The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About7.0 - Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan - PA2013-001 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT September 17, 2015 Meeting Agenda Item No. 7 SUBJECT: Local Coastal Program Implementation Plan (PA2013-001) PLANNER: Patrick Alford, Planning Program Manager (949) 644-3235, palford@newportbeachca.gov INTRODUCTION The Draft IP is a regulatory document intended to implement the policies of the California Coastal Act and the City's certified Coastal Land Use Plan. Staff has identified eight (8) remaining key issues that present potential areas of disagreement with Coastal Commission staff. These issues are summarized in "LCP Implementation Plan Key Issues" (Attachment No. PC 1). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW This item is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects, which have potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA (CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3)). PUBLIC NOTICE The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of the meeting at which the Planning Commission considers the item). Prepared by: Submitted by: Patrick J. Alford, Planning Program Manager *na i,r ICP, Deputy Director ATTACHMENTS PC 1 LCP Implementation Plan Key Issues The draft LCP Implementation Plan is also available in PDF format at the City of Newport Beach Internet site at http://www.newportbeachca.gov/trending/projects-issues/other-important- issues/local-coastal-program-certification/d raft-implementation-plan. 1 V� QP �P Attachment No. PC 1 LCP Implementation Plan Key Issues 3 V� QP �P LCP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Issues ISSUE 1 COASTAL BLUFFS The Coastal Act requires development to minimize the alteration of natural landforms, and the City's Coastal Land Use Plan (CLUP) recognizes coastal bluffs as significant BACKGROUND: scenic and environmental resources that are to be protected. The City's Bluff (B) Overlay was adopted to implement the landform protection policies of the General Plan and not those of the CLUP, which are generally morespecific. Coastal Commission staff comments have generally focused on the B Overlay's three development zones for principal structures, accessory structures, and minor accessory structures. They question whether the minimum bluff edge setbacks for bluff subject to marine CCC POSITION: erosion are being maintained. They are also concerned about some of the minor accessory structures that are permitted (e.g., walls, fences, and irrigation systems). They also do not want these development areas to be perceived as guaranteed; that development will be further restricted by safety, habitat protection, drainage/water quality factors and as geologic conditions change over time. While there may be some variation on individual properties, the B Overlay overall implements the bluff protection policies of the CLUP. The Draft IP was also revised to CITY RESPONSE: include cross references to other regulations on coastal/geologic hazards, landscaping, swimming pools, natural landform projection, protective structures, and scenic and visual quality protection. RELEVANT IP 21,28,040 SECTIONS: ISSUE 2 COASTAL CANYONS The new Canyon (C) Overlay would apply to properties along Buck Gully and Morning BACKGROUND: Canyon. The C Overlay based on General Plan Natural Resources Policy NR 23.6. It would codify the "stringline setback" procedure that has been in practice since 2007. Earlier Coastal Commission staff comments suggested that they would like to establish a "canyon edge' setback and that existing development on canyon faces should be pulled back over time. However, recent Coastal Commission staff CCC POSITION: comments have been on the appropriateness of the stringline method to limit development on the bluff face. They also have questioned a provision that would allow modification or replacement of existing development that extends beyond the stringline setback with like structures in the same development footprint. CLUP Policy 4.4.3-18 calls for using the stringline to restrict development from extending beyond the Predominant Line of Existing Development (PLOED). The CITY RESPONSE: provision for existing development recognizes that these structures exist and will continue to be repaired and maintained. Allowing modification and replacement presents the opportunity to at least implement some LCP standards (i.e., habitat buffers, appropriate landscaping and irrigation, water quality BMPs, etc.). RELEVANT IP 21.28.050 SECTIONS: 1 LCP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Issues ISSUE 3 PRIORITY LAND USES The Coastal Act and the City's CLUP require that visitor-serving commercial recreational and coastal-dependent land uses have priority over other land uses. These