The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutC-847(C) - Jamboree Road Realignment between Pacific Coast Highway and Palisades Road (1966)l OcecMBCR 30, 1966 Coxco, INC. P. 0. DRAWER C STANTON, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. J. R. ELLCXSON CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR SUDJECTS JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (CAT) CHANGE ORDER N0. 7 GENTLENENS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR 60NSIDERATION ARC THE ORIGINAL AND SIX COPIES Of CHANGE ORDER N0. 7 FOR SUBJECT CONTRACT. PLEASE RETURN THE ORIGINAL AND THREE COPIES TO THIS OFFICE AFTCR EXECUTION. UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY OP THE PLAN FOR REMEDIAL WORK, PREPARED BY MR. WILLIAM F. LEVER, THE WORK MAY PROCECD. If THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE FORM Of THE CHANGE ORDER, OR THE COMPUTATION OF THE DOLLAR AMOUNTS SHOWN THEREON, PLEASE CALL ME AT 673 - 2110, EXTENSION 26. VCRY TRULY YOURS, 16 KENNETH L. PERRY ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KLP:IH ENCLS: CC: RoCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP 13440 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIf. BAKER, FARNHAM & BEGAN 3610 LONG BEACH BLVD., LONG BEACH, CALIF. 0 WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER 304 E. PACIFIC COAST HWY. LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA. 80813 TELEPHONE 43$8311 December 29 1966 Mr. Kenneth L. Perry, Assistant City Engineer, City of Newport Beach, City Hall, 3300 W. Newport Blvd. , Newport Beach, California 92660. Dear Mr. Perry : 0 jamboree Road Bridge. C - 847 In reply to your letter of December 23 1966, I have made the changes requested and enclose one copy of Drawing No. R - 5086 - S for your approval. The requested list of bridges has been addressed separately to the City Engineer. WF L /gl xc : Rockwin, with print. Yours very truly, William F. Lever. R E C E I V F D DEC 3 0 1966 PUBLIC WORKS DtPT. C- 847(C) See Contract File for Remedial Work at Jamboree Road Bridge BAKER, FARNHAM & BEGAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW JAMES J. BAKER DANIEL W. FARNHAM WILLIAM O. BEGAN AREA CODE 213 TELEPHONE 426 -7155 3610 LONG BEACH BOULEVARD December 28, 1966 LONG BEACH ], CALIFORNIA Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT C -847 Rockwin Job No. 7249 Dear Mr. Nolan: As you will recall, we are attorneys for Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation with regard to the Jamboree Road Bridge contract. We are in possession of copies of Assistant City Engineer Perry's letter of December 23, 1966, to Consulting Engineer William F. Lever and the State Division of Highway's letter to you of December 19, 1966, both relating approval of Mr. Lever's plans and specifications for the reme- dial work on Jamboree Road Bridge. The minor proposed changes to the plans contained therein are acceptable and will be incorporated into the plans. With respect to the procedural accomplishment of the modifications, and in accordance with our previous telephone discussion with Mr. Seymour, we request that a Change Order be issued which will serve as authoriza- tion to Rockwin to proceed with the remedial work in accordance with the approved calculations, plans and specifications of the Consulting Engineer. The foregoing is to be done with the understanding that the cost of the remedial work is to be assumed by the contractor and that upon determina- tion of the monetary quantities by which the contract price is to be reduced, a supplemental change order specifying these amounts will be issued. As indicated by the analysis of the State Division of Highway's Engineering Department, we believe that the proposed corrective measures and plans demonstrate a conscientious and effective remedial engineering effort by Rockwin. We have advised our client to proceed forthwith to accomplish the same upon approval by the procedural method specified herein or some similar method. This will permit the bridge engineering and remedial construction work to be completed with the cost thereof being borne by Rockwin. However, all monetary adjustments, such as for elimination of asphaltic concrete wearing surfaces, credit to the City for the cost to be incurred by equivalent construction allowance for future bridge widening, 0 Mr. Benjamin Nolan Page 2 December 28, 1966 41 etc., will occur by supplemental change order. If you have any question concerning this matter, please call so that we can determine what further action is necessary to resolve this question. Very truly yours, BAKER, FARNHAM & BEGAN BY G✓� // " -i iam Began WDB -gsm CC Tully H. Seymour, Esq. City Attorney City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Coxco, Inc. P. O. Drawer C Stanton, California Mr. Lloyd A. Compton Vice - President Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation 13440 East Imperial Highway Santa Fe Springs, California Mr. William F. Lever Consulting Engineer 304 East Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, California Mr. Russell A. Bergemann Secretary Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation P. O. Box 429 Baldwin Park, California RECEIVEDO' DEC 2' D96fi ULPT: DECEMBER 23, 1966 MR. WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER 344 EAST PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LONG BEACM0 CALIFORNIA SUBJECTS JAMBOREE ROAD BR10GE (C-&7) DEAR SIRL ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND A COPY OF THE STATES LETTER OF APPROVAL FOR REMEDIAL WORK ON THE JAmoREE RoAD BRIDGE. TWO RELATIVELY MINOR CHANGES TO THE PLAN ARE REQUESTED. ALSO ENCLOSED IS A COPY OF THE PLAN WHICH SHOWS THE CHANGES REQUESTED BY THE STATE. PLEASE MAKE THESE CORRECTIONS TO THE TRACINGS AND SUBMIT A COPY TO THIS OFFICE FOR APPROVAL. IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU ADD A CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH TITLE BLOCK AND THE NUMBER R -J08-S TO TIC PLAN. THIS CAN BE 14001FIED SLIGHTLY TO FIT AVAILABLE SPACE BUT SHOULD FOLLOW CLOSELY THE ENCLOSED EXAMPLE, AS DISCUSSED WITH YOU ON THE TELEPHONES IT IS ALSO REQUESTED THAT YOU FURNISH TO THE CITY ENGINEER A LIST OF THE MAJOR BRIDGES THAT YOU HAVE DESIGNED OR HAVE WORKED ON IN THE PAST. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ME. VERY TRULY YOURSO 0 KENNETH L. PERRY ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KLP:IH ENCL81 3 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA — HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 P. 0. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054 620 -3700 December 19, 1966 07- Ora- 0-NptB SS Project 38(l) (Section 2107 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: Plans and specifications for the remedial work on Jamboree Road Bridge in Newport Beach are approved. The plans show that a conscientiously detailed effort has been made to correct the prob- lem of the floating sonovoids. Considering the various factors involved, this general type of corrective work may be the only acceptable procedure. While it is a matter of individual judgment as to whether an equivalent struc- ture will be provided, we feel that this remedial work should not be considered as being a guarantee against the City having to do some future work on the structure. We have not had experience with remedial work of this type and are thus unable to say whether or not a potential would exist for cracks or small spalls to form in the concrete deck slab. Only the passage of time will tell. The enclosed plans show two comments in red pencil for the City's consideration, We suggest that some type of reinforcing steel arrangement be used at the upper corners of the transverse expansion joints. Also, in order to help hold the transverse expansion joint filler in proper position, the City may choose to insert it between the existing prestressed units. We understand the cost of this remedial work is to be borne by the contractor and not financed with gas tax funds. V t C E I V E D uc 221966 Enc. PUBUG WORKS DEPT. Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer A. A. SMITH Assistant District Engineer H. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER 0 • C - (�emc0 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT P. o. Box 1078 BANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: 634 -2300 400 WEST EIGHTH ST. AREA CODE 714 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, 92702 1966 FILE No. F05.23 Mr. Benjamin Nolan Assistant Public Works Director City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: The plans and specifications transmitted with your letter of November 17, 1966 in regard to the concrete protective slab over the prestressed deck units have been reviewed by this office. The district concurs in your corrective measures to remedy the problem caused by floating sonovoids in the Jamboree Road bridge prestress deck units, subject to your also obtaining State Division of Highways approv- al. JWS/gp Very truly yours, % � ,� H. G. Osborne, C ie Engineer GAG � .166 p��1G Vu��n1�a UtPS. MR• .46S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR 40o W 8TH STREET SANTA AMA, CALIFORNIA ATTENTIONt MR. WENDELL HARTMAN SUBJECTS JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C.847)j BRIDGE DEAR SIR: FOR YOUR INFORMATION THE TOTAL CO3T OF THE SUBJECT BRIDG: STRUCTURE 19 AS FOLLOWSS (f - S "? <Aaq,) NOVEMBER 290 1966 CONTRACT ITEM DESCRIPTION COST 11 FURNISHING PILES 437! 9.76 IIA DRIVING PILES 29.00 12 BRIDGE 127.6w.00 11194-P949-76 TOTAL CONTRACT COST 11 DESIGN, INSPECTION, AND TESTING COSTS. (ESTIMATED AT 10% of CONSTRACT COST• FINAL DETERMINATION CANNOT BE A0E UNTIL CONCLUSION OF THE PROJECT). I 190494.A TOTAL 4214,444.76 THE SNARE OF THE A.H.F.P. FOR THE BRIDGE STRUCTURE IB 1 x 80336 x 4214,444.76 - $25,529.13. VERY TRULY YOURS, G BCNJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KLPINAJ November 25, 1966 Re: AHFP #138 Jamboree Road - Bayside Drive to Palisades Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: Reference is made to subject project and to your letter dated November 18, 1966. Our letters dated August 23, 1966 and October 3, 1966 stated that AHFP participation in the Jamboree Road Bridge would be completely withdrawn. Since your office is in complete control of the project, you are in a much better position than we are to determine the amount of available funds from the various agencies. When the final accounting is submitted for this project, all construction items pertaining to the bridge will.- -have to be shown as ineligible items. Very truly y�s, . S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor ASR:WLH:mr of Nov PuBt .�, _ ($RID6E) A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSI OREN AND COUNTY SURVEYOR L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE i C> F= PSS T. ROAD COMMISSIONER OEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR A.. SURVEYOR R. B. VAILE W. L. Z4UN DIVISION ENGINEER -OPERATIONS REFUSE OISPOS.L ENGINEER NGE M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT OI VI SIGN ENGINEER - ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFEICER TELEPHONE: 934 -3456 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 0TH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 November 25, 1966 Re: AHFP #138 Jamboree Road - Bayside Drive to Palisades Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: Reference is made to subject project and to your letter dated November 18, 1966. Our letters dated August 23, 1966 and October 3, 1966 stated that AHFP participation in the Jamboree Road Bridge would be completely withdrawn. Since your office is in complete control of the project, you are in a much better position than we are to determine the amount of available funds from the various agencies. When the final accounting is submitted for this project, all construction items pertaining to the bridge will.- -have to be shown as ineligible items. Very truly y�s, . S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor ASR:WLH:mr of Nov PuBt .�, _ PUBLIC WORKS Nov. 22, 1966 CITY ATTORNEY PUBLIC Womxs DEPARTMENT REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD (C.847); BRIDGE THE BRIDGE DECK UNITS ON THE SUBJECT PROJECT HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN A FAULTY MANNER. THE CITY REOUESTEO THAT THE CONTRACTOR REPLACE THE DEFECTIVE U911730 AND THE CONTRACTOR COUNTERED WITH A PROPOSAL THAT ME BE ALLOWED TO REPAIR THE EXISTING DECK UNITS BY INSTALLING A REINFORCE* CONCRETE SLAB OVER THE DEFECTIVE UNITS. THE METHOD OF REPAIRING THE DEFECTS IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND ALL OF THE OTHER PARTICIPATING PUBLIC AGENCIES EXCEPT THE ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM (A.H.F.P.). THE CONTRACTOR IS WILLING TO REPAIR THE BRIDGE AS PROPOSEDS IN ADDITION TO REDUCING THE CONTRACT PRICE TO COMPENSATE THE CITY FOR TWO ADDITIONAL COSTS THAT WOULD BE INCURRED BY ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROPOSAL: A. THE ADDITIONALODST TO CONSTRUCT A FUTURE THIRD LANE 4•INCNES THICKER THAN THAT SHOWN /N THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. THE ESTIMATED COST OF TNIS #TEN IS ESTIMATED TO BE 45,700. B. THE AMOUNT OF PARTICIPATION BEING WITHDRAWN BY THE A.H.F.P. THE EXACT AMOUNT HAS NOT BEEN DETERMINED AS YET BY YHE A.H.F.P.p BUT IT MAY BE ANYWHERE BETWEEN $100000 AND "pOOO. ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A DRAFT COPY OF THE PROPOSED CHANGE ORDER WHICH WE INTEND TO SEND TO THE CONTRACTOR. KENNETH L. PERRY ASST. CITY ENGINEER KLP:NAJ ENCLt Fl� a NovEMSER 21a 1966 CO #OO INC. P.O. DRAWER C STANTONO CALITORNIA ATTENTIONt MR. J.R. ELLEXWN CONTRACTS ADMINISTRATOR SuRJECTs JANBoREE RoAo REALIOMIK MT (C -847) GENTLENKNS YOUR LETTER M Novcmcn 170 19660 CALLING OUR ATTENTION TO AN ARITHMETICAL ERROR Of $100 IN YOUR LAST PROGRESS ►AYIK NT HAS SEEN RECEIVED* THE SHORTAGE WILL SE CORRECTED ON YOUR NEXT MONTHLY PROGRESS PAYMENT* VERY TRULY YOuR80 q KENNETH L. PERRY ASST* CITY ENGINEER CCt FINANCE DEPARTMENT KLP:UAJ 0 NOVEMBER 18, 1966 MR. A.C. BIRNIE DEPUTY DISTRICT ENGINEER DIvIs1oN of HIGHWAYS P.O. BOX 2301/ TERMINAL ANNE11 Los ANGELESS CALIFORNIA,, 9004 ATTENTION: MR. A.A. SMITH SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C -07): BRIDGE DEAR SIR: ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REVIEW IS A COPY OF THE PLANS AND SPECI- FICATION FOR REMEDIAL WORK FOR REPAIR OF DEFECTS TO THE DECK UNITS OF THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE. THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS WERE PREPARED OY MR. WILLIAM F. LEVERS STRUCTURAL ENGINEEIIp AT THE REQUEST OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE BASICALLY THE SANE AS APPROVED IN PRINCIPLE BY THE MIDGE CITY AND COUNTY PROJECTS ENGINEER W.C. KI£DAISCH ON AUGUST 220 19a. IN THE INTEREST OF COMPLETING THE PROJECT AS SPON AS POSSIBLE YOUR EARLY REVIEW IS REQUESTED. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONSs PLZASE CALL KENNETH L. FERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KLP:NAJ ENC0 r� 0 NOVEMBER 18, 1966 MR. A.S. KoCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER W. 8TH STREET ATTENTIONS MR. WENDELL HARTMAN SUBJECTS JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C -847); BRIDGE DEAR SIRS IT IS PLANNED TO PROCEED WITH THE REPAIR OF THE DEFECTIVE BRIDGE DECK UNITS USING THE GENERAL METHOD PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR OF CONSTRUCTING A REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB OF 4- INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS OVER THE EXISTING DECK. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ABSORB THE ROAD DEPARTMENTS PARTICIPATION IN THE COST OF THE STRUCTURE. BEFORE A CHANGE ORDER CAN BE ISSUED TO THE CONTRACTOR COVERING THE ABDUCTION IN COSTS IT IS NECESSARY TO KNOW THE DOLLAR AMOUNT OF PARTICIPATION THAT IS BEING WITHDRAWN. IN THE INTEREST OF COMPLETING THE PROJECTp IT IS REQUESTED THAT A DETERMINATIO OF THE AMOUNT BE MADE AS SOON AS PASSIBLE AND FURNISHED TO THIS OFFICE. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONSp PLEASE CONTACT KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS 4� BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KLP:MAJ TELEPHONER: 0 0 IACxsoN 7 -5126 COXCO, INC. TWwoA s 3 -2604 Cox Bros. Construction Co. P' 0. DMW R C KNOTT AND RATEL ROADS STANTON COMNOE=UNTY), CALIFORNIA November 17, 1966 City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Att: Accounts payable disbursements Gentlemen: We are in receipt of your check in the amount of $6, 683. 10 made in partial payment of progress under contract No. 847 - Jamboree Road Realignment. We note that the estimate prepared by the Public Works Department contains an arithmetical error of $100, 00. This error occurs in subtracting the 1010 retention and previous payments from the amount earned to date. The balance due should be $6, 783. 10. appreciated. Your check for the difference will be Very truly yours, s COXCO, 113G✓ By jZontracts Administrator ^ A. S. Cos .. . PHRnmsrn M. A. Cox ..... vr=-PREE. R. D. COX . VICE -PREE: TREAE. We are in receipt of your check in the amount of $6, 683. 10 made in partial payment of progress under contract No. 847 - Jamboree Road Realignment. We note that the estimate prepared by the Public Works Department contains an arithmetical error of $100, 00. This error occurs in subtracting the 1010 retention and previous payments from the amount earned to date. The balance due should be $6, 783. 10. appreciated. Your check for the difference will be Very truly yours, s COXCO, 113G✓ By jZontracts Administrator 0 0 NOVEMBER 17, 1966 ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. H.G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER SUBJECT: .JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C-&7) BRIDGE DECK UNITS DEAR SIRi ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REVIEW. ARE ONE COPY EACH OF THE PLANT AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK FOR THE JAlIOOREE ROAD BRIDGE. THF. FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE ESSENTIALLY THE SAME AS THOSE APPROVED IN PRINCIPLE BY THF. DISTRICT ON AUGUST 26, 1966. UPON YOUR APPROVAL,, WE WILD IF DESIREDS TRANSMIT THE ORIGINAL DRAWING FOR YOUR SIGNATURE. IN THE INTEREST OF COMPLETING THE PROJECT AS SOON AS POSEIDLES YOUR EARLY REVIEW IS REQUESTED. IF THERE ARE ANY OUEST:CN5 PLEASE CALL KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOUR3.9 BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECYOR W :NAJ ENCL: NOVEMBER 17, 1966 MR. A.S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER 4w WEST 8TH STREEO SANTA AHAs CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. WENDELL HARTMAN SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C -847) DEAR SIRt ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REVIEW AND COMMENT IS A COPY OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK ON THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE. THE PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN PREPARED BY MR. 'WILLIAM F. LEVERS STRUCTURAL ENGINEER AT THE REQUEST OF THE CONTRACTOR. IT IS INTENDED TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT AS SOON AS THE PARTICIPATING AGENCIZS APPROVE THE PLANS. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KLPtNAJ ENCL: November 15 1966 Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Asst. Public Works Director, City of Newport Beach, City Hall, 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, California 92660. Dear Mr. Nolan : Remedial Work at San Diego Creek Bridge, Jamboree Road Realignment. Transmitted herewith are four (4) copies of Specifications, Drawing, and Calculations for the above, for your approval. F. cc. Rockwin(2) WFL /gl Yours very truly, 1 William F. Lever. WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER 304 E. PACIFIC COAST HWY. LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA, 90813 TELEPHONE 4358311 November 15 1966 Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Asst. Public Works Director, City of Newport Beach, City Hall, 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, California 92660. Dear Mr. Nolan : Remedial Work at San Diego Creek Bridge, Jamboree Road Realignment. Transmitted herewith are four (4) copies of Specifications, Drawing, and Calculations for the above, for your approval. F. cc. Rockwin(2) WFL /gl Yours very truly, 1 William F. Lever. r BAKER, FARNHAM & BEGAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW JAMES J. BAKER DANIEL W. FARNNAM WILLIAM O. BEGAN Nove: ber S, 1966 County Counsel County of Orange 515 N. Sycamore Sand Ana, California 92701 Attention: Keith Welputt, Esquire RE: JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE - ROCKi Gentlemen: We are legal counsel for Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation with respect to its rights and obligations arising out of the above construction project and the contractual agreements related thereto. From our telephone convers&tions with your office we are aware that the dispute between the various parties involved in this construction project has not formally been referred to your office. However, in the hope and belief that it will be ben - eficial to all of the various parties, and in conformity with the best interests of the public to resolve this dispute without litigation or further delay, we are writing to set forth the position of Rockwin in this matter and to seek the assistance of your office in attempting to satisfactorily resolve the disagreement. Inquiry into the facts surrounding this matter will reveal that Rockwin, a sub - contractor on the ;:cove project. h.z: constructed certain concrete bridge unit members for instal; --tion in a bridge ....onstltuting a portion of the Jamboree Road re- alignment aid improve:: � F ::..r_r, that the unit n:erabers as con- structed did not strictly com.piy v; :. spcc::_'ic dons governing the construction. As a consequer_co thereof, 1,o::iL.;:_. has r &7u!aed the services of Mr. William F. Lever, a Consulting En,l<nocr, "and a reco; sized expert in this field. 3.1r. Lever has conceived, and Zi:, . ^:in has propsed, a method of remedying t�,e defects so that if the ::once- _ __,k_�ers and bridge deck Wre altered as pe the calculations, plc: :.a awd $_ ccifications of the a:agineer, it will constitt. substantial perfor:narace of the sub- contract. That this is so is demons o Zrad by the fact that thz :o ozwa is acceptable to and has been approved by thy; City of Newport EI :.•ch; the Orange County Flood Control District; and the California Division of kig_zv:aya. Not withstanding this, the Orange County Road Department, as repro., ntative of the Arterial Highway Financing Pro,-am. . . has not accepte- propos_i of the Consulting Engineer and apparently if the br'.0 a is comply: in accordance with the calculations and plans of Mr. Lever, L% A. H. C. P. x -.ot contribute its funds which approximate the sum of i, 000. is In .,..:b regard we foal it should be observed that the actual November 3. 1 966 County Counsel - County of Orange Page 2. share of the County funds attributable to the bridge docking is some $10.000.00 or $12, 000. 00, the total cost of the bridge being approximately the sum of $225. 000.00. With regard to how this matter should be resolved. we respect- fully invite your attention to the provisions of Paragraph 3 of the Con- tractual Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and the County of Orange, represented by the Flood Control District. Under the requirements of thtea paratwoph anv dt dputn bot veen the County and t2,e City of Newport l3o%ch relsttng to the perforinance of the contract is required to be referred and submitted to the Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach for resolution. In effect, the dispute herein has in fact been referred to the Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach and has in fact been resolved by way of approving the calculations, plans and specifications of the Consulting Engineer. Nevertheless. the County Road Department appears to be adamant in its refusal to concur with the acceptance by all of the other public agencies involved. We respectfully submit that a fair and reasonable analysis of this entire matter impels the conclusion that the lack of concurrence by the Orange County Road Department is contrary to the spirit and intent of the contractual agreement for the construction, and that in the public interest the refusal of the Road Department should be re- evaluated and rescinded at this time. It is requested that you review this matter and consult with the representatives of the County's Road Department to the end that the dispute may be resolved in accordance with the determination of the Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach. and the representatives of the other participating agencies. By copies of thie letter to all of the interested parties, we wish to assure each of them of the sincere desire and intention of Rockwin to have this entire matter satisfactorily resolved and to reaffirm its willing - noes and readiness to forthwith proceed in full compliance with the proposal and recommendations of the Consulting Engineer. Your attention to thin -equest and response to our correspondence will be very much appreciated i Yours very truly. BAKER, FARNHAM & BEGAN By. J William D. Began, WDB:sb . I 0 MR. WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER 3J5 E. PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY LONG BEACHs CALIFORNIA 90806 SU84ECT: JA14BOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C -847) (SPSCIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK) DEAR SIR: 3RIOGf OCTOBER 27, 1966 THIS OFFICE HAS REVIEWED THE PRELIMINARY "SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK" PREPARED BY YOUR OFFICE FOR THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE, THE FOLLOWING LIST OF POINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OR ON THE DRAWINGS: 1. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS MUST 3E SIGNED BY WILLIAM F. LEVER. 2. THE SPECIFICATIONS SMALL SPECIFY THAT THE FINISHED PROFILE OF THE DECK SHALL BE A CONTINUOUS SMOOTH CURVE. 3. THE PLANS MUST SHOW DETAILS FOR INSTALLING THE BARRIER RAILIHOp GUARD RAID AND HANDRAIL TO THE NEW GNADES. THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL STATE THAT THE RAILS WILL BE AT UNIFORM HEIG14TS ABOVE THE DECKS AND THAT THE PROFILES OF THE RAILS SHALL BE CONTINUOUS SMOOTH CURVES. 4. THE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL STATE THAT THE REINFORCED CONCRETE TOPPING HAS A MINIMUM THICKNESS OF 4 INCHES. 5. CLARIFY HOW THE DOWELS SHALL ACT AS ONAIRS FOR THE SUPPORT OF THE REINFORCING MAT. IS SUPPORT FOR THE MAT AT 48" CENTERS ADEQUATE; IF NOTE SPECIFY ADDITIgUAL CHAIRS. t 6. SPECIFY GROUT PROPORTIONS; NOW MUCH NON - SHRINK ADDITIVES SHOULD BE ADDED TO THE GROUT; AM SPECIFY HOW TO USE THE ADDITIVES. SUBJECT: CONTRACT 847 PAGE Z 7. SPECIFY FINISH OF CONCRETE SLAB PER SECTION 40 OF THE CALIFORNIA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. 8. DETAIL TRANSVERSE JOINTS. 9. ADD A SECTION TO THE SPECIFICATIONS TO THE EFFECT THAT PORTIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS REGARDING PAYMENT NO NOT AP ?LY TO THESE'�SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK." IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE AT 673 -Zito, EXTENSION 26. VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJAN N B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC IIORKs DIRECTOR KLP:NAJ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Date OCTOBER 26, 1966 NO. TO: FILE C -847 (BRIDGE) FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: ESTIMATED ADDITIONAL COST TO CITY TO WIDEN EXISTING BRIDGE TO THREE LANES IF 4" CONCRETE SLAB ADDED TO PRESENT BRIDGE ASSUMPTIONS: I. THE ADDITION OF 4° OF REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK WOULD NOT APPRECIABLY ALTER THE COST OF PILES OR PILE CAPS. ' 2. THE MINIMUM VOLUME OF REINFORCED CONCRETE NECESSARY AT $12O/CU-YD. TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 4" THICKNESS OVER AN AREA 12' X 336, Is: 12' X 336' X 4/12 = 49.8 CUBIC YARDS SAY 50 C.Y. 27 THE COST = $120/C.V. X 50 C.Y. _ $6,000 3. THE TONNAGE OF ASPHALT CONCRETE NECESSARY TO PAVE AN AREA 121 X 336, X 2" THICK IS: 12 X 6 X 2'' = 5014 TONS SAY 50 TONS 160 ST./TON/IN. THE COST SAVINGS @ $6.00 /TON X 50 TONS = $-300 KERRY :NET ADDITIONAL COST TO CITYsIlOQ K ASST. CITY ENGINEER KLP:NAJ 0 0 WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER 304 E. PACIFIC COAST HWY. LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA. 90813 TELEPHONE 433 -8311 October 18 1966 Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Dear Mr. Nolan: San Diego Creek Bridge, Jamboree Road Realignment Enclosed are proposed Specifications for Remedial Work for the above, covering items mentioned in your letter of October 12 1966 adressed to Coxco, Inc. Your approval at an early date is requested. Yours very truly, William F. Lever. Encl : 4 copies cc: Rockwin, with 2 copies WFL /gl RECEIVED OCT 1"' 1966 PUBLIC WUMS DEPT I SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGE JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK November 14 1966 Prepared in the Office of William F. Lever Consulting Engineer 304 E. Pacific Coast Highway Long Beach, California 90806. SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK, SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGE. Contents. 1 Standard Specifications 2. Payment 3. Sandblasting 4. Drilling 5. Reinforcement 6. Grout 7. Concrete Deck 8. Barrier Railing, Guard Rail and Handrail 9. Pile Cap Dowels Appendix - Drawing 66/29 ot Page. 2 2 2 3 3 4 i • SPECIFICATIONS FOR REMEDIAL WORK, SAN DIEGO CREEK BRIDGE. 1. Standard Specifications. Except as modified herein, all work shall conform to Standard Specifications dated July 1964 of the State of California Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, hereinafter referred to as State Standard Specifications. In the event of any conflict between these Specifications for Remedial Work and the specifications issued as part of the contract documents for Jamboree Road Realignment, these Specifications for Remedial Work shall govern. 2. Payment. Portions of the State Standard Specifications regarding payment do not apply to these Specifications for Remedial Work. All remedial work including additional earthwork shall be performed by the Contractor at no cost to the City of Newport Beach. 3. Sandblasting. The rough top surface of the precast prestressed concrete deck units shall be sandblasted to provide a positive key between the units and the new concrete slab which is to be poured over them. Sandblasting shall be of sufficient severity to clean and expose the coarse aggregate over the entire area of the tops of the units, by the removal of all cement matrix and laitance. Undercutting, loosening, abrasion and removal of the coarse aggregate shall be avoided, All coarse aggregate shall remain firmly embedded after sandblasting. Sandblasting shall be dry process, using silica -type sand. Sand shall be used once only and shall be blown clear of the surface after exposure of the coarse aggregate. At least 300 cubic feet per minute of air at 100 pounds per square inch pressure shall be used for each nozzle. 1. Pi 4. Drilling. 0 Holes for dowels shall be drilled at the locations shown on the drawings unless interference with reinforcing steel occurs. In such case the drill shall be withdrawn as soon as the reinforcing is encountered, and a new hole shall be started adjacent so as to clear the obstruction. All holes shall be vertical and of diameter and depth as shown on the drawings. All chips and dust shall be removed from the holes on completion, and holes shall be washed out with water and .shall be re- cleaned with compressed air immediately before placing dowels and grout. 5. Reinforcement. Materials and workmanship shall conform to State Standard Spec- ifications, Section 52. Dowels shall be reinforcing bars and shall be embedded in drilled holes and in keyways to the depth shown on the drawings. Projection of dowels shall be the correct length to permit them to act as chairs for the support of the slab reinforcing mat. 6. Grout. Materials and workmanship shall conform to State Standard Spec- ifications, Section 51. Grout for keyways and dowel holes shall contain a non - shrink additive. Non - shrink additive shall be Embeco,.;manufactured by Master Builders, Inc. , and used in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. Grout shall be proportioned by weight and shall consist of one part of Embeco non - shrink additive to two parts of non- air - entrain- ing portland cement, to three parts of moist concrete sand. Water content shall be the minimum required for workability, a higher content being permissable for embedment of dowels in drilled holes than for continuous keyways between units. All grout shall be mixed at site, and for at least two minutes in a mechanically - operated mixer. Keyways shall be free of grease or bond release agents and shall be saturated with water so as to be moist prior to placement of the grout. 2. 0 0 7. Concrete Deck. The deck shall be a reinforced portland cement concrete slab with a finished surface forming continuous smooth curves and tangents as indicated on the profile drawing. Finish of deck shall conform to State Standard Specifications, Section 40. Minimum thickness of the deck slab shall be four inches, vary- ing to a maximum thickness in excess of seven inches, as required to conform to the profile and to compensate for irreg- ularities in elevations of prestressed concrete units. Materials and workmanship shall conform to State Standard Spec- ifications, Sections 51 and 90, modified as follows : Portland Cement Concrete shall be Class A, with the mix proport- ioned to contain 6.0 sacks of cement per cubic yard, a maximum proportion of 44% by weight of fine aggregate, and a minimum pro- portion of 45% by weight of #3 aggregate (1" maximum). Admixture shall be 3LA Pozzolith at a quantity of 0.2 pounds per sack of cement. The sandblasted surface of existing concrete shall be thoroughly washed down and shall be damp but not wet immediately before the new concrete slab is poured. Transverse joints shall be formed of premolded expansion joint filler and shall be located over each pier and abutment at the ends of existing prestressed units. All joints shall be sealed with Rubber Calk 3105 or Presstite No. 55 sealant, applied hot. B. Barrier Railing, Guard Rail and Handrail. Barrier Railing, Guard Rail and Handrail shall be installed at uniform heights above the finished deck slab, conforming to corresponding continuous smooth curves and tangents as indic- ated on the profile drawing. Dowels for the barrier railing shall be spliced as shown on the drawing. Guard rail posts shall be raised three or six inches as required, using splice plates in the latter case. Four high - tensile bolts conforming to ASTM A 325 shall be used in each embedded plate or splice, in lieu of six unfinished bolts. 3. ;-.. 0 Adjustment of guard rail to required profile shall be obtained by use of slotted holes in flanges of posts. Height of handrails shall be adjusted by the use of coupling nuts and extension studs. 9. Pile Cap Dowels. The number of holes to be drilled in pile caps and abutments, and the number of dowels to be placed in said drilled holes to secure prestressed units shall be reduced to one at each end of each unit. 4. j C C- 847(C) See Contract File for Plans J� WILLIAM F. LEVER 0 SHEET I of IS CONSULTING ENGINEER JOB Ho. LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA _ DATE f 1E:JIfieL WoRk A SAS., D ; �;:.� � C�z E E✓ ,c BFI, � C, ,y �ESt�rl. + ru�vre>:s NIr,INi r^ 4" R, c, si-Aa ovc� Pr2�>��;,�SSt'D urJ�TS �o�C GoM1 =SOLI _'E AG"no�J. Z. �JiRUCTl1R /fit_ C��C�'.- A;Ts+tiS Ir 1G��7U!' =1: 1IE>z'sJt1tl 3. ��Qi ;aNAt 17�u uJraS7 >aOES ND? APt'T�r. 'Jo IkAv StS, aI F I c P, P.3--r �EFt t-C_' �ll1ifV OK.. Gtt n.6V Gi �: IN V'E1i.Y�C.A L.- CJ RL.J ,t.JG AN=A CA C! U R.F'.N,.H 5Aa DIE o �.KEE1C E3a1 2 WILLIAM F. LEVER `` �p SHEET--=—OF CONSULTING ENGINEER ,AM9o2 ° D., Iy PORT jlmm ki, JOB NO, LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA PR f -- 'QSStT7C��P DATE" 'A-'-BY-%64L 1 ; 1 rjIAPHRAC.MS Ib1�(� AY 113 Polka's ± VOIDS II-3t I1' -I" Lt,-Jwc 12.6 j I -L - S" corm 2 12 15 DS N V¢ Z70 -K X `-) unatT; WIDE _ �2 UL71TS 4;'- 111'4 q's, Ir.TER , sPnrls (6) :1r@ 28 DA`!` = Soou PSI W "i, Eli !YD'S T ,4 PPRox wo2klr.Ir' FOPIce = 423-dbK• IK) TcP gNDi tlK Soy dc.. r— E'-1D SPaui h11oSPA+J 5%L4 MK Sob a'S 1 ST R. tiM1ti� �cs- 1.3:4. (a R 223 M,DSPPw 5Qa }Mk 51+ �9,�0, 96 I{ IoeZMk 515 It� II,IL;IS Ib,i� 10,�9,zo DEZIGa TI-ItCGNESS OVER- VOIDS ; 1 r2 i c� 1 0' l - w'� = 4 '/4. //4 <S -t v 4 5 b 0 9 10 IZ- 13 14 15 1� k t F,= lt3 K Z'1 tom` 4a9 Co��h °'Y i9 21 t lZ 3 to i I I I i I I I I r t 1 -77- LI 5 11 i WILLIAM F. LEVER SHEET 3 oF_ CONSULANG ENGINEER JOB 1401 -19L 9 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA _ DATE'I + �BV gI- .ECoRC) S CF CnrJCR6TE TrNCiGNESS 04E� Vo,cs PIER : 1 Z 3 4 S 'S'. At Y, N A%JT, i•�JD �yoJ) =`R fJi �J ,:� GROSS SSe4-710�J FQ,-1 RECORDEC> T$ U3,0<.N A. ;iii. tQ CoMPL�aTE BJT Pk.ESUMELj FE?P.fSVN'A i tVC : 5 �oL DtrL�"rlS AS No R6�a 0.9 U�IIT rjo m U NIT No 2 : ' `L/ — 9 � 2� 2'Iti 3�4 2% - — 2/ ,. Z�w "1�i 2�¢ 3 2 2' 33y� 111 t 4k k.> caaD I 4 s ,, 4 3 _33/, Qi�4�4% 4w4;a� —4�4 j - 4h.-i- sJ1 2y2%+I - 2y4 -1 icy 37,Z33/4 ZY, 3�q,'4 34 3 ;134 '_2'li 3 3 2 , 2 - 2�� 2 2��. Z'�, Z; ?L 2 2 I IZy, [2, 4� LlY i�4 4, 3 - - �4 3 }1 3�} 41," 4/i 4 4/y 4 ( l 2iL l2 i r ,r 7' Y 2'p/f 2 12Y1 I }� 2 214 fly 3 Y Z'' -'✓ 3J 911 7 a E- DDu. Tr1tm OVERV010. ��Sr+ i a/I AV. T-wi so (+SSUrAE CSOUERrJ n1 pouv2 -AC�z n Z if (UuIT C'1 , MIDSPAll) WILLIAM F. LEVER -0f7– • SHEET " CONSULTING ENGINEER soe .T 0 9 LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA .._ DATE �IJ�4_ev1�L. �E,_L}IEGIG SECTan� PRfopE .TEES WITH 2Ais£D \JoJDS 4 Z , _ 12 iji` F.2on1 �o17oM C �,. Per` >TRESS 12 2: WILLIAM F. LEVER • _ • BHEET-LL-OF- CONSULTING ENGINEER _ JOB NO — -� LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA DATE 1�1a By -if:1- = 3419 t C<o7o t 2 oaj' - 57,4 31- X 9.4 Zxx� aa` ZY'PP „? P.at 34130 4 'L930 + 1°,8 13 0 Z -t C”" = 505:�'0/'II 47 44zo Zb Co RoS T� - �jo5o i ! c ]•� p 4 MO 4 F.JS�A> I E 4 S DL l�. G. WEARIrJ Cy S�(LFAC.E (�Okl}.) c I %nP �A5 o2��iniALL�( DE. 515 r.1 t. J> CELLUL.,AK SI..A`3 = C�`�e, ADD ['012. Ewo 43LoCKS U1 P, p. NJ > 184 LL 0 zo -, ib - 44 v.,�tE.�v Fer�c^'loi•J. — 1 L AfJE 5 � 7-4s .c) 6200 T_oYf�L DL 4- LL + I s t}32• o r t�21JLk_.oN__( (o9 i3 k �� _ �::4 �' I� _ ��'C) Ci INCREASE 1r1 DL i A' C l£ 7,0 L -\5 50 7- X 4 = go --_.__ r ✓} - ; i LDL - _36 93 4.ar J v Zoi �! K Z48- K DL 11J GIZE'AiE _ ��.o� Gk:.EA,SE IN D L. = 60O,"/4' RJE ;:. = So r g u d.l s >= 30 oK/(>l�i L.L. EnJ13 SNEA?- a 55 aK /LA."E WILLIAM F. LEVER • • SHEET '? of CONSULTING ENGINEER JOB NO. LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA DATElI I`�By WL- ASS`:. 4s r- 11 44 -314 = 8.30 ST`2C.SSE.S AT . Yizr._J�Fct2. A1T !yT G1JD 4096o-� 4'813 x e,3o L5. ^xi2 oP _ 1�.� - - - - -_ _>7�_ -_ -- t 3s.jb _. = 730- 1138 +sZ1 408 ?,1 48 °6r� . 830 + _ Ip.�on I Bpi = 730 - -29P - 2 �e 7 = loo t 1360 - 636 = +1454 li +2090 �s 1 7 i 15$0 F11.1AL. 5-7RLSSES PRECA_;T + iov -F-I l y� _43 Z. 1 ZD4'Z�` 239op K 8.3o 201 + 2o?x1z = (033 - 98Z+- 614 = 1 325 Psi 610 35�b 3C7' Bolt X33 + g239o� x830 _ Zoizoo.i2 (o3� f 1174- go3= +(oo�1:t z�a� 29e7 GC�'"1POSlT'= STKES'y'ES ADD DQ.�E PRdsTzesS n> w =T T�PV1N�� +325 i +loo8 - 796 24s 000 x i z 44ZC3 2460oo x 12 -37+L' = + nj4mi = — 73EPsl +325 ' +765 { _ 1 +212 CoM.ESI�J� -'-Di STRESS DIAG�Ar' A` MIDSPAIJ M:Lto STCVt A7 tx>JDS 0I- Fo R - rv,3Sion,j - 349 P: I +1811 Psi (P74 �9fa i 1,70 2Sx14 a = il'48' 674 .x 748= 44o x r WILLIAM F. LEVER aHetrrZot=T CONSUOTNO ENGINEER JOS NO �g. LONG BEACH, CAUFORNIA _ pgrE_�I 9 Y L. F . W ;7u 6't ToPPttJC1_ l JP to .J / � c�cc P..S Dn� Sf•P 4- S� 129 . 9'S0 -} a + 13'� B x 4 � 11 7' .(�7 '296 s 13 • i} l7 u Cb , lcae�;c is by -It'Q -4 = 4•Ib C+ 2'P9 iva 4v } ((e', o n f ') + 37 3 l x$3 r- 9. 4o s � 4'L A4" � L Ads rK.x C� 3x„f�,�,,,•, 341 115Aes h 4r, ti3 4 GG155 - % —Ll Zy Gor1PcaatiT"E f 3S 21 /, .3 4� _�,�g7 Z6 GoMi9o5t; "E _ �'SS2.1�l�6v 4713 5 `.. M 01Iti-A , . SPAN 4K 17 • r7 Gra D rti DUE To �J i Y 3 0 7c.'> .t E3:. ! - Nl _ t .o o • 7_. A.c�o aKFasrpES•,cr. vN)- e'C. ':34 0 n -1 i> z 492 K 32cv >" .K At A' I5 E E. f i ELLL WILLIAM F. LEVER • sHS �r 8 ; CONSULTING ENGINEER Jos N LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA DATE II 14 SY VFL Fj, SThESS�s (_�' STaEiS -ES ,l.T TR.ar�SFE,R.. AY 7 'r- f NoT;o:'rt t = i- 454 Psi r',QA! STKL—VZGT PRE:. A, ST 1 ToP ?� ^.)C,\,j M - Z++ Z 70 PTI 2k<i'�:%J x�2 Nig f ' 63? +- 1 1 �d - 24a Zoo 1 L '91 + SI $31 P -- _ 29th �'oMpOSI'(c :';Ye�.ESSFT� IAGD !�( DUB or, :_L AMP f Towf = 2"Oo;? r r z + S43 Pil s487 4� 73 r. 4543 re)o 4oi3 PSG: + 2.090 Psi -- 349 PSi 181I psf 543 2 �� 63z si7s =°1 x S43 ills i3 42 S4 X 13 -L == --Lo �— c oUt sraVLD s7RC -ss Ds c', zp r� AT "soypNw 1 L- C> STEM -. AY Sn::i:-S WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA OJ. I10R.ILP�.1T�+i., SµitAR.. �4nSlAp) VERTICAL SNElt0. V D.L 44.6 4�•8 I•s _ �6 • i3 WAS New 5•9 %. NcRL 4 0 R %-t 5 o r-A Q. 4 SAY R Eurvocc)" URJIT V 6 I AND S4APj oR U� _ v 1 ib �- ;4 31 F FFECTJE W,DTH 7 a7 1 (3.53 q _ V L C l" P D.L • SHEET � OF_j_ JOB NO (o 6i Z9 DATE { { � 9V �t- 854 x 41. 5`L S5 8 x O.4 �O e 7 w > (--7 4G •B "' /�N�T {g.s 2z'4 b' 7 48 (a 413w T s = V = 4-e• io' p 97 NET x 4- - 14-5 iwl to Y - g•¢7„ b s -415 AcT..r nt_ w,DTai T . - 50-590 4a600 ,� I¢8� a 4'7 46 x Sn590 AR-t ol;OASLP- F'o R RoU414 4 GLC7. *J CoaTAtT 5QP -^AC.E Wrll-WJ?- h- At'L#AAw -nC P/.. A- MtHO2AyE5 213 p */A u x 40 41h L iiaWEVGK , �,tov1�E TIES ' {S a eF Cor -r!AG7 At2 C7\ Ro2 AL Lotr.Jnaq (.l". CC 4fix 12 % i"Ie 10G' Pta F"Y u * k DQ—1 c=5 1 t I 46 RbLES F,4Lty w; -14-; raoti- sHkfuK, gaDJT #4 (d (o�OC.113 CRl7.oJY r.", 9 - ' 8o W,Ypr 92 0 12 0. C, 2 RowS $ TACT; tr- �v t 0 6'i-r k T L) -r E; /+ acL-Tc; (Asr" A. 325, )r,op /.+ tr A 3o j) 1 -Z . S,/ tj r-1 F -j 15 �A C L, bD t- r5 . 6JFN3LE: KCI FOR io. 1451 csz W— Rs p aGo/, t:xF-4fftf-PST IP,,l . t,,l 0 " IS Ck P kiZ V I T>EU WIWAM F. LEVER SHEET -LO OF__ CONSULTING ENGINEER -Joe No 6,0- LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA DATE !W!l--MY WL ;0 _4oQl,.l2vQ-rAL SLAIX) =*X-T C-^ + ^ -48 6� •- Zoo +I G.7 S26 4C g S gl 4 12 4 957WCe-"J -)Ilji-lr ANP SL.A;t sal S2 Y- ;-7 r rL-r vji,>-rLj I Ne S2,6 0 o x 2 418 x 7 ^A G41 61Q. 0 6'i-r k T L) -r E; /+ acL-Tc; (Asr" A. 325, )r,op /.+ tr A 3o j) 1 -Z . S,/ tj r-1 F -j 15 �A C L, bD t- r5 . 