Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2016-102 - Adopting the West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan (PA2015-138)
RESOLUTION NO. 2016-102 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE WEST NEWPORT MESA STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN (PA2015- 138) WHEREAS, on May 26, 2015, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach (City) adopted Ordinance No. 2015-12 creating a height overlay district to allow increased residential building height along with an increased setback for properties located in the Multiple Residential District in Statistical Area A2 in West Newport Mesa; WHEREAS, the height overlay district provides an opportunity to better improve the aesthetic environment in the West Newport Mesa area; WHEREAS, West Newport Mesa Land Use Policy LU 6.6.4 in the General Plan directs the City to work with property owners and encourages the preparation of a master plan for the residential neighborhood that defines park and streetscape improvements that provide amenities for local residents and enhances the area's identity; WHEREAS, stakeholder meetings were conducted on January 26, 2016, to identify some of the primary concerns and desires for improving the area; WHEREAS, public workshops with local residents, business owners, and property owners occurred at the West Newport Community Center Gymnasium on February 17, 2016, March 16, 2016, and June 22, 2016, to help guide the Master Plan's development; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the progress of the draft Master Plan during study sessions on February 18, 2016, and June 9, 2016, and provided further guidance to staff on potential improvements to the Master Plan at each of these study sessions; WHEREAS, the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission reviewed the draft Master Plan during its meeting on July 5, 2016, and expressed its support in implementing the concepts provided in the Master Plan; WHEREAS, on July 21, 2016, the Planning Commission reviewed the final draft of the Master Plan at its regular meeting held in City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the Planning Commission at this meeting. After some discussion and further direction, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend adoption of the West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan, with minor amendments; and WHEREAS, on August 9, 2016, the City Council considered the final draft of the Master Plan at its regular meeting held in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660. A notice of time, place and purpose of the meeting was given in accordance with the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to and considered by the City Council at this meeting. Resolution No. 2016-102 Page 2 of 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows: Section 1: The recitals provided above are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution. Section 2: The City Council does hereby adopt the West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan, which is attached as Exhibit 'A," and incorporated herein by reference. The West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan shall apply to all property within the project area, as depicted on page 1 of Exhibit "A." Section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 4: The City Council finds the adoption of this resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378) of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or indirectly. Section 5: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. ADOPTED this 9tn day of August, 2016. ATTEST: Leilani I. E City Clerk Fp 6iane B. ixo Mayor Attachment: Exhibit A - West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan ANOMR-d West Newport Mesa STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN Prepared for the C This page intentionally left blank. WEST NEWPORT MESA STREETSCAPE MASTER PLAN Prepared for the City of Newport Beach. O� 1 Y n C'141 �P FO V - Document prepared by RRM Design Group. rrm 1'f design group ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 644-3309 CITY COUNCIL Diane B. Dixon, Mayor - District I Tony Petros - District 2 Duffy Duffield - District 3 Kevin Muldoon, Mayor Pro Tem - District 4 Edward D. Selich - District 5 Scott Peotter - District 6 Keith D. Curry - District 7 PLANNING COMMISSION Kory Kramer, Chair Peter Koetting,Vice Chair Peter Zak, Secretary Bradley Hillgren Ray Lawler Bill Dunlap Erik Weigand Tim Brown CITY STAFF Kimberly Brandt,AICP Community Development Director BrendaWisneski,A1CP Deputy Community Development Director Benjamin Zdeba,AICP Associate Planner Tony Brine, PETE City Traffic Engineer This page intentionally left blank. 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 PROJECTAREA.........................................................................I 1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW...............................................................I 1.3 PUBLIC OUTREACH...............................................................2 1.4 GENERAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS ...... 3 1.5 IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES................................................4 2 PLACENTIA AVENUE 2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS......................................................7 2.2 PUBUC INPUT...........................................................................7 2.3 OPPORTUNITIES......................................................................8 2.4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.............................................10 2.5 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE......................................15 3 SUPERIOR AVENUE 3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................17 3.2 OPPORTUNITIES....................................................................17 3.3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.............................................17 3.4 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE......................................21 4 MONROVIA AVENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH STREET 4.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................23 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS....................................................23 4.3 OPPORTUNITIES....................................................................25 4.4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.............................................27 4.5 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE......................................33 5 LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES 5.1 PLANT PALETTE .............................. ........................... ............ 35 5.2 SITE FURNISHINGS...............................................................39 5.3 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE.....................................................41 5.4 LIGHTING................................................................................42 5.5 PUBLICART..............................................................................42 TABLE OF CONTENTS 6 IMPLEMENTATION PHASING 6.1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................45 6.2 PROJECT PHASING AND COST ESTIMATES................45 6.2 FUNDING SOURCES............................................................46 A APPENDIX A A.I LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE.................................................................................A This page intentionally left blank. 1 INTRODUCTIC West Newport Mesa Streetscape Maste INTRODUCTION VIF I West Newport Mesa Study Area Map 1.1 PROJECT AREA The West Newport Mesa neighborhood is roughly bound by 16th Street, MonroviaAvenue, Hospital Road, and Newport Boulevard. The site for the proposed Newport Banning Ranch Development abuts the study area to the west and Hospital Road abuts the study area to the south. The study area covers approximately 149 acres of land within the City of Newport Beach and is comprised of residential, commercial, industrial, and medical office uses with several housing complexes, numerous medical uses, industrial offices and buildings, and Carden Hall, Pacifica Christian High School, and Coastline Community College. 1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW The West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan (Plan) is a document designed to establish a vision and foster implementation of an action plan to beautify and improve the public right-of-way within West Newport Mesa. It provides a framework to discuss future development requirements in the private and public realms and address relationships between the building edge and the roadway. The ultimate goal is to create a lively and safe multimodal area that serves the needs of the community. In developing the Plan, the team reviewed several pertinent planning documents, including the Newport Beach General Plan, Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan, and the proposed Newport Banning Ranch Planned Community Master Development Plan. Several public outreach events were conducted to encourage public involvement, to better understand the needs and concerns West NewtportMesa Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach �' of the community area, and to prioritize projects within West Newport Mesa. The Plan identifies challenges with the study area and provides recommended improvements and phasing as well as cost estimates to assist with implementation. The following primary goals were identified to guide the design and development of the study area: • Develop a vision for West Newport Mesa. • Implement complete street principles to better serve pedestrians, transit riders, bicyclists, and automobiles. • Encourage bicyclist and pedestrian activity. • Create a more walkable environment. • Improve safety. • Improve landscape areas to be more aesthetically pleasing. • Utilize sustainability measures such as low -water -use planting and LED lighting. • Implement traffic calming measures. 1.3 PUBLIC OUTREACH In an effort to involve all those interested and affected by the Plan, public outreach events were conducted to better understand the needs and concerns of the community, residents, employees, and visitors of the area. Stakeholder interviews and community workshops were held to provide a variety of opportunities for the community to become engaged in the planning process and help develop strategies to best serve their needs. 1.3.1 STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS Interviews were conducted on January 26, 2016, with various stakeholders interested in the improvements to West Newport Mesa. The following stakeholders were interviewed: • Representatives from the Newport Knolls, Newport Terrace, and One Nautical Mile communities as well as Seaside Catering & Cafe, a local business • Tony Petros, City of Newport Beach Councilmember • MBK Homes and Studio PAD Landscape Architects on Ebb Tide Development During these interviews, opportunity and constraint maps and existing conditions photos were shared to support the discussion for the vision of the study area. Placentia Avenue existing condition 15th 'feet existing condition West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 2 _ _---- — City of Newpo coach INTRODUCTION Dot exercise at March 16th workshop Nna� tlo ow i�k�t Top ten community desires deternnned from public outreach 3 I West Newport M_esa_Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach 1.3.2 PUBLIC WORKSHOPS Several public workshops were conducted in early 2016, to assist the project team in identifying and prioritizing issues and ideas to create a vision for the study area: • Workshop #I: February 17, 2016 • Workshop #2: March 16, 2016 • Planning Commission Meeting:June 9,2016 • Public Open House:June 22, 2016 • Planning Commission Final Review: July 11, 2016 Community members shared their comments and concerns in response to the opportunities and constraints maps, proposed improvement concepts, planting, site furnishings, lighting, and graphics presented by RRM Design Group. The main topics of the workshop included improving walkability and pedestrian safety, bicycle safety, addressing high speeds on roadways, streetscape beautification, low -water -use planting, increasing street amenities, increasing visibility and lighting, improving parking availability, and addressing drainage issues. This feedback was the foundation used to develop the concepts outlined later in the Plan. 1.4 GENERAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS Information gathered from field observations, City staff input, and public comments were utilized in the analysis and integrated into an exhibit (Figure 1. 1). Key topics that were identified by the community include: • Increase lighting to improve visibility and safety, and to help reduce vandalism • Widen sidewalks • Increase parking availability and capacity • Remove sidewalk obstacles such as utilities and signage • Add traffic calming measures • Improve overall safety for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians • Improve visibility to promote a safe feeling • Add more bicycle facilities • Address vandalism, graffiti, and homelessness • Implement 15 foot setbacks in entire study area • Provide opportunities for nodes, benches, wider parkways and sidewalks • Utilize complete streets concepts • Create more walkable streets • Consider bike share program • Foster neighborhood feeling on smaller streets • Provide safer crossings for pedestrians LfOYfitslexLuteo NRtlfClgx lq \AMNYIG fLNCM MYfIINIIfMI �Dtx ILN mttn rOf nccu LIO r.% IIY NG qN'a PlA i0 t45l IN EMER MEj W, [OAS T G1hx..G UF':n .. lN3t NDOIrLOLM000 wucm fNLf r smpNG L xLULLu lNNf cornet sIL®t <NNY-r<w *e 'AccutNALns AI [ND OI 16TH STREET ! - a C HM.lION1IIiYE A}AP4Nfit1 4(MQYS rznAcr MI4PN1! 1rUt.Y r4W Surm.+ mv»or aN Np:xA: wa 6tWron MptI t�l12A5:X M4D!1Y .YAYrWiR LEGEND li IC T I" .A C 0liIA11N W.. IGX QJ' p P.C ..... ("v M.N.tYGEMit) EY -1 3rL' F PH( ,)5 ` f f ... iAFS 17 lap Figure I.1: Communy car.- iems an. i.'ers 1.5 IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES 1.5.1 COMPLETE STREETS Implementation of the complete streets design philosophy is a large part of the improvements that are desired for the study area. This movement pushes to plan for balanced, multimodal transportation network that meets the needs of all users (motorists, pedestrians, people bicycling, children, persons with disabilities, seniors, movers of commercial goods, and users of public transportation) of streets, roads, and highways. The California Department ofTransportation (Caltrans) adopted Mrtl NOi4 .-A-1:' MIMEO USES 19LSA1.3 U n' 11 YW11 AT WL 0vi INTRODUCTION VISLFlYCL IARIA 0!V!{OlMINI N tNx¢ 1 MfA AUDrOC6 C,OSSNG MOULD Lrl NrUtt UNDFIGbYNDNC.,O• Fxlrf AUm LLtA WOM SttfM nUS CONflLNMID LSA C1ctKi1 RL[SIVA. fU6SnALAttL LEI,WMTt ftx ALLAN t xA,VW unu vaswn IlrxLrG ono 9YRYDL .Cpli[Llfl • LDNMNO L[0 .ulwceo v1ylAm 11 NR6lONN 101 VfNKI! LIrDlNxx! Id MfiLIG NnY11! Wp[AI .COACLIxf Iq OL M[pCAt WISIrANL SE9VNG cl LlSIDlNIIM C,OSbSG G NANOVf4 complete street policies in 2008, and has been working to implement complete streets throughout the State transportation system. These policies are also supported by Federal law requiring safe accommodations for all transportation users. West NewportMesa Streetscanpe Master Plan A City of Newport Beach I 4 INTRODUCTION 1.5.2 GREEN STREETS AND SUSTAINABILITY The study area provides opportunities to enhance environmental resources and create sustainable site improvements to reduce stormwater pollution and runoff, minimize solar heat gain, and encourage walking and biking. A large percentage of the surfaces within the street corridors right-of-way are impervious and absorb summer heat. Impervious surfaces prevent the percolation of water, creating stormwater runoff that washes motor vehicle pollutants and other surface contaminants into storm drains and eventually to reservoirs and oceans. "Green Streets" principles should be applied to streets, where appropriate, within the study area in an effort to reduce water pollution and replenish local groundwater storage. Green streets strategies include managing stormwater through small scale drainage features to slow, filter, and capture urban runoff and precipitation. Several ways to accomplish this are to increase the permeable areas through parkway strips, medians, bioswales, and storm drains with pervious bottoms to allow infiltration. Solar heat gain is created when dark elements absorb heat from the sun and emit excess heat throughout the day and night. A way to minimize this is to use lighter colored materials to reflect the sun's heat and to create shade over the exposed areas. Street trees planted in parkways and medians are an effective way to create shade and absorb greenhouse gases (GHGs) and other airborne pollutants. GHGs can also be reduced by providing more opportunities for non -motorized transportation. The Plan aims to improve neighborhood walkability by increasing sidewalk connectivity, accessibility, sidewalk improvements, increased lighting, enhanced Class II bike lanes, and sharrows. Providing alternate transportation choices also creates opportunities for a healthier lifestyle within the community. reduce impact on traditional drainage systems Jr I West New Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of I-iowrnrt Beach ----_ _ . Law -water -use planing, current irrgabon techniques, mukh, and increased permeable area are all ways to create a r )re sustainable environment a PLACENTIA AVEN West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan PLACENTIA AVENUE 2.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Placentia Avenue, from just north of Production Place south to Hospital Road, is lined with medical, commercial, office, industrial, and dense residential uses, and is urban in nature. The right- of-way is fairly wide, varying from 60 to 80 feet and designated for bicycle, vehicular and bus travel. Parking is prohibited along Placentia Avenue. The following elements describe the existing conditions: • High vehicular travel speed EBB TIDE • Uninviting pedestrian and bicycle environment due to PROJECT exposure to traffic SEASIDE CAFE & CATERING • Lack of seating and trash receptacles • Four bus stops provided by OCTA for bus route • Reduced visibility at intersections for vehicles and pedestrian activity, especially I Sth Street intersection • Lack of street trees and planted medians north of Superior \ Avenue intersection DPOINT COVE APARTMENTS • Variety of plant species on privately and publicly owned JQ landscapes NEWPORT c� • Varying building setback distances SUPERIOR NEWPORT MEDICAL Q Powerlines alongboth sides of the street TERRACE PLAZA •f The northern border of Placentia Avenue, just south of 16th ;. �...... �. *. f.; Street, is the City boundary between Costa Mesa and Newport r r r r r Beach, yet there is no signage, gatewayelement, or change in identity signifying the transition between the two cities. 'PORT BROOKVIEW - REST NEWPORT 2.2 PUBLIC INPUT Comments collected from community members about Placentia Avenue at the various public outreach events include: • Pedestrians and bicyclists feel constrained due to high vehicle speeds - • Reduced visibility turning right on 15th Street from UNION Placentia Avenue heading south t BANK • Pedestrian and bicycle crossing I Sth Street from Placentia Avenue concerns - • Barrier shrub planting outside Newport Terrace LEGIU, u encroaches onto sidewalk on Placentia Avenue and gives CITY LIMIT HOA G NEWPORT LIDO MEDP -- PROJECT STUDYAREA LIMIT HEALTH CENTER little room to walk ©PHOTO LOCATIONS CENTER Possible mid -block crossing opportunity AND DIRECTION EF61.WG CLASS " €' P LANE PROPOS€D '.'KE LA I— ��■ _EKISTNGCLASi K:LANE .f PROPOSED GLASS ii'rCE LANE, - OCTA SE CLAS Ex6T.4G POWERUNES STREET LIGHT OPPORWM' �..UDEWALY. GPPORTMTY cTRAFFIC SIGNAL 13 So STOP N P!acentio Avenue opportunities and coostIo nts map wtth existing photo locations 7 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan_ City OFNew B, a& h P 2.3 OPPORTUNITIES With consideration to existing conditions and public input, several opportunities for improvement were identified: • Enhanced bike lanes • Landscaped medians and parkways with low -water -use plants with unified plant theme • Additional site furnishings • Enhanced crosswalks • Standard setback policies for new development • Improved identity for people entering Newport Beach from Costa Mesa • Gateway opportunity at north PlacentiaAvenue when entering the City of Newport Beach East side of Placentia Avenue looking north adjacent to Ebb Tide Development with bike lane improvements and 15'setback improvement opportunities ID 1. ■li Intersection at Placentia Avenue and 15th Street looking scuth w"h enV it cc—ent and bike Ione improvements Intersection at Placentia Avenue and 15th Street looking north with aosswolk Bike Ione and sidewalk improvement opportunities ?om P,acen-s Avenue looking south West Newport -Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I Q City of Ne•�, port ", 7ch ENTIA AVENUE LEGEND # J� SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS to STRIPED BIKE LANES mjjjw LANDSCAPE MEDIANS Y LOW-WATER-USETREES i LOW -WATER -USE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SITE FURNISHINGS STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM Existing ccndimns on In icenna Avenue beeveen 15th Street 9 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach 2.4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Placentia Avenue is a four -lane undivided, highly traveled road in the study area. The existing conditions perspective (Figure 2. 1), shows the Placentia Avenue right-of-way between I Sth Street and Production Place, and exhibits current conditions including varying sidewalk widths, building locations, and overhead powerline heights. Vehicular speeds consistent with an arterial road cause safety concerns for exposed pedestrians and bicyclists. Several proposed improvements focus on streetscape beautification and pedestrian and bicycle safety are shown in the perspective in Figure 2.2. Recommended improvements designed to enhance pedestrian and bicycle safety and experience include meandering sidewalks, striped bike lanes, and additional site furnishings. A modified sidewalk configuration will allow space for planted parkways as well as provide opportunities to locate bus stops, site furnishings, signage, and utilities in a way that allows increased accessible movement along the corridor. Additional site furnishings, as identified in Section 5.2 of this document, should be installed at approximately one location per block. Additional furnishings may be located on private property, Proposed improvements along Placentia Avenue looking north should property owners choose to add to the theme and walkability of the area. An opportunity for an accessible bus stop also exists in front of the residential development across from Production Place. Landscape medians are proposed for PlacentiaAvenue in locations which do not block or limit access to existing residences and businesses. Canopy trees with low shrub and groundcover are — West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of ! o; t+ewpBeacn I 10 aLACENTIA AVENUE _ rmAffuNoscerf, r f s' II' m m Il' 1GYFl GNf Ar s' P iGVEL GNE fI1:F fgfW/3R As W111EE"ON SIOfWAIS COX01110N WAY WA1 flCf iRAtle WiF RIVFI UNI YNL MfONX 11NF CONMION M ' CUA410{ML " r . improvements EDGECONDMON VARIES FUWRE TS'PRIVATE SETBACK i W TH NEW DEVELOPMENT TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY WIDTH AND POWERUNES. MURUAUMA'PARKWAY p, WITH TREES. Typek Existing Condition======IM1•MIWIWII• Typek Proposed Improvements=IMlWIMIWI1•=lM== 1 I West N_ewwport Mesa Streetscc a Master Plan City of Newport Beach " r Ali EDGECONDMON VARIES FUWRE TS'PRIVATE SETBACK i W TH NEW DEVELOPMENT TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY WIDTH AND POWERUNES. MURUAUMA'PARKWAY p, WITH TREES. Typek Existing Condition======IM1•MIWIWII• Typek Proposed Improvements=IMlWIMIWI1•=lM== 1 I West N_ewwport Mesa Streetscc a Master Plan City of Newport Beach recommended for median plantings to provide shade, while maintaining visibility along the corridor. Street trees should be planted in parkways with a width of four feet or greater. In areas where powerlines occur and will not be undergrounded at the time of improvements, trees with a smaller canopy height should be considered in order to avoid tree topping under the powerlines. Low -water -use plant species for parkways, medians, and private landscape improvements have been selected and are included in Chapter 5: Landscape and Streetscape Amenities. A maintenance program tailored to the West Newport Mesa area is recommended as a future implementation item to ensure the area is well kept Future development should include a I S -foot setback from the street frontage to allow for street beautification, widened and meandered sidewalks with planted parkways, and increased space for pedestrian nodes and site furnishings (Figure 2.3). At the time of future development, the City may obtain an easement for these improvements. 