Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-1066 - Improvement of Seashore Drive from 55th Street to Orange AvenueCONTRACT NO. 1066 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS 26TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 1966 LAURA LAGiosy ACTING C ,YT7 CLERK F 1 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH., CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF INVITING BIDS SEALED BIDS WILL BE RECt1VED AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK, CITY HALLS NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA) UNTIL 10500 A.M.y ON THE 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 1966, AT WHICH TIME THEY WILL BE PUBLICLY OPENED AND READS I ROCHE CCHAMBERS O02VHE5CfVYLCOUNCIL FOR PERFORMING WORK AS FftlbW'�d ',', IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE (CONTRACT NO BID WILL BE RECEIVED UNLESS IT IS MADE ON A PROPOSAL FORM FURNISHED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. EACH BID MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY CASHS.CERTIFIED CHECK., OR BIDDER S BOND MADE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, FOR.AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO AT LEAST 10 PER- CENT OF THE AMOUNT BID. THE DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SEALED BIDS WHICH REQUIRE COMPLETION AND EXECUTION ARE THE FOLLOWINGS I. - PROPOSAL 2. PAGE 3 - DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS 3. PAGE [I, BIDDER'S BOND j: PAGE 9 - NON- COLLUSYON AFFIDAVIT 5. PAGE 10- ::CONTRACTOR'S FINANCIAL STATUS THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE AFFIXED WITH THE APPROPRIATE AND CORRECT SIGNATURES AND SEALS OF TBE CORPORATIONS PARTNERSHIPS JOINT VENTURE ANDIOR INDIVIDUAL. IN ACCORDANCE WITHTHE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1770 OF OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HAS ASCERTAINED THE GENERAL IN THE LOCALITY IN WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED FOR MECHANIC NEEDED TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND IS SET FORTH OF SAID RESOLUTION IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIT BEACH. THE LABOR CODE, THE CITY COUNCIL PREVAILING RATE OF PER DIEM WAGES EACH CRAFT OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR IN RESOLUTION NO. 6258. A COPY Y CLERK IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT ALL BIDS ARE TO BE*COMPARED ON THE BASIS OF THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF THE QUANTITIES OF WORK TO BE DONE. No BID WILL BE ACCEPTED FROM A CONTRACTOR WHO HAS NOT BEEN LICENSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 9, DIVISION III OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS' CODE. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS., FORMS OF PROPOSAL, - BONDS, AND CONTRACT MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENTS CITY HALLiS NEWPORT BEACH., CALIFORNIA. A NON- REFUNDABLE CHARGE OF $2.00 WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF STANDARD SPECIFI- CATIONS. A. REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT OF 5.00 WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF PLANS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. UPON RETURN OF THE SET OF PLAN3, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT,, THE $5.00 DEPOSIT WILL BE REFUNDED BYMAILi NO REFUNDS WILL BE MADE LATER THAN 60 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF BID. THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS AND TO WAIVE ANY INFORMALITY IN SUCH BIDS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH., CALIFORNIA LAURA LAGIOS, ACTING CITY CLERK E PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACT NO.' 1066 IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55th STREET AND ORANGE STREET To The Honorable City Council City of Newport Beach California The undersigned declares that he has carefully examined the location of the proposed work and has read the Notice Inviting Bide, that he has examined the plans and specifications for Contract No. and hereby proposes to furnish all materials and do all work required to complete the work in accordance with said plans, the Standard Specifications of the City of Newport Beach, and the Special Provisions, and that he will take in full payment therefor the following unit prices for each item complete in place, to wit% Estimated Item Quantity Item Description Unit Total No. and Unit Unit Price Written in Words Price Price Z. 1 Clear, Grub and Grade Lump Sum ® F I vE TwousANo F I yr Nnun"rn Dollars and Cents $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 ump um 2. 