HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-4114(E) - PSA for City Hall and Park Master Plan Architectural Design Competitionf
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
ROSSETTI ARCHITECTS
FOR CITY HALL AND PARK MASTER PLAN
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMPETITION
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of thiso?#h day of \.lu rw ,
2008, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a Municipal Corporation
( "City"), and Rossetti Architects a Michigan Corporation, whose address is 2800
Lafayette Avenue, Newport Beach, CA 92663 ( "Consultant "), and is made with
reference to the following:
RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws
of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now
being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of
City.
B. City is planning to conduct an architectural design competition for the City Hall
and Park Master Plan ( "Project ").
C. Consultant has been selected by the City Hall Design Committee as one of five
firms to submit an entry into the competition.
D. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and
knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement.
E. The principal member of Consultant for purposes of Project shall be Roberta W.
Jorgensen,FAIA.
F. City Hall Design Committee has solicited and received qualifications per the
City's request for qualifications (RFQ) from Consultant, has reviewed the
previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and the City
desires to retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and
conditions set forth in this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as
follows:
1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the above written date, and shall
terminate on the 12th day of December, 2008, unless terminated earlier as set
forth herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
Consultant shall diligently perform all the services described in the Scope of
Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The
• i
City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Services at its sole
discretion.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Consultant shall submit their entry by the September 18, 2008, 5pm deadline to
be considered in the Design Competition. Failure to meet this condition will
result in termination of this Agreement by City.
4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
City shall pay Consultant for the services on a lump sum not -to- exceed basis in
accordance with the provisions of this Section. Consultant's compensation for all
work performed in accordance with this Agreement, including all reimbursable
items and subconsultant fees, shall not exceed Fifty Thousand Dollars and
no1100 ($50,000).
4.1 Consultant will be paid an initial payment of 10 %, Five thousand ($5,000)
upon execution of this contract and the submittal of an invoice to the City.
The City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after approval
of the initial (10 %) payment invoice by City staff.
4.2 Consultant will be paid the balance of 90 %, Forty-Five Thousand
($45,000) provided Consultant submits an entry that fully complies with
the criteria set forth in Exhibit A by September 18, 2008 at 5pm to the
City. If Consultant fails to comply with the criteria set forth in Exhibit A or
make a timely submittal, Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional
compensation under this Agreement. The City shall pay Consultant no
later than thirty (30) days after approval of the final (90 %) payment invoice
by City staff.
5. PROJECT MANAGER
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of
the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable
times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated ROBERTA
JORGENSEN to be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or
reassign the Project Manager or any personnel listed in Exhibit A or assign any
new or replacement personnel to the Project without the prior written consent of
City. City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the
removal or assignment of non -key personnel.
Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its
personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.
Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to
complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.
2
6. ADMINISTRATION
11
This Agreement will be administered by the City Manager's Office. Dave Kiff
shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for City
under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his /her authorized
representative shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the services to be
rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
In order to assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this
Agreement, City agrees to, where applicable:
A. Provide access to, and upon request of Consultant, one copy of all
existing relevant information on file at City. City will provide all such
materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's
work schedule.
8. STANDARD OF CARE
8.1 All of the services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and
technical personnel required to perform the services required by this
Agreement, and that it will perform all services in a manner
commensurate with community professional standards. All services shall
be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not
employed by City, nor have any contractual relationship with City. By
delivery of completed work, Consultant certifies that the work conforms to
the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and
local laws and the professional standard of care.
8.2 Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has, shall obtain, and
shall keep in full force in effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and
expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of
whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its
profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business
license during the term of this Agreement.
8.3 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be
responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by
reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or the failure of City
to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consultant's
work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or
governmental agencies.
9. HOLD HARMLESS
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and
hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents,
3
• 0
volunteers and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties) from and
against any and all claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury,
death or damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes
of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and
expenses (including, without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court
costs) of every kind and nature whatsoever (individually, a Claim; collectively,
"Claims "), which may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to
the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or its
principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, consultants,
subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for
whose acts they may be liable or any or all of them.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require
Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the
sole negligence, active negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified
Parties. Nothing in this indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of
attorney's fees in any action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This
indemnity shall apply to all claims and liability regardless of whether any
insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation
upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by the Consultant.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis
and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of
conducting the work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent
they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this
Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute approval
for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over
the means of performing the work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with
the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give
City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance or to
exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant
shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the services.
11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated
Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or
interest in the work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the
Consultant on the Project.
12. CITY POLICY
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project
direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points
in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals
and policies.
0
•
13. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator and /or his/her
duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and
progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that
have been scheduled or are desired.
14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement
of work, Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during
the term of this Agreement, a policy or policies of liability insurance of the type
and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
A. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of
insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance
coverage required herein. Insurance certificates must be approved by
City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance or issuance
of any permit. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with
City at all times during the term of this Agreement.
B. Signature. A person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf shall sign certification of all required policies.
C. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an
insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner
to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders' Rating of A (or higher) and Financial Size
Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of
Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk
Manager.
D. Coverage Requirements.
i. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability
Insurance for his or her employees in accordance with the laws of
the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each
subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation
Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with
the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's
employees. Any notice of cancellation or non - renewal of all
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by City at least
thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days written notice of non-
payment of premium) prior to such change. The insurer shall agree
to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents,
employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by Consultant for City.
5 4
0
ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance in an amount not less than two million
dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage, including without limitation,
contractual liability. If commercial general liability insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed
under this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be at
least twice the required occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
automobile insurance covering bodily injury and property damage
for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for
any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not
less than two million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for
each occurrence.
iv. Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional errors and omissions insurance, which
covers the services to be performed in connection with this
Agreement in the minimum amount of two million dollars
($1,000,000).
E. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance
policy shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with
respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of
the Consultant.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects to
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents
and volunteers as respects to all claims, losses, or liability arising
directly or indirectly from the Consultant's operations or services
provided to City. Any insurance maintained by City, including any
self- insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess
insurance only and not contributory with the insurance provided
hereunder.
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as
though a separate policy had been written for each, except with
respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City, its elected
or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
R
r •
V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed
officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended,
voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits, by either
party except after thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days
written notice of non - payment of premium) written notice has been
received by City.
F. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claim made or suit instituted arising out of or resulting from
Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
G. Additional Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own
judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of
the work.
15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the services to be
provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or
subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following
shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other
disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of
the interest of any general partner or joint venture or syndicate member or
cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint- venture or syndicate or cotenancy,
which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty
percent (50 %) or more of the voting power, or twenty -five percent (25 %) or more
of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint- venture.
16. SUBCONTRACTING
City and Consultant agree that subconsultants may be used to complete the
work outlined in the Scope of Services. The subconsultants authorized by City to
perform work on this Project are identified in Exhibit A. Consultant shall be fully
responsible to City for all acts and omissions of the subcontractor. Nothing in
this Agreement shall create any contractual relationship between City and
subcontractor nor shall it create any obligation on the part of City to pay or to see
to the payment of any monies due to any such subcontractor other than as
otherwise required by law. The City is an intended beneficiary of any work
performed by the subcontractor for purposes of establishing a duty of care
between the subcontractor and the City. Except as specifically authorized
herein, the services to be provided under this Agreement shall not be otherwise
assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted out without the prior written
approval of City.
7
i 0
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing
produced (hereinafter "Documents "), prepared or caused to be prepared by
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of
implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and
City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further
compensation to Consultant or any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's
expense, provide such Documents to City upon prior written request.
Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents
for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written
authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to
Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to
Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than
Consultant is waived against Consultant and City assumes full responsibility for
such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received
from Consultant written consent for such changes.
18. COMPUTER DELIVERABLES
CADD data delivered to City shall include the professional stamp of the engineer
or architect in charge of or responsible for the work. City agrees that Consultant
shall not be liable for claims, liabilities or losses arising out of, or connected with
(a) the modification or misuse by City, or anyone authorized by City, of CADD
data; (b) the decline of accuracy or readability of CADD data due to inappropriate
storage conditions or duration; or (c) any use by City, or anyone authorized by
City, of CADD data for additions to this Project, for the completion of this Project
by others, or for any other Project, excepting only such use as is authorized, in
writing, by Consultant. By acceptance of CADD data, City agrees to indemnify
Consultant for damages and liability resulting from the modification or misuse of
such CADD data. All original drawings shall be submitted to City in the version
of AutoCAD used by CITY in ".dwg" file format on a CD, and should comply with
the City's digital submission requirements for Improvement Plans. The City will
provide AutoCAD file of City Title Sheets. All written documents shall be
transmitted to City in the City's latest adopted version of Microsoft Word and
Excel.
19. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and
communications that result from the services in this Agreement, shall be kept
confidential unless City authorizes in writing the release of information.
(J
0
20. OPINION OF COST
•
Any opinion of the construction cost prepared by Consultant represents his/her
judgment as a design professional and is supplied for the general guidance of
City. Since Consultant has no control over the cost of labor and material, or over
competitive bidding or market conditions, Consultant does not guarantee the
accuracy of such opinions as compared to contractor bids or actual cost to City.
21. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
The Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, its agents, officers,
representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for
infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright
infringement, including costs, contained in Consultant's drawings and
specifications provided under this Agreement.
22. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be
performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and
any services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum
period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date
of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and
invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of
City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and
invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all
work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a
period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this
Agreement.
23. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction
of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be
deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement.
Consultant shall not discontinue work as a result of such withholding. Consultant
shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or his /her designee
with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its
investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts
found to have been improperly withheld.
24. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional
inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what
would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work
accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and /or
9
0 0
restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this paragraph is
intended to limit City's rights under the law or any other sections of this
Agreement.
25. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the
Project.
26. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the
California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act "), which (1) requires such
persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially
affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such
persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably
financially affect such interest.
If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act.
Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate
termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold
harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's
violation of this Section.
27. NOTICES
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under the terms of this
Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served
when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof
in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first -class mail, addressed as
hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests or approvals from
Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at:
Attn: Dave Kiff
City Managers Office
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949 - 644 -3003
Fax: 949 - 644 -3020
E -Mail: dkiff @city.newport- beach.ca.us
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from CITY to Consultant shall be
addressed to Consultant at:
Attn: Roberta W. Jorgensen
Rossetti Architects
2800 Lafayette Avenue
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Phone: 949 - 566 -0080
Fax: 949 - 566 -0082
10
0
28. TERMINATION
•
In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of
this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be
deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not
cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar
days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to
give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after
receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the
steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure
the default, the non - defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by
giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.
Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the right, at its sole
discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving
seven (7) calendar days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of
termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for services
satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination
for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of
termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other
information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement,
whether in draft or final form.
29. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS
Consultant shall at its own cost and expense comply with all statutes,
ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including
federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted.
In addition, all work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City,
county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be
subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.
30. WAIVER
A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition
contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach
of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether
of the same or a different character.
31. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or
nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations
and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal
agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein.
11
• 0
32. CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement
and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms
of this Agreement shall govern.
33. INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning
of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by
reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction
which might otherwise apply.
34. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document
executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
35. SEVERABILITY
If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of
this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
36. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters
relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be
adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange.
37. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT
Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not
discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment
because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age.
12
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first written above.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
4"' C'r c---
City Attorney
for the City of Newport Beach
ATTEST:
:
BX�w
Y
LaVonne Harkless,
Cit Clerk
Y VI..
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
A Muni cipa Corporation
By:_-�Q�.-�--
City Manager
for the City of Newport Beach
Rossetti Architects:
By:4*=
I (Corp o ate Officer)
Title: r h 2�l
Print Name: oh�'�Q Jbr seh
By:
(Financial Officef)
Title: CIF U
Print Name: N1k I._y N I J
Please note: Corporations must complete and sign both places above even if each
office is held by the same individual
Attachments: Exhibit A — Scope of Services
f:\users\pbw\shared\agreements\fy 08-09\city hall design\rossetti architects.doc
13
Fax #:
CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE
CHECKLIST
City of Newport Beach
This checklist is comprised of requirements as outlined by the City of Newport Beach.
Date Received: 7/28/08 Dept. /Contact Received From: Shauna Oyler
Date Completed: 7/28/08 Sent to: Shauna Oyler By: Jessica Scherer
Company /Person required to have certificate: Rossetti Associates Architects dba: Louis A. Rossetti, Architects
1. GENERAL LIABILITY
A.
B.
C.
N
INSURANCE COMPANY: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
AM BEST RATING (A: VII or greater): A +XV
ADMITTED Company (Must be California Admitted):
Is Company admitted in California?
LIMITS (Must be $1 M or greater): What is limit provided?
E. PRODUCTS AND COMPLETED OPERATIONS (Must
include): Is it included?
F. ADDITIONAL INSURED WORDING TO INCLUDE (The
City its officers, officials, employees and volunteers): Is it
included?
G. PRIMARY & NON - CONTRIBUTORY WORDING (Must be
included): Is it included?
® Yes ❑ No
$2M Each Occ/$4M Agg
® Yes ❑ No
❑ Yes ® No
H. CAUTION! (Confirm that loss or liability of the named
insured is not limited solely by their negligence) Does
endorsement include "solely by negligence' wording? ❑ Yes ® No
I. NOTIFICATION OF CANCELLATION: Although there is a provision that requires
notification of cancellation by certified mail; per Lauren Farley, the City will accept the
endeavor wording.
11. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
A. INSURANCE COMPANY: Travelers Property Casualty Company of America
B. AM BEST RATING (A: VII or greater) A +XV
C. ADMITTED COMPANY (Must be California Admitted):
Is Company admitted in California? ® Yes ❑ No
D. LIMITS (Must be $1M min. BI & PD and $500,000 UM):
What is limits provided? $1,000,000
E. ADDITIONAL INSURED WORDING TO INCLUDE (The City its
officers, officials, employees and volunteers): Is it included? ❑ Yes ® No
F. PRIMARY & NON - CONTRIBUTORY WORDING (For Waste
Haulers only):
Is it included? N/A ❑ Yes ❑ No
G. NOTIFICATION OF CANCELLATION: Although there is a provision that requires
notification of cancellation by certified mail; per Lauren Farley, the City will accept the
endeavor wording.
111. WORKERS' COMPENSATION
0
A. INSURANCE COMPANY: Travelers Indemnity Company
B. AM BEST RATING (A: VII or greater): A +XV
C. LIMITS: Statutory
D. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION (To include): Is it included? Z Yes ❑ No
HAVE ALL ABOVE REQUIREMENTS BEEN MET?
IF NO, WHICH ITEMS NEED TO BE COMPLETED? GL: primary
Primary & eontributory not non- contrihutnrv_ Auto- Hired & N.-n.ed
LCD--'
I- //-�
Yes ® No
dorsement states
can
0
Oyler, Shauna
From: Jessica Scherer [JScherer @bbsocal.com]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 1:19 PM
To: Oyler, Shauna
Cc: Rhonda Kostoff
Subject: Revised Rossetti Architects
Shauna,
0 Page 1 of 1
With the confirmation from Rossetti's Insurance Agent, the certificate is good to go. They will be issuing an
endorsement giving primary & non - contributory coverage. Let me know if you need anything further.
Jessica Scherer for Rhonda Kostoff
Commercial Lines Account Administrator
Brown & Brown of California, Inc.
P.O. Box 6989
Orange, CA 92863
Ph: (714) 221 -1841 Fax: (714) 221 -4141
Email: jscherer@r bbsocaLcom
License# OF06835
NOTICE: Please be aware that you cannot bind, alter or cancel coverage without speaking to an authorized representative of
Brown 8 Brown of California, Inc. Coverage cannot be bound without confirmation from an authorized representative of Brown 8
Brown.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this communication, including attachments, is privileged and
confidential. It is intended only for the exclusive use of the addressee. If the reader is not the intended recipient, or the
employee, or the agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us by return email or telephone immediately. Thank you.
07/28/2008
• May 19, 2008 •
ROSSETTI
City of Newport Beach
CITY HALL AND PARK
2800 Lafayette
Newport Beach, CA 92663
t. 949.566 0080
f. 949.566.0082
www.rosselli.com
Is
• 0
ROSSETTI. ARCHITECTURE. INTERIORS. GRAPHICS. PLANNING
2800 LAPAYETTE, CANNERY VILLAGE, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92663
Telephone. 949566.0080 ROSSETTI.COM Fax. 949.566.0082
May 19, 2008
Newport Beach City Clerk's Office
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Dear Selection Committee,
Rossetti Architects is pleased submit our qualifications to participate in the City of Newport
Beach City Hall and Park Master Plan Design Competition. Our architectural practice is located
in Cannery Village, Newport Beach and the potential of working with our own City to create a
special place for conducting the peoples' business while at the same time providing an
important civic park is truly a once -in -a- lifetime opportunity.
Rossetti is a national firm that also has a long Newport Beach lineage. Roberta Jorgensen,
FAIA is principal of the office, a Newport Beach resident, graduate of Newport Harbor High
School and a passionate advocate for her home town. Truly understanding and respecting our
community's commonly held values, as well as understanding the opinions of our citizens that
can be quite divergent, will be extremely important in this design and implementation process.
Roberta and Jason Briscoe, AIA are the architects for the extremely successful and popular
Coronado City Hall and adjacent Glorietta Bay Park. The project is comprised of the City Hall,
16 -acre bayfront park and the Coronado Community Center. The design process, to a
significant extent, was conducted during City Council meetings and televised live on the local
cable channel. The idea of building a new City Hall was not uniformly popular, and the goals
and vision were decidedly not uniform among the citizens. Numerous public meetings were held
on topics ranging from master planning the site, height restrictions, access and parking,
environmental concerns, bay views, design character, the meaning of `timeless ", functional
needs and priorities, budget, materials and color for the exterior and interior, citizen access to
government offices and so on. The resulting design is one that has been embraced by all of
those with originally divergent opinions and priorities and has become a focus of City pride. It is
unique to its people and its site and serves them in the manner that they specifically need and
value.
Fortunate are those who have experienced an environment that has left them with profound
and lasting positive and even inspirational thoughts and emotions. Sometimes, the emotions
rising from the attractiveness of a far -away vista, soothing sounds of running water, or by an
appreciation of historical continuity, cannot be explained by the merits of a physical inventory.
The real answer lies not in the number of elements that define an environment, but in the
skillful way they are brought together to touch the human spirit. This special feeling, often
referred to as a `sense of place', can be provided by Mother Nature, or by the willful intent of
human design.
Rossetti and our landscape architect/park designer SWA Group of Laguna Beach feel that
attitude, ambiance, and activities help establish a sense of place. Our objective is to develop
public spaces into destinations that have a gravitational pull, that produce sensations,
�'
ROSSETTI
0
Newport Beach City Hall Selection Committee
May 19, 2008
Page 2
described by those well informed as 'place'. Refreshing and enjoyable landscaped areas,
community oriented public spaces, and aesthetically pleasing and thoughtful architecture that
serves the needs of the people are a few elements of 'place' in this context.
Our local understanding and presence combined with our national resources and experience
make us singularly well suited to provide the City of Newport Beach with inspiring yet
functional design, a high degree of community involvement facilitated by those who
understand our local culture and context, and outdoor public spaces and places that will
delight and serve our citizens of all ages for many generations.
Thank you for this opportunity.
By virtue of submission of the following information, Rossetti declares that all information
provided is, to the best of our knowledge, true and correct and that the firm and our team of
consultants can complete the project as described.
Sincerely,
Roberta W. J rgensen, FAIR, LEED
Principal
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALLAND PARK
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION LETTER
2. TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. GENERAL INFORMATION
4. FIRM/ TEAM ORGANIZATION
5. EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
6. PROJECTAPPROACH
7. DESIGN MANAGEMENT APPROACH
8. AGREEMENT / EE & 0 INSURANCE / CLAIMS
R 0 S S E T T I I I&
ARCHITECT
ROSSETTI ASSOCIATES, INC.
Architect
2800 Lafayette
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Tel: 949 - 566 -0080
Fax: 949 -566 -0082
www.rossetti.com
Date Established: 1969
Corporation
Contact: Roberta Jorgensen, FAIA
949 -566 -0080
rjorgensenfdrossetti.com
R 0 5 S E T T I I R
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
3. GENERAL INFORMATION
KEY CONSULTANTS
SWA
Landscape Architect & Park Design
580 Broadway, Suite 200
Laguna Beach, CA 92651
Tel: 949 - 497 -5471
Fax: 949 - 494 -7876
www.swagroup.com
RBF CONSULTING
Civil Engineer
URBAN DESIGN GROUP
Public Outreach
14725 Alton Parkway
Irvine, CA 92618
TeL 949 - 472 -3505
Fax: 949- 473 -8373
www.rbf.com
FUNDAMENT & ASSOCIATES, INC.
MEP Engineer
26 Executive Park, Suite 100
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: 949- 251 -1131
Fax: 949 - 251 -9434
www.fa- eng.com
JOHN A. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES
Structural Engineer
950 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90015
Tel: 213 - 483 -6490
Fax: 213 - 483 -3084
www.johnmartin.com
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
Parking Consultant
2550 Hollywood Way, Suite 303
Burbank, CA 91505
Tel: 818 - 953 -9130
Fax: 818 - 953 -9331
www.walkerparking.com
DAVIS LANGDON
Cost Estimator/ Scheduling
301 Arizona Avenue, Suite 301
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Tel: 310 - 393 -9411
Fax: 310 - 393 -7411
www.davisLangdon.com
McKAY CONANT HOOVER, INC.
Audiovisual / Acoustic
5655 Lindero Canyon Road, Suite 325
Westlake Village, CA 91362
Tel: 818 - 991 -9300
Fax: 818 - 991 -2324
www.MCHinc.com
THE LIGHTING DESIGN ALLIANCE
Lighting Consultant
1234 East Burnett Street
Signal Hill, CA 90755 -3510
Tel: 562- 989 -3843
Fax: 562 - 989 -3847
www.LightingDesignAtliance.com
THE Eco >LogicSTUDIO
LEED Consultant
4417 West Sunset Boulevard,
Suite 385
Los Angeles, CA 90027
Tel: 626- 590 -9940
www.TheEcoLogicStudio.com
a` •0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
4. FIRM/ TEAM ORGANIZATION
FIRM PROFILES
Architect ROSSETTI. Creation is a constantly evolving process. For nearly forty
years, Rossetti has consistently created environments that are intellectu-
ROBERTA JORGENSEN. FAIA, LEER ally, aesthetically, and emotionally powerful. Through inspired and innova-
Principal in Charge tive design, we create dynamic places to live, learn, work, shop and play.
We give physical form to culture, providing solutions that follow function
MATTHEW ROSSETTI, ALA, LEED AP while touching the soul. Clients choose Rossetti for this transcendent form
Design Principal of design and the consonant way we integrate our business acumen.
THOMAS AHN, AIA, LEED AP We view our clients and their vision as a wellspring of knowledge from
Project Designer which we draw, in order to deliver a product that enhances economic value
by way of design. Our specific culture of design innovation is maintained
JASON BRISCOE, AIA through a deliberate process, ensuring a consistent vision across all offices
Project Manager and our projects. It is formulated and driven by the economic and emo-
tional needs of our clients and their industries around the globe.
PAUL MURPHEY, AIA, CSI, LEED AP
Project Architect Over 100 talented design and planning professionals fill our five offices in
Detroit, Los Angeles, Newport Beach, Denver and Shanghai. Rossetti's ap-
JAN PURCELL, IIDA proach is a cohesive methodology integrating architecture, planning, inte-
Interior Designer riors and graphics, focused on environmentally sustainable design. From
planning to design through construction implementation, we bring strategy
and consistency to all of our projects.
Working with Rossetti means engaging impassioned, intelligent, diverse
professionals who bring a variety of expertise to your project through an
open exchange of ideas. Our dedication to these principles keeps us con-
nected to our clients, resulting in long term relationships and setting un-
precedented standards of performance.
Landscape Architecture SWA. For over 50 years, SWA Group has been recognized as one of the
Park Designer world's design leaders in the fields of landscape architecture, planning and
urban design. The firms has received over 400 awards and has worked in 47
RICHARD K. LAW states and more than 40 countries. Their principals are among the indus-
Principal in Charge try's most talented and experienced designers and planners with over 75%
of work historically coming from repeat clients.
JAMES MALONEY
Principal Planner The firm brings strong aesthetic, functional, and social design ideas to
their projects, and is committed to integrating principles of environmental
DAVID R. GAL, ASLA, LEED AP sustainability. At the core of their work is a passion for imaginative, solu-
Landscape Architect tion- oriented design that adds value to land, buildings, cities, regions, and
to people's lives.
In addition to full landscape architecture services, SWA produces com-
prehensive land plans and master plans for large land areas. They apply
this with the skill of an urban designer to entire districts, as well as street
systems, city blocks, public parks and plazas, waterfronts, and especially
urban infill and land use changes —as well as the design of new urban
environments.
SWA has created environments for City Halls as diverse as Irvine and Milpi-
tas, as well as parks and open space environments for the Irvine Company
and other public and private parklands. The firm is currently planning an
•0
00
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALLAND PARK
4. FIRM/ TEAM ORGANIZATION
11 -acre civic center site in Vista, California. SWA also provided landscape
architecture services for the Newport Beach City Library and knows the
adjacent site of the proposed new City Hall.
Civil Engineer / Urban Design RBF CONSULTING/ URBAN DESIGN STUDIO. RBF has successfully provid-
CRAIG JOHNSON, PE ed planning, engineering, design and construction services for institutional
Project Manager and public works projects. More than 400 professionals in the Irvine office
bring the experience level required to complete complex engineering de-
AL ZELINKA, AICP, CMSM signs that are timely and cost conscious. Through its stormwater manage -
Planner, Community Outreach ment services, RBF integrates sustainable design, erosion control, water
quality and open space goals.
URBAN DESIGN STUDIO )UDS) is a distinct division of RBF consulting with
experienced planners dedicated to making a difference in community build-
ing projects. UDS believes in the value of community involvement and local
ownership to protect and honor Community Values, Heritage, Culture and
Environment. UDS possesses the skills and expertise to help strengthen
community through strategic planning services and a variety of citizen out-
reach and public participation approaches.
Structural Engineer JOHN A. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES. John A. Martin & Associates provides
JOHN A. MARTIN, JR., SE structural design services for at[ project types and sizes, in both the public
Principal in Charge and private sectors. They utilize the latest design technologies, including
3D modeling, to understand design detail and engineering challenges early
KAL BENUSKA, SE in the process, minimizing costly modifications.
Project Manager
MEP Engineer FUNDAMENT AND ASSOCIATES. For 21 years the Irvine -based firm has
PAULO FUNDAMENT, PE, LEEDAP been dedicated to complex and highly sustainable projects for public and
Principal in Charge institutional clients. The firm has established itself as a leader in provid-
Mechanical & Plumbing Engineer ing sophisticated mechanical, electrical, and energy efficiency- related ser-
vices. Sustainable building design fundamentals are the basis for a major
REED R. STOUT, PE portion of the firm's engineering work.
Electrical Engineer
Parking Consultant WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS. During its43 years of business, Walker
PARI ASHABI has grown to be the largest firm in the world devoted solely to parking con -
Project Manager/ Functional Design suiting and design of parking structures. Walker's services include master
planning, financial feasibility analysis, parking studies, comprehensive de-
sign solutions and operations/ management consulting.
Cost Estimator/ Project Scheduler DAVIS LANGDON For the past 34 years, Davis Langdon has provided a
RICK LLOYD broad range of cost management, project scheduling and management
Associate Principal services to owners, architects, government agencies and institutions. Their
integrated processes will enable the team to find the most effective and
economical solutions.
Acoustics /Media Consultants
DAVID A. CONANT, FASA
Principal, Architectural Acoustics
KYLE M. RIDENOUR
Senior Consult nt, AV Systems
R 0 S S E T T I I R
McKAY CONANT HOOVER INC. Since 1987, MCH has consulted
on more than 1500 projects, providing Acoustical services such as
room acoustical design, noise assessment and control, etc. Me-
dia services cover sound reinforcement and projection and televi-
sion systems from conception to operation.
3
00 00
Ci -Y CF N =WPCRT HACH CITY HALL AND PARK
4. FIRM/ TEAM ORGANIZATION
Lighting Designer LIGHTING DESIGN ALLIANCE. Established in 1992, LDA's has
CHARLES ISRAEL. IALD. LC proven expertise in the design and specification of complete light -
Principal ing and control systems, from concept through installation. Using
ARCHIT JAIN, LC the industry's most current information and technology, LDA cre-
ates the appropriate light environment that yields minimal energy
Lighting Designer consumption.
LEED Consultant THE ECOJ,Logic STUDIO
KATRINA ROSA, AIA, LEED AP Intelligent Green consulting with currency on sustainability man -
Princpal dates and requirements facing the building industry. Eco>Logic
Studio acts as a guide and partner every step of the way, with ex-
perience, judgment, credibility and relationships ensure a suc-
cessful outcome with your clients.
MATTHEW ROSSETTI. AIA, LEED AP
Diesyr Pr- T_,pal
Design Cversigh
R 0 S S E T T I
ROBERTA JORGENSEN, PAIA, LEED AP
Principal In Charge
JASON BRISCOE, AIA
Protect Manager
THOMAS AHN. AIA, LEED AP
Design Lead
JAN PURCELL, IIDA
Irtervor Design
PAUL MURPHEY, AIA, LEED AP
Protect Architect
CONSULTANT TEAM
SWA
Landscape Architect / Park Design
Richard K. Law, Principal in Charge
James Maloney, Principal Planner
David R. Gal, LEED. Landscape Architect
RBF
Civil Engineer/ Urban Design
AI Zelinka. AICP, CMSM.
Planner. Community Outreach
Craig Johnson, PE, Project Manager
JOHN A. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES
Structural Engineer
John A. Martin, SE. Pnnc,pal in Charge
Kai Senuska, SE. Project Manager
FUNDAMENT 8 ASSOCIATES
MEP Engineer
Paolo Fundament, PE. LEED
Principal In Charge/ Mech 8 Plumbing Engr
Reed R. Stout, PE, Electrical Engineer
DAVIS lANG00N
Cost Estimator
Rick Lloyd. Principal in Charge
MCKAY CONANT HOOVER
Acoustic/Audiovisual
David A. Conant, FASA, Principal Acoustics
Kyle M. Ridenour, Sr. Consultant AV Systems
WALKER PARKING
Parking Consultant
Part Ashabi. Frotect Manager. Des -gn
LIGHTING DESIGN ALLIANCE
Lighting
Charles Israel. IALK, LC, Principal
Archit Jain. LC. Lighting Designer
ECOLOGIC STUDIO
LEED Consultant
Katrina Rosa. AIA, LEED, Principal
4
City of Newport
Beach
MATTHEW ROSSETTI. AIA, LEED AP
Diesyr Pr- T_,pal
Design Cversigh
R 0 S S E T T I
ROBERTA JORGENSEN, PAIA, LEED AP
Principal In Charge
JASON BRISCOE, AIA
Protect Manager
THOMAS AHN. AIA, LEED AP
Design Lead
JAN PURCELL, IIDA
Irtervor Design
PAUL MURPHEY, AIA, LEED AP
Protect Architect
CONSULTANT TEAM
SWA
Landscape Architect / Park Design
Richard K. Law, Principal in Charge
James Maloney, Principal Planner
David R. Gal, LEED. Landscape Architect
RBF
Civil Engineer/ Urban Design
AI Zelinka. AICP, CMSM.
Planner. Community Outreach
Craig Johnson, PE, Project Manager
JOHN A. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES
Structural Engineer
John A. Martin, SE. Pnnc,pal in Charge
Kai Senuska, SE. Project Manager
FUNDAMENT 8 ASSOCIATES
MEP Engineer
Paolo Fundament, PE. LEED
Principal In Charge/ Mech 8 Plumbing Engr
Reed R. Stout, PE, Electrical Engineer
DAVIS lANG00N
Cost Estimator
Rick Lloyd. Principal in Charge
MCKAY CONANT HOOVER
Acoustic/Audiovisual
David A. Conant, FASA, Principal Acoustics
Kyle M. Ridenour, Sr. Consultant AV Systems
WALKER PARKING
Parking Consultant
Part Ashabi. Frotect Manager. Des -gn
LIGHTING DESIGN ALLIANCE
Lighting
Charles Israel. IALK, LC, Principal
Archit Jain. LC. Lighting Designer
ECOLOGIC STUDIO
LEED Consultant
Katrina Rosa. AIA, LEED, Principal
4
1
rj
JRONADO
CITY
HALL
t
MRIETTA
RAY
PARK
1
rj
i
s•
i
• • C'Y OF N •RT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
CALIFOR91AM
4 project includes
the 16 -acre Mori -
Park and Bayfront
le, and Community
n.[h RAB. ns J- rge -sen Rr stc Dher
r• •0
s
- M
r
THE CITY OF
BAKERSFIELD
PORTFOLIO
BAKERSFIELD, CALIFORNIA
Rossetti has a long- standing relation-
ship with the city, which began with the
Arena in 1997, then the Amtrak Station,
McMurtrey Aquatic $ Ice Sports Center,
and continues to the Community Cen-
ter and 200 -acre Sports Village now in
design.
The Village is designed to LEED certifi-
cation standards. It features innovative
wastewater technology with stormwa-
ter management incorporated in water
features, water efficient landscaping
and irrigation.
• • CITY OF NEWPORT CITY HALL AND PARK
s �
R 0 S S E T T I IL
0• 0•
This international design competition was awarded to the Rossetti team and is currently complet-
ing design development. Mixed -use project integrates a major sports stadium with commercial,
retail and residential.
Includes three themed recreational parks and other areas for casual play and community events.
• CITY OF N •RT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
R 0 S S E T T I IL
2010
ASIAN GAMES
ATHLETES VILLAGE
GUANGZHOU, CHINA
International design competition
winner, Rossetti is doing the master
planning and design of the new Ath-
letes Village for the 2010 Asian Games.
It is a mixed -use of sports, residential,
restaurant and retail.
IRVINE
JDENTCEI
PANSION
8
NOVATION
�. i. i�iii • IT-j •�
All
^, c
ti�
r fl fll� �' VIII
00
UC IRVINE
STUDENT CENTER
EXPANSION
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA
146,684 SF New
145,918 SF Renovation
�r >
CITY OF NEWPOR CITY HALL AND PA- -
will,
4 >�� lie -- r-
-`
�► -
i, C B:
r �'
"K
w
A design build competition winner, the $52.9M Center was de-
signed to reinforce the civic nature of the complex as a cutturat
heart for the campus. The Center houses Student Government,
Conference, Meeting, and other Activity Spaces. The new build-
ing is in the process of LEED certification.
T'•
1�
00
00
^. O' A
N
.y.
I�
1kr# " L'
F
ti � .
UC RIVERSIDE
HECKMANN CENTER
PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA
The design creates an open space with civic
qualities. The facility is flexible to host a A
variety of educational, business and civic /
events at the Palm Desert Center.
i
L
*fit ;,— ^�,,•,_
00 00
CITY DF NEWPCRT BEA- - 21TY 41 AND P4RK
The $115M arena has a highly cost effective structural system
designed by the firm we propose for the City Hall. Our design
delivers an aerodynamic design vision that reflects its context
near an international airport as well as the economic function-
ality of rapid changeovers to multiple uses.
CITIZENS BUSINESS
BANK ARENA
CITY OF ONTARIO
ONTARIO, CALIFORNIA
METROPOLITAN
GARDENS
DENVER,COLORADO
This mixed -use urban project is in the US-
GBC's LEED ND pilot program for creating
sustainable neighborhoods. It is a phased
group of residential, retail, commercial,
entertainment and parking facilities on 24
acres, interwoven with a variety of green
park spaces.
15
AUBURN
DITION
Rossetti undertook its third commission fo
this client since designing the original $60h
arena in 1988. These additions include exten
sive office, retail and club offerings that fulfil
a design vision for attracting today's patrons.
M
This addition and ren-
ovation transformec
an inadequate former
high school audito-
rium into a fully func-
tional regional per-
forming arts venue.
Our design was hailec
for capturing the city's_
vision for the project,
a delicate balance of
casual elegance.
•• CITY OF NEWPEACH CITY HALL ANn PARK
SHANGHAI
FISHERMAN'S WHARF
SHANGHAI, CHINA Design competition `or mixed -use commercial, residential, retail & ho
LOS ANGELES
CLIPPERS
TRAINING
CENTER
PLAYA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NAD AL SHEBA
RACECOURSE
ABU DUBAI, UAE
International design competition,
decision pending.
NCITY OF NEWPOR CITY HALL AND PARK
R 0 5 5 E T T I IL
INTERIOR
DESIGN
rT 1
W
SWA worked closety
with the architects of
a $100M renovation to
Fashion Island to devel-
op landscape and urban
design concepts which
draw upon the arche-
type of a European vil-
lage that has been built
over time.
This shopping village
is comprised of several
"neighborhoods," each
with its own unique
character and with a
wonderfully rich pedes-
trian environment.
SWA wrapped the site with Olive Trees, French Lavender and
Canary Palms, creating a contemporary Mediterranean garden
character for the library while extending the interior uses into
the garden spaces surrounding the main building complex.
-r
CITY OF NEWPOR CITY HALL AND PARK
SWA's landscape design includes recon-
figuration and repairing of the existing
lake and addition of fountains, a plaza
and gardens. Surface and under- struc-
ture parking was added, entries to the
site improved, and the existing landscape
upgraded. The new landscape develop-
ment establishes a strong identity for this
important civic space.
SWA collaborated to master
plan the Civic Center and
48 -acre park. They de-
signed the landscape of the
Civic Center complex and
Linked it to the adjoining
park with a promenade.
r
22
M
cm HALL
^r '4
ROAD L STAGE
Surrounded by the City Hall, Police Station, Public Library, and other commercial buildings.
Murrieta Town Square Park is envisioned to be a vibrant mixed -use civic core with an amphi-
theater, tree -lined paths, lawn, and gardens, designed to capture the spirit of the city's heri-
tage and embrace the city's contemporary life.
SOKA UNIVERSITY
in SWA's design for the central campus, melds visual ideals with a phi-
losophy of ecological sustainability. A compact development envelope
minimizes site disturbance, maximizes pedestrian circulation, and
reduces the impact of utility installation and allocates more than half
the site to natural areas.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
TEAM EXPERIENCE
ROSSETTI
ROBERTA JORGENSEN, FAIA, LEED AP Roberta will actively lead and participate in all aspects of the project from
Principal in Charge concept through completion. She will provide oversight of the team's work.
Years with Firm: 3 ensure that resources are made available to effectively service the work,
and monitor client satisfaction throughout the project. Roberta brings ex-
pertise and experience in the planning, design and delivery of public use
facilities and has worked extensively with both in -house and consultant
team members.
Roberta is Past President of both the American Institute of Architects (AIA)
California Council and AIA Orange County. Having served on the Newport
Beach Arts Commission, she engages people in artistic culture. Roberta
was recently elected as Chairman of Orange County Coastkeepers, and is
actively involved in promoting outreach and education for the protection
and preservation of Orange County's water bodies.
Coronado City Hall and Glorietta Bay Park and Bayfront Promenade
Irvine City Hall
Corona del Mar Beach Improvements
Student Center Expansion, University of California, Irvine
Newport Coast Fire Station
Campus Master Plan 1989, 1997, 2006 / Campus Consulting Architect,
CSU San Marcos
John Wayne Airport Parking Structure, Orange County
MATTHEW ROSSETTI, AIA, LEED AP As President, Matt Rossetti leads the firm's mission of innovative thinking,
Design Principal and has been consistently responsible for designs that resonate value to
Years with Firm: 19 our clients: aesthetically, functionally and, most importantly, by achieving
their goal. Matt's advocacy of sustainability has motivated designers to
..think green ", using every opportunity to integrate and implement sustain-
able practices into planning, architecture and interior design.
Troy Community Center
Troy Civic Master Plan,
Palace of Auburn Hills
Compuware Corporate Headquarters
Old Dominion University Convocation Center
THOMAS AHN, AIA, LEED AP Tom is a gifted designer who can transform broad ideas into solutions
Designer that balance creativity and innovation with efficiency and purpose. He is
Years with Firm: 7 sensitive to maintaining design intent and works collaboratively with team
members, consultants and public constituencies to ensure that the vision
and voice of the client is executed successfully. Currently, he is the lead
designer for the Bakersfield Community Center and Sports Village which
will be eligible for LEED certification.
City of Bakersfield Community Center & Sports Village
City of Redondo Beach Performing Arts Center Expansion /Renovation
City of Bakersfield Amtrak Station
USC Galen Center and Athletic Pavillion
Home Depot Center, on the Campus of CSU Dominguez Hills
R 0 S S E T T I IL 23
0 0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
JASON BRISCOE, AIA Jason has led the design and planning effort for many award- winning proj-
Project Manager ects and is thoroughly familiar with the kind of influences and guidelines
ears with Firm: 3 that shape the development and execution of design. His focus on under-
standing the unique values, needs and personality of all constituencies, has
provided him with an acute awareness of how to work in the public forum
and build consensus among divergent groups. Jason is currently President
of the American Institute of Architects Orange County and has been affili-
ated with the Orange County Museum of Art.
Coronado City Hall and Glorietta Bay Park and Bayfront Promenade
Corona del Mar Beach Improvements
Marie D. Bartolo Center for the Performing Arts, U. of Notre Dame
Grand Central Arts Center, City of Santa Ana / CSU Fullerton
The Thacher School, Ojai, California
Athletics Dept. & Parking Administration Office Building, CSU Long Beach
PAUL MURPHEY, AIA, CSI, LEED AP Demonstrated success in project development, documentation and deliv-
Project Architect
ery throughout his career, support Paul's passionate interest and expertise
Years with Firm: 1
in process, documentation and quality. He has worked on several award -
winning projects of various types and sizes locally and internationally. His
approach includes diligent mentoring of team members so that projects
are fully supported with the highest caliber of dedicated, knowledgeable
staff. Paul has exceptional listening and analytical skills enable him to as-
sess situations and develop effective solutions.
The Colburn School. Los Angeles, California
Marie D. Bartolo Center for the Performing Arts, U. of Notre Dame
The Thacher School, Ojai, California
Biomedical Library, University of California, San Diego
John Wayne Airport Parking Structure, Orange County
JAN PURCELL, IIDA
An award - winning Interior Designer, Jan is recognized for her extraor-
Interior Designer
dinary ability to translate clients' visions into creative environments that
Years with Firm: 2
reflect their culture and consistently exceeds their expectations. She is re-
sponsible for an inter - disciplinary group that focuses on integrated inte-
rior solutions. Jan's open communication of project directives between the
project team and the client ensures a transparent process that leads to a
successful design solution.
Clark Hill Group
Genesys Group
Carson Business Interiors
CBS Corporation
Comenca Bank, Rennaissance Center
General Motors and Chrysler Corporations
SWA
RICHARD K. LAW Dick provides design guidance and quality control for the Laguna Beach
Principal in Charge office, as well as site planning, urban design and architectural landscape
Years with Firm: 41 services. He has done award winning work for public and private entities
around the globe, and is gifted in the oversight of everything from large
scale urban planning to smaller urban parks.
Soka University
The Water Garden
Victoria Gardens
R 0 S S E T T I IL
6
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
JAMES MALONEY, ASLA With 23 years of experience as a planner and project manager, Jim has
Principal Planner extensive experience in the management of complex projects with multiple
Years with Firm: 12 consultants and a public high profile. He is exceptionally skilled in achiev-
ing group consensus and getting work swiftly approved. His commitment
to quality environments reflect his stewardship of the earth with particular
strengths in park and community planning.
Irvine Ranch Open Space
Jeffrey Open Space Trait
Lambert Ranch Master Plan and Design Guidelines
Lowry Open Space Master Plan to Redevelop Lowry AFB
Irvine Planning Area 9 Land Use Plan
Woodbury Community and Parks
DAVID R. GAL, ASLA, LEER AP David served as the Project Director for the award winning Yuma City Hatt.
Landscape Architect A primary focus of his work is the creation of a sustainable landscape that
Years with Firm: 2 is environmentally sensitive and contributes to reducing building and site
energy costs, reducing storm water run -off and the utilization of recycled
and ecologically sustainable materials.
Yuma City Hall, on 4 acres
Caltrans District 11 Office Campus
Nokia Product Creation Center
RBF CONSULTING / URBAN DESIGN STUDIO
AL ZELINKA, AICP, CMSM Al Zetinka is a Certified Main Street Manager, has over 18 years of urban
Planner, Community Outreach planning and design experience, and has developed his planning career
Years with Firm: 8 to improve and revitalize neighborhoods, commercial districts and down-
towns. His practice in urban design and planning has expanded to include
a unique and important dimension of community livability: public safety
through urban design, on which he has authored many publications.
Pasadena Green Building Outreach and Education Program
Strategic Plan for the Vista Santa Rosa Sphere of Influence
Design Guidelines / Standards for Three Areas: Placer Ranch, Placer
Vineyards, and Regional University
Downtown Master Plan Ketchum, Idaho
Roseville Downtown Visioning Project
CRAIG JOHNSON, PE Mr. Johnson has over two decades of experience in the areas of land de-
Project Manager velopment design, mapping, and surveying. He currently manages and is
Years with Firm: 8 actively involved in the production of improvement plans and grading plans
for transportation, residential, commercial, institutional, and resort devel-
opment projects.
Santa Monica Civic Center Parking Structure
Orange County Performing Arts Center Concert Hall
Sage Hill School on 34 acres
JOHN A. MARTIN & ASSOCIATES
JOHN A. MARTIN, JR. SE Mr. Martin leads the quality assurance of each project designed by the
Principal in Charge firm and provides overall general supervision of the design. His expertise
Years with Firm: 35 and direct hands -on approach, coupled with his in -depth knowledge of the
building industry, provide the client with excellence in engineering design,
while budgetary and schedule requirements are met. Mr. Martin will pro-
vide quality control reviews at major stages of your project.
Coronado City Hall and Glorietta Bay Park and Bayfront Promenade
R 0 S S E T T I IL Corona City Hall Complex 25
Calabasas Civic Center Plaza
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARI ASHABI She will take the project from conceptual development through construc-
Project Manager tion documents, as well as bidding and construction administration. She
Functional Designer has been involved in the production of working drawings and design deveL-
ears with Firm: 13 opment drawings for parking facilities throughout Southern California.
Los Angeles City College Parking Garage. 400 spaces
Pacific Design Center Red Building Parking Garage, 1600 spaces
Palomar Pomerado Medical Center Parking Structure, 700 spaces
Campbell Shipyard Hotel Parking Structure, 2000 spaces
RICK LLOYD DAVIS LANGDON
Associate Principal As the Associate Principal -in- charge of the firm's Los Angeles office, Rick
Years With Firm I I Lloyd brings 23 years of experience providing construction cost planning
R 0 S S E T T
III
Orange County Performing Arts Center Expansion
Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza
Manhattan Beach Fire and Police Station
UCI Student Center Expansion
KAL BENUSKA, SE
Kal will be responsible for structural analysis and design, specifications.
Project Manager
project coordination, and team management. His experience in structural
,ears with Firm_ 22
engineering design and project management encompasses a diverse array
of project types including extensive work with the Rossetti team on several
publicly owned projects.
Orange Coast College Fitness Complex
Chicago Fire Stadium
Real Salt Lake Soccer Stadium
Manhattan Beach Police, Fire and 911 Communication Headquarters
Anaheim Convention Center Expansion
Riverside County District Attorney Office Building
Richard Nixon's PresidentJat Library Expansion
FUNDAMENT ANA ASSOQIATES i
PAULO FUNDAMENT, PE, LEED AP
Pauto takes a hands -on app�oactt to management. He will be involved in
Principal in Charge
the daily activities & progress of the project and will attend all major de-
Mechanical & Plumbing Engineer
sign and client meetings.. As a member of the California State University
Years With Firm: 21
Mechanical Review Board he gives direction on setting systemwide design
and operations criteria4or sustainable protocols. His dynamic manage-
ment style and ability to clearly communicate complex technical issues has
lead to numerous successful projects.
CSU Office of the Chancellor Mechanical Review Board
CSU CofV Bch, Outpost Cafe Replacement Project
Hoa%Hl*9d14Emergency Care Unit Major Renovation
Los Angeles Harbor College, New PE & Wellness Center
REED R. STOUT, PE
Reed is a proven team leader who will be responsible for overseeing design,
Electrical Engineer
preparation of electrical drawings, specifications, cost estimates, shop
ears With Firm: 8
drawings review and construction administration support for the project.
Mount San Jacinto College New 2 -Story Classroom Building
Saddleback College Library Remodel
UCSD Campus Wide Energy Management System
Corona Del Mar Harbor High School HVAC Reconstruction
Burbank City Hall HVAC Reconstruction [Historic Site)
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARI ASHABI She will take the project from conceptual development through construc-
Project Manager tion documents, as well as bidding and construction administration. She
Functional Designer has been involved in the production of working drawings and design deveL-
ears with Firm: 13 opment drawings for parking facilities throughout Southern California.
Los Angeles City College Parking Garage. 400 spaces
Pacific Design Center Red Building Parking Garage, 1600 spaces
Palomar Pomerado Medical Center Parking Structure, 700 spaces
Campbell Shipyard Hotel Parking Structure, 2000 spaces
RICK LLOYD DAVIS LANGDON
Associate Principal As the Associate Principal -in- charge of the firm's Los Angeles office, Rick
Years With Firm I I Lloyd brings 23 years of experience providing construction cost planning
R 0 S S E T T
III
TEAM
EXPERIENCE MATRIX
Coronado C ty Had & Community '
Center / Glonetta Bay
Wine Civic Center
Thousand Oaks Civic Arts Plaza &
City Hall
Vista Civic Center
Temecula Civic Center
John Wayne Airport Parking
Structure
University of Notre Dame
DeBartolo Center'
Colburn School•
CSU Long Beach
Demonstration Classroom
LA Harbor College Theater
City of Bakersfield
Mondavi Center for Performing
Arts - UC Davis
Royce Hall - UCLA
Home Depot Center
UCi Student Center Expansion
Real Salt Lake Stadium
Soka University of Orange County
Anaheim Convention Center
Orange Coast College
Fitness Complex
Orange County Performing Arts
Center Expansion
CSULB Outpost Dining Budding
CSUSM Center for Children &
Families
Redondo Beach
Performing Arts Center
LA City Fire Station 5
LA City Fire Station 43
LA City Fire Station 78
ROSS ET TI IL
0 0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
O
cr
>
>
I n
m
Of
Q
<
Q
E
E
m
lc
d
>�
C
O
o
m
m
A
C
c
o
v
m �
U
-
o
Mw
j c
0
o
0
W. O
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Work of Rossetti team prior to joining Rossetti
THE HOME DEPOT CENTER
125 -acre development in Carson,
California, featuring state- of -the-
art stadiums and facilities for many
sports.
•Initial estimate $80,000,000
•Client Initiated Scope Add $70M
•Final Bid Amount $150,000,000
Opened exactly on schedule for an
opening day game.
ORANGE COAST COLLEGE
FITNESS COMPLEX
2 story, 30,000 SF PE and Athletics
building, houses basketball facili-
ties, weight training, performance
studios, Locker rooms, meeting
room and offices, ticket booth, and
storage spaces. Project includes
ADA improvements to the adjacent
football field.
*Initial estimate $8,100,000
*Client Initiated Changes $375,000
•Final Bid Amount $8,475,000
Opened in phases on schedule
UC IRVINE STUDENT CENTER
4- building complex with 141,000
SF of new and 146,000 SF of reno-
vation.
•Initial bid estimate $51,909,000
•Client Initiated Changes $8.09M
*Final Cost $60,000,623
Opened in phases on schedule
BAKERSFIELD ICE SPORTS &
AQUATIC CENTER
*Initial bid estimate $9,300,000
•Add't non - construction costs
$.92M
*Client Initiated Changes $1.01V
*Final Cost $11,220,000
Opened in 2 phases on schedule
R 0 S S E T T I IL
0
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
BUDGET AND SCHEDULE
METHOD. We build cost modeling and estimating into our design and docu-
mentation process. A consistent application of this philosophy has resulted
in a history of athletic facility projects being brought in on budget, leading
to a list of repeat clients.
Programming Phase. Develop
square footage costs and compare
those to historical data (with esca-
lation and location factors includ-
ed) for similar facilities.
Schematic and Design Develop-
ment Phases. Depending on con-
struction delivery method, during
these phases reconciled cost dis-
cussions begin. Quantity surveys
and votumetric areas will be es-
tablished and refined as the design
process continues. Cost allowanc-
es will be identified and priority op-
tions will be discussed.
"1 had a great experience with Matt
and his staff. He designed a beauti-
ful, cost effective YMCA that stands
out among any in the region. He was
very conscious of our limited budget
and made changes all along the way
as needed."
Laurie Berkow
former Executive Director, YMCA
At all times we will work with you to consider first cost, lifecycle cost, and
operational expectations and efficiencies. We will compile costs and op-
tions for prioritization by the City. Sustainable design will affect the effi-
ciency of operations for all elements of the building, and will be discussed
and considered with the City throughout the process.
Construction Documents Phase. The costs will continue to become more
specific, more accurate and final decisions will be incorporated into the
drawings and specifications.
Construction Phase Our systematic approach to construction phase com-
munication with the City and the contractor will be an important factor in
keeping the project moving ahead as planned and avoiding delays and sur-
prises. Any Change Order Proposals received will reviewed promptly and
fairly so that construction can proceed without distraction.
We have achieved success in controlling project construction costs on sev-
eral projects, three recent examples. See sidebar.
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
5. EXPERIENCE & REFERENCES
REFERENCES
CITY HALL Mr. Mark J. Ochenduszko - City Manager (6191522-7335
The City of Coronado mochenduszkofacoronado.ca.us
He had oversight of our interaction with the City Council, including internal
Rossetti Team Members: client workshops, public presentations and external community outreach.
Mr. William H. Cecil - Capital Projects Manager (619) 522 -7314
Engineering and Development
bcecil(Bcoronado.ca.us
He was our day -to -day contact with the city. We worked closely with him on
all matter related to the program, design, budget and schedule.
RABOBANK ARENA Mr. Alan Tandy, City Manager [6611326-3751
AMTRAK STATION atandyfaci.bakersfield.ca.us
ICE SPORTS & AQUATIC CENTER As the city's key executive he had oversight of each project and final
SPORTS VILLAGE & COMMUNITY approval on programming, budget and design. Although his participation
CENTER on projects is more with internal city staff than the design team directly, he
City of Bakersfield can speak to the ability of our team members to meet schedules and bud -
Rossetti Team Members: gets and to execute the city's design vision with excellence. Mr. Ahn worked
on the Amtrak and Sports Village projects.
STUDENT CENTER Ms. Rebekah Gladson, AIA - Assistant Vice Chancellor t9491824-6630
University of California, Irvine rgladsonfduci.edu
Rossetti Team Members: She is the Campus Architect and worked closely with our team throughout
the project, having oversight of all aspects of the work. These included
extensive hands on work sessions to refine the program and make design
improvements within a pre- approved budget.
CORONA DEL MAR BEACH
IMPROVEMENTS'
The City of Newport Beach
Rossetti Team Members:
Roberta Jorgensen, FAIN, L =L_
Jason Briscoe. AIA
PALACE EXPANSION
The Palace of Auburn Hills
Rossetti Team Members:
I: at ssetr
Mr. Dave Kiff, Assistant City Manager (9491644-3002
dkiff(Bcity.newport- beach.ca.us
We worked with him in our community workshops, and in ensuring rigor-
ous funding requirements elements were met in the design.
Mario Etemad, Executive Vice President 12481377-8618
metemadfdpalacenet.com
He was the client's key executive and decisionmaker on the project. His
work with our team involved rigorous programming and design develop-
ment as well as oversight of budget and schedule compliance.
R 0 5 S E T T I IL • Protect completed by Rossetti team members while with the firm of Robbins Jorgensen Christopher. 30
6. PROJECT APPROACH
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
The Newport Beach City Hall and Park may be the most significant civic
space created in the City for generations, both past and future. This is
evidenced by the attention the community has devoted to the project to
date and by the resources it intends to commit for design, construction
and ongoing operations. The Rossetti team, based in Newport Beach.
shares the excitement and commitment of the City officials and commu-
nity. Our commitment will be evidenced by our rigorous design approach
and community outreach. Our design philosophy for the Newport Beach
City Hatt and Park is that it must be a facility that is OF the PEOPLE, BY
the PEOPLE, and FOR the PEOPLE.
'1 would characterize Rossetti's OF the PEOPLE The City Hall and surrounding park should embody the
creative and artistic ability as be- heritage and aspirations of the City of Newport Beach - its people and the
place. The architecture and landscape design will be timeless and specif-
yond exceptional. is to this unique site, culture and context. All elements of the design will
Rossetti assimilates their clients' represent and advance the sustainability of the quality of life, quality of
community, and quality of environment that is unique to Newport Beach.
goats and represents them com-
pletely throughout the project. The BY the PEOPLE At the core of the Rossetti process is a rigorous commu-
nity outreach program to encourage dialogue, gather ideas, and engage
entire staff is well trained, respon- the community in identifying and carrying forward community held val-
sive, and takes pride in delivering a ues. Our team, in collaboration with City staff, will facilitate workshops
and participate in Council Study Sessions to encourage exchange of ideas,
top quality product." inform the community of specific opportunities and challenges, and Lis-
ten to the insight of all interested members of the community. While the
Alan Tandy, City Manager physical construction will be performed by contractors and trades people,
City of Bakersfield the design process will represent a 'virtual barn - raising'.
Visioning Process
R 0 S S E T T I IL
FOR the PEOPLE. The program for the City Hatt and Park includes pro-
gram elements intended to foster forward development of culture in
Newport Beach and encourage collaboration between the community and
their government. The experience of the Rossetti team, our understand-
ing of similar facilities, and our knowledge as members of the community
will enable us to deliver a design that encompasses the program of the
facility in a way that optimizes its functionality, while celebrating the vi-
sion, spirit and specialness of Newport Beach.
DESIGN VISION
Significant work has already been completed by the City to define the
needs of the City Hall. We will not reinvent the wheel, but we want to be
sure that we completely understand the program information that has
been developed to date. We will also offer you any additional ideas and
concepts about how to best define the scope, quality, flexibility and func-
tionality of the project. By verifying with you in detail the existing data, we
wilt together be able to better understand the goals and priorities of the
users and the implications of the available funding.
We witl make any adjustments to the program that result from our veri-
fication discussions and proceed to imagine with you the possibilities for
this exciting project. How will we enhance the connection of government
and the services provided to our citizens? How do we provide park de-
sign opportunities that will result in a wonderful outcome for this project?
31
0 0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
6. PROJECT APPROACH
How will we accommodate future needs while not compromising today's?
What is the image that these buildings should present to the City from the
VISIONING PROCESS exterior as well as from the functional interior spaces? What message
do we want to send with our design? We anticipate lively and fascinating
Analyze effective use of space discussions with citizens and city officials as we consider the options and
opportunities before us.
and explore program enhance-
ment opportunities in various to- We enjoy working in workshop fashion as much as practical so that as
cations. many people as possible can participate and we can all speak freely,
Explore ways to keep the user physically interact using markers and photographs, and hammer out to-
>>
gether the big decisions that will be formgivers as the design proceeds.
experience welcoming while in- We work informally but purposefully. We will keep the process moving
creasing functions and space ef- forward. After the major design elements are defined, we will proceed
ficiency. with Design Development and Construction Documents.
» Evaluate locations and rela-
tionships of functions for "real
estate value " - i.e. can premium
space be transformed to provide
a more meaningful function and/
or one that maximizes intensity of
schedulable use?
» Scout potential internal and ex-
ternal locations for "indoor -out-
door" transition spaces.
» Review with you the civic event
opportunities and logistical needs
and consider potential options for
future flexibility for interior and
exterior spaces.
>+ Review opportunities for flow
around and through City Hall,
park and library, and the addition
of various passive and active ar-
eas.
>> Examine opportunities to incor-
porate the City Hall and park with
the pedestrian flow of the library,
CDM Plaza, and Newport Cen-
ter and to increase the "passive'
ownership of the facilities by the
citizens.
>> Consider additional amenities
that can be provided to secure the
highest and best experience for
the Newport Beach community.
TECHNICAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE WORK PLAN
Rossetti has a strong tradition of developing and implementing Work
Plans that lead to timely, detailed and effective design management, pro-
cess scheduling and coordination of the design, documentation and con-
struction administration process. Input from the City's designated repre-
sentatives will be used to optimize the coordinated efforts of the design
team as it plans, designs and documents the project, with consideration
of reviews and approvals, procurement and lead time construction activi-
ties and schedules.
Rossetti's approach uses proven procedures and protocols to plan and
document projects and will work with the City and contractor to custom-
ize them for this project. As schedules are developed they include mile-
stone events and dates. Progress documents are posted by all disciplines
on our team website every two weeks without fail. Documents reviews
are conducted within the team and by peers outside the team to verify
that the progress and quality of the work is represented as it should be.
These face to face in -depth reviews typically occur late in Schematic De-
sign and Design Development and at 50 %, 75% and 90% completion of
construction documents. These reviews also verify that coordination of
the work of all disciplines is up to date and correct. Continual design and
document coordination is assured by ongoing involvement of the design-
ers from all disciplines through the document process and will last until
construction and occupation of the City Hatt and park is completed.
WE RESPECT THE PROCESS
We believe it is important to respect the process This means respecting the
caring and passion of citizens who participate in public meetings; respect-
ing that each of us communicates in their own way and that it is incumbent
upon the Rossetti team to help draw out the concepts that each person
brings; respecting the value of the time invested by everyone involved in the
design process; respecting and incorporating the values, visions, facts and
decision established at appropriate milestones along the way.
Project design and construction schedules usually make the process of
R 0 S S E T T I IL project development appear that everything proceeds in orderly, straight ,
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALLANO PARK
6. PROJECT APPROACH
lines. The more that occurs the better. The reality, though, is that some
curves, bumps and rerouting are unavoidable. Managing the inevitable
curves, rather than being surprised when they happen, is the key to mak-
ing continuous - albeit sometimes imperfect - forward progress. The
more specifically defined the process the more manageable, and in fact
the more flexible it wit[ be.
The quantity of information that has already been gathered plus the quan-
tity of site related and new program information we will uncover as we
begin our work requires constant attention to information management.
By documenting the information received at each workshop, the conclu-
sions drawn and the next steps, we will be able to distill data and deci-
sions for better management and tracking.
Design - Inspiration, Function and Timelessness
aA
.]
R 0 5 5 E T T I
There are many issues that must be
addressed in the design of the City
Hat[ and Park. Fundamental is the
concept that the design must address
two different systems or 'patterns ".
These patterns, people and nature
are consistent with how we have ap-
proached other projects. Often, it is
not the separation of these patterns,
but rather the integration of these
inter - retated parts into one cohesive
whole that spells timeless success
for a public space.
The City Hall, Park and library needs
�� ■� to be integrated into one strong de-
sign move that functions as the heart
of the community, where the pub -
tic feels welcome and nature is re-
spected. The design needs to address
civic gathering spaces, spaces for all
ages to enjoy the outdoors, functional
relationships between uses and appropriate recreational amenities for
the public. The City Hall and Park should be a proud symbol of the City,
one that is both beautiful, functionally efficient and ages beautifully over
time.
Our approach to design is to develop an idea or ideas that transcends
simple problem solving to create a compelling and very memorable expe-
rience. Artful design - not for its own sake but to enrich peoples experi-
ence is a goat. The long linear nature of the site posses many challenges
that can be overcome with a simple bold idea. A high level of creativity and
inventfulness can create a beautifully crafted place with a deeper level of
meaning. The combination of landscape and architecture provides the op-
portunity to make valuable and lasting contribution to both the social and
physical environment of the city, one that considers the adjacent residen-
tial community and the neighboring vibrant retail and office centers.
Deliverables:
NOTICE TO PROCEED
P Project Schedule
Memoranda of meetings /agree-
ments
• Dates for future work sessions
• Project director with contact in-
formation of relevant city rep-
resentatives and Rossetti team
personnel
• Verification of reporting process
and channels
Deliverables:
PROGRAM CONFIRMATION
• Revised program standards
R 0 S S E T T I IL
• •
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
7. DESIGN MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Our Design Management Approach for Phase III of the City Hall and Park
project is outlined here. A significant part of the our approach will be
community involvement. Rossetti and Urban Design Group will meet
with the City to carefully define a public outreach process and schedule.
Therefore, specific identification of times for public input cannot yet be
itemized here.
PHASE III DESIGN PROCESS
PREDESIGN AND PROJECT START -UP
Notice to Proceed
Following receipt of authorization to proceed, our Team will meet with
designated representatives, prior to initiation of work, in order to:
• Establish organization relationships responsibilities and communica-
tion channels
• Identify personnel who will participate in this process
• Confirm or clarify program goals /objectives of the city and provide gen-
eral insights
• Identify other appropriate contacts and resources necessary to ensure
complete examination of issues and specific relevant data
• Collect existing data regarding site and program parameters
• Establish specific times, locations and personnel for review meetings
and presentations
• Verify dates for committees, public and council work sessions
Program Confirmation and Verifications
Rossetti will coordinate a review of the program to ensure the city's unique
needs are identified as the basis for the ultimate design solutions.
In order to achieve a highly functional facility, needs must be verified and
updated. Interviews with representative associates with this project, and
the re- interview of primary user groups may be necessary. Interview
information gathered will include perceptions of the site, facility needs,
estimated utilization, future requirements and general insight into the
program.
• Review policies, needs, estimated utilization and future directions
• Review overall functional organization
• Review departmental functional relationships
• Review facility space planning of existing program
• Verify space allocations for proposed program
• Modify program as necessary and agreed to
• Establish office systems and equipment standards and specifications
• Verify and refine office layouts and standards
SITE INFRASTRUCTURE DESIGN
Site Evaluation
Evaluate site in greater detail than was possible in Phase II.
Site size and configuration and ability to accommodate developments
Land utilization
0 0
CITY Of NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARS
7. DESIGN MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Deliverables: • Relationships to surrounding homes, offices, library and retail
SITE EVALUATION • Landscape concepts and forms
• Structures placement
:Overad �) to AnaiySIS • Sun and shadow analysis
a Evaluation and Site Res onsive - Movement systems, traffic, infrastructure availability, and circulation
p • On- site /adjacent site parking availability and needs
documents • Utilities systems
• Site Servicing
• Visibility /Imageabitity
• Viewplanes and opportunities
• Surface and subsurface soil conditions
• Micro Climate
• Easements, zoning and other legal restrictions
• Client review
• Client approval and authorizations
Deliverables: Schematic Design
SCHEMATIC DESIGN The schematic design phase of the project will confirm and refine the
s Sustainability workshop with City Phase II concepts with the committee, community and council.
* Public workshops, committee and . Meet with city to review all relevant material including program, sched-
Council reviews ule and phase I design.
. Design concepts for progress ap- . Meet with City to develop public review process and schedule, city re-
proval view and approval process and accountability and decision making re-
* 50% submission of Schematic De- sponsibilities.
sign Documents
» Final submission of Schematic Meaningful, inclusive, and transparent community involvement is the
cornerstone to a successful Newport Beach City Hatt and Park effort. It
Design Documents, Budget and is important to provide the Newport Beach community - those for whom
Schedule and Project Data Manual the new City Hall will be built - an opportunity to participate in the forma-
tion of a supported vision for a new City Hatt and Park. Within the context
of leadership and collaboration offered by the Design Committee and the
City of Newport Beach, community participation for the Newport Beach
-The on- premise design charrettes City Hall and Park wit( have multiple goals:
led by your firm offered quantifiable Education. Residents should understand the process and program for
value that quickly and effectively the new City Hall and Park.
brought clarity to our project. The Interest. The process should generate interest in the new City Hall, so
various design solutions suggested that residents want to participate in shaping it.
by your team enables us to under- Dialogue. Difficult issues that are the source of disagreement in the com-
munity can become the topics of constructive dialogue that encourages
stand the opportunities and chat- residents to understand each others' points of view and commonly held
values.
lenges involved in our project. -
Irp,t. The new City Hatt and Park should be founded on principles de-
Ron Evans, Executive Director veloped through meaningful input from as many residents as possible,
Von Braun Center representing different needs, experiences, and points of view.
Support. The process should ultimately create a Newport Beach City Hall
and Park that enjoys strong community support and serves as a symbol
for Newport Beach's past, present and future.
ROSSETTI
i
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
7. DESIGN MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Community participation will engage residents in a process that results
in a City Halt and Park. Meaningful participation will be offered through
both face -to -face contact and online involvement. Initial participation will
seek to understand what is important to the Newport Beach communi-
ty. Through this process, community issues will be identified that wilt
become topics for in- person workshops and presentations. The mutual
"The City put a great deal of understanding developed in these venues will lead to a progression of
design refinement and support to result in community support. Broad
thought and effort into developing community involvement will begin with a sequence of high - profile events.
an RFP that would attract the best Deeper education will then be provided to those who want to learn more
about the City Hall and Park. Focused workshops and meetings will be-
architects and urban planners. gin to develop criteria and designs. Open houses and online participation
We selected Rossetti unanimously will provide direct input into the crafting of the design. Throughout, the
and have been very pleased with community participation process will be supported by ongoing outreach
efforts and feedback from the City Hall Committee, City of Newport Beach
our choice. staff and leadership.
e Confirm and refine design direction
I especially liked their approach
a Confirm design criteria,
in focusing first on what kind of
• Meet with city to discuss code and ordinance requirements
• Refine relationships of program elements
place we wanted. Rossetti helped
a Conduct sustainability workshop with City to identify interactive ap-
us define and shape our ideas for
proach and operational goals and value added priorities
the feel of casual elegance we
• Develop schematic design alternatives and review with committee
a Review with community user groups and council
wanted. They exceeded our expec-
a Develop schematic layout of floor plans, park, parking structure and
tations."
circulation configuration
• Review schematic design concepts with client and community groups
Sue Armstrong
a Monitor program requirements and ares against actual design
a Develop acoustical criteria and objectives for appropriate areas
Assistant City Manager Iret.)
• Develop mechanical /electrical system concepts and alternatives
City of Redondo Beach
a Develop basic structural system concept
e Prepare schematic site plan, floor plans, elevations and sections
• Review systems concepts with city
e Prepare cost estimate
• Prepare project data manual including project description, systems de-
scription and design criteria outline
a Submit documents for City review
• City approval and authorization to proceed
Deliverables: Design Development
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT • Review budget status and determine with city any required actions
s Public workshops and committee a Confer with /obtain preliminary concurrence with regulatory agencies
and Council reviews for progress : Monitor program for design comptiance
Monitor code compliance
approval. a Contact utility companies; obtain additional data
*Interim submission of Design De- a Refine site plan and park plan
velopment Documents, Budget a Prepare plans, elevations, sections, schedules and notes as required to
and Schedule fix and describe the project
» Final submission of Design Devel- a Continuously review and refine sustainability approach
opment Documents, Budget and a Prepare preliminary draft of project manual
Schedule a Prepare data to assist development of detailed cost estimate
• Review design with city
R 0 S S E T T I IL
36
0 0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
7. DESIGN MANAGEMENT APPROACH
• Review design with community /user groups
• Prepare cost estimate
• Building agency review
• Submit documents for city review and approval
Deliverables:
Construction Documents
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
• Develop an updated project schedule including meeting dates, mile-
rs =; cyresS SUL)F- lta S or aoeu-
stones, progress document delivery dates, client review dates, etc.
ments at 50%,75%.90% CD's
• As documents develop, confer with and obtain further review from reg-
» 90% submittal for plan check
utatory agencies.
m 100% CD's Incorporate plan check
• Coordinate the work of all team members.
comments.
• Coordinate drawings with Project Manual, including specifications and
s Area calculations
City's General Conditions.
s Cost estimates
• Review the drawing index with all concerned parties.
s Title 24 calculations
• Establish a checklist and timetable for approvals and permits.
• LEED credits checklist
• Determine alternates, cash allowances, and unit prices.
• Utility company approvals
• Obtain owner's specific contract requirements on insurance, bonds,
*Savings by Design submittal
construction agreements, and bidding procedures. Determine what
items, if any, are to be furnished by Owner, and those items not to be
included in the contract. Obtain schedule for delivery and installation of
Owner- furnished materials, and /or products.
• All disciplines post progress drawings on project website every 2 weeks
for teamwide coordination and verification of progress. Conduct face -
to -face team meetings to address coordination of systems, dimensions
and sustainable processes prior to submittal of 50 %, 75% and 90% CD's.
Conduct in -house review of documents three times during the phase [at
10 %, 50 %, and 90% complete) by senior staff not working on the project.
Continuously maintain calculations of net and gross areas.
• Prepare estimate of probable construction cost at submittal of 50 %,
75% and 90% CD's. Review cost in detail with City each time. Return to
programming priorities if budget issues arise.
• Submit drawings, Project Manual, estimate of probable cost, and area
calculations to the Owner at 50 %, 75 %, 90% and 100% CD's.
• Work closely with all city reviewing agencies throughout the process to
avoid surprises or misunderstandings that could delay the project or
cause additional cost.
• Determine with City and bid alternates and define in documents.
Deliverables: Bidding Phase
BIDDING PHASE • Assist City in reviewing qualification statements from interested bidders.
» Pre -Bid Meeting • Assist City in conducting a pre -bid conference, prepare a report and
aAddendums distribute copies.
• Record responses to bidders' requests for clarification in the form of
a written addendum distributed to all bidders. Evaluate proposed sub-
stitutions and request for product approval; notify bidders of accepted
substitution by addendum.
• Assist the Owner in the receipt, tabulation and analysis of bids; check
bids for irregularities. Advise the Owner on selection of alternates and
obtain Owner's approval.
Construction Administration
Because Rossetti is located in Newport Beach, we will be able to provide
fast and consistent support during construction.
ROSSET ?I � -
0
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
7. DESIGN MANAGEMENT APPROACH
Deliverables:
• Review contractor's project schedule, including submittal schedule.
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
• Develop and implement a system of routing and distribution for project
.Applications for Contractor Pay-
correspondence and submittals.
ments
• Assist City with pre- construction meeting.
• LEED Progress checklist submit-
• Establish site observation and project meeting schedules and agenda .
tat reviews
Include sustainable /LEED progress and documentation in agenda.
• RFI responses
• Review Owner - supplied labor and materials.
• Project site meeting attendance
• Keep Owner informed on the progress of the work. Prepare field re-
ports as required. Participate in scheduled project meetings. Review
the Contractor's updated progress schedules and advise the Owner of
potential revisions to anticipated occupancy date.
• Prior to the first application for payment, receive, review and approve, if
appropriate. Contractor's schedule of values.
"'Rossetti's talented solution -on-
• Receive and review the Contractor's applications for payment. Review
ented design firm demonstrated its
record drawings to assure they are kept current.
• Review required test reports.
ability to thrive in challenging fast-
• Receive submittals in accordance with approved submittal schedule.
Review, take appropriate action, and return to the Contractor. Maintain
paced environments, bycomplet-
submittal log.
• Review and respond to responsible Requests for Information IRFI's1, log
ing the work within schedule, and
and distribute.
helping us to launch an important
• Review Contractor's proposed cost for changes and advise City of rec-
ommendation.
facility with auspicious timing. '
• Receive from the Contractor notification of substantial completion and
list of items to be completed or corrected. Respond to the Contractor's
Dr. Irvin Reid. President
punch list of remaining work to be repaired or completed after review -
Wayne State University
ing work in the field.
• When the project isjudged to be substantially complete, prepare a Certificate
of Substantial Completion. Review the Contractor's request for final inspec-
tion and conduct a field inspection of the project to confirm completion.
Deliverables: Post- Construction Services
POST CONSTRUCTION SERVICES • Assist City with final building commissioning
• Assist City with FF &E and move management if requested
r nal -, Cc r a," rys • Compile operational data manuals and warranties for City
LEED Documentation • Finalize record drawings
» Savings by Design Submittal • Conduct post- contract evaluation with City representatives after occu-
pancy
• Compile LEED certification documentation and submit to USGBC. Fol-
low up until Silver certificaton, or better, is received.
• Secure all final agency approvals.
• Submit for Savings by Design rebate
30SSETTI
ti3
10
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL AND PARK
8. AGREEMENT / EE &0 INSURANCE / CLAIMS
AGREEMENT
We recommend two adjustments in the Professional Services Agreement
1. Articles 8.1 and 29. Recommend amend to reflect that they are based on
our professional judgment or are to the best of our knowledge, information
or belief.
2. Article 9. Recommend substitute language: The Design Professional
agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by taw, to indemnify and hold the
Client harmless from any damage, liability or cost [including reasonable
attorneys' fees and costs of defense] to the extent caused by the Design
Professional's negligent acts, errors or omissions in the performance of
professional services under this Agreement and those of his or her sub -
consultants or anyone for whom the Design Professional is legally liable.
The Client agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by taw, to indemnify and
hold the Design Professional harmless from any damage, liability or cost
[including reasonable attorneys'
fees and costs of defense) to the
extent caused by the Client's neg-
tigent acts, errors or omissions
and those of his or her contractors,
- subcontractors or consultants or
anyone for whom the Client is le-
�;3 -a II Y
gatly liable, and arising from the
dw f 4 t project that is the subject of this
Agreement.
th
ERRORS & OMISSIONS INSUR-
ANCE
$5,000,000 per claim limit and ag-
gregate
CLAIMS HISTORY
Oakland Commons
Potential failing screen watt
Opened 12/05
Closed 8/7/06 - $123,884.43
Negotiated settlement without Liti-
gation
R0SSETTI IL _1J
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. S- 33
June 24, 26'0-8
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Dave Kiff, Assistant City Manager
949 -644 -3002 or dkiff @city.newport- beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: SELECTION OF FIVE FINALISTS FOR CITY HALL AND PARK DESIGN
COMPETITION
ISSUE:
What firms or teams shall the City select as finalists for the Design Competition for City
Hall and the Park?
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
Ratify the recommendations of the City Hall and Park Master Plan Design Committee by
selecting the following firms to go forward in the Design Competition for the City Hall
and Park Master Plan project and authorize the City Manager to enter into stipend
agreements with these firms:
• Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Gonzales Goodale Architecture
• Johnson Fain
• LPA
• Rosetti Architecture
BACKGROUND:
The City Council, guided by the City Hall Design Committee, issued a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) for the design of the new City Hall and Park (and other related
facilities, including a parking facility) on April 11, 2008. The Design Committee,
consisting of the following persons:
• Lary Tucker, Chairman (non- voting)
• Andy Bowden, Landscape Architect
• Rush Hill, Architect
• Walt Richardson, Architect
• Linda Taylor, Architect
• Stephen Sandland, Architect
... met six times in open, noticed, and public meetings at the Friends Room at the
Newport Beach Public Library since April 7, 2008, to:
• Assist City staff in preparation of the RFQ,
• Develop a Judging Procedure and Criteria for responses (see Exhibit A, Part 1);
• Assist in the Council's development of General Design Parameters for the City Hall and
Park Master Plan;
City Hall and Park Master Plan Team Selection
June 24, 2008
Page 2
• Propose answers to questions that various firms raised as the firms reviewed the RFQ;
• Receive and review the RFQ responses (there were 51 firms /teams /individuals that
submitted responses by the May 19, 2008 deadline);
• Rank the responses consistent with the attached Scoring Sheet (see Exhibit B),
selecting thirteen (13) firms to "short list' and to have City staff make reference checks
on each firm to the extent possible; and
• Forward the names of five (5) firms or teams to the City Council for the Council's formal
consideration to complete in the Design Competition.
All of the 51 submittals were made available at the City Clerk's Office in City Hall and at
the Central Library.
The Design Committee's review took place both independently and in public sessions
on June 2 and June 16. At the June 2nd meeting, after a detailed individual review that
took dozens of hours by each Committee member over the Memorial Day weekend and
other free time during that period, the Committee narrowed the field of 51 firms down to
thirteen. The "short list" of thirteen firms was (in alphabetical order):
• Arquitechtonica
• Bauer and Wiley
• Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Carrier Johnson
• DMJM Design
• Dougherty and Dougherty
• Gensler
• Gonzales Goodale Architects
• Johnson Fain
• LPA
• NBBJ
• Rosetti Architecture
• Studios Architecture
At the June 16th meeting, the Design Committee recommended that the following five
firms (shown in alphabetical order) be selected by the City Council to participate in the
next phase of the competition. The committee also selected Dougherty and Dougherty
as an alternate in the event one of the firms declines to proceed. The next phase
involves a $50,000 stipend for each firm to work over Summer 2008 on a "Concept
Plan" for the City Hall and Park Master Plan and to return in September 2008 for
detailed public review and discussion about each of the five Concept Plans.
Five Firms Recommended for Consideration
• Bohlin Cywinski Jackson
• Gonzales Goodale Architecture
• Johnson Fain
• LPA
• Rosetti Architecture
City Hall and Pad* Master Plan Team Selection
June 24, 2008
Page 3
The Committee stressed that the selection of these five firms was very challenging after
winnowing the list to thirteen. Each of the thirteen firms, they noted, could do the job
well — but they believed that the five firms identified here were the "best of the best" that
submitted responses to the RFQ, and they unanimously endorsed forwarding the five
firms to the City Council. Their 5 -0 recommendation on Monday, June 16t", 2008 urged
the Council to enter each of the five firms into the Competition by granting them each
the $50,000 stipend and contracting with them for the Concept Plan work.
Each of the firms' submittals (all fifty -one, in fact) remains available in the City Clerk's
Office and the Central Library for public review.
What's Next?
As noted, the design teams, if they are selected by the Council on June 24th, 2008 and if
they agree to go forward, will work over the summer to prepare Concept Plans for the
City Hall, Park, and related facilities.
On or about September 22nd, 2008, the Design Committee envisions meeting in a public
setting to receive presentations from each of the five firms. By late October or early
November 2008, the Committee hopes to have completed its review of the Concept
Plans and to put forth a ranking (based on the attached criteria — see Exhibit A, Part 2)
to the City Council. The Council's tentative calendar shows the Council considering the
plans on November 25t", 2008.
A Word of Thanks
The time donated to the community by each of the six Design Committee members has,
to date, been extraordinary. Their work will continue in the fall, and may be equally
time - consuming at that point. The City offers its sincere thanks to the Committee
members for their generosity.
Prepared & Submitted by:
ave Kiff, Assi ant City Manager
Exhibits: A — The Committee's Judging Procedure and Criteria for Part I and 2 of the Competition
B — Blank Scoring Sheet Committee members used to score the 51 submittals
City Hall and Park Master Plan Team Selection
June 24, 2008
Page 4
Exhibit A
Newport Beach City Hall & Park Master Plan
Judging Procedure & Criteria
Part 1 - Ranking the RFQ Responses
Judging Procedure
In Part 1 (recommending up to five firms from the RFQ submittals), the Design Committee
will consider all submittals except those that have been disqualified for providing less
information than is required in Section V of the RFQ or for not meeting the minimum
experience qualifications or showing appropriate financial stability in the RFQ. The
Committee will rank the submittals according, generally, to a point score based on the
following:
1. Experience and References (50 %).
• Does the quality of the team's expertise and design work as submitted (including "at
least three recent large scale projects of similar scope, preferably with a public
agency for a public building ") meet the Committee's expectations for functionality,
timelessness of design, and overall design vision? (25 %)
• Does the proposing team have appropriate expertise and experience working
successfully together in architecture, landscape architecture, structural engineering,
mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, civil engineering and other related
engineering services, project scheduling, cost - benefit analysis, value engineering,
LEED and sustainable design, and general administration of all design and
construction components of the project? (10%)
• How is the team's track record of completing functional project goals on time and on
budget? Are the end users satisfied that the project met all their objectives? (15 %)
2. Project Approach (30 %). Is the team's philosophy and approach to the Project -
including program requirements, vision, and expectation of the Project's functionality
appropriate? Does the team's Project Approach statement satisfactorily address specific
methods or processes they would use to ensure a successful collaboration with all of the
Project stakeholders, Including City officials, staff, and community members?
3. Design Management Approach (20 %). Is the stated design management approach
(including managing the intended scope of work and related professional services to
assure the timely and cost effective completion of the Project, working with the City's
team, Quality Assurance /Quality Control, and the incorporation of LEED and other
sustainable elements) appropriate? Are there unique qualifications of the team in terms
of design management?
The Committee will recommend teams to the City Council as Part 1 concludes. The City
Council will use similar criteria to review, modify, or accept the Committee's
recommendations.
City Halt and Park Master Plan Team Selection
June 24, 2008
Page 5
Newport Beach City Hall & Park Master Plan
Judging Procedure & Criteria
Part 2 — Ranking the Five Firms' Concept Plans
In Part 2 (ranking criteria for the up to five firms /teams' concept plans), the Committee
and the City Council will review and rank the up to five (5) teams' submittals generally as
follows:
1. Functionality of Design (30%). Does the Concept Plan show an entire Project (City Hall,
park, and parking structure) that meets or exceeds all program parameters, that will be
functional for the community and that will promote an effective municipal organization?
• Integration. Does the Concept Plan successfully integrate the park, City Hall and the
existing library?
• Building. Does the Concept Plan show an efficient use of the building that limits
square footage and maintenance costs but that still maintains an open, airy, and
expansive feel? Will the public feel welcome without compromising the any of the
building's intended efficiency, security, or staff amenities?
• Park. Does the park design meet the desires of the community for a natural park
with appropriate recreational amenities?
• Space. Is the amount of space taken up by each element appropriate, balancing
building and parking needs with natural park space?
2. Creativity and Timelessness of Design (25 %). Does the Concept Plan show a unique,
exciting design that will remain appropriate, interesting, original and substantial into the
long -term future? As a public space, will the design solution make a valuable and
lasting contribution to both the social and physical environment of the City?
3. Practicality, Efficiency and Constructability (25 %). Does the Concept Plan reflect a
resource expenditure by the City that is appropriate for a large municipal facility in this
community? Is the design responsive to budget constraints? Does the Concept Plan
and its supportive documentation fully reflect the requests of the Committee and the
Council made to the design team?
4. Sustainability (20 %). Does the Concept Plan show sufficient elements of sustainability,
including at least the minimum appropriate level of LEED certification (silver), energy
efficiency, water quality protection, water conservation, and more?
City Hall and Park Master Plan Team Selection
June 24, 2008
Page 6
Exhibit B
Scoring Sheet Used to Evaluate RFQ Submittals
Newport Beach City Hall & Park Master Plan
I Request for Qualifications (RFQ,) Scoring Fwm
FlrmlTeam Warne:
Rater Name: Dae:
LEx
fence and References '50%
(Aj Does he guW4 of he team's expertise and design work as submitted I including "at #east three recent large soale projects
of similarscope, . pre uabtyevitha pubtE agency for apulttla buifdinp't meet the Camanittees expectations fora- 'ctianality,
timetessness of des' p, and arrall design vision?
il
Value:
29, DtS
(B) Dais the proposing learn haw appropriate expertise and experience working in arc>1 tecture,
landscape ardhitea6are,. structural engineering, mechanrcal': "ineering, eieefrical. engineerasg, civil engine:a€ ng and other
related erngmeeri: rig services, protect scheduling, cost - benefit uaiysis, value engineering, °LEED and susW 'e des;p, and
general administration, of all design and ccarstrueuart camponemis of hire prpjeat?
Value:
tQ
(C; Hors is the aeants track record of ca mpiefi g ftm.:-FOnal project goals an Mane and on budget7,,4re the ens! users satSf�ed
thae the project met alf their ohjeciues?
vaara:
1 v-
Serb#stat Ezp,eriernce & References =
L.2
Project Approach (30%)
Is the teams philosophy and approach to the Praject— including program nequfremem . vision, and expetttat , of €.;_
Ptoja,:. s functionality apprapriaie? Does 'tte teams Project Approach s atemerd saeisfacv* address spe Fiic methods or
processes used to ensure a successful caliaharation, vnith all of the Project stakelwlders, including Chy officials, staff, and
community mom&ers?
Value:
3
Design Management , Approach . (20%)
Is fire stated design management. approach {including managing the tn-:ended scope of wee and related praEess4oaa= srJicas
to assure the timely and cast effective camp+kaian of the Project, xrcrkaoi;I utitr the 0 - -:ys team„ QAMC, and the inoa-paation
of LEED.and odw susainabia elements) appropriate? Are there unique quadificatic s; of the team in terms of assign
managernerV
Value:
2fl
Total Score, Aft Sections =