Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-847(A) - Jamboree Road Realignment between Pacific Coast Highway and Palisades Road (1961-1964)0 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER 9 NOVEMBER 5, 1964 SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT,,EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD, REVISED FIRST CONTRACT (CONTRACT NO. 847) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. AWARD CONTRACT TO COXCO, INC. FOR $338,468.50 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF AWARD BY THE STATE. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT UPON APPROVAL. FIVE BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND.OPENED IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS BY THE DEPUTY CITY CLERK AT 10:30 A.M. ON OCTOBER 21, 1964. i BIDDER COXCO, INC. Ecco, INC. SULLY - MILLER JOHN L. MEEK CO., INC GRIFFITH CO. STANTON GARDEN GROVE ORANGE LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES TOTAL $338,468.50 345,503.00 33So,248.8o 406,844.20 428,245.50 THE LOW BID IS 13.4% MORE THAN.THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE OF $298,477. MOST OF THE INCREASE IS IN BRIDGE COSTS; THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HAS APPROVED THE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED FOR THEIR SHARE. AFTER DISCUSSING THE BIDS WITH CONTRACTORS AND WITH THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, THAT PREPARED THE PLANS, AND ESTIMATE, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO RECOMMEND AWARD. THE'ORIGINAL ESTIMATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN TOO LOW, AND IT IS FELT THAT THE LOW BID RECEIVED REPRESENTS A FAIR PRICE FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE. APPROVAL OF AWARD BY THE STATE IS REQUIRED WHEN THE LOW BID IS GREATER THAN THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING DESIGN, INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION IS $381,000. THE INCREASE OVER THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED WHEN THE PLANS WERE APPROVED IS DUE TO THE HIGHER CONSTRUCTION COST AND TO THE INCLUSION OF INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION COSTS TO BE FINANCED WITH GAS TAX FUNDS. T0: CITY COUNCIL '! SUBJ: JAMBOREE RD. REALIGNMENT (C -847) DATE: 11/5/64 PROPOSED FINANCING IS'INDICATEO BELOW- ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT #163,500 COUNTY (AHFP FUNDS) 1 ,750 CITY (STATE GAS TAX FUNDS) 108,750 p TOTAL $381,000 PRESENTLY, $85,000 IS BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT NO. 26 -3397 -012 FOR THIS PROJECT. A BUDGET AMENDMENT AND A REVISED GAS TAX BUDGET HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. THE PROJECT SHOULD BE,COMPLETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1965 AND NOVEMBER 1966 DEPENDING ON THE RATE OF FILL PLACEMENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED ON THE UNSTABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL. O B ER CITY MANAGER y ATTEST TO OPENING BIDS: MARY WASILOFF DEPUTY CITY CLERK RC:BBN:vs TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SEPTEMBER 11, 1964 SUBJECT: REVISED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD (CONTRACT NO. C -847) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED AT 10:00 A.M. ON OCTOBER 21, 1964 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE PLANS BY THE STATE AND THE COUNTY. THIS PROJECT PROVIDES THE FIRST 2 LANES OF THE ULTIMATE 6 -LANE DIVIDED SECTION. WIDENING TO 4 LANES WILL BE NEEDED IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE: HOWEVER, THE ULTIMATE WIDENING TO 6 LANES SHOULD BE A NUMBER OF YEARS AWAY WHEN TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANT. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO PROVIDE A BRIDGE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO SPAN THE ULTIMATE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DIS- TRICT IS FINANCING THE INCREASED BRIDGE LENGTH COSTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 1, 1963- THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST IS $298,477. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST INCLUDING ALL ENGINEERING, EXCEPT FOR INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION TO BE DONE BY THE CITY, IS $329,000. PROPOSED FINANCING IS: ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: $136,000 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM (COUNTY): 102,500 CITY GAS TAX FUNDS 90,500 TOTAL $329,000 PRESENTLY $170,000 15 BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT NO. 26- 3397-012 FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS FIGURE INCLUDES $85,000 GAS TAX FUNDS AND $85,000 AHFP FUNDS. WHEN BIDS ARE RECEIVED, IT IS PROPOSED TO SUBMIT A BUDGET AMENDMENT AND A SUPPLE- MENTAL PROJECT STATEMENT AMENDING THE GAS TAX BUDGET. eisPOSITi -- OON:Q_ � MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2. SUBJ: REVISED PLANS FOR REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD DATE: 9/11/64 BECAUSE OF THE UNSTABLE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PLACE THE FILL AT A CONTROLLED RATE AND TO WAIT UNTIL A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF THE ANTICIPATED SETTLEMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE BEFORE PAVING THE NEW ALIGNMENT. THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PERIOD MAY BE AS LONG AS 24 MONTHS; HOWEVER, IT IS HOPED THAT THE ACTUAL TIME NEEDED WILL BE SOMEWHAT LESS. THE PROJECT SHOULD BE COMPLETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1965 AND NOVEMBER 1966 DEPENDING ON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AS INDICATED ABOVE. OBERe V CITY MANAGER RC:BBN :vs 10 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR -UU SUBJECT: PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD (CONTRACT NO. C -847) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. n II 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED / AT 10:30 A.M. ON AUGUST 6, 1963, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE PLANS BY THE STATE AND THE COUNTY. 3. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICA- TION STATING THAT THE CITY HAS OBTAINED THE NECESSARY RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE PROJECT. THE TOTAL y. ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND ALL ENGINEERING, IS $204,000.00. ORANGE COUNTY, THROUGH THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM, WILL REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR 50% OF THE COST OF ALL ELIGIBLE WORK. THE CITY SHARE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS WILL BE FINANCED BY GAS TAX FUNDS. INSPECTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION BY CITY FORCES WILL BE PAID FOR OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND. THE SUM OF $170000.00 HAS BEEN BUDGETED FOR THIS PROJECT UNDER ACCOUNT NUMBER 26- 3397 -012• THE INCREASE IN .ESTIMATED COST IS DUE PRIMARILY TO UNSTABLE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS DISCOVERED DURING THE SOILS INVESTIGATION. BECAUSE OF THE UNSTABLE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PLACE THE FILL AT A CONTROLLED RATE AND TO WAIT UNTIL A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF THE ANTICIPATED SETTLEMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE BEFORE PAVING THE NEW ALIGNMENT. THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PERIOD MAY BE AS LONG AS 24 MONTHS- THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED BETWEEN AUGUST, 1964, AND AUGUST, 1965, DEPENDING ON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AS INDICATED ABOVE. A NEW BRIDGE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OVER THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL; THE DESIGN PROVIDES THAT FLOOD FLOWS WHICH CAN PASS THE EXISTING BRIDGES AT JAMBOREE ROAD AND AT MACARTHUR BOULEVARD CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. DESIGN OF THE BRIDGE PROVIDES FOR FUTURE EXTENSION IF PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ARE CONSTRUCTED. PREPARED BY: DONALD C. SIMPSON COUNCI OBER PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTO j; CITY MANAGER DISPOSITIO RC:DCS:BBN:vR oe 6 -21 -63 FILE: � CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W- NEWPORT BOULEVARD To: PORTER# O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG DATE DtS.. 510 - 31sT sleety — NEWPORT BEACHi CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: 4*9 W. F. STM INGSOM SUBJECT: JAM*ORtt ROAD REALIGNMENT WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: NO. COPIES DESCRIPTION I Copy OF LETTER FROM FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT DAT90 DEBMtR 40 1963. COPIES TO: PRINT OF PLAN AND PROFILE DRAWING FOR PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL- PRINT OF CHANNEL RIGHT OF WAY DRAWING. PRINT OF SKETCH SNOWING END TREATMENT OF BRIDGE SUGGESTED DY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT. BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. CITY EMGIMttR f H. G. 06BORNE CHIEF ENGINEER ORANdiRCOUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DATRICT P. O. BOX 1078 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 AREA CODE 714 .�Q.17Q 1.1963 Mr. Donald R. Simpson Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: 400 WEST EIGHTH ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, 92'lO2 FILE No. F05.212 This letter is in regard to the length requirements for the Jamboree Road bridge at its crossing of San Diego Creek Channel. Enclosed are prints of the plan and profile sheet of the proposed earth channel, right of way map, and prints of a sketch showing the recommended 326 foot length be- tween bridge end abutment piling, where said length is measured perpendicular to the channel. Proximity to the marina development eliminates hy- draulic efficiency as a criteria so either piles or piers may be used in the waterway area. Adverse soil conditions are notable in this area and are a contributing factor towards the bridge length re- quirement. JWS /gp Encl. Very truly yours, H. G. usborne, Chief Engineer R F 0 F I V E D ID j _. !U U �s 9/1 1 2 3 4 63 (12) it RRSDI=ON NO. 5881 A RESOLUTION Or THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI?Y Or NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF. A CONTRACT WITH PORTER 013RIEN & AR14STRONG . FOR ENGINEERING Sii ii, Eb 5I WHEREAS, there has been presented to. the City Council of 6 the City of Newport Beach a certain contract between the City of 7 NeWPort ]leach and Porter, Q'Brien & Armstrong for additional 8 engineering 'services, including S revision of plans and specifics- 9 Lions, in connection with the realignmcnt of Jamboree Road between 10 Back Bay Drive and Palisades Road and the construction of a bridge 11 over the San Diego Creek drainage channel; and 12 WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the terms and 13 conditions of said contract and found them to be reasonable and 14 equitable. 15 Iuw1 THEBEFOgE9 BE IT RESOLVED that said contract be 16 approved and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and 17i directed to execute the same on behalf of the City of Newport Beach, 18 ADOPTED this 28th day of October 1963. 19 20 mayor 211 ATTEST: 221 � C 3 i, erk 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 100 J 9I1�/53 (5) 1 I' CONTRACT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES 2 3 THIS AGREEMENT i6 made and entered into phis `. � dsy.of 4 V ��� , 1963, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT 8$W a 5 municipal corporation, hareinafter referred to as "City", and 61 PORTIRt O'BRIEN 6 ARMSTRONG, a partnership and a licensed engineer - 7I ing zinn, hereinafter referred to as "Engineers "; 8 saIUi ZA3, City intends to realign Jamboree Road between 9 Back Bay Drive (formerly known as Bayside Drive) and Palisades 10 Road, and to construct a bridge over the San Diego Creek dram 11 channel, hereinafter referred to as "Project "; and 12 WHEREAS, engineering services are necessary in connection 13 with said project consisting of plans and specifications for said 14 project; and 15 WHEREAS, Engineers have furnished City Keith plans and 16 specifications for the "project" pursuant to a contract between 17 said parties entered into on January 4, 1963; and 18 WHEREAS, City has decided to make substantial changes in 19 the "project" which will necessitate additional engineering serv- 20I ices, including a revision of the plans and specifications previous 21i submitted by Engineers; and 22'i WHEREAS, Engineers have submitted a proposal to perform 231 such additional engineering services and to revise said plans and 24' specifications; 25 NOW, THEMORE, the parties agree as follows. 26 I. Scope of Work. Engineers agree to perform the fol 27 lowing services: 28 (a) To furnish revised plans, specifications and 29 cost estimates for the project, including, but not necessarily 30 limited to, the following specific items: 31 (1) To design and to furnish plans and speci- 32 fications for a bridge across the San Diego Creek channel I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14, 15 16, 17 181 19 20'' 21 22 23 24 25'. 26i 27 28 291 301 311 32, The bridge shall be designed with a length of approximt 360 feet and a width of 33 feet with sidewalk and with prevision for future wl&aing. (2) To prepare an economic analysis of alter bridge designs in order to aid in determinii*—the most economical structure consistent with design regairemeuts. (3) To conduct additional subsurface investiga- tion needed as the result of the increased,length of the bridge. (4) Revision of grading, drainage and other details necessitated by the changes in the bridge dgign. (b) The revised plans and specifications shall include special provisions, all of which shall be.suitable for use by City to call for competitive bids. (c) All drawings shall be prepared in ink do stands Mylar sheets which will be furnished by City. II. Checking of shop drawings and revision of plans and specifications as necessary to accommodate conditions discovered during construction shall be included within the contract price hereinafter stated. III. Rngineersshal,l be available for consultations with the Public Works Director and his staff regarding interpretatism of the plans and other problems which may from time to time arise at no additional cost to City. IV. Original drawings, reports ;, notes, maps, and other documents shall became the property of the City and may be repro- duced as deemed necessary by the Public Works Director. V. Engineering work, except bridge design, shall be per - formed in the Newport Beach offices of Engineers. VI. City reserves the right to terminate this contract at any time by giving Engineers three (3) days' prior written notice either by personal service or by placing said notice in the United 4. IL • 9 1I States mails, postage prepaid. addressed to any of Engineers' busi- 2I� ness offices. In the event that City shall terminate this contract; 3 it shall reimburse Engineers on the basis of its actual payroll 4 costs incurred to the date of termination plus 110%. 51, VII. All plans, specifications, and .other documents for ,i 6' the project shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Public 7 Works Director of City and delivered to him within 90 calendar 8 days fallowing the execution of this agreement by the City. 9 VIII. In consideration of the performance of the above - 10 described engineering services, City agrees to pay Engineers the 11 actual costs of said ser -Aces computed on the basis of the follow - 12 ing fee schedule, but in no event shall the City be obligated to 13 pay more than the total sum of $14,400.00. 14 Fee Schedule 15 Design Engineer $79,20 /day Structural Engineer 76.30 /day 16 Draftsmen 52.36/day Typist 40.00 /day 17 Drill Rig with crew 35.00 /hour 18 Laboratory Tests 19 Consolidation & Swell $60.00 /each 2011 Moisture Content and Unit Dry Weight 5.00 /each Mechanical Analysis with Hydro 25.00 /each 21I Unconfined Compression Strength 7.50 /each Atterberg Limits 25.00 /each Triaxial Shea 25.00 /each 2211 r Payment shall be made on the following basis after sub - I 24;1 mission to the Public Works Director of an itemized statement: 25 (a) Seventy -five per cent (75 %) to be paid 26� within 20 days after submission of the completed plans, 27 specifications, and additional subsurface investigation 28 to the Public Works Director. 29 (b) Twenty per cent (20x) to be paid within 30 30 days after approval of the plans and specifications by 31 the City Council, but in any event not later than 90 days 321 after delivery of the plans and specifications. 3. 1 (c) The final, lira per cent (5 %) to be paid 2 upon acceptance of the construction wank. by the City 3 Council, but in any event not later than i8 months after 4 submission of the plans and specifications to the Public 5 Works Director. 6 In addition, City ahali reimburse Engineass for the actual 7 cost of reproduction of copies of said plans, specifications and 8 related documents requested by city, 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this con - 10 tract as of the day and year first above written. 11 12 CITY OF NEWPOILT BUCK 13 BY _ mayor 14 Attest: 15 16 City Clerk 171 CITY 18 191 POILTER, 0 BRIBN & ARMSTRONG 20 i 21j ENGINEERS 22:1' 23i1 24 1 251 26 27 28 41 30 31 32 4. _.I__ _. ___ �.� I - -i' _ i • k Movitmen 22, 1963 VA- V- F- STEVLINOSON PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARNBTRONQ 510 - 318T STREET MEMPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA SUBJECTS JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAN Sim TIE USE Or A MAIIIMUN SUPE49LEVATION RATE N BOON THE PROJECT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED PREVIOYBLY. ATTACKED rOR VOW 1ICK4E0C9 IS A COPY Or A LETTER TO THE STATE REQUESTING PRELIMINIANT APPROVAL Or THIS 098I0N FEATURE AND A COPY Or THEIR REPLY, YOU VILL NOTE THAT THEY HAVE LEFT THE DECISION U► TO THE CITY* ME FEEL THAT T14C DECISION SHOULD BE $ABED ON AN ANALYSIS Or TUC AOVANTAKS AND DIS- ADVANTAGES or THE VARIOUS FACTORS INVOLVED. TIE POSSIBILITY or SOME VARIATION IN 0961014 AND CONBYRUCTIOM COSTS FOR THE BRIOBE SHOULD NOT BE A rACTOR IN THE DETERMINATION, VERY TRULY YOURS, 14,01 BENJAMIN B. MOLAM ASST. CITY ENGINEER ATTS. BBMIVS r • STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT Vll MAILING ADDRESS SOX 2904. TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54. CALIFORNIA November 20, 1963 Mr. Donald Simpson Director of Public Works 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: 120 S. $1111NG 912117 LOS ANGELES 12. CALIF. YNON[, MADISON 08090 .LEASE REFER TO FILE NO, VII - Ora- O -NptB MCS -58(l) Reference is made to your letter of November 15, 1963, concerning the use of a 2% superelevation as a maximum rate on subject project wherein the minimum curve radius is to be 1600 ft. and the maximum speed limit is to be set at 45 miles per hour. Your letter states that the maximum safe speed for 2% super and 1600 ft. radius is about 60 miles per hour and in checking this against the chart on Figure 7 -203.2 of the Division of Highways Planning Manual of Instructions, Design Section, your statement appears to be correct under ordinary dry weather conditions but makes no allowance for passenger comfort or slick pavement. You will note in looking at this chart that the staggger line crossing the family of curves indicates that an b% superelevation should be used and this corresponds with Table 7 -202.2 in the same Manual. The 45 miles per hour speed limit indicates that for a 1600 ft. radius curve, no superelevation would be required if we are to neglect passenger comfort and loss of side friction between the tires and the pavement in case the surface becomes slick for any reason. The use of a 2% superelevation to facilitate future side street connections appears to be a legitimate reason for such a modification, but the pavement surface roughness should be considered and adequate policing of the speed zone would be required. This still neglects passenger comfort and reduces the factor of safety. The decision in this case is left to the City, but a superelevation of less than 2% should not be considered. R r -- " L MEC :lad PUBLIUn DEPTE Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Distr ct Engineer By M. L BAUDERS Dis rroofec atEgIneexor�ty Nsvemssn 15v 1963 MN. A. C. 8IRw16 DISTR1aT ENOIN[tR Division or Hiem Vs awl Wo TcwINAL Awax LOS Anselts 54, CALIrORNIA ATT6NTlawk NR. N. 1., SAU0t8S Su"evs VII -D AJ ldPT® PRouaT 35 (1)$ JAN ONC RoAS R[AtlawNtNT kAR Stitt As fMlaATCO Iw OUR LRTTtR Or AYOUST no 1963,.ewt sveiggT PNoataT 111 MOW UNKRO0106 Nt- 0e111sN TO PROV1at ran A 1.00448 0141006 OvtR TN2 SAN 0I900 CNt2R CNANNtL. IN 111068 TO PROPIOC A SAT1S►ACTSNY OiSISN rOR rUTiMt Sloe ROAD coww2CT1ONS, IT IS R60UtsTts THAT YOUR Orrlae SIVt PRtLIwINANY APPROVAL TO INC Ust Or A U" fWJM SUPICUL00tON RAU Of IS Ow lift P"Atr. Twt wFNium CURve RAsIUs am not PRo.ItCT Is lyft rem MITN A SUPiN6L6VAT10N NATt Twt K"IW M Mort 1111260 "UL0 09 AROW N.P.w. JAM049 ROAD Is A CITY mica won limpseaTIONS AT 00102 AM POSTea sPteO LIMITS fir 45 M.P.N. ON Liss. IN VIcw or ng" rACTS, IT It NOT r6LT THAT A SMORLItVATION NATt UHICN IS LeOS TNAN TN6 STAN"" roll STATE 1111111WAYS MMILO st atTRIM6NTAL TO TNt 0R64124T. %$$mo VR VtRY TRULY Towns, 4aA DeNAL9 C. Stwmw hol.14 WORKS DlsesTes • 1�a 15, 1963 MR. W. F. STCVLING06N PoRTtR, O'BRItN & AmsTRONG 510 - 31ST STRttT NtNPoI%T- -BlACN: N I A JAmoRtt RoAs RCALOWMIOT,lA1tttMCNT FOR ENOINttRIN6 Rt- Dts1GN / DCAB SIR% TRANSMITTtD ARt TNt FOLLOWINGS FULLY tKCCUTCo COPY OF TNt AORttMtNT. p. ORIGINAL$ AND ISTRA 6LVt LI11t PRINTS OF TNt PLANS AND TNt 40066 SCCTIGNS. PLEASC COMMCNC[ WORK ON TM PROdtCT AT YOUR 9ARL119ST CONViNItNCt. VCRY TRULY YOUR$ i4w B[NJAMIN B. NOLAN AsST. CITY ENGINttR ENCLS. B9N%vR H. G. 09BORNE CHIEF ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROLOSTRICT P. O. BOX 1078 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 400 WEST EIGHTH ST. AREA CODE 714 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA. 92702 NOV 12 1963 FILE No. FO5.63 Mr. Donald R. Simpson Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: Enclosed for your files are three fully executed copies of Joint Powers Agreement No. BA63F5 -107 between this district and your City providing for the lengthening of the Jamboree Road Bridge over the San Diego Creek Chan- nel to its ultimate length. Also enclosed are three copies of the Minute Order of the Board of Supervisors of the Orange County Flood Control District authorizing the execution of this Joint Powers Agreement. WKM/ gc Enclosures Very truly yours, W. K. McRae Business Manager RECEIVED Nov i 3 196? PUBLIC VV'U '•'`S "T. MIi S OF THE BOARD OF SUPAISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA November 5, 1963 A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, also sitting as the Governing Board of the Districts governed by the Board of Supervisors, was held November 5 1963, at 9:30 A.M. Tfie following members being present: C. M. Featherly, Chairman, David L. Baker, William J. Phillips, Wm. Hirstein, Alton E. Allen and the Clerk. IN RE- JOINT POWERS AGREEIa M CITY OF NEWPORT MACH SAN MOO CREEK CHANNSL JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE On motion of Supervisor Allen, duly seconded and unanimously carried, the Chairman and the Clerk are authorized to sign the Joint Powers Agreement No. BA63F5 -107 dated November 1, 1963, between the Orange County Flood Control District and the City of Newport Beach for the lengthening of the Jamboree Road bridge over the San Diego Creek Channel to its ultimately required length. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, �County of Orange ss. I, W. E. ST JOHN, UNMENNIMM County Clerk and ex- officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. Im IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 5j5 h 'day of November, - W. E. ST JOHN County Clerk and ex- offfdo Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California ' 15M 5 -21.69 1,52c: a 10 -17 -63 (7) 1 2 3 4 5 6 rl 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 16 A G R E E M E N T a BA63F5 -107 ar .fi i- THIS AGREEMENT entered into this day of 1963 BY AND BETWEEN ORANGE,COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT hereinafter referred to as "District', AND CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, hereinafter referred to as "City ". R E C I T A L S A. City has heretofore acquired rights of way recorded in Book 6135, Page 155, Official :records of Orange County, for the realignment of that por�-ion of Jamboree Road that crosses San Diego Creek Channel. B. District has acquired rights of way -recorded in Book 6462, Page 165, of said Official Records, upstream of said Jamboree Road right of way for the improvement of San Diego Creek Channel, which channel is project F5 of the Engineer's Report dated March 1955. C. City, in the improvement of Jamboree Road, plans on an 80' bridge at the present crossing of San Diego Creek Channel; said 80' bridge would provide hydraulic capacity equal to the existing bridge. D. District's proposed improvement for San Diego Creek Channel would require a bridge approximately 360', in length at its crossing of Jamboree Road. For the purposes of this agree- ment, bridge length shall be measured parallel to the center line of the roadway, and shall extend from outside to outside of the end abutments. It is deemed mutually advantageous for District and City to enter into an agreement to share the costs of construction 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 la 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 W1 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 0 A of a bridge of the ultimate length necessary to span the pro- posed channel as a part of City's plans for the improvement of Jamboree Road. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows: 1. City shall undertake, all work necessary for the preparation of plans and specifications for the improvement of Jamboree Road. Said plans shall include a bridge approxi- mately 360' in length at the crossing of San Diego Creek Channel. The width of the bridge shall provide for 2 standard traffic lanes and a sidewalk for pedestrians. Provision for future widening of the bridge shall be made in the design. 2. Upon approval of said plans and specifications by District, and other agencies as may be required by law, or agreement, City shall promptly advertise the same for bids, receive and open bids and award a contract for the construction to the lowest responsible bidder, if any. 3. The construction contemplated by this agreement shall be under the direction and control of City, except that District may also furnish an inspector for the bridge at San Diego Creek Channel. in case of disagreement between District's and City's inspectors, such disagreement shall be referred to City's Director of Public Works for resolution. 4. The bridge costs shall include the cost of construction of the substructure and superstructure, wingwalls and abutments and incidental appurtenances thereto. Said bridge costs do not include the cost of any asphalt surfacing, channel work, or embankment construction and approach features. Within 45 days of demand, District shall pay to City 280/360 of the acceptable low bidder's construction costs for said bridge construction as herein contemplated; said demand, however, shall not be made prior to award of contract. -2- 1 5. After completion of the work and filing of Notice 2 of.Completion, City shall determine the actual betterment cost 3 of said bridge construction, which betterment cost shall be 4 280/360 of the actual payment made to the Contractor, as outlined 5 in paragraph 4 above. If the final cost payable by District 6 is less than the amount previously p::id, City shall refund to 7 District promptly the difference. If the final cost payable 8 by District is greater than the amount previously paid, District 9 shall, upon demand, promptly pay the difference to City. 10 6. In the event that the final design of the bridge 11 provides for a length other than 350', the City share shall be —y12 modified to the proportion of 80' divided by the actual length 13 and the District share shall be the remainder of the bridge 14 cost as defined above. 15 7. District also agrees to pay to City a sum equal to 16 10% of District's share of the construction cost as compensation 17 for the costs of engineering, administration, and inspection. 18 The method of payment shall be the same as provided above for 19 construction costs. 20 8, From and after completion of said construction, 21 maintenance of the bridge shall be t_e responsibility of City. 22 9. It is estimated that District's total cost under this 23 agreement including engineering, administration, and inspection 24 will be $125,000. If the lowest responsible bid received by 25 City is such that District's cost would exceed the above amount 26 by more than ten percent (10 %), District's written concurrence, 27 will be required prior to award of contract in order to obligate 28 District for any cost in excess of $137,500. 29 30 31 32 -3- 1 04 4 E c 1C is 14 li 1� 1; lE 1' lE IS 2( 2: 2, 2; 2( 2! 24 2 2E 2c �C 37 3� IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this agreement the day and year first above written. ORANGE CONY, D CONTRO. DISTRICT By Date / �i� Chairman o its Boar Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM GEORGE F. HOLDEN ATTEST: COUNTY COUNSEL OF W. E. ST JOHN, County Clerk and ORANGE COUNTY, CALI ORNIA ex- oficio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the Orange County By Floo ontrol/D]istrict By / l�Lt A4 ' &. CITY OFF NEWPORT BEACH Date: BY (it sri�✓ <.�7 Mayor ATTEST.ti t z Cit C r c RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: By C ie Engineer APPROVED AS TO FORM Dated: bee 31� 1463 WALTER W.,CHARAMZA City. Attorney BY J .%✓,.... -- axle TULLY SEY UR Ass6towCity Attorney I —4— H. O. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER i ORANG #COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL ISTRICT 0 P. G. Box 1078 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 400 WEST EIGHTH ST. AREA COO, 714 SANTA ANIy CALIFORNIA, 92702 QCT 3 1 1963 FILE No. F05.212 Mr. Donald Simpson Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir; Enclosed are ten copies of Agreement No. BA63F5 -107 providing for district participation in the financing of a bridge on Jamboree Road at its crossing of the San Diego Creek Channel. Paragraph 9 on page 3 of the agreement has been cor- rected as discussed with Mr. Nolan. It is our understanding that this agreement has been executed by the City Council in accordance with Resolution No. 5880 and that it is only necessary to obtain the City signatures. To present this agreement for our Board's considera- tion on November 5, 1963, it will be necessary for seven copies to be returned to this office on November 1, 1963, of which number three fully executed copies will be returned to you after execution by our Board of Supervisors. JWSJgc Enclosure Very truly yours, rum A istant Chief Engineer NO. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 0 • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Date AUGUST 30, 1963 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ASST. CITY ENGINEER JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT: CITY -OCFCD AGREEMENT COST SHARING PERCENTAGES bo CITY = 300 = 22.2% 2. BRIDGE AREAS '+JITHOUT SIDEWALK WITH SIDEWALK 280 OCFCD = 3600 = 77.8,= 30' X 36o, = 10,800 SF 33' X 36o, = 1SF 3. ESTIMATED COST CONSTRUCTION A) OCFCD, PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE: $162 000 ($1 NSF, O' WIDTH) (B) OCFCD, REVISED FOR S.W., 11880 X X15: 51 200$15�SF, 33' WIDTH) (C) F, OIB & A ESTIMATE (8- 27 -63): $125,000 T33 = $10.50/SF) I TOTAL COSTS (OCFCD SHARE (A) CONSTRUCTION 162,000 10%J ENGINEERING 16 200 TOTAL 170,200 OCFCD TOTAL $138,600 (B) (C)(SEE ABOVE) 178,200 125,000 1 ,800 12,500 196;6(50- 137,500 $152,500 $107,000 THE SAVINGS TO THE CITY MENTIONED IN THE CCU NCIL MEMO WERE CALCULATED ON THE BASIS OF THE 30' WIDE BRIDGE COSTING $162,000 WITHOUT AN OCFCD CONTRIBUTION TO ENGINEERING COSTS. IT IS VERY UNLIKELY THAT CONSTRUCTION COSTS WOULD BE SUFFICIENTLY HIGH TO INCREASETHE CITY SHARE. HOWEVER, 1 DO NOT SEE ANY VALID REASON WHY DISTRICT PAR- TICIPATION SHOULD HAVE A MAXIMUM LIMIT. A VERBAL DISCUSSION BETWEEN YOU AND THE DISTRICT CHIEF ENGINEER REGARDING THE LIMIT ON DISTRICT PARTICIPATION MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA. IT COULD BE MENTIONED TO HIM THAT, BASED ON ESTIMATES BY OUR ENGINEERS, THE TOTAL DISTRICT SHARE, INCLUDING COSTS OF WIDENING FOR SIDEWALK AND 10 ENGINEERING, WOULD BE LESS THAN $125,000• AUGUST 30, 1963 MEMO TO: PWD FROM: ASST. CITY ENGR. THE COST ESTIMATE PREPARED BY PORTER, 01BRIEN AND ARMSTRONG IS A DETAILED ESTIMATE BASED ON THE ROUGH QUANTITIES NEEDED FOR AN ASSUMED TENTATIVE DESIGN- IT IS NOT A "PER SQUARE FOOT" ESTIMATE. THE ORIGINAL W 'BRIDGE WAS ESTIMATED TO COST $42,6w EXCLUSIVE OF SLOPE PROTECTION. THIS FIGURE WOULD HAVE BEEN ABOUT $17.75 PER SQUARE FOOT. B. B. NOLAN BBN:vs A s 0 9 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT P. 0. BOX 1079 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA H. 0. 0800RNE CHIEF ENGINEER TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 4 2 1963 Mr. Donald Simpson Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: 400 WEST EIGHTH ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA FILE No. F05.212 Reference is made to your letter of August 16, 1963 wherein a revised draft of the agreement providing for district financial participation in the Jamboree Road bridge across San Diego Creek Channel was enclosed. It is noted that the agreement is basically as for- warded to you with added provisions for a wider bridge for sidewalk purposes and 10% for engineering,adminis- tration, and inspection. The added features are satisfactory to the district provided a clause is added which would limit the district's participation to a maximum of $125,000. If this meets with your approval, we will prepare the necessary copies of the agreement. JWS /gp Very truly yours, R,- .,u orne, Met Engineer 0 MR. H. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT P.O. Box 1078 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA AuGu3T 16, 1963 SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT, SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGE JOINT FINANCING AGREEMENT DEAR SIRS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REVIEW IS A REVISED DRAFT OF THE SUBJECT AGREEMENT. SEVERAL MINOR CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE FOR CLARIFICATION. PLEASE NOTE ALSO THAT THE PARAGRAPH REGARDING DISTRICT PARTICIPATION IN ENGINEER- ING COSTS HAS BEEN REWRITTEN TO CONFORM WITH THE PRACTICE IN PAST AGREEMENTS REGARDING SUCH PARTICIPATION- IT IS FELT COSTS OF ENGI- NEERING SHOULD BE SHARED IN THE SAME PROPORTION AS CONSTRUCTION COSTS. THE DESIGN OF THE LONGER BRIDGE WILL PROVIDE FOR A MINIMUM PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALK. A BRIDGE OF THE LENGTH PROPOSED WOULD POSE A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD WITHOUT A SIDEWALK. WE APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT THE DISTRICT CANNOT COMMIT FUNDS FOR FUTURE WIDENING AT THIS TIME SINCE THE AVAILABILITY OF FINANCING IS UNKNOWN. WE HAVE THEREFORE OMITTED FROM THIS AGREEMENT ANY PROVISION FOR SHARING THE COST OF THE WIDENING. PLEASE FURNISH US WITH COMPLETE CROSS SECTIONAL AND ALIGNMENT DATA FOR THE PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENT AT THE BRIDGE LOCATION $O THAT OUR ENGINEERS CAN COMMENCE DESIGN PROMPTLY ON APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT. VERY TRULY Y URS, DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ENCL. DCS :BBN:vs NO. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DCS:vs 0 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PU81E Date AUGUST 16, 1963 FINANCE DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT EASTOLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD - (C -847) PLEASE REFUND THE $5.00 DEPOSIT FOR SUBJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TO THE FOLLOWING: METAL PRODUCTS DIVISION ARMCO STEEL CORPORATION 6155 MALT AVENUE LOS ANGELES 22, CALIFORNIA Sxaax SOULE STEEL COMPANY 6200 WILMINGTON AVENUE LOS ANGELES 1, CALIFORNIA ATTN: W. SALLA I D. C. S. August 15, 1963 Director of Public Works City Hall 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Realignment of Jamboree Road, Revised Proposal for Design of Bridge Approximately 360 Feet Long and Adjustment of Contract Drawings to Reflect New Bridge Length In accordance with your request of August 12, 1963, we are modifying our proposal dated July 31, 1963 for the subject project, to reflect the following changes: 1 . Eliminate superelevation transition from bridge by reducing maximum superelevation rate to two percent (2 %) and modify design northerly of the bridge. 2. Design bridge for approximately 33 feet width with provision for future widening. The provisions of paragraphs I, Scope of Work, and II, Fee Schedule, remain the same as our proposal of July 31, 1963. AIRPORTS - HIGHWAYS - STRUCTURES - UTILITIES . DAMS . REPORTS - SVRVEYS . SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS - FOUNDATIONS AND STABILIZATION • • %44W PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG LOS ANGELES• CALIFORNIA PARTNERS O. J. PORTER & COMPANY O. JAMES PUNTER NEWARK •NEW JERSEY K. H. O'BRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG SACRAMENTO •CALIFORNIA JAMES R. PORTER 510 -31st STREET Assoc I ATES JAKE C. YOUNG WASHINGTON 0. C. NEWPORT REACH, CALIFORNIA C. F. GFIGG 673 -0845 C. H. DARBY RENO • NEVADA OTTO M. VIKRE J. F. WHITE (A. I. A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I. A.) LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949 -1960 August 15, 1963 Director of Public Works City Hall 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Realignment of Jamboree Road, Revised Proposal for Design of Bridge Approximately 360 Feet Long and Adjustment of Contract Drawings to Reflect New Bridge Length In accordance with your request of August 12, 1963, we are modifying our proposal dated July 31, 1963 for the subject project, to reflect the following changes: 1 . Eliminate superelevation transition from bridge by reducing maximum superelevation rate to two percent (2 %) and modify design northerly of the bridge. 2. Design bridge for approximately 33 feet width with provision for future widening. The provisions of paragraphs I, Scope of Work, and II, Fee Schedule, remain the same as our proposal of July 31, 1963. AIRPORTS - HIGHWAYS - STRUCTURES - UTILITIES . DAMS . REPORTS - SVRVEYS . SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS - FOUNDATIONS AND STABILIZATION CJ . • • Director of Public Works Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer August 15, 1963 Page Two. Paragraph III, Cost Breakdown (Estimated) is revised as follows- 1 . Economic Analysis of Various Bridge Types $ 1,000.00 2. Subsurface Investigation 1,730.00 3. Laboratory Testing 500.00 4. Bridge Design 9,500.00 5. Revise Grading, Drawings, etc. 1,650.00 Total $14,380.00 Say $14,400.00 The estimated completion time is two and one -half (2 -1/2) months. We wish to point out the following items for your consideration: 1. Although design of the future widening is not considered sufficient information must be developed for "joining" details for the type of bridge selected to assure workability of future widening. 2. Due to superelevation, geometry of future widening must be accomplished to assure proper clearance of proposed flood control dike. 3. Geometric time for bridge deck elevations has been greatly reduced by removing superelevation transition from bridge; however, because the bridge bents are parallel to channel center line and bridge is skewed approximately 13 degrees to the channel, setting deck elevations still requires considerable geometric calculations. 4. Additional drafting and computing time occurs if radius of curvature north of bridge is reduced to pull superelevation transition off of bridge, due to greater number of cross sections changing. We further wish to point out the following factors: 1 . The proposed :superelevations for the radius of curves used does not meet state or AASHO Standards and might cause disagreement with county or state authorities. PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG 4 • r Director of Public Works Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer August 15, 1963 Page Three. 2. It is imperative that we receive, before commencing work, the proposed bottom of channel elevation and dike heighth and alignment from the Flood Control District so that we may utilize fully the design time computed in our estimate of cost. We trust that the revised proposal meets with your approval, and will be available for further discussion if desired. CFG :bp Very truly yours, C. F. Grigg Chief Engineer PORTER. O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG AUGUST 120 1963 MR. C. F. GRIGG PORTERS O'BRIEN AND ARMSTRONG 510 - 31ST STREET NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENTS PROPOSAL FOR REDESIGN DEAR SIR: CONFIRMING OUR PREVIOUS VERBAL DISCUSSIONS 3 WE SUGGEST TWO MODI- FICATIONS TO YOUR PROPOSAL DATED JULY 31, 1963- 1. ELIMINATE SUPERELEVATION TRANSITION FROM TIIE BRIDGE BY REDUCING THE MAXIMUM SUPERELEVATION RATE TO 2% AND MODIFYING THE DESIGN NORTHERLY OF THE BRIDGE. 2. THE BRIDGE SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO BE ABOUT 33 FEET WIDE WITH PROVISION FOR FUTURE WIDENING RATHER THAN W FEET WIDE AS PROPOSED. BECAUSE OF THE LONG PERIOD OF TIME WHICH WILL ELAPSE BEFORE CON- STRUCTION TO ULTIMATE WIDTH WE DO NOT FEEL THAT IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE TO PREPARE DRAWINGS FOR A FULL WIDTH BRIDGE AT THIS TIME. THE MAXIMUM FEE PROPOSED SHOULD BE REVISED TO REFLECT THESE MODIFICATIONS. VERY TRULY YOURS Ary BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. CITY ENGINEER BBNavR 4 0 9 LOS ANGELES• CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG NEWARK •NEW JERSEY O. J. PORTER & COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA - 510 - 310 STREET WASHINGTON D.C. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 673 -0845 RENO • NEVADA July 31, 1963 Director of Public Works City Hall 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Realignment of Jamboree Road, Proposal for Design of Bridge Approximately 360 Feet Long and Adjustment of Contract Drawings to Reflect New Bridge Length PARTNERS O. JAMES PORTER K. H. O.BRIEN ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER ASSOCIATES JAKE C. YOUNG C. F. GRIGG C. H. DARBT OTTO M. VIKRE 1 F WHITE (A.LA.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I.A.) LEONARD C. URQUHART 19491960 In accordance with your request and the instructions contained in your letters of July 24 and July 26, 1963, we present the following proposal for the subject work. PROPOSAL I. SCOPE OF WORK I A Design bridge with sidewalk approximately 360 feet in length to accommodate future flood control improvements. This structure will replace the 80 -foot structure previously designed, 2. Conduct economic analysis of alternate bridge designs to determine most economical structure consistent with design requirements. 3. Conduct additional subsurface investigation due to increased length of bridge. AIRPORTS - HIGHWAYS . STRUCTURES . UTILITIES - DAMS - REPORTS . SURVEYS - SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS . FOUNDATIONS AND STABILIZATION Director of Public Works City Hall, Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Tuly 31, 1963 Page Two. 0 Assistant City Engineer 4. Revise grading, drainage and other details as necessitated by the bridge revision. Earthwork balance will be attempted by excavating for the width of the initial roadway, rather than the ultimate roadway as is now shown on the drawings, and changing the cut slopes from 1 -1/2 to 1 to 1to1. 5. The general scope of work will remain the same as in our present agreement. II. FEE SCHEDULE We propose to do the work for the actual cost based on the following fee schedule, not to exceed a guaranteed maximum cost of $17,000.00. Design Engineer $79.20 /day Structural Engineer 76.30 /day Draftsmen 52.36 /day Typist 40.00 /day Drill Rig with crew 35.00 /hour Laboratory Tests Consolidation & Swell Moisture Content and Unit Dry Weight Mechanical Analysis with Hydro Unconfined Compression Strength Atterberg Limits Triaxial Shear III. COST BREAKDOWN (Estimated) $60.00 /each 5.00 /each 25.00 /each 7.50 /each 25.00 /each 25.00 /each 1. Economic Analysis of Various Bridge Types $ 1,000.00 2. Subsurface Investigation 1,730.00 3. Laboratory Testing 500.00 4. Bridge Design 11,700.00 5. Revise Grading, Drawings, etc. 2,150.00 $17,080.00 SAY $17,000.00 The estimated completion time is two and one -half (2 -1/2) months. PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG Director of Pub *Works • City Hall, Newport Beach, California Attention; Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer July 31, 1963 Page Three. IV. The following comparisons are given for the new design versus the original design contract. 1. Increased Size of Bridqe a. Estimated cost of 360 -foot long bridge of approximately 48 -foot width is in a range from $175,000.00 to $200,000.00 - Standard ASCE Fee Curves give recommended design fee on Curve B from $11,500.00 to $12,600.00. Our detailed cost estimate for design works out to $11,700.00. b. Original 80 -foot long bridge, 48 -foot wide, was estimated to cost approximately $47,500.00. Standard ASCE Fee Curves give recommended design fee on Curve B as approximately $3,500.00. 2. Increased Complexity of Bridge a. Increased length of bridge requires transitions for super - elevation for reverse horizontal curve coupled with a vertical curve. This makes setting of bridge deck grades exceedingly complex and requires much geometric effort and time. A grid system must be prepared for the deck, with lines at 20 -foot intervals perpendicular to the roadway, and 5 -foot intervals parallel to the roadway with deck elevations computed for each point. Time required for these calculations are included under item 5 of the cost breakdown. b. The original 80 -foot bridge was not involved in superelevation transition, and had a uniform cross slope on the deck. 3. Subsurface Investigation a. Actual experience on original contract in the difficulty of access and drilling at this location set the price for the new subsurface investigation. The soft underlying strata causes collapse of the hole, necessitates use of casing and redrilling, and makes the sampling operation extremely difficult. Previous experience shows that 60 -foot holes are necessary to insure sufficient information for pile design, and the variable nature of the strata requires additional subsurface information for the longer bridge. We estimate two to three additional holes will be required to obtain this information. b. Drilling cost for the original proposal exceeded our estimates by a considerable amount due to the extremely difficult drilling conditions. PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG Director of PubloWorks • City Hall, Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant City Engineer July 31, 1963 Page Four. 4. Revise Original Drawings - Not Including Bridge Drawings a. Drafting changes will be required on drawings and cross sections of the original contract drawings due to increased length of bridge. Redesign of roadway in cut section is required to effect earthwork balance. In addition, new quantity estimates and specification revision will be required. As mentioned above, geometric computations for bridge deck grades are included in this item. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and will furnish more details at your request. CFG:bp Very truly yours, C. �X) C. F. rigger Chief Engineer PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG i .. JULY 26, 1963 MR. W. F. STEVLINGSON PORTER,, O'BRIEN, AND ARMSTRONG 510 - 31ST STREET NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA SUBJECT? REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD DEAR SIR: BECAUSE OF THE MUCH LONGER BRIDGE TO BE PROVIDED FOR IN THE RE- VISED DESIGNS IT APPEARS DESIRABLE TO PRVIDE A MINIMUM S'OE- WALK FOR PEDESTRIAN SAFETY. IT IS EXPECTED THAT AN ADO :TIONAL BRIDGE WIDTH OF ABOUT 3 FEET WOULD BE NEEDED. WE HAVE RECONSIDERED THE ORIGINAL REQUIREMENT THAT AtL ENGINEER- ING WORK BE PERFORMED IN YOUR NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE. IT WILL BE SATISFACTORY TO DO THE BRIDGE DESIGN IN YOUR LOS ANGELES OFFICE IF THAT IS DESIRED. THE REMAINDER OF THE REVISIONS SHOULD BE PERFORMED IN NEWPORT BEACH. THE PROPOSAL REQUESTED IN OUR LETTER OF JULY 24, 1963, SHOULD REFLECT THE CHANGES INDICATED ABOVE. BBN:VR VERY TRULY YOURS ! BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. CITY ENGINEER .. MR. W. F. S>/ERILINGsON - - PORTERS OIBRREM AND ARMSTRONG 510 - 31ST ST*UT *WPORT BEACH, CACIPOIRNIA 3049CT) REALIGNMENT Or 4i IEE ROAD DEAR SIRS CONF!RN1HO OUR PREVIous DISCUSSIONS* VOUR FIRM IS R94UESTE4 TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL rOR REVISIOO THE PLANS AND SItECirltATIONS roll ima SUsJEOT PneAcT. THE rOLLOWINO $*ANUS ARE MkEDEDt 1. 1MEREAOE LENGTH or SRIoGE -'room 80 FEET TO APPROXI- MATELY * FEET IN ORDER TO AtCOMMIGGATE FUTURE - - FLOOD 60NTROL IMPROVEMENTS- IT IS EXKtTED TMAT A NEW ECONOMIC ANALVSIS OF ALTERNATE SAID" DESIGNS WOULD BE JUSTIFIED IN VIEW OF THE MAJOR REVISION INVOLVED. IT IS ALSO EXPECTED THAT ADDITIONAL SDOM suRrACE INVESTIGATIONS WILL SE OCOUIREO- FOR DEVON Or THE LONGER SRIDGE. Z. REVIS9 GRADIMO# DRAINAGEF AND OTHER DETAILS AS MECESSI- TATEO OV THE BRIDGE REVISION. THE GEIKRAL BCOPE or THE WORN TO BE PERFORMED OV Two FIRM WOULD REMAIN THE SAME AS PROVIDED ron IN OUR PRESENT AGREEMENT EM4EPT FOR TIRE AODITRORAL SUSSURFACE INVESTIRATIONS MENTIONED ASOVE• 17 IS SUGOCOT90 THAT COMPENSATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES SE ON AN "HOURLY RATE„ OR „COST PLUS" BASIS WITH A MAXIMUM LIMIT. VERY TRULY VIURst BENJAMIN B. NOLAN %ASST. CRTY ENGINEER i • TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT RECOMMENDATIONS; 1. ADOPT A MOTION CANCELLING THE CALL FOR BIDS THAT ARE DUE TO BE OPENED AUGOST 6, 1963, AND DIRECTING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO SC. NOTIFY ALL CONTRACTORS THAT HAVE TAKEN OUT PLANS. 2. AUTHORIZE: 7HE NEGOTIATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR JOINT FINANCING OF THE PROPOSED BRIDGE CROSSING OF SAN DIEGO CREEK- 3. AUTHORIZE THE PREPARATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH PORTER, O °ARIEN AND ARMSTRONG FOR THE REVISION OF THE PLANS AND SPECIrICA'TIONS•, ATTACHEDIS A COPY OF A LETTER FROM THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT REQUESTING A RE- DESIGN AND RE- ADVERTISING OF THE JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT PROJECT, MEETINGS HAVE BEEN HELD WITH THE FLOOD CONTROL REPRESENTATIVE SINCE RECEIPT OF THE LETTER. IT APPEARS TO ALL CONCERNED THAT A BRIDGE APPROXIMATELY 360° IN LENGTH SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED RATHER THAN THE 80' LENGTH CALLED FOR IN OUR PLAN ";. MR. OSBORNE HAS AGREED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE DISTRICT PAY ABOUT 78% CE THE COST OF THE LONGER STRUCTJRE. THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE REVISED PROJECT i.i $330,4o0 DISTRIBUTED AS FOLLOWSZ 1- ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 2. ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM 3. CITY GAS TAX FUND GENERAL FUND SALARIES INCLUDING OVERHEAD) TOTAL THE COST 'WOULD BE $126,000 $102,200 $ 92,500 $ 9,]00 $.330,400 IF THE PROJECT IS REVISED, AND THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PARTICIPATES IN THE COST, THE CITY WILL SAVE ABOUT $4,000. THIS RESULTS FROM THE LOWER liNli COST OF CONSTRUCTING THE LONGER BRIDGE AND THE ELIMINATION OF A CONSIDERABLE AMOUNT OF EMBANKMENT CONSTRUCTION. ULTIMATE PLANS CONTEMPLATE THE NEED FOR 4 ADDITIONAL BRIDGE LANES, TH)S WOULD BE ACHIEVED BY CONSTRUCTING ANOTHER 2 -LANE BRIDGE AND THEN ADDING ONE LANE TO EACH OF THE TWO BRIDGES. .MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL SUB J. JAMBOREE RD. REALIGNMENT IN OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT OBTAIN A FINANCIAL COMMITMENT TOWARD THE ULTIMATE BRIDGE THE DISTRICT DOES NOT KNOW WHETHER FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE ADDITIONAL WIDENING 15 REQUIRED, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR THEM NOW FOR ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE FIRST STAGE• 2. WE HAVE ATTEMPTED TO CONSTRUCTION'. SINCE FOR PARTICIPATION WHEN TO MAKE A COMMITTMENT PARTICIPATION IN FUTURE BRIDGE WIDENING SHOULD BE NEGOTIATED AT THE TIME THE DISTRICT COMMENCES ANY CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE STREET RIGHT -OF WAY OR WHEN THE CITY DECIDES TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION OF ADDITIONAL TRAFFIC LANES. NOTWITHSTANDING THE RESPECTIVE OBLIGATIONS OF THE CITY AND THE DISTRICT, THE ONLY REASONABLE COURSE OF ACTION APPEARS TO BE ACCEPTANCE OF THE DISTRICTS PROPOSAL FOR JOINT CONSTRUCTION OF THE LONGER 2 -LANE BRIDGE AT THIS TIME. IT APPEARS FROM THE PATTERN OF DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA THAT THE FIRST STEP OF 2 ADDITIONAL LANES WOULD BE NEEDED IN ABOUT 2 TO 4 YEARS. THE NECESSITY FOR WIDENING TO THE ULTIMATE 6 -LANE SECTION IS NOT ANTICIPATED UNTIL ABOUT 1975 OR 1980. FYC�J�{1G DONALD C. SIMPSON %�iY�/✓ PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ATT. - LTR. RC.DCS:BBN:vs 7/i8/63 R OBE R CITY MANAGER / A.S. KO CH • R. V. WISE A LINTY SURVEYOR AND O EPOTY COUNTY RV EYOA y AO COMMISSIONER {�y`��T��(�,�j -110 o R.B. VA LE L (//�� ®MM of �LLL gp HIGHWAY OE_ S {ON ENGINEER L. MCCONVILLE W.E. LEWIS SST. COUNTY 5URVEYOR EFFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER E 'ANO ROAD C041MISSIONER ROAD D E P A R T M E N T TELEPHONE: 547- 05454 ) 54] - ENGINEERING BUILDING OONIS BARRETT BUSINESS MANAGER AREA CODE 714 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 July 18, 1963 Re: AHFP #138 Jamboree Road Bayside to Palisades Mr. Donald C. Simpson, Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of July 16, 1963 regarding readvertisement of the above indicated A.H.F.P. project in order to effect a cooper- ative agreement between the City and the Orange County Flood Control District. We feel that the original advertisement fulfilled the City's obligation under the terms of the A.H.F.P. agreement. The subsequent development involving Flood Control participation in the bridge construction and the necessary readvertisement will not alter the status of A.H.F.P. participation in the costs incurred by the City on this project. ASK: MS: sd Very truly yours, rn^ A. S. KOCH County Surveyor & Road Commissioner - - - SAFETY PAYS -ON THE JOB; IN THE HOME; ON THE HIGHWAYS - - - MIKES OF THE BOARD OF SUP*ISORS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA July 17, 1963 A regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, also sitting as the Governing Board of the Districts governed by the Board of Supervisors, was held July 17 , 1963, at 9:30 A.M. The following members being present: C. M. Featherly, Chairman; David L. Baker, William J. Phillips, Wm. Hirstein, Alton E. Allen and the Clerk. IN RE: AUTHORIZE NEGOTIATION OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE SAN DIEGO CREEK CHANNEL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH On motion of Supervisor Allen, duly sevonded and unanimously carried, the Chief Engineer of the Orange County Flood Control District is authorized to negotiate a ,joint powers agreement with the City of Newport Beach for the lengthening of the Jamboree Road bridge over the San Diego Creek Channel to its ultimately required length as requested in his letter dated July 17, 1963. The district's share is estimated to be approximately $125,000.00 of bond funds. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, 1 ss. County of Orange ) i I, L. B. WALLACE, County Clerk and ex- officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of the minute entry on record in this office. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal thi 1963. 17th day of July ' - - -- 10 1 L. B. WALL CEO` County Clerk and ex- officio Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California 16M 5.21.69 !J MR. A. S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA Ak JULY 16, 1963 SUBJECT: AHFP PROJECT 138, JAM80REE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR SIR: THE CITY IS PRESENTLY NEGOTIATING A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE SUBJECT PROJECT. THIS AGREEMENT WILL PROVIDE THAT THE NEW BRIDGE TO BE CONSTRUCTED OVER THE SAN DIEGO CREEK CHANNEL BE OF sum - CIENT LENGTH TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL IMPROVE- MENTS. AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WITH YOUR STAFF, IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE CITY BE AUTHORIZED TO CANCEL THE CALL FOR BIDS AND TO DELAY RE- ADVERTISING FOR BIDS UNTIL THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT IS EXECUTED AND THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED. VERY TRULY YOURS, DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DCS:BBN :vs 6 0 JULY it, 1963 NO. A. C. BIRNIE DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGMAYS BOX 2304, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. M. L. SAUDERS SUBJECT: VII- MA -NPTS PROJECT 38(l) ; JAM80REE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR SIR: THIS IS IN REPLY TO YOUR LETTERS OF JUNE 28 AND JULY 1, 1963, REGARDING THE SUBJECT PROJECT. THOSE ITEMS AFFECTING THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN COVERED BY ADDING PAGE 34, MODIFICATIONS TO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, TO THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND BY REFERENCE TO THE STATE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS WHERE PERTINENT. IT IS PROPOSED TO ADD A.0 SURFACING TO SHOULDERS CARRYING RUN -OFF WATER BY MEANS OF A CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER. THIS WORK WOULD NOT BE AN AHFP ELIGIBLE ITEM; THEREFORE THE C037 WOULD BE PAID BY HE CITY. WE ARE PRESENTLY IN THE PROCESS OF REVISING THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFI- CATIONS. PRELIMINARY COPIES OF THE REVISED SPECIFICATIONS WILL eE FORWARDED FOR YOUR REVIEW AS SOON AS THEY ARE AVAILABLE ATTACHED FOR YOUR REFERENCE ARE THREE COPIES EACH OF THE FOLLOWING RE- VISED SHEETS OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS: I- COVER SWEET 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3• SHEETS 13 AND 34 PLEASE DESTROY PREVIOUS COPIES OF THESE SHEETS. VERY TRULY YOURS, 4;0' DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ATTS. DCS:BBNaYR. ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT H. O. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER 1,1r. Donald Simpson Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: P. o. Sox love SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: 547-0547 900 WEST EIGHTH Sr. .S4.11 TA .G NA. CALIFOR1I4 �L ? 1963 FILE Plo. F05.212 San Diego Creek Channel - Jamboree Road This letter concerns the design of the proposed Jamboree Road bridge across San Diego Creek. A review of the files of the San Diego Creek project suggests that you may have been given an erroneous impression of the district's position in regard to this bridge. It so we wish to apologize and ex- plain that the discussions apparently were carried on in general without the benefit of specific plans. Now a review of the finished plans, show- ing the location of the bridge and its hydraulic design as prepared by your private engineers, reveals that considerable public money might be saved by cooperation in securing a structure to meet ultimate conditions. The bridge as designed will within a few years require lengthen- ing, which in turn will require the construction of a detour, the removal of many thousands of yards of compacted embankment, and considerable dis- confcrt and danger to the traveling public. It is believed possible to develop a channel and bridge design at this location which will obviate the above expensive and objectionable items. Our engineers will be available to work with your private engineers in an active and consult- ing capacity to achieve a unified design, and by reason of the final location of the bridge, it will be legally possible for the district to participate financially in its construction cost. This problem has been discussed with Mr. Koch, the County Road Commissioner, who states that your city has met the basic requirements for the County's participation in this project and a re- advertising of the job with a modified bridge design will not effect your eligibility for the county Hinds. Mr. Donald Simpson - 2 - We urgently recommend that you very seriously consider a re- design and re- advertising of this job in the interest of obtaining the most from the public money, which no matter which agency adminis- ters it has only one source - the taxpayers. HGO:mn cc: Mr. A. S. Koch Very truly yours, P H. G. Osborne, Chief Engineer Y.. t l P41 -ER, O'BR7EN & ARMSBB*ONG O. J. PORTER & COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4201 SUNSET BOULEVARD . LOS ANGELES 29, CALIFORNIA • NORMANDY 42191 TO — City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California DATE July 8, 1963 OUR INVOICE NO. 9089 YOUR P.O. NO. Agreement dated January 4, 1963 PROJECT No 6W4 Attn: MI Nolan COVERING PERIOD A Ben Nolan City Engineer FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Engineering 6 -e vices in connection with DssiLm of Jamboree Road Realignment) per Agreement dated January 4, 1963. Item (a), Page 3 of Agreement `f 5 p of $9,200-00 Item (b), Page 3 of Agreement 20,n of $9,200.00 $ 6,900.00 1, 840.00 $ 8,740.00 Porter, O'Brien & Armstrong Chief Fingineer ip 6 13VINE COMPANY ORD ROAD, POST OFFICE BOX 37, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA, LINCOLN 4 -0120 July 5, 1963 Mr. Donald C. Simpson City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Simpson: Re: Jamboree Road Realignment Due to the requirements of the City of Newport Beach to increase the right of way of Jamboree Road to 132 feet, it has been necessary to prepare the accompanying map. The drawing demonstrates the proposed me ing the required widening. Basically it quiring the entire 32 foot widening from side northerly of Ford Road and from the southerly of Ford Road. If the proposal it is suggested that the City adopt this any future developments. =hod of provid- proposes ac- the westerly easterly side is satisfactory, alignment for Please contact this office if further information is required. Very.truly yours, W. R. Mason Administrative Engineer WRM:FH:pab Enclosure 1k 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ]DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII MAILING ADDRESS BOX 2304. TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54. CALIFORNIA July 1., 19'3 Mr. Joseph Dev'-in Ci�y Engineer 3300 w. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: '20 ". 6PRINS STREET LOS ANGELES 12. CALIF. PHONE: MADISON O -3030 PLEASE REFER TO FILE NO. VIT- Ora -Np-LB Project 380 ) Reference is made to your letters of June 21 and June 26, 1963, submittin. plans, special provisions and estimate for the improve- ment of Jamboree Road from Ba;side Drive to Palisades Road. Confirming our telephone approval of June 2u, 1963, we have reviewed the plans, special provisions and estima -le as discussed I n person and by telephone with P.sst. City Engineer Benjamin Nolan, and the corrected plans, special provisions and estimate are approved I or advertising for bids subject to, the fol__ot;itic remarks. Approval to advertise is subject to the necessary revisions to the parts of the City's Standard Specifications required for this project, which revisions wre covered in our review letter of June 28, 163. The asphalt concrete di''ch proposed on the Low side of superelevation between Stations '(1 +50 and oB +C would seem to be of little value vaitnout a paved surface to close the gap between the drivin;� lane and the ditch. With only a light 011 treatment of the aggregate 'uase, traffic on the shoulder would tend to break up the surface traffic of the shoulder and the edge Of the A.C. Glitch causing erosion and eventual breakdown of the edge of pavement. I would appear that the s;aall investment required to pave out with a full structural section for the i%-hole o ft, shoulder vrould be a „pod investment for preventive maintenance, and it would serve as a part of the future driving lane indicated in the ultimate cross section snovrn on Sheet 2 of the plans. Please forv,a.rd a summary of bids when received for the completion of our files or for approval of the award of the contract if the low bid exceeds the pre l. m1nary estimate. It is su;;ested that the City review the estimate to determine if i, is in line with current price trends before advertisinO, and if adjustments in estimated costs are necessary, submit a revised estimate for our information. w- • • Mr. Joseph Devlin -2 VII - Ora. -NptB Project 38(1) July 1, 1,963 Please furnish us with the estimated completion date for this project, along with the summary of bids. MEC:lad Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE District Engineer By M. L.:BAUDERS District City and County Projects Engineer �ro T 0 0 STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII MAILING ADDRESS BOX 2304, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54, CALIFORNIA June 28, iqt Mr. Joseph Devlin City Engineer 3300 I.T. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: 120 S. 9Fnlx6 S1.F[i LOS AN GELS 12, CALIF. PHONE: MADISON 0 -3030 PLEASE REFER TO FILE ND. VII- Ora -NptB Project 38(1) We have reviewed the City Standard Specifications submitted I or use with Gas Tax Project No. 33(1) for initial construction on Jamboree Road and 'have the following remarks in regard to chan,-es suggested to clarify the City's intent and to provide adequate specifications to cover the work proposed. Please forvra.rd three copies of your revised specifications as quickly as possible since the approval to advertise Project 38(1) is subject to the provision of adequate Standard Specifica- tions to cover the work. The City is cautioned that care should be taken to see that the prospective bidders are issued the revised Standard Specifica- tions for use in preparing their bids on this project. Under Section 1 -13 of the City Standard Specifications, the State Stan ar Specifications, January 1960, are listed, with the additional wording: "and all subseauent additions and revisions ". The State does not issue any official additions or revisions to their Standard Snecificat:ions, which they consider as binding. P11 such changes are made by writing special provisions somewhat as follows for example: "Clear- ing and Grubbing:- Clearing and grubbing shall conform to the provisions in Section 16 of the State Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions." The changes are then included in paragraphs following such an introductory paragraph. It is suggested that Section 7-03, Hours of Labor, be reviewed In 11'"tii. Of tYle 1961 revisions to the Statutes, Division II, Part 7, Chanter 1, Article 3, Sections 1810 through 181;, inclusive, of the Labor Code. Section 9, Measurements and Payments, makes no mention of "payment", or "no separate payment", for public convenience and public safety. P.lthouh reference could be made to Sections 7 -1.0 and 7 -1.09 of the State Standard Specifications, it is the usual practice for cities to specify that the con- tractor shall comply with the provisions of these sections, but no separate payment will be made therefor. a 0 VII - Ora -NptB Project 33(1) Mr. Joseph Devlin -2 June 28, 1963 It is recommended that Section 9 be reconsidered with reference to each section of the Specifications in order that payment clauses be included for all work required. Structure excavation and backfill, rather than being in Section 10, Grading and Earthwork, is in Section 16, Sanitary Sewers and Appurtenances. Inasmuch as the Specifications as written therein are for sanitary sewer trench conditions, they are not entirely adequate for other types of structure excavation and backfill. In Section 10 -04 removal of oversized material in the upper 3" of su grade is specified but no method of payment is given. In Section 10 -06 and other sections concerning compaction, the requirement for compaction to 90 per cent or 95 per cent standard density should be clarified. The percentage must be relative to something and different materials provide different conditions. The test by which the relativity is to be determined should be designated since there is no such thing as a "standard density ". Test; Method No. California 216, in which "Relative Compaction" is defined as the ratio of the in -place density of a soil or aggregate to the test maximum density of the same soil or aggregate when compacted by a specific test method, is recommended. This could be covered in Section 6 -01 of the City Standard Specifications and thereafter reference could be made to "90 per cent relative compaction" or "95 per cent relative compaction" as the case might be. Under Section 12, Asphalt Paving, the material specified in Section 12-04 for paint binder should be mixing type asphaltic emulsion SS -1 or SS -lh rather than penetration type, since it must be cut with water to avoid excessive thickness of application. Section 12 -09, Manhole and Valve Box Covers, should be limited to sanitary sewer and storm drain manholes. All utility manholes and valve boxes are the responsibility of their owners to adjust, and at their expense. It is suggested that under Section 13 the City add some soundness requirements to their standard specifications in order that dis- integration of the concrete be avoided. Reference is made to Section 90 -1.02E of the State Standard Specifications. [7 0 0 VII - Ora -NptB Project 38(1) Mr. J. Devlin -3 June 28, 1963 In Section 13 -07 the allovrance of a 4" slump for curb, gutter, cross gutter and sidewalk concrete seem excessive and since it is not necessary it is recommended that a 2" maximum slump be specified to provide more strength in the concrete. In Section 13 -08 it is required that the entire area of exposed concrete be cured by the curing compound method. This is not desirable where bonding between concrete pours is necessary, particularly in concrete structures, and if used it should be further specified that such surfaces be thoroughly cleaned by abrasive blasting prior to the succeeding pour. Reference is made to Section .1 -1.19 of the State Standard Specifications. In Section 16 -04 the removal of unsuitable material in excavation is limited to a depth of 2t, which might not take care of the conditions. How is the sand or gravel backfill to be paid for (Replacement of unsuitable material) if structures other than sewer pipe are involved? (Included in price oi' sewer pipe). Why does the City desire to omit steps from sanitary sewer manhole and storm drain structures as specified in Section 15-09 (i7 -07 refers to ].6-09)? In Section 17 -07 the Specification for standard frames and covers should be clarified as to quality of material. (The size and weight should be given in the standard plans). ME,C : lad Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE District Engineer By M. L1 BAUDERS District City and County Projects Engineer COUNTY OF ORANGE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT CONTRACT A.H.F.P. Project # 13B Improvement and Construction Of Jamboree Road, Bayside Drive to Palisades in the City of Newport Beach 1. As required by the officially adopted procedures of the County of Orange Arterial Highway Financing Program, the Road Commissioner hereby certifies that: (a) Funds for subject project have been properly budgeted by both parties to the Administration Agreement. (b) The right of way for subject project has been properly certified by the City Council. (c) Plans and Specifications for subject project have been properly prepared and approved in accordance with authoriz- ed procedures. 2. This authorization is issued to certify that the Contracting Authority, as designated by the Administration Agreement for subject project, may now proceed with the a rtisement and receiving of bids for subject project. Date: June 27, 1963 CC 9**Stjr tt'( J. Patrick H. Christianson * *B�Yft"66* B. Wise Barrett W. Zaun A. S. KOCH r 0 0 JUNE 27, 1963 MR. A. S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER kOO WEST STN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: AWP PROJECT 135, JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR SIR: THIS IS IN REPLY TO YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 25, 1963, CONTAINING COMMENTS ON THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS• TIME FOLLOWING ACTION HAS SEEN TAKEN ON THE ITEMS MENTIONED: I. THE AC SPECIFICATION NOW CALLS FOR 3111" MAXIMUM AGGREGATE. WE MOULD PREFER NOT TO MODIFY THE OTHER AQSREOATE REQUIREMENTS AT PRESENT BECAUSE OF THE SHORT TIME ELEMENT. OUR SPECIFICATION HAS WORKED WELL IN THE PAST; HOWEVER WE ARE CONSIDERING MAKING THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO OUR STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS WHEN THEY ARE REVISED, 2. THE SAME COMMENT IMOICATED ABOVE APPLIM 3, THE EARTH WORK SPECIFICATION WILL BE MODIFIED AS REQUIRES BY THE MATERIALS REPORT. 4. THE CROSSOVER ROAD STRUCTURAL SECTION CAN BE MODIFIED AS NEEDED. IT IS ANTICIPATED THAT THIS CONNECTION WILL ONLY BE IN SERVICE FOR A SHORT TINE. 5- BECAUSE OF THE OVER -ALL FILL SETTLEMENT ANTICIPATED AND THE FUTURE EXTENSION OF THE BRIDGE IT IS NOT FELT THAT THERE WOULD BE ANY ADVANTAGE IN USING T14E STATE STRUCTURAL SACKFILL SPECI- FICATION AT THE BRIDGE. VERY TRULY YOURS, DONALD C SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DCS:BBN:VR i MR. A. C. 81RNIE DISTRICT ENGINEER, DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS BOX 2304, TERMINAL ANNEX Los ANGELES 54, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION. MR. M. L. BAUDER$ 40 JuME 26, 1963 SUBJECT: Vll- ORA -N ►TB PROJECT 38; JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR SIR: ATTACHED FOR YOUR APPROVAL ARE REVISED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT AS DISCUSSED WITH MR. M. E. CAMP OF YOUR OFFICE ON JUNE 21, 1963. THE REVISED COST ESTIMATE IS ALSO INCLUDED. A SHOULDER WIDTH OF 8 FEET HAS BEEN PROVIDED EXCEPT FOR A LENGTH OF ABOUT 550 FEET ON THE EASTERLY SIDE. THAT AREA WILL BE POSTED FOR NO PARKING. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS AND THE FINANCING ARE INDICATED BELOW: COSTS DESIGN $ 11,000 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 196,000 INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION 5,000 TOTAL $212,000 FINANCING COUNTY (AHFP FUNDS) $106,000 CITY (GAS TAX FUNDS) 100,100 CITY (GENERAL FUND) 5,900 TOTAL $212,000 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS - 2. 6 -26-63 CITY GENERAL FUND MONEY WILL BE USED FOR INSPECTION AND ADMINI- STRATION AND FOR INELIGIBLE CONTRACT ITEMS. SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM.) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE FINAL COST ESTIMATE IS NIGHER THAN THE AMOUNT BUDGETED IN THE ORIGINAL PROJECT STATEMENT. IT IS PRO- POSED TO SUBMIT A SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT STATEMENT AMENDING THE APPROVED BUDGET UPON RECEIPT OF BIDS. VERY TRULY YOURS xe�;_j DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ENCL. DCSSBBNtYR RIGHT OF 4Jr�Y CERTI.FICATIO�N'' 0 E L16 "r2tr IT OF J',',.BOREE RO,;D FROM 7;,STBLIJFF DRIVE TO P- LISADES RO -D THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HE,REGY CERTIFIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR AHFP PROJECT NG. 130 THAT: I. ALL RIGHT OF WAY HAS BEEN ACQUIRED. 2. THE ONLY IMPROVEMENTS EXISTING WITHIN THE RIGHT OF WAY ARE CERTAIN UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THOSE UTILITIES WHICH '.,JOULE; INTERFERE WITH CONSTRUCTION WILL BE RELOCATED BY THE 01.,N7-RS. 1N MAKING THIS CERTIFICATION THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AGREES TO HOLD THE COUNTY HARMLESS FROM ANY LIABILITY WHICH NAY ARISE BY REASON OF THE COUNTY'S RELIANCE UPON THIS CERTIFICATE AND ITS USE OF SAID RIGHTS OF WAY. i DATE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BY IMARGERY SCHROU'ER CITY CLERK X ` A.S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND • ROAD COMMISSIONER L. MCCONVILLE ASST. COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 r HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 June 25, 1963 Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: G.R. ESTABROOK DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR R.B. VAILE HIGHWAY DIVISION ENGINEER W.E. LEWIS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER DONIS BARRETT BUSINESS MANAGER Re: AHFP #138 Jamboree Road Bayside Dr. to Palisades Reference is made to the above indicated A.H.F.P, project, for which Plans, Specifications, Estimate and Design Report were recently submitted. We note that certain revisions have been made in accordance with our previous comments of June 6, 1963. This, however, has been our first opportunity to review the specifications and in connection therewith we offer the following suggestions: 1. The City's specifications on AC call for 1/2" maximum rock. We recommended that on this arterial highway 3/4" maximum be used. In addition, we recommend that the aggregate require- ments be modified as indicated on the attached sample County specification, which has been accepted by almost all of the cities in the County and is most compatible with the materials available. 2. For the same reason as above, we recommend that the requirements on your specification for aggregate base be modi- fied per the sample specification attached. 3. The earth work specifications may also be subject to some modification depending upon the compaction requirements of the Materials Report, which will be prepared after rough grading is completed. 4. Whatever the requirements of the Materials Report, it is suggested that the structural section for the "crossover road" be equal to that of the permanent traveled way, unless the City feels that the ultimate improvement is imminent. - - - SAFETY PAYS -ON THE JOB: IN THE HOME: ON THE HIGHWAYS - - - 0 City of Newport Beach lJ June 25, 1963 Page two 5. We suggest that the City adhere to the State standard specification on structural backfill, for the backfill adjacent to the bridge abutments. 6. The matter of the extent of the A.H.F.P. participation has been reviewed and the City may anticipate A.H.F.P. partici- pation in the treated shoulders, in addition to Items 1 and 2 of our letter of June 6, 1963. We trust that these comments will meet with your concurrence and look forward to receiving your revisions and the Right of Way Certification so we may continue processing this project. ASK: MS: sd encl. 2 cc: W. Zaun Very truly you ✓( A S • KOCH County Surveyor & Road Commissioner • Section 26 11 -8 -61 ( ) Aggregate —'ase.- -Class 2 aggregate base shall conform to the provisions for Class 2 aggregate base as specified in Section 26 of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. At least 65 percent, by weimht, of the material retained on the No. 4 sieve shall have at least one fractured face as determined by Test Method No. Calif. 205, modified. Test Method No. Calif. 205 shall be modified to read "Method for Determining Perce;�taL7e of Fractured Particles" Where in the test procedure the term "crushed particle" is used, in lieu thereof shall be substituted "naturally or mechanically fractured particle ". Any particle with one or more fractured faces regardless of size shall be considered a naturally or mechanically fractured particle. Where in the text of the test procedure the term "mechanically fractured" appears, the word "mechanically" shall be deleted therefrom. In lieu oi the spreading; requirements specified in Section 26, aggregate base material shall be spread upon prepared sub - crade by means of approved spreading devices which will deposit a uniform windrow or layer, and after spreading as above specified, the material shall be shaped to the requirements of Section 26 of the Standard Specifications. Motor Eraders may be used for the aforementioned shaping. Tailgate spreading by dump trucks of the material will not be permitted except for spot dumping and in areas not readily accessible to approved spreading devices. 0 • Section 39 3/10/61 ( ) Asphalt Concrete. -- Asphalt concrete shall be Type B and shall conform to the provisions of Section 39 of the Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. The penetration range of paving asphalt will be determined by the Engineer. The amount of asphalt binder to be mixed with the mineral aggregate shall be between 3 percent and 7 { oercent by weight of the dry mineral aggregate. The exact amount of asphalt binder to be mixed with the mineral aggregate will be determined by the .Engineer. The ninth paragraph in Section 39- 3.OL'6A of the Standard Specifications, which specifies the temperature of the mixture discharged into the hauling; vehicles, shall be deleted. At least 75 percent, by weight, of the material retained on the No. D sieve shall have at least one fractured face as de- termined by Test Method No. Calif. 205, modified. Test Method No. Calif. 205 shall be modified to read "Method for Determining Percentage of Fractured Particles ". Where in the test procedure the term "crushed particle" is used, in lieu thereof shall be substituted "naturally or mechanically fractured particle ". Any particle with one or more fractured faces regardless of size shall be considered a naturally or mechanically fractured particle. Where in the text of the test procedure the term "mechanically fractured" appears, the word "mechanically" shall be deleted therefrom. The leveling course mixture shall be placed on the prepared subgrade by means of approved spreading devices which will deposit a uniform windrow or layer, and shall be spread and shaped with motor graders. The use of asphalt pavers for laying the leveling; course mixture shall not be permitted e.ccept upon the written approval of the Engineer. In lieu of the rolling equipment required in Section 39-5.03 and 39 -6.03 of the Standard Specifications, the Contractor will be required to furnish one u ton 2 -axle tandem roller for each 100 tons, or fraction thereof, of asphalt concrete placed per hour by each asphalt paver or motor grader. Ar 0 0 Section 39 3/lo/61 Page 2 The miscellaneous areas to be paid for at the contract price for square yard for placing asphalt concrete (miscellaneous areas) in addition to the price paid per ton for the material involved shall be limited to ditches, spillways, aprons, at the ends of drainage structures, and driveways. Paint binder (tack coat) shall be mixing type asphaltic emulsion with a bituminous base grade of 60 -70 paving asphalt, except where directed by the engineer to use another grade. Prime coat shall be liquid asphalt grade 250 unless directed otherwise by the engineer. Cematg of Oranie HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA _ itne 25, 1 ")63 Rs : 141VP #138 3,u,iboree Road Layside Dr. to Palisades Mr. Beni tI.^sin 11. ;Nolan, Assistant City Engin €per. City of Newport Beach 3303 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: t.a.fe:ence. is made to the above indicated A.Fi.F.P, pro8ect, fo:: which Plans, Spec:bications, gstimats and Desiiin Repot were recently 0-uhmitted. We note that certain revisions have been made in accordance faith oars pzevi.ous comments of Jun,a 6, 1 63. This, however, has b>en our fi st opportunity tc review the specifications and in connection eher2 with we offer the following suggestions: 1. The City's specifications on i %C call for 1/2" maniurana rock, the recce=- need that on this aiteria,l highway 3/4" maximum be used. In addition, *- recommend that the aggregate require- ments he modifi--d as indicated on the attached sample County specification, which has been accepted by almost all of the cities in the County and is most compatible with the materials available . 2. For the same reason as above, we recommend that the requirements on your specification for aggregate base be modi- fied per the sample specification attached. 3. The earth work specifications may also be subject to some modification depending upon the cc.mpaction requirements of the Materials Report, which will ba prepared after rough grading is completed. 4. Whatever the requirements of the Materials Report, it is suggested Chat the stuctual section f.o,: the "crossover road" be equal to that of the permanent traveled way, unless the City feels that the ultimate improvement is immiinent. - C Ah 0 0 of NewJ.:rj'l-- June 25, 1963 Page two 5. ";a su;�gast )--h&L the City adhe a to the State standard specification on stvict-iral b-ac-idill, fo;. the backfill adjacent to the ;ridge alburra-ents. 6. 'rhe matte--- of iC'x-- ex.tent of the A.H.F.P. participation Pias reviewed -and tlh.-�! C-ity may anticipate A.H.F.P. partici•- I L. patliOn in the treated shoulders, in addition to Items I and 2 C;7 3:I:,- letter Of Jlz.'0�2 D" I'l-163. trust tna-� commeot; wili wet with your --on c ii rice aziJ L.Z'. to n�!_'Avinv your --visions and the :RL.4i,'t Of ni 5.w 1'.ay continue pfocessing this p:ujiz!CL. Very t-'uill yours, encl. 2 CC i • TOo CITY COUNCIL FROM CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT; PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD (CONTRACT NO. C -847) RECOMMENDATIONS: I. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. q II I` 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED AT 70:30 A.M. ON AUGUST 6, 7963, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE PLANS BY THE STATE AND THE COUNTY, 3, AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A. RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICA- TION STATING THAT THE CITY HAS OBTAINED THE NECESSARY RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE PROJECT, THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION AND ALL ENGINEERING, IS $204,000.00. ORANGE COUNTY, THROUGH THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM, WILL REIMBURSE THE CITY FOR 50% OF THE COST OF ALL ELIGIBLE WORK. THE CITY SHARE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS WILL BE FINANCED BY GAS TAX FUNDS. INSPECTION AND CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION BY CITY FORCES WILL BE PAID FOR OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND. THE SUM OF $770,000.00 HAS BEEN BUDGETED FOR THIS PROJECT UNDER ACCOUNT NUMBER 26 -3397 -072. THE INCREASE IN ESTIMATED COST 15 DUE PRIMARILY TO UNSTABLE: FOUNDATION CONDITIONS DISCOVERED DURING THE SOILS INVESTIGATION. BECAUSE OF THE UNSTABLE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IT WILL BE NECESSARY 7 0 P _ACE THE FILL AT A CONTROLLED RATE AND TO WAIT UNTIL. A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF THE ANTIC!PATED SETTLEMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE BEFORE PAVING THE NEW ALIGNMENT. THE TOTAL, CONSTRUCTION PERIOD MAY BE AS LONG AS 24 MONTHS. THE PROJECT WILL BE COMPLETED BETWEEN AUGUST, 1964, AND A(1GU5T,, ?965, DEPENDING ON CJNSTRUGiiOii CONDITIONS AS INDICATED ABOVE. A NEW BRIDGE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OVER THE DRAINAGE CHANNEL; THE DESIGN PROVIDES THAT FLOOD FLOWS WHICH CAN PASS THE EXISTING BRIDGES AT JAMBCREE ROAD AND AT MACARTHUR BOULEVARD CAN BE ACCOMMODATED. DESIGN OF THE BRIDGE PROVIDES FOR FUTURE EXTENSION IF PROPOSED ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT IMPROVEMENTS ARE CONSTRUCTED. PREPARED BY: DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RC.DCSeBBN:VR 6 -27 -63 -1 ' 6 -of-1 CBERT COOP CITY MANAGER City of 3300 W. Newport ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA June 6, 1963 Newport Beach Newport Boulevard Beach, California R. V. WISE DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR R.B. VMLE HIGHWAY DIVISION ENGINEER W.E. LEWIS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER DONIS BARRETT BUSINESS MANAGER Re: AHFP Project 138 Jamboree Road Bayside Dr. to Palisades Rd. Attn: Benjamin B. Nolan, Asst. City Engineer Dear Sir: Reference is made to the indicated AHFP Project for which preliminary plans were received with your letter of May 15, 1963. These plans have been reviewed and in connection therewith, we offer the following comments: 1. In accordance with the originally approved project statement, the city may expect AHFP participation in paving sections limited to 26' roadways only. Any roadway paving beyond these limits, as indicated in the Typical Paving Section on Sheet 4 would be at the City's expense. 2. The plans do not indicate construction of the divided roadways south of Palisades Road. We understand that this will be corrected, and in accordance with the original statement, AHFP will participate in paving limited to 2 -26' paved roadways, for a distance not to exceed 500' south of Palisades Road. 3. The stationing for the Typical Section on Sheet 3 does not conform with the plans. 4. Dimensions relative to center line, edge of pavement, etc., should be included on the plan and profile sheets. 5. Additional curve data should be given for the temporary bypass and the detour on Sheet 7. 6. Sheet 5 southerly end of and the existing should also be c in which the toe way. should indicate the transition at the the job between the proposed construction facility south of Eastbluff Drive. Sheet 5 :)rrected to show the detour for that section of fill encroaches onto the existing traveled - - - SAFETY PAYS -ON THE JOB; IN THE HOME; ON THE HIGHWAYS - - - A.S. KOCH 14 COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER L. MCCONVILLE ASST. COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 AREA CCOE 714 City of 3300 W. Newport ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA June 6, 1963 Newport Beach Newport Boulevard Beach, California R. V. WISE DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR R.B. VMLE HIGHWAY DIVISION ENGINEER W.E. LEWIS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER DONIS BARRETT BUSINESS MANAGER Re: AHFP Project 138 Jamboree Road Bayside Dr. to Palisades Rd. Attn: Benjamin B. Nolan, Asst. City Engineer Dear Sir: Reference is made to the indicated AHFP Project for which preliminary plans were received with your letter of May 15, 1963. These plans have been reviewed and in connection therewith, we offer the following comments: 1. In accordance with the originally approved project statement, the city may expect AHFP participation in paving sections limited to 26' roadways only. Any roadway paving beyond these limits, as indicated in the Typical Paving Section on Sheet 4 would be at the City's expense. 2. The plans do not indicate construction of the divided roadways south of Palisades Road. We understand that this will be corrected, and in accordance with the original statement, AHFP will participate in paving limited to 2 -26' paved roadways, for a distance not to exceed 500' south of Palisades Road. 3. The stationing for the Typical Section on Sheet 3 does not conform with the plans. 4. Dimensions relative to center line, edge of pavement, etc., should be included on the plan and profile sheets. 5. Additional curve data should be given for the temporary bypass and the detour on Sheet 7. 6. Sheet 5 southerly end of and the existing should also be c in which the toe way. should indicate the transition at the the job between the proposed construction facility south of Eastbluff Drive. Sheet 5 :)rrected to show the detour for that section of fill encroaches onto the existing traveled - - - SAFETY PAYS -ON THE JOB; IN THE HOME; ON THE HIGHWAYS - - - ' • 0 City of Newport Beach June 6, 1963 Page two 7. We assume that the C.M.P. culverts at Stations 86 and 93 will be asphalt coated. 8. Please include on the plans any existing obstructions that are to be removed. 9. Inasmuch as the revetments will have to be reconstructed in the not too distant future when the San Diego Creek channel is widened, we suggest construction joints to facilitate removal. 10. Certain additional comments have been provided by our structural engineer which we feel will be of assistance and a copy of these is attached. Our Materials Lab is also reviewing the plans and any additional comments we may receive from them will be forwarded to you at once. However, in order that you may proceed with the necessary revisions, we are returning a set of check prints herewith. ASK:MS:sd Att. Very truly yours, . --�K. S. KOCH County Surveyor & Road Commissioner M STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII MAILING ADDRESS BOX 2304. TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 34. CALIFORNIA May 10, 1963 Mr. Joseph Devlin City Engineer 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: lao N. snewe ar9sv LOp ANGELES la. CALIF. PNONKI MADISON 0.9090 PLEASE REFER TO FILE NO. VII -Ora -N tB Project 36 Reference is made to your letter of April 24, 1963, sub- mitting preliminary plans for the Jamboree Road realignment, Bayside Drive to Palisades Road. There were no specifications or estimate to facilitate this preliminary check but our Bridge Department provided the following comments for the City's special provisions. 1) No prestressing force is given for the pre- stressing units, only the number of strands of steel. The prestressing force was used by the designer in arriving at the strands required, but the force should be given for the information of contractor. It appears that the force should be in the order of 360 kips, after losses. 