
District as an underground utilities district pursuant to Chapter 15.32 of the Code of
Ordinances of the City (the "Ordinance Code "); and
WHEREAS, as directed by the Resolution of Intention, the Assessment Engineer
prepared and submitted of its engineer's report, entitled "Preliminary Engineer's Report," dated
June 9, 2009 (the "Preliminary Engineer's Report"), and this City Council on June 9, 2009,
adopted its Resolution No. 2009 -37 (1) preliminarily approving the Preliminary Engineer's
Report and scheduling a public hearing for July 28, 2009, to consider the report and to hear
protests and expressions of support for the Assessment District and (2) directing the City Clerk
to provide for mailed notice of the hearing and assessment ballots to the affected property
owners in accordance with Section 4 of Article XIIID of the California Constitution and Section
53753 of the California Government Code; and
WHEREAS, notice of the public hearing on July 28, 2009, was given to property
owners by mail, accompanied by the property owner assessment ballots, as required by law, as
evidenced by a certificate of mailing which is on file with the City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, following the preliminary approval of the Preliminary Engineer's Report,
the Assessment Engineer discovered that an error had been made in calculating the proposed
assessment respecting the parcel identified as Assessment No. 310, resulting in a proposed
assessment which is $24,248 less than what it would have been had the calculation been
performed correctly, and resulting in proposed assessments on all of the other parcels in the
Assessment District which are higher by the same aggregate amount of $24,248 than they would
have been; and
WHEREAS, the Assessment Engineer has prepared and submitted for consideration at
the public hearing an amended engineer's report, entitled "Final Engineer's Report," dated July
28, 2009 (the "Final Engineer's Report"), in which the proposed assessments on all parcels in
the Assessment District other than Assessment No. 310 have been reduced to the lower amount
which they would have been had the calculation respecting Assessment No. 310 been performed
correctly; and
WHEREAS, having reduced the total amount to be assessed by $24,248, the
Assessment Engineer has made a corresponding change in two contingency line items and in the
line items pertaining to "Financing Costs" for the purpose of maintaining a total amount to be
assessed, as set forth in the cost estimate, which is equal to the total amount proposed to be
assessed; and
WHEREAS, the statement of "Methodology," set forth at pages 20 through 22 in the
Final Engineer's Report, has been supplemented with a paragraph retiring that consideration
was given to reducing the amount of area assigned to parcels based upon the building setbacks
applicable to each parcel and that, based upon factors enumerated in the paragraph, the
Assessment Engineer concluded that such reductions should not be made; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was conducted as scheduled on July 28, 2009, and
having provided opportunity for any interested person present to be heard, and the Mayor
having provided one last opportunity for any property owner present to either (1) submit an
assessment ballot or (2) change an assessment ballot previously submitted, and upon seeing that
there were no further actions to be taken with respect to either submission or changing of
assessment ballots, the hearing was closed; and
WHEREAS, following the close of the public hearing, the City Clerk opened, declared
and tallied the assessment ballots which were received prior to the close of the hearing, and the
City Clerk has reported to this City Council that the assessment ballots received in favor of
proceeding with the Assessment District exceed the assessment ballots received in opposition to
proceeding, as determined in accordance with Section 53753 of the California Government
Code, this City Council hereby finds and determines that there is not a majority protest
respecting the Assessment District; and
WHEREAS, based upon the recommendations of the Assessment Engineer, as set forth
in the Final Engineer's Report, and all of the testimony heard and written communications
received from interested persons, this City Council hereby finds and determines that (1) the
general benefits have been appropriately identified and separated from the special benefits, as
set forth in the Final Engineer's Report, (2) only that portion of the estimated cost of the Project
which represents local and special benefit has been assessed against the respective parcels of
land which are assessed and (3) the proposed assessment of the portion of the total estimated
cost and expense of the Project which represents local and special benefit upon the respective
parcels of land in the Assessment District, as set forth in the Final Engineer's Report, represents
a fair and equitable apportionment of such estimated cost and expense in proportion to the
estimated benefits to be received by each of the parcels, respectively from the improvements
which comprise the Project; and
WHEREAS, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this City Council hereby
finds and determines that, under the facts and circumstances pertaining to the Assessment
District, the general benefits imparted by the Project, as recommended by the Assessment
Engineer in the Final Engineer's Report, are relatively incidental, and do not exceed and are
fully offset by the combined contributions from Southern California Edison and AT &T, with the
result that only that portion of the estimated cost of the Project which represents local and
special benefits has been assessed against the parcels of land which have been determined to be
specially benefrtted;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby Determined, Ordered and Resolved as follows:
SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. This City Council hereby finds and determines that there was not a
majority protest within the meaning of Section 53753 of the Government Code, and hereby
overrules all protests, whether written or oral, submitted prior to or at the public hearing.
SECTION 3. The Final Engineer's Report, dated July 28, 2009, is hereby approved
without modification.
SECTION 4. The proposed work and improvements which comprise the Project, as
described in the Final Engineer's Report, are hereby ordered.
SECTION 5. The individual assessments, in the amounts set forth in the Final
Engineer's Report, are hereby confirmed and levied, and this action is final as to all persons in
accordance with Section 10312 of the Streets and Highways Code (the "Code').
SECTION G. This City Council hereby expressly finds and determines that the Project
is categorically exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act
( "CEQA "). In the event that a Notice of Exemption has not previously been prepared and filed,
this City Council hereby directs the preparation of a Notice of Exemption, indicating that the
Project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA, and further directs that said
Notice of Exemption be filed with the Orange County Clerk for posting in accordance with
CEQA.
SECTION 7. This City Council hereby finds and determines that the information set
forth at page 17 of the Final Engineer's Report demonstrates compliance with the requirements
of Part 7.5 of Division 4 of the Code, thereby dispensing with any further proceedings pursuant
to said Division 4, and this determination and action is final and conclusive as to all persons in
accordance with Section 3012 of the Code.
SECTION 8. A Notice of Assessment shall be prepared and recorded by the City Clerk
in the official records of the Orange County Recorder, together with an assessment diagram in
the form set forth in the Final Engineer's Report. Notice of recordation of assessment shall be
given by the City Clerk by publication and by mail in the form and manner required by Section
10404 of the Code. The notice of recordation of assessment given by mail shall also prescribe
the deadline for submission by or on behalf of any property owner of a cash payment to prepay,
either in whole or in part, the assessment levied upon the property of such owner, pursuant to
Sections 10403 and 10404 of the Code.
SECTION 9. Pursuant to Section 10603 of the Code, the Superintendent of Streets is
hereby designated to collect and receive the cash payments from property owners on account of
the assessments levied, and the Superintendent of Streets shall, upon the expiration of the
prescribed 30 -day cash payment period, submit to the City Clerk a Certificate re Paid and
Unpaid Assessments.
SECTION 10. Following receipt of the Certificate re Paid and Unpaid Assessments, this
City Council intends to proceed with authorization of the issuance and sale of the Bonds,
pursuant to the Improvement Bond Act of 1915 and upon the security of and in a principal
amount equal to the unpaid assessments, bearing interest at a rate not to exceed twelve percent
(12 %) per annum, with the last principal installment of the Bonds to mature not to exceed
twenty -four (24) years from the second day of September next succeeding twelve (12) months
from their date.
SECTION 11. The area within the Assessment District is hereby designated an
underground utilities district pursuant to and in accordance with Chapter 15.32 of the Ordinance
Code, and in accordance with Section 15.32.040 of the Ordinance Code, this City Council
hereby establishes the date which is one year from the date on which the Project facilities are
released by Southern California Edison and AT &T, respectively, as a reasonable date by which
all affected property owners must be ready to receive underground service.
SECTION 12. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2009.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
1262833.1
RESOLUTION NO. 2009 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH APPROVING CONTRACTS WITH CERTAIN UTILITY
COMPANIES FOR UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 103 (G SUE Balboa Blvd /Channel Rd/Ocean Blvd)
WHEREAS, this City Council has, pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California (the "Code "), by adoption of its Resolution No. 2009 -36, declared its intention to order the
work of converting existing overhead electrical and communication facilities to underground
locations, together with appurtenance work and improvements (the "Project'), within or immediately
adjacent to an area designated by Resolution No. 2009 -35, adopted by this City Council on June 9,
2009, as Assessment District No. 103 (G SdE Balboa Blvd/Channel Rd/Ocean Blvd) (the
"Assessment District'); and
WHEREAS, Section 10110 of the Code ("Section 10110 ") specifies that, before ordering the
construction or installation of any facilities which are to be owned, managed or controlled by another
public agency or public utility, an agreement is required setting forth the terms and conditions of the
installation, ownership, management and financing of those facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Project includes facilities which are to owned, managed and controlled by
(a) Southern California Edison and (b) AT &T (together, the "Utility Companies "); and
WHEREAS, the Utility Companies have submitted to the City their respective contracts (the
"Utility Company Contracts "), each in a standard form for facilities such as those included in the
Project, and the Utility Company Contracts have been submitted to this City Council at this meeting
for consideration; and
WHEREAS, this City Council wishes to approve the Utility Company Contracts as the
means of achieving compliance with Section 10110;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby Determined, Ordered, and Resolved as follows:
SECTION 1: The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. The Utility Company Contracts are hereby approved for execution and
delivery on behalf of the City to the respective Utility Companies.
SECTION 3. Immediately upon execution of the respective Utility Company Contracts,
conformed copies of them shall be transmitted to the office of the respective Utility Companies,
together with a copy of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 28th day of July, 2009.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
1262614.1
Mayor
Final
Engineer's Report
for
Underground Utility
Assessment District No. 103
(G St / E Balboa Blvd / Channel Rd / Ocean Blvd)
Prepared under the provisions of the
Municipal Improvement Act of 1913
For the
City of Newport Beach
County of Orange, California
July 28, 2009
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No, 103 (G St 1 E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvdl
Final Enaineei s Report
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction and Certifications ................................... ...............................
PART I
Plans and Specifications .......................... ...............................
PART II
Cost Estimate ............................................ ...............................
PART III
Assessment Roll and Method of Assessment Spread...........
Table 1 — Assessment Roll ......................... ...............................
Debt Limit Valuat ion ................................. ...............................
Exhibit I — Method and Formula of Assessment Spread..........
PART IV
Annual Administrative Assessment ....... ...............................
PART V
Diagram of Assessment District .............. ...............................
PART VI
Description of Facilities ........................... ...............................
Right -of -Way Certificate ........................... ...............................
Certification of Completion of Environmental Proceedings—,
APPENDIX
A. Excerpts from Assessment District No. 64
13 Assessment Calculations
Q:Wewport Beach\kwloVepons�ad 103 final qv 8ju109.doc
Page
....................1
.................... 4
.................... 5
...............6
.............. 8
............. 17
............. 18
............. 24
............. 25
............ 32
............33
............ 34
BHarris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No, 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 1
AGENCY: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PROJECT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 103
TO: CITY COUNCIL
ENGINEER`S "REPORT" PURSUANT TO THE
PROVISIONS OF SECTIONS 2961 AND 10204
OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
The purposes of this Assessment District is to provide financing to underground power, telephone
and cable facilities in the area generally bounded by G Street / East Balboa Boulevard / Channel
Road / Ocean Boulevard. The proposed underground utility improvements will provide conversion to
an upgraded utility system and will enhance neighborhood aesthetics, safety and reliability.
The construction of these improvements will conform to existing City of Newport Beach, Southern
California Edison, AT &T and Time Warner Cable standards. By virtue of such improvements, the
proposed improvements are of special and direct benefit to these properties.
Pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID of the State Constitution, Part 7.5 of the "Special
Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 ", being Division 4 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 ", being Division 12 of said Code, and the Resolution of Intention, adopted by the City Council
of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, State of California, in connection with the proceedings for
Assessment District No. 103 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District "), 1, Joan E. Cox,
P.E., a Registered Professional Engineer and authorized representative of Harris & Associates, the
duly appointed Engineer of Work, herewith submits the "Report" for the Assessment District,
consisting of six (6) parts as stated below.
PART
This part contains the plans and specifications which describe the general nature, location and extent
for the proposed improvements to be constructed, and are tiled herewith and made a part hereof.
Said plans and specifications are on file in the Office of the Superintendent of Streets.
PART II
This part contains an estimate of the cost of the proposed improvements, including capitalized
interest, if any, incidental costs and expenses in connection therewith as set forth herein and attached
hereto.
PART III
This part consists of the following information:
A. A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the proposed
improvements upon the several subdivisions of land within the Assessment District, in proportion
to the special benefits to be received by such subdivisions from said improvements, which is set
forth upon the assessment roll filed herewith and made a part hereof.
Q:%N wport BeachAD103Uepons\ad103 final rpt 8ju109.doc I Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd f Channel Rd t Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 2
B. The total amount, as near as may be determined, of the total principal sum of all unpaid special
assessments and special assessments required or proposed to be levied under any completed or
pending assessment proceedings, other than that contemplated for the Assessment District, which
would require an investigation and report under the "Special Assessment Investigation,
Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" against the total area proposed to be assessed.
C. The total true value, determined from the latest Assessor's roll, of the parcels of land and
improvements which are proposed to be assessed.
PART IV
This part contains the proposed maximum annual administrative assessment to be levied upon each
subdivision or parcel of land within the Assessment District to pay the costs incurred by the CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH, and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the administration and
collection of assessments, from the administration and registration of any associated bonds and
reserve or other related funds, or both.
PART V
This part contains a map showing the boundaries of the Assessment District, and a diagram showing
the Assessment District, the boundaries and the dimensions of the subdivisions of land within said
Assessment District, as the same existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
The Boundary Map and Assessment Diagram are filed herewith and made a part hereof, and part of
the assessment.
PART VI
This part shall consist of the following information:
A. Description of facilities
B. Right -of -Way Certificate
C. Environmental Certificate
This report is submitted on July 8, 2009.
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
JOAN E. COX, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 41965
ENGINEER OF WORK
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Q%Newpon 13eac1MD103 \rcpons \ad103 final rpl8jW09.doc Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd f Channel Rd f Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 3
Preliminary approval by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
CALIFORNIA, on the _ day of , 2009.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, on
the day of 12009.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Q:Wewpon Beach\AD103\reports \ad103 final rpt Bju109.doc M Harris &Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 4
Part I
Plans and Specifications
The plans and specifications to construct the utility undergrounding improvements, and any ancillary
improvements thereof, for the area generally described as Assessment District No. 103, G Street /
East Balboa Boulevard / Channel Road / Ocean Boulevard, describe the general nature, location and
extent of the improvements for this Assessment District are referenced herein and incorporated as if
attached and a part of this Report.