113 Construct Type "A" Concrete Linear Curb and Gutter Feet A Two Dollars and Cents $ �_�n $,hR A Per near o0 GE 3. 227 Construct Type "B" Concrete Linear Curb Feet ® ONE Dollars and FIFTY -FIVE Cents er near o0 4. 21000 Construct Modified Type "B" Linear Concrete Curb Feet ® ONE Dollars and FIFTY -FIVE Cents $ 1.59 $30100.00 Per Linear oo PR -2 Estimated Item Quantity Item Description Unit Total No. and Unit Unit Price Written in Words Price Price 5. 29900 Construct 6" Asphalt Concrete Linear Dike Feet a Dollars and pp,, EIGHTY cents Per linear Foot 6. 29160 Construct Class 2 Aggregate Ton Base Two Dollars and .SEVENTY-FIVE Cents $ 2.75 $ 5,940.00, Per Ton 7. 19620 Construct 3" Asphalt Ton Concrete Pavement ® FIVE Dollars and SIXTY -THREE Gents $ 5.63 $ 9aM.60 Per Ton 8. 840 Construct 4" Concrete Square Sidewalk Feet ® Dollars and FORTY Cents $ .4o $ 336.00 Per Square Foor 9. 51270 Construct 4" Concrete Slabs Square Feet ® Dollars and p FORTY Cents 8 .40 ,� 2,108.00 Per square Foo 10. 30 Construct Asphalt Concrete Ton Overlay Six Dollars and _.No Cents $ 6.00 $ 180.00 Per Ton 11. 380 Construct 21" R.C.P. Storm Linear Drain Feet 0 FOURTEEN Dollars and Cents er ineax o0 ® ONE HUNDRED Dollars and No Cents $irx�.00 $ gnn_nn Bach PR -3 Estimated Item Quantity Item Description Unit Total No. and Unit Unit Price Written in Words Price Price 12. 1 Construct 8t Curb Inlet Each Structure ® ONE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED Dollars and No Cents Bach 13. 1 Construct 21 Ditch Inlet Each Structure ® THREE HUNDRED FIFTY Dollars and No Cents $ 350• $ 3U0.00 Bach 14. 1 Construct 480 Concrete Each Manhole THREE HUNDRED TWENTY Dollars and NO Cents $320.00 $ 320.00 Bach 15. 1 Construct 600 Concrete Each Manhole ® THREE HUNDRED NINETY Dollars and No Cents Each 16. 1 Install Traffic Signal Each Detector FIVE HUNDRED SEVENTY FIVE Dollars and No Cents Bach 17. 1 Adjust Traffic Signal Each Detector and Pull Bog ® SIX HUNDRED TWENTY -FIVE D011ar9 and No Cents $62,5-120$ Bach 18. 5 Adjust Manhole Covers Each ® ONE HUNDRED Dollars and No Cents $irx�.00 $ gnn_nn Bach • Estimated Item Quantity Item Description 190 14 Adjust Water Valve Boxes Each 1s ` 0 PR -4 lER511 ® TWENTY Dollars and No Cents $ 20.00 280.00 ac -- 20. 13 Adjust Survey Monument Each Covers ® FORTY Dollars and No Cents $ 40.00 520.00 Each 21. 4 Relocate Fire Hydrants Each TWO HUNDRED Dollars and No Cents $ 200.00 800.o0 aC 22. 32 Relocate Water Meters Each Q TWENTY FIVE Dollars and NO Cents $25.00 $ 800.00 aC 23. 400 Install 1" Water Service Linear Pipe Feet ® THREE Dollars and SIXTY Cents 93.6o $ 1,44o.00 —­"Per Linear o0 24, 200. Concrete Saw - Cutting Linear Feet @ Dollars and FIFTY Cents 8 •50 $ 100.00 Per Linear o0 25, 7 Install 6" Water Main Each Connections ® FIVE HUNDRED FIFTY Dollara and No Cents $550.00 3.850.00 ac Estimated Item Quantity No, and Unit 26, 1 Lump Sum Item Description Unit Unit Unit Price Written in Words Price Price Install 3 Barricades and Reflectors ® THREE HUNDRED NINETY -Fi VE Dollars and NO Cents 395.00 $ 395.00 'Lump Sum TOTAL PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS FORTY -SIX THOUSANDY SIX HUNDRED FORTY -SIX Dollars and FIVE Cents TOTAL $ 46,646 -o5 I ALL BIDS ARE TO BE COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF THE GIVEN ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF WORK AS INDICATED IN THIS PROPOSALS TIMES THE UNIT PRICE AS SUBMITTED BY THE BIDDER.. IN CASE OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN WORDS AND FIGURES THE WORDS SMALL PREVAIL. IN CASE OF AN ERROR IN THE EXTENSION OF A UNIT PRICED THE CORRECTED EXTENSION SHALL BE CALCULATED AND THE BIDS WILL BE COMPUTED AS INDICATED ABOVE AND COMPARED ON..TME BASIS OF THE CORRECTED TOTALS. THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF WORK INDICATED IN THIS PROPOSAL ARE APPROXIMATE ONLYO BEING GIVEN SOLELY AS A BASIS FOR COMPARISON OF BIDS. THE UNDERSIGNED HAS CHECKED CAREFULLY ALL OF THE ABOVE FIGURES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ON THE PART OF THE UNDERSIGNED IN MAKING UP THIS BID. THE UNDERSIGNED AGREES THAT IN CASE OF DEFAULT IN EXECUTING THE REQUIRED CONTRACT WITH NECESSARY BONDS WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS, NOT INCLUDING SUNDAY, AFTER HAVING RECEIVED NOTICE THAT THE CONTRