The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12 - C-3369 - Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard Intersection ImprovementsCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT Agenda Item No. 12 June 24, 2003 TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department Fong Tse, Associate Civil Engineer 949 - 644 -3311 ftse@city.newport-beach.ca.us SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD /MACARTHUR BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 3369 RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Approve the plans and specifications. 2. Approve Negative Declaration. 3. Award Contract No. 3369 to Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. for the Total Bid Price of $1,440,944.80, and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute the contract. 4. Establish an amount of $144,055.20 to cover the cost of unforeseen work. 5. Approve a Budget Amendment appropriating an additional $505,880 to Contributions Account No. 7251- C5100584 and increasing revenue estimates by $505,880 in Circulation and Transportation Fund Revenues Account No. 250- 4858. 6. Approve a Budget Amendment appropriating $70,000 from the unappropriated balance of the Transportation and Circulation Fund to Account No. 7261 - 05100584. DISCUSSION: At 11:00 AM on May 14, 2003, the City Clerk opened and read the following bids for this project: BIDDER TOTAL BID AMOUNT Low Hillcrest Contracting, Inc. of Corona $1,440,944.80 2 Sequel Contractors, Inc. of Santa Fe Springs $1,534,675.00 3 Palp, Inc. of Long Beach $1,743,451.00 4 Los Angeles Engineering, Inc. of Rosemead $1,852,609.30 Subject: Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements — Award of Contract No. 3369 June 24, 2003 Page: 2 The low total bid amount is six percent below the Engineer's Estimate of $1,540,000. The low bidder, Hillcrest Contracting, Inc., possesses a General Engineering "A" contractor's license as required by the project specifications. Hillcrest has completed similar projects for other Southern California agencies. The work will widen the portion of northbound MacArthur Boulevard between Jamboree Road and Fairchild Road to facilitate the space needed to add a left -tum lane at Jamboree Road for both directions and to add a northbound right -turn lane at Jamboree Road, thus increasing intersection capacity and improving the level of service for existing and future traffic. To accommodate the roadway widening and traffic realignment, retaining walls, various utility relocations, PCC sidewalks, asphalt concrete pavement, a traffic signal, and a street lighting system will be constructed next to the Centerpointe Business Center within the City of Irvine. The existing raised median islands on MacArthur Boulevard adjacent to the intersection will be reconstructed and realigned. The southbound Jamboree Road right -turn lane and the adjacent traffic island at MacArthur Blvd will be reconstructed to improve traffic flow. The existing curb -side bus stop along northbound MacArthur Boulevard in front of the Koll Center will be replaced with a new mid -block bus "turn-out" pocket. New landscaping, irrigation system, various drainage facilities, and pavement striping and markings will be constructed throughout the work limits. This project was approved by the Orange County Transportation Authority for competitive Intersection Improvement Program (IIP) funds under the Combined Transportation Funding Program. The IIP will fund up to $642,742 for the construction work and up to $87,600 for administrative, testing, and inspection services. In addition, since the improvements are within both the City of Newport Beach and the City of Irvine, the City of Irvine has agreed, through a Cooperative Agreement, to reimburse the City of Newport Beach for their portion of the project costs, up to $722,000 for construction and up to $98,500 for administrative and inspection services. Environmental Review The City of Irvine prepared the Initial Study and the Negative Declaration (without mitigation measures) document, which is attached. It was posted by the County Clerk on September 21, 2001. The public review period ended on October 24, 2001. No public comments were received. Funding Availability-. Staff originally budgeted $314,620 for the contribution from the City of Irvine and now requests a Budget Amendment appropriating an additional $505,880 to Account No. 7251 - 05100584 for the total $820,500 to be reimbursed by the City of Irvine. subject: Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements —Award of Contract No. 3369 June 24, 2003 Page: 3 A second Budget Amendment is recommended to appropriate an additional $70,000 from the unappropriated balance of the Transportation and Circulation Fund to Account No. 7261- C5100584. Upon approval of the recommended Budget Amendments, there will be sufficient funds available in the following accounts for the work: Account Description Circulation and Transportation Contribution from City of Irvine Intersection Improvement Program Prepared by: r Fon se Associate Civil Engineer Account Number 7261- C5100584 7251- C5100584 7284- C5100584 Total Attachments: Project Location Map Bid Summary Initial Study and Negative Declaration Budget Amendment Submitted by: Amount $220,273.00 $721,985.00 $642,742.00 $1,585,000.00 ;n G. Bdda rfi Works Director CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TITLE: Jamboree Rd/MaeArthur Blvd Intersection Improvements BID LOCATION: City Clerk's Office - City Hall CONTRACT NO.: 3369 DATE: May 14, 2003 TIME: 11:00 AM ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: $1,540,000.00 BY: Fong Tee PROJECT MANAGER: Fong Tee f: \Usem\pbw\shareMcontract100.01 \\BID SUMMARY FORM.xIs Page 1 Engineer's Estimate Hillcrest Contractin .Inc. ULbL;KIP I lUN ULAN I AMU NI UNIT AMOUR I 1 o ilas ion 1 L 60 000.00 2 ra is Control 1 L 5 000.0 3 Construction Advisory it, 1 S 3000.00 4 urvev Services 1 L 17,500.00 leannq and rubbing 1 L 500.00 r. UU. du, .uu 6 Unclassme Excavation 3680 40.00 7 Curb 8 24' Gutter 11 L 5.00 [ .ui . 