Said Plans and Specifications for the improvements are on file in the office of the Superintendent of
Streets.
Q:lNewport Be CMADIOVCporIs\ad103 Fimal rpt 8ju109.doc I Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page _5
Pali II
Cost Estimate
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Assessment Engineering
Estimated Costs
$64,000
Preliminary
Confirmed
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION COSTS`
Disclosure Counsel
$20,000
Electrical Costs (Southern California Edison)
City Administration
$100,000
Electrical Construction Costs
$3,053,100
$3,053,100
Construction Contingency (-110%)
$305,310
$305,310
Edison Design Engineering
$135,800
$135,800
$25,000
$3,494,210
$3,494,210
Telephone Costs (AT &T)
Dissemination Agent
$3,000
Telephone Construction Costs
$992,998
$992,998
Construction Contingency( -10 %)
$99,300
$99,300
AT &T Design Engineering
$102,000
$102,000
$348,113
$1,194,298
$1,194,298
Street/ Alley Rehabilitation
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Construction Contingency (-7.5%)
$75,000
$75,000
$1,075,000
$1,075,000
Estimated Utility Contribution for Equivalent Overhead System
- $678,621
- $678,621
Total Design & Construction Costs:
$5,084,887
$5,084,887
Less deduct from contingency:
- $19,744
Modified Total Design & Construction Costs:
$5,065,143
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
Assessment Engineering
$64,000
$64,000
Contractlnspection
$75,000
$75,000
Disclosure Counsel
$20,000
$20,000
City Administration
$100,000
$100,000
Financial Advisor
$15,000
$15,000
Filing Fees
$5,000
$5,000
Bond Counsel
$25,000
$25,000
Paying Agent
$3,000
$3,000
Dissemination Agent
$3,000
$3,000
Financial Printing, Registration and Servicing
$10,000
$10,000
Incidental Contingencies
$28,113
$28,113
Total Incidental Expenses:
$348,113
$348,113
Less deduct from contingency:
- $1,352
Modified Total Incidental Expenses:
$346,761
Total Construction and Incidental Expenses: $5,433,000 $5,411,904
FINANCING COSTS
Underwriter's Discount 1.25% $78,000 $77,759
Bond Reserve I Credit Enhancement 6.00% $375,000 $373,396
Funded Interest @ 12 months @ 5.75% $359,000 $357,693
Total Financial Costs: $812,000 $808,848
TOTAL AMOUNT TO ASSESSMENT: $6,245,000 $6,220,752
Time Warner Cable is required to pay for undergrounding through the Franchise
Agreement with the City.
Q:Wcwpon Bcach1AD I03kepons \ad 103 Bnal rpi Sjul09.doc Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 6
Part III
Assessment Roll and
Method of Assessment Spread
WHEREAS, on June 9, 2009 the City Council of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, State of
California, did, pursuant to the provisions of the 1913 Act "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ",
being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code, of the State of California, adopt its Resolution
of Intention No. 2009 -36, for the installation and construction of certain public improvements,
together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith, in a special assessment
district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 103 (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District "); and
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by law, did direct the Engineer of Work to
make and file a "Report ", consisting of the following as required by Section 10204 of the Act:
a. Plans
b. Specifications
c. Cost Estimates
d. Assessment Diagram showing the Assessment District and the subdivisions of land therein;
e. A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the works of improvement levied upon the
parcels within the boundaries of the Assessment District;
f. The proposed maximum annual assessment to be levied upon each subdivision or parcel of land
within the Assessment District to pay the costs incurred by the City and not otherwise reimbursed
resulting from the administration and collection of assessments or from the administration and
registration of any associated bonds and reserve or other related funds.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention as previously adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Joan E. Cox, the authorized representative of HARRIS & ASSOCIATES,
pursuant to Article XIIID of the California Constitution and the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913 ", do hereby submit the following:
Pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Intention, I have assessed the costs
and expenses of the works of improvement to be performed in the Assessment District upon
the parcels of land in the Assessment District specially benefited thereby in direct proportion
and relation to the special benefits to be received by each of said parcels_ For particulars as
to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of
which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
2. As required by law, a Diagram is hereto attached, showing the Assessment District, as well
as the boundaries and dimensions of the respective parcels and subdivisions of land within
said District as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention,
each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots respectively have been given a separate
number upon said Diagram and in said Assessment Roll.
Harris &Associates
Q:1Newpon Beach1AD103Veports1ad103 renal rpt 8ju109.doc
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd 1 Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 7
3. The subdivisions and parcels of land the numbers therein as shown on the respective
Assessment Diagram as attached hereto correspond with the numbers as appearing on the
Assessment Roll as contained herein.
4. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that bonds will be issued in accordance with Division 10 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the "Improvement Bond Act of
1915 "), to represent all unpaid assessments, which bonds shall be issued in one or more
series, each with a term not to exceed the legal maximum term as authorized by law,
THIRTY -NINE (39) YEARS from the 2nd day of September next succeeding twelve (12)
months from their date. Said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the current legal
maximum rate of 12% per annum.
The bonds may be issued in more than one series, depending upon duration of the
improvement work and related considerations.
5. By virtue of the authority contained in said "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 ", and by
further direction and order of the legislative body, I hereby recommend the following
Assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of improvement for the Assessment
District based on the costs and expenses as set forth below:
For particulars as to the individual assessments and their descriptions, reference is made to
Table 1 (Assessment Roll) attached hereto.
6. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in the exhibit identified as Part III
(Exhibit 1), which is attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated.
Q \Newporn BeachVADI03VreponsVadt03 final rpt Sju109.doc = I Harris &Associates
As Preliminarily
Approved
As
Confirmed
Estimated Cost of Construction:
$5,084,887
$5,065,143
Estimated Incidental Expenses:
$348,113
$346,761
Estimated Financial Costs:
$812,000
$808,848
Estimated Total to Assessment:
$6,245,000
$6,220,752
For particulars as to the individual assessments and their descriptions, reference is made to
Table 1 (Assessment Roll) attached hereto.
6. The Method of Spread of Assessment is as set forth in the exhibit identified as Part III
(Exhibit 1), which is attached hereto, referenced and so incorporated.
Q \Newporn BeachVADI03VreponsVadt03 final rpt Sju109.doc = I Harris &Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd t Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 8
Table 1
Assessment Roll
Asmt
No.
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Total
True
Value
Existing
Liens
Assessments as
Preliminarily
Approved
Assessments
as Confirmed
and Recorded
Value
to Lien
Ratio
1
048- 201-47
$2,235,837
$0
$23,842.59
$23,749.81
94
2
048 - 201-46
$1,012,999
$0
$19,406.75
$19,331.24
52
_
3
4
048_261 -41
048- 201-40
$89,231
$339,123
- $0 .
$0
$16,079.89
$16, 079.89 - --
$16,017.32
- $16,017.32
6
- 21 "
5
048 - 201 -39
$919,017
$0
$16,079.89
$16,017.32
57
6
048 - 201 -38
$465,839
$0
$16,079.89
$16,017.32
29
7
048- 201 -37
$1,485,691
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
96
8
048 - 201 -52
_
$1,810,164
_
$0
$31,050.81
_
$30,929.98
59
9
048- 201 -34
$1,555,500
$0
$15,525.41
.__$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$15,464.99
101
10
048 - 201 -33
$848,343
$0
$14,970.93
$1_4,416.44
$14,912.67
57
11
048 - 201 -32
$67,780
$0
$14,970.93
$16, 634.36..........
$14,912.67
5
12
048 - 201 -31
$959,294
$0
$14,970.93
$18,297.80
$14,912.67
64
13
048 - 201 -30
$398,460
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
27
14
048- 201 -29
$774,349
$0
$14,970.93
$15,525.41
$14,912.67
52
15
U48 -201 -04
$440,076
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
30
16
048- 201-45
$127,651 -
$0
$28,832.89
$28,720.70
4 -�
17048-
201 -26
1.569
$0
$14,360.34
-
44
18
048- 201 -25
$392,199
$0
.__$14,416.44
$14,416.44
_.-
..__
$14,360.34
27
19
048- 201
$330,838__.
$Q.....__..
$1_4,416.44
- --
$_14,360.34.
23 -
20
048 - 201 -23
$275,419
$0
$16, 634.36..........
-- $16,569.64
....17... -_-
21
048 - 201 -22
$663,824
$0
$18,297.80
$18,226.60
36
22
01
-048- 2-48
$1,157,771
$0
$16,079.89
$16,_017.32
72
23
048 - 201 -51
$972,728
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
_
63
24
648-M-50
$289,255
$0
$15,525.41
M1464.9-9
19
25
048 -201 -02
$891231
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
6
26
048 -201-03
$94,130
$0
$13,861.97
_
$13,808.03
7
27
048 -201 -04
$674,814
0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
49
28
048 -201 -05
$1,011,926
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
73
29
048 - 201 -06
$265,579
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
19
30
048 - 201-07
$785,777
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
57
31
048 -201 -08
$73,089
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
5
32
048 -201 -09
$819,088
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
59
33
048- 201 -10
$829,636
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
60
34
048 - 201 -11
$636,170
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
46
35
048 - 201 -12
$311,052
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
23
36 _
648-261-13
$344,459
$0
$13,861_97
$13,808.63
25
37
048 201 -14
$743,973
„
$0
$13,861.9_7
$13,808.03
54
38
_ 048201 -15
$1,043,551
--
$0
$13,861.97
$--l-3--,808--03-
39
048 - 201 -16
$657,439
....$0........
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
48
40
048 - 201 -17
$592,362
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
43
41
048- 201 -18
$490 361,
$0
$13,808.03
42
048 - 201 -19
$70,817
$0 .
$13,861.97
_
$13,808.03
5
- -- 43
----
-
0_48_- 201 -20 ...
$450,486
- -$83,646........
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
33
44
048 - 201 -21
- --
$0 --
....$17,188.84
..$17,121.95
...5...... --
__45
048 -192 -01
$290,094
1 0 -
$26,614.98
-
-- $26,511.41
1T
Q:1N=pon Bc WAp1031rcpor(slad)03 Final rpt 8ju109.doc Hams & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's R Page 9
Assessor's Total Assessments as Assessments Value
Anrot Parcel True Existing Preliminarily as Confirmed to Lien
Nn. Number Value Liens Approved and Recorded Ratio
48
M
|Han�&&sswia�s
0*vmvr000mcxwo'o�Ver",l�,a/o3noan*@uwvao, ���|
_
'--
$18,778.92
90
61
048-191-08
$216,526
79
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
15
t 14,416.44
$14,360.34
28
64
048-191-11
$113,100
32
$17,674.27
6
$332,946
$0
$14,416.4il
$14,360.34
23
M
|Han�&&sswia�s
0*vmvr000mcxwo'o�Ver",l�,a/o3noan*@uwvao, ���|
'--
$18,778.92
90
79
048-221-10
$4W1616
$0
t 14,416.44
$14,360.34
28
81
048-221-12
$332,946
$0
$14,416.4il
$14,360.34
23
83
04822144
$535,537
$0
$16,634.36
$10.569.64
32
64
T62.
92
048-221-32
$1,985,000
$0
$13,861.97
$13,80803
144
M
|Han�&&sswia�s
0*vmvr000mcxwo'o�Ver",l�,a/o3noan*@uwvao, ���|
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District N43.103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 10
Assessor's
Asmt Parcel
Total Assessments as
True Existing Preliminarily
Value Liens Approved
Assessments Value
as Confirmed to Lien
and Recorded Ratio
93 048 - 221 -31 $1,853,000 $0 $13,861.97 $13,808.03 134
94 048- 221 -30 $170.629 $0 $1386197 $1380803 12
95 _
048- 221 -26
$4.43,754
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
5
96
048- 221 -27
$116,067
$0
$17,743.32
$13,255.71
_32
9
97
048 -220 -01
N/A
$0
_$13,307.49
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
98
048 -222 -01
_
$2,406,000$0.
$0
_
$13,307.49
$13,255.71
_
182 -
99
048 -222 -02
$193,322
$0
$18,85228
$18,778.92
14
100
048 -222 -03
$648,681
_
$0
_$13,861.97
$13,861.97
__$13,808.03
$13,808.03
47
101
048 - 222 -04
$2,142,000
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
155
102
048 -222 -05
$1,679,000
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03__122
108
103
048 -222 -06
$579,914
$0
_
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
42
104
048 -222 -07
$200,011
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
_
14
105
048 -222 -08
$861,199
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
62
_106
048 -222 -09
$904,937
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
66
107
048 - 222 -10
$776,464
$0
$13,861.97
_
$13,808.03
56
108
048- 222 -11
$0
_
$13,861.97
$13,8_08.03_
13�
109
048 - 222 -32 _.._..__.—
__$180,236
$164,489
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
12
110
048- 222 -33
._$510,117 -
$0......._..-
- $13,861.97
-- $13,808.03
-- 37
111
048- 222 -34
$376,834
$0
$14,4_16.44
$14,_360.34
26
112
048 - 222 -35
$1,050,561
$0
$14,970.93
— $14,912.67
_
70
113
- -- ..._..
048 - 222 -27
- - -- ................_._........__.
$106,490
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
7
114 -
048.222 -26
$865 309
$0
...._..__
$14,416.44
.... _
.......
$14,360.34
60
115
048 - 222 -25
$138,161
$0
$14,970.93
..._..
$14,912.67
9
116
$1,490,130
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
96
117
048 - 222 -23
$84,613
$0
$16,079.89
$16,017.32
5
118
048- 222 -22
$237,769
$0
$16,63436
14
119
048 - 222 -21
$87.094
$0
$17.188.84
_$16,569.64
$17.121.95
5
120
048- 222 -20
$90,608
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
5
134
048.222 -19
$83,092
$0
$17,743.32
$17,674.27
5
122
048 - 222 -31
$1,826,214
$0
$18,297.80
_
$18,226.60
100_
23
123
048-22-2-30
$171,808
$0
$18,297.80
$18,226.60
9
,.. 124
048 - 222 -28
$94,820
$0
$18,85228
$18,778.92
5
125
048 - 211 -27
$686,340
$0
$18,852.28
07
$18,778.92
37
126
048 - 222 -16
$752,117
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
44
127
048- 222 -37
$1,850,000
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
108
128
048 - 222 -36
$646,894
$0
$18,297.80
$18,226.60
35
129
048 - 211 -36
$860,389
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
58
130
048 - 211 -35
$674,344
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
49
131
048- 211 -34
$877.242
$0
$13.861 -97
$13.80803
64
_133
048211 -03
$1212902
$0
$13861,,97_,
$13,808.03
88
134
048 - 1 -37
21
$422,649
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
..,. -.