2) The statement of force to be used for lateral prestressing is stated as the force equivalent to 1 -1/411 X mild steel rod stressed to 30,000 p.s.i. This is rather an indefinite specification since high tensile steel would develop a'much different stress depending on whether the force were considered as that necessary to develop equivalent initial tension, or equivalent tension after losses. T— iwould be a difference of several `un�%reH —per cent. It is suggested that the actual initial required force or the actual final required prestressing force be given. The losses in mild steel may be in the order of 2/3 the initial stress while high tensile steel losses would be in the order of 1 /10 the initial. VII -Ora -N pptB Project 38 Mr. Joseph Devlin -2 May 10, 1963 Projects involving structures are to be submitted in triplicate in accordance with Section 7.02 of the City and Cooperative Projects Manual of Instructions. MEC :lad Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE District Engineer BY / / l/ DERSG� . L J BAUDERS District City and County Projects Engineer RECEIVED MAY 14 1963 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. r MR. WILLIAM R. MASON THE IRVINE COMPANY P.O. Box 37 TUSTIN, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR MR. MASON: IIVL MARCH 18o 1963 THIS IS TO REQUEST THAT YOU RECONSIDER THE NECESSITY FOR RE- TAINING IN USE THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF JAMBOREE ROAD SOUTHERLY OF PALISADES ROAD. SEVERAL PROBLEMS HAVE BECOME APPARENT CURING DETAILED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. 1. IT WILL BE DIFFICULT TO DETOUR TRAFFIC ON JAMBOREE ROAD THROUGH THE EXCAVATION AREA UNLESS THE CUT IS MADE FULL WIDTH. Z. IT WILL BE EXPENSIVE AND DIFFICULT TO RE- MOVE THE REMAINING MATERIAL AT SOME LATER DATE WHEN THERE IS A NEED FOR THE ROAD TO BE WIDENED. 3. THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A REALLY SATIS- FACTORY AND ECONOMICAL METHOD OF PROVIDING ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY. VERY TRULY YOURS ezm BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. CITY ENGINEER BBN:YS . 'L'f35^S man raj i 1I T' BiBBBIN6 1 w 3 IRIS AGRZIMEH'i is made and enter" laato this day of 4 _��, 196 3 , by and %etwe ms, the CITY OF X WPORT BEACH, a 5 wMaicipal corporation, herainaft* referred to as "City", and 6 PORTKO O*BRIENT 6 ARMSTRONiG* a partnership and a licensed enginaevi. 7 firma hereinafter referred to as "Engineer ";. 8 WMMW, City proposes to realign Jamboree Road between 9 Back Bay Drive (formerly known as Bayside Drive) and Palisades 10 Road, and to construct a bridge over time Sam Diego Creek drainage 11 channel, as shown as a map of the project marked Exhibit "A" which. 12 is attaei -wd hereto and incorporated by reference in this contract; i 13 and 14. WHERSAB, engineering services are necessary in connecthn 15 with said project consisting of design, plans and specifications for 16 the entire project; and 17 WUtM. maginser has submitted a proposal to perform said 181 engineering services ;. 19 WT, BEFORE, the parties agree as follows: 20 1. Engineer shall provide services consisting of the 21 following items% 22� (a) .topographic survey of the project area. 23, (b) Plans, specifications and cost estimates for 24 the project. 251 2. The services will include the preparation.of plans 26 and specifications, including special provisions, suitable for use 27} by City to call for competitive bids. 28 3, The plans and specifications for the proposal bridge 29 across the San Diego Creak drainage channel as shown, an Exhibit_ "A" 30 shall be prepared in such a way that the bridge maybe eucteudoA ,Bind 31 widened in the fixture. 32 4. All drawings shall be prepared in ink on standard f 1 "Ji Luc shoots which will ba: #mMishod to the Mgbww by i9W;.± • 2 3. Engineer agrees to "OdI4 the plans m t: speeifica- 3 tio" required by the Public Yorks Diveetm at vj6 additional 4 cost to'Gity if the bids for construction of the project are mare 5 thm five p"' cost (3%) above $1509000. s 0: Checking of shop drawings and revis"a.af,plios and 7 speeigicatims as necessary tp accammodatrt conditions. dim . 8 dusi% amstruction shall be included within fake vointract Wae 9 heraitff+after stated. 10 p, Engineer shall be available fast consultat3fts with 11 the ftblic Works Director and his staff resardiag interpretatift 12. of the plans and other problaas whioh may free time to time ar#a! 13 at no additional cost to Eiityr. 14 s. Original draviap, reports: motess mmps�: and otbo r 15 documents small rac'e'me Clue property of the City and my bi►zo 16 dused as deemed necessary',by the Public Works Director. 17 9. Env drift work shall be pert"med in the Newport 18 Reach office of say' eor* except for spatial services wMah of 19 necessity asst be perforMOd.elsewhere. 20 10. City reserves the right to tsmminate this ceatmot 21 at any time, by giving Eagincer thIm (a) digs' prior Written notica- 22' either by personal service or by placing said notice in the united 23 states mails, postage prepaids addressed to say of Sngtuaer•o Wei - 24 nose offices. In the evrztt that city tball tosmin"a tide contract, 25 it Shall reimburse Engineer on the basis of its actual payroll costs 26 incurred to tha date of tereination plus 11=0 27 11. All plans, specificatiO04, "d other documents for 28 the project shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Public 29 Works Director of City and delivered to hia within 120 calendar 30 days following the execution of this agreement by the City. 31 120 in consideration of the porfosmance of the above- 32 described engineering services, City agrees to pay Engineer the 81 9 10 11 12, 13 14' 15 16, 17 18 19 201 21 221 23I ifs 2511 26 27 28 29 30 31; 321 total liens of #9$200, p as hallows: (a) Seveni)61five par Qmat (7n) to be paid witbia 20 days after submission of the completed plans, sposilirations, and tgp,hic survey to the Public Director. (b) Twenty p`Or cent (20%) to be paid within 30 days after approval of the plans and specifications by the City Counail` b*.,in any event not later than 90 days after delivery of the plow and specifications. (a) The final fiva per cent (3%) to be paid upon acceptance of the oGnstruction work by the City Cauncil,.but in s"_.a ant not later then 18 months after submission of the plane and specifications to the Public Works Director, In addition, City shall retalmm" Ingtoaft for the actual cost of reproduction of eepies of said plans, specifications and related documents requested by City. IN WITNESS WRMU, the parties bane executed this con- tract as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ,M BRACH Ily i cc. e- — Attests 1 1 y Clem CI:Ti PO88, 0 A.B!'IST Eyr K. H. O'BRIEN Partner $=Iux". .7. C- 847(A) See Contract File for Exhibit A Alignment Plan r TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC W011," DIRECTOR SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT' DESIGN ENGINEERING SERVICES RECOMMENDATION: AUTHORIZE THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ENGINEERING FIRM OF PORTERS O'BRIEN AND ARMSTRONG TO PERFORM THE SUBJECT ENGINEERING SERVICES. IN SCHEDULING THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FOR THE 1962 -1963 FISCAL YEAR, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE DESIGN ENGINEERING FOR THE JAMBOREE ROAD PROJECT SHOULD BE DONE BY AN OUTSIDE CONSULTANT. PORTER, O'BRIEN AND ARMSTRONG, THE FIRM THAT DID THE SOILS ENGINEERING WORK FOR THE PROJECT, HAS SUBMITTED A FAVORABLE PROPOSAL FOR THE DESIGN ENGINEERING- THE FEE, FOR DESIGN WILL BE $9,200. THE SOILS ENGINEERING FEE ALREADY PAID WAS 41,800, FOR A TOTAL OF $11,000. DUE TO THE COMPRESSIBLE NATURE OF UNDERLYING SOILS DEPOSITS IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE FILL IN STAGES- IT IS ANTICIPATED THE CONSTRUCTI'ON PERIOD WILL EXTEND OVER AN 18- MONTH'PERIOD- THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT PLANS TO CONSTRUCT A CHANNEL OF ABOUT 350 FEET IN WIDTH WHEN SAN JOAQUIN DAN IS, REMOVED: IT IS PROPOSED TO BUILD A BRIDGE AT THIS TIME WHICH WILL SPAN THE PRESENT CHANNEL WITH A. LENGTM APPROXIMATELY EQUAL TO THE EXISTING WOODEN STRUCTURE. THE NEW BRIDGE WILL BE DESIGNED $O THAT IT CAN BE LENGTHENED WHEN NECESSARY TO CROSS THE FUTURE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL- PREPARED BY: DONA }D C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RC�DCS:BBN:vs 12/4/62 i OBER� CITY MANAGER PORTER dL O'BRIEN • O. J. Porter & Company CONSULTIM ENGINEERS 4701 russO bevlrvard for •nyaler 19 Ealifernia Normandy 4.4191 n OAT[ Nov. 16,t 1962 /� Newport OUR INVOICE ND. 423 TO— City of l�rt Beach YOUR P.O. No. 3300 O V WW1.. Newport Boulevard 4X37 N BCacho California PROJECT NO. Attar Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan COV [RIHa PERIOD Dept. of Public Works FOR PROF[aaIONAL a[RVIC[a: Engineering Services in connection With reaUgament of Jamboree Road. between lo Bayside Drive and Palisades ad. Contract C -795 Resolution � . .................... Surveys '. X40 i t Subsurface Investigation and Soils Engineering 11500.00 $ i.$oo.0o `K! O'Brien Partner �vo�l ff i MR. H. Q. OSBoRNE CHIEF ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT P.O. Box 1078 SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA DEAR MR. OSSORME: 6 OCTOBER 16, 1968 YOUR LETTER DATED JULY 26, 1962 RELATIVE TO OUR PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD ACROSS SAN DIEGO CREEK HAS BEEN REVIEWED. IT IS STILL THE CITY'S INTENTION TO CROSS SAN DIEGO CREEK WITH A NEW STRUCTURE HAVING A LENGTH OF 65 TO 70 FEET. AS INDICATED PREVIOUSLYS THE BRIDGE WILL CONFORM TO THE TOP OF LEVEE ELEVA- TIONS YOU HAVE PROPOSED. IF YOU PLAN TO REMOVE EXISTING UPSTREAM PROTECTIVE DEVICES THEN WE FEEL YOU SHOULD MAKE PROVISION DOWNSTREAM TO THE POINT OF FINAL DISPOSAL AT THE UPPER BAY TO ACCOMMODATE THE ADDED FLOWS THAT MAY RESULT. ANY OTHER COURSE OF ACTION COULD LEAD TO EXTENSIVE PROPERTY DAMAGE. WE WOULD WELCOME FURTHER DISCUSSIONS ON THIS MATTER IN AN EFFORT TO COORDINATE THE PROJECTS THUS PREVENTING ANY POSSIBILITY OF PUBLIC FUNDS BEING SPENT FOR CONSTRUCTION THAT MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED IN THE FUTURE. VERY TRULY YOURS zzv DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CC: A. S. KOCH, COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONER CITY ATTORNEY DCS:vs ORANGE OUNTY FLOOD CONTRO ISTRICT Mr. i1orkaid 418,VW" Public Works city of Newpo 3300 wi Newport voidios" NOVPMt beach, California Dear Si* Ref*rwsewAa made to your letter of June 4. 1162, regarding the Improvement of Jamboree Road a� a IM between Palis ad and Bayside Drive. `As you are aware, the district is sparing titans .0 for 4 - revement of Ban Die Crook Ccmel from the OrMou" of adsting Sayards Drive to a point southerly of Low Road. Construction dowsoftem of Bayside PDrive will not be a part of this project end will be AL upon future Improvement of Upper Newport Day. Y Design criteria for the subject channel b" been coordinated with the Irvine Company and the University of California's future campus developutent. A basic:: consideration was that the chaos I should not be SN"Pct to tidal flows from Upper Newport Day. Accordingly the channel profile has been based on an Invert elevation of 4.25 and top of levee elevation of 20.25 at a point 2000 feet downstream from MacArthim boulevard: The proposed channel will require, a 390-foot right of way, based on a 254-foot Invert, 3:1 side sim&aS to the top of love* and a 20-foot levee road an each side* i (t) f The district h"_ tl �qS by the Irvine Company that an ty ,grentad by the Departumt of Water Res& rswval of exist- I" o a Desk Cihanne°�l.'=aliof -the construction amsand futture level ot.; upstream drat stt� area could subject the cha Capacity of 35,000 Cubic feet per second. In view of the abVV. 4a 1.4 . p is believed that is the City's respons provide adequate span he !or ultimate flows. Shod tonal data, pertinent to the desiggnn of San Diego Cre�tt. 1up stream of Bayside Drives ba desired, please ; 'this office. Data in regard to the bay developa,joad . possible estuary grades and sections should heed with the Irvine Company and the Orange County iepartstant. Very truly yours, H. G. Osborne, Chief Engineer By Brunner Assistant Chief 3nginser OrS :yh ccs Mr. A. S. Koch, County Surveyor 6 Road Commissioner =r , .. 1 %.. :.'. �4p ..� 2 Al i r 4 7 8 ' 9 10 11 12:: 14 . 15 . 17 18 " 19 l 20 21 22 23 ,. <. 24 25 26 27 ,. 28 29 30 32 f » s ... 1 .t ya F� r ,)• :• ' x7GA° 'i• ` �` �M1`a r �� i �' , s THE IRVINE COMPANY POST OFFICE BOX 37- TUSTIN-CALIFORNIA 13042 MYFORD ROAD TUSTIN, ORANGE COUNTY TELEPHONE: TUSTIN- Lincoln 4- 0120 - TELEGRAMS- EXPRESS -SANTA ANA May 21, 1962 Mr, Donald C. Simpson City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Simpson: Enclosed is the original and one copy of the Deed of Street Easement for Jamboree Road which have been executed by our Company. As per our conversations with the salt works and yourself, the work will not be started on this project until the ponds in question have been cleared in October. WRM:pab Enc. -2 C14 Very truly yours, W. R. Mason Administrative Engineer RECEIVED MAY 9-11 1952 PUBLIC WORKS OEPL May 7, 1962 Re Donald C. Simpson, Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: G. R. ESTABROOK DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR R. S. VAILE NIONWAY DIVISION ENGINEER M. 1. STORM RCFUBE DISPOSAL ENDINCER DONIB BARRETT BUSINEBO MANAGER AHFP #138 Jamboree Road Enclosed are two fully executed copies of .Arterial Highway Financing Program agreement, Project #138, Jam- boree Road, Bayside Drive to Palisades. These copies are for your files. Very tru y , S, KOCH County Surveyor & Road Commissioner ASR:MS :egg Attach. 2 RECEIVED MAY A IOC;z PUBLIC WORM S DEPT, SAFETY PAYS ON THE JOB III THE HOME ON THE HI(aHW&YS i A. S. KOCH "COUNTY BURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER O . county e ASST. COUNTY SURVEYOR 333 AND ROAD COMMISSIONER TELEPHONE: HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT KIMBERLY 7 -3311 EEET. 292) ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST STH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA May 7, 1962 Re Donald C. Simpson, Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: G. R. ESTABROOK DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR R. S. VAILE NIONWAY DIVISION ENGINEER M. 1. STORM RCFUBE DISPOSAL ENDINCER DONIB BARRETT BUSINEBO MANAGER AHFP #138 Jamboree Road Enclosed are two fully executed copies of .Arterial Highway Financing Program agreement, Project #138, Jam- boree Road, Bayside Drive to Palisades. These copies are for your files. Very tru y , S, KOCH County Surveyor & Road Commissioner ASR:MS :egg Attach. 2 RECEIVED MAY A IOC;z PUBLIC WORM S DEPT, SAFETY PAYS ON THE JOB III THE HOME ON THE HI(aHW&YS - t;iitlA�'.�Y. !}l;. AID AN1};tr:Ix4L 1f1CiIWAY` FINANG %kOGRAM. �. T'ittiFBG'?% "AllMiN1S'iI2ATIUN AGREEMENT 1 :t r PkOJE CT " � MEM043DUM OF AGREEME FC¢ed into Jeesboree Ctrs day ofa�, : a� 2, and between t ITT° �Paayyside Dri . Palisades to 8 here.�naf ter the City, and as ts:000NTY 0 ANGE, State of :CaE��Eornia, :herein- 4..�after referred Co as t1FGounty. 5 .:. ' . WITPtE_ $NTH; 6 WHER94, the Board of Supervisors by Reeol Cion of May 31 £. 7 1956 adopted the Master Plan of Arterial Hi'ghtaays to sezve,.the entire County ine din the incor orated cities thereof ' ". 9• WHEREAS, .Articles 2 and 3 of Chapter 9, Divis on ".of the. 10 Streets and Highways Code authorize a county tso desires to 11 expend futrtds; apportioned to it. out of the California Highway Users 12: Tex Fund for,:afd to the cities „ and. in the imprCvement, construction, epair of streets :within 'a cit and y, 14 WHEREAS, the.Orange County Board, of Supervisorg and the Orange 15 County League of `Cities have agreed upon a cooperative financial 16 program for the establishment,; construction, and maintenance'-:6f ' a j 17 ,. County Arterial Highway system known as the:'Arterial H3ghwj Fin- { 18 ancing Program, and 19 WHEREAS, theloard. :of Supervisors•hasi by appropriate action, 20, provided in the budget '.0f the Special Road Improvement Fund for,' 21 the'Fiscal Year funds for the improvement of streets- 196263 III 22 within the incorporated.; cities of the.;Countiy.5 which streets' 'are a 23 part of the County's Master Plan. of Arterial Highways, and Zlhaa WHEREAS, the'Board of Supervisors .on 19 by formal resolution adop -ted the formal'paure for the admin 26 istration of the Arterial Highway Financing Program, which procedure =i 27 is outlined in a document. on file with the County Clerk, 'formal ly - known As.the'County'of Orange Arterial Highway Financing .Program �..' 29' Procedure Manual, and 30 WHEREAS, it is .mutually agreed between the parties that 31 32- Jig AOIT FROM DAY61DK. DRIVd TO PAL RO D ! street inciuded;in the range Countyr P an' of Arterial . .nY.. �LiY�'y�_ 1 k'�leld':: %�'� s .s vst. yy.�3 }�t'5i4 � *aL�. .-��” r�- ....?!�- �':ex "j•�n'3'NYRtiN _:.4s- .�,f.'Sh -.Y oc " 4 y�T.�� .. .- :Y.. y 4 " L&Y19, is a street of erd`1: County i�ierest and bsr 2 impro in accordance witH a policies of the "Arterial Hig Wk. 3 „Financing ProErate. -Said work of such improvement shall :jbe referred 4 to.hereinaftQr as:the Project - .: 8, ' NOW THEREFORE IT IS` AGREEDyi the artiea hereto as follows. , P ' x 6 The procedures outlined in the.AYterial -. Highway Financing 7 Procedul'- Manual herein r04red to shall be m�de.a part q this .. 8 Agreement. 9' 2, The Cont 6ting..Authority for the. Project is �jYeby desig 10 nated;. ap city f y Newpoft ba=h• 11 3. The Project Engineer for the Project is hereby;desi;nsted 12 as City of Nf leach. �N. 13 4, The Construction Engineer for the Projact•;ie he re by desig- 14. nated.ae City of`.Ne�rpart 4"ah. 15 5: Quality control of materials necessary during C-e coititruc - -: 16 tion of the Project. shall be performed by the County. 17 6. The work shall be subject at all times to insge.ction hg the.. , A. 18 authorized representatives of both parties.' 19 7. Funds t, o be used for the Project: 20 (a) The estimated cost'of the Project covered by this 21 Agreement is: DESIGN ENGINEERING 22v60Q'I�ii 22 -- RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION• CONSTRUCTION CONMCT CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING 183400'00 a 23 CONTINGENCIES: :...,; '4,0ft•oo 24 I TOTAL: . . $ 170.000.00 25 (b) On the basis of the above estimate, this Project. will 26 'be financed as follows: 27 COUNTY FUNDS: :.. '8$,000.0ti 28 CITY . FUNDS :. 8 : . 00 . = 29 TOTAL: i e (c) Final adjustments of project costs. -will bU 00001.00 30 the basis of the. County S per cent, the City 50 per cent on eligibla- 31 items in the contract. 32 (d). Any funds spent prior to shall not February 27, 19620 - 2.- ".-aYfi .i F a be red in the fina ccountI of this iheoJect. 2 8 •4fter'completio f.conatruction th6 -" arty. having re- sponaibility for ma "ance of the Project sha11 maio,t in the roadway structures and facilities the "safe and ul�le condition' ` " to which they have been impr _ -or constructed uiid�3V' this Project: 651 ` ;, 3. County -wide exfeosion of Arte:ria S'Atem: 7 To pYomote u .it of Count Arteziel Hi hws,` stem 8' " with the Cit ° y hteater Plan of Major Street$, -both perties agree .to 9 conti,te. the ` , promulgation of the A H.F." as outl.ined�in the 10 aforeme>#'. oned Procedure Manual. a ` ,,. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City as" "caused this Agreement to be. executed by its Mayor and attested by its ;Clerk, County .has 13 caused this Agreement to be executed ,by the:-Chairsiah'of::ita'Board " 14 _ of Supervisors and attested by its Clerk, ou the.datea written. 15. opposite their sigpaturea, ali,;tereunto duly authorized by Ttese ,o 1b'lution Minu e. Order `df of the City Board :Supwisors ", :Councilndthe of xeapedtivel 17 C JY..QF.PI — PORT, BEACH, 19 a munici 1 ;; , .. " p . corporation;: 20 Dated :.:._ 19GZBy Mayor 2l APPROVED AS T0: tQRt�I 22 DATED. ATTEST: Gr 23 WALTER W: -CHARA 1: KE� x CITY ATTAR +NEY 24 City Clerk 25 COUNTY OF ORANGE a political auixl`ivis 26 ion. of the State of'. California 27 Dated:_ 19_By 28 Chairman of t e. oar. o uPery sons 29 ATTEST: 30 L. B. WALLACE 31. County C er anq:ex -o icio er .o said Board of Supervisors ' Zz By Deputy r .0 . D�.sa6mu�ac`�.3dim ��...is._-s.: . -i�dr. •..r.,.i.:r,: ..J 'A'?:wia3.... X �';. i1 1 j - CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION FORM PROJECT JAIMORitt RDA R9ALI MMUT PARCEL N0. LOCATION SOUT"ItLr Or 'ALIOAfits ROAD REF. DWG. PURPOSE Ri"T or W&v AEAUIsiTi" DATE ta,.17.Lf PREPARED W.P. & K.D. CHECKED le, AX PROOFED R 0 A STRIP Or LAM 13:.00 ntT WIN IM OLocK 51# Or �1RvlNtts X WNIvisioH to TIME Cowwv or OaLms, STATt or CALI►OR1tA't AO bow 011 A NA► 0990M9e IN KOOK 1, PAW = Or MISC9LLANtoss Koo to TIME Orrict or TIME COUNTY R9COMIt M SAID Ce11TV, "IS STRIP LYING 66.00 ratT OM ChC11 6109 W VW C9NTCRLIN9 %NICK IS OCSCRIKe AS rOLLOYSI } dtOl MIW AT TNt IOUTH90LY CORMCM OF TIME NORTOMST9RLV SMONALr O a or THt s0UTN9ASTCRLv oN9•1ALr or OI.00K 50 or SATs IRv /N9SSUMIvis10M X �- M Ulf CORKM 16 SHOW 00jp1AQ�NAP ATTACN90 TO A 0991 TO OAis COUNTY or Ga"a/ R9conts IM ow __,i, PASt II�' WFIC1AL RtCOROS Or Ulf I:Z COtHITrj TNLMtt S. ��1 50 Vol III* rt9T TO TNt KOIMIMS K A �j��4 TANO9MT CUR1K# COMCAV9 $K*M"T9RLY AM HAVING A UINOWS Or 1,6W MTj . ter]] ``l� TNtNC9 OMTIMERLV 1 111.01 F99T ALOINI 84I8 CURVt TWOUON A CtiRRA< � I -Or R W, 97 j T1KMct TOWNT TO "to CURV9 S. r (S� � C.i (~ OOj.00 FCCT TO TN9 OtOIMNIMO Or A TANUNT CURVt CONCAVt.119ST9RLY AM . wAvive A MEAD /Us or 9,M00 rccTj TM9N9ts *W"KMLY 613.16 rCCT ALUM "is CURV9 THROWN a C�NTRAL A1OLt or TO A POINT OF_ t9 TANNCr WITH A L11119 TWAT is ►ARALL9L WITH AM 36.00 rtcT 9AOT9RLY a.�es�e, -y �A Or THt C9NT9RLIM9 M JA11SORitt ROAD AS D9OCRiD9D 10 A 0990 TO NID Cowan RtCoR0it0 I1 GOOK 11110, Pas[ 10, Orricia RtcOMi or Saio a � cotHtrrl T1t SASIs Or station ran TWIs ocOCRI►TIoN ARt Town was 1 Ditto WCORWO IM Ow 1037, Pan 869, Or►IcIA< Itzgeass Or sale C T. i` CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION FORM PROJECT jAmsoult ROAD ALI"Wea PARCEL NO. LOCATION soumaLY or p 416AOts ROAD REF. Dws• Lo 00 4/b PURPOSE 21MV Or f.AY AGO OSITION DATE PREPARED �.'. � ®� CHECKED /J, N. PROOFED A stair or LANs 132.00..rUT K /Dt in Bum 51. or IR►lla 0s SINIDIVIS1oN IN rut COUNTY Or STATS or CA41roulA. AS SNOUN ON A 11M OSCORKD IN 90" 1. PAW 6 Or 016C9LLANtola MAPS IM VW orrle9 or TN9 Comy R9eomm or "to COWtV. "ID OTRIr LYING 66.00 I'M ON DASH 6109 or TIN: 40T9RL IM UN ICN IS 91:8401049 AS FOLLONSI R661NNINO AT TN9 SOUTN9RLY gown K TNt NoMTNU ucitLY oN9N1a► or To someAittRLY OIK+NALr OT BLOCK 54 or SAID 1RVINK'S SUe- 11 /VISION AS SAID COMUR If SNOMN ON A NO ATTACKS TO A Otto TO $619 COWTV Of SMAUU# 0990MCD IN TOOK IM PAW 113 DrrICIAL memos or "is CevNTY; Tame S. 3r 43, 504 %$ 1#229 1'99T To Tlit St$INNINS Or A TANOtNT CUMV9. OOMNAVC DOWTH"STCALY Ale "VINO A RADIUS Or 1.694 rayj TKNet ssUTNtMLY 1 11.01 ►99T ALONG "it CUM TNMOUON A CtNTRAL ANOLt or 46* �1 �0; VWIIC9 TANKNT TO SHIM CUM S. 'r 121 39" 6.. %65.06 r99T TO TNt MCOINNINO or A TANKNT CURV9 CONCAVt U9STtRLY AIM NAVINO A RADIUS or 2,ke ritrj TN9NCt# s01 maLY 613. 16 r9tT ALoNO "to CUMV9 mom A CtNTRAL AN0L9 Or 1V 301 17" TO A POINT Or TAMMY WWII A LOW TWAT Is ►ARALL91. MITN Ale 16x04 r9ST WDT9RLY Or TNt CtNTtRLlllt Or JA1MORRt ROAD AS Dt$CMIStD IN A 0990 TO SAID COUNTY 11990110,110 IN BOOK 4110. MAOt top orrIC1A1 R96o1MS or "to e01wvs iMt MASIS Or 69ARiN0s ►OM TN16 0960IFTION AK 1NO69 no in M, 099D 09COMKO 10 BW 1037. ►AO9 269. Orr m" RLeoMDs or SAID eoUNTY• fie�n9 tCrnovc�l 6y Sty ,�t���n�y r AL/SADES l �. ► I C2T l44, yut .......... PROPOSED /32 ew � ri � J1. � v J � � � � ' U tif. \ ` Ems-' -� '•.A � �� \ i �°i to ¢' CURVE DATA 114 u E•� K = /600.00' N•_ .• o CURVE 04 -c 7o K. )......... /4 a 36 7 2400. oo' _ rl CC/RVE DATA (ac. TO R4D /AL) N Np r z400. oo' \b - L _ 460_4 -6'— R goo 3'�° DETAIL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DRAWN. P DATE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ^P'-; JAMBO,E'EE RD. REAG /GNtiI4!FA17' 4 . PUBLIC :.WO SOUTK OF PqL lS'AQES A0. 0 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROJECT REPORT REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD GENERAL THE EXTREMELY POOR GEOMETRIC ALIGNMENT OF THE PRESENT ROADWAY WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS HAS RESULTED IN AN UNACCEPTABLE ACCIDENT RATE AND INADEQUATE TRAFFIC CAPACITY DURING PEAK HOURS. THE HIGH DESIGN STANDARDS OF THE PROPOSED FIRST STAGE CONSTRUCTION WILL GREATLY ALLEVIATE THE CONDITIONS INDICATED ABOVE. RIGHT OF WAY OF SUFFICIENT WIDTH TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE WIDENING TO ACCOMMODATE INCREASING VOLUMES OF TRAFFIC HAS BEEN ACQUIRED. II. PRESENT ROAD THE EXISTING ROADWAY 15 APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET WIDE AND 15 IN FAIR TO POOR STRUCTURAL CONDITION; THE ALIGNMENT IS SUBSTANDARD. THERE IS AN EXISTING WOODEN BRIDGE OVER THE SAN DIEGO CREEK DRAINAGE DITCH. III. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION TWO 12 FOOT TRAVEL LANES WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCT- ION, BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN TRAFFIC EASTERLY OF THE EXISTING ALIGNMENT AT THE NORTHERLY END DURING CONSTRUCTION AND THE PERIOD OF FILL SETTLEMENT IT HAS BEEN POSSIBLE TO PROVIDE 4 TRAVEL LANES AT THE PALISADES ROAD INTER- SECTION AT NO INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION COST. THE STRUCTURAL SECTION IS ESTIMATED TO BE 4 INCHES OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE OVER 7 INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE. THE FINAL STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE DETERMINED BY SOILS TESTS AFTER THE COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING. IT 15 PROPOSED TO PLACE THE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVING IN TWO LIFTS THE FIRST UNDER THE PRESENT CONTRACT, AND THE REMAINDER UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT AFTER THE ANTICIPATED FILL SETTLEMENT IS NEARLY COMPLETE. A NEW REINFORCED CONCRETE BRIDGE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED OVER THE SAN DIEGO CREEK DITCH. THE DESIGN PROVIDES FOR FUTURE WIDENING AND FOR FUTURE EXTENSION IN LENGTH TO ACCOMMODATE PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS. IV. DESIGN CRITERIA THE MINIMUM CURVE RADIUS IS 1600 FEET; ALL CRITERIA HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED 50 AS TO PROVIDE FOR A DESIGN SPEED OF 65 MILES PER HOUR. REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD PAGE 2 V. FUTURE CONSTRUCTION WIDENING TO A 4 LANE DIVIDED SECTION IS ANTICIPATED IN THE NEAR FUTURE AS TRAFFtC VOLUMES DEVELOP. THE ULTIMATE WIDTH WILL BE 6 LANES DEVIDED IN ORDER TO HANDLE TRAFFIC ANTICIPATED ABOUT 15 YEARS FROM NOW. IT IS EXPECTED THAT JAMBOREE ROAD WILL BE EXTENDED NORTHEASTERLY FROM PALISADES ROAD ACROSS PRESENTLY UNIMPROVED LAND TO SAN JOAQUIN ROAD IN THE FUTURE. THE SECTION OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY TO THE PRESENT PROJECT WOULD BE WIDENED TO THE ULTIMATE SECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE. THE DEVELOPERS OF IRVINE COMPANY LAND ACROSS FROM THE AERONUTRONICS PLANT ARE PRESENTLY CONSTRUCTING THE FIRST STAGE OF THIS WIDENING FOR A LENGTH OF ABOUT 6500 FEET SOUTHERLY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. VI. REFERENCE DATA A SOILS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED BY CONSULTING ENGINEERS PORTER O'BRIEN, AND ARMSTRONG. THIS REPORT IS ON FILE IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. FINANCING OF THE PROJECT WILL COME FROM AHFP FUNDS THE CITY GENERAL FUNDS AND STATE GAS TAX FUNDS. VII. DRAINAGE LOCAL DRAINAGE HAS BEEN DESIGNED FOR STORMS OF 10 YEAR FREQUENCY. THE SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGE HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO PASS ANY FLOWS WHICH WILL BE TRANSMITTED BY THE WEIR AT THE OLD SAN JOAQUIN DAM SITE AND BY THE EXISTING BRIDGE AT MAC ARTHUR BOULEVARD. WHEN THE PROPOSED FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS IN SAN DIEGO CREEK ARE CONSTRUCTED THE BRIDGE WILL BE EXTENDED. VIII. OBSTRUCTIONS NO OBSTRUCTIONS AFFECT THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION EXCEPT FOR CERTAIN UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. TWO EXISTING BUILD- INGS NEAR THE CUT AT THE NORTHERLY END OF THE PROJECT PREVENT EXCAVATING THE CUT TO ULTIMATE WIDTH AT THIS TIME. THESE BUILDINGS WILL BE REMOVED WHEN THE ROAD IS WIDENED TO 6 LANES IN THE FUTURE. IX. RIGHT OF WAY A RIGHT OF WAY 132 FEET IN WIDTH HAS BEEN ACQUIRED FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY AT NO COST TO THE CITY OR COUNTY. THIS WIDTH WILL PROVIDE FOR A 6 LANE CIJIDED ROADWAY, PARKING LANES AND PARKWAYS. SLOPE EASEMENTS AS REQUIRED WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE IRVINE COMPANY. r • • REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD PAGE 3 X. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION DETAILS ARE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE FILL SLOPES ARE Z TO I. THE CUT SLOPES ARE IZ TO I IN ORDER TO PROVIDE SUFFICEIENT FILL MATERIALS ALTHOUGH STEEPER CUT SLOPES ARE STABLE IN MOST OF THE PROJECT AREA. PREPARED BY: y1N'7 /ji BEN AMIN B. NOLAN ASST. CITY ENGINEER STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH) I. MARGERY SCHROUDER, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that according to the records of the City of Newport Beach filed and maintained in my office, the foregoing Resolution No. 5573 was duly and regularly adopted, passed, and approved by the City Council of the City of Newport Beach, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held at the regular meeting place thereof, on the 9th day of April 19 62 , by the following vote, to wit: AYES, COUNCILMEN: Kingsley, Atkinson, Cook. Stoddard, Hart. Lorenz, Somers NOES, COUNCILMEN: None ABSENT, COUNCILMEN: None Dated this 19th day of April , 1962 Uityerk an x- c o Clerk of the City Council, City 6f Newport Beach, State of California. mlwz� MR 13 14 15 16;: 17 18; 19.. 20 21 22 if 23 i: 24 25 ii 26 27 28 29 31 32 same on beWf of the City of NvAport Beach* this 9tb day of pzil,, tum, r 0 0 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MIANAGER AND ,PUBL I C WORKS D I REPTOR SUBJECT: SOILS ENGINEERING FOR JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT RECOMMENDATION: AUTHORIZE PREPARATION. OF A CONTRACT WITH PORTER AND O'BRIEN FOR SOILS ENGINEERING ON THE JAMBOREE RDAD.REALIQMMEMT. BECAUSE OP'THE FILL AND THE BRIDGE Oil THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD CERTAIN SOILS ENO INEER ING, WORK WILL 13E-NECESSARY- THE FIRM OF.PORTER AND O'BRIEN'HAS PROPOSED TO DO TNIS WORK FOR A FEE OF $12800.00. THE IRVINE COMPANY HAS INDICATED THAT IT WILL SUPPLY EXCESS FILL DINT FROM THEIR EAST BLUFF DEVELOPMENT FOR.TNIS PROJECT.AT NO'COST TO TMEi CITY. THEREFORE IT IS DESIRABLE THAT THE SOILS ENGINEERING BE COMPLETED AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE SO THAT THE CITY CAN TAKE ADVANTAGE.OF THE IRVINE COMPANY OFFER'AND THE RESULTANT SAVINGS IN MONEY. PORTER AND O'BRIEN HAS.ALSO SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL FOR COMPL ETE DESIGN OF THE PROJECT. ESTIMATED FUTURE WORK LOADS OF THE EMOINEERINB DIVISION INDICATE THAT IT MAY BE NECESSARY THAT THE DESIGN BE DOME_BY AN.' OUTSIDE CONSULTANT. PREPARED BY= DONALD C. SIMPSOM PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RC :DCSiBSN:vR $ -5 -62 OB pmacooi f CITY MANAGER r PORTER & O'BRIEN O. J. Porter & Company CONSUIrTING ENGINEERS NEWPORT BEACH • CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA NEWARK • NEW JERSEY SACRAMENTO • CALIFORNIA March 29, 1962 Director of Public Works City Hall 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Dear Sir: SUBJECT Proposal for Engineering Work - Realignment of Jamboree Road from Bayside Drive to Palisades Road In accordance with your request of March 23, 1962 we submit herewith our proposals for the subject work. The first proposal is for subsurface investigation and soils engineering for roadway cuts and fills, and the foundations for a bridge crossing the proposed O.C.F.C.D. Channel. The second proposal is for preparation of design, plans, and specifications for the entire project including the items in the first proposal. We appreciate the opportunity of submitting these proposals to you. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you desire clarification of any of the items. Very truly yours, C. F. Grigg Chief Engineer CFG: dr Encls. ,510 31st street . newport h*ach cafifornfe • 673.04,45 _ t R ':� .- .9�-�' �..o x : • sue.^ a _ .: REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD PROPOSAL 1 SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION AND SOILS ENGINEERING 1. Surveys 2. Subsurface Investigation and Soils Engineering T 0 T A L ITEM 1. Surveys LUMP SUN $ 300.00 LUMP SUM 1,500-00 $ 1,800.00 The proposed relocation of Jamboree Road, including the bridge, will be staked and stationed from information furnished by the City of Newport Beach so that accurate boring locations may be obtained. ITEM 2, Subsurface Investigation and Soils Engineering a. Borings - A total of seven (T) engineering test borings will be made. All borings will be taken to the proposed depth listed unless rock or other firm foundation material is encountered at a lesser depth. Standard penetration tests will be made in each of the borings and sufficient samples obtained to conduct laboratory analysis of the material encountered. (1) Bridge - Three (3) borings to a 50 -foot depth each. There will be one (1) boring at each abutment and one at the center of the bridge. If these borings encounter firm bearing material, other than rock, at depths less than 50 feet, one of the borings will be driven to 50 feet to obtain depth of the firm bearing material. (2) Roadway Cuts - Two (2) borings to a depth of 15 feet each will be made in roadway cuts; one boring at each side of the water area. (3) Roadway Fills - Two (2) borings to a depth of 30 feet each will be made for the embankment area in the water. PORTER & OBRIEN PROPOSAL #1 (continued) b. laboratory Analysis - Mechanical Analysis, Atterberg Limits, Unit Weight and Moisture Content Determinations will be obtained for each soil type encountered. In addition, Consolidation Tests and Unconfined Compression Tests will be run on any silts and clay encountered. c. Soils Engineering - An engineering analysis will be made of the boring logs and laboratory test results, and a foundation report will be prepared. This report will contain boring logs, gradation curves, laboratory test data, analysis, and recommendations for foundation design of the bridge and roadway. PORTER & OBRIEN SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION, SOILS EKG MORI , DESIGN, PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT. LUNG SUM $ 11,000.00 This price includes the cost of surveys, subsurface investigation, and soils engineering, as quoted in Proposal #1. From our estimated cost of the project, the ASCE Curve, after deduction of items to be furnished by the City, recommends a fee of $14,000.00. However, there are certain items, notably drainage, which do not require the normal design effort and we have reduced our fee accordingly. PORTER & OBRIEN i a • PORTER & O'BRIEN 510 - 31ST STREET NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA ATTN: MR. C. F. GRIGG DEAR SIR: MARCH 23, 1962 CONFIRMING OUR DISCUSSION OF YESTERDAY, THE CITY REQUESTS THAT YOUR FIRM SUBMIT PROPOSALS FOR CERTAIN ENGINEERING WORK ON THE REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM BAYSIDE DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD. TWO PROPOSALS ARE REQUESTED AS FOLLOWS: I- SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATIONS AND SOILS ENGINEERING FOR A. ROADWAY CUTS AND FILLS. B. FOUNDATIONS FOR A BRIDGE CROSSING THE PROPOSED O.C•F.C.D. CHANNEL. 2. DESIGN, PLANS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE ENTIRE PROJECT IN- CLUDING ITEMS MENTIONED ABOVE. THE CITY WOULD HANDLE RIGHT OF WAY ACQUISITION, CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION, CONSTRUCTION STAKE -OUT, AND INSPECTION. FUNDS BUDGETED FOR THE PROJECT, INCLUDING ALL ENGINEERING AND INSPECTION, ARE ABOUT $170,000. THIS FIGURE IS BASED ON A BRIDGE OF 70' SPAN; HOW- EVER IT 15 ANTICIPATED THAT ADDITIONAL MONEY WILL BE AVAILABLE TO CONSTRUCT A BRIDGE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO CROSS THE ULTIMATE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. THEREFORE TOTAL COST WILL BE INCREASED BY THE DIFFERENCE IN COST BETWEEN THE SHORTER AND LONGER BRIDGES. APPROXIMATE PROJECT LIMITS AND ROADWAY SECTIONS ARE AS INDICATED ON THE ATTACHED DRAWINGS. ALIGNMENT HAS BEEN DCTER14INED AND RIGHT OF WAY IS NOW BEING ACQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. WE ARE ALSO ENCLOSING FOR YOUR INFORMATION TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS SUPPLIED BY THE IRVINE COMPANY. THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - J. W. SCHWARZE, DESIGN DIVISION ENGINEER - CAN SUPPLY DATA ON THE PROPOSED SAN DIEGO CREEK FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. THE CITY WILL FURNISH STANDARD MYLAR SHEETS FOR THE DRAWINGS. THE SPECIFI- CATIONS SHOULD PROBABLY CONSIST OF SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO BE USED WITH THE LTR. TO PORTER & O'BRIEN 3/23/62 CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS A COPY OF WHICH IS ENCLOSED. IF I CAN BE OF FURTHER HELPS PLEASE 00 NOT HESITATE TO CALL. VERY TRULY YOURS 615 J BENJAMIN B. NOLAN Assoc. CIVIL ENGINEER ENCLS. BBN:Ys PAGE 2 A+ PUBLIC WORKS WARTM& CITY OF NEWPORT 3EAdW NO. IMIT. DATE ACT IOM P.W. DIRECTOR Z y / AssT. P.W. DIR. T� CITY ENGINEER TRAFFIC DIY. ELECTRICAL DIY. WATER & SEWER DIY FAELO.ENOIREER OFFICE ERmtMEER Alm L go SECRETARY REMARKS, G e�,- ___AI FEBRUARV S, 1962 NR, A. L. HIMELHOCH DISTRICT EMOINEER Division OF HIGHWAY& P.O. Box 2304 - TERMINAL ANNEx Los ANGELES 54, CALIFORNIA DEAR SIR: QI DECEMBER 11, 1961, WE INFORMED YOU THAT THE CITY WAS CON- SIDERING A PROJECT THAT WOULD EXTEMB JAIIBOIKE ROAD NORTHERLY OF PALISADES ROAD TO AN INTERSECTION WITH MCARTMIR BOULEVARD. THIS PROJECT WAS CoNT1110ENT UPON PARTICIPATION OF COUNTY AHFP FUNDS. WE HAVE KEN INFORMED BY THE COUNTY THAT FUNDS WILL NOT BE AVAILABLE FOR THE POsT1oN OF THE PROJECT NORTHERLY OF PALISADES ROAD. SINCE IT WILL NOT NOV BE POSSIBLE TO ASANDON THE INTERSECTION OF MEARTHUR BOULEVARD WITH PALISADES ROAD AND SAN JOAOUIN ROAD, IT Is REOVEsTED THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PROCEED WITH THEIR PREVIOUS PLANS FOR SIGNALIZING THIS INTERSECTION. VERY TRULY YOURS, DONALD C. SIMPSON PuBL:c WORxs DIRECTGR CC: CITY MANAGER MR. WILLIAM MASON, THE IRVII/E CowANY MR. A. S. KOCH. COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPT. 0 MR. A. S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER 4W WEST 8tH STREET SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA 6 JANUARY 250 1962 SUBJECTS AHFP PROJECT - JAMBOREE ROAD IMPROVEMENT DEAR SIRI IN REPLY TO YOUR LETTER OF JANUARY 17, 1962 YE ARE SUPPLYING THE REVISED COST ESTIMATE AS REQUESTED. PART D. "SOURCE OF FUNDS ", OF THE PRELIMINARY PROJECT STATEMENT AS REVISED MOULD HOW READS THE REDUCTION IN CONSTRUCTION COST 1S $14,600 AND THE TOTAL OECREASE IS $16,400. THE SAVINGS RESULT FROM THE REDUCED MIRTH OF PAVING IN THE FORMER 4 LANE SECTION, ELININATION OF TYPE B CURB, AND REDUCTION IN DRAINAGE COSTS. PROVISION FOR LEFT TURN BAYS AT THE PALISADES [`:GAO INTERSECTION HAS BEEN RETAIN - ED, HOWEVER. SUCH MAJOR ITEMS OF CONSTRUCTION COST AS THE SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGES EARTHWORKS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS ARE EITHER UNAFFECTED OR ONLY SLIGHTLY MODIFIED BY THE CHANGES THUS RESULTING IN A RELATIVELY SMALL DECREASE IN TO- TAL COST. PRIOR TO A FINAL DECISION IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE TECHNICAL STAFF RECONSIDER THE PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED. ACTUAL COUNTS DURING PEAK HOURS AT THE JAMBOREE - PALISADES INTERSECTION IN- DICA','E TRAFFIC VOLUMES FAR IN EXCESS OF EFFICIENT CAPACITY. THE RESULTANT CONGESTION AND INTERFERENCE WITH TURNIMG MOVEMENTS ARE EVIDENCED S`' TRAFFIC BACKING UP FOR A QUARTER MILE OR MORE AT TIMES. HAZARDS TO SAFE VEHICLE OP- ERATION ARE EXTREMES AND THE ACCIDENT RATE AT PRESENT IS CONSIDERED UNACCEPTABLE. SIMILAR CONGESTION OCCURS AT THE EXISTING MACARTNUR - PALISADES 1 N TERSECTION. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OFFERS A BALANCED DESIGN PROVIDING SUFFICIENT CAPACITY AT THE INTERSECTIONS TO FULLY UTILIZE A 2 LANE SECTION DE- VELOPED TO HIGH GEOMETRIC STANDARDS. A COMPARATIVELY SMALL COST INCREASE WILL ACCOMPLISH THE DESIRED WORK. CITY COUNtY TOTAL SURVEY AND PLANS 80100 88100 16,200 RIGHT OF WAY - - NONE CONSTRUCTION p,,- 82 0770000 O,,- 82,700 165,400 INSPECTION 2,500 2,500 ,000 TOTAL 93,300 93,3w 1 ,d.0 THE REDUCTION IN CONSTRUCTION COST 1S $14,600 AND THE TOTAL OECREASE IS $16,400. THE SAVINGS RESULT FROM THE REDUCED MIRTH OF PAVING IN THE FORMER 4 LANE SECTION, ELININATION OF TYPE B CURB, AND REDUCTION IN DRAINAGE COSTS. PROVISION FOR LEFT TURN BAYS AT THE PALISADES [`:GAO INTERSECTION HAS BEEN RETAIN - ED, HOWEVER. SUCH MAJOR ITEMS OF CONSTRUCTION COST AS THE SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGES EARTHWORKS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS ARE EITHER UNAFFECTED OR ONLY SLIGHTLY MODIFIED BY THE CHANGES THUS RESULTING IN A RELATIVELY SMALL DECREASE IN TO- TAL COST. PRIOR TO A FINAL DECISION IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE TECHNICAL STAFF RECONSIDER THE PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED. ACTUAL COUNTS DURING PEAK HOURS AT THE JAMBOREE - PALISADES INTERSECTION IN- DICA','E TRAFFIC VOLUMES FAR IN EXCESS OF EFFICIENT CAPACITY. THE RESULTANT CONGESTION AND INTERFERENCE WITH TURNIMG MOVEMENTS ARE EVIDENCED S`' TRAFFIC BACKING UP FOR A QUARTER MILE OR MORE AT TIMES. HAZARDS TO SAFE VEHICLE OP- ERATION ARE EXTREMES AND THE ACCIDENT RATE AT PRESENT IS CONSIDERED UNACCEPTABLE. SIMILAR CONGESTION OCCURS AT THE EXISTING MACARTNUR - PALISADES 1 N TERSECTION. THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OFFERS A BALANCED DESIGN PROVIDING SUFFICIENT CAPACITY AT THE INTERSECTIONS TO FULLY UTILIZE A 2 LANE SECTION DE- VELOPED TO HIGH GEOMETRIC STANDARDS. A COMPARATIVELY SMALL COST INCREASE WILL ACCOMPLISH THE DESIRED WORK. 0 6 LTR. TO A. S. KOCH SUBJI JAMBOREE RD. IM► YCHENT PAGE 2. LAST YEAR THE ORANGE COUNTY TRAFFIC COMOITTEE INVESTIGATED THE PROBLEMS IN THIS AREA. AT TIE MEETING OF MAY 122 1961 THE COMMITTEE MADE THE FOLLOWING RECOMNENDATIONSS A. STRIPE A LEFT TURN POCKET LANE ON PALISADES ROAD AS A MINIMUM SAFETY PRECAUTION. B. WIDEN JAMBOREE ROAD TO 4 LANES AT THE INTERSECTION (WITH PALISADES ROAD) " SOON AS PRACTICABLE. C. PLACE ON THE PRIORITY LIST CONSTRUCTION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AS THE INTERSECTION MEETS MINIMUM SIGNAL WARRANTS. THE FOREGOING WERE MINIMUM RECOMMENDATIONS MADE FOR PRESENT CONDITIONS. PRO- JECTIONS FOR THE NEAR FUTURE INDICATE MUCH GREATER TRAFFIC VOLUPES TO COME. THEREFORE, WE FEEL THAT THE PURPOSES OF THE PROJECT COULD NOT BE SUCCRSS- FULLY ACCOMPLISHED NOR THE MAXIMM RATIO OF BENEFITS FOR MONIES EXPENDED BE OBTAINED IF THE PROJECT IS RCMKgp IN SCOPE. DCS:88N:YS VERY TRULY YOURS DONALD C. SAMSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A. B. KOCH LONHTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER AIR 112"11, L. McCONVILLE ASST. COUNTY SURVEYOR AND RDAD COMMISSIONER TELEPHONE; HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT KIMBERLY 7 -3311 [EXT. 2921 ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA January 17, 1962 Donald C. Simpson, Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: B. R. ESTABROOK DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR R. B. VAILE HIGHWAY DIVISION ENGINEER M. 1. STORM REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER DON IS BARRETT BUSINESS MANAGER Reference is made to your proposed Arterial Highway Financing Program Project for the construction of Jamboree Road from the existing alignment of Bayside Drive to Mac- Arthur Boulevard. The Technical Staff revs @wed this project on January 15, 1962 and requested that further information be submitted. The Staff determined that the project was eligible for part- icipation in the program for construction of a basic two lane development including a two lane bridge. Please transmit a revised estimate showing the estimated cost to City and County for construction of such a two lane development. Your earliest consideration of this matter is necessary since further review of the project will be withheld until this information is received. ASK:JLC:eg RECEIVED JAN 22 1962 maic WORKS DEPT. yours, LS• V • 1�VVL County Surveyor & Road Commissioner Chairman, Technical Staff, AHFP SAFETY PAYS -ON THE JOB; IN THE HOME; ON THE HIGHWAYS r 0 9 J :.nu L: y 170 1962 Don ;ld C. :,Lmpeon, Director of Public Works City Oi Newp.;rt Fetich 330D Newpcx. t Bo -1 v : :rd Newport Pe icb, ( li c ni L Derr Sir: Reference is m.-Ad to your proposed arterial Highway Financing Program Project for the construction of Jamboree Road from the existing alignment of B�xyside Drive to Mac• arthur Boulevard. The Technical Staff revic.aad this project on January 15, 1962 and requested that further information be submitted. The Staff determined that the project was eligible for part- icipation in the pr > ;r :m fo.: construction of a basic two 1.2ne development including a two lane bridge. Please transigit :t revised estimate showing the estimated cost to City and roi;nty fo;: construction of such a two lane development. Your earliest consideration of this matter is necessary since further review of the project will be withheld until this information is received. Very truly yours, =i. 6. KOCH County Surveyor & Fcad Commissioner t;,SK:JLC:e`, Chairman, Technical Staff, :iHFP 13042 MYFOF TUSTIN, ORANGE Mr. Donald C. Simpson City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Simpson: Re: Jamboree Road Dedication i THE IRVINE COMPANY COST OFFICE BOX 37 ^TUSTIN-CALIFORNIA NE: TUSTIN- Lincoln 4- 0120 - TELEGRAMS- EXPRESS-SANTA ANA January 11, 1962 Reference is made to your letter of January 10, 1962 trans- mitting a document for the dedication of a portion of Jamboree Road. In comparing the taking described in this document with an "Alignment Plan" for Jamboree Road prepared in your office December 22, 1961, it has been noted that the two alignments are not identical. The dedication does not reflect the alignment of the reversing 2400 foot radius curve which will be a transition from the new alignment to the existing align- ment. If the dedication were processed as proposed at this time, it would be necessary in the future to accomplish an abandonment and rededication. Even in light of the necessity to accomplish the dedication at the earliest possible time, it is believed that the best interests of both the City and the company would be served by having the pending dedication reflect the intent of the master alignment. It would be appreciated if the document could be revised so that it is completely contained within the right of way sug- gested by the aforementioned "Alignment Plan." Very truly yours, RECEIVED W. R. Mason JAN 12 1962 Administrative Engine r �UBUC WORKS DEPT. WRM :pab Enc. -3 a 1 9/62C (6 $^ Rom 1 3 �I i'a9IS , wide, ,etersd to t day o!'.. 1. . 4 1 Jana�,ry® ;+, by- ;b.aen 1RYi191i CiERARi, • da1t#.m 5 dv1Y "gant'i ed and em"'A thq imws of the �r u! mitt 6 ia� he,reinaftex sLot-I" •'uranter and the 0T`MPRW-'' 7 I �eN, �eipai co a ioa, haicainiAftsr ealiad "+6�a�i �:, 9 ! Cr+uxis , 8 vaiwil�e, ooap atLon, ham. grants to for att ! e1l,tsa . 10 ,aa .,ate ' real, in tale t�tY "of � . 11 followit�_deircribad p 121, County of Orange, Statl;tif- CaliforaLs: 13 A strip of 132.0t�. asst arida. ,in l�loatk "JaI, of the Irvi�ae'1 ivW iss t :Ga ty of Siraa�s�,a, 14 Itt#R Af Ca texnia° as' shows on a aomp racerdst in girlie i, ppaage S8'# Miscellaaeoua s in tba 15 office, -1. t'he . order of aaial' n ,:'. said,, atkip lytr to" oil +each 4; o 16 centar2itse, whic ft dee gibed .161lous;.:>. 17 Bssgginnius at' ap coin oe� -'tire ►tat"% , Tine of said Block biro the aitarlis�s of 18' Palisades UjO on on 0* sttaehstlo do" l to Coe�gtyy of, re,carded Apti1,9, 1940, 19` le,ok`iO3T, pa** 3 9, O €ficial of raid C fie,cordai ; distant B. $0° 16 :10„ E., 20I MOM fast from tbeauntlse,rrl�r'e:oraer.of Lot 144,'*1ock 30 of raid Irvine a Subdiviff "y 21 ti1►sne i 4. 39' 43' _41 4 P :33.3$1*l to ,t e • be• f i aninE _ ..44. a. tangam, durve Commove +acu�rasterly 22 and roiinn�� a radius `o! 1,614 Kit; thence south -. er1Y - 1311.01 :later -.also& sa0-10 0ys through a 23 '24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 k f central angl*; 4A -;bb ° 56 49 "; fame, taugaa ° said c�►e, S. 7" 12' 59" it $3 ,':4 foot to trio Point of intersection of Sa"Na',Drive and Jem- boree held as 449*ribed in deed to County, of Orange, recorded Noves6ir 20, It57 in Be,rit 4110 page 10 of Official 3taaards -#►f ZiA.:doucttl► ite,cos s. <.r Said .property ovor.whioh the asieralat.is ha by granted is shown upon City of Newport Beach Public Werkas._Depastsrant draw- - i iag No. L- sm ->i/W -dated 12- 28-61, entitled °,Jamboi °. Rdo 8wlign• VIA ist South of Paiirades Road"., .a copy, of hie..ibr the sake of convenient idratifiication narked 8shibit "A" and attached iiaret® and made a part hereof by this w*f*renee. i • n Ji ll L :'s ry.Yl ff J 1 . •.vnxeRy.Vee yN .(ssl •iZ i �+ iS_ _ b szamlRYd�F ...3n}Ya`Sc y 1 It is furthe* "d and &&read betswri. Parties 2' that the Grant sea or ass shall at all 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13. 14 15 16' 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24, 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 or{ .gucc ors 33rD, fI times =dad from time tot hereafter have the light and .does here - ;, by reaej?�e the right to conit;Wt ,"in"IA -And operot*,linos of j am�g and al i kites Across `or over. aaief atraet.s±�d highway or �1est therapi and to construct, msintais,;cad 4 itr at oay'aiae or facia, "time to efws' private road. crossings at #aces 'approed by Glraatee d t$a . at 3da7 . t1ild or $vet..1: to time to 'construct maintain, and use cross ,,. .. i�a nos any cad ��kiada of,4irie8 as •. a inclkdiig linos for the conveyance o.ltAer and electric sot' Xu any manner so as to interfere with the use of said property `for street or highway Pte« by ihrati#dis`. ow its tu¢eessoss or assigns or to interfere with the,,fUw or dr4kinsge Of stftu water, and provided that iA.the:came:of constructiga:by.. said Grantor, its successors or assigns ,.foi¢ way of the store- ,... :., amationed purposes across said easomeat &ftl ar the sasok° .ia improved with pevament, said construction shall. be, done byr, driving or born .under the paved amrface in a manner as not tc► injure said smeefSne: If the surface is injured or deeeroyed. iE shall be repl*6ad with- out cost to Grantee, and, in arse of;coms tioa prior to the improvement of said street with hard surfacat the opening made for way such construction shall be back - filled and'paeked..in a manner that the surface of the land will be replaa ", and provided furthas that if any relocation of any of said facilities constructed by Grantor or its successors or assigns is stade'necessary by the construction, reconstruction, or repair of street ;i�sproveaestts, such relocation shall be done at no cost to Grantee or its sueaes- oars or aasigns.. it is further . understood and agr*W between the parties hereto that the easement hereby granted shall be subject to all existing easements of record. IN WITNESS HHUMOP . throutor has executed this document " A, 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 3. s x k p 2 y :. . :6 �. 7. 9 10 11 '< 13 14 15�.... 16 (public Works Department. drawing No,z„:.-- 5009' /W) .. 17 . 18I 19 20 .. 21 . . 22 23 24. 25 26' 27 28 29 .30 31 32 i "' E %H1B IT A ' i DECEMBER 27, t96t MR. A. S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER COURT HOUSE ANNEX SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA DEAR SIR: ENCLOSED ARE SIX COPIES OF THE PRELIMINARY PROJECT STATEMENT TOGETHER WITH CERTIFIED COPI'cs OF RESOLUTION N0. 5532 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD. VERY TRULY YOURS, J DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ENCLS. DCStvR PRELIMINARY PROJECT STATEMENT ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM ARTERIAL CLASSIF. PRIMARY NAME OF STREET JAMBOREE ROAD LIMITS OF - IMPROVEMENT BAYSI BOULEVARD EXH1BIJ 2 COMMITTEE USE ONLY CITY OF M BEACH M - PS-0- FOW MOWN AS ~ YSiDE DRIVE) FY TO MACARTHUR NO. M1. A. EXISTING STREET DATA' 1. RIGHT OF WAY MIN. 40 FT -. I. MAX 160 FT. 12 2. PAVEMENT WIDTH *MIN,. 24 'FT. A MAX— �S�FT. 30 CURB FROM CIL'(NONE MIN. - F.T. i MAX - 'FT. ��_����� ADT50� 0 _ESTIMATED CO_UN! X DATE 6-61, TRU� EST. 5. MINIMUM N0. TRAFFIC LAMES 2 WIDTH FT. 6. PARKING: DIAGONAL - ONE SIDE PARALLEL - ONE SIDE NOME -ONE SIDE EMERGENCY ONLY TWO SIDES TWO SIDES TWO SIDES * EXISTING ROADWAY WIDTH ON BRIDGE - 17.61 B. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT a7 MINIMUM RIGHT OF WAY 132 FT:: ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY 1 FT.- O. MINIMUM WIDTH OF PAYEMEN FT.: ULTIMATE WIDTH 7 _ FT. 9. CURBS FROM C/L STREET - FT.: ULTIMATE DIST. rj FT. 10. 'EST. ADT 10 YRS. 21,000 TRUCKS 10 - -� 11. TRAFFIC LANES TWO AND FOUR WIDTH 12 FT. 12. PARKING: NONE ONE SIDE Two SIDES' PART TIME EMERGENCY ONLY BY COUNTY X C. PROJECT DATA 13. SURVEY AND PLAMS EST. COST WORK I . RIGHT OF WAY EST. COST NONE WORK 1Fj. i CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION, EST. EST. COST COST 1�,0 WORK 600 WORK '17. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT $ 201,000 BY COUNTY X CITY BY C060TY X CITY BY -_COUNTY - X CITY BY COUNTY X CITY D. SOURCE OF FUNDS (EXPLAIN UNDER REMARKS) 18. EARLIEST DATE CITY WILL HAVE FUNDS AVAILABLE 1762 -1963 FISCAL YEAR 19. IS THIS STAGE CONSTRUCTA OM X YES Not NO. OF YRS" 12 tEXPLAIM BELO ;) 20. REMARKS'. CITY CONSTRUCTION CO3T FROM GAS TAX FUNDSO ENGINEERING CO3T3 FROM GENERAL FUND. ANTICIPATE WIDENING TO II LANES ABOUT 1965 CITY OFFICIAL - AND 6 LANES ABOUT 1975. (SEE DISCUSSION AT- TACKED) IRVINE CO. WILL SUPPLY R/W. DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS NOTES DRAW TYPICAL SECTION ON TITLE BACK.OF SHEET - DECEMBER 26, 1961 SCCTIION* ATTAOMED ATC - r ATTACHMENT TO PRELIMINARY i*CT STATEMENT ARTERIAL HIGHWAY_I... G PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT OF JAW E ROAD 6Elk.:.INFORMATION THREE DIFFICULT PROBLEMS PRESENTLY EX13T WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS; THE CON- GESTED INTERSECTIONS OF PALISADE D WITH JAMBOREE ROAD AND PALISADES ROAD WITH MACARTNUR BOULEVARD, AND'THE SUI : ARD ALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE. IN THE PAST 33 MONTHS THERE HAVE BEEN 15 ACCIDENTS IN THE AREA (NOT INCLUDING THE MACARTNUR INTER89CT10M). THESE ACCIDENTS NAVE RESULTED IN '4 DEATHS AND 7 INJURIES., THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT WITH WIDENING RELOEATION, AND SIGNALIZATIOM OF THE INTERSECTIONS WILL MATERIALLY REDUCE THE ACCIDENTS AND CONGESTION. INITIAL COMSTRUCT,I,ON THE SOUTHERLY 2400 FEET OF THE PROJECT WILL BE 2 LANE$ WIT" 10 F00T SHOULDERS. FROM A POINT ABOUT 5W FEET SOUTHERLY OF PALISADES ROAD TO MACARTNVR BOULEVARD THE SECTION WILL BE 4 LANES DIVIDED WITH A 16 FOOT MEDIAN. THE 2 LANE PORTION VILL BE DESIGNED AS ONE SIDE OF A DIVIDED ROADWAY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE WIDENING WITH A MINIMUM OF INCONVENIENCE. INTERSECTIONS WILL HAVE LEFT TURN BAYS AND. TRAFFIC SIONALS+ IT 13 ANTICIPATED THERE WILL BE A MAJOR FLOOD CONTROL. CHANNEL AND EXTENSIVE FILLING BY THE IRVINE COMPANY IN THE AREA; THEREFORE THE PROPOSED ROAD WILL CROSS THE TIDAL FLATS ON A FILL AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVATION 25. THIS FILL AND THE NEW BRIDGE ACROSS SAM DIEGO CREEK ACCOUNT FOR THE COMPARATIVELY NIGH CO3T PER MILE. ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS BASED ON PRESENT COUNTS AND PREDICTIONS YAREN FROM THE REPORT PREPARED BY WILBUR S141TH FOR THE IRVINE COMPANY, INDICATE 'A'`4F LANE DIVIDED SECTION WILL SE'WARRAMTED AROUND 1965 AND A SIX LANE DIVIDED SfCTlOM IN 1975. THESE WIDENED SECTIONS WOULD .kXTEMD SOUTHERLY OF THE PRESENT PROJECT LIMITS TO THE COAST HIGHWAY. DESIGN ,AIM- TOPOGRAPHY FEATURES WILL PERMIT THIS EVENTUAL WIDENING TO BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT FINANCIAL PENALTY. THE IRVINE COMPANY WAS REVIEWED THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT AND WAS INDICATED A WILLINONESS TO GRANT, THE Vim- KATE RIGHT OF WAY AT THIS TIME WITHOUT COST TO THE CITY. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH :. , " _, ' G7 NO. TO: Public Works Director D. Simpson FROM: City Clerk M. Schrouder SUBJECT: Date December 28. 1961 In accordance with your request, I am transmitting herewith two certified copies of Resolution No. 5532, requesting the County of Orange to include within the Arterial Highway Financing Program the develop- ment of Jamboree Road. It is my understanding from our conversation this morning, it is not necessary for me to forward a certified copy of this Resolution to the Board of Supervisors. MS:mv Encs. 0 6 PRELIMINARY PROJECT 33a._ ,_ ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINA441 RAM ARTERIAL UASSIF. CITY OF NEW BEACH, PRIMARY NAME OF STREET JAMBOREE ROAD (ALSO KNOWN As tAYSIDE DRIVE) Limits OF IMPROVEMENT BAYSID[ DRIVE TO MACARTMUR BOULEVARD LENGTH ,0.7 MI• EXHIBIT, 2 COMMITTEE USE ONLY M - P.: .0 FWmos FY MO• EMERGENCY ONLY C. PROJECT DATA 1�. A. EXISTING STREET DATA'. : EST. 1. RIONT OF WAY MIN. 40 FT. 58 �'){t MAX 100 FT. 12 p 2. PAVEMENT WIDTH *MIN. FT. ��Jai MAX FT. 30 COUNTY X CITY CURB FROM CIL' (NONE) MIN. - FT. MAX - AFT. EST. COST ADT 00 ESTIMATED COUNTED X DATE 9-61 TRtl�� EST. 5. MINIMUM NO. TRAFFIC LAN ES 2 WIDTH FTr e Y� 5,b0O WORK OY 6. PARKING/ DIAGONAL -ONE SIDE PARALLEL - ONE SIDE NONE - ONE SIDE 203,000 EMERGENCY ONLY TWO SIDES TWO SIDES TWO SIDES • EXISTING ROADWAY WIDTH ON BRIDGE a 17.6' S. PROPOSED STREET IMPROVEMENT Minimum RIONT OF WAY 1. FT:; ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY 1 FT.- MINIMUM WIDTH OF PAVEMENT 24 FT.; ULTIMATE WIDTH 76 FT. �. CURBS FROM C/L STREET - FT.; ULTIMATE DIST. . 56 FT. 10. EST. ADT 10 YRs. 21,000 TRUCKS 10 11. TRAFFIC LANES TWO AND FOUR WIDTH 12 FT. 12. PARKING1 NONE ONE SIDE TWO SIDES` PART TIME EMERGENCY ONLY C. PROJECT DATA 1�. SURVEY AND PLANS EST. COST WORK BY COUNTY X CITY I . RIGHT OF WAY EST. COST NOME WORK BY COUNTY X CITY 1Z. CONSTRUCTION. EST. COST #��.000 WORK BY COUNTY CITY 1 IMSPECT,IOM" EST= COST e Y� 5,b0O WORK OY COUNTYX CITY 17. TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT 203,000 D. SOURCE OF FUNDS (EXPLAIN UNDER REMARKS) 18. EARLIEST DATE CITY WILL HAVE FUNDS AVAILABLE 162 -1 6 FISCAL YEAR 19. la TIM S STAGR COMBTRUCT.IOM X YES Not NO. OF YRS" 2 EXPLAIN BEL 20. REMARKS; CITY CONSTRUCTION COST FROM GAS TAX FUNDSO ENGINEERING COSTS FROM GENERAL FUND. ANTICIPATE WIDENING TO 4 LANES ABOUT 1965 AND 6 LANES ABOUT 1975. (SEE DISCUSSION AT- TACHED) IRVINE CO. WILL SUPPLY R/W. MOTE; DRAW TYPICAL SECTION ON BACK, OF SWEET 89OTIOM¢.ATTAOMEb CITY OFFICIAL DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS TITLE 6 ATTACHMENT TO PRELIMINARY PRCT STATEMENT ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT OF 46MNI @REF ROAD G'ENIML INFORMATION THREE DIFFICULT PROBLEMS PRESENTLY EXIST WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS; THE CON- GESTED INTERSECTIONS OF PALISADES ROAD WI,TH-JAMBOREE ROAD AND PALISADES ROAD WIT" MAGARTHUR BOULEVARD, AND'THE SUBSTAMDAP.V ,wLIGMMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD IN THE VICINITY OF THE EXISTING BRIDGE. IN THE MST 33 MONTHS THERE HAVE BEEN 15 ACCIDENTS IN THE AREA (NOT INCLUDING THE MACARTHUR INTERSg CTION). TNESE ACCIDENTS HAVE RESULTED IM A DEAT "S AND 7 INJURIES- THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT WITM WIDEMIMQ, RELOCATION, AND SIONAL.IZATIOM OF THE INTERSECTIONS WILL MATERIALLY REDUCE THE ACCIDENTS AND CONGESTION. INITIAL CONSTRUCTION THE SOUTHERLY 24M FEET OF THE PROJECT WILL BE 2 LAMES WIT" 10 FOOT SHOULDERS. FROM A PdIMT ABOUT 5W FEET SOUTHERLY OF PALISADES ROAD TO MACARTHUR BOULEVARD THE SECTION WILL BE 4 LANES DIVIDED WIT" A 16 F00T MEDIAN. THE 2 LANE PORTION WILL BE DESIGNED AS ONE SIDE OF A DIVIDED ROADWAY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE WIDENING WIT" A MINIMUM OF INCONVENIENCE. INTERSECTIONS WILL HAVE LEFT TURN BAYS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS: IT IS ANTICIPATED THERE WILL BE A MAJOR FLOOD CONTROL-CHANNEL AND EXTENSIVE FILLING BY THE IRVINE COMPANY IN THE AREA; THEREFORE THE PROPOSED ROAD WILL CROSS TIRE TIDAL FLATS ON A FILL AT APPROXIMATELY ELEVATION 25. THIS FILL AND THE NEW BRIDGE ACROSS SAM DIEGO CREEK ACCOUNT FOR THE COMPARATIVELY "ION COST PER MILE. ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS, BASED ON PRESENT COUNTS AND PREDICTIONS TAKEN FROM THE REPORT PREPARED BY WILBYR SMITH FOR THE IRVINE COMPANY, INDICATE A"*LAHE DIVIDED SECTION WILL BE WARRANTED AROUND '1965 AND A SIX LANE DIVIDED9ECT'ION IN 1975. THESE WIDENED SECTIONS WOULD.E,XTEND SOUTHERLY OF THE PRESENT PROJECT LIMITS TO THE COAST HIGHWAY. DESIQN.AIID.TBPOQRAPHY FEATURES WILL PERMIT THIS EVENTUAL WIDENING TO BE ACCOMPLISHED WITHOUT FINANCIAL PENALTY. THE IRVINE COMPANY RAW REVIEWED THE PROPOSED ALIGNMENT AND WAS INDICATED A WILLINGNESS TO GRANT,,THE ULTI- MATE RIGHT OF WAY AT THIS TIME WITHOUT COST TO THE CITY. CITY 617 NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA DccENBER 13, 1961 MR. A. L. H114ELHOCH DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P. 0. BOX w TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 511, CALIFORNIA ATTENTIONS MR. MACK E. ECKNARDT SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD EXTENSION DEAR SIR: THIS WILL CONFIRM THAT THE CITY INTENDS TO FORWARD BY DECENBER 31, 1961, TO THE ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT A PROPOSED ME- ALIGNMENT AND EXTENSION Of JAMBOREE ROAD. THE NEW ROADWAY IB PROPOSED FOUR LANES WITH A 16 -fool MEDIAN, WtTH THREE PHASE FULL-ACTUATED SIGNALS AT INTERSECTIONS WITH PALISADES ROAD AND AT MACARTHUR BOULEVARD. THIS NEW ALIGNMENT WILL CROSS MACARTHUR BOULEVARD AT OR NEAR THE OLD INTERSECTION WITH SAN JOAQUIN ROAD AND CONNECT WITH THE EXISTING SAN JOAQUIN ALIGNMENT. IT 15 POSSIBLE THE OLD ALIGNMENY OF PALISADES ROAD FROM JAMBOREE TO MACARTHUR WOULD BE RETAINED, HOWEVER, THE NEED FOR SIGNALS WOULD UNDOUBTEDLY APPEAR GREATEST AT THE NEW MACARTHUR INTER- SECTION. FINANCING WOULD tNVOLVE PARTICIPATION OF COUNTY AHFP FUNDS AND CITY FUNDS. VERY TRULY YOURS, WILLIAM A. DUNDAS CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER OC: MR. A. S. KOCK, COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONER WAD :YR r 1^ '7T TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: REALIGNMENT AND EXTENSION OF JAMBOREE ROAD RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM THE DEVELOPMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD. DlscDssiam: PROJECT LIMITS THE PROJECT WILL BEGIN AT THE END OF THE 1958 COUNTY IMPROVEMENT NEAR THE INTERSECTION WITH BAYSIDE DRIVES AND END AT'MACARTHUR BOULEVARD, A LENGTH OF ABOUT 3/4 OF A MILE. THE COUNTY WILL EXTEND THE ROAD NORTHERLY OF MACARTHUR TO SAN JOAQUIN ROAD. INITIAL CONSTRUCTION THE SOUTHERLY 2$00 FEET WILL BE 2 LANES WITH 10 FOOT SHOULDERS, FROM A POINT 500 FEET SOUTHERLY OF PALISADES ROAD TO MACARTMUR BOULEVARD THE SECTION WILL BE 4 LANES DIVIDED WITH A 16 FOOT MEDIAM� THUS PROVIDING FOR LEFT TURN LANES AND GOOD TRAFFICiCAPACITY AT THE INTERSECTIONS. THE PALISADES AND MACARTHUR INTER SECTIONS WILL HAVE TRAFFIC SIGNALS. THE 2 LANE PORTION WILL BE DESIGNED AS ONE HALF OF A 4 LANE DIVIDED ROAD IN ORDER TO PROVIDE FOR FUTURE WIDENING. T, E IRVINE COMPANY HAS 11004CATED THAT TREY WILL SUPPLY THE RIGHT OF WAY NEEDED FOR THE ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE CITY. ULTIMATE CONSTRUCTION THE RAPID FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF THE EAST BLUFF AREA WILL GENERATE - HEAVIER TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND A NEED FOR MORE TRAFFIC LANES. BY ABOUT 19650 A FOUR LANE DIVIDED SECTION WILL BE REQUIRED, AND A SIX LANE DIVIDED SECTION WILL BE NEEDED AROUND 1975• SAFETY INFORMATION IN THE PAST 33 MONTHS THERE HAVE BEEN 15 ACCIDENTS IN THE PROJECT AREA RESULTING IN 4 DEATHS AND 7 INJURIES. THIS SEVERE ACCIDENT RECORD IS- PRIMARILY DUE TO THE SUBSTANDARD ALIGNMENT OF THE EXISTING ROAD NEAR THE OLD BRIDGE AND TO THE EXTREME PEAK HOUR CONGESTION AT THE EXISTING INTERSECTION OF JAMBOREE ROAD WITH PALISADES ROAD. THE PROPOSED REALIGNMENT AND WIDENING AT THE INTERSECTIONS WILL MATERIALLY REDUCE THESE HAZARDS. TO: CITY COUNCIL Susi: REALIGNMENT AND EXTENSION OF JAMBOREE RD. FINANCING 0 ESTIMATED COSTI CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING CONTINGENCIES) #180,080 ENGIMEERING AND INSPECTION 23AW (INCLUDES SOILS ENOINEERING CONSULTANT) TOTAL 4203,000 SOURCE OF FUNDS: A.H.F.P. FUNDS (COUNTY) $101,500 CITY OAS TAX FUNDS 91,500 CITY GENERAL FUND (ENGINEERING DIVISION BUDGETED FUNDS) 10,000 PAGE 2 GAS TAX FUNDS OF ABOUT $85,000 UILL'BE AVAILABLE DURING THE 1962 -1963 FISCAL YEAR, LEAVING A BALANCE OF #6,500 TO BE FINANCED FROM 1963 -1964 GAS TAX FUNDS OR FROM OTHER AVAILABLE CIYY FUNDS. PREPARED BAY: �ZUP' G�Qrry DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RC:DCS:BBN:V3 12/22/61 ROBER�� V CITY MANAGER .847(A) See Contract File for Exhibit A Alignment Plan eb - - ---------- - - ff I .... ...... - ----- - ------ I Ara G�3s ��6� ------------------------ - - - - -- �; � - - - -q � �_.------ - - - - -- _. - - - -- - - -- - -- _ _ - - . - - - -- _ _ - -1 �__ ... ✓ �-L- L . C_. J'G .. r._t__. _ � - ..�- »...�,.,�{✓+-- .G- .:-- :...�G � ,_,!� ..G,- E�°��., L.c �x e. �E . �,• S�LJLL - GAG °..+L „�w z -� ✓f-Y w�lr 4 tG.t„ C.. % / d~e,+!� -C C� {t .e �� C�ra.4. -?! . %��� •- _' -1a'- Q _ . .Ym.�t�.< G . rte` �- '� °�'J ,. �. i r ep .,t,6e e. C tr, ¢ iGO +�G 6., to G-�I -G C� Ly.�.. � G9 Gi " ♦ . -a C" .i ✓ S� ::: ?i 4 «' ol --- 4-4s, jacrO -a C" f � � i I I � \ 4 / i le N 13 17 zeec.t 7/ �{./i �!i C ✓Get.. - � �� t �a L'�tL L�G�cx' �/'�r. +. _ ...!�✓�ls -G�TiQ .. . - .. ATx-7.4- Fc.G-6.f? YES IqO J WOMACK r.T1 HIONWAY ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING P. O. BOX 1400 SACRAMENTO T EDMUND G. BROWN GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Departmeut of publir MOB SAM;F!AMENTO ems: City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Gentlemen: ROBERT B. BRADFORD 011tsci oR , North Arm Newport Bay Bridge No. 55 -140 VII -Ora -184 -A PLEA -E REFER TO FILE NO. November 21, 1961 Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan We have searched our files but have been unable to find records of any subsurface investigations in the vicinity of the North Arm of Newport Bay Bridge No. 55 -140, VII- Ora - 184 -A, which will be of any value to you in the.study of proposed San Diego Creek Channel mentioned in your letter of November 13, 1961. RECEIVED NOV 22 1961 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Very truly yours, J. C. Womack State Hi hway En ineer BB 1 / A. L. Elliott Bridge Engineer - Planning ORANG�COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL STRICT ... ._ V. 4 YDX IOTB SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: N. D. OYBORNC KIMBERLY 7.331 FLOOD COHTROL 6NOlNCp1 _;:y, Mr. Donald Simpson Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: J. D. BRUNNER "BISTANT FLOOD CONTROL ENDINEER FILE No. F5.233 San Diego Creek Channel (Bond Project F5) Transmitted are two preliminary prints of Dwg. No. F5 -103 -1 showing the proposed plan and profile of San Diego Creek Channel in the vicinity of Jamboree Road. Also transmitted is one print of the Irvine I Company s topography map for the same area on which has been indicated the proposed centerline of channel improve- oo cO ment. 0, o Preliminary design of San Diego Creek Channel has been based on a "green belt" concept in keeping with Irvine Company planning for the proposed university town site and residential area. 'This type of channel will have a broad invert with flat side slopes and will have the invertlocated above tidal influence, all of which will permit the channel area to be landscaped as part of a green belt. The channel outlet into Upper Newport Bay has not as yet been designed although the channel will generally be located as shown with the centerline of channel passing through the existing Jamboree Road Bridge and emptying into the upper end of the proposed rowing course. Should there be any questions regarding design of this channel, please contact this office. Very truly yours, H. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER By ..W. SCHWARZE Design Division Engineer OMS /yh Encls. : O u : r u! n � n r : a' r u! C3 n r is— —. z. - .. p . ._ _..— _. —._._ — __.._._... . —_ ___ _.. _. _.. .. __. .._ QQa' iuir�bt�ol'` iv�rs -� 1s d/� d� a' r n r is— —. z. - .. .. .......... ......... . ._ _..— _. —._._ — __.._._... . —_ ___ _.. _. _.. .. __. .._ QQa' iuir�bt�ol'` iv�rs -� 1s d/� d� i' '>— ...:..A ••.. .: a v...... e- a_ x ,. x ,.. a__...a_ v. x. r -, r.. -x- z- x • , -t - -r a ::: - -r y. rl IVN I d Z- U i r r is— —. z. - .. .. .......... ......... . ._ _..— _. —._._ — __.._._... . —_ ___ _.. _. _.. .. __. .._ QQa' iuir�bt�ol'` iv�rs -� 1s d/� d� I d Z- U i !'Iiwcw - CYO C, / g a PR ,st c vT NC POS�00 /��� V4 `y NEWPORT HARBOR UN /ON l / H /6H SCHOOL D /ST OR. 5432-392 '? lie 21 0 Q 0 4j_ Q Ong � Y F� W .. CL - 3 - - F J � . \ ���0 a � �q yob o-_ 5►� �, V ,y i No' ao. Of LP IV _U s� �,0 toe fv Pe 3 M 11 +fJ / c � � z .a !�y a -z v _ C- 847(A) See Contract File for Right of Way Map C- 847(A) See Contract File for Jamboree Road Realignment Between Pacific Coast Highway and Palisades Road Attention: Mr. Ben Nolan, City Engineer SUBJECT: Cross Sections, Jamboree Road Relocation Gentlemen: This will verify, information given Mr. Pat Daanigan of your office concerning the use of original cross sections after the recent alignment change. These cross sections can be used as the road aligmmt changed only a few feet along the contours and the vertical profile changed an average of 0.02 to 0.03 of a foot with a meaimme of 0.09 on one vertical curve. These are within the limits of planimeter readings. Stationing of the existing cross sections should be revised to show the sections at their new, survey locations. Section T3f23.41 should be changed to read Section T3 +1.8.94 Subtract 4AT from all sections beginning with Section T3+T3 through Section 84+$0. Equation at this point should read - 84+45.53 Back 84 +52.78 Ahead Add 2-T8 from Section 85.00 to the end of the fob, 103.105.68• Our original cross section sheets have been revised accordingly. Very truly yours, R E C E I V E D P08TSR, `Bl� & ARASS95ioaG DEC 2119641 C. F. CFG/"BUC Wonh: 6 0A AIRPORTS HIGHWAYS 6TAUCTUNEB UTILITIES DAMS HVGRLO SURVEYS BOIL wM GEOLODIQAL JNVEBT1pAYlONf ROUNDATIONB AND BTAGIUIEATN)ry j 3 PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA PARTNERS O. J. PORTER & COMPANY O. JAMES PORTER K. H. O"BRIEN NEWARK NEW JERSEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER E10 -31 ST STR EET ASSOCIATES swcRwMENio ewuvo RNU NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA JAKE C. YOUNG C. F. GRIGG 673 -0545 C. H. DARBY WASHINGTON O.C. OTTO M. VIKRE J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER . V. J. SPOTTS (A.LA.) I RENO NEVADA LEONARD C. UROUHART 1545.1960 December 18, 1964 City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Ben Nolan, City Engineer SUBJECT: Cross Sections, Jamboree Road Relocation Gentlemen: This will verify, information given Mr. Pat Daanigan of your office concerning the use of original cross sections after the recent alignment change. These cross sections can be used as the road aligmmt changed only a few feet along the contours and the vertical profile changed an average of 0.02 to 0.03 of a foot with a meaimme of 0.09 on one vertical curve. These are within the limits of planimeter readings. Stationing of the existing cross sections should be revised to show the sections at their new, survey locations. Section T3f23.41 should be changed to read Section T3 +1.8.94 Subtract 4AT from all sections beginning with Section T3+T3 through Section 84+$0. Equation at this point should read - 84+45.53 Back 84 +52.78 Ahead Add 2-T8 from Section 85.00 to the end of the fob, 103.105.68• Our original cross section sheets have been revised accordingly. Very truly yours, R E C E I V E D P08TSR, `Bl� & ARASS95ioaG DEC 2119641 C. F. CFG/"BUC Wonh: 6 0A AIRPORTS HIGHWAYS 6TAUCTUNEB UTILITIES DAMS HVGRLO SURVEYS BOIL wM GEOLODIQAL JNVEBT1pAYlONf ROUNDATIONB AND BTAGIUIEATN)ry j LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'B R I EN & ARMSTRONG O. J. PORTER & COMPANY NEWARK . NEW JERSEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 510 -31sT STREET SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 673 -0645 WASHINGTON D.C. RENO • NEVADA Decibel 18, 1964 City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 Nat Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California .Attentiont ear. Dsa Nolsa, City lMilomem BEiBJMi Cross Sections, Jsdoree Bond Relocation PARTNERS O. JAMES PORTER K. H. O'BRIEN ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER ASSOCIATES JAKE C. YOUNG C. F. GRIGG C. H. DARBY OTTO M. VIKRE J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I. A.) LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949.1960 "Phis will verify iaformatioa gtvi xr. Pat i>ma 4pa of your off"e, concerning the use of original cross sections art" the recant aligumt change. 3Geas crass sections Can be used " the road aligpaent changed mer a few fat slang the lmatours and Ibis vertical. profile Changed an &VwpV of 0.02 to 0.03 of a foot with a owdtam of 049 am ease vertical curve. 'Ouse are within the limits of planimeter ridings. Statianing of the mdatiag cross secttms should be revised to show the sections at their new survey locations. Section T3+ AI should be changed to read Oestisa ?3+'18.9$ Subtract 4AT frog all sections bsgtnming with Section T3+T3 tbmugb Section 84+50. 20a tion at this point should road - 84+43.33 Rank 84+52 Ahald Add 2.78 frost Section 85+00 to the and of the job, 103+05.68. Our original crass section sheets have boa revised accordingly. Nary truly yourso C. F. Grin ,' AI... RTS - HIGHWAYS - STRUCTURES . UTILITIES - DAMS - REPORTS - SURVEYS . SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS . FOUNDATIONS AND STABILIZATION it All eo o�knui n 'r'ssrwesaev sr co�roRwrron IMAI 0 MST IMPUTAL HIGHWAY, SANTA •E SPRINGS. SAUTORNIA RE: JAM RU HW 1RZ& WNXW TO: Coxcop Inc• 7002 Katella Ave, Y• ®• BOX C Stantenj, California Attet Mr. Fred Meier GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING HEREWITH: ❑ BLUE PAINTS ❑ BLUE LINE PRINTS ❑ SPECIFICATIONS ❑ PHOTOSTATS ❑ AS FOLLOWS: JOB NOS 64 -249 DATE: . 12 -18-64 �, P ., LSE Z ❑ PHOTOGRAPHS ❑ TRACINGS ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS ❑ SAMPLES DRAWING NO. NO' COPIES DRWO. DATE OR REVISION DATE REMARKS Erection Plan In accerdane with our tel hone conversation Dwl with your of ice are sending five sets SIMM Details of dr ago and calculations fir yew Bill of Naterial PLEASE COM X the folleming points which Isere — M A r float finish oball be used us t of dens 6 Location of i arts is the side of exterior d to ve rticall 1" - ' should be each sm of bridga. pL"b*adi%vt*d a my be axed to provide &stressed force to 91"fina- 1'. Vwt handling and approval Trill be greatly appreciated to facilitate our tight prod schedule' Note: If enclosures received are not listed above, SENT Sys . kindly notify us at once. ❑ OUR MESSENGER Very ftuly yours, ❑ KEeavEg a MESS�N6ER Rockwin [Ile CtAWAMiB ro. t s ❑ PHOTOGRAPHS ❑ TRACINGS Cl SHOP DRAWINGS Fl SAMPLES DRAWING NO. NO' CORES DRWO. DATE OR REVISION DATE R E M A R K S ilrection Plan In accordanci with our telephone conversation D -1 with Your of icep we are sending five 5 sets ShW Details of ah dra n and calculations for Your - "bti and subsoquent a Bill of Material X the following painta which were agreed upon y the office of Porter, QlBri Special npl�mqlm I- Raelm 9:4r or shall he provided Will Individual Of ll 4. StAnd welded transverse connectors shall I 5. A rough rood float finish shall be used on t t of rders 6 Location of inserts in the side of exterior rders v be adjusted vertically 1N to avoid s ands as shown n f last band rail post should be L.4ff 600- d b d n a. le • b estressed force to zUdersi v a e 4 fs X b cut 6 a _ zz Pe A of �' A TC- J Type U -1 0 Type M -1 C _ T ype v T . , p �® TYPE M.1..3 Type L Type M Type U -2 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE OUT TO OUT OF RARE MARK BAR DIMENSIONS cur LOCATION OR NO. QUAY. TYPE SIZE a b c d x I8 RDIA]WS 401 7034 U # �- . 3-10 ! '- 0„ /�o„ 402 2034 U -f 3 -1ov 1-G" ! =6' Sa3 432 J 3'10 A 1=0" 1'0" Soo 432 3 =10 5'0 5 864 L ttr 4� p/� it 2` 506 76 A r 38 -4 507 32 V -3 7 11'6` 0 -2 "O -9' 6 O 288 1. #(0 1 =2° 0` - -G' 409 196 A r.f 1- 2 611 32 A ' 3= �O 12 42 L '* 1! 'i " 016 4r3 2d A # 1 -7'' 37 =10 S1 z 1 9 6 U 3 1►=4'' 0'2z' 0` -9 "12 =934 LFZZU : All re -bars shall be tagged with contract no. followed by dash and Pe. Mk. No. Example: 2 4 g _ 4 U/ • JOB ✓fah /,b' V F.' Z- /' R C -4 ; � ROCKWIM Wit= A Z / c9? Q L / Cs AIMENT, RRESTRESSEO CONCRETE COP. 13"D E �Ow -' JDf hfl,�T OAT[ /Z- %"E�'�' 9Y SANTA FE jigINGS CALIFORNIA cn+ Joe 114 "AS O.QJFe ROAD ROCKWW te FMTKUB CONCKR CON. ran OAT[ By J, SANTA K SRO" AUPM" -- - — - ------- n 1"A QkK 286 -4 14AoQ C9 4 — llr<14FCv I @ Joe 14 M8 C>,q',crf 4>0,4,0 .e E5,4 A/A I E IV 7-, rDR ice No.6 24 9 g)^Yg 12 - 7-ig 4 ov. V. P. I ""wm FWTAMW COMIM CW. SMM FE SPWNG& CAUFOWM I SMT. %N fl) I � I M; 1 T t li"! S „ ri /VIA 2 K 0 2 - ReQlo, �� 8 Y 1404E 411- ~96 f1ol-e . Al 4 0P K �n1 4 — REc, Jp_ �V JDS ./RM.f}'Cit'�F Xc'a'��4� MCKMDI PRESTRESSED COMCKETE PAM. FOR / A /� 1 aaAD c. 2 «.u... «.o..... JDs ND. /n 4 4 � DA7[ 1a �- -6f By ✓ P i SANTA H SWMCd GL"MM FOq M A4R* QVAAr4,5fzc zz#cr# 12 9 13" S"re E 4 P4, (-2) 176 1 go 8017- W&;"404 AO'Or MY,44-N.4 3 28$ 12"00•P, IL 90 r141A1,w-l'A 54 l(O" 11-3" y wept o P6 grog 5' 4 (0 x 22 VAC D *j A To 4 swewAu v IL '+6 Naees OVDIVEW ecrAFr A - too 114, eC-2 MCN-OvIVA10 0�! 298 - 61,12 OVOO OPA 0 " , "" 1 - t- swr (3) 72 1,-'30 Vo,*Z> 3(a 10�'f i; o 3 VOD 36 121Ykq 12L8 ' SoNO vo 46 11) 4, IS 102'�ap. 12'- 8 150 AfO VO /0' t/2 i 216 �2,2,0a 0 11L I cc ,Vo v 0 l c> ( 12� 131 108 /01 n. I 0 AO vo Cleo s 1> 0400 40 12L 571, 570A/0V 54 lQV$v-Q Q (a) (34- 3,, x IPC PA ��12 ;,�r '60-.,v V'r see sw r 4-2 ov SEE SN7- A Ing .3 0-3 'Vcx/.*,� cv re W// if �O Sir e -TvrA- 3 74- PUPN=u COMM top. SAND FE &Mt*Qk CALFURf" IQ EALIGn/MF. NT ram Jam NO. w M ROCKWIN ENGIN.¢CR. *{ - Jtgggo CONCRETE 0096 SKgCT z x DEAD GG+AD: �= /N' /; 3,- Z. .. 13= z ..._ /9:z ••:.r -r;r f�dil,ptJ ��JL = G, eS`i < ¢r.S x a.lzS� /�¢. �,K �a /;rat - A- Zr d, r4rt2 5 f 43 0.4 f % , ly,,�-NT P- Arr <,/7- Mr_ bld•o xC.5xv.8 = 248.o /f 4,�s� /7 +G.6�rc7r/so.� Otttl To ra % wr /6 r!r /y- -- :'48 K USE = 76o'�/r �. fa ?_3, s- x %o —. g23.9K z x r ' RGCKWIN ENSINk[R *71l ESSEd COhICRET I II I t t. 1 l,. i f: { f 4 u ,.0 T ! /j�Tj_'7.G + 98.6x73��J�12 '/`p F /,IOS— SPSS /�ZSlArtil 1,434 o? 423.9 f23 i w "!.sa 452 /2 �9S- gr4so /,GlSs t /2upu.� -ago -Ito_ II EmT ¢73.rf 4 ?.9x7.30 4 ?Zr�l2 �C oo-= /OPsl, =Ol /7/I4 O TP! L A T TcF .4 r v05 ro TAw E rI6MS POO Baas 2 A'-0" --- 4.Sr3�.Sr 3.19 SRS = �. %!/✓ P__,_ N --r777 ; ROQKWIN ENGINEERS- STRESSED CONCRETE CON TANTS owre... Jo. No P- X235 �14M:�0E�E &0O.4 i:,E,4, Al s/!F 9N No.. �— _... —._ __.... . rk T. f C.e; 5, j AMJ�tJ2" x 4.25 %7.00 �' f � K 6, zs _ 1 2.60 � - ---'--� -- --�•-- ---- '-a---': '�. F 8 tf J/ JQi(fF .! � \'I � r .��'. ✓r" ' .. �� F / � f _ y J j to it /F „r '• t ; F �' 4 � 1 $4 0 ,:r i� ..x., '. f �y �`iY a :'4y �,'T N 7 0,kCl K 9 1 T 31 X I cu Xb TY]Ve A J.4 S Type U-1: Th., * 0 Type X-1 Type J d d IL c U oil y. Type , a d x TY P LO U-3 Type L Type K Type U-2 ALL DUMBIONS ARE OUT TO OUT OF BM MARK BAR D I X E N 8 1 0 N S cur IWJMON OR 10, TYPE IMMS BULAUS 7 SIZE —a—T—b--F c d x 401 — 2034 Tu- 3-10' ILD, IL67" 402 2034 lb 4 3 3'-/q" 1'-V Id 1!(o' S-04 432 j 3L/oA ►L6" Co' To 864. L rA Zm 5-o(o 76 38-4w .5*07 32 Ll 0-3 0!9 0'" 6 OR 12891 1. (a 1 6' 409 11961 A P .4 810 11 4 f 811 3 21 A z 612 42 L r' -'► 01 6� -413 23 A 4 1 5-14 1228 A -4 if-13' SIS 96 U-1 11-4' 0`-2r 0 9 " =12-9 NOTES: 1. All re-bars shall be tagged vitb contract no. followed by dash and Pe. W. No. Example: 'If 2 457 - 4 Cl 2. Joe I 4 /,9 V /CZ" 1-7 c A ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. R t-f- A Z G 1,111,l roa 3"0 E Jo! No-6424f DATE -7-e'-r ay J. SANTA K SPRiNGS, C 1"NIA y Y =28 mf_ wf ;r K K A4A A? /e 4 54 - A>,= 4'0 JOB ,JANlis OR ,EE ROAD IN R EAY /G NMG A! T tMTNESSEO CBNCTE COQ. FOR 13"a X. 1r 41 mlpw ^v ..e A ,q e AG "G. ¢ 24 9 / �1 DaT[ /1-7- 6 ¢ ov J, P SAW^ N: VMHG, CMMNY1 ZF. s «. f. t4v0 XTeez S*H/,WS.) lveopR&Allf sleep. P,4,a:, 200 mot. ir 2-7,5'96 Alcice-c Ir L 3 10 *' ' o-f 1v IA A /< 8 4 - Rff(:p -10 JOB "CZ1,01440 REa�iG.vMBNT- rop �#24 qT BY 1 P Romm PRESTRESSED COMM CORP. 12"0 E. I.Pgn,,L SARA Ft WRIWk% CAM"LA k rn 11 ig 6 & 1"A AFK -0/7 2 - Redvlo. M.4 AF 4 Joe llqlo-410 6 IVIVI E,V 7— F130 l f:! � Joe mo =4 DA-tc ey WMWIN MWIEM COMM tor. SAWA FE SPRWZ& CALKAW t BILL ` OF: MARK Q(/AN 31IE LEA/GT DiESCR /P , /ON` +i!'tM,tRJ�t'3 129 7 2 176p 400 IL 3 p 8047` w yE r Nur <;r� ire.►` 2 $ d �r /�O.D` ! � 9 �� TN /�vI.YSl[ 7U81Njs SlEEV6° 4 54 u & 1— h/Ert� lAw E ' rS,E.+ >rStY Mhas sSs d .i4► r l a�v - s G x 22 GVFz4 PL4tE ASS�MBL_ N r3 �� N ©alrf. Y.,AlNA dtPA dNQ L►dJ"v1" A'y 6 10 0 ► „�# TYPE eC -a 7` 299 6 X l i — �R� a No 50 ssP Ai41 - S 72 12z'�,.o t1 -3” 50N0 vpr;p 9 3t10 lo1e+�D I1� -3a $O�/O ✓d /'p ld 36 122 12' - -S Sofia vo /1.7 .11 18 H le4o.o.12 -8" S'amovo /G tl2 2t6 22Oao I1� 1' &"O A/,p V0 t C _ Cl 3) 108 , 7� 1t}, 10$ 22,;ca 12!S2 $0A/C,VGIU _ rlsl S4 l9i "ao• l2=sz` 54,vovrrt A, NNfaoP PAAY& art .78 pL Ef see, 4wr .4 -2.. ►� 2 3 x' --O AM<NOR PLATIs WlP•7 NOL6f SEe� Sf►T..A 1 >X! r 3 A Alf'" PLA Z'XI�9 741-6 PeEwlOLDEr� JC /N1' F /LLEe - 260'_ p PRCIWOZ"O .la /.Vr a>cZF. _ �M1 Joe ,/AMBO,pE� Z 0,4 CO RpCI11�IM . FMTKSM C@KIM CM. B f 134.a C OWSMAI Wow MV - .. way FE srl�iacts. BMW - _ REAL /GNMENT raw ' .a* 'MC*f249 aAT[ /Z- 7 -6f.dy ✓. P. J. /57.5 21 �Rc +PE.PTJES ' O h l a_- _fLE�uti,._ 2 if s. �� 6•H /.Z Jya �Zx �i.i7 0.70X' /!. ! %77d0't 33'A7 S.. 7, 8« Gf /A 42/0 W= -�- -, !v'p ='9 S 4 <,t,/r #ARO x /i20 -S /G -44r Z— /x% Sowp►? t. PIR taivr_` tt i4 :t- 4 x/47 �l24 .Si 2 / 4 A- �''i %fc�� �v <crtr,v $ - 4• °- = c. g S S 7 C o 7b7,+ t t l Ate; it Zw;z F Tor i wc/e_yr.: 27.•'.r. t ;: - 98 ?.4 K USA =.7i f s Z 3. S`S k! o 42 3.� J. /57.5 f. NtCG STS c AT 7-el A r ADa To. fie 7.30 73 590 = f 00544 —345 . S -4 Or 16 7 3 /Z '30 -f /, /DS —S8S ;��2bDra�:{ +��3 423. rl j,; k 7.3c 6 --- 7- 4.52 { ;*Zr NtCG STS c AT 7-el A r ADa To. 59g- u z/ 3, S -4 7 JCA r - -- 14 ------ ---- - ROCKWIN ENGINEERS TAA P .*T$kK9SXD#CONCRZTlK CONS fiNTS e- A 4 7w l I S7 14' VK 4.E�i� 176,00 -till JE------------------ for- 14 1. jh' TAA S7 1. jh' ac'3 Pic omt.4.s { IL 544-co 4L 8t +00 3p L+ 54 L d' L+ j i. j i- -r - A 6 f 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD TD: TITLE INSURAMCC 800 N. MAIN ST. SANTA AMAX CALIfORMIA ATTENTION:; [ROCM WATTL'c "-CMtEf ENOtNtER SUBJECT: JAMSOR[C ROAD REA OMMCMT WE ARE TRANSM I TT 1 NO THE ~PIIE'LOW IN G: N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 It* MA►i No. RfN - 5009 -L REAL IOMWCMT Of JANDONCE ROAD REMARKS: COMPARISON Of TNC CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS (No$. N -SA WJM3 -SA AND TRACT ViTM YNt ROOMY Of WAY DESCRIPTIOM (0A. I10 %IO) IMOICATES THAT TUC AND 18" WAT[R MAINS AR[ DCfINITCIY VITNIM THE iTRE[T RIGHT Or WAY. If YOU NAVE ANY fURTNCR QUCSTIONS,, PLCASC ICEL fREE TO CALL US. I i N i 46, t 1�lRTtfly o�esicii a Ai1ti�TMNN �''r 510 �I�T ST11tt�.T" MttN T OEAEN� yµtf��tA AMUT44111 504CTi Pooling Rom R[A4 "WIFT QLMT4CItCMi Into WILL CW iM1. am comik III" N T[Ale" . 1IK ?#t[ 'LCAK.MViot Tug V"" TO tl[f4tST Tttt At.l#NI�Ni. M Tllt- Acconto 11fONTN►*1A9.tAAttItMT. 'II 1 -fM rr •' L.vi44 Ai�TtD Tr "T •TIK Ct[ # t 11N COtl T t�11C+ t � , tiff MATtMi� if AMT$ vlu IX .MTAt": Of �M' TtMt TOM p fSCC:Mr 1MAIN" AfTI�MMM! f' 111Yir 'mil' wl T. O WV* . it Won$ DIUCTOM .. Y Jail • • Qt PORTER, O'BR I EN & ARMSTRONG PARTNERS LOS LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA D. J4MES PONTeR O. J. PORTER & COMPANY K. H. O'BRIEN NEWARK • New JERSEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAME AME6 R. PORTER ASSOCIATES 510 -31ST STREET JAKE C. YOUNG SACRAMENTO • CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA C. F. GRIGG 873 -08418 C. H. DARBY OTTO M. VINRE WASHINGTON • O.C. J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I. A.) RENO • NEVADA LEONARD C. URGUHART 1840.1880 November 25, 199► City of Newport Beech Department of Public Works 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Perry SUBJI3CCT: Proposal for Piezometer Installation and Other Services, Jamboree Bout` Construction. Gentlemen: We propose to furnish and install five (5) settlement platforms and three sets of piezcmeters (two piezometers per set) for the lww sum price of $.30000.00. The locations for the installations will be staked by the City of Newport Surveyors free sketches furnished by this office. Daring the construction we propose'to advise the City of the allowable rate to place fill material so as to prevent embankment failure by analivis of piezometers and settlement platform readings. Elevations on the settlement platform should be taken daily by the City Surveyors and results turned over to our forces for graphic plottings and analysis. We propose that piezom,eter readings be measured by our personnel Who will accomplish the graphic plotting and analysis. This Work would be undertaken using the following rate schedule: Bate Schad," Soils Engineer 10.00 /hour 6 50u n s� / Typiat 4.T5 7hour Vehicles mileage 100 /rile At BOIL AN @;OWLOOICAL- .INV�ETI6ATIONY POUNDATI$N{_dgD- NFASILMArIO{(,,.;:: --y.. -'_ 0 0 City of Newport Beach Attention: Mr. Parry Department of Pablic Works November 259 1964 Page Two 7 r; We estimate that the cost of fill control should range between #6,000.00 and *10..OW.00 depending on settlement rate and scheduling of eonstreetion. ell p.i�i�J-ta ti Thank you for the opportunity to present this proposal. We are available to answer any question at your regsest. Very tray you".. l 7A.� RECEIVEQ NOV 271964 PUBLIC WOW DEPT PORTER, O'BRIEN a: AR144TRONG C-847 r VArl NOVEMBER 169 1964 WREN AND VAN ALEN 51w S. SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES 1141 CALIFORNIA SUBJECT! INSURANCE FOR COXCOp INC•li CONTRACT WITH CITY Of NEWPORT BEACH GENTLEMENI ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND COPY OF A LETTER TO COXCO OUTLINING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THEIR CURRENT CONTRACT WITH THE CITY FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD. VERY TRULY YOURS KENNETH L. PERRY ASST. CIVIL ENGINEER ENCL. KLP;vR A J= NOYEMSER 161 l9a COXCO, INC. C/O COX BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P. 0. DRAWER C STANTON, CALIfORMIA SUSJECTI JAMBORtt ROAD REALIGNMENT - EASTBLUPf DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD (CONTRACT NO. &7) 6ENTLEMtN2 ENCLOSED ARE Pin COPIES Of THE CONTRACT OOCUMENTS fOR THE.[OM- STRUCTION Of SUBJECT PROJECT. ACTION AWARDING THIS CONTRACT TO YOU, SUBJECT TO RECEIPT Of WRITTEN APPROVAL Of THE DIViS1ON Of HIGHWAYS, WAS TAKEN BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON NOVEMBER 9, 19p- THE CITY HAS KEN NOTIf1ED BY TELEPHONE THAT THE PROJECT HAS KEN AP►ROVCD, SO WRITTEN APPROVAL SHOULD 6E RECEIVED SHORTLY. IT WILL Be NECESSARY FOR YOU TO EKECUT[ THE LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND, PERfORMAMCE BOND, AND TIME CONTRACT. THE DATE Of THE CONTRACT IS TO K LEFT BLANK, AND IT WILL Be fILLED IN WHEN THE CITY E%ECUT[S THE AGREEMENT AFTER WRITTEN APPROVAL OP THE DiV1810N Of HIGHWAYS IS RECEIVED, THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS WILL K DISTRIBUTED AS fOLLOVSt (1) CITY CLERK, (Z) PUBLIC WORKa DEPARTMENT, (3) CONTRACTOR, (4) BONDING COMPANY, AND (5) CITY FINANCt DEPARTMENT. IN ADDITION TO THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS PLEASE SUBMIT CERTIFICATES FOR PUBLIC LIABILITY AND PROPERTY &[ INSURANCE, AND WC*KNEN /S COMPENSATION INSURANCE. THE FOLLOWING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE STRICTLY ►OLLOWED: I• THE CITY Of NEWPORT BEACH 16 TO B[ NAMED AS AN ADDI- TIONAL ASSURED ON THE PUBLIC LIABILITY AND PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE. Tos COXCO, INC. II -16-6k SUBJI CONTRACT NO. 847 - 2. THE LIMIT OF THE INSURANCE~ SMALL BE AS FOLLOW&% A. LIMIT Of LIABILITY FOR INJURY OR ACCIDENTAL DEATNi ONE PERSON $I0O,000.00 ONE ACCIDENT 4300,000.00 B. LIMIT OF LIABILITV FOR PROPERTY DAMAGE! ONE ACCIDENT $25,000.00 AGGREGATE LIABILITY FOR LOSS '50.000.00 3. THE POLICIES SMALL BE ENDORSED AS FOLLOWS: "IT 15 HEREBY UNDERSTOOD Aft AGREED THAT THE POLICY TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE REFERS MAY NOT BE CANCELLED MATERIALLY CHANGEDS NOR THE AMOUNT OF COVERAGE THEREOF REDUCED, NOR THE POLICY ALLOWED TO LAPSE UNTIL TEN (10) DAYS AFTER RECEIPT BY THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY Of NEWPORT BEACHp CITY HALLS NEWPORT kACHs CALI- fOR%IAx Of A REGISTERED WRITTEN NOTICE Of SUCH CAMCEL- LATION OR REDUCTION IN COVERAGE.° PLEASE SUBMIT YOUR PROPOSED STARTING DATE IN ORDER THAT WE NAY PLAN OUR INSPECTION SCHEDULE. THE SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRE THAT ALL Of THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS Be RETURNED TO THE CITY WITHIN IO DAYS AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN MAILED TO YOU. VERY TRULY YOURS KENNETH L. PERRY ASST. CITY ENGINEER ENCLS. KLPsvR J v STATE OF CALIFORNIA- HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Gwv r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII, P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES U November 16, 1964 MAdison 0 -3700 07- Ora- O -NptB SS Project 38(l) (Section 2107) Mr, Benjamin Nolan City Engineer 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Nolan: Please refer to your letter dated October 27, 1964, transmitting the Bid Summary for the construction on Jamboree Road from Bayside Drive to Palisades Road and requesting authority to award the contract. The low bid of $338,468.50, submitted by Coxco, Inc., is $39,991,50, or some 13.4 per cent,'more than the Engineer's Estimate of $298,477.00. The other bids ranged from $345,000 to $428.000. After reviewing the bids, you requested authority to award for the following reasons: 1. Your consulting engineers, Porter, O'Brien & Armstrong, are of the opinion that their estimate did not adequately provide for unusual conditions to be encountered in driving of piles and other bridge foundation work. They are agreed that the soft, com- pressible material at the bridge site will require costly preparations prior to driving piles. The bid items for furnishing and driving piles and for constructing the bridge accounted for some $32,000.00 of the overrun. 2. The Orange County Flood Control District and Orange County Road Department have recommended award. These agencies are contributing more than 70 per cent of the project financing. 3. Suitable financing is being arranged, 4. There is no indication that lower bids would result from readvertising. Mr. Benjamin Nolan -2- November 16, 1964 It should be noted that our Department advised, prior to advertising, that a more efficient pile design, using fewer and lighter piles, and a T -beam super- structure would probably result in a considerable saving. However, the consultants retained their original design on the basis of extremely poor foundation conditions and approach fill limitations. As requested by the City, the Department consents to award of the contract to Coxco, Inc. at the low bid of $338,468.50. OVJ:jht Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer BY � M. L. BAUDERS District City & County Projects Engineer RECEIVED NOV 181964 Pu�uC WORKS DEPT*. NOVEMBER 5, 1964 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT,,EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD, REVISED FIRST CONTRACT (CONTRACCT NO. 847) RECOMMENDATIONS: AWARD CONTRACT TO- COXCO, INC. FOR #338,468.50 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF AWARD BY THE STATE. - 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT UPON APPROVAL. - FIVE BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND.OPENED IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS BY THE DEPUTY CITY CLERK AT 10:30 A.M. ON OCTOBER 21, 1964. ' i BIDDER Co*CO, INC. Ecco, INC. SULLY - MILLER JOHN L. MEEK CO., GRIFFITH CO. STANTON GARDEN GROVE ORANGE INC. LOS ANGELES LOS ANGELES TOTAL $338,4683.50 33480,248.80 406,844.20 428,245.50 THE LOW BID IS 13.4% MORE THAN.THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE OF $298,477• MOST OF THE INCREASE IS IN BRIDGE COSTS THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HAS APPROVED THE EXPENDITURE REQUIRED FOR THEIR SHARE. AFTER DISCUSSING THE BIDS WITH CONTRACTORS AND WITH THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, THAT PREPARED THE PLANS-.AND ESTIMATE, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO RECOMMEND AWARD. THE'ORIGINAL ESTIMATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN TOO LOW, AND IT IS FELT THAT THE LOW BID RECEIVED REPRESENTS A FAIR PRICE FOR THE - WORK TO BE DONE, APPROVAL OF AWARD BY THE STATE IS REQUIRED WHEN THE LOW BID IS GREATER THAN THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT, INCLUDING DESIGN, INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION IS $381,000. THE INCREASE OVER THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED WHEN THE PLANS WERE APPROVED IS DUE TO THE HIGHER CONSTRUCTION COST AND TO THE INCLUSION OF INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION COSTS TO BE FINANCED WITH GAS TAX FUNDS. i I TO: CITY COUNCIL SUBJ: JAMBOREE 'RD. DATE: 11/5/64 REALIGNMENT (C -8+7) PROPOSED FINANCING IS INDICATED BELOW. ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT $163,500 COUNTY (AHFP FUNDS) .108,750 CITY (STATE GAS TAX FUNDS) 1o8,750 TOTAL $381,000 PRESENTLY, $85,000 IS BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT NO. 26- 3397 -012 FOR THIS PROJECT. A BUDGET AMENDMENT AND A REVISED GAS TAX BUDGET HAVE BEEN PREPARED FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. THE PROJECT SHOULD BE.COMPLETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1965 AND NOVEMBER 1966 DEPENDING ON THE RATE OF FILL PLACEMENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED ON THE UNSTABLE FOUNDATION MATERIAL. ATTEST TO OPENING BIDS: MARY Q.. 4w i flaw � DEPUTY CITY CLERK RC :BBN:vs 6 OBERT Co6P( CITY MANAGER 7 Eastbluff to Palisades: Mr. Joseph Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr..Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director Dear Sir: Reference is made to your letter of October 27, 1964 which transmitted for our information the bid summaries for subject project and outlined the expected total costs and their distributions*-:'-.'.-" The total AHFP allocation to this date is $85 000.00. Your letter indicates a total expected cost to AHFP of 108,750.00. Any adjustment of allocation will have to be made by the Board of Supervisors. If the City will require the additional funds prior to contract completion, the reallocation may be requested now for the estimated total required amount. If, however, the original allocation will be sufficient for the duration of the work, the reallocation may be requested at the time of.final accounting for the exact total amount required. The former method may, if insuffi- cient, require an additional reallocation; the latter method will naturally not. We will await requesting any Board action until we receive your directive. In the meantime, upon contract award you may request deposit with.the City of the $85,000.00 existing allocation. _ A. S. �Y.OMMI KOCM - t \f1OPEN AND COUNTY SURVEYOR w C. O R. V. WINE ROAD REST. ROAD CDMMU tlON[R MMIDDI DEPUTY COUNTY fURVLYOR UN U T -/ O C AND fURV[YDR ,Y 7 r R. !: vA11.E - W. E. LEWIS DIVISION ENMESH - OPERATIONS RLIUf[ DISPOSAL EIIONICER Eastbluff to Palisades: Mr. Joseph Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr..Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director Dear Sir: Reference is made to your letter of October 27, 1964 which transmitted for our information the bid summaries for subject project and outlined the expected total costs and their distributions*-:'-.'.-" The total AHFP allocation to this date is $85 000.00. Your letter indicates a total expected cost to AHFP of 108,750.00. Any adjustment of allocation will have to be made by the Board of Supervisors. If the City will require the additional funds prior to contract completion, the reallocation may be requested now for the estimated total required amount. If, however, the original allocation will be sufficient for the duration of the work, the reallocation may be requested at the time of.final accounting for the exact total amount required. The former method may, if insuffi- cient, require an additional reallocation; the latter method will naturally not. We will await requesting any Board action until we receive your directive. In the meantime, upon contract award you may request deposit with.the City of the $85,000.00 existing allocation. MR. A. S. Koch ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA ATTENTIONS Mkt. J. W. PCMDERYAST E OCTOKIt 47s 194 SUBJCCTS ANPP No. 138, JAMBOREE ROADS EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADEs ROAD DEAR SIR: TRANSMITTED ARE TWO COPIES OF THE BID SUMMARY FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. THE LOW BID RECEIVED IS ABOUT 13% OVER THE ENOINEER's ESTIMATES HOST OF THE DIFFERENCE BEING IN THE BRIDGE COST. AFTER DISCUSSING THE BIDS WITH CONTRACTORS AND WITH THC CON- SULTING ENGINEERS IT HAS KEN DECIDED TO RCCOMMEND AWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE ORIGINAL CSTIMATE APPEARS TO HAVE BCEN TOO LOW AND IT IS FELT THAT THE LOW DID RECEIVCD REPRESENTS A FAIR PRICE FOR THE WORK TO BE DONC. IN FACT THERE HAS BEEN SOME INDICATION THAT READVERTISING MIGHT RESULT IN NIaMER PRICES. A COPY OF A LETTER FROM THE CONSULTING ENGINEER RECOMMENDING AWARD IS ENCLOSED. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS AND FINANCING ARE INDICATCO SCLOWt COSTS DESIam 2g��00.00 CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT 338,4G8.50 SCTTLCMENT INSTRUMENTATIONS CONTROL '�. SURVEYS FILL CONTROL# ETC. 5,131.50 INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION 12tow._00 TOTAL 4381,,,000.00 MR. A. S. KOCH 1047A AHFP No. 138 - 2. µ7. FINANCING ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 416 �j00.00 COUNTY (AHFP FUNDS) 1 0750.00 CITY GAS TAx rum" 1 .750.00 Tara Toir" 4381,000.00 ANY INELIGIBLE ITEMS WILL SE FINAD FROM THE CITY GENERAL FUNO. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PROJECT COSlf AND FINANCING ARE CONSIDERADLY DIFFERENT FROM THOSE SHOWN IN THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT. IF A RE- VISED AGREEMENT OR OTHER ACTION IS NEEDED ON THIS ACCOUNTS PLEASE ADVISE US. ENcLs. BBNtvR VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ABET. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 0 OCTOBER 27, 1964 MR. A. C. DIRNIE DEPUTT DISTRICT ENGINEER Division or HIGHWAYS P. O. DOA 231, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54, CALIFORNIA ATTENTIONI MR. M. L. DAUBER: SUBJECT: V114CR APTD PROJECT AS JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR SIR: TRANSMITTED ARE TWO COPIES Of THE DID SUMMARY POO THE SUBJECT PROJECT. THE LOW DID RECEIVED IS ABOUT 13% OVER THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, MOST Or THE DIrrERENCE SEING IN THE SRIDGE�COSTS. AFTER DISCUSSING THE 8108 WITH CONTRACTORS AND WITH THE CONSULTING ENGINEERS, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO RECOMMEND AWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL, SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF AWARD BY THE STATE. THE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE APPEARS TO HAVE SEEN TOO LOW, AND IT IS FELT THAT THE LOW DID RECEIVED REPRESENTS A FAIR PRICE FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE. IN FACT THERE HAS KEN SOME INDICATION THAT READVERTISING MIGHT RESULT IN NIGHER PRICES. A COPY Of A LETTER FROM THE CONSULTING ENGINEER RECOMMENDING AWARD IS ENCLOSED. IT IS NO ►ED TO PRESENT THE CONTRACT TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR AWARD ON NOVEMKR 9, 1964, or STATE APPROVAL IS GRANTED. THE ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE WOULD K ABOUT DECCNOER Is 1965- THIS DATE MAY K DELAYED BY THE CONTROLLED RATE OF FILL PLACE - MENT NECESSARY TO ALLOW UNDERLYING COMPRESSIBLE SOILS TO GAIN STRENGTH. MR. A. C. BIRNIE - 2. 10 -2744 JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT YOUR LETTER DATED OCTOBER 6, INAS $OH[ COMMENTS REGARDING THE BRIDGE DESIGN. A REVIEW Of THE BORING LOGS ON SNEETS 17 AND 21 OF THE PLANS WILL DISCLOSE THAT FOUNDATION CONDITIONS FOR THE SRIDOC ARE RATHER POOR. SIMPLE SPANS WERE SELECTED BECAUSE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF DIFFER- ENTIAL SETTLtMENTS, ALTHOUGN IT 16 RECOGNIZED THAT A CONTINUOUS BRIDGE WOULD PROBABLY BE LESS EX ►ENSia. THE SLAB SUPERSTRUCTURE WAS PREFERRED TO T ♦CAMS IN ORDER TO MINIMES APPROACH FILL AND TO PROVIDE A MORE DESIRABLE ROADWAY PROFILE. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS AND FINARCim ARE INDICATED BELOW: COSTS DESIGN S 25,1100,00 CONSTRUCTED CONTRACT 3. ,468.50 SETTLEMENT INSTRUMENTATION CONTROL SURVEYS FILL CONTROLpETC. 5,131.50 INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION 12.000.00 TOTAL =381,000.00 FINANCING ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT `16 .00 COUNTY (AWP FUNDS) Iw *m.00 CITY GAS TAX FUNDS 419C75D.00 TOTAL 6381,000.00 IN OUR LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 16, I964, REGARDING THE PROJECTS IT WAS STATED THAT THE COSTS OF INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION WOULD BE BORNE BY THE CITY GENERAL FUND. THIS STATEMENT WAS IN ERROR] AND IT IS PROPOSED TO USE OAS TAX FUNDS FOR THE WORK. SINCE THE PROPOSED OAS TAX EXPENDITURE IS HIGHER THAN THE AMOUNT PRESENTLY BUDOETEDS A SUPPLEMENTAL PROJECT STATEMENT AMENDING THE APPROVED BUDGET WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION ON NOVEMBER 9X 1964, AND TRANSMITTED TO THE STATE. THE LIMITS OF WORK WILL BE COR- RECTED ON THE REVISED PROJECT STATEMENT. VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS OIRECTOR ENCL. BBNsvR OCTOBER 26, 19A MR. H. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER P.O. Box 1078 SANTA ANA, CAL 1 FORMN A SUBJECTS JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT, SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGE DEAR SIRS BIDS HAVE BEEN RECEIVED ON THE SUBJECT PROJECT. TWO COPIES Of THE 010 SUMMARY ARE ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REFERENCE. THE LOW 910 RECEIVED IS ABOUT 13% OVER THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE, MOST Of THE INCREASE BEING IN BRIDGE COSTS. AFTER DISCUSSING THE BIDS WITH CONTRACTORS AND WITH THE CONSULTING EN- GINEERS, IT HAS BEEN DECIDED TO RECOMMEND AWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE ORIGINAL ESTIMATE APPEARS TO HAVE BEEN TOO LOW AND IT IS FELT THAT THE LOW BID RECEIVED REPRESENTS A FAIR PRICE FOR THE WORK TO BE DONE. IN FACT, THERE HAS BEEN SOME INDICATION THAT READVERTISING MIGHT RESULT IN HIGHER PRICES. A COPY OF A LETTER FROM THE CONSULTING ENGINEER RECOM- MENDING AWARD IS ENCLOSED. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT NO. BA63F5 -107, WRITTEN CONCURRENCE OF THE DISTRICT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO AWARD Of CONTRACT IN ORDER TO OBLIGATE THE DISTRICT FOR ANY COST IN EXCESS OF '137,500. BASED ON THE LOW DID RECEIVED, AND INCLUDING 10% FOR LNQI- NEERING AND 5$ FOR CONTINGENCIES, DISTRICT'S TOTAL SNARE IS ESTIMATED TO BE 171,000. APPROVAL OF THE DISTRICT TO AWARD IS HEREBY REQUESTED. VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ENCLS. BBNIVB : CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'BR I EN & ARMSTRONG LOS ANGELES PARTNERS O. J. PORTER & COMPANY D- JAMES PORTER K. H. O'BRIEN NEWARK NEW JERSEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER ASSOCIATES 510 -31sT STREET SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA JAKE C. YOUNG C. F. GRIGG 573 -0845 C. H. DARBY OTTO M. VIKRE WASHINGTON o. C. J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A.L A.) RENO • NEVADA LEONARD C, URGUHART 1949 -1960 October 23, 1964 City of Newport Beach. Department of Public Works 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Ben Nolan, City Nngineer SOBJ&CT: Bid SumIary, Jamboree Road Realignment, Contract Number 84T. Gentlemen: We have reviewed the tabulation of bids received on the subject contract on October 21, 1964 The low bidder was Coxco, Inc. of Stanton, California for a price of $338,468,50. This is approximately 13% over the engineers estimate. After careful analysis of the bid summary we recommend that the contract be awarded to Coxco, Inc. for $338,468.50. The discrepancy in the low bid with the engineers estimate seems confined to Items 11 and lla, Furnishing Piles and Driving Piles. Our estimate did not take sufficiently into consideration the soft compressible material at the bridge site which causes abnormal preparations to enable the piles to be driven. Very truly yours, PORTSR, O'BRISK & AINSTRONG @' C. F. Grigg CFG/hw 0 RFCFIVFD OCT 2 3 1964 ,PUBLIC WOW DEPT, I HIGHWAYS - BTBUGTURES . UTILITIES - DAMS . REPORTS Cl* SNEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC i C WORKS _ DH 711ENT CONTRACTORS CHECK -OUT LIST 816 OPENING OCTO ER 21, 1964 PROJECT JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT - EASTSLUFFF DRIVE WORKING DAYS 'f D TO PALISADES ROAD CONTRACT NO. 8+7 DEPOSIT REQUIRED $9.0o ENOINEER'E ESTIMATE 10'. -'ao Ca.M NO. NAME AND ADDRESS PHONE DEPOSIT REMARKS 5.0 0 ,Y,ae�oe..0 / 4flort'q !!/ � s� saw 3/ S- /SOD ��3 � .�'• sa(Zy� � `A 3 �� Wake- IQ. pa, , ` b Z.� V.s n O;Ovlb \1 o, E' S 3! 1533 - 6 x•00 z 3 t o o f 11, O o hit-- 10- l � a¢ 6MA� it e 0_.�w•a,6� �f�.to•6�i . Cl ZtM1.. 1 S / �� % -21 v CITY AEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DATMENT CONTRACTORS CHECK,0 -T LIST PROJECT JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT - EASTBLUFF DRIVE_ TO PALI�4ADES ROAD CONTRACT NO. 841 10:30 A.M. BID OPENI -NQ - OCTOBER 21., 1964 WORKINQ DAYS DEP081T REQUIRED $5-00 ENQINEER'R ESTIMATE Iwo mm I NOT 'N� 1 ♦ • 1%ol mwm��-, W-2 CITY AMEWPORT'BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DATMENT CONTRACTORS CHECK -OUT LIST - 4q fo',--60 A, M, BID OPEN INO bLl WORKINQ DAYS 2so DEPOSIT REQUIRED !K. bo ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE NO. NAME AND ADDRESS PHONE DEPOSIT REMARKS Z l0 15 6� 2 O . ,00 +6 � g �' •� -�- o ►+al I t o-M-*— 4- y `? ©fig e.e0✓ ��' 2 `,GJon J �t , yj o z5 rS 6s� wJt U \ �Lnn.� �,o a '3Zo O'S-k- f24 Xd i . M 1 "e 1- CITY EWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DCNT CO TRACTORS CHECK -OUT LIST PROJECT JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT - EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD - FIRST CONTRACT BID OpENI'Na AUGUST 6, 1963 . ` WORKING DAVi 2 WORKING DAYS j DEPOSIT REQUIRED .00 - ENGINEER's ESTIMATE _1 2lb-50_ P .S1.. ® ) 'l` F, UNION • .. IN 0 �r// . ® P - . rx, / n w Putt s FINANCE DwaoR PUSL ►C WORKS QIRtCTM CJAAM ME ROAD REAUANI ; - REFUND 7 PLCASC REFYNO $5.00 TO CACN OF TVA rOLLOYIMQI R. E• STA09% COOKING, INC. 2691 NnIToN AvtNuE • SAN DICOO 13, CALIFORNIA (2•5ETS + $10.00) R. M. SKANNSS Box 745 TusT►MS CALIFORNIA WILLIAM M. HANDLEY 216 N. SANTA CLARA SANTA ANA$ CALIFORNIA J. T. DcvLIM f' 10/21/64 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NOTICE, -.TO- BIDDERS: CONTRACT NO. G -8117 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR JAMBOREE ROAD,REALIGNMENT ADDENDUM N0.1 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS FOR ALTERNATE PILING SCHEMES AS SHOWN ON SHEET 16 OF THE PLANS, PLEASE REVISE THE QUANTITIES ON THE PROPOSAL FOR BID ITEMS N0. 11 AND 11A. TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE QUANTITIES FOR THE ALTERNATE SCHEME WHICH YOU HAVE SELECTED. THE PRINTED QUANTITY SHOULD BE CROSSED OUT AND THE CORRECT QUANTITY WRITTEN IN BY HAND; ALSO PLEASE NOTE THE ALTERNATE SELECTED ON THE PROPOSAL SHEET BELOW .ITEM 11, INDICATE THE DATE OF CORRECTION AND INITIAL THE CHANGE. THE CORRECT QUANTITIES ARE: ITEM 11 ITEM 11A .ALTERNATE 1 - 6528 L.IN. FT. 1113 EACH ALTERNATE 11 L/7$'2 1 p LIN. FT. 81 EACH ALTERNATE III 13� 11218 LIN. FT, 74 EACH BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ' ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BBN:vs 10/20/64 C� OCTOBER 200 19611 ' MR. C. F. GRIGG PORTERS O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG 510 - 31ST STREET NEWPORT BEACHq CA LIFORNIA SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT, SETTLEMENT INSTRUMENTATION DEAR SIRS CONFIRMING OUR PREVIOUS TELEPHONE 013CUS31ONSO YOUR FIRM IS REQUESTED TO SUPPLY THE MATERIALS AND 00 THE INSTALLATION AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY SETTLEMENT INSTRUMENTATION ON THE JAMBOREE ROAD PROJECT. THE INSTRUMENTATION USED SHOULD BE THE "OLD TYPE" LESS EXPENSIVE), AS DICUSSEO. BBNSVR VERY TRULY YOURS BENJA IN �NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR STATE OF CALIFORNIA - HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND 0. BROWN, Gw w DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT YII, P.O. BOX 4304, LOS ANGELES 54 October 6, 1964 MAdison 0 -3700 07- Ora- 0-NptB Project 38(1) Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Nolan: We have reviewed the revised plans and specifications for the proposed improvement of Jamboree Road from East Bluff Drive to Palisades Road and they are approved for advertising for bids, subject to the following comments: 1. It will be necessary for the City to submit a revised Project Statement since the limits proposed in the Project Statement failed to include work which is proposed South of Bayside Drive. 2. It is the opinion of our Bridge Department that the bents are considerably more expen- sive than is necessary. It is possible they were so designed in order to resist earth- quake forces. If the structure had been designed continuous and monolithic, the earth- quake forces would be delivered to the abut- ments and lighter piers would result. The Department is also of the opinion a T -Beam superstructure would be more economical for these spans then the proposed slab units. The District suggests that in the future, the City submit preliminary bridge plans in the early stages of the work as considerable savings may result by an early review by our Bridge Department. As an example, the District wishes to point out that this structure is designed with thirteen very Heavy piling for each pier. The bridge section, the District would have recommended, would have used about seven lighter piers since the thirteen heavy piling tend to reduce the quality of the structures appearance as well as increasing the cost. i Mr. Benjamin Nolan -2- October 6, 196+ Please..forward a summary of bids when received for the completion of our files or for approval of the award of the contract if the low bid exceeds the preliminary estimate. It is suggested that the City review the estimate to determine if it is in line with current price trends before advertising, and if adjustments in estimated costs are necessary, submit a revised estimate for our information. Please furnish the estimated completion date for this contract, along with the summary of bids. FCB:jht Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer BY: �/ M.�L' DERS . BAU District City & County Projects Engineer RECEIVED OCT 8 7964 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, PUBLIC CITY WORKS DEPARTMb OF NEWPORT BEACH NO. INIT. DATE ACTION ' P.W. DIRECTOR AsST. P.W. DIR. -` AsST. CITY ENGR. PKG. METER DIV. ELECTRICAL DIV. WATER & SEWER DIV. FIELD ENGINEER - CITY MANAGER SECRETARY 777777-7 77� 1( O F A. S. KOCH RO , OMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR L. McCONVILLE R. V. WIsE ASST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR ANO SURVEYOR R. S. VAILE W. E. LEWIS DIVISION ENGINEER —OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER — EX GIX EE RIrv4 BUSINESS MANAGER N G E TELEPHONE: 547.0547 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST RTN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 927D1 October 1, 1964 Re: AHFP #138 Jamboree Road Eastbluff Dr. to Palisades Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard .Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: The revised Plans and Specifications for subject project have been reviewed and found to be satisfactory. The attached Authorization to Advertise is therefore issued. Also attached is the signed title sheet of the Plans. Please forward two copies of the Bid Summary when available. ASK:JWP:sh Atts. 2 Very truly Yours, A. S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor DECEIVED pCT 6 1964` PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, 0 COUNTY OF-ORANGE ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM AUTHORIZATION FOR ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PROJECT CONTRACT A.H.F.P. Project #138 Improvement and Construction of Jamboree Road, Eastbluff Drive to Palisades Road in the City of Newport Beach 1. As required by the officially adopted procedures of the County of Orange Arterial Highway Financing Program, the Road Commissioner hereby certifies that: (a) Funds for subject project have been properly budgeted by both parties to the Administration Agreement. (b) The right of way for subject project has been properly certified by the City Council. (c) Plans and Specifications for subject project have been properly prepared and approved in accordance with authorized procedures. 2. This authorization is issued to certify that the Contracting Authority, as designated by the Administration Agreement for subject project, may now proceed with the advertisement and receiving of bids for subject project. 24e6ad County Surveyor & Road Commissioner A. S. VCH Date: October 1, 1964 cc: J. Patrick H. Christianson R. Wise D. Barrett OPORTER, O'BRIEN & ARRItRONG Consulting Engineers NEWPORT BEACH • CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 6019 ESTIMATE FOR JAMBOREE ROAD RFAI.IGNMENT BY WFS (A. Q.) Eastbluff Drive to Palisades Road o- ... - -A oa - -a SHEET 1 OF 1 DATE 8 -2T -64 NO. BID ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Clearing and Grubbing S un 3 500.00 2 Roadway Excavation TO.000 C.Y. 0.80 56.000.00 Ditch Excavation 150 C.Y. 1.00 150.00 4 Compacting original Ground 7,000 S.Y. 0.10 TOO.00 Imported Sand Borrow 18 000 C.Y. 0.90 16 200.00 6 Aggregate Plase 9-800 n 7 Liquid Asphalt MC -1 18 Ton 145-00 810.00 8 Asphaltic Emulsion RS -1 14 4hn 60.00 840.00 Asphalt Concrete 2,150 Ton 8.00 1 200.00 10 Placing A. C. Ditches 2,350 L.F. 0.20 47o.00 11 Furnishing Piles 4,T52 L.F. 4.75 22,5T2.00 11A Driving Piles 81 Each 280.00 22 680.00 12 San Diego Creek Bridge Sam 11 000.00 11 Sroml-a-l-Drm Inlets I Poch 100.00 14 Standard Precast Manhole TA MP Skim 400.00 15 18" R. C. P. 444 L.F. 15.00 6 66o.00 16 Reset 24" x ' C.M.P. TA IMP am 700-00 1 " C.M.P. 150 L.F. 20.00 1,000.00 18 12" C.M.P. Downdrain 46 L.F. 10.00 460.00 19 Downdrain Entrance Tapers 3 Each 6 .00 195-00 20 Downdrain Slip Joints 3 Each .00 105-00 21 Dovndrain Anchor Assemblies 3 Each 45.00 135.00 22 Metal Beam Guard Railing 26o L.F. .00 1 23 Guide and Culvert N rkers 40 Each 10. 4 24 Setting Road Signs 20 Each 15-00 300.00 25 Removing Traffic Strips 5.000 L.F. 0.10 00.00 26 Modi in Manhole mp am 100.00 27 Septic Tank System 1A Mp g LIM 900.00 28 Construction Surveys 4. 00 l � SC►TCMS n 33s 1964 MR. A. S. Koch COUNTY SURVEYOR AND AGO COMISStONEII 400 WEST 8TH STRELT SANTA ANA, CALIFGMIA ATTENTIONS MR. Jog PtNOCRGAST Sv"cTt AHPP PROJUT 130, JMISORtC ROAD RtALeWMXT, REVISED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DEAR Stitt TRANSNtTTtD ARC ONC SET Or PRINTS Or THE SUSJtCT W ANi, TIRE REVISED SPECKr14AT10Ns, TIN: rINAL COST tSTINATE, AND THE ORIGINAL COVCR SNECT root SIGMATURC. IN ACCORDANCE WITH TINE COMCNTS IN YOUR LETTER Or Junk 211, 19640 THE rGLLOWtNG CHANSES NAME SEEN MADE TO THC PLAMI, 1. ArTER CONSULTING WITH Tut STRUCTURAL EHGIMCCS IT WAS OECIDEO THAT THE ADVANTAGES Or CHANGING THE NCTNOD Or OOTAINIM SUPCR9L9VATION TRANSITION WOULD NOT K PMNOUHCCD CMOUOM TO JUSTIFY MAKING TMt REVISION AT THIS TINE. THE TITLES ON THE PIER 7 ELEVATIONS ON OIREET 12 NAVC SEEN REMISED AS SUGOCSTEO. 2. THE MSC PLATE SOLT DOWN NOLCS WCRt INDICATE& SLIGHTLY OVtRStZC TO ALLOW FOR POSSISLE NISALIGlMXT# HOWEVCR, IT DOES APPCAR THAT SLOTTING WOULD K tKSIRASLt AND WE WILL ALLOW TNC CONTRACTOR TO SLOT TIFF HOLCS IF DESIRED. A Nat NAS SEER ADDCD ON SHEET 19 RtG wilt RAILING MATtR1Ats MID inamNT. Tut KM RAILING MATERIAL WAS NOT[& ON SHCCT 10. TMt rOLLOWING COMMCUTS APPLY TO THE SFCCIAL PROVISIONS: 1. THE TIIK Or COMPLETION "AS SEEN CHANGED TO 250 WORKING DAYS. AN EXAN►NATION Or THE Sta tNCt Or CONSTRUCTION OMRATIONS R9111101090 INDICATES THAT IT WOULD K DIFFICULT TO rURTNER REDUCE TIRE TINE. m 0 a MR. A. S. Kacm 903D-64 sma .IA mag ROAD Rc AL I GWCUT • $. TIM: 6TATpEMT ntOAnDINS NAINTLNAtItt Or TRAMC HAS 6E9M ADUR TO Me SPLCIrICATIONS. 3. Tut sumsT1OM ntaAS61N6 ASYTIKMT PILts mAS {trio Ann TO TIN: S►tCI►ICATIaNS. �. Tog sumsTlsM ag"sDiNO PILL MANNER twnw NAS stem ADDED TO THE SPeCIFICATIOMS. 5. TIE SVWSTION MOARDINS CU"Ift NO 9XT9NS1ON Or PILING HAS 6rtN AMD TO THL SPUIPS AT1ONi. 6. IT Is rLLT THAT 6YrrICItNT CONTROL Or 04 IM COWTRMCT#ON CAN 6r OSTAIMLO WITH THE BASIC SPLCIFICATIOM6S As THt PLANS AM CSITC OLTAILta. Tut reLLOWINO COMI[NTS APPLY TO Tmt tSTIMATLt I. TWO UPARATL 610 ITtNS ran ►OMISHINO AW ►LACIMa PILLS AM OLINO USED. Z. 0 WAS NOT 8[6111[0 TO CNANOt TNC mcTNOO Or sISO1MS Tut 6Rlow STRVCTUK AT THIS TINE. 3. METHOD Or CA1IKIAAT1OM FOR THt ITEMS IKNTIONLO "As Stem CLAM it ILO. �. TNt rIMAL COST C&TIHATC IS ATTACIEO. THr tsTIMATED TOTAL COOTS AND rIMAHCONS AM INDICATLO OLLOWI Des ION COIISTRIICTION CONTRACT SLTTLLIM:MT INOT0110NMAT IOM CONTROL SURYLY# TILL CONTROL, LTC. . INSKCTIOW AND ADMINISTRATION TOTAL s2;, 5,123 I MR. A. S. Koch 9+30 -6�1 SUSJI JANSORtE ROAD RCALIG/RIt11T w I' l lim um ORANGE COUNTY iL CONTROL DISTRICT 41 I= COUNTY (mm nmww � CITY GAS TAx /GNOS CITY GENERAL FUND �Z.DiiD TOTAL 43%1A M ANY IHELIsiOLE mus VILL K FIMANCto raw TNc CITY ttNERAL rum. PLEASE NOTE THAT TNt PROJECT COSTS AM FINAtlCING An CONSIDt11AKT DIFFERENT FROM Y"ou swam IN TNt ORIOIRML AOREtmoT, IF A hevisED ASREENEMT OR OTHER ACTION Is NECO90 ON THIS ACCOUNTO ►LEAK ADVISE Use IT Is RCO1ItsTte THAT THE ORIGINAL COYER sNttT K TRAl"ITTte TO JACK SCNMAut OF THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AFTER APPROVAL AND txtCYTION OY THE ROAD DEPARTMENT. EHcL: SBNIVR VERY TRYLT Towsi BENJAMIN Be NOI.AN Asst. PusLlc MoRia DIRtcTae &►TENSER If, #90 PR. A. C. BIRNit DISTRICT ENGINEER Dlvlslo8 of HIGMtAVS P. 0. BOX 23�01► � TERMINAL ANNtx Los ANGELES W, t CALIFORNIA ATTCNTIONt 161. IA. L. ®AYDERS Susan VII.WR NPTS PROJECT 30$ JAMME ROAD RtALOUNNT, REVISED PLANS kAR SIRS TRANsMITTtD ARC THREE COPIES of THC COST ESTIMATC FOR THE SUSJECT PROJECT. THE ESTIMATED TOTAL COSTS AND FINANCING ARE INDICATED sELOW2 DESIGN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT SETTLEIKNT (NSTRUMENTAT IOIt, CONTROL SURVEY, FILL Cowmat., ETC. TOTAL F ORANGE COUNTY iLo00 CONTROL DISTRICT COUNTY (mrp FUNDS) CITY GAS TAX FINIDs TOTAL Aj,4T7 5023 ✓• ..• ..s r THE COSTS OF INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION ARE NOT INCLUMD AROVC AS THIS WORK WILL K DONE OY CITY FORCES AND FINANCED WITH PREVIOUSLY DUDGETED GENERAL FUNDS. PLEASE NOTE TWAT THE ESTIMATED GAS TAX 9XPE10ITUU Is HIGHER THAN THE AMOUNT PRESENTLY SUDSETED. IT IS PROPOSED TO SUSISIT A SU►PLEIICHTAL PROJECT STATEMENT AMENDING THE APPROVED OUDKT UPON RECEIPT OF RIGS. ENCLS. aft" PERT TRULY YOURS, SCI B. NOLAN ASST. PUDLIC MORRS DIRECTOR TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: CITY MANAGER SEPTEMBER 11, 1964 --is- SUBJECT: REVISED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD FROM EASTBLUFF DRIVE TO PALISADES ROAD (CONTRACT NO. C -847) RECOMMENDATIONS: I. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED AT 10:00 A.M. ON OCTOBER 21, 1964 SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF THE PLANS BY THE STATE AND THE COUNTY. THIS PROJECT PROVIDES THE FIRST 2 LANES OF THE ULTIMATE 6 -LANE DIVIDED SECTION. WIDENING TO 4 LANES WILL BE NEEDED IN THE NOT TOO DISTANT FUTURE: HOWEVER, THE ULTIMATE WIDENING TO 6 LANES SHOULD BE A NUMBER OF YEARS AWAY WHEN TRAFFIC VOLUMES WARRANT. THE PLANS HAVE BEEN REVISED TO PROVIDE A BRIDGE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH TO SPAN THE ULTIMATE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL. THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DIS- TRICT IS FINANCING THE INCREASED BRIDGE LENGTH COSTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 1, 1963. THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST 13 $298,477. THE TOTAL ESTIMATED COST INCLUDING ALL ENGINEERING, EXCEPT FOR INSPECTION AND ADMINISTRATION TO BE DONE BY THE CITY, IS $329,000. PROPOSED FINANCING IS: ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT: $136,000 ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM (COUNTY): 102,500 CITY GAS TAX FUNDS 90,500 TOTAL $329,000 PRESENTLY $170,000 IS BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT NO. 26p- 3397-012 FOR THIS PROJECT. THIS FIGURE INCLUDES $85,000 GAS TAX FUNDS AND $85,000 AHFP FUNDS. WHEN BIDS ARE RECEIVED, IT IS PROPOSED TO SUBMIT A BUDGET AMENDMENT AND A SUPPLE- MENTAL PROJECT STATEMENT AMENDING THE GAS TAX BUDGET. i MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL PAGE 2. SUBJ: REVISED PLANS FOR REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD DATE: 9/11/64 BECAUSE OF THE UNSTABLE FOUNDATION CONDITIONS IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO PLACE THE FILL AT A CONTROLLED RATE AND TO WAIT UNTIL A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF THE ANTICIPATED SETTLEMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE BEFORE PAVING THE NEW ALIGNMENT. THE TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PERIOD MAY BE AS LONG AS 24 MONTHS; HOWEVER, IT 15 HOPED THAT THE ACTUAL TIME NEEDED WILL BE SOMEWHAT LESS. THE PROJECT SHOULD BE COMPLETED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 1965 AND NOVEMBER 1966 DEPENDING ON CONSTRUCTION CONDITIONS AS INDICATED ABOVE. OBERe V CITY MANAGER RC:BBN:vs E ORANGCOUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT N, a, 0220"NE CHIEF ENGINEER Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Public Works Director City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: A o. Box 10,R SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TREPNONE: 547.0547 SW 41%4 4013 WCBT EIGNTN BT. BANTA AIµ CALIFORNIA FILE No. F05.233 San Diego Creek Channel - Jamboree Road Bridge By letter dated August 25, 1964, your office submitted two sets of plans and specifications for the proposed bridge across the San Diego Creek Channel for the realignment of Jamboree Road. A review of the plans indicates their adequacy with respect to geometry and hydraulics. It has not been possible to give the plans a complete structural check because this office does not have in its possession AASHO Standards for pre- stressed deck units. A check with the road department of the County of Orange indicates that these specifications are not available from that source. It is assumed that the adequacy of the structural design will be checked by either, or both, the City of Newport Beach and State Division of Highways. ... Several items have been observed and modification is recommended. On sheet 11, note 1 indicates a date of 1960 for California Division of Highways Standard Specifications. This date probably should be 1964. On sheet 15, it is recommended that full hoop stirrups be provided in the typical slab unit. It is further recommended that in the slab unit detail on sheet 15, the dis- tance from the bottom of the slab unit to the center of gravity of the pre- stressing strands be given. Very truly yours, G H. G. Osb Chief gineer Hco:mn " RECEIVED SEP 8 1964 gDBLIC WORKS DEPT; I LOS ANGELES . CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG PARTNERS I O. J. PORTER & COIYTPANY O. JAMES PORTER K. N. O'BRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS NEWARK NEW JERSEY ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER j ASSOCIATES 510 -91ST STREET JAKE C. YOUNG SACRAMENTO • CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA C. F. GRIGG 679 -0845 C. H. DARBY OTTO M. VIKRE WASHINGTON • D.C. ' J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I. A.) RENO • NEVADA LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949.1960 i Est 31..19& City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Bcalevard Department of Public Works Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Ben Nolan, City Engineer SIJBJEM Revised Cost Estimate, Eamboree Road Relocation. Gentlemen: Attached hereto are four (4) copies of the revised cost estimate reflecting the substitution of item 11, Furnishing Piles, and item 13A, Driving Piles for old item 11, Furnishing and Placing Piles. Very traly yours, PORMS O'BRIEB & ARM IRDNG C. F. Grigg Chief Engineer = /hw Attachments (4) 3 I B HIGHWAYS STRUCTURM •. UTILITIES • OAKS - REPORTS OURYEY/ SKULAW GKOLOOfCAL IRV£6TIOATION6 FOUHOATIONQ i11i814}LATIOtl' .. s� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTjWT Id CITY OF NEWPORT B NO, NIT. DATE ACTION P. W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIF<. $-LS ASST. CITY ENGR. PKG. METER DIV. ELECTRICAL DIV. WATER & SEWER DIV. FIELD ENGINEER CITY MANAGER SECRE 7'ARY REMARKS. r- 0 M AUGUST 25, 1991 MR. H. G. OSDORNE CHIEF ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD DISTRICT P. 0. Box 1078 SANTA ANAp CALIFORNIA SU6JECTt JAMSORCE ROAD BRIDGE AT SAN DIEGO CREEK CHANNEL DEAR SIRI TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR APPROVAL ARE A COST ESTIMATE AND 2 SETS OF PLANS AND SPECIIICATIONS POR TUC REALIGNMENT or JAMBOREE ROAD BETWEEN EASTBLU /I DRIVE AND PALIsADEs ROAD. THE LENGTH Of THE BRIDGE CROSS- INS THE PROPOSED SAN DIEGO CREEK CHANNEL HAS SEEN CHANGED TO 3371 BY USING AN END ABUTMENT DETAIL SUGGESTED 6Y YOUR OF /ICt. UNDER THE TERMS Or THE JOINT POWERS AGREEMENTS THE FLODD CONTROL DISTRICT SNARE Of THE ESTIMATED COST INCLUDING 10% FOR ENGINEERING WOULD BE ABOUT $136 /GOO. YOUR EARLY REVIEW 01 THE PLANS WOULD 6E APPRECIATED. VERY TRULY YOURSS JOSEPH T. DEVLIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ENCL. JiDt88Ntcs PUBLIC AuGusT BD, 19A CITY ATTORNEY PARILIC Wolm kPARTNENT CONTRACT 000010M FAR TRAFF IA Da t 1AMeE I" At EASTBUFF ARI ME AND iD R0S ? + /U//00 (C.0) 1- ATTACNea ARe rouR copies or THE SusxCT Oa vauT root Yom Review AND APPROVAL. If THERE DecumeNTS ARE IN OMPA, PLEAK NCTU NI THE Pawn COPIES To THIS OFFICE POR FURTHER PROCESSING. 1111CN $" ASST. Civil. ENsINEER Wics ATTs• THE IRVINE COMPANY 13042 MYFORD ROAD, POST OFFICE BOX 37, IRVINE,CALIF.92650, LINCOLN 4 -0120 August 20, 1964 Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Nolan: Re: Salt Works Access With reference to your letter of August 12, 1964, we wish to inform you that a new access road to the Salt Works will be completed prior to the construction of Jamboree Road, Very truly yours, A %// , W. R. Mason Vice President WRM:pab AUG j1964 VF� unKS � DEPT Aww w 188 190 1!b As Co Masse 01STROOT Entities Division or "Imaim OISTSICT%T ►. 00 ssw J*, Ttswllfa Almost Los Attoituts Ot CALirlwwloA Arras Mao we 1.. $maps Swa teTs V 11.ORA.lkw w strew PAST + ; JAMM9 MGM RLAL#406 - kAS Stets Tamomf v e no "me MPOWAL an 3 MT* er r"w me socelroeATltwa< rats TML m aeT 1nacT. Tug "Aim Comm Flaw Two Oatoll" 'PLMN Is IN Ltw motwlws Two 1011low To 391 IN Lemma A OLTAILts east tsTlwATt Me LtT II Mniwlw PRO49CY FlwAtlatws WILL rOLLSM lk*MT. Ysvu LAta.T stvlty or Tea: PLAws www a s,►nT Ar►stetATts. YtsT Tafty rslwts# s=wrAwtw se Not" ASST. PWL1C WPM CIKCM owes Air"O r�T PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME T CITY OF NEWPORT 6 NO. IT. DATE ACTION P. W. DIRECTOR AsST. P.W. DIR. z ASST= CITY ENGR. PKG. METER DIV. ELECTRICAL Div. WATER & SEWER DIV. FIELD ENGINEER CITY MANAGER Z SECRETARY a 0. A~T (2s 1964 MR. W. R. MASON THE IRVINE COMPANY P 0 Box 37 iRVINEs CALIFORNIA SUBJECTS SALT WORKS ACCESS DEAN Sls: AS PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED WITH YOUR OrIICC# PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ON JAMOREE ROAD WILL BLOCK ACCESS TO THE SALT WORKS OVER THE ABANDONED PORTION Of BACK BAY DRIVE. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT A NEW ACCESS ROAD BE CONSTRUCTED FROM BACK BAY DRIVE SOUTHEAST Of THE SALT WORKS SO THAT ACCESS TO THE WORKS WILL NOT BE INTERRUPTED. VERY TRULY YOURS, 4� BENJAHiN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BBNics o film i e PAR O'BRIEN & ARMSTAG O. J;;. PORTER & CQMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 4201 SUNSET BOULEVARD • LOS ANGELES 29, CALIFORNIA • NORMANDY 4 -2/ICENO DATE July 30, 1864 /� �T City of Newport Beach Y'�_.. �' OUR 803 -City Hall BAf- TO tjo-a W, Newport Boulevard YOLI? P.O. No. dated.- IQ/80/88 Newport wport Beach, California ROJECT NO. 80.3 't Nolan Attat , r. Bea / COVERING PERIOD M FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: /• Enginswing Service's in Connection wi Design of land ree Road Reallgiostent per agreement Dated October 80, 1868: Item I, SeWon VU1, Page 8 of Agreement: Pee Schedule Design Engineer 70 days ® $79.20 $ 5,544.08 Structural Ergiaeer 68 days ® $76.30 5,188.48 Draftsman .60 days @ $61.$6 $14,881.$Oi + Extra work is not included in Ws invoice but will be billed separately after agreement with Department of Public works. Guaranteed Maximum per Agreement $14, 400.00 (a) 73% of $14,400.00 Y'L 26- 339 -02- $10,800.00 PORTER, O'BRLBN & ARMBTRONG 7 , Richard M. Hudson Partner 0 MR. C. F. GRIaG PORTERS OIBRIEN & ARMSTRONG 510 - 31ST STREET NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR SIRS 0 JUNE 30, 1961 ENCLOSED ARE TWO COPIES OF A LETTER FROM THE COUNTY ROAD DEPART- MENT REGARDING THE PLANS FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT. YOUR COMMENTS ON THE TECHNICAL ITEMS ARE INVITED. I BELIEVE WALTER RUSE MAS ALREADY REVIEWED ITEM 1 REGARDING THE BRIDGE: CROSS SLOPE AND DISCUSSED THE MATTER WITH JOE PENDERGAST. MY FEELING IS THAT THE CONFIGURATION SHOULD REMAIN AS DESIGNED UNLESS THERE ARE SIGNIFICANT ADVANTAGES TO THE CHANGES PROPOSED. VERY TRULY YOURS Jv01�1_ BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ENCL. BBN:vs Newport Harbor Union High School District Newport Harbor High • Costa Mesa High • Corona dal Mar High .1601 16th some, Hrxport smch, California Ts4phoe Wd"y "M OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT June 26, 1964 Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: Your letter of June 25 concerning plans to improve and realign Jamboree Road has been received. Mr. Russell is out of town until the middle of July. I am sure that when he returns he will contact you re- garding the parcel of land this District is considering for a fifth high school site. A map of this site is enclosed herewith. mf encl. Sincerely yours, Mar Fay Secr tary to r. Russell Oil 91d30 SMOM 0116nd V96L Z NK 03.A1303i MAX M. RUSSELL SUCERIRT"DERT a r of A. S. KOCH COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE ASST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR AND SURVEYOR R. B. VAILE W. E. LEWIS DIVISION ENGINEER -OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER M' 1. STORM DONIS BARRETT GNE DIVISION ENEINEER - ENGINEERING pV SIN E95 MANAGER TELEPHONE: 547.0547 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 June 24, 1964 Mr. Joseph Devlin, Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. B. B. Nolan Dear Sir: Re: AHFP #138 Jamboree Road Bayside to Palisades The revised Plans and Specifications for subject project have been reviewed and the following comments are offered for your consideration. With respect to the Plans: 1. Since the Plans were previously approved and the revision particularly concerns the bridge portion, the road plans were re- reviewed and found to be satisfactory. The prime concern on the bridge is the geometric configuration of span 8 for compensation of change in superelevation. The solution shown presents several related difficulties. The deck, by the proposed plan, will be constructed in two planes, spans 1 -7 on 21% super and span 8 on an almost 07. super, while the A.C. is to be smoothly variable from the middle of span 6 to the end of span 8 and beyond. Attainment of the desired surface will be difficult, if not impossible. Also, the height of guard rail with respect to the top of surfacing will not be constant since the pavement thickness will be varying. If the detailing is retained, the elevations of Pier #7 on Sheet 12 should be titled "west end looking east" and "east end looking west" to avoid possible misunderstanding. It is suggested that consideration be given to warping the decks of spans 6, 7, and 8 instead of the scheme shown. This may be accomplished by stepping the pile caps transversely at Piers 6 and 7 and the north abutment, halving the elastomeric bearings, placing the individual units constantly on a 27. super, and using a welded cross tie detail (enclosed) in lieu of the 1 -1/4" rod shown. The final configuration would show warped planes on spans 6, 7, and 8, across which the roadway paving machine could operate City of Newport Beach June 24, 1964 AHFP #138 Page two and produce the desired riding surface. The pile caps would be on the roadway super and widening would produce no difficulties. Cost should be comparable for the structure and possibly cheaper for the paving. The guard rail would be constructed to a constant height above deck unit and result in a constant height above paving surface. 2. With respect to the guard rail details on Sheets 18 and 19, the following questions arise: It seems reasonable to enlarge the base plate bolt -down holes on the pedestrian rail and slot the holes in the 1/4 "x3 "x8" washers to allow for misplacement of bolts during slab construction. Likewise, vertical slotting of the deep beam guard rail post hold -down holes might be desirable. No description of materials andtreatment is evident. Are the posts, bolts, hold -down plates, etc. to be galvanized after fabrication? Are the pedestrian and barrier rails steel or aluminum? With respect to the Special Provisions: 1. The time limit of 280 working days appears most generous considering that suspension of fill operations by the engineer will discontinue the working day count. A four mile stretch of the Newport Freeway was only allowed 275 days, included 11 structures, and was completed in time. Two hundred working days sounds more than sufficient. Since the bridge may well be the time controlling factor, suspension of filling operations and detention of paving should not discontinue count of working days if bridge construction continues. A statement to this effect on Page 14 may satisfy any related questions that may arise. 2. On Page 18, "Maintenance of Traffic ", the statement should be made that compensation is included in other items of work. 3. With respect to piling, it is suggested that the abut- ment piles be pre - drilled through the fills and backfilled with sand to prevent drag due to fill settlement. In such case, jetting would be hard to control and may have to be avoided. Refer to 49 -1.06 of the State Standard Specifications. 4. The minimum pile weight is in excess of 15,000# and consideration of this fact should be made in choosing the hammer energy. It should be in the vicinity of a foot -lb. per lb. of pile. 5. Will cutting of the prestressed piling be detrimental in the event they cannot be driven to cutoff? Conversely, no extension details are shown should extension be necessary. 2 City of Newport Beach AHFP #138 June 24, 1964 Page three 6. The specifications for the bridge proper appear lacking sufficient detailing considering the complexity of the structure (concrete, reinforcing, elastomeric bearings, prestressed units) and the items included in the lump sum price (guard rails,etc.). Enclosed is a copy of bridge specifications which you may review for guidance in expanding this section for better control. With respect to the Estimate: 1. Furnishing and placing piles is generally bid as two separate items to more suitably compensate the contractor for set -up time involved in driving and for additional lengths of piling should such be necessary. The bid items would be furnishing paid for per lin. ft. and driving per each. 2. Although the bridge structure is rather definitely detailed, bidding it at other than a lump sum item has certain advantages. Any necessary change orders can be more easily negotiated. Unit prices are useful future estimating. 3. Several items included in the estimate are not described in the Special Provisions as to specifications or inclusiveness of compensation. These include: 3.Ditch Excavation, 4.Compacting Original Ground, 6.Aggregate Base, 22.Metal Beam Guard Railing, and 23.Guide and Culvert Markers. 4. An Engineers Estimate of cost will be required prior to advertisement. With respect to your request for a three month time extension into the 1964 -65 Fiscal Year for project advertisement: On June 10, the Technical Staff met for consideration of requested advertisement extensions. It was their general con- clusion that unless a situation completely out of the control of a city arose, ample time was afforded in any fiscal year for project design and advertisement. This project under discussion has been allocated funds from AHFP for approximately two and one -half years. Advertisement was accomplished within the fiscal year allocation was made, but cancelled when revision to the bridge plans was necessary. It is unreasonable, however, to expect that the revision would take longer than the original design and fail to be completed within a year. The City appears to have shirked its responsibility of pressing its consultants to completion within the allotted time. If conditions other than this exist, please enlighten us. Nevertheless, the request for extension has been approved in consideration of the fact that Plans and Specifications have been completed and advertisement is pending only review by participating agencies. 3 City of Newport Beach June 24, 1964 AHFP #138 Page four Upon reply to this letter, and the necessary corrections to Plans and Specifications, processing of the project to advertisement will be continued. ASK:JWP:sh Atts. 2 cc: W. Zaun RECEIVED JUN 2 9 1964 Very truly your , . S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor PUBLIC WOI`S DEPT. 4 LOB ANGELES . CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG PARTNERS O. J. PORTER & COMPANY O. JAMES PORTER NEWARK NEYI'ERSEY K. H. 0 BRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER SACRAMENTO • CgLI 10-31 STREET ASSOCIATES FORBfR NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA JAKE G. YOUNG C. F. GRIGG IOO 673 -084$ C. H. DARBY WABXIN GTON p. C. OTTO M. VIRRE J. F. WHITE (A. LA.) W. J. WAGNER RENO NEVADA V. J. SPOTTS (A.I. A.) LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949.1980 YUAe i8s 1964 Mr. Joe Pendergast Orange County Bead Department 48g West Eighth street Santa Ana, California Dear Mr. Pendergast( Following our telephone conversation this maraing with respect to the revision of vertical control of prestressed concrete units in span 8 (between pier no. 7 and tarth abutment) . I have examined the situation very carefully and came up with the following conclusions( 1. Cost - (wise, your proposed revision in the span referred to above will be somewhat more expensive than the original layout. 2. Structurally, the proposed stepped -up north face of pier no. 7 will be hard to construct because of the flat cross slope at north abutment (840.87S%). Such stepped -up rise will be limited to approximately 3/8 -inch * per 4 -foot 0 -inch of Siv -21 X 48 prestressed concrete units. It will also create a discontinuity of slastomeric bearing pads between two adjacent units, as proposed in original layout. 3. A complete change from 1 -1/4 -inch 0 steel tie rods, to fiat shear plates for tieing the units together will result in higher cost per square foot of unit area for additional fabrication and embedment of am* units. Amount of required field welds with such a layout is also objeadflNSableo so for as the total cost of structure is concerned. it is, therefore, recommended that present layout and details will be retained without any modifications, unless it will be proven that such a change will result in considerable money savings for the client or will simplify the construction. AIRPORTS . N/GNWAY5 . STRUCTURES . UTILITIES - DAMS . REPORTS . SURVEYS - -OIL. AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS FOUNDATIONS AND STABILIZATION lip r4 of Mr. Too pondwgast 0r4A9* COURIty ROM Department jape 18, 1964 Page Two. At Wesemo it Is assumed that the afttional weight of excess awfacing will mat result in my "agwme OW1094 on either the fdlo cap membw or PlIes, and, therefore, had been neglected in amputations. Very truly yours, Walter Russ senior Dess► Zn9lueer wRthp N CC: Mr. Ben Nolan, Cityftgumu Newport Beach, California PORTER. O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG MR. A. S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER 400 WEST STN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ATTENTIONS W. JOE PENDERGAST L .PINE 16, 1964 SUBJECTS AHFP PROJECT 138, JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT, REVISED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS DEAR SIRS TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND APPROVAL ARE 3 SETS OF THE SUB- JECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE FINAL COST ESTIMATE IS BEING PREPARED AND WILL BE FORWARDED SHORTLY. THE ONLY MAJOR CHANGE 15 THE LENGTHENING OF THE BRIDGE TO ACCOMODATE THE ULTIMATE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND WIDENING OF THE BRIDGE TO PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN WAY. THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT HAS AGREED TO PAY THE COST Of LENGTHENING THE BRIDGE. APPROVAL OF THE PLANS BY THE STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS AND THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 13 ALSO REQUIRED. IN ORDER TO SECURE TIME TO OBTAIN THESE APPROVALS, IT IS REQUESTED THAT A THREE -MONTH EXTENSION Of TIME TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS BE GRANTED. ENCLa. BON:vR VERY TRULY YOURS, A7 BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST• PUBLIC WORK& DIRECTOR LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG PARTNERS j O. J. PORTER & COMPANY O. JAMES PORTER N. H. O'BRIEN CONSULTING ENGINEERS NHWARK NEW JERSEY ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER ASSOCIATES 510 -31ST STREET JAKE C. YOUNG SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH• CALIFORNIA C. F. GR1GG 673 -0545 C. H. DARBY OTTO M. VIKRE WASHINGTON D.C. J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A.I. A.) RENO • NEVADA LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949.1960 Nay 6, 1964 Mr. J. Devlon Public Noss Director city Ran Nevport Desch, California Attention: llr. Hen Nolan SUHdM: Our Job &19 lientlown: Here are three copies of our limy 69 1964 ftglseor* Estimate for the Jamboree Road Realignment, Eastbluff Drive to Palisades Road, Revised First Contract. Rgsee sets of glans, dated 5 -6-64, for this ease contract are being suWitted amier seperate cover for your review sad cements. cvY(IAY 11 7 `tM) NF8:v1 Eaclostaes Very trwT yours., mm PM AIRPORTS - HIGHWAYS STRUCTURES • UTILITIES DAMS REPORTS SURVEYS -SOIL AND.GEOL001GL INY68TIaATIONS - FOUNDATION= STAftLuw ON PORTER, O'BRIEN &FA ONLY Consufffng Engineers ' ►�- Y' NEWPORT BEACH • CALIFORNIA PROJECT NO. 6019 ESTIMATE FOR SHEET? OF L JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGMIM BY REL & WFS Eastbluff Drive to Palisades Road DATE 5 -6 -64 114. i..A F4...+ /inn +.n+ NO. BID ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Clearing and Grubbing Lump Sum 31500-00 2 Roadvay Excavating 75,000 C.T. 0.80 60,000.00 3 Structure Excavation. 352 C.Z. 1.50 528.00 4 Structure Backfill 277 C.T. 3.00 831.00 Ditch Excavation 200 C.Z. 1.00 200.00 6 Compactin Original Ground •8 200 S.T. 0.10 820.00 Imported Sand Borrow 17,000 C.T. 0.90 15,300-00 8 Aggregate Base 41620 Ton 3.50 167170.00 Li id Asphalt MC -1 18 Ton 45.00 810.00, 10 Asphaltic Emulsion RS -1 17 Ton 60.00 1.020.00 11 As haltic Coacrete 2,180 Ton 8.00 17 440.00 12 Placing A. C. Ditches 2,17-9-- L.F. 0.20 434.00 13 1 Furnishing and Placing P1 14 San Diego Creek Brid slim 11 000 15 Special Drop Inlets Each 150.00 16 18" R.C.P. 60 L.F. 16.00 7 360.00 17 24" C.M.P. 280 L.F. 20.00 5,600.00 18 12" C.M.P. Down in 65 L.F. 5.00 20.00 19 Downdrain Entrance'Tapers Nj 3 Each 65.o0 195.00 20 c Downdrain Slip Joints V I Each 35.00 105.00 21 Dovndrain Anchor Assemb ies 3 Each 45.00 135.00 22 Metal Beam Guard Railing 260 L.F. 5.00 1,300-00 23 Guide and Culvert Markers 29 Each 10.00 290.00 24 Setting Road Signs 10 Each 15.00 150-00 25 Removing Traffic Stripes 200 L.F. 0.10 20.00 26 Modifying Manhole L S 100.00 27 Septic Tank System L s4m 900.00 28 Construction Surveys Lum3. 4 000.00 TOTAL 300,028.00 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT G/ 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD DATE �rIL tl„ i To: Nn. A. kNg RKAULT JAN& M. ftwaO1RRY* INC. 535 t. WALIpIT PAOAOtNAi CALI►ORNIA j ATTENTION: SUBJECT: 18" W091t Lout Ow Ikw JANOORtt ROAD Boom Onts SAN Ditto CRtts how CONTROL CNANNtL WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FMLOWI.NO: N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION LSTTKN REMARKS: [*CLOW* /011 YOUR INIORNATION li A COPY Of A LtTnO IRON PORTtRo O�ORItN & ARNOTRORO RLOAROINO lYMORTt Ian Tilt mjtgT MATtR Llllt. COPIES TO: BY` v / w • Sawmill i. NOLAN Am. CITY t1101Nten Cam) LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA PORTER, O'B R I EN & ARMSTRONG PARTNERS O. J. PORTER & COMPANY D. JAMES NTER K. H. O'BR(EIEN NEWARK • NEW JERSEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER ASSOCIATES 510 -31ST STREET JAKE C. YOUNG SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA C. F. GRIOG 673 -0845 C. H. DARGY OTTO M. VIKRE WASHINGTON D.C. J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I. A.) RENO • NEVADA LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949 -1960 April 1T, 1964 Department of Public Yorks City Ball 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Bea Nelan Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Bracket Supports for an 18" ID Mortar Lined hater Main Pipe 0 Nast Edge of Sea Diego Creek Bridge Complying with the request by City of Newport Beach, this office has developed bracket supports for water pipeline referred to above which will satisfy the following conditions: 1. The horizontal clearance from vertical face of exterior deck waits will be adequate for a 20" OD steel welded pipe with a 1/4" shell thickness. 2. Distance between individual bracket supports is limited to 15' -0" ma:irmffi. 3. The longitudinal grade of pipe center line will be identical with the grade of bridge deck with an spex (high point near of Pier No. 2. 4. Terminal brackets 0 the end of the bridge will not allow any chang&ln either horizontal or vertical directions of the proposed pipeline. If such changes will be required by final layout, separate concrete block anchors shall be.provided past the ends of bridge strueture, to prevent possible horizontal water pressure thrust on abutment pile groups. AIRPORTS - HIGHWAYS - STRUCTURES - UTILITIES - DAMS - REPORTS - SURVEYS Department of Public Works Newport Beach, California April 1T, 1964 Page !so 5. Concrete block anchors past the ends of bridge structure are required iX expansion points are located "Y911sere through the length of bridge structure. 6. Be provisions had been made for supports of the following items: a. Air -relief valve b. Check valve c. Enka! -off gate valve Of these three items listed above the air relief valve should be located at Pier No. 2 vbile chock and gate valves should be located off of the bridge. the above restrictions on the pipe line design in order to avoid overstressing the bridge structure should be brought to the attention of your engineers. CFG /vl very truly you" C. F. i" Chief Engineer PORTER. O'BRIEN 4 ARMSTRONG r MR. W. F. STEVLINGlON PORTER, O'BRIEN AND ARMSTRONG 510 - 31ST STREET NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA APR w I* 1964 SUBJECTI JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT, 18" MATER LINE oN BRIDGE DEAR SIRS THE ENCL :•890 PRINTS HAVE BEEN MARKED TO INDICATE THE 7RIP- VISION WHICH SHOULD BE MADE IN THE BRIDGE DESIGN TO ACt41111► DATE THE FUTURE 18° WATER LINE CROSSING- As PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED VERSALLY, THE GAS COMPANY NAB RE- QUESTED THAT PROVISION ALSO BE MADE FOR A 12" GAS LINE CROSSING. A SIMILAR SUPPORT DETAIL ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF THE BRIDGE WOULD PROBABLY BE APPROPRIATE. VERY TRULY YOURS, 14 ;1 BENJAMIN 3, NOLAN ASST. CITY ENGINEER ENCLS. BBN:VR Subject: Pipeline Crossing - San Diego Creek Bridge Dear Mr. Nolan: At your request, we have considered the requirements for installing an 18 -inch diameter pipeline on the proposed San Diego Creek Bridge. We have marked up one set of drawings prepared by Porter, O'Brien and Armstrong and have enclosed them for your review. Also enclosed is a sketch showing details of the proposed pipe support. Although not indicated on the sketch, the pipe crossing would have sleeve - type couplings and also would be allowed to move slightly through the sup- porting brackets. We assume that you feel it would be more appropriate to spend time on these details when the actual pipeline design is undertaken. In accordance with your verbal instructions, we will bill for this work on the basis of our standard hourly rates, which are listed below: Principal Senior Engineer Engineer Engineering Geologist Senior Designer Designer Draftsman $25.00 per man -hour 16.00 12.50 n n n 12.00 11.00 " 10.00 " 8.50 N N N If you have any questions, or do require additional details, please contact me. Very truly yours, JAMES Mp MONTGOMERY Consu `king Engin , Inc. A. Gene Rheault AGR/mjs Enclosures 4o.28 RECEIVED MAD ,.,c4 ..I RUM nva:i6b:: &T. R E P O R T — V A L U A T I O N S S ­FLANS A N D 8 P E C 1 F 1 C A T 1 O N 8 1. 1 S U P E R V 1 E 1 O N J el w JAMES M. MONTGOMERY, OONGULTING ENGINEERIS, INC. - SSS EAST WALNUT STREET, PASADENA, CJ.LIFORH IA 91101 - TELEPHO N E8: 795.7129 AND 881.8819 JAMES M. MONTGOMERY JOHN R. FEE RUSSELL C. KENMIR R. DEWEY DICKSON March �/ /1� 1'YLL cll 21 , 19V4 WILLIAM W. AULTMAN WILLIAM J. CARROLL. JR. KENNETH 1. MULLEN A. GENE RHEAULT EARL E. WAGNER PAUL Y. HENNESSY WILLIAM D. MATHIS WILFRIED F. LANGER �, / M . Benjamin B. Nolan WILLIAM H. BLACKMER PETER G. RINOEI9 Public Works Department BRIAN STONE RICHARD D 8. HOLMGREN, JR. PHI LIP OATBOULIB WATKINS. JR. ALAN JACK City of Newport Beach EDWARD A. A BANN DU WAYNE R. LICKS 3300 West Newport Boulevard JOHN E. WARD CARLOS M. CAMPUZANO Newport Beach, California Subject: Pipeline Crossing - San Diego Creek Bridge Dear Mr. Nolan: At your request, we have considered the requirements for installing an 18 -inch diameter pipeline on the proposed San Diego Creek Bridge. We have marked up one set of drawings prepared by Porter, O'Brien and Armstrong and have enclosed them for your review. Also enclosed is a sketch showing details of the proposed pipe support. Although not indicated on the sketch, the pipe crossing would have sleeve - type couplings and also would be allowed to move slightly through the sup- porting brackets. We assume that you feel it would be more appropriate to spend time on these details when the actual pipeline design is undertaken. In accordance with your verbal instructions, we will bill for this work on the basis of our standard hourly rates, which are listed below: Principal Senior Engineer Engineer Engineering Geologist Senior Designer Designer Draftsman $25.00 per man -hour 16.00 12.50 n n n 12.00 11.00 " 10.00 " 8.50 N N N If you have any questions, or do require additional details, please contact me. Very truly yours, JAMES Mp MONTGOMERY Consu `king Engin , Inc. A. Gene Rheault AGR/mjs Enclosures 4o.28 RECEIVED MAD ,.,c4 ..I RUM nva:i6b:: &T. R E P O R T — V A L U A T I O N S S ­FLANS A N D 8 P E C 1 F 1 C A T 1 O N 8 1. 1 S U P E R V 1 E 1 O N PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT r CITY OF NEWPORT BEA� ND. INIT. DATE ACTION P. W. DIRECTOR Ass T. P.W. Di R. —u- ASST. CITY ENGR. -13 PKG. METER DIV- ELECTRICAL Div. - WATER & SEWER DIV• FIELD ENGINEER CITY MANAGER (:3 DISECRETAIlY �L�C -gi7 SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANYOF CALI FOR NIA ORANGE COUNTY DIVISION • P. O. BOX 1310 • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA JUSTIN M. KENNEDY DIVISION MANAG JR March 19, 1964 4, 'Y City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California ATTENTION- Mr. Nolan Dear Sir. We propose to install a 1211 gas line in Jamboree Road between Palisades and Beto. This will require an in- stallation on your proposed bridge on Jamboree Road. We request that provision for this line be included in your design. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely H. M. Kemmerer Distribution Supervisor RECEIVED MAR 2 0 1964 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. / e . CITY OF NEWPORT BEAfti °" PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (/) 3300 W. NEWPORT BQULCVARO TO: PO"TRRj, 018R1RN & Ammon DATE ,b /A 510 • 31111T STRR[T NCMVOMT kAC ", CALI /OmMtA ATTENTION: MR, W. fr. .STRWL INS"N SUBJECT: JAMORCC RrAY RRALIOMMT WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION 3 POIMTi LAC" Of tIKLTt 8, 14 Am 15 N CASTIMILINI IMi+ROUNIENT ►LAMB REMARKS: FOR TOyM Y!R too ratmi TIO" Of T"C JAmongR ROAD NA""i COPIES TO: BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTM� CITY OF NEWPORT BEA NO. INIT. DATE ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR AsST. P.W. DIR. ENGINEERING Div. TRAFFIC Div. WATER &.SEWER Div. FIELD ENGINEER ELECTRICAL Div. SECRETARY l REMARKS: �� /.PWI! � Director of Public Works City of Nevport Beach City Hall 3300 hest Nevport Blvd., Newport Beach, California Attention: Yr. Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant City Engineer Gentlemen: SUBJM: Progress Schedule - Realigsment of Jamboree Road Our Job No. 6019 In answer to your inquiry ve anticipate submittal of the final plans and specifications for the subject contract on or before )larch 15, 1964. Delay was encountered due to lack of information concerning plans for the flood control ehannel at and devastream of the bridge. This information still bas not been received. We also encountered delay in reviewing pile foundations due to encountering cobbles in the first of the new boringae Very truly yours, v ` s7 co F. Griggg RECEIVED FEB 331964 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CFG /bep AIRPORTS HIGHWAYS - GTRUCTYI¢S,. UT1LR11911 , p IUj6- �..J144 ' PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA PARTNERS O. J. PORTER &COMPANY O. JAMES N. H. O•BRIEN ?'.: _. .;NEWARK • NEW JERSEY CONSULTING ENGINEERS ELLIS L. ANMSTNONIE-' _ JAMES R. PORTER 5tO -91ST STREET ASSOCIATES SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA JANE C. YOUNG C. F. GRIGG 879 -085 C. H. DARBY WASHINGTON • D.C. OTTO M. VIVRE J. F. WHITE (A.I.A.) W. J. WAGNER V. J. SPOTTS (A. I. A.) RENO • NEVAOA LEONARD C. URQUHART 1949.1960 February 12, 1961 Director of Public Works City of Nevport Beach City Hall 3300 hest Nevport Blvd., Newport Beach, California Attention: Yr. Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant City Engineer Gentlemen: SUBJM: Progress Schedule - Realigsment of Jamboree Road Our Job No. 6019 In answer to your inquiry ve anticipate submittal of the final plans and specifications for the subject contract on or before )larch 15, 1964. Delay was encountered due to lack of information concerning plans for the flood control ehannel at and devastream of the bridge. This information still bas not been received. We also encountered delay in reviewing pile foundations due to encountering cobbles in the first of the new boringae Very truly yours, v ` s7 co F. Griggg RECEIVED FEB 331964 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. CFG /bep AIRPORTS HIGHWAYS - GTRUCTYI¢S,. UT1LR11911 , p IUj6- �..J144 i p JANUARY 27, 1964 MR. C. F. GR16G PORTER, OIBRIEN & ARMSTRBNG 510 - 3187 STREET NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT DEAR CORKY: IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF YOU COULD PROVIDE Us WITH A WRITTEN SCHEDULE ON THE REVISION OF THE PLANS. WE ANTICIPATE $ONE PRESSURE FROM THE COUNTY TO EX►EDITE EXPENDITURE GF THE AHFP FUNDS. VERY TRULY YOURS, ,�el X//,/� BENJAMIN B. NOLAN AssT. CITY ENGINEER BBN:vs