Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-954 - Street Improvements - Westcliff-Dover Intersection, and 5th Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy AvenueJUNE 14, 1965 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DOVER - WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION REVISIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. APPROVE THE REVISIONS TO A STANDARD TEE INTERSECTION AS SHOWN ON PLAN 2 OF THE WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID REPORT. 2. RETAIN THE ENGINEERING FIRM OF WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID TO PRE- PARE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. FINANCE THE WORK WITH SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. DISCUSSION: ON APRIL 12, 1965, THE COUNCIL DISCUSSED A LETTER FROM THE DOVER SHORES COM- MUNITY ASSOCIATION REQUESTING A TRAFFIC STUDY OF THE DOVER - WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION. THE CITY MANAGER INDICATED AT THAT TIME THAT A STUDY BY THE FIRM OF WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID, CIVIL ENGINEERS, WAS UNDER WAY. THE REPORT HAS NOW BEEN COMPLETED, AND A COPY IS ATTACHED FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS. THE COST OF THE STUDY, $482.99, HAS BEEN FINANCED WITH PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED FUNDS IN ACCOUNT NO. 3077, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, ENGINEERING. IT IS RECOMMENDED IN THE REPORT THAT A MAJOR REVISION BE MADE IN THE CHAN- NELIZATION TO CONVERT THE PRESENT CONFIGURATION TO A DESIGN SIMILAR TO A STANDARD TEE INTERSECTION. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONCURS IN THAT RECOMMENDATION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. THE REVISED CONFIGURATION WILL BE MUCH SAFER, AS MOTORIST CONFUSION CAUSED BY THE PRESENT NON - STANDARD LAYOUT WILL BE REDUCED. 2. THE REVISED CONFIGURATION WILL BE BETTER ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE MOVEMENTS WHICH ARE EXPECTED TO SHOW THE GREATEST FUTURE INCREASES. (MOVEMENTS INTO AND OUT OF DOVER DRIVE NORTHERLY OF THE INTERSECTION.) 3. A FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CAN BE BETTER ACCOMMODATED BY THE REVISED INTERSECTION. 4. THE REVISED DESIGN WOULD ENABLE EXTENSION OF A STREET SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION IF THAT SHOULD EVER PROVE TO BE DESIR- ABLE. 5. ANALYSIS OF THE TRAFFIC COUNTS INDICATES THAT THE REVISED INTERSEC- TION WOULD STILL HAVE AMPLE CAPACITY TO ACCOMMODATE THE LEFT TURNING MOVEMENT FROM DOVER NORTHBOUND TO WESTCLIFF. SUBJECT: DOVER - WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION REVISIONS PAGE Z WE HAVE CONTACTED THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS REGARDING THIS WORK, AND THEY HAVE INDICATED THAT THE PROJECT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR FINANCING WITH SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST IS $18,000. THIS FIGURE IS RATHER HIGH BE- CAUSE OF THE EXTENSIVE REMOVALS NEEDED, STREET LIGHT AND STORM DRAIN RELOCATIONS, CURB RELOCATION AND MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION, PATCHING IN THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING ISLANDS, RESURFACING, AND PLACEMENT OF FUTURE STREET LIGHTING CONDUIT. A PROPOSAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID TO PREPARE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENGINEERING.FEE WOULD NOT EXCEED $2,200; THIS AMOUNT IS 12.2% OF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST. IT IS ESTIMATED THE PLANS COULD BE COMPLETED BY AUGUST 15, 1965. THE POSSIBILITY OF COMBINING THIS WORK WITH OTHER STREET PROJECTS IN THE 1965 -1966 BUDGET INTO A SINGLE CONTRACT IN ORDER TO REDUCE UNIT PRICES IS BEING INVESTIGATED. ACTUAL TIMING OF CONSTRUCTION WOULD DEPEND ON THIS DETERMINATION. PH,�DE VL I N IC KS DIRECTOR :BE ATTS: COUNCIL MEMBERS ONLY F IA TRAFFIC CHANNELIZATION STUDY DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE May 1965 Prepared for CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Prepared by Williamson and Schmid Civil Engineers 1535 East First Street Santa Ana, California 547 -6721 L w. The following analysis of the intersection channelization at Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive was prepared at the request of the City of Newport Beach, Department of Public Works, in a letter dated March 19, 1965. RECOMMENDATIONS The following improvements are recommended: 1. Reconstruct and relocate the traffic islands, pavement and drainage structures to provide channelization as shown Plan No. 2 contained in this report. 2. Remove existing Easterly curb, northerly of the intersection, and widen the street as shown in red on Plan No. 2. 3. Relocate the street lighting to conform to the traffic island locations and curb relocations. 4. Place proper signing to stop traffic at the following movements: a. North -bound Dover Drive turning left onto Westcliff Drive b. South -bound Dover Drive - all traffic C. East -bound Westcliff Drive turning left onto Dover Drive S. Place proper lane striping with good quality reflective traffic paint. 6. Consideration should be given to placing the necessary conduit for future traffic signals while construction is in progress.so that the street wild not have to be excavated in the future. INTERSECTION DATA Data used in studying the intersection is as follows: 1. Police Department collision diagrams for 1962, 1963 and 1964. 2. Traffic counts taken by City forces during April 1964 and March 1965. 3. Traffic channelization and paving plan (Drawing #96 -2622) dated May 8, 1958. -1- 4 1 40 INTERSECTION DATA - Continued 4. Pield inspection, day and night, and survey location of existing striping, driveways and lighting. INTERSECTION STUDY Our observation of the intersection indicates that very little delay is experienced by vehicles going in any direction through the intersection at this time. Traffic counts are not predominant in any one movement. The major problem at the intersection is the poor accident record. Pavement striping and painting of the traffic islands was observed to be very poor, as the paint had poor reflective qualities after dark. Collision Map No. 1 shows the recorded accidents between January 1 and December 31, 1962. All three accidents could have been caused by drivetconfusion. Collision Map No. 2,showing recorded accidents between January 1 and December 31, 1963, indicates a considerable increase in traffic and eleven accidents. The majority of accidents indicate a confusion in the direction the vehicles wished to travel. Poor visibility is also indicated. The two intersection collisions between two vehicles indicates that a change in the channelization might help the drivers anticipate each other better so that the head -on collisions could be reduced. Collision Map No. 3, showing recorded accidents between January 1 and October 31, 1964, indicates a reduction in vehicles colliding with the island North -bound on Dover Drive, and we feel this was the result of the lighting installed within the intersection. The same problem still exists, however, as vehicles seem to be confused as to where to go and collide with the traffic islands and other vehicles. Two plans of the intersection were prepared to study the possibilities of improving the traffic - carrying charac- teristics of the intersection. In Plan No. 1, we attempted to improve the existing channelization. Traffic turning left from Westcliff Drive to proceed North on Dover Drive would cross North -bound traffic on Dover Drive going West on Westcliff Drive at a larger angle and would have a free lane North on Dover Drive due to proposed changes in island shape and widening of the pavement and replacement of curb and gutter along the Easterly side of Dover Drive between Westcliff Drive and the entrance to Westcliff. Traffic -2- going Southerly on Dover Drive is provided with a wide lane approaching cross traffic and a free lane Southerly on Dover Drive. A left -turn pocket lane is also provided for traffic turning left into the driveway West of the intersection. We suggest that Plan No. 1 is an improvement over the existing intersection. The accident record might be reduced between vehicles, but little has been improved for the vehicles colliding with the traffic islands. Plan No. 2 shows a complete revision of the intersection into a regular "T" intersection with a free lane for North- bound traffic on Dover Drive and a free right turn from East- bound Westcliff Drive to South -bound Dover Drive. Traffic desiring to turn left from Dover Drive to Westcliff Drive would be required to stop before turning left. All cross traffic must stop under this plan. We believe that Plan No. 2 will greatly reduce the accident rate within this intersection. All vehicles wanting to turn left will be required to stop. This will tend to reduce the collisions between vehicles. The single -car collisions will be reduced due to absence of traffic islands forcing vehicles to turn, except for the free right turn for vehicles on Westcliff Drive desiring to travel South on Dover Drive. While Plan No. 2 requires that the existing free left turn from Dover Drive to Westcliff Drive stop, we feel that adequate provisions for that movement are provided. Very little delay, if any, will be experienced with existing traffic volumes. When the traffic volumes start causing excessive delays under Plan No. 2, it is our opinion similar delays would be observed with Plan No. 1. The development of the arterial street master plan in this area will tend to increase the through traffic on Dover Drive. Traffic control signals at the intersection would probably reduce the head -on collisions but would tend to increase the rear -end collision rate. Traffic control signals should be used as a method to move traffic in congested area and reduce time delay. As time delay is very light, traffic control signals are not necessary at this time, but will probably become necessary as traffic volume increases. A two -level interchange was considered at the inter- section of Westcliff Drive and Dover Drive, but the distance between the intersection and Buckingham Lane and the distance between the intersection and Westcliff Drive to the East is much too short to provide for the turning movements required. Prepared by B. W. Williamson 4C�� -.3- I 0 l I 1 I • I �o ,o /yeJTGUFF oR /VE -� n � I �K 'I II _ i O T n / O ,] TRI N o, ' I ti K a TO: CITY COUNCIL, FROM: PUBLir WORt;S DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DOVER 4ESTCL. FF #NTERSECTION REVISIONS RECOMMENDATION 0 J "L: ;vs 1965 APPROVE. HE 'RF.:COMMENDAT IONS OF THE. REFOR: TO THE CC-UNCiL DATED JUNE: s4, 6965 DISCUSSION: AT "HE MEETING OF' JUNE 14; 1965, THIS MA "TER WAS RE'F'ERRED BACK TO THE STAFF FOR FURTHER STUDY, ATTACHED FOR COUNCIL McMETRS ARE: COPIES OF THE PREVIOUS PUSL,IC WORKS DEPARTMENT REPORT DA.T.ED ,JUNE 4, A REVISED DRAWING OF PLAN ', AND POL:C'. DEPARTMENT COLLISION D:AGRA.M.S -OR 1962 TO 1964. N - ' THE STAFF WAS AL.E � DiP.ECTE:D TO PREPARE A. C01. 1, FOR PLAN I, THIS AMOUNT IS E:5-- 14ATE.D 70 B- $7,400; AS COMPARED ?'O $!8;000 FOR PLAN 2. 77' AT ":•tE PREV;QUS M:i S:W ING CONCERN WAS EXPRCSSED RE:GAPiiNG THE MERGING MOVEMENT oti! DLk E,R DRIVE OUTHBOVND BETWEEN. VEHICLES ENTERING FROM WESTCLIFF EASTBOUND AND FRom DOVER 50U "HBOUND. THIS WA CAUSED PARTIALLY BY AN INCORRECT REPRZSENTA.T!ON Oi THE MEDIAN OK De' /ER; AS SYOWN O THE DRAWING OF PLAN I. THE HAS BEEN CORRE:C','ED. A3 CA4 5E SEEN, THAT PARTICULAR MERGE ;5 T,H, E. SATE FOR BOTH PLAN I AND Pi,AN 2, AND NFA.RLY THE SAME AS '�N, E: MERGE: NOw <,s T.S.. THE POLICE DEPARTM IN- C'O _i. i.`. ION DIAGRAMS INDICATE THAT NO AC'C'DZN'$ 4adE. BEEN CAUSED BY TCE MERaF, WE S" :LL CONCUR ,.ti T'!f. RECOMMENDATIONS OF. '. �:F: (ON-U "..TING ENGINEER FOR THE REASONS PREVIOUS:..` STATED. ,THE MC'T imPORTAN" RE'.SCN BEING THE GREATER SAFETY 0- 1EE PLAN 2 L.AYCVI: POL'.CE ?:CC IO':NT D!A.GRAMS SHOW THAT A TOTAL OF 23 ACCIDENT-- HAVE OCCURRED IN ?'P:?:5 ;N'''cRSEC ?3G" IN A PERIOD OF TWO YEARS AND '!'E'i MON''H.S. MOST OF THE AC•;.!DE: N7.= VE. RE, CAUSED BY-MOTORIST CONFUSION. W; 225 Grand Canal, Balboa Island, California. 15i-June, 1965• Honorable Councel of 14ewport Beach, City Hall, Newport Beach, California. ventlemen: This is in reference to the alley Marine Avenue and The Grand Canal residences and runs from Balboa *venue to Park Avenue. When we built our home at 225 Grand Canal twelve years ago the alley in general w$s in fair condition and with the exception of the te-mement like structures rented for business purposes very l &ttle to complain about. However, some years ago the gas company and the water company came through and dug up the alley. The last one through filled the trench but very poorly and by now there is groves to about six inches deep in the alley, especially Denim and 223 Grand where the young blood careens around the corner at Balboa Avenue at full speed to beat the traffic on Marine. 2� r. n, Canal In our effort to comply with beautifying the city we sweep deeper and deeper if we want to rid our portion of the alley of trash and debris. As to expenses to the city it depends which utility was last to dig the ditch. We cannot remember this but believe that if it was the gas company they should do the job of filling properly. Respectfully, -sage asmiXssen, 225 Grand Canal, Balboa island, California. TO: CITY COUNCIL /a FROM; CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR C SUBJECT: 5TH AVENUE (IMPROVEMENT, LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE 9 U / IF THE COASTAL FREEWAY IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ADJACENT TO 5TH AVENUE, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT 5TH AVENUE BE DEVELOPED AS A 40 -FOOT WIDE STREET ON A 60 -FOOT RIGHT OF WAY. THIS WIDTH WOULD PERMIT PARKING ON BOTH SIDES PLUS TWO TRAVEL LANES. THE ESTIMATED COST OF CURBS, GUTTERS, PAVING, AND DRAINAGE IS AS FOLLOWS: SOUTHERLY FULL HALF WIDTH 1. LARKSPUR TO NARCISSUS 10,700 21,400 2. NARCISSUS TO POPPY TOTAL $ 20,00 $ 42,200 TO CONSTRUCT THE RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENT WILL REQUIRE THE DEDICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 35 -FOOT WIDTH OF RIGHT OF WAY. THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OWNS THE PROPERTY ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE BE- TWEEN LARKSPUR AND NARCISSUS. THE IRVINE COMPANY OWNS THE REMAINING PROPERTY ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE. BOTH PROPERTY OWNERS HAVE BEEN CONTACTED RELATIVE TO THEIR PARTICIPATION IN THE PROJECT. THE CHURCH HAS INFORMED US THEY ARE STILL WILLING TO SHARE IN THE COST OF THE IMPROVEMENT, ALTHOUGH THE EXACT AMOUNT WOULD BE SUBJECT TO NEGOTIATION. THE CHURCH SHOULD BE GIVEN SOME CREDIT FOR STREET EXCAVATION DONE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THEIR BUILDING. THE IRVINE COMPANY PROPERTY IS UNDEVELOPED, AND THEREFORE THEY DO NOT DESIRE TO SHARE IN THE COSTS OF THE IMPROVEMENT AT THIS TIME. THE COMPANY WOULD, HOWEVER, DEDICATE THE REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY. IT MAY BE POSSIBLE TO CON- STRUCT THE SOUTHERLY HALF ONLY FROM NARCISSUS TO POPPY AND FOR THE TIME BEING PROHIBIT PARKING. THIS WOULD STILL PERMIT TWO -WAY TRAFFIC. IF THE COUNCIL DESIRES TO PROCEED FURTHER WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVE- MENT, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE STAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CHURCH IN AN ATTE -MPT TO ARRIVE AT A MUTUALLY SATISFACTORY COST SHARING AGREEMENT AND TO INCLUDE THE PROJECT IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION LATER THIS MONTH. DONA�PREPARED BY: �//'J�J/�� =DiRECTO IL:OB RT 00 V PUBLIC WOR YJ - -- CITY MANAGER ITION: RC:DCS:VR �. FILE:/' O0 7 -5 -63 �.` " *TY OF NEWPORT BEA* COUNCILMEN Volume 17 - Page 8 N m➢ o 0 0 m y y v o m r Index T „I„ R 10 AZ CONTINUED BUSINESS: 1. A memorandum dated June 27, 1963, was presented from the City Attorney regarding the case of Hancock Banning, Jr. , et al. , vs. Dewey, et al. , Orange County Superior Court No. 82516. The City Attorney was authorized and directed to execute Motion x a disclaimer on behalf of the City of Newport Beach as to All Ayes the property described as Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 in the action entitled, Banning, et al. , v. Dewey, et al. , being Cause No. 82516 in the Superior Court in and for the County of Orange. 2. A letter dated June 25, 1963 from A. W. Snyder, Chairm Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission, recommen ing the renewal of the annual agreement with the Newport Harbor Lawn Bowling Association, was presented. Resolution No. 5810, authorizing the execution of an agreement with the Newport Harbor Lawn Bowling Asso- ciation for the term July 1, 1963 through June 30, 1964, Motion x was adopted. Roll Call: Ayes xxx xxxx 3. A memorandum dated July 2, 1963 from the City Attorney regarding annexation of the Lido Sands area to the Coast- al Municipal Water District and the Metropolitan Water District, was presented. The City Attorney was authorized and instructed to deposit Motion x the annexation fee with the Coastal Municipal Water Dis- All Ayes trict based upon the approval of the Board of Directors of Lido Sands Community Association, ,CURRENT BUSINESS: 1. A report dated July 5, 1963 from the City Manager and Public Works Director entitled 115th Avenue Improvement Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue,” was presented. The Clerk was instructed to read the report commencing with the second paragraph. Councilman Lorenz made a motio to approve the recommendations of the City Manager and Public Works Director and to instruct them to negotiate with the church for the payment of its share and that the I design be limited to Larkspur to Narcissus, and that the City bear the cost of the southerly half. A discussion wa had, Mrs. Carol Duncan and Mr. William Hall spoke from the audience. The recommendations of the City Manager and Public Works Director were approved, and Motion x they were instructed to negotiate with the church for the All Ayes payment of its share, and it was directed that the design be limited to Larkspur to Narcissus and the half street Page 8 *TY OF NEWPORT BEA* COUNCILMEN Volume 17 - Page 9 m 7 f0 O O Index T..1. Q 1OfZ from Larkspur to Jasmine; and that the City bear the share of the southerly half of the improvement, was approved. The City Manager and the Public Works Director were Motion x instructed to negotiate with The Irvine Company with a All Ayes view to improving 5th Avenue from Narcissus to Poppy. 2. A letter was presented from Noel Singer, dated June 28, 1963, appealing from the decision of the Planning Com- mission conditionally granting Resubdivision No. 165 per- taining to Block 224, Section "A ", and Block 324, Lan- caster's Addition to Newport Beach. The matter was set i Motion x for public hearing on July 22, 1963. All Ayes 3. A report was presented from the City Manager and Public Works Director, dated July 2, 1963, entitled "Relocation of Traffic Signal on Jamboree Road Serving Aeronutronic. " A discussion was had regarding the widening of Jamboree Road from two lanes to four lanes adjacent to the East Bluff development which necessitates the relocation of a portion of a traffic signal system serving Aeronutronic. The City Manager was instructed to negotiate and come Motion up with an agreement for the cost of the signal relocation Ayes x x x x x to be divided three ways, one third to the developers, one Noes x x third to Aeronutronic, and one third to the City. A brief discussion, regarding traffic signal and paving policies,was had. 4. The request of the Newport Beach School District to im- prove for playground purposes the beach area lying be- tween the southerly extension of the easterly and westerly lines of 13th and 14th Streets for a distance of approxi- mately 300 feet, was presented. Resolution No. 5811, granting an encroachment permit, Motion x was adopted. Roll Call: Ayes xxxx xxx 5. A memorandum was presented from the City Manager an Public Works Director recommending the acceptance of the realignment of Carnation Avenue and Bayside Drive (C -832) by Sully- Miller Contracting Company, and auth- orization to the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion and release the surety bonds in due course. The recom- Motion x mendations were approved and authorized. All Ayes 6. A memorandum was presented from the City Manager and Public Works Director recommending acceptance of im- provements by Trumar Corporation in Tract No. 4463, located on Windward Lane and Leeward Lane in the West Bluff area. The recommendations were approved and Motion x authorized. All Ayes Page 9 TO: CITY COUNCIL - FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: ALTERNATE GEOMETRIC DESIGNS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDENROD AVENUE AND IRIS AVENUE. PRELIMINARY STUDIES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDENROD AVENUE AND IRIS AVENUE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ATTACHED IS DRAWING ND. L -3077 SHOWING THREE ALTERNATE CROSS - SECTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES FOR EACH ALTERNATE ARE ALSO ATTACHED. N'3 THE AVAILABLE RIGHT -OF -WAY IS LIMITED BY THE EXISTENCE OF THE BASEBALL DIAMOND ON THE YOUTH CENTER PROPERTY. ALL THREE CASES WOULD ALLOW TWO MINIMUM TRAVEL LANES, BUT CASE 2 WOULD ONLY PERMIT PARKING ON ONE SIDE. CASE t AND 2 PROVIDE FOR A NORMAL 10 FT- PARKWAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCIL SELECT THE TYPICAL CROSS - SECTIONS AND AUTHORIZE THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COST DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE CITY, THE YOUTH CENTER, AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE PROJECT. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT FINAL ACTION BE DEFERRED UNTIL APRIL 24, 1961 IN ORDER THAT BOTH THE YOUTH CENTER AND ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS MAY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE PROPOSAL. PREPARED BY: DONALD C SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RS: DCS:EK 4 -7 -61 6��72JXa_e� ROBERT SHELTON CITY MANAGER I CASE 1. `CITY r-AMIPM EEAOf . RLSLIC WQVM EST MAT IM6 FORM PROJECT Erik STRi ET. ` `. fff K( ©Avr' PRELI*INA2T DIVISION E-iow n [+w O�tE". - II-�iB . _ I= F INAL N0. fTEM dfArTITI'" :aXIT. _PRICE .-AMOUNT EXcAVA?IDli 3"-a .C.;Y.. .,O.6r- 821 : FULL 1. ? P.M.S. 2^ 24 SIDCVAL K. .. �, •. hf. Z'i'$�I' S. F. 0140 py., Large 3 GcrtTCR TO ... L.F 1. t$t e. -c. RETAINAfa VALL 1.. F. 1. 10 f tb E . .. .. Sm -TOTAL - to$ cow tisatmey 1409 31. i_ TosM 'y4 . ■ d s :AH Y CITY .OF 1Pf)R'f BEACH - PUBLIC WCRKS° DEPT- jEN7 EST MAT I MG FORM PROJECT *H AVENulE By'. LARSEM I M PREL IM I NARK OIYISION X(fNi' €'R FN& 1 DATES C3 FINAL G. iTE►t QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT r t._ 2&4 G.Y. 1.00 =0.4: T- rr 2 2 . 01 ?C i -40 im (EXIST POWER POLE '', 2 4 BLOCK WALL I EXIST. POWER POLE 4 BLOCK- - WALL EXIST. POWER POLE 2 4' BLOCK WALL 25 "EXIST. R W 48 _ 20 _I_ 28' - 18� 18" 1 10" PMS. CASE I 5 EXIST_ R W 48 I- 22 -- -- -26" 6 _16" j 2 P. M.S. �q ;lil! °�llld 1la11N5 rcic .me - C ASE 2 4" U.R.B. E X I ST R/W _ 48 26" - 22' Z P. M.S. CASE 3 4" U.R.B. NOTE: ESTIMATED COSTS COST INCLUDES GRADING, CURB � GUTTER, U.R.B.,P.M.S., CASE 1 $ 12,111.94 BLOCK WALL � SIDEWALK. CASE 2 $ 11,460.75 CASE 3 118gz.13 CITY OF NE WPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROPOSED ALTERNATES FOR FIFTH AVE. GOLDENROD AVE. TO IRIS AVE. DRAWN ✓I- DATE APPI,OYEp�__.... IC WORK5 VIRECT01 3077 - . -_ i 0 N ■-- 0 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY MANAGER \p ,��� SUBJECT: ALTERNATE GEOMETRIC DESIGNS AND COST ESTIMATES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDENROD AVENUE AND IRIS AVENUE. PRELIMINARY STUDIES FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN GOLDENROD AVENUE AND IRIS AVENUE HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. ATTACHED IS DRAWING No. L -3077 SHOWING THREE ALTERNATE CROSS - SECTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATES FOR EACH ALTERNATE ARE ALSO ATTACHED. THE AVAILABLE RIGHT -OF -MAY IS LIMITED BY THE EXISTENCE OF THE BASEBALL DIAMOND ON THE YOUTH CENTER PROPERTY. ALL THREE CASES WOULD ALLOW TWO MINIMUM TRAVEL LANES, BUT CASE Z WOULD ONLY PERMIT PARKING ON ONE SIDE- CASE 1 AND Z PROVIDE FOR A NORMAL 10 FT. PARKWAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCIL SELECT THE TYPICAL CROSS - SECTIONS AND AUTHORIZE THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. COST DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE CITY, THE YOUTH CENTER, AND THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS SHOULD BE DETERMINED PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE PROJECT. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT FINAL ACTION BE DEFERRED UNTIL APRIL 24, 1961 IN ORDER THAT BOTH THE YOUTH CENTER AND ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS MAY HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO REVIEW THE PROPOSAL. PREPARED BY: DONALD C SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RS:DCS:EK 4 -7 -61 ROBERT SHELTON CITY MANAGER -CITY i KACH . KWIC wow wr-T ow EST MNATT ING FORM \. 8Y:: K : par PROXCT 4TH STREET [ 'PRELIMIMA27 DIVISION Ep4tlatsRlNe y DATE M FINAL N0. ITE". i1tHIMfITT :III[IT _ PRICE S } EX'caVAtraN (Gale Oac). .., C.l.. a.6C 821, Fr.Lc C:Y. 1.00 2z...�: u Ft.8 P.M.S... 2'" 24 S;i: O.iP: ate•'.." _.. Gu"a® GUTTER I. L -F_ ,. tai4.. 76 ' EZ't Ta 1N.EN6 MiaLL L. F- .10 r6 .. .too CANTf110EMCY ,' - `,. . 1 REER t.N® Q ?`! 1 Toriu t 2,.t i :. y4 . _ I (EXIST. POWER POLE ' 4 BLOCH WALL EXIST. POWE POLE — 4 BLOCK — WALL EXIST. POWER POLE 2 ff 40 BLOCK WALL 48 -- _ 20 - 28' 1 g 18� 18" 1 .. t 1 2G" ESTIMATED COSTS CASE 1 S'2,'rr.94 CASE 2 $'1.460.75 CASE 3 1 185,? 13 P. MS. CASE I -4° u.R.D. 25 EXIST. R/W 48 16 16 10 j --2� P M.S. CASE 2 m CASE 3 �-- 4" U.R.B. 25. EXIST_ P. M.S. i U.R.B. UT 6 LG NOTE: COST INCLUDES GRADING, CURB � GUTTER, U.R.B.,P.M.S., BLOCK WALL l SIDEWALK. C C CITY OF NE WPORT BEACH DRAWN 1L DATE3-ZF6! PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT aPC o� V PROPOSED ALTERNATES FOR FIFTH AVE. 5si LIC WORKS DIRECTOR GOLDENROD AVE. TO IRIS AVE, L-3077 I. I VI ,_ -.ME rail to: City of Newporaeh, City Clerk 3300 W. Newpor vd Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 16206 NOTICE OF COMPLETION PUBLIC WORKS KG1, 8001 t- 392 AT REQUEST ORANGE COUNTY, CALIF. ".M JUL 27 1966 L i11UE CULTLE, CeuOr Recorder To All Laborers and Material Men and to Every Other Person Interested: FREE YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on June 15, 1966 , the Public Works project consisting of Street Imnroyement. Westcliff -Dover Intersection. 5th Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Popp)cAvenue_ (r -9S,) on which i,_ T._ White C:ompagy was the contractor, and Argonaut Insurance Company was the surety, was completed. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH i AssistariP lice orks Director VERIFICATION I, the undersigned, say: Assistant I am the /Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach; the foregoing Notice of Completion is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on" -2k l�iC at Newport Beach, California. OP ice i VERIFICATION OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned, say: Acting I am the /City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach; the City Council of said City on July 25, 1966 accepted the above described work as completed and ordered that a Notice of Completion be filed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on July 26, 1966 at Newport Beach, California. Laura Lagios �ti ,yob' , 7 JULY 25, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR X I SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, 5TH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (C -9514) RECOMMENDATIONS: / 1. ACCEPT THE WORK. 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. 3. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO RELEASE THE BONDS 35 DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF COMPLETION HAS BEEN FILED. DISCUSSION: THE CONTRACT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF - DOVER INTERSECTION, 5TH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE HAS BEEN COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BID PRICE WAS: $65,3p00.81 AMOUNT OF UNIT PRICE ITEMS BID: 63,589.114 AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDERS: 1,220.06 TOTAL CONTRACT COST: 64,809.20 AMOUNT BUDGETED IN ACCOUNTS #19- 33148 -o28 AND #19- 3355 -023- $7+,500.00 THE EXTRA WORK CONSISTED OF REMOVING ADDITIONAL SOFT MUDDY MATERIAL AT THE WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, REMOVAL OF A SMALL AMOUNT OF ADDITIONAL CONCRETE CURB ON FIFTH AVENUE, AND CONSTRUCTION OF THE ASPHALT BERM ON FIFTH AVENUE (APPROVED BY COUNCIL ON JUNE 13) 1966-). AT THE SOUTHERLY END OF THE WESTCLIFF -DOVER PORTION, APPROXIMATELY 100 FEET OF THE IMPROVEMENT WAS DELETED DUE TO SETTLEMENT OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT TRUNK SEWER MAIN TRENCH. THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE COMPLETED CONCURRENTLY WITH THE REPAIRS TO THE SEWER MAIN TRENCH, AND , WILL COST APPROXIMATELY $800.00. IN ADDITION TO THE CONTRACT COSTS, $2,O8O.00 WAS SPENT FOR DESIGN AND $2,996.00 FOR CON- STRUCTION STAKING. ALTHOUGH IT HAD BEEN ANTICIPATED THAT THE COST OF RELO- CATING THE POWER LINES ON FIFTH AVENUE (APPROXIMATELY $3)000.00) WOULD HAVE TO BE BORNE BY THE CITY, THE EDISON COMPANY FINALLY AGREED TO RELOCATE AT NO COST TO THE CITY. ALL FINANCING FOR THIS PROJECT WAS SUPPLIED BY SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. TO: CITY COUNCIL 7.25 -66' SUBJ: CONTRACT 954) 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS E. L. WHITE COMPANY OF GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA. THE ORIGINAL DATE OF COMPLETION WAS MAY 17, 1966. THE CONTRACTOR WAS DELAYED APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS IN MOVING ONTO THE FIFTH AVENUE SITE DUE TO THE DELAY IN RELOCATING THE EDISON COMPANY POWER POLES. ALL WORK WAS COMPLETED BY JUNE 15, 1966. CHI T�DEVL IN IC KS DIRECTOR :VR 0 K E N O'B R I E N & A S S O C I A T E S' • June 1, 1965 City of ]Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Kenneth Perry, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Pavement Design, 5th Avenue between larkspur and Poppy, Corona del Mar,. California. Gentlemen: We submit the following results of laboratory teats and pavement design analyses for bituminous roadway construction on 5th Avenue between larkspur and Poppy Street, Corona del Mar, California. The two samples tested for "R" value determinations were Judged representative of the material at the indicated subgrade elevation throughout the length of the proposed construction. "R" values of 5.5 and 10.0 were obtained for these two tests. It is our opinion that a design "R" value of 10.0 is realistic for the entire roadway after analyzing the stabilometer teat results and materials classifications. The lower indicated "R" value was determined for a sandy soil under high degree of saturation with low density. This condition will not be present in a properly controlled subgrade easily accomplished in a closely inspected project. Scarification and recompection of the subgrade soils will be necessary in those areas where the sandier soils are present. Following design procedures set forth by the State of California Highway Department, several alternate pavement sections are recasmmnded for three traffic index assignments. These pavement sections have been summarized in the following table. CONSULTING ENGINEERS 0- c. i City of Newpozokeach Department of Public Works June 1, 1965 Page Two PAVIAM SECTION 5th Aranne - Corona del Mar Subgrade Design "R" Value a 10.0 Traffic Index 5 6 7 Plant Mix Asphaltic Concrete •301 •35' .25' .35' .35' .25' •25' Class B Cement Treated Base 90' 1.00' 50' Class 1 Aggregate Base .65' .80' .50' 1.00' .55' Class 1 Aggregate Subbase •57' Total •95' 1.15' 1.15' 1.42' 1.35' 1.25' 1.30' (11.4 ") (13.8 ") 13.8 ") 17.1 ") (16.2 ") (15.0 ") (15.6 ") If we can provide further information regarding this report or be of further service to you in this matter please advise. HJD /hw Attachments Very truly yours, KEN O'ERIffii A ASSOCIATES Herbert J. Dix Civil Engineer CE 13,635 RECEIVED JUN 2 1965 PU6UC WORKS per. KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES t WN O'BRIEN & ASSOATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING , SHEET 1 of 1 PROJECT #'M Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CM - Station 4+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING -11 -6 CE0 OMPL aMPlETE0 5 -11 TYPE a DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No dater Encountered u e x y CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS J m > N Z W a U Q Z F r N u Z N N W W F d r _ r L= O W 3 M014TURE CONTENT % PL• •N<T. eLL z o n o 4.0 a o rM SAND: eme clay and milt, brown. Sc Sand Equiv. . 9. "R" value. 5.5 1 2 FM SAND: clayey, trace of milt, gray- brown. 3 4 Bottom of Pi 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 TT 15 16 17 18 19 20 R.V. R..VA•� 1• BORING N0. ¢ n AN O'BRIEN & ASSOCICS CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING Z SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT #9O72 p Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CDM - Station .60 8 SURFACE ELEVATION Fxisting Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED 5 -11- 5 COMPLETED -11- TYPE a DESIGNATION OF DRILL M Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER hone DEPTH TO WATER NO Water Encountered W w >_ y CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS m N Z W a °° W ~ Z a Z N a d Q M_ � 2 a 2 2 3 MOISTURE CONTENT j{. PL. GNAT. LL 1.0 210 JO 40 60 FIM SABDS silty, brown. ISM Sand Equiv. • 8. • I P CLA2s some sand brown. CL 3 FINE SAADi clayey, some milt and white calcareous inclusions, slightly cemented, gray -brown. SC 4 5 6 Bottom of Pit • 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 R.O.&A. IGRR -If BORING NO. K• O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING 3 SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT Ti9M Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CIN - Station 14+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED 1 5-11 - COMPLETED -11- TYPE 6 DESIGNATION OF DRILL WE Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water Encountered W m q i n CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS o 133 > N Z a IN w Z a d Z M N W W D.� 1=a Z R O W 3 MOISTURE CONTENT % PL ♦ GNAT. ELL 10 20 SO •O 60 CLAY: some sand, stiff, moist, gray - brown. CL Send Equiv. 4. "R" Value 10. 2 3 CLAY; sandy, sow silt, brown to yellow - brown. 4 SAIMSTM: yellow- brown. 5 6 Bottom of Pit. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 A.O.A A. PC AY - IA BORING NO. K• O'BRIEN & ASSOCIES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING 4 SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT #9m Pavenwent Design, 5th Ave. C24 - Station 15+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Xxisting Orade DATE OF BORING STARTED 5 -11 -6 COMPLETED 5 -U- TYPE d DESIGNATION OF DRILL FPS Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag° HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water F.ncounUred W w, z i CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS -j O m > N J Z Fv Z i Q Q W w w y Z 0 yW W ap: L F a Z I r 0: O W MOISTURE CONTENT % PLC NAT. -ALL i0 20 30 �0 30 FM SAND: silty, trace of clay, brown. � 2 CIAZ: $me sand, trace of silt, gray- brawn. C' 3 4 INUMOTOW3 weathered, eligbtly eenented, white and yellow. 5 6 7 Bottos of Pit 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 N.O. AA. FORM - If BORING No. .4. z KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LEGEND TO LOGS I SOIL Unified Soil Classification System SYMBOLS ROCK Sandstone Siltstone Q. Conglomerate Shale Limestone Granite CLASSIFICATIONS ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL Approximate percentages Conventional geological denoted by soil adjectives terminology is used Primary 30% to 50% °Some" 12% to 30% Trace" 12 % or less Drive Sample Undisturbed Tube Sample Soil or Rock Core No Recovery Water Level no &UM GENERAL SAMPLING Drive Samplers MPS - Modified Porter Sampler 1.94 "I.D. x 2- 1 /2 "O.D. PS - Porter Plug Sampler 1.94" I.D. x 3" O.D. NS - Navy Sampler 2.44" I.D x 3" O.D. SPT - Standard Penetration Sampler 1.38" I.D x 2" O.D. Undisturbed Samples ST Shelby Tube Sampler 2.86" I.D x 3" O.D. OS - Osterberg Tube Sampler 2.86" I.D. x 3" O.D. Core Samples PT - Pitcher Tube Sampler 2.86" I.D x 3" O.D. DB - Diamond Core Barrel Sampler TEST DATA w - Moisture Content as percent of dry Soil Weight 0 - Organic Content as percent of Dry Soil Weight - Angle of friction LL - Liquid Limit PL - Plastic Limit G - Specific Gravity of Soil Solids e - Void Ratio Ou - Unconfined Compressive Strength in tons /sq.foot Es - Expansion at Saturation in percent of initial volume Pr - Penetration Resistance in number of blows of hammer required to drive sampler one foot or specified distance N - Penetration Resistance of standard sampler in number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to advance sdnlyter. 12° . JUNE 13, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 954 / 3 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF $685.00 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE BERM ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF FIFTH AVENUE. DISCUSSION: INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE IS THE GRADING OF A DITCH FOR CARRYING STORM RUN -OFF WATER ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE STREET. THIS DITCH WILL INTERCEPT AND DIVERT THE MAJORITY OF THE OVER- LAND SHEET FLOW WHICH PRESENTLY FLOWS SOUTHERLY ON NARCISSUS AND ORCHID, CREATING A FLOODING CONDITION ON COAST HIGHWAY DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY RAINFALL. BECAUSE OF THE GRADES INVOLVED AND THE LIMITED WIDTH OF RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABLE IT HAS BEEN NECESSARY TO LOCATE THE DITCH NEAR THE EDGE OF PAVE- MENT. IT HAD ORIGINALLY BEEN PLANNED TO-DELINEATE THE EDGE OF THE DITCH WITH REFLECTORIZED PADDLES. HOWEVER, IN THE AREA FROM MARGUERITE TO LARKSPUR THE DITCH IS ESPECIALLY DEEP AND CLOSE TO THE PAVEMENT. IT IS FELT THAT CONSTRUC- TION OF THE RECOMMENDED BERM IN ADDITION TO THE PADDLES WILL CREATE A SAFER CONDITION FOR MOTORISTS- APPROXIMATELY-370 FEET OF BERM AT A UNIT PRICE OF $1.$5 IS INVOLVED. SUFFICIENT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN ACCOUNT NO. 19 -3348 -028. -i3 G 6 FILE: 1• SEP T DEI IN BLIC RKS D I RECTOR VR AY OF NEWPORT BEACH Volume 19 - Page 174 Minutes of REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNC Date of Meeting: February 1, 1966 Time of Meeting: 8:00 P.M. Index Place of Meetinv- Council Chamhera DRAFT MINUTES COUNCILMEN I z m O Y n m `�f` Roll Call: Present x x x x x x x 1. A memorandum was presented from the Public Works Director dated February 1, 1966 regarding street improvements, Westcliff -Dover intersection, Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue (C -954). Robert Lynam, a partner in the firm of E. L. White Company, the low bidder, spoke from the audience. A discussion was had. Resolution No. 6284 awarding a contract for the street improvement, Westcliff -Dover intersection, Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue (Contract No. 954) with E. L. White Company at the contract price of $65, 300.81 (waiving the irregularity in the bid bond that was submitted with the low bid, Motion x and with the understanding that change orders be Roll Call: executed immediately), was adopted. Ayes x x x x x x x A change order deleting the construction surveys from the contract, and a change order correcting the quantity of curb listed in the Proposal Item No. 12, incurring an additional cost of $2, 514. 76 based on a unit price of $2.42 per lineal foot, proposed by the contractor for the additional amount of curb which Motion x exceeds the original Proposal quantity, were approved. Ayes x x x x x x x The Public Works Department was authorized to retain the firm of Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates to perform the construction surveys for a total fee not to exceed Motion x $3,200. Ayes x x x x x x x The following Budget Amendment was approved: Motion x Ayes x x x x x x x C -55 in the amount of $15, 500 (decrease in Unappro- priated Surplus) being an increase in Budget Appropriations, for improvement of Westcliff -Dover intersection, Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue; $15, 500 from Unappropriated Surplus State Gas Tax 186. 1 Funds to General Services - Streets, Land Improvement. 2. Upon the recommendation of Mayor Gruber it was agreed to consider a Commission appointment later in the evening. 3. A memorandum dated January 27, 1966, containing the recommendations of the Charter Amendment Page 174 n1BL rc wom FEB. z* 1966 CITY ATTORNEY ASSISTANT PUBLIC WOWS DIRECTOR RELOCATION OF EDISON POLES ON 5TN AVENUE TRANSMITTED FOR TOUR INFORMATION ARE A COPY OF AN EASEMENT AND AM AQREE- NEWT BETWEEN THE IRVINE COMPANY AND TH[ COISON COMPANY FOR THE CXISTING EDISON POLE LINE ON THE NORTHERLY SIDt OF 570 AVENUt. THIS tAi[MENT WAS GRANTED TO EDISON PRIOR TO THE RECENT DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF 35 FEET Of ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ON TNC NORTHERLY SIDE or 5TH AVEWUEj THE POLE LINE FALLS WITHIN THE NORTHERLY 35 FEET. IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF 5TN AVENUE* IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO RELOCATE THE POLE LINE APPROXIMATELY 5 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE PRESENT LOCATION. THE EDISON COMPANY CONTENDS THAT* AS THEY NAVE FR(OQ RIGHTS* THE EXPENSE OF RELOCATION MUST BE BORNE BY THE CITY. IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU GIVE US YOUR OPINION ON THE FOLLOWINGS I. UNDER THE TERMS OF THE EASEMENT AND THE AGREEMENT* COULD THE IRYINE COMPANY REQUIRE RELOCATION AT EOIGON EXPENSE IN TMt CASE AT NANO? Z. DID ANY RIGHTS THE IRVINE COMPANY HAD TO REQUIRE RELOCATION PASS TO THE CITY UPON THE DEDICATION OF THE STREET RIGHT OF WAY? 3. UNDER THE TERNS or OUR FRANCHISE* COULD EDISON NOW SE Rt- QUIRED TO RELOCATE AT THEIR EXPEWSE RtGARDLESB OF THE PRIOR EASEMENT? IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF WE COULD HAVE YOUR ANSWERS AS SOON M POSSIBLE. -11 BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ON: BE .9- i FEBRUARY 1, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (C -954) I. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. REJECT ALL BIDS. 2. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO REVISE THE PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS. (AUTHORIZATION FOR A CALL FOR BIDS WILL BE REQUESTED AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.) 11. RECOMMENDATIONS: (IF COUNCIL DECIDES TO AWARD) 1. WAIVE THE IRREGULARITY IN THE BID BOND THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPARENT LOW BID. (THE BID BOND ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED CONTAINED AN ERROR IN THE COMPANY'S NAMES A CORRECTED BID BOND HAS SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN SUBMITTED.) 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO E. L. WHITE COMPANY IN "-�- $ 5,3 THE AMOUNT OF 6 00.81 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK iuuNCl�: TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. DJSP /OSITTIIta 3. APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER DELETING THE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS FROM THE �/ -IaZY CON TRACT. (THE CONTRACTOR HAS VERBALLY AGREED TO ITS DELETION.) 4. .APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER CORRECTING THE QUANTITY OF CURB LISTED IN PROPOSAL ITEM NUMBER 12. THE COST OF THE CHANGE WOULD BE $2,514.76 BASED ON THE UNIT PRICE OF $2.42 PER LINEAL FOOT PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THAT AMOUNT OF CURB WHICH EXCEEDS THE PROPOSAL 3�ti6 � QUANTITY BY 25 %. (25% x 465 - 116 L.F.) 1.16 x $3.23 - $374.68, 2 , 884 x $2.42 - $2,139.08, $374.68 + $2,139.08 a $2,514.76.) ti 5. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO RETAIN THE FIRM OF RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES TO PERFORM THE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS FOR oa. A TOTAL FEE NOT TO EXCEED $3,200. 6. APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,500. DISCUSSION: FOUR BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:00 A.M., JANUARY 19, 1966. BIDDER TOTAL TOTAL E. L. WHITE COMPANY $ 65,300.81 $ 68,530.81* GARDEN GROVE p � SULLY- MILLER CONTRACTING CO. $ 68,341.85 $ 69,991•$5" ORANGE SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVEN�TO POPPY AVENUE (C -954) . GRIFFITH COMPANY $ 70,799.05 $ 72,499.05 * COSTA MESA 2,200.00 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS: 3,200.00 R. W. MCCLELLAN & SONS $ 72,499.39 $ 74,319.39 * COSTA MESA O.O O 7 ,50000.00 * TOTALS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 1000 L.F. OF 6" SPECIAL CURB AND GUTTER BASED ON UNIT PRICES BID. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT THERE IS CAUSE TO REJECT ALL BIDS. THE REASONS FOR THIS OPINION ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. THE LOW BID IS 17.72 OVER THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE. 2. ITEM NO. 12 OF THE PROPOSAL (SPECIAL CURB AND GUTTER WITH 6" CURB BASE) IS AN UNBALANCED ITEM.. 3. BID ITEM N0. 28 (CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS) oW,A,S 400% OVER THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE. A SAVINGS OF APPROXIMATELY $800 COULD BE REALIZED IF THESE SURVEYS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND /OR PRIVATE ENGINEER. 4. BID ITEMS NO. 2 AND N0. 3 (EXCAVATION) WERE 400% OVER THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE. IF THIS JOB WERE TO BE RE -BID, THE EXCAVATION WOULD BE FIGURED ON A CUBIC YARD BASIS AND A DISPOSAL SITE WOULD BE FOUND FOR THE EXCESS EXCAVATION. WHILE IT IS FELT THAT THIS WOULD RESULT IN A LOWER PRICE, THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT THE SAVINGS WOULD BE REALIZED. 5. TO ALTER BID ITEM NUMBERS 12 AND 28 WOULD REQUIRE CHANGE ORDERS IN ADVANCE OF AWARD. IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAS FOLLOWED A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH IN ARRIVING AT ITS RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT AND THAT IT HAS NO STRONG OBJECTIONS TO AN AWARD AT THIS TIME. ONE OBVIOUS ADVANTAGE TO AN EARLY AWARD WOULD BE THAT A 6- WEEKS DELAY IN COMPLETING THE WORK WOULD BE AVOIDED. THE AMOUNT OF THE BUDGET AMENDMENT IS COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS: BASE CONTRACT: $ 61,274.81 CURB CHANGE ORDER: 2,514.76 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING: 2,200.00 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS: 3,200.00 COMPACTION TESTING AND CONTINGENCIES: 2,310.43 RELOCATE EDISON POLES: O.O O 7 ,50000.00 PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED 59,000.00 15,500.00 THE ABOVE TABULATION INCLUDES $3000 FOR THE ESTIMATED COST OF RELOCATING THE EDISON FACILITIES ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE STREET. THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY HAS CONTENDED THAT THEY HAVE PRIOR RIGHTS AND THAT THE COST OF RE- LOCATING THE POLES WILL HAVE TO BE BORNE BY THE CITY. (A COPY OF BID SUMMARY IS ATTACHED.) \\ "'? JTD:BE ATTS. SEPH DEVLIN BLIC W KS DIRECTOR C -954 See Contract File for Bid Summary A�t 2 A 10MUTION OF THE CITY COMIL or 2w CITY OF INWORT WACH MARVIN A CONT" "- M THE SUM 3 nwoo"at"To, WAICLU-1690va ans"MI(wo M AIM= FRW W ft� Avum TO VWft AVOU 4 (GWIVA CT . 954) 5 WfigkWo pursuant t0 the "ties invitift bid* ftwss#Wk 6 cmsiating oil the street UVTOV*Nfttp Wostc.uft-Hover laters*ctiano 7 Sth AvQWw tv�s Wkspur Avow" lo Pony Avion in the city of wow- 6 poft lwhl, Lik onewdWe With the plafts MW g"Gificuimm ba3m . ta,» 9 for* a4opt", bid* W*T* Nseelved an thm, 19th day of jaws"Ya 19", 10 "d rAlialy opened and declared.; &64 11 MAARws, it OPPeags MW the Lawst mvpftstbLo bidder 12 th"efor is X. L. White Cm pan" 13 MOW, THWFMs 1 IT R=MVU tb&t tb* bid St 1. L. 14 obits CmV= 7 Ili the &%"me of #63j300.$2 U s*captod and that dw 15 cantratt fm the 60bAtnatlem Mork be &mz*d to "Id biddy'. 16 U tT nRTM USOMU that th* XmIer and City CIO& "a 17 11 hereby sUth"jxod dad 41X*ot" go ex"Ute 0 caW=4Wt in actoreWWO 18 with the specifteationso, lkLd sad tbla a«asd Am behalf of the city 19 Of X&wWmt beftb, Su4 tbalt the City Clartk be directed to ftaLish 20 as executed copy to the sustaWfid bidder, ' " 21 AWPM this "344ay of -jammuy, r 19". 22 23 v uxty 1�1vk 26 * 27 28 29 30 31 32 TO: FROM: CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR JANUARY 24, 1966 SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE LARKSPUR TO POPPY (CONTRACT 954) RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO E. L. WHITE COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT OF $65,300.81 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. DISCUSSION: FOUR BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:00 A.M., JANUARY 190 1966. BIDDER TOTAL E. L. WHITE COMPANY $65,300.81 GARDEN GROVE SULLY— MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY $68,341.85 ORANGE 0 GRIFFITH COMPANY 70,799.05 COSTA MESA R. W. MCCLELLAN & SONS $72,499.39 COSTA,MESA ALTHOUGH THE LOW BID IS 17.7% HIGHER THAN THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE OF $55,500o AWARD IS RECOMMENDED AS IT IS FELT THAT THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE WAS TOO LOW AND THE BIDS RECEIVED FAIRLY REPRESENT THE COST OF DOING THE WORK. REJECTION AND READVERTISING ARE ORDINARILY RECOMMENDED ONLY WHEN IT APPEARS THAT THE BIDS RECEIVED WERE NOT COMPETITIVE OR THAT REVISIONS TO THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS WOULD RESULT IN REDUCING THE COSTS. A TOTAL OF $59,000.00 IS PRESENTLY APPROPRIATED FOR THIS WORK IN BUDGET ACCOUNT NUMBERS 19 -3348 -028 (SELECT SYSTEM PROJECT NO. 48, 5TH AVENUE) AND 19- 3355 -023 (SELECT SYSTEM PROJECT N0. 55, DOVER— WESTCLIFF). THE TOTAL ESTIMATED.,COSTS ARE: CONTRACT : $65,300A OUTSIDE ENGINEERING : $ 2,200.00 COMPACTION TESTS AND CONTINGENCIES: $ 2,299.19 TOTAL $69,80o.00 A BREAKDOWN OF THE CONSTRUCTION COSTS BETWEEN THE TWO PORTIONS OF THIS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT IS INDICATED BELOW: FIFTH AVENUE WESTCLIFF —DOVER TOTALS BUDGETED(TOTAL) $38,000.00 $21,000.00 $59,000.00 ESTIMATED(CONST.ONLY) $35,700.00 $19,800.00 $55,500-00 CONTRACT $4o,160. 7 $25,14o. 4 $65,300.81 TO: CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 249 1966 SUBJ: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER FNTERSECTION9 ETC. THIS ENTIRE PROJECT IS BEING FINANCED WITH SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. SUFFICIENT UNCOMMITTED FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE TO COVER THE INCREASE IN COSTS. A BUDGET AMENDMENT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR IN DOING WORK OF THIS TYPE HAVE BEEN CHECKED WITH THE CITIES OF GARDEN GROVE AND COSTA MESA. THOSE CITIES HAVE EXPRESSED COMPLETE SATISFACTION WITH THE CONTRACTOR'S WORK. THE ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION IS MAY 60 1966. r 61P J EP DEVL IN BLIC RKS DIRECTOR JHM:VR ATTEST TO OPENING OF BIDS I k a I "1".' S, L-0. � M RGE Y SCHROUDER, CITY CLERK JANUARY 24, 1966 T0: CITY COUNCIL ' FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (C -954) REVISED RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. REJECT ALL BIDS. r 2. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO REVISE THE PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS. (AUTHORIZATION FOR A CALL FOR BIDS WILL BE REQUESTED AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.) DISCUSSION: FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS AFTER PREPARATION OF THE MEMO REGARDING THIS PROJECT PREVIOUSLY TRANSMITTED TO THE COUNCIL INDICATE THE DESIRABILITY OF REJECTING THE BIDS. IT IS FELT THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE FORM OF PROPOSAL WITH REGARD TO EXCAVATION WORK, AND REMOVAL OF THE STAKEOUT SURVEY WORK FROM THE CONTRACT WILL RESULT IN REDUCED COSTS FOR THOSE PORTIONS OF THE WORK. NO CHANGES IN THE LIMITS OR AMOUNTS OF WORK ARE CON- TEMPLATED. IN ADDITION, AN ERROR IN THE PROPOSAL FORM HAS BEEN FOUND. THE QUANTITY OF ONE TYPE OF CURB TO BE CONSTRUCTED WAS SHOWN AS A LESSER AMOUNT ON THE PROPOSAL FORM THAN THE CORRECT FIGURE. THERE IS SOME INDICATION THAT THE LOW BIDDER UNBALANCED HIS BID TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS ERROR. CORRECTING THE PROPOSAL QUANTITY FOR THIS ITEM WILL INCREASE THE INDICATED TOTAL COST ACCORDINGLY. HOWEVER, THE TRUE COST OF THE WORK SHOULD BE LESS, AS THE BIDDING SITUATION WILL BE MORE COMPETITIVE. IF THE REVISED CONTRACT IS APPROVED AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING ON FEBRUARY 14, 1966, NEW BIDS WOULD BE RECEIVED ON MARCH 9, 1966, AND CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE COMPLETED BY JUNE 20, 1966. THE SPECIFICATIONS WILL PROVIDE THAT THE WESTCLIFF °DOVER WORK BE DONE FIRST SO AS TO MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE WITH TRAFFIC. r" 1 UUWVCIL: DISPOSITION: SEPH eRKEs VLIN r BL IC DIRECTOR O' FILE: N:BE .2 / -Co(, • CITY OF :�r;;,''POnT BEACH, C ILI F( NIA NOTI4.E OF INVI "ING .'IDS SEALED BIDS wi:l. be - eeiyy"a at the office of.thef,'- Cierk, City Hall, NewpC:i Beach, California until 10:00 A.N., on the 19th day of Janu- ary, 1966, at which time the} Will be publicly opened am' read, for performing work as follows: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WF.STCLIFF -DOVER INTFR- SLCTION, STIi .4VENiJE1 i,kRKSPUR AVENUF, TO POPPY AVENUE (CONTRACT 954) No bid will be received unless it is made on a proposal form furnished by the Public Works Department. Each bid must be accompanied by cash, certified check, or bidder's bond made payable to the City of Newport Beach for an dmouut equal to at least 10 percent of the amount bid. The documents included with- in the sealed bids which require completion and execution are the following: 1. Sheet 2 - Proposal 2. Sheet 3 - Ridder's Bond 3. Designation of Sub -Con- tractors 4. Contractor's Financial Sta- tus 5, Non - Collusion Affidavit The documents shall be af- fixed with the appropriate and correct signatures and seals of the corporation, partnership, joint venture and /or individual. In accordance with the pro- visions of Section 1770 of the Labor Code, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach has ascertained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages in the locality in which the work is to be performed for each craft or type of workman or mechanic needed to execute the contract and is set forth in Resolution No. 5729. A copy of said Resolution is available in the office of the City Clerk in the City of Newport Beach. All bids are to he compared on the basis of the Engineer's estimate of the quantities of work to be done. No bids will be accepted from a Contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Divi- sion III of Business and Profes- sions Code. Plans and specifications, forms of proposals, bonds, and contract mac w obtained at the Public Works Department, City Hall, Newport Beach, Califor- nia. _ w A non - refundable charge of $2.00 will be required for each set of Standard Specifications. A refundable deposit of $5.00 will be required for each set of plans, special provisions, and contract documents. No refunds will be made later than 60 days after award of the bid. The City of Newport Beach reserves the right to reject any or all bids and to waive anv informality in such bids. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA MARGERYSCHROUDER, City Clerk Publish: Dec. 30, 1965, in The Newport Harbor Ensign TOa FROM: CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DECEMBER 27, 1965 SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, 5TH AVENUE LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (CONTRACT 954) RECOMMENDATIONS: j / 0 1. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1966, AT 10:00 A.M. DISCUSSION. THERE ARE TWO PROJECTS INCLUDED WITHIN THIS CONTRACT AT A TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF $56,200,00, INCLUDING OUTSIDE ENGINEERING, THE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATED COSTS ON EACH PROJECT: BUDGETED COST ESTIMATED COST FIFTH AVENUE (ss #48) $ 38,000.00 $ 35,700.00 (19- 3348 -028) WESTCLIFF -DOVER (SS #55) 21,000,00 227000,00 (19- 3355 -023) $ 59,000,00 $ 57,700.00 INCLUDES $2,200.00 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING, THE ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION IS APRIL 19, 1966, THIS ENTIRE PROJECT IS TO BE FINANCED BY SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS, THE IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE WILL PROVIDE FOR TWO TRAVEL LANES, WITH A PARKING LANE AND CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIDE, A DITCH TO BE GRADED ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE WILL MORE SATISFACTORILY HANDLE DRAINAGE ALONG THIS STREET- IT IS PROPOSED THAT DURING PORTIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD FOR FIFTH AVENUE THAT THE STREET WILL BE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC; HOWEVER, ADEQUATE ACCESS TO ADJACENT IMPROVED PROPERTY WILL BE PROVIDED, DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE DOVER - WESTCLIFF REVISIONS, A DETOURING SEQUENCE WILL BE PROVIDED SO AS TO ACCOMMODATE TRAFFIC WITH AS LITTLE INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC AS POSSIBLE- THE WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION REVISIONS WILL PROVIDE IMPROVED CHANNELI- ZATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW, THEREBY AUGMENTING THE CAPACITY OF THE INTERSECTION AND IN- CREASING TRAFFIC SAFETY IN AN AREA WHERE TRAFFIC IS INCREASING AND THE ACCIDENT HISTORY HAS BEEN VERY POOR. �-- PH DEVLIN IC 0 KS DIRECTOR VR 70 , FROM m4rm ' • S!)6SBCT: .rNrelesECr�oN of OouC�t a U1�'sT�ufF Slsowrr is a tsuiew off" fear a/a7�4 it fbc ama- of f(, a. Qboua i..7�craec�io.�, 6z -/44B re= !9 6 9, sq -v4 40 of s i l }' S4 of c147 cs- isze _ 7/ , 6'7 X yo a i cir j I i ai -�eq Z2 " till 40 c/ AY 6/- X90 jem 43 7 Z7 to 30 N clay C -954 See Contract File for Plans 1 V mfg`. �a �h Q V . V V � e z�BQ'. e in. a o °vo�g o a8 R Z lk IV v �$ o ono o•aao .o� o � ONN O A $�00' 00 Qa 90.00 .Ofl a 00 o 0 0 o O 0a 0 a Z�� Q ._.. 4 q Vi ' 0! �� �e�.�.fl gocr�mhhQai� a �.�hN N g+ : �� a � d tp Zegoo°��.g�°oNOgo °9$op° qa4 °oo� ai h H ali Q h $ O cn y1 Pi av N av .q ti $ ° 6 p � g �b �. Z Z aL 41 V Va \i v v ti 4 ti � V w ..� •:, � Vi W Yt ti' W W `a u '`' � 4 ^ � ti W SS h1 �yN NH If INOEX p4cF. SURVEY Ti 7 . . . . . jj..... g 54 r 4#11 -A -:3 T T;T 9 _k 1 06 - fli r ...... .... It L. T TA T 4 - -- tl 4 • 1-T 44 T 44 14 Form CU -3 COLLIER -UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California Department of Public Works Division of Highways (Through District Engineer) Advance approval is requested ❑ is designed in accordance ❑X involves a deviation from ® is designed to meet appro' ,'4ar-FF From: City ® County ❑ of NEWPORT BEACH Date: FEBRUARY 23, 1965 of the following project which: with approved standards. approved standards. red standards through "stage construction." Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 Miles. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructing cur s an GUTTER (ONE SIDE), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of.the CITY Contract or day labor city, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION* Surface thickness and type Base thickness and-type Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 -8' 2- 12' 2- 12' Lt.1 Rt. Lt. Rt. Lt. Rt. 0 1 0: 0 8 .8 8 0., 0 0 16' 32' 40' 25' 6o' 6o' Existing Proposed I" RMAS " AC NONE . 8" AB *Types: BS- bituminous seal, AC- asphaltic concrete, PCC- Portland cement concrete, Other Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2,000 Design ADT1 1 o Est.total � n a az 0 yrs.after completi RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface CTB- cement treated base AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase gn re authorized o c a i U LIC WORKS DIRECTOR 7. .j W, on 304,C. OPS9 9* 46. :....ULTIMATE- DEVELOP"GAJ7 PIW Ih 0U.C. OVER S�__S-rA�E _C01V-57rl?UCr 10 �.mm REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION AREAS FOLLOWS: I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE IS NOT PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AT THIS TIME- 2. LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD. r. THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSrANTIATED•BY SOIL TESTS. Sec /ana a r /�r'5.2 /3�� /389 / �.9 /¢J •o. /3kP -�oo9 / o / 3s 7a L . AG /1C -- -�.�_- .- . -- _ '457 f3f.� /4�`s9 /4/ \ rc rc �r mss /449 \\ TG TL Grr-x &Z-7 -Z o I 73 47 Tc y1 , 44 J-/7 75-14 51! io o Tc rL rf+v�s • 3f7S �s > .9 37° sS.B sue° /373 13 TG? r � 7 a 4 -ry�r 7� /033 Ora )S 77- z -2, 7s- 9 77C 23 31 sG Sg ZZ7 62- 7S 9G -7oo' • Are 9 2s sS /se, 7S 9G -7oo' • 70 k, • i-44; 2 3 _ ( /262/9.9 72,, '2 ZZ 79 9? 70 k, • i-44; I fl3 J ... 9 fro Ll i i Z 60 zap ' Y �I V � l N \ V -Acc i SURVEY OF-- 7T--- 14: rT 5-4 7f 4ktlll;d 4c w II 4- - ----- jr— t 14-11 2 4 7-T 7•g z-- ---- yln - o "411- P r, pp A�l Z�s lez 61, T.,c 1,72 W' Ll T4- Z7.6 !-J. Tw� 146 4 H +4,9 7-op -t3oo T,,f lH— t 334 ICZ +34 l '- -1 SURVEY OF ._.. .. ..... PAGE H14 I 1 G..E I ; } : r T'i 1 ' r � •` } I t I r l F : dY i ''r w O I ♦ m ji w 7 is f a it i. ..� ... .._.... ... _.._._ .... :. _._. —_�. .. • i r �T i _ _ I J. O r 1 I_ N I .. r..' ..ice r- a- Y �I — 1 SURVEY OF cc) < m 0 z N. i. -T t 4 r J - - - - - - - - - - N —4 F it -4-4. 77 �J L-4- ----i ...... ... . ------ r 7 -7� < > u t 4- L- 4L- 4--+-� 4- LA-L -4-4- p 4 4 EF 4-4 a Pk� + L N CIE I SURVEY OF_ T_flk IL ro No on ON 7 -4. .i: 4­4 -IF • -4. .i: 4­4 -IF • I ' YY Ir ..1 F - Z4 1 1 I .: L J I , I ' YY N 'V o p 0 ttt�ouu I� TNI l�c N n� �1I;A �\ 'DDJjj p �._ u d. l ; J yea tz .1\3 O� \ 0 � zr h i D d Vi N \ b IH H �I FZ ks k N .\s � \• `�h� rNaH � �� p�h• e+ J h N d wv NA W N h h \ 0' o� p n N V1' - 4! SURVEY of /-Q�O -__os _..r0AP03 Awe_— ...__.. ._ ._._...- - - - -- I y wow /M 'kc'. -- _ t - 1 � _ I , { } k : , 0 41 IF 0. 4 V i I y !1' 9 _i 4 J IF r _ F 44A _ j_.I ;. _ 1 ° .t .�. 7. � p/ � ', • , � III �� /� � -� -" r--t- e i ✓ � i•• lfjf ae! -'li Ir NIL r' � i� i' +-•_;. ___ i.. _ _ � .1.. .; .;.: pV. IBS' t .- ..�-? ". _fi�. 0 IOW k �i !/LYd¢- �r mm - i !:: O - w 13 r - __. io 1 , _ I. L Hr FBI r4� 5✓ > f, X 7 �• _ ! l 1 - V. !S>••li .: ,....._... __ -...ate _ i I. } I . , , i 1 } 1 i IT I i A, Lk f, 4 � t- _ Its { :wz • 1. C. 7'- Ale . . ....... +37 Yzre '47 /37.0 74.3 o C, F7-'- 7F 3-1 /,/Ag, 2- f. 34 :4-Z ILLL-L, - �,b� SURVEY +4 i4 J- -L- ... 70 --- -- ----- �; 1 4 7- i r - rj SURVEY OF -F F T r Y r 771 L 7 IM 77 It, -F F T r Y r - -- - k . 0 Z V 0 z U > L - -- - k . 0 Z V 0 z U > --7SURVEY OF !;,- el • -=-7. P41 FFT-f VVV VN r I -4--.- 1 1 .-N�-- IA SURVEY OF 1?1 ''.. 1 j ki MIT t-" .1 __4 - 14 141" -4 4-4 L _4.4_ '7T+' r + i, 1731 ....... -- --- ­- --- WIN T 7-1 4i W- vir fK A ID\ WIND- _N I . . . TIN q 7 r KAI NW 7 4 Vi T- 7 4-44 L El Em f 41 z O A LJ 0 W > u w U E SURVEY O F . -. -1 . �i -� I -------- G✓ SURVEY OG-7'- Al -4�_1.r1!'/ f' -' /��� .... .. /V._._.. - ...._�- -. SURVEY OF t-T v" .". k, 4-t ..... Lu th V v 41 t LA Nom. ...... ld- 0 Q 0 Z O z 0 ,j • a. > u 0 U • 7 0 Q 0 Z O z 0 ,j • a. > u 0 U • SURVEY' OF-...- 1p 1 LL r- Ll r. • O LL O u 0 SURVEY OF _T f F7 -1 T Ir I Ali— ;t Ir rr ®r 4-H .411 'n -J- � Mn _974 R_12 to S� T-7- W., - . V - ­� - N 7 7 KAI, tir 0 • ww • SURVEY OFD I • i _ + I -r�lr- i t , f -F F�j ; r T.� ,J I I YI : 7 -. _ 9- '.- RWmric'- .__7`-A"K.r:` �iQ-' . ;; [. J- --- 7_..E. A ..t,_ Form CU -3 COLLIER- UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California % From: City ® County ❑ of Department of Public Works Division of Highways (Through District Engineer) NEWPORT BEACH Date: FEBRUARY 23, 1965 Advance approval is requested of the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. ❑X involves a deviation from approved standards. ® is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road FIFTH AVENUE Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 miles. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructing cur s an GUTTER (ONE SIDE), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY contract or ay a or city, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION* Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type *Types: BS- bituminous AC- asphaltic FCC- Portland Other Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 -8' 2- 12' 2- 12' Lt. Rt. 'Lt. Rt. Lt.1 Rt. 0 0 0 8 .8 1 8 0_ 0 0 16' 32' 40' 25' 60' 60' Existing Proposed I" RMAS 3 AC NONE . 8" AB TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 0 Design ADT (Est.total 0 yrs.aft, seal, RMAS- road -mix asphaltic concrete, CTB- cement treated base cement concrete, AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. IC WORKS DIRECTOR complet surface J v 1� A.G 60 " 40' � 3 „4•G. op6p 8"A.B 25' EX /5T: R�W i 1 .o i to I; ULTl ",n TE DCV6'LOP"eAJT- 3 B” C.9 'GUT7EJ2 i j 8 "C. F � 2 GUTTER REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE AS FOLLOWS: I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE IS NOT PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AT THIS TIME. 2• LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD. THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED 'BY SOIL TESTS. r JForm CU -3 COLLIER -UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California From: City ® County ❑ of Department of Public Works Division of Highways NEWPORT BEACH (Through District Engineer) Date: FEBRUARY 23, ig65 Advance approval is requested of the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. ❑ x involves a deviation from approved standards. ® is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." Name of Street or Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 Miles. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, cons ruc ng cur s an GUTTER (ONE S I DE) , DRA I NAGE D ITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY 'Contract or ay a or city., coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION* Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 -8' 2- 12' 2- 12' Lt, Rt. Lt. Rt. Lt. Rt. 0 0: o 8 .8 8 0., 0 0 16' 32' 40' 25 ' 6o' 6o' Existing Proposed I" RMAS " AC NONE 8" AB TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2,000 Design ADT 000 (Est.total n a 0 yrs.after completion *Types% BS- bituminous seal, RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface AC- asphaltic concrete, CTB- cement treated base PCC- Portland cement concrete, AB- aggregate base Other AS- aggregate subbase Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- gn re authorized o c a struction features, etC., PU LIC WORKS DIRECTOR on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. is a e GOO' 2 25' EX157- RIN �j . /O' = 40 /0' 8 "GF E Z'GUTT�R Z 4.6 `- 3"4,c. Ol/ER 8 "X s.. ULTIMATE DEVELQ~SE-A 7- i8 "CF � 2'GUT7ER REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE AS FOLLOWS'. I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE IS NOT PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AT THIS TIME. 2• LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD. THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED BY SOIL TESTS. W Form CU -3 COLLIER -UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California From: City ® County ❑ of Department of Public Works Division of Highways NEWPORT BEACH (Through District Engineer) Date: FEBRUARY 23, +965 Advance approval is requested of the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. ❑X involves a deviation from approved standards. ® is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road FIFTH AVENUE Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 Msiles. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructing curbs an GUTTER (ONE SIDE ), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY on rac or ay a or city, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION* Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 -8' 2- 12' 2- 12' Lt. Rt. Lt. Rt. Lt.1 Rt. 0 0 0 8 .8 8 0 0 0 16' 32 40' 2 ' 6o' 60' Existing Proposed I " RMAS "" AC NONE 8" AB *Types: BS- bituminous seal, AC- asphaltic concrete, PCC- Portland cement concrete, Other Note% Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2,000 Design ADT 5,000 Est.total in all anes 0 yrs.after completion RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface CTB- cement treated base AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase Z v /O \�I 8'C.F E 2 "Gar ER's v moo. A,G co o' 40' /2'. 1 /2' 25' EX /sr P111/ v /0 8' I � I� w 3 „Q,G. OVER B 11 - 8 " C.9 € 2 'GUMCI? UCTIMATO DEVCE- QRME"A-/T 1 8 "C.F � 2'GUTTER __ l' /,P57` - Ge' CONS7PUCTlOti1 .._.. REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE AS FOLLOWS: I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE IS NOT PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AT THIS TIME 2. LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD. THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED 'BY SOIL I� Form CU -3 COLLIER -UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 City ® County ❑ of ACT State of California From; Department of Public Works Division of Highways (Through District Engineer) NEWPORT BEACH Date: FEBRUARY 23, 1965 Advance approval is requested of the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. ❑X involves a deviation from approved standards. ® is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road FIFTH AVENUE Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 yilas. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructIng curbs an GUTTER (ONE SIDE), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of right-of-way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY Contract or ay a or city, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION+ Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 - 8' 2 - 12' 2 - 12' Lt. Rt. Lt.1 Rt. Lt.1 Rt. 0 0 0 1 8 .8 8 0 0 0 16' 32' 4o' 25, 6o' 6o' Existing Proposed I" RMAS " AC NONE 8" AB TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2,000 Design ADT 5,000 Est.total in all anes 0 yrs.after completion *Types: BS- bituminous seal, RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface AC- asphaltic concrete, CTB- cement treated base PCC- Portland cement concrete, AB- aggregate base Other AS- aggregate subbase Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. 8 "C•F. � 2�'6U77�R� J C 46 60' 0 �-- 3 ",4,G. OPEP B"f1.6. Lo 25' EX /ST R/l/v /0 I� - UL TI M,�] TE' DEVE[.OPMEit/T 45-CF �f Z'GUTTER REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE AS FOLLOWS: I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE IS NOT PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AT THIS TIME. 2• LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD. THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED BY SOIL TESTS. Vl SURVEY CF--. A4, SURVEY af . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... t T-- I 4-L- J. --1 -fir_' it mm 1 7, 4L Mi VI 1 Is m q7 4 > + ----- -- 1-4--- 4�4+ I LJ I 1 1 FF—TF7T af • �� ; L FEBRUARY 24, 1965 MR. A. C. Pi1RNIE I)EPUTY DISTRICT ENGINEER DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P. 0. BOX 2304, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54: CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. M. L. BAUDERS O SUBJECT: GAS TAX PROJECT NO. 48 FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE DEAR SIR: ENCLOSED PLEASE FIND SIX COPIES OF FORM CU -3, REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL FOR SUBJECT PROJECT. IT I$ PROPOSED TO FINANCE THIS PROJECT WITH SECTION 186.1 FUNDS. FIFTH AVENUE IS A COLLECTOR ROAD, ITEM NO. 64 ON THE CITY'S SELECT SYSTEM. THE REASONS FOR REQUESTING APRROVAL OF A DEVIATION FROM APPROVED STANDARDS AND APPROVAL OF STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE: LOCATION OF THE COASTAL FREEWAY NORTHERLY OF AND PARALLEL WITH FIFTH AVENUE MAKES THE FORM OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT HARD TO PREDICT, BUT THE STREET SHOULD BE IMPORVED AT THIS TINE. 2. CITY POLICY REQUIRE$ PROPERTY OWNERS TO CONSTRUCT STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEN PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED; BUT AS THE PROPERTY OWNER ON THE NORTH IS NOT DEVELOPING AT THIS TIME, IT IS DESIRABLE TO POSTPONE CONSTRUCTION OF CURB ANDD GUTTER ON THE NORTH SIDE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED. 3. THE PROPERTY OWNER ON THE NORTH IS WILLING TO DEDICATE 35 FEET, WHICH, WHEN ADDED TO THE EXISTING 25 FEET WIDE RIGHT OF WAY, WILL MAKE 6O FEET AVAILABLE. DIV. OF HIGHWAYS p GAS TAX PROJECT NO. 48 - Z - AS THE CITY COUNCIL IS ANXIOUS TO CONSTRUCT THIS PROJECT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, AND AS THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAS 8119M DIRECTED NOT TO EXPEND SECTION I86.I FUNDS UNTIL ADVANCE APPROVAL OF THE PROJECT 13 SECURED FROM THE DISRSVSS OF HIGHWAYS, IT IS REQUESTED TNAT THIS PROJECT BE REVIEWED AND APPROVAL GRANTED SO THAT PRE- PARATION OF PLANT} MAY COMMENCE. THE PRELIMINARY STRUCTURAL SECTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWING IS 3" A. C. OVER 8" AGGREGATE BASE. SOIL TESTS WILL BE TAKEN AND THE ACTUAL STRUCTURAL SECTION DESIGNED BY RECOGNIZED CONSULTING CNG;NEERS. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT KENNETH L. PERRY OF THIS OFFICE AT 71$- 673 -2110, EXTENSION 27. VERY TRULY YOURS, 0 C�SLPH T. DEVLiN Pj�`IJULIC 6'oRKS DIRECTOR ENCLS. JTD:KLP:BE 0 PUBLIC igMif CITY 14 MASMR PISLIC VORM, DIRECTOR 4 1/14/64 I PRQI 606 OF FIFTH AVENE KTHEEM 40 ONE E AID IIARC13BitS ATTACHED IA A COPT K A LETTER RECc1Ye0 raw $T. Jame CNU01CN RCTU NI#no THE POPOKD CONTRACT B[, all TIE CITY AND THE CIURcN Foe THE ImPROVEIcNT of 5TH kVCOA♦ IN VIEW Of THE CHURCN911 POSITION# IT APPEARS THE CITY MUST CHOOSE FROM THE ►OLLOWING ALTEOHATIVCSi 1. ABAmon THE PROJECT FOR THE TIRE KING, 2. ATTEMPT TO CONSTRUCT THE IIviROYCHEMT UNDER an ASKSSRENT DISTRICT PRocccOlNO, 3, INMVc ONLY THE SOUTHERLY NALf or THE ST01EET AT THIS TIRE. Ir THE PROJECT IS ASAMDOMEDN THE ONIMCAS or DUST AND MUD 441896 BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIK Or 5TN AVENUE WOULD REMAIN UW- RESoLVaOs THE LIKELIHOOD Of CONSTRUCTING TIC IMPROVCWOIT URM M AN ASKSSHERT DISTRICT PROCEEDING SEEMS RcMOTC. ANY M A,60MAILE ASKSSMENT DISTRICT SOUNOARY WOULD GIVE THC CHURCH ErICCTIVC CONTROL SINCE THEIR PARCEL Womb UNDOUBTEDLY AMOUNT TO 1101E Tian 51% or THE TOTAL AREA /NCLUDEO WITHIN THE DISTRICT. IN "WIGNH THE CITY WOULD K "%two A CONTolowtoN TO THE DISTRICT WHICH WOULD K UKD To PAY THE COSTS OF THE tIMROVCNENT ON THE SOUTHERLY SIK AND THIS TYPE or COMMOUTiON NIGHT K OMVICYLT TO JUSTIFY WITHOUT AM EQUAL AMOUNT KING COW - TRtINI ES, 1001 THE INPROYCtENTS ON THE NOWTHEOLV SIK. A NALr- STREET /M►itowacNT, CWISiSTime Or CYRSB AND GU►TCRS on THE SOUTHERLY SIK An 20-i►EcT or ►AVeMENT, NIGH► K crrcCTttfc AND SOLVE SORB Or THE PROKCIS�ALTNOUSH IT WOULD K REQUIRES TO PROM /SIT PARKING 011 THE SOUTHERLY SIK TO LEAVE SUFFICIENT WIDTH FOR TWO-WAY TMWFIC. THE EXISTING RIGHT- OF-WAY 16 ONLY 25-MCT /R WIDTH AND A HALF - STREET IMPAOYCHENT WOULD REQUIRE A MINIMA OF 35 rccTs' THERCroRC,10 ADDITIONAL fear WOULD Iowa TO K KDICATED DY THE CHURCH. IN ADDITION ALL PRDSLE/IS or DUST me MUD WAD NOT K Dolvco SINCE THE UHIHPR0IKOH GRAND AREA Or THE CHURCH WOULD STILL REMAIN ADJACENT TO THE IMPROYEHEMT, ALSOi THE COWS COST WOULD PROBASLY K HIGHER SIMCE THE CHURCH WOULD MOT K PARTICI- PATING ON THE REQUIRED DRAINAGE rACILIT►CS WHICH WOULD K VIRTUALLY THE SATE AS Or THE CRT IRA STREET IIERC IMPROVED. PLCASC INDICATE WHAT fURTHER ACTION YOU PEEL WE SHOULD TAKE IN THIS MATTCR. CCi CDINK /LMAM Lomas,, CITY ATTORNEY ATT, Dat" Z�5 qmTe- ZM4t.3orr,orz-, ov on� ASSJMPTIOh�S' AQ I5 b PZ0V0G7eb TO Z (A XLe TBUCICS = I.S4 3 A*lL -rzucxS = OfS `lo IJO %V ocrc v. LAs -6EIL 10 `C EA R. S 4-10.0 6;o�L T�S,Sj �NZTERL %-4o9TtQrJ rv�r 6, W.L. PhyLe 015 tc 119SO) X 110 3 A*LC 005 6 (9 so) x 9Z0 ewL EAv- 3 Z2-0 8 9 70 1241 90 GWL = IZ,190 x/0 = IZ1,goo DET�QM,c�Az 4oti1 DP i- ( \p.1 9 ok� -Trz\%L,e 7- 02.3 Gw `DOD T' I. = Z,Z C)03 z- Cr t) (i �O - Q, TAZLC 7 -604.3 Sc,o7 4 o N S" A -c J "7.4 - rrAc6Lz 7- 6 o a-. 3 + / "A,C• Cb-'SUEF. 1..4HCnl A r 2EraLI2.aU. Form CU -3 • • COLLIER -UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California Department of Public Works Division of Highways (Through District Engineer) Advance approval is requested ❑ is designed in accordance ❑X involves a deviation from ® is designed to meet appro' Name of Street or From: City ® County ❑ of NEWPORT BEACH Date: FEBRUARY 23, 1965 of the following project which: with approved standards. approved standards. red standards through "stage construction." Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 yi'las. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructing cur 5-5 GUTTER (ONE SIDE), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, a c.,•or the purchase of r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY Contract or ay a or My, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width .of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION* Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type *Types: BS- bituminous AC- asphaltic PCC- Portland Other Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 -8' 2- 12' 2- 12' Lt. Rt. Lt. Rt. Lt. Rt. 0 0 o 8 .8 8 0. 0 0 16' 32' 4o' 251 60' 60' Existing rroposed !" RMAS " AC NONE 8" AS TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2,000 Design ADT i all (Est.total n a 0 yrs.after completio seal, RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface j concrete, CTB- cement treated base cement concrete, AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. 0 2i Co' 1o' "- 3 "A.C. OV07 80A6 UC_TlM,47_E DE 6_C- OP"eA -17" Lb 0 h roo' '26, EX /ST. `'v I w T) n' 2 /2' 1 /2' / I A,C PAV60 .oirc//- 3� J A.C. Ova 8`A 6 8 °C,F � 8' GUiTE,P REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE AS FOLL ^wS; I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY F-o" STREET (VP'�OVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE 15 NOT PROP^SINa To nevck.')P AT THIS TIME- 2. LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD- t' THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED BY SOIL TESTS. i 9 0 Form CU -3 COLLIER- UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California From% City ® County ❑ of Department of Public Works Division of Highways NEWPORT BEACH (Through District Engineer) Date: FEBRUARY 23, 1965 Advance approval is requested of the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. ❑x involves a deviation from approved standards. ® is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road FIFTH AVENUE Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 N.i'lea , The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructing cur s an GUTTER (ONE SIDE), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY Contract or day labor city, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 - 8' 2 - 12' 2 - f2' Lt, Rt. Lt, Rt. 0 0 0 8 .8 8 0 0 0 161 32' 4o' 25' 1 60' 60' Existing Proposed I" RMAS " AC NONE. 8" AB *Types: BS- bituminous seal, AC- asphaltic concrete, PCC- Portland cement concrete, Other Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special-con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2.000 Design ADT 2 000 {Est.tota1 n a ane 0 yrs,after completion RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface CTB- cement treated base AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase gn e au or ze o c a PU LIC WORKS DIRECTOR Z \�I e'c.F E z'•SUrT�R 3 i� A,G c 8' 1 COO' 25 • EX /: 40' 12' 1 8' ULT11WATE DEVCL0PME1,-17- /w v /0' �o �N 8" C.�S' g' 2'GUnEl2 8"Cf" q ;?'GUTTER 4-IE'S7 3;r g( 5- COA/S?RUCT/OtiL... REASONS FOR USING STAGE CONSTRUCTION ARE AS FOLLOWS: I. CITY POLICY REQUIRES DEVELOPERS TO PAY FOR STREET IMPROVEMENTS. THE LANDOWNER ON NORTH SIDE IS NOT PROPOSING TO DEVELOP AT THIS TIME. 2• LOCATION OF COASTAL FREEWAY NORTH OF THIS AVENUE MAY MAKE THIS A FREEWAY FRONTAGE ROAD- THE STRUCTURAL SECTION WILL BE SUBSTANTIATED 'BY SOIL TESTS• I, TnwP2n�1F.MP(`lT nP FIPTN QJ -_E_ R��.T��.:ct.N___. -- �Gsi6tJ of Sec-riorJ s;s ,i MPfro Q \s ' (ipT = 1375 R"iLOTECTgD TO 10 `(EARS 010 Z- AxLE zQacV-s - t.r-,°io d e 3 -AfLL4 TR0c ,Cs = O.S CIO t'�(] TZJCK (.AQ6GQ TH1iw3 3 AXLSZ% Desk6a T'E(Z �oQ = IO `Azs �IALUG 5.5 C(3AS`p ©n1 S0 1L '7BtTS) �ETE�MUJ AT 10 tJ oP •W - L- IFQOM TA %LE 7-60Z.3A) CALCJt- l�T1DVOS �O tASSeQ6t =?- N66L;6;i8LC pr.L6 .ol S ,c 13is A 110 - z 2.75 AXLC 00 S n t 375 K 9240 330 i:. w. L-, E ra?- 8 b o 5 �,w,L, = 8607 g Y, (o -(es ; 8%, 0: o E.vu.L. = 8610Z0 VETEIZM��JAt•101�i ©F �`ZP�FFIG ��J��X �'F�6tJ'�E �%'6D2, 3 R.IiPFIG. rtJ:��lC � �•� .9 z616a r-o L V., C. �� �ET�xR.N i^1T�T10tJ OF CSR- AJirl���yJ �� �1t.�.1J -�- �,F16� �E '7- bo4,3 -T� -AFFIL LAR S G.`. = I.s TQ `C 4-" A.G. 7r\YMR ?C3LNr,4Q6 FO7- 0.1&1 r- -r- IA - C; •7 -6043 Aue T. 1. = • 0 GF = 0,84 --/ G,e. 6� ° TMlCp1��ES�S 6 /ZA�GL �o 17 AVGL o s E �C-0MNCn1'OGO S�= •G"CtOri q^ J�,e, - 3 x PROSE ac Coryr. t � aec�l¢F �wM6a HOT[o6,C�6N� lS p.�q��SCp} Srar��s H. M�T6C �� Part 7— Design PLANNING MANUAL 7 -602.3 August, 1964 7 -602.3 Evaluation of Traffic (1) Scope and Purpose. Traffic data required for design include traffic counts which represent the pres- ent and estimated future average daily two -way truck traffic volumes. Trucks are classified according to the number of axles, and buses are considered to be trucks. Expansion factors should be determined for each axle classification from the most appropriate available traffic count data. The purpose of obtaining this information is to make a representative estimate of the equivalent 5,000 -pound wheel loads (EWL) in one diretcion of travel to be expected during the 20 -year period fol- lowing construction or a specified period other than 20 years. A shorter period should be used for tempo- rary construction or when the pavement is to be re- tired by new construction before the end of the period normally used in design. For design purposes this E117L'is expressed as the traffic index or TI, by using Figure 7- 602.3. Secondary highways and lightly traveled roads may be designed for a shorter period when experience in the area on existing facilities indicates that a lighter design will be adequate. In no case should this design period be less than 10 years. The use of a period shorter than 20 years should be justified at the time the structural section is submitted for approval as provided under Index No. 7- 608.1(d). (2) EWL Constants. Table 7- 602.3A gives con- stants used in obtaining the annual number of equiva- lent 5,000 -pound wheel load repetitions in one direc- tion of travel. These constants have been developed from a statistical sample of both loaded and unloaded trucks weighed on primary state highwm-s. For other highways or special conditions of loading, the con- stants may be adjusted if axle load information is known. The constants have been computed for use with normal two -way traffic counts to give EWL figures for one -way travel. When using directional counts or estimated ramp traffic the constants must be nmlti- plied by two. SIT1GP FIGURE 7 -602.3 tC' LC it1� Il f.�511 ?11r�i 'i �� J^ %r If I(�,. �I \ Ea'L VALUES '/ EQUATION ( Traffic ffi EWL Io n19 c Index = 6.7 101 1 (3) EWL Calculation. Following is an example of the application of the above constants in estimat- ing the EWL. TABLE 7- 602.3A EWL Constants for Dual -tired Commercial Vehicles Z J r� ..l r� r � J �J I I Y Annual design EWL Type of vehicle per vehicle per day 2 -Axle truck-------- - -- - -- 110 3 -Axle truck-------- - - - - -- 920 e truck ------------ 1 5-Axle truck-------- - - -- -- 3390., 6-Axle truck-------- - - - - -- 2230 Z J r� ..l r� r � J �J I I Y l i Figure 7 -604.3 August, 1964 l J r �1� 1��.;�C_'1+�✓t'�1�.��1L, lt�1i €��:a��G;l�'I �C,1�i_, \J��1f tom; ....LC�L GE-Gravel Equivaient TI - Traffic Index !k R Resistance Value %-rF— 3. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0.5 — i- - - - - -- wde " 0.5 ffic I_ r ra 4.0 F- . w 1.0 1.0 `5 60 z 1. F 1.5 - I 1.5 w . . 80 a 2A X100 v� - - --_ 2.0 w LU cc 2.5 CD 1 � I 3.0 - t t O. I I I 3.5 3.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 . R = VALUE r I� W t Part 7- Design PLANNING MANUAL 7 -604.4 Aupuat, 1964 TABLE 7 -604.3 Gravel Equivalents of Structural Layers in Feet NOTES: R \IS is road -mixed asphalt surfacing. BTB is bituminous- treated base. LTB Is lime- treated base. 7 -604.4 Summary The completed design is 0.30 foot of asphalt con- crete over 0.65 foot of Class 2 aggregate base over 1.00 foot of Class 2 subbase. Other alternate designs for the assumed basic data could be as follows: Actual Gravel Thickness Material in Layer Equivalent 0.30' Asphalt concrete ____________ 0.60' 0.45' Class "13" cement- treated base 0.68' 1.00' Class 2 subbase______________ 1.00' 1.75' 2.28' 0.25' Asphalt concrete ____________ 0.501 .. 0.45' Class "A" cement- treated base 0.77' 1.05' Class 2 subbase______________ 1.05' 1.75' 2.32' The above designs based on the formula do not pro- vide an adequate factor of safety. It is necessary to add thickness to the theoretical designs to provide this safety factor and it is accomplished by providing an increase in required gravel equivalent for the layer to which it is to be applied. In designs using Class "A" or Class "I3" cement- treated base, the increased thickness should be. applied to the base layer. In un- treated aggregate base and Class "C" cement- treated' base designs, the factor of safety should be provided by increased thickness of the asphalt surfacing. The increased thickness of surfacing or base will result in a decrease in the thickness of subbase because the safety factor is not applied to the over -all gravel equivalent requirement. The gravel equivalent in- creases to be provided are as follows: Gravel Equivalent Increase Buse Type (Feet) Layer Applied To Class "A" cement - treated hale 0.24 Cement - treated base Class "B" cement - treated base 0.22 Cement - treated base Class "C" cement - treated base 0.18 Asphalt concrete Aggregate base 0.16 Asphalt concrete t^� n ) .�i �i J J u ASPHALT CONCRETE Cement - treated Base Traffic Index (TI) RMS Aggre. Clues 5 BTB Aggre- gate and 5.5 6.5 7.5 S.5 9.5 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 and gate sub - A B C below 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 11.0 12.0 13.0 14.0 LTB base base Actual thickness Gravel Equivalent Factor (GI) GI Gr GI GI of layer feet 2.50 2.32 2.14 2.01 1.89 1.79 1.71 1.64 1.57 1'.52 1.2 1.7 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.10 -------- 0.25 0.23 0.21 0.20 0.19 0.18 0.17 0.16 0.16 0.15 0.12 __ ____ _______ _ __ __ __ ___ ___ _ _ ____ __ 0.15 -------- 0.38 0.35 0.32 0.30 0,28 0.27 0.26 0.25 0.24 0.23 0.18 ------------------ -------- -------- 0.20-------- 0.50 0.46 0.43 0.40 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.33 0.31 0.30 0.24 __ ________ ____ ___ ___ __ ____ _ _ _ _____ 0.25 -------- 0.30 -------- 0.63 O. 0.58 0.70 0.54 0.64 0.50 0.60 0.47 0.57 0.45 0.54 0.43 0.51 0.41 0.49 0.39 0.47 0.38 0.46 0.30 0.36 ----------- __ ____ c� _______ ------ _ ____ -------- ___ __( -_ -------- -------- �3 6 .35 -------- 0.4 g4- 0.88 0.81 0.75 0.70 0.66 0.63 0.60 0.57 0.55 0.53 0.42 -- ---- ---- -- - ----- 0.39 0.35 0.40 -------- 1.00 0.93 0.86 0.80 0.76 0.72 0. fib 0.66 0.G3 0.61 0.48 ______ ____ ________ 0.44 0.40 0.45 -------- ------ 1.04 0.96 0.90 0.85 0.81 0.77 0.74 0.71 0.68 0.54 0.77 0.68 0.54 0.50 0.45 0.50 -------- __ ____ 1.16 1.07 1.01 0.95 0.90 0.86 0.82 0.79 0.76 0.60 0.85 0.75 0.60 0.55 0.50 0.55 -------- ------------ 1.18 1.11 1.04 0.98 0.94 0.90 0.86 0.84 0.66 0.94 0.83 0.66 0.61 0.55 0.60 -------- ------------------ 1.21 1.13 1.07 1.03 0.08 0.94 0.91 0.72 1.02 0.90 0.72 0.66 0.60 0.65 -------- ------------------ 1.31 1.23 1.16 1.11 1.07 1.02 0.99 0.78 1.11 0.98 0.78 0.72 0.65 0. 70 -------- ------------------------ 1.32 1.25 1.20 1.15 1.10 1.06 0.84 1.19 1.05 0.84 0.77 0.70 0. 75 -------- ------------------------------ 1.34 1.28 1.23 1.18 1.14 0.90 1.28 1.13 0.90 0.83 0.75 0. 80 -------- ------------------------------ 1.43 1.37 1.31 1.26 1.22 0.96 1.36 1.20 0.96 0.88 0.80 0. 85 -------- ------------------------------ 1.52 1.45 1.39 1.33 1.29 1.02 1.45 1.28 1.02 0.94 0.85 0. 90 -------- ----- ------------------------------- 1.54 1.48 1.41 1.37 1.08 1.53 1.35 1.08 0.99 0.90 0. 95 -------- ------------------------------------------ 1.56 1.49 1.44 1.14 1.62 1.43 1.14 1.05 0.95 1-00 -------- ___ --- _____ ___ ______---------------------- 1.64 1.57 1.52 1.20 1.70 1.50 1.20 1.10 1.00 1. 05 -------- __---------------------------------------------- 1.65 1.60 1.26 1.79 1.58 1.26 1.16 1.05 NOTES: R \IS is road -mixed asphalt surfacing. BTB is bituminous- treated base. LTB Is lime- treated base. 7 -604.4 Summary The completed design is 0.30 foot of asphalt con- crete over 0.65 foot of Class 2 aggregate base over 1.00 foot of Class 2 subbase. Other alternate designs for the assumed basic data could be as follows: Actual Gravel Thickness Material in Layer Equivalent 0.30' Asphalt concrete ____________ 0.60' 0.45' Class "13" cement- treated base 0.68' 1.00' Class 2 subbase______________ 1.00' 1.75' 2.28' 0.25' Asphalt concrete ____________ 0.501 .. 0.45' Class "A" cement- treated base 0.77' 1.05' Class 2 subbase______________ 1.05' 1.75' 2.32' The above designs based on the formula do not pro- vide an adequate factor of safety. It is necessary to add thickness to the theoretical designs to provide this safety factor and it is accomplished by providing an increase in required gravel equivalent for the layer to which it is to be applied. In designs using Class "A" or Class "I3" cement- treated base, the increased thickness should be. applied to the base layer. In un- treated aggregate base and Class "C" cement- treated' base designs, the factor of safety should be provided by increased thickness of the asphalt surfacing. The increased thickness of surfacing or base will result in a decrease in the thickness of subbase because the safety factor is not applied to the over -all gravel equivalent requirement. The gravel equivalent in- creases to be provided are as follows: Gravel Equivalent Increase Buse Type (Feet) Layer Applied To Class "A" cement - treated hale 0.24 Cement - treated base Class "B" cement - treated base 0.22 Cement - treated base Class "C" cement - treated base 0.18 Asphalt concrete Aggregate base 0.16 Asphalt concrete t^� n ) .�i �i J J u C -954 See Contract File for Topography am K 1!5Kr5 -7- hly AP-7 �17 0, AA C> 5'-72 7 5S A-77 7-Z- oc- 1c; 4- i 0,3 -2,2-7 6'! 0, 'ILI -7 K i I - Ste. A. C e ' Z i =0.3y , �_ ..; Sto e G - G` -O^'�- .. >.; .- /o Off C, �. - .RV G , +70 i G-yc +Z S- c o c +35 G OSr �3VC - 1+70 Q 5VG 7iee f 4t06 - -- -C;- ,ZtoO f U 7+zo f75 -2 74 2�_ <5� = - - -- — 4° G-o EVc - - -c- t 3a /a, Q ?� *75 c o— Zr-to ° G - o'= X75- F O°4 t7V G o'-Z- tzS G-os8 I +7s 04 --- fZ5 f= oaz +45 6-1 d}7S /_ /Ga rtf G-osm 4SO C- 0S- O .73 -1,s-4 c - o - °'� t7s C 049. aZS D aSa G o /410o G - -( �C•.Ol�� 475- G -ot3�. -- tZS G O°-3 t.Ss G ��' - - I�VG +%,e °- / G -O Byc /Lt°e G_p4S 111 +70 G-o°$ G-yc +Z S- c o c +35 G OSr �3VC - 1+70 Q 5VG 7iee 4t06 - -- -C;- ,ZtoO f U 7+zo f75 -2 74 2�_ <5� = - - -- — 4° G-o EVc - - -c- -- - 4)s- c -o +So L 6 /3 *r5 G-06= Eyc X75- F O°4 t7V G o'-Z- tzS G-os8 I +7s 04 --- fZ5 f= oaz +45 sz - 4D I +i0 VL +zs -° +75 z �clf /L aZS D aSa G o /410o G - -( �C•.Ol�� 475- G -ot3�. -- tZS G O°-3 t.Ss G ��' - - -- too C of +.So i C - o=ff CO — +70 G-o°$ G-yc +Z S- c o c +7s L -oZ, CO!` 4t06 - -- -C;- BVc Z9 - - -c- -- - 4)s- c -o is -ZS c o3L Co tSb oL /e t°e c - 0 -Z /s +tFS C-o I-L I +7s .C- l - fZ5 f= oaz +45 G p2Y Gr�Z�4 , Lt /e F -off SVG IMP F-0 - Q Taper i j I 17 +,Jv r 7 two r- a '1IE-7 -t76 G-Olw 17 +$5 RD,n 3c2 i i - 9 i G - i Jar.= ___ �'- %._ _ rsy��-x •:b.. .� ' 1,_ T -fi _�^ "�!- _ � 't•:l�r # wl � fir% - T -.. — F, H Ave RE-rW I�F- N FUA L& �O ETY- LEF-T SIDE.-_ ...- . -* � � qwc-"T SID E 5 TA. HDR - GR. Exisr. HDX-'ZL 5TA -0-2.5 �003e - /33• F� 133, 68 33• SQL /3 4; ?16 t 7-3 136.73 20 /3778 . 13?, BCR Bet Belt BcAe W-R eta aye /314,57 ) 314. f, z 134. 7o )34-78 1310.0& 139. dd 13µ.5z 34.29 134•oe. 153.88 133-71 133,10 )34.aq 134.15- 134.33 135•i.Z 135.69 135-of .... . . ..... -47. Z5 137. 76 3.9, /f/ EA'5:r CUPL9 13¢.62-. ;70 D /33, � (o 13 -7, z 5- W-76 LLR-. xxtsm -WP 13:st•11 1 + 50 1314. 74, 475 1314.84 13q.)5 1+00 + 25 134. Zo /33• F� 133, 68 33• SQL /3 4; ?16 t 7-3 136.73 20 /3778 . 13?, BCR Bet Belt BcAe W-R eta aye /314,57 ) 314. f, z 134. 7o )34-78 1310.0& 139. dd 13µ.5z 34.29 134•oe. 153.88 133-71 133,10 )34.aq 134.15- 134.33 135•i.Z 135.69 135-of .... . . ..... -47. Z5 137. 76 3.9, /f/ EA'5:r CUPL9 13¢.62-. ;70 D /33, � (o 13 -7, z 5- W-76 LLR-. xxtsm -WP 13:st•11 1 + 50 1314. 74, 475 1314.84 13q.)5 1+00 1314-92 134. Zo 43o SVC 135.07- 134.3&. +37 134.44 +50 135. OX 155.04- + 134. Ds +7D eve 034.90 15 2+_o6 13-4.lo-3 11-4. few +25. 1341.41 /a4(. +50 134.19 +7D -f 75 133.94 115519's 3-too 133.74 /33.7¢ '1•/0 )3VC 133.65 *25 133-55 )33.50 *7e Evc 133.61 +75 133•&S q +Zs +50 )3.14..22 +25 I /34.79 75 1 1-34, +7-T 13-512 -0 tes - 41- /3s7•Z7 *So /.35.7.1...13671. Y-20 zvc t 7s ,tgz 4.9 A5? 9r) /33• F� 133, 68 33• SQL /3 4; ?16 t 7-3 136.73 20 /3778 . 13?, BCR Bet Belt BcAe W-R eta aye /314,57 ) 314. f, z 134. 7o )34-78 1310.0& 139. dd 13µ.5z 34.29 134•oe. 153.88 133-71 133,10 )34.aq 134.15- 134.33 135•i.Z 135.69 135-of .... . . ..... -47. Z5 137. 76 3.9, /f/ EA'5:r CUPL9 13¢.62-. ;70 D /33, � (o 13 -7, z 5- W-76 LLR-. xxtsm -WP 13:st•11 1 133.6f 05 13q.)5 1-34 134. Zo 134.3&. 13•L. 5/. 134.44 133-73. PF447 134.1.0 13:st•11 1 133.6f 05 1-34 /3N-47 133-73. 134. Ds /35(-,05 1 34.7 v 6?- 133. L7 3.5-7.1 05 1-34 F1 F -TH AVER= 'v;'�!.r, ..- /_EFT SIOc _. _/� /SrIYT SLOG S 7A. NPR. f>R,. - B.Y1Si. HGR.2L. ,H4Q_Et -_.. _.4T ^_.... TOP_S1!RFi..4-R•. _- mviT.WRR,__ 8 +so x•3•`/.3.? .. l3`gJ. 3cy5' 150.30 /50.2% /Jrd• f'7-5 9._9/_ I.OJ.! .L� /�• /iJ. /39.73 /3175- .- + -p5 1,50. 44 /5 +00 Hc4 /3.9.53 /�9• <Z . 91-00 / 40.45 /y0, !�L /5"7/• ,`js _ - . /�/ / /5-/ +25. +50 a / 4 / • v 2 01, 39 = �' +45 ..o /SZ -75 /¢//,•¢L/9 15Z, 9:J .�Y�/'I,`.3Z. +75 I4 /. 86 15`--1,11 01 1 • /42 i9 /¢2.Z7 /¢Z /51.77 192./3 .+zS Iv Z,7z A x¢2.73 /�z <%� /5`1.90 I_ui.S7 ,,// Atz•5/¢ ,+•Sa Svc 143.15.. /�3. /3 /Y�• // /43.0/ /¢z 9.7 l�lo•4-G Bc.R /443. /5 /57.83 /S7. $3. �5�, J%. .. 157•g2 •fS0 +p2 = / - e« I43.4o /¢337 +90 eve- I43. 54 /,¢//''3, 57Z_ +OO / 43. 59 lie 38 hi Al /43.5,/ +,$o /43.75 +75 /43,$3 �`Y� -OZ /y�Y Z� /43•.7>r /¢f 3.�7 /Z +0 -0 143.92 ,I /¢y.�8 /Y'V',zJ� - -" +z S 144.1111 I +35.Qvc /44.o-3 ,/ 2 `. /�7'f o3. - AA ��4-,S�. .Bc .. 74, 73 R 1 4,1 - - +75. /H4.43 /y¢,! /¢S 0/7 VC 144.29 +95, 144•$N �¢Y'. (�7 ��Y"� 144. (i9 /7'X%fpcc?? Evc 145.38 �,¢/S38 B2.4 vc. 145. 1-25 I4J.GS' !YS /•¢%. Z3 J45,35 +SO /Qb•45 /�. �. /¢� 9� 1 46.3/ I -h 75 147.22 7- ,�O = -' 14+00 /47.99 147.f /17'�� . + 25' /48.76 7 q 15CO77 /48• �o +sa 149.S3 37 175 150.30 /50.2% /Jrd• LSo.Ly SIR 1,50. 44 /5 +00 /51.0(, IS-101 +05 gvc 131. 21 /�/ / /5-/ +25. 15199. /O /5�..�! �G.•1� = �' +45 /SZ -75 ISZ,7V- .. 15Z, 9:J +(05 /53.77 /51.77 {5¢,O/ /53.72 adsEVC /5`1.90 /0$vc /SG.GI /�lo•%Z l�lo•4-G �- +34D /57.83 /S7. $3. �5�, J%. .. 157•g2 •fS0 /s8•d'd' ��eJ•�f1 -. /.L/�. Y'�_.. ...._ ..... /58• &! ... +70 /S9. 70 138. 7d' 13713/ l No.9 z IHI, 7/ Iy2.S9 I 'l 2.75 Iw3. O.Y /43• /t /43. 20 IV3. Zg 1',3.31 /45.60 l'13 . ?7 .I /y9.8L 1 46.8 7 1N7.4x 145/8' /48.y5 /41.72 /So•aL 154. i ,. LAP 5TA 8 <-R SHEET 32. 3 RIG —Nr SirvE ToP 41RD_OC _ ..EYl6T.C"aa.L.. . -.__lI P_Lr- K......IJL�S2.._L/P...- /C!o. W? 1 /oo•l.o I � FIFTH OE B --VWEEN 5TA .IfDR. GR. "IAT. HOR. EL.. H4B EL. /Tot 70 /Go -3y //pO•�y "Sf. 3/ +,o --- -vo•ay �idl,8/ JS�SS/ +3'0 /!o/. I -7 �.�I. I IS / (.A/. ffz- + 70 f✓c /4,/.07 - 17+958cR /60,:9.F.L /60 /Z/ /�(� OUST �L. z- ,. LAP 5TA 8 <-R SHEET 32. 3 RIG —Nr SirvE ToP 41RD_OC _ ..EYl6T.C"aa.L.. . -.__lI P_Lr- K......IJL�S2.._L/P...- /C!o. W? 1 /oo•l.o I � CITY EWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS D TMENT MEMO wr TO: FROM: �ov� SUBJECT:. DATE le� /JlZ L s. ,Lk -: /,L,C; oo <7, COPIES TD: IGNED PUT IT IN WRITING . . . WRITTEN MESSAGES SAVE TIME AND AVOID ERRORS 1. .:.... _.. CITY NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS J�R'TMENT MEMO 1[f FROM: SUBJECT: p , c_95? DATE 7 � Z f' Of j! PG.df%wr4f- Ge eTVT To S_ *4 /1Fl�t /3erlwcs� !�e- l s cove 4v rna.[e E N O-r oc ff7- d w 0,l 7-""A.. -pr lG " lt"d rex .,-i4s 04o 4a t+P, rvzdedtG it is rs &jr CAo'OlrAl!C'a lM COPIES TO: A4144-� SIGNED PUT IT IN WRITING. . . .WRITTEN MESSAGES SAVE TIME AND AVOID.ERRORS `17 11 i / al Tf \- "IZ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD TO. Dive Ilan 4► His"" no, am 23A Tko$ l"6 Amex L" AmUL96,0 C &LITOMIA ATTENTION. Ha* A.A. soil" SU84ECT. smcci 5voram C401 iitoom WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING. NO. COPIES 2 cum REMARKS. FAIR Y&A OiMliw ACID Amm"Ais COPIES TO. pa"a i"Act 7J Fmacv 56 DATE JMT 21, 1967 DESCRIPTION BY: comm am fll aces EMsi1Ki# r PROXCT s7'c-74 �Pv A _ c ! •/3 'i—�erN Aukv- ' ` CITY AWPORT BEACH - P,UBLIC WORKS DENMENT ESTIMATING FORM DIVISION_.('A�� t . DATE 1.k(G(13L(o LX-l-;lLk(o,T[�2�5 BYi r_3 PRELIMINARY t8 FINAL �Li,U�JUC NO.. ITEM WQsreklF< DOJ�.IL- QUANTITY. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT 1 Moue A.C.�A�MT L xcP(�sr osi /g192,/ f-5 L 41,3 4 S.o Z . —,c:>k( iZ l,oz 8. 2 f 7.6,07 'Y 39 i a 3.3 2 ?eG tiJ = e ?lv �� /`/ 1 R 5 r d.3zz 7c --D ,,, - A PPRoAem 1 3Z.7, 5;- o, IgZ.Z3 Y/�'3.38 c l 8'' t3. // 4 z f 974- r, N 57q• 0 13 L a /I o z 7, z. 2 <tioP�,rc� sr o�3•od. �� c-: � /o2.�v (. I Z4 z� A E. 7DI7.4 WAt L- 1 � PROA T CITY OM)EMPORT BEACN — PUBLIC. WORKS OEMLENT ESTIMATING FORM DIVISION DATE BY: C3 PRELIMINARY ;Y FINAL "NO. ITEM QUANTITY. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT - LltSfC%FF � u r,rrw /a! z44.co r Q '� A F,t.o CiG,ti - -rt 1000 -;- G °= e� b7 fil�Aoc Al Z ZGP� ot�V CITY OF NEWW SEACH - NBLIC WOM WARTMENT , ESTIMATING FORA PROJECT — C�2c�s �e� 5� / 8 f s C3 PRELIMI 1 DIVISION DATE FIMAL No. ITEM QUANTITY. UNIT PRICE AMOUNT �q3 tivrnac -T 103 ,4 9' L:XeAC.D4Tf0�I AS Z "c7� AkrQe4 AJ tj C ,- r= 7�- o - ita T D3c� KT OF" C.hN/YA� o v It f t A r• / .f J 4f Td✓ Ct+dt/ W r nu TN V U 10 -Ayr jrlVA for ,��� io3a ? �o n 10 _ c; 1 /0 U 11 1 3 N to m a� xAl o w o, a. o 0 O .ma U Q O +l 10 +i U y Am In A H U a cz� W O �N Q S H EU N u 6 8 N f�' W Q vw O E+ as xa �o I a W H a a O u N m U T-r N YI 4 O C U U m w cq0 a°. m N o(n 4 V] 1i N p x co W a N N m a m 11 b N U P. a) m d A r-I A& N 19 F ¢ MI � Q J O N o O 2 rW N v n 0 W ir w Z `� O a N W N W N N W_ 2 °E w P W m x F V V * N K W Z UJ U 0 Z H V J W C Y U ( 7 �m a Y o m c VOA` N) \ N O S?Z F _�Oa M V Y � m °w Z U i wz Wz °— m - D' w < U Q 0 M m a ^ m 03131dw00 a03A ONO N1NOw r NNOM 1SMA 30 a%3A ONO N1NOw U 1�va1NO� S3lIN 001 /1 HION3l a a c 10 �m ti O9 of C Oy 2 CO CO In 0 J >> 0 Z a z o U V V] rc �Wo a .y y �G7 3N 1 H oNa n I U H cr W t I vl 4N O w oQ 0 03 0Z cr qu 2 ax o �. It 3 - co 3000* O A N .i F- UfL)¢ U U W W i Y W �n &ii WNU2 _N aiai �f U FORM CU- 5e.Rev. f0 0 O as U .o ti a� pH .�1 W N b � xv % ti O • 3:%0 Oco 0 Uy F4 N m w - IV e () fG s. x O to s # # # a . a, aCi 0 oti CO IO >r .O O 9f! 0 U ma w 9) O a0 00 Ep � N aq a m �0 O m .0 m b 0 0 U f0 9 to H Q1 # m 0 .1 U 4-. y R H N N • OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, Governor DEPARTMENT Of PUBLIC WORKS O DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 07- Ora= O -NpptB P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054 October 11, 1967 Project SS48 2 & MA 0 -3700 Fiscal Xear•19 5- ,1866 -67 Section:186.1 Mr. Ben Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: We have completed the engineering audit of the project noted above, des- cribed as Fifth Avenue - Larkspur to Poppy (48) and Westcliff -Dover The work performed in accordance with the Collier -Unruh Act under Q Section 186.1 in the amount of $ 71,154.84 Q Section 186.5 in the amount of $_ is approved. Approval is based on the following exceptions to the project as submitted for review: •. .. Matching credit for this project has not been audited. This does not complete the fiscal project are subject to examination by office for the purpose of ascertaining been met. cc: CTLedden Controller's Office 7 -eC -614 DEC 66 REV audit. The financial records of the the auditors of the State Controller's that the requirements of the A have Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy Dist ct Engineer By A. A. SMITH Assistant District Engin er CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTME'T PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 2 FOR PERIOD END ING���lc�(�_ ! PROjECT: IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF - DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE BUDGET NO, SEE BELOW CONTRACT . 0, 954 ITEM CONTRACT PERCENT AMOlin;T c, CONTRACT ITEM FRICE COMPLETE EARNED I I REMOVE A.C. PVMT. 0.034 /SF 45,342 SF $1,541.63 2 EXCAVATION (DOVER) 4,192.16 LS 100% 4,192.16 3 EXCAVATION (FIFTH) 6,929.36LS 90% 6,236.42 4 RS -2 SEAL COAT 124.02/T 3.02 T 374.54 ! 5 'AGGREGATE BASE 3.39/T 872.60T 2,958.11 • 6 ASPHALT CONCRETE 7.21/T 557.12T 4,016.83 7 2" P.C.C. MEDIAN PVMT 0.322/SF 1,598 SF' 514.56 8 4" P.C.C. DRIVE APPROACH o.61 /SF 1,327.5 SF 809.77 9 ALLEY APPROACH 192.23 EA. 6 EA. 11153.38 10 TYPE '.'A" C & G 6" 2.29/LF 110 LF" 251.90 II SPECIAL C & G 8" 3.23/LF 172.5 557.17 12 SPECIAL C & G 6" 3.23/LF 581 LF I,876.63 13 TYPE "A" C & G 6" 2.21 /LF 3442 LF 7,6o6.82 14 SPECIAL C.B. /M.H. 847.90 EA. 100% 847.90 15 4" A.C. PIPE 13.09/LF 14 LF 183.26 16 18" C.M.P. 9.76/LF 1 � i • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPART Ij IE is 2C 21 22 2_ 21 2' 21 2 21 PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. FOR PERIOD ENDING Mar 15, 1966 PROUECT: IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF -DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE BUDGET N0. SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO. ITEM No• CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT PRICE PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED SIGNED `f/ -��� 24" C.M.P. 14.64/LF .2.5 LF 36.6o I ROCK SUBDRAIN 9.76/CY 7.8 CY 76.12 I INSTALL ISLAND TOPSOIL 976.00 LS 90% 878.4o RELOCATE EXIST. WATER METER 61.00 EA. ]-EA. 61.00 ADJ. MISC. STRUCT. TO GRADE 85.40 EA '. ADJ. M.H. TO GRADE 115.90 EA 3 EA. _,347.70 j RELOCATE ST. LT. 402.60 EA. 5 EA. 2,013.00 1 ADJ. SURVEY MONUMENTS TO GRADE 36.6o EA. 2 -50% 36.60 j 2" X 6" REDWOOD HEADER, 0.85 /LF A.C. DRAINAGE DITCH $2.52/LF GUARDRAIL 5.66/LF 3 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 4,026.00 LS ADDITIONAL ITEM #12 2.42/LF 647 LF 1,56 4 $30,136. 