6JFN3LE: KCI FOR io. 1451 csz W— Rs p aGo/, t:xF-4fftf-PST IP,,l . t,,l 0 " IS Ck P kiZ V I T>EU WILLIAM F. LEVER SHEET Ll Of CONSULTING ENGINEER Joe LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 4EoHETK.1;•, CONTROL A bj'! # *4 407. . .......... BS db '7 P-T STA Z2 A- 141 " = ZZ'5'n S is 1-14 to ?Am S�l1 z J't I 86+ + 47 514 s 33 � 1% 4, 5 7 4' (0 33 1 � 33 � 49i 14. 49 + 4- 5933 A,. (0 13 = 10-771 0= 4- F E�Avr uw,n; C> Z 2- 5-11 -7 "a3 ps i.(-+ IS I' L-A s,-r. v r QoN f-7,.-L- D 5 c'' Oz rQa"A RE M'ipJ iLFv.'IT 4_ CIF EA97 L)WOT 5}ATlon��j Pfd r LE NE .45.15 ij-Sl 4333' 86+ 514 s 33 � 185 +A7 .*j5 Z6-"- 5 7 (0 33 1 � 33 � 14. 49 + 4- 5933 BS+ 31 81+ -10 13 6'5+ 4) 33 .14 SFw 8S +-'3 1'• 4333' 86+ 514 s 33 � 185 +A7 .*j5 Z6-"- 5 7 (0 33 1 � 33 � 14. 49 4- 5933 81+ -10 13 + .14 tC.+-0q•5l 4333' 185 +A7 .*j5 Z6-"- S.5+ lr� &Z 14. 49 14 -10 13 x+'1.51 .14 tC.+-0q•5l j, �* 3'$33 714 54.33 Sj•Si d;+ 7i 33 3.14 • ! 4. 96,33 674'17'33 14 36133 PI+ 35.5-L 1-7 4-14 65+01 33 5.14 zzli 88+19 51s 4333' 2oo-A 67,1, T l I x�tis I 2s �s 22 BS 24- 3 24 18 • WILLIAM F. LEVER SHEET �Z cor, CONSULTING ENGINEER Z2 35_ STA L33+ z Joe N 6 t ' LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA 22 85 DATE h 1 _®vim L i 33 BAST PRoF!i�E LIr.,It'.. A�v./A�cE e.�•c ZOr ! X00 V G. 83 +Zo To +20 �_.�.___ UP SS .o Pe' ZS2oar Fo R_ O, 2 S 2 +S E . 2�•g5 N •ZS} 234r oefy!JA►. ELE'J < 21 6o A-,�A93}ov z�'sr E;,EV Vz 5:0 AizT�83�Zv- 2S•35 01 - Zou X �2520 = 2 So t �y nt Zg•i{ ,BUJ +•' 25 35 V P. 2oo-A 67,1, T l I x�tis I 2s �s 22 BS 24- 3 24 18 Z2 35_ STA L33+ z AtsodE 22 85 L i 33 66 2�•g5 8 13 Sv + •ZS} 234r z�'sr 2S•35 Zg•i{ 84 +2� 84�ua + zs 23 •9z 14.4 3 84pp //,.� 4 io / l 4 0.4 24-,7.o . BS+ to, t+ 24 39 ep 24 31 a uu +:, u7y3I.1¢ 24 46 cf 24 4 0 , wN 35+ To (orciy STC i35 +5o + LS) 24 54 cf 24 53 M!N. or'� ob +l5 4 24 S4 t 24'50 M'N. 86 + 20 ( _ 8 +uv ± IS) 24 . ;4 86-+ 57.i4 24 46 G f 2..4,39 M!4 ,i •_o_ �i ,6�9n {4 2d 4-7- ': 24 2'a N,!+J. 10 U • 4-Z zo El r .r STA\ o +5-1 t¢ 53 4 t._ p 'L2 85 �j 3�'I �o� s 043 X i33 � �•�2 239j 643 151 x 4 7 53 w X12 4a 24 �� •�;.A S5 + +o•.4 61� �}•fl o 23 4? •.�'�S x•$tS �a � •9a x 9t •91 2Q-s5 i, i -a'�` -�.`' ,.a. gx .�:.: '�t'�cu �t. s f xs �� z�- '3'- x,_:�,�s•�.�.w��'. .�.a ._'; -s., g.. ".a : • • WILLIAM F. LEVER SHEETI�) OF CONSULTING ENGINEER JOB NO.� LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA _._ DATE II I4 ®v_iADL -4•oo' V G. A a7S P Af o R tT5 i 7TH 13s + -j 4- fl3 Y to 27 el� Z3 6 9 X35 23 � A- 5?a 3a 1 31 14 83 s 2.a 'j,1•gC. Z3, �4 7 n 413 x4 = 99 K 9i 4- 91 L4 4- STce 8G t IS t4 83 i -Lo __ 22 85 2 9S }4- '73a 23'83 p •775 6 X •262 4 '7 x I '°ate j1 24 54 STA\ o +5-1 t¢ 53 4 t._ p 'L2 85 �j 3�'I �o� s 043 X i33 � �•�2 239j 643 151 x 4 7 53 w X12 4a 24 �� •�;.A S5 + +o•.4 61� �}•fl o 23 4? •.�'�S x•$tS �a � •9a x 9t •91 2Q-s5 i, i -a'�` -�.`' ,.a. gx .�:.: '�t'�cu �t. s f xs �� z�- '3'- x,_:�,�s•�.�.w��'. .�.a ._'; -s., g.. ".a WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSWING ENGINEER LONG BEACH, CALIFORNIA KE'J�.RS —t V C o. 8HEET[T OF Joe N b6 DATE 4tK BY-&L + A Q 0 8: +70 'z o2.i 'r 9zfaa 23 8� 22.71 i- oratbo Fig 4 ZO 88 t C> aft i J, 1z. IDS L v >1 + 41 Z4 18 'L4 Z) T� X4 Z4- 0-1 T 74 + ID4 Z3 so C+ BAB s -Bi6L Z3 4-4 6, i 4 9S 'Z-o 4 v3. Z 4 VALUAM.'F. LEVER s►ieet�era� 5 v :: .. •, CONSULYMS ENGINIER LANG BEACH, CALIFORNIA Boa I{ OAT v jrl wi t5M 1tC?. Ei.LUC AJ°�iC Z4t WfAP s1 �EtkvdF� 4�H N 7iYiC FtZEWgii E0 FaR M t_USPr�N. fUorit-Z itQI! 4M *14 111• T' f�2a.1pED vJ• Ez4E 3 Tr+'T'to>v *. � �•,wY1N �RoJi� vr,•✓��1� ' CRo >kf�:1. �•_ *R �. ;E Pnvfa�i doh w -D41 QSytaf4 2431 24• 3°� i n yi �3'S¢ k2:�)Zi•91 Sfau 85 t 25 St F A%sr -i 6 5 +31 14- z4.43 Z4 4h ; 23 aS 2 %Z3 98 (418 ) ,4 24•S3 24'54• 24.01 (LY.)24-at>" 3 86+ i5 14 24 So Z4 54 1 23 -% 24 a i+t f rr 7/8, F 3 _ 4 + 5� 14 24 39 24 4' 23 84 LJ °)21.)a ' i x ` 4 S +- 99 14 24 !e, 7441 13. b' �(Z;��Z3 54 s7+ 35 52 ( %Y4) J. S -6 81+ 41 !4 23:98 24 n� ?3 ¢0 ! 2Z3 S9 S j f b -7 83 14 23 GZ 23 $n 23 0✓ tl•3'r.23"33 f 2L -89 (31) x2.,A t 7 •`� f � � 83r4b i4 23 21 23. 26 7.2:.9b z -L ok S:A G Q65n}TH:.L A:JxtG1AFt� tR,pFsLE, +I ! No M,oshn•� of w.evcE) ..;:. V-4 stv= i + '70 'Z. od )'. 23.8G3 ! 46 ! 2 6 - +� f3 : i' b 23 4 8 ! 4� 2-b 00 ; =4, $8 t45 I .'Z. s�o :� 2.2'7 � -._� �o •_ 22•�,."j. p s y CT 22-57 f� + So O'6 7 2268 In itt 2z' 2:4 8 °j i -?•5 l' 25 22.52 + 09 ±.74, 1 61. 2236. + 4o 89� 9S !-oz 22 2z + 4b zz 68 i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD TO: INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA CENTRAL TOYER BUILDING ORANGE, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: NO- JOHN T. WALKER SUBJECT: REALIGNMENT OF JAMBOREE ROAD (C7) i DATE OCT. 17, 1fy'"'c WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 CONTRACT FOR SUBJECT CONTRACT 2 PERFORMANCE BOND FOR SUBJECT CONTRACT 1 STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS REMARKS: NOTE SECTIONS 7 -11 AND 7 -12 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. COPIES TO: BY: KENNETH L. PERRY ASST. CITY ENGINEER • =a CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA City Han 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 714 873.2110 OCTOBER 171 1966 INSURANCE BY NORTH AMERICA CLAIM AND LOSS DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 1085 ORANGE, CALIFORNIA, 92668 ATTENTION: MR. W.C. HARPER SUBJECT: WESTERN SALT CO. VS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GENTLEMEN: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR REQUEST OF OCTOBER 12, 1966, FOR INFORMATION TO USE IN DEFENDING SUBJECT LAWSUIT. IN HIS LETTER TO YOU DATED SEPTEMBER 27, 1966, MR. W.P. MCCRAY OF MCCRAY AND MCCRAY ASKED YOU TO DETERMINE IF THERE ARE ANY HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENTS WHICH MIGHT RUN TO THE BENEFIT OF YOUR ASSURED. SECTIONS 7 -11 AND 7 -12 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 7 -II. RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGE: THE CITY, THE CITY COUNCIL, OR THE ENGINEER SHALL NOT BE ANSWERABLE OR ACCOUNTABLE IN ANY MANNER FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE THAT MAY HAPPEN TO THE WORK OR ANY PART THEREOF; OR FOR ANY MATERIAL OR EQUIPMENT USED IN PERFORMING THE WORK; OR FOR INJURY OR DAMAGE TO ANY PERSON OR PERSONS, EITHER WORKMEN OR THE PUBLIC; FOR DAMAGE TO ADJOINING PROPERTY FROM ANY CAUSE WHATSOEVER DURING THE PROGRESS OF THE WORK OR AT ANY TIME BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY, THE CITY COUNCIL, AND THE ENGINEER FROM ANY SUITS, CLAIMS, OR ACTIONS BROUGHT BY ANY PERSON OR PERSONS FOR OR ON ACCOUNT OF ANY INJURIES OR DAMAGES SUSTAINED OR ARISING IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE WORK OR IN CONSEQUENCE THEREOF. THE CITY COUNCIL MAY RETAIN 50 MUCH OF THE MONEY DUE THE CONTRACTOR AS SHALL BE CONSIDERED NECESSARY UNTIL DISPOSITION HAS BEEN MADE OF SUCH SUITS OR CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES AS AFORESAID. SUBJ: WESTERN SALT CO. VS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PAGE 2 ' i 7 -12. CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR WORK: .EXCEPT AS PROVIDED ABOVE UNTIL THE FORMAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE CITY COUNCIL, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE CHARGE AND CARE THEREOF .. AND SHALL BEAR THE RISK OF INJURY OR DAMAGE TO ANY PART THEREOF, i BY THE ACTION OF THE ELEMENTS OR FROM ANY OTHER CAUSEp WHETHER.' " ARISING FROM THE EXECUTION OR FROM THE NON— EXECUTION OF THE WORK. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REBUILDS RESTOREp AND MAKE GOOD ALL INJURIES OR DAMAGES TO ANY PORTION OF THE WORK OCCASIONED BY ANY OF THE ABOVE CAUSES BEFORE. FINAL ACCEPTANCE AND SHALL BEAR THE EXPENSE .. . THEREOFj EXCEPT SUCH INJURIES OR DAMAGES OCCASIONED BYACTS OF THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OR PUBLIC ENEMY., IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING THAT THE CONTRACTOR'S INSURANCE' CARRIER HAS FILED AN ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY$ THEREFORE IT IS . .'RESPECTFULLY REQUESTED THAT YOU CHECK WITH THEM IN ORDER TO AVOID,' POSSIBLE DUPLICATION.OF EFFORT.' THE CONTRACTOR'S INSURANCE CARRIER IS THE AETNA CASUALTY.AND SURETY' COMPANY, HARTFORD, CONNECTICULT. THE AUTHORIZED�AGENT' IS: . . WREN AND VAN ALEN� INC. ' 54$ S. SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA . IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS1 PLEASE. CALL KENNETH`L. PERRY OF THIS Of F ICE' s ;AT 671- 21100 EXTENSION 26.' VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR .. CC: CITY ATTORNEY KLP:NAJ I i W. Mlli; MCCRAY W. PAT MCCRAY 01F"V18 M. ALEVMON -CAW 4W W . MCCRAY Sc MCCRAY 911 No. *MOADW^V -yVIT[ not 41A AMA:.,.CALIPOlFN1a 02701 Septemb 1966 INSURANCE BY NORTH AMERICA Claim and Loss Department P.O. Box 1085 orange, California, <z_2668 Attns W. C,, harper] Re: 9 LR 824 7 C of ort Beach West n Salt Company 11 -23 -65 Gentlemen: C_V7 jrn prOpLV 7.1071 AMA COD[ 714 i LJ�SEP 2 POLICYHOLDERS SE1110E ORANGE In response to your letter of August 31, 1966, please be advised that we have reviewed the pleadings in this matter and at the present time would suggest the following- information be obtained. We should find out who owns the land on whilab the salt works is operated, this is probably the Irvine._COSr pany, and from the owner of the land we should obtaft,L_a copy of the lease between the owner and the salt comy in order to ascertain whether or not the damages claimed %xe entirely the property of the salt company or whether some of this money would properly go to the owner of the land. An attempt should be made to locate scale maps of the area showing both the right of way and the salt works, maps should show the area both before and after any changes were made and pursuant to the roadworks was done. we should obtain plans of the work done and ascestain who designed the new roadway, what contracts were let for the work and who had the supervision of the work and whether or not in the design of the entire project the drainage was considered and engineered and if so who was responsible for this engineering. We should obtain all copies of contracts on this work, both the prime contract and copies of the sub - contracts, and ascertain whether or not there are any hold harmless agreements which might run to_ the q benefit of your insurbd: r' 2 -INA Harper Re: Westel;l .salt vs. Newport 11-ach sin the original cclmpiiint there is a ditch that supposedly was filled 0- with dirt and it should be as- certained the exact location of this ditch to determine whether or not it was on the right of way or whether or not it was on property controlled by the plaintiff. It should be ascertained Aether or not the roadbed was actually elevated above the dike mentioned in the com- plaint. Complete photographs of the area should be located showing the area both before and after the roadwork was done. These photographs should include both aerial and ground photographs, if at all possible. we should obtain rainfall reports, particularly for November 23, 1965, however, these reports should be com- prehensive enough to include not only that general period, but the rainfall for several years prior to this particu- lar incident. A check should be made to see what notice the salt \ \\\l) works had of the changes that were being made in the road - ✓ way and whether or not they were ever consulted on any possible damage to the salt works. A check should be made to see whether or not other heavy rains have damaged the salt production and an effort made to determine whether or not prior to the changes they were subject to some flooding. It is possible that after the above has been obtained and reviewed that it might be advisable to consult an en- gineer regarding the natural drainage and the changes in the drainage and some consideration might be given to consulting that man who maintains an office in Garden Grove and who is quite familiar with drainage problems in the Orange County area. The co- defendants should also be contacted and any items of investigation conducted by them reviewed in the. hopes of avoiding duplication of work. Please advise whether you wish us to arrange to have Mr. Meader conduct this investigation or whether you d'sire to have it done by men in your office. Very truly yours, MC CRAY AND MC CRAY WPM:be P._ McCray UNIVERSITY 6.1761 SPRUCE 3.1972 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORAT ION 13960 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, BANTA FE 6PRIN08. GLIPbRN1A Y0870 October l4, 1966 Mr. William F. Lever Consulting Engineer 304 E. Pacific Coast Hwy. Long Beach, California Ref: Jamboree Road Bridge Rockwin Job #7249 Dear Sir: This is your authorisation to proceed with the completion of the design for the topping on the subject bridge. This work should be in conformance with the specific requests as noted in City of Newport Beach letter dated Oct. 12, 1966. Note that the timing on this project is vitally, important to the City, and we suggest you take steps to make a partial submittal to the City regarding sandblasting and bond as well as placement of the dowels so that this phase of the work can be performed simultaneously with the City's review of calculations, plans and specifications. WAH /cl cc: Coxco, Inc. City of Newport Beach Very truly yours, ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. W. A. Hutchinson RCIVE-U 0 'T I 1968 PUBLIC ULPT. `J COKCO, INC. P. 0. DRAWER C STANTON, CALIfORNiA ATTENTION: MR. J. R. ELLCXSON CONTRACT ADMINI9TRAToR 3Ues_cT: JAMBOREE ROAD RL,,LIG.MENT (C$b7) GENTLEMEN: OCTOBER 12p 1966 THE W-THOD DEVELOPED By MR. WILLIAM F. LEVER TO REMEDY THE FAULTS NOW 7-%IBTING IN THE BRIDGE DECK UNITS OF THE JAMBOR?:E ROAD SRIp0E IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. THE ORANG:. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND THE CAI.IFORNIA DIVISION OF H!GHWAYII HAVE ALSO APPROVED THE CONCEPT. THE ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT, REPRZSENTING THE ARTERIAL H1GHKAY FINANCING PROGRAM (A.H.F.P.)A WILL NUT ACCEPT THE PROPOSAL Tt REMEOY THE FAULTS. IF THC BRIDO[ DECK IS REPAIRED PER THE PROP05AL, THE A.H.F.P. WILL WITHDRAW IT! `SHARE OF THE FINANCING OF TH ?- BRIDGE: WHICH COULD AMOUNT TO AN ESTIMATED MAxIMUM AMOUNT OF APPRO:IMATELY 025,000. iF THE METHOD Of REPAIRING THE BRIDGE DECK D =VFl PED BY MR. LEVER I -- USED, THUS CAUSING THE A.H.F.P. TO WITHDRAW ITS FINANCING OF ITE :HARE OF THE COST OF THE BRIDGE, THE CONTRACTOR MUST ABSORB THlti COr;T AS WELL AS AN ADDITIONAL REDUCTION IN COST OF APPROXI- MATELY , OW WHICH WOULD COMPENSATE THE CITY FOR THE COST Of AN ADDITIONAL 4- INCHES OF OCC( THICKNESS WHEN THE BRIDGE IS NiD[MED TO THRE: LANES IN THE FUTURE. TH£Rr. APPEAR TO $-E TWO PRACTICABLE COURSES OF AC.TI04 OPEN TO THE CONTRACTOR IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE BRIDGE: A. REPAIR, THE DECK, AS PROPO:ED BY MR. LEVER, WHICH WILL 7NVOLVZ REDUCING Ti,- CONTRACT AMOUNT AN ESTIMATED $31,5wj OR $. REPLACE THE DECK PER TH" ORIGINAL PLA45 AND 5PECIFICITI04S. _ r i • COXCO# INC. 2. 10 -12-" JANboREE ROAD REALIGNMS :MT (CAD Iv THE CVENT THAT IT IS DECIM* TO REPAIR THE EX13TING DECK AS VU ;H-_ L-vER PROPOSALS PLEASE HAVE. *, LEVER PROCEED WITH PREPARAT WO OF THC CALCULATIONS# PLANS, AMD SPECIf ICATiONS. DETAILED CALCULATIONS# PLANS, ,.4D SPECIFICATIONS MUST DC PREPARED fit FINAL .FORM AND SiGN€D BY We LEVER. TH:Y MUST ti.LCARLY SHOW AND EXPLAIN T14E TREATMENT TO BE GIVEN ALL r5'N;,TRUCTIVN DETAILS AFFECTED BY THE REMEDIAL WORKS IN- ELUDING THL FOLL;iJING: 1. SANDBLASTING AHD BOND. THE AGE AND STRENGTH OF THE EAIaT- ING CONCRETE DECK U,31TS WILL DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS AS TO PROCEDURE AND r-UIPME`!T. T%' 6E USED IN ORDER TO SECURE A GOOD SANDBLASTING J08 AND OBTAtN ADEQUATE BOND TO THE NEV 2. TUCSdEtSs DETAILED P£C IF iCAT t: NS MUi ?T or DEVELOPED FOR THE - '04- :iHRINK GROUT, AS W.LL AS FOR -Hr PLACEMENT Of TH:- DOWELS. ' JOINT s. BOTH TRAti'::VER'SE s•ND LONGITUDINAL i01NT5 MU` >T BE CAREFULLY DESIGNED -.ND DETAILED. THERE MUST BE TRANSVERSE JOINT AT EACH PILE CAP. 4. CaRADE �.. NEW 6RADCi MUST %!: :STA «LICHED AC003:i THE 3R IDK`# MA;146 3 URP. THAT THE C +:vrR°'TE D€CY. IS VOT L €S$ THAN 4 iNCIK>t THICK AT ITS THINYE::T POINT. TH°: NEW VRrF!L� GRADES FOR THE MIDGE SHALL %E C- i%TINU`IiUS, ;:MOOTH CURVJ S. 5• ENBE.DDED ITEMS. DETAILS MUST BE 'SHOWN HOW THE CALIFORNIA STANDARD ARRIER RAILING, THE CG "' $LAN HIGHWAY O'JACtD RAIL, AND THE PIPE HANDRAIL ARE TC BE RAIa£D TO Tti:. NEW GRADE. WHEN COtfPLETED, THE PROsILES OF ALL Tiff RAIL; S:J:L1. or CON- TINUOUS, SMOOTH CURVE.'., AND AT UNIFORM HEIGHTS .=$DVS THE DECX, WHICH WILL IM A CANT INUOUS, 33400TH L_URV €. i O. TH£ -IYCH R €I'4FORC£0 CON,.R%TE >LAp NU3T ExT €ND THE FULL WIDTH 3F THE BRIDGE. THE CALCULATIONF, PLAN., <^10 �PECIFIC'.TI'.1N:S PREPAR €D $V MR. LEVER ::HALL BE 171:BJECT TO FINAL EPPROVAt. OF THE CITY OF CI€WPGR'T 8,ACM, ORANGE COUNTY FLooc CONTROL OISTRI:T, AND THE CALIFORNIA DIVISION Of HIGHWAY >. ALL COSTS Of THC HOOIFICATIO!!S 'dlt. RE ¢C.Rti,.. D" THE CON- TRACTOR IN ADDITION TO TM-:. REDUCTIO3 IN THE COATRACT A%, :WXT FOR THE %RIDGE IN THE - "STIM.ATED MAxA"UM A.:YJUNT :JF 31,500. 0 q COx6D, INC. io -m-66 .IAMBOREC ROAD R ALIGNMENT If TNC BRIDGE IS TO BE REPAIRED, A CHANGE ORDER AUTHORIZING THE REDUCTION OF PRICE WILL BE PROCESSED. IF A.H.F.P. FI,It.NcING Is AGAIN SECURED IN THE FULL AMOUNT OR ANY PERC£147.kQE OF THE FULL AMOUNT, AN AMENDED CHANGE ORDER WILL 8E PROCESSED AND ANY SHARE OF THZ COST OF THE BRIDGE CONTRIBUTED BY THE A.H.F.P. WILL RESULT IN A CORRESPONDING ADJUSTMENT IN THE AMOUNT TO BE D:.Dur %D UNDER THE CHANGE ORDER. SINCE THE TIMING ON THIS PROD ?.-CT IS VITALLY IMPORTANT TO THE CITY, IT 15 URGED THAT THE WORK 8E COMMENCED AS SOON AS P0351GLC• IF THERE ARE ANY CUESTIONS, PLCAaC : =ALL KENNccTM L. PERRY Of THIS Off ICE AT (714) 673.2110, z.xTENSION 26. VERY TRULY YOURS, /� BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KLP:va CC: ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPT. Roc KWIN PRESTRESSED C01CRCTE CORP. KEN OIBRICN & AS8OCIATC3 MR. LEVER NO. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBL : C 14ORKS DEPARTMENT 0 Date OCT. 6, 1966 TO: FILE C -847 (BRIDGE) BY THE DIFFERENT PUBLIC AGENCIES: FROM: ASST. CITY ENGINEER 801336 A. H. F. P.: 112 SUBJECT: DIVISION OF COSTS OF JAMBOREE ROAD BR DGE BETWEEN .A.H.F.P., O.C.F.C.D., AND CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH GAS TAX FUNDS TOTAL CO:NTRA--F COST OF ORIGINAL BRIDGE (PER PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUESTS) ONTRACT ITEM 11 (FURNISHING PILES) $ 37,749.78 11A (DRIVING PILES) 29,600.00 12 (BRIDGE) (INCLUDES ALL CONCRETE ITi: MS, BUT NOT ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT) 127,600.00 SUB TOTAL $ 194,949:78 ENGINEERING 100 _ 19, 9 98 8 TOTAL $ 214,444.76 ESTIMATED EIRE AKDOWN OF COST OF ITEM 12 A. DECK, RAILING, ETC. 2/3 x $127,600 = $ 85,067.00 B. PILE CAPS, CURTAIN AND WING WALLS, !-TC. 1/3 x $127,600 = 42, 3 .00 TOTAL ITEM 12 $ 127,600.00 ESTIMATED SHARING OF COST BY THE DIFFERENT PUBLIC AGENCIES: TOTAL 3PUZ-P� c`s COST , CITY: 1/2 OF 801336 A. H. F. P.: 112 OF 80/336 o.C.F.C.D.: 256/336 ITEM C.TY A. H. F. P. O.C.F.C.D.11 TOTAL TOTAL 3PUZ-P� c`s COST , $2),208-30 $23,208-30 $148, 533.18 11 4 . 8 $19 ,9 9 7 LESS ENGINEERING j TOTAL CQW7 24CT COST INCLUDING 'ENGINEERING $25,529.13+ 2 2Z 29.1 $163,386-5o $214,444.76 ' (ioa. eDwAgiG ITEM 12 ONLY: BRIDGE I 1 INCL. APPURTENANCES LESS PILES AND PAVEMENT $1 1 0.4 $1 1 0.4 .$ 21,219.o6 $1271700.00 BRIDGE DECK AND RAILINGS;. ONLY 1 $lo,lz7.oz $10,127. oz $ 64,812.96 $ 89,o67-00 W K. L. PERRY ASST. CITY ENGINEER T CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA SEPTEMBER 2O, 1966 MR. A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMIU TONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR 800 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA SUBJECTt JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C -847), BRIDGE DECK UNITS DEAR MW. KOCH: IT IS REOUCSTED THAT THE COUNTY RECONSIDER THE DECISION INDICATED IN YOUR LETTER OF AUGUST 23, 1966, NOT TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED REMEDIAL MODIFICATION TO THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE DECK. THIS REQUEST IS MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. IT IS FELT THAT THE MODIFICATION WOULD RESULT IN A BRIDGE OVA QUALITY AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THE ORIGINAL DESIGN, THUS FULFILLING THE INTENTION OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.. 2. THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT_, AND THE DESIGNERS, KEN O'BRIEN AND ASSOCIATES. COPIES OF THE LETTERS OF APPROVAL FROM THESE AGENCIES ARE ENCLOSED FOR REFERRNCE. 3. THE REMEDIAL MODIFICATION WOULD ENABLE THE NEW ROADWAY TO RE- OPENED TO THE PUBLIC SEVERAL MONTHS SOONER THAN IF THE DECK, WERE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. IN ADDITION TO THE GREATER CONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC, EARLIER OPENING OF THE ROADWAY WOULD BE VERY DESIRABLE FROM A SAFETY POINT OF VIEW BECAUSE OF THE POOR ACCIDENT HISTORY ON THE PRESENT ALIGNMEMT. 4. THE BRIDGE WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY, THUS THERE WOULD SE NO ADDITIONAL COSTS TO THE COUNTY IF ANY UNUSUAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSES WERE TO OCCUR. 