The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutX2020-1136 - Alternative Material & Methods (2)XZ®2�o 0 Ij31a OCCAn Lvlo FAIR 4EWPoRor_ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUG 1 " 2020 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT u� x BUILDING DIVISION ''t c 'e• 100 Civic Center Drive I P.O. Box 1768 1 Newport Beach, CA 92658-8915CITY OFNEWPORT w;?ucoaNy www.newoortbeachca.00v 1 (949) 644-3200 SEAM CASE NO.: ❑X REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION TO PROVISIONS OF TITLE 9 (FIRE CODE) OR TITLE 15 (BUILDING CODE) OF THE NEWPORT BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE (See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee422Q ❑ REQUEST FOR ALTERNATE MATERIAL ]�`'-t •C OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION (See Reverse for Basis for Approval) (Fee $294) ❑ REQUEST FOR EXEMPTION FROM DISABLED ACCESS DUE TO PHYSICAL OR LEGAL CONSTRAINT (Fee $1,637) (Ratification by the Board of Appeals will be required.) For above requests, complete Sections 1, 2 & 3 below by printing in ink or typing. !11417.1797* -T81 W FOR STAFF USE ONLY Plan Check # 0856-2020 # of Stories 3 Occupancy Classification R3/U Use of Building SFR # of Units 1 Project Status PROPOSED Construction Type XLB erified by TT No. of Items 1 Fee due $294 DISTRIBUTION: ® Owner ® Plan Check TT N Petitioner ❑ Inspector ❑ Fire ❑ Other SITE ADDRESS: 2811 Ocean Lane Petitioner CivilScapes Engineering, Inc. Owner DDCFRJ INVS LP (Petitioner to be architect orengineer) Address 4686 E. Ontario Mill Parkway Address 28052 Camino Capistrano, Ste 213 Ontario. CA 91764 zip Laguna Niguel zip 92677 Daytime Phone (909)373-6044 Daytime Phone (949) 464-8115 12 I REQUEST: Submit olans if necessary to illustrate request. Additional sheets or data may be attached. I UJUSTIFICATION/FINDINGS OF EQUIVALENCY: CODE SECTIONS: Z,OL`( [Section 1808.7.4 of the 294& CBC Petitioner's r' l Position Principal Signature a CA Professional Lic. # PE 76698 Date 8/19/2020 FOR STAFF USE ONLY DEPARTMENT ACTION: In accordance with: ❑ CBC 104.11/CFC 104.9 ❑ CBC 104.10/CFC 104.8 (Alternate materials 8 methods) (CBC Modification) ❑ Concurrence from Fire Code Official is required. ❑ Approved ❑ Disapproved ❑ Written Comments Attached By: Date ❑ Request (DOES) (DOES NOT) lessen any fre protection requirements. ❑ Request (DOES) (DOES NOT) lessen the structural integrity The Request is .,k' Granted ❑ Denied (See reverse for ❑ Granted (Ratification required) appeal information) Conditions of Approval: tin Signature '1`0 Pos'.n f_�"n Rt fit n1mr'Y nFFt®! Print Name APPEAL OF DIVISION ACTION TO THE BUILDING BOARD OF APPEALS (See Reverse) (Signature, statement of ownerorapplicant, statement of reasons for appeal and fling fees are required.) CASHIER RECEIPT NUMBER: f� �' C�� ^*' FormsVnod'd 09/21/18 Guidelines for Approval of Alternate Materials. Design and Methods of Construction Basis For Approval For the Chief Building Official and Fire Code Official or their designated agent to approve a request for modification or a request for alternate material or method of construction, he/she must determine that special, individual reasons exist that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical and that equivalency is provided. The resulting condition must be in conformance with the spirit and purpose of the Code provisions involved and that such modification does not lessen fire protection, structural integrity or occupant safety. The applicant must provide sufficient information with this application to allow the above evaluation to be made. Requirements for Submittals The applicant design professional shall prepare a Written Report that describes the alternate proposal along with the applicable data listed below: • State specific code provisions for which alternative is requested and why request is being submitted. • Describe by