18.001 8 8" CC Curb Media to Huu Curb 8 12 utter (Median) 472 L 23.00 10 8 PL MnO-Tied Curb 12- Gutter elan 402 IT- 23.0 11 4 " Stamped olored ncrele Median 2 6 8.00 1 4' ida alk 8588 4.50 .Uu 13 4' Thick T assage a 117 13.00 14 PCC Curb Ram ase 750. u. u . Cum Ramp -as 2 750.00 1 16 Modified Mid- lock us Tumoul 50 F 18.00 t r. UU.UU b.UU 17 Asphalt Concrete 0.2' 30 TN 52.0 u.uu 220.0-0 18 Asphalt Concrete 635 T 52.00 19 As halt oncrete 1.5' Deep Li 864 N 5 [ .uu bi, u.0 20 Aggregale B 2.0' 4 N 48.00 1 Gola Plane 2- minimum & Var AC Overlay 356 1.00 . U 22 ISIurrV Se at T II 13030 S 1.00 .0 u. ,[a . u 23 SWdura ncrele Pli ace wall l4 323 uy 400.00 I [ .[uu.uu -T 47M 4 Wall Drainage and bUbOram 6vstem Spli ace a ace Block - Retwall L 8 0 0.00 aouuu.uU 25 oncre a Masonry 16' SPIT 795 S 45.00 i[. .0 26 Concrete Masonry 2" SPlifface Block - Retwall 2370 SF 40. 001 ZW4,5uu.0 ncrele Masonry U tiplinace Block - Retwall 0 30 .00 1. 2 12" PC Wall Utter 660 L 15.00 uu. uu.uu 29 Cable Railin Vin I ogled 660 LF 30. UU. i. 0 112- IRWD Water ine elocalion 5 L 150.05 U. 31 4 Private ewer Force Main Relocation Cenlerpom e 5 80.00 lructural Concrete i n wall 8 Y 500. uu. 33 all Drainage and ubdrain Yslem Sign Wall 1 L 1,5 0.00 34 Conc Masonry 16" Precision Block 7.b Hi h ilasler 1 LS 1 000. .uuU.UU 1 one Masonry 16" Precision lock 4.0' High Pilaster 1 L 744.00 u.uu u. Conc Masonry 1 "Precision Bloc - i n all 122 7 one Masonry 8 recision Block - ign all 4 20.00 38 LIP Stone Veneer Sign wall) 225 S 0.00 39 12' RCP Storm Drain It 500 -D 60 LF 1 75. 1k .0 y 40 I 18- R P Storm Drain 0 63 LF I 100.00 urb Inlet O - .5' NB Std. 306-L) 3 3,5 .00 bu .uu 42 u Intel I YPe UL - 14' Std. 306 -L 1 4.800.001 43 lCurto Inlet TYPe 11 - 7.5'ICOI Stoll. 30 1 FA 4,20 . Z41zuu.uu tW0.013 44 econs ruct 12- bg C.. Inlet Drain Fibs 1 50.00 zb2bu.uu 4 Curb Intel YPe II - 14' I Std. 300 3 FA 4.800.001 46 Curb Intel II - 21' Lou I Std. 300 2 5,400.00 1 u, uu.0 Junction Slr. No. 1 OI Sld. 306 2 EA 4,5 .0 $7-00-um 48 Concrete oltar CNBSld.313- 4 L600.00 uu. 4 Junction Slr. No. 1 ld. 310 -L 4 FA 4,5 .00 u . 0 Concrete Encase enl over Pipe 80 L 80.00 U. [b.uu 51 AMUS Reconstruct MH Frame over to Grade 45 .00 auu.uu 2 luonstruct Steel Manhole Urb Plate Assembly 1 LS 750.00 luuu.uu 53 Re oca e A us Water Valve Frame and Cover to Grade (Cathodic 30 .00 Uu.uu 54 Replace 1 FV Valve and Riser to rode 1 300.00 uu.uu u bb A01US 4- Valve Frame and Cover to Grade 1 300.0 6 Relocate /Modify 4" Blowoff Riser Assembly 1 L 3.500.001 57 Relocate and Modify 2" I W ARVR Assembly 1 L 2, 0. 0 8 Furnish an Install 1 Cooper Reclaimed Water Service 1 EA 5 .00 ,buu.uu .[u . 59 Furnish and Install 2' Reclaimed Water Service 1 A 3. 00. buu.uu ,b .UU Relocate an Install 2' Reclaimed Water Service 1 3,500.00 �, u .uu (jbuu.uu 591= 61 Street Ligh System ewPort Beach 1 LS 10.000.001 uu.uu heel Light Svs em rvme 1 15, 00.00 63 Traffic Signing 8 lnpmo 1 L 10.0 0.00 u 64 Inhalation System i o Newport Beac 1 8.000.00 ,uu . 65 Irrigation tem ( ity of rvme 1 L 52 000.00 b.VVI Z.500.09 uuuu.uu Topsoil Bac III or Planlinq 11 0 CY 67- Landscape Planlinq City of Newport each 1 L ,000.00 4 aa.uuu.UU 6 Landscape Planlinq ludy or Irvine 1 LS 62 9 91)-day Plant - Establishment an Maintenance Newport Beach 1 3,200.00 90-day Plant Establishment and Maintenance Irvine an enlerppi 1 LS 4,2 0.00 U. U s, uu. 1 1 raric blqnal Modification 125 000.00 2 Temp 6' hain Link Safety Fence I Lb 5,000.00 u [, As -Built Plans 1 954.00 EE 1 $1,540,000.00 1 LOW 1 $1.440,944.80 f: \Usem\pbw\shareMcontract100.01 \\BID SUMMARY FORM.xIs Page 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TITLE: ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: PROJECT MANAGER: Tee f:\ users \pbwlshared \contract\00 -01 \\BID SUMMARY FORM.xIs Page 2 Se uel Contractors. Inc. Excel Pa vin Company ry JUAN I I I T UN 1 1 HMUUry UNI XMUUNI 1 Mobilization 1 L qu Traffic Control 1 = 3 Construction Advisorv, SIqn 1 LS ouuu.uul MUL"J.'Ju .0 4 --- LSurveY bervices 1 L 5 Cleannq and Grubbinq 1 L-9 10BOU0.130 6 Unclassified Excavation 36 Y 7 urb 824' utter 116 i5. ____1 9708M. 11 8 P Curb Median 738 a. 6' C Curb 12" utter Median 472 LF .uu r. 1 Mooned Curb 12' utter (Median) 402 LF 5• 1 4' am d olore oncrel Median 7 o. e 1 4 "PCC idewalk 8588 S e,r 1 4' Thick P C e' ' P Passage a 1 F .0 a5g5. 14 1 P Curb m Case 2 1 Curb Kamp Lease E 2 EA ,4 1 died Mid -Block Bus umout 95 SF a. u r. 1 Asphalt Concrete 10.2') 30 N al. n 1 halt Concrete .6 635 N a . [ . 1 As halt oncrete 1.5' Deep 864 N 50.00 .[u . 2 Aggreqate B s (2.09 2043 N •a 21 Cold lane 2" minimum Var AC vedav 3569 SF .uu Zz lu Seal T II 1303 Y .5 2 iruc'ural 'e 323 CY eo• 24 Wall Drainage and Subdrain SYstem Di ace Wall 1 LS ncre'e MasonrY 16" bmatace lock- Retwall 26 oncrete Mason ry 12" Splitlace Block- Rewall 2370 4r•4 2 rate Mason 8' li ace Block - Retwall 3200 SF 8 12" PC Wall utter 660 LF 2 ble Rail nYl oaled 30 1 1 ' WD Water Line elocation 50 L 1uu. 1 4' Private ewer Force Main Fielocalion (Centerpointe) 5 LF tructural 'e iqn wall Y •4 3 reins a and ubdrein S stem i n all 1 L 34 MasonrY 16" Precision Block 7.5 High Pilaster zfUU.UU 35 jConc nc Masonrt6" Precision Block 4.0' Hiqh Pilaster 1 L buu.00 36 nc Mason 12 recision Bloc - (Sign all 122 S 37 one MasoaR 8" Preclslon Block - Sign all S .0 a,a 38 ge tone Veneer iqn all 4U.UU 9 12' R torm Drain 1500-D LF u a,5uu. u 4 P Storm rein (2000 R22b 41 Curb rile' S - 3.5' NB Std. 3 6- E u Inlet - 14' IJ td. 306 -L) a5. 4 rile Ype IL- I id. 300 44 econstruct 12" S C.I. Inlet Drain Poe LS u .uu obuu F0,000 .00 45 ICurb Inlet I VPe II - 14' I td. 300) EA 5 i 46 urb Inlet e 1- V I Std. 300 u0. u 4 Junction Str. No. 1 I tit c. 306 k]2 EA [uuu.0 48 n rete llar td. 13-L [ u 4 unction Sir. o. 1 CNB td. 310-L EA 400 .00 i , =TO= Concrete Encasement over Pipe 51 iusufReconstmct MH Frame 8 Cover to Grade 2 EA "I 2 Construct Steel Man ole urb Plate Assembl 1 u 5 elocate /AdtusLWater Valve Frame and r to rade hoa 2 EA 500.0 54 Rep ace 16' BFV Valve and Riser to rade 1 A 4 <• 55 4" Valve Frame and Cover to Grade 1 EA 56 Relocate Qd 4"Blowo iser Assembly 1 4 57 Relocate and Mod 2' IRWD ARV Assembly 1 L .0 a5.uuu.uu 58 Fumish an Install i' oo ec Reclaimed Water Service 1 4 52 Fumish an Install eclaimed water ervice 1 EA b,Uu .u0 0u .00 . 