5. THE CITY'S 18 -INCH WATER LINE IN JAMBOREE ROAD COULD BE COM- PLETED SEVERAL MONTHS EARLIER. THE ENTIRE EASTBLUFF AREA IS PRESENTLY SERVED WATER FROM A DEAD END LINE; ANY OUTAGE WOULD HAVE VERY SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES. COMPLETION OF THE 18 -INCH LOOP WILL PROVIDE ANOTHER SOURCE OF WATER FOR THE AREA. CITY OF NEWPORT. BEACH CALIFORNIA . MR. A. S. KGcH 9-20 -" C- 7 - BRIDGE DECK UNITS 2. WE WISH TO EMPHASIZE THAT IN NO EVENT IS THE CITY WILLING TO ACCEPT SUBSTANDARD OR INFERIOR WORK. IN FACT, SEVERAL EARLIER PROPOSALS BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR CORRECTIVE MEASURES WERE DISAPPROVED AND THE BRIDGE DECK REJECTED. (SEE CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CONTRACTOR DATED JULY 13 AND JULY 19, 19660 AND EARLIER DATES; COPIES OF WHICH HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED TO THE ROAD DEPARTMENT.) OUR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REMEDIAL MEASURES IS BASED SOLELY ON THE BELIEF THAT THEY WOULD RESULT IN A BRIDGE MEETING THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT REQUIRE- MENTS. IF THE REMEOIA'L MEASURES ARE NOT APPROVED WE FEEL THE DECISION FOR DISAPPROVAL SHOULD NOT BE ARBITRARY, BUT SHOULD BE BASED ON VALID ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS. WE WILL BE GLAD TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER AT YOUR CONVENIENCE. VERY TRULY YOURS JOSEPH T. DEVLIN- PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BSN:VR ENCLS. ftPTEMSER 20, 1966 MR. A* S. KOCH ROAD COW ISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR 800 WEST STN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C -&7)0 BRIDGE DECK UNITS DEAR MR. KOCH: IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE COUNTY RECONSIDER THE DECISION INDICATED IN YOUR LETTER OF AUGUST 23, 1966, NOT TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED REMEDIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE DECK. THIS REQUEST 15 MADE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONSt }. IT IS FELT THAT THE MODIFICATIONS WOULD RESULT IN A BRIDGE OF A QUALITY AT LEAST EQUIVALENT TO THE ORIGINAL DESIGN, THUS FULFILLING THE INTENTION OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. THE PROPOSED MODIFICATION HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS, THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, AND THE DESIGNERS, KEN O'BRIEN AND ASSOCIATES. COPIES OF THE LETTERS OF APPROVAL FROM THESE AGENCIES ARE ENCLOSED FOR RCFERENCE. 3. THE REMEDIAL MODIFICATION WOULD ENABLE THE NEW ROADWAY TO BE OPENED TO THE PUBLIC SEVERAL MONTHS SOONER THAN If THE DECK WERE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED. IN ADDITION TO THE GREATER I11CONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC, EARLIER OPENING OF THE ROADWAY WOULD BE VERY DESIRABLE FROM A SAFETY POINT Of VIEW BECAUSE OF THE POOR ACCIDENT HISTORY ON THE PRESENT ALIGNMENT. 4. THE BRIDGE WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE CITY, THUS THERE WOULD BE NO ADDITIONAL COSTS TO THE COUNTY If ANY UNUSUAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSES WERE TO OCCUR. 5. THE CITY'S 18 -INCH WATER LINE IN JAMBOREE ROAD COULD BE COM- PLETED SEVERAL MONTHS EARLIER. THE ENTIRE EASTBLUFF AREA IS PRESENTLY SERVED WATER FROM A DEAD END LINE; ANY OUTAGE WOULD HAVE VERY SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES. COMPLETION OF THE 18 -INCH LOOP WILL PROVIDE ANOTHER SOURCE OF WATER FOR THE AREA. 0 0 MR. A. S. KOCH 9 -20-66 C -W7 - BRIDGE DECK UNITS 2. WE WISH TO EMPHASIZE THAT IN NO EVENT IS THE CITY WILLING TO ACCEO. SUBSTANDARD OR INFERIOR WORK. IN FACTS SEVERAL EARLIER PROPOSALS BY THE CONTRACTOR F.R CORRECTIVE MEASURES WERE DISAPPROVED AND THE BRIDGE DECK REJECTED ' (SEC CORRESPONDENCE TO THE CONTRACTOR DATED JULY 13 AND JULY 19, 1966, AND EARLIER DATES; COPIES OF WHICH HAVE BEEN SUPPLIED TO THE ROAD DEPARTMENT.) OUR APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED REMEDIAL MEASURES IS BASED SOLELY ON THE BELIEF THAT THEY WOULD RESULT IN A BRIDGE MEETING THE INTENT OF THE CONTRACT REQUIRE- MENTS. IF THE REMEDIAL MEASURES ARE NOT APPROVED WE FEEL THE DECISION FOR DISAPPROVAL ;MOULD NOT BE ARBITRARY, BUT SHOU'_D BE BASED ON VA_ID ENGINEERING ^ONSIDERATIONS. WE WILL BE GLAD TO DISCUSS THIS NATTER AT YOUR COHVENIENCE- VE*Y.TRULY YOURS, .JOSEPH.'T DEVLIN PURL 1'C RKS DIRECTOR BBN:VR ENCLS. NEWFORT BEACH CALIFORNIA City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 714 673 -2110 OCTOBER 6, 1966 COXCO, INC. P.O. DRAWER C STANTON, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. R.A. KERFOOT SUBJECT: JAMBOREE R94-C REALIGNMENT (C -847) GENTLEMEN; WITH THE WIDENING OF PALISADES ROAD AND INSTALLATION OF THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT JAMBOREE ROAD NEARING COMPLETIONP IT HAS BECOME ESSENTIAL THAT THE FOUR LANE PORTION OF THE SUBJECT PROJECT BE COMPLETED FROM PALISADES ROAD TO APPROXIMATELY STA 97 + CO. IT IS PLANNED TO USE THE CROSS -OVER FOR SOUTHBOUND TRAFFIC UNTIL THE BRIDGE IS COMPLETED. AS YOU WILL REMEMBERS THIS WAS DISCUSSED LAST SPRINGS BUT WAS DROPPED WHEN IT WAS THOUGHT THAT THE ENTIRE CONTRACT WOULD BE COMPLETED BY THE LATTER PART OF JULY (SEE LTR. DATED APRIL 28A 1966). AS IT APPEARS, THAT COMPLETION OF THE BRIDGE WILL BE DELAYED FOR SOME TIMES PLEASE COMPLETE THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE ABOVE MENTIONED AREA AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. VERY TRULY YOURSY '11� G.P. DUNIGAN� JR. ASST. CIVIL ENGINEER GPD:NAJ r of NGE M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT OIVI$ION%.%I NEE R - ENGINEERING BUSINES$M A.AGER TELEPHONE: 534.3430 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 5TH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 October 38 1966 - Mr. J. T. Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: Reference is made to your letter of September 20, 1866 regarding the Jamboree Road Bridge. The County has reconsidered your reasons for accepting the cont metorls proposed modification of the design of the bridge decks. After the defective beams were discovered, we concurred with the City's notifying the contractor that this portion of the work was rejected. At that time we were convinced that the City's action was the correct approach considering the contractural arrangements and obligations of the contractor. The situation seems to remain unchanged except for the intent of the City.now to accept a substitute for the earlier rejected beams. We have concluded that the County's position should remain as stated in our letter of August 23, 1966. We will not approve the proposed modification and will withdraw participation in the cost of the structure if a substitute for the defective beams is made. ) EA AM r ;BV Er. `IVED OCT 5 1966 PUBLIC WOKK� ULPT. Commissioner 6. County Surveyor A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE •SST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR AND SURVEYOR A. B. V AILS W. L. ZAUN DIVISION ENGINEER - OPERATION$ REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER NGE M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT OIVI$ION%.%I NEE R - ENGINEERING BUSINES$M A.AGER TELEPHONE: 534.3430 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 5TH STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 October 38 1966 - Mr. J. T. Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: Reference is made to your letter of September 20, 1866 regarding the Jamboree Road Bridge. The County has reconsidered your reasons for accepting the cont metorls proposed modification of the design of the bridge decks. After the defective beams were discovered, we concurred with the City's notifying the contractor that this portion of the work was rejected. At that time we were convinced that the City's action was the correct approach considering the contractural arrangements and obligations of the contractor. The situation seems to remain unchanged except for the intent of the City.now to accept a substitute for the earlier rejected beams. We have concluded that the County's position should remain as stated in our letter of August 23, 1966. We will not approve the proposed modification and will withdraw participation in the cost of the structure if a substitute for the defective beams is made. ) EA AM r ;BV Er. `IVED OCT 5 1966 PUBLIC WOKK� ULPT. Commissioner 6. County Surveyor a CITY AND COUNTY PROJECTS OANUAL Exhibit INFORMATION TO SUPPORT STRUCTURAL REVIEW OF BRIDGES AND OTHER MAJOR STRUCTURES Local agency records should provide the following data: 1. A statement by agency's inspecting engineer verifying: a. That he witnessed major portions of construction work on the critical structural items. b. That requirements of the contract plans and specifications were substantially met. 2. Material Records a. For concrete, a list showing: R 1 The names of the cement and aggregate suppliers. 2 Test results of aggregate samples. 3 For transit mix concrete, copies of the delivery tickets showing the amount of cement in the mix. (4) All concrete samples taken and their compressive strengths. b. For reinforcing and structural steel, a list showing: • 1 The names of the supplier and fabricator. �2; Any shop inspection given and /or a certificate of compliance by the steel company. (3) Tabulation of shipping tags, bills of lading for steel shipments and tabulation of total weight of steel shipped to the job. c. For prestressed concrete, railing and /or other major structural components: (1) A report of inspection or certificate of compliance by the supplier. 3. The "as built plans ", signed and dated. This can be a set of contract bridge plans with changes shown in a contrasting color. They should show: a. Changes actually made as found necessary during construction. b. Final elevations of the bottoms of footings and a brief description of the footing bearing material. c. Final pile tip elevation and the pile bearing values as calculated by driving resistance. • d. Final horizontal and vertical clearance when the structure spans roads or railroads. I September 1966.. V' Or 0 A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE ASST. ROAD COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR ANO SURVEYOR R. B. VAILE W, L. ZAUN DIVISION ENGINEER - OPERATIONS REIUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER N / l� �.0 G M. 1. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER - ENGINEERING BUSINESS MANAGER TELEPHONE: 034.3455 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST STH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 32701 August 33, 1966 Mr. W. Joe Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: Reference is made to your letter of August 16, 1966 concerning a proposal by the contractor's engineer to modify the Jamboree Road bridge deck units. We have considered the proposal and the overall effect it has on the structure. Regardless of the intended structural adequacy of the modification, the finished bridge will not meet the requirements of the design, plans and specifications. The addition of a four inch slab topping, even if it could be bonded securely or keyed to the questionable beams, is still a proposed substitution for defective workmanship. We believe the contractor is obligated under contractural arrangements to build a structure which,is in accordance with the design, plans and specifications. On similar'situations which have occurred on County contract projects, the defective workmanship was rejected and replaced by the contractor. In this case, we believe the contractor has failed in the performance of his contract unless he replaces the defective beams in lieu of substituting a modification of the design. The County therefore does not approve the pro- posed modification and will withdraw participation in the cost of the structure if it is modified. The City, at its discretion, may continue with the construction of the bridge as proposed, with the City and County participating in the balance of the project. If there are any questions regarding the County's position in this situations please do not hesitate to call. , ' Very ur , r M. Road Commissioner & ASK:RBV :sl Co WWI 6Z De, if) KEN O'B R I E N & A S S O C I A T E S 4201 sunset boulevard, los angeles, california 90029/213664 -2191 August 17, 1966 Department of Public Works City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attentions Mr. B. Nolan, Assistant Public Works Director Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Jamboree Road Realignment (C -847) Bridge Deck Units #6019 We have reviewed the corrections to the prestressed deck slab proposed by Mr. Lever and interpose no objections. It is, therefore, recommended that the modification be approved. Very truly yours, J. R. H JRHsbh newport beach, california CONSULTING ENGINEERS washington, d. c. r i STATE CA CALIFORNIA — TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Go,e,eo, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. BOX 1499, SACRAMENTO August 22, 1966 07- 0ra- 0 -NptB SS Project 38(1) Jamboree Rd Bridge Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: We have reviewed your proposal of August 16, 1966 for correcting the problem caused by the floating sonovoids and have no comments on the remedial design submitted by Mr. William F. Lever, consulting structural engineer. We concur with your general acceptance of the procedure. It is suggested that the pending specifications cover the degree of sandblasting required, bonding of the dowels in the drilled holes and curing of the 4 -inch deck slab. If these details are covered to your satisfaction, then this letter may be interpreted as prior structural approval to proceed with the work. Please check with District 07 for administrative approval. Very truly yours, J. E. McMahon Assistant State Highway Engineer - Bridges By /// ^-'t W. C. Kiedaisch Bridge City & County Projects Engineer RECEIVED AUG 2 >< 196 PUBUG nwaS DEPT. r, 0 0 f ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT V H. G. OSBORNE CHIEF ENGINEER P. a Box 1070 BANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE: $34 -2900 400 WEST EIGHTH ST. AREA CODE 714 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA, 92702 FILE No. F05.23 AUG 2 5 9966 Mr. Benjamin Nolan Assistant Public Works Director City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: The plans transmitted with your letter of August 16, 1966 in regard to the 4" concrete protective slab over the prestressed deck units have been reviewed by this office. The district concurs in your corrective measures to remedy the problem caused by floating sonovoids in the Jamboree Road bridge prestress deck units. JWS /gp Very truly yours, H. G.'09 borne, Chlet Engineer WrrrIVED 2 9 is%, *URKS Wit COPIES ALSO SENT TI: MR. H.G. GS00RNE0 CHIEF ENGINEER ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 4GG W. 8TH ST. SANTA ANA MR. KEQ'BRIEN AND ASSOCIATES 4201 SUNSET BLVD. L.A. 29, CALIFORNIA ATTN: MR. HOLDEMAN MR. J.E. McMAHoN. BRIDGE ENGINEER P.O. Box 1499 SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA }} (ATTN: MR. W.C. KIEDAISCH/ AUGUST 160 1966 MR. A.S. KOCH COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMISSIONER 8 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. WENDELL HARTMAN SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT (C-847); BRIDGE BECK UNITS GENTLEMEN: ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORATION HAS RETAINED MR. WILLIAM F. LEVER, A CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FROM LONG BEACH, TO INVESTIGATE MEANS OF CORRECTING THE PROBLEM CAUSED BY FLOATING SONOVOIDS IN THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE DECK UNITS. MR. LEVER HAS PRIIPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF A POURED IN PLACE REINFORCED CONCRETE DECK OF 4 -INCH MINIMUM THICK - NESS) TO BE INSTALLED OVER THE PRECAST UNITS. SHEAR TRANSFER WOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MEANS OF DOWELS. A COPY OF THE PRELIMINARY CALCULATIONS AND SKETCHES PREPARED BY MR. LEVER IS ENCLOSED FOR YGUK REVIEW AND COMMENT. AFTER A BRIEF REVIEW BY THIS OFFICES IT IS FELT THAT MR. LEVERS PROPOSAL WOULD RESULT IN A BRIDGE OF QUALITY AT LEAST EQUAL TO THE ORIGINAL DESIGN. IF THERE IS NO OBJECTION TO THE CONCEPT BY THE OTHER AGENCIES INVOLVED IN FINANCING THE BRIDGE$ WE WILL INSTRUCT MR. LEVER TO PROCEED WITH DETAILED PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MODIFICATIONS NEEDED. THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WOULD TNEN BE SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL BY ALL AGENCIES INVOLVED. ALL ADDITICNAL COSTS FOR THE WORK WILL BE BORNE BY THE CONTRACTOR. IN THE INTEREST OF COMPLETING THE PROJECT AS SOON AS POSSIBLEp YOUR COMMENTS AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE DATE ARE REQUESTED. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS! !7� BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BBN:NAJ ENCL. r `' LOS ANGELES • CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO • CALIFORNIA LIVINGSTON • NEW JERSEY RENO • NEVADA 0 PORTER, ARMSTRONG, RIPA & ASSOCIATES O. J. PORTER SI COMPANY ENGINEERING • PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE 415 FRELINGHUYSEN AVENUE NEWARK, NEW JERSEY 07114 201. 242.4200 CARLE- PORTHART August 12, 1966 Mr. Joseph Devlin, Director Department of Public Works City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Dear Joseph: O. JAMES RORTRR ELLIS L ARMSTRONG LOUD C. RIPA JAMES R. PORTER ALDER/ L. ELACKWKLL OEOROE R. HALTON YROMOS G. RIPA JAKE C. YOUNG LEONARD 0. UROUNART 1040.1000 It certainly was a pleasure to visit with you after so many years when we were associated on the work in French Morocco in 1951 -53. That assignment was very interesting, I believe, to all of us; but as usual, it was not without may troublesome periods. I haven't heard about the activities of George Hall for many years. I occasionally hear from and about Frank Basil, who is in business for himself in Greece and was doing work in the Far East. The Western Salt Company summons and complaint is being handled by Austin C. Smith, Jr. of the law firm of Kirtland & Packard, 639 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California - Telephone 624 -0935, for the Continental National American Group, with whom we have a million dollar professional liability insurance with a $15,000 deductible, and where we pay the maximum of $5, 000 for legal and court costs. Attached is a copy of my letter to Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr. of July 20, and his letter of July 25 to Mr. Austin C. Smith, Jr. I am also enclosing my letter of even date to Kenneth H. O'Brien, who has also been served with the summons and complaint. I hope I didn't make any error in the information you gave to me on July 5. I shall, indeed, be grateful to you if you can confer with Mr. Smith at a later date and again in our defense on the complaint of '1411• ENGINEERING PLANNING ARCHITECTURE HIONWAYS.AIRP OPTS - DAMS. UTILITIES. STRUCTURES. GEOLOGY - FOUNDATIONS - STABILIZATION 1 :s I le Mr. Joseph Devlin, Director Department of Pub lie Works City of Newport Beach August 12, 1966 Page 2. Western Salt Company and Cox Co. , Inc. , the contractor in this cross- complaint against us. Looking forward to having another nice visit with you on one of my next trips to southern California. With best wishes for Sour continued success, I remain Sincerely, 0.fj: CJP:gC Enclosures cc: Austin C. Smith, Jr. Merritt Lane, Jr. James R. Porter PORTER, ARMSTRONG. RIPA & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING • PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE ...... . . . . . 9 0 Los ANGELES CALIFORNIA PORTER, AROSTRONG, RIPA & ASSOCIATES SACRAMENTO • CALIFORNIA O. J. PORTER & COMPANY " ENGINEERING . PLANNING . ARCHITECTURE LIVINGSTON • NEW JERSEY 615 FRELINGNUYSEN AVENUE NEWARK, NEW JERSEY 07114 RENO • NEVADA 201- "a•4800 CABLE.PORTHART k�'.i &sii F+t i[, 1908 !TjS, Kennttll H. l:l4aric3 O'Brien & Associates 4,:01 Sunset Boulevard t.os t >- cltciea, LalifjIi�j,is 80010 O. JAMES PORTER ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG LOUIS C. RIPA JAMES R. PORTER ALBERT L. BLACKWELL GEORGE R. HALTON GEORGE G. RIPA JAKE C. YOUNG LEONARD C. URGUHART 1969 -1.60 uubject: tl'esterr, Salt Lompan� vs, City of export Heaeh; Coo Co., Inc. ; Portcr, 6'Brien & Arrnstrong, et al. 