24 BUDGET NOS: C.O. #1 — (FIFTH) 19-3348 -o28: $16,154.47 C.O. #2 - (W -D) 19- 3355 -023' $ 3,81+1.85 C.o. # 244.61 c.o. # 22 3 6 - b a ORIGINAL CONTRACT EXTRAS TO DATE C�)NTR.AC'C TO D.ATF $65,300.81 C -) 1,7 8.51 63,51+2.30 AMoDNT EARNE:: $38,6o6.8o LEss 10,% ReTE >i; IoN 3,860.68 PRE -v PRVIOU.s PAYMCUT!3 1 ,749.80 AMOUNT DUE THIS REUuesr19,996.32 SEND PAYMENT TO: E.L. WHITE COMPANY 12311 CHAPMAN BLVD. GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA D� i I HEREPY CER'TIF't''HAT THE ABOVE: AMOUNTi AND VALUES ARE CORRECT- SIGNED `f/ -��� �; . S IGNED �" V ENGI .ER QN' R TOR BY AITY OF NEWPORT BE A COUNCILMEN Volume 19 - Page 173 \ Z r OA mP O Gam` Index 1Qhf, � and Advisory Committee of the District on January 27, 1966, enclosing a copy of a letter from Attorney Jack J. Rimel dated January 2, 1966 addressed to Bookman and Edmonston, Consulting Civil Engineers, and a copy of a letter from R. M. Edmonston of Bookman and Edmonston, dated January 4, 1966, to the Board of Directors of Coastal Municipal Water District. ADDITIONAL ITEMS: Bob Lynam, a partner in the firm of E. L. White Company, spoke from the audience. He referred to the rejection of bids for the street improvements at Westcliff -Dover intersection and Fifth Avenue from Larkspur to Poppy Avenue, and stated that this was the second time that his company had been the low bidder and that the bids had been disallowed. A discussion was had. It was brought out that even if the bid proposal form had contained the right number of lineal feet of curbing, the E. L. White Company bid would still have been the low bid. The previous action of the Council (as indicated on Page 163 of the Minutes of this meeting), rejecting all bids for subject work, was rescinded, and the matter was diaried Motion x for the next Council meeting, which will be an adjourned Ayes x x x x meeting on February 1, 1966, for the receipt of further Noes x x information from the staff. Absent x The meeting was adjourned at approximately 9:50 P. M. Motion x to Tuesday, February 1, 1966 at 8:00 P.M. Ayes x x x x x x Absent x • to CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. Lt 11>� III FOR PERIOD ENDING SAM Lu t:l BUDGET CONTRACT NO. S ITEM NO. CONTRACT ITEM CON AC . PRICE PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED i9- 33yv -o Z 9, OZ- 339 ORIQINAL CONTRACT EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE AMOUNT EARNED •6kAw7.2Q LESS 10% RETENTION �p LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 58v GV AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST , 6 •92 59NO PAYMENT T0I E.L. WHITE COMPANY 12311 CNAPMAN k vo. GARDEN QRWE,, CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CER IF THAT T E A V il0UNT3 AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. SIGNED SIGNED NGINEER CONTRACTOR BY i Z Y/ �I W J N N N N N ON W N W ZO -u Y— O p A f<<t �p O1 O W W' NO • N NO N �O W N -F' n A n z m O r r r. r W N �, -i -i N \ m 9 .m m m m . m m '*1 -n \i WON ON -9 m n z m v r D D r r O m .It N N a A 0 "A �F Y Y �Q Y ut -• �_n 00 O rn -N.1 rn w w 3� n v N NO O N V n L •' *t r s N v1 0 --1 -n m z m. -1 =3 m w ON .W m a VW1 00 Vl N lJl ppp Vl NO DWI N �D -W Z C v N •SON � � W �O Vl � NO rJ m 7 N ao O 1 O ONN O. W -J O Oo N \.n tv m ON w rl �' fl V1 r w a h 0 it . p �. W ° N LN ISS O � y 3 N \11 ,. i 31 G Gn W W N N — — 6 6-%,D C Co � �1 O ON V VI - -P� W W Z Z -7 O G_' O a m m m m z z -1 C C-) m --I N z N N 0 4 N -1 N N -i a P' N a a X m m A _ W 9 9 - -C v v V V - -C r r 3 3 N N c cl N N x x x x m m _ a n n m m n n m m { { O O D D' n n N N < < < < < < N N � � m m .r n n s s s s a a - - n n r r N N D D D D m m m m o o - -zi 3, r r D D r r r r D D a a - (7 n n - -1 D D m m - -I - -1 m D M m . b ' 'O C C1 n _ V n. A A l A O m r r Z Z 2 2 n n O O m m f f3'l m M n n R° R R" R l7 A O m • - -A O C m • •W 1 12. R Ro D D m m n n D Dw > > . n 1 1 • O - -1 C . 3 3 O O O ON O Oo O O M M D D 1 1 m m • •i < < x x a a O Om - -s z m m Z Z ~ ~ a z 0 i i m m z z °r - -1 3 3 r r. s sr E n t t � s f-. 1 m f 1: 1 z c � a a — O OD N N W W W W N N O O O O - -J W W O ON � � O O \11 ,. i m 81 N O r n u 0 N b\ r N S 1 ODJ VI r,,), W N NN O i m m M O m 0 W D 0 o a N o r o O O � 3 O O > x E m n ti 1 o i x m o o: -1 x n :O r c • O v m N O n m N .• '* m A t n o > o t r x r r > o 3 . i z z V kL III ` z c O O z -r1 m m c -4 ~ O D W W O •la A < a s a o °v fl i co a N m x s z rn v 00 to co m y ~ O m A n D i m W ONO o m n A � 9 r 3 m D O A 1`I J z A G . o \ W m i A t7 A O D Z 3 O 91 z - G IC cA �' LTl N O O —_ Co ON � � F r N �• OO � N V1 �O1 -J F Q r r N \ O O\ �O O p S — z r*1 m 8 .q m m I r Trl D N 1 ' n N (Vl IV 3n x 'p , O\V}• -FW N — ; I -pr r M r- r- \.n n s. > m m 3i Oo -n mz - r n > m W V N � m D D 6 9 O\N -� 1 1 01 F.' O\ %fin �! O— N O\ -J C- In\ In W -J V1 C O 01.l1 -.. •F' 00 �7� M1S -J .yam, m 3D Z Q\ . i —I S S O i m m M 0 D 3 � 3 f'1 m i m m m n :O r c N O O t n z r i b V - O F< 1 z y R• i m 1 v C co n D o m n 9 Z m D M z o G . o '. m i O Z 3 O 91 z IC S 4 r CE7Y OF NEw ORTt ACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTNOT PRCGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. �► (F�AN�►L) FOR PERIOD ENDING PROJECT; BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW ITEM I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 CONTRACT ITEM REhIOVE A.C. PVMT EXCAVATION (DOVER) EXCAVATION (FIFTH) RS -2 SEAL COAT AGGREGATE BASE ASPHALT CONCRETE 2" P.C.C. MEDIAN PVMT. 4" P.C.C. DRIVE APPROACH ALLEY APPROACH TYPE "A" C & G SPECIAL C & G 8" 1 � rye SPECIAL C & G 6" J TYPE "A" C & G 6" • VD SPECIAL 4" A.C. PIPE 18" C.M.P. CONTRACT NO. PRICE 0.034 /SF 4,192.16 LS 6,929.36 LS 124.02/T 3.39/T 7.21/T 0.322/SF 0.61 /SF 192.23 EA. 2.29/LF 3.23/1-F 3.23/LF 2.21 /LF 847.90 EA 13.09 /LF 9.76/LF COMPl-ET E 45,342 SF 100,E 100% 3.02 T 4,039.90 T 1,662.25 T 1,598 SF 1,327.5 SF 6 EA. 110 LF 172.5 LF 581 LF 2,051 LF i EA. 14 LF 95 LF 3 1,541.63 4,19e.t6 6,929.36 374.54 13,695.26 11,984.8¢ 514.56 809.77 1,153 •38 251.90 557.17 1,876.63 4,532.71 847.90 183.26 921.20 C6TY OF NEORT BEACH — PUSLsC WO.RAS DEPARTS'T PRCGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 4 (FINAL) FOR PER= ENDING #±c 30, 1 PROjECT:�IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF -DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE Bi,DGET NOS SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO. ITEM Nc., CONTRACT ITLM CONTRACT PRICE COMPLETE E:.ARP;ED I 17 24" C.M.P. 14.64/LF 4 LF 58.56 18 ROCK SUBDRAIN 9.76/cY 7.8 Cy 76.12) 19 INSTALL ISLAND TOPSOIL 976.00 LS 100 976.00 20 RELOCATE EXIST. WATER METER 61.00 EA. 1 EA. 61.00 21 ADJ. MISC. STRUCT. TO GRADE 85.40 EA. 5 EA. 427.00 22 i ADJ. M.Y. TO GRADE 115.90 EA. 13 EA. 105%•70 23 RELOCATE ST. LT. 402.60 EA. 5 EA. 2013.00 24 ADJ. SURVEY MONUMENTS TO GRADE 36.60 EA. 2 EA. 73.20 25 2" X 6" REDWOOD HEADER 0.85 /LF 1,825.5 Lr 1,551.67 26 A.C. DRAI.NAGE DITCH $2.52/LF 10851 LF 4,664.52 27 GUARDRAIL 5.66/LF 43 LF 243.38 28 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 4,206.00 LS - ADDITIONAL ITEM #12 2.42/LF 647 LF 1, . 4 BUDGET NOS. 3, •1 (FIFTH) 1973348 -028: C.O. :t2 - (W—D_ 19- 3355 -023: C.o. f Imo-- 244..61— o. c .— C- o - -- - -- — - - - -- - c.o. ---= , ORI:.!NAL C.,NTRA.fr $65,300.81 Ey,� !AS T• DATE —I, 758.51 C',N7RAC'r TC D:,Te 63,5+2.30 #641809.20 r"�6-5 LESS IU% RE.it ,ON , 57,��•23 LE %S PRE,, Ii%V.S "J.J+Y M,;,, F6T J% A e40UN'[ D::E TnIS RE.Q uc•i 6.05 4 64,809.20 SEND PAYMENT:TO: E.L. WHITE COMPANY 12311 CHAPMAN BLVD. GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 1 rii: >E B'r CER: "' 7r'AT THF. ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VA :_UE`. ARE CORREf'.. 7 ✓r E SIGNED (—c— 'r` L" (r BY %.8� /REQUEST C €TY OF PROGRESS PAY EN NO. NAT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTS T >v FOR PERIOD END(NGjunt,w, 1w PROJECT., IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF - DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO. ITEM �o. CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT PRICE PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED I REMOVE A.C. PVMT 0.034 /SF 45,342 SF 1,541.63 2 EXCAVATION (DOVER) 4,192.16 LS 100 40192.16 3 EXCAVATION (FIFTH) 6,929.36 LS l00% 6,929.36 4 RS -2 SEAL COAT 124.02/T 3.02 T 374.54 5 AGGREGATE BASE 3.39/T b039-90T 13,695.26 6 ASPHALT CONCRETE 7.21/T 1662.25 T 110984.82 7 2" P.C.C. MEDIAN PVMT. 0.322/SF 1,598 SF 514.56 8 4" P.C.C. DRIVE APPROACH 0.61 13F 1,327.5 SF 8D9-T7 9 ALLEY APPROACH 192.23 EA. 6 EA. 1,153.38 10 TYPE "A" C & G 6" 2.29/LF 110 LF 22551.90 11 SPECIAL C & G 8" 3.23/LF 172.5 LF 557.17 12 SPECIAL C & G 6" 3.23/LF 581 LF 1,876.63 13 TYPE "A" C & G 6" 2.21/LF + 2051 LF 4,532.71 14 SPECIAL C.8. 1M.H. 81+7.90 EA 1 EA 847.90 15 4" A.C. PIPE 13.09/LF 14 LF 183.26 16 0, C.M.P. 9.76 LF 95 LF,_,. 927.20 CITY OF NET BEACH - PUBLiC WORKS DEPART* PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. y CFIti» J FOR PERIOD ENDING Am7p;; fig" PROJECT; IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF -DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO. 954 ( -EM Noe CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT FR €CE PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED 17 24" C.M.P. 14.64/LF 4 li 58.56 IS ROCK SUBDRAIN 9.76/Cy 7.8 CI( 76.12 19 INSTALL ISLAND TOPSOIL 976.00 LS 100 % 976.00 20 RELOCATE EXIST. WATER METER 61.00 EA. 1 EA, 61.00 21 ADJ. MISC. STRUCT. TO GRADE 85.40 EA. 5 EA 427.00 22 ADJ. M.Y. TO GRADE 115.90 EA. 13 EA 10506.70 23 RELOCATE ST. LT. 402.60 EA. 5 EA. 20013. 24 ADJ. SURVEY MONUMENTS TO GRADE 36.6o EA. 2 EA 73.20 25 2" X 6" REDWOOD HEADER 0.85 /LF 1,825.8 LF 1:551.67 26 A.C. DRAENAGE DITCH $2.52/LF 1851 61. 4,66k.52 27 GUARDRAIL 5.66/LF 413 6 FAP A3 -38 28 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 4,206.00 LS — ADDITIONAL ITEM #12 2.42/LF 647 LF 1 BUDGET NOS: 30 (FIFTH) 19 -3348 -028: t22, 16.11 ) W -D_ 19- 3355 -023 4 9.00 C.O. #2 C.O. #3 ; C 2411.61 .'O. .95 CIO, /5 ORIG!NAL CONTRACT $65:300,0.81 ` ExTR.AS TO DATE t— )1,758.51 CONTP.AGT TO DATE 632542.30 AMOUNT EARNEi: Less 10% Re,EOir;gN LESS PRE "V'IOU.S PPYMEt,T AMGuN"r DuE T;;Is REQuf: T 6, "412.47 7( ` -- — 22,966.11 14 ' SEND PAYMENT. -T0: 6 � p• 0.9, Z� E.L. WHITE COMPANY 12311 CHAPMAN BLVD. GARDEN GROVES CALIFORNIA CPR! .'F" "'HAT 'rHE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORREC o FI t /` �. SIGrvED SIGNED /� -E.'J ENGINEER NT =R \' BY ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award at contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT �- Material Testing Section 1W TEST NO. C -CG -C- 14471 ' . FIELD NO. /arg Contra] on RELATIVE COMPACTION W OTOR P.OROR AHFPI ma teria is s act actually �'^" • entering into works. DATE REPTD. - _ If contract, use Contract item PROJECT D&IFIR AGENCY– &Jr5/OE AGEM'S CZ/l�e WPpf B: RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR G/N ?E SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY I� MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION /A/G Ti/ REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL fr /,'g ') DEPTH +� TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE i DATE .3-�G' ^_ls TESTED BY: BON IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4��.r _q [WT. SAND RETAINED 15941 _ ,3/ 70 CWT. SAND USED D TEST SAND DENSITY M E VOLUME SAND USED 3 F VOLUME CONE + RING .!i G VOLUME TEST HOLE .1804 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - MOLE + TARE Z9 30 1 TARE WEIGHT 3 (mac. J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 2S. 76 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 142. L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 90Q 3 DRY WT. gs INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN `7, MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION WET WT. ROCK 3672. DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. _ a DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. DRY WT. - 3 TOTAL DRY WT. %, ROCK % MOISTURE CORR.MAX. DENS] TY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN \ I P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD II S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /90 T WET DENSITY I V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E – F K = J =G CONE .1667 – L= K= (100 % +N) QUO +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P –Q) -r Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: G ^_ MAX. RECIFIVED Test Method Calif. 216 -F APR 4 1966 B-� PUBLIC WORKS DEPT O BI ING WILL BE MA E • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ATERIA .3ott -09 RELATIVE COMPACTION -5 f /x� r5 /a /o well METHOD A 9 8 ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 135 13-7 MOISTURE �S RC = _�/_._ —. % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL`% AT END OF MONTH \ I /f0 \ I II /90 I N I ry �o `gym /!0 A B-� PUBLIC WORKS DEPT O BI ING WILL BE MA E • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ATERIA .3ott -09 RELATIVE COMPACTION -5 f /x� r5 /a /o well METHOD A 9 8 ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 135 13-7 MOISTURE �S RC = _�/_._ —. % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL`% AT END OF MONTH ❑Prelimmar tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award a contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT q Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— Vq6' I4 ` r FIELD NO. C 6F Control tests on RELATIVE COINPACTION W 0. R ' P .l AHFPI — materials actually -'=` • entering into works. DATE REPTD. '-`� 6 If contract, use contract item PROJECT fin' ✓F:G AGENCY QU7 5 /DE 1964 its RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR b -Wrrt SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ,AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION ? n/OKT,U RT LT OF (� STA REPRESENTING LIMITS ^^ TYPE MATERIAL fI•16 . (9 V) DEPTH •Q TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3-30 -ZZ TESTED BY: &A IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND % 70 B WT. SAND RETAINED /0.7,0 C WT. SAND USED INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D TEST SAND DENSITY 2.(•: E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING GI VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. - 3 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE . do I TARE WEIGHT $.3e J WET WT. EX C. SAMPLE 22. e K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 1,39.2 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 13:4.1 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIEL6 LAB WET WT. o(- 3 DRY WT. 5 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN "5 MOIST. M +c) N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK i DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - 3 Q DRY WT. - 3 /90 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR. MAX. DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA SUMMARY MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN y RC - q7 TENT. RC = P WET WT. AT COMPACTION i Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. /90 R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD /?O S HT. COMPACTED_ SPECIMEN II N T _ WET DENSITY A V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE .1667 - L =K- (100 % +N) Q= 0- x(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276•F • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) } 6 � -5 Diem t5 °/O GYe /f METHOD A 10 B ❑ SUMMARY I RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS /so OPT. DENSITY 133 ) 3-7 MOISTURE ✓ y RC - q7 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL —% i /90 /?O II N A METHOD A 10 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY 133 ) 3-7 MOISTURE ✓ y RC - q7 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL —% WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH r301 1 -03 RELATIVE COMPACTION L14'f�:[dl:f�l�a ❑ for li,ninoY controprior COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEOtRTMENT Material Testing Section 0 TEST NO. C— 61p 14 73 . CONT NO.OR ElControl tests on (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFP) materials actually RELATIVE COMPACTION • entering into works. DATE REPTD, If contract, use contract item PROJECT DOVE -4 AGENCY CWT'S1DIE 06 MCW -- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR t,.ItltTE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION %*4 IA �!_ RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS - TYPE MATERIAL —DEPTH a TO II�� BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 443o B WT. SAND RETAINED 6. , 4r C WT. SAND USED 30 40 D TEST SAND DENSITY -' z Ae. E VOLUME SAND USED .4419 F VOLUME CONE + RING .146.9 G1 VOLUME TEST HOLE . 1 bS`l H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 1 2 5.$0 1 TARE WEIGHT 3.1e J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 22 ]O K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 13 .� L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE Bt 7 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. Op DRY WT. 86 ) % MOIST. N SP. GR. ROCK /IO WET WT. ROCK 2434 DRY WT. ROCK P WET WT. - a SPECIFICATION: NL_% DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT. Q % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA SUMMARY MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN /IO RC =__3 % P WET WT. AT COMPACTION SPECIFICATION: NL_% Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. I R % MOISTURE /SO CONDITION OF MOLD i S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN Ii T_WET DENSITY I V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D � D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K =J +G CONE .1667 — L =K +(100 % +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) f 6 METHOD A ® B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N PLACE OPT. DENSITY 3 -7 /IO RC =__3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% � I 1 \ /SO i Ii I N � D /!0 1 1 t \ [A- { METHOD A ® B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N PLACE OPT. DENSITY 3 -7 MOISTURE S RC =__3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% F301143 � � RELATIVE COMPACTION El toralwardaof controprior COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— G6; --CL 147¢ • FIELO NO. QerJ RELATIVE COMPACTION CONT. NO.OR Control tests on (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFP) materials octually • entering into works. DATE REPTD. j If contract, usaccontract item PROJECT 02499 AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR NH /7"ff ITIME SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY I� MAINTENANCE El SUBD. El PERMITS El LOCATION #_ 7 we5r RT LT OF (L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL 19-A �' •� DEPTH 4 TO // A BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3 -0-46 TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ¢2.00 B WT. SAND RETAINED MOLD NO. C WT. SAND USED O D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED >(c >;.•{ F VOLUME CONE + RING I G VOLUME TEST HOLE .1635 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 4.90 1 TARE WEIGHT 3.05 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE Z/. $S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 1 33, G L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE I.z S.2 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE B ❑ FIELD LAB WET WT. t�88 MOLD NO. DRY WT. 2 3 % MOIST. M 4.2 N SP. GR. ROCK % WET WT. ROCK 6. DRY WT. ROCK I WET WT. - ,QI DRY WT. - 3 14'. TOTAL DRY WT. /90 % ROCK Q CORR.MAX.DENSITY Colton. 129.5 B ❑ • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS 1 MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 MOISTURE O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% I P WET WT. AT COMPACTION /90 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. \ I 1 I R % MOISTURE /70 I CONDITION OF MOLD A � S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T _ WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. 6� s C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -F K +G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100 % +N) Q =O+ (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LIS. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ri«n r3 / %o lNP7/ METHOD A 1.9 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS 1 I DENSITY 130 iso 4 9 MOISTURE Rc=---a 5 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% I /90 \ I 1 I /70 I N NNE � A � CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. 6� s C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -F K +G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100 % +N) Q =O+ (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LIS. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ri«n r3 / %o lNP7/ METHOD A 1.9 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY 130 13-7 4 9 MOISTURE Rc=---a 5 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ 181 LLI1NG WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY VV v v RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) TER IA LS ENGINEER F301143 RELATIVE COMPACTION . IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 37. 50 Preliminary tests prior WT. SAND RETAINED COUNTY OF ORANGE _ C to sword o contract. 3 / S'o ROAD DEPARTMENT TEST SAND DENSITY SZ.G.9 E Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— ir.4 C 1_4675 F VOLUME CONE + RING ./ FIELD NO. Smc S Control tents on 94.0 RELATIVE COMPACTION "'T. NO. OR IW.0. aR P.O.OR AHFPI ,®, materials actually I _ ¢/f entering into works. WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE .1.4.6 DATE REPTD. WET DENSITY IN PLACE 1 -34. 0 If contract, use contract item DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ^_ PROJECT F/G'`Ee AGENCY /7'%%T5" /'y4fFJ�y RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR LI/H/TE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION T El AGENCaYE MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION A�:.IIC 5a//'"H RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL !�•�7' L� DEPTH ¢i/ TO /r BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3'S0 `GG E= C+ D TESTED BY: 73':'F UNIT IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 37. 50 B WT. SAND RETAINED �. 0-0 C WT. SAND USED 3 / S'o D TEST SAND DENSITY SZ.G.9 E VOLUME SAND USED .3909 F VOLUME CONE + RING ./ G VOLUME TEST HOLE 94.0 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 2 . �d I TARE WEIGHT ¢/f J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE .1.4.6 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 1 -34. 0 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 128.9 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA I FIELD LAB _ WET WT. 3 400 01 DRY WT. MOISTURE 6 RC = _95— % MOIST. M 9;0 N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. 00 2272 DRY WT. ROCK .4-1715 WET WT. - a % MOISTURE 19. �aJ DRY WT. - 3 19-99 TOTAL DRY WT.- CONDITION OF MOLD 23. Y.+ % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA I MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOISTURE RC = _95— % P WET WT. AT COMPACTION SPECIFICATION: NL_% Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSI TY V _ DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = _ VOLUMES, C.F. C= A– B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E – F K = J _ G CONE .1667 – L = K + (I Do- + N) Q = 0 _ (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P –Q) TQ V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 .1 SE REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F C, J Ims"m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ❑ BILLIN,G WILL BE Fiat I-l1 -. RELATIVE COMPACTION f B, -f Fiero rs / a/o 6YetJ METHOD A R B \ I RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE DENSITY I�?ryo *+ *C? MOISTURE RC = _95— % \I % SPECIFICATION: NL_% /9d I O � o f B, -f Fiero rs / a/o 6YetJ METHOD A R B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE DENSITY I�?ryo *+ *C? MOISTURE RC = _95— % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% DE AT END OF MONTH IA LS WW6: lec- 12/l /63 (6) 1 CONTRACT FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT 2 3 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of 41 1963, between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal 5+ corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City ", and RECTOR WARDENS 6 AND VESTRY MEN OF ST. JAMES CHURCH, Newport Beach, California, a 7 nonprofit corporation, hereinafter referred to as "St. James 8' Church "; 9 WITNESSETH: 10 WHEREAS, Fifth Avenue in Corona del Mar in the City 11 between Jasmine Avenue and Narcissus Avenue is presently dedicated 12 to a width of 25 feet; and 13 WHEREAS, the ultimate right -of -way of Fifth Avenue in 14 this area is proposed to be 60 feet in width; and 15 WHEREAS, St. James Church is the owner of the property 16 lying adjacent to and northerly of Fifth Avenue between the bottom lry of Jasmine Gully and Narcissus Avenue; and 18JJ WHEREAS, it is in the interests of the two parties to 19 this contract and in the public interest that Fifth Avenue in said 20 area be dedicated to its proposed width and improved as soon as 21 possible in order to provide safe access to the adjoining property 22 and better traffic circulation; 23 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 24 1. St. James Church agrees to dedicate the southerly 25 35 feet of their property for street purposes by deed in a form 26 approved by City as necessary to increase the right -of -way width 27 of Fifth Avenue to 60 feet. 28 2. City agrees to improve Fifth Avenue between Jasmine 29 Avenue and Narcissus Avenue with grading, curbs, gutters, street 30 base material, standard asphaltic paving, and drainage facilities. 31 The improvements will be 40 feet between curbs except in the area 32 between Jasmine Avenue and Larkspur Avenue which will reduce from 1 40 feet between curbs at Larkspur Avenue to 20 feet between curbs 2 at Jasmine Avenue. 3 3. The improvements shall be made by a public works 4 contract in accordance with plans and specifications which shall 5 be prepared by City and approved by the City Council. The plans 6 and specifications shall be prepared and bids called for within 90 7 days after the execution of this contract. The contract shall be 8 awarded only to the lowest responsible bidder and City shall re- 9 quire the work thereunder to be diligently prosecuted to completiot 10 4. The cost of construction under said public works 11 contract shall be initially paid by City. St. James Church shall 12 reimburse City for the cost of all grading and construction of 13 street improvements northerly of the proposed center line of Fifth 14 Avenue in said area, plus 50% of the cost of construction of the 15 proposed drainage facilities within this area of Fifth Avenue, and 16 a proportionate share of the cost of engineering, including the 17 preparation of plans and specifications and inspection during con - 18 struction, with the maximum amount to be paid by St. James Church 19 to City fixed at $12,000. 20 The exact amount to be paid by St. James Church shall be 21 determined by application of the unit prices to the improvements 22 for which St. James Church herein agrees to pay and that amount 23 added to the pro rata share of the lump sum prices for items not 24 bid in unit prices contained in the bid upon which the contract is 25 awarded by the City Council of City. 26 Upon the amounts being fixed as hereinbefore provided, 27 City shall advise St. James Church in writing of that amount. St. 28 James Church shall pay City the amount so fixed, plus interest at 29 4% per annum from the date the work is accepted by the City Council 30 until paid. Payment by St. James Church to City shall be made 31 within 30 days after St. James Church receives payment from the 32 State of California upon the property owned by St. James Church or 2. 1+ 2 3' 4 51 I 7I 81 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25i 261 27 28 29 30 31 32 any part thereof being taken by said State for highway purposes, or 7 years from the date of this contract, whichever first occurs, 5. The amount hereinbefore agreed to be paid by St. James Church, but not the maximum amount, shall be reduced by the sum of $1,367.00, which constitutes credit for the grading here- tofore performed by St. James Church in the area of the proposed street improvements and which has the effect of reducing the total cost of said street improvements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this con- tract as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH By Mayor Attest: CITY CiyCer RECTOR WARDENS AND VESTRY MEN OF ST. JAMES CHURCH, NEWPORT BEACH By By 3. ST. JAMES CHURCH TRAFFIC CHANNELIZATION STUDY DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE May 1965 Prepared for CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Prepared by Williamson and Schmid Civil Engineers 1535 East First Street Santa Ana, California 547 -6721 The following analysis of the intersection channelization at Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive was prepared at the request of the City of Newport Beach, Department of Public Works, in a letter dated March 19, 1965. RECOMMENDATIONS The following improvements are recommended: 1. Reconstruct and relocate the traffic islands, pavement and drainage structures to provide channelization as shown Plan No. 2 contained in this report. 2. Remove existing Easterly curb, northerly of the intersection, and widen the street as shown in red on Plan No. 2. 3. Relocate the street lighting to conform to the traffic island locations and curb relocations. 4. Place proper signing to stop traffic at the following movements: a. North -bound Dover Drive turning left onto Westcliff Drive b. South -bound Dover Drive - all traffic C. East -bound Westcliff Drive turning left onto Dover Drive 5. Place proper lane striping with good quality reflective traffic paint. 6. Consideration should be given to placing the necessary conduit for future traffic signals while construction is in progress „so that the street wil not have to be excavated in the future. INTERSECTION DATA Data used in studying the intersection is as follows: 1. Police Department collision diagrams for 1962, 1963 and 1964. 2. Traffic counts taken by City forces during April 1964 and March 1965. 3. Traffic channelization and paving plan (Drawing #96 -2622) dated May 8, 1958. -1- 0 0 INTERSECTION DATA - Continued 4. Field inspection, day and night, and survey location of existing striping, driveways and lighting. INTERSECTION STUDY Our observation of the intersection indicates that very little delay is experienced by vehicles going in any direction through the intersection at this time. Traffic counts are not predominant in any one movement. The major problem at the intersection is the poor accident record. Pavement striping and painting of the traffic islands was observed to be very poor, as the paint had poor reflective qualities after dark. Collision Map No. 1 shows the recorded accidents between January 1 and December 31, 1962. All three accidents could have been caused by driverconfusion. Collision Map No. 2,showing recorded accidents between January 1 and December 31, 1963, indicates a considerable increase in traffic and eleven accidents. The majority of accidents indicate a confusion in the direction the vehicles wished to travel. Poor visibility is also indicated. The two intersection collisions between two vehicles indicates that a change in the channelization might help the drivers anticipate each other better so that the head -on collisions could be reduced. Collision Map No. 3, showing recorded accidents between January 1 and October 31, 1964, indicates a reduction in vehicles colliding with the island North -bound on Dover Drive, and we feel this was the result of thg lighting installed within the intersection. The same problem still exists, however, as vehicles seem to be confused as to where to go and collide with the traffic islands and other vehicles. Two plans of the intersection were prepared to study the possibilities of improving the traffic - carrying charac- teristics of the intersection. In Plan No. 1, we attempted to improve the existing channelization. Traffic turning left from Westcliff Drive to proceed North on Dover Drive would cross North -bound traffic on Dover Drive going West on Westcliff Drive at a larger angle and would have a free lane North on Dover Drive due to proposed changes in island shape and widening of the pavement and replacement of curb and gutter along the Easterly side of Dover Drive between Westcliff Drive and the entrance to Westcliff. Traffic -2- going Southerly on Dover Drive is provided with a wide lane approaching cross traffic and a free lane Southerly on Dover Drive. A left -turn pocket lane is also provided for traffic turning left into the driveway West of the intersection. We suggest that Plan No. 1 is an improvement over the existing intersection. The accident record might be reduced between vehicles, but little has been improved for the vehicles colliding with the traffic islands. Plan No. 2 shows a complete revision of the intersection into a regular "T" intersection with a free lane for North- bound traffic on Dover Drive and a free right turn from East- bound Westcliff Drive to South -bound Dover Drive. Traffic desiring to turn left from Dover Drive to Westcliff Drive would be required to stop before turning left. All cross traffic must stop under this plan. We believe that Plan No. 2 will greatly reduce the accident rate within this intersection. All vehicles wanting to turn left will be required to stop. This will tend to reduce the collisions between vehicles. The single -car collisions will be reduced due to absence of traffic islands forcing vehicles to turn, except for the free right turn for vehicles on Westcliff Drive desiring to travel South on Dover Drive. While Plan No. 2 requires that the existing free left turn from Dover Drive to Westcliff Drive stop, we feel that adequate provisions for that movement are provided. Very little delay, if any, will be experienced with existing traffic volumes. When the traffic volumes start causing excessive delays under Plan No. 2, it is our opinion similar delays would be observed with Plan No. 1. The development of the arterial street master plan in this area will tend to increase the through traffic on Dover Drive. Traffic control signals at the intersection would probably reduce the head -on collisions but would tend to increase the rear -end collision rate. Traffic control signals should be used as a method to move traffic in congested area and reduce time delay. As time delay is very light, traffic control signals are not necessary at this time, but will probably become necessary as traffic volume increases. A two -level interchange was considered at the inter- section of Westcliff Drive and Dover Drive, but the distance between the intersection and Buckingham Lane and the distance between the intersection and Westcliff Drive to the East is much too short to provide for the turning movements required. Prepared by B. W. Williamson 4C - ;w -3- ------------ -7 II a L- �— yniro ��in1r�M i I 3 31A - �f-2 .F z !Ind iz. 1pl% CO LL' IVM- Ld a bb .F z !Ind iz. 1pl% CO LL' IVM- bb w :.�A WILLIAMSON & SCHMID 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 0 MARCH19, 1965 SUBJECT: INTERSECTION CHANNELIZATION AT DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE GENTLEMEN: YOU ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE INTERSECTION OF DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE. THE INTER- SECTION IS PRESENTLY CHANNELIZED TO ALLOW FREE LEFT TURNS FROM NORTHBOUND DOVER TO WESTCLIFF AND FREE RIGHT TURNS FROM EASTBOUND WESTCLIFF TO DOVER. THE ACCIDENT RECORD FOR THIS INTERSECTION IS RATHER POOR AND WILL PROBABLY GET WORSE, SO A STUDY HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE FOLLOWING THREE ALTERNATES SHOULD PROBABLY BE CONSIDERED: 1. MAKE NO CHANGES; 2• REVISE PRESENT CHANNELIZATION; 3. CONSTRUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND REVISE CHANNELIZATION AS NEEDED. IF YOUR REPORT RECOMMENDS REVISIONS TO THE PRESENT CHANNELIZATION, IT SHOULD INCLUDE SKETCHES SHOWING THE APPROXIMATE CONFIGURATION OF THE CHANGES. IF A SIGNAL IS RECOMMENDED A VERY ROUGH COST ESTIMATE TO BE USED FOR DIS- CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY SHOULD BE INCLUDED. TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR REFERENCE IS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL: 1. POLICE DEPARTMENT COLLISION DIAGRAMS FOR 1962, 1963, AND 1964; 2. TRAFFIC COUNTS; 3. A DRAWING SHOWING PRESENT CONFIGURATION. COMPENSATION AT YOUR STANDARD HOURLY RATES WOULD PROBABLY BE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS WORK. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROUGH ESTIMATE OF THE PROBABLE MAXIMUM FEE WITH THE PROPOSAL- BBN:VR ENCLS. i VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJAMIN B• NCLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Ai JUNE K*, 1965 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: DOVER - WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION REVISIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. APPROVE THE REVISIONS TO A STANDARD TEE INTERSECTION AS SHOWN ON PLAN 2 OF THE WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID REPORT. Z. RETAIN THE ENGINEERING FIRM OF WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID TO PRE- PARE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 3. FINANCE THE WORK WITH SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. DISCUSSION: ON APRIL 12, 1965, THE COUNCIL DISCUSSED A LETTER FROM THE DOVER SHORES COM- MUNITY ASSOCIATION REQUESTING A TRAFFIC STUDY OF THE DOVER - WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION. THE CITY MANAGER INDICATED AT THAT TIME THAT A STUDY BY THE FIRM OF WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS WAS UNDER WAY. THE REPORT HAS NOW BEEN COMPLETED, AND A COPY 15 ATTACHED FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS. THE COST OF THE STUDY $482.99, HAS BEEN FINANCED WITH PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED FUNDS IN ACCOUNT N0. 3077, PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, ENGINEERING. IT IS RECOMMENDED IN THE REPORT THAT A MAJOR REVISION BE MADE IN THE CHAN- NELIZATION TO CONVERT THE PRESENT CONFIGURATION TO A DESIGN SIMILAR TO A STANDARD TEE INTERSECTION. THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONCURS IN THAT RECOMMENDATION FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. THE REVISED CONFIGURATION WILL BE MUCH SAFER AS MOTORIST CONFUSION CAUSED BY THE PRESENT NON- STANDARD LAYOUT WILL BE REDUCED. Z. THE REVISED CONFIGURATION WILL BE BETTER ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THOSE MOVEMENTS WHICH ARE EXPECTED TO SHOW THE GREATEST FUTURE INCREASES. (MOVEMENTS INTO AND OUT OF DOVER DRIVE NORTHERLY OF THE INTERSECTION.) 3. A FUTURE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CAN BE BETTER ACCOMMODATED BY THE REVISED INTERSECTION. 4. THE REVISED DESIGN WOULD ENABLE EXTENSION OF A STREET SOUTHEASTERLY OF THE PRESENT INTERSECTION IF THAT SHOULD EVER PROVE TO BE DESIR- ABLE. 5. ANALYSIS OF THE TRAFFIC COUNTS INDICATES THAT THE REVISED INTERSEC- TION WOULD STILL HAVE AMPLE CAPACITY TO ACCOMMODATE THE LEFT TURNING MOVEMENT FROM DOVER NORTHBOUND TO WESTCLIFF. .0 SUBJECT: DOVER- WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION REVISIONS PAGE 2 WE HAVE CONTACTED THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS REGARDING THIS WORK, AND THEY HAVE INDICATED THAT THE PROJECT WOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR FINANCING WITH SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST IS $18,000. THIS FIGURE 15 RATHER HIGH BE- CAUSE OF THE EXTENSIVE REMOVALS NEEDED, STREET LIGHT AND STORM DRAIN RELOCATIONS CURB RELOCATION AND MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION, PATCHING IN THE LOCATIONS OF THE EXISTING ISLANDS, RESURFACING AND PLACEMENT OF FUTURE STREET LIGHTING CONDUIT. A PROPOSAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID TO PREPARE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. THE ENGINEERING FEE WOULD NOT EXCEED $2,200; THIS AMOUNT IS 12.2% OF THE ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST. IT IS ESTIMATED THE PLANS COULD BE COMPLETED BY AUGUST 15, 1965. THE POSSIBILITY OF COMBINING THIS WORK WITH OTHER STREET PROJECTS IN THE 1965 -1966 BUDGET INTO A SINGLE CONTRACT IN ORDER TO REDUCE UNIT PRICES IS BEING INVESTIGATED. ACTUAL TIMING OF CONSTRUCTION WOULD DEPEND ON THIS DETERMINATION. 1 EPHU \DEVLIN LIC KS DIRECTOR BE ATTS: COUNCIL MEMBERS ONLY TO. CITY COUNC ;L FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR JANUARY 24, 1966 j-3 SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLiFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (C -954) REVISED RECOMMENDATIONS-. REJECT ALL BIDS, 2. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO REVISE THE PLANS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS, (AUTHORIZATION FOR A CALL FOR BIDS WILL BE REQUESTED AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.) DISCUSSION: FURTHER INVESTIGATIONS AFTER PREPARATION OF THE MEMO REGARDING THIS PROJECT PREVIOUSLY TRANSM i TTED TO THE COUNC II_ 'INC) KATE THE DESIRABILITY OF REJECTING THE BIDS. IT 15 FELT THAT MODIFICATIONS TO THE FORM OF PROPOSAL WITH REGARD TO EXCAVATION WORK, AND REMOVAL OF THE STAKEOUT SURVEY WORK FROM THE CONTRACT WILL RESULT IN REDUCED COSTS FOR THOSE PORTIONS OF THE WORK NO CHANGES IN THE LIMITS OR AMOUNTS OF WORK ARE CON- TEMPLATED. IN .ADDITION, AN ERROR IN THE PROP05AL FORM HAS BEEN FOUND. THE QUANTITY OF ONE TYPE OF CURB TO BE CONST'RUCfED WAS SHOWN AS A LESSER AMOUNT ON THE PROPOSAL FORM THAN THE CORRECT. FIGURE, THERE IS SOME !NDiC:ATION THAT THE LOW BIDDER UNBALANCED HIS BID TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THIS ERROR. CORRECTING THE PROPOSAL QUANTITY FOR THIS ITEM WILL INCREASE THE INDICATED TOTAL COST' ACCOROPNGLY.. HOWEVER, THE TRUE COST OF THE WORK SHOULD BE L E S S , AS THE 6 I D D !NC 5 1 T U A T ' ION W I L L BE MORE CCMPET I I I VE. IF THE REVISED CONTRACT 15 APPROVED .AI THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETiNG ON FEBRUARY 14, 1966, NEW BIDS WOULD BE RECEIVED ON MARCH 9, 9966, 4ND CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE. COMPLETED BY JUNE 20, 1966. THE SPECIFICATIONS WILL. PROVIDE THAT THE WESTCLiFF -DOVER WORK BE DONE FIRST 50 AS TO MINIMIZE INTERFERENCE WiTR TRAFFIC. JOSEPH DEVLIN PUBLIC \{ RKS DIRECTOR N:SE PUBL ac WoRK,S DEPAR -MEW C: ,'v nC Nrwpnge Rind. PLEASE ! `/ P. HANDLE RE E & CP -MEN? Ca SEE P.W.D., 6. PREPARE WR!T'. EN REPORT RE AG JI PREPARE REF! F?LE U. POST ON ATLA{ MAPS REMARKS.-,—d n!C- 4.4 z -CCU t.. GNe.(��wsc � OK�i'Sc�y�` ✓'C`�tAtiYx. < ��` °t�;, �+n d ,Q�A�*•i �a 'rte C 1Nc T E ACTION P,W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. D °R. 2 -z UTIL4TY SUPT. _ TRAFF?C ENGR. !- ASST, C9TY ENGR. Q SUBDPV, ENGR. DES?GN ENGR, CO-OP PROJ•. ENGR. �- _ F:ELD ENGR. •.,rc�_ii 1 � G tr� SECRETARY PLEASE ! `/ P. HANDLE RE E & CP -MEN? Ca SEE P.W.D., 6. PREPARE WR!T'. EN REPORT RE AG JI PREPARE REF! F?LE U. POST ON ATLA{ MAPS REMARKS.-,—d n!C- 4.4 z -CCU t.. GNe.(��wsc � OK�i'Sc�y�` ✓'C`�tAtiYx. < ��` °t�;, �+n d ,Q�A�*•i �a 'rte C r FEBRUARY 11 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (C -954) I. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. REJECT ALL BIDS. 2. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO REVISE THE PLANS AND SPECI- FICATIONS. (AUTHORIZATION FOR A CALL FOR BIDS WILL BE REQUESTED AT THE NEXT COUNCIL MEETING.) II. RECOMMENDATIONS: (IF COUNCIL DECIDES TO AWARD) 1. WAIVE THE IRREGULARITY IN THE BID BOND THAT WAS SUBMITTED WITH THE APPARENT LOW BID. (THE BID BOND ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED CONTAINED AN ERROR IN THE COMPANY'S NAME; A CORRECTED BID BOND HAS SUBSEQUENTLY BEEN S TAE (DD .. 7))/ 2. ADOPT ��SOLU'fY fl W ING THE CONTRACT TO E. L. WHITE COMPANY IN THE AMOUNT 4F $65 0 At)/Ol //AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE CONTRACT. (�lY/ Y c 3. APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER TING ))QQTHE CO S tT ION SURVEYS FROM THE CONTRACT. (THE CONTRACTOR HA 4&BALLY AGREED TO ITS DELETION.) 4. .APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER CORRECTING THE QUANTITY OF CURB LISTED IN PROPOSAL ITEM NUMBER 12. THE COST OF THE CHANGE WOULD BE $2,514.76 BASED ON THE UNIT PRICE OF $2.42 PER LINEAL FOOT PROPOSED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THAT AMOUNT OF CURB WHICH EXCEEDS THE PROPOSAL QUANTITY BY 25 %- (25% x 465 - 116 L.F., 116 884 x $2.42 = $2,139•x, $374.68 + $2,139• _ $23514.76.1 5. AUTHORIZE THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO RETAIN THE FIRM OF RAUB, REIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES TO PERFORM THE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS FOR A TOTAL FEE NOT TO EXCEED $3,200. 6. APPROVE A BUDGET AMENDMENT IN THE AMOUNT OF $15,500. DISCUSSION: FOUR BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:00 A.M., JANUARY 19, 1966. BIDDER E. L. WHITE COMPANY GARDEN GROVE SULLY- MILLER CONTRACTING CO. ORANGE TOTAL $ 65,300.81 $ 68,341.85 TOTAL $ 68,530.81 * $ 69,991.85* SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVE t TO POPPY AVENUE (C -954) GRIFFITH COMPANY $ 70,799.05 $ 72,499•o5 * COSTA MESA R. W. MCCLELLAN & SONS $ 72,499.39 $ 74,319.39 * COSTA MESA * TOTALS FOR AN ADDITIONAL 1000 L.F. OF 6° SPECIAL CURB AND GUTTER BASED ON UNIT PRICES BID. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT THERE 15 CAUSE TO REJECT ALL BIDS. THE REASONS FOR THIS OPINION ARE AS FOLLOWS: THE LOW BID IS 17.7% OVER THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, 2. ITEM N0. 12 OF THE PROPOSAL (SPECIAL CURB AND GUTTER WITH 6° CURB BASE) IS AN UNBALANCED ITEM.. 3. BID ITEM ND. 28 (CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS) WAS 400% OVER THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE. A SAVINGS OF APPROXIMATELY $820 COULD BE REALIZED IF THESE SURVEYS WERE PROVIDED BY THE CITY AND/OR PRIVATE ENGINEER. 4. BID ITEMS No. 2 AND NO. 3 (EXCAVATION) WERE 400,% OVER THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE. IF THIS JOB WERE TO BE REBID, THE EXCAVATION WOULD BE FIGURED ON A CUBIC YARD BASIS AND A DISPOSAL SITE WOULD BE FOUND FOR THE EXCESS EXCAVATION. WHILE IT IS FELT THAT THIS WOULD RESULT IN A LOWER PRICE, THERE IS NO ASSURANCE THAT THE SAVINGS WOULD BE REALIZED. 5. TO ALTER BID ITEM NUMBERS 12 AND 28 WOULD REQUIRE CHANGE ORDERS IN ADVANCE OF AWARD. IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT HAS FOLLOWED A CONSERVATIVE APPROACH IN ARRIVING AT ITS RECOMMENDATION TO REJECT AND THAT IT HAS NO STRONG OBJECTIONS TO AN AWARD AT THIS TIME. ONE OBVIOUS ADVANTAGE TO AN EARLY AWARD WOULD BE THAT A 6-WEEKS' DELAY IN COMPLETING THE WORK WOULD BE AVOIDED. THE AMOUNT OF THE BUDGET AMENDMENT IS COMPUTED AS FOLLOWS: BASE CONTRACT: $ 61,274.81 CURB CHANGE ORDER: 2,514.76 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING. 2,200.00 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS: 3,200.00 COMPACTION TESTING AND CONTINGENCIES: 2,310.43 RELOCATE EDISON POLES. 0202."02 7 ,500.00 PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED 022.22 15' ,500.00 THE ABOVE TABULATION INCLUDES $3000 FOR THE ESTIMATED COST OF RELOCATING THE EDISON FACILITIES ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE STREET. THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY HAS CONTENDED THAT THEY HAVE PRIOR RIGHTS AND THAT THE COST OF RE- LOCATING THE POLES WILL HAVE TO BE BORNE BY THE CITY. (A copy OF BID SUMMARY IS ATTACHED.) �OSEPH DEVi IN JTD:BE d UBL IC W I DIRECTOR ATTS. OFY OF NEWPORT BEAR Volume 19 - Page 174 Minutes of REGULAR ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNG Date of Meeting: February 1, 1966 Time of Meeting: 8:00 P.M. „ Index Place of Meeting: Council Chambers - Ficc C- �s y co r p m z Roll Call: Present x x x xxx x 1. A memorandum was presented from the Public Works Director dated February 1, 1966 regarding street j 1 improvements, Westcliff -Dover intersection, Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue (C -954). Robert Lynam, a partner in the firm of E. L. White Company, the low bidder, spoke from Jthe audience. A discussion was had. Resolution No. 6284 awarding a contract for the street improvement, Westcliff -Dover intersection, Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue (Contract No. 954) with E. L. White Company at the contract price of $65, 300. 81 (waiving the irregularity ' in the bid bond that was submitted with the low bid, Motion x ` and with the understanding that change orders be Roll Call: executed immediately), was adopted. Ayes x x x x x x x A change order deleting the construction surveys from the contract, and a change order correcting the + quantity of curb listed in the Proposal Item No. 12, incurring an additional cost of $2, 514. 76 based on a i unit price of $2.42 per lineal foot, proposed by the I contractor for the additional amount of curb which Motion x exceeds the original Proposal quantity, were approved. Ayes x xlx x x x x The Public Works Department was authorized to retain' the firm of Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates to perform] the construction surveys for a total fee not to exceed Motion xl $3,200. Ayes x x x x x x x The following Budget Amendment was approved: ' Motion x i Ayes x�x l x x x x C -55 in the amount of $15, 500 (decrease in Unappro- ix priated Surplus) being an increase in Budget Appropriations, for improvement of Westcliff -Dover intersection, Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue; $15, 500 from Unappropriated Surplus State Gas Tax 186.1 Funds to General Services - i Streets, Land Improvement. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH L CIS l I January 21, 1966 To: City Clerk From: City Attorney Subject: Street Improvement, Westcliff -Dover Intersection, 5th Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue Attached is a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council, will award to E. L. White Company the contract for the street improvement, Westcliff -Dover Intersection, 5th Avenue from Lark- spur Avenue to Poppy Avenue in the amount of $6:5,300.81. Tully H. Seymour City Attorney THS:aem Encs. cc - City Manager Public Works Director: (12) u RES011iffION NO. 2 I A RESOLUTION OF iwa VY C100CIL 0V THE CITY OF 1I3iWaT BSACH AINIARDOG A CONTRACT PM THE STREET 3 IMPROVIKENT, WESTCLIFF- DUV;ER INTS&SEC110I1 5TH AVENUE F$i0li5 LARUN R AVENUE TO POPPY AVE h 4 (CONTRACT lip. 954) 511 VPJUdAS, pursuant to the notice inviting bids for work 611 consisting of the street zmproveemnt, westcliff -Dover Intersection, 7 5th Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue in the City of New - 8 port beach, in accordance with the plans and specifications hereto - 9 fore adopted, bids were received on the l9th dal. of January. 1966, 10 and publicly opened and declared; an' 11 W1 MLAS, it appears that this lowest responsible bidder 12. therefor is Z. L. White Cosgany; 13 NOW, =MFOREv BE IT RUOLVED that the bid of S. L. 14 White Company in the amount of $65,300.81 be accepted and that the 15 contract for the eanstruction work be awarded to said bidder. 16 BE IT T[31dTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are 17 hareby authorised and directed to execute a contract in accordance 18 with the specifications, bid and this award on behalf of the City 19 of Newport beach, and that the City Clerk be directed to furnish 20 on executed copy to the successful bidder. 21i ADOPTED this 2_4th+ _ day of January, 1966. 2211 23 24 ATTEST: 25 26 City Clerk 27 28 29 30 .31 32 Mayor CONTRACT NO. 954 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, 5TH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS 27TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1965 CITY CLERK I I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF INVITING BIDS SEALED BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, CITY HALL, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA UNTIL 10°00 A.M., ON THE 19TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1966, AT WHICH TIME THEY WILL BE PUBLICLY OPENED AND READ, FOR PERFORMING WORK AS FOLLOWSZ STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, 5TH AVENUE, LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (CONTRACT c54) NO BID WILL BE RECEIVED UNLESS IT IS MADE ON A PROPOSAL FORM FURNISHED RY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. EACH BID MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY CASH, CERTIFIED CHECK OR BIDDERS BOND MADE PA';ABLE TO THE CETY OF NEWPORT BEACH, FOR AN AMC•UNT EQUAL TO AT LEAST. 10 PERCENT OF THE AMOUNT BID. THE DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SEALED BIDS WHICH REQUIRE COMPLETION AND EXECU- T:ON ARE THE FOLLOWINGS 1. SHEET 2 - PROPOSAL 2. SHEET 3 - BIDDER'S BOND 30 - DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS ji - CONTRACTOR'S FINANCIAL STATUS 5. - NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE AFFIXED WITH THE APPROPRIATE AND CORRECT SIGNATURES AND SEALS OF THE CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, JOINT VENTURE AND /OR INDIVIDUAL. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS JF SECT KIN 110 OF THE LABOR CODES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HAS ASCERTAINED THE GENERAL PREVA iL ING RATE OF PER DIEM WAGES IN THE LOCALITY IN WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED FOR EACH CRAFT OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED TC. EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND IS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION No. 625 ?. A CJPY OF SAID RESOLUTION IS AVAILAB',E IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE CITY OF NEWP')RT BEAC:i. ALL BIDS ARE TO BE COMPARED ON THE BASIS OF T.iE ENGiNEER'S ESTIMATE OF THE QUANTITIES OF WORK TO BE DONE= NO BID WI �_L BE ACCEPTED FROM A CONTRACTOR WHO HAS NOT BEEN LICENSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTE- 9, DIVISION 111 OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS' CODE. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, FOR" vF PROPOSALS, BONDS, AND CONTRACT MAY BE ^BTAINED AT THE PUBLIC WOP.KS DEPARTMENTS CIT:' HALL, NEWPORT BEAC H, CALIFORNIA. A NON =REFUNDABLE CHARGE OF $2.00 W'.LL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. A REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT OF $5 =00 WII.,L BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF /PLANS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS,. AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. No REFUNDS WILL BE MADE LATER THAN 60 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF BID. THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACrt RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS AND TO WAIVE ANY INFORMALITY IN SUCH BIDS, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH; CALIFORNIA MARGERY SCHROUDER, CITY CLERK • • PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACT NO. 954 TO THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA THE UNDERSIGNED DECLARES THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK, THAT HE HAS EXAMINED THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT No. 954, AND HEREBY PROPOSES TO FURNISH ALL MATERIALS AND DO ALL WORK REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCOR- DANCE WITH SAID PLANS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, AND THESE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND THAT HE WILL TAKE IN FULL PAYMENT THEREFOR THE FOLLOWING UNIT PRICES FOR EACH ITEM COMPLETE IN PLACE, TO WIT: ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL N0. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE 1 41,700 SQUARE FEET 2. LUMP SUM 3. LUMP SUM 4. 5 TONS 5• 3,928 TONS REMOVE ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVEMENT C�J DOLLARS AND THREE AND FOUR TENTHS CENTS PER SQUARE FOOT EXCAVATION (R- 5033 -3, 5 SHEETS) @Fw* TNOUsAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY- TWODOLLARS AND SIXTEEN CENTS $4,192.16 $ 42 IR. 16 LUMP SUM EXCAVATION (R- 5034 -S, 2 SHEETS) ®SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED TWENTY4064OL LARS AND THIRTY -six CENTS $6.929.6 $ 6,929.36 LUMP SUM RS -2 SEAL COAT On NUNDRED TWENTY -FOUR DOLLARS AND TWO CENTS $ 124.02 $ 620.I0 PER TON AGGREGATE BASE TREE DOLLARS AND THIRTY -NINE CENTS $ i. 'A9 WA.415.92 PER TON P - 2 ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL NO. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE 6. 1,604 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TONS S[VLN _ DOLLARS TwLNTT -oNL AND CENTS $ 7.21 $ 11,564.84 PER TON 7. 2,700 2° THICK CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING SQUARE FEET G " DOLLARS TNIRTT -WO AND Two TLR¢M AND CENTS $ 0.322 $ 869.4o PER SQUARE FOOT 8. 19615 4° THICK CONCRETE DRIVE APPROACH SQUARE FEET " DOLLARS SIIITY•ONL AND CENTS $ 0.61 ,,per $ 985.15 PER SQUARE FOOT 9. 6 ALLEY APPROACH EACH ONE NUNDRLD NINLTT -Two DOLLARS TMEMTT•TNRLL AND CENTS $ 192.23 ,p $ 1,1 3.A PER EACH 10. 132 TYPE "An CURB & GUTTER - 8° CURB FACE LINEAR FEET ® Two DOLLARS TwLNTT -NINE AND CENTS $ 2.29 $ 302.28 PER LINEAR FOOT 11. 176 SPECIAL CURB & GUTTER - 8" CURB FACE LINEAR FEET 0 TNRE[ DOLLARS TN[NTr -TNRE[ AND CENTS $ 3.23 $ 565.48 PER LINEAR FOOT 12, 465 SPECIAL CURB & GUTTER - 6" CURB FACE LINEAR FEET 0 TMREE DOLLARS AND TwENT7 -TNRE[ CENTS $ .2 $ PER LINEAR FOOT -� 13. 72,023 TYPE "A° CURB & GUTTER - 6f' CURB FACE LINEAR FEET Q Two DOLLARS TwENTT -ONE AN CENTS $ 2.21 $ 4,470.83 PER LINEAR FOOT ® SIXTY-ONE DOLLARS AND 0 CENTS $ 61.00 183.00 PER EACH 21 8 ADJUST MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES TO GRADE EACH ® [IONtr -rlvt DOLLARS AND aa rOR1T CENTS •4 V 683,20 PER EACH P -3 ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL NO. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE 14. ONE SPECIAL COMBIN. CATCH BASIN - MANHOLE EACH @ EIONT NYNOREO rORTV -itrtN DOLLARS NINETY AND CENTS 817.90 U7 :90 PER EACH 15. 14 4" DIAMETER A.C. PIPE LINEAR FEET 0 TNIRTEEN DOLLARS NINE AND CENTS $ 13.09 $ 163.26 PER LINEAR FOOT 16. 95 p 18" DIAMETER C.M. PIPE LINEAR FEET @ NINE DOLLARS SEVENTY -SIX AND CENTS $ 9.76 $ 927.20 PER LINEAR FOOT 17. ,• Y 24" DIAMETER C.M. PIPE - 16 GAGE LINEAR FEET FounTEEN DOLLARS SIXTY -POUR AND CENTS PER LINEAR FOOT 18. 10 ROCK SUBDRAIN CUBIC YARDS ® N /NC DOLLARS SEytNTr -slx AND CENTS 9.76 $ 97,60 PER CUBIC YARD 19. LUMP INSTALL ISLAND TOPSOIL Sum NINE NUNDRED scrcNTr -sex DOLLARS ' AND��'' 0 CENTS 976.00 $ 976.00 LUMP SUM 20. 3 RELOCATE EXISTING WATER METERS EACH ® SIXTY-ONE DOLLARS AND 0 CENTS $ 61.00 183.00 PER EACH 21 8 ADJUST MISCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES TO GRADE EACH ® [IONtr -rlvt DOLLARS AND aa rOR1T CENTS •4 V 683,20 PER EACH P ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL NO. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE 22. 5 ADJUST MANHOLES TO GRADE EACH 0 ONE HUNDRED FIFTEEN DOLLARS AND NINETY CENTS $ 115.90 $ 579.50 PER EACH 23. 6 RELOCATE STREET LIGHTS EACH 0 FOYR NYNDRED TWO DOLLARS AND C, 81x17 CENTS $ 402.60 $-2,415.6D PER EACH 24. 2 ADJUST SURVEY MONUMENTS TO GRADE EACH 0 TNIRTYwslx DOLLARS SIXTY AND CENTS 'L $ 36.60 $- 73.20 PER EACH 25. 1,912 Z" X 6° REDWOOD - HEADERS LINEAR FEET 0 DOLLARS EISNT -FIV£ AND CENTS $ o.85 $ i625.20 PER LINEAR FOOT 26, p 1,822 ASPHALTIC CONCRETE DRAINAGE DITCH PAVEMENT LINEAR FEET 0 Two DOLLARS FIFTY-TWO AND CENTS $ 2.52 $ 4,591.44 PER LINEAR FOOT 27. 25 INSTALL GUARDRAIL LINEAR FEET 0 FIVE DOLLARS AND SIXTY -S Ix CENTS LC $ 5.66 $ 141.50 PER LINEAR FOOT 28. LUMP PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS SUM 0 FOUR THOUSAND TWENTY -SIR DOLLARS AND CENTS $ 4.026.00 $ 4 OZ .00 LUMP SUM TOTAL PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS SIXTY -FIVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND EIDNTY -ONE CENTS TOTAL $ 65,300.81 J t THE UNDERSIGNED AGREES THAT IN CASE OF DEFAULT IN EXECUTING THE REQUIRED CONTACT WITH NECESSARY BONDS WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS NOT INCLUDING SUNDAYS AFTER HAVING RECEIVED NOTICE THAT THE CONTRACT IS READY FOR SIGNATURE, THE PROCEEDS OF .. CHECK OR BOND ACCOMPANYING THIS BID SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. LICENSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATUTES OF THE 'S`T^ATE OF CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CONTRACTORS LICENSE N0. '236M THE UNDERSIGNED HAS CHECKED CAREFULLY ALL OF THE ABOVE FIGURES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ON THE PART OF THE UNDERSIGNED IN MAKING UP THIS BID. ACCOMPANYING THIS PROPOSAL IS BOND CASH CERTIFIED CHECK) CASHIER'S.CHECK OR BOND) IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL BID PRICE- 635-3163 PHONE NUMBER 1119166 DATE . 12311 CNAPNAN BOULEVARD SUIT[ 112 GARDEN GROVE IDDER's ADDRESS E. L. WHITE Co. BIDDERS LAM ME � r (SEAL) /s/ Room W. • PARTNER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CAPARTNERlNIP TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (INDIVIDUALS CORPORATION, COPARTNERSHIP) LISTSELOW NAMES OF PRESIDENTP SECRETARY TREASURER AND MANAGER IF A CORPORTATION AND NAMES OF ALL COPARTNERS IF A COPARTNERSHIP: E. L. WNITE COMPANY E. L. WNITE . PARTNER R08ERT W. LTNAN - PARTNER • .� • PAGE 3 DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT HE HAS USED THE SUB -BIDS OF THE FOLLOWING LISTED CONTRACTORS IN MAKING UP HIS BID AND THAT THE SUB' - CONTRACTORS LISTED WILL BE USED FOR THE WORK FOR WHICH THEY BIOS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. NO CHANGE MAY BE MADE IN THESE SUB- CONTRACTORS EXCEPT UPON THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. ITEM OF WORK SUB- CONTRACTOR ADDRESS 1. CONCRCTC 0. L. KELLAR Inc. 962 WANDA RD-, ORAll" 2. PIPC & DRAINARC DAL[ CASADA 13412 NLVKOP[, GAROCN GROVE 3• GUARDRAIL JAe* LIMsET 2264 PONOMA, COSTA bk$A 4. SURYET SOUTNVORTN a STCYCNs 116 E. 18TN ST.. COBTA MESA 5• 6. E. L. WmiTE Co. BIDDERS NAME (INDIVIDUAL, COPARTNERSHIP OR CORPORATION) IZ311 CNAPMAM BOULEVARD, SUITE 112 QARDEN GROW ADDRESS �CC CITY CLtRK'f FILE FOR BOND . PAGE 4 BIDDER'S BOND TO ACCOMPANY PROPOSAL KNCId ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, THAT WE, AND i AS PRINCIPAL, AS SURETY, ARE HELD AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN THE SUM OF DOLLARS LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE PAYMENT OF WHICH SUM WELL AND TRULY TO BE.MADE, WE BIND OURSELVES, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE PROPOSAL OF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN, PRINCIPAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND IF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL SHALL DULY ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR SUCH CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL EXECUTE AND DELIVER THE TWO (2) BONDS DESCRIBED IN THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS (NOT INCLUDING SUNDAY) FROM THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF A NOTICE TO THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL BY AND FROM SAID CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH THAT SAID CONTRACT IS READY FOR EXECUTION, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID; OTHERWISE IT BE AND REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, AND THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE FORFEITED TO THE SAID CITY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS DAY OF , 19` CORPORATE SEAL (IF CORPORATION) (ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ATTORNEY IN FACT) t BY TITLE PRINCIPAL SURETY A, • LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT PAGE 5 Bond No. 070199 WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED HAS AWARDED TO F[ORUARY 1, 1966 E. L. Wu m COMPANY HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "PRINCIPAL", A CONTRACT FOR STKU 09"EIENT DOVER•HESTCLIFF 1WERSECTIONg 5TN AVENUE MN LAMSM TO POPPY AVENUE IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. WHEREAS, SAID PRINCIPAL HAS EXECUTED OR IS ABOUT TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND THE TERMS THEREOF REQUIRE. THE FURNISHING OF A BOND WITH SAID CONTRACT, PROVIDING THAT IF SAID PRINCIPAL OR .ANY OF HIS OR ITS SUBCONTRACTORS, SHALL FAIL TO PAY FOR ANY MATERIALS, PROVISIONS, PROVENDER OR OTHER SUPPLIES OR TEAMS USED IN, UPON, FOR OR ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AGREED TO BE DONE, OR FOR ANY WORK OR LABOR DONE THEREON OF ANY KIND, THE SURETY ON THIS BOND WILL PAY THE SAME TO THE EXTENT HEREINAFTER SET FORTH: NOW, THEREFORE, WE E. L. WHITE CO. P.O. BOX 712, GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA AS PRINCIPAL, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE CONTRACTOR AND ARGOT INSURANCE COMPANY AS SURETY, ARE HELD FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE SUM OF THIRTY —TWO THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FIFTY AND 41 /100 the OLLARS !$ 32,650.41 ) SAID SUM BEING ONE -HALF OF THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, FOR WHICH PAYMENT WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE WE BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE PERSON OR HIS SUBCONTRAC- TORS, FAIL TO PAY FOR ANY MATERIALS, PROVISIONS, PROVENDER OR OTHER SUPPLIES, OR TEAMS, USED IN, UPON, FOR OR ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK CONTRACTED TO BE DONE, OR FOR ANY OTHER WORK OR LABOR THEREON OF ANY KIND, OR FOR AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CODE WITH RESPECT TO SUCH WORK OR LABOR, THAT THE SURETY OR SURETIES WILL PAY FOR THE SAME, IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING THE SUM SPECIFIED IN THE BOND, AND ALSO, IN CASE SUIT IS BROUGHT UPON THE BOND, A REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEE, TO BE FIXED BY THE COURT, AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4204 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. PAGE 6 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND — CONTINUED) THIS BOND SHALL INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY AND ALL PERSONS COMPANIES AND CORPORATION ENTITLED TO FILE CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 1192.1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SO AS TO GIVE A RIGHT OF ACTION TO THEM OR THEIR ASSIGNS IN ANY SUIT BROUGHT UPON THIS BOND) AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4205 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AND THE SAID SURETY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED) HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES THAT NO CHANGE) EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED THEREUNDER OR THE SPECIFICATIONS ACCOMPANYING THE SAME SHALL IN ANY WISE AFFECT ITS OBLIGATIONS ON THIS BONDS AND IT DOES HEREBY WAIVE NOTICE OF ANY SUCH 'CHANGE) EXTENSION OF TIME) ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACTOR OR TO THE WORK OR TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. IN WITNESS WHEREOF) THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN DULY EXECUTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SURETY ABOVE NAMEDy ON THE 7th DAY OF FEBRUARY ) 196 66 E. L. WHITE CO. (SEAL) A \ (SEAL) I�''�.1,J- (SEAL CONTRACTOR (SEAL CARL. R. ARMST��iG ATTOMW cSEti -) i ARGONAUT INSURANCE COIPANY ISEAL) i. APP AS TO FORM: SURETY CITY A ORNEY THIS BOND WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BY MOTION FP TE ATTEST° v CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE 4 On this 7th day of FEBRUARY 19 66 s before me, 'o Notary Public, within and for said County and State, personally appeared CARL R. ARMSTRONG to me personally known, who being duly sworn, upon oath, did say that he is the Agent and Attorney -in -fact of and far the ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California that the Corporate soul affixed to the foregoing within instrument is the seal of said Company; that the seal was affixed, and the said instrument was executed by authority of its Board of Directors; and the said did acknowl, v,ma4;�r:p WILMA E. HARDIN NOT°n�Rzyy t71BLIC- CALIFORNIA 7SFA.. AL OFFICE IN ORANGE COUNTY ,.. FID'T052 -Ri'• - ...�,.,= .--- ..,.:.+ice free act and deed of said Company. WIL(4.4 E. HA "DIN Commission ommission Expires Aprit 26, 1961 My Commission expires 1 • PAGE 7 Bond No. 070199 Premium $490.00 PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT, WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF NEWPORT BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED HAS AWARDED TO E. L. WNIT[ Co, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "PRINCIPAL"" A CONTRACT FOR .STREET IMPROVEMENT WESTCLIFF-DOVER INTERSECTIONS 5TH AVENUE FROM LANISM AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS NOW ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. WHEREAS, SAID PRINCIPAL HAS EXECUTED OR IS ABOUT TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND THE TERMS THEREOF REQUIRE THE FURNISHING A BOND FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF SAID CONTRACT, NOW, THEREFORE, WE, E. L. WHITE CO. P.O. BOX 712 GARDEN GROVE CALIFORNIA AS PRINCIPAL, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "CONTRACTOR" AND ARGONAUT INSURANCE CO. AS SURETY, ARE HELD AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE SUM OF' THIRTY -TWO THOUSAND SIB HUNDRED FIFTY ANIb0WARM: 4 32.650.41 ), SAID SUM BEING EQUAL TO 50 OF THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT., TO BE PAID TO THE SAID CITY OR ITS CERTAIN ATTORNEY, ITS SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS; FOR WHICH PAYMENT, WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE, WE BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL, HIS OR ITS HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS, SHALL IN ALL THINGS STAND TO AND ABIDE BY, AND WELL AND TRULY KEEP AND PERFORM THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENTS IN THE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY ALTERATION THEREOF MADE AS THEREIN PROVIDED ON HIS OR THEIR PART, TO BE KEPT AND PERFORMED AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER THEREIN SPECIFIED; AND IN ALL RESPECTS ACCORDING TO THEIR TRUE INTENT AND MEANING➢ AND SHALL INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ITS OFFICERS AND AGENTS, AS THEREIN STIPULATED, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID; OTHERWISE IT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND VIRTUE° PAGE 8 (PERFORMANCE BOND - CONTINUED) AND SAID SURETY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES THAT NO CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED THEREUNDER OR THE SPECIFICATIONS ACCOMPANYING THE SAME SHALL IN ANY WISE AFFECT ITS OBLIGATIONS ON THIS BOND, AND IT DOES HEREBY WAIVE NOTICE OF ANY CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK OR TO THE SPECIFICATIONS- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN OULY'EXECUTED BY THE PRINCIPAL r_ AND SURETY ABOVE NAMED, ON THE 7th DAY OF FEBRUARY , 196 6¢ A E. L. WHITE CO. (SEAL) (SEAL) (SEAL) CONTRACTOR (SEAL) CARL R. ARMSTRONG ArbRmy ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY (SEAL) SURETY -- - -' APPROVED AS TO FORM% CITY MT§RNEY .... r� STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE It On this _ 7th day of FEBRUARY 19 66 Before me, a Notary Public, within and far said County and State, personally appeared CARL R. ARMSTRONG to me personally known, who being duly sworn, upon oath, did say that he is the Agent and Attorney -in -foct of and far the ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California that the Corporate seal affixed to the foregoing within instrument is the seal of said Company; that the seal was affixed, and the said instrument was executed by authority of its Board of Directors; and the said did acknowledge that he executed the said instrumen 11 ,free act and deed of i ompany.." M- \ v!LMA E. HAPDIN J Noo :.ic- ca.IFORNtA �l FY \t�T%i) `F7L: P4:�:! ^rAl. �? ?RCF. IN My Commission Nom ORANGE COUNTY Expire, April 26, 1969 My Commission expires 0 NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT IJ PAGE 9 THE BIDDERS, BY ITS OFFICERS AND AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT AT THE TIME OF FILM NG THIS 810, BEING DULY SWORN ON THEIR OATHS SAY, THAT NEITHER THEY NOR ANY OF THEM, HAVE IN ANY WAY, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ENTERED INTO ANY ARRANGEMENT OR AGGREMENT WITH ANY OTHER BIDDER, OR WITH ANY PUBLIC OFFICER OF SUCH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WHEREBY SUCH AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS OR EITHER OF THEM, HAS PAID OR IS TO PAY TO SUCH BIDDER OR PUBLIC OFFICER ANY SUM OF MONEY, OR HAS GIVEN OR IS TO GIVE TO SUCH OTHER BIDDER OR PUBLIC OFFICER ANYTHING OF VALUE WHATEVER, OR SUCH AFFIANT OR AFFIANTSOR EITHER OF THEM HAS NOT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ENTERED INTO ANY ARRANGEMENT OR AGREEMENT WITH ANY OTHER BIDDER OR BIDDERS, WHICH TENDS TO OR DOES LESSEN OR DESTROY FREE COMPETITION IN THE LETTING OF THE CONTRACT SOUGHT FOR BY THE ATTACHED BIDS; THAT NO BID HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN THROUGH ANY BID DEPOSITORY, THE BYLAWS, RULES OR REGULATIONS OF WHICH PROHIBIT OR PREVENT THE CONTRACTOR FROM CONSIDERING ANY BID FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN WHICH IS NOT PROCESSED THROUGH SAID BID DEPOSITORY, OR WHICH PRE- VENT ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN FROM BIDDING TO ANY CONTRACTOR WHO DOES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BID DEPOSITORY; THAT NO INDUCEMENT OR ANY FORM OR CHARACTER OTHER THAN THAT WHICH APPEARS UPON THE FACE OF THE BID WILL BE SUGGESTED, OFFERED, PAID OR DELIVERED TO ANY PERSON WHOMSOEVER TO 'INFLUENCE THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SAID BID OR AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT, NOR HAS THIS BIDDER ANY AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER, WITH ANY PERSON WOMSOEVER TO PAY, DELIVER TO, OR SHARE WITH ANY OTHER PERSON IN ANY WAY OR MANNER, ANY OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE CONTRACTS SOUGHT BY THIS BID. D W A N [R SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY RfLB[RT W. LYNAN THIS 19TH DAY OF JANUART , 196 6 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: NAT 17, l %s� Jmw A. Run (SEAL) NOTARY' PUBLIC PAGE 10 BIDDERS STATEMENT OF F4NANCIAL RESPONSIBtL &T'Y TECHNICAL ABIL M AND EXPER&E:NC.E (THE BIDDER IS REQUIRED TO STATE WHAT WORK OF A SIMILAR CHARACTER TO THAT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED CONTRACT HE HAS SUCCE.SSFULL'. PERFORMED AND GIVE REFERENCE WHICH WILL ENABLE THE C'.TY COUNCIL TO JUDGE HIS RESPONSIBIL!T''p EXPERIENCEp SKILL AND BUSINESS STANDINGod THE UNDERSIGNED SUBMITS HEREWITH A STATEMENT OF HIS FINANCIAL RESPONSEBSLITYD THE UNDERSIGNED SUBMITS BELOW A STATEMENT OF THE WORK OF SIMILAR CHARACTER TO THAT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED CONTRACT 'WH ^.CH ?F_ : %AS SUCCESS Fil!LY PERFORMED. CITY OF COSTA M[SA SUNSHINE HOMES INPROVEMENT DISTRICT CITY Of COSTA MESA 17TN STREET PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS STATE OP CAL /►ORNIA STREET IrwROYEY[gT + LimeeLN & VALLEY VeEW CITY OF GARDEN GROVE IMPROVEMENTS AT FIRE STATIONS 13 AND PERSONAL EXPERIENCE - MR. WHITE • 19 YEARS AS GENERAL SUPT. • SULLY - MILLER PERSONAL EXPERIENCE • MR. LYNAM - 10 YEARS FIELD SUPT. • HEAVY CONSTRUCTION) :1 /a/ ROS[RT W. LYNAN - PARTNEII SIGNED C 0 N R A C T PAGE II THIS AGREEMENT, MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS DAY OF , 1966, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATE AS THE CITY, PARTY OF THE FIRST PART, AND E. L. WINITE CID, HEREINAFTER. DESIGNATED AS THE CONTRACTOR, PARTY OF THE SECOND PART. WITNESSETH- THAT THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS; I. FOR AN IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PAYMENTS AND AGREEMENTS HEREINAFTER MENTIONED TO BE MADE AND PERFORMED BY THE CITY, THE CONTRACTOR AGREES WITH THE CITY TO FURNISH ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SS STREET INIUVEIENT, WESTCLIFF•DOVEB {NTERSECTIONs 5TH AVENUE FROM LAMMIUt AVEMUE TO KtPPY AVENUE (C•954) AND TO PERFORM AND COMPLETE IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER ALL THE WORK PERTAINING THERETO SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR;,TO FURNISH AT. HIS OWN PROPER COST AND EXPENSE ALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR AND MATERIALS NECESSARY THEREFOR, (EXCEPT SUCH MATERIALS, IF ANY, AS IN THE SAID SPECIFICATIONS ARE STIPULATED TO BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY), AND TO DO EVERYTHING REQUIRED BY THIS AGREEMENT AND THE SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS- 2. FOR FURNISHING ALL SAID MATERIALS AND LABOR, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT, AND DOING ALL THE WORK CONTEMPLATED AND EMBRACED IN THIS AGREEMENT, ALSO FOR ALL LOSS,AND DAMAGE ARIS.I.NG OUT OF THE NATURE OF THE WORK::AFORE&A1D.y OR FROM THE ACTION OF THE ELEMENTS, OR FROM ANY UNFORESEEN DIFFICULTIES WHICH MAY ARISE OR BE ENCOUNTERED IN THE PROSECU- TION OF THE WORK UNTIL ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY, AND FOR ALL RISKS OF EVERY DE- SCRIPTION CONNECTED WITH THE WORK; ALSO, FOR ALL EXPENSES INCURRED BY OR IN CONSEQUENCE OF THE SUSPENSION OR DISCONTINUANCE OF WORK, EXCEPT SUCH AS IN SAID SPECIFICATIONS` ARE EXPRESSLY STIPULATED TO BE BORNE BY THE CITY AND FOR WELL AND FAITHFULLY COM- PLETING THE WORK AND THE WHOLE THEREOF, IN THE MANNER SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY WILL PAY AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE IN FULL COMPENSATION THEREFOR THE LUMP SUM PRICEY OR IF THE BID 15 ON THE UNIT PRICE BASIS, THE TOTAL PRICE FOR THE SEVERAL ITEMS FURNISHED PURSUANT TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, NAMED IN THE BIDDING SHEET OF THE PROPOSAL, AS THE CASE MAY BE. 3. THE CITY HEREBY PROMISES AND AGRLES WITH THE SAID CONTRACTOR TO EMPLOY,..AND DOES HEREBY EMPLOY THE SAID CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE MATERIALS AND TO DO THE WORK ACCORDING TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED AND REFERRED TO FOR THE PRICE AFORESAID, AND HEREBY CONTRACTS TO PAY THE SAME AT THE TIME, IN THE MANNER AND UPON THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE SPEC IF ICAT IONS; AND THE SAID PARTIES FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS•y DO HEREBY AGREE TO THE FULL PERFORMANCE Of THE COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED.. 4. THE NOTICE TO BIDDERS, INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS, CONTRACTOR 'S PROPOSAL, AND THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ALL AMENDMENTS THEREOF, WHEN APPROVED NY THE PARTIES HERETO, OR.WHEN REQUIRED BY THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE PLANS AND SPEC IF ICAT ION5y ARE HEREBY INCOR►OIt ATED IN AND MADE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT- PAGE 12 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THE DEFENSE OF AND INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY,_ THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND THEIR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM ALL CLAIMS, LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY AND LIABILITY OF EVERY KIND, NATURE AND DESCRIPTION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT OR WORK, REGARD- LESS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE; AND FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY AND LIABILITY, HOWSOEVER THE SAME MAY BE CAUSED, RESULTING DIRECTLY OR IN- DIRECTLY FROM "THE NATURE OF THE WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF RE- SPONSIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE CAUSED THIS CONTRACT TO BE EXECUTED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. ATTEST CITY CLE K APPROVED AS TO FORM; CITY AT RNEY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA a, MAYOR BY pDw TITLE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 954 STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION' 5TH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE I. SCOPE OF WORK THE WORK TO BE DONE UNDER THIS CONTRACT IS THE IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE AND RE- CHANNELIZATION OF THE WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION. IT INCLUDES, BUT 15 NOT LIMITED TO, THE FOLLOWING: A. REMOVING OF EXISTING ASPHALT PAVEMENT, CONCRETE CURB, AND CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER. B. EXCAVATING, GRADING, AND COMPACTING TO FINISH SUBGRADE ELEVATIONS. C. THE PLACING OF AGGREGATE BASE, ASPHALT CONCRETE SURFACING, CURB AND GUTTER, ALLEY APPROACHES, AND SIDEWALK. D. THE CONSTRUCTING OF A STORM DRAIN CATCH BASIN, STREET LIGHT STANDARDS, AND A MANHOLE IN PLACE, E. THE RELOCATION OF STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNS. F. THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, AND TRANSPORTATION NECESSARY FOR THE ACCOMPLISHMENT OF THE ABOVE ITEMS, AND ANY OR ALL INCIDENTAL WORK AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DWGS. R- 5033 -5 (5 SHEETS) AND R- 5034 -5 (Z SHEETSj, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, AND THESE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. II. TIME OF COMPLETION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK WITHIN 90 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT BY THE CITY. Ill. SCHEDULE OF WORK A COMPLETE SCHEDULE SHOWING THE ORDER AND DATES THE CONTRACTOR PROPOSES TO CARRY OUT THE WORK SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL. THE SCHEDULE SHALL BE OF SUFFICIENT DETAIL TO ENABLE THE ENGINEER TO DETERMINE THAT TRAFFIC MAY BE PROPERLY MAINTAINED. NO WORK SHALL COMMENCE UNTIL A SCHEDULE OF WORK HAS BEEN APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER 3 WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO THE NEED FOR REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING SPRINKLER SYSTEM WITH- IN THE LANDSCAPED AREAS OF THE WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION. IV. CONDUCT OF WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. MAINTAIN THE JOB SITE IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY CONDITION AT ALL TIMES AND PREVENT THE SPREADING OF DUST AND DEBRIS ON ADJACENT PROPERTY. SP -2 V. PAYMENT THE PRICES BID FOR THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FULL COMPENSATION FOR ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PARTICULAR ITEMS COM- PLETE IN PLACE. PAYMENT FOR INCIDENTAL ITEMS OF WORK NOT SEPARATELY PROVIDED FOR IN THE PROPOSAL SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR OTHER ITEMS OF WORK. VI. CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HIRE EITHER A LAND SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER, REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, TO PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS NECESSARY TO ACCUR- ATELY PLACE ALL IMPROVEMENTS TO LINE AND GRADE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND PROVIDED IN THESE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. THE LAND SURVEYOR OR CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL CERTIFY THE 11 AS- BUILT" GRADES AND LOCATIONS OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS ON A COPY OF THE CON- STRUCTION PLANS. VII. PAVEMENT REMOVAL REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAVEMENT SHALL BE A SEPARATE PAY ITEM. ALL EXISTING ASPHALT CONCRETE BERMS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE AREA OF ASPHALT PAVE- MENT AND SHALL BE REMOVED AS ASPHALT PAVEMENT AT THE PRICE PER SQUARE FOOT OF AREA. OILED DIRT WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED PAVEMENT FOR PAY PURPOSES. VIII. WESTCLIFF -DOVER (R- 5033 -S) A. EXCAVATION AND TOPSOIL PLACEMENT CLEARING AND GRUBBING IS INCLUDED IN THE LUMP SUM PRICE PAID FOR EXCAVATION. ALL GRASS, WEEDS, AND OTHER OBJECTIONABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE. CLEAN TOP SOIL REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING ISLANDS SHALL BE STOCKPILED AT A SITE ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITY TO FILL THE ISLANDS WHICH ARE NOT TO BE PAVED. THE STOCKPILED MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN THE ISLANDS TO GRADE AND ANY EXCESS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE. THE LUMP SUM PRICE FOR PLACING TOP SOIL IN THE ISLANDS SHALL INCLUDE THE COST OF IMPORTING ANY MATERIAL NEEDED OR REMOVING ANY EXCESS MATERIAL FROM THE JOB SITE. B. WEED KILLER WEED KILLER SHALL BE PLACED BENEATH THE 2" CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING AND SHALL CONSIST OF POLYBAR CHLORATE OR EQUAL IN SOLUTION WITH WATER. THE SOLUTION SHALL CONSIST OF ONE GALLON OF WATER PER POUND OF POLYBAR CHLORATE. SOLU- TION SHALL BE UNIFORMLY APPLIED WITH POWER SPRAYER AT.A MINIMUM RATE OF ONE GALLON OF SOLUTION FOR EACH 25 SQUARE FEET OF AREA. COMPENSATION FOR FURN- ISHING AND APPLYING THE WEED KILLER SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS INCLUDED IN OTHER ITEMS OF WORK AND NO ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE WILL BE MADE THEREFOR. C. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 12 OF THE STANDARD SPECI- FICATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH SUFFICIENT RAKERS TO PROPERLY FEATHER THE EDGES OF THE VARIABLE THICKNESS PAVEMENT TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER WHERE PAVING IS PERFORMED OVER EXISTING. PAVEMENT. • i SP -3 C. ASPHALT CONCRETE PAVING (CONT'D) A SEAL COAT OF RS -2 (FOG SEAL) SHALL BE APPLIED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER AT A RATE OF APPROXIMATELY 0.10 GALLONS PER SQUARE YARD. THE APPLICATION AND MATERIALS USED SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 37 AND 94 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS DATED .JULY) 1964) OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS) DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS) STATE OF CALIFORNIA. D. PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE THE CONCRETE CATCH BASIN AND MANHOLE SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF CLASS A CONCRETE) 1Z-INCH MAXIMUM AGGREGATE) PER SECTION 13 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. CURBS) GUTTERS) ISLAND PAVING) AND FOOTINGS SHALL BE CLASS B CONCRETE) 111-INCH MAXIMUM AGGREGATE) PER SECTION 13 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. E. DRAINAGE STRUCTURES THE CATCH BASIN AND MANHOLE SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 17 OF THE STANDARD SPECI- FICATIONS. ALL STRUCTURE EXCAVATION) BACKFILL) REINFORCING STEEL) AND MIS- CELLANEOUS ITEMS SHALL BE CONSIDERED AS INCLUDED IN THE LUMP SUM PRICE FOR THE VARIOUS STRUCTURES) COMPLETE IN PLACE. F. STREET LIGHTING THE EXISTING STREET LIGHTS SHALL BE RELOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONDUCT HIS OPERATION SO THAT THE STREET LIGHTS ARE NEVER OUT OF SERVICE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 5 P.M. AND 5 A.M. ALL STREET LIGHT RELOCA- TION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 18 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. EXISTING CONDUIT SHALL BE EXTENDED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. EXISTING CABLE SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE LAST EXISTING SPLICE AND REPLACED WITH NEW CABLE IN CONFORMANCE WITH SECTION 17 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, THE PRICE PAID FOR RELOCATING EACH STREET LIGHT SHALL INCLUDE ALL ITEMS NECES- SARY TO RELOCATE THE STREET LIGHT) INCLUDING ADDITIONAL CONDUIT) NEW WIRE) CONDUIT BEDDING MATERIAL) AND ALL OTHER WORK NEEDED TO PUT THE STREET LIGHTS IN OPERATION TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE ENGINEER. G. TRAFFIC CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A SPECIFIC DETOUR PLAN ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. TRAFFIC SHALL BE ALLOWED TO TRAVEL THROUGH THE INTERSECTION IN ALL DIRECTIONS AT ALL TIMES. AT LEAST ONE TWELVE FOOT LANE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH MOVEMENT. SCHEMATIC DRAWINGS SHOWING ACCEPTABLE DETOUR PHASING ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. IX. FIFTH AVENUE (R- 5034 -S) A. GRADING AND EXCAVATION THE ENTIRE STREET AREA WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RE- MOVED AND THE UNDERLYING MATERIAL EXCAVATED TO REQUIRED DEPTH AND COMPACTED TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE NEW STRUCTURAL SECTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. A DRAINAGE DITCH SHALL BE GRADED FROM A POINT 4 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE REDWOOD HEADER AS SHOWN ON THE TYPICAL SECTION AND THEN STRAIGHT GRADED TO EXISTING PROPERTY LINE ELEVATIONS ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF FIFTH AVENUE. PAYMENT FOR THE EXCAVATION OF THE DRAINAGE DETOUR SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THIS ITEM. SP -4 A. GRADING AND EXCAVATION (CONT'D) APPROXIMATELY 7,200 CUBIC YARDS OF EXCAVATION ARE INCLUDED IN THIS ITEM. THE REMOVAL OF 10 LINEAR FEET OF CURB AND GUTTER ON EACH SIDE OF ALL INTERSECTING STREETS TOGETHER WITH ANY NECESSARY GRADING WORK ON ADJACENT PRIVATE PROPERTY SHALL ALSO BE INCLUDED IN THIS ITEM. PRESENTLY NO CURB EXISTS ALONG FIFTH AVENUE. EXTREME CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR THE PROTECTION OF PROPERTY ADJOINING THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE AND ANY DAMAGE DONE TO THIS PROPERTY SHALL IMMEDIATELY BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS EXPENSE. DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE EXCAVATION SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSE TO THE CITY. REMOVAL OF ALL CONCRETE APRONS, SIDEWALKS AND APPROACHES TO BE REBUILT SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THIS ITEM. RELOCATION OF THE EXISTING BARB WIRE FENCE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THIS ITEM. B. DRAINAGE DITCH CONSTRUCT Z° A.C. PAVED DRAINAGE DITCH AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PAYMENT FOR THE ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PAVEMENT IN THIS DITCH WILL BE MADE ON A UNIT BASIS AS SHOWN IN THE PROPOSAL. C. REDWOOD HEADERS CONSTRUCT Z" X 6" REDWOOD HEADERS ON THE NORTHERLY EDGE OF PAVEMENT. SPACING FOR THE STAKES SHALL BE 10 FEET MINIMUM ON CENTERS. PAYMENT SHALL BE ON A UNIT BASIS AS SHOWN IN THE PROPOSAL. D. ADJUST SEWER MANHOLES TO GRADE THE SEWER MANHOLES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO 12" BELOW FINISH GRADE ELEVATION PRIOR TO THE FINAL PREPARATION OF THE SUBGRADE. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PAVING, THE MANHOLES SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO FINAL GRADE PER STD - 401 -L. THESE MANHOLES ARE OWNED BY ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT #5, AND ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE DISTRICT INSPECTOR. TWO WORKING DAYS NOTICE MUST BE GIVEN PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION. E. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACHES REBUILD 4" THICK CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APPROACHES TO MEET GRADE AT PROPERTY LINE. ANY WARPING TO MEET ELEVATIONS SHALL BE DONE AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. F. CURB AND GUTTER CONSTRUCT TYPE "An CURB AND GUTTER AS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES. EXISTING ELEVA- TIONS AT THE ENDS OF CURB RETURNS ON INTERSECTING STREETS SHALL BE MET AS SHOWN ON THE PROFILES. G. ALLEY APPROACHES CONSTRUCT ALLEY APPROACHES INCLUDING CURB AND SPANDRELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH DRAWING STD -105 -L FOR THE STANDARD 14, WIDE ALLEYS AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. ELEVATIONS AT PROPERTY LINE OF INTERSECTING ALLEYS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY STD- 105 -L. A.C. PAVING SHALL BE FEATHERED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO EXISTING GRADE AS TYPICALLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PAYMENT FOR THIS ITEM WILL BE MADE ON A UNIT BASIS FOR EACH ALLEY APPROACH INSTALLED,, EXCEPT FOR THE A.C. PAVING, WHICH SHALL BE PAID FOR UNDER BID ITEM NUMBER 6. SP -5 H. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES (NORTHERLY OF FIFTH AVENUE) CONSTRUCT Z° A.C. OVER 4" A.B. DRIVEWAY APPROACHES ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF FIFTH AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. PAYMENT FOR THIS ITEM SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT PRICES OF ASPHALT PAVING AND AGGREGATE BASE. I. TRAFFIC CONTROL PORTIONS OF FIFTH AVENUE MAY BE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. HOWEVER, ADEQUATE ACCESS TO ADJACENT IM- PROVED PROPERTY SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR BY THE CONTRACTOR. OFFICE OF COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER a .1 1 1 i1 r M►TERIALS REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF THE INTERSECTION OF DOVER DRIVE AND NYSTCLIFF DRIVE CITY OF NEwPW BEACH DATE; REPORT SUPERVISION; SUBMITTED BY; SUBMITTED T0; October lb, 1965 H. J. Lrisan F. F. La Belle, Materials Engineer Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director of Public Yorks City of Newport Beach This report presents t1t tindings of a subsurface investiott" and laboratory analysis of soils at the intersection of Dover Drive;wd twesteliff Drive, both primary arterial highways, in the City of Newport Beach• This report has been prepared to satisfy the Materiels Report ' requirements of the Collier-Unruh Act, II. AIITHORIZATION ' The investigation was authorised by the City of Newport Beach per letter datsd September 13, 1965• ' III. BASXMINT SOILS ' The native soil at the proposed grading plane is silty sand. The mechanical analysis and Resistance 'R' Values for the native soils are tabulated in detail on the attached Soil Survey Sheet. IT. LABORATORY ANALYSIS ' As my be noted on the attached S.S.S., the Resistance 'R• Value ' of the native soil is 71 with 31 per cent passing the No. 200 sieve. V. TRA"IC INDEX A Traffic Index (T.I.) of 8.3, which was recommended by the Orange County Traffic Engineer, has been used in determining the structural section. ' 11. MARABLN SECTION " Y Gravel NonivaloAt Cemnarable Section ' 31 18.5" a. 9 "ACA4 0AB b. ACA1 "AB 11 I ' VII. RECOKKENDED STRUCTURAL SECTION I' A. Recommended Section Location Recommended Section Dover Dr. & Westcliff Dr. 4 "AC/11 "AB Intersection B. Discussion A drop "R" the rapid in the Value was noted when moisture ' content of the sample was increased. Since high field moisture was encountered at the time of sampling (12-309 an "R" Value tof 31 has been used for design of the structural section. VIII. RECOMMUDED SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTROL OF MATERIALS ' The specifications hereinafter referred to shall be State of ' California, Division of Highways Standard Specifications, dated July, 19649 -ad Orange County Standard Special Provisions. ' IB. RECOMMENDED SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONTROL OF MATERIALS 1. Earthwork, Section 19.2, 9 -7 -65. 2. A: Eregate }ease, Section 26, 8 -7 -65. _ 3. Asphalt Concrete, Section 39, 8 -7 -65• REPORT PREPARATION AND FIELD DATA: A. Silbaugh LABORATOR7 SUPERVISIONS D. Dixon PROJECT NO. 42g-EC SOIL_ SURVEY SHEET BY K'9s CHKD.BY DATE _9"z-6-5—PROJECT TN75f 1- -_c ctl efi DOVER w-- s rctiFF SH. / of / z BORING OR SAMPL N . O LAS NUMBER t' DATE SAMPLED 9 -/6 -65 0 � STATION POVE.0 S weSrc LrFF . v DISTANCE FROM vt W DEPTH OR ELEVATION 02-3Q o TYPE OF MATERIAL try Ar:p ° PASSING NO. 4 o0 > u II 16 90 J a It It 30 8'3 z It u 50 7 a I It 10o w II 200 > SAND 9 ROCK *200 A- W f/1 % SILT ( -200 to S microns) Zo ° CLAY ( -j TlCfaflt) T SPECIMEN IDENTIFICATION A B I C A 9 C 01 a I C A F COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE /U MOISTURE AT COUP. ° •O. i �,:> 2�' /Z3 W `- DRY DENS. OF BRIO. Ibs /au.ft. EXUDATION PRESSURE P.S.I. /o.7:) 780 75 155 o: STABILOMETER R -VALUE � 70 7 5/ F G.E: STABLOMETER- INCHES /0,0 n .S.O /:=.5 W EXPAN. PRESSURE- INCHES p ,3 O S O R-VALUE at EQUILIBRIUM 1 7/ :1 G.E. of E UILIBRIUM- INCHES m a FIELD MOISTURE 2.3 ~ N TRAFFIC INDEX f3. " .st `4i LEGEND y •,• P.C.C. r9 `D 2 r ' \c p Ix U. P BOR 1 a A. C. 0 A. B. d _W > J .� --�' r• a El Z a .. itTro :t .. Y t y tq iY SAND (' SILT ® CLAY .57EXISTING GRADE ., Z J m 71 1n TS TS Y LL � ! SOIL N(D O II 9 JUNE 13, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE, CONTRACT NO. 954 / 3 RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE A CHANGE ORDER IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF $685.00 FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ASPHALTIC CONCRETE BERM ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF FIFTH AVENUE. DISCUSSION: INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE IS THE GRADING OF A DITCH FOR CARRYING STORM RUN -OFF WATER ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE STREET, THIS DITCH WILL INTERCEPT AND DIVERT THE MAJORITY OF THE OVER- LAND SHEET FLOW WHICH PRESENTLY FLOWS SOUTHERLY ON NARCISSUS AND ORCHID, CREATING A FLOODING CONDITION ON COAST HIGHWAY DURING PERIODS OF HEAVY RAINFALL. BECAUSE OF THE GRADES INVOLVED AND THE LIMITED WIDTH OF RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABLE IT HAS BEEN NECESSARY TO LOCATE THE DITCH NEAR THE EDGE OF PAVE- MENT. IT HAD ORIGINALLY BEEN PLANNED TO DELINEATE THE EDGE OF THE DITCH WITH REFLECTORIZED PADDLES. HOWEVER, IN THE AREA FROM MARGUERITE TO LARKSPUR THE. DITCH IS ESPECIALLY DEEP AND CLOSE TO THE PAVEMENT. IT IS FELT THAT CONSTRUC- TION OF THE RECOMMENDED BERM IN ADDITION TO THE PADDLES WILL CREATE A SAFER CONDITION FOR MOTORISTS. APPROXIMATELY 370 FEET OF BERM AT A UNIT PRICE OF $1.$5 IS INVOLVED. SUFFICIENT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN ACCOUNT NO. 19- 3348 -028. "" VED BY CITY Ott DATE L, CIL 196 PD E EVLIN LIC RKS DIRECTOR :VR i � � / //fy),�_- �- L- ��,�G.:./+ (.cam 1...�'C. +- �_C.al� � 2- G�'G_..'C. %s: �. �� au or�>lt M OME OF FICE • MENLO PARK. CALIFORNIA NOW t PROPOSAL BOND R KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, r 1 J That we, E. L. WHITE COMPANY P.O. BOX 712. GARDEN GROVE as Principal, and the ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized under the laws of the State of California, as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto _ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA in the full and just sum of 10% OF AMOUNT BID (hereinafter called the obligee) Dollars, (S for the payment whereof in lawful money of the United States, we bind ourselves, our heirs, administrators, executors, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the said PRINCIPAL has submitted the accompanying bid dated for CONTRACT NO. 954. STREET IMPROVEMENTS WESTCLIFF — DOVER INTERSECTION. FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR TO POPPY AVENUE. NOW, THEREFORE, if the said contract be awarded to the Principal and the Principal shall, within such time as may be specified, enter into the contract in writing, and give bond, with surety acceptable to the Obligee for the faithful performance of the said contract, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and Sealed this 19th day of _ JANUARY 1966 E. L. WHITE COMPANY C ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY --` STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss, +COUNTY OF ORANGE On this 19th day of JANUARY 66 I'9 before me, a Notary Public, within and for said County and State, personally appeared CARL R. ARMSTRONG to me personally known, who being duly sworn, upon oath, did say that he is the Agent and Attorney -in -fact of and far the ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation created, organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of California that the Corporate seal affixed to the foregoing within instrument is the seal of said Company; that the seal was affixed, and the said instrument was executed by authority of its Board of Directors; and the said did acknowledge that he executed the said instrums free acct /and /deed of , 1Comp ny -� VJ{± F.AA E. HARDIN -� 1 i<.31A A' - CA.4Fi:,a,NIA Notary Public PF.:NaPAL OFRCc IN WILMA E. HAROIN "� J ' ORANGE CGUNTY My Commission Expires April 26,1969 i.__... .— My Commission expires KEN O'B R I E N &• ASSOCIATES June 1, 1965 City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Kenneth Perry, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Pavement Design, 5th Avenue between larkspur and Poppy, Corona del Mar, California. Gentlemen: We submit the following results of laboratory tests and pavement design analyses for bituminous roadway construction on 5th Avenue between Larkspur and Poppy Street, Corona del Mar, California. The two samples tested for "R" value determinations were ,fudged representative of the material at the indicated subgrade elevation throughout the length of the proposed construction. "R" values of 5.5 and 10.0 were obtained for these two tests. It is our opinion that a design "R" value of 10.0 is realistic for the entire roadway after analyzing the stabilometer test results and materials classifications. The lower indicated "R" value was determined for a sandy soil under high degree of saturation with low density. This condition will not be present in a properly contrplled subgrade easily accomplished in a closely inspected project. Scarification and recompaction of the subgrade soils will be necessary in those areas where the sandier soils are present. Following design procedures set forth by the State of California Highway Department, several alternate pavement sections are recommended for three traffic index assignments. These pavement sections have been summarized in the following table. s „•,• .. , : •:, CONSULTING ENGINEERS •• 1 . + City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works June 1, 1965 Page Two PAVEMENT SECTION 5th Avenue - Corona del Mar Subgrade Design "R" Value • 10.0 Traffic Index 5 6 7 Plant Mix Asphaltic Concrete •301 •35' •25' •35' •35' •25' •25' Class B Cement Treated Base 90' 1.00' .50' Class 1 Aggregate Base .65' So' .50' 1.00' •55' Class 1 Aggregate Subbase •57' Total •95' 1.15' 1.15' 1.42' 1.35' 1.25' 1.30' (11.4 ") (13.8 ") 13.8 ") 17.1 ") (16.2 ") (15.0 ") (15.6 ") If we can provide further information regarding this report or be of further service to you in this matter please advise. BJD /hv Attachments Very truly yours, KIM O'�BRIEN & ASSOCIATES Herbert J. Dia Civil Engineer CE 13,635 • REN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES KAN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING ' SHEET I OF � PROJECT #9m Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CM - Station 4+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED —ll- COMPLETED 5-11 - TYPE a DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No (later Encountered W o t y CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS OO f Y N J > Z W w oZ r W W n Z EA a W W (l fi W to _ > (L' f] W 3 MOISTURE CONTENT % PL. GNAT, iLL 10 20 !O IO SO r= WMI: some clay and silt, brown. Sc Sand Equiv. a 9. "R" Value. 5.5. I 2 YM SAND: clayey, trace of silt, gray- brown. 3 4 Bottom of Pit 5 6 7 S 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 a.O.a A. FO NM -la BORING NO. 1 PLATE KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING 2 SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT #9072 gn, 5th Ave. A►e. CDII - station 8+60 Paveaent Design, SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING TARTED 5 -11- 5 COMPLETED 1 5-11-65 TYPE a DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water Encountered W 4 : N c ZZ y CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS -j N J > Z W o �� W ~ Z LLJ N N NW W (L W �a R W i MOi STURE CONTENT % PLA -- - -n LL IO 20 30 '70 50 FM SANDI silty, brown. SM Sand Equiv. . 