0 Relocate and Install Reclaimed Water Service A 61 treat Li R S stem New ort each 1 LS "I 6 'reel Liq t Ys'em Irvine 63 Treffic i nln 'n in 1 L I i i 6 'gation bM City o Beach) 65 Initiation stem Ci o Irvine) 1 LS 40000.0 u u a opsoil ack III or Planhn 1100 Y [ , [ 6 Landscape Planting i o New con Beach)-- 1 L uu .0 6 andscape Ian in Cit f Irvine 1 LS 0 69 9"a lant Establishment and Maintenan ewport each 1 L 000.00 ru luu-cav Plant Establishment and Maintenance Irvine and Center0oi 1 LS a 4 71 Tre Ic Signal Modification 1 u . 72 Tem 6' Chain Link Safety ence 1 LS u u. u 3 s- wit Plans 1 2ND $1.534.675.00 3RD $7,743.451.00 f:\ users \pbwlshared \contract\00 -01 \\BID SUMMARY FORM.xIs Page 2 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TITLE: Jamboree Rd/MacArthur Blvd Intersection Improvements CONTRACT NO.: 3369 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE: 5115401000.00 PROJECT MANAGER: Fong Tse f:\usem\pbw \shared \contract \00 -01 \\BID SUMMARY FORM.xIs Page 3 Los Angeles En ineerin , Inc. 1 Mobilization 1 L 2 ra is ntro 1 LS 3uuuu.uu onstwction A visory iqn 1 L 4 Surve Se rvi 5 1 Ps— 5 F_ lea nn and rubbing 1 6 Unclassilied Excavation 3680 CY 7 8" CC Curb 24" Gutter 1163 8 8" PCC Curb edlan 738 �. 9 Curb & 12 Gutter Median 1 8 odi is u 12" utter (Median) 402 __LF bb,bzu.w 11 4" Stam ed Colored Concrete Median 2786 SF 12 4" idewalk 8588 13 hick PCC T Vpe,u, P C Passage way 117 Or 14 PCC Curb Ramp Case C 2 A 15 1PCC Curb Ramp Case E 2 EA o 16 1 Mocilied id -Block Bus I umout 50 S 17 As halt Concrete 0.2' 3 18 ASPhali oncrete 0.6 635 N .yoo. 1 halt oncrei Deep 864 N 20 Aggreqate Base 2.0 43 21 luola Flare 2" minimum & Var AC Overlay- 3569 22 Slurry eal T t 13U3-0- S 2 . 23 Structural oncrete Plitface wall Fos 23 CY IOU.UU U0 i. a . 24 lWall Dminaqe and Subdrain System (Splitface al 1 . 25 oncrete Masonry 16" pinface Block - "Mail SF o. 6 iConcrete Masonry 12" Solitface Block - Retwa11 2370 F 27 oncrete Masonry 8" Plitface Block - Retwa11 200 SF .2 28 1 'P al tter 660 LF 29 Cable Railing Vinyl Coated 660 L 0 12 "IRWD Water Line Relocation 50 LF 31 4" Pnvate ewer orce Main RelocatiojiluentemointeT 50 LF 32 Ibinuclumf Concrete iqn wall 8 3 a I mina a and ubdmin System (Sion Wall 1 LS 34 Conc Masonry 16" Precision Block 7.5 High Pilaster 1 L 35 one Masga!Y16" Precision Block 4.0' Hiqh Pilaster 1 Conc asonry 1" recision lock - n a 1 F 37 one Masonry 8" Vrectsion Block- I Sign Wall) 224 SF 38 I Ledqe Stone veneer iqn all 225 SF 1 54.1313 39 1 " R P torn Drain 1500 -D 6 40 18" RCP Storm Drain 2000 -D 263 LF 41 luum Inlet I VDe Ub - 3.5' NI3 bid. 306-L 3 A 42 Curb Inlet T - 14'((;NB 51d. 3 -L 1 EA 43 1 Curb Inlet Type II - ZS C I Std. 300 1 EA 4 n u 44 1 Reconstruct 12" S C.I. Inlet Drain ice 1 L ell - 14' id. 300 3 EA 7 46 MuInlet urb Inlet a II - 21' (U U1 Std. 30 2 EA .P 47 Junction -ir. o. I id. 306 2 EA uu .0 48 oncrete Collar -NB Std. 313-L 4 A 49 liunction.5tr, No. 1 ( NB Sid, 310.E ) 4 EA z u. 50 ncrete Encasement over me 80 LF 51 Ad'us econsiruci MH reme 8 Cover to Grade 2 EA 52 nsiruci feel Manhole Curb Plate Assembly i S 53 I Relocate Adjust Water alve F me and over to G de athodic 2 A 'I uuu.uu 4 Place 16" BFV Valve and iser to - de 1 I LA 55 IAduSt 4" Valve Frame and Cover to Gmde 1 EA Relocate Modi 4" Blowotf Riser Assembly 1 L 57 IRelocate and Modify WD ARVR Assembly 36uu.uu a . .0 5 umish and Install 1" UooPer Keclaimea Water beroce 1 EA 4000.013 9 Fumish and in stall Keclaime Water ervice 1 FJ� 60 Relocate an Install2" Reclaimed Water ervice 1 61 IStreet Light System Newport each 1 L u. 62 lbireel Light System Irvine 1 L fa is m & tnLP' 1 L 4U U.0 4 Irrigation System (City of Newport Beach)1 65 Irri anon SYSiem City of Irvinel 1 « 66 I I oPSOlI BaCktill for Plan m 1100 CY a 7 Landscape Planting Cit o Newport Beach 1 S .uu 68 Landsca a an in City of Irvine 1 LS 69 9 .v Plant Establishment and Maintenance ew rt Beach 1 L 70 90-daY Plant Establishment and Maintenance none and enterm 1 L 11 11 ra Ic tonal Modhication 1 1 LS < « 7 e=6 ' Chain Link barely - ence 1 L 73 As -Built Plans 1 LS 4TH 1 $1,852,609.30 f:\usem\pbw \shared \contract \00 -01 \\BID SUMMARY FORM.xIs Page 3 NOTICE OF INTENT TO ADOPT / NOTICE OF AVUABILITY NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements This serves as the City of Irvine's Notice of Intention to adopt an Initial Study /Negative Declaration for the Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvement P cre ared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State CE ZCoun local implementation procedures. SEName of Project: Jamboree Ro ad /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements GARYL Project Location: The proposed project is located at the existing Jamboree Roa order intersection at the border of the City of Irvine and the City of Newport Beort Orange, State of California within the Irvine Business Complex (IBC). Lead Agency: City of Irvine, One Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, California, 92606 Project Description: The objective of the proposed project is to improve the existing level of service (LOS) at the intersection of Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard. The project will also serve to alleviate future traffic operational deficiencies projected to occur with the planned build - out of the IBC. Proposed intersection improvements have been designed to accommodate ultimate long -range improvements to Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard. Project Applicant: City of Irvine NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the City of Irvine proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration for the above -cited project. Such Negative Declaration is based on the findings that the project poses no potential for permanent significant adverse impacts. The reasons to support such a finding are documented by an Initial Study prepared by the City of Irvine. Copies of the Initial Study and the Proposed Negative Declaration are available for review at the City of Irvine Public Works Department, One Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606. For questions regarding the Negative Declaration contact: NAME: Ms. Sun -Sun T. Murillo TITLE: Senior Transportation Analyst ADDRESS: City of Irvine One Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606 PHONE: 949/ 724 -6262 Public Review Period: Begins: September 24, 2001 Ends: October 24, 2001 In accordance with the State CEQA Guidelines for implementing the California Environmental Quality Act, any comments concerning the findings of the proposed Initial Study /Negative Declaration must be submitted in writing and received by the City of Irvine no later than 5:00 p.m., Wednesday, October 24, 2001, in order to be considered prior to the City's final determination on the project. Should you decide to challenge this Project, you may be limited to the issues raised during this 30 -day public review period. Please mail or fax your written comments to Ms. Sun -Sun T. Murillo, City of Irvine, One Civic Center Plaza, Irvine, CA 92606 (FAX: 949/724- 7513). Date: September 24. 2001 ✓ /6'�1 % J� ` t Ms. Sun -Sun T. Murillo, Senior Transportation Analyst C (_ Initial Study and Negative Declaration Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements City of Irvine Department of Public Works 1 Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92623 Contact: Sun -Sun T. Murillo, Senior Transportation Analyst September 2001 �w Environmental Checklist Form. Table of Contents I. Project Title ........................................................................................... ..............................1 2. Lead Agency Name and Address .......................................................... ..............................I 3. Contact Person and Phone Number .......................... .. ......................................................... 1 4. Project Location .................................................................................... ..............................1 5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address ................................................... ..............................1 6. General Plan Designation ...................................................................... ..............................1 7. Zoning ................................................................................................... ..............................I 8. Description of Project ............................................................................ ..............................1 9. Surrounding Land Uses ......................................................................... ..............................1 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required ........................... ..............................2 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected......... Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ....................... ............................... ...2 ........................4 Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road 8 MacArthur Boulevard i Figure 1 City of Irvine List of Figures M ...Project Location Initial Study and Neqative Declaration Jamboree Road 8 MacArthur Boulevard 1. Project title: Environmental Checklist Form 2. Lead agency name and address: 3. Contact person and phone number: 4. Project location: 5. Project sponsor's name and address: 6. General Plan designation: 7. Zoning: 8. Description of project: Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvement Project City of Irvine Department of Public Works Project Development Section I Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92623 Sun -Sun T. Murillo, Senior Transportation Analyst (949) 724 -6262 The intersection of Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard lies along the city boundary line between the cities of Irvine and Newport Beach. Figure 1 illustrates the project location. City of Irvine Department of Public Works I Civic Center Plaza Irvine, CA 92623 Urban and Industrial 5.1 IBC Multi -Use The Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvement Project (CIP 312030) is a joint effort between the cities of Irvine and Newport Beach, in which the City of Irvine is the lead agency for the environmental phase of the project. The improvements at the intersection provide increased operational capacity and efficiency, and are included as a mitigation measure for the 1985 and 1991 Environmental Impact Reports (EIR) for the Irvine Business Center (IBC) Re -Zone. Improvements include realignment of the westbound to northbound right tum movement onto MacArthur Boulevard, and widening of the northbound MacArthur Boulevard approach to provide for a dedicated right tum lane onto Jamboree Road. Improvements also include a second northbound and southbound left-tum lane on MacArthur Boulevard by way of reduced median widths. Minor improvements include sidewalks, traffic signal modifications, drainage improvements, and parkway landscaping. In order to accommodate the dedicated northbound right -tum lane, an estimated 14,562 sq. ft. of right of way must be acquired with the project. An estimated 700 -foot long, 10 -foot high retaining wall is proposed east of the northbound right -tum lane due to existing sloped landscape at the location. Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard 41- 9. Surrounding Land Uses: The intersection ofMacArthur Boulevard and Jamboree Road lies within the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine, in the County of Orange. The intersection lies within the southwesterly limit of the Irvine Business Complex. The northwest and southeast corners of the intersection comprise of two -story commercial buildings with associated outdoor parking lots adjacent to the intersection. The northeast comer comprises of a multi -story commercial building with an outdoor parking lot adjacent to the intersection. A vacant lot exists on the southwest comer of the intersection. 10. Agencies Whose Approval is Required: City of Irvine City of Newport Beach ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact' as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. ❑ Aesthetics ❑ Agriculture Resources ❑ Air Quality ❑ Biological Resources ❑ Cultural Resources ❑ Geology /Soils ❑ Hazards & Hazardous Materials ❑ Hydrology /Water Quality ❑ Land Use[Planning ❑ Mineral Resources ❑ Public Services ❑ Utilities /Service Systems ❑ Noise ❑ Population ❑ Recreation ❑ Transportation/Traffic ❑ Mandatory Findings of Significance Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard 14 F i gu,r, 1. I U #/ o BAKER ST. W Co m 4 ADAMS AVE. ORANGE O 9pGlf ,pZ ?p\P Cg CD CITY 0 F COOAST E ANGL 6 U. •- COST g : FOAIRGRO ND �s" °' pP .= Z x Q MESA o o x c h f! 'FO Sl0 m CITY �p OF m PO q IRvI KES OR CD VICTORIA. ST. per. \.�� UPPER \ O NEWPORT_, c qe 19TH BAYS ITY 9E U.C.I. ti z H S c� OF BISON AVE PROJECT NEWPO'� BEAC LOCATION S ORNF O 090 a JJ. ` \ '\\ \ r f �p NPT. Gi y GJ�o '0 \\ r I H ENTE pt\� ITY YARD d� BA/� 9 DRESER.a DRT B/LBOA � P� O � `/o 5LAN0 G ,L -� VICINITY MAP yyr F i gu,r, 1. DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ❑ I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment; and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ❑ 1 find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed my mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. ❑ I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. September 24, 2001 Signature Date Sun -Sun T. Murillo Printed Name City of Irvine Initial Study and Neoative Declaration Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard L EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Signincant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but ❑ ❑ ❑ O not limited to trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or ❑ ❑ X❑ ❑ quality of the site and its surroundings? d)Create a new source of substantial light or glare which ❑ ❑ ❑ would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? (a and b) The proposed project will consist of intersection improvements to provide increased operational capacity and efficiency. The site is located within a developed urban setting with no scenic vistas located within the view shed. Further, no scenic resources exist within the project area. The project will result in only minor changes to existing public facilities located within the public right of way. No impact will result. (c) To implement the proposed northbound dedicated right turn lane for the project, right of way is to be acquired and a 10 -foot hig retaining wall is proposed as part of this project. The existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings would not be significantly degraded. It is anticipated that the use of appropriate lighting, landscaping and architectural treatments would serve to reduce potential adverse visual effects. (d) The proposed project will consist of intersection improvements to provide increased operational capacity and efficiency. No new lighting, oror glare are proposed or anticipated through the development othe project. No impact will result. 11. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or ❑ ❑ ❑ X❑ Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non - agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a ❑ ❑ ❑ X❑ Williamson Act contract? c) Involve other changes in the existing environment ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard Issues: which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to a non - agricultural use? Less Than Significant Potentially With Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporation Less Than Significant No Impact Impact (a through c) The project area does not contain prime farmland, unique farmland, or farmland of state -wide importance. The project site is located within a developed urban setting and is zoned for a variety of uses, none of which is agriculture. No Williamson Act contracts have been executed in the project area. The project will not involve any changes to the existing environment that could result in conversion of farmland to non - agricultural use. No impact will result. Ill. AIR QUALITY: Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the ❑ ❑ ❑ identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status applicable air quality plan? species in local or regional plans, policies, or b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian substantially to an existing or projected air quality ❑ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by violation? the California Department of Fish and Game or US c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of for ❑ ❑ ❑ a protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the any criteria pollutant which the project region is Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, non - attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant ❑ ❑ ❑ Q concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q (a through e) The proposed project will not result in an increase in development potential above the level currently allowed by the City's adopted General Plan. No impact to air quality issues will occur as a result of the proposed project. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or ❑ ❑ 13 a through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ ❑ ❑ habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally ❑ ❑ ❑ Q protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any ❑ ❑ ❑ native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree ❑ ❑ ❑ Q preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ❑ ❑ ❑ Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation? (a through f) No specific development is proposed. Additionally, the proposed intersection improvements do not impact or modify existing development regulations or City policies for the preservation of biological resources. No impact will result. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the El El 1:1 significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique ❑ El MR paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those El El El MR interred outside of formal cemeteries? (a through d) The proposed project does not involve revisions to development standards that would impact cultural resources. No impact will result. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial ❑ ❑ ❑ adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: See items i through iv below. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as ❑ ❑ ❑ delineated on the most recent Alquist - Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ❑ ❑ ❑ EK Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard `. Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact iii) Seismic - related ground failure, including ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ liquefaction? environment through the routine transport, use, or iv) Landslides? ❑ ❑ ❑ �X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X topsoil? ❑ ❑ c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 unstable, or that would become unstable as a result and accident conditions involving the release of of the project, and potentially result in on- or off - hazardous materials into the environment? site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ liquefaction or collapse? ❑ acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X I8 -I -B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? school? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑x use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? (a through e) The proposed project will not result in an impact related to geologic problems including fault rupture, seismic ground shaking, liquefaction, landslides, soil runoff, unstable soils, and expansive soils. The proposed retaining wall will be subject to site - specific geotechnical studies as determined appropriate by the City. No impact will result. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the ❑ ❑ ❑ environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or ❑ ❑ ❑ acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one - quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? (a through d) The proposed project does not involve the use of hazardous materials. No impact will result. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for of Irvine Initial Study and Negative Declaration Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard L Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, El El El a would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? (e and f) The City of Irvine borders John Wayne Airport, operated by the County of Orange. The proposed project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area. No impact will result. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere ❑ ❑ ❑ a with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ ❑ a loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? (g and h) The proposed project will not impair implementation of an adopted emergency response plan. The proposed project is located in a developed urban area that is not adjacent to wildlands. No impact will result. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste ❑ ❑ ❑ a discharge requirements. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or ❑ ❑ ❑ a interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of ❑ ❑ ❑ the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of ❑ ❑ Q ❑ the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off - site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would ❑ ❑ ❑ Q exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Initial Study and Negative Declaration Jamboree Road 8 MacArthur Boulevard Issues: ❑ ❑ Less Than b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, ❑ Significant or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the Potentially with Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or Impact Incorporation Impact Impact f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 g) Place housing within a 100 -year flood hazard area ❑ as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100 -year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation of seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? ❑ ❑ ❑ (a and b) The proposed project will not impact groundwater supplies, water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. No impact will result. (c and d) Any and all changes in drainage patterns as a result of the proposed retaining wall and additional asphalt will be incorporated in the design per City design standards. The proposed project does not impact any existing stream or river courses and does not significantly increase the rate or amount of surface runoff. Implementation of the proposed project would not result in any significant long -term impacts. The slight increase in the amount of surface water run -off is not anticipated to substantially impact the existing stormwater drainage system. (e through j) Other than minor changes in water drainage patterns summarized above, the proposed project will have no impact on hydrology and water quality. No impact will result. IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, ❑ or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? (a through c) The proposed project will not physically divide an established community. The proposed project will not conflict with existing general plan goals or policies. No habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans exist in the project area. No impact will result. Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard L Issues: Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporation Less Than Significant Impact No Impact X. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: in excess of standards established in the local a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral ❑ ❑ ❑ resource that would be of value to the region and standards of other agencies? the residents of the state? b) b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally - ❑ ❑ ❑ important mineral resource recovery site delineated groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? on a local general plan, specific plan or other land c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ❑ ❑ use plan? ❑ levels in the project vicinity above levels existing (a and b) No loss of known mineral resources will occur with the proposed project. No impact will result. XJ. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels ❑ ❑ ❑ in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑ ❑ groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ❑ ❑ ❑ levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in El 11 Q ❑ ambient noise levels In the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ ❑ or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, 13 13 13 would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? (a, c and d) Construction of the proposed improvements may result in short-term increased noise levels in the immediate project vicinity due to the operation of construction vehicles and other construction activities. This activity may result in a minor disturbance to existing commercial receptors situated near the project site. This would be a temporary condition, would cease upon project completion, and is subject to noise ordinance requirements. In orderto minimize construction noise impacts, the City of Irvine requires that construction activity be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, and 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on Saturday with no construction on Sundays or federal holidays. Although the project slightly increases the daily traffic volumes through the intersection, the post - project traffic noise will not be perceptibly different away from the immediate project vicinity. As a result the slight increase in ambient noise levels on the project vicinity is considered less than significant. Initial Study and Negative Declaration Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard L Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact (b, a and f) The proposed project is not within the vicinity of a public airport land use plan nor a private airstrip, and will not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels generated by groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels. No impact will result. XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, ❑ ❑ ❑ either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑X necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, ❑ ❑ ❑ necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? ❑ ❑ ❑ (a through c) The proposed project does not involve additional housing development in the community. It will not alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the City's population. No impact will result. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered government facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Police protection? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Schools? ❑ ❑ ❑ Ox Parks? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q Other public facilities? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q The proposed project does not generate additional demand for fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public facilities. New or physical alteration to existing facilities will not be required. No impact will result. XIV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing ❑ 11 ❑ neighborhood and regional parks or other El recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be Initial Study and Negative Declaration Citv of Irvine .lamboree Road 8 MacArthur Boulevard Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact b) Does the project include recreational facilities or ❑ ❑ ❑ require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? (a and b) The proposed project will not increase the use of existing neighborhood facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. No impact will result. XV. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in ❑ ❑ 17X ❑ relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 7X of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 7X either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 7X feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ❑ 1 7X f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? ❑ ❑ ❑ Q g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or program ❑ 11 C1 1 7X supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? (a) As part of the mitigation measures associated with the 1985 and 1991 EIR for the Re- Zoning of the Irvine Business Complex (IBC), the project increases the capacity for right -turns onto Jamboree Road through the proposed dedicated right -turn only lane from northbound MacArthur Boulevard to eastbound Jamboree Road. The second left-turn lanes from both directions of MacArthur Boulevard onto Jamboree Road increase the capacity for left turn volumes. Therefore, the proposed project will result in improved conditions at the subject intersection and will not result in an increase in traffic in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system. (b through g) The proposed project improves the operational level of service at the intersection, does not result in a change in air traffic patterns and does not incorporate substandard design features. The project provides adequate emergency access and does not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation. No impact will result. Initial Study and Negative Dedaration Citv of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard Issues: Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? ❑ ❑ ❑ b) Require or result in the construction of new water ❑ ❑ ❑ or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater ❑ ❑ ❑ treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? fl Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted ❑ ❑ ❑ Q capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 regulations related to solid waste? (a through g) The proposed project will not generate wastewater or a demand for water. Therefore, new facilities will not be needed, and new storm water drainage facilities are not required. No solid wastes will be generated with the proposed project. No impact will result. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ( "Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? ❑ ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ ❑ [H] ❑ Initial Study and Negative Declaration City of Irvine Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard I 4 Issues: Less Than Signlfleant Potentially with Significant Mitigation Impact Incorporation c) Does the project have environmental effects which will 13 13 substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Signifteant No Impact Impact El ❑ (a) Due to the limited scope of the proposed project, project implementation would not have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self - sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plan or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. No impacts beyond the immediate intersection are anticipated. (b) Due to the relatively limited nature of the proposed physical improvements, the project would not involve significant cumulative impacts. The project creates a positive regional traffic and air quality effect, and for these reasons, is a key mitigation measure for the 1985 and 1991 EIRs for the Re- Toning of the Irvine Business Complex (IBC). (c) Due to the nature and relatively limited scope of the proposed improvements, project implementation would not have environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. Construction- related activities are anticipated to have only minor, temporary impacts (congestion, noise). Potential long -term impacts, including noise, is less than significant. ON of Irvine Initial Study and Neqative Declaration Jamboree Road & MacArthur Boulevard /^ T,`,;s office is exemp - 'Im firing / 1'QcC u', ref COyEmmer., Jdg J 07037 :oTa :D n�� I"rG Cf CC- e i , ,. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION To: _ Office of Planning and Research From: (Public Agency) City of Irvine 1400 Tenth Street, Room 121 Department of Public Works Sacramento, CA 95814 P. O. Box 19575 Irvine, CA 92623 -9575 X County Clerk County of Orange P. O. Box 838, Santa Ana, CA 92702 �-1 pF iq �2 Subject: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 21152 of the Public Resources Code. N/A Sun -Sun T. Murillo State Clearinghouse Number Lead Agency (If submitted to Clearinghouse) Contact Person Project Title: Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements Project Location: (949) 724 -6262 Area Code/Telephone /Extension Recorded in Official Records, County of Orange Gary Granville, Clerk- Recorder IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINO FEE 200185001189 09;52am 10125101 170 10 Z01 0.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvement Project lies within the City of Newport Beach and the City of Irvine, within the County of Orange Project Description: Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard. This is to advise that the City of Irvine has approved the above described project [ X ] Lead Agency [ ] Responsible Agency and has made the following determinations regarding the above described project: 1. The project { [ ] will [ X ] will not ) have a significant effect on the environment. 2. [ ] An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. [ X ] A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures { [ ] were [ X ] were not ) made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A statement of Overriding Considerations { [ ] was [ X ] was not ((t �) adopted for this project. Date received for filing: October 25, 2001 A�',y� PIt � T F I L E V Signature (Public Agency) Ji'7' ,rn. Senior Transportation Analyst OCT 2 5 2001 Titre GARY L. UGRA � II{b. `!arn.?ecorder GARYL RANVILLE,Clefk•Recorder DEPUTY By— DEPUTY FORM 45 -03 (6/99) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimis Impact Finding Project Title: Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements EA /MND Project Location (include County): The proposed project is located at the existing Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard intersection at the border of the City of Irvine and the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California within the Irvine Business Complex (IBC). - pF rq�� A. Ulm Ry Project Description: The objective of the proposed project is to improve the existing level of service (LOS) at the intersection of Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard. The project will also serve to alleviate future traffic operational deficiencies projected to occur with the planned build -out of the IBC. Proposed intersection improvements have been designed to accommodate ultimate long -range improvements to Jamboree Road and MacArthur Boulevard. Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): As a result of the Initial Study, it has been determined that the project will have no significant adverse effects on the environment. There were no findings of impact to State and Federal Waters. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.4 of the Fish and Game Code. Name: Sun -Sun T. Murillo - �,. 3Z4 Senior Transportation Analyst P Lead Agency: City of Irvine Date: October 25, 2001 FILED OCT 2 5 2001 GARY L. G A VILLE, Clerk- Recorder By DEPUTY CT GAA`f L. GA"d!!7LL=, uerk•Aecorder gy DEPUTY FORM 45 -24 (6199) City of Newport Beach NO. BA- 079 BUDGET AMENDMENT 2002 -03 AMOUNT: 5575,sso.00 EFFECT ON BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE: Increase Revenue Estimates X Increase Expenditure Appropriations Transfer Budget Appropriations SOURCE: from existing budget appropriations X from additional estimated revenues X from unappropriated fund balance EXPLANATION: AND NXIncrease in Budgetary Fund Balance Decrease in Budgetary Fund Balance No effect on Budgetary Fund Balance This budget amendment is requested to provide for the following: To increase revenue estimates and expenditure appropriations for the Jamboree Road /MacArthur Boulevard Intersection Improvements, C -3369. ACCOUNTING ENTRY: BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE Fund Account 260 3605 REVENUE EST /MATES (3601) Fund /Division Account 250 4858 EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS (3603) Description Circulation & Transportation Fund Balance Description Contributions - Refunds /Rebates from Govts Amount Debit Credit $70,000.00 $505,880.00 Signed: ZAK -A" A- J6l Financial pproval: Administrative Services Director Date Signed: % al . 4 �- Administrative Appr al: City Manager Da Signed: City Council Approval: City Clerk Date Description Division Number 7251 Contributions Account Number C5100584 Jamboree Rd /MacArthur Blvd Improvements $505,880.00 Division Number 7261 Fund Balance Account Number C5100584 Jamboree Rd /MacArthur Blvd Improvements $70,000.00 Division Number Account Number Division Number Account Number Division Number Account Number Signed: ZAK -A" A- J6l Financial pproval: Administrative Services Director Date Signed: % al . 4 �- Administrative Appr al: City Manager Da Signed: City Council Approval: City Clerk Date