2.4.1 PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS Four improvement types were identified for improvements along Placentia Avenue within the public realm. Recommended improvements are located based on existing conditions, available public right-of-way, and enhancement opportunities. Areas where no proposed changes occur are located where existing conditions are restrictive. Type A: Existing Conditions: Currently, areas in the right-of-way have narrow sidewalks and missing trees, which make it hot and uncomfortable for walking. Many existing parkways include grass with a high need for water. Type A: Proposed Improvements: The sidewalk will be widened to make a more walkable pedestrian experience. Existing mature trees will be supplemented with lower story plants and groundcovers. New street trees will be added to provide additional shade for pedestrians and to beautify the street. Water -intensive lawn will be replaced with drought - tolerant, visually appealing shrubs that will preserve resources and add character to the street PLACENTIA AVENUE NEWPORT TERRACE �l BROOKVIEW ' NEWPORT ' UNION BANK NEWPORT JQ� SItPFRInR HOSFIIA Plocentia Avenue Strectscope Imorovemen: Cor_ tons AMEAME —West NMesa Streetscape Master Plan I 12 _.__ewport _- City i f He,+port Bea -;_.h LEGEND � amu CITY LIMBS �•� PROJECT BOUNDARY . TYPE A CONDITION E =ME TYPE C CONDITION R61� MMA TYPE D CONDITION A CHANGE SEASIDE CAFE CATERING , PROPOSED Z; i W 1 >, NEWPORT TERRACE �l BROOKVIEW ' NEWPORT ' UNION BANK NEWPORT JQ� SItPFRInR HOSFIIA Plocentia Avenue Strectscope Imorovemen: Cor_ tons AMEAME —West NMesa Streetscape Master Plan I 12 _.__ewport _- City i f He,+port Bea -;_.h PLACENTIA AVENUE EDGE CONDITION VARIES TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY WIDTH AND POWER NINES. MINIMUM A' PARKWAY WIIHITEES. PRIVATE SETBACK VARIES fUNRE IRIVA71 WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT �'---., �}'- I t Y` Type C: Existing Condition -- M Type C:Proposed Improvements=_�������� Type C: Existing Conditions: Type C: Proposed Improvements: Lawn cover requires significant watering in order to maintain Buffering the sidewalk from the street with planters provides vitality. Long stretches of sidewalks have sparse tree spacing, a pleasant pedestrian experience while adding character to offering little shade to pedestrians. the public realm. Augmenting mature trees with similar, shade - providing trees increases comfort for pedestrians and makes the street more attractive as a whole. Native and drought -tolerant planting will reduce water needs and soften the roadway edges along the street. 1 I West Newport Mesa Streetscapee MasterPlan City of Newport Bead I — -- - - PLACENTIA AVENUE Type D: Existing Condition============ Type D: Proposed Improvements========== Type D: Existing Conditions: ; r` ,, Lack of a sidewalk for pedestrians decreases connectivity, accessibility and discourages CSE SIOt CAFE 6l�! -- alternative transportation. Existing vegetation lacks cohesion to other community landscaping `A'eRs c 1z1 and decreases visibility, thereby decreasing pedestrian comfort.>I Ia! Type D: Proposed Improvements: 1¢! 1�! The addition of a sidewalk creates a more walkable community by increasing connectivity. 1 WI Parkway planters include attractive, drought -tolerant landscaping and buffer the pedestrian Ie� NLwEOEi SJ 1¢I wrEmoK from the street. The addition of vines over the fence increases comfort for the pedestrian Without compromising the visual buffer between the public and private realm. ! RRWKYIEM ! ! NEWI09t 1 1 ! N'34G ', � NENtfOai VD(% NEA4iM. Mfa1CAl CnafE CEMER , l NA HOSPITAL ROAD Placentia Avenue Streetscope Irnprovernent Conditions West Newport Mesa Streetsc_ape Master Plan I A -- — -- Cify Of Newport m 4 Bea PLACENTIA AVENUE 2.5 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE This section presents the estimated cost of public improvements identified within the PlacentiaAvenue corridor. These improvements include new sidewalks with additional landscaping, a new landscaped median, striped bike lanes, and street furnishings. Additional costs for area -wide improvements and implementation prioritization are identified within Chapter 6 and the original detailed cost estimate and background is provided within AppendixA of this document. While the overall cost of the public right-of-way improvements have been provided, it is possible that some of the financial burden will be met as part of private redevelopment within the study area. Cost estimates are shown as lump sum, rounded to the nearest thousand, include hard and soft costs, and assume prorates for general conditions, design contingency, and escalation. All cost estimates for construction are based on current 2016 rates. At the time of project bidding, it is important to ensure that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received. Conceptual Cost Estimate Project Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, landscaped medians, and street furnishings): $764,000 General Conditions: 10% $ 77,000 Design Contingency: 30% $229,000 Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $113,000 Subtotal: $1,183,000 Bonds: 02% $ 24,000 Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 95,000 Placentia Avenue Total Estimated Cost: $1,302,000 I 15West Newport Mesa Stre_et_scape Master Plan 1 City of Newport Beach J , K SUPERIOR M West Newport Mesa Streetsc SUPERIOR AVENUE East side of SuperorAvenue looking south with turf removal and replacement with low -water -use plant species opportunity Superior Aven :e or Plarenuo Avenue Intersection enkcrcement rppartunity 3.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Superior Avenue between 16th Street and Hospital Road has a wide open street character lined with medical, commercial, office, and residential development. The right-of-way is fairly wide along Superior Avenue, ranging from 80 to 100 feet. The following elements describe the existing conditions: • Traffic speeds consistent with arterial road • Multiple driveways and curb -cuts provide opportunities for pedestrian/bicycle/vehicular conflicts. Bicyclists have been observed riding on the sidewalk • Class 11 bike lane south of the Placentia Avenue intersection • Class III bike lane north of the Placentia Avenue intersection • Lack of seating and trash receptacles • Lack of buffer between the sidewalk and the street • Power poles, utilities, and signage are located within sidewalks, creating accessibility issues • Inconsistent landscape theme 3.2 OPPORTUNITIES Several opportunities for improvement were identified with consideration to existing conditions and public input including: • Driveway consolidation • Landscape parkways • Unified low -water -use plant theme • Site furnishings • Enhanced crosswalks • City of Newport Beach gateway opportunity on north Superior Avenue when entering the City from Costa Mesa 3.3 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Superior Avenue is a four -lane divided, highly traveled road characterized by distinctive planted medians and adjacent to a variety of land uses. Landscaping located within parkways on and privately owned land varies in plant species and style. Turf parkways along the Superior Avenue corridor should be replaced with low -water -use shrubs and groundcover. Additional areas should be evaluated and replaced if excessive water use exists. Street trees should be planted in existing and proposed parkways with a width of four feet or greater. In areas where powerlines occur, and will not be undergrounded at the time of improvements, trees with a smaller canopy height should be considered in order to avoid tree topping under powerlines. I 7 West Newport Mesa Stre_etsca a Master Plan _ City of Newport Beach COAST WINERY tOSSFIT SEASIDE CAFE & 9RT BEACH CATERING SANDPOINT COVE APARTMENTS :LIEF NEWPORT TERRACE NEWPORT BROOKVIEW SEACREST NEWPORT ONE NAUTICAL MILE _ EWPORT (NOLLS THE BEACH HOUSE APARTMENTS UNfON BANK Z17 VERSAILLES ON THE BLUFFS SuperiorAvenue opportunities and constraints map nth exiv.ng photo lac tion; SUPERIOR AVENUE CITY OF COSTA MESA EBB TIDE PROJECT NEWPORT SUPERIOR MEDICAL PLAZA HOAG HEALTH CENTER 'PO �qO P� 40 Q 4z, CI' A FLAGSHIP HEALTHCAR CENTER 11 I .EGET,'' HOAG NEWPORT LIDO MEDICAL an LIMIT HEALTH CENTER ^-- PROJECT STUDY AREA UNIT CENTER PHOTO LOCATIONS AND DIRECTION girt.:: ai C'.A' .NIKE '•N _• Pk.:Ju.:LA.S I1 elAi tA•:. EY a>G Cay'_.. E C L, ._ FRC'::'. -..D C' A:'_ :... tA' ; _ C.LiA3H- NA T4/•c:- 3N'l West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I l O City of 17 e,;Purt -z . I O PERIOR AVENUE Recommended plant species are provided in Chapter 5: Landscape and Streetscape Amenities. A unified landscape along Superior Avenue would help create a cohesive character for the corridor. Site furnishings, also identified in Chapter 5, should be installed once per block to improve walkability and the pedestrian environment. Future development should include a 15 -foot setback from the street frontage to allow for street beautification, widened and meandered sidewalks with planted parkways, and increased space for pedestrian nodes and site furnishings (Figure 2.3). At the time of future development, the City may obtain an easement for these improvements. 3.3.1 PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS Two public realm improvement types were identified for improvements along SuperiorAvenue. Recommended improvements are located based on existing conditions, available public right-of-way, and enhancement opportunities. Areas where no proposed changes occur are located where existing conditions are restrictive. Type A: Existing Conditions: Currently, areas in the right-of-way have narrow sidewalks and missing trees which make it hot and uncomfortable for walking. Many existing parkways include grass with a high need for water. Type A: Proposed Improvements: The sidewalk will be widened to make a more walkable pedestrian experience. Existing mature trees will be supplemented with lower story plants and groundcovers. New street trees will be added to provide additional shade for pedestrians and to beautify the street Water -intensive lawn will be replaced with drought - tolerant, visually appealing shrubs that will preserve resources and add character to the street. - - TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY WIDTH AND POWERUNES. i MINIMUM' PARKWAY -�� WITH TREES. EDGECONOMON VARIES FMRE IS' PRIVATE SETBACK WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT Type A: Existing Condition=====Type A:Proposed Improvements========== l A I West Newport Mesa Streets_cape Master Plan_ _ 17 City of Newport Beoch SANDPOINT COVE APARTMENTS Q THE BEACH HOUSE APARTMENTS I— Z LL NEWPORT V TERRACE Q J CL VERSAILLES ON THE BLUFFS AT NEWPORT Superior Avenue Streetscope Improvement Condivons SUPERIOR AVENUE 10 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARK MAINTENANCE LEGEND 111mmu CITY LIMITS •—•- PROJECT BOUNDARY Mm■ TYPE A CONDITION ENM■ TYPE C CONDITION NAMEEN I:O CHANGE 7/�' PROPOSED West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 20 — - - - — Cit, c.fls:p�rt Beach EDGECONDDION VARIES PRIVARESEERACU EDGECONUTION VARIES EUNIRE IS' PRIVATE SMACK / - WNN NEW DEVELOPMENT WIDTH AND POWERUNES. Type C: Existing Condition============ Type C: Proposed Improvements======== MM Type C: Existing Conditions: Lawn cover requires significant watering in order to maintain vitality. Long stretches of sidewalks have sparse tree spacing, offering little shade to pedestrians. Type C: Proposed Improvements: Buffering the sidewalk from the street with planters provides a pleasant pedestrian experience while adding character to the public realm. Augmenting mature trees with similar, shade - providing trees increases comfort for pedestrians and makes the street more attractive as a whole. Native and drought -tolerant planting will reduce water needs and soften the roadway edges along the street 3.4 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE This section presents the estimated cost of public improvements identified within the Superior Avenue corridor. These improvements include new sidewalks with additional landscaping, striped bike lanes, and street furnishings.Additional costs for area -wide improvements and implementation prioritization are identified within Chapter 6 and the original detailed cost estimate and background is provided within AppendixA of this document. While the overall cost of the public right-of-way improvements have been provided, it is possible that some of the financial I 21 West Newport Mesa Str_eetscape Master Plan City of Nc-wport Beach burden will be met as part of private redevelopment within the study area. Cost estimates are shown as lump sum, rounded to the nearest thousand, include hard and soft costs, and assume prorates for general conditions, design contingency, and escalation. All cost estimates for construction are based on current 2016 rates. At the time of project bidding, it is important to ensure that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received. Conceptual Cost Estimate Project Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, and street furnishings): $737,000 General Conditions: 100/0 $ 74,000 Design Contingency: 30% $221,000 Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $ 109,000 Subtotal: $1,141,000 Bonds: 02% $ 23,000 Overhead and Profit 08% $ 91,000 Superior Avenue Total Estimated Cost: $1,255,000 4 1 MONROVIA AVENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH STREET West Newport Mesa Streetscope Master Plan AVENUE • 1STH STREET • CITY OF COSTA MESA 6TH STREET• ���-llllll'''"' ` 0 ORANGE COAST WINERY A .LN,� �I GARDEN HALL &rrrrrr�Eii`N r. ' L���III �K 741f (Lyy) ir7l�I�i�i��r •Q CROSSFIT Irr rr rr iTi1 SEASIDE CAFE & NEWPORT BEACH CATERING 9z Z COC COASTLINE 4 COMMUNITY I, COLLEGE E N A��V TH SANDPOINT COVE APARTMENTS SEACLIFf NEWPORT TERRACE • tr*rrr�rjr ylr*Ir•pr�rrrr�r�Lrr r•r>rr *Err• r� r� /r r•r rII. �JL�L�;��J r� rr1 rrl �� F NEWPORT • BROOKVIEW SEACREST NEWPORT Its :up with exisoag photo Ixafws for hloaror;a Avenue, 16th Street, Pt ha, i Place, Mrd 15th Street 4.1 INTRODUCTION MonroviaAvenue, 16th Street, Production Place, and 15th Street share similar characteristics and opportunities for improvements. Chapter 4 describes the existing conditions and cost estimates, as well as proposed improvements for each of the corridors. 4.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4.2.1 MONROVIA AVENUE MonroviaAvenue, from just north of 16th Street at the City boundary to the south ending of the cul-de-sac, has a 23 I West Newport Mesa Vreetsc_ape Master Plan_ City. of Newwt Beach LEGEND CITY LIMIT �— PROJECT STUDYAREA LIMIT PHOTO LOCATIONS AND DIRECTION FK"'e:G CLASS II MIKE LANE -- PRJPL:S> CLASS Y BIKE LANE —Ex., G CLASS tlI BIKE LANE F<'J:- 1 CLASS M EIKE LANE CGTF F.. RC _'L' . Ex..' 3:0WEF':'NES -IR%ET, a.. GE oar.¢nY --SINEW .Lr G^PC rut n or, aNA: © :._sT< neighborhood feel in comparison to Superior Avenue and Placentia Avenue. The 60 -foot -wide right-of-way has two travel lanes, one in each direction, and there is parallel parking on either side of the street. MonroviaAvenue is flanked by industrial and residential uses. Coastline Community College and Carden Hall, a private school, are also located on the west side of the street. Several existing conditions include: • Peak traffic patterns for Coastline Community College, drop off and pick up times for Carden Hall, and work hours for businesses and Production Avenue • Pedestrian and bicycle travel is perceived as constrained MONROVIA AVENUE • On -street parking is often fully utilized Lack of bicycle facilities Lack of street furnishings and pedestrian lighting Overhead powerlines are located along segments of the street frontage • Landscape parkways on both sides of the street • Varying landscape palette including turf, low -water -use planting, and trees crosswalk o,,d bul.out op;nrt rn�l East side of Monrovia Avenue looking north with turf removal and replacement with low -water -use plant species opportunity enhancement and bulbout opportunity _ West Newport Mesa Streeh ope Master Plan I �l A City of Newport 3each L'i NROVIA A 4.2.2 16TH STREET 16th Street, from Placentia Avenue west to Monrovia Avenue, includes a light industrial use neighborhood, half of which is located within the City of Costa Mesa on the north side of the street At the far west end of 16th Street is the Newport Beach City Utilities Yard, and a possible future location for the West Newport Beach Community Center. The right-of-way for 16th Street is 60 feet wide and has two travel lanes with parallel parking on both sides of the south side of the street. A few existing conditions include: • Lack of bicycle facilities • Turf parkway and sidewalks on the north and south side • Powerlines line most of the north side. • Lighting is limited to street lights attached to power poles • Varying plant palette • Lack of site furnishings 4.2.3 PRODUCTION PLACE Production Place, from Monrovia Avenue to Placentia Avenue, is bordered by industrial buildings. The right-of-way is 60 feet wide and includes two travel lanes, parallel parking and sidewalk flanking either side of the street, and some landscape areas. A few existing conditions include: • Narrow sidewalks without landscaped parkways to buffer the street edge • Utilities and signage located in the sidewalk • Inconsistent street lighting • Turf dominant planting with a few street trees on the south side of the street • Varying traffic patterns due to Coastline Community College, drop off and pick up times for Carden Hall, and work hours for businesses I 2 C West Newport Mesa Streetsc_ ape Master Plan J City of Newport Beach PLACE • 16TH STREET 4.2.4 15TH STREET I Sth Street, from Superior Avenue west, is a predominantly residential street with dense housing. Pacifica Christian High School is located at the old West Newport Community Center building. Coastline Community College and the future Kobe Inc. Headquarters bookend the west end of 15th Street, while commercial, medical, and office buildings bookend the east end. The right-of-way varies from 60 to 72 feet wide, containing two travel lanes and parallel parking on both sides. Several existing conditions are listed below: • Lack of on -street parking • Varying sidewalk width and parkway • Utilities, signs, and power poles on the south side of the street located in the sidewalk • Powerlines on north side of the street • Decomposed granite path on north side parkway • Lack of bicycle facilities • Inconsistent lighting on the south side. • Visibility concerns at the Placentia Avenue and Superior Avenue intersections 4.3 OPPORTUNITIES With consideration to existing conditions and public input, several opportunities for improvement were identified: • Pedestrian lighting for increased visibility and walkability. • Sharrows for bicycle safety and awareness • Enhanced crosswalks and curb extensions at intersections to increase visibility and safety • Turf removal and replacement with low -water -use planting • Shared parking program with Coastline Community College • Wayfinding directional signage for major destinations • Additional street trees • Consistent plant palette to unify the street • Site furnishings • Sidewalk improvements NROVIA AVENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH and bike facilities South side of 16th Street looking east with landscape improvements and bike facility opportunities and replacement, and increased lighting opportunities and replacement, and increased lighting opportunities 15th Street looking east from the south side of the street with parkway, sharrow, and lighting opportunities 15th Street looking west from the north side of the s --eat with sharrow opportunities est Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I n L - -- -- -- - - - — W City of 14ewDort Beach LCJ MONROVIA Al W Q FUTURE BANNING RANCH 'ENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH STREET *'&MM..Frr" COSTA +" MESA 16TH! STREET Q ,1Z r0ASORANi -L IFFY y{::vE4V ll.l I TU CONNECTION TO BANNING RANCH air Pro fssed imprweme= (. • Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street Production %ace, and 15th Street 4.4 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ON P $,AS JE G CATE NS•fYOR Jv TI tRAC^ NEWP::•,' iJPERiUi J AE,)iCAI P P.A[A Q 1STH STREET 0 Q Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Production Place, and I Sth Street are considered the neighborhood streets of the study area. They are all characterized by varying sidewalk and parkway widths, but are generally similar in needs including pedestrian and bicycle improvements, low -water -use planting, additional site furnishings, and increased parking. Pedestrian and bicycle improvements for this area include new meandering and wider sidewalks, enhanced crosswalks, bulbouts, and sharrows. Enhanced crosswalks and bulbouts are envisioned at the 16th Street, Production Place, and 15th Street intersections at Monrovia Avenue, reducing the crossing distances and increasing the visibility for pedestrians. Bike sharrows are proposed in the area to elevate the importance of bicyclists in the area. A sharrow is a street marking which is placed in a travel lane to notify drivers that bicyclists can legally ride In the roadway. Turf is present on the four streets in parkway and privately owned landscape areas. Low- water -use planting should replace turf in all parkway and City controlled right-of-ways. Opportunities for street trees should be considered to provide more shade along the streets. Street trees should be planted in existing and proposed parkways with a width of 27 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach LEGEND CITY LIMIT .�..�... PROJECT STUDY AREA LIMIT - STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION w= PARKING LOW WATER USE NATIVE PLANTING SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 1 IE ENHANCED CROSSWALKS AND BULBOUTS SHARROWS AND STRIPED LANES �s NEW STREET LANDSCAPE MEDIANS Z STREET TREES AND DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANTING *'tfr SITE FURNISHINGS PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING PARKING PROGRAMS IMPROVE STREET DRAINAGE EXISTING BUS STOP • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • four feet or greater. In areas where powerlines occur, and will not be undergrounded at the time LEGEND of improvements, trees with a smaller canopy height should be considered in order to avoid tree SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS, BULBOtopping under powerlines.A cohesive plant palette will help create a more unified character for �' � ENHANCEANDMENTS CROSSWALK the neighborhood streets and the study area as a whole. Site furnishings should be considered ENHANCEMENTS to provide seating nodes with trash receptacles and appropriate lighting. Site furnishings and SHARROWS lighting recommendations can be found in Chapter 5: Landscape and Streetscape Amenities. Evistirng conditions for Mcdrovv- AverL 166 Street, Prcductian F. ice, .,d 15th Street LOW -WATER -USE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SITE FURNISHINGS Various proposed conditions (er Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Production Mace, and 15th Street U '�''}• S7�{. LOW -WATER -USE TREES LOW -WATER -USE SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVER SITE FURNISHINGS LIGHTING STREETSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OPARKING SHARE PROGRAMS DRAINAGE .111L -.— _ — West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 2Q City of Newport Beoch vU AVENUE • 15TH STREET • PRODUCTION PLACE • 16TH STREET Monrovia Avenue, Production Place, and 15th Street all have a shortage of available on -street parking. Parking share programs With Coastline Community College and Pacifica Christian High School should be explored, in an effort to alleviate the parking shortage. 4.4.1 PUBLIC REALM IMPROVEMENTS Four public realm improvement types were identified for improvements along MonroviaAvenue, 16th Street, Production Place, and 15th Street. Recommended improvements are located based on existing conditions, available public right-of-way, and Future development should include a 15 -foot setback from the enhancement opportunities. Areas where no proposed changes street frontage to allow for street beautification, widened and occur are located where existing conditions are restrictive. meandered sidewalks with planted parkways, and increased space Type A: Existing Conditions: for pedestrian nodes and site furnishings (Figure 2.3). At the time of future development, the City may obtain an easement for these Currently, areas in the right-of-way have narrow sidewalks and improvements. missing trees which make it hot and uncomfortable for walking. Many existing parkways include grass with a high need for water. S I Type A: Proposed Improvements: - The sidewalk will be widened to make a more walkable pedestrian experience. Existing mature trees will be supplemented with lower story plants and groundcovers. New street trees will be added to provide additional shade for pedestrians and to beautify the street. Water -intensive lawn will be replaced with drought - tolerant, visually appealing shrubs that will preserve resources and add character to the street. EDGE CONDITION VARIES FUNRE T5 PRIVATE SETBACK WITH NEW DEVEIOPMENT TREES WNW PARKWAY MOTHAND POWERUNES. MINIMUM d' PARKWAY Type A: Existing Condition============ Type A: Proposed Improvements MMMMMMMMMM 29 I West NewwwwSort Mesa Streets_cape Master Plan 7 City of Newport Brach Type B: Existing Conditions: The current sidewalk in place provides no buffer to the street, resulting in a barren and exposed space. The lawn in the adjacent landscape require Intense water needs and frequent maintenance. Type B: Proposed Improvements: Proposed improvements include adding parkway planters to buffer the street, improving pedestrian comfort, and allowing the sidewalk to meander in wider right-of- ways. Additional trees will shade pedestrians and grow to add character to the street. Replacing water -intensive lawn with drought -resistant, native landscaping preserves resources and adds visual appeal. AVENUE • 15TH STREET • NEWPORT REACH CITY UTILITIES 41 LEGEND null CITY LIMITS •-- PROJECT BOUNDARY =ME TYPE A CONDITION MMM TYPE B CONDITION u —=ME TYPE C CONDITION Z.M= MEMO TYPE D CONDITION === MMN NO CHANGE d��RR�kkh PROPOSED COAST P WNIERY N 'Y L._ IALL ; Jtm� m woomm_m== =tri w ■ CROSSFIT SEASIDE CAFES NEWPORT BEACH CATERING Z SANI)FONTCOVE 4PARINIEN'I5 I— ry EH— Z W SEA,CUFF Q NEWPORT TERRACE CL NEWPORT SEACRESt Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Prrduc.n Place, a—' 15t S'-eet Sr P• --ape lm( r,ement C. l t, n- PRIVATE SETBACK VARIES EDOECONDMON VARIES ENURE 15' PRIVATE SETBACK WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT_, BROOKVIEW NEWPORT TREES VARY WITH PARKWAY WIDTH AND POWERUNES. MINIMUM < PARKWAY 111P. WITH TREES. Type B: Existing Condition============ Type B: Proposed Improvements========== West Newport Mesa_Stre_etscape Master _Pla_n I '?O — — -- – – — --- -- --- J Cc; Cf I- E; ✓PO f Be0, AVENUE • 15TH STREET • P Type C: Existing Conditions: Lawn cover requires significant watering in order to maintain vitality. Long stretches of sidewalks have sparse tree spacing, offering little shade to pedestrians. Type C: Proposed Improvements: Buffering the sidewalk from the street with planters provides a pleasant pedestrian experience while adding character to the public realm. Augmenting mature trees with similar, shade - providing trees increases comfort for pedestrians and makes the street more attractive as a whole. Native and drought -tolerant planting will reduce water needs and soften the roadway edges along the street. n J _ 1., lit EDGE CONDMON VARIES P=RE 15' PRIVAIESEMACK WNN NEW DEVELOPMEW I 1REES VARY WM PARKWAY WIDM AND POWERNNES. Type C: Existing Condition============ Type C: Proposed Improvements========== Type D: Existing Condition============ Type D: Proposed Improvements = = I• 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 31 I West Newport Mesa Streetsc pe Master Plan City of Newrxyt Beach --11 — • 16TH STREET West Newport Mesa Streetscaape Master Plan I 32 Ci'y cf i:ewport Beach AVENUE • 15TH STREET • 4.5 CONCEPTUAL COST ESTIMATE This section presents the estimated cost of public improvements identified within the Monrovia Avenue, 16th Street, Production Place, and 15th Street corridors. These improvements include bulbouts with bioswales, new sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle sharrows, pedestrian oriented street lighting, and street furnishings. Additional costs for area -wide improvements and implementation prioritization are identified within Chapter 6 and the original detailed cost estimate and background is provided withinAppendixA of this document. While the overall cost of the public right-of-way improvements have been provided, it is possible that some of the financial burden will be met as part of private redevelopment within the study area. Cost estimates are shown as lump sum, rounded to the nearest thousand, include hard and soft costs, and assume prorates for general conditions, design contingency, and escalation. All cost estimates for construction are based on current 2016 rates. At the time of project bidding, it is important to ensure that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received. MonroviaAvenue Project Improvements (new bulbouts/bioswales, sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $678,000 General Conditions: 10% $ 68,000 Design Contingency: 30% $203,000 Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $100,000 Subtotal: $1,049,000 Bonds: 02% $ 21,000 Overhead and Profit 08% $ 84,000 Monrovia Avenue Total Estimated Cost: $1,154,000 33 I West Newport Mesa_S_tre_etscaQe Master Plan City of Newport Beach 16th Street Project Improvements (new bulbouts/bioswales, sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $393,000 General Conditions: 10% $ 94,000 Design Contingency: 30% $282,000 Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $ 139,000 Subtotal: $1,454,000 Bonds: 02% $ 29,000 Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 116,000 16th Street Total Estimated Cost: $1,599,000 Production Place Project Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $390,000 General Conditions: 10% $ 39,000 Design Contingency: 30% $117,000 Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $ 58,000 Subtotal: $604,000 Bonds: 02% $ 12,000 Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 48,000 Production Place Total Estimated Cost: $ 664,000 15th Street Project Improvements (new bulbouts/bioswales, sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle facilities, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $793,000 General Conditions: 10% $ 79,000 Design Contingency: 30% $238;000 Escalation to 2019: 14.76% $117,000 Subtotal: $1,227,000 Bonds: 02% $ 25,000 Overhead and Profit: 08% $ 98,000 ISth Street Total Estimated Cost: $1,350,000 5 1 LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAP_E_ AMENITIES west Newport Masa Streetscape Master Plan LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES Recent Dover Drive Streetscape Improvements Landscape Palette Areas LEGEND CITY LIMIT PROJECT STUDY AREA STREETS - SUPERIORAVENUE PLACENTIAAVENUE MONROVIAAVENUE 16TH STREET PRODUCTION PLACE - ISTH STREET 'Note: Street colors are keyed to p!mrc palette matrix. 35 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach 5.1 PLANT PALETTE The plant palette for the West Newport Mesa streetscape incorporates several complementary tree, shrub, and groundcover palettes that will help to create a distinctive character and unified theme for each corridor. The majority of the streets in the study area currently have inconsistent plantings, preventing these streets from possessing a true sense of identity, Canopy trees with a high, broad branching structure are recommended for plan area streetscapes for several reasons. Canopy trees create shade for roadway and sidewalk surfaces, thereby reducing the heat island effect and creating a more comfortable environment. In addition, trees improve air quality by absorbing vehicle air pollution and enhance water quality by capturing and filtering stormwater runoff. Lastly, canopy trees provide a passive traffic calming influence by visually narrowing the feel of a corridor, which leads a driver to instinctively reduce speed. A few of the challenges within the study area include the overhead powerlines and narrow parkways within the street right-of-way. Trees with lower heights that can handle small root zones are recommended for most of the streets adjacent to powerlines. In addition, many of the streets have more right-of- way on one side of the street than the other. In these areas, trees an be planted on the City -owned right-of-way and private land owners are encouraged to plant similarly. Planting should be low -water -use to comply with the State of California's drought -tolerant laws and to reduce water use. A variety of plants and colors should be used within the medians and the parkways to create a unified, yet diverse and aesthetically pleasing corridor. Boulders and mulch should be used as accents in the landscape area. Mulch should also be used as a tool to retain moisture and lessen the need for additional water. On the following pages, a list can be found with recommended trees, shrubs and groundcover and corresponding height, spread, spacing, and location. Many of the species listed in the plant palette matrix are existing species, which are currently present within the study area. Plant species should be selected appropriately for height, spread, and intended use and placed where optimal growing conditions will ensure health and longevity. Certain existing tree, shrub, and groundcover species in the study area should be replaced at the time of landscape improvements if they have destructive roots, weak branching structure, and high water use or are poisonous or combustible or leave heavy debris. LANDSCAPE AND — — -- -- _ _ West N"Roort Mesa Streetscae Master Plan I 36 City of IJewpxI Sewn Z' G s1S. tom. t Agonis (lexuosa Arbutus unedo Agave americana Agave parryi Baugainvilleo spp. PeppermintTree Strawberry Tree Blue Agave Parry's Agave Bougainvillea r � S w. Metrosideros ex-elso Platanus racemosa Carex praegracilis Carissa macrocarpa Gstus purpureus New7ealand ChristmasTree California Sycamore California Field Sedge Natal Plum Purple Rockrose Quercus agrTolio Tipuana tipu Keckiella con#blia Muhlenbergia rigens Myoporum parvi";m Coast Live Oak Tipu Tree Heartleaf Kecldella Deer Grass Creeping Myoporum a r t i r r, � Tristaniopsis lounna Ulmus parv(joba SoMa clevelandii Senecio serpens Yucca pfomentow'Golden Sword' Water Gum Chinese Elm Cleveland Sage Blue Chalk Sticks Golden Sword Yucca — — -- -- _ _ West N"Roort Mesa Streetscae Master Plan I 36 City of IJewpxI Sewn AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES Legend: P = Primary Trees O = Secondary Trees *Known to be attacked by the Polyphagus Shot Hole Borer Beetle. Assess the severity of the beetle before planting this species. 37 I west Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan _ City of Newpo,t Beach i I Agonis (lexucsa • • • • • • • PeppermintTree - Arhutus'Manna • • • • • • • • Arbutus Arbutus unedo • • • • • O O P P P P Strawberry Tree • • • • • Baubmla vanegoto • • • • • ® • Purple Orchid Tree • • • Brachych¢un acerfc us • • • • 0 • Flame -Free Lagerstroeno indica 'Natchez' • • • O ® • • O P • • • White Crape Myrtle Laurus noaihs'Saratogo' • • • • • • • O O Saratoga Laurel © Lophostemon confertus • • • O O O O • • Brisbane Box Magnolia grondif lona 'Little Gem' • • • • O e • • P O P O Little Gem Magnolia Metrosideros excelso New Zealand • • • • • • • P • • O Christmas Tree Phoenix doctyM1fero • • • • • • • • • Date Palm Platonus racemosa* • • • • • • P California Sycamore Quercus agn(olra • • • • • • • Coast Live Oak Syogr us romanzuffona • • • • • P Queen Palm Lpuano apu • • • • • • • • • O O Tipu Tree Trlstonlopsls lounna • • • • • O • • • • Water Gum Ulmus parnfolio • • • •• • • O Chinese Elm Legend: P = Primary Trees O = Secondary Trees *Known to be attacked by the Polyphagus Shot Hole Borer Beetle. Assess the severity of the beetle before planting this species. 37 I west Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan _ City of Newpo,t Beach Aeonmm spp. • • • • • • • • P • • Canary Island Rose California Field • • • • • • • Agave omencono • • • • • • • • • • P • • • • Blue Agave • Bush Anenome Agave attenuota • • • • • • • • O O P • Agave • Purple Rockrose Agave desmettiono Festuca idohoensis 'Variegate' Variegated Dwarf • 'Sislayou Blue' • • • • • • • • • O P P P P P Agave P Idaho Fescue Agave parryi Parry's Agave • Hardenbergia vio!acea • • • • • • • • • O • • O Agave victorm-reginae P Purple Lilac Vine Queen Victoria • Legend: P = Primary Shrubs and Groundcover, O = Secondary Shrubs and Groundcover • City of Newport B3och • • • • • O P P P P P Agave Aloe spb Aloe • ® •• • • O Amgozanthos flavrdw • • • • • • • • • • • Kangaroo Paw Bougainvillea spp • • • • • • • O O P O O P Bougainvillea Callistemon vnmmafa'bude John' Little John • • • • • O P Bottlebtush Carex drvulsa European Gray • • • • • • • TPP P P Sedge Carex proegracrlis • • • • • • P • • California Field • • • • • • • • • Sedge • • • • • • • • • • • Conssa macrocarpa • • • • • • P • • Natal Plum Corpmtena cah(omica • • • • • • • • • • • Bush Anenome Cetus purpureus • • • • • O P • • Purple Rockrose Festuca idohoensis 'Sislayou Blue' • • • • • P O P P P P Idaho Fescue Hardenbergia vio!acea • • • • P P Purple Lilac Vine Legend: P = Primary Shrubs and Groundcover, O = Secondary Shrubs and Groundcover West New port Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I %a4 City of Newport B3och LANDSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE AMENITIES ,. i; Keckiello cordifoho • • • • • • • • • • • • Heartleaf Keckiella Muhlenbergia Imdne.men 'Leri • • • • • • Autumn Glow Muhly I Muhlenbergia rigens • • • • • P P P P P P Deer Grass Myoporum pornfolmm • • • • • • • • Creeping Myoporum Penstemon heterophyllus • • • • • • 0 0 • • • • • Beard Tongue Rosmnnus offianalis • • • • • P P P P P P Rosemary SOMG develandn • • 0 0 0 0 m O • • • • • Cleveland Sage Salvia meff fern 0 • • 0 0 • • • • • • Black Sage Salvia leucontho • • 8 0 • • • P P P P P P Mexican Sage Bush Seneac serpens • • ® 0 • P P P P P P Blue Chalk Sticks Yucca filamentoso'Golden Sword' • • • • • • • e O Golden Sword Yucca Legend:P = Primary Shrubs and Groundcover,O = Secondary Shrubs and Groundcover 5.2 SITE FURNISHINGS Street furnishings such as benches, trash and recycling receptacles, bike racks, and bus shelters can create a sense of character and unify a place. Furnishings in the study area should be clustered together to create gathering spaces and nodes for members of the community to enjoy. Recommended street furnishings are provided below. BENCHES Benches should be placed every 300 feet to improve the pedestrian experience. Benches may be placed with other furnishing elements to create a node. Benches should be designed to deter homeless activity, whether using a center armrest, installing a shorter bench or installing individual chairs. Skateboard deterrents can also be added to the benches to help reduce damage. Manufacturer. Maglin or similar Model.• MLBS 10 Series Color. Graphite Gloss or RAL Custom Gray 39 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan____ City of Newport Beach LANDSCAPE AND CHAIRS Chair locations should be determined on the same criteria as bench locations. Chairs should be placed in groups of two or more or accompany a bench. Manufacturer. Victor Stanley or similar Model.PRSCA-8 Production Collection Color. Gray or RAL Custom Gray TRASH AND RECYCLING RECEPTACLES Trash and recycling receptacles should be placed in multiple places along each corridor to provide multiple convenient waste disposal locations. Receptacles should also be placed with other furnishings such as benches and bus shelters. Manufacturer. Maglin or similar Model. MLWR250-32 Series Color: Graphite Gloss or RAL Custom Gray BIKE RACKS Bike racks should be located near transit stops, schools, the community college, medical areas, commercial areas, parking lou, and various places throughout the study area. They should also be considered within new development and open space areas. Bike racks encourage bike ridership and prevent bikes from being locked to high posts or trees. Bike racks should accommodate a minimum of two bicycles and their capacity should be determined by the location and the number of bicyclists who frequent the destination. Manufacturer: Dero or similar Model. Round Rack Color: Silver or Gray BUS SHELTERS Bus stop shelters shall be added to all current and future bus stop locations within the study area. Bus shelters should be combined with benches and trash receptacles. Safety lighting should also be considered for bus shelters. Manufacturer: Landscape Forms or similar Model. Kaleidoscope OS Color: Silver All furnishings should be coated with a protective sealant against rust to combat local coastal conditions. 2- the 5- If r cora _West kewport Mesa StreetscapeMaster Plan 1 40 LANDSCAPE AND ""IP 16TH STREET z a PRODUCTION PLACE O z O 15TH STREET 9 Wcypn.:,ng signage map lacaws 5.3 WAYFINDING SIGNAGE A wayfinding signage program should be established for the study area to enhance mobility, physically accommodating various modes of transportation.The City should coordinate with community organizations to develop key points of interest for signage locations and content. Vehicular directional signs will establish an identity for West Newport Mesa as a special district within the City of Newport Beach. They incorporate distinctive forms and colors inspired by the local area. Common, easy to understand symbols and fonts identify and guide travelers to the district's destinations and attractions. Durability and economic implementation and maintenance were planned for in the design of the signage. 41 I West Neww�ort Mn esa Streetscape Master Pla City of Newport Beach — —_ .^__._ SIGN TYPES Q Vehicular Directional Sign A.8 U tiH H ITAL NA Typical destinations may include: • Coastline Community College Community Center • Medical Center • Trails Parks Relevant public destinations outside the district, creating better connectivity Wayfinding signs for bikes will follow the guidelines of the City's Bicycle Master Plan. Pedestrian wayfinding signs (directional and directories) may be developed in the future as the area evolves, following the design aesthetic established by the vehicular signs, only on a much smaller scale. Wayfnding signage should be uniform with site furnishings. Deigned by Graphu: Solutions Pedestrian lighting should be uniform within the study Grea DSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE Monument signage should also be considered at higher profile locations such as City boundaries and heavily traveled areas. Monument signs should follow the current City monument sign program, should be located in planted medians, and should be lit at night. 5.4 LIGHTING Pedestrian lights are typically located along pathways and sidewalks to provide a smaller, more focused illuminated area. Pedestrian lights should be placed evenly along sidewalks where lighting is needed. Globes should be dark sky compliant and should have LED light bulbs. Man*aurer: Ameron (City Standard Type V) or similar Model: 22 -CT -10 Color: Standard Concrete 5.5 PUBLIC ART The use of public art within a community is an effective way of expressing the unique personality and character of the area. Public art should serve as an aesthetic improvement to enhance the pedestrian environment Stand-alone installations or design integrated installations should both be considered with future improvements in the study area, such as building murals, paving, benches, sculpture, mosaics, and water features. A public art program should be developed for the West Newport Mesa community that is consistent with public art programs that are currently on-going with the City of Newport Beach. SIGN FACE '.AL •.. _C <',„ ,T GRAPHICS PANEL: C•'n.T D ".:.'A -i, aE%t-TWE V'NY.W(T F`Pk:' a3Nt: .r;3C IS I, "',.nil L":'IrA-:VFRLAY COLOR MATCH REFERENCE: 1, r.AY.':'_"-qF "PNt.•.;T RACK OF SIGN: PA STBRAYf -0 G SIGN POST:44 A'_ '.i. i,'/ - 'F0UONSELOWGRA0ETPEATV,' C_FAOSwu%1 FOOTING: CORCRETE FGPTINS FERC_ PAINT FINISHES: ALL PAINT FIX VS -S' GEL-G'3P '.3KH WITH ANL -GRAFFITI CPA' 1v" West Neww�Tort Mesa Streetsc_ape Master Plan I 42 -- —" City of Newport Bcoch o Community kst hinope f1w 4 College Community 4 Center Trails Pedestrian lighting should be uniform within the study Grea DSCAPE AND STREETSCAPE Monument signage should also be considered at higher profile locations such as City boundaries and heavily traveled areas. Monument signs should follow the current City monument sign program, should be located in planted medians, and should be lit at night. 5.4 LIGHTING Pedestrian lights are typically located along pathways and sidewalks to provide a smaller, more focused illuminated area. Pedestrian lights should be placed evenly along sidewalks where lighting is needed. Globes should be dark sky compliant and should have LED light bulbs. Man*aurer: Ameron (City Standard Type V) or similar Model: 22 -CT -10 Color: Standard Concrete 5.5 PUBLIC ART The use of public art within a community is an effective way of expressing the unique personality and character of the area. Public art should serve as an aesthetic improvement to enhance the pedestrian environment Stand-alone installations or design integrated installations should both be considered with future improvements in the study area, such as building murals, paving, benches, sculpture, mosaics, and water features. A public art program should be developed for the West Newport Mesa community that is consistent with public art programs that are currently on-going with the City of Newport Beach. SIGN FACE '.AL •.. _C <',„ ,T GRAPHICS PANEL: C•'n.T D ".:.'A -i, aE%t-TWE V'NY.W(T F`Pk:' a3Nt: .r;3C IS I, "',.nil L":'IrA-:VFRLAY COLOR MATCH REFERENCE: 1, r.AY.':'_"-qF "PNt.•.;T RACK OF SIGN: PA STBRAYf -0 G SIGN POST:44 A'_ '.i. i,'/ - 'F0UONSELOWGRA0ETPEATV,' C_FAOSwu%1 FOOTING: CORCRETE FGPTINS FERC_ PAINT FINISHES: ALL PAINT FIX VS -S' GEL-G'3P '.3KH WITH ANL -GRAFFITI CPA' 1v" West Neww�Tort Mesa Streetsc_ape Master Plan I 42 -- —" City of Newport Bcoch This page intentionally left blank. IMPLEMENTATION PHASI West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan ENTATION 6.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides direction for implementing the public improvements proposed within the West Newport Mesa study area. Individual street improvements and area -wide wayfinding, bicycle facilities, and walkability have been considered in prioritizing and phasing recommendations. Associated cost estimates for each street (provided in previous chapters) have been organized within proposed near (2.4 years), mid (4-6 years), and long (6-8 year) term phasing plans. In addition, potential future funding sources are identified within the chapter. 6.2 PROJECT PHASING AND COST ESTIMATES NEAR TERM PHASE (2 TO 4 YEARS) A number of near-term improvements have been prioritized, balancing community input and desire with the City's ability to create change with capital improvement projects that will beautify the area and improve walkability and bicycle access within the existing public right-of-way. Priority projects within the next few years include: • MonroviaAvenue (new bulboutslbioswales at Production Place, sidewalks with additional landscaping, pedestrian oriented lighting, wayfinding signage, and street furnishings): $1,154,000 • Placentia Avenue medians: $50,000 MID-TERM PHASE (4 TO 6 YEARS) Mid to long-term projects will likely be realized as private development transitions over time and incremental improvements are implemented. The following matrix provides a summary of improvements necessary to carry out the vision for the West Newport Mesa area. In addition, prioritylphasing and preliminary cost estimates are provided. PlacentiaAvenue Remaining Improvements (new sidewalks With additional landscaping, bicycle striping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding signage, and street furnishings): $908,000 Production Place Improvements (new sidewalks with additional landscaping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding signage, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $664,000 I Sth Street Improvements (new bulboutslbioswales at Monrovia Avenue, sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle sharrow striping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding signage, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $1,350,000 Improvements within private property expanded required setback and undergrounding of utilities, where feasible (on- going) Total Estimated Conceptual Cost of Mid -Term Phase (with General Conditions, Contingencies, Overhead, and Escalation): $2,922,000 • Placentia Avenue Type D Improvements to 15th Street LONG TERM PHASE (6 TO 8 YEARS) intersection (new sidewalk, wall, and additional landscaping): - S A I 'd $346,000 • Crosswalk striping throughout the study area: $14,000 • Bicycle facility striping and signage throughout the study area: $41,000 • Improvements within private property expanded required setback and undergrounding of utilities, where feasible (on- going) • Coordination with Coastline Community College and Pacifica Christian High School to explore shared parking agreements upertor venue mprovements (new si ewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle striping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding signage, and street furnishings): $1,255,000 16th Street Improvements (coincide with construction of the Community Center) (new bulboutslbioswales at Monrovia Avenue, sidewalks with additional landscaping, bicycle sharrow striping, crosswalk striping, wayfinding signage, pedestrian oriented lighting, and street furnishings): $1,599,000 Improvements within private property expanded required setback and undergrounding of utilities, where feasible (on - Total Estimated Conceptual Cost of Near Term Phase going) (with General Conditions, Contingencies, Overhead, and Escalation): $1,605,000 Total Estimated Conceptual Cost of LongTerm Phase (with General Conditions, Contingencies, Overhead, and Escalation): $2,854,000 45 I West Newport Me_sa_Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach 6.3 FUNDING SOURCES A summary of potential funding sources, as identified in the 2014 City of Newport Beach Bicycle Master Plan, are listed below. FEDERAL PROGRAMS • Bus and Bus Facilities Program: State of Good Repair • Bus Livability Initiative • Federal Transit Act • MAP -21 - Surface Transportation Program • MAP -21 - Pilot Transit -Oriented Development Planning Program • National Center for Environmental Health - Health Impact Assessment for Improved Community Design • Transportation Investments Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) Program STATE PROGRAMS • CalTrans Active Transportation Program (ATP) • Community Based Transportation Planning Grants • Environmental justice: Context -Sensitive Planning • Safe Routes to School (SRTS) • Sustainable Communities Planning Grant and Incentives Program • Watershed Protection Program (Proposition 13) REGIONAL PROGRAMS • Clean Air Fund (AB 434/2766 -Vehicle Registration Fee Surcharge) • Orange County Measure M2 Local Return • OCTA Bike Corridor Improvement Program (BCIP) Call for Projects PRIVATE PROGRAMS • Health Foundations • PeopleForBikes West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I 46 Ci!y of fie•A ort -each This page intentionally left blank. i "lahkl. A I APPENDIX A West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan -0APPENDIXA Leland Saylor Assoc i ates A Certified DVBE CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE WEST NEWPORT MESA NEWPORT BEACH, CA LSA JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3 July 25, 2016 PREPARED FOR RRM DESIGN BY LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 800 1 San Francisco I California 1 94104 415-291-3200 1 415-291-3201 (f) I www.lelandsaylor.com 7/2512016 1 of 17 A l I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of Newpod Beach Leland Saylor Associates PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA CLIENT: RRM DESIGN DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES PENDIX JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3 PREPARED BY: JS BID DATE: ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE 3 II SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE 9 III ESTIMATE it 7/25/2016 2 of 17 West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A -City of I dewport Beach !1 APPENDIX A Leland Saylor Associates PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA JOBNUMBER: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 SECTION I PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE 7/25/2016 A3I West Newport Mesa Streetscapee MasterPlan J City of Newport BR ach - —� – 3 of 17 _- - APPENDIX A 0 Leland Saylor Ass9ciates 1.1 TYPE OF STUDY: CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA JOBNUMBER: 16.078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORTBEACH,CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN BID DATE: EARLY 2019 DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/2S/2016 PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE N/A Sitework: 1.0 1 PROJECT SYNOPSIS 1.1 TYPE OF STUDY: CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Construction Type: SITEWORK Foundation Type: RETAINING WALL Exterior Wall Type: RETAINING WALL Roof Type: N/A Stories Below Grade: N/A Stories Above Grade: N/A Sitework: PAVING, MEDIANS, LANDSCAPE, STRIPING, LIGHTING Plumbing System: N/A Mechanical System: N/A Fire Protection System: N/A Electrical Service: LIGHTING 1.3 GENERAL NOTES REGARDING PROJECT: REFURBISHMENT OF SEVERAL AREAS OF STREETSCAPES. WORK TO INCLUDE PAVING, MEDIANS, LANDSCAPE STRIPING, UGHTING AND DRAINAGE. 7/2512016 4 o 17 West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A A City of Newport Beach d%APPENDIX A Leland Saylor Astiociates of Bids Differential I ...... _..... _............ +25 to 100% 2 - 3 .................... PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA JOB NUMBER: I6-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORTBEACH,CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN BID DATE: EARLY 2019 DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE 2,0 IDEFINITIONS 2.1 ESTIMATE OF COST: An Estimate of Cost Is prepared from a survey of the quantities of work - items prepared from written or drawn Information provided at the design -development, working drawing or bid -documents stage of the design. Historical costs, information provided by contractors and suppliers, plus judgmental evaluation by the Estimator are used as appropriate as the basis for pricing. Allowances as appropriate will be Included for Items of work which are not indicated on the design documents provided that the Estimator is made aware of them, or which, in the judgment of the Estimator, are required for completion of the work. We cannot, however, be responsible for items or work of on unusual nature of which we have not been Informed. 2.2 BID: An offer to enter contract to perform work fora fixed sum, to be completed within a limited period of time. 3.0 jBIDS&CONTRACTS 3.1 MARKET CONDITIONS: In the current market conditions for construction, our experience shows the following results on competitive bids, as a differential from Leland Saylor Associates final estimates: Number Percentage of Bids Differential I ...... _..... _............ +25 to 100% 2 - 3 .................... ...... +10 to 25% 4- 5 ......... _I .......... _... 0 to +107. 6 - 7 ......... _............ ... 0 to .10% B or more ... .... _....... .......... -10 to -20% Accordingly, it is extremely important to ensure that a minimum of 4 to 5 valid bids are received. Since LSA has no control over the bid process, there is no guarantee that proposals, bids or construction cost will not vary from our opinions or our estimates. Please see Competitive Bidding Statement in the estimate detail section for more information. 7/25/2016 A5 I West Newport Mesa Stree_t_sc_a Jae Master Plan City of Np%,port Beach 5 of 17 APPENDIX A A Leland Saylor Assoclatrs Mechanical Landscaping REPORT ONLY None None PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RIM DESIGN BID DATE: EARLY 2019 DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE 4.0 IESTIMATE DOCUMENTS 1 4.1 This Estimate has been compiled from the following documents and information supplied DRAWINGS: Architectural Mechanical Landscaping REPORT ONLY None None Structural Plumbing Accessibility Standards None None None Civil Electrical Other None None None SPECIFICATIONS / PROJECT MANUAL: Describe: Complete, or Technical Only or Bid & Conditions of the Work. MM, LBE. COSTS PROVIDED BY OTHERS: Describe: None, or list. 4.2 The user is cautioned that significant changes in the scope of the project, or alterations to the project documents after completion of the concept level estimate can cause major cost changes. In these circumstances, Leland Saylor Associates should be notified and an appropriate adjustment made to the concept level estimate. 5.0 1 GROSS SQUARE FEET BUILDING GSF STREETSCAPES 334,160 TOTAL Gross Flow Area 334,160 6.0 IWAGE RATES 6.1 This Estimate is based on prevailing wage -rates and conditions currently applicable in NEWPORT BEACH, CA. 7.0 1 PRORATE ADDITIONS TO THE ESTIMATE 7.1 GENERAL CONDITIONS: 10.007. An allowance based on 10.00% of the construction costs subtotal has been included for Contractors General Conditions. 7.2 CONTINGENCY: 30.007. 7/25/2016 6 of 17 _West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A6 . — __.. __ _ . -- City of Newpe)rt Beach APPENDIX A Leland Saylor ASsocintas PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA CLIENT: RRM DESIGN DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3 PREPARED BY: JS BID DATE: EARLY 2019 ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 An allowance based on 30.00% of the construction costs subtotal has been included for Design/Estimating Contingency. NOTE: This allowance is intended to provide a Design Contingency sum only, for use during the design process. It is not intended to provide for a Construction Contingency sum. 7.3 ESCALATION: 14.76% An allowance of 14.76% has been included in this estimate for construction material & labor cost escalation up to the anticipated mid -point of construction, based on the following ossumpfions: Construction start date: EARLY 2019 Construction period: 9 MONTHS Mid -pant of construction: MID 2019 Annual escalation rate: 5.00% Allowance for escalation: 14.76% No allowance has been made for Code Escalation or Technological Escolation. 7.4 GEOGRAPHIC FACTOR - REMOTE SITE 0.00% This estimate is based on current market prices for work of a similar character, done in NEWPORT BEACH, CA. No adjustment is required for geographical location factor. 7.5 PHASINGALLOWANCE No Phasing Allowance is needed for this job. 7/25/2016 0.00% A7 I west Newwport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan _ City of Newport Beach 7 of 17 APPENDIX A 0 Leland Saylor AeSocla[es PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA JOBNUMBER: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN BID DATE: EARLY 2019 DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATEDATE: 7/25/2016 PREFACE AND NOTES TO THE ESTIMATE 7.6 BONDS: 2.00% An allowance of 2.00% of the construction cost subtotal is included to provide for the cost of Payment and Performance Bonds, if required. 7.7 CONTRACTOR'S FEE: 8.00% An allowance based on 8.00% of the construction cost subtotal is included for Contractors office Overhead and Profit. Office overhead of the contractor is always included with the fee. All field overhead of the contractor is included in the General Conditions section of the estimate. 8.0 ISPECIAL NOTES PERTAINING TO THIS ESTIMATE 8.1 SPECIFIC INCLUSIONS, The following Items are specifically included in this estimate: NONE 8.2 SPECIFIC EXCLUSIONS: The following items are specifically excluded from this estimate: HAZMAT SOIL REMEDIATION 7/252016 8 of 17 West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A8 City of Ne>, port Beach ftAPPENDIX A Leland Saylor Associlntos PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA CLIENT: RRM DESIGN DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES SECTION II JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3 PREPARED BY: JS CHECKED BY: IS ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE 7/2 512 01 6 9 o117 AO I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan 7 -- C:,.,. cf : dewpOrl Beach 11 ,y :leo I."r,� «• -- - --------- ---- -- — — - APPENDIX A� LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA JOB NO: 16.078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES DATE: 7/25/2016 SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE DIV If DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT COST TOTALS SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATE 1.00 ESTIMATE 334,160 GSF 21.90 $ 7,318,486 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 1 334,1601 GSF 21.90 7,318,486 PRORATES INCLUDED IN ABOVE COSTS General Conditions 10.00% Design Contingency 30.00% Escalation 14.76% Phasing Allowance City Procurement / LEE Requirements SUB -TOTAL 334,1601 GSF j21.90 $ 7,318,486 Bonds / Insurance 2.00% Contractors Fee 8.00% TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 1 334,1601 GSF 21.90 $ 7,318,486 Competitive Bidding The prices in this Estimate are based on Competitive Bidding. Competitive Bidding is receiving responsive bids from at least five (5) or more General Contractors and three (3) or more responsive bids from Major Subcontractors or Trades. Major Subcontractors are Structural Steel, Plaster / EIFS Contractors, Mechanical, Plumbing and Electrical Subcontractors. Without Competitive Bidding, Contractor bids can and have ranged from 25% -to 100% over the prices in this Estimate, depending on the sae of the job. We urge you to notify your client of the existing bidding climate, and work with them to ensure that the project is adequately publicized so that they can get the minimum number of bids for competitive bidding. Please contact LSA if you need ideas about how to publicize your project. 712512016 10 of 17 _ West Newport Mesa Streetsca Jae Master PlanwI A 1 O City o` Neport "r A I: APPENDIX A _ Leland Saylor Associates PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA JOB NUMBER: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 SECTION 111 STREETSCAPES 7/25/2016 A 1 1 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City o.' wFG' Beach — -- - --- 11 of 17 APPENDIX A* LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE ITEM # I DESCRIPTION UANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL PLACENTIA AVENUE 23.37 763,872 SUPERIOR AVENUE 19.66 736,272 MONROVIA AVENUE 30.01 677,827 16TH ST 21.63 938,367 PRODUCTION PLACE 26.00 389,659 15TH ST 39.89 793,027 TOTAL SITE 1 4,299,024 4 299 024 PRORATES General Conditions 10.00% 429,902 Design Contingency 30.00% 1,289,707 Escalation to 2019 14.76% 634,536 Geographic Factor- Remote Site 0.00% - Phasing Allowance 0.007. SUBTOTAL 6,653,1691 Bonds 2.00% 133,063 Overhead and Profit 8.00% 532,254 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS 7 318 486 7/25/2016 12 of 17 West Newport Mesa Streetsca Jae Master Plan I A 1 2 ----- -- — ----- City of Ncwport Beach APPENDIX A LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE ITEM# DESCRIPTION QUANTITY I UNIT I COST TOTAL PLACENTIA AVENUE TYPEAIMPROVEMENT- 1,557 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 12,456 SF 4.00 49,824 SIDEWALK 12,456 SF 16.00 199,296 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 6,228 SF 0.25 1,557 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 6,228 SF 3.50 21,798 IRRIGATION 6,228 SF 3.00 18,684 ADJUST DRAINAGE 6,228 SF 1.00 6,228 TYPE C IMPROVEMENT 765 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 6,120 SF 4.00 24,480 SIDEWALK 6,120 SF 16.00 97,920 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 3,060 SF 0.25 765 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 3,060 SF 3.50 10,710 IRRIGATION 3,060 SF 3.00 9,180 ADJUST DRAINAGE 3,060 SF 1.00 3,060 TYPE D IMPROVEMENT 300 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 2,400 SF 4.00 9,600 RETAINING WALL, 3' AVE. HEIGHT 900 SF 55.00 49,500 RETAINING WALL FOOTING 150 CY 550.00 82,500 RETAINING WALL EXCAVATION 6 BACKFILL 300 CY 35.00 10,500 SIDEWALK 2,400 SF 16.00 38,400 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 1,200 SF 3.50 4,200 IRRIGATION 1,200 SF 3.00 3,600 ADJUST DRAINAGE 1,200 SF 4.00 4,800 7/25/2018 13 of 17 I West Newport Mesa Streetscap--_Master Plan A13 _ _ _ _ _ C:-; of Newport Beach LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT I COST TOTAL STREET TREES & GRATES 18 EA 1,900.00 34,200 STRIPED CROSSWALKS 10 EA 500.00 5,000 BIKE LANE STRIPING 1,259 LF 10.00 12,590 WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION 2 EA 1,900.00 3,800 DEMO ROADWAY FOR MEDIAN 1,220 SF 4.00 4,880 MEDIANS, LANDSCAPED 1,220 SF 20.00 24,400 TRAFFIC CONTROL 30 DAYS 720.00 21,600 SITE FURNISHINGS 3 SET 3,600.00 10,800 SUBTOTAL I I I763872 SUPERIOR AVENUE TYPE A IMPROVEMENT - 760 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 6,080 SF 4.00 24,320 SIDEWALK 6,080 SF 16.00 97,280 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 3,040 SF 0.25 760 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 3,040 SF 3.50 10,640 IRRIGATION 3,040 SF 3.00 9,120 ADJUST DRAINAGE 3,040 SF 1.00 3,040 TYPE C IMPROVEMENT 3,035 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 24,280 SF 4.00 97,120 SIDEWALK 24,280 SF 16.00 388,480 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 4,047 SF 0.25 1,012 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 4,047 SF 3.50 14,163 IRRIGATION 4,047 SF 3.00 12,140 ADJUST DRAINAGE 4,047 SF 1.00 4,047 STREET TREES & GRATES 26 EA 1,900.00 49,400 STRIPED CROSSWALKS 2 EA 500.00 1,000 BIKE LANE STRIPING 915 LF 10.00 9,150 WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION 2 EA 1,900.00 3,800 SITE FURNISHINGS 3 SET 3,600.00 10,800 SUBTOTAL -----73-6-,2-72-1 7/25/2016 14 of 17 West NewQort Mesa Streetscape Master Plan I A 1 1 __ --- -- - West �F Cr, e`Newperte7ch APPENDIX A _ UT LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE ITEM # DESCRIPTION I QUANTITY I UNIT I COST TOTAL MONROVIA AVENUE TYPEAIMPROVEMENT- 1,260 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 10,080 SF 4.00 40,320 SIDEWALK 10,080 SF 16.00 161,280 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 5,040 SF 0.25 1,260 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 5,040 SF 3.50 17,640 IRRIGATION 5,040 SF 3.00 15,120 ADJUST DRAINAGE 5,040 SF 1.00 5,040 TYPE C IMPROVEMENT 800 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 6,400 SF 4.00 25,600 SIDEWALK 6,400 SF 16.00 102,400 CLEAR AND GRUB (EI LANDSCAPING 1,067 SF 0.25 267 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 1,067 SF 3.50 3,733 IRRIGATION 1,067 SF 3.00 3,200 ADJUST DRAINAGE 1,067 SF 1.00 1,067 STREET TREES & GRATES 15 EA 1,900.00 28,500 BULBOUTS - 2 CORNERS 4 EA 10,000.00 40,000 LIGHTING 2,193 LF 100.00 219,300 STRIPED CROSSWALKS 3 EA 500.00 1,500 SHARROW STRIPING 320 SF 2.50 800 SITE FURNISHINGS 3 SET 3,600.00 10,800 SUBTOTAL 677,827 16TH ST TYPEAIMPROVEMENT- 3,182 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 25,456 SF 4.00 101,824 SIDEWALK 25,456 SF 16.00 407,296 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 12,728 SF 0.25 3,182 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 12,728 SF 3.50 44,548 IRRIGATION 12,728 SF 3.00 38,184 ADJUST DRAINAGE 12,728 SF 1.00 12,728 7/25/2016 15 Df 17 A15G I West Newport Mesa Stre_etscape Master Plan I J City of New;-; t Beach APPENDIX AG LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WESTNEWPORTMESA LSA JOB NO: 16-078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE ITEM # DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT I COST TOTAL TYPE C IMPROVEMENT 556 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 4,448 SF 4.00 17,792 SIDEWALK 4,448 SF 16.00 71,168 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 741 SF 0.25 185 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 741 SF 3.50 2,595 IRRIGATION 741 SF 3.00 2,224 ADJUST DRAINAGE 741 SF 1.00 741 STREET TREES & GRATES 19 EA 1,900.00 36,100 BULBOUTS - 4 CORNERS I EA 20,000.00 20,000 LIGHTING 1,660 LF 100.00 166,000 STRIPED CROSSWALKS 4 EA 500.00 2,000 SHARROW STRIPING 320 SF 2.50 800 WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION 2 EA 1,900.00 3,800 SITE FURNISHINGS 2 SET 3,600.00 7,200 SUBTOTAL 938.3671 PRODUCTION PLACE TYPE B IMPROVEMENT 1,249 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 9,992 SF 4.00 39,968 SIDEWALK 9,992 SF 16.00 159,872 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 4,996 SF 0.25 1,249 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 4,996 SF 3.50 17,486 IRRIGATION 4,996 SF 3.00 14,988 ADJUST DRAINAGE 4,996 SF 1.00 4,996 STREET TREES & GRATES 10 EA 1,900.00 19,000 LIGHTING 1,249 LF 100.00 124,900 SITE FURNISHINGS 2 SET 3,600.00 7,200 SUBTOTAL 389 659 15TH ST TYPEAIMPROVEMENT- 293 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 2,344 SF 4.00 9,376 SIDEWALK 2,344 SF 16.00 37,504 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 1,172 SF 0.25 293 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 1,172 SF 3.50 41102 IRRIGATION 1,172 SF 3.00 3,516 ADJUST DRAINAGE 1,172 SF 1.00 1,172 7/25/2016 16 of 17 - - -- West Newport Mesa Sireetsca Jae Master Plan I q 1 6 C'tyc N�r,r ,}E9C1Ch APPENDIX A LELAND SAYLOR ASSOCIATES PROJECT: WEST NEWPORT MESA LSA JOB NO: 16.078AR3 LOCATION: NEWPORT BEACH, CA PREPARED BY: JS CLIENT: RRM DESIGN CHECKED BY: IS DESCRIPTION: STREETSCAPES ESTIMATE DATE: 7/25/2016 GSF: 334,160 CONCEPT LEVEL ESTIMATE ITEM If DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT I COST TOTAL TYPE C IMPROVEMENT 956 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 2,294 SF 4.00 9,178 SIDEWALK 7,648 SF 16.00 122,368 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 1,275 SF 0.25 319 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 1,275 SF 3.50 4,461 IRRIGATION 1,275 SF 3.00 3,824 ADJUST DRAINAGE 1,275 SF 1.00 1,275 TYPE D IMPROVEMENT 620 LF DEMO (E) SIDEWALK 2,480 SF 4.00 9,920 RETAINING WALL 1,860 SF 55.00 102,300 RETAINING WALL FOOTING 310 CY 550.00 170,500 RETAINING WALL EXCAVATION & BACKFILL 620 CY 35.00 21,700 SIDEWALK 4,960 SF 16.00 79,360 CLEAR AND GRUB (E) LANDSCAPING 2,480 SF 0.25 620 LANDSCAPING, PLANTBED, SHRUBS 2,480 SF 3.50 8,680 IRRIGATION 2,480 SF 3.00 7,440 ADJUST DRAINAGE 2,480 SF 4.00 9,920 STREET TREES & GRATES 16 EA 1,900.00 30,400 BULBOUTS - 2 CORNERS 2 EA 10,000.00 20,000 SHARROW STRIPING 320 SF 2.50 800 WAYFINDING SIGN, POLE AND FOUNDATION 1 EA 1,900.00 1,900 SITE FURNISHINGS 2 SET 3,600.00 7,200 SUBTOTAL 793027 7/25/2016 17 of 17 A 7 I West Newport Mesa Streetscape Master Plan City of Newport Beach STATE OF CALIFORNIA } COUNTY OF ORANGE } ss. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH } I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; that the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 2016-102 was duly and regularly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said Council, duly and regularly held on the gth day of August, 2016, and that the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Council Member Peotter, Council Member Duffield, Council Member Selich, Council Member Curry, Council Member Petros, Mayor Pro Tem Muldoon, Mayor Dixon NAYS: None IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said City this 10th day of August, 2016. Leilani I. Brown, MMC City Clerk Newport Beach, California (Seal)