'Dear ii;r, O'Brien, When I was irc Southern California on July 5 and S. i met with Austin C. Smith, Jr. , attorney for Continental National American Group In the above action; Joseph Devlin, Director of the L*pertment of Public j 'arks, City of Newport i3eaeh; and Benjsailn helan, City Engineer of Newport Beach, Attached is a copy of my letter of July 20 to Merritt ane, Jr. regardint; the suuject claim which be forwarded to Austin C. Smith, Jr. on July 25. For our mutual protection, i believe that you should, through youi attorney, cooperate with lair. Smith in preparing affidavits by you and your employees who :'tave first -hand knowledge of the cese. I believe Mr. Smith is preparing to conduct interrogatory examinations of the plaintiff and th4E contractor in the cross - complaint to determine what is the basis for tEleir claims. After this stage of the case is Completed. I think that it would then be necessary to prepare interrogatories, referenced above, preparing a defense and a cross - complaint against the contractor. The set of plans and copies of tht PUA contracts with the City of Newport Beach were apparently lost in t:'.e mails, as the tube was empty, when it arrived in Newark from Sacramento. Will you kindly send us snot .er copy of the contracts and plans to Newark, and also a copy of the specifications whicic you prepared for the work on Jamboree goad. Very truly ,yours, JP:ic O. Porter 10411 + cc: ustlin S Jr. ENGINEERING PoeP }I JCV1•n PLANNING 1 a6i-r Plitt l ane ARCHITECTURE HIG78&g1EP0ffG. Pr -41 TIES- STRUCTURES. GEOLOGY .FOUNDATIONS. STABILIZATION JAMES R. E. OSIAS WOOORUIF J. ENOLISM MICN OLAS CONOVER ENGLISH fRANCIE E.P. M'CARTEq M CRRITT IAN C•JR. AftTNW ...... LBR.JR. AgT.UR l NIMS.g EUGENE M. MARINO JULIUS B." M"0A GEORGE C. WITTE.JR. RO.E., P. INauO A'S IREDERICK W. ROSE JON" R.OROSOICR JAMES M. BENNETT STENCH B. MOSKINS POO." N. HOUGHTON ..CHAS G OAp ALIREO L.TEROUSON.m STANLET R. STCVIMBOR SERTRAM E. BUSCM CHARLES R MERRILL ANDREW T. 6 ERRT FRANKLIN M. "CHO PETE. W. igEDICR DAVID N. DUOAN.St MARTIN J. BRACT • 0 MriCARTER & ENGLISH COUNSELLORS AT LAW 11 COMMERCE STREET NEWARK, N. J. ' o71aa July 25, 1966 Re: Western Salt Co. vs. City of Newport Beach 10 ARIA COD[ 201 gas -sago Mr. Austin Smith, Jr., Esq. Kirtland & Packard, Esqs. 639 South Spring Street Los Angeles, California 90014 Dear Mr. Smith: I enclose a copy of a letter dated July 20, 1966 that Mr. Porter has written to me summarizing his confer- ence with you when he was in Los Angeles. You will note that he adds certain information that he did not have when he spoke to you and that in the next to last paragraph he makes a suggestion. If there is any way that we can assist in the do- fense of this action, please do not hesitate to call upon i use Very truly yours, MLscs Merritt Lane, Jr.p x s Enc. ,! cc: Mr. 0, James Porter• 4; s rOd1EA. aM:110M1::V1 { iglAlunL W. . JUL 2 616 14EWAM N. J. July 20. 1966 Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr. McCarter & English 11 Commerce Street Newark, N.J. Re: Western Salt Co. vs. City of Newport Beach Dear Mr. Lane: I have just returned to the office this morning after having considerable difficulty in obtaining pinne reservations from San Francisco. While in Los Angeles, I conferred with Mr. Austin Smith, Jr. , of Kirtland &Packard re ardina the Western Salt Company's clnim, after first having a meeting with the officials of the City of Newport Beach. The court allowed the service on Ken O'Brien to stand for the claim against Porter, O'Brien & Armstronc -O: J. Porter & Co. It appears however, that a good defense can be presented with the com- bined efforts of the Department of Public Works of Newport' Beach and Ken O'Brien. Welch, Cummings & White of the Stotler Towers, Los Angeles, are the attorneys representing Ken O'Brien. Their name was given to Mr. Smith so that he could coordinate with them in preparing = the defense in conjunction with testimony which I believe the Engineers of the Department of Public Works in New port Beach wiM be willing to prepare. The officials of Newport Bench are as follows: 1) Joseph Devlin, Director of the Department of Public Works. 2) Benjamin Nolan, City Engineer. 3) Pat Dunigan, Inspector on the project. I hired Joseph Devlin as a young engineer in 1951, and he worked for us for over two years in French Morocco. Ile indicated that the flooding, which is the basis of Western Salt Company's claim, was the fault of the Contractor, as he did not maintain the ditch to carry away the 1 storm water as provided in the Contract. Apparently this deficiency had been called to the Contractor's attention by the Inspector before the 'a 9 Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr. McCarter & English • July 20, 1966 Page 2 flooding which occurred on November 23, 1965. After this, the Contractor took care of the storm water with a ditch and other facilities; as called for in the Contract, and then no further flooding into Western Salt Company's property occurred. Engineers, Devlin and Nolan stated that part of the water and silt which flowed into Vat "It" came from the Western Salt Company's own property. Mr. Devlin indicated that they would do what they could to prevent us from being damnred by the claim. Fe indicated that the Contract required the Contractor to hold the City of Newport Beach "Harmless ". They also have not accepted the pre - stress deck panels on the bridge and they are holding the Contractor responsible to construct the bridge to meet all the Contract requirements. I talked on the telephone with Ken O'Brien and he stated that while they were not engaged to supervise construction, he could prepare affidavits with members of his staff who have first -hand knowledge of the cause of the flooding. I verbally requested Mr. Austin Smith to confer with Ken O'Brien'!s attorneys in obtaining an affidavit from Ken O'Brien and his staff. 1 also told him that I thought we should enter a cross - complaint against the Contractors to counteract his cross - .complaint against us. If you concur, I believe that this letter, or a revised copy of it, should be sent to Mr. Smith of Kirtland & Packard in Los Angeles, California. Sincerely... O. J. Porter r Managing Partner OJJP: j1 Letter in Duplicate cc: ELA . �s xm.evNOnea: IAC N 7-6126 COXCO, INC. x TWJXO 3 -2604 Cox Bros. Construction Co. P. o. DM R C Mfow AND $ATZU • ROME STANTON (on = wo ), CALIFORNIA August 12, 1966 G. P. Dunigan, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Subject: Jamboree Road Bridge Dear Sir: A. S. COX ..... i�pms�r M. A. Cox ..... vx:o-PN R. D. Cox .. v=4wL+la We are in receipt of a copy of your letter to Cabildo Corporation dated August 10, 1966. We respectfully request your prohibiting the use of any portion of the bridge by anyone for work outside the requirements of our contract with the City. We make this re- quest particularly in view of the fact that the bridge deck has not been accepted by the City to be structurally sufficient. Your understanding and cooperation in this matter is appreciated. Very truly yours, COXCO INC. By R. A. Kkrfoot General Superintendent MR. WILLIAM F. LEVER 304 EAST PACIFIC COAST HI AY LONG BEICHs CALIr0RN#A Aorl3 SUBJECTI JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE DEAR MR. LEVER: TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR INFORMATION AS REQUESTED ARE CO JES *AF THE PILE DRIVING RECORDS /OR THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE. WITH REGARD TO THE MEASUREMENTS OF THE DEPTH OF COVER OVER THE VOIDS IN THE DECK UNITS WE HAVE NOT COMPLETED ANY ADDITIONAL MEASURVNENTS BEYOND THOSE YOU NOW HAVE. IF YOU FEEL IT IS IMPORTANT TO YOUR ANALYSIS TO HAVE THE REMAINDER OF THE MEASUREMENTSS IT IS SUGGESTED THAT THE CONTRACTOR COMPLETE THEM. VERY TRULY YOURSO BENJAMIN B. NOLAN CITY ENGINEER BBN:VR ENCL. 0 AUOUBT 5# 1966 MR. A*S. Kotw ROAD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR 8013 Wr ST 8:H STREET SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: "AR. WENDELL L. HARTMAN SUBJECT: JAMNOREE ROAD REALIONISENT (C -847) Bfz'oGE DECD: ut4tY:: DEAR SIR: ENCLOSED FOR YOUR INFORMATtL`N ARE COPIES OF ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE RELATING; TO THC ORtUGE DECK UNITS ON SUBJECT PROJECT. THIS 18 IN ADDITION TO THE CORRESPONDENCE SENT TO YOU ON AUGUST 3. 1966. VERY TRULY YOURS, KENNPTMCL• FERRY ASST. CITY ENGINEER KLP:NAJ ENCL. WILLIAM F. LEVER CONSULTING ENGINEER 304 E. PACIFIC COAST HWY. LONG BEACH. CALIFORNIA. 80813 TELEPHONE 438 -8311 July 28 1966 Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California 92660 Dear Mr. Nolan : • Jamboree Road Realignment (C -847), Prestressed Bridge Deck Units. This letter will acknowledge receipt today of one copy of your Field Book notes dated July 21 1966, showing elevations taken on tops of prestressed units for the purpose of determining the camber. It would be appreciated if you could also furnish as soon as possible the completed records of depths of holes into cores, and records of pile- driving and as -built condition of pile caps. Yours very truly, WFL /gl cc: Rockwin William F. Lever. RECIFFIYEO A.uc, 0 IC IAC N 75126 COXCQ, INC. TWDroAn 3 -2604 Cox Bros. Construction Co. P. O. DnkA C KNOTT AND xATBLLA ROADS STANTON meANOCcwmvTi "CALIFORNIA July 23, 1966 Benjamin B. Nolan, Asst. Public Works Director Citk Hall 3300 W Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: b r. d��t -- A. s. cox ..... pm■ M. A. Cox .... VN PIR0. A D. Cox .. via- v=LA%z& . Subject: Jamboree Road Realignment (C -847), Bridge Deck Units Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation has employed the services of William F. Lever. His commission is to develop a suitable method to remedy the faults now existing in the bridge deck units. His report will be submitted to you for consider- ation at the earliest possible date. We will appreciate your extending the appropriate professional courtesies and cooperation to Mr. Lever in his attempt to benefit all parties concerned. Very truly yours, Administrator RFP►FIVED JUL ers ins SURVEY OF . . . . . . . . ---- - ------- itt 4 -7 i �4 jl- 741. t p! 7- T �Ij4 AF, z 23,78 7 23,7/ lv V.., 31 3;47 < 23. 46 2 za, 9% 211 S Z;.+,[ 2F4 4 'fq 73, 44 ----- ---- ... > Co Z�;,ioj ZF. 22; 46 ZZ• $,9 22. -5-3 9��A� ,?.7Z- ZZ,.-B OZ-O 02,4z 24.7�9 ZZ, 7Z 2-7,7z 2z."J� zo,43 zzzi 'o 4 m - - 7- I��W�RT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i CALIFORNIA �4�oaN�r U00 W. Newport Blvd. Area Cods 714 0751110 JULY 19, 1966 COXCO, INC. P:O. DRAWER C STANTON, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. J.R. ELLEXSEN SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNME T (C- Vt BRIDGE DECK UNITS. GENTLEMEN: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JULY 15, 1966, PRESENTING A SECOND PROPOSAL TO THE CITY TO ENGAGE A MUTUALLY ACCEPTABLE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER, AT ROCKWIN EXPENSE, TO REVIEW THE PRESENT SITUATION AND PREPARE A TOPPING !DESIGN TO CORRECT THE SITUATION. WE ARE WILLING TO EXAMINE ANY REASONABLE PROPOSAL, BUT OUR POSITION REMAINS AS INDICATED IN OUR LETTER OF JULY 130 19661 IN WHICH WE ADVISED THAT THE BRIDGE DECK IS REJECTED, AND THAT THE FIRST PROPOSAL FOR .. REMEDIAL MEASURES SUBMITTED WAS NOT SATISFACTORY. YOU ARE URGED TO COMMENCE REPLACEMENT OF THE DECK AS SOON At POSSIBLE SO THAT COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AND THE ROADWAY PUT IN SERVICE. THE RATE OF FILL SETTLEMENT HAS SLOWED TO AN ACCEPT- ABLE RATE, AND PAVING CAN BE DONE AS SOON AS THE BRIDGE IS COMPLETED, VERY �TRULY YOURS,, �/[/)// BENAJAMIN B. NOLAN ,. ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR KLP:NAJ CC: ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOC. ATTN: MR. J.R. HOLDEMAN ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT ATTN: MR. WILLIAM LEWIS i ' Ts�ecxoxse: JAO x 7.5126 WXC0 INC. TWmoAxs 3 -2604 Ci0% Bf06. COnStRlCtlOn CO. P, 0. DMWPD C $NOTT AND 8ATMIA ROADS STANTON toe z coDxrn, CALIFORNIA July 15, 1966 G. P. Dunigan, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: Subject: Jamboree Road Realignment, C -847 A. S. Cox ..... PW M. A. Cox ..... vC pP R. D. Cox .. vus- P=L-Tx u. We submit herewith a proposal to correct the unsatisfactory bridge deck. This proposal is described in the attached copy of letter from our subcontractor, Rockwin Pre- stressed Concrete Corporation. Your prompt consideration will be appreciated. Very truly yours, J. R. Ellexson Contracts Administrator RFCFIVED JUL 181966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. A_ .c�.r ...-. UNIVERSITY 8-1781 SPRucE 3 -1972 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORATION 19440 [AST INP[INAL NIONWAY. SANTA I[ {PIANOS. CALIFORNIA July 14, 1966 Coxco, Inc. P. 0. Box C Stanton, California Attn: Mr. R. A. Kerfoot Ref: Jamboree Road Realignment Rockwin Job #7249 Gentlemen: Rockwin proposed a method to correct for the displacement of the voids in the bridge deck slabs. This was presented by Coxco's letter June 7, 1966, to the City of Newport Beach. To this date we have not received a response to this proposal; however, you have indicated their verbal response was negative and they are preparing a letter. We would like to suggest submitting a second proposal to the City to engage a mutually acceptable Structural Engineer, at Rockwin expense, to review the present situation and prepare a topping design to correct the condition. Cost for furnishing and installing proposed topping would be borne by Rockwin. In the event the asphalt or other material presently proposed for the topping is deemed unnecessary, Rockwin would expect monetary assistance from the City of Newport Beach or Coxco to the value of that phase of the work. We trust you will find this a satisfactory approach and present this offer to the City. Yours very truly, ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. W. A. Hutchinson WAH /cl la7T, A.YJ_ Otl3Y ......n. •......r. n' TI....... eHO�.;. hn!' BUM'�4.xanm�y!gNM!Trv.!!Y'aa.]0.^ .: ..:.:•..T�^.KF '^v RnYl1 .. ... .. .. ... .... 'snR�.TF.�a'F?"^!F.l.!'.d`n^�r. a ' SEW PART CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH u s i CALIFORNIA:: e■. ' city Hall �crFOar�r 3=1 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 714 t 6732110 i JULY 1 3; 1966. COXCO, 'INC. P- 0. DRAWER C STANTONJ CAL.1 PORN 1 A ATTENTION: MR. R. A..KERFOOT SUBJECT: \ ROAD REALIGNMENT BRIDGE BRIDGE DECK UN ITIT GENTLEMEN: WE HAVE COMPLETED REVIEW OF THE RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION WHICH.' " WAS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF FLOTATION OF THE VOIDS. IN THE DECK UNITS FOR THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE. WE HAVE ALSO RE_.. VIEWED WITH OUR CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND WITH THE BRIDGE DEPART- MENT OF THE STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS THE REMEDIAL MEASURES SUGGESTED BY YOUR SUBCONTRACTOR, ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORATION. IT IS OUR OPINION THAT THE PROPOSED REMEDIAL MEASURES ARE NOT SATISFACTORY. BECAUSE OF THE FACT THAT THE DECK UNITS DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE RE- QUIREMENTS OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTI- FIED THAT THE BRIDGE DECK IS REJECTED AND MUST BE REPLACED WITH A DECK WHICH MEETS THE CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS. THE FOLLOWING DISCREPANCIES HAVE BEEN OBSERVED: .1. ALL OF THE DECK UNITS HAVE VOIDS WHICH HAVE FLOATED BY ' AMOUNTS VARYING FROM 3/4 INCH TO 3 -1 /4 INCHES. . 2. HONEYCOMBED CONCRETE, EXCESSIVE SURFACE CRACKING, AND POORLY FINISHED CONCRETE ARE EVIDENT IN MANY UNITS. 3. THE DIMENSIONAL TOLERANCES ARE EXCESSIVE, RESULTING IN SIDES AND ENDS OF THE UNITS NOT BEING PARALLEL OR OF PROPER ALIGNMENT. 4. MANY CURB DOWELS ARE NOT PROPERLY EMBEDDED. 5• THE INSERTS FOR THE FUTURE 8 -INCH WATER LINE BRACKETS ARE NOT PROPERLY PLACED. 6. THERE ARE SOME LOCATIONS WHERE REMOVAL OF THE'PLYWOOD i HOLD -DOWN TEMPLATES FOR THE SONOTUBES HAS LEFT'VOIOS IN .. t THE CONCRETE. - - Coxcoj INC. 2. c-847 :7-13-66 SOME OF THE ABOVE MATTERS HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED PREVIOU SL Y IN CORRES- PONDENCE DATED MARCH .11 MARCH IL AND APRIL 28, 1966. YOU ARE URGED TO COMMENCE REPLACEMENT OF THE DECK AS SOON AS A POSSIBLE SO THAT COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT CAN BE ACCOMPL I SHED'AND THE ROADWAY PUT IN SERVICE. THE RATE OF FILL SETTLEMENT HAS SLOWED TO AN ACCEPTABLE.RATEp.AND PAVING CAN BE DONE AS, SOON AS' THE BRIDGE IS COMPLETED. VERY TRULY YOUR$, BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ,. BBN:VR IIJ cc. RoCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. KEN O'BRIEN & Assoc. ATTN: MR. J.. R. HOLDEMAN ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPT ATTN: MR- WILLIAM LEWIS li c 1 1295 HOLES WERE DRILLED IN DECK TO DETERMINE Alf6 MT .. FLOTATION. VOIDS HAVE ,. FLOATED AS MUCH A33j ", LEAVING OpL'C'.._ /'+ CONC. OVER y11Vl O:r AVERAGE VOID HAS FLOATED APPROXIMATELY I " =I #p APPROX. -OF VOIDS HA*t:A.."ATED MORE THAN WHICH IS CONSIDERED TO BE TME- �lIfAX. ALLOWABLE. I�I SUB - CONTRACTOR (ROCKWIN) Wj* SUSSESTED REP <PNS IST INS OF 2" P.C.C. TOPPING OVER SLAB. SUGGESTION WAS SUBMITTED TO STATE FOR COMMENTS. "STATE EIWY.. DEPARTMENT,, BRIDGE DIVISION ACCEPTED THIS AS ALTERNATE SOLtIf "BUT IT 13 iii* AS DES;RASLE AS REJECTION 0 THE SLABS." STATE ALSO SAYS THIS SOLUTION MAY C.A93E FUTURE MAINTEMINANCE PROBLEMS. RE- CASTING OF SLABS WOULD TAKE APPROXIMATELY I MONTH: SETTLEMENT OF UNDERLYING FILL HAS NOW REACHED AN ACCEPTABLE RATE FOR USE OF ROAD (APPROX J " /MO.l COMPLETIOMSXZ DATE WAS FLEXIBLE - DEPENDED UPON RATE OF SETTLEMENT. SPECS. ALLOWED CITY TO DELAY PAVING UP TO 61 MONTHS AFTER COMPLETION OF FILL. LAST FILL WAS PLACED 3/292 SO WE COULD DELAY TILL 9/29 IF WE WI;SNED. ASSUNING THE DECK IS TOTALLY REJECTED., TIME OF COMPLETION WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY 60 DAYS LATER. WE ANTICIPATE NOTIFY COXOO OF SLAB REJECTION ON 7 -14. i '' KEN O'B R I E N & ASSOCIATES 4201 sunset boulevard, los angeles, calif ornia 90029/213- 664 -2191 July 8, 1966 Public Works Department City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Mr. A. P. Dunigan, Jr. Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Jamboree Road Bridge C -847 #6019 As requested by your letter of June 9, 1966, we have reviewed the proposed alterations to the subject bridge. The following are our comments: 1. The submitted computation assumes that the additional 2 -inch cap will act as a unit with the existing deck. In order to assure that this will happen, a positive means of shear connection between the deck and the 2 -inch cap must be made to prevent separation when the structure deflects due to live load. 2. The additional load due to the 2 -inch slab will be less than 5 percent of the design loads for the piles and pile caps; consequently, while additional loading is undesireable, the additional loading would not materially effect the piles and pile caps. JRH:bh Very truly yours, J. R. Holdeman Director of Engineering RECEIVED JUL 111966 newport beach, california CONSULTING ENGINEERS washington, d. c. STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS SACRAMENTO June 29, 1966 07- Ora- 0 -NptB SS Project 38(1) Jamboree Rd Bridge Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: We have reviewed the calculations Prestressed Concrete Corporation, forwarded with your letter of June 22, 1966, and find some errors. However, our calculations shoe are adequate for a 1z0 offset of the voids, the 2" thick concrete topping. of Rockwin to this office they contain N the deck slabs with or without it is our opinion that the concrete topping epoxyed to the slabs is an alternate solution but it is not as desirable as the rejection of the slabs. The epoxy will not guarantee that the topping will be free from future maintenance problems due to poor workmanship, deflections, shrinkage or other factors but4 if placed correctly, it may give satisfactory results. Should you decide to allow the contractor to place the topping we would still approve the project for matching funds if all work is completed satisfactorily. We recommend you obtain an experienced inspector to insure the topping is placed correctly. RECEIVED JUL 1 1966 Attach PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.,\ Very truly yours, J. E. McMahon Assistant State Highway Engineer - Bridges ByZi' W. C. Kiedaisch Bridge City & County Projects Engineer Ms. ". OWUNN ft"m catione 040. a= 14" SAIIIIANUMp CAI OV40MIA Ammism Plite " Ass"inse 3111NOUTS JAMMU 4W 0111104111 km Siat A* vwj "WO we An aw"It"Clue am 91"1 to irliette"I"Sm jawfte *9a Bosom, *Atwy m"ag vw votes #v ina OW O(AW *Avg ro"go. Irla cSovow" no Oup"" # "LV^&*fSv M A co"un Twotwe vale* vows a Oftits was Im sees., ArM avaL viseAnion viTu WvAw lift hwmi Am 96w* 4wessw in WO Aoiftax Aw LWw Jissuaw to Sospaowp* tT We act ro 109111► A "" 01' Tot C"Lafew " "Ill FlIft "we Comm* is T119 ODWOWAO Or 4100111141111 1411101111 TWAT It Vft W" to OsOWM* TIOAT Tug Too 11M 410011016.6 for 11041(v10 To Tot tKIIIIIIIIII SlAw. on jM 9j, A "Ma W" star To VON 11111144*11111 THAT VW C"CfAA?t$W Wgw giaLmo* Tier' wM LM ow ow Mwimar. so Two st"its AM: 2MLSMS OPIN VOW at AT IIIIS VtW* W9 W114 09 OWT TO ASUPT A OWAAW VAX" 044 M VIOM SUNtW$o To Cm 0MCIAT&S va 44O111t S aws. vCLP!Twjv V40 SITIU no OWAN a. tr Tom An Aw Own was PLAAW 64L OR qft Kitaist" LO ft*w Aw Totil, wricte Coxces logo Ps On DWAIN C STAWMjj CAL#►MOIA ArTurowl Wao Je Ike tLttwMo CWMas AM101 �011494T& Awsmat QOAO ft&Llwmw (C -MITI ftvmsa to WIN To "on 44 im ? Igo* passarms vow$$& f" I"IMIS Vla Itm7nu 00 AGNOWMISO W A LeTTeas Alt, set"* am "L4"&T#4m MOM OR vm. I"Ono*• Mom# ftmos ftamsm c"Ummemmmm mw Tw Vacua is scirms NN MIIMrLrAMT, 11tv Alia*' SEtaLTRM, Poll mvivi AM 9"x-1T• Mawlew me-sm"Mmmutut W mkiir row TM smam cftwv Obw Sawma4tso Tw DIMICTS, AM TM c"fromm Offlolemi 4► N THIS LCTM . is #v. No VAT To gx - smew"we APPww^ aw "a pawooftf, oil " 4w To Two sl�M T"T Ma MILK*, To wous was OW&AM Vms$"Lv M New or 10MR1 saw" Tut w " om" al TOK VOISS M 4"SKAM It " iNBM VM#"#+V "to WILL a" TOP In NOIriTiLT TIM AW aww _.: ._ RWRN! 0#11 MftgTwg MA1100,86 SOMMOM Tilt ow NOW Or "a 411MOVINT* MIT MO CM4XtM TO #MOM* MOMMUS, TW; MOST W VOIR At #1104060 awilm TOM#"# a* Tug On'? 4w 1 MOROt .on 41IM omes" "A APPNOACM VABT a mm IN TO cowls""r6 IT 10 UMX*M TOT MM MOM MMMXVM. TO 1J Tllt VOMOi 89 TINT A o"Nsimf"n. g" K Met or "a INJOS" 410CA Vale* We Uj%M V*M WWI" AM at~-"-.40 411w, a wile" vowma kisjw#* L Neumi AODT# PM to Vnma JANTM KIM CC/ meamin Pammosom 18"Mm env* J ®� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ' CALIFORNIA City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 714 673.2110 JUNE 91 1966 MR. J.E. MCMAHON BRIDGE ENGINEER -- - - P.O. Box 1499 SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. W.C. KIEDAISCH SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE DEAR SIR: AS YOU KNOWS WE ARE EXPERIENCING SOME DIFFICULTY IN FINISHING THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGES MAINLY BECAUSE THE VOIDS IN THE DECK SLABS HAVE FLOATED. THE CONTRACTOR HAS PREPARED A CALCULATION FOR A 2" CONCRETE TOPPING WHICH WOULD BE APPLIED OVER THE DECK. AFTER SEVERAL DISCUSSIONS WITH W.A. MCINTYRE AND OSCAR JOHNSON IN LOS ANGELES AND LLOYD JOHNSON IN SACRAMENTO WE HAVE DECIDED TO SEND A COPY OF THE CALCULATIONS TO YOU FOR YOUR COMMENT. IT IS THE - CONSENSUS OF OPINION DOWN HERE THAT IF THE SCHEME IS APPROVEDY THAT THE TOPPING SHOULD BE EPDXYED TO THE EXISTING SLABS. WE WILL BE HAPPY TO ACCEPT A COLLECT TELEPHONE CALL FOR YOUR COMMENTS. THE CITY DOES NOT WISH TO SHIFT THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTING THIS BRIDGE TO THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS] BUT IT DOES APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS AND HELP THAT YOUR OFFICE HAS GIVEN US. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL ME OR KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS .BENJAMIN B.,NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR . CC: D.F. DOWNING KLP:NAJ 0 C -�y7 WPORT BEACH i FORNIA Im 1 KEN OtBRIEN AND ASSOCIATES �420I SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90029 ATTENTION: J.R. HOLOEMAN, DIRECTOR OF ENGINE SUBJECT: JAMBOREE ROAD REALIGNMENT GENTLEMEN: city aeu 8300 W. Newport Blvd. Am Code 714 mm" JUNE 91 1966 ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND SELF - EXPLANATORY LETTERS, DETAILS, AND CALCULATIONS SUBMITTED BY COXCO, INC. FOR PROPOSED ALTERATIONS TO THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE. THE REASON FOR THE PROPOSED CHANGE IS THAT THE VOIDS IN THE BRIDGE DECK SLABS HAVE FLOATED. YOUR COMMENTS AND/OR APPROVAL ARE REQUESTED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.' NOTE THAT NO MENTION IS MADE OF EPDXYING THE NEW CAP TO THE EXISTING SLABS. WE FEEL THAT THIS SHOULD BE REQUIRED. IN ADDITIONS THE ADDED LOAD ON THE PILES AND PILE CAPS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS PLEASE CALL KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS, NJAM N B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CC: ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE COXCO, INC. .cLP:NAJ :,NCL. SDLEPHD329: IAC K 75126 COXCO, INC. TWmoABs 3 -2604 Cox Bros. Construction Co. P. O. Dm C Kuow AND Kama ROADS STANTON (oe w coDern, CALIFORNIA June 7, 1966 G. P. Dunigan, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California C -8�7 A. S. COX ..... PDSsm M. A. Cox ..... viC FnL R. D. Cox .. vxa- semanu Dear Sir: Re: Jamboree Road Realignment, C -847. We wish to present herewith our proposal of a method of constructing a bridge deck slab which is acceptable to you. Thismethod is described by a copy of letter and detail sketch with calculations as prepared by our subcontractor, Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation. Your consideration and approval is urgently requested in view of the requirement that the bridge deck be completed and ready for paving on or before July 28, 1966. Very truly yours, a M Administrator cc: Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation rA . UNIVERSITY B -1761 SPRUCE 3 -71372 PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORAT /ON 18440 CAST INOMIAL HIGHWAY. SANTA F6 SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA June 6, 1966 Coxco, Inc. 7002 Katel]aAve. Stanton, California Attn: Mr. R. A. Kerfoot Ref: Jamboree Rd. Realignment Rockwin Job #7249 Gentlemen: In reference to the latest position of the City of Newport Beach, that of proving the location of every void within plus or minus 314" as the basis for accepting the bridge, we are proposing the following alternate. We have prepared calculations assuming that the voids are vertically displaced by lk" upwards. We would add 2" of concrete topping reinforced with 6 gage at 6" centers mesh. Our calculations indicate that all stresses are acceptable and that an asphalt wearing surface could still be placed over the topping. The extra costs for the topping would be paid for by Rockwin. We are postponing any testing program until we are advised on this proposal, as we believe it to be a more practical solution. Yours very truly, ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. JJ. Peirsol Plant Manager JHP /cl Enclosures 5 sets calculations .1 4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECORD OF ORAL INFORMATION FILE. yf DATE: Cq Jo FROM tL TO: (so p OUTSIDE AGENCY'S TELEPHONE ADDRESS' td. dI- L.A SUBJECT: in v WILL THIS BE CONFIRMED IN WRITING? YES No OUTLINE OF IMPROTANT POINTS: ACTION REQUIRED I. 2. 3• a C, 9 V� � ., 14- � � f IS PERSON RESPONSIBLE DATE DUE NOTE: USE.STANDARD INTRA-OFFICE ROUTING FORM TG,SEND THIS INFORMATION TO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PERSONNEL2 AND THEN ROUTE TO FILES. F\6m Cos rj -Ic c 1 :a 2 i� y 2 ROCKWIN ENGINEER P ESTRESSED CONCRETE CON $ TANTS ..IAH,E30f2E� R ?A.:J /PEfiL /4N�'fG`rVT 4�o DxTE__G - . - .a�,q._. ion NO lV��. CMK•0..__ GHWKY ,o N \ fW g� STR A N 0.5. j WlT,v CORRECT 1-�CAT 1o1v of (/o /GS.' 2) OCAT /CA, OF_YO /OS ,q= 670 /N ?, Ic .33, 870 /N¢ AREA of vo %o: 2- /22,•�_2Kg - /P�f= c 245.3, Zt=3,2 /0 /x/3, z6=3,2¢O/N3 Gt= /0.55 /O.¢S/N. Cf�G7ox /G7O_332.i.5 332.0 R/G`/GffT W = 76 0 �/° 4. F. Sb = Z/, oo - V. go = //, Z o /N, I= 33,870 +G7ox 0.75 =- 832n(i.so- o.7v)2 = 33,£'70 +377- 212 =.94, o35/,v ¢ i .Zt 3 4,0 35T 9.80 = 3,473 /N.3 i ! + 2,: ._ ..- ... G.O x / /.SJ t ,�7Kf sAV � Io. % 3 Ct tN, 670x-74 Co/✓CA?ETE STi.'�'N�'T /_. - - -- -- -__.-- ...- --------------- C,y = Z3. oo _ /o•73 = 12.071.t/. Ar T.QANSFE'R y-�� = yf ticLn :. j= 24,0 ; +670x407+ 7__4 '? r74 x9.73 z A 2SoAys �' = S,noO ps,, i2 = 34.c3''+ 767 t25t 7, 006> ¢l/833 1N.4 Ct+NC,QErF of TcpprNS- / =- ,, Zr= ¢//833+- /c.73.- 3,8991u3, .31ocop ET"PP 3.37x.ci ps/.: �Swc.[6nF= 4.P9./0`Ps/ Z.e = 4/,..833 = 12.27..= A8 9. g{3 ®AEi� l3r* ,o N \ fW g� STR A N 0.5. j WlT,v CORRECT 1-�CAT 1o1v of (/o /GS.' 2) OCAT /CA, OF_YO /OS ,q= 670 /N ?, Ic .33, 870 /N¢ AREA of vo %o: 2- /22,•�_2Kg - /P�f= c 245.3, Zt=3,2 /0 /x/3, z6=3,2¢O/N3 Gt= /0.55 /O.¢S/N. Cf�G7ox /G7O_332.i.5 332.0 R/G`/GffT W = 76 0 �/° 4. F. Sb = Z/, oo - V. go = //, Z o /N, I= 33,870 +G7ox 0.75 =- 832n(i.so- o.7v)2 = 33,£'70 +377- 212 =.94, o35/,v ¢ .Zt 3 4,0 35T 9.80 = 3,473 /N.3 Z6N ` 3 4, 0 3 S //. 2 0 = 3,039 /,v , 6 =¢8x4.z�- 37.u. 2,: ._ ..- ... G.O x / /.SJ t ,�7Kf sAV � Io. % 3 Ct tN, 670x-74 Co/✓CA?ETE STi.'�'N�'T /_. - - -- -- -__.-- ...- --------------- C,y = Z3. oo _ /o•73 = 12.071.t/. Ar T.QANSFE'R y-�� = yf ticLn :. j= 24,0 ; +670x407+ 7__4 '? r74 x9.73 z A 2SoAys �' = S,noO ps,, i2 = 34.c3''+ 767 t25t 7, 006> ¢l/833 1N.4 Ct+NC,QErF of TcpprNS- / =- ,, Zr= ¢//833+- /c.73.- 3,8991u3, .31ocop ET"PP 3.37x.ci ps/.: �Swc.[6nF= 4.P9./0`Ps/ Z.e = 4/,..833 = 12.27..= 745 psi. 074S f Pao 16 20 LiIA tEMII As x 3 Zox RUCKWIN ENraINEER *STRESSED CONCRETE CONXTANTS DATE _3 s-- SHEET -V 23, k / 8 = J .;. ". 9 21 -I-z) A" C- 3 8717 /.v I Soo 4 Zt 3, 210 e" 2 jr n IAI I.Zx;4.,'7 C,7cx1j,17= 7, S,, 33�s 70 .870 Llpe ZoAD 1-120-s 1.1-44 PER /y 4 7 4)t 144- )43, f Pe 14C 248,c A, c ls'c. 41.,T' 241s, 1- 4 3 2, A� TOTAL 2 7. L= 23, k / 8 = J .;. ". 9 1X.x i.2� J,'<0: D own to !? -- ,_ < V 1 ct v Vol x r..G 777 77 d s r t K4, Milo ab f F z ROCK.WIN ENGINEER*' PNESTRESSED CONCRETE CONS ..TANTS OAT, JOB NO NO �%AHBOF'E R0,4J> /PEf1G /!„VHt`Nj 67—or _. GHMM NO .Y —OF P I , T i ti i /o spa. e °270,c STRAND$. h - 3 � z i77-2l2= 9¢,o3S /N¢, M. /N.a 039 5N _y 6= fBxF —z�— 37,u, /N, x�p- t.37nJ)< /_� ` /.3 f _ 67017¢ 0.7 - C�vlceFr� STi'� v�.jT CS = 23.00- 1�•�3'_F2r�7�v. A TXAr -Ft'!1 Jc�a= 4,4)o0P.s/, 2 ',, , 74,22 �'" e V5 1 °� e33tG�oxl,pzt_ -- +74)1974 r ` ¢L-b" CG /Jc.e£rc OF 7-epp -zNG 7�= 3�OO s/� Zr =;� �J 3'` -0 - ^XJ3 =�S$9$/N3�, �irnna,. =_'Y.:�l- itlh'�Mtt. _ .itn .,.�.:��t►I�Mr�I /...M. .2aisr�i+ff.'�'ifi!.��'IT.�. 3i�'9 /�n--".�'.��:Q�i�:,.. 1, i:l/i,Ff CORRECT LoCAT /O /J OF k/p/p, ., 2) A'/ -H NL6tt LOCAriOiv PF Yp /O5 A _ X 70 iN ? , I = 3 3, 870 /N Akan aF vo,G: _ 2¢5.3 2/p � - - Zt- 3,2/o/3, N �•¢ S. /� r io-.-5 z __ Gt = /0, 55 /N., C6 = /0, 4C6, /N, L70x/0.5 332 >!•S Wfl6HT W = 760 °*/RC.f. = Zl.cc 9.6 "c = /I. 2olN: h - 3 � z i77-2l2= 9¢,o3S /N¢, M. /N.a 039 5N _y 6= fBxF —z�— 37,u, /N, x�p- t.37nJ)< /_� ` /.3 f _ 67017¢ 0.7 - C�vlceFr� STi'� v�.jT CS = 23.00- 1�•�3'_F2r�7�v. A TXAr -Ft'!1 Jc�a= 4,4)o0P.s/, 2 ',, , 74,22 �'" e V5 1 °� e33tG�oxl,pzt_ -- +74)1974 r ` ¢L-b" CG /Jc.e£rc OF 7-epp -zNG 7�= 3�OO s/� Zr =;� �J 3'` -0 - ^XJ3 =�S$9$/N3�, �irnna,. =_'Y.:�l- itlh'�Mtt. _ .itn .,.�.:��t►I�Mr�I /...M. .2aisr�i+ff.'�'ifi!.��'IT.�. 3i�'9 /�n--".�'.��:Q�i�:,.. - --------- ROCKWIN ENGINEER STRESSED CONCRETE CONSITANTS Joe NoG9- GHErr NO. .6--OF- ,';ALEV e" CALL -114-A771014 49A7EO OCraer,,Z 9, ISFe4 Sq7.; 4, 7. 100 4 1. F.7. = /o0 )f 4 /.5 zxo./Z.T- 7/, :;- "K J"I'R ES S e 5 A 7- Ar 2� �f,99,r. 71�o � = - Z�71!�c—"12= 730 -/,/3 5 + e. 70 Y-1 A + 76:5 psi, 3 8J9 13-- 730 875,D5/. 7,r,of= " 14 -�,4�20 C. 7v A 1 07-f= 3 -�7o-5 Jp ca J,&3 1 *17i� �31 ----------- ------- - - Top + 76:5 psi, 3 8J9 09 875,D5/. , J'o 8 -7-6.. *17i� 4D Ile) rE rzm5low, I'li z _r, 6 A r,511,0 Ar As C 50 x 0 STAMM# CALIF MIA ATTCMT tom IM, **A* star A► su"ats jamommir Rom Betels C-&7 BtMTLawas Mw 26# W M TWt Dintsom suoule TMt KtT"m CMILT TINS ammo ttt Kaman AW ARtataM PON am UAWLTAMTII WAA M11At -TIM aet9AtA Kee Da1tLa► Mt Not "am ADr /t149 "*AT IT VIOL K "FSSVACTaer To 0"" OW VA" LEWU DOWL At &ACA 9116) ar 94" 41141410611411 99" N hW— Two r&" LtWATM AA14LA 1NLU Man To at T4AGtn AT ga". tM AM tAGI a► TMt COW W*#Aaw AT 111aat La6ATiaMA wwaR To as"" UK 1191 PLAate !ta aatM/MM. #LAM# A ll$M 911144 WHAT AS PLAt'i9 4M SO= TO MOLD TIME 99AVIMa PAD tM PaAtT►aw AYr► IT 14 & AKWgD TWAT AMT MAM{ M TMt M#*W 96411 MAUD 1Mt'IL A W1 IWAT IM MAS 94911 wet M To Tat Aca"SO WTT or TM4 ALMh i4ar Ta11Lr raw# ito aAM JW. . AA�Ts aas *omiW Pau`.rm��ost,o,.,,Co1lGlstvt# CW ATM Ike OALCU M111 i -i KEN O'B R I E N & ASSOCIATES .r^ 4201 sunset boulevard, los angeles, ealifornia 90029/213 - 664.2191 _g`I IB May 25, 1966 City of Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. A. P. Dunigan, Jr. Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Jamboree Road Bridge C -847 #6019 We have made additional studies regarding the doweling of the slab for the subject bridge and conclude that provided provision is made for holding the bearing pads in place, a single dowel will be adequate for the interior slab units. The edge panels must have two dowels. JRH:bh Very truly yours, r J J. R. Holdeman Director of Engineering RFCFIVFD MAY 2 6 1966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. newport beach, california CONSULTING ENGINEERS washington, d. c. I MAT, �9i6 CsKCG, logo p.o. DRAW" C STANTON, caun KMIA AmovieMt MR. R.A. KERrBOT SIn,KCTt JAMGSG[t RW BRIDGE (CAT) Qtimumus PER THE VERBAL KtGUtst M ALNAMsKA rommV CMIG►Atty. LTS &, tLEvAT#ow MEKt TAKER MM THE sRIDME DECK SLAS AT IM CEMMR GI 9"N N THE IIAIID- MAIL BOLT CLMSTEKS. TMtGt tLtvATIOW ARE ON" sM THE ATTACHED sMEET. As That Is !TILL A MsSIMILITT THAT sow M THE DICK sLASs MAv M KCJECTED, IT IS SUMSTCD THAT ANT CU MN TAGNMATIGN Gr THE MAMKIAIL ME OCLATtO uN►IL "IS DECK HAS WEN ACCCMD. VERT TWAT TSARS, a.P. WIMIGAM, JR. AssT• CIvIL EMGINEtK CCI ALHANMKA PSuwmm CG., LTD. VDIMAr i �titlo� li/2L�' t�itlG2 FOaEa A V/ 61Z<DGC T?��l DLL. or Sys DA`: E' FROM W4- OUTS ME AGENCY aS 1 PHIONE� �O�A -- _ ? 20 _ ADDRESS Ve'kmoN7 4mv SUBJECT: WILL ThIS EE G,ONFIRFIED IN WRG lvl�SZ �. YEc —X t�D OUTLINE CF IMPRliTAMr P• ":f fu':SS 1i(/ �,¢Lf/ /mil �' /ED�ftSct� Sv%�e�ZVIS�NC � /DBE F�l Z3 �s,2. tL✓ cr7y- � entry nh'.a ✓��s ��2Tt�.�C� S•9ctzq�rt7�7o �T.4r�s Did Mor r�F c'9us 91)7- tic J/ ° /* "Irc l- lVo T cox r «r AA 60�JS� REQORED.rj?: FF.S.z;;.S:_ DATE DBE 2. 3 NONE_: USE STANDARD CNTR.A -t;FF PI 5 .R t"'i'7MS F'�GRm 7C T,E tv:S °740? 0N.r CAT 0 :w0 T� PUBLIC WORKS DEF%ARTt4E:N'r PERSf AJNF'L. A,,''. TXErd r� /%GI.UTY t��Ltd�iZ�D ,�I sg� l�✓ Pt�SoAl 47 eQ,, T o� AO, 174- L, 4, ��29,4-15'C,l /l�oeE wLrW 7e-Y(z- J04 5 . 9 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RECORD OF ORAL INFORMATION FROM :li�� IN PERSON '—I FIRM: TEL. .TELCON Im1 if NO. INIT. DATE CID P.W. DIRECTOR ASST.P.W. DIR. UTILITY SUPT. TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR. CO -OP. ROJ. ENGR. FIELD ENGR. A. SECRETARY To :- w 11 /1,4 ct,,eF of sovf�&rn 0f-f,0 ��IU�St0YN TEL. EA.- SUBJECT: —�0 Y',_o U O I QS _ IS OUTLINE OF INFORMATION RECEIVED gI GIVEN 1,(I me C -ul FILE: C DATE: <jz� .� T d., fa, o< 4-et 6U a, ACTION REQUIRED PERSON RESPONSIBLE DATE DUE k5 -� ce- ea , � P A s,A-f NOTE: MAKE COPIES FOR ADDRESSEES INDICATED BY "C„ IN ND. BLOCK. US /t/� Pegs ELT �3/Yl /.S. 457, 2:97) i ,�o 0 Coee ELF ✓. _ : > ,.:. 041711 Z -5-.35- = z3. �'S 27 s, c7 = Z.3, /.3 3 s = z3. so Z8 s,si = Z 9� z7 = z 3. S3 Zy s 8fl = Z�• oa a` Sze se/737�/ 7 23. S5, 3. s, oy = 2Z . 7S 3� 37 s/g �22. /Z S s.z¢ = z3.j� s3¢ =zz, 5-0 /S .s Z7 =033 a3 ssz¢ = Zz,. ;�;p :!�j spy = .�3• ¢3 ers/ Evo� s. ZZ 22 55 5'Z- > 23. ZS 5 27 ,86 7 X33 - Z¢ 577 ll`iX 57ig t i AI2 fl " c.. —sue,. v. _...Q.0 �.�a �ex:r� ur._sis�- ._. -e.s.' C-. _ OaL v CL V r -- — - -. N;r ✓cf/ c:n-1Z f�.Py.ic2. !CYl rrcl' �.T..r✓?�'.._ /C_ - `�9. - - -- _ i P�oce�n �.t, e7✓cs% _,��cE'..To taco Bez72 /.cam_.; PAT 9V 19" THE IRVINE COM►AMT Poo* 8 t 37 IRVIMi CALIPSRMJA _j ATTEMT IOMI IIR.Fmms SYSdtCTI RCALIANKMT AF Joe"" *000 041 GEIITL[/KNI II;ILREMCE IS MLR[ TO TOYS Ltw M OF APNIL 50 166, RtOAMIils tSSSiON OF TNt CUT SLOPC mew THC DILL Rtsfeca to TMIS SLAP[ MLA slaty A IKAVV COLT M AMNLLT 9W"ISM APMOR/MATCLV SK was AOMr AS TAU NCNTIONS TOM AN M9 AREAS OF CROONS STARTING MAIN. IT IS Pw.ANNCO TO AMLT AM M CII COAT OF CWJLSION W ITNIM TM IBXT MV IISIITNS WITH TM NOOK TMAT THIS WILL SW ALL 91 M1GM OF TM SL01t. WE NAYC SSSLptf THAT Via KAPt MAS Soil SASLT %RODEO IN Am" w*m IRR /OATION WATER NAG 69E4 KSMITT90 TO MOM OSWM TIK FAU OF TM CWT► IT IS SYGOESTEO THAT WATCHING OF THL LAW AM RAM St CLMMLT COMTROL"D IN own TO Pft"w TMES 9X"SS W A ISOM SLIMS TMt emu SF FWRTNER M&Am MISSION OR Mum M TN•E CMT SL01t. YERtT /�tMLV THIRST v OtNJANIM B. NSLAM Asst. PYIILIC WWas ®IRitTOR CCI 1$ATt11M SALT COOART SAN JemIn am Cum 008040 1 TSLRPRORRs: • IAOx N 7 -5126 COXCO, INC. TWwoARs 3 -2604 Cox Bros. Construction Co. P' 0. DUW R C RNOTT AND xATRr., ROADS STANTON coR GR="m, CALIFORNIA April 29, 1966 G. P. Dunigan, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: A. S. Cox ..... PNRmnR M. A Cox ..... VICR -PRn& R. D. COY .. Vxz- Pus. -Te Re: Jamboree Road Realign- ment, C -847 It is evident from the volume of correspondence, the most recent of yours being dated April 18, 1966, that we are confronted with unresolved problems in connection with the pre- stressed concrete bridge members. It is our opinion that per- haps some or all of these problems might be solved at a personal meeting between City's representatives, our supplier and sub- contractor, and us. We therefore suggest that you schedule such a meeting at your earliest convenience to be held at your offices. We further suggest that fully authorized representatives from each interested party be present in order to agree to final settlement of each question that may arise. Please advise the writer or our Mr. R. A. Kerfoot of your reaction to this suggestion, either by letter or telephone. Very truly yours, Lo Administrator R - CErVED MAY $0 IS" "WIC _, CoNcojo INC. Poo. DRAWtIt C STANTONS CALIFORNIA ATTNI MR. R.A. KLRroeT SuBRCT JAWSORt[ ROAD BRIOOEe C-S$T GenutMENI 9 !NAIL ass, 1966 IT HAS RECCHTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT TIC RICHMOND 19INC14 DIA. $HUNTS ALONG THE EASTERLY tDOt Or THE DECA SLABS MOVE 9CCM IWPOOPERLT PLSCtD. THE ►OLLOWIMi OtsmpA11C12s Wang MOTtoi 1. OVER AN INCH VARIATION IRON !LAN LACATION "OTICALI.T AND HORIZONTALLY . 2. IMOtRTS NOT PLUINI WIT" tOSt Of une 3. VARIATION IN OLPTM ►ROM ILUSM TO RLCLMO 2 ISM** W9 NAVE MMIANUO TO MAVt t"M WAT[R MAIN ORAC%9T CMOM MADC WITH SLOTTED NOLtS TO ALLOW IOM ITEM 1 6001K9 DWt TO TM[ OLOTTtO WOUMS MOMeV601p IT OLCOMS tOSLNTIAL THAT TMt BOLT W9ADO BEAR UNIFONNLY AOOINOT "K PLATE TO PRLVCUT AMY OHMM UT Or TNt SRAMT, DWt TO ITLN 2 AMMO IT WILL Ot 0196900ART TO UK A TAPLRCD SPIN WAMII WNKO THE NLAO OI TIK DOLT. Team WAOMARs WILL MATE TO K SUPPLIto OY VON so TOWR W D- 40WMMTDRP ROsNWIMe, ITEM 3 A001K WILL MCOUIK TWAT TOU r1NINlsM OOLTO or sYIPICIaw Lgom TO ALLOW POR THOSE INSERTS WHICH Alit 9A99001VCLT Ot"MD INTO THt 900E 01 THt OLAO. VCRV TRULT TOWMip Gore DN111OAN JR. ASST. CIVIL UINttR eet AmwoN PRAOTKOBLO Csmnvg Cwt Arno IIRe OALXWAMI Calm* Ct11P.P ATTO Mb [I 0 0 APO 116 d. so �OaeRM1AM111 co Svmn MO CALIIG MIA ATTMI Ill. RSA• PACNF R AMACTs MR<t hom somm cps ogNRpK*i Aa S IM OWN LMU M APRIL 191 1K "momeme RGiIUIIN /e Mgelti! M AM /L (IRYMCtMA tMt MRWLTNM M *Mt MIME 1WM MRN " M MONWLTAM►e no T1RH1 •Nllak TKY Heat MPLMV low To pal" maw ft AND AEte AS PM MINIIM4 PLA*o TM Mft VOW I YILL at PIS Must CMST IMP SWITI*G TM 091111, 1111 We" IMIL9 OMs"m rem 1 on eOSttts ftO W NS TMg n.MT" 00100 ROM106 tl MOR awl WANE SMINS 18 AMMSIige Y S MITM* ill am MAe MM MSKV TM so um= *am Anil. 190 lquo Now"m Tom TW Ase GSgmm Poona MIT* emea s im SRMVMTIKAL mmom Y M TIM; MINI eggs Wm offaws Te T*t Pmo *#LITY M ftow a MSIeG+ or AP/gAN T*AT "m ttlRLg w N fM ASMa1Kw mn MILL NAYS swim h AN SOUPTANIA MAR IN APPMMN WUV 90 Offte TO MOM WNW et SWVW M AM MSAeY MO PAVING AT VIEW VMS* M 00 Still MGSSMM VOW Tst tsNSM et /MIS "#*e M" Me SIRAN come"" am eTANOM " NMM MMI*t MOLT. Tag Lemom Tm vm to =I""* TIIL Om OMONSM SI THIS SMT WILL saw me MAK M Sg "Lug"N IT w AMAIN sum Rte Tw TW Am :Iomis *Mt son gran Te eiTINARMnr COMM VHS MOM StM IN T*g am M FMO Vtw "%%I rMSNO �IS�110 .W. Anforso► Com Glel*gq 641 RSM1slIM pommoae COOK" CMP.O km NI. QUAUtlMI fts O'BMa m A Agee.,, Am$ Mb Nomm M amm" TEL PHOMG: • • JAcxsoN 7-5126 COXCO, INC. TWINoa s 3 -2604 Cox Bros. Construction Co. P. O. DMWDE C IGioT AND KATE•ea ROADS STANTON sos m covsm, CALIFORNIA April 28, 1966 G. P. Dunigan, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Subject: Jamboree Road Realignment, C -847, Bridge Dear Sir: A. S. Cox ..... Ystsm M. A. Co ..... vacs- -Pass. R. D. COY . . V=- PEES.+L In answer to your letter of April 19, 1966 in which you suggest that we present a non- destructive structural test method for the deck slabs, we attach hereto a letter from Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation; dated April 27, 1966, Please advise us of your approval of the referenced method of testing and if you believe the results therefrom will be conclusive. Very truly yours, COXCO, LM Administrator cc: Rockwin Prestressed Concrete Corporation �U RECFIVFD APR 291966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Oki - acka in PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORATION 18440 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY. BANTA FE SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA April 27, 1966 Coxco, Inc. 7002 Katella Ave. Stanton, California Attn: Mr. R. A. Kerfoot UNIVERSITY 8-1761 SPRucE 3 -1972 Ref: Jamboree Rd. Realignment Rockwin Job #7249 Gentlemen: Although we have in one instance a floated void we believe that the voids in general are satisfactory. However, to dispel the doubts expressed by the City of Newport Beach in their letter of April 19, 1966, we offer the following testing. We propose to simulate the design loading (H -20 or 32,000 lbs. per axle) by driving a vehicle lengthwise over the voids. This vehicle will have a single rear axle with two wheels and will be loaded in such a manner as to give an axle reaction of 16,000 #. This is to be considered equal, in the void area, to 32,000 lbs. distributed on a single axle equipped with duals. Please advise us of your reaction to this proposal as we are anxious to get this matter cleared up. Yours very truly, ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. J. H. Peirsol Plant Manager JHP /cl KEN O'B R I E N & ASSOCIATES 4201 sunset boulevard, los angele:s, california 90029/213 -664 -2191 April 25, 1966 City of Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Jamboree Road Bridge, C -847 6019 We have reviewed the proposed revised doweling plan submitted by Rockwin Engineers and after carefully considering all alternatives we feel that there would be less damage to the structure by placing the dowels in the locations required by the plans and cutting the reinforcing as required. It is, therefore, recommended that this plan be disapproved. The plan for the repair of the damaged void is acceptable and is recommended for approval. Very truly yours, J Holdeman Director of Engineering JRH /mk RE MV, tn ,per �7 M5 newport beach, california CONSULTING ENGINEERS wasb.ington, d. c. Aram 19, 1966 CsM60, 1=4 ORAWta C STAMTON, CALlre"IA ATM WI. KRa►OOT n slr ACT �Jawmt Pwv Seems C4017 (WNTLOUNS EvqOwv An CIMIts or Lemas ►RON KsCMY#M TO CITY# OATLO ARIL �1, 1966j Am f TIK CITV TO 0a COW. AWS KfN Ito &w Assainrs OATCD An IL s 1966. kaAa0111s Tot ►LOATts "ISS, Mt STILL aL T ►ICItMT RVIKWA M SLOMr MOOMMA NINIt &LISTS TO CAMt to AC99"MILIT► Or Tar OCCN sLA" AT TNif Iotr TNrat ( A wAgolow NOM - KSTaMCTIVC MIT Ts TMAT r0 Os O► sN►FICIva up" AMS Ta M OM PS 30►►1 MOTO !TO Tot OrsIM LOADS. As Tlrcat IS no C T s[ C! AND 1 n Is silOitsT[s THAT TOY NOTM IN THAT C MCR 110101 11 /o Or asYTts TW OYM COMCO• 1M is Ar, , AO MMAL COMTMASTM, WILL K AMAU Or TNt PROMOS Of tllt AM TO Tom sW+COMTRACTCM. � J Ytar TaYSr TOYb, �X i� t AssT. CIVIL EMSIMttR CCI itOCIIMIO Pm* Mssts Commit CDR►, ATTM Wes OALtttMSMI KtM 09bIiM A A*m#ATVs ATM Ws. HOLSrNAM fit' I N" ENCL. 6 6 Coxao, 11Ia. P.O. D"wo Co STAwm# CALormom AttMl 9vadceT JANUORte I�w dRMUe� 0-847 IAeMTLpKMt [MaLOSes Am COPIts of Lima$ fRell AmmoN TO TNt CM# O:TU Awls. 40 I*# AM ffAq TM CITY TO OW COIM&TAMTss lien Wftw/ No Arlo IMS OATto ARM IOf I966k lt"was TMt (LOAM vomp We WILL feet TMAT sow' n#tw eM /stNlMe M MLO " RMtiTS TO CAM DWATS As TO The AC6[MTAMLITT w To Gees stAOS AT TNts TOM* Twu An# 1 AN wmp A Nmnn Or NOM. KxvmtTtYt TCST NKTMO@s " slow THAT TOM "1" ARL or sWftgnw 09"N Alb TMe MOM 4W 9wf1919MT 11MO ;M TO CASRV Tilt se411910 LOW& IT is M M MO TMAT VOW NO VVA SUPOGOWN69TOOM KOCIMHy TAU 1MATt 68 ACTION OUT Oe NRCtssARY TO "TIWACTORILT Pam THAT Tug sR 4049 a" Is SYJPJCVURALLV MIGNOTt• As TKU is NO CONTRACT KTWZO TMe, CITY AM AOMiMIMs IT is MIYOINtn;es THAT Tstl NsT11T It"wiN TMAT ALL CodMltopmaNCe no ftm4o at muv a TMSWOn C"w IM TNls ways Tout As nos& 441TRAS"Ps wt" as Aww of To on"" or TNe, HSt1C A911#41wo TO YipR $11116844WRACV4116 vest; TR1R.T miss's flop Ognla"d �I1t. Ass;• CIVIL ENStIKel1 CCt notwoM ftco" M COW KTe CORPS, ATTMt Ike offs Val Ken Olftten ♦ ASM IATts ATM *A* Ns►O mm QNDI N" EMCLO wou t$911119M Me Ass". 2"Of SwmgT kvD4 La Awasuss C&L wessm Ams lbo HoLopw ------------ Smsays sAmmumtc AWA lamas C, <� kwnxmut APSIL 18r 16 ENNAM to A cm of A wm no Rowin swou"ift An ALT"Ming PL&Nmw or Ta OWALS in vo ""a anits KCAN mw#u v "is 4magn We" at O►ilwAsTONTO k411111101111 VW nAAVCD VOIDS# W !TOLL ►M T%W " 10100,041 NOW 89 em"go no ft"AT44" at"" "M WOO WfibL a AGGICIPTAIIIA me um so movirm Cmes in awn& swnucTm me Rowse* vw Vam TIMLT Vowing 4C io VOWIWA* qk* AsSIMAW CtwiL Emomm got Como# hat A"*$ Moo kwo► Molmin co►e Avm Nne Room AZ) -PREILINO R PRjOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN A Z OF CONTgmI, 71U MMIPOTENTIAL ROAD DEPT. B C SOURCES 'RED Material Testing Section TEST No. 66-555 SIEVE AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT KEY. . CR AC_j OR 0... GRADE USED E CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. 2 MATERIALS ACTUALLY co— x (W.O..' D'N...1AHFPIAUP #138 ENTERING INTO WORKS MOISTURE AT �COMP�AjCTION % 0 SPECIAL TESTS B soil FED. NO. 3 DATE REPTD. 4-5-66 DRY DENSITY #ICU. FT. iF CONTRACT, Mill!"15ONTRACT ITEM • ROAD NO. Jamboree Road PROJEC7 NAME San Diego Creek Bridge 21/, RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) -CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION E) OUTSIDE §fl MAINTENANCE SUFD PERMITS AGENCY: City of Newport AGENCY Beach 2 - SAMPLE OF Import DEPTH ou 3 LIMITS OF SAMPLE 24' S Bridge 0 - LOCA. OF SOURCE Ar)t)arentiv trom-P-ut on Jamboree N/Bridize - i 40 j DATE SAMPLED 3—X —bb By G. RI-Vdon TITLE KA 111 RECEIVED 3 —Z1-00 FOR USE • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) P-301 T-42 [I BILLING WIL4 BE MADE AT END OF MONTH A A � MATLAILS ENCINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL a GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN 'A B C D E SIEVE Le KEY. . CR AC_j OR 0... GRADE USED E SPECIF,H LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S,;. MOISTURE AT �COMP�AjCTION % 3 DRY DENSITY #ICU. FT. 21/, ST..ILOMETIOe.'*AIUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS, P.S.I. 1112 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. 114.1 DR. OVEN DRY 8.8. D. APP. SUBBASE 11/2 FINE BASE. % ft"E SURFACE 4 L. L. � P. L. P. 1. COMES)ON VALUE B 99 1 TRAFFICIOMNEX 16 95 5 DURABILITY .1 FINE ICOARSE OPEC, 7 by EXUD. PRE28 30 78 22 BVIEXPAIN. PRESS so 49 WET DRY AVG. SPEC. j I AT EQUFL. SPEC. Do 30 70 1 INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. THICK. OF 5U IU LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CC 9.6 % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION M/O CURVE NO. .REMARKS: 'R' Value should be approximately the same as Test 66-556. • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) P-301 T-42 [I BILLING WIL4 BE MADE AT END OF MONTH A A � MATLAILS ENCINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL a ` -PRELIMINARY TES S PRIOR COUNTY OF ORAN TOWARD OF CONT T ROAD DEPT. OPOTENTIAL SOURCES ED Material Tasting Section TEST NO.V - AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT -. REPORT OF TESTS ON 6 ®CONTROL TESTS ON FIELD NO. AHT' P ! MATERIALS ACTQIALLY _ coxnxPO. f ENTERING INTO WORKS - Iw -o... P.O. Mu n. AxFFr ' O SPECIAL TESTS B nt Soil FED. NO. i DATE REPTD 4-5-66 . IF COHTRH USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. Jamboree Road PROJECT NAME San Diego Creek Bridge j • RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY: City of CONSTRUCTION C] OUTSIDE ® AGENCY Newport Beach,,, MAINTENANCE C3 ,SUB'D -PER _ SAMPLE OF Im ort RET. CR, DEPTH 00 35 LIMITS OF SAMPLE 110 N of Bride 21 I�1B 21 LOCA, OF SOURCE Apparently from cut on -� - oree N Bridge OWNER�R- MANUFACTURER -x - UANTITY EPR TED _ DATE SAMPLED 3/22/66 1 ` BY G. _ RiRldon TITLE EA III RECEIVED 3-21 - FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A C D E SIEVE �F'O 9 F R LE O RET. CR, ADJ. OR COMB. GRADE A6 USED 6PE61F. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I, 21 I�1B 21 21 /� 21 ,. _ M016'rtM[`AT COMPACTION % 10 9 1 3 DRY OENA' OF BRIO., # %CU. FT. _ 1 L2-2,2197 .1 21/1 w STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 71 74 80 Z EXUDATION PRESS. F.B.I. 190 220 15 00 112 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES 1 THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN - - SP. GR. - OVEM DRY S. S, D. APP. SUBBASE - I11 FINE BASE % COARSE BUR FACE 4 L. L. I P, L. P. I. COHESION VALUE R 100 0 TRAFFIC INDEX 9.0 16 98 1806 DURABILITY FINE COAR69 SPEC. j BY EMUD. PRBSe� 30 '1 j BY •.<PI1N. PRfi66 - 5o 55 45 .1 WAY .. DRY AVG. SPEC. Q AT E.U1L. 100 31 6(, J INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 4.2 M 27 73 1 5U 13 IU LARY- SPE, . MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: - . % 'DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION - - % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: In accordance with t - est ation as per e re pest or so n letter from the City of N ort Beac ate March ZI 19ob, the fol owin comments are made: 'R' Value T.I. G.E. Re uired Structural Section 78 9.0 4,111 ors 3 NS The proposed structural section of 3 AC 7 AB is adequate in the areas of the above desi ated Proiect which are re resented by this investi- ation. It shall be noted a'or Arial High that Jamboree Road is a M rte or which the minimum recommended section is enera AC AB. R E C E I V I APR 7 1966 RESIDENT ENM, "MY MKS F- 6011.93 'V ��VflfW_ Cl BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 4 U 40 THE IRVINE COMPANY IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 (714) 644 -0120 April 5, 1966 Mr. B. B. Nolan City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Subject: Jamboree Road Dear Mr. Nolan: The Irvine Company has granted to the City of Newport Beach rights of way for the construction of Jamboree Road between East - bluff Drive and Palisades Road. This construction has taken place over the last several months. On a prior occasion, and we again was evidence of erosion along the construction. The principal area easterly side of the right of way is a residence very near the brow particular slope appears to be qu Your office assure that diminish the FEH /cjz call it to your attention, there slope banks created by the subject of concern is that slope on the near Palisades Road where there of the created slope. This Lte sandy. is requested to continue observing this slope to there is no undermining of sufficient magnitude to integrity of that slope. Very truly yours, ./ Frank E. Hughes Manager of Engineering ELF �v to � PPR ? ,966 EQ�. �V- \C VXP Q� ` FRANKLIN & WICHMAN CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 6311 NORTH FIGUEROA STREET L09 ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90042 City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beachs California CLINTON 5.7169 AWi1 5, 1966 Rot Investigation of Jamboree Road Bridge S T A T E M E N T FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AS FOLLOWS: For time of Robert Franklint 8 hra @ ,15.00 /br i OUR JOS NO. 6612 $120.00 T 3 0» 9 0 ®CLLuin PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORAT ION 13440 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY. SANTA FE SPRING$. CALIFORNIA April 4, 1966 City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Attn: Mr. G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Asst. Civil Engineer UNIVERSITY B -1761 SPRUCE 3 -1972 Ref: Jamboree Rd. Realignment Rockwin Job #7249 Gentlemen: Upon receipt of your letter of March 17, 1966, we made a survey of the above referenced bridge. Aside from the items already documented and approved by you, two additional problems exist. The first of these pertains to dowels in the pile cap. When drilling for these dowels, excessive rebar has been encountered in the pile cap. Upon reviewing the drawings this rebar must be the main longitudinal reinforcement and in some cases the pile dowels into the pile cap. Standard practice for bridges of this design have one dowel at each end of the girder at centerline. We believe it would be better practice to accept this criteria rather than cut this steel. For those girders having both dowels over rebar we propose to move off of this rebar and drill a hole at the center of the girder. This would involve drilling thru the girder as well as into the pile cap. The second problem pertains to a floated void. This void by itself is easy to remedy as it is under the poured -in -place curb. We propose that the void area be formed and the curb be poured per plan. However, this void being out of position has created some doubts as to the location of other items. We remind you that this job was under full time inspection while being fabri- cated. While errors have been discovered this should not be construed that we should not have some confidence in the inspection. It is suggested that we accept the problems that are known and mutually solve them by proceeding with the job. We will appreciate your earliest consideration of these matters. RFCr JV fD APR S 1966 JHP/c1PuBUC W084S 96'pr Enclosures Yours very truly, ROCKWZN PIj�STRESSED � J. H. Peirsol Plant Manager CONCRETE CORP. ROCKWIN ENGINEER so L POSTRESSED CONCRETE CONSULTANTS DATM .3/- 31 �bj�/� Jogs No.L74 �G 47 OY 'L ♦7 CNK'D_LiLL ,JAMBOREE ROAD - RE4416NMENr Co,CECT/ vE MEASvFZE 7-y_A -VC10 Cywr/- icr• PIaw 6/N4=, -- - - -- - 4 F o o . 1c FA Dowels 4s R&q',P* ay cowreAcr 1! DOWEL — 5uasrrrure / '/l D0wel- PEA N — f4ia nF,e 5 .E' „c -r.. — DJRY'XFACK n b L i t�A ROCKWIN ENGINEERS - PR TRESSED CONCRETE CONSU ANTS DATE - Jo. wo. 6 4 —24 9p ay --:6 P CXK'D..S2 =_ J .M802E DAD- i2Ei}L/4NAleNr' BN6RTNO�OP� A - - - -- - -�— - -- -- -- No,iry -tasr CCZoVeZ Cc aloeDEg CS-3. comic- I F r- i tl' G P A G 0-1 PK'OV/DE 'CORM PS �B4dt�.R.V� FIX L .►y,CO,A/G, A_m. * APo"L 1# 19" Como P.00 Inc. Lzot C. STAUMS CALL MIA ATY*t Noto Kcoupoa Susiley$ ftALOWwwr W Jmwwu R Z=171 � VOW L9MIt "UP ftftlll AM CWT Of A LMSM VOW *U"WA f � M -I DATtD MhSM 23# IR6*34AVIK Man 11114CIVIC06 TUC INITIM INOMSTIM r ALIGNING TUC NAND SAIL BY NKMIA IMP MAW iADft It SATIVACTOOlVe 17 AMAIkll VAPAVIM# TOM SM A► TO AMONO Oft" 90 NOT PINIACT rM gHWU AWK TIME DtCK TO ALLGW A SWIPICICUT;T*I"W" OF 61140►7' TO 119114OLT ON THE IIAND MAIL INICION PAPALIAL WITH TM ftMWAV IN"* III "Stu CAUSS, IT WILL rMNIMILY a noteca"T TO alto TN MOLTS, IBV Or SL99V9 GOVLINU OR WcLD►"& IN OW OPINION TUCK 45 10 ANITIOPI"T1411111 "Ift A SUMM TO Age ION T119 AfflYto As is ro►wito *uT to AL**jwu rowspsy's Log= no GAMM IOAAI sroWN IM Ramon's S► ontwin"* It otOwunto to a "MML Mmottion: ow is' ,Vpt 4w wgit auks, Racwtu WAVAD PONAfty oave amosoce Tn. sGLTS &ACOMINKY* ALO&UMA fWAMy ALSO agooview sufflus TWO: nAtLiono weft an Anil, 118�1 fts Ow Lzown 4w RAW* 170 19661 to WON on" a PSWOM so Tw into 09" UNTIL "TIWAC"RV AMR= AM CMKgTIVC WKAVMS MW. MCM woo& t, "IM9 ev lamove V9111' TMV VWAW& AssisTAw CIVIL Esmuzorn IFDI*w NEWARK . NEW JERSEY SACRAMENTO • CALVORNIA NEWPORT 11"CN . CALIFORNIA WASNINOTON . D. C. RENO • NEVADA y 0 11 PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG O. J. PORTER & COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS GIOI OUNBCT BOULEVARD LOB ANOCL90 30. CALIFORNIA NORMANDY 64101 March 31, 1966 Roger S. Woolley Law Office Security First National Bank Building Rancho Santa Fe, California 92067 Gentlemen: Receipt of your letter of March 29, 1966, transmitting a copy of the claim filed by Western Salt Company against the City of Newport Beach is acknowledged. For the record, we have reviewed the design prepared for the City of Newport Beach and find that such design did not contribute to the circumstances related in the claim. Very truly yours, K. H. O'Brien KHO:bh PARTNERS O. JAMEO PORTER K. M. O'RRI EN ELLIS L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER ASSOCI.T €s JAKE C. YOUNG C. F. ORI00 C. H. DARBY OTTO M. VIKRE J. F. WHITE (A.,.A.) W. J, WAGNER V. J. EPOTTE (A.I.A.) LEONAND O. UROUNAIIT 1940.10[0 ..( I' I { `I { i 1 i i l i I PORTER, ARMSTRONG, RIPA R ASSOCIATES, INC. A 11956 t f . 1 NEWARK, N. I f. AIRPORTS . ,IIONWAYR • STRGGTURRS • OTILITISS • DANE . RRPOGTS , DUAYEYS , SOIL AND GRDLOGIDAL t"Na"OAl10NS • POUNDA110MS LNO %TAR1L0A11GN 4. .. .. ..r._._.�v�f�1��•R,F1!!.!T .., ,r f1n.. F9t, R.n•..• iP'. �:' �2�'.'. ;!!Yf`'��:w..Y.�._..�.�is::..�_ LOB ANGELES 9 CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO 9 CALIFORNIA WASHINGTON 9 D. C. RENO 9 NEVADA 0 10 PORTER, O'BRIEN & ARMSTRONG O. J. PORTER & COMPANY CONSULTING ENGINEERS 415 FRELINGHUYBEN AVENUE NEWARK. NEW JERSEY 07114 CA[L[.PORTHART 810ELOW 2 -4200 April 28, 1966 City of Newport Beach Clerk, Secretary and Auditors Newport Beach, California Gentlemen: RECE''O CITY Ci.r -RK M �,y 2 1966 W , cn,y OF f "arm BzA?xi. ` CAW, O. JAMES PORTER K. K. 0.8 RIEN LLLI• L. ARMSTRONG JAMES R. PORTER JAKE C. YOUNG O. P. GRIGG C. H. DANNY OTTO M. VIKR[ W. J. WAGNER V. J. GROWS IA. 1. A.1 LEONARD C. URGUHAW 1212 -1960 Subject: Claimant, Western Salt Co. vs City of Newport Beach This company received through the mails, a copy of the claim of Western Salt Co, against the City of Newport Beach, dated March 24, 1966. It was forwarded by mail to Porter, O'Brien & Armstrong, 510 31st Street, Newport Beach, California, the Contractors, Coxco, Inc. , and Cox Brothers Construction Co. , 7002 Katella Road, Stanton, California. The claim covers alleged damages to Western Salt Co. Is Vat H in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of California. The alleged damages, according to the claim, occurred on or before November 23, 1965. Attached hereto is a copy of Ken O'Brien's letter of March 31, 1965 to Roger S. Wooley Law Office for Western Salt Company, Security First National Bank Building, Rancho Santa Fe, Cali- fornia, which states that a review of the engineering design prepared for the City of Newport Beach indicated that such design did not contribute to . circumstances related to the claim. The design which our firm prepared for the City of Newport Beach was accepted by the City of Newport Beach in the Fall of 1964. Referring to Paragraph 8 of the claim, it is my understanding that 10 to 12 inches of rainfall occurred in early November 1965 in this area. This amount of rainfall within the enclosed Vat H would certainly have pre- vented the Western Salt Company from harvesting any salt in Vat H until after many months of dry weather. Their claim for this loss is in the amount of $8, 600.00. Certainly this loss, and the alleged loss of production in Vat H for 1966, was due to natural forces of extremely heavy and unprecedented rains in Southern California last Fall, and could not have been caused at all by the design of Jamboree Road. If any damage occurred to the levees around Vat H SOIL AND GEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS • HIGHWAYS . AIRPORTS . DAMS . UTILITIES . STRUCTUR65 FOUNDATION@ AND STABILIZATION . City of Newport BeO Newport Beach, California •April 28, 1966 Page .2 during this flood, it is our contention that it could not have been caused by the design which we prepared for you of Jamboree Road. As you are aware, the City of Newport Beach had the responsi- bility of supervising the construction work carried out by Coxco, Inc. and Cox Brothers Construction Co. We, therefore, are not qualified to comment on any of their 'operations that might have, under the very heavy rains, contributed to the alleged damage cited in Paragraph 5 of the claim. Our insurance carriers, The Continental Casualty Company, have been notified of the claim. This letter is written to clarify the defense on behalf of the City of Newport Beach and Porter, OIlBrien & Armstrong- O. J. Porter & Company. We wish to assure you that we will be glad to assist in any way possible in preparing a defense against this claim. Sincerely, O. '. Porter Managing. Partner OJP :j1 Enc. cc: Mr. K. H. O'Brien, 4201 Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, Cal. Mr. M. Lane, McCarter & English, 11 Commerce St., Newark, N.J. Mr. D. Liljedahl, Continental Casualty Co., 2975 Wilshire Blvd. Los Angeles, Cal. Mr. E. Jerge, Continental Casualty Co., 1511 K Street, N.W. Washington, D. C. PORTER. O'SRIEN d ARMSTRONG - CONSULTING ENGINEERS TH. PHOo R: IAaxsoN 7 -5126 MxoAn 3 -2604 C C / /2 1 9 CCO, INC. Cox Bros. Construction Co. P. 0. DMW R O KNOTT AND KATErr.e Rows STANTON COMNOR CODNT», CALIFORNIA March 28, 1966 G. P. Dunigan, Jr., Assistant Civil Engineer City of Newort Beach 3300 W Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California A. S. Cox ..... DRRxR M. A. Cox ..... tncs -awe. R. D. Cox .. v�ca- PRRe.desaa Subject: Jamboree Road Realignmant, C-847, Hand Rail Dear Sir: We refer to your letter of March 15, 1966 and the construction requirements for the bridge hand8guard railing . We submit in answer a copy of letter dated March 23, 1966 from our subcontractor, Alhambra Foundry Co. , Ltd., in which they suggest the use of grout pads as a means of elevation adjustment, providing that sufficient projection has been allowed in the setting of the anchor bolts. It is anticipated that the manner in which guard rail is fabricated with slotted bolt holes that there will be sufficient adjustment allowed to accommodate the desired result. If other and more expensive methods are required to accomplish the results set forth in your letter, then we must pro- pose a change order to the contract be executed to allow reimburse- ment to us for the added costs. Very truly yours, COXCQ, INC. By, z R. A. Ker oo General Superintendent R E C F I V F D MAR 3 01966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. oa3a e3xj 1 1 4 7 m e R j D R L H R m B R A Coxco Inc. P. 0. Drawer C Stanton, California Attention: J. R. Ellexson Gentlemen: R n R v e n u e C R L I P o R n I R March 23, 1966 Re: Jamboree Road Bridge Contract No. C 847 We refer to your letter of March 16, 1966; with the attach- ed copy of letter from City of Newport Beach. The details shown on the high rail to be measured cast deck unit. This is Sheet 19, detail A -19. Sl pre -cast deck units, and through C -21 do not show contract plans call for the 3'6" from the top surface of the pre - shown on Sheet 18, detail A -18 and feet 11 shows the elevation of the Rockwin's detail shop drawings C -1 a camber. Accordingly, the rail was fabricated to Standard State Highway specifications as referred to in the Special Prov- isions. The rail is all fabricated and at the galvanizers. We are scheduled for the installation of this rail either during the week of March 28, or April 4, 1966. It is not practical economically and from the stand point of shop practice to tailor make each individual panel of rail to conform to any deviations in the deck unit. It has been a standard practice even when mounted on a poured in place sidewalk or curb that sufficient projection be allowed when setting the anchor bolts to permit the use of grout pads on the post. Please advise the next course of action otherwise, we are prepared to make the installation as outlined above and de- tailed on the plans. Very truly yours, AL RA FOUNDRY CO., LTD. i/John T. Sofr4nko I =X Puf w WO CITY OF NEWPORT BEAC-4. NO. i IN IT. DATE ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR A55T. P.W. DIR. UTILITY SUPT. _ TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR. CO -OP, PROJ. ENGR, FIELD ENGR. SECRETARY PLEASE: I. HANDLE 5. REVIEW & COMMENT 2. SEE P.W.D. 6. PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT READ (7� PREPARE REPLY FILE O. POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS: �W Pp CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH u _ s CALIFORNIA 0 ORANGE COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA ATTN: FRANK L.ABELLE City Hall 8800 W. Nbwpwt Blvd. Area Code 714 648 -4110 MARCH 21p 1966 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR "Rn VALVE AND PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATION DEAR SIR: IT IS REQUESTED THAT STABILOMETER TESTS BE PERFORMED ON SUBGRADE SOILS FROM THE LOCATIONS LISTED BELOW.AFTER OBTAINING THE "R" VALVESf IT IS REQUESTED THAT A RECOMMENDED STRUCTURAL SECTION BE PROVIDED FOR EACH LOCATION. THE ESTIMATED TRAFFIC INDICES ARE ALSO LISTED BELOW. RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF LIME STABILIZATION FOR LOCATIONS (1) AND (2) ARE ALSO REQUESTED. 