code section those provisions for which alternative is desired. • Compare the proposed alternative versus the code requirements in terms of structural strength, suitability, effectiveness, fire resistance, safety and health impacts affecting the building or user of the building. • Demonstrate that the proposed alternative is compatible with balance of code requirements. • When applicable, specify how authoritative consensus document(s) are used to substantiate proposal. (Reference draft ICC Building Performance Code Commentary Section 1.4.2.3 for background information). • Provide assumptions, references, and documentation of evaluation methods utilized. This includes intended use, input data, anticipated outputs, and limitations of computer models and other analytical tools or methods. • Specify when and where special inspection and testing are required and the standards of acceptance for demonstrating compliance. Show how the proposed alternate, if accepted, will be identified on the job site. • Where land use restrictions and building setbacks are required, deed restrictions may be an appropriate method to ensure continued compliance. • State how and where alternate proposal is incorporated within construction plans and prepare plan amendments as necessary. The design professional has the responsibility to coordinate all construction documents and ensure compatibility between documents. • The report and design documents shall be dated, signed and stamped by the design professional according to the plan submittal procedure. • For alternate methods of design requests, the applicant shall set performance criteria for his design. Performance criteria shall be reviewed, amended and approved by the Building or Fire Code Official prior to start of design. Alternative Design Review/Verification The Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official has the responsibility to review design submittals for compliance to the adopted codes and procedures. If the Building or Fire Code Official does not have the expertise on staff to make a thorough and competent review, the Building or Fire Code Official shall select a consultant that possesses the necessary qualifications to perform a third -party or peer review. Cost of peer review shall be paid by applicant to the Building Division prior to commencing the review. • Verify that all applicable information and justifications listed above as requirements for submittals is received and verify that evaluation and design methods used by designer are appropriate to the alternative proposed. • Verify products are being used in accordance with their listing conditions as required by recognized listing agencies. If not available, require documentation and/or testing to demonstrate compliance with intent of code and intended use. • Evaluate performance of material and possible flaws that could affect performance of material in its installed state. • The reviewer shall document that the submittal has been reviewed and accepted as meeting the alternative materials, design and methods of construction provisions of the code. If the Building or Fire Code Official is not satisfied that the applicant has met the conditions, the request should be denied in writing with the applicable reason(s). Inspection/Field Verification The alternate proposal as approved in the construction documents must be verified by inspection, and, where necessary, testing as follows: • To verify that alternate materials, systems and fabricated products comply with accepted design criteria and the manufacturer's and engineer's installation procedures, inspectors should check product labeling, certification, quality assurance processes, and testing, as applicable. • When appropriate, an approved third party quality assurance inspection and testing service may be required for continuous and complex inspection and testing activities. This is intended to verify that construction complies with the code and the approved plans. Appeal from the determination or action of the Chief Building Official or Fire Code Official or their designated agent may be made to the Building and Fire Board of Appeals. To appeal, the applicant must provide special individual reasons that make compliance with the strict letter of the Code impractical. Appeals or ratifications pertaining to State Disabled Access Standards require complete evidence to substantiate that the proposed design is equivalent to that prescribed by that standards or that due to legal or physical constraints, compliance with the standards or providing equivalency would create an unreasonable hardship. Appeals must be submitted on the Appeal Form available at Permit Counter accompanied by the proper fee. You will be notified in writing of the appeal hearing's time and date. 6.88 FS . 82.61 76.46 FL 4.8% . l_... v2 O FS 4 78.? :74 6 TG TV{ 71,411NV 74.7. F5, O / FS / 4`STEPS J 75.90TG :(2 EACH)' 75.93 c 76.57 FS FS O j 2 3-714" STEPS 0 FS { 7.25 FG z 7581 ® 2.0% FG Q O W 2.0% O V _ 77.85 77.61 FS - FS Z a7r�5:10TG 10 7 7INV�77.44 2.0% 82.60TR FL (� 79.60TW EGRESS LARDER LLJ \J PER ARC"LAN 4`STEPS J 75.90TG :(2 EACH)' 75.93 c 76.57 FS FS O j 2 3-714" STEPS 0 FS PROPERTY FG z 7581 ® 2.0% 2.0% Q O W 2.0% O V _ 77.85 77.61 FS - FS Z 7781 82.6aq '79.60TW 4`STEPS J 75.90TG :(2 EACH)' 75.93 c 76.57 FS FS O j 2 3-714" STEPS 0 FS PROPERTY ,77.15 2.0% I O FS O O O Z F=lyfI 82.6aq '79.60TW -A C3, - 76.60 EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN; 3. WIDE SEWER EASMENT 17�7Z!j PROTECT IN PLACE PROPERTY LINE 60 74.50 - 74 55 7 74.97TG - 76.46 '^ .7.20 7.25FG FG FL,GB 3 ]7T.971NV N40°OZ'2SE 96.00'FM 79.60TW 3 6GFS 072.374 STG ... 2.0= � 2.0% •, 2.8� z2" 2.8% z2'i 2.0% LL 4.8% ?� ... 4.8% 7725 - ... ...-. �_... _. ... ... _... _.. - .._... ..._. ... t-... _... 74.51F5 ,074TG .49FG 1 5 }5 ;7 9�NVO 1 1178 152 ° 74771,3 .' ^ 74.45TG 7558 T6.68 : 1 0 4O 15 74.40 V 72.771NV 7. 755 ii 1S. IS 11' 1 5 O� 78.72 Ic F P 5 11 TS ._....� 8 7-0.6 TG TTASINVIOTG O �,1�0, ,,,,` +' 2% / 071,411NV z.0% 82.60TR74 3STC* - 7 72441NV .r o 7492F5 O^�° 74.77 79.60TW EGRESS LADDER o PROPOSED RESIDENCE- iSTEP / F5. 3 I PER ARCFh PLAN EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN, - 2' n 7 7T.20iG 78 2 n u. 7L381NV 71V 7.25 - z PROTECT IN PLACE ' 'e w LL FF = ! 5, QO 78:21 - 1 FG 7.207G 7 Q E-7440 11 1.5 O 71. *341N J EXISTING FENCE 74.40 3 77.25 7.60 TO BE REMOVED FL,HP -7B"" STEPS ,, • FG 7.81 2.0% FG Ilq 7500FF FS p Q 1I+ 74.61FS 75.00' a 11 79.67 (3 EACH) 79.32 p < �07435TG 4-1/2"STEP 11 _ 75 . FS O p 7 72.551NV ua 79.42F5' 2% 1 '2.0% U C3 74.51F5 GFF=74.80 1"STEP : 7.85 61 O 74.80GFF FS FS 74.20 O�c 2.0% 74.¢9FG 74.75FS 11. 79.6711 C3, 1/2"STEP IS TS O77.81 PROPERTY LINE 'o : ^ 74.40 2.0% 11 6:50 3 FS PROPERTY LINE FL,HP 7.15 Ijo 75.00FF - - TS 4 + 75.00 74.6TGFF 76.50 0 p 7435TG TS 11 4-5/8"STEP it 75 76.11 76.11 7 7ZOOTG 7.15 z. % p 7 2.65INV 15 'f5 FS 3 u; 71.261NV FS �j 2F 3F) 4"'STEPS O '07590TG a' (2 EACH) .}o 71.38INV. ' . O Z 75.93 76.57 -- - p 74 40 74.51FS - _ IXIS'ff �e FS FS Z FL,HP 74.49FG 74 7G B TO BE REMO D �Z O ° 79.60T1N, 2.0% 2.0% 72921NV 2 c O 74.35TG 1� -- ~74.75 5.00 ry 3-T/8" STEPS i 72.751NV _ APO@ 74.55 74.53 ` 3O (2 EACH)(� 7 907 4 _ FS it 74.3OFS 7F55 TFS3: FS 7424 11 76.50 12 7TG6 \:J75.901N _ 74.26FG pe GFF-74.55 tics- 5 GFF-74.56 TS 75.00 5 76.98 Ll;jo m N O .. *' a 7G 12 .. 12 TQ 77.731NV 19 74.53TG 74.35. 74.37G " 76.06 `76.97 7757 T - 7422 7441T6 _ 5 74.52 8 - 8 7496 75.75 f5 Fes/ .. 8 72.861NV ti FS 72961NV FS 73.161NV CFS) TS TG 12 ®7418TG 6.03 74.32 '82.60TR 72.791NV W FS PROTECT EXISTING FS 79.60TW SAWCU7AT EXISTING WALL - oW SAWCUTAT ALLEY ANO EASEMENT TO BE REMOVED EASEMENT LINE � -EASEMENT LINE - H 6372-------7L77N40°00'00E96.00'.69 FS FS PROPERTY LINE C3 GRADING PLAN