8. I 2 CLAZI some sand, brown. CL 3 TM SMet clayey, some silt and white calcareous inclusions, slightly cemented, gray- brown. SC 4 5 6 Bottom of Pit 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 IB 19 20 K.O. • A. Foaff - n �- BORING N0. .. .. -. PLATE.-N-0. AN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIPES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING 3 SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT 7912 Pavement Design, 5th Ave. MIN - Station 14+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing tirade DATE OF BORING STARTED 1 5-11-63 COMPLETED 1 5-11_65 TYPE d DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Baekhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water Encountered W u a _ y CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 0 m N J - Z W O v . a= Fa- W Z N a W W '^ air W ~ a _ _ > V m: O W 3 MOISTURE CON PLC GNAT. ■LL i0 20 30 ♦0 60 CLIA2: some sand, stiff, moist, gray - brown. CL Sand Equiv. • 4. OR oe1lx 10. 2 sandy, some silty brown to yellow -brain. --3 -CLAY: 4 SANDSTONE: yellow - brain." 5 6 Bottom of Fit a 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 IS 16 17 18 19 20 K.O. n A. FOng -1n BORING NO. 3 .,-..... -. PLATE NO..,__, -.�•a •N O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINFEIIS LOG OF BORING 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT #9IM Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CDM - Station 155+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED 5 -11-6 COMPLETED 5-11-65 TYPE B DESIGNATION OF DRILL APB Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water Encountered W a o Z 3 CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS J m N J Z Q W Q O U Z - I'_ J 2 fA a W W '^ a V H U a O = D: � O W 3 MOISTURE CONTENT 56 IL S GNAT, eLL 1.0 20 30 s0 50 TIRE &UO: silty, trace of clay, brown. sm 2 CLAT: some sand, trace of silt, gray - brown. CL 3 4 SANDMI S: weathered, slightly cemented, white and yellow. : 5 6 7 Bottom of Pit 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 H 20 K.O. AA.VORM -w BORING NO. 4 0 KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LEGEND TO LOGS SOIL Unified Soil Classification System SYMBOLS ROCK Sandstone Siltstone a. Conglomerate = Shale Limestone Granite CLASSIFICATIONS ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL Approximate percentages Conventional geological denoted by soil adjectives terminology is used Primary 30% to 50% "Some' 12 a/o to 30% °Trace" 12% or less Drive Sample Undisturbed Tube Sample Soil or Rock Core No Recovery Water Level BAG BAWW GENERAL SAMPLING Drive Samplers MPS - Modified Porter Sampler 1.94 "1.D, x 2-1/2 "O.D. PS - Porter Plug Sampler 1.94" I.D. x 3" O.D. NS - Navy Sampler 2.44" I.D x 3" O.D. SPT - Standard Penetration Sampler 1.38" I.D x 2" O.D. Undisturbed Samples ST Shelby Tube Sampler 2.86" 1.0 x 3" O.D. OS - Osterberg Tube Sampler 2.86" I,D, x 3" O.D. Core Samples PT - Pitcher Tube Sampler 2.86° I.D x 3" O.D. DS - Diamond Core Sorrel Sampler • M- TEST DATA w - Moisture Content as percent of dry Soil Weight 0 - Organic Content aspercent of Dry Soil Weight i3 - Angle of friction LL - Liquid Limit PL - Plastic Limit 6 - Specific Gravity of Soil Solids e - Void Ratio Qu - Unconfined Compressive Strength in tons /sq.foot Es - Expansion of Saturation in percent of initial volume Pr - Penetration Resistance in number of blows of hammer required to drive sampler one factor specified distance N - Penetration Resistance of standard sampler in number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30" required to advance sampler 12° CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH +. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT f CHANGE ORDER NUMBEf3{ --r Z CONTRACT 'WESTCLIFF.- DOVER, FIFTH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NUMBER `. 954 CONTRACTOR � --E:L: WHITE COMPANY I. DUE TO FAILURE OF THE SEWER MAIN TRENCH 13ACKFILL IN THE VICINITY OF STATION 7 + 00, DELETE ALL WORK SOUTHERLY OF STATION 7 + 25. THIS WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNDER A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CONTRACT AT A LATER DATE. THE APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES OF WORK DELETED ARE: ITEM QUANTITY .,j PRICE +. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT f CHANGE ORDER NUMBEf3{ --r Z CONTRACT 'WESTCLIFF.- DOVER, FIFTH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NUMBER `. 954 CONTRACTOR � --E:L: WHITE COMPANY I. DUE TO FAILURE OF THE SEWER MAIN TRENCH 13ACKFILL IN THE VICINITY OF STATION 7 + 00, DELETE ALL WORK SOUTHERLY OF STATION 7 + 25. THIS WORK WILL BE PERFORMED UNDER A COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT CONTRACT AT A LATER DATE. THE APPROXIMATE QUANTITIES OF WORK DELETED ARE: ITEM QUANTITY t PRICE 5. A.B. 20 TONS @ 3.39 $67.8o 6. A.C. PVMT. 10 TONS @ 7.21 72.10 7. 2° P.C.C. MEDIAN PVMT 665 SF @ 0. 22 214.13 12. SPEC. C.& G 150 LF @ N2 363.00 APPROXIMATE COST REDUCTION: 717 03 SIGNED: / ✓' �6l•L•- �.-- r„. —��. CONTRACTOR: DATE: y ":r `ln lr_- BY: ccc,.. DATE: /I L 7 1 v t 1 v CITY OF NEWW BEACH DEPARTWNT OF PUBLIC WORKS CHANGE ORnrc NU!RE y'/ � 4w . f'..ONTRACT IMPROVEMENT OF 4'rEStCLI : a`.tOYER AND 5iH AVENUE. CONTRACT MOCER 954 CONTRACTOR: E.L. vIHiTE COMPANY 1. l+%H:Rt SOFT, SPONGY I.REAS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE SUB - GRACE, EXCAVATE TO THE DEPTH DiR`_'CTEO BY THE ENGIAEER AND 5ACKF16L WITH AQQRZGATE aAAE. THiS 1.ORK SHALL SE PCRFOP.4E7 ON A FORCE ACCOUNT BASIS PER SECTION 9.03 OF THE CITY STANDARD SPEC IFICATIONS* THE APPROXINAI'_ COST OF THE WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CHANGE IS: 250.00. DATE: CONTRACTORS BY: DATE: THE FINAL COST OF T" CHANGE, CHANGE, PER EXTRA WORK SHEETS AND INVOICES SUB- MITTED IBS #225.95 DATES CONTRACT R: By; DATE: 3� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3 CONTRACT IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF -DOVER AND 5TH AVENUE CONTRACT NUMBER : 954 CONTRACTOR . E.L. WHITE COMPANY 1. THIS CHANGE CONFIRMS PREVIOUSLY 153UED INSTRUCTIONS. DUE TO AN ERROR IN THE GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR THE MEDIAN ON DOVER DRIVE AT STATION 10 + 50, IT WAS NECESSARY TO ADJUST THE CURB FORMS TO A REVISED GRADE. THIS WORK WAS PERFORMED ON A FORCE ACCOUNT SASISs PER SECTION 9 -03 OF THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONSt AT THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL COST OF 5250.00. DATE: CONTRACTOR'. 13y: x D ATE : �z -l/ THE FINAL COST OF THIS CHANGE PER EXTRA WORK REPORTS AND INVOICES SUBMITTED ISC 4a6I SIGNED: DATE: CONTRACTOR: BYt DATE: REfFIVFD AIR 2 5 1966 puBLIIG WORKS DEPT. f 0 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 7 CONTRACT IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF - DOVER AND FIFTH AVENUE CONTRACT NUMBER 954 CONTRACTOR . E. L. WHITE COMPANY 1. AS DIRECTED, REMOVE ADDITIONAL EXISTING CURB ON THE SIDE STREETS AT FIFTH AVENUE IN ORDER TO ELIMINATE JOINING TO SMALL BROKEN PORTIONS. THIS WORK SHALL BE DONE AT THE UNIT PRICE OF $1.25 /L.F. 52 L.F. @ $1.25 = $65.00 DATE: b `� CONTRACTOR: BY: DATE: ^�i..ti,A 3�. l4 (<+ L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 6 CONTRACT IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF - DOVER AND FIFTH AVENUE CONTRACT NUMBER : 954 CONTRACTOR: E.L. WHITE COMPANY I. CONSTRUCT 370 LIN. FT. OF 6" A.C. BERM ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF FIFTH AVENUE FROM MARGUERITE AVENUE TO LARKSPUR AVENUE AND AT THE EASTERLY SCHOOL ENTRANCE AT THE UNIT PRICE OF $1.85 PER LIN. FT. 37D LF j $I.85 = $684.50 SIGNED :, ` -( , DATE: CONTRA r./ I r a 0 SPECIAL PROVISIONS for REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION of CURBS, TRAFFIC ISLANDS, PAVEMENT, STORM DRAIN AND STREET LIGHTING at Intersection of DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE Newport Beach California November 1965 l 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Estimate of Quantities and Cost Items Pavement Removal Excavation Aggregate Base (Class 2) Asphalt Concrete (Type B) Asphalt Concrete (Type B) Feather Prime Coat Seal Coat 2" Thick Portland Cement Concrete Type A -2 Curb and Gutter, 8" c.f. Type B Mod. Curb and Gutter, 8" c.f. Type B Mod. Curb and Gutter, 6" c.f. Type A Curb and Gutter, 6" c.£. Concrete Catch Basin W =2' V= Manhole Frame, Cover and Concrete Deck 24" Corrugated Metal Pipe, 16 gage Adjust Manhole to Grade Adjust Water Valve Frames and Cover 4" Orangeburg Perforated Pipe, 11 Estimated Unit 4.00 Quantity Price Total 9,700 s.f. $0.15 $1,455.00 800 c.y. 0.75 600.00 850 Tons 2.60 2,210.00 300 Tons 6.50 1,950.00 150 Tons 7.50 1,125.00 350/248Gal.100.00 8.00 141.11 1200/248Gal.100.00 each 483.80 2,700 s.f. 0.30 810.00 132 l.f. 3.10 409.20 176 l.f. 2.75 484.00 1,465 l.f. 2.50 3,662.50 295 l.f. 2.90 855.50 Lump Sum 5.00 700.00 Lump Sum 25.00 300.00 3 l.f. 15.00 45.00 5 each 75.00 375.00 2 each 50.00 100.00 including fittings and concrete collar lz" Rock in Place for Subdrain Place Top Soil in Islands Relocate 6 Existing Street Lights Relocate Existing Water Meters, complete with frames and covers Furnish and install W61R Relocate W61R Furnish and install W21R Relocate W21R Furnish and install R1R Relocate R1R Furnish and install R18R Rt Furnish and install W59R 12 l.f. 4.00 48.00 8 c.yl 10.00 80.00 35 c.y. 1.50 52.50 6 each 450.00 2,700.00 3 each 75.00 225.00 2 each 8.00 16.00 2 each 3.00 6.00 1 each 35.00 35.00 1 each 5.00 5.00 3 each 15.00 45.00 1 each 5.00 5.00 2 each 25.00 50.00 1 each 25.00 25.00 $18,998.61 0 0 Special Provisions Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive Scope of Work- The work herein specified consists of removal of asphalt concrete curb, concrete curb, asphalt concrete pavement, earthwork, electrical street lighting conduit, pull boxes and street light standards; relocation of street lights; furnishing and placement of new wiring and rigid metallic conduit; construction of curb and gutter, storm drain catch basin, manhole, and island concrete pavement; placement of aggregate base and asphalt concrete pavement and all other things necessary to complete the work shown on the plans and specified in the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach, and these special provisions. Progress of Work: The work required on the plans and in the Standard Specifications and these special provisions shall be completed within sixty (60) calendar days after receiving notice that the contract has been executed by the City. Attention is directed to Sections 8 -03, 8 -04 and 8 -06 of the Standard Specifications. Detours and Traffic Control: Attention Specifications. the intersection one 12 -foot lane on Detour Plans, barricades and 1 the satisfaction is directed to Section 7 -10 of the Standard Traffic shall be allowed to travel through in all directions at all times. At least shall be provided for each movement as shown Phase 1 or Phase 2, at all times. Adequate fighting shall be maintained at all times to of the Engineer. Schedule of Work: A complete schedule showing the order and dates the Contractor proposes to carry out the work shall be submitted to the Engineer for approval. The schedule shall be of sufficient detail to enable the Engineer to determine that traffic may be properly maintained. No work shall commence until a schedule of work has been approved in writing by the Engineer. Grading and Earthwork: Existing pavement removal shall be a separate pay item. All existing asphalt concrete berms shall be included in the area of asphalt pavement and shall be removed as asphalt pave- ment at a price per square foot of area. -1- • Clearing and Grubbing is included in the price paid per cubic yard for excavation. All grass, weeds and other objectionable material shall be removed from the street right of way. Excavation - Clean top soil removed from the existing islands shall be stockpiled at a site acceptable to the Engineer in sufficient quantity to fill the two islands to be constructed. The stockpiled material shall be placed in the islands to grade and any excess material shall be removed from the right of way. The Engineer shall determine the exact cubic yards of excavation for payment and his figures shall be final. The lump sum price for placing top soil in the islands shall include the cost of importing any material needed or removing any excess material from the right of way. Aggregate Base: Aggregate Base shall conform to Section 11 of the Standard Specifications. Asphalt Paving: Asphalt paving shall conform to Section 12 of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor shall furnish sufficient rakers, to the satisfaction of the Engineer, to properly feather the edges of the variable thickness pavement where paving is per- formed over existing pavement. Portland Cement Concrete: The concrete catch basin and manhole shall be constructed of Class A concrete, 1z -inch maximum, per Section 13 of the Standard Specifications. Curbs, gutters, island paving, and footings shall be Class B concrete, 12 inch maximum, per Section 13 of the Standard Specifications. Curbs and Gutters: Curbs and gutters shall conform to Section 15 of the Standard Specifications. Drainage Structures: The catch basin and manhole shall conform to Section 17 of the Standard Specifications. All structure excavation, backfill, reinforcing steel and miscellaneous iron and steel shall be considered as included in the lump sum price for the various structureg, complete in place. Street Lighting: The existing street lights shall be relocated as shown on the plans. The Contractor shall conduct his operation so that the street lights are never out of service between the -2- i • hours of 5 P.M. and 5 A.M. All street light relocation work shall conform to Section 18 of the Standard Specifications. Existing conduit shall be extended as shown on the plans. Existing cable shall be removed to the last existing splice and replaced with new cable in conformance with Section 17 of the Standard Specifications. The lump sum price for relocation of street lights shall include all things necessary to relocate the five existing street lights as shown on the plans and place them in operation to the satisfaction of the Engineer. I i! �w y J Q ,h o �-j )L �r i Fo 0 �x ito �1 � � � �� I x � �F� J �1 1I 3 e� �I � � �s -- Q �' � � N W �� k �� i ,� p s� :I Y ` �� � 3n /d'O ! �� /7�1f3M� <� i f it �� � � \� ' a` �� �� � � a . � +; � � A "F I ,� �� �. I � �o �o 0 �� .� 1 i S '' F � R SPECIAL PROVISIONS for REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION of CURBS, TRAFFIC ISLANDS, PAVEMENT, STORM DRAIN AND STREET LIGHTING at intersection of DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE Mod a G•raNSuGT�W6 EN6�NeEK„j Newport Beach California December 1965 A Special Provisions Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive Scope of Work: The work herein specified consists of removal of asphalt concrete curb, concrete curb, asphalt concrete pavement, earthwork, electrical street lighting conduit, pull boxes and street light standards; relocation of street lights; furnishing and placement of new wiring and rigid metallic conduit; construction of curb and gutter, storm drain catch basin, manhole, and island concrete pavement; placement of aggregate base and asphalt concrete pavement and all other things necessary to complete the work shown on the plans and specified in the Standard Specifications of the Public Works Department, City of Newport Beach, and these special provisions. Progress of Work: The work required on the plans and in the Standard Specifications and ,these special provisions shall be completed within sixty (60) calendar days after receiving notice that the contract has been executed by the City. Attention is directed to Sections 8 -03, 8 -04 and 8 -06 of the Standard Specifications. Detours and Traffic Control: Attention Specifications. the intersection one 12 -foot lane on Detour Plans, barricades and 1 the satisfaction Schedule of Wo is directed to Section 7 -10 of the Standard Traffic shall be allowed to travel through in all directions at all times. At least shall be provided for each movement as shown Phase 1 or Phase 2, at all times. Adequate fighting shall be maintained at all times to of the Engineer. A complete schedule showing the order and dates the Contractor proposes to carry out the work shall be submitted to the Engineer for approval. The schedule shall be of sufficient detail to enable the Engineer to determine that traffic may be properly maintained. No work shall commence until a schedule of work has been approved in writing by the Engineer. The Contractor shall notify the Engineer 72 hours prior to the need of removal of the existing sprinkler system within the landscaped areas, which are to be removed by City forces. -1- 0 0 Grading and Earthwork: Existing pavement removal shall be a separate pay item. All existing asphalt concrete berms shall be included in the area of asphalt pavement and shall be removed as asphalt pave- ment at a price per square foot of area. Clearing and Grubbing is included in the price paid per cubic yard for excavation. All grass, weeds and other objectionable material shall be removed from the street right of way. Excavation - Clean top soil removed from the existing islands shall be stockpiled at a site acceptable to the Engineer, in sufficient quantity to fill the two islands to be constructed. The stockpiled material shall be placed in the islands to grade and any excess material shall be removed from the right of way. The Engineer shall determine the exact cubic yards of excavation for payment and his figures shall be final. The lump sum price for placing top soil in the islands shall include the cost of importing any material needed or removing any excess material from the right of way. Weed Killer: Weed killer shall consist of polybar chlorate or equal in solution with water. The solution shall consist of one gallon of water per pound of polybar chlorate. Solution shall be uniformly applied with power sprayer at a minimum rate of one gallon of solution for each 25 square feet of area. The contractor shall kill any weed growth that appears in treated area within one year from date of application by injecting the solution into the soil under pressure to the approval of the Engineer. Compensation for furnishing and applying the weed killer shall be considered as included in the other various items of work, and no additional allowance will be made therefor. Aggregate Base: Aggregate Base shall conform to Section 11 of the Standard Specifications. Asphalt Paving: Asphalt paving shall conform to Section 12 of the Standard Specifications. The Contractor shall furnish sufficient rakers, to the satisfaction of theEngineer, to properly feather the edges of the variable thickness pavement where paving is per- formed over existing pavement. -2- A seal coat of RS -2 (fog seal) shall be applied as shown on the plans and directed by the Engineer at a rate to be determined by the Engineer between 0.05 and 0.10 gallons per square yard. The application and materials used shall conform to Sections37 and 94 of the Standard Specifications dated July 1964 of the Department of Public Works, Division of Highways. Portland Cement Concrete: The concrete catch basin and manhole shall be constructed of Class A concrete, 12 -inch maximum, per Section 13 of the Standard Specifications. Curbs, gutters, island paving, and footings shall be Class B Concrete, 12 -inch maximum, per Section 13 of the Standard Specifications. Curbs and Gutters: Curbs and gutters shall conform to Section 15 of the Standard Specifications. Drainage Structures: The catch basin and manhole shall conform to Section 17 of the Standard Specifications. All structure excavation, backfill, reinforcing steel and miscellaneous iron and steel shall be considered as included in the lump sum price for the various structures, complete in place. Street Lighting: The existing street lights shall be relocated as shown on the plans. The Contractor shall conduct his operation so that the street lights are never out of service between the hours of 5 P.M. and 5 A.M. All street light relocation work shall conform to Section 18 of the Standard Specifications. Existing conduit shall be extended as shown on the plans. Existing cable shall be removed to the last existing splice and replaced with new cable in conformance with Section 17 of the Standard Specifications. The price paid for relocating each street light shall include all things necessary to relocate the street light, including additional conduit, new wire, conduit bedding material, and any other things necessary to place the street light in operation to the satisfaction of the Engineer. Construction Surveys: The contractor shall hire either a Licensed Land Surveyor or Registered Civil Engineer, registered in the State of California, to provide all construction surveys necessary to accurately -3- place all improvements to line and grade as shown on the plans and provided in these special provisions. The Licensed Land Surveyor or Registered Civil Engineer shall certify the as -built grades and locations of all improvements immediately after completion of all improvements on a copy of the construction plans. Full compensation for providing the required construction surveys and as -built certification shall be considered as included in the various items of work, and no additional allowance will be made therefor. ME A • Estimate of Quantities and Cost $19,406.20 Estimated Unit Items Quantity Price Total 1. Pavement Removal 9,700 s.f. $0.15 $1,455.00 2. Excavation 800 C.Y. 0.75 600.00 3. Aggregate Base (Class 2) 900 Tons 2.60 2,340.00 4. Asphalt Concrete (Type B) 320 Tons 6.50 2,080.00 5. Asphalt Concrete (Type B) Feather 150 Tons 7.50 1,125.00 6. Prime Coat 1.5 Tons 100.00 150.00 7. Seal Coat 5 Tons 100.00 500.00 8. 2" Thick Portland Cement Concrete 2,700 s.f. 0.30 810.00 9. Type A Curb and Gutter, 8" c.f. 132 l.f. 3.10 409.20 10. Special Curb and Gutter, 8" c.f. 176 l.f. 2.75 484.00 11. Special Curb and Gutter, 6" c.f.1,465 l.f. 2.50 3,662.50 12. Type A Curb and Gutter, 6" c.f. 295 l.f. 2.90 855.50 13. Concrete Catch Basin W =2' v =4.0 Lump Sum 700.00 14. Manhole Frame, Cover and Concrete Deck Lump Sum 300.00 15. 24" Corrugated Metal Pipe, 16 gage 3 l.f. 15.00 45.00 16. Adjust Manhole to Grade 5 each 75.00 375.00 17. Adjust Water Valve Frames and Cover 2 each 50.00 100.00 18. 4" A.C. Perforated Pipe, including fittings and concrete collar 12 l.f. 4.00 48.00 19. 2" Rock in Place for Subdrain 8 c.y. 10.00 80.00 20. Place Top Soil in Islands Lump Sum 75.00 21. Relocate 6 existing street lights 6 each 450.00 2,700.00 22. Relocate existing water meters, complete with frames and covers 3 each 75.00 225.00 23. Adjust Survey monument frame and cover to grade 2 each 50.00 100.00 24. Furnish and install W61R 2 each 8.00 16.00 25. Relocate W61R 2 each 3.00 6.00 26. Furnish and install W21R 1 each 35.00 35.00 27. Relocate W21R 1 each 5.00 5.00 28. Furnish and install R1R 3 each 15.00 45.00 29. Relocate R1R 1 each 5.00 5.00 30. Furnish and install R18R Rt 2 each 25.00 50.00 31. Furnish and install W59R 1 each 25.00 25.00 $19,406.20 DECEMBER 27, 1965 T0: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: STREET IMPROVEMENT, WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION, 5TH AVENUE LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE (CONTRACT 954) RECOMMENDATIONS: i / 0 1. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS= 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1966, AT 10:00 A.M. DISCUSSION: THERE ARE TWO PROJECTS INCLUDED WITHIN THIS CONTRACT AT A TOTAL ESTIMATED COST OF $j INCLUDING OUTSIDE ENGINEERING- -? I00•o0 �HE FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE ESTIMATED COSTS ON EACH PROJECT: BUDGETED COST ESTIMATED COST FIFTH AVENUE (SS #48) $ 38,000.00 $ 35,700.00 (19- 3348 -o28) WESTCLIFF -DOVER (SS #55) 21,000.00 22,000.00 (19- 3355 -023) $ 59,000.00 $ 579700.00 • INCLUDES $2,200.00 OUTSIDE ENGINEERING. THE ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION ES APRIL 19, 1966, THIS ENTIRE PROJECT IS TO BE FINANCED BY SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX FUNDS. THE IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE WILL PROVIDE FOR TWO TRAVEL LANES, WITH A PARKING LANE AND CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIDE. A DITCH TO BE GRADED ALONG THE NORTHERLY SIDE WILL MORE SATISFACTORILY HANDLE DRAINAGE ALONG THIS STREET. IT IS PROPOSED THAT DURING PORTIONS OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD FOR FIFTH AVENUE THAT THE STREET WILL BE CLOSED TO THROUGH TRAFFIC) HOWEVER, ADEQUATE ACCESS TO ADJACENT IMPROVED PROPERTY WILL BE PROVIDED. DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE DOVER - WESTCLIFF REVISIONS, A DETOURING SEQUENCE WILL BE PROVIDED SO AS TO ACCOMMODATE TRAFFIC WITH AS LITTLE INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC AS POSSIBLE- THE WESTCLIFF -DOVER INTERSECTION REVISIONS WILL PROVIDE IMPROVED CHANNELI- ZATION OF TRAFFIC FLOW, THEREBY AUGMENTING THE CAPACITY OF THE INTERSECTION AND IN- CREASING TRAFFIC SAFETY IN AN AREA WHERE TRAFFIC IS INCREASING AND THE ACCIDENT HISTORY HAS BEEN VERY POOR. APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL PH DEVL IN IC O KS DIRECTOR DATE e Z 1�6�' VR 0 A. T. STOVER CIVIL ENGINEER 1 327 MARINE AvENUE BALBOA ISLAND, CAUB. 92662 G' (714) 673 -5501 tier Its, 1966 . L. MTR CLUPAXT 32311 Cbapen Avenaa Oardea drove# Califernia Attas M LUAY PUR(;HA3 0RD3 R a On your projoet on Fifth Avenue in Corona dal Her# pave a drivempy for St. Michael and All Angels' giwdmj, including Grade to Drain Fine Grade Prime *10 A.C. per City Specifications Took and Yeatbor to join existing and all other next required to make a complete and eatisfactux7 job# FM TPA FIXAD LUMP SM OF - - - - - - - - - - - MIUTT DOLLARS (640.00) RFCFlvf� VAY3I Wit WWKS DEA• FFiH Nvex -vc 0 }/ IAU 7-/77E3 S772 e z-T' ,Qer+ovE' P PPf/ E — w v8 P w.TSG'TTA E w O,ecssio E GJ Naeusu5 E w /�lae�a.o E w /IiACGuRi7Yr � w �qC�c S�v2. E w Torec. s 36 60 36 va 36 36 Zv 9'7 36 36 36 S6 4,9Z sf 7L � O 8 4' 60 7Z 60 G' o 48 v6 68 68 60 CO 68V s f .: ; 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 40054 MA 0 -3700 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport 3300 W. Newport Newport Beach, Dear Sir: May lo, 1966 Beach Boulevard California 07- Ora- 0-14ptB SS Project 55 Section 186.1 Our review of the project to improve the intersection of Westcliff Drive and Dover Drive, Select System Project 55, has revealed that additional information is needed before we can approve this project for financing with Sec- tion 186.1 funds. Construction of the median island and left -turn lane in Westcliff Drive has reduced the roadway width to less than Collier -Unruh standards. These standards indicate that in addition to the standard 12- foot -wide traffic lanes, v -foot shoulders are to be provided also. A decrease in the width of the traffic lanes or-parking lanes constitutes a deviation for which we need justification. We realize the primary purpose of any road or street is to provide for traffic movement. The shoulder area out- side the traveled way is generally improved to provide (1) back -up support for the pavement; (2) for safety, such as sight distance, lateral clearance, turning space at driveways and intersections and an area for slowed or stopped vehicles; and (3) as a reserve for future expansion. Traditionally, in urban areas, this shoulder area has been used for parking while using the abutting commercial, industrial, or residen- tial property. This does not mean this area must be used for parking or that it has been built just for parking. If the parking does not interfere with the basic purpose of traf- fic movement, this lane area may continue to be used in this manner. However, when parking interferes with the movement of vehicles in the traveled way, parking should be eliminated or restricted. The standards state that "parking lanes" can be eliminated when justified. This means where conditions -2- Mr. Benjamin 11clari E May 10, 1966 necessitate a reductio_, of this width at a sacrifice of the basic uses for this area, this eight feet can be reduced to a minimum of two feet. It does not mean that elimination of parking justifies this reduction. Since the standard four -lane street is 611 feet wide, exclusive of a. median, the standard half traveled way width fer this situation would be 32 feet; two 12 -foot traffic lanes and an 2-foot parking lane. Where the parking lane is justifiable reduced to two feet, the one -half width would be 26 feet. rlowever, where bounded by curbs on both sides, as on a divided street with curbed median, the minimum two - lane, one -way roadway width should be 2v feet. If the street is undivided or has a, painted median, the 26 -foot half width would be the minimum deviation. If elimination of the parking lane is justified, it appears that with minor modifications, a minimum of 28 feet between curbs could be provided. We hope the discussion above will assist your further review of this project and design of future projects. Since the approval of your petition to accumulate Section 186.1 funds is dependent on the approval of this project, your reply at an early date will be appreciated. Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer By a. J. i A. A. SrdITII Assistant District Engineer verfIVED OL �,y i 11966 O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE .�. TO AWARD OF CONTRA ROAD DEPT. SAEr- OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SA Material Testing Section ' AFTER AWARD OF CON ,CT lESi NO. G6��f'_ 'fir II CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS O N FIEtO NO, I MATERIAL$ ACTUALLY iw.O. rP.O. 4�.¢ K Na. r ENTERING INTO WORKS //JT 1M'.O. ar P.O. Nu. or AHFPI O �7 �alj QE�G'� -•�'E ..�, �' C}'� FED, NO, -' • SPECIAL TESTS - DATE REPiD. �� /_(eG IF CONTRACT, U -RACY ITEM - 9 ROAD NO. fir. PROJECT NAME FFiN Sir, RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 'CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION pUTSIDE MAINi gNCE $U B'D PERMITS /1 AGENCY AGENCY: Wfi m1wT/�GN h Ir 1 LIMITS OF SAMPLE — LOCA.OFSOURCE /0 DATE SAMPLED 5' -27 -6G BY C 6c4Ld TITLE 4 %. Z RECEIVED ?kf` FOR USE IN 'BILLING WI BI I BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.4¢ A6C3RE6ATE.6:SOIL" MADE. AT END OF MONTH MAT4IALS, ENGINEER GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A Es C D E SIEVE QF(, 7 F, d e O RET. CR. ADJ. OR COMB. GRADE AS USED Ga BPECI F. LIMITS �" SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. _ - MOISTURE AT fA TION % ] DRY DENSITY OF- BRIO.. #ICY. FT. 21/1 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 QO /T'('i EXV13ATION PRESS. II /Z CIO -f Q� THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK.. DICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. N SP. A . OVEN O0.Y B.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I/I FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. I P. L. .. P- I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX Ib DURABILITY :FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EAUD. PRESS 3D L S J > BY E %PAN. PRESS SD tl ° WET y •78 DRY AVG. SPEC. Q AT EDUIL, SPEC. INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. zoo Z — 9 SU IU LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % 'DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM M015TURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MJD CURVE NO. REMARKS: 6 196g 'BILLING WI BI I BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.4¢ A6C3RE6ATE.6:SOIL" MADE. AT END OF MONTH MAT4IALS, ENGINEER \ Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. .. Contra moteri, enteric PR' RE '[ SEND REP( t LOCATION r. �. REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH TO --�BELOW FINISHED GRADE nnT -2l -6(n ..TESTED AV: GL 1,0A -TE COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT AL IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ,:j 2. (,O 61 WT. SAND RETAINED 1C-no C WT. SAND USED �.'. -i. n D TEST SAND DENSITY al.-12 E VOLUME SAND USED 4-0 F VOLUME CONE + RING 1 qz G VOLUME TEST HOLE . I q % 1 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE -72,(.)0 1 TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX. DENS] TY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE Z K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 1 0. L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE S MLMHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MOLD NO. FIELD LAB WET WT. I !;CIO 01 DRY WT. 1 4 fe (o, % MOIST. I M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK. DRY WT. ROCK'` Q WET WT. - Al /JO DRY WT. = 3 TOTAL DRY. WT. R % ROCK CORR.MAX. DENS] TY I • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. /JO R % MOISTURE I CONDITION OF MOLD /a o S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN N NNti � T WET DENSITY o�� H V DRY DENSITY A CONV. FACTOR--O.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE .1667 - L=K =(100 7, +N) Q =O +(100 -1 +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R= (P-Q) . Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: f?. C �tF j = 140 R Test Method Calif. 216 -F RECEIVED JUN 1 1966 PUBLIC WORKS DEP11 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) i B+ 3 Firm r3 / %WEf/ METHOD A'0 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 13(0 140 MOISTURE ' S RC= TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_%. ❑ BILIxING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH EIAT1 4- CQ Pl I i' i i I IID 1 I 1 � /JO I /a o N NNti � o�� H A 3 Firm r3 / %WEf/ METHOD A'0 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 13(0 140 MOISTURE ' S RC= TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_%. ❑ BILIxING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH EIAT1 4- CQ Pl I i' i i ❑Preliminary tests prior to .word of contract. .,." ❑ Control tests on materials actually -' • entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT . Material Testing Section ?RQJE,CT Ci TH. ST, AGE % %: RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR - JOE SEh PORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGES INTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION N (.- REPRESENTING LIMIT TYPE MATERIAL�i DATE— IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB BI WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D TEST SAND DENSITY N: E VOLUME SAND USED , °`77 O F VOLUME CONE + RING eC G VOLUME TEST HOLE Fz. I H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE % ROCK I TARE WEIGHT % MOISTURE J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 3. S L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE � /l-, RT LT OF (� STA DEPTH - �! T BELOW FINISHED GRADE 1 TESTED BY: - METHOD A MOI$'fURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA ELD LAB WET WT. 2 3 DRY WT.• -7 ) INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M i. N: SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. —7 DRY WT. _ 3 DRY WT, COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY % MOISTURE • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN i P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT, COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE i CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN II N I T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY A — CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -F K =J +G CONE .1667 - L= K +(1 DOa +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ❑ BILLfNG WILL BE 9+ 1 METHOD A 0 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 35 MOISTURE G RC = qG % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) BY nLS E t R se AELATIVE COMPACTION.. :_ ' - _ /so f I i i II N I NH~ 4 A — 9+ 1 METHOD A 0 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 35 MOISTURE G RC = qG % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) BY nLS E t R se AELATIVE COMPACTION.. :_ ' - _ El Preliminary tests prior II to award of contract. �r r. I" 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT A& 011911E SE14bAE'PORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS Ldt'J'WON C�- S -T ILL S7 RT LT OF (� STA -f C) REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL A. (J. DEPTH 3 TO I ( BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE - -7 - (O (a TESTED BY: !- r 1� K `- CC) A "T E IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4-1. B WT. S RETAINED I Q , C WT. SAND.' D D TEST SAND DENSITY Z E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING Q G VOLUME TEST HOLE . I L' 30 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 2`7. „7 v I" TARE WEIGHT ;3:J 0 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE %G , O K WET DENSITY IN PLACE , L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE S METHOD A MOISTURE $AMPLE MOLD NO. FI EE.D' LAB WET WT. 4 01 DRY WT. (a'� % MOIST. M �t. N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK' Q WET WT. - -J,- /90 DRY WT. - a =- TOTAL DRY WT. R ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY I • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA. MOLD NO. 1 2 :. 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN I P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. /90 R % MOISTURE I CONDITION OF MOLD IR D S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY v �e op CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C s D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 � G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100 ;e +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) � Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: 14 C' (k Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A ®. B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY a 1 4a MOISTURE $ RC= 3�o % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT'END OF MONTH BY I��IvIN• JVU� RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) RIALS E 1301 1-83 RELATIVE. -CO:MPACT.IOW. I i via /f0 I `1 /90 I IR D v �e op NO A� REMARKS: 14 C' (k Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A ®. B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY a 1 4a MOISTURE $ RC= 3�o % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT'END OF MONTH BY I��IvIN• JVU� RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) RIALS E 1301 1-83 RELATIVE. -CO:MPACT.IOW. I i via II E3Preliminar tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE ., to award a contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section._ Tgt♦T No C —qq.. e25 4 ¢ ❑ RELATIVE COMPACTION FONT. NO.O i Control ttl is on (W .O. OR P O OR AHFPI mataria is actually enuring into works. - DATE REPTO. • If contract, use contr item PRO A REST GINEER (INSPECTOR) M. CONTRACTOR )4/�N1 -F-Y / SEND REPORT Tp: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AG AINTENA NCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 6/5. /F.C.LOCATION l c • RT LT OF CL STA Ji REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH DATE - 5- 1`271 TESTED BY.: �- IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 1, B WT. SAND RETAINED .^ -- C WT, SAND USED ZO D TEST SAND DENSITY -' E VOLUME SAND USED A-O 1 S F VOLUME CONE + RING 1 .� G VOLUME TEST HOLE 4 G H WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE a 1, a I TARE WEIGHT ., 00 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 2-9.30 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 3$'„ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE _ METHOD A TURE SAMPLE WET WT. LLD LAB 1 DRY WT. .^ -- 4 % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK 1 MET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. I - TOTAL DRY -WT:. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA SUMMARY MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 Oj INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOISTURE C� 1 1 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. I Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. Re R % MOISTURE tiN CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN �^ m ?� T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY - CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E =.0 + D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J G CONE .1667 1 - L= K= (100 % +N) Q =0. (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F L_J f FINISHED GRADE METHOD A ® B ❑ . SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS /f0 IN PLACE OPT, I MOISTURE C� 1 1 TENT. RC = /JA SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. I Re tiN u ao� iro �^ m ?� METHOD A ® B ❑ . SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT, DENSITY I O 140 MOISTURE C� RC = q �' TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) BY RELATIVE . :-COMP �tri�i.rr I ❑Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. '_• ❑ Control tests on materials actually • entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE • ROAD DEPARTMENT • Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION If contract, use contract item TEST NO. C+- AS FIELD NO.I� / CON T. NO. (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFPI ZI 24- IC DATE REPTD. �— 3� —(.L PRO 5-7 H• 5-7• AGENCY RESENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) M A X CONTRACTOR H A L- I_ Y OUTSIDE SEND REPORT T[� FQNSTRUCTION ❑ SG MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION S PN- I `� 4i Tl-I• ST L nrZLH IL7 RT LT OF CL STA 12+ 1 0 REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH TO 11 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE x-2-1 —(o TESTED BY: C LA kk 't1 Cn /-i-T F- IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D TEST SAND DENSITY - 7Z E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. — t H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 3 i I TARE WEIGHT S. J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 29.10 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 13 G. O METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 500 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M y . N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. — ; Q DRY WT. — t 1 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY 1 • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. 1 R % MOISTURE 1 CONDITION OF MOLD i /7 0 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN N I T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C- D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K =J - G CONE .1667 — L =K +(100% +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 1 .1810 R = (P —Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) /3011 -e3 BY f B+ /f0 I 1 /90 1 1 i /7 0 N I 'q -5 ' Firm e5 /a /o Wet/ a METHOD A. S B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT, PLACE DENSITY I i5 G ) 4O MOISTURE RC = 97 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_q ❑ BILLINGAWI LL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH .,;= �TERNILS ENO RELATIVE COMP - ACTION LOCATION N�" - _. -rN. REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL hl- L. _ DEPTH DATE 5-2 -7-- G C. TESTED BY IN PLACE DENSITY ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE -70 8 WT. SAND RETAINED to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT 0 WT. SAND USED 2.. Q, D TEST SAND DENSITY Material testing tion TEST NO. C = 5:41 & Ig %$ 1 !'.� -'' ❑ °atrat f °= - materials actually' RELATIVE ACTION FIELO NO. �c G COOT. 100. o W+O.Op P.O. OR AHFPI 44�( r� •; • entering into works. TARE WEIGHT DATE REPTD. J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE If cotltroct, use contract item WET DENSITY IN PLACE I L PROJECT ! 7P. ST. `'" _AGENCY C/ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN RESIDENT ENGINEER (IN$FtECTOR) )`. C CONTRACTOR H A :r- t - SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ 11T111E MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ MITS ❑ LOCATION N�" - _. -rN. REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL hl- L. _ DEPTH DATE 5-2 -7-- G C. TESTED BY IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND -70 8 WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED 2.. Q, D TEST SAND DENSITY �., :. E VOLUME SAND USED Ig %$ F VOLUME CONE + RING 19 G G VOLUME TEST HOLE I L7 $ H I WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE CORR.MAX.DENSITY I TARE WEIGHT 3, J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE g5, L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 27. RT LT OF rL STA 1-7 +2O TO I I BELOW FINISHED GRADE A' MET "A MOISTUR - PLE FHWb I LAB WET WT. C.OG MOLD NO. DRY WT. 2 3 % MOIST. IMI (s.'L 1 N SP. GR. ROCK 1 WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK_. WET WT. AT COMPACTION WET WT. _ a •.;;. f I DRY WT. - 1 TOTAL DRY WT. DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA'- MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 1 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION f I Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE I N NNN � CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN f j T_WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 I FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L- K= (700 % +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 f _. METHOD A ® B ❑ - SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY i 40 MOISTURE 8 RC = 9 I % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% �1" r3 /- % LYBt/ - REMARKS: 74C] @8 Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F30f 143 _. ❑ BILLING,'WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY ------ v.v v: ATERIALS eNGINEER R LAT G# IPACT-ION /i0 I 1 /90 f I I N NNN � f j A �1" r3 /- % LYBt/ - REMARKS: 74C] @8 Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F30f 143 _. ❑ BILLING,'WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY ------ v.v v: ATERIALS eNGINEER R LAT G# IPACT-ION ❑oawoi ry tests prior }o award d o contract. ❑ Control tests an materials actuallg • entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT L+ Material Testing Section TEST NO. Cam_ I I ITIVE t tP'ACTION 1w o. P.OROR AHFPI • 424 —k " DATE REPTO. lfcpf"' t,.ur,*Agi ict item R ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) M �-. i- outsioE �y 5 - ORT TO: CONSTRUCTION- ❑ AGENCY L1p LO ON REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL A.a- DEPTH_ DATE G TESTED BY: C L-� ;r IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND •} , (10 B I WT. SAND RETAINED 3. _ C WT. SAND USED INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D TEST SAND DENSITY 1 N' E VOLUME SAND USED .4000 F VOLUME CONE + RING I IQ (fog G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. - p H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 1 TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /a o K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 40.3 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ) 31, (o — CONTRACTOR M H L F- -1 MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ RT LT OF (L STA I +OS MRIKOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 3. _ DRY WT. S INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN %MOIST.' M 9 1 N' SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - Q DRY WT. - p TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3. _ 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN - P WET WT. AT COMPACTION I " Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. 1 R % MOISTURE /a o CONDITION OF MOLD I S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ,v fie, oo 0 O %!0 1N T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY -CONY. FACTOR--.0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F, C= A- B E= C+ D U "IT CONE +UNIT G =E -F' 'K =J +G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100 % +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM.RING ".0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 1 1969 .` FINISHED GRADE /f0 I - /d0 I 1 /a o I ,v fie, oo 0 O %!0 1N REMARKS: 14 Ce Test Method Calif. 216 -F • rte! f %lyell METHOD A: ® B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS OPT. PLACE DENSITY 13Z 140 MOISTURE -% g RC =�.4. % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: ❑ BrLLINGIWILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) p -.. F30114a: ... °E.LATWE -COMP i t r E. L. WHITE CO. contractor: 11311 CHAPMAN AVE -, SUITE 118, GARDEN GROVE, CALIF, 94610 l/ PHONE p11) 638 -3163 J( June 7, 1966 Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Subject: Price for ad,.:itional work on 5th Avenue. Dear Mr. Devlin: For removal, grading and replacement of approximately 884 sq. ft. of 4" sidewalk we are pleased to quote $0.955 per sq. ft. For 300 lin. ft. of 6" high AC berm, $1.85 per lin. ft. For 1700 lin ft. of same , $ 1.15 per lin ft. Very truly yours, e-ry , Robert W. Z nam Pa rtner, E. .White Company I ! M CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD DATE .JUNE 9, r966 T0: A.C. BIRNIE DIVISION OF ,HIGHWAYS P.Q. Box 2304, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES 54, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: A.A. SMITH p SUBJECT: SELECT SYSTEM PROJECTS 48 AND 55 WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION (3) PETITION FOR ACCUMULATION OF SECTION 186.1 FUNDS REMARKS: SUBMITTED PER YOUR REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT OUR LETTER PETITION DATED MARCH 15, 1966. IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE PAYMENT EXPENDING THE FY 63 -64 FUNDS WILL BE MADE ON JUNE 30. COPIES TO: BY:�T,Lr ;Y v J • 0 19-§1-- 64 Fiscal Year 19„-, Fiscal Year Fiscal Year STATE OF-CALIFORNIA DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS STATE.HIGHWAY ENGINEER SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA (TO HE TRANSMITTED THROUGH DISTRICT ENGINEER) A.C. BIRNIE Address. DISTRICT VI1 PETITION FOR ACCUMULATION OF SECTION 186.1 FUNDS The City of NEWPORT BEACH pursuant t0 Section 186.6 of the Streets an g ways o e providing for accumulation and expenditure of State Highway Funds apportioned under Section 186.1 for construction and right -of -way costs in respect to Select System city streets does hereby submit this petition for the accumulation of $5.0606 0 _ apportioned and to be apportioned during. the 16 -64 fiscal years. All work to be•acoomp s e with ese n s s all be done pursuant to statutory requirements and as described below. These funds are to be expended prior to JUNE 100 (dates, such as June 30, I 9) The specific project is located on TH AVENUE _ ` name o s ree and extends from LARKSPUR 'AVENUE to POPPY AVENUE AND AT TH E INTER Se A de ai...: description p e propose pro ec s no u e on e ,attached "Specific -Plan" Project Sheet. In conformance with Section 186.6 regarding a specific plan for accumulation of required matching funds, the proposed financing of the project including the planned conformance with matching requirements . is outlined under "PROPOSED FUNDING." %4t IV PROPOSED FUNDING Matching Credit on Hand Fy 63 -64 Fy FY 64 -65 FY FY Fy FY Subtotals Total 186.1 and Matching Fund Total Project Cost Other Funds to be Provided Accumulation for Project 186.1 Funds Matching.Funds 5i,o66.o5 Funds 65,3oo.81 65,300.81 Prepesed Date of Start of Construction FEBRUARY 16, 1966 Matching Funds will be made available from the following source(s): ( Fund) W PRIOR YEARS 69,ioo.81 ACCU LATION S ature, Authorized Orr ��� • --(Date) PUBLIC WORKS OIicREC ial OR e Approval Recommended: Program Approved istrict City and County � a e Projects Engineer (District Engineer Deputy State Highway Engineer (To be submitted in triplicate with copy of resolution approving proposed accumulation budget. An accumulation petition need be submitted once only for each project. Such petition should, therefore, be submitted prior to the two -year expiration date for the first year's apportionment being accumulated, and should cover each succeeding year's apportionment which may also be accumulated for the particular project financing.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA — HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G• BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054 June 8, 1966 07- Ora- 0-NptB SS Project 55 erection 186.1 Plr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard -'�ewnort Peach, California Dear Sir: The plans for the improvement of the 111'lestcliff Drive - Dover Drive intersection, as submitted by your letter of April 26, 1466, and supplemented by the information in your letter of 'day 26, 1966, have been reviewed. Based on 11 -foot traffic lanes and the prohibition of parking within the project limits, this channelization project is satisfactory for financing with Section 186.1 gas tax funds. Je understand that Projects 11.8 and 55 have been combined under one construction contract, that all construction should be completed prior to July 1, 1966, but that final payment to I the contractor may not be made till after July- 1, 1966. This ` contract is being financed with Section 186.1 funds apportioned { a in the 1963 -64 fiscal year, which funds must be expended prior �"�„ to July 11 1966. On June 3, 1966, we transmitted to you forms `d os'+ W for an Accumulation Petition, which should be completed and re- turned to us prior to June 15, 1966, should there be any possi- bility that final contract payment cannot be made prior to July 1, 1966. Please contact us should you have any questions regarding the forms or the requirements relative to the expenditure of the gas tax funds apportioned in the 1963 -6Li. fiscal year. Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District :engineer RECFIVED JUN 131966 By A. AITH PUBLIC WOM DEPT Assistant . ssista t.DistrI*ct Engineer __1�5 xlu: STATEMENT fr -� RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIA ES ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS PHONE 548 -7723 P. D. BOX 117 136 ROCHESTER STREET COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA TO: City of Newport Beach DATE June 13 19 66 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California. YOUR ORDER 2212 Attention: Mr. G.P. Dunigan. JOB NO 9482 STATEMENT DYE WHEN RENDERED - INTEREST CHARGED ON PAST DUE ACCDYNTB Construction staking on a portion of 5th Avenue, Corona del Mar, California. Survey Party 62 hours @ $28.00 P1736.00 Supervision 10 hours @ $15.00 1 150.00 1886.00 RECEIVED JUN 1 I966 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. ( ys�� CITY OF NE "•FORT 88ACH • Laboratory Analysis for April lgii O_C_E_Af & "" RE 15.00 Fi old TEO 3 Iwo, a 5.00 ter. ssn -�z Relative ompaction 2 totts a 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #66-0 -1664 & 65 37.00 OCFJJ A "ti" STREET Field Time 2 br4. a 10.00 Lr. 2o.CO Relative Comoaotiom 2 tests 8 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #C -1740 & 41 42.00 CEN IA AVE 6 P Brill Rig ! 2 men , 15:00 hr. 15.00 Resistance Value 1 tot 0 27.50 ea. 27.50 Mechanical Analysis 4 Hydro. 1 lest 2 11000 ea. 11.00 Moisture Ve.lue l test a 1.10 ea. 1.10 Test #66 -557 Office: Drafting & Report Preparation, 1 hr. 4 5.00 hr. 5.00 59.60 i OCi,AN FRONT 0#1001 Field Time 2 hrs. a 5.00 br. 10.00 Relative Compaction 2 tests 4 11.00 ea. 22.00 Teat #C -1769 A 1770 32.00 OC AN FR Fie d ime 2 bra. 5.00 hr. 10400 Relative Compaction 2 tests 8 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #0-1784 A 85 32.00 &V-R DRIVE Field Time } bra. 8 10.00 hr. 30.00 i, c9K Moisture d ce.loulations 4 tests a 2.00 ,a. 8.00 Test C -1803 thru 1806 38.00 CCFAN FRONT Field Time 1 hr. s 10.00 hr. 10.00 Relative Compaction 1 test a 11400 ea. 11.00 Test #C -1818 21.00 VV_r_R_i_►_cS�TCLI„ PFF F srz 3 bra. 10.00 hr. 30.00 moisture h Calculations 7 teats 8 2.00 hr. 14.00 Test #C -1828 thru 1834 44.00 CCAN FRONT old Time 2 bra. i 10.00 hr. 20.00 Relative Compaction 2 tests a 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #C -1826 b 27 42.00 (Continued on Page 2) - (Continued on Page 3) - Page 2. CITY OF MPORT BEkC8 Laboratory Analysis Fos April 1966 (Contd) OCEAN BLVD ALLEY Field. Time 2 hP40a A 5.00 hr. 10.00 Relative Compaction 1 teat a 11.00 ea. 11.00 Relative Compaction I. test R 13.20 ea. 13.20 34.20 Test #C -1879 & 80 `'- OCEAN Fie �ime 2 brs. 0 1Q.00 br. 20.00 jz Relative Compaction 3 tests 0 11.00 ea. 33.00 53.00 Teat #C -1909, 10 & 11 _F._AS B��LUF__F Time 1 hr. ! 5.00 br. 5•^� Resistance Value 1 test 0 27.50 ee. 27.50 Hydrometer & Grad. 1 test 0 11.00 ea. 11.00 Moisture 1 test a 1.10 ea. 1.10 Test #66 -599' 1001 CONTRACT Field Time 2 bra. a 5.00 hr. 10.00 ti Relative Compaction 2 tests ® 11.00 ea. 22,00 32.00 Test #C -1979 & 80 CCCEAN BLVD ALLEY Field Time 3 hra. a 5.00 br. 15.00 Relative Compaction 1 test 0 13.90 ea. 13.20 Moisture & Calculations 2 tests 9 2.00 ea. 4.00 32.20 Teat #C -1974 thru 76 OCEAN BLVD Field Time 2 bra. ® 5.00 br- 10.00 Relative Compaction 1 test 9 13.20 ea. 13.20 L Moisture & Calculations 2 tests 0 2.00 ea. 4.00 Test #C -2002, 2003 & 2004 27.20 OCEAN BLVD ALLEY Field Time 1 hr. 9 10.00 br. 10.00 Relative Compaction 1 test 9 11.00 ea. 11.00 Moisture & Calculations 1 test a 2.00 ea. 2.00 23.00 Test #C -2069 & 70 EAST BLUFF Field Time 3 bra. 9 5.00 hr. 15.00 Moisture & Calculations 4 tests R 2.00 ea. 8.00 23.00 Test #0- 2059, 60, 61 & 62 (Continued on Page 3) - \ r page 3. i J • CITr.oF NEWPORT BEACH Laboratory Analysis for April 1966 (Ooutd) OCEAN BLVD ALL.. Fie d Time 2 bra, ® 5.00 br. 10.00 z, Relative Compaction 2 tests a 11.00 N. 22.00 Test #C -2056 & 57 VISTA ORO (WATFIi) is Time 2 bra. • 5.00 hr. 10.00 Relative Compaction 1 test ! 11.00 ea. 11.00 Tentative Compaction 1 test Is 6.60 ea. 6.60 Test #C -2054 & 55 VISTA DEL ORC ( S .WPR) Field Time 3 hre. 5.00 br. 15.00 Relative Compaction 3 tests ® 11.00 ea. 33.00 Test #C -2051 8- 52 ANNIVERSARY ESTATES INTERIOR STREETS Field Time 2 men bra. • 5.00 br. 20.00 Resistance Value, Untreated 2 tests 0 27.50 ea. 55.00 Test #66 -558 & 560 Resistance Value Treated 2 tests 4 38.50 aa. 77.00 Test #66 -560 - 2}% Lime - 5 x Lime Hydrometers 6 tests 4) 11.00 ea. 66.00 Tests #66 -558 tbru 560, & 567 tbru 569 Moistures 6 tests ® 1.10 ea. 6.60 Tests #66 -558 thru 560, & 66 -567 thru 569 Office: (Drafting & Report) 4 bra. 0 5.00 Sao 20.00 EAST BLUFF DR Coarse Grading 1 test a 3.30 sae 3.30 Fine Grading 1 test a 6.60 ea. 6.60 Test #66 -P -443 Total - 02- 55Ct>- /Li 15 (0 _ oZk 8z,00 3077 �rS_ =� 32.00 27.60 48.00 244.60 e. # 978,90 ., CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA city Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Area Code 716 673 -1110 MAY 26, 1966 A.C. BIRNIE .. - DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P.O. BOX 2304, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA ATTENTION: MR. A.A. SMITH SUBJECT: SELECT SYSTEM PROJECT #55 - WESTCLIFF AND DOVER INTERSECTION DEAR SIRS WE HAVE REVIEWED YOUR LETTER OF MAY 100 19660 IN WHICH YOU REQUESTED ADDITIONAL JUSTIFICATION FOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE ROADWAY WIDTH STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THE COLLIER -UNRUH ACT. THE EXISTING WIDTH OF ROADWAY. CURB TO CURB. WAS 64 FEET. IN VIEW OF THE HEAVY TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS INVOLVED, IT WAS CONSIDERED ESSENTIAL FOR. TRAFFIC SAFETY THAT POSITIVE CHANNELIZATION BE INCLUDED. THIS WAS PRO- VIDED IN THE FORM OF THERk ISED MED.IAN. SUFFICIENT RIGHT -OF -WAY WAS NOT AVAILABLE TO ALLOW CONFORMANCE WITH COLLIER -UNRUH STANDARDS. TWO - APPROACHES WERE AVAILABLE FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. ACQUIRE THE ADDITIONAL RIGHT -OF -WAY TO FULLY MEET COLLIER -UNRUH STANDARDS. 2. UTILIZE THE EXISTING RIGHT -OF -WAY TO THE BEST ADVANTAGE. ALTERNATIVE (I) WAS REJECTED BASED ON THE EXTREMELY HIGH COST TO ACQUIRE THE DEVELOPED REAL ESTATE ALONG WESTCLIFF. ONE SIDE OF WESTCLIFF IS DEVELOPED FOR COMMERCIAL USE, THE OTHER IS MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL. UNDEVELOPED LAND IN THIS AREA HAS RECENTLY SOLD FOR APPROXIMATELY $100,000 AN ACRE. FULL COMPLIANCE WITH COLLIER -UNRUH STANDARDS WITH REGARD TO PARKING LANES AND MEDIAN WIDTHS, WOULD HAVE REQUIRED ACQUISITION OF AN ADDITIONAL 14 FOOT WIDTH OF RIGHT -OF -WAY AT A COST OF AT LEAST $20,000. HEAVY PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC IN THIS AREA PROHIBITED REDUCTION OF THE PARKWAY WIDTH.' . AN ADDITIONAL 15,000± WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED TO RELOCATE EXISTING CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK, CATCH BASINS, AND STREET LIGHTS AND TO CONSTRUCT Y SUBJECT: SELECT SYSTEM PROJECT #55 MAY 262 1966 PAGE 2 THE ADDITIONAL WIDTH OF PAVING WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN REQUIRED. LARGE QUANTITIES OF OFF- STREET PARKING ARE AVAILABLE IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF THE ADJACENT PROPERTY. PARKING ALONG WESTCLIFF DRIVE HAS BEEN PROHIBITED FOR SEVERAL YEARS AND A REVISION AT THIS TIME COULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED. PARKING WAS THEREFORE ELIMINATED FROM FURTHER CONSIDERATION. WIDENING TO PROVIDE A 28-FOOT CURB TO CURB WIDTH ALONG THE SECTION CONTATNING A RAISED MEDIAN WOULD HAVE REQUIRED RELOCATION OF EXISTING CURBS GUTTERS STREET LIGHTS, AND CATCH BASINS AND CONSTRUCTION OF ADD- ITIONAL PAVING AT AN ESTIMATED COST OF $105000. RIGHT -OF -WAY COSTS WOULD PROBABLY HAVE EXCEEDED $5000. THE DECISION WAS THEREFORE MADE TO FOLLOW ALTERNATIVE (2). THE EXISTING 64 -FOOT CURB TO CURB WIDTH OF WESTCLIFF DRIVE PROVIDED SPACE FOR TWO 12 FOOT LANES] TWO 13 FOOT LANES, A 10 FOOT LEFT TURN POCKET AND A 4 FOOT MEDIAN AT THE NORTHWESTERLY END OF THE PROJECT. THE 4 FOOT MEDIAN WIDTH WAS CONSIDERED THE MINIMUM DESIRABLE FOR THIS PARTICULAR LOCATION. ANY LESSER WIDTH WOULD POSE A HAZARD TO DRIVERS IN BOTH DIRECTIONS., EASTERLY OF THE LEFT TURN POCKET, THE MAXIMUM LANE WIDTHS CONSISTENT WITH CHANNELIZATION REQUIREMENTS WERE PROVIDED. ANY REDUCTION IN MEDIAN WIDTH WOULD ENDANGER VEHICLES IN THE POCKET. IT SHOULD BE POINTED OUT THAT IN ESSENCE, THIS PROJECT INVOLVED ONLY RECONSTRUCTION AND RECHANNELIZATION OF AN EXISTING INTERSECTION TO IMPROVE OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS. THE SCOPE OF THE WORK DID NOT INCLUDE WIDENING OF THE EXISTING STREET' EITHER AT THE INTERSECTION OR WESTERLY OF THE INTERSECTION. IT IS FELT THAT SUCH WIDENING AT THE INTERSECTION WOULD HAVE BEEN OUT OF PROPORTION WITH THE SCOPE OF THE PROJECT AND COULD NOT BE JUSTIFIED IN TERMS OF BENEFITS RECEIVED FROM AN ENGINEERING POINT OF VIEW. WE BELIEVE THE WIDTH AVAILABLE HAS BEEN USED TO BEST ADVANTAGE. CON- STRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND TRAFFIC IS FLOWING SMOOTHLY WITH NO PROBLEM DUE TO LANE WIDTH. SINCE THE OBJECT OF THE DESIGNS TO FACILITATE THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC2 HAS BEEN ACHIEVEDO WE SINCERELY HOPE THIS DEVIATION FROM THE COLLIER -UNRUH STANDARDS WILL BE APPROVED. VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJAMIN B. NOLAN CITY ENGINEER HTC:NAJ F F.- Frew Avc - �,rr .•� City of Newport Beach TO 3300 W. Newport Boulevard C 9 r Y Newport Beach, California. Attention: Mr. G.P. Dunigan, Engineering Dept. SUBJECT:. FOLDf MESSAGE Dear Pat: FROM RAUB�IN, FROST £T ASSOCIATES Engineers 6 Surveyors P. O. B " 117 - 136 ROCHESTER ST. COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA Phone: 548 -7723 DATE: June 13, 1966. Enclosed please find the City Ties for Irvine Block corner Marguerite Avenue and Poppy Avenue as requested on the 5th Avenue job. EBEI/ew Sincerely, RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES E.B. Hillyard. PLEASE REPLY TO 3 SIGNED REPLY J D RECEIVED JUN 141966 �,/� PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. DATE — /5 - -�'� SIGNED, -1 i" - BBZ THIRD AVE., B C YN 92, H Y ° ° "' " °' THIS COPY FOR PERSON ADDRESSED j. DATE NJ6 I AUDITOR - CONTROLLER TIR -?ON T R2 !E INVOICE NO. 3 J#qw 249 106 jg_ _533 ,SANTA BOX 567 14 1kLI). TO A ANA, CALIFORNIA NUMBER ACCOUNT, FUND DEPT.. NAME • CM BEACH ADDRESS Blvd irt Wft,, C�Lliforrda QUANTITY PRICE AMOUNT IJ � L - 1,-c OZ'- 5-5"97- 12 (-tee?, 00 c- 9,,c WAWA 5U X12297 -04/ 22.30 5 C/ -2, 3"t S- - 0 2 JF TOTAL DUE CUSTOMER EXTRA COPY r 1 OCEAN BLVD & G STREET, Field Time Relative Compaction "B" Test #C -2126 32ND STREET ALLEY /� Field Time OZ- Relative Compaction "B" Moisture & Calculation Test #C -2140 & 2141 BATBOA & G STREET Field Time Relative Compaction "B" Test #c_2142 & 43 // \\ OCEAN AVE & G STREET V Field Time Relative Compaction "B" Test AC -2172 2 hrs.`. 0 5.00 hr. 10.00 1 test 0 11.00 ea. 11100 2 hre. 0 5.00 hr. 10.00 1 test • 11.00 ea. 11.00 1 test • 2.00 ea. 2.00 2 hre. 0 5.00 hr. 10.00 2 testa 0 11.00 ea. 22.00 1 hr. 0 5.00 hr. 3.00 1 test 0 11.00 ea. 'x.00 G CONTRACT #1001 SEWER MAIN & CONTRACT �F]00. (At Ocean H1vd Alley P: L St) Field Time 2 hrs. 0 5.00 hr. 10.00 Relative Compaction "B" 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #C -2190 & 2191 32ND ST & BALBOA Coarse Grading t 1 test 0 3.30 ea. 3.30 Fine Grading 1 test 0 6.60 ea. 6.60 Sand Equivalent 1 test 0 2.20 ea. 2.20 Test #66- P_1005 ALLEY (SEWER) Field Time Relative Compaction 'B" Test #C -2204 & 2205 OCEAN FRONT (SEWER) t� Field Time Relative Compaction "B" Test X2252 & 2253 OCEAN BLVD A= - MM Field Time Relative Compaction "B" Test #C -2267 & 2268 3 hrs. 0 10.00 hr. 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. 3 bra. 0 5.00 hr. 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. 2 bra. 0 10.G0 hr. 2 tests ® 11.00 ea. (Contimed on Page 2) - 21.00 23.00 16.00 � . f 12.10 30.00 22.00 52.00 15.00 22.00 37.00 20.00 22.00 42.00 i Page 2, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Laboratory !2LI ! i s for May' 1966 (Contd) OCEAN & 0 sTxsE"t _ wdM LINE Field Time 3 hrs. 0 0-5.00 hr. 15.00 Relative Campeegion "B" 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #MPS77 & 2278 C1001 - OCEAN BLVD ALLEY Field Time - - 2 hra. 0 10.00 hr. 20.00 V Relative Compaction "B" v 2 tests ® 11.60 ea. 22.00 Test AFC -2300 & 2301 OCEAN BLiM ALLEY & OCEAN BLVD ALLEY SEWER M Field Time 2 hrs* �- 5.00 hr. 10.00 /' ^elative Compaction "B" Lt 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. 22.00 TFst #C -2319 & 2320 FIFTH AVE (CORONA DEL MAR Field Time 3 3 hrs. ® 10.00 hr. 3a.� Relative Compaction "B" 5 tests @ 11.00 ea. 55.00 Test fC -2336 thru 2340 - OC °.AI? 7 LV1) ALLEY (SEtJER) lJ Field Time 2 hrs. • 10.00 hr. 20.00 Relative Compaction "B" 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test #C -2332 & 2333 OCF.A'.i ?L?10. ALLEY 1 Field Time 2 hra. @ 10.00 hr. 20.00 Relative Compaction "B" 1 test @ 11.00 ea. 11.00 Test #C -2388 _, OC71"! AVA St1TR Field Time 3 hrs. @ 5.00 hr. 15.00 Relative Compaction "B" 2 tests @ 11.00 ea. 22.00 Test +C -2376 & 77. FIFTH AVE, JOB #954 (J v Field Time (2 men) 3 hra. 0 10.00 hr. 30.00 Relative Compaction "B" 4 tests 0 11.00 ea. 44:00 Tertat:_ve Compaction 1 test 0 6.00 ea. Test #C -2407 thru 2411 MC FADDEN AVE & COURT AVE Field Time U 4 hrs. @ 5.00 hr. 20.00 Relative Compaction "A" 1 test 0 13.20 ea. 13.20 Moisture & Calculations 2 tests ® 2.00 ea. 4.00 Test #C- 2412 -A* 2412;3 & 2413 (Continues on Page 3) - I 37.0 42.00 32.00 85.00 42.00 31.00 37.00 80.00 37.20 Page 3. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACS . Laboratory Analysis for May 1966 (Contd) FIFTH STREET /�\ Field Tim V 3 hrs. 1. -10.00 hr. Moisture & Calculations 7 tests 4:-9.00 ea. Test #C -2541 thru 2547 19th & COURT R 966 (S dER) Field Time 3 hrs. 4 10.00 hr. Moisture & Calculations 3 tests 4 $r00 es. Test #C -2529s 2530 & 2531 30.00 14.00 44.00 30.00 6.00 36.00 Total - 770.30 nn sue_ 929`I -oY/ 7_., C a..� DATE January 2o, 1966 SOLD TO NUMBER OUNTY OF ORANI AUDITOR - CONTROLLER P.O. BOX 567 SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA NAME CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH ADDRESS 3300 W. Noport Blvd Newport Beach, California INVOICE NO. REFERENCE THE INVOICE NUMBER ON REMITTANCES FOR PROPER CREDIT ORIGINAL INVOICE F aso -a TOTAL DUE 74.60 ACCOUNTING CODE FUND DEPT. OBJ. SVB -OBJ. Laboratory Analysis for December 1965 112 0001 748 REFERENCE THE INVOICE NUMBER ON REMITTANCES FOR PROPER CREDIT ORIGINAL INVOICE F aso -a TOTAL DUE 74.60 QUANTITY D E S C R I P T I O N PRICE AMOUNT Laboratory Analysis for December 1965 INTERSECTION OF DOVER & WESTCLIFF Hand Boring (1 man) 2 hrs. 0 5.00 hr. 10.00 Resistance Value 1 test ® 27,50 ea. 27.50 Hydrometer w /Grading 1 test ® 11.00 ea. 1100 Moisture 1 test a 1.10 ea. 1.10 Test +65 -1528 Office: (1 man) 5 hrs. 0 5.00 hr. 25.00 74 60 -94 9- 3355--oz REFERENCE THE INVOICE NUMBER ON REMITTANCES FOR PROPER CREDIT ORIGINAL INVOICE F aso -a TOTAL DUE 74.60 [I Preliminaiy tests prior to .word of contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB ROAD DEPARTMENT WT. SAND RETAINED 3 Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— G D F E D N0. ,_ 5 antral tests on g RELATIVE COMPACTION (W�O TOR P.OROR AMFPI HFP) materials actually F .4. %mot.- -- entering into works. G VOLUME TEST HOLE ,1630 If contract, use contract item DATE REPTO. I TARE WEIGHT PROJECT �.S 7"A/ i4 Y.t%. .SY "�S"^4 AGENCY �•�'�w`°- *�"i'*'z RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR)- T`A'VGf_Y CONTRACTOR'. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION r=47714P _FVW_, LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10.3(p TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH TO �� s6 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: �.9OK,ePI`,Xd.�if1E?i WET DENSITY 37 139-. /? d IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USEDff,�p INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D TEST SAND DENSITY qp E VOLUME SAND USED /{!7 F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE ,1630 H WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EX C. SAMPLE p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 ,/f, 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK PI WET WT. ROCK 2 /f-OQ DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - ; Q DRY WT. - a 1 I TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY 1 / e ( MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 ,/f, 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN e:' PI WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2 /f-OQ ?-A .4 � Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. 1 I R % MOISTURE 1 / e 4-2,0 CONDITION OF MOLD LOSS vVC S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10.3(p 10,5:* T WET DENSITY 37 139-. /? d V DRY DENSITY N CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K +G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100% +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F '-13x1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) f J3 � 3' F /F�c 1 t5 /ado ilea A METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY )�11*a 13a "f MOISTURE =AtA4f RC - � &' - TENT. RC = % C ' " -. SPECIFICATION: NL �� %. BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION \ I /fo 1 � 1 I MNI 'I I /? d I N �HH � f J3 � 3' F /F�c 1 t5 /ado ilea A METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY )�11*a 13a "f MOISTURE =AtA4f RC - � &' - TENT. RC = % C ' " -. SPECIFICATION: NL �� %. BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior to aword o1 contract. ontrol tests on materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION If contract, contract item TEST NO. C— 240 FIELD NO._ 0. IW .O. OR P.O. OR AHF P) DATE REPTO. PROJECT .S T2--e ect'4C , tcrtA _'" 942t AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) s .f'A1 `:' CONTRACTOR 6n,4r W161Z2 oGENCY ® SEND.RE PORT TO: CONSTRUCTION A MAINTENANCE SuUB Oa [.�. PERMITS ❑ AGENCY cy� ''e.: LOCATION 7�7* - -e--VA 2? s�f. s R T OF 1L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL -.,y i DEPTH // � TO / 7r BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE I -C° ?P-44 TESTED BY: A��✓�I-4-04eltley IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND , 9j WT. SAND RETAINED s, C WT. SAND USED 0 D TEST SAND DENSITY , 30, E VOLUME SAND USED .33 F VOLUME CONE + RING • /.&/o G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. H IWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE % ROCK 1 TARE WEIGHT gyp, J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE �.f , Cr K WET DENSITY IN PLACE', .CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. 1 2 r DRY WT. 4 01 % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. — 3 DRY WT. - 3 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT. I % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSI TY % MOISTURE REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F M RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGPQ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 r 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN R P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. I R % MOISTURE t O .CONDITION OF MOLD U4l4C C('Se. 5 HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /O CrD /0.8o I I T WET DENSITY �� o0 V1 DRY DENSITY o O Ln CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D I UNIT GONE +UNIT G = E - F K = ! _ G CON E .1667 - L= K= (100 % +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x ( S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F M RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGPQ S+ -S - Fiero rs / a %Wei) METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY M O I S TU RE RC = 93 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL,% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH r3o11 -a3 RELATIVE COMPACTION fi R I IA I I I I I �� o0 o O Ln S+ -S - Fiero rs / a %Wei) METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY M O I S TU RE RC = 93 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL,% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH r3o11 -a3 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary testro,p . r to award o aontrct'a 'i. 9-015ontrol tests on Taterlals actU.Il1• entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION If contract, use contract item TEST NO. C— Cf FIELD NO. S VNT. NO. OR O. OR P.O. OR AHFPI DATE REPTD. PROJECT . <.'.sr'.�.. Grr?k<`°L+�i AGENCY RESJDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) Y CONTRACTOR. OUTSIDE rrpp�� SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE S U BD. �r�,'j. PERMITS El LOCATION �i' sr_�'�40.� . .'-* . -, IFTTFV78F �L STA i Zt S S REPRESENTING LIMITS P/ TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH �.� � TO 12 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE ,gn--- 20,-Gr TESTED BY: A0 ^�%tW-V "J' 4 f e `" IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED f ,tea C WT. SAND USED ,7 D TEST SAND DENSITY .2r E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING�p G VOLUME TEST HOLE ,/ H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE , I TARE WEIGHT z° 3C5 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA " FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN o MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK PI WET WT. ROCK •45'a DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. -; Q DRY WT. - a TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY z, REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGP) r3011-63 go f B. MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA " MOLD NO. 1 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN o \� 1 PI WET WT. AT COMPACTION •45'a 1 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. I R 7 MOISTURE z, CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN o, T WET DENSITY tv 0 V DRY DENSITY CONY, FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J+ G CONE .7667 - L= K +(100a +N) Q =D +(100% +N) SM. RING .0143 .7810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGP) r3011-63 go f B. 3 F�Em rs � %ls% /J METHOD A 0 B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC = % TENT. RC =_ G •S % SPECIFICATION: NL — %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RELATIVE COMPACTION /so I \� 1 1 iso I I i - l? O I tiN N tv 0 A �p / %G7 aal- 3 F�Em rs � %ls% /J METHOD A 0 B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC = % TENT. RC =_ G •S % SPECIFICATION: NL — %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RELATIVE COMPACTION Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- FIELD NO. -bF -fig ram RELATIVE COMPACTION CON T. NO.OR ontrol tests an IW.O. OR P.O. OR AHFPI materials actually A/' entering into works. DATE REPT D. IF contract, use contract item PROJECT v` �N ✓�: Jod '4e 2,5 j AGE NCY�I��- �WPG2T RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 7— i/V��}/ CONTRACTOR .E•.G I•— ILf /// /ic SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. PERMITS ❑ LOCATION '�- . -� ✓.c. aG'�i(/�RT (Cf�OF�cSA 7 1-Z3 REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL N. S. DEPTH // v TO / 7 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: ifS.:�,Fdr r9�,EN,ey IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 5�, 8,5-- B WT. SAND RETAINED R90 C WT. SAND USED 2J° OS, D TEST SAND DENSITY CF',Z, 30 E VOLUME SAND USED • 3,�jp F1 VOLUME CONE + RING .jg /O G VOLUME TEST HOLE '7 O H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 24.0-7 1 TARE WEIGHT 2.90 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE z % , /S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LA6 WET WT. 1 ,(,¢, DRY WT. 3 %MOIST. i M N SP. GR. ROCK ae WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK P WET WT. —,33 DRY WT. — a TOTAL DRY WT. Q % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY SR.) f MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA I i MOLD NO. 1 ,(,¢, 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ae ao P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD c,G u. � gzv I i S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY I CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D p 'J O UNIT CON E +UNIT G =E — F K = i +G CONE .1667 — L =K +(100 % +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING ,0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR _x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY SR.) f METHOD,.. A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY /',- Z � } MOISTURE i�p•e� RC= f? % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ILLI NG WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION \ I i /fa I i 1 AF 0 tiN I p 'J O H /ID METHOD,.. A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY /',- Z � } MOISTURE i�p•e� RC= f? % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ILLI NG WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of aontract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C= 2 �// / FIELD NO. 6�roF —d 1�1/COntral tests t on RELATIVE COMPACTION (W.OTOR P.OROR AHFP) 1LL1SS materials actually .f.ZA/C entering into works. ' DATE REPTD. If contract, use contract item PROJECT -5 AGENCY CZ/✓e-c RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) % /NGLL= 7' CONTRACTOR .�•�r 'I/C /ifi /� OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ auW. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION T OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH /� TO /7 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE .5 =,Za —G G TESTED BY: e3 ort3 IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED _ 3 0 C WT. SAND USED zSir 20 D'TEST SAND DENSITY p E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE ./. H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE o d I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE z/ • /$' K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2tiF 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK PI WET WT. ROCK Z4 00 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. — i Q DRY WT. — a TOTAL DRY WT. - % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY / REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA - MOLD NO. 1 ,C.4 2tiF 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ae 00 PI WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z4 00 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - R % MOISTURE / CONDITION OF MOLD 44, Ov S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN I i u •7U TI WET DENSITY G 0 V DRY DENSITY I rNN '�1 CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C. F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K +G CONE .1667 — L= K +(1 DO % +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 - .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) f1 METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE O ®T RC = �� TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL�% ❑ BILLINQ WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F301 1 _e3 RELATIVE COMPACTION IALS ENGINEER - , i /30 I i I t I rNN '�1 poo H j A f1 METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE O ®T RC = �� TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL�% ❑ BILLINQ WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F301 1 _e3 RELATIVE COMPACTION IALS ENGINEER 9 STATEMENT RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS PHONE 5�13 -7733 P. O. SOX 117 136 ROCHESTER STREET COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA TO: City of Newport Beach DATE April 12 19 661L_ 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California. YOUR ORDER 2217 Attention: Mr. G.P. Dunigan. LIDS STATEMENT OUR WHEN RENDERED - INTEREST CHARGED ON PAST OUR ACCOUNIR Dover - Westcliff Improvement Staking. Survey Party - 30 hours @ $30.00 = $900. Supervision and calculation 6 hours @ $15.00 = 90. Plan Change and Restaking. Survey Party - 3 hours @ $30.00 = $ 90.00 Supervision - 2 hours @ $15.00 30.00 !Ct sS C�:<. RFUGrFn �3�i RECFIVED APR 13 1966 PUBLIC DEPT. III A.4; 9 1116. 0.00 1 120.00 1110.00 /201 S T Ai? E M E N T WILLIAMA and SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA (AREA COOK 714) 547 -0721 April 4, 1966 F City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California �- $2200. 0-6 DETACH AND MAIL WITH YOUR CHECK. YOUR CANCELLED CHECK 15 YOUR RECEIPT. 4 -4 -66 Preparation of plans and specifications for improve- ments at Westcliff and Dover Drives TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $2,200.00 pC.A,v GHA,vGe f RBSryK1A+� ZU. O fr0.00 RKeifr. 85 854 ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. / � ROAD DEPARTMENT 1 �7 G� J Material Testing Section • TEST NO. C —x,(33 (� FIELD NO. I - o-Contral tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION .( OOTOR P.OROR AHFP) materials actual)y Sr2¢ -C • entering into works. E If contract, use contract item PROJECT *.L!$":j" -id A ✓C LO_RO /VN art_ i%H72�'F`/54AGENCY C' �'Wp 012T CM RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) ( i ^/6 1-r4 CONTRkWO F� 1TG UT 1E EE�l SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE [D E SUD. PERMITS ❑ LOCATION FI f= i N A✓E vJ, -✓a7AY r1' S - le- allI�DI-JeTWORRSI��.T`,(� REPRESENTING LIMITS - ` lJ ('((� (1L►/L TYPE MATERIAL h1S(SJB6kADEl DEPTH // TO /7" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 5 -17- 1aL TESTED BY: 5 t ^4 �R3 IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND sj BI WT. SAND RETAINED 11.70 C WT. SAND USED 77,70 D TEST SAND DENSITY $7. 73 E VOLUME SAND USED •/ F VOLUME CONE + RING /a G VOLUME TEST HOLE . / H WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE 2),-76 1 TARE WEIGHT 2,'90 J. WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /.8.90 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. C.C. 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - i Q DRY WT. - 3 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY :'a /d • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. c•c. 1 C.C. 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 240c, 8400 i P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. /P O R % MOISTURE :'a /d i- a. CONDITION OF MOLD unc/cr G/ s S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /0.70 T WET DENSITY �. /3a.' V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K =J =G CONE .1667 L =K +(100 %o +N) Q =0. (100% +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F I�ow • 2Cr-LUD2cG� Q fr T237 ev BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) f 6� ' +3 / -lo Plet/ METHOD A ❑ B D�' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY / 133 MOISTURE RC = q TENT. RC = 9a % SPECIFICATION: NL `75 % F3ot1 -es _RELATIVE COMPACTION _ ) i /P O N f 6� ' +3 / -lo Plet/ METHOD A ❑ B D�' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY / 133 MOISTURE RC = q TENT. RC = 9a % SPECIFICATION: NL `75 % F3ot1 -es _RELATIVE COMPACTION _ ❑ Preliminary tests prior . COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— .2 a 3 7 FIELD NO. 2 o- RELATIVE COMPACTION `.O. "° °R Control tests on CON OR P.D. OR AHFP) materials act.olly 424 — K entering into works. N S S J7SaZA 705 DATE KEPT D. If contract, use contract item PROJECT Pir-7" AJC (<oZ oNN _Drl AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) TI N"'EY CONTRACTOR EL. IAii4iTf SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCDYE L_I MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION r-IFT H A%XE is iv 'ti,<v - " >un %v ovVic•' >" 6E•' fI LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL NS SJr36r2A D5 DEPTH // TO ti BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 5 -'_7 t^/° TESTED BY: 7EA/At7S r Hrz3 IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND J7. Lo BI WT. SAND RETAINED 7 �1 C WT. SAND USED 28.45 D TEST SAND DENSITY 82.73 E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING ./8i0 G VOLUME TEST HOLE . / a H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE t.P.. 7o I TARE WEIGHT 2,90 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE tom• 8c K WET DENSITY IN PLACE . 69 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 0,c. 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK S 4-00 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a Q DRY WT. - 3 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY i•e7d • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. C. C. 1 0,c. 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ,2460 24400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION S 4-00 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE i•e7d t /• 8 /a o CONDITION OF MOLD C/oS Vr<r S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10.50 /0. T WET DENSITY S.3 /3.?' .2 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D I UNIT ICO NE +UNIT G= E— F K= J— G CONE .1667 — L = K _ (100% +N) Q = 0 _ (100 %+ N) M. S RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING 1 .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Colif. 216 -F • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) /i0 1 \ 1 /so /a o N I NHti � 00� N T A METHOD A ❑ 8 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /a,? X36 MOISTURE OPt' RC = �% `� % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL 5__'%. El/BILI„)NG WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH rsalt -aa RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior • COUNTY OF ORANGE to sword of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— X3.38 FIELD NO. (-L Control io s ct an RELATIVE COMPACTION CON T. NO. OR (W.O. OR P.Q. OR AHFP)4VW_'e'� malaria is actually entering into works. n/ .S - S�t��T<N�� DATE REPTD. 5• /g (�L // If contract, use contract item PROJECT rpT;✓ Q •yE 10oe^,u Ze it /NXJ l 4/95+/ AGENCY RESIDENT E#GINEER (INSPECTOR) T7wv"4a'y CONTRACTOR F.c. )../.✓i Tc SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY �' MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION F +Fr�JAve /Sin(�Scr- RT LT OF ®STA 7 +75 REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL ../•S DEPTH /�� TO ''7 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE S- /7 -G /_ TESTED BY: 4ee IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 38,y B WT. SAND RETAINED //• )S C WT. SAND USED 27.80 D TEST SAND DENSITY ArZ 73+ E VOLUME SAND USED 340 F VOLUME CONE + RING 1/8/0 G VOLUME TEST HOLE . /$ H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 2 t, g I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /$. K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /22, L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LA13 WET WT. 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. I M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK 2445 DRY WT. ROCK WETWT. - i Q DRY WT. - s TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY +.2, • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 W 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 246p 2 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2445 ZO Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE +.2, }$,p CONDITION OF MOLD u Over S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10.1Z 11 -06 A T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C- D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 . (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • f=S1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) [3'131 f 6-� -y' Frio rS r %wno'l METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 122 131 MOISTURE / �� avc/gr RC=---13--% TENT. RC - % SPECIFICATION: NL 95 %. LL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH ER F3011 -e3 RELATIVE COMPACTION ; /f0 i I N �Hy 4 ti U� op � j a . po A f 6-� -y' Frio rS r %wno'l METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 122 131 MOISTURE / �� avc/gr RC=---13--% TENT. RC - % SPECIFICATION: NL 95 %. LL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH ER F3011 -e3 RELATIVE COMPACTION ; ElPreliminary tests prior to award of contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. TEST SAND d /•OS` ROAD DEPARTMENT WT. SAND RETAINED /3 L6' Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- 47,46 D TEST SAND DENSITY FIELD NO. 4- Control tests on VOLUME SAND USED RELATIVE COMPACTION CONT NO OR (w.O. OR P.O. OR AHFP) materials actually . /S /o G 4L4 -•l entering into works. H /JS - 6d1 61, 14 CE p DATE REPTD. S -lo -44 I TARE WEIGHT If contract, use contract item J PROJECT Flt= Tr-I p✓E(coYoi.ca D :L Ybt1Z)' 96'4 AGENCY �S6. j-3 K RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 7-1 Nf. L6K CONTRACTOR EL 1IT1111 [?r' SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION EIF -7Ad 4VZ 9_/ iV'i✓S. C� RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS - 10,40 TYPE MATERIAL *J S - 5J?y;'2p Dr DEPTH TO 77" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE S- / % -r;oG TESTED BY: /7rw'UcS t H¢kg / . G IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND d /•OS` B WT. SAND RETAINED /3 L6' C WT. SAND USED 47,46 D TEST SAND DENSITY 82,73 E VOLUME SAND USED ,3 / F VOLUME CONE + RING . /S /o G VOLUME TEST HOLE . /So a H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE �,Z, )70 I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX. DENS] TY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE m l METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 0,0 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK a., 00 DRY WT. ROCK i WET WT. - n Q DRY WT. - n TOTAL DRY WT. I % ROCK R CORR.MAX. DENS] TY ��� t MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA ` MOLD NO. C. c. 1 0,0 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN a40o .41 00 I P WET WT. AT COMPACTION a., 00 3a8 i r Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. I R % MOISTURE ��� -3.0 NN tiN CONDITION OF MOLD O ✓e Slue r m l A S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /O. 50 10,40 T WET DENSITY /..3 $•3 / . G V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= 1+ G CONE .1667 - L =K= (100% +N) Q =0- (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) . Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F /fo \ 1 I /so I 1 i r I NN tiN //0 m l A f J3. S 'ie� r5 /-- /,plerr) METHOD A ❑ B E3' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 13-, /13 MOISTURE a% G/ 1 - RC = � % TENT. RC SPECIFICATION: NL °/S % [BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH SY V RESIDENT ENDINEER (CITY ENGP,.) MA LS ENGINEER RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior I t COUNTY OF ORANGE to owar o on roc . ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— .a34-0 ).;. FIELD NO. S CONT.NO.OR Control tests on IW.a. OR P.O RELATIVE COMPACTION . OR AHFP) 4t '-`— materials actually p f entering into works. SO DATE REPTD. �•�lQ KG's. If contl`00. Use contrOCt Item PROJECT ,Oe"c Prue FY+� AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) —CONTRACTOR E:e- '•'✓^•%•rf SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY L7 MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 70 d SCG RT LT OF CL STA d +'>s REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH—A/ �s TO IP" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE S- /i -r:C TESTED BY: DEk- •s.�s'°'�/.IE`tB IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND /.4S B WT. SAND RETAINED ,.Q E'p C WT. SAND USED Z7. cs D TEST SAND DENSITY g2•, .i3 E VOLUME SAND USED p F VOLUME CONE + RING • sds0 GI VOLUME TEST HOLE O H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE ,.21_Qp I TARE WEIGHT Z %To J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ✓8, ?c K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 12 (1•7 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE ^ FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK 24040 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a Q DRY WT. - 3 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY ... } 1/ pp . REMARKS:•3ES'r RZEr4 0r M6.QOU1AY, -r CLT Nor Kch>IZ.E Sm /JTRT)vE n F IA7 H o0 t-_ W f bT'" or Test Method Calif. 216 -F F-0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGP) -5 Fiero 'r5 -a Wet% METHOD A ❑ B 0' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS 10i T, DENSITY 3 MOISTURE RC = 95 % TENT. RC = %! SPECIFICATION: NL_2_1�-%, F3911-e3 1 RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 Vd 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2400 I i P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 24040 2A55 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE ... +2.3 CONDITION OF MOLD (frier OUBr' S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN %0.72, II.1 T WET DENSITY 131. 4. 127.$ V DRY DENSITY { m CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C. F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K = J +G CONE 1667 — L =K +(100% +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 } 1/ pp . REMARKS:•3ES'r RZEr4 0r M6.QOU1AY, -r CLT Nor Kch>IZ.E Sm /JTRT)vE n F IA7 H o0 t-_ W f bT'" or Test Method Calif. 216 -F F-0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGP) -5 Fiero 'r5 -a Wet% METHOD A ❑ B 0' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS 10i T, DENSITY 3 MOISTURE RC = 95 % TENT. RC = %! SPECIFICATION: NL_2_1�-%, F3911-e3 1 RELATIVE COMPACTION I /fo I I i II i. /? O { m A� } 1/ pp . REMARKS:•3ES'r RZEr4 0r M6.QOU1AY, -r CLT Nor Kch>IZ.E Sm /JTRT)vE n F IA7 H o0 t-_ W f bT'" or Test Method Calif. 216 -F F-0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGP) -5 Fiero 'r5 -a Wet% METHOD A ❑ B 0' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS 10i T, DENSITY 3 MOISTURE RC = 95 % TENT. RC = %! SPECIFICATION: NL_2_1�-%, F3911-e3 1 RELATIVE COMPACTION G. L. KELLAR, INC. �� S CEMENT CONTRACTOR 962 WANDA ROAD • ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PHONE 531.5547 Date 941 24, 1466 E. L. White 12311 Chapman. Ave. Ga4den Gnove, CaU4. Inv. 06764 Wea.tcU46 E DoveA City o4 Newpokt Beach Ext4a to conttact due to eng.i,nev i.ng mot 32 hA. Labor ince. W. E Fringe Bene6 t6 144. 87 1.5 cy v concAete 1 .43 17.8 i I Inv. 06764 STATE J 1 F,- U. WHITE CO. Contractors 12311 CHAPMAN AVG., SUITE 112, GARDEN GROVE, CALIF. PHONE (714) 638-3163 TO Q6e&fCi)DATE 41 J .l Ohl" "'i l4s to 0 STATEMENT ..Y E. L. WHITE SITE CO. Contractors 12311 CHAPMAN AVE.4-3U1TE 112, GARDEN GROVE, CALIF. PHONE (714) 638 -3163 15 l TO jJ t J (EAW r,4 f&C I7DATE Tj1 11 G t &cell, w wv . lqw ZE L.7 IZ f il I IIV3 FiH le Fit it C-1 -T _7 LP • G. L. KELLAR, INC. CEMENT CONTRACTOR 962 WANDA ROAD 0 ORANGE, CALIFORNIA PHONE 531 -5547 Date IWL. 2 ? 1466 12311 Chapman. Ave. Garden Gun, Utij. Nleatci i66 £ DOUeA Crt' o6 Nevpoht Beach. Eztaa to eonticact due to enginming mwt 32 hk. Labart .i.nct. Ina. 6 Fk:xge Une6-iU 194. S7' 1.5 ey conckete 71.43 iXS . - it I � s ❑Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. - �g�:Control tests on materials actually t works COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT i Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION TEST NO. C— IYAR FIELD NO. / CONT. NO. OR (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFP) 4CeW —� en enng m o war . 0049 wE p DATE REPT D. If contract, use contract item / PROJECT Z70 ✓457-4 i 1.c%= sra < "�'`' AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 7_1ti 6"&Y CONTRACTOR fc. wNrrg OUTSID SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION El AGENCY E MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 1' ✓ESTCtisx .TNiF.P. ORr�w•or RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL fiB 494t_`O DEPTH �� TO S-" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE —TESTED BY: .✓F'P� j1 /G��Y IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 37. e0 B WT.. SAND RETAINED 8.35 C WT. SAND USED 2s•o6 D TEST SAND DENSITY 6s�.2i E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING 174P G VOLUME TEST HOLE • '5c H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 2e• 70 1 TARE WEIGHT 9:40 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ? /.3O K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /gG -/ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE /34 a METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 400 3 DRY WT. 86.T INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M 9.9 N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK ace? DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - -' Q DRY WT. - i TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY (� MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN !so P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD /90 I S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN !70 T WET DENSITY HN V DRY DENSITY NN CO CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L = .. (100% +N) Q = O - (100 %+ N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) = Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 f A REMARKS: � oF..'s.r>- .-9zo 8 'c`_.r , Test Method Calif. 216 -F APR 221966 -S '-rem rS /-a /o WetJ METHOD A Er- B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE 8 RC= % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % PUBLIC iv(1[ &s jy . ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) ^ F301143 RELATIVE COMPACTION !so 1 /90 I !70 HN I NN CO A REMARKS: � oF..'s.r>- .-9zo 8 'c`_.r , Test Method Calif. 216 -F APR 221966 -S '-rem rS /-a /o WetJ METHOD A Er- B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE 8 RC= % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % PUBLIC iv(1[ &s jy . ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) ^ F301143 RELATIVE COMPACTION Preliminary tests Prior Prior to award of contract. a,Control tests on materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION .ae 6e dr o If contract, use contract item TEST NO. C— /p FIELD NO. .� CONT. (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHF P) DATE REPTD. *-/I- 6G PROJECT f!e"�*' AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) T "�Qelp� CONTRACTOR ��•'"�'y��"- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION 13 AGENCY I MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION ✓ ✓ES 'S7"'N RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL .vAr C et '/ DEPTH 'R TO "� BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE d" -406 TESTED BY: " e12Pf 1 IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND al' / &J, B WT. SAND RETAINED ,e. ao C WT. SAND USED .'Ja D TEST SAND DENSITY ar. 2l E VOLUME SAND USED , 3703 F1 VOLUME CONE + RING • /969 G VOLUME TEST HOLE X7-9'¢ H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE .7, GS I TARE WEIGHT -0.4c J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /20 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 906 2 DRY WT. 8cs 4 % MOIST. INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN SP. GR. ROCK I 1 WET WT. ROCK 7. 'F_' DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION WET WT. — a SPECIFICATION: NL % DRY WT. — a TOTAL DRY. WT. DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. % ROCK I CORR.MAX.DENSITY _ s MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA SUMMARY MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN I 1 I RC = P WET WT. AT COMPACTION % SPECIFICATION: NL % Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. i I _ R % MOISTURE 1 /20 CONDITION OF MOLD I N H� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY � A V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE .1667 - L =K= (100 % +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 B. REMARKS: �������s�r� /,lb�B��Ga /SZ� Test Method Calif. 216 -F m- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 3 - fieto 'S /% , el.) METHOD A Q- B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS /so OPT, I DENSITY I 1 I RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % /90 i I _ 1 /20 I N H� 1b 40 op6 N no � A B. REMARKS: �������s�r� /,lb�B��Ga /SZ� Test Method Calif. 216 -F m- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 3 - fieto 'S /% , el.) METHOD A Q- B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT, DENSITY MOISTURE ¢ 8 RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011-83 RELATIVE COMPACTION rERIALS ENGINEER ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. Control tests an materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION qP CG/E' G If contract, use contract item TEST NO C— /830 FIELD NO. S CON. NO OR ( N. T OR P.O. OR ..FP) atG-K DATE REPTD. 4—/9 —" PROJECT '0- -`s-+P r AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) TiNGCr->- CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCGVE MAINTENANCE ❑ Suer). El PERMITS El LOCATION her.. rra.« Soc.r '.S oe� 111,8 RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL .4.8 $<e/B O DEPTH �' TO `' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE a-rQ- TESTED BY: Alk-90 f IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 3d.3S' B WT. SAND RETAINED &.so C WT. SAND USED 29• -r3 D TEST SAND DENSITY 8z. z/ E VOLUME SAND USED . as74 F VOLUME CONE + RING •/Argo G VOLUME TEST HOLE .r62s H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE .?C. so I TARE WEIGHT % MOISTURE J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE Lf,rO K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /29.8 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE rro.6 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD MOLD NO. LAB WET WT. 900 4 01 DRY WT. 8Ga %MOIST. M 4.2 WET WT. AT COMPACTION N SP. GR. ROCK 2 , WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. a. /z DRY WT. ROCK a.og WET WT. - a % MOISTURE r6.98 DRY WT. - ' /x•80 TOTAL DRY WT. CONDITION OF MOLD 2o. 3Y % ROCK I 20 % CORR.MAX. DEN SI TY HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN "f MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA I MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE /9D CONDITION OF MOLD I S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ) - T WET DEN SI TY /7D- V DRY DENSITY I CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J+ G CONE .1667 - L = K _ (100% + N) Q = 0 + (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) . Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Ae,9x P�A'F /w /3 Pi eR Test Method Calif. 216 -F M RESIDENT ENUMNEER (CITY ENGP..) } f3- -,$- `irco rS iv, /yEtf METHOD A 2� B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /Z.5 /3 6P MOISTURE B % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -33 RELATIVE COMPACTION TERIALS EN \ I l i /9D I i ) - /7D- I H -,$- `irco rS iv, /yEtf METHOD A 2� B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /Z.5 /3 6P MOISTURE B % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -33 RELATIVE COMPACTION TERIALS EN ElPreliminary tests prior ' COUNTY OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. TEST SAND to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT WT. SAND RETAINED yd-'o 0 Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— /9-'31 N D FIELD NO. Sr Control tests on o. RELATIVE COMPACTION CON T. NO.OR 1W.a. OR P.O. OR .."t materials oct.ally F VOLUME CONE + RING entering into works. ,pQ BC',e< p { - If contract, use contract item DATE REPT D. Eg—/9-64 PROJECT ✓ vlrA- C 11�Cl.Y"CG�FF AGENCY C /N.O TARE WEIGHT RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY [�-- MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION W� s «iG G f' RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS 13 g, TYPE MATERIAL W'r geydl O DEPTH TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 4 -/8 ^G6 TESTED BY: / =�,t•B !'�"rm -.- IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 0 B WT. SAND RETAINED yd-'o 0 C WT. SAND USEDZB.a'O N D TEST SAND DENSITY 6' ?.Zr E VOLUME SAND USED .3aa2 F VOLUME CONE + RING DRY WT. - '- G VOLUME TEST HOLE - HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE e e3, �p I TARE WEIGHT % MOISTURE J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 26.6,0 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /--? ?0 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 13 g, METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. pp 1 DRY WT. 9 7 Z 3 % MOIST. M ,�, Z N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT.-ROCK I i DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION WET WT. - DRY WT. - '- TOTAL DRY WT. DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Max 0&,vr rx, /3B@... Pf7 f/%10 � 'G�- C -iS2.7 Test Method Calif. 216 -F m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CRY ENGR) MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN I i P WET WT. AT COMPACTION j Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE I /30 CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY I V DRY DENSITY j CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D oho I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100 % +N) Q =D +(100 %+N) SM. RING .01434 .1810 R . Q V = FACTOR -x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Max 0&,vr rx, /3B@... Pf7 f/%10 � 'G�- C -iS2.7 Test Method Calif. 216 -F m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CRY ENGR) } B-r .n METHOD A B WK SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE 3 RC- `%6 % TENT. RC - % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS F901143 RELATIVE -COMPACTION INEER i /f0 I i j I /30 i 1 I 1 /i 0 I N j NNry � oho � /tD � } B-r .n METHOD A B WK SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE 3 RC- `%6 % TENT. RC - % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS F901143 RELATIVE -COMPACTION INEER E] Preliminary tests prior _ COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- /$ 9_,2 FIELD NO. S o- RELATIVE COMPACTION COOT NO.OR Control 1e5is On CON OR P.O. OR AHFP) materials oct,,ally entering into works. '0A, ,BG<IE 4 DATE REPTD. If contract, use contract item PROJECT f _y✓FS re•e iz'f -AGENCY- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) T+niGGEr CONTRACTOR E.0 w✓�•' SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION Oov� RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH �� TO `' w BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE �_&e -e6 TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY AI, INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 44.25 B WT. SAND RETAINED leas C WT. SAND USED 29 so D TEST SAND DENSITY e?. 2/ E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING ✓s69 G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. - a H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE t5•�o I TARE WEIGHT 3,do J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 2 /,7a K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE p, METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 00 3 DRY WT. B INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M j Z N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK { WET WT. -1 Q DRY WT. - a \ i TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY /sa REMARKS: M.ox OEi✓ -r %i A @ Fr" Ce G -C - /_!7Z7 Test Method Calif. 216 -F m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CM ENGR.) MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA - I MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN r3 RC = /fo TENT. RC = P WET WT. AT COMPACTION v� { Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. \ i R % MOISTURE /sa CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN I I I T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY roN CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.P. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L = K (100% +N) Q = 0 a (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: M.ox OEi✓ -r %i A @ Fr" Ce G -C - /_!7Z7 Test Method Calif. 216 -F m RESIDENT ENGINEER (CM ENGR.) -s - fiEm r5 / % pYe>J METHOD A Er B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY MOISTURE r3 RC = /fo TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL %. v� { \ i I /sa \ \ I i I I I /? e I roN -s - fiEm r5 / % pYe>J METHOD A Er B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY MOISTURE r3 RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award o contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— 1833 FIELD NO. Ce Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION WOO ?OR P.OROR AHFP) az6 -Y materials actually entering into works. ,qQ BCU! 4 (! DATE REPTD. 4 -f9 -6G If contract, use contract Item PROJECT OO✓E =.P •r K /E4'rc�.F.c• AGENCY ��NC RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) �"'^rCcrr✓ CONTRACTOR —,4- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION El AGENCOYE [r;- MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION FfssrS�� /a~s ✓E.r, .v /W6[T: CG�FF �G RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL ,e¢4 BGaE' O DEPTH -r" TO ! BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE a ✓d'CG TESTED BY: f✓E',p6+ �^�+�Y IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND I 44.40 B WT. SAND RETAINED i4. C WT. SAND USED p. 95 D TEST SAND DENSITY 32.z/ E VOLUME SAND USED ..3dG3 FI VOLUME CONE + RING %%&60 G VOLUME TEST HOLE • �_qlvl4' H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE �?,.Gr I TARE WEIGHT 3. c'o J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /4.2a' K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /,g8,/ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ,-�_ G METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 00 3 DRY WT. Q 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M 3, N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a Q DRY WT. - n TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX. DENS I TY REMARKS: M.ax I)�t7r r.3,P @ 6' FROAY 66 -C - t s'_? Test Method Calif. 216 -F MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. i R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD /90 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN I I T WET DENSITY i 1 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 +G CONE .1667 - L =K= (100 % +N) Q =0- (100 %+N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: M.ax I)�t7r r.3,P @ 6' FROAY 66 -C - t s'_? Test Method Calif. 216 -F B� 3 figm ..s / %n lNe>/ METHOD A B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /3 13 MOISTURE 13 8 RC= 7% % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY It RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGPQ N F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION /fD 1 i 1 /90 I I i 1 .�N m�'4 y /O �°6 Dr ?D 111111 B� 3 figm ..s / %n lNe>/ METHOD A B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /3 13 MOISTURE 13 8 RC= 7% % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY It RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGPQ N F3011 -83 RELATIVE COMPACTION [I Preliminary tests prior ' to award of contract. control tests on moteriols actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION AFB GIuE O If contract, use contract item TEST NO. C— 193¢ - FIELD NO. 7 CONT O. NO. OR 1W.0. R P.O. OR AHFP) DATE REPTD. ,�" : PROJECT 001e--'p F 1.�.k�s7-mc.c,� AGENCY C/N 8, RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 71:11IG44f ^ CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION ©�`�'�' /S �w /E. C.o RT LT OF rL STA OA 70 REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL 094? 0c O DEPTH ��• TO -r BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 6 - /3-GG TESTED BY: .4/eTt ,tdtic"' f IN PLACE DENSITY i MOLD NO. METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 'm•[T B WT. SAND RETAINED /2.me RC = �� FIELD LAB C WT. SAND USED d8•e3 WET WT. -700 D TEST SAND DENSITY re. c/ DRY WT. 8(p E VOLUME SAND USED .3 >2a %MOIST. M 3.6 N F VOLUME CONE + RING • /9C 50 SP. GR. ROCK G VOLUME TEST HOLE HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN WET WT. ROCK , 2Z H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 2C.9rS DRY WT. ROCK / I TARE WEIGHT _g .0c, DRY DENSITY WET WT. - -A' /s 3 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /0,9-5, DRY WT. - -3 VOLUMES, C. F. K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 11.34.4 TOTAL DRY WT. ( 6 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ( p, Z .1667 % ROCK L =K +(100" +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) CORR.MAX. DENSITY .0143 f MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA i MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN B RC = �� % TENT. RC = P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE /90 CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY N I V DRY DENSITY w. CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C. F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =JAG CONE .1667 - L =K +(100" +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) =- Q V = FACTOR x Q> S LG. RING .0302 .1969 f A REMARKS: _"42. D jte 'rr /3§ & r-R o.r r GS- rj7.7 Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83 59 -s Flee r.5 ( % We>J METHOD A B E3 i RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N PLACE OPT. DENSITY 131 63 8 MOISTURE ^'f• B RC = �� % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% /90 I N I w. A REMARKS: _"42. D jte 'rr /3§ & r-R o.r r GS- rj7.7 Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83 59 -s Flee r.5 ( % We>J METHOD A B E3 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N PLACE OPT. DENSITY 131 63 8 MOISTURE ^'f• B RC = �� % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% F1 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RELATIVE COMPACTION y •' CITY OF NORT BEACH PRCGR.ESS PAYMENT RE�CEST NO PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR01 -T FOR PERIOD ENDING PROaE:CT. IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF —DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE BIiD'3F" ,±,i_: SEE BELOW 1 CONTRACT .I'4 =rte r:c CON-,PAC, I TE.M —co ACT PRlC.E °ER.CEE-F* COM,FLL T_ _ �AARC ,r -- `..aRn,C.D I REMOVE A.C. PVMT. 0.034 /SF 5371 SF $ 182.61 2 EXCAVATION (DOVER) 4 192.16 LS 100% 4,192.i6 3 EXCAVATION (FIFTH) 6,929.361-$ 4 RS -2 SEAL COAT 124.02/T 5 AGGREGATE BASE 3.39/T 848.40T 2,876.07 6 ASPHALT CONCRETE 7.21/T 48.66T 350.83 7 2" P.C.C. MEDIAN PVMT 0.322/SF 8 4" P.C.C. DRIVE APPROACH 0.61 /SF 9 ALLEY APPROACH 192.23 EA. 10 TYPE "A" C & G 8" 2.29/LF 110 LF 251.90 11 SPECIAL C & G 8" 3.23/LF 172.5 557.17 12 SPECIAL C & G 6" 3.23/LF 581 LF 1,876.63 13 TYPE "A" C & G 6" 2.21 /1-F 175 LF 386.75 14 I SPECIAL C.B. /M.H. 847.90 EA. 25% 211.97 15 4" A.C. PIPE 13.09/LF 14 LF 183.26 16 18" C.M.P. 9.76/1-F d- ' CITY OF OORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPAR *NT PRGC,RESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. -� I _ FOR PERIOD ENDING ARPIL 15, X66 PROJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF WESTCLIFF -DOVER & FIFTH AVENUE BUDGET NO: SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO, ITeM N . I COn,TR.AC" ITEM CONTRACT PRICE PERCEN COMPLETE.: - -- EARNED 17 241+ c.M.P. 14.64/LF 2.5 LF 36.6o 18 ROCK SUBDRAIN 9.76/cy 7.8 Cy 76.12 19 INSTALL ISLAND TOPSOIL 976.00 L$ 80% 780.80 20 RELOCATE EXIST. WATER METER 61.00 EA. I EA. 61.00 21 ADJ. MISC. STRUCT. TO GRADE 85.40 EA. 22 ADJ. M.H. TO GRADE 115.90 EA. I EA. 115.90 23 RELOCATE ST. LT. 402.60 EA 5 EA. 2013.00 24 ADJ. SURVEY MONUMENTS TO GRADE 36.60 EA. 25 2" X 6° REDWOOD HEADER 0.85 /LF 26 A.C. DRAINAGE DITCH $2.52/LF 27 GUARDRAIL 5.66/LF 28 CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS 40026.00 L$ - - 5ee C, 0. 0 1 - ADDITIONAL ITEM #12 2.42/LF 647 LF 1574 C5Fr CA '0 15,718.11• BUDGET NOS: C.O. #1 - (FIFTH) 19- 3348 -028: C.O. #2 - (W -D) 19- 3355 -023: 16,388.67 C.O. # 244.61 C.O. # ' 225.25 416,366.67 OF.I;.ihAL C ONTP.:f.- $65,300.81 E*TF:Ar: T,'s DATr ) 1,758.51 CaNTR.AC,' Tc D;.r.- 63,542.30 AM.�w EA .n : $16,388.67 LE'rss IJ$ R ic: ' :(,N 1,638.87 LEA � PPt ` 16t•:> PA'•'MliF2T A.Mi +UNt Dw: I -fiF kF „V LI'�.” $14,749.80 4 F. FL T�) CF- /'.HAT ?.r.:: AEriVl: .AMC�NT.S �,-E N INF.F FZ PAYMENT TO: V L. WHITE COMPANY 11 CHAPMAN BLVD. GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA AND VA!-Ut ° ARE CORRECT. S'IGNED_j& e BY �p r G v- 'i7 N Lr 0 01 T1 G rlm 1a R CITY �fi1i^ NEWPORT BEACH Vic; Laboratory Analysie for March 1966 PARK AVENUE BRIDGE Corid. Cylinder 4 3 tests @ 2.20 ea. Test #66_151, 152 & 153 @ 2.00 ea. - 1475 BALBOA ISLAND BRIDGE $ 135.80 WESTCLIFF & DOVER Cone. Cylinder 5 tests ® 2.20 ea. Test #66_122 & 123; #66_132 thin 134 Relative Compaction 2 BALBOA ISLAND BRIDGE 6 11.00 ea. Tentative Compaction 1 test Cone. Cylinder 6.6o 6 tests ® 2.20 ea. Test (66_170 thru 175 BALBOA ISLAND BRIDGE Cone. Cylinder 6 tests 0 2.20 ea. Test #66_200 thru 205 BALBOA BRIDGE _ MARINE AVENUE Cone. Cylinder 6 tests ® 2.20 ea. Test #66_267 thru 272 Field Time 4 hrs. 0 5.00 hr. Moisture & Calculations 5 tests @ 2.00 ea. Test #66- C_1471 thru 1475 Total $ 135.80 WESTCLIFF & DOVER Field Time 2 hrs. @ 10.00 hr. Relative Compaction 2 tests 6 11.00 ea. Tentative Compaction 1 test try 6.6o ea. Test #66_C_1253, 54' &1255 19 - 3353 0 2 3 `12*- t � � C 6.60 6.60 11.00 11.00 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.20 13.20 20.00 10.00 30.00 20.00 22.00 6.60 48.60 Total $ 135.80 �( PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACAft N0, INiT. ATE ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIR. — u UTILITY SUPT. TRAFFIC ENGR. 2 ASST. CITY ENGR° / SUBDiV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR, CO —OP. PROJ, ENGR. FIELD ENGR. 23 SECRETARY — PLEASE, to HANDLE 5. REVIEW & COMME NTC,, -eV 2D SEE P.W.D. 6. PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT READ �7y PREPARE REPLY FILE O. POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS; Y • a THE IRVINE COMPANY 13042 MYFORD ROAD, POST OFFICE BOX 37, IRVINE,CALIF. 92650, LINCOLN 4 -0120 City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Ben Nolan March 21, 1966 / i )J Z' 11 J Subject: Disposal Site for Fifth Street Construction Gentlemen: The Irvine Company will accept the excess material from the above construction project. The material is to be placed, as shown, in the area designated on the enclosed plan. All fill is to be placed under direction of an acceptable soils firm and in accordance with the City Grading Ordinance. Upon completion of the fill work the contractor shall request a final inspection of the site by The Irvine Company. We will also require a final soils report from the soils engineer. Very truly urs, FH /jb /mz ;kt ghes Enclosure RECEIVED MAR 22 196g PUBLIC WoRh3 �tp ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE �I( to award at contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT ! Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— G6 -c- 1.253 FIELD NO. / RELATIVE COMPACTION CONT. NO.OR I-1 _CaniPol tests on 1W.0. OR P.O. OR AHFP) materials actually :S Art ;-S- - entering into works. .r .i DATE REPTD. If contract, use contract item PROJECT l.c/ESTC��r- .^.%�9.�'� -�z- AGENCY �6"✓e "t�C� `fie` °c^� RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR)-Ie!LT/r✓CGcY CONTRACTOR wNir'!r SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY [� MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. El PERMITS El LOCATION __��F� 'g'U° R7-. "Q' RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL -DEPTH /d11 TO- s,' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE "a7.1 -6C TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 41460 B WT. SAND RETAINED /7166 C WT. SAND USED Zf. gd D TEST SAND DENSITY eezi E VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE + RING��i'O G VOLUME TEST HOLE • / >G°� H IWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE, I TARE WEIGHT ,boo J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /o fo K WET DENSITY IN PLACE i /14.9 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE I METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. DRY WT. % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a DRY WT. - 3 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F �Ee��vEo MAR 25 1966 PUBt9C 'W0j\j\S ;;LET• BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) } B. -5 61440 rS /% /9/eiJ METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 117 MOISTURE RC = TENT. RC = �• % SPECIFICATION: NIL QC' ❑ BIkLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -B3 RELATIVE COMPACTION i /so As I /T O tiN 1 ti u� o0 //O al A } B. -5 61440 rS /% /9/eiJ METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 117 MOISTURE RC = TENT. RC = �• % SPECIFICATION: NIL QC' ❑ BIkLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -B3 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to oword of comroct. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- 6C, -C- /.2 S¢ FIELD NO. Z o- Control tests on RELATIVE C ±OMPACTION °oTOR P.OROR materials actually .g.5 entering into works. If contract, use contract item DATEREPTD. GPROJECT ` 4 t'fOM RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) V-e'Q• 7i^49cr CONTRACTOR IUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY © MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION /.v Ie!- .e, -4p, " RT LT OF STA REPRESENTING LIMITS — TYPE MATERIAL •�/. S DEPTH p TO /a7 �� BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE �r'.?4y -G E TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY A'INITIAL WT.TEST SAND 4ri.L6 B WT. SAND RETAINED /y /e3 C WT. SAND USED -276-0 D TEST SAND DENSITY Ar ,ate^ E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING .Ir" G VOLUME TEST HOLE �s24 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE �2¢.�p 1 TARE WEIGHT --? ap J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 2/.40 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /GZ./ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB .WET WT. 2eG- 3 DRY WT. 01-INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - Q DRY WT. - n TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216-F P,ESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F30t 1-63 BY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA - MOLD NO. 1 171 C. 2eG- 3 4 01-INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN -Vl 0 i P WET WT. AT COMPACTION to Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. I R % MOISTURE /sa CONDITION OF MOLD I UAIQ4- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /.?o T WET DENSITY tiN I V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR-0.592 I FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D oho UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K =J +G CONE .1667 — L =K +(100 % +N) Q =0 +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P—Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q . S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216-F P,ESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F30t 1-63 BY f J3 -s Fico .s / %We /J METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY �¢'� -'¢7 MOISTURE �� B RC = 1(7 TENT. RC =91i • 3 % SPECIFICATION: NL `��% ❑ BILR -1 N&I LL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RELATIVE COMPACTION /f0 i I /sa j I /.?o tiN I y ,'gym oo. oho � 1 //D f A � f J3 -s Fico .s / %We /J METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY �¢'� -'¢7 MOISTURE �� B RC = 1(7 TENT. RC =91i • 3 % SPECIFICATION: NL `��% ❑ BILR -1 N&I LL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. Control tests on materials octaolly entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION If contract, use contract item TEST. NO. C— 44-C- /.2 FIELD NO. .qF CONT. NO.OR O (W.O. R P.O. OR AHFP) 4=�4-4� DATE RE PTO. 3- 44 4 -[4 PROJECT 0lVtl,<P A �' K/f"si %L`� ° ✓:�fi GENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) W-4J. TiiVae -fi CONTRACTOR t *IP-ir OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY D' MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION P7' m" RT LT OF (� STA REPRESENTING LI TYPE MATERIAL ^. s DEPTH TO dq/' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE `^ -3�GG TESTED BY: '✓��° -�+° � � <`'�Y IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND .CO, z5 B WT. SAND RETAINED /.?." C 'WT. SAND USED 27.70 D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED 395¢ F VOLUME CONE + RING 'X&? o G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. - i H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE J?.$6 I ITARE WEIGHT -5, J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WE7 DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 aW 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK PI WET WT. ROCK �Srpp2a6i DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a Q DRY WT. - i TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY F1Gx/3 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) -0 MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA - MOLD NO. paint 2 aW 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 24707 :2¢p0 RC = PI WET WT. AT COMPACTION �Srpp2a6i SPECIFICATION: NL § % Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE F1Gx/3 -i CONDITION OF MOLD r✓�'�'P S/�^nQ'� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN -ioZZ ioa8 T WET DENSITY /39.0 /3s6 V DRY DENSITY I 0 CONV. FACTOR =0.592 I FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K=T- CONE .1667 - L= K-:-(I OOTO +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S -G. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) -0 } B+ S F1— r.5 /o /p klef-) METHOD A ❑ B [�J"- SUMMARY I IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY 428 1449 MOISTURE RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL § % I I 0 /7 I N HNti Q no T � m } B+ S F1— r.5 /o /p klef-) METHOD A ❑ B [�J"- SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY 428 1449 MOISTURE RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL § % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F3011 -113 RELATIVE COMPACTION J JP Form C'J -3 0 Exhibit G COLLIER- UNRTJH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REOUEST FOR DEVIATION AUTHOP.2ZATICr' Project No. ss -55 From: City ✓ county of State of California Department of Public Works Division of Highways (Throw h District E i NEWPORT BEACH C ng neer) Date: 3/23/66 Authority is requested to use 1.04¢ or Matching Funds to finance the following project which: [involves a permanent deviation approved standards. (] is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." or Termini App. 25' W'LY OF INTERSECTION TO INILUECTioN AND FRom APPRlIY IMATCiv II. ;5' M,g 70 325' N',Y OF SAID INTERSECTION Length fl 25 Miles. The proposed work consists Of PAVING CONST. OF T AF Gra ing, pnv ng, cons ruc ng our s an NO DRAINAGE and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase of right -of -way QQIQTRAC under the direction of the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH contraci or day labor city, county, state. TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 10,000 DESIGN' ADT 14 000 (Est. total in all lanes 20 years after completion) . GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -way STRUCTURAL SECTION Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 4 -12' 4 -12' 4-12, Lt.1 Rt. Lt. At. Lt. Rt. VARIES VAR ES VA IES VARIES VARIES VARIES 64' 1: 64' 64' Traffic Index 8.0 R -value Surface thickness and type* Base thickness and type* *Types: BS-bituminous seal, AC- asphaltic concrete, PCC- Portland cement concrete, Other Note: Explain reasons.for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. Existi Pro s d It mat 4" A.C. " „ 8" C.T.B. 12' A.B. 1 12" A.B. RMAS- roadmix asphaltic surface CTE- cement - treated base AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase y v s n •v L c v ,9 c o I m i •o � L q v o o W� e n s W o .n t:, � C d y .: 6 E • A C S - �+ C; A y � •n w U U a C F E W y O W G E d 0? 0.0 I V ti d b G O Gp O° •a R a u •o (J .. >, ` u E u N ec -� a� n" o u;° ❑ d Q_° c �' z o `'� .'C a� R G G ' •L' °' �, i F a� � o Dos u 'C .=7 L... s <ey mu n, .A-E o R 3.'c, ` � �nm ❑ om ��n �n o.W. Ei 7g Ei is n ® R s L o (d F Ly R % U o ,u ., � °c° .7 •ao ' N .v E � v m .n 3 .. c D L` ° g oRc-^ 0 R ❑ D G q d A E y v o '- C7 O 4 c F; i . 4 X A c m o iBaK'eo6 c C -d a a^ U c "�da •6 mBb LLUiw,adv Olt } hd at3 R 'D p°0 rti Wj "D c a •o 'O d a°+ a m >, W W m h �' •o :ouYs�,v o m ❑ R.... - D D �nL = I R(j •O ry .D a C ,6' m R d N d'� N B E m r `G Q L" 3� rTi d C R ti 1, A W O N W •�m.�u �v va�yw d� da•'•�,m� m`°� �6�vU y'c v'�: �c�o� •vo 66'S�G�' -o >,n Rg •v a.�, �°a aal Um e�'{'0.d ` dc�, •L E�"A ,�v�a.p .�+�•m- 6�J,oa E � r d�S .?c 3 ° >mMm _tea E� A tJ�. oc '°?ELd,I lXZ e� °B B$o �5��6i �moso ws CCA ` �? �Ag��my.dcva�a`�, �a�c °SE 4ARO3m� A m om n„u° cdv��°rS ..,A .d°npD LEiE'uNp 6Eio ���'mL:: O•cxi�G;d �W.0 GLN °•W Rod... o .FJ e�r� � = C "a' F � � y C N •00 �L. ..7 A G � -d" �' y C�y� N C L U x +� ,S � G. �N�" �.n E C � h d D '3 Ny N := � O ... CL N ;L' O ❑ � .0 .-.. A ;-. .0 m A ti u .•C U G A O u ..� � E 5 ., v U ... v' ., ., R U (], ; L' _ o d A N O d p R m (Z t o a s e v � y U o� R o p u aRi ! • v m L `° v m r °' �`a .� v z L •dv s a ro x v � •° m a 3^, a �+ u E n u .� a v `' 4 .o W o R u c a; C/-° \• < n`o 5 n - c 9 .`a i "• � A � N w O• ° .n N� � O 'U Y 9 � icL W ° L� d D GC 75 I u m �' 'a c 'v v •-, r• � '° F. d ami 8 L � $ � qb� � .'-9 cd. � u � �jb ❑ o c � pWq a A � •� a e � � c� Qand Yd '�-' .'7 .«d+.°. �i Z i E u'4 w ,m •{+o� wS�A•So � 30gvvR. z SaBO'$zJa �a� mN.e�j L� RAUS# BEIw# FRows 6 ASSOC. 136 ROCHESTER / COSTA MESA# CALIFORNIA SUBJECTI DOVER•WESTCLI GENTLEMEN: (MP1{QVEMENTS# 0-954 FEBRUARY Iu# 1966 PER PURCHASE ORDER 12213y PLEASE PERFORM THE FOLLOWING SURVEYING: I. STAKE THE MEW LOCATIONS FOR THE STREET LIGHTS. 2. PLACE 3 -FOOT OFFSETS TO FACE OF CURB IN THE AREAS SHOWN ON THE ENCLOSED DRAWING. WHEN THE REMOVAL IS COMPLETED# THE REMAINING MEDIAN CURB WILL BE STAKED. THE CONTRACTOR EXPECTS TO START WORK ONa°,40^-'0 VERY TRULY YOURS# El G. P. DUNIGAN# JR. ASSISTANT CIVIL ENGINEER GPDIBE 3 ENCL. �t i i FIRMS► W:.' PtEL I C WORKS FEB. 149 1966 FINANCE DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IWPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVM, MESTCLIFF -OOMER INTERSECTION (C -954) PLEASE REFUND DEPOSITS FOR THE SUBJECT CONTRACT TO THE FOLL0IIING S. J. COOK i SON* ZCe5 PLACENTIA, COSTA MESA STEINY & MITCHELL INC. 1401 N. BAXTER# ANAHEIM K. L. PcRRY ASST. CITY ENGINEER VR $5.00 5.00 1 FEBRUARY, 1966 THE IRVINE COMPANY IRVINE CALIFORNIA ATTENTION=` MR. FRANK HUGHES \� SUBJECTS RELOCATION OF EDISON POL(8 ON FIFTH AVENUE BETWEEN . LARKSPUR AND POPPY AVENUES DEAR MR. HUGHES CONSTRUCTION UNDER THE CONTRACT JUST AWARDEO FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN LARKSPUR AND POPPY WILL REQUIRE THAT THE EXISTING EOISON POLE LINE BE RELOCATED APPROXIMATELY 5 FEET NORTHERLY. INASMUCH AS THE EOISON COMPANY CLAIMS PRIOR RIGHTS IN TNK RIGHT OF WAY, THEY HAVE CONTENDED THAT THE RELOCATION MUST BE DONE AT CITY EXPENSE. WE FEEL THAT THE IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE IS OF IMPNTANCE TO THE PROPOSED HARBOR VIEW HILLS DEVELOPMENTS AND ALSO TO FURTHER IRVINE COMPANY DEVELOPMENTS TO THE NORTH OF 5TH AVENUE. ON THIS BASIS IT 13 REQUESTED THAT THE IRVINE COMPANY REQUIRE THE EDISON COMPANY TO RELOCATE THE POLES AT EDISON EXPENSE AS PROVIDED FOR IN YOUR EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT WITH EOISON. SINCE THE RIGHT OF WAY AND IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE ARE NOW FAIRLY WELL FIXEDp IT IS NOT LIKELY THAT A FUTURE RELOCATION OF THE POLES WOULD BE NEEDED. VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN B. NOLAN CITY ENGINEER BBN:BE y 0 MR. H. TEAQLE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY $120 GARFIELD AVENUE HUNTINGTON SEACH, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: 5TH AVENUE POWER POLES DEAR SIR: 1 FEBRUARY 11, 1966 IN OUR LETTER OF DECEMBER 29, 1965, YOU WERE REQUESTED TO RE- LOCATE THE EDISBN COMPANY FACILITIES WHICH LIE WITHIN THE LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION AND WHICH WILL BE AFFECTED BY THE PRO- POSED WIDENING OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN LARKSPUR AND POP ►Y AVENUES. To DATE, YOUR POWER POLES, WHICH STAND ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF 5TH AVENUE, HAVE NOT BEEN RELOCATED. THE CONTRACT TO WIDEN 5TH AVENUE HAS BEEN AWAROEO, AND IT 15 IMPERATIVE THAT YOU BEGIN THE POLE RELOCATION IMMEDIATELY. THERE HAVE BEEN SOME DISCUSSIONS WITH MEMBERS OF YOUR COMPANY CONCERNING THE CITY'S RIONTS TO REQUEST THIS MOVE. IT IS THE OPINION OF THE CITY ATTORNEY THAT THE CITY SUCCEEDED TO THE RIGHTS OF TNC IRVINE COMPANY, AS GRANTED IN THE ORIGINAL EASE- MENT AND THE MODIFICATION AGREEMENT, WHEN THE ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY FOR FIFTH AVENUE WAS DEDICATED. THE ORIGINAL GRANT OF EASEMENT EXPRESSLY PROVIDES FOR THE RELOCATION OF POLES, ETC., ". . . TO CONFORM WITH . . . . . . . DEVELOPMENT . . . . . .° IT 13 C33ENTIAL THAT THE RELOCATION BE UNDERTAKEN PROMPTLY. YOUR COOPERATION WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. WE WILL K AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS THIS MATTER WITH YOU AT YOUR CONVENIENCE, IF DESIRED. MTC:YR VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJAMIN B. KoLAN CITY ENGINEER January 28, 11166 City of Newt+ort Beach ?300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Benjamin 8. Nolan Assistant Public works Director Gentlemen: We will provide construction staking for the construc- tion of curb, paving and storm drain facilities at Dover and westcliff Dri,�•es, as ehov+n on Drawing No. R- 5033 -3, sheets 1 through 5, and for s*_recat Lmr%rovements to Pifth Avenue, t,arkspur to Poppy, as shown on Drawing No. R- 5034 -5, sheets 1 and 2, for a maximum cost of $3,997. The actual cost will be deter- mined by the following hourly ratess t;ngineer 3 -man Survey Party 2 -man Survey Party $14.00 per hour 29.00 " 23.00 " The following estimate of time and cost for each operation was used to compute our estimate: Dover and westcliff Tie out existing monumen- tation 6 hre 0 $29.00 m $174.00 Set control lines & offsets 8 hre 0 29.00 a 232.00 Rough grade & temporary island staking (paving cut lines)16 hrs 0 29.00 - 464.00 Curb & gutter stakes (3 stages minimmq) 30 hrs i 29.00 - 870.00 Reset monuments 8 hrs ! 29.00 z 232.00 Catch basin staking 4 hrs 6 29.00 - 116.00 Grade & location for street lights 8 hrs 0 29.00 a 232.00 Supervision 4 hrs ! 14.00 - 56.00 Misc. staking & supervision (travel time, checking 8 hre ® 29.00 - 232.00 grades) 2 hre ® 14.00 - 28.00 $2636.00 City of Newport Beach January 28, 1966 Page 2 fifth Street Control Rough grade Stake 6 alley approaches Stake 1900'+ curb & gutter Stake 14 curb returns Set grade to adjust man- holes (7) Stake (bluetops) 1900' Header Stake 2 CUP's Stake 1900'+ drain ditch Supervision 6 bra 4 $29.00 a $174.00 4 bra ® 29.00 a 116.00 4 bra 0 29.00 m 116.00 6 bra 0 29.00 a 174.00 a bra ® 29.00 a 232.00 3 bra ® 29.00 - 87.00 6 bra 0 29.00 - 174.00 2 bra ® 29.00 = 56.00 6 bra 0 29.00 - 174.00 4 hrs 4 14.00 4 56.00 $1301.00 NOTE; No provision made for preservation of existing monumentation. Sincerely, B. W. L7i11 r,�ao., BWW;gs RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSIMIATES ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS PHONe 5 B -7723 P. O. Box 117 136 ROCHESTER STREET COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA January 28th, 1966 City of Newport Beach - City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California. Attention: Mr. Ben Nolan: Dear Sir: We would like to hereby submit our proposal for the Surveying Services re- quired by you for Construction Staking on a portion of Fifth Avenue, in Corona del Mar, between Larkspur Avenue and Poppy Avenue, and the Staking for curb, paving and storm drain construction at Dover Drive and Westcliff Drive intersection. We propose to complete the Surveying Services set forth herein as a part of this contract in the following manner : One set of construction stakes for rough grade, curb grade, header grade and drainage ditch grades, as shown on your Plans. After viewing the sites and checking the items required, we have prepared an estimate as follows : 3 - Man Survey Party 104 hours @ $28.00 per hour $2,912.00 Calculation and Supervision 18 hours @ $15.00 per hour $ 270.00 TOTAL $3,182.00 The total of $3,182.00 is maximum. Actual cost will be based on the above mentioned hourly rates. City of Newport Beach - Proposal - January 28th, 1966 - Page 2 If this proposal meets with your approval would you please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us for our records. Sincerely, RAUB, BEIN, FROST & ASSOCIATES V " /`� JGR /a: Jack G. Raub ENCL: Civil Engineer City of Newport Beach BY: A ` DATE: i Z, RECFIvED JAN 311966 PUBLIC WORKS Ur-PT. E. L. WHITE CO. Contractors 12311 CHAPMAN AYF., SUITE 112, GARDEN GROVE, CALIF. PHONE (714) 638 -3163 January 27, 1966 Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Subject: The proposed contract for Improvements of 5th Avenue - Larkspur to Poppy, 1estcliff Dover Intersection. Dear Mr. Devlin: Reguarding the additional curb on bid item #12, we are pleased to quote $ 2.42 per lineal foot for the additional 884 lineal feet. Very truly yours, e L am partner, E.L.White Company A RECEIVEp JAN 2? 1966 PUBLIC WORKS piff, r" 0 NN. N. TtAmt BISTNICT SUPERINTtNOENT SOIITNERN CALIPORNIA EOUSON CrrANT $121) OAR►ISLO ATtNUE OW106140 SCACH# CALIPONNIA MN. rams 4itNSLOW OR Was Am SCHWA*, ENGUNCca me Or►ICt PaC If iC TELEPNOHE COIPANY 311 EAsT BALs" Sowmao BALSOA,0 CALtrOUNtA NA. L. N. MACMILLAN .StCT1oN $UPtRVism SOUTHERN Co 196 GAS COMPANY P. 0. Box 334 AHAHEINs CALtrommiA Dc AN .ions r� C- 9ll�'¢ DaetMSER 29p 1* ENCLOK0 ARE THE riNAL DRAWINGS Q WK9TS) f0N THE i"PROVtNENT OF THE wtsm irr -DoV£R INTERSECTION AND FIMA AYtNY£A LAOXOPUR AVtNUt To POPPY Aytwe. PLEASE *to LINE ON TUCK PLANS ANY CONFLICT WITH SUSFASS OR U110[064000 UTILITIES AND RETURN THEN TO HE AS SOON AS FOSS I SLt. ALL CONFLICTING st*fAC£ OR UNOtRGROWO UTILITIES WILL NAVE TO BE NOVEO PRIOR TO ;A*UAAV 24, I9". tNc sC/KDULES START Or co*- STRUCTION. Ir TOU PLAN ANT FUTURE INSTALLATION! OR RELOCATION Or EXISTING UTILITIES IN 91"Am Or THESE LOCATIONS PLEASE INDICATE Toms INTENTIONS ON TIKIC PLANS AND I WILL MET WITH YOU TO COOROl" ATE Vow WORK WIT" OURS• SNOULO ANY AOOITIONAL INFORMATION BE NEOUIREOO PLEASE CONTACT IK AT THIS OFrICC. VERY TRULY To ms# JAIKs N. Noreen ASsistANT CIVIL EIwIISCR E :�3 EIIR4�t � � y 4P FRANCES R. SHAW 720 LARKSPUR CORONA DEL MARS CALIFORNIA C - 95f�D -V DECEMBER 28, 1965 SUBJECTS IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE BETWEEN LARKSPUR AND POPPY AVENUES CORONA DEL WAR DEAR MS. SHAW: THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH IS PLANNING TO IMPROVE FIFTH AVENUE ADJOINING YOUR PROPERTY. THE IMPROVEMENT WILL INCLUDE PAVING AND THE PLACING OF CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF FIFTH AVENUE AND POPPY AVENUE AT THE CORNER. THE NEW CURB LINE WILL BE LOCATED 10 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE AND UP TO 1�1 LOWER THAN THE PRESENTLY EXISTING GROUND LINE ELEVATION AT YOUR PRO- PERTY LINO. THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING PER- MANENT TYPE PUBLIC STRUCTURES WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT- OF-WAY.,-.H OWER, ANY PLANTSO VEGETATIONS PLANTERS OR PRIVATE WALKWAYS THAT YOU WISH PROTECTED SHOULD BE REMOVED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. CONSTRUCTION IS ANTICI- PATED TO BEGIN IN FOUR WEEKS. If YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONSO PLEASE CONTACT JIM MITSCH AT THIS Of FILE. VERY TRULY YOURS JOSEPH T. DEVLIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR JH M: BE rzoNcc:�.s 2 , S,,4 LAj 7Z o LaeArsP�e WAA) � ET pL 408 ,�ivec 4�ao Z,36- t7L'p /Z /" /,4k'6UECiT,E 00N0v Y. L ,4410 721 �9ei6otr.� �c ?o rc /AQG �e- ' 720 �,42i soG. � 16;,erL. L. CG�g /H.lr�r Zj�/S-A�e4oe!/Er��,c,d� -- ) 2 72o 7z C_. G rjiZEel�� 's— C 7z / z acu4A 7Z-11 / uC Ko ��= O N S C 7,r4 72p 4,,A,)sET74 w42p_ C-('��� r kc OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATId AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII, P.O. BOX 4304, LOS ANGELES 90054 MA 0-3700 December 16i 1965 07- 0ra- 0 -NptB ss Project 48 section 186.5 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: Our review of Marguerite Avenue from 5th Avenue to 243 Peet northeast, submitted as Select System Project No. 70, indicates that it to satis- factory for Collier -Unruh financing. This letter will also confirm an agreement by Mr. Cook of your City, and our field repre- sentative, Mr. Howell, to include Marguerite Ave- nue as part of your Select System Project 48. The Number 70 is now available for re -use. The extent of the will be dependent upon review and audit. JAH /jc cc: CTLedden financing to be allowed the ibpartment's final Very truly yours, A. C. BMIS Deputy District Engineer A. Sm ;111 By A. A. SMITH Assistant District Engineer n- WILL SON AND SCHMIAVIL ENGINEERS jo(A CORPORATION; 'M 1535 EAST FIRST STREET _ SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE 547 -6721 November 19, 1965 Mr. Ben Nolan, City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Sir: Attached are the completed plans and special provisions along with an estimate of construction costs for the intersec- tion of Westcliff and I%ver Drives for your review. We have considered your suggestion on subdrains due to the rapid drop in R -value with increase in moisture and show subdrains to be constructed within the two islands to be planted. It is assumed that City forces will relocate the sprinkling system, reinstall the sprinkling system and plant and maintain the landscaped islands. The merging of South -bound traffic on Dover Drive is shown to be complete at the first driveway on the West side of Dover Drive, South of the intersection. This is the most logical location to eliminate the third lane. The use of white cement in the curb and gutter on the traffic islands would require a white aggregate to be effective and the cost of concrete from the plant is estimated to triple. Extreme care would be required during paving and sealing operations to keep the concrete clean. Upon investigation, we suggest that the curbs be painted with traffic paint at the time striping is applied. Sincerely, B. W. Williamson BWW:gs Attachs. STRUCTURES' HYDRAULICS' LAND PLANNING • HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS SCPTCMSCR 7. 1965 MR. B. W. WILLIAMSOM WILLIAMSON & SCHMID 1535 EAST FIRST STRCCT SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA SuBJtCT% Dona • WESTCLIFF (NTCRStm om RCVis10Ns DCAR SIR% THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE CITY WILL MAKE ANY NECESSARY RE- VISIONS TO TMC SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND DO ANY LANDSCAPING WORK Nttoto FOR THE ASOVE PROJECT. THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD PROVIDE THAT THE CONTRACTOR NOTIFY TUC CITY 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF NEED FOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM REMOVALS SO THAT TUC WORK CAN NE SCNEDULCD. THE ONLY AREAS WHICH WILL at LANDSCAPED WILL St THE LARK TRIANGULAR ISLAND AND TUC WIDER PORTION OF THE ISLAND EXTENDING WESTERLY ON WESTCLiFF. THt OTHER ISLANDS SHOULD PROSABLY HAVE CONCRETE MEDIAN PAVING. ALSO, WE ARC MAKING ARRANGEMENTS ►OR TUC COUNTY LAO TO RUN TtSTS TO OCTERUIN9 TUC R VALUC TO BL UstD FOR OCSIGN OF PAYt+ KENT STRUCTURAL SCCTIOM. YOU WILL at FURNISHto WITH THIS INS FORMATION AS 300N AS IT IS AVAILABLE. VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASSISTANT PusLlc WORKS DIRCCTOR Met cc: R. B. 4 R. DinecToR JULY 21, 1965 MR. B. W. WILLIAMSON WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA1 CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR REVISIONS TO DOVER- WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION DEAR SIR: ON .JULY 120 1965, THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZED REVISIONS TO THE DOVER- WESTCLIFF INTERSECTION AS SHOWN ON PLAN 2 OF YOUR REPORT DATED MAYS 1965. THE COUNCIL ALSO AUTHORIZED THAT YOUR FIRM BE RETAINED TO PREPARE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE REVISIONS. YOU WILL RECEIVE A PURCHASE ORDER SHORTLY, BASED ON YOUR PROPOSAL DATED JULE 10, 1965. PLEASE PROCEED WITH THE WORK AT YOUR CONVENIENCE. ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REFERENCE AS REQUESTED IS A PRINT OF A DRAW- ING SHOWING THE STREET 41GHTINO SYSTEM AT THE INTERSECTION. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THE LIGHTING LAYOUT SHOWN HAS SINCE BEEN REVISED AS THE DRAWING WAS PREPARED IN 1950. VERY TRULY YOURS BENJAMIN 13. NOLAN ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BBNtsc 1 O'B R I E N & ASSOCIATES ) oulevard, los angeles, ealifornia 90029: 213 -664 -2191 City of Newport Beach TO— Department of Public Works 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES: Labor, Engineering Technician (Sampling) Laboratory' "R" Valve with Grading Sand Equivalent DATE OUR INVOICE No. YOUR P.O. NO. PROJECT NO. July 8, 1965 332 NPB 0122 9072 COVERING PERIOD May -June 1965 1 -1/2 hrs @ $12.50 $18.75 2 -1/2 hrs @ 8,00 20.00 $ 38.75 2 @ $75.00 $150,00 3 @ 10,00 30,00 180.00 $218.75 Total Invoice Amount per Purchase Order 1tjPB 0122 - $200.00 �4 OK '2-r2_6 RECFjVF0 JUL 9 1965 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 0 0 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCIDENT RATE AT INTERSECTION OF DOVER DRIVE & WESTCLIFF DRIVE THE ACCIDENT RATE IS NOW AVERAGING ABOUT 11 PER YEAR, OR I ACCIDENT PER 500,000 VEHICLES USING THE INTERSECTION. THE LATTER FIGURE CAN NOT BE COMPARED TO ANY AVERAGE FIGURE BECAUSE NO STATISTICS OF THIS TYPE ARE KEPT. i HOWEVER THERE ARE STANDARD WARRANTS ESTABLISHED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF INTER- SECTION IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS TRAFFIC SIGNALS. IN GENERAL, IF THERE ARE 5 OR MORE ACCIDENTS PER YEAR SUSCEPTIBLE OF CORRECTION BY THE IMPROVEMENT, IT 15 CONSIDERED THAT THE IMPROVEMENT IS WARRANTED. ALTHOUGH WE DO NOT HAVE A PRECISE ANALYSIS OF THE CAUSES AND METHODS OF CORRECTION OF THE ACCIDENTS WHICH HAVE OCCURED� IT APPEARS THAT THIS TYPE OF WARRANT WOULD BE MET FOR THIS PARTICULAR INTERSECTION. BENJAMIN B. NOLAN r WILLIMSON AND SCHMID0IVIL 19 CO FP ORP TION) City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Asst. Public Works Director Gentlemen: *e I3�- a ENG 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE 547 -6721 June 10, 1965 Reference is made to your letter of June 7, 1965 inviting a proposal for preparation of plans, specifications, cost estimate and striping diagram for revising the inter- section of Dover and Westcliff Drives as recommended in our report dated May 1965. We propose to prepare the plans, specifications, cost estimate and striping diagram for revisions as mentioned above all to your approval for a cost not to exceed $2,200.00. The actual cost shall be determined by our hourly rates which are as follows: Principal Engineer $15.00 per hour Junior Engineer 12.00 " Draftsman 9.00 " 3 -man Survey Party 27.00 " Secretary 4.50 " " Blueprints Cost + 25% A copy of our engineering cost estimate is attached for your review. Our time schedule is proposed as follows: Work to begin within three working days of authorization to proceed. Plans and specifications completed for your approval within 24 working days thereafter. We will need a print of the existing street lighting plans and underground conduits to prepare the plans. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal. RECEIVED Sincerely, JUN 14 19652�I���,�, BWW•gs B. W. Williamson STRUCTUREPUBL WQ- F&AND PLANNING • HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS ENGINEERING COST ESTIMATE for Preparing Plans and Specifications for Improvements at Westcliff and Dover Drives for City of Newport Beach Topography June 10, 1965 3 -man Survey Party 12 Hours @ $29.00 /hr $348.00 Street Plans Drafting 2 Sheets @ 12 hours per Sheet 24 Hours C $9.00/hr $216.00 Design 2 Sheets C 16 hours per Sheet 32 Hours C $12.00 /hr 384.00 Paint Strip Design 2 Sheets @ 4 hours per Sheet 8 Hours @ $12.00/hr 96.00 Supervision 2 Sheets C 4 hours per Sheet 8 Hours C $15.00/hr 120.00 816.00 Street Lighting and Underground Conduit Drafting 4 Hours @ $9.00 /hr $ 36.00 Design 12 Hours C $12.00/hr 144.00 Supervision 2 Hours C $15.00 /hr 30.00 210.00 Cost Estimate and Quantities Cost Estimate 4 Hours C $12.00 /hr $ 48.00 Quantities 8 Hours @ $12.00/hr 96.00 144.00 Drainage Drafting 6 Hours C $9.00 /hr $ 54.00 Design 12 Hours @ $12.00/hr 144.00 Supervision 3 Hours @ $15.00/hr 45.00 243.00 r' •r Specifications Writing 8 Hours @ $12.00/hr 8 Hours @ $15.00/hr Typing 4 Hours @ $4.50/hr Contingencies, conferences, etc. TOTAL J $ 96.00 120.00 18.00 $234.00 205.00 $2,200.00 4 .TUNE 7, 1965 WILLIAMSON & SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: REVISIONS TO DOVER- WESTCLIII INTERSECTION GENTLEMEN: YOU ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECP IFICATIONS, A COST ESTIMATE, AND A STRIPING DIAGRAM FOR THE REVISIONS TO THE INTERSECTION OF DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE, AS RECOM- MENDED IN YOUR REPORT DATED MAY, 1%5. THE PLANS SHOULD BE PREPARED ON STANDARD SIZE SHEETS WHICH WILL BE FURNISHED BY THE CITY] EITHER INK ON MYLAR OR PENCIL ON VELLUM MAY BE USED. THE SPECIFICATIONS SHOULD CONSIST OF A PROPOSAL AND OF SPECIAL PROVISIONS TO BE USED WITH THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, A COPY OF WHICH IS ENCLOSED FOR YOUR REFERENCE. A COPY OF A PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION COST ESTIMATE IS ALSO ENCLOSED FOR YOUR USE. COMPENSATION AT YOUR STANDARD HOURLY RATES WITH A GUARANTEED MAXIMUM FEE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS WORK. PLEAS LET US KNOW WHAT YOUR TIME SCHEDULE WOULD BE FOR COMPLETION OF THE PLANS. IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF WE COULD HAVE YOUR PROPOSAL BY JUNE 11, 1965, SO THAT IT COULD BE CONSIDERED BY THE COUNCIL AT THEIR MEETING OF JUNE 14, I965. VERY TRULY YOURS, BENJB. NOLAN ASSISTANT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BBNISE rrP- WILLPRMSON AND SCHMID9IVIL ENGINEERS 1 A CORPORATION) 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE 541 -6121 January 28, 1966 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant Public Works Director Gentlemen: We will provide construction staking for the construc- tion of curb, paving and storm drain facilities at Dover and Westcliff Drives, as shown on Drawing No. R- 5033 -S, sheets 1 through 5, and for street improvements to Fifth Avenue, Larkspur to Poppy, as shown on Drawing No. R- 5034 -S, sheets 1 and 2, for a maximum cost of $3,997. The actual cost will be deter- mined by the following hourly rates: Engineer 3 -man Survey Party 2 -man Survey Party $14.00 per hour 29.00 " 23.00 " The following estimate of time and cost for each operation was used to compute our estimate: Dover and Westcliff Tie out existing monumen- tation 6 hrs @ $29.00 = $174.00 Set control lines & offsets 8 hrs @ 29.00 = 232.00 Rough grade & temporary island staking (paving cut lines)16 hrs C 29.00 = 464.00 Curb & gutter stakes (3 stages minimum) 30 hrs @ 29.00 = 870.00 Reset monuments 8 hrs @ 29.00 = 232.00 Catch basin staking 4 hrs @ 29.00 = 116.00 Grade & location for street lights 8 hrs @ 29.00 = 232.00 Supervision 4 hrs @ 14.00 = 56.00 Misc. staking & supervision (travel time, checking 8 hrs @ 29.00 = 232.00 grades) 2 hrs @ 14.00 = 28.00 $2636.00 STRUCTURES • HYDRAULICS • LAND PLANNING* HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS 1 City of Newport Beach January 28, 1966 Page 2 Fifth Street BWW:gs Control Rough grade Stake 6 alley approaches Stake 1900'+ curb & gutter Stake 14 curb returns Set grade to adjust man- holes (7 ) Stake (bluetops) 1900' Header Stake 2 CMP's Stake 1900'+ drain ditch Supervision 6 hrs @ $29.00 = $174.00 4 hrs @ 29.00 = 116.00 4 hrs @ 29.00 = 116.00 6 hrs C 29.00 = 174.00 8 hrs @ 29.00 = 232.00 3 hrs @ 29.00 = 87.00 6 hrs @ 29.00 = 174.00 2 hrs @ 29.00 = 58.00 6 hrs @ 29.00 = 174.00 4 hrs @ 14.00 = 56.00 $136',1.00 NOTE: No provision made for preservation of existing monumentation. Sincerely,�� B. W. Williamson RECE1YEd JAN 31 IM vw�i DEW CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEP#WNT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 CONTRACT WESTCLIFF- DOVER, FIFTH AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS CONTRACT NUMBER 954 CONTRACTOR E. L. WHITE COMPANY I. DELETE BID ITEM #28, CONSTRUCTION SURVEYS. THIS WORK WILL BE SUPPLIED BY THE CITY. NOTIFY THE CITY 3 DAYS IN ADVANCE OF NEEDING THE CONSTRUCTION STAKE -OUT. COST REDUCTION DUE TO THIS ITEM IS: $ 4,026.00 2. CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 1,000 LIN. FT. ADDITIONAL SPECIAL CURB, BID ITEM #12. THE FINAL MEASURED QUANTITY OF THIS ITEM WILL BE PAID FOR AS FOLLOWS: 581 LIN. FT. @ $3.23 /LIN.FT. $ 1,876.63 REMAINDER (APPROX. 8884 LIN.FT.) °0 $2.42/ LIN.FT. 2,139.2tS APPROXIMATE TOTAL $ 4,015.91 ORIGINAL BID (FOR 465 LIN.FT.) $ 1,501.95 APPROXIMATE COST INCREASE DUE TO THIS ITEM $ 2,513.96 THE TOTAL COST REDUCTION DUE TO CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1 IS: $ 1,512.04 SIGNE� /' -� -- DATE R E CTJ TED FEB 171966 PUBLIC gnu.,;.; Y DATE f CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DEPARTMENT Date NO. FROM: SUBJECT: J,C/v..�.L / =r_x /mac_" .2�,c v�•A r. v </ /'.[�n,c //c %%rF /•C .S /�.> /7 /1u.a.cp / ✓n.•/..iC rc�2 C'c,c / /n'nrr�_ u? ,a s s�,.ti� .a r /T /a v�.✓.r cam/ T>u .:.�,c/ /,�r c.riib� T� j N� .. .. . .; .. . . .. G -:p 4 1 aJ c , -39 construction Staklnk, Cost Estimate Dover & westcliff Tie Out Existing Mj-)numentation 6 hrs. @ $29.00._ $174.00 Set Control Lines & Offsets. 8 hrs. @ 29.00 + 232.00 3 Rough Grade & Temporary Island Staking (Paving Cut Lines) 30 hrs. @ 29.00 870.00 Curb & G"'tters Stakes 3 Stages 1 4 `�p Minn-jort11 24 hrs. 4 29.00 696.00 rNpd Feather Lines 16 hrs. Pesvt Monuments 6 hrs. @ 29.00 232.00' . Cat.h Basin Stixins�; 12 h:-s. @ 29.00 348.100 Grace & ',ocati.jn for Stre --,z: g::ts 8 hrs. @ 29..00 232.01) Supervision (Jerry &.Gere 12 hrs. @ 14.00 = 168. 0.1) Prin. Supervision. Time P,.-in. 6 hrs. @ 28.00 108.00 Staking & Supervision (travel time, chec -king. grades) 16 hrs. @ 29.00 464.00. 4 cry. @ 14.0 0 .. 56.00 - = m00% $4 .0044.00 /DJ. The above estimate will:vary according to the contractor's specifications. YRv. .. .. . .; .. . . .. G -:p 4 1 aJ • i C -Ray K E N O ' B R I E N & A S S O C I A T E S ., , City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California June 1, 1965 Attention: Mr. Kenneth Perry, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Pavement Design, 5tb Avenue between larkspur and Poppy, Corona del Mar, California. Gentlemen: We submit the following results of laboratory tests and pavement design analyses for bituminous roadway construction on 5th Avenue between larkspur and Poppy Street, Corona del Mar, California. The two samples tested for "R" value determinations were judged representative of the material at the indicated subgrade elevation throughout the length of the proposed construction. "R" values of 5.5 and 10.0 were obtained for these two tests. It is our opinion that a design "R" value of 10.0 is realistic for the entire roadway after analyzing the stabilometer test results and materials classifications. The lower indicated "R" value was determined for a sandy soil under high degree of saturation with low density. This condition will not be present in a properly controlled subgrade easily accomplished in a closely inspected project. Scarification and recompaction of the subgrade soils will be necessary in those areas where the sandier soils are present. Following design procedures set forth by the State of California Highway Department, several alternate pavement sections are recommended for three traffic index assignments. These pavement sections have been summarized in the following table. V Ror LocATiow of p►TS oN DeAw11j&s 13HM i.., .: n,�,1i r,�l il••ri. i,� CONSULTING ENGINEERS •, .�nn�n:c� -•�, ri. :. ��. � < ._ _. ... �.i.::�s_:_.- '= x— �„�.��... �:.rv�. ice_ ,:: '- �r..z._ _'s -•.., L'�_.�. ..:. ..........mss •• ` City of Newpo 0 Beach Department of Public Works June 1, 1965 Page Two PAVEMENT SECTION 5th Avenue - Corona del Mar Subgrade Design "R" Value w 10.0 Traffic Index 5 (> 7 Plant Mix Asphaltic Concrete .30' .35' .25' •35' .35' .25' .25' Class B Cement .90' 1.00' 50' Treated Base Class 1 Aggregate Base .65 .80' .50' 1.00' .55' Class 1 Aggregate Subbase .57 Total -95' 1.15' 1.15' 1.42' 1.35' 1.25` 1l. 30' (11.4") (13.8 ") 13.8 ") 17.1 ") (16.2 ") (15.0 ") (15.6 ") If -we can provide further information regarding this report or be of further service to you in this matter please advise. HJD /hw Attachments a Very truly yours, KIN O'MM & ASSOCIATES /fli k / 4 Herbert J. Dix Civil Engineer CE 13,635 KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES AN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING ' SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT #9M Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CEN - Station 4+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED 1 5- -6 COMPLETED 5-3-1-65 TYPE a DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Backhoe SAMPLES "Hag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No hater Encountered y m i CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS f T N J Z W z w W to i Z fA NW W Q.� W )' V• 2- O W 3 MOISTURE CONTENT % PLC GMAT. ALL IO 20 30 •O 60 SAND! Rome Clay and silt, brown. Sc Sand Equiv. - 9• I'B" value . 5.5• 17M 2 FINE SAPID: clayey, trace of silt, gray- brown. 3 4 Bottom of Pit • 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I LL 20 N.O. &A. FORM -IS BORING NO. 1 ~ .711 IAN O'BRIEN & ASSOCICS CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING Z SHEET I OF i PROJECT #9OT2 Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CM - Station 8+60 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED 1 5-11-65 COMPLETED 1 5-11-b5 TYPE S DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water Encountered W e Z a CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS O Y N J Z W _ O. Q Z r f n Z y v'ai a W� I� F a Z i O = 3 MOISTURE COMTERT O L �-MA-� LL i0 20 30 '.0 60 FINE SANDt silty, brown. SM Sand Equiv. • 8. I 2 CLAYS some sand brown. CL 3 FINE SANDt clayey, sore silt and white calcareous inclusions, slightly cemented, gmy- brown. SC 4 5 6 Bottom of Pit 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 [.0.•A. FORM -Is I KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING 3 SHEET I OF 1 PROJECT #9M Pavement Design, 5th Ave. CM - Station 14+00 SURFACE ELEVATION Existing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED 1 5 -11 -6 COMPLETED TYPE d DESIGNATION OF DRILL WE Backhos SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water Encountered W j : a CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS 0 z W 00 a z W N = Z N a W W '^ 6. �. ~a = I t = D: o w 3 MOISTURE CONTENT 96 PLC G �Ll NAT 1.0 30 3A 60 CLAY: am* sand, stiff, moist, gray- brova. CL Sand Equiv. . 4. "A" Value 10. 2 3 CLAY: sandy, same silty brain to Ye11Ov- brown. 4 5 ND SA TOPM: yellow- brown. 6 Bottom of pit 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 IS s 19 20 N.O.•A. FORM -10 .. 9AAiNIi._N04 _ KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LOG OF BORING 4 SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT i92 Pavement Design, 5th Ave- CIM - Station 15+00 SURFACE ELEVATION $:Listing Grade DATE OF BORING STARTED -11 -6 COMPLETED 5-11 - TYPE a DESIGNATION OF DRILL NPB Backhoe SAMPLES "Bag" HAMMER None DEPTH TO WATER No Water NnCOIIDtered W w o i i CLASSIFICATION OF MATERIALS J Q m f r 0) � Z a OL, W � Z H Q r H W W N y = y NW W (L li t: U 0 2 _ r 2 0: W i MOISTURE CONTENT 16 O L k-- -''-'� L L 10 20 30 40 60 FM SAND: silty, trace of clay, brow. � 4 2 ClAT: some sand, trace of silt, gray-brown. C' 3 41 S4NDBTMM: weathered, slightly cemented, white and yellow. 5 6 7 Bottom of Pit g 9 10 it 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 H 20 N.O. R A. FORM - It z • KEN O'BRIEN & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING ENGINEERS LEGEND TO LOGS I SOIL Unified Soil Classification System SYMBOLS ROCK Sandstone Siltstone Conglomerate _= Shale Limestone -i' Granite CLASSIFICATIONS ENGINEERING Approximate percentages denoted by soil adjectives Primary 30% to 50% Some" 12% to 30% �Trace" 12 % or less GENERAL SAMPLING Drive Samplers MPS - Modified Porter Sampler 1.94 "I.D. x 2- 1 /2 "O.D. PS - Porter Plug Sampler 1.94" I.D. x 3" O.D. NS - Navy Sampler 2.44" I.D x 3" O.D. SPT - Standard Penetration Sampler 1.38" I.D x 2" O.D. Undisturbed Samples ST Shelby Tube Sampler 2.86" 1.0 x 3" O.D. OS - Osterberg Tube Sampler 2.86" I.D. x 3" O.D. Core Samples PT - Pitcher Tube Sampler 2.86" I.D x 3" O.D. DB - Diamond CAre Barrel Sampler Drive Sample Undisturbed Tube Sample Soil or Rock Core No Recovery Water Level US $AXPZ8 GEOLOGICAL Conventional geological terminology is used TEST DATA w - Moisture Content as percent of dry Soil Weight 0 - Organic Content as percent of Dry Soil Weight 0 - Angle of friction LL - Liquid Limit PL - Plastic Limit G - Specific Gravity of Soil Solids e - Void Ratio 0u - Unconfined Compressive Strength in tons /sq.foot Es - Expansion at Saturation in percent of initial volume Pr - Penetration Resistance in number of blows of hammer required to drive sampler one foot or specified distance N - Penetration Resistance of standard sampler in number of blows of 140 lb. hammer falling 30° required to advance sampler 12" _ 41 N 41 2/i v =77717 I All Di 41 N 41 2/i v =77717 I All --T -F -71117 fi �10D1/ -1c9 JD S9 t 6 ! j V � �C f L�\i�v1 V l L 0 f� q 1 V !I r ,6'/ �� /i ;Ode �O /• f L i i d -.i 6 \rt� tl 1ti � 1 n 111 *3A V i w of b ` •v-rs 03 t b .� - . --T -F -71117 fi �10D1/ -1c9 JD S9 t 6 ! j V � �C f L�\i�v1 V l L 0 f� q 1 V !I r ,6'/ �� /i ;Ode �O /• f L i i d -.i 6 \rt� tl 1ti � 1 n 111 *3A V i w of ` •v-rs 03 t b .� - . V S/V Y V8 4:*1O I \� _ I r_�_dtiyy� D;I i 7 7k- ! 1 o, �\ �,-7/-// 7 /-100' f- /1 �• � I � p a' E, . O` i$it II�f� 1 cJ Q a U q v „ t� V V i\ I I ( •o� .D I — - I ! I I I , �I 1` 1 �Ocu\ �vvl i s \\ 1 \ i It 0 eel 1 I E °veil i L� i J 70 rY Inn tl ; 6c •sir •y•y� I 99[�.JY9 I 0 �1'i -3A V aims v1s tv v Vu J I.•i lR Z %Y -717 ,9cY o� NN In I ti� I • p I I / r Q a U q v „ t� V V i\ I I ( •o� .D I — - I ! I I I , �I 1` 1 �Ocu\ �vvl i s \\ 1 \ i It 0 eel 1 I E °veil i L� i J 70 rY Inn tl ; 6c •sir •y•y� I 99[�.JY9 I 0 �1'i -3A V aims v1s tv v Vu J I.•i lR Z %Y -717 ,9cY o� NN In I ti� CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT NO. TO: F I LE - 1 ✓ I Date APRIL 5, 1965 FROM: ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER SUBJECT: DESIGN CRITERIA - FIFTH AVENUE FROM LARKSPUR TO POPPY (C -954) CRITERIA ASSUMED FOR DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL SECTION FOR SUBJECT PROJECT IS AS FOLLOWS: TRAFFIC = ADT = 12,000 IN 1975 ADT = 1,000 IN 19 5 AT OPENING OF STREET TRUCKS = 5% OF TOTAL: DISTRIBUTION E.W.L. 2 AXLE = 3.1010 330 AXLE = 1.16 I,OZ0 AXLE = 0.21 2,460 5 AXLE = 0.50 4,620 6 AXLE =_2.03__ 3,040 TOTAL 5.00% T.I. = 7.1 CALCULATED BY LYNN PARKER OF COUNTY ROAD DEPARTMENT OFFICE. Vill 1 KENNETH L. PERRY ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER KLP:BE April 1, 1965 Mr. Robert Guggenheim, President Dover Shores Community Association x.o� 1386 Galaxy Drive Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Guggenheim: Your letter dated March 22, 1965, regarding the traffic condition at the intersection of Westcliff Drive and Dover Drive has been received by the City. This letter will be forwarded to the City Council at its next meeting. Enclosed is a copy of a proposal for a traffic study at the intersection of Westcliff Drive and Dover Drive from the firm of Williamson and Schmid, Civil Engineers. The City has instructed this firm to begin their study im- mediately and it should be under way by the time your letter reaches the City Council. If you have any detailed questions regarding the traffic at this intersection, may I suggest that you contact Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan, Assistant Public Works Director. He can be reached at Area Code 714, 673 -2110, Ext. 27. Thank you for your interest in this matter and for your offer of help by your Association. If you would like to discuss this matter with me personally, please do not hesitate to contact me. HLH:mm CC: B.B. Nolan, =/ Assistant Public Works Dir. M 4' Sincerely, HARVEY L. HURLBURT City Manager MR. WILLIAM MASON, VICE PRESIDENT THE IRVINE COMPANY P. 0. Box 37 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 3 MARCH 26, 1965 SUBJECT: 5TH AVENUE STREET EASEMENT BETWEEN LARKSPUR AND POPPY AVENUES DEAR SIRS THE CITY COUNCIL ON FEBRUARY S, 1965, APPROVED THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN LARKSPUR AND POPPY AVENUES AS A GAS TAX PROJECT FOR THIS YEAR. IT IS PLANNED TO CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER ALONG THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF 5TH AVENUE AND PAVE A 32 FOOT WODE STRIP IN ORDER TO PROVEDE A PARKING LANE ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE AND TWO FULL LANES OF TRAFFIC. THE DESIGN WILL CONFORM TO MINIMUM STATE STANDARDS TO QUALIFY FOR STATE FUNDS, AND THE PROPOSED A.C. PAVEMENT SECTION IS 3" A.B. OVER 6" A.B. IN ORDER TO IMPLEMENT THIS PLAN, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO OBTAIN FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY AND THE ST. JAMES PARISH THE 35 FOOT WIDE STREET EASEMENT DESCRIBED IN THE ATTACHED DEED AND AS SHOWN ON THE ACCOMPANYING SKETCH. THE COUNCIL IS INTERESTED IN COMPLETING THIS PROJECT THIS SUMMER AND YOUR ASSISTANCE IN EXPEDITING THIS MATTER WILL BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THIS 35 FOOT WIDE STRIP WILL MAKE THE TOTAL RIGHT of WAY 60 FEET. THE FUTURE CURB SEPARATION WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 40 FEET, WITH THE EXACT WIDTH DEPENDING ON THE FUTURE NEEDS NORTH OF 5TH AVENUE. ADEQUATE ACCESS TO THE EXISTING ENTRANCE AT ST. JAMES WILL BE PROVIDED WITH ASPHALT PAVED APPROACHES. WE REQUEST THAT THE ATTACHED ORIGINAL AND TWO COPIES OF THE EASEMENT FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY, AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES BE EXECUTED, NOTARIZED, AND RETURNED TO OUR OFFICE. A FULLY EXECUTED COPY WILL BE RETURNED FOR YOUR FILES. UPON RECEIPT OF THESE DOCUMENTS, THE PLANS WILL BE COMPLETED AND A PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT PREPARED. IF ANY FURTHER INFORMATION IS NEEDED, PLEASE CONTACT MIKE ANDERSON OF THIS OFFICE. VERY TRULY YOURS, JOSEPH T. DEVLIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR MJA:BE CC; ST. JAMES PARISH Pr­ WILLOAMSON AND SCHMIDOIVIL ENGINEERS Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California (A CORPORATION) 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE 547 -6721 March 25, 1965 Re: Intersection Study- Dear Mr. Nolan: Dover and Westcliff Drives . Reference is made to your letter of March 19, 1965, inviting a proposal for preparation of recommendations regarding the intersection of Dover and Westcliff Drives. We propose to study the intersection and prepare recommendations, including rough cost estimates for improvement. Police Department collision diagrams for 1962, 1963 and 1964; traffic counts, and drawings presented will be used. A visual inspection of existing signing, lighting and striping will be made. Our recommendations will include a drawing showing all recommended changes, signals, striping and a report explaining our recommendations, including alternates and estimated costs. We propose to do the work involved above for a maximum cost of $500.00 with the actual amount to be deter- mined by our hourly rates listed below: Principal Engineer $15.00 per hour Junior Engineer 12.00 " Draftsman 9.00 " 3 -man Survey Party 27.00 " Secretary 4.50 " Blueprints Cost + 25% work will begin at your request and will be completed within a two -week period. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this pro- posal. We will consider it a privilege to provide you with our services. Sincerely, R F C F I V F D B. W. Williamson pUBUC BWW: gs RUP&% i L-Za t STRUCTURES' HYDRAULICS' LAND PLANNING • HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS 4 F/ �A n 19, ine ronoraL;12 City Council City of Newport Beach N =_wport Seat^, Ca'ifornla Gentiemen: i The following was resolved dt the March 2J, l 967 meetin:; of the cdrd of uirectors cf O•�ver Snores Community Association: As the pd;:ulation in the vicinity c`` Dover Snores continues to grow; and Inasmuch ss it iS event the commercial activities located along 171n Street in both Costa Mesa and. the City of +'vewGort Seach are crowing rapidly; and Due to this growth, conjeetion is continuing to build up at llestciiff Drive and Dover Orive; Tnererare, we reouest a traffic study and review be made to cetermine how best the in.ersection can be imrreved, either with additidnai channalization, traffic lights or u comptnatior, of both. I am certain our members would assist in any way possible in completing such a survey as us, ,along with the citizens of Newport Beach and Costa, Mesa, will benefit from such an improvement, 'Yours very truly, K. ( Robert Guggenheim, President Dover Shores Community Association RG /vd W STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS m DISTRICT VII, P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054 VIA 0-3700 march 110 1965 'ir. Benjamin rdolan Cat . _r gineer 3300 ` +. Tiewport boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: Reference is made to your letter submitting for approval the project to from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy ;enuu. 0q- Ora- 0-NptB SS Project 4$ of February 24, 1965 improve Fifth Avenue A review of the material submitted indicates that the project appears satisfactory for Collier -Unruh financing subject to the possibility that parking may be restricted on the north side. If, upon completion of the project, a field determination: is made that the drainage ditch on the north aide is shallow enough to permit parking than a parking restriction will not be required. Pho e),tent of the Collier -Unruh Act Financing to be allowed will be depeiACent upcn rht Department's final review and audit of the project. Vary trul; yours, Deputy District ngineer By .4. L. BAUDER3 District City and County Projects Engineer JAH:fs 6 a C -qs4 .TATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII, P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 54 MA 0 -3700 March 11, 1965 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor M 07- Ora- 0-NptB SS Project 48 Reference is made to your letter of February 24, 1965 submitting for approval the project to improve Fifth Avenue from Larkspur Avenue to Poppy Avenue. A review of the material submitted indicates that the project appears satisfactory for Collier -Unruh financing subject to the possibility that parking may be restricted on the north side. If, upon completion of the project, a field determination is made that the drainage ditch on the north side is shallow enough to permit parking then a parking restriction will not be required. The extent of the Collier -Unruh Act Financing to be allowed will be dependent upon the Department's final review and audit of the project. JAH:fs Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer By M. L.'BAUDERS District City and County Projects Engineer RECEIVED MAR 16 1965 PUBLIC kURKS gip. MARCH 9, 196 WILLIAMSON & SCHMID 1535 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA SUBJECT: INTERSECTION CHANNELIZATION AT DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE GENTLEMEN: YOU ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT A PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING THE INTERSECTION OF DOVER DRIVE AND WESTCLIFF DRIVE. THE INTER- SECTION IS PRESENTLY CHANNELIZED TO ALLOW FREE LEFT TURNS FROM NORTHBOUND DOVER TO WESTCLIFF AND FREE RIGHT TURNS FROM EASTBOUND WESTCLIFF TO DOVER. THE ACCIDENT RECORD FOR THIS INTERSECTION IS RATHER POOR AND WILL PROBABLY GET WORSEN SO A STUDY HAS BEEN REQUESTED. THE FOLLOWING THREE ALTERNATES SHOULD PROBABLY BE CONSIDERED: I. MAKE NO CHANGES; Z. REVISE PRESENT CHANNELIZATION; 3. CONSTRUCT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND REVISE CHANNELIZATION AS NEEDED. IF YOUR REPORT RECOMMENDS REVISIONS TO THE PRESENT CHANNELIZATIONS IT SHOULD INCLUDE SKETCHES SHOWING THE APPROXIMATE CONFIGURATION OF THE CHANGES. IF A SIGNAL IS RECOMMENDED A VERY ROUGH COST ESTIMATE TO BE USED FOR DIS- CUSSION PURPOSES ONLY SHOULD BE INCLUDED. TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR REFERENCE IS THE FOLLOWING INFORMATIONAL MATERIAL: I. POLICE DEPARTMENT COLLISION DIAGRAMS FOR 1962 1963, AND 1964; Z. TRAFFIC COUNTS; 3. A DRAWING SHOWING PRESENT CONFIGURATION. COMPENSATION AT YOUR STANDARD HOURLY RATES WOULD PROBABLY BE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS WORK. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROUGH ESTIMATE OF THE PROBABLE MAXIMUM FEE WITH THE PROPOSAL. VERY TRULY YOURS, A^ BENJAMIN B. NOLAN ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR BBN:vR ENCLS. i Form CU -3 COLLIER -UNRUH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR PROJECT APPROVAL Project No. 48 State of California Department of Public Works Division of Highways (Through District Engineer) From; City ® County ❑ of NEWPORT BEACH Date: FEBRUARY 23, 1965 Advance approval is requested of the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. ❑x involves a deviation from approved standards. ® is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction." DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road FIFTH AVENUE Termini LARKSPUR AVENUE TO POPPY AVENUE Length 0.36 Miles. The proposed work consists Of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURB AND (Grading, paving, constructing ei GUTTER ( ONE SIDE), DRAINAGE DITCH and will be performed by gutters, etc., or the purchase or r g -o -way) CONTRACT under the direction of the CITY Contract or ay a or city, coup y, s a e. GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Median Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -Way STRUCTURAL SECTION• Surface thickness and type Base thickness and type Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2 -8` 2- 12-1 2- 12' Lt. Rt. Lt.1 Rt. Lt. Rt. 0 0 0 1 8 .8 8 0.-1 0 0 16' 32' 40' 25' 60' 60` Existing Proposed I" RMAS " AC NONE . 8" AS *Types: BS- bituminous seal, AC- asphaltic concrete, PCC- Portland cement concrete, Other TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2,000 Design ADTZ �Est.total"in a an s 0 yrs.after completion; RMAS- road -mix asphaltic surface MS- cement treated base AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase Note: Explain reasons for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- t9n a su or ze o ca struction features, etc., U LIC WORKS DIRECTOR on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. Itle STATEMENT ! JACK S. RAUB & ASACIATES ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS PHONE 646 -9733 P. C, SGE 119 136 ROCHESTER STREET COSTA MESAS CALIFORNIA TO: City of Newport Beach O. — August 28.19- &- 3300 Newport Boulevard i Aewpovt Beach, Califoraia YOUR ORDER_ Joe NG.�Qn,{+ STATEMENT DUE WHEN RENDERED - INTLREST CHARGED ON PA[M DUE ACCOUNTS Improvement Flans ox Fifth A veaue between Larkspay and Narcissus $980000 TOTAL Billed in daplloa Blaepsiats C �-- v t c C) $951.60 i i JULY 2, 1964 JACK S. RAUS & ASSOCIATES 136 ROCHESTER STREET COSTA MESA/ CALIFORNIA ATTNI MR. RosERT W. BE IN SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OP FIFTH AVENUE LARKSPUR TO NARCISSUS DEAR SIR: PLEASE PROCEED WITH THE PREPARATIONS OF THE PLANS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE sE7WEEN LARKSPUR AND NARCISSUS AS OUTLINED IN YOUR LETTER OF JUNE 23, 1964- IT IS REQUESTED THAT THE WORK FOLLOW THE OUTLINE 61VEN BELOW AND THAT THIS OFFICE BE NOTIFIED WHEN THE COST OF EX41NEENINO HAS REACHED $930.00. AT THE PRESENT/ THIS APPEARS TO BE THE MAXIMUM AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT CAN BE SPENT ON OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FOR THIS PROJECT. OUTLINE OF WORK: 1, TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A. USE M.S.L. OF 1929 (SHOW B.M. ELEVATION AND LOCATION ON DRAWING). B. FURNISH 8j X 11 CENTERLINE TIES FOR INTERSECTIONS. C. START STA 0+00 AT CENTERLINE OF LARKSPUR AND FIFTH AVENUES. 2. PLANS A. USE SINGLE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STANDARD PLAN AND PROFILE SHEET, B. START STA. 0+00 AT LEFT SIDE OF DRAWING. C. REFERENCE TO CITY STANDARD DRAWIN63 FOR CURSSS ALLEY APPROACH AND X- OUTTERS. D. DO NOT INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: I. COST ESTINATE w LTR. TO JACK RAUB & Assoc. 2. SUBJI IMPROVEMENT Of 5TH AYE• 7/2/64 2. SPECIPICATIoms 3. INDEX MAP TITLE PAGE O• STREET LIGHTS EXI$TtNG UTILITIES %:CENTERLINE MONUMENTS TITLE BLOCK INFORMATION E. INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING! 1. EXISTING GROUND LINE AT SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. 2. EXISTING GROUND LINE AT FUTURE CENTER LIME 3. EXISTING GROUND LINE AT FUTURE NORTH PROPERTY LINE (50' WIDE STREET) #. EXISTING TOPO. ENCLOSED IS A PRINT OF THE IMPROVEMENT PLANS USED ON FIFTH Avewuc BETWEEN DAHLIA AND IRIS AVENUES WNICH CAN BE USED AS A GUIDE FOR THE GEOMETRIC AND STRUCTURAL SECTIONS. SNOW IMPROVEMENTS NORTHERLY Or FUTURE CENTER- Lime Of FIFTH AveNOE WITH A LIGHT DASHED LINE. USE A 0.5 FOOT CROSSFALL BETWEEN CURB$ ON FIFTH AVENUE VERY TRULY YOURSO JOSEPH T. DEVLIN Punic WORKS D I RCcToR -NCI. JTDIV$ z 0 0 JACK S. RAUB & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS PHONE U. B•SI&I P. O. BOX 117 136 ROCHESTER STREET COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA June 23, 1964 City of Newport Beach Department oc" Public ;forks 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attention: Mr. Joseph Devlin Dear Sir: ::e would like to hereby submit our proposal for the Engineering and Surveying services required to improve 5th Avenue between, and inclusive of, the intersections with Larkspur and Narcissus Avenues, within the City of Newport Beach, California. All ;snc- ineering and Surveyinq work shall be done in accordance with the standards and requirements o. the ,_ :ity of Newport Beach, for a 50 foot street right -of -way with 40 feet of pavement between curbs. Following are the Enqineering and Surveying services which are to be performed as a part of this agreement. A. Topographic Survey B. Preparation of Street I_rlprovement Plans in accordance with the standard requirements of the City of Newport Beach, for approximately 970 lineal feet of 5th .Avenue between Larkspur Avenue and Narcissus avenue, for the construction of curbs and gutters, sidewalks, paving and street lights. C. one set of field stakes for each of the following construction operations. 1. Curb and gutter elevation and location control stakes. 2. Setting of all final monuments within the street right- of—way . The concrete monu;nent structure shall be pro- vided by others as a construction item. D. Furnishing of centerline ties to the City for all centerline monuments. Preparation of a final quantity estimate for all imoroveme.nts shown on the plans and an engineers cost estimate on these items. Pg. 2 - City o° ;Newport Beach ltr. - June 23, 1964 0 0 ;e propose to perform all of the Engineering and Surveying ser- vices specified above on a per diem basis, in accordance with the following hourly rate schedule, however, our total fee will not exceed a maximum figure of $1,950.00. Registered Engineer Design and Calculation Dra °tina Field Survey Party ;15.00 per hour ;,12.00 " It $ 9.50 " " $26.00 " " Any additional work authorized by you such as legal descriptions, sketches, underground utility desiqn and /or staking or additional construction staking, will be done on a per diem basis in accord- ance with the hourly rate schedule given herein. An itemized bill will be sent to you upon your approval of the completed construction drawings, for all costs to date, however, this bill will not exceed a maximal of $1,400.00. Upon completion o- construction staking a final itemized bill will be sent for all costs to date, however, the total of this bill and billing No. 1 shall not exceed the maxi:uu_,ri charge of $1,950.00. If this proposal meets with your approval, would you please sign the enclosed copy and return it to us for our records. Re appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project and hope the method outlined in our proposal meets with your approval. R: B/dd encls 1 FIRM: BY: DATE: Very truly yours, Zobert W. Bein Civil Engineer RECEIVED JUN 2.J 1964 PUBLIC WG' KS DEPT. vWk 3209 VIA LIDO NEW PORT REACH, CALIF, RECTOR THE REV. JOHN H. PARKE ASSISTANT THE REV. DONALD R. LONGENECKER TELEPHONE: 675 -0210 January 10, 1964 Mr. Donald L. Simpson Director of Public Works Newport Beach, Calif. Dear Mr. Simpson: I am returning herewith the original and one copy of the pro- posed contract between the City of Newport Beach and St. James Church. At its meeting on Jan. 9, 1964, the Vestry of St. James voted not to proceed with the improvement of Fifth Ave., and therefor not to sign the contract. By way of explanation, several factors entered into the deci- sion, and they all involve money, or lack of it. Our school on Fifth Ave. is in the process of being reorganized, and the Church doubts the advisability of spending more money on the property when the future there seems to be so definitely limited due to the freeway plans. Incidentally, there are several items in the contract that are different from our recollection of our earlier discussions of the mat- ter, but since the Vestry has decided against proceeding with the street improvement anyway, there is probably no point in going into these dif- ferences now. Very truly yours, uj_c� �N�� Byro H. Farwell, Senior Warden St. James Church. RPP,F.IVFD �Li'v e• s/J • 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Dace 12/12/63 TO: CITY ATTORNEY FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE BETWEEN JASMINE AVENUE AND NARCISSUS AVENUE A DRAFT OF THE PROPOSED CONTRACT WITH ST. JAMES CHURCH FOR THE SUBJECT IMPROVEMENTS HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPEARS TO BE SATISFACTORY. THE AMOUNT Of CREDIT TO BE INSERTED IN PARAGRAPH 5 HAS BEEN COMPUTED TO BE O s367. THE TOTAL COST OF THE GRADING PREVIOUSLY PERFORMED WAS $2,30 AND IT APPEARS THE CITY /S SHARE SHOULD BE "OUT 57%- PLEASE SEND A COPT OF THE PROPOSED CONTRACT TO ME FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE CHURCH'S REPRESENTATIVES. DCssys zove D. C. S. IMAPr VWC:mec . 12/4/63 (3) CONTRACT FOS STREN ?'IMPROVEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, and entered into this day of December, 1963, between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal eagporation, hereinafter referred to as "City ", and RECTOR WARDENS AND VX Y MEN OF ST. JAMES CH 0!,,P' Newport Beach, California, a p nonprofit coreration, hereinafter referred to as "St. James Church "; WilNESSETH: WHEREAS, Fifth Avenue:in Corona del Mar in the City between Jasmine Avenue and Narcissus Avenue is presently dedicated to a width of 25 feet; and WHEREAS, the ultimate right -of -way of Fifth Avenue in this area is proposed to be 60 feet in width; and WHEUMLS, St. James Church is the owner of the property lying adjacent to and northerly of Fifth Avenue between the bottom of Jasmine Gully and Narcissus Avenue; and WHEREAS, it is in the interests of the two parties to this contract and in the public interest that Fifth Avenue in said area be dedicated to its proposed width and improved as soon as possible in order to provide safe access to the adjoining property and better traffic circulation; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. St. James Church agrees to dedicate the southerly 35 feet of their property for street purposes by deed in a form approved by City as necessary to increase the right -of -way width of Fifth Avenue to 60 feet. 2. City agrees to improve Fifth Avenue between Jasmine Avenue and Narcissus Avenue with grading, curbs, gutters, street base material, standard asphaltic paving, and drainage facilities. i The improvements will be 40 feet between curbs except in the area 'F1LL1A�ATX _iY�6r- ?9YACpK -o • • between ,jasmine Avenue and Larkspur Avenue which will reduce from 40 fist between curbs at Larkspur Avenue to 20 feet between curbs at Jasmine Aven. 3. The improvements shall be made by a public works contract in accordance with plans and specifications which shall be prepared by City and approved iii the City Council. The plans and specifications shall be- repared and bids called for within 90 days after the execution of this contract. The contract shall be.awarded only to the lowest responsible bidder and City shall require the work thereunder to be diligently prosecuted to completion. 4. The cost of construction under said public works contract shall be initially paid by City. St. Jaws Church shall reimburse City for the cost of all grading and construction of street improvements northerly of the proposed center line of Fifth _ Avenue in saidyy area, plus 50% of the cost of construction of thq Ivr ~proposbdyd aidagi facifiti ahwithinsthis area ofuFifth Avenue ,�1w ith � the maximum amount to be paid by St. James Church to City fixed at $12,000. The exact amount to be paid by St. James Church shall be determined by application of the unit prices to the improvements for which St. James Church herein agrees to pay and that amount added to the pro rata share of the lump sum prices for items not bid in unit prices contained in the bid upon which the contract is awarded by the City Council of City. Upon the amounts being fixed as hereinbefore provided, City shall advise St. James Church in writing of that amount. St. James Church shall pay City the amount so fixed, plus interest at 4% per annum from the date the work is accepted by the City Council until paid. Payment by St. James Church to City shall be made within 30 days after St. James Church receives payment from the State of California upon the property owned by St. James Church or any part thereof being taken by said State for highway purposes, or 7 years from the date of this contract, whichever first occurs. 2, The amount heteinbofore agreed to be paid by St. Jams Church, but not the matt amount, shall.be reduced by :t* um of 7 fqhich constitutes credit for the. grading heretofore performed by St. James church in the area the proposed . street improvements AO which has the effect of reducing the total cost of said seet improvements. IN WrMSS WHEREW, .,etc. 3. NO. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: 1 I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH C 1 TY ATTORNEY PUBLIC WORKS D /RCCTOR AGREEMENT FOR 1WROVEMENT OF.-,VW AVENUE BETWEEN JASMINE AVENUE AND NARCISSM AVENUE Date PLEASE PREPARE A DRAFT OF AN AGREEMENT FOR sUSJECT IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH. THE AGREEMENT WOULD PROVIDE FOR DEDICATION OF ADDITIONAL RA! BY THE CHURCH ANS THE FINANCING OF THE CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY. THE CHURCH WOULD BE REQUIRED TO RCPAM TUC CITY FOR ITS' ONARE OF THE COST AT THE TIME Of ACQUISITION OF THIS PROPERTY BY THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYSp BUT IN NO EVENT LATER THAN 7 YEARS FROM DATE OF EXECUTION OF THE AGREEMENT. SONS OF THE PERTINENT ITCH& YOU MAY NEED FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE AGREEMENT ARE AS FOLLOWSI DCSIYs I I. EXISTING R/W Is 25' IN WIDTH. 2. PROPOsCD R/w is 60' IN WIDTH. 3• CHURCH 18 TO DEDICATE SOUTHERLY 35' OF THEIR PROPERTY FOR STREET PURPOSES. 4. WIDTH OF STREET Is TO BE 40' BETWEEN CURBS EXCEPT THE WESTERLY PORTION BETWEEN JASMINE Ave. AND I.ARKSPUA WHICH WILL VARY 40' TO 20'. 5. IMPROVEMENTS. GRADING CURBS, GUTTERS, BASIC., PAVING AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES. 6. CHURCH TO PAY COST OF ALL CONSTRUCTION NORTHERLY OF PROPOsEO CENTER LINES PLUS 50% OF ORAINAOE FACILITIES PLUS PROPOR- TIONAL SHARE Of ENGINEERING, WITH TOTAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 412$000. FINAL COST TO BE DETCRUI14ED AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT BY COUNCIL AND TO 8E BASED ON BID PRICES. 7. CHURCH TO SE GIVEN CREDIT Of FOR EXCAVATION PREVIOUSLY PAID FOR BY THEM. S. CORPORATE NAME Of CNURCN - RECTOR WARDENS AND VESTRY MEN Of ST. JAMES CNNRCHj NEWPORT BEACH 9. PLANS AIM/ sPECIfICAT1ONS TO 8E PREPARED BY CITY. 040 D. C. S. 3 VIP 0 AUGUST 27, 1463 MR. GERALD L. RUSSELL EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT DISTRICT VII P.O. BOX 2304 TERMINAL AMMtX LOS ANGELES �40 CALIFORNIA DEAR GERRY: WE NAVE NOT HEARD AS YET FROM THE RIGHT OF MAY PEOPLE CONCERN- ING THE SETTING OF A DATE FOR A MEETING BETWEEN THEMS THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH AND THE CITY TO DISCUSS THE PROBLEMS CONNEC- TED WITH THE WIDENING OF FIFTH AVENUE- IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF YOU WOULD REMIND THEN SINCE WE ARE ANXIOUS TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE- VERY �TRTRULY YOURSp `^'Z� DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CC: CITY MANAGER DCStV$ AUGUST 16, 1963 MR. BYRON H. FARWELL 2124 E. BALBOA BOULEVARD BALBOA, CALIFORNIA DEAR MR. FARWELL: WE HAVE AGAIN REVIEWED THE QUESTION OF MOW MUCH ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY WILL BE REQUIRED FROM THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH PROPERTY TO PERMIT THE ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT OF FIFTH AVENUE. SINCE THE COASTAL FREEWAY IS NOW ADOPTED ALONG A ROUTE IMMEDIATELY NORTHERLY OF FIFTH AVENUE, IT APPEARS THAT FIFTH AVENUE WILL NEVER BE MORE THAN A FRONTAGE ROAD. THE TOTAL RIGHT OF WAY REQUIRED FOR THIS TYPE OF ROAD IS 60 FEET. THE WIDTH OF THE EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY IS 25 FEET AND THEREFORE, THE ADDITIONAL AMOUNT REQUIRED FROM THE CHURCH PROPERTY WOULD BE 35 FEET. WITHIN THIS RIGHT OF WAY, IT IS CONTEMPLATED THAT A STREET WITH TWO TRAFFIC LANES AND PARKING ON BOTH SIDES WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED. SEVERAL YEARS AGO, THE PLAN WAB TO CONSTRUCT A 4 —LANE STREET TO FORM AN EXTENSION OF MARGUERITE AVENUE. IN THE LETTER YOU RECEIVED FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY RECENTLY, IT WAS STATED THAT THE RIGHT OF WAY RE- QUIRED FOR THE STREET WOULD HAVE BEEN 70 FEET. IN CHECKING OUR RECORDS, WE FIND THAT THIS IS AN ERROR. IN A MEMO TO THE CITY COUN- CIL DATED FEBRUARY 10, 1961, WE STATED THAT IT WAS PLANNED TO CON- STRUCT A 64 —FOOT WIDE STREET OR A 78 —FOOT WdpE:RIGHT :.OF WAY. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS BUILD A STANDARD 2 —LANE SUBJECT OF AN AGREEMENT THE IRVINE COMPANY. I IRVINE COMPANY $O THAT OUT. 78 FEET AND THE 60 FEET THAT IS REQUIRED TO STREET APPARENTLY IS THE 18 FEET THAT WAS A BETWEEN YOURSELVES, THE CATHOLIC CHURCH AND HAVE RELAYED THIS SAME INFORMATION TO THE I HOPE NOW THAT THE RECORD IS STRAIGHTENED I HAVE NOT YET HEARD FROM THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS REGARDING OUR PRO- POSED MEETING, BUT I WILL CONTACT YOU AS SOON AS I LEARN OF THE DATE AND TIME. VERY TRULY YOURS, ZaA DONALD C- SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DCS:vB a EPISCOPAL CHURCH HIGHWAY COMMI MR. FARWELL, CHAIRMAN - OR. 3 -1887 2124 E. BALBOA BLVD. BALBOA MR. BILL MARTINS MAYOR OF LAGUNA BEACH OFFICE TEL: Hy 4 -3346 RES. TEL: 0RX3X '*lKk JOE CARVER OFF TEL: LI 8 -7423 HOME TEL: OR 3 -470 JOHN KILLEFER OFF TEL: 646 -9395 HOME TEL: Li 8 -o982 E _ k _.. >-, eo 4 .1 4, 100 10, ae AV o NIL, Az01/0 2—",lR0 /,- �a . ............ . . ..... . 4V S_? ae AV o NIL, I February 210 1961 Moise, Harbach and Hewlett 3514 Ninth Street tiivarsids, California Attne Mre Hewlett Gentlemene We have calculated that the contractor, J. Ray Construction Company, has moved approximetoly 6600 cubic yards of earth from the proposed right -ofway for Fifth Avenue. It appears, however, that the excavated right- of-voy will not drain to the west due to the area in the vicinity of Larkspur be- ing about a foot higher than that, northerly of Marguerite. A channel should be graded along the toe of the slope on the southerly aide of the fah property in orier to drain the low area and prevent the run- off from flowing down into the streets of Corona del Mar. With the exception of the drainage problem, the work has been done in an acceptable manner. GiD sys ace Je Ray Construction Co. St. James Church, Attne Mr. Garner Very truly you". G. P. Dunipan, Jr. Asst. Civil Nngineer TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY MANAGER SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVENUE BETWEEN NARCISSUS AVENUE AND LARKSPUR AVENUE IN A LETTER DATED JUNE 9, 1960, THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH REQUESTED THE CITY TO SHARE IN THE COST OF IMPROVING 5TH AVE. BETWEEN NARCISSUS AVE. AND LARKSPUR AVE. ALTHOUGH FUNDS WERE NOT BUDGETED, THE PROJECT WAS GIVEN AN "A" PRIORITY `ON THE CAPITAL PROJECTS LIST, WITH THE CITY'S SHARE ESTIMATED TO BE $10,000. THE PORTION OF 5TH AVE. BETWEEN NARCISSUS AVE. AND MARGUERITE AVE. IS DESIGNATED AS A MAJOR STREET ON THE ADOPTED MASTER PLAN. A PRECISE PLAN IS BEING CONSIDERED BY THE PLANNING COMMIS310H WHICH PROVIDES FOR AN IMPROVED SECTION 64 -FT. BETWEEN CURB$ ON A 78 -FT. WIDE RIGHT -OF -WAY. SEVERAL MEETINGS HAVE BEEN HELD WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE CHURCH IN AN EFFORT TO DEVELOP A FORMULA FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF THE TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPROVEMENT COST OF $30,361. SINCE ADJACENT PROPERTIES ARE NORMALLY EXPECTED TO BEAR THE EXPENSE OF IMPROVING A RESIDENTIAL STREET, THE FOLLOWING METHOD FOR DIVIDING THE COSTS IS SUGGESTED FOR CONSIDERATION: 1. EPISCOPAL CHURCH PAY FOR CURB, GUTTER, 31DEWALK AND AN 18 -FT. WIDTH OF PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO THEIR PROPERTY AND DEDICATE AN ADDITIONAL 53 -FT. OF RIGHT -OF -WAY. Z. PROPERTY OWNERS ALONG SOUTHERLY SIDE PAY FOR CURB, GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND AN 8 -FT. WIDTH OF PAVEMENT ADJACENT TO THEIR PROPERTIES. (8 -FT. IS A NORMAL PARKING LANE) 3. IRVINE COMPANY PAY FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN THE NORTH- EAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF 5TH AVE- AND NARCISSUS AVE. EQUAL TO A NORMAL RESIDENTIAL STREET. 4. CITY PAY FOR CENTER 38 -FT. WIDTH OF PAVEMENT AND ANY BASE REQUIRED UNDER THE ADJACENT STRIPS IN EXCESS OF NORMAL RESIDENTIAL REQUIREMENTS. 5. ALL PARTIES SHARE IN COSTS FOR EXCAVATION, IN PROPORTION TO THE COSTS DERIVED IN 1 THROUGH 4 ABOVE. 6. ALL PARTIES SHARE IN COST FOR DRAINAGE, EXCEPT THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY OWNERS, IN PROPORTION TO THE COSTS DERIVED IN 1 THROUGH 4 ABOVE. 0 PAGE 2 (IMPROVEMENT OF 5TH AVE. BETWEEN NARCISSUS AYE. AND LARKSPUR AVE.) BASED ON THE- DISTRIBUTION OUTLINED ABOVE, EACH PARTY'S ESTIMATED COST WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS: 1. EPISCOPAL CHURCH 13,404 2. PROPERTY OWNERS ON SOUTH SIDE 5,425 3. IRVINE COMPANY 1,552 4. CITY 9,980 TOTAL 30,361 THE IMPROVEMENT SHOULD BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE OPENING OF THE CHURCH SCHOOL IN SEPTEMBER, 1961. PREPARED ABY :(� DONALD C. SIMPSON PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR RS: DCS:EK 2 -10 -61 ROBERT SHELTON CITY MANAGER ri 0 0 2 -14 -61 5TH AVENUE - NARCISSUS TO LARKSPUR COST DISTRIBUTION EPISCOPAL SOUTH ITEM CHURCH PROPERTY IRVINE CITY TOTAL C & G $ 1,507 $ 1,360 $ 218 $ 86 $ 3,171 SIDEWALK 11449 1,040 189 56 2,734 PAVING 2,592 624 264 1,842 5,322 BASE 2,137 512 220 3,737 6,606 SUBTOTAL $ 7,685 $ 3,536 $ 891 $5,721 $17,833 % FOR EXCAVATION 43.09% 19.83% 5.00% 32.07% % FOR DRAINAGE 53.70 - - - 6.30 40.00 EXCAVATION 2,140 985 248 1,595 4,968 DRAINAGE 1,345 - - - 155 1,000 2,500 $11,170 $ 4,521 $ 1,294 $8,316 CONTINGENCIES or 10% 1017 452 129 832 ENGINEERING OF 10% 1,117 ^ 452 129 8322 TOTAL $13,404 $ 5,425 $ 1,552 $9,980 $30,361 2 -14 -61 0 7 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA June 169 1960 Noise, Harbach and Hewlett, Architects P. 00 Box 989 `riverside, California Attn: James A. Hewlett Gentlemen: Znclosad is a preliminary plan for street improvements on Fifth Avenue, in front of the proposed St James Parish School. At the request of St Ja::,es Church, the radius and length of the reverse curae westerly of Farguerite Avenue have been changed as noted. Our present intention is to not construct sidewalk on the "Island" between the two driveways. When your plans for the driveways are completed, please forward a copy so that we may incorporate the returns and approaches into our final plans for the street improvements. Vary truly yours, DONALD C. SIMPSON Public Works Director By G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Aset. Civil Engineer GPDsek Encl 1 . lAW OFFICES HAM►LTON,'MURRAY, ELLIOTT, MUELLER; ALINE d. STODD RICHARD MILTON WILLIAM L.R RAY PETER M. ELLIOTT Est"'" GILBERT N. MUELLER ARTHUR J. ALINE JOHN P. STOOO 8. 1 2 NORTH BROAD -WAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA KIMBERLY 7- 595j.!$ a .. December 19,41060 City Clerk„ City of 14,D" port Beach, City Hall, Newport Besch, Colifo .ia Re, St, Jasars Pariah School Bear Sir: Several months ago or behalf of the Building Comuii-ttee Of St- James Parish bay School, 'I requested a studs less'or,' with the City Council of Newport Beach to So over the cost of the improvement of Fifth Street in .Corona del Kar, which abuts on the St- James parish property. nis is to advise you that we are opening bids on construction on December 22;196.0 and if the bids are within the architect=s estimate and are financially. feasible for us to handle we hope to break earth and start construction during Januarv;,1961, Construction will require approximately eU or eight months so our present plans call for opening school for the fall session, 1961. We are still easious to discuss this matter with the City Council and other responsible Newport Beach City officials. Your assistance in providing an opportunity to do this at the earliest possible moment will be greatly appre- ciated and will materially assist us as well sa the City in the construction progress of the street as well as the buildings themselves. Veryi�tuly yours, Ai it z i 7 ne AJA /gg c - c - City Manager City'Nnglaaer ✓. _t; St. James Episcopal Churak Fifth Avenue v' Corona del Mari California Attne Mr. J. Carver Dear Mrs Cat vots This will *=firm ou and 26th regarding the excavation an area known as proposed Fifth Avenue# required by either the Church or the a JanuarF 309 1961 conversation at Jaaaary 25 th removal of amseso dirt in the No additional perms will be Contractor to parform this work, The area will be graded to leave a 1 fleet high bank along the northerly side of Fifth Avenue and will as" to the north to the appresdmsto elevation of the top of the peepessd curb along the southerly side of the church property. Adequate pwAsions will be made to prevent the runoff from the ohnrch prepelfg from flowing into Ceram del ►taro An es to 101 diameter island will be left around the bases of the power poles. The City will provide an inspector to in• sure that the work is done in the above uannero It to understood the above will cost i2s39do00o The Contractor shall take all precautions to avoid damp to the sever line and manholes along the somberly boaadsr7 of the property The Coumt, Sanitation District will locate the manbolao The City will provide any necessary barricades in {he Fifth Avenus right of way to indicate hazards caused IW this work. The City Council has not given any indication as yes to what extent the City will participate in the cost of the improve. Rents to Fifth Aveauto If the City does partisipates and the result. ing agreement shows that the Church has paid for sere than their share of the excavations the Church will receive sradls for the excess in the final accounting: very truly yours Donald Co Simpson ACSSV Public Vorks Director cos City Manager Jo Flay Construction Co. A. Jo Acme y Q y - LAW OFFI.CE9. k— WRAY,, ELLIOTT & AUNIE' t V{fLt IVAM L. MURRAY P€ ER M. ELLIOTT- .. AR".,UR J. AUNE 112 WEST THIRD STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA KI.8ERLY 7=1616 4L � June 9 e :1960 C!O `:couwil.'of the Ci of omp"t Beaahe 33 11o, :Xewowt illvd a liawporC Btaeb, ' i3?�.f $E�p�ls Attentions. tire-. aargery Wbbrouder City Clark Dow tars. 8abrouders As A. representative of. the Building �fttee.of ebs at. imes I Church into at. the dolvelopmat of '04 ps�erty ad #Agent to fifth Avows is Ceroot�l liar ccaliforoila, I de'6 On to .advise tine:Cittyy Cou H that it iA tbo relent intention. of tba o� iuisetim to feauee to ge babe ds pie ily as posse a school buildift or build on that pr arty; In that aoaaeation I an ces� 'that. it ai,l.l be aaaeespyr toot iaproveo neat of Filth Avenue to be cow#Uted cad "t natter b#s 'he f %e S. di .A altlt W. D.ald seto ore elo�ia y rw Siapsone Newport Beach Public Wos'ks Director, Mr. simpsl ..fir data of. June 8j, 19N# submitted to 4s aoat.:elas rstas for that Vxopomod.1w ps- veo*nt j" it w m swag "ted that. tbs City council of . sw4port 8eaeh should be wde AMMWe our owc ras�it lDtention to proceed with the dervitlepneni. OfPwlr Property, . so that considat.'dt$toa of the cost of swsvemmt am be sods by the City Council in, budget vlaivaing, Additicetpll�! :�t .roapeatlnlly request �. epptmity to most with appropriate city goverment olflorolAls at the earliest practicable- opportunity so that the cost distribution.om be discussed. betweeaOs. I an In , that yew -eeirJkrrp.Vo for #mob a . Asti% and will advise as of the tim laud place of aviob asetin. 'air.•; I F Ott City xcil, atc c.c. Mr. Donald Siapsm Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Seaacb, Calif. Mr. Robert Shelton City 6f Newport beach, City Manager, 33011 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beaaho Calif, Mr. Joe carver 108 Via Palen Newport Beaeh, Calif. • Jfte 9, 1960 4 Mr. Arthur J. Aune 112 West 3rd Street Santa Ana, California Dear Mr. Anne: 0 June S, 1960 Enclosed is a cost estimate for the improve- ment of 5th Avenue between Narcissus and the proposed entrance to the Episcopal Church westerly of Marguerite Avenue. The estimated cost distribution should be considered as tentative only, since the assumptions have not been approved or discussed by the City Council, the property owners along the southerly side of 5th Ave., or the Irvine Company. The estimates were made only as a basis upon which the Episcopal Church could commence discussion with the City Council leading to possible City partici- pation in the project. DS:MM CCs City Manager Encs. Very truly yours, I DONALD SUIPSON Rublic Works Director Ii8TXRMUNf OP 5th AVE. NARCISSUS TO EPI8C88AL CHURCH ENTRANCE W/O HUM== Estimate Cost: Total Price $8,595 3,173 2,734 6,607 5,322 $ 26,431 2.643 $ 29,074 Assumptions upon which to bass division of costs 1. Property owners along southerly side to pay for curblen* gutter F Iidcw��� adjacent to property and 8 feet of pavement consisting of required excavation. 2" of asphaltic concrete surfacing and 4" of untreated rock base. 2. Episcopal Church to pay for curb. gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to property and 18 feet of pavement consisting of required excavation, 2" of asphaltic concrete surfacing and 4" of untreated rock base. 3. Irvine Co. to pay for 1/2 of Sth Ave. and Narcissus Ave, adjacent to their property consisting of excavation, curb and gutter* paving and base. 4. City to pay cost of remaining 38 feet on 5th Ave., consisting of excavation. 2" of asphaltic concrete and 6" of untreated rock base plus 2" of untreated base over the other areas. Estimated costs based on the above assumptions: 1. Southerly property owners 2. Episcopal Church 3. Irvine Company 4. City Total ..................... $ 4,368 13.975 1.813 8.918 $29.074 1 .._ —. .. 4>�. Unit Item Description gmtl y Unit Price 1. Excavation 8595 cu. yd. $1.00 2. Curb S Gutter 2047 lin. ft. 1.55 3. 4' Sidewalk 7812 sq. ft. 0.35 4. Untreated Rock Base 2643 ton 2.50 5. 2" Asphaltic Concrete 887 ton 6.00 Subtotal Contingencies of 10% Total Price $8,595 3,173 2,734 6,607 5,322 $ 26,431 2.643 $ 29,074 Assumptions upon which to bass division of costs 1. Property owners along southerly side to pay for curblen* gutter F Iidcw��� adjacent to property and 8 feet of pavement consisting of required excavation. 2" of asphaltic concrete surfacing and 4" of untreated rock base. 2. Episcopal Church to pay for curb. gutter, and sidewalk adjacent to property and 18 feet of pavement consisting of required excavation, 2" of asphaltic concrete surfacing and 4" of untreated rock base. 3. Irvine Co. to pay for 1/2 of Sth Ave. and Narcissus Ave, adjacent to their property consisting of excavation, curb and gutter* paving and base. 4. City to pay cost of remaining 38 feet on 5th Ave., consisting of excavation. 2" of asphaltic concrete and 6" of untreated rock base plus 2" of untreated base over the other areas. Estimated costs based on the above assumptions: 1. Southerly property owners 2. Episcopal Church 3. Irvine Company 4. City Total ..................... $ 4,368 13.975 1.813 8.918 $29.074 1 .._ —. .. 4>�.