policies are primarily implemented through the CM (Commercial Recreational and Marine) Coastal Zoning District and the CV (Commercial Visitor-Serving) Coastal BACKGROUND: Zoning District. The CM District is intended to provide for areas on or near the waterfront that will encourage the continuation of coastal-dependent and coastal- related uses. The CV District is intended to provide for areas appropriate for accommodations, goods, and services intended to serve visitors. The Draft Implementation Plan (IP) land use tables contain notes stating these uses will have priority over other uses. The language in the table notes is not sufficient. They question how the City will CCC POSITION: respond to projects in these districts that do not provide priority uses. They want to further narrow the range of allowed land uses (e.g., not allowing offices and other non- priority uses). All coastal development permits (CDPs) will be reviewed for consistency with the purpose and intent of the zoning district. CDPs for physical development will be CITY RESPONSE: reviewed to ensure that the design can accommodate the uses intended for the zoning district. CDPs for land uses will be reviewed on a case by case basis to determine if the proposed use is consistent with the purpose and intent of the zoning district. RELEVANT IP Table 21.20-1 (Note 4), Table 21.20-2 (Note 6), Table 21.22-2 (Note 5), Table 21.20-1, SECTIONS: Table 21.20-1, Table 21.22-1, and Table 21.22-2 ISSUE 4 PREFERENTIAL PARKING DISTRICTS The City has only existing preferential parking zone (Newport Island established in BACKGROUND: 1981) in the Coastal Zone. CLUP Policy 3.1.6 -2 requires a CDP to establish a new, or modify an existing, referential parking zone. CCC POSITION: Coastal Commission staff wants the Draft IP to require a LCP amendment in order to establish a new preferential parking district. Requiring a LCP amendment for a new or modified preferential parking zone is not consistent with CLUP Policy 3.1.6-2. The section of preferential parking was revised to include a finding that the establishment of the preferential parking zone will not have a direct impact to coastal CITY RESPONSE: access. In order to make this finding, the Draft IP now requires that there be substantial evidence in the record that the public's rights of access to, and along the shoreline and coastal blufftops are not directly impacted, including impacts to the use and capacity of public parking. There must also be substantial evidence in the record that that consideration was given to the availability of, and opportunities for, alternative modes of transportation. 2 LCP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Issues RELEVANT IP 21.40.145 SECTIONS: ISSUE 5 BEACH CURFEWS The City has restricted public use of the beaches since 1947. BACKGROUND: The Coastal Commission's 1994 guidance document recognizes curfews adopted prior to February 1, 1973 as grandfathered and allows for the adoption of new regulations pursuant to the guidance document. Coastal Commission staff wants language on current beach closure regulations (i.e., curfews) incorporated in the Draft IP along with a requirement that any changes to existing regulations would require a CDP. CCC POSITION: NOTE: A CDP modifying beach curfew would certainly be appealable to the Coastal Commission or have to be approved by the Coastal Commission, if they retain original permit jurisdiction on the beaches. CITY RESPONSE: The current beach closure regulations are grandfathered and, therefore, not subject to Coastal Commission review. RELEVANT IP 21.48.055.E (New) SECTIONS: ISSUE 6 PERMIT AND APPEAL JURISDICTION MAPS The Permit and Appeal Jurisdiction Maps establish the boundaries of the Coastal BACKGROUND: Zone, appeals areas, exclusion areas, deferred certification areas, and other coastal- related areas within the Coastal Zone in the City. CCC POSITION: Coastal Commission staff maintains that their Mapping Unit is responsible for the preparation of these maps. The City provided the Mapping Unit with all the GIS data used to produce the Permit CITY RESPONSE: and Appeal Jurisdiction Map in February 2015. As of this time (Sept. 2015), the City has not received any substantive response. RELEVANT IP 21.12.020 and 21.14.045 SECTIONS: ISSUE 7 CONTINUATION OF THE CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION ORDER The Coastal Act allows the Coastal Commission to create categorical exclusion orders, which exempt types of projects that do not have the potential to create a significant adverse effect on coastal resources or on public access. The City was BACKGROUND: granted a categorical exclusion order (Cat Ex) in 1977 that excludes single-unit and two-unit projects from CDP requirements, with the exception of the first row of lots on the shoreline. Pursuant to the Coastal Act, the Cat Ex will automatically terminate after the LCP is 3 LCP IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Key Issues certified. Coastal Commission staff has indicated that they will support reaffirming the categorical exclusion order that would be considered after certification of the LCP. It is uncertain if all areas covered by the current categorical exclusion will continue to CCC POSITION: be exempted under a new categorical exclusion order. For example, Coastal Commission staff has stated that continuation of the Cat Ex for Buck Gully and Morning Canyon would be "problematic." CITY RESPONSE: No changes to the Cat Ex are proposed. RELEVANT IP 21.52.045 SECTIONS: ISSUE 8 SEA LEVEL RISE In the ten years since the CLUP was certified, sea level rise has emerged has emerged as a significant Coastal Commission issue. While the CLUP does have BACKGROUND: several policies that address sea level rise, it does not address the issue to the extent suggested by the Coastal Commission Sea Level Rise Guidance document, which was adopted on August 12, 2015. Coastal Commission staff will review the Draft IP for consistency with Sea Level Rise CCC POSITION: Guidance. The Draft IP should incorporate as much of Sea Level Rise Guidance as is possible. The Draft IP requires that sea-level rise as a factor in coastal hazard reports, in slope stability analyses and erosion rate estimate reports, and in public access design. In addition, a Sea Level Rise Appendix was added that outlines what the City has done to date and an action plan for addressing sea level rise in the future. CITY RESPONSE: It would be unfair and inappropriate to require the City to stop the LCP certification process at this late stage in order to conduct the significant and extensive data collection, technical analyses, risk assessment, and policy reassessments necessary to address sea level rise. RELEVANT IP 21.30.015.C, 21.30A.050.A, and Appendix A (New). SECTIONS: 4 g Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Local Coastal Program Certification r �W Pp Planning Commission �Q e Study Session SeptemberU T °gtrFoa��P Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) SFW POkT Keyissues Y T Coastal Bluffs City of Newport Beach Coastal Canyons Local Coastal Program Priority Land Uses Preferential Parking Beach Closures Jurisdiction Maps Cat Ex Implementation Plan PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 2 September 2015 Sea Level Rise 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 2 '�.' 1 �y.,� Ate :?� -r'� .^ •. Xk tar 4 7- r - AMM ` - Z WAR moi... j r - x Coastal Bluffs Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Coastal Bluffso. SFW PpkT Issues L Y m n If)4iN Development Areas Accessory structures (Areas C) Starting point, not guaranteed Bluff Edge Setbacks 25-ft for principal structures 10-ft for accessory structures 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 4 Issue : Development Areas 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division Issue : Development Areas ( Cont . ) ROO 48 ft 3207-3309 01 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division � �;i �" Ife • o f� il. u '' r e Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) SFW POkT Development O�` �^ If)4iN Adjustment , Safety Erosion rates F — niry Protective devices Compatibility Public view impacts Sensitive habitats 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 7 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Bluff 17. dge Setbacks 93% Compliance 92% Compliance s� yS V g, t� app 40 Or P� IJ e 35FWFmm BIER EN:_IXi, n B-8 Carmo Shores —toF.FmmEIWEtll:aA C ie mentA ac ane _am®_ aes_mo a e,2013 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 8 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Bluff Edge Setbacks ( Cont . ) 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 9 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) (Cqr ,$��:� , �r � •z.. � a '.i�� Qat. 3� 4 Oma. �j c n� t� Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001) Proposed Overlay Map rSAEEL LA TER eGJ ••• ESL � � �'• �' RIVE0.A -_SpP V°O '.•:C•`oay F � 0d�•. F 00 TER 2R �P? Jy '•:zMgHOe tiS Q00 .SD TEP y9 •':.Wisp E3: RL A TER s' , ��,. dPp` O d •'•'1 +�v� RRq (O TER m e gLFAi 2y� R n O L < &G ��-�QORRS SR SFgR"q DO oR Ro Ro CORONA ', N A RD FOREST 4ORO BERBER o a o P D00 RO ? KFORD hq T/yA. OL ELf � 3 RO RCR ¢ RA ooRT< O P M OE qHL o EO R OP O •.,..,... ... uTTLE r +SLR CORONA Oan R O gTR'F, O RD R h0 O ¢ O RREMOh rry RO O r yw ` yqM OR wL..ar nERNgM P e� 0 C-1 Canyon Overlay DRAFT (Buck Gully and Morning Canyon) Name c-t canyon Ovenzy_iPI February 2015 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division ii Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Coastal Canyons : Issues Stringline Setback Method Structures Extending Beyond the Stringline 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division lz Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Development S • Method Bluff edge setback? �< Contour lines? fir PLOED? Stringline? n 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 13 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Existing Structures Development beyond _ 4 the stringline May be replaced with like structures 50% exterior wall limit ra. yy 261 i s . 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 14 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Priority Uses e � P 9<�FOFN\ Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) SFW POkT Y T Priority - r Uses P �� If)4iN Coastal -Dependent/Coastal- Related Commercial Recreational/Marine (CM ) District Visitor-Serving/Recreational Commercial Recreational/Marine (CM ) District Commercial Visitor-Serving (CV) District Mixed-use Districts on Peninsula/Balboa Is . 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 16 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) CM District -�� NORTH STAR I Eac �. rrF ny yb Ot �e ✓ � f 3 ) J � NEWPORT ES LINDA ISLE � �'Ny coagT Z SNF 2 � 2 NIQN HARBOR LIDO ISLAND PENINSULA NFWpOHT COLLINS SALBOA I"qyQ LIDO SAY ISLa NO ISLE ISLAND c x NEWPORT PIER BALBOA ISLAND ,IR4 OHANNE< 4b BALBOA PIER 0 A 2 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 17 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) CV District of nR 0 0/SLE a A -4W-- N fie' iaaeFq SNION ••• •, . ouxee ISLAND . F PACIFIC OCEAN xx�suie . LIDO ixuxo nneo. ISLE a BALBOA ISLAND •� a � r 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division i8 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Peninsula/Balboa • nd Mixedmuse , HIpHOyAV '?� 0 S (i F NEWPORT our✓Es LINDA ISLE � DHy cnasr N iNFA R HARBOR LIDO r ISLAND PENINSULA \rf Nf�POA'TCOLLfNR BALBOA ISL, ` LIDO BAY ISLAND ISLAND 1 ISLE I 1 I NEWPORT PIER BALBOA ISLAND CHANNEL BALBOA PIER 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 19 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Land Use Regulations Implementing priory requirements through CDPs Allowing non-priority uses Public/private schools Financial institutions Business offices Medical/dental offices PC Districts Bayview Balboa Bay Club Lido Peninsula 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 20 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) OR RESIDENTS AND GUESTS ONLY ZIN MW2d[1MAJO � r L • YJ '� �I' ' � � ll � il711111a a , I • � �J ••r n n Preferential Cq< pp pN P Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Preferential Parking Districts Only one currently Newport Island _71 - New Districts CDP required } r Protect quality of life r, s alleviate traffic, noise, etc. . No direct impact to coastal access 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 22 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Future Districts CCC Comments Identify all proposed districts and provide justification or Require a LCP amendment CLUP Policy 3 . 1 . 6-2 CDP to approve or modify a district 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 23 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Balboa s! :-i- 9 P� 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 24 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) k. IRKING LOT ' 8 BEACH CLOSED 1oP 6qM M SEW PO�,T Beach ~ n Cq</FO RN P Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Existing Regulations CCC Comments Incorporate current regulations Future changes require a CDP 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 26 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Beach Closures 1994 CCC Guidance Document Beach curfew enacted/enforced prior to 1973 not subject to Coastal Act review City has regulated the use of the public beaches at night since 1947 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 27 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) NOTICE F PENDING PERMIT A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE IS PENDING BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: Re m0ft of the exisdna amss N M Elemenlary.the inslallptq,I f CMU walls _w_Ith a decorative can and fence where Indicated on Dlans.and the Installabon fM to stairs to acoess the LOCATION:Newport Elementary 50ool 1327 W.Ocean Front APPLICANT: CIN of Newport Beach APPLICATION NUMBER: CD2014,001 DATE NOTICE POSTED: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE PHONE OR WRITE THE OFFICE LISTED BELOW BETWEEN 8 A.M.AND 6 R.M.,WEEKDAYS. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST DISTRICT OFFOE 200 OCEANGATE.10^FLOOR LONG BEACH,CA 9W024IM (6e2)590-m, wuxrax mLowsrocxuxo r Permit U etK °gt�Foa��P Permit and Appeal • Jurisdiction Maps 11 Issue : First Public Road �i��i� ''�.�III/�I !- -��• �•I i I II ,�j4 gr"I .FIs �irr.. ' '•! �� f�f. `LI t `Od 1/ 1 I r Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) CA Code of Regulations Section First Public Road Paralleling the Sea Lawfully open to uninterrupted public use and is suitable for such use; Publicly maintained ; Is an improved , all-weather road open in at least one direction ; Is not subject to any restrictions; and ■ Does in fact connect with other public roads providing a con inuous access s s em , and generally parallels an tol lows TF3-775751 ine of the sea. 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 31 Balboa Island/Coronado Comparison BALBOA ISLAND CORONADO LAI 0 �b CA OA ISLAND ¢ r 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 32 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Permit Jurisdiction eay i 300from bluff 300' from bluff 1. L ,.•.r� .•w n.w.m.uwmm.uaw , it First Public Rtl� • • ' r' a' m First Public Rd. Ino 300' from bliff uJ.. ! ` CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH onurot CWx , c<uroxxin DO' from beach / First Public Rd. 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 33 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Draft 1111 ost Certification , IIEOI ATORY AND JUMSMPONAL lWMO}WSS CSY}1M.ab�e..on .�.F...Froc......o...n IxF�XN9,rvkw dMbe�BR Wv e_.... u.e^.v •• ra�..r.w..._... a............vl v... r..e.. '(D1R 'CWbm4 CaNW Cmux}fan .. 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 34 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) 4✓ORFS y e \ \ I 1 I C `F � I 1 E \ y NfWPoNT NEN mRay�NLwPneXY��`yjy� �'. Continuation of the Cat Ex a� O � U ? e�El C'9CI FOR��P Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Irvine Terrace I J f 1 •i f. 9 b b rkCNTA L[r rd a ►�, 'ice. F� ' �?w .. z a Q 9 `4 ✓ E� 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 36 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Canyon Areas 00 /pf sr�' •, q4C � ISS ry� Q W ee oO�Fo �O'PO a�GNYW RD i p9 ' ONA �ry� ry, 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 37 ��^ 1-.� •'�. tib•.. .•.. S Sea Level Rise Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) SL1. 11111 • / e is Follows Coastal Act polices Minimize hazards (avoidance) ft ',, CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION IDANCE Maximize protection of public SEA LEVEL RiSEPOLICYGUssing Interpretive Guidelines for Addressing access, recreation , and resources andSea CostaLevel l Din LocalCoastalPer Programs and Coastal Development Permits " Best Available Science" Assumes 5.5 ft. rise by 2100 ■ Addressing SLR i n L C P s and NANIMOus�r AUOMD-Au un 12 2 1 � n OS CDPs ■ Adaptation Strategies 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 39 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Adaptation Strategies Protect Protect, • Hard protection • Soft protection/living shorelines Accommodate: Accommodate Protea otelculturol barriers for • Siting and design standards flood protection • Retrofit existing structures • Stormwater management Hybrid. 'a ommodate over short-term, cate over Update land use designations and Retreat zoning- R ordinances • Redevelopment restrictions • Permit conditions Retreat: Limit new development in Y r I d hazardous areas and areas adjacent \,,/ to wetlands,FSH 4"other habitats • Removal of vulnerable development • Promote preservation and conservation of open space 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 40 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Projected Flooding 1111111 � 66 =in P � � 1 4,A� few Projected Flooding During a Maximum(1%)71d A....ins a a r r LI �7 Yt y r Ji S61n.M1 SElinin Rx by Year 2100 and East ng general Me1gM11a att El.vatl.n 8 fw[(NAVO50) Areas Iowa,Ihrn Elevxw 10.01ee11NA0,ppB Eelum). Appionmatelm6 of 0oode,eumq a nommiin we in � y Yx12055 with an immu mab good treat of 0.1 3feel eM MM durrw 00.1 b 31toura - 1 A,ees Iowa,than Elemiden 12.0fuel 1NisION delum) App,wlmate muni of Mod'mp dump a itmd..We In Y — Y..20.0 wuh an gWe MM oelmetde th.101-51M .m good it.,..of 01 to 7Imum. Coneµlevel mMtil M pmdMnery plandn,purro es. Longer gooddUmhrn one dwpe,food mpns im the e.m..l N.nm. 09/17/15 Community Development Department- Planning Division 41 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) Scope of Work Data/Modeling Multi-scenario Impact Analysis Flooding and inundation Wave impacts Erosion Sediment supply Saltwater Intrusion LCP Update 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 42 Planning Commission - September 17, 2015 Item No. 7a: Additional Materials Presented at Meeting 001 ) LCP Update Land uses Development regulations Public access Views and visual quality ■ Habitats 09/17/2015 Community Development Department- Planning Division 43 i 1' r 074 illIllitif Ali won Op i For more information contact: Patrick J. Alford, Planning Manager 949-644-3235 ipp PAlford@newportbeachca.gov www.newportbeachca.gov