31
135
048 - 211 -38
$_3,001500
-$64-
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
217
136
048 -211 -05
542
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
7
137
—
048 - 21106)
—48 --- - -- .............._..
$80,609
_$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
6
138
38
048 - 211 -27
RRF7919
---
Qn
__ _...
Qd4 RR 'I
07
Q1 3 RnR nA
99
Q:\Newpon Be WAD1034epons \ad103 final upt 8ju109.doc
Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd 1 Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report
July 28, 2009
Asmt
No.
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Total
True
Value
Existing
Liens
Assessments as
Preliminarily
Approved
Assessments
as Confirmed
and Recorded
Value
to Lien
Ratio
139
048 - 211 -28
$81,919
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
6
140
048 -211 -08
$1,732,266
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
125
141
048 -211 -09
$418,094
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03_
30
,TT-048-:21
$728,909
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
_
53
143
-144
-048- 211 -11
$514,578
--- $ $00
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
-. -� -37---
$127,786
048 - 211 -12 —
$1,565,326
$0
$13,307.49 -
$13,255.71-"-
118_..
_ 145
048 - 211 -39
$1,819,000
$0
$16,634.36
$16,569.64_
110
146
048 - 211-40
$459,369
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
_
32
147
0_48- 211 -23
$1,560,600
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
109
148
048- 211 -22
$549,744
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
38
149
048- 211 -21
$1,379,570
$0
_
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
96
150
048 - 211 -20
$954,279
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
66
151
048- 211 -19
$89,167
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
6
152
048 - 211 -18
$213,926
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
15
153
048 - 211 -17
$142,317
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
10
154
048- 211 -30
$317,114
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
22
-155
046 - 211 -32
$112,552
$0
$14,3_60.34
8
156
048- 211 -31
$394,187_
$0
$14,416.44
^$14,360.34
27
157
048- 211 -25
$675,841
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
_
47_
158----M--211-15
$1,480,385
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
103
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
048 - 211 -14
048 211 13
048- 261 -30
048 - 261 -29
048 - 261 -28
...........
048 - 261 -33
048 - 261 -34
$1,826,214
$1.826 214
$2,001,415
$85,648
$440,871
.. _........ ....._..._
$892,805
$106,753
$0 ___
$0-
$0
$0
$0
..............
$0 __
$0
$14,416.44
$16,634.36
$17,743.32
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
.................
$14,416.44
11.1.11
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
$16,569.64
$17,674.27
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
......4,.......31
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
127
110
113
6
31
....
_ _ 62
7
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
048 - 261 -31
048- 261 -32
048- 261 -25
048- 261 -24
048 - 261 -23
048- 261 -22
048 - 261 -21
$1,653,959
$37858 ,5
$88,820
$1,14344
$166,009
$84,959
$367,135
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
115
26
6
80
12
6
26
173
048- 261 -20
$1,800,000
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
125
174
048 - 261 -19
$1,826,214
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
127
175
048- 261 -18
$1,836,000
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
128
176
048- 261 -17
$192,831
$0
$17,743.32
$17,674.27
11
177
048 -261 -01
$753,270
$0
$16,634.36
$16,569.64
45
178
048 -261 -02
$127,786
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
11
179
048 261 -08
$1,0--9-5--,-0- 9-8
-$-0--
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
94
180
048 -261 -04
$2,050,000
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
177
181
048,261 -05
$887,204..
$0,.
76
_ 182
048 -261 -06
_
$2,_395,000
-_ _-
$0
.__..$.1.1,644.06
$11,644.06
._- _._..
-.. _- __$11,598.74_
$11,598.74
206
183
....._ ................_..._.
048 -261 -07
$76,744
-$0
$11,644.06-
$11,598.74
......7 ..-
184
048 -261 -08
...
$602,681
.._..-
$0
_
$17,743.32
. -.....
._..-- -- ' -- - --.
$17,674.27
..._.._....._...._. -
34
11
QANe port BcachWDl03\mpons \ad103 final rpt 8ju109.doc Hams & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 12
187
Assessor's
Total
$0
Assessments as
Assessments
Value
Asmt
Parcel
True
Existing
Preliminarily
as Confirmed
to Lien
No.
Number
Value
Liens
Approved
and Recorded
Ratio
185
048 -261 -09
$847,147
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
49
186
048- 261 -35
$416.927
s0
$11.644.06
$11.598.74
36
187
048 - 261 -36
$73,019
$0
$11,644-06
$11,598.74
11
188
048- 261 -11
_$133,098
$431,551
$0
$7,762.70
$11,598.74
37
189
190
048 - 261 -12
048 - 261 -13_
$401,098
- $834,521 _..._
_$11,644.06
$D $11,644.06
$O$11,644.06_
-- J $7,762.70
_
$11,598.74
35
- - -- $11,598.74
72
191
048 - 261 -14
$2,73_4,000
$0
$11,644.06
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
$11,598.74
236
68
_
192 048 - 261 -15 $783,068 $0
193
048 - 261 -16
$83,188
$0
$16,634.3_6
$16,569.64
5
194
048 - 252 -12
$1,292,154
$0
$33,268.72
_
$33,139.26
39
195
048 - 252 -11
$3,130,652
$0 $13,307.49
_
$13,255.71
236
196
048 - 252 -10
$150,136
$0 $12,753.02
207
$12,703.39
12
197
048 - 252 -15
$190,670
$0 $38,813.52
208
$38,662.47
5
198
048 - 252 -14
$424,023
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
37
199
048- 252 -13
$73,019
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
6
200
048 - 252 -19
- -
$74,400
-
$7,762.70
$7,732.49
10 --
201
048- 252 -18
V $74,611 -
$0
-- J $7,762.70
$7,732.49
10
202
048 -252 -05
$101,859
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
7
203
048 - 252 -21
_ $743,973 -
.......$0
$9,980.62
$9,941.78
75 �. --
204
048- 252 -20
- $1,955,952
-$0 --
$11,644.06 -
$11,598.74
169
205
048 -252 -03
$95,785
$0
$17,743.32
$17,674.27
5
206
048 -252 -02
$69,847
$0
$11,644:06
$11,598.74
6
207
048- 252 -17
$1,778,000
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
124
208
048 - 252 -16
$827,929
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
58
209
048 - 251 -21
$99,093
$0
$27,723.94
$27,616.05
4
210
048 - 251 -22
$84,471
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
4
211
048 - 251 -23
$377,757
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
-17 -
212
048 - 251 -24
$467,118
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
21
213
.....
048 - 251 -25
.. ......._.............
$1,294,673
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
59
214
048 - 251 -26
.. _. ...
$2,043,887
$0
..__ .. ...
$22,179.15
._ .........._I_........ .
$22,092.84
......... ........
93
215
648- 251 -27
$2,247,000
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
102
216
048 - 251 -28
$92,401
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
4
217
048 - 251 -29
$80,195
$0
_
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
- -4
218
048 - 251 -30
$694,533
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
31
219
048- 251 -31
$386,456
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
17
220
048 - 251 -32
$1,026,555
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
46
221
048 - 251 -33
$80,743
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
4
222
048 -251-07
$186,148
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
8
223
048 - 251-06
$256,533
$0
$28,184.16
$281074.49
9
224
048 - 251 -37
$1,716,922
$0
$32,159.76
$32,034.62_
54
225
048 251 38
- _... .
$1,271'i66
$0
$28 832,89
$i81720.70
44
226
048 - 251 -34
$419,569
$0
$27,723.94
_-
$27,616.05
_-
15
227. -_
048 - 251_35
$599,027__..
$0
$27,723_94_
22
226
048 - 251 -14
$477,870 -
$0
._.._
$22,179.15
_ _._$27,616,05... -
$22,092.84
-22
229
048 - 251 -15
$108,334
$0
$22,179.15 ._._._.._$22,092.84
5 - --
230
048 - 251 -16
$763,463
$0
$22,17915
$22,092.84
35
Q:Wewporl BeachWD103treports\ad 103 Fnal rpt 8ju109.doc Hams & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St t Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd! Ocean Blvd)
Final Enaineer's Report Paw 13
Asmt
No.
Assessor's
Paroel
Number
Total
True
Value
Existing
Liens
Assessments as
Preliminarily
Approved
Assessments
as Confirmed
and Recorded
Value
to Lien
Ratio
231
048- 251 -17
$190,275
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
9
232
048- 251 -18
$194,204
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
9
233648-251-16
-- -...— _...._.... ....
$15,464.99
$820,237
_
$0
_
$22,179.15
_
$22,092.84
_
234
-
048 - 251 -20
$1,427,241
_..__
$0
___ --
$22,179.15_
.___37
$22,092.84_
-
- 65_-
2M-
236
_
048 -251 -02
048 -251 -03 --
$527,244
$129,966
$0
$0
_
$22,179.15
$22,179.15
$22,092.84 --
$22,092.84
-24 --
6 --
237
048 -251 -04
$957,220
$0
$22,179.15
$22,092.84
43
238 048 -251 -05
239 048 - 272 -28
240 048- 272 -29
241 048- 272 -20
243 048- 272 -31 $568,930 $0 $15,525.41 $15,464.99 37
244 048 - 272 -30 $1284165 10 $15525.41 $15464.99 83
246
1
252
048- 272 -27
$90,540
253
048 - 272 -21
$1,105,601
254
048 -272 -09
$495,528
255
048- 272 -10
$1,590,180
256
048- 272 -11
$111,027
257
048 - 272 -12
$1.098.275
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
7
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
36
259
048- 272 -17
$1,1291444
$0
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
40
$0
_- $15,525.41 -_--
_$15,464.99--- ........27
--
---- ..._....
$0
.. ......._....--
$15,525.41
-- -...— _...._.... ....
$15,464.99
---- --
29
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
34
$0
$15,525.41
$13,808.03
6„
$0
$52,121.00
$51,918.18
21
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
36
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
115
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
8
$0
$13,307.49
$13,255.71
83
258
048 - 272 -18
$758,935
$0
$16,079.89
$16,017.32
47
259
048- 272 -17
$1,1291444
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
82
260
048 - 272 -16
$1,053,116
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
76
261
048- 272 -15
$4991909
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
36
262
048- 272 -14
$1,567,038
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
113
263
048- 272 -13
$148,139
$6
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
10
264
048 - 271 -30
$760,092
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
49
265
048- 271 -29
$1,357,284
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
88
266
048- 271 -17
$527,343
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
38
267
048- 271 -28
$184,631
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
11
268
048 - 271 -26
$90,750
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121-95
5
269
048 - 271 -25
$166."635
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
10
270
048 - 271 -27
$167,460
$0
$17,188.84
$17,121.95
10
_27104871
_2_14__ .
$13,861.97
$13, 808.03
272
048- 271 -13
. _$423,837.,
$94,681
,$0
$0
$13,861.97
-
$13,808.03
.31
7
_273
048- 271 -21 -
-._. _$3,008,994
$0__.._
-$0
$20,515.72
$20,435.88
147
274
048- 271 -23
$771,481 -
$12,753.02
$12,703.39
61
275
................._..
048 - 271 -37
- $380.588
$0 _-
-$14,78-7.9-
14,787.95
$14,730.40
1.
26
276
048 - 271 -19
1
-- --
$484,534
-- ......_.
$0
.. - - --
$15.525.41
- ....
6 __- -.
$15.464.99
- -
31
QANewpor, Beach\AD103keportslad103 final rpt 8ju109.doc
Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report
July 28, 2009
Page 14
$2,354,289
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
171
283
Assessor's
Total
$0
Assessments as
Assessments
Value
Asmt Parcel
True
Existing
Preliminarily
as Confirmed
to Lien
No. Number
Value
Liens
Approved
and Recorded
Ratio
277 048 -271 -01
$445,916
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
30
278 048 -271 -02
$152.273
$0
$27,169.46
$27,063.73
6
280 048- 271 -32 $425.881 $0 $13.861.97 $13,808.03 31
282
048 -271 -05
$2,354,289
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
171
283
048 -271 -06
$972,514
$0
$27,169.46
$27,063.73
36
284
048 -271 -07
$2,580,224
_
$0
$26,060.50
$25,959.09
99
285
048 -271 -08
$350,784
$0
$12,753.02
$12,703.39
28
286
048 -271 -09
$1,346,138
$0
$6,653.75
$6,627.85 _
203
287
048 -302 -01
$238,455
$0
$18,297.80
$18,226.60
13
288
048 -302 -02
$757,406
$0
$16,634.36
$16,569.64
46
289
048 -302 -03
$914,679
$0
_
J$16,634.36
$16,569.64
55
qan
naa- Ar».na
$797 9Fq
$n
$16 634 36
$16.569.64
44
__$16,634.36
_. $16,634.36
297_
048- 302 -11
$129,861
$18, 297. 80__
-
298
_
048-302-17
$712,867
$0
..........
$22,179.15, ..
......_$18,226.60..__7,....___
.. $22,092.84
_ -32.
299
_ _
048- 302 -16
$145,469
$0
$18,297.80
$18,226.60
8
300
046- 302 -15
$120,682
$0
$18,297.80
$18,226.60
7
301
048- 302 -14
$550,044
$0
$18,297180
$18,226.60
301.
302
048 - 302 -13
$322,904
$0
$18,297.80
.,..18 __.
-303
048- 302 -12
$227,908
$0
$21,070.19
$20,988.20
11
304
048 -290 -01
N/A
$0
$0.00
$0.00
N/A
305
048- 291 -01
$871,988
$0
$13,307.49
$13,255.71
66
306
048 -291 -02
$171,163
$0
$13,30749
$13,255.71
13
307
048 - 291 -22
$1,349,631
$0
$13,307.49
$13,255.71
162
308
048 - 291 -23
$2,340,900
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
170
309
048 - 291 -20
$575,452
$0
$191961.23
$19,883.55
29
316
048 - 291 -26
$997,268
$0
$13861.97
$13,861.97
72
311
048- 291 -19
$1,227,595
$0
$1330749
$13,255.71
93
312
048 - 291 -18
$104,681
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
8
313
048 - 291 -17
$559,071
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
40
314
048 - 291 -24
$1,975,865
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
143
315
048- 291 -25
$105,849
$6
$13861.97
$13,808.03
8
316
048 - 291 -15
$138,002_
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
10
317
048-291-14
$505,665.