1. PLACENTIA AVENUE AT PRODUCTION PLACE SEE ENCL. (I). T. 1. =8.0 2. ANNIVERSARY ESTATES ALL STREETS WITHIN THIS TRACT MUST BE UPGRADED. SEE ENCL (2). T.I. =4.8 3. JAMBOREE ROAD @ SAN DIEGO CREEK. ONE TEST SHOULD BE PERFORMED ON A SAMPLE OF THE ROADWAY FILL FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW BRIDGE.AND ANOTHER FROM THE FILL SOUTH OF THE BRIDGE. T.I. =9.0. VERY TRULY YOURS$ HUNTER T. COOK PROJECT ENGINEER HTC:NAJ ENCL. 4t D Coxcos, INC. P.O. DRAWER C STANTONs CALIrORNIA ATTNI MR. R.A. KERroOT SUSd[CT: JANBoREt ROAD REALIONM[ i C�1 6[NTLL11EN2 A 210 UaTioN 9-04 or Tote CITY STANDARD SPEciricATious sTATts TNAT No f 110NTXlY PRODR[YS PAYMENT WILL B[ NAB[ WHEN THE WORK Is NOT ►ROC[[OINB IN ACCORDAIILE MITN TU[ PROYisio*S or TNt CONTRACT. As rut BRiDOE DECK 19 UNACCEPTABLE PER OUR LETTER or MARC* 17j, 19"p AND As TN19 19 [SSENTIALLY TUC ONLY WORK P[RroRMED IN TX[ LAST M00ftA NO PIIOSRESS PATNW WILL Ot MADE Iron TXIs NoNTX. VERY TRULY Youss* 6.P. DuutaA p JR. Assi9TANT CiYiL ENSINEtR OPDSNAJ i. 0 COKCO, INC. P. 0. fIRAM[R C STANTO4, CALIFOONNA ATT9MTIOtN1 MR. R. A. SIIOd9CT1 JAMOOREC GEMTLtUENI REALMN.Um, CAT' MARC* 1?i'406 TODAY, WHILE CMCCKIMO THE INPROP��PLACCO CUM MALS ON TUC- IMIMK# A HOLC WAS PUM14CO TINOOMII THE DECK SLAG* 11 WAS FOUND ?NAT INS E011- CRETE WAS ONLV I +IA INCHES THICK INSTEAD OF T09 WA INCNt3 A0 SHOIIN OM THE PLANS. .THIS APPARENTLY WAS CAUSCO $Y TIK 3040YUK JFLOAT- INO. NOT ONLY 010 TN9 TINE PLOAT VCRTtCALLY, OWT ALSO 0"MONOU"Y, RCSULTINO IN THE EOU OF TNC SLAG OtINO ONLY 1* INCHES THICK INSTEAD OF 3* INCHES AS REQUIRED. AS NINTEO OUT IN OW LETTER OF MARCH 1, 19", "a OLADS Went NOT CAST TO Tilt PLAN SNAPS AND DINCM$IONS, TIN El[PAliSWO PAPERS WIRE HOT OF TUC REOU11190 MEIOHT, MOST OF TUC CUU DOWELS tiENt INPROICRLY PLACED, AND TUC FINISH WAS NOT AS SPCCIFICO• TN9 , IMATION OF ALL TIC ADM DISCRE ►ANCICS INDICATES THAT TUC CNTIft DECK IS UMACCC►TAOLE AS A RCSULY OF TUC COMPLETC LACK OF ATTENTION TO TUC PLANS AND $PICIFICATIONS OM THE PART Or YOUR SW- CONTRACTOR, ROCKWIN. OE, ANY FURTHER WORK NAY DE P9RFORHCO On THE OCCK, IT WILL HAVC TO K CONCLUSIVELY PROVEN THAT THt SO4OTOIDS, INCIMPORC /HO DAR$, DOWELS, NLTS, CTC., HAVE 0994 PLACED PKC MLY AS $NOWT ON TM PLANS AND THAT THE @RUNE DECK WILL SATISFACTORILY CARRY THE LOA" FOR WHICH IT VAS KSI4HE09 GPDIVR CCI ROCKWIH PRtSTRCSSCD CONCKETE COOP. KCM O'ORICM & A$sOCIATC$ ATTNI NR. HALDENAN VERY TRULY YOUR$, G. ►� Du4tOAN, JR. A$ST. CIVIL tNOI4ttM MARCH 150 1966 Coxcf, 1116. P.0. DRAVCR C. STAWONj CALI/OSIIIA i ATTRI MRS K[RIOOT SufdtCTi JAINIMC ROAD ft" IGNNC � BeNTLtMCM► 1 THt RCIM:OIAL 09ASVMO MWOftO IN ROCSYINJIS LtTTtA OMM HAMM 100 1966, ARC SATISFACTORY. YcR�Y�TR�MLT Y+01MSp S.t. Dumoomp JR. AffHTAM1'CIYiI CMfiMttR Cc► PlomIM 1•RtSTRts"o CONCR[Tc Come. Out Has AALtttVSM1 13W EAST lwcn#AL HIMKtAY SANTA Pt S►RIMWp CALIFORNIA CONGO# INC. = P.O. DRArto C. STANTON# CALIrORNIA ATTNi MR. KERrooT i SUSACTI .JAMOO"t ROAD RLALISommYs CA7 kmTLtMLMi IT HAS COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THERE MAY at OOMC MISU NItRSTAMING RLGARDING.TIIL PLACEMENT Or TUC HARD RAIL ON TUC JAHRORCC ROAD CRIDOt• PLR THE PLANS# THE RAIL IO TO O9 3'-6" ASOVC THE KCR SLAOSS, MOYEVCR# THE TOP Or THE RAIL IS TO N[ PARALLEL WITH TUC RoADVAY PROr.ILC, DUE TO TUC COMKR IN THE PRECAST SLAGSp IT WILL DL NECESSARY TO MAST THE MCIGMT Or THE POSTS OR SHIM UNDER TUC OASES TO PROIIIK T801110040 GRADE roR TMC TOP Or THE RAIL• YOU ARE RCMINDLD THAT THE HANGNAIL AM POSTS ARC TO K GALVAMItto A/TER. ►ASRICATION, TN[KPORti NO rILLO CUTTING OR WELDING WILL Gc PERMITTtO. Tug ADM ALSO HOLDS TRUE ram THE PLACommor THE atp KAM OYARS RAILING. PLtAK mroo I YOUR RAILING SUS- COMTRACTGN N THEIR RcONIKKNTS IN OWN THAT ML HAY PLAN IN ADVANCE To INSTALL THE RAILIKU IN A PROKO MAI MER.. VERY TRULY YOURS l� a.►. DUMIGAU# JAB ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINctR 6rDINAr Ar -.L.in PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORPORAT ION I3640 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY. BANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach., California Attention: Mr. G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer UNIVERSITY 5 -1761 SPRUCE 3-1972 March 10, 1966 Re: Jamboree Road Realignment (C -847) V Gentlemen: We are in receipt of recent letters from your office dated March 1, 1966: March 30 1966 and March 4, 1966, requesting certain information. The following points are made in answer to your requests: 1. Enclosed please find six (6) copies of our Grout Mix Data sheet indicating 1/8 lb. of Alcoa Powder per cu. yd, of concrete which would represent less than .02% of the weight of cement as recommended by the Civil Engineering hand- book by Urguhart, and confirmed by Mr. John McKoan, Technical Representative of Alcoa Aluminum. 2. Please also find herewith six (6) copies of a sketch indicating a method for inserting dowels in our prestressed deck slab. 3. Expansion papers between bents shall be extended by this company to the proper height. 4. Bolts shall be inserted by Rockwin into inserts in the side of the girders prior to the installation of the water main. 5. The gaps at the ends of the prestressed girders shall be remedied as follows: a. Form along bottom of girders with foamed polyurethane so as grout material will not spill out over abutment and around bearing pads. b. Push expansion paper over against end of one girder. c. Pump grout into the remaining opening at the same time shear keys are grouted. Y , • City of Newport Beach page - 2' - March 10,v 1966 As per our telephone conversation of iiffis date it is understood that the above mentioned points clarify all present unresolved questions pertaining to Rockwin's products. BP /bs enc. CC /Coxco., Inc. Very truly yours., rp RECEIVED MAR 111966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, CORP. r� MA CLt W Na, 11443 Y sn as Y sn r GROUT MIX DATA 1. JOB TITLE: Jamboree Road Realignment 2. JOB LOCATION: East Bluff Drive to Palisades Road, Newport Beach, California 3. GROUT MIX: a. Cement - 7 sacks per cu. yd. Type II b. Sand - Approx. 75% W.C. sand to 25% cement c. Aluminum - 1/8 lb. per cu, yd. of Alcoa Atomized Aluminum Powder $3 Jos Jamboree Road Rea lignment Fos City of Newport Beach, Calm JOR No. 249 3 -8 -66 sy JD ROCMN MYRESSEO CONCRETE COW - S(Mt4 I( yP(IrvGS, U[SCMft1A y.,r 17 Aas _ PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR NT i's-1-1 CITY OF NEW ORT M5H N IN T. DATE ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIR. —/o UTILITY SUPT. TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR. CO -OP. PROJ. ENGR. FIELD ENGR. SECRETARY �EEASE 1. HANDLE 5. REVIEW & COMMENT Z. SEE P.W.D. E). PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT 3. READ e7 PREPARE REPLY 4. FILE U. POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS: 6311 NORTH FIGUERGA STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90042 March 9, 1966 0 FRANKLIN & WICHMAN CONSULTING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Kenneth Perry Assistant City Engineer Gentlemen; CLINTON 5-7169 On March 3, 1966, Mr. Robert Franklin of this office, visited the site of the Jamboree Road Bridge and inspected prestressed concrete deck members which were in place on the subject bridge. Mr. Franklin also made a preliminary review of contract drawings, shop drawings, and structural calculations as relating to these deck members and made calculations of his own, copies of which are enclosed. The field investigation disclosed random cracks on the top surface of maw of the deck members. These cracks were concentrated at or near the ends of the members. Calculations indicate that under the weight of the mem- bers only there exists approximately 300 psi tension in the top surface of these members at their ends. The cracks are attributed to differential vertical shrinkage between concrete poured between and around sonotube voids and concrete poured directly over sonotubes. Surface cracking is aggravated to some extent by the presence of relatively large amounts of mild steel top reinforcement. It is probable that the tendency to develop shrinkage cracks as described exists throughout the full length of the member. Calculated tensile stresses in the ends of the stresses, however, will keep cracks in these areas open and may, indeed, cause some new cracks to develop or may cause existing cracks to widen slightly. Shrink- age cracks in the center of the members are closed and are kept closed due to the prestressing and the fact that compressive stress exists at the top surface. It is not felt that these cracks are of structural significance. They will not impair the strength or rigidity of the prestress deck members to any appreciable degree. It is recommended that these cracks be thoroughly sealed to prevent the intrusion of atmospheric moisture and to eliminate any possibility of corrosion of reinforcement. We are pleased to have had the opportunity to be of service to you. Do not hesitate to consult us further as you may desire. Very ly yours, �Z_7/ `�� RECEIVED ROBERT E. FRANKLI MAR 9 1966 REF:ef PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ROBERT E. FRANKLIN ROBERT H. WICHMAN r k'Esc wr »'Ow,q c -4 pq wit" Sccfion /�roCcrf/ea Za °e 6c /z: Vi 5 1. ZXJt64s /Z.f` v - •245.44 � /e.t�- 2677., T7o�,o 1'I " ?/ . 7"4Alo.E■ + _ tlG.59 /e. &E - ?v9:� - 9Stc• 377 r _ 7Sx7 • S. ?d 3.6 - 1E .G4 11 ... a, .7S m4t s. &7.72 yt : /a.58 " `S! ■ 327S yb . /0.42" sA s 3346 - 94 40 6667.72 x/solif♦ = op an.. 42' -Ssa' /eaa Nfea/`DT7 urtr /o Pon.` a 4/ /Iq %d Ai' //% mrAag7 : 41,94 .97 G9S..r Q/. 4 ' =ii /496/2.!''►. end. >. ., „ 40.97 /cY�� f70urta/ ocf'GS hn elect Pt,4 G4& 6/sg ,fier •!623•x_' 'f239o0/6 G7.72 s 43S pas' C tSJA, 2.2$ a /2 27 G c Yo.4T J. /* ► 7.Y4'. }' 3 b. 2 S w Z /7.6_ Re //3/ 75 -,a ' SG.S = /B = 9.194' laa�36,'• 9pQ oi:. -` ,•e end A4j 0-12;e /475/? s 17,74144 M %3t 545' AMU • 6 s' Ft �3s - 932 r 54S • 243 fb ■G 36 1973 -i9G� /o'i•/ /nf /1'la • /2 x/4„928 ft = 22 9 fb /os 4 MAX. a »ei 14'n6/On / ft • l07 -d95 302 ps'r`. = KLIN & WICHMAN P*0419ar 6G 188T.;/ LTfNG STRUCTURAL - ----- .4V .—Ar 2x.7fC4,(125' v -044.44 /D S! IZE77 // l$ 907 7S44 57.7 ,75x7 /0 C.4 7S &67.72 74987 20 4.v . .... .... . --------- - ------ 32 ?s /0.42, .54 s 33 4G 14748 e, 7. 7 Z //,o aeon 42 5 • /C.0 5 m -Z 7 'it le -,%A A Z7 97 40.97' VS-S x 4/.47' 40,77% g z Jni, ,PIA 9001 e- 7, 72 s 43S C cs- 5 27 -T- 2 I's <3./.99 97'1 /7 2 =/7'14/4 737 r = 45 243 F6 35 *922 -S3 r. /02 40 2 M14572.8 75dI3 G Sal SZ.? 229 fb - 10.5 .0 ft . 127 - G is 302 p+t ee. = KLIN & WICHMAN P*0419ar 6G 188T.;/ LTfNG STRUCTURAL PANCM 11, 1966 r ROCKWIM PRESTIKfOtO COMOUTC COR►SRATIO. 1310 E. IMPtRIAL HIOMMAI,•,., SANTA Ft SPRINGS, CALI/O6 ATTt*#Oxi JAR. GALECEWSKI SUOJSEFI JAMGOREE ROAD REALIGNMtIft (C4017) GENTLEMENI PER OUR COIR9ROAT10M THIS NORMIMG, ,FORWARDING A COPY Or THE LtTTtR Or TRAMSMITYAL AND PROPOSES, GROUT Mix FOR YOUR RLVMtW. Tom: "CIVIL Emimccoome HANODOOK," C. C. UmOART, EGITOR, THIRD EDITION, MLNYIONO ADDING GRANULATED ALUMINUM TO GROUT AT TIN: RATE OF FROM jW3 TO .Qe PERCENT BY Wt1O11T OP YN9 CEMENT (PM 692). THEY FURTHER MENTION THAT GUAI** AMOUNTS Or ALVIIIMUI MAY St UND TO PRODUCE A Leirs RtMOTN, LIGHT WEIGHT CONCRETE. Tat NIK' ►Mw POSED BY YOUR COMPANY WOULD St .0" PjlftUMT, OR WCARLY THOU TINtS THE AMOUNT MCHT10HE111 ARGYE• PLEASE SUPPLY US WITH INFORMATION COMrIRMINt TWAT TM$ AMOUNT OF ALUMINUM USED IN TNt GROUT FOR TN[ SMEAR KEYS WILL RESULT IN THE "M14M STRENOTM, NOM +SHRINK INS MMOUe AS REOU1GO BY' TINE PLANS, ALSO CNCLOSLD IS AN UNSIGNED SKETCH INDICATING A IKTIM FOR IN• Ot2TING DOWELS IN A PRESTRESSED DECK SLAG. THIS GIIETCM WAS NAIOK* TO OUR INSPtCTOR BY ONE Or YOUR LA20RERS. ANY STRUCTURAL NODIrI. CAT IONS TO TIC JAMMUEC ROAD GR IOW KCK GLASS MST GE 9121196 BY A CIVIL OR STRUCTURAL EMOINtLR AMID PROPCRI.Y SUSMITTCO MR. TNC CITY'S APPROVAL. THE s1UEtCN ALSO MAKES NO MENTION Or TILL tK1OTiMO, IN. PROPERLY PLACED CURD OOWELS. TMtit SHOULD u SNOWM ON TNL OKLTCN At TO Gt BEHOVED OR TO REMAIN IN PLACt. GPDIVR CCI COKM:o, INC. ATTNI R. A. KERrooT ENCLS. I VERY TRULY YOURS, G. P. OUMMGAN, JR. AGST. CIVIL EN21MEcR COXCO1 INC. P. O. DRAWER "C" STANTON� CALIFORNIA NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 714 678 -2110 MARCH 3. 1966 SUBJECT: ANCHOR BOLTS FOR WATER MAIN BRACKET AT EDGE OF DECK SLAB GENTLEMEN: IT HAS BEEN BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT A CHANGE WAS MADE IN THE ANCHOR BOLTS THAT WERE TO BE INSTALLED AT THE EDGE OF THE DECK SLABS FOR THE BRACKETS WHICH WILL ULTIMATELY SUPPORT AN 18^ WATER MAIN ON THE JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE. APPARENTLY TYPE EC-2 RICHMOND INSERTS WERE INSTALLED IN LIEU OF THE ANCHOR ' BOLTS. BECAUSE OF THIS CHANGE, PLEASE PROVIDE OETAILS AND SUBMIT CAL- CULATIONS INDICATING THE STRENGTH OF THIS REVISED CONNECTION TO VERIFY ITS CONFORMANCE WITH THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. ALSO PLEASE FURNISH AND INSTALL APPROVED BOLTS TO CONFORM WITH THE DETAIL AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AFTER THE CALCULATIONS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WATER MAIN ARE BEING COMPLETED1 AND IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT WE HAVE THIS INFORMATION AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. VERY TRULY YOURS] BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC.WORKS DIRECTOR MJA:VR CC: ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE,CORP. KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES m FRANKLIN & W I C"MAM 6311 M. FiewooA Los AMELESS CALIrM JA, 9oft ATTCHTIOMI MR. r<*Ognv nmmw IN swedgert JAMOOng 0 ENCLOSED ARE C"495 Of THE SIMPFAIIIAMINGSIp PLANS# AND CALCULATIONS M TUC PR9w4Tjt9&$"D9Cx Wtftgn F*lt tilt SUOJECT "10490 YOU WILL NOTE THAT THE SW J*Mnll 01"94 rMW Tat ►LANSj, OUT WERE APVWM*-*T TUC COWSULTAMT** wrovelram" twellictoo Tilt ►umcwAot o*oa* rem YOUR vm *No" sc Ty►to Ano MIAOW: ** THURSDAY MORMIN4, GM$vn Emias. veny TWLY Y*Unv G* P. DOXISAMp JR. ASSISTANT CIVIL DMI*ttn xz. Coxco, INC. P. 0. DRAWER C STANTONS CALIFORNIA ATTCNTIONS NR. R. L. Worm SWJtCT3 JAMODRtC ROAD RtAL1uNNNT, C-al *A*WN :t, t�66 CCNTL[M[NI TIN: 009-CASTS, PRC -47REASED D[CI( Rs FOR Tnt SRoft ON Tot SWAtCT JOSp As SUPPLItD OY TOW SIID *R'ROCRWI*p AMC IN O[NERAL NOT ACCIEPY"Lt, TNC FOLLOt/lNs DISCRCPANCIts WEW NOUN 1. SIDCs AND two Aft NOT PARALLCL 00 OF PROPER ALIMMUTS, RtSULTINO IK tXCCSSIVC OAPs OLT%Oft%- MENUKU 2. EXPANSION PAPERS DETWttN DENTS ARt NOT OF su►F1CItNT Nt14NT. 3• ASST OF TUC WARD OOWCLS ARC NOT PROPCRLY t11=ODED AS 8 f ON THE SHOP ORAWINOS. k. TNtRt IS EXTCNSIVE CRACRIMS ON TNt SUR►ACt OF SONS OF TNt MCMURS. Wt NAVt KNOWS A CONSULTANT TO ASSIST Us IN NAKINO A ACCH1011 RCOARD- Ift ITCN II-AD01R, ME WILL ADVIOC YOU IF THE OLAOS SNDULD DE RCPLACCD ORS IF NOTE WHAT UN901AL NCASURtS WILL NAVt TO IK TAREN. PLWASC $W NIT YOUR RtCONNCNOts SOLUTION FOR ITtNS 1s SF AND 3. m OUR OtTlew AND APPROVAL UPSOC DOING ANY GROUT /NR OR OOMCTSY! WORN. VCRY TRULY YOUMy G. P. DWIOAN0 JR+ AssT. CIVIL ENDIN[tR QmIVR CC1 ROCNNIN PRCsTRtssts CONCRtTt CORP. PUBLIC WORKS DEPAWENT LITY,OF NEWPORT WRCH NO. INIT. DATE ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIR. UTILITY SUPT, TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. y, SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR. CO -OP. PROJ. ENGR. FIELD ENGR. a/ SECRETARY PLEASE: C - ni Y r% 1. HANDLE 5. REVIEW & COMMENT 2. SEE P.W.D. 6. PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT READ �7y PREPARE REPLY . FILE O. POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS: t 0. 0 o C tu oe n PRZS7Wff8BED :.--T= C0?J=ftrTU CORPORATION 134A0 EAST IMPERIAL HIGHWAY. SANTA FS SPRINGS. CALIFORNIA RE: Jamboree Road Reali JOB NO. 249 TO: Public Works Departmeae�-' 3300 Newport Beach Blvd. DATE: 2-23-66 Newport Beach, California Attn: Mr. Perry GENTLEMEN: WE ARE SENDING HEREWITH: ❑ BLUE PRINTS F-1 PHOTOGRAPHS ❑ BLUE LINE PRINTS ❑ TRACINGS r-1 SPECIFICATIONS ❑ SHOP DRAWINGS r-1 PHOTOSTATS F-1 SAMPLES W Grout Mix Data AS FOLLOWS:, SENT BY. F1 OUR MESSENGER ❑ RECEIVER'S MESSENGER Ist CLASS MAIL ❑ PARCEL POST ElExPREU No' I DRWG. DATE OR OF REMARKS COPIES REYISION DATE WE W91A �V! Mr, Note: If enclosures received are not listed above, kindly notify us at once. Very truly yours, Rockwin Prestressed Concrete dii6ration Per —.� . . . . ........ SCUT mix DAB 1. JOIT TITLF: Jamboree Road Realignment 2. J01 tOrATTON: East Bluff Drive to Palisades Road, Newport Beach, California, 3. MUT 14171: a. Cement - 7 sacks per cu. yd. Type 11 b. Sand - Approx. 75% W.C. sand to 25% cement C. Aluminum - 3/8 lb. per cu. yd. of Alcoa Atomized Aluminum Powder 0 -9 J013 Jamboree Road Realignment FOR —iii-ty—o JOB No- 9 DATE 2-23-66 By ROCKWIN PRESTRESSED CONCRETE CORP. 13"0 C. I.Pgft.A, H10 ... V SANTA FE SPRINGS, CALIFORNIA BHT. 1 4s LI BHT. 1 4s �:k BHT. 1 4s CatisT C -(S C17., 30 nr e4 7 0 KEN O'B R I E N & ASSOCIATES 4201 sunset boulevard, los angeles, California 90029/213-664-2191 January 25, 1966 Department of Public Works City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Jamboree Road Realignment Per our discussion on the telephone, enclosed is a reproducible copy of sheet 13 showing revised abutment elevations. Very truly yours,., i R. Holdeman Director of Engineering JRH:bh Enclosure K 4 (.._ P/ 2ff�vs #6019 R F C F I V F 0 JAN 26 1966 PUBLIC WORKS UEPL newport beach, California CONSULTING ENGINEERS washington, d. c. C- 847(C) See Contract File for Jamboree Road Realignment San Diego Creek Bridge North & South Abutments Plan, Elevations & Details �r Z3. Y7 z3-sl :- - = -: ZZ,73 Z3.S/ 22.80✓ 2Z 8/ ..._ M 17Y Y -Z3 L3.,�o ✓23.03 3. Ze, ti . y i 0 �� ► _ o.. - �p0 s b _ - 2 ._ Z3 ZZ, r 2� - ........._ o• dL9S x 3 =m.Q7 - - .42 x_3<._f - -- --SE 19.2 _-- 0._0.x_- /9. l tZ:S- ot:(_�7.i- _t.0.1�- :- `Z`�D9 to.oy(_ ° /�.9g tZ- Sit /,770..[.,7•..° �.?'..Ja Y I. 7 s *.... °_.x..13..._`...... ZZ_._QY_.....� _.._. 4".4 IS. z34- o -o L _/8. zs._ r z m ri71- tc,i . _ .ZZ.�3 -C zz•�o� I .JoL JANUARY 12,p 1960 COXCOO INC. P. 0. DRAWER C STAwTom,j CALorommiA ATMITIONS MR. R. A. KtorooT SusjccTt JAMMOCC ROAD BRIDGE) CAT%:' ationgsigm: WC HAVE RECCIV99 INC mcpow rmom OUR CONSULTANT INC PILE CAP RC- OCSIQ* NECESSITATED NY INC EXCESSIVE HISALIOMKOOT OF SOW Of THE ►ILIM49 Too: PILE CAPS WILL NAVE TO ME WIDENED TO PROVIDE AT LEAST 6 sacoics MIN INC PACE Of THE PILES TO INC PACE Or TIM CAP. Tme STIRRUPS SHOULD GC WROCHCO TO PROVIDE 2 INCHES CLEARANCE 6ZTWCC% THE fACC Or Inc PILE CAP AND INC SVR►ACC Or INC STEEL• THE wAim atfoorencome wAms SHOULD BE SPACED EQUALLY WITHIN INC WIDENED STIRRUPS* Toot neavinto PILE CAP weetwome 1St 1. NORT049MLY ANUTMOT: 1-3/ko ON Int SOUTHERLY SIDE 2. stur No* 6 ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE • Bt%y No* 2 1 ON INC SOUTHERLY SIDE SENT NO, I 1 1-1/4" ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE BILLMIS rOM THE CONSULTANTIS SERVICES WILL St 14ADC IN INC NEAR rUTURC. offlive CCt MACCO CORP. PILL Dmovios Div. ATTut MR. PARKER VERY TRULY YOUR$# go Po DumiaAms in. ASST. CIVIL Emaimcgo �k PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH N 1 E ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR r_ ASST. P.W. DIR. UTILITY SUPT. TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. 3 SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR. / CO -OP. PROD, ENGR. iv FIELD ENGR. / - /Z- SECRETARY / PLEASE: c 8y % 1. HANDLE 5. REVIEW & COMMENTCeAT 2. SEE P.W.D. 6. PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT READ PREPARE REPLY . FILE �. POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS: J L) KEN O' B R I E N & ASSOCIATES 4201 sunset boulevard, los angeles. California 90029/1213-664-2191 January 11, 1966 Department of Public Works City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr, G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Gentlemen: SUBJECT: Jamboree Road Realignment As requested, we have reviewed the pile cap design as effected by the pile deviations. The following are our conclusions and recommendations: #6019 1. Widening of the pile caps to include the deviated piles is not critical insofar as the pile caps are concerned. It is therefore recommended that the entire pile caps be widened to maintain a minimum edge distance of 6 inches. Minimum steel cover should be maintained and the interior steel rearranged to provide equal spacing. Stirrups should be lengthened as required. 2. The deviation, however, becomes critical due to eccentric loading on the piles themselves, and cause undesirable bi- lateral bending and unequal loading on individual piles. Investigations indicate even though these deviations will reduce the safety factor on the structure, they will not increase the stresses beyond acceptable limits. It is concluded, therefore, that the piles are acceptable as driven. 3. The wing -wall pile in its present location will not adversely effect the structure. It is concluded that this pile may remain in place. I hope that this information will be sufficient for your needs. If you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at any time. truly yours, RECEIVES r`.R.Hldeman Director of Engineering JRH:bh JAN 121966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. �- newport beach, California CONSULTING ENGINEERS washington, d, c.