_ _
$0
$13 861.97
__.. .$13 808.03
37.,, ... .
318
048- 291 -13
_
$1,167,027
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
85
..._. ....
319...
..--_._ ...
048-291-12
......
$94,332
$0
....
$16 079,89......
..
$16 017.32...
320
-,.048
048 -291-06
$2,846,000
.
$0
$16,634.36
..
$16,569.64
172_ _
_
321
048 -291 -07
$2,43_6,525
$0
$15525.41
$15464.99
158
322
048- 291 -08
- $1,364.761
--- 0
$15525.41
$15,464.99
88
Q:\Nmpon BeacMAD103\rrts \W103 final rpt 8julKdoc W Harris &Associates
epo
City of Newport Beach
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Reoort
July 28, 2009
Asmt
No.
Assessor's
Parcel
Number
Total
True
Value
Existing
Liens
Assessments as
Preliminarily
Approved
Assessments
as Confirmed
and Recorded
Value
to Lien
Ratio
323
048 -291 -09
$525,399
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
34
324
048- 291 -10
$1,114,061
$0
$15,525.41
$15,464.99
72_
325
048 - 291 -11
$2,500,000
$0
$9,148.90
$9,113.30
_
274_
326
048- 292 -28
$505,120
$0
^$16,079.89
$16,017.32
_
32
327
328
048 - 292 -29
048 -292 162
$1,924,740
$1.196.981
$0
$0
$13,861.97
$13.861.97
$13,808.03
$13.808.03
139
87
330
048 -292 -04
$716,117
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
52
331
048 -292 -05
$1,750,000
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
127
_332
048 -292 -06
$137,932
$0
- $13,861.97
$13,808.03
_
333
048 -292 -07
$1,586,610
$0
$13,861.97
_
$13,808.03
_10 _
115
334
048 - 292 -27
$89,164
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
6
335
048- 292 -26
$727,613
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
49
336
048 -29232
$82,121
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
6
338 048 - 292 -10 $185,324
_ $16,569.64 11 _
$14,360.34 147
344
048 - 292 -20
$98,475,
$1,3,861,97_
$13,808,03
- --.
7
345
048 - 292 -19
...,,- -_ -_
$514,846
..$0........
$0
$-11,644.06
$11,598.74
44
346
048 - 292 -18
$431,376,
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
37
347
048- 292 -17
$95,169
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
8
348
048 - 292 -35
$564,217
$0
$11,644.06
$11,598.74
49
349
048- 292 -34
$1,068,457
$0
$131861.97
$13,808.03
77
350
048 - 292 -15
$351,436
$0
$12,753.02
$12,703.39
28
351
048- 292 -14
$162,762.
$0
$12,753.02
$12,703.39
13
352
048 - 292 -13
$197,001
$0
$12,753.02
$12,703.39
16
353
048- 292 -12
$162,559
$0
$12,753.02
$12,703.39
13
354
648- 292 -11
$_1,263,768
$0
$12,015.55
$11,968.79
106
355
048 -261 -01
$1221735
$0
$16,63436
$16,569.64
7
356
048- 281 -02
$765,067
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
55
357
048 -281 -03
$2,075,598
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
150
358
048- 281 -04
$490,708
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
36
359
048 -281 -05
$1,677,769
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
122
360
048 -281 -06
$329,284
$0
$13,861.97
$13,808.03
24
361
048 - 281-31
$118,675
$0
$12,198.53
$12,151.06
10
362
048 - 281 -36
$87,026
$0
$14,970.93
$14,912.67
6
363
028135
48
- --
$219398.,,-
$14416.44
$14,36034
15
364
048 -281 -09
$203,064
,...,$0
$0
$14,416.44
$14,360.34
14
365
048.281 -10,
94,334
$1,4,416.44
$14,360_34
7
366
048281 -11
_ .
._.-$-99- 2,19_1
,. .$0,
$0
$14,416.44
_ -- .$14,360.34
...69... -_
367
048 - 281 -12
$96 -218
$0 --
- $141416.44
$14,360.34
-67- -
15
Q:Wempon BmMAD I 03Vepor0ad 103 renal rp18ju109.doc M Harris &Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Enoineer's Renart pace 16
Assessor's
Asmt Parcel
No. Number
374 048-281-27
375 048-281-26
376 048-281-25
377 048-281-24
379
Total Assessments as Assessments Value
True Existing Preliminarily as Confirmed to Lien
Value Lions AoDroved and Recorded Ratio
$17,743.32
048-281-33
$17,674.27
60
$14,416.44
- - - ----- �14,41 6.4-4
$14,360.34
$14,360.34
10
123
�$14—,4-16-44
384
$14,360.34
20
$14,416.44
$19,961.23
$14,360.34
11
$14,416.44 --
385
386
$14,360.34
152
$14.416.44
$21,070.19
$24,951.55
$14.360.34
71
383
048-281-33
$0
$16,634.36
$16,569.64
65
384
____$1,071,606
048-281-34
$159,178
$0
$19,961.23
$19,883.55
8
385
386
048-281-16
048-281-15
$138,345
$3.425.000
$0
$o
$21,070.19
$24,951.55
$20,988.20
$24.854.45
-7
138
" Harris & Associates
Q:\Newron B�ch1AD103\reporls4adI03 final rpt gpI09.doc " I
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 17
Table 2
Debt Limit Valuation
A. ESTIMATED BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT
$6,220,752
B. UNPAID SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
$0
TOTAL A & B
$6,220,752
C. TRUE VALUE OF PARCELS
$298,153,641 **
AVERAGE VALUETO LIEN RATIO
48 :1
Unpaid Special Assessments shall consist of the total principal sum of all unpaid special
assessments previously levied or proposed to be levied other than in the instant proceedings.
** True Value of Parcels means the total value of the land and improvements as estimated and
shown on the last equalized roll of the County or as otherwise reasonably calculated.
This report does not represent a recommendation of parcel value, economic viability or financial
feasibility, as that is not the responsibility of the Assessment Engineer.
CERTIFICATION
1, the undersigned Assessment Engineer, do hereby certify that (i) the total amount of the principal
sum of the special assessments proposed to be levied, together with the principal amount of
previously levied special assessments, as set forth above, do not exceed one -half (1/2) the total true
value of the parcels proposed to be assessed, and (ii) the amount proposed to be assessed upon any
parcel does not exceed one -half of the true value of the parcel.
EXECUTED on July 8, 2009.
HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
JOAN P.E.
R.C.E. No. 41965
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
QMmport Deach\AD103 reports \ad103 final rpt 8ju109.do I Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No, 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 18
Exhibit 1
Method and Formula of Assessment Spread
Since the improvements are to be funded by the levying of assessments, the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913" and Article XIIID of the State Constitution require that assessments must be based on
the special benefit that the properties receive from the works of improvement. In addition, Section 4
of Article XIIID of the State Constitution requires that a parcel's assessment may not exceed the
reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel. Section 4 provides that
only special benefits are assessable and the local agency levying the assessment must separate the
general benefits from the special benefits. It also provides that parcels within a district that are
owned or used by any public agency, the State of Califomia, or the United States shall not be exempt
from assessment unless the agency can demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those
publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit. Neither the Act nor the State Constitution
specifies the method or formula that should be used to apportion the costs to properties in any special
assessment district proceedings.
The responsibility for recommending an apportionment of the costs to properties which specially
benefit from the improvements rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is appointed for the purpose
of making an analysis of the facts and determining the correct apportionment of the assessment
obligation. In order to apportion the assessments to each parcel in direct proportion with the special
benefit which it will receive from the improvements, an analysis has been completed and is used as
the basis for apportioning costs to each property within the Assessment District.
Based upon an analysis of the special benefit to be received by each parcel from the construction of
the works of improvement, the Assessment Engineer recommends the apportionment of costs as
outlined below. The final authority and action rests with the City Council after hearing all testimony
and evidence presented at a public hearing, and tabulating the assessment ballots previously mailed
to all record owners of property within the Assessment District. Upon the conclusion of the public
hearing, the City Council must make the final determination whether or not the assessment spread
has been made in direct proportion to the special benefits received by each parcel within the
Assessment District. Ballot tabulation will be done at that time and, if a majority of the retumed
ballots weighted by assessment amount are not in opposition to the Assessment District, the City
Council may form the Assessment District.
The following sections set forth the methodology used to apportion the costs of the improvements to
each parcel.
SPECIAL BENEFITS
In further making the analysis, it is necessary that the properties receive a special benefit
distinguished from general benefits conferred on real property located in the District or to the public
at large.
The purpose of this Assessment District is to provide the financing to underground existing overhead
electrical, telephone and cable facilities as well as rehabilitate the affected portions of streets and
alleys within the District. These facilities are the direct source of service to the properties within the
Assessment District.
Q:1Newporl Beach1AD101treponsiad103 final rpt Sju109.doc I Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 19
The proposed replacement of existing overhead utility facilities (power, telephone and cable
facilities) with underground facilities and removal of the existing utility poles and the overhead wires
will provide a special benefit to the parcels connected to and adjacent to, or in near proximity of, the
facilities as follows:
Improved Aesthetics Benefit. This benefit relates to the improved aesthetics of the streetscape due
to the removal of overhead wires and utility poles. The removal of guy wires and other support
structures related to the overhead facilities are included in the definition of improved aesthetics.
Properties that are adjacent to, or in proximity of, overhead facilities receive an aesthetic benefit.
• Additional Safety Benefit. This benefit relates to the additional safety of having the overhead
distribution wires placed underground and having the power poles removed, which eliminates the
threat of downed utility lines and poles due to wind, rain and other unforeseeable events. Falling
facilities can lead to personal injuries and damage to structures, including fire. Properties
immediately adjacent to the facilities usually have a greater risk. Furthermore, in compact
communities like Balboa Peninsula, the negative effects of falling lines and poles are more
widespread including blocked roadways and alleys, and property damage due to impact. Properties
that are adjacent to, or in proximity of, overhead facilities receive a safety benefit.
• Connection Benefit. This benefit relates to the enhanced reliability of service from the utilities
being underground, due to having all new wires and equipment and having that equipment
underground, which reduces the threat of service interruption from downed lines. When compared
to overhead systems, fewer outages occur due to various acts of nature, traffic collisions and
obstructions (such as trees). Properties that are connected to, or have the ability to connect to, the
facilities proposed to be undergrounded receive a connection benefit.
By virtue of such special benefits, the proposed improvements will provide a higher level of service,
increase the desirability of the properties and will specifically enhance the values of the properties
within the Assessment District. Therefore, the proposed improvements are of direct and special
benefit to these properties.
GENERAL BENEFITS
Section 4 of Article XIIID requires that the general benefits imparted by the utility undergrounding
project be separated from the special benefits and that only the special benefit portion of the costs of
the project be assessed against those parcels which are identified as receiving special benefits.
Separating the general from the special benefits requires an examination of the facts and
circumstances of the project and the property being assessed.
In this particular assessment district, the streets and alleys along which the existing overhead utility
facilities are being undergrounded function as local and collector streets. No roadways are designated
as an arterial, a major arterial or a scenic corridor in the Transportation Element of the City's General
Plan. Furthermore, the City has an established network of arterial streets which appear to function as
intended to provide for the movement of traffic around and through the community at large without
the need to utilize local collector streets for such purposes. Under these circumstances, any use of
the streets within the assessment district as "through" streets is incidental.
With the exception of the City park properties, the properties situated within the assessment district
are zoned exclusively as residential. Under this circumstance, the impacts, both visual and safety,
are largely isolated to those properties (find the persons who inhabit them) which front on these local
Q \Newpon BeachlADl03\repons \ad103 final tpt 8iu109.doc Harris &Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 20
streets and alleys, with only incidental impacts on those who visit homes within the assessment
district or who pass through the assessment district on trips originating outside the boundary and
having a destination outside the boundary.
Based on these facts and circumstances, any general benefits to the property within the assessment
district in general, to the surrounding community and to the public at large from the project of
undergrounding these local overhead utility facilities on the local streets and alleys, such as to the
general public visiting in cars, on bikes or on foot, are incidental and do not exceed five percent (5 %)
of the estimated project costs. Therefore, only the net amount of $5,475,332 of the estimated project
construction costs is considered the special benefit portion of the construction costs. This general
benefit portion of the cost is more than offset by the 13 +% utility company contribution.
METHODOLOGY
Based upon the findings described above, the special benefit received by the properties within the
boundaries of the Assessment District is the conversion from an overhead to an underground utility
system resulting in additional safety, enhanced reliability, and improved aesthetics to the adjacent
properties.
Based on these conditions, it is our conclusion that the improvements specially benefit all assessed
properties in the Assessment District.
To establish the benefit to the individual parcels within the Assessment District, the highest and best
use of each property is considered. For example, a vacant property is considered developed to its
highest potential and connected to the system.
The more a property is developed, the more it benefits from the proposed improvements. Most of
properties within this Assessment District are zoned residential and some have one or two dwelling
units on them. There is a direct correlation between the size of a property and the extent to which a
property may develop. Because parcel size is one of the main limiting factors for what can be built on
a property, or the extent the property is developed, the size of each parcel is used as the base unit for
measuring benefit.
The area of each property has been rounded to the nearest 100 square feet(sf), which accounts for
any minor area calculation inconsistencies.
Consideration was given to reducing the amount of area assigned to parcels based upon the building
setbacks applicable to each parcel. Due to the combined factors of (a) significant variations in the
setback requirements, including front, side and rear setbacks, (b) availability of future variances from
currently applicable setback requirements as well as existing variances already in place, and (c)
significant variations in the ratios between building size and lot size, it was concluded that
adjustments to parcel areas on account of setback requirements would not improve upon the
assessment methodology. Accordingly, no reductions have been made to parcel area based upon
applicable setback requirements.
The area of a condominium is calculated by taking the area of the base parcel and dividing by the
number of condominiums.
The special benefits from the undergrounding of overhead utilities are categorized into the three (3)
distinct benefits identified above. All parcels within the District, except for the few exceptions
Q: NmWri 8each%AD1e3VeP0,Wadle3 final rpt %u109.do 1 Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineers Report Page 21
identified below, receive 3 of the 3 benefits (which is a factor of 1). Therefore, their rounded parcel
areas are multiplied by 1 to calculate the "Assessed Parcel Area" on which costs are apportioned.
Note: In 1995, Assessment Nos. 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296 and 297 were included in Assessment
District No. 64. These properties were previously assessed for their improved view of
Newport Harbor due to the wires and poles being removed adjacent to the City park across
Balboa Boulevard / Channel Road. These properties were not assessed for improved
neighborhood aesthetics, improved safety or connection benefits associated from the previous
undergrounding of the overhead utilities, and were specifically given a credit, that was applied
to their calculated assessment amount, to make sure they were not doubly assessed for the
future undergrounding of the poles and wires serving their properties (reference is made to
pages 8 and 9 of Final Engineer's Report, dated June 1, 1995, which are provided in Appendix
A). Therefore, these properties receive full benefits from this proposed undergrounding and
are not considered to be assessed twice for the same benefits.
Exceptions
The following are parcels whose benefits do not fit the above methodology, as explained below.
Assessment Nos. 55, 223, 238, 275 and 354. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded
are in close proximity to these lots, although not directly adjacent; therefore, these properties are
assigned 1/2 Aesthetic Benefits. However, because the poles and wires are close enough to
encroach on the property should they fall, these properties are considered to receive full Safety
Benefits. Therefore, theses parcels receive 2 -1/2 of 3 benefits and their rounded property area is
multiplied by a factor of 5/6.
2. Assessment No. 54 and 286. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded are not in close
proximity to these properties and do not provide significant aesthetic benefits to these properties,
nor would they encroach upon these properties should they fall. Therefore, these properties are
assigned 0 Aesthetic Benefits and 0 Safety Benefits. Therefore, these parcels receive 1 of 3
benefits and their rounded property area is multiplied by a factor of 1/3.
3. Assessment No. 325. The poles, wires and guy wires to be undergrounded are in close proximity
to this parcel, although not directly adjacent; therefore, this property is assigned 1/2 Aesthetic
Benefits. Excluding guy wires, which are support structures to the overhead facilities and poles,
the poles and wires to be undergrounded are not in close proximity to this property, and would
not encroach upon this property should they fall; therefore, this property is assigned 0 Safety
Benefits. Therefore, this parcel receives 1 -1/2 of 3 benefits and its rounded property area is
multiplied by a factor of 1/2.
4. Assessment Nos. 97, 304 and the park property adjacent to Assessment No. 54. These properties
are small neighborhood pocket -parks with no potential for development that are not in close
proximity to the poles and wires proposed to be undergrounded, nor are they connected to the
system to be undergrounded. Therefore, these properties are assigned 0 Aesthetic Benefits, 0
Safety Benefits and 0 Connection Benefits.
Q:Wewpon Beach1AD103Vepor(sW103 final rp( 8ju109.doc I Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103(G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 22
Assessment No. 310. This parcel's preliminary assessment was calculated based on an incorrect
lot area, which is less than what it actually should be. Spreading the assessments based on the
correct lot area causes all other parcels to realize a 0.39% reduction in their assessment amounts,
and the resultant $24,248 has been deducted proportionally from the construction and incidental
contingencies and the financing costs, as can be seen in the cost estimate. Because no parcel's
assessment may be increased above what it was noticed, Assessment No. 310's assessment
remains at the amount that was shown in the Preliminary Engineer's Report. Therefore, neither
Assessment No. 310 nor any other parcel within the Assessment District is paying more than its
proportional share of the special benefits attributable to it from the improvements being
constructed by this Assessment District.
ASSESSMENT APPORTIONMENT
Each parcel will be apportioned its fair share of the construction costs based on the Assessed Parcel
Area calculated for each property.
Incidental Expenses and Financial Costs have been assessed to the entire Assessment District on a
prorata basis relative to the total construction cost allocations.
The individual assessment calculations are provided in Appendix B. For particulars to the
Assessment Roll, reference is made to Table I in Part III of this report.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have been
spread in direct accordance with the special benefits that each parcel receives from the works of
improvement.
DATED: July 8, 2009 HARRIS & ASSOCIATES
'egOFESSIph
'p1,H E.
JOAN E COX, P.E.
NO. 41965 A R.C.E. No. 41965
EXP. 3/31/10 * ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
0 op cLUf CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
COUN "I Y OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Q; \Newport Beach VAD1031reponsladlo3 final rp18ju109.doc I Hams & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St 1 E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 23
I, , as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram
attached thereto, was filed in my office on the, day of , 2009.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram
attached thereto, was preliminarily approved by the City Council of the CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH, CALIFORNIA, on the day of 12009.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, , as CITY CLERK of the CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram
attached thereto, was approved and confirmed by the City Council of said City on the day of
.2009.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I, , as SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS of the CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH, CALIFORNIA do hereby certify that the foregoing Assessment, together with the Diagram
attached thereto, was recorded in my office on the _ day of , 2009.
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
QANewpon Beach\AD103Veparts \adl03 final rpt 8ju109.doc M Harris &Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 24
Part IV
Annual Administrative Assessment
A proposed maximum annual administrative assessment shall be levied on each parcel of land and
subdivision of land within the Assessment District to pay for necessary costs and expenses incurred
by the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, and not otherwise reimbursed, resulting from the
administration and collection of assessments, from the administration or registration of any bonds
and reserve or other related funds, or both. The maximum assessment is authorized pursuant to the
provisions of Section 10204(f) of the Streets and Highways Code and shall not exceed fifty dollars
($50) per parcel per year, subject to an annual increase based on the Consumer Price Index (CPI),
during the preceding year ending in January, for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles, Riverside,
and Orange County areas. The exact amount of the administration charge will be established each
year by the Superintendent of Streets.
The annual administrative assessment will be collected in the same manner and in the same
installments as the assessment levied to pay for the cost of the works of improvement.
Q\New ort8eachWD103Ve ports \ad I03 final rPt 8ju10doc Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 25
Part V
Diagram of Assessment
A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is attached hereto. Full -sized copies of the Boundary
Map and Assessment Diagram are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, of the City of Newport
Beach.
As required by the Act, the Assessment Diagram shows the exterior boundaries of the Assessment
District and the assessment number assigned to each parcel of land corresponding to its number as it
appears in the Assessment Roll contained in Part III Table 1. The Assessor's Parcel Number is also
shown for each parcel as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention and
reference is hereby made to the Assessor's Parcel Maps of the County of Orange for the boundaries
and dimensions of each parcel of land.
Q: \Newport Beach1AD 103Vepor0adl 03 final rpi Slul09.doc Harris &Associates
A.
a
m
9
0
A
?S
J
c
O
w
`c
6
R
2
d
z
17/1°
0
N
N
J.
d
r/
A
N
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM. FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 103.
(G Street /East Balboa Boulevard /Channel Rodd /Ocean Boulevard)
CITY OF NENPORT BEACH. Ca6NTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF CAUFg2NiA
4�JL_i I JL
2
rxe ebnwav m nc wo-F�n, 'ssLSwmt mra .w: .s. srxs rz. rs- r.ex +¢ nw�va.
vroR+w m5'+w a�.wF a Lx .u. ':s - vxs xrmu. n�wr rs nv
Vl)f U/]v{ F4eK1 pMl /SSEtlSUfl. SV{C xOLLY &KK 6 eA� /S B W R �yP6 b. 1 9VIM
ro.e:s .xe en we uasnnws wen .w,e.
ON
SCN.L =150'
r[uoao »n PYLA1 ax
4LW[il ¢v."
?n a riww+'eC+u
MMIPNr /
UM °NL,
b'.r✓{ b 4Si96ut Wi tbmaaR
♦.w+esoemeti +.mcbrec d�'4e
FSCthPoR m LWtSNSY ttt 4rR4X�
M¢m WY,sw.r.
KJ 04v
N:NfY 6WFM(,MQ'4
ettwr rzcoimPC.wx
u F�v
•L[91o[61M NX CiPeC tt' M 4%FmlFwnf' V
SIPLfI3r bIY 6 ryCVRd.[ BL'✓.ri YN5 �� MY G
IVYCN! Y S:K[K
/F ! >Xieub!1 °'�S lCl#0 UY nQ 41e
Mx[ W:S, P[IXA M'U sµFQe b -lam
z ASRZ9PxS nMAau i/:O. tlYs
QAb W rirt._PAt'b�
P1Y CMY
ba b m[ nn b b Uq bm
BC. li'PM -9AY ;C_. SUN
LEGEND:
��— 455FSSOfl'S PM�llai?
—" � 90unOx9Y
%'.So`fnu4is•r5
>sb Nm
wr wmroe � xn. =o
[O
0 o m
a
a
N C �
=' w
o N i
rte. N
3
7
2
O
W
m
Go
Q
9
6
n
S
m
A_
6
0
s
pN
O
N
s
c
a
0
d
d
o°
d
7.
N
20
ra-
O
d
m
ID
N
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 103
(G Street /Eost Balboa Boulevard /Channel Road /Ocean Boulevard)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. COUNTY CIF ORANGE
ASSG'SSOrs SOP 300k 048 STATE OF CALIFORNIA
E. BALBOA BOULEVARD
JJ f 13
\� 0\ F29� 18. 19
�A e0� , `a f� • .
\ d
UP
h
W
w
(n
s w
m w
(n
W
Z
J
U
F
Q
+t
d
GRAPHIC SCALE
(d'ml
GN'
--
ASSESSOR'S 11RCM IR.i
W? 118E
r..�
ASSESS W OISfi
1g:
s1
3A < (S1
E16y
�{
10 11
JJ f 13
\� 0\ F29� 18. 19
�A e0� , `a f� • .
\ d
UP
h
W
w
(n
s w
m w
(n
W
Z
J
U
F
Q
+t
d
GRAPHIC SCALE
(d'ml
GN'
--
ASSESSOR'S 11RCM IR.i
W? 118E
r..�
ASSESS W OISfi
8W .y
Cig9-ASSM*$
SPAM SEC.W
�{
ASSESSOR'S PA4Mi.. h'WWP
AMESSAIWT AWVSER
....
W PES 10 8CREY0'.EO
Lbt
�COAtP�UClIDAA, AREAY
N EiGWpY(
� AI tt
6NWpi
T C C7
_ A
9
� as
D � d
� N �
N
N
m
O
4_
`±
Z
O
O
W
n
r
am
O'
d
W
4
n
m
A
n
O
d
W
8
c
AC
v �
N
N NN
V tp
w
0
7.
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 103
(G Street/East Balboa Boulevard /Channel Road/Ocean. Boulevard)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Assessor's Map Book 0478
E. BALBOA BOULEVARD 5.8ALSOA
64)
al
—T
C A'd-ldk-
(3
T- - 7
PLA7A DEL NOME
CUPPW SCALE
Z'
. 0
42:
O
C)
14
I'm
cc
0
No
O
WTLRrt
vsmcl
QDii
A•W�'U o� 50�
V)
OE K.Own vIXfS •0
z
e5$( CS .8V?
::J
y s TO ac Rt..'b
X
Z'
. 0
42:
O
C)
14
I'm
cc
0
No
O
N
N p�
N O_
i
U
v
d
c
G
n,
t
07
0
a_
W
N
0
r
C
Z
O
E
t � O
Z' m
c o'
�W
O `y
L) —
C G
U M tar
9 N -V Lll.: 1 M i r� 'I-
"3
an -us tnN
i91. -�VR p 9SI 11MF Tkrl Y4Wil)H
v�r awP.
- csmmb�O farm".• •..
ba8!. NA Msv IkT11
6 ome 36 of 1'.
tr3gnnx t d °- .wts,4,v
NGtrx9a Ord s.wstssti+'Ctt
ralrlseP 1.+A�wiRrr
Du�1 ipavd S.tlP65]SSY °.---
a
f
3.mg gtaavaa
r�+5
m
R
n
L`
\_�abn3Tn� N
i
}t ost p�
t
tet E154:_._.
'rya
ti !.'WINS 3 -K
vtowinvo !0 3LV1s
30NV20 do ALN00* H3V38 1808M3N 10 All*
(Psonalsog'Ugaoo/pDO8 IaUUDgO /PJonalnog ooQloo JSO3 / ;9214S 0)
£ 80d Kv8DVl(] IN3WS53SSY
vvi Btr0 good dory s Jo =sassN
N
v
N
N
Q
PiS
R
Z
is
0
a
0
c
0
°m
g
S
v
b
I
E
0
a
m
0
t
8
0
d
w.
0
n
S
d
3.
a�
Fry
0
n
d
m
0
N
Assessor's Map Book 048
E. BALBOA BOULEVARD
1 U7
z
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 103
(G Street /East Balboa Boulevard /Channel Road/Ocsdn'. Boulevard)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. COUNTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
q�3.4) C$.I
�24i
if543 i•2a7.�' ._
i� l��f�
r21
ljl.
31
L `. i.23s
_..i.
F
W
N
GRAPHIC � §CAGE
to -�1
L FGEND:
-
G55CYy.R'9 VARCf4 Lu.•C
L01 U
,,,,,
oaROnRR
30
4qi
Z
w
s47
4SSESSCR'$PARCEL RW&.t
•
MS£5 TO m Ii vY
7[Q
A59ES w! Rwq"
...:.
MRES TO U Nl KD
i 9iJ
aE
N
F
W
N
GRAPHIC � §CAGE
to -�1
L FGEND:
-
G55CYy.R'9 VARCf4 Lu.•C
L01 U
,,,,,
KStsSUE &t 0a1.cl
oaROnRR
Ak5 t5 % 1e14 SMN
4SSESSCR'$PARCEL RW&.t
•
MS£5 TO m Ii vY
7[Q
A59ES w! Rwq"
...:.
MRES TO U Nl KD
iii "B�--
F a oxu
Z'
S� IAWYH w;=. '% Nt•=.
1xu m -um
epic _ d_„j1'ms I s.m s a a
. G
tO
G �
c�
A6 �i
N �
ro
A
O
S
O
O
W
W
m
d
0
d
6
7
CL
O
W
g
c
a
m g
o m
Z
E
a
W
5
0
0
43
n
x
3.
N
Qn
N
N
O
d
.e
O
N
Assessor's Adcp Book 043
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM FOR
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 103
(G Street /Eost Balboa Boulevord /Chonnel Road /Ocean Boulevard)
CITY Or NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
Ygl
!zr��
/2i
61- 38 3
�... p 169
t
CEAtV BOULEVq ..:
:tl
38
GRAPHIC SCALC
>o n
-- AACSSq[5 FtijCP.. IP.M1
......,.,. AS£E95LM1 Ms IRICl
(1 11 ASsE .s 'ACE YJ
1D —sows PARm N sm
• mm 10 -BL mwvlo
OT n95 WB7.WYRER
.R 10 az xeumtn
E A kl _
I � orc u ma
>a rnro�Nrow.wx.,w, mm,u.rwr:na I
a
c�
c W
y n
� S
m
H
3
0
N
a
0
w
L7
N
m
O
d
W
R
n
Er
m
a
a
c
m
N
S] pN
W S
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 32
Part VI
Description of Facilities
Section 10100 of the Act provides for the legislative body of any municipality to finance certain
capital facilities and services within or along its streets or any public way or easement. The
following is a list of proposed improvements as allowed under the Act to be installed, or improved
under the provisions of the Act, including the acquisition of required right -of -way and/or property. For
the general location of the improvements to be constructed referenced is hereby made to the Plans
and Specifications described in Part I of this report.
The following improvements are proposed to be constructed and installed in the general location
referred to as Assessment District No. 103.
1. Removal of existing utility poles.
2. Removal of overhead resident service drops.
3. Construction of mainline underground power, telephone and cable conduit, with appurtenant
manholes and pullboxes.
4. Construction of service conduit and appurtenances.
The improvements have been designed by the Southern California Edison Company, AT &T and
Time Warner Cable. The City of Newport Beach will inspect the work to ensure conformance to City
standards and specifications where applicable.
The City will also construct additional pavement rehabilitation as needed for the project.
Once completed, the underground facilities will become the property and responsibility of Southern
California Edison Company, AT &T, and Time Warner Cable.
Each owner of property located within the Assessment District will be responsible for arranging for
and paying for work on his or her property necessary to connect facilities constructed by the public
utilities in the public streets and alleys to the points of connection on the private property.
Conversion of individual service connections on private property is not included in the work done by
the Assessment District.
The estimated time for completion of the undergrounding of the utilities is 36 months after the sale of
bonds. Property owners will be required to provide necessary underground connections within 120
days of the completion of the underground facilities.
Failure to convert individual service connections on private property may result in a recommendation
to the City Council that the public utilities be directed to discontinue service to that property pursuant
to Section 1532 of the Municipal Code. Overhead facilities cannot be removed until all overhead
service has been discontinued.
QANewport BeachtAD103Vepmis\adl03 anal tpl Sjul09.doc Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Pace 33
Right -of -Way Certificate
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
The undersigned hereby CERTIFIES UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that the following is all
true and correct.
That at all time herein mentioned, the undersigned was, and now is, the authorized representative of
the duly appointed SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
CALIFORNIA.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions of Article XIIID of the
California Constitution, and the "Municipal Improvements Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of certain public
improvements in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 103 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District').
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND CERTIFIES AS FOLLOWS:
It is acknowledged that the proposed Works of Improvement must be located within public rights -of-
way, land, or easements owned by or licensed to the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, County of
Orange, State of California, at the time of the construction of the Works of Improvement, and the
undersigned hereby further certifies that all rights -of -way necessary for the Works of Improvements
will be obtained and in possession of the City, County, or State prior to construction by the CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH.
EXECUTED this day of
California.
2009, at CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
SUPERINTENDENT OF STREETS
CITY OF NEWPOR "I' BEACH
State of California
By:
Stephen Badum, PE
QANewpon Deach\AD1034epons \ad103 final fpl8jul09.doc M I Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No, 103 (C St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Page 34
Certificate of Completion of Environmental Proceedings
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
The undersigned, tinder penalty of perjury, CERTIFIES as follows:
That I am the person who authorized to prepare and process all environmental documentation as
needed as it relates to the formation of the special Assessment District being formed pursuant to
the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, said special Assessment District known and
designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 103 (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District').
2. The specific environmental proceedings relating to this Assessment District that have been
completed are as follows:
CEQA compliance review:
The proposed project is Categorically Exempt (Class 2) from the provisions of CEQA
(replacement or reconstructions).
3. I do hereby certify that all environmental evaluation proceedings necessary for the formation of
the Assessment District have been completed to my satisfaction, and that no further
environmental proceedings are necessary.
EXECUTED this day of 2009, at CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
California.
By:
Stephen Badum, PE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Q:Wexvpod neachLADIWVeporls1ad103 final rpt 8julWdoc Harris & Associates
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix
Excerpts from
Assessment District No. 64
Final Engineer's Report
dated June 1, 1995
BHarris & Associates
WNmPon BeacMAD103\reporis \ad 103 final rpt 8ju109.doc
City of Newport Beach - Assessment District No. 64 (Channel Road)
ENGINEER'S REPORT - January 26, 1995 Pape 8
improvements will provide a higher level of service to each individual property, and as the
aesthetic environment surrounding each property will improve, it is our recommendation that
benefit be spread on a per parcel basis.
The properties in the District are separated into two types of benefit categories:
I. Properties receiving service and which are directly adjacent to the poles, guide -lines and
overhead facilities which are proposed to be removed.
2. Properties located on the south -west side of Channel Road, directly across Channel Road
from the public beaches, and identified on the Assessment Diagram as Assessment No.s 9
through 15 and No. 36 (APN 048- 302 -05 through it and APN 048- 282 -19). These
properties are not served by the facilities proposed to be underground; however, these
properties will receive an extraordinary increase in property value resulting from the
removal of overhead electrical and communication facilities from between the fronts of the
properties and the view of Newport Harbor.
Properties not located directly adjacent to the facilities to be underground and not directly across
from the public beach receive only incidental benefit from the improvements, and are therefore
not included in the District.
As discussed above, all properties in the District are zoned residential. We have therefore
spread the assessment on a per parcel basis to each parcel in the District.
An exception to this is Assessment No. I (APN 048 - 240 -37) which previously underground
the utilities along the property as a requirement of development. There is currently a power
pole at the southeast corner of the property and a guide -line which extends approximately
1 I.5 feet in front of the property. Both of these would be removed as part of the District
improvements. The undergrounding would affect i t.5 feet of the 83.5 feet of property
frontage, or 13.48% of the frontage; therefore, the assessment for this property will be
13.48% of a standard parcel's assessment.
In Category No. 2, the "view" parcels described above, a credit has been applied to each
parcel to account for the future undergrounding of these parcels' utilities. These parcels
are not having their utilities underground at this time, but they clearly receive a benefit
based on view enhancement. Therefore, these parcels are given a credit which represents
an estimate of the cost to underground their utility services in a future undergrounding
assessment district. The credit has been calculated as follows:
The utility undergrounding construction cost for the proposed Assessment District (as
provided by Southern California Edison Company and Pacific Bell Telephone Company)
is divided by the total length of the undergrounding. This provides an average cost per
foot of undergrounding.
5236,170 - 1,752 ft = 5134.800 per ft
P:$WP51 DATA5REPORTSIC=A DFORMM.N11H A=Herryman S Henigar
City of Newport Beach - Assessment District No. 64 (Channel Road)
ENGINEER'S REPORT - January 26, 1995 Page 9
This average cost per foot of undergrounding is then multiplied by the affective length
of the future undergrounding for the Category No. 2 parcels, which calculates an
estimated cost for the future undergrounding of utilities serving those parcels.
5134.800 per ft x 295.75 A = $39,867.10
The utilities which serve the view parcels are located in an alley, in back of the parcels,
and also serve parcels located on the other side of the alley which would benefit from
the future undergrounding; therefore, the estimated future undergrounding cost is
divided in half and then apportioned as a credit, on a per parcel basis, to the Category
No. 2 parcels.
($39,867.10 _ 2) _ 8 parcels = 52,491.70 credit per parcel
The public beaches, Assessment No. 8 (APN 048- 301 -07) and No_ 34 (APN 048- 292 -I1), being
City property, will not receive an assessment. However, the City is malting a 50% contribution
for the cost of the utility undergrounding adjacent to the two public beach parcels.
Incidental and Financial Costs have been assessed on a prorata basis relative to the construction
cost allocation.
For particulars as to the assessment roll, reference is made to Exhibit 11, in the Appendix.
A detailed itemization of improvement costs may be found in Pan II of this report.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have
been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of,
improvement.
DATED: January 26, 1995.
P:\ W P31 DATA \R CPORTStCOX%A IWOIt NIN.NI -II
BSI CONSULTANTS, INyC.
By: � /
JEFFREY K1. tOOPLVR, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 31572
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE- OF CALIFORNIA
t .T
Berryman & Henigar
City of Newport Beach - Assessment District No. 64 jChanne! Road)
ENGINEER'S REPORT -June 1, 1995 Page 9A
MODIFICATIONS TO THE
METHOD AND FORMLJLA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
Based on input from the first public hearing, modifications to the method and formula of
assessment spread are provided as follows:
Three properties have already had their telephone lines underground. These specifically are
Assessment No.s 1, 2 and 3 (APN 048- 240 -37, 048 - 301 -11 and 048 - 301 -10). Therefore,
these parcels are given a 20 % credit on their total assessment, as the cost of undergrounding
the telephone facilities is approximately 2017o of the total construction cost.
The utility pole located adjacent to Assessment Parcel No. 35 (APN 048 - 292 -11) was
originally proposed to be removed. The Edison Company has been directed to leave this
Pole in place, thereby eliminating the benefit to this property. Therefore, the assessment
on this property has been reduced to 50.00.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for the referenced Assessment District have
been spread in direct accordance with the benefits that each parcel receives from the works of
improvement.
DATED: June 1, 1995.
BSI CONSULTANTS, INC.
By: lmlel4 Y COOMR, P.E.
R.C.E. No. 31572
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
P:1 W P5I DATAkR EPORTS%COX \A DEW L64.Nl' 5
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix 8 -Page I
ADDendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total Confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel Size (sf) Benefit Parcel Construction Incidental Financial Total
1551
MIRAMAR
DR
34
048- 201 -11
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1553
MIRAMAR
DR
35
048- 201 -12
2,500
1
2.500
$11,242.95
$769 70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1557
MIRAMAR
MIRAMAR
DR
.. ......
36
048- 201 -13
2,500
....
1
..........
2,500
......._...._ 95 -.
$11,242.95
$769.70
....
$1,795.38
.. .. ...
$13.808.03
1561
MIRAMAR
DR
37
048- 201 -14
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1565
MIRAMAR
DR
38
048 - 201 -15
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,79538
$13,808.03
1569
MIRAMAR
DR
39
048- 201 -16
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1573
MIRAMAR
DR
40
048 - 201 -17
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1577
MIRAMAR
DR
41
048- 201 -18
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1581
MIRAMAR
DR
42
048- 201 -19
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1585
MIRAMAR
DR
43
048- 201 -20
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1589
MIRAMAR
DR
44
048- 201 -21
3,100
1
3,100
$13,941.26
$954.42
$2,226.27
$17,121.95
1512
MIRAMAR
DR
45
048 -192 01
4,800
1
4,800
$21,586.47
$1.477.82
$3,447.12
$26,511.41
1520
MIRAMAR
OR
46
048 -192 -02
3,500
1
3,500
$15,740.14
$1,077.57
$2,513.53
$19,331.24
1530
MIRAMAR
OR
47
048 -192 -03
7,200
1
7,200
$32,379.71
$2,216.73
$5.170.68
$39,767.12
1532
MIRAMAR
OR
48
048 -192 -04
4,000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
$22.092.84
1536
MIRAMAR
DR
49
048 -192 -05
4,000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
$22,092.84
1540
MIRAMAR
DR
50
048 -192 -06
4,200
1
4,200
$18,88816
$1,293.09
$3,01623
$23197.48
7544
MIRAMAR
DR
51
048 -192 -07
4,300
1
4,300
$19,337.88
$1,323.88
$3,086.05
$23,749.81
1550
MIRAMAR
DR
52
048 -192 -08
4,500
1
4,500_
$20,23732
$1,385.45
$2485445
1552
MIRAMAR
DR
-53
048 -192 -09
101100
1
18100
-
$3,109.26
__$3,231;68
$7,253.17
7507EBA(.80R
8L VD --
54
04879149
3,400
_
0.33
1,133
_$45,421.62
$5,095.31
11
$34883
$81366
_$55,784.05
$6257.80
1505 E
BALBOA BLVD
55
048 -191 -02
3,300
0.83
2,750
$12,367.25
$846.67
$1,974.91
$15,188.63
1509 E
BALBOA BLVD
56
048 -191 -03
2,900
1
2,900
$13,041.83
$892.85
$2,082.64
$16,017.32
1515E
BALBOA BLVD
57
046 -191 -04
2,700
1
2,700
$12,142.39
$831.27
$1,939.01
1577E
BALBOA BLVD
58
048 -191 -05
2,700
1....
2,700
$12,142.39
$831.27
$1,939.01�
...$14.912.67
$14,912.67
Harris & Associates
Q:\Nmpon Bcach\ADl03\repons \ad103 final rpt 8ju109.doc
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No, 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd 1 Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix B - Page 2
Appendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel Size (sf) Benefit Parcel Construction Incidental Financial Total
1744 PLAZA DELNORTE
94
048- 221 -30
2,500
t
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$7,795.38
113808.03
1748 PLAZA DEL NORTE
95
048- 221 -26
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1752 PLAZA DEL NORTE
96
048 - 221 -27
2,400
1
2.400
$10,793.24
$738.91
$1,72356
$13,255.71
City Median Park
97
048 -220 -01
12,500
0
0
$0.00
$0.60
$0.00
$0.00
1703 PLAZA DEL SUR
98
048 -222 -01
2.400
1
2,400
$10,793.24
$738.91
$1,72156
$13,255.71
1707 PLAZA DEL SUR
99
048 -222 -02
2.500
1
2,500
$11242.95
$769.70
$1,79538
$13,80803
1711 PLAZA DEL SUR
100
048 -222 -03
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1715 PLAZA DEL SUR
101
048 -222 -04
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1719 PLAZA DEL SUR
102
648 -222 -05
2.500
1
2,500
$17242.95
$769.70
..
$1.795.38
- _
$13,80 . . 8 8 .03
1723 PLAZA DEL SUR
103
048 -222 -06
2,500
t
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1725 PLAZA DEL SUR
104
048 -222 -07
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1731 PLAZA DEL SUR
105
048 -222 -08
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1735 PLAZA DEL SUR
106
048 -222 4)9
2.500
1
2,500
$11242.95
$76970
$1,79538
$1380803
1737 PLAZA DELSUR
_. - ... _
107
048- 222 -10
.. -. -.
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
1
1741 PLAZA DELSUR
108
Q48- 222 -11
2,500
1
$11,2_4295
-
-__ 8.
$13,808.03
7747 PLAZA DEL SUR
109
048 - 222 -32
2,500
1
- --
2,500
$11,242.95
_$76970
$769.70
.$1,79538
$1.795.38
$13,808.03
1757 PLAZA DEL SUR
110
1148- 222 -33
2,500
1
$11,242_95
$_76970
1753 PLAZA DEL SUR
111
048- 222 -34
2,600
1
_2,500
2,600
$11,692.67
_
$800.49
,$7179538
$1,867.19
._$13808.03
$_14,360.34
1755 PLAZA DEL SUR
... .. _.
112
048222 -35
2,700 -
12,700
812,14239
- $83127
$1,939.01
-- $14,912.67
1700MIRAMARDR
113
048 - 222 -27
28C0
1
2800
$1259211
$86206
$201082
. _..._-
.-.. $1546499
1706 MIRAMAR DR
114
048 - 222 -26
2.600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1.867.19
$14,360.34
.. 7710 MIRAMAR DR
715
048222 -25
2,700
1
$12,14239
$1,93901
1.
$14912.67
1714 MIRAMAR DR
116
048-222 -24
- .2,800 � - -..
.1
.- -6
2,800
$12,592.11
_$83127
$862.06
$2,010.82��
$15,464.99
W I Has & Associates
Q:Wcrvport BeachlAD l 0i4eporrs \ad 103 final rpt 8ju109.do
City Of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineers Report Appendix B - Page 3
Appendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total Confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel Size (sf) Benefit Parcel Construction Incidental Financial Total
Address No, Number Rounded Factor Area Costs Expenses Costs Assessment
123 D48- 222 -30 3,300 1 3,300
124 048 - 222 -28 3.400 - 7 3 400
7747 MIRAMAR DR __
140
048 -211 -08
2,500__
Y 2,500
$11,242.95
1
$1,795.38
$13,808_03
7757 MIRAMAR DR
141-
.._...__
048 - 211 -09-2,500
....._-
Y 2,500
.,-
$11,242.95_
$769.70
$1,79538
$13,808.03
__77SWAAIRAMARDft
742
_...1
048277 -70
2,509
_
1 2,500
$77,24295
$769.70
$7,79538
873,80803 --
..__ -_. _.. -1759 MIRAMAR DR
--
143
048 - 217 -11
2,500
_
1 2,500
$11,242.95
_
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
..... . -,1767 MIRAMAR DR
144
048- 211 -12
2,400 - --
1... ... 2,400
- $10,79324
- $73861
$1,72356 -
- 13255.71
7700E OCEAN BLVD
745
048 - 211 -39
3,000
7 3,000
$1349155
$9236a
$215445
$1656964
1705 E OCEANBLVD
146
048- 211 -40
2600
7 2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
1708
E OCEAN
BLVD
147
648 - 21143
2.666
1
2600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
.1774E
OCEAN
BLVD
148
068- 211 -22
26001
- 2600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.79
$14,360.34
1716TOCEAN
BLVD
149
048. 211 -21
2600
1
2,660
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,86719
$14,360.34
1720
E OCEAN
BLVD
150
048- 211 -20
2,600
1
2600
$11,69257
$800.48
$186719
$1436034
1726
E OCEAN
BLVD
151
048 -211A9
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
1730E
OCEAN
BLVD
152
048- 211 -18
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
_ $80048
$186719
$1436034
1732
E OCEAN
BLVD
153
048- 21147
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867,19
$14,360.34
1738
E OCEAN
BLVD
154
048- 211 -30
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.0
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
1740
E OCEAN
BLVD
155
048 - 211 -32
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,36034
1746E
OCEAN
BLVD
156
048- 211 -31
2,600
1
2600
$11, 692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
1756E
OCEAN
BLVD
157
048- 211 -25
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$80048
$186719
$7436034
1754E
OCEAN
BLVD
158
048- 211 -15
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
1756
E OCEAN
BLVD
159
048 - 211 -14
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
1760E
OCEAN
BLVD
160
048- 211 -13
3,000
1
3,000
$13,491.55
$923.64
$2,154.45
$16.569.64
2000
E OCEAN
BLVD
161
048 - 261 -30
3,200
1
3,200
$14,396.98
$985.21
$2,29806
$17,674.27
2004
E OCEAN
BLVD
162
048- 261 -29
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
2008
E OCEAN
BLVD
163
048- 261 -28
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,86719
$14,360.34
2012
E OCEAN
BLVD
164
048- 261 -33
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867,19
$14,360.34
2016
E OCEAN
BLVD
165
048- 261 -34
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,86719
$14,360.34
2020
E OCEAN
BLVD
_
166
048- 261 -31
2,600
1
_
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
2024
E OCEAN
BLVD
167
_
648 - 261 -32
2600
t
... _.. _
2,600
_
$11,692.67
$800.48
,..
$1,867.19
_.
$14,360,34
2028
E OCEAN
BLVD
168
_69
048- 261 -25
2 600 ...
7
2,600
$11,692 67
$800 48
$1,86719
. _._.
$14 360 3A
_ 2032
E OCEAN
BLVD
169
048- 261 -24
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
_
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
2036E
OCEAN
BLVD
170
048- 261 -23
2,600
1
2,600
$11,69267
$800.48
$1,86719
$14,360.34
2040
E OCEAN
BLVD
171
048 - 261 -22
2,600
1
2,600
$1169267
$80048
$186719
$1436034
2044EOCEAN
. ... ._.
BLVD
172
048- 261 -21
2600
1
$11,692.67
$1,86719
$14,360.34
2050E
OCEAN
BLVD
173
048261 -20
2600
1
_2,600
2,600
$11,69267
_$80048
$80048
_
$1,86719
2052
E OCEAN
BLVD
174
048- 261 -19
2,600
1
2,600
$11.692.67
_
$800.48
$1,86719
_$14360.34
$14,360.34
M I Harris & Associates
QANewpon BeacMAD1035cpons1ad103 Final rp78ju109.doc
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix B - Page 4
Appendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel SlIelsf) Benefit Parcel construction incidental Financial Total
Address No. Number Rounded Factor Area Costs Exoenses Costs Assessment
-09
100
M Harris & Associates
Q:V,le%vporI Beach\AD1034epmts%adl03 final rpt Rju]Wdoc " I
322LST
199
-
048- 048- 252 -13
- -
2,1 W
-,-
1
-
2100
--
$9,444.08
- --
$1 1,S874
s
324LST
200
048-252-19
1.400
1
T, Zow
.-E
� :o5
326 L ST
201
048-252-18
1,400
1,400-
..
$6,29605
$431.03
$1,005.41
$7,732.49
........
-T3U-CST
-M
64ii--iUL05
Ziii�
I
ziiob
$12,592 11
t7i 5,4C4 99
...
........ ......
332 L ST
203
048-252-21
1,800
1
1,800
$8,094.93
$556.18 -
$1,292.67
$9.941.78
334 L ST
204
045-252-20
2,100
1
2,100
$9444.08
$646.54
$1.508.12
$11.598.74
._._338.
T
048-252-03
3.200
1
$14.390.98
$985.21
0.2EI8.0.8
07,674.27
-L-S ... .. .....
340 LST
.2.05
206
048-252-02
2.100
1
.31,2100
2,100
$9.444.08
$646.54
$1,508.12
$11,598.74
BAL66A BLVD
-20
648-252 -1 7
2.600
i
2.600
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
04,3i30.341
2669E
BALBOA BLVD
648-M-i6
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$800.4 1 8 -
$1.867.19
$14,360.34
429
BELVUE LN
209
048-251-21
5,000
1
5,000
$22.485.91
$1,539.39
$3,590.75
$27,616.05
4278iECVWf
LN
210
048- 251 -22
4,666-
1
4,606
$17.988.73
s1,231.51
$2,87260
$22,092.84
425
BELVUE LN
211
048-251-23
4,000
1
4.000
$17,988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
$22.092.84
Q3
ML\idil EN
m
048- 251 -24 1
4,000
1
4,060
$17.988.73
$1.231.51
V872.60
$22.092.84
421
BELVUE LN
m
048-251 -25
4,000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1,231.61
$2,672.60
$22,092.84
419
BELVUE EN
214
048-251-26
4,000
1
4,006
$17.98873
$1.231.51
$2,972k0
$22,092.84
417
BELVUE LN
215
048 - 251 -27
4.000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1 231.51
$2,872.60
t2209284
415
BELVUE LN
216
048-251-28
4.000
1
4,000
$17.988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
$22,092.84
413
-ZIITRLVU�LN
BEUVUE LN
217
648-251-29
4,000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
$22,092.84
218
648-251*-*30
4,000
1
4.000
$17,988.73*
$1.231.51
. $2,872.60
$22.092.84
409
BELVUE LN
219
048-251-31
4,006
1
4.000
$17.988.73
$1,231.51
$2.872.60
$22,092.94
407
BELVUE LN
220
049-251-32
4,000
1
4,000
$17.988.73
$1.231,51
$2.872.60
$22,092.84
405
BELVUE LN
221
048- 251 -33
4,000
1
4,600
$17.988.73
$1,231.51
$2872.60
$22,09284
403
BELVUE LN
222
048-251-07
4,0()0
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1,231.51
$2872.60
$22,092.84
401
BELVUE LN
223
048-251-06
6.100
0.83
6.083
$22,859.18
$1,564.95
$3650.36
$28,074.49
466
DifMIE C14
224
048-25-1-37
5,800
i
5,800
$26.663.65
$1,785:70
$4,165.27
$32,034.62
T26
BELVUE LN
225
646-251-38
5,200
1
5,200
$23,385.35
$1,600.97
$3,734,38
M,720.70
424
BELVUE UN
jLR------M-
226
1
-5.000
U2,48-5.91
$1,539.39
$3,�90.75,
$27,616.05.
Ii22
BELVUE
-64-8251-555,Yff
i
spao
$iz-j,86.61
tl.53MS ..
.... $3690.75
$27,616.05
74266CEILTEUN--
4.000
i
4,000
$77,988.73
t1.231.51
S2,872.66
t22.092.84-
416
BELVUE EN
229
048-251-15
4,000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
V2,092.61
418BELVUELN
230
048-251-16
4.000
1
4,000
$17.988.73
$1,231.51
$2,872.60
$22.092.84
41413
-ZlTi3ELVUIECM
- ELVUE LN
231
k4 -M L17
4,000
-
i
'000
$17,988 . .....
.73
-- I .......... ...
.... .. I -
$2.872.60
---- ----- --
$22,092.84
--8
TK
048-251-18
4,000
1
4,000
$17,988.73
.$1.23151.
$1,231.51
$2.672.66
-W2.092.84
M Harris & Associates
Q:V,le%vporI Beach\AD1034epmts%adl03 final rpt Rju]Wdoc " I
City of Newport Beach July 26, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St! E Balboa Blvd / Channel Rd l Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix B - Page 5
Appendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total Confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel Size (at) Benefit Parcel Construction Incidental Financial Total
Address No. Number Rounded Fartnr Area Costs Fxunnses Costs Assessment
-- 400 BELVUE LN �
- 238
048 -251 -05
5,200
- -0.83 4,333
$19,48629
$1,334.04
$3,111.74
$23,932.077
2025E 8ALBOA BLVD
239
-28
3.200
1 3,200
$14,39098
$98521
12,29808
$7787427 - - -
2031EBALBOA BLVD
240
_048272
048 4272 -29
3,200
1 3,200
- $14,390.98
-$ 985.21 - - --
$2,2.08 --
98
$17,674.27 -
445 SEVILLE AVE
241
048 - 272 -20
2,800
1 2,800
$12,592.11
$862.06
$2,010.82
$15,464.99
2026 MIRAMAR DR
259
048 - 272 -17
2,500
1 -
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70 --
$1,795.38----
_$13,8D6.03_ -
2032 MIRAMAR DR
260
048- 272 -i6-
2,500
i -
-- 2,500 -
$11,242.95
$ 769.70
$1.795.38
2034 MIRAMAR DR
261
qae- 272 -15
2.500
i
2,500
$11,242.95
$76970
$1,795.36
$i 3.808.03
2038 MIRAMAR OR
262
048- 272 -14
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.36
$13,808.03
.. .. 2042 MIRAMAR DR
263
048. 272 -13
2,700
i
060
$12,14239
$831.27
$1,939.01
$14,912.67
448 SEVILLE AVE
264
048- 271 -30
2,806
1
2,800
$12,592.11
$862.06
$2,010.82
$15.464.99
2037E BA160ABLVD
26$
048- 271 -29
2,800
1.
2,800
- $12,592.11
$862.06
$2,010.82
$15.464.99
444 SEVILLE AVE
266
048- 271 -17
2,500
1
2,500
$11.242.95
$769.70
$1795.38
$13,608.03
440 SEVILLE AVE
267
048 - 271 -28
3,100
1
3,100
$13,941.26
$954.42
$2,226.27
$17,121.95
36
4 SEVILLE AVE
268
048- 271 -26
3,106
.... 1.
3,100
$13,94Uii
54.
$942
$2,226.27
$17,121.95
432SEVILLEAVE
269
048 - 271 -25
3,100
1
3,100
$13,941.26
$954.42
$2,226.27
$17,121.95
424 SEVILLE AVE
270
048- 271 -27
3,100
1
3,100
$13,941.26
$954.42
$17,121.95
420 SEVILLE AVE
271
048- 271 -14
2,506
1
2,506
$11,242.95_
$769.70
,$2,226.27
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
4165EVILLE AVE
272
048 - 271 -13
2,500
1,
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
412 SEVILLE AVE
273
048- 271.21
3,706
1
3,700
$10639.57
$1,139.15
$2,657.16
$20,435.88
408 SEVILLE AVE
274
048 - 271.23
2300
1
2,300
$10,343.52
$708.12
$1,651.75
$12,703.39
402 SEVILLE AVE
275
048 - 271 -31
3,200
0.83
2,667
$11,993.98
$821.11
$1,915.31
$14,730.40
2041 E BAL BOA BLVD
276
048- 271 -19
2,860
1
2,800
$12,592.11
$862.06
$2,010.82
$15,464.99
449 M ST
277
048 -271 01
2,700
1
2,700
$12,142.39
$831.27
$1,939.01
$14,912.67
445 MST
278
048 -27102
4,900
1
4,900
$22,036.19
$1,508.60
$3,518.94
$27,063.73
441 MST
279
048 -271 -03
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
433 MST
280
046- 271 -32
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
. 429 MST _
281
048- 271 -33
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
.__ 425MST
282
..
048 -271 -05
2,500
1
2,500
$1.1,242.95
$76970
$1,79538
$13808.03
421MST
048 -271 -06
....
4,900
1
4,900
_
$22,036.19
$1,50860
$3,51894
-- 63.73
$270
409MST
__283
264
048 -2710
4,700
1
$21,13675
$3,37531
$2595909
405MST
285
048 -271 -08
2,300
_4,7_00_
$10,343.52
_$1,44703
$708.12
$1,651.75
_
$12,703.39
2046 SEVILLE AVE
286
048 -271 -09
3,600
_
0. - 33
_2,300
1,200
$5,396.62
$369.45
$867.79
$6,627.85
2101 E BALBOA BLVD
287
048 -302 -01
3,300
1
3,300
$14,840.70
$1,016.00
$2,369.90
$18,226.60
_ 2105 E BALBOA BLVD
288
048 -302 -02
3,000
1
3,000
$13,491.55
$923.64
$2,154.45
$16,569.64
- 2109E BALBOA BLUD
_.
289
048 -302 -03
3000
1
_
3,000
$13,49155
$92364
_ _
2715E BALBOA BLVD
290
048 -302 -04
3,000
1
3,000
$13,491.55
$923.64
„$2,15445
$2,154.45
_$16,56964
$16569.64
= I Harris & Associates
Q:Wempon BeachLAD 1034epons\ad 103 final rpt 8jul09.doc
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St 1 E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd 1 Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix B - Page 6
Appendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total Confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel Size (so Benefit Parcel Construction Incidental Financial Total
Address No. Number Rounded Factor Area Costs E.,anses Costs Assessment
2137 CHANNEL RD 296 048- 302 -10 3,000 1 3,000 $13,491.55 $923.64 $2.154.45 $16,569.64
-._
2140 GRANADA AVE 297 048- 302 -11 3300 1 3,300 $14,84070 $101600 $236990 $18,226.60
.._... ,___ _----__... -- . _. �......, .__.._. ....__._. -
2100 SERRANO AVF 29R OdR- 309 -17 d.Ofxt- 1 d OnitA17 ORR �? 4t X31 F1 A9 R79 RO A99 ❑99 Pd
.._......._- ._......_�...
.. 2112
.2118
SEVILLE AVE
SEVILLE AVE
_314_048_297
375
91- '- __...._...
-24
048- 291 -25
2,500
_ _..
2,500
- 1
1
2,500
--
2,500
$11,24295
$11,242.95
- $769,70
$769.70
_$1.795.38
$1.795_38
$73608,03
$73808.03
5EVILLE AVE_
_. 316
048 - 291 -75
2,500
1
2,500
_
$769.70
$1,795,38-
_
$13,808.03
2724
SEVILLE AVE
317
048 - 291 -14
2,500 --
1-
,._2,500 _--
2,500
__$1242.95
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38-----
$13,808.03 -
2126SEVILLEAVE
.. .,
$13,808.03
318
048- 291 -13 ..............
.500
.. ...
1
2,500
..._.._._.,....._._......
$17,24295
.
$76970
...__.._._._.___...._..........
$1,795.38
_._...._._...
$13.808.03
2132
SEVILLE AVE
379
048 -291x2
2.900
1
2,900
$13,041.83
_
$892.85
$2.062.64
116,07 Z32
2201
....
CHANNEL RD
320
048 -297 -06
3.000
1
3,000
$13,491.55
$923,64
$2,154.45
$16,569.64
2205
CHANNEL Rp
321
.. ..
048291 -07
2.800
7
2,800
$72,592.71
$862.06
$2,07082
$15,46499
2209
CHANNEL RD
322
048 -291 -08
2.800
$13,808.03
2,800
$12,592.71
$862.06
$2,010.82
$75,464.99
2273
CHANNEL RD
320
04829.09
_
21800
_1
1
_
2,800
$12,5.92.11
$862.06
$2,01082$15,464.99
-048- 292 -27
2107 SEVILLE AVE
326
048- 292 -28
2,900
.. 1-
2,900
$13,041.83
$89285
$2,08264
$16017.32
2105 SEVILLE AVE
327
048 - 292 -29
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,79538
$13,808.03
2109 SEVILLE AVE
328
048 -292 -02
2,500
7
2,500
$11,242.95
069.70
$1.79538
$13,808.03
2113 SEVILLE AVE
329
1148 -292 -03
2.500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1.795.38
$13,808.03
2117 SEVILLE AVE
330
048- 292{14
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70$1,795.38
$13,808.03
..
2121 SEVILLE AVE
331
048 -292 -05
2,500
t
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
- ...
$73,808.03
_ _
2127 SEVILLE AVE
332
048 -292 -06
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
2129 SEVILLE AVE
333
046 -292 -07
2,500
1
21500
$11242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
$13,808.03
2133 SEVILLE AVE
334
-048- 292 -27
2.700
1
2,700
$12,142.39
$831.27
$1,939.01
$14,912.67
2137 SEVILLE AVE
335
048- 292 -26
2.700
1
2,700
$12,742.39
$831.27
$1,939.01
$14,912.67
2141 SEVILLE AVE
336
048- 292 -32
2,700
1
2,700
$12,142.39
$831.27
$1,939.01
$14,912.67
2145 SEVILLE AVE
337
048- 292 -33
2,700
1
2,700
$12,142.39
$831.27
$1,939.01
$14,912.67
2149 SEVILLE AVE
338
048-292 -10
3,000
1
3,000
$13,491,55
$923.64
$2.154.45
$16,569.64
2100 MIRAMAR DR
339
043- 292 -25
2,600
1
2,600
$11,692.67
$600.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
2104 MIRAMAR DR
_340
048- 292 -24
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$76930
$129538
$13,808.03
2108 MIRAMAR DR
341
046-292-23
2,500
1
2,500
$17,242.95
$769.70
$7,795 38
_ _...3
$13,808.03
.2112 MIRAMAR DR
342
04829222
_
2500
_
1
2,500
$11,24295
$76970
$1,79538
$13,808.03
2116 MIRAM19AR DR
343
048292 -27
_
2,666
1
2,500
$11,24295
$76970
$1,79538
_
$13808.03
_
2120 MIRAMAR DR -
344
048- 292 -Z0
2,500
1
2,500
$11,242.95
$769.70
$1,795.38
_
$13,808.03
2724 MIRAMAR DR
345
048- 292-19
2.100
1
2,100
$9,444.08
$646.54
$1,508.12
$71,5904
2126 MIRAMAR DR
346
048- 292 -18
2,100
1
2,100
$9,444.08
$646.54
$_1,508.12
$11,598.74
2126 MIRAMAR OR
347
048- 292 -77
-2-'.-1 00
1
2,100
$9,444,08
$646.64
$1,508 12
$11.598.74
30
21 P41RAMAR OR
348
__
048- 292 -35
2,100
1
2,100
$9,4.08
M
$646.54
$1,508.12
$11,598.74
Hams & Associates
Q 1NeAvpnn Beach1AD 103Vera ns1ad 103 final rpt 8ju109.doc
City of Newport Beach July 28, 2009
Underground Utility Assessment District No. 103 (G St I E Balboa Blvd I Channel Rd I Ocean Blvd)
Final Engineer's Report Appendix B - Page 7
Appendix B - Assessment Calculations
Assessor's Parcel Assessed Total Confirmed
Property Asmt Parcel Size (sf) Benefit Parcel Construction Incidental Financial Total
Address No. Number Rounded Facfor Area Costs Exnenees Costs Assessment
2150 MIRAMAR DR 353 048- 292 -12 2,300 1 2,300 $10,343.52 $708.12 $1,651.75 $12,703.39
_ ....... ......... 48 .1.- .._.. -, --. _
2265 CHANNEL RD_ _ 354 046 - 292 -11 2,600 _ _ 0.83 _ 2,167 $9,745.39 $667.17 $1,556.23 __$11,968.79
2101 MIRAMAR DR- 755 048 -281 -01 3,000 1 3,000 $13,491.55 $923.64 $2,154.45 $16,569.64
19
2704 E
OCEAN
BLVD
372
048 - 281 -29
2,600
_ 1
$11,692.67
$800.48_
$14,360.34
_2110 E
OCEANBLVO
373
_048- 281 -28
2,600
1
_2,600 __.-
$11,692.67
$800.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
_ .2112E
OCEAN
BLVD
374_
Q48287 -27
2600
1
__2,600
$11,69267___$80048
_
$1436034__
2118 E
OCEAN
BLVD
375
048- 281 -26
__
1
_2,600
2,600
$860.48
_$186719
$1,867.19
2720E
OCEAN
_...
BLVD
376
048- 281 -25
__2,660
2 -.-
..- __2,600
_$11,692.67
_ $11,692.67
- $600.48 -
$1,867.19
_$14,360.34
$14,360.34
2124 E
OCEAN
BLVD
377
048- 281 -24
2 ,600
1 -
- 2,600
$11 692
67
$866.48
$1,867.19
$14,360.34
2128 E
.. ... ..
OCEAN
BLVD
__...
378
048- 281 -39
3,300
1
3,300
$14,840.70
$1,016.00
$2,369.90
$18,226.60
2132 E
OCEAN
BLVD
379
048- 281 -21
_ _ ..
3,300
7
1
1.3.00..
3,300
......_..14......0.7._..
$14,840.76
..6.
$1,076.00
$2,369.90
......
$18,226.60
2140 E
OCEAN
BLVD
380
048 - 281 -20
3,10D
1
3,100
$1394126
$954.42
$2,226.27
$17,121.95
2144 E
OCEAN
BLVD
381
048- 281 -19
4333_
4 700
1
._
4,700
3333._...._....
$21,136.75
...
$1 647.03
$3,375.37
$25,959.09
2152 E
OCEAN
BLVD
382
048 - 281 -18
4,300
1
4,300
$19,337.88
$1,323.88
$3,088.05
$23.749.81
2156 E
OCEAN
13..33-.
BLVD
383
048 -281 -33
3,000
1
3,000
$13,491.55
$923.64
$2,154.45
$16.569.64
2760 E
OCEAN
BLVD
384
048 - 281 -34
3,600
1
... 3333.
3.600
......-........._....
$16,189.85
$1,108.36
$2,585.34
$19,883.55
2164 E
OCEAN
BLVD
385
048- 281 -16
3,800
1
3,800
$1,169.94
$2,728.97
$20,988.20
2291 CHANNEL RD
386
048- 281 -15
4,500
1
4 ,500
_$17,089.29
$20,237.32
$1,385.45
$3,231.68
$24,854.45
Hams & Associates
QANewpon BaicMA0103hccrorisWI03 final rpt 8ju109.doc
EFFECT ON
I
City of Newport Beach
BUDGET AMENDMENT
2009 -10
BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE:
Increase Revenue Estimates
Increase Expenditure Appropriations AND
Transfer Budget Appropriations
SOURCE:
from existing budget appropriations
from additional estimated revenues
PX from unappropriated fund balance
EXPLANATION:
NO. BA- 10BA -004
AMOUNT: F$5,847,356 .00
AIncrease in Budgetary Fund Balance
Decrease in Budgetary Fund Balance
No effect on Budgetary Fund Balance
This budget amendment is requested to provide for the following:
To increase revenue estimates and expenditure appropriations for proposed Assessment District #103 the area
generally bounded by G Street, E. Balboa Boulevard Channel Road, and Ocean Boulevard for undergrounding
utilities.
ACCOUNTING ENTRY:
BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE
Amount
Fund Account Description Debit Credit
4103 3605 AD #103 Fund - Fund Balance $276,800.00
REVENUE ESTIMATES (3601)
Fund /Division Account Description
4103 6961 AD #103 - Bond Sale $5,847,356
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS (3603)
Automatic System Entry .
Signed: c- -!2-7
Financial Approval: Administvaive Services Director — Dat
Signed:
Signed:
Manager Da
City Council Approval: City Clerk Date
Description
Division
Number
74103
Assessment District #103
Account
Number
9801
AD Electric
$3,053,100.00
Account
Number
9801
AD Electric
($678,621.00)
Account
Number
9802
AD Phone
$992,998.00
Account
Number
9804
AD Street Rehabilitation
$1,000,000.00
Account
Number
9805
AD Construction Contingency
$459,866.00
Account
Number
9811
AD Phone Design
$25,000.00
Account
Number
9813
AD Construction Inspection
$75,000.00
Account
Number
9814
AD City Administration
$100,000.00
Account
Number
9815
AD Underwriter's Discount
$77,759.00
Account
Number
9816
AD Capitalized Interest
$357,693.00
Account
Number
9817
AD Bond Counsel
$25,000.00
Account
Number
9818
AD Paying Agent Fees
$3,000.00
Account
Number
9819
AD Filing Fees
$5,000.00
Account
Number
9820
AD Printing, Advertising, Notices
$10,000.00
Account
Number
9822
AD Disclosure Counsel
$20,000.00
Account
Number
9823
AD Financial Advisor
$15,000.00
Account
Number
9825
AD Incidental Contingency
$26,761.00
Account
Number
9827
AD Dissemination Agent
$3,000.00
Automatic System Entry .
Signed: c- -!2-7
Financial Approval: Administvaive Services Director — Dat
Signed:
Signed:
Manager Da
City Council Approval: City Clerk Date
City of Newport Beach
Utility Underground Assessment District No. 103
ASSESSMENT BALLOT TABULATION RESULTS
Total of
Ballots Received
No. of Ballots: X8(0
Ascot Amt: $ T 31 147.
Ballots tabulated by:
Total
"Yes" Ballots
No. of Ballots: l50
Ascot Amt: $ 2t`i9 93q3
Ascot Amt
Percent Yes: 530/4)
Hafts &s�Associates
Joan E. Cox, P.E., Project Manager
Date: .Tz je - 200
(' 1),wumcnts and %clunp%('arulMl) sktoptKPB 103 Vota •ballot nnuRs form by ascot doc
Total
"No" Ballots
No. of Ballots: 13(c
Ascot Amt: $ 2t17Li� S`1
Ascot Amt
Percent No: '-!7 'yo
NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT AS DEPUTY CITY CLERK
Notice is hereby given that Iris Lee is appointed Deputy City Clerk effective July 28,
2009. This appointment shall continue until July 29, 2009 and is for the purpose of
tabulating ballots for proposed Assessment District No. 103 at the City Council meeting
of July 28, 2009.
�&- S.
Leilani 1. Brown, eity Clerk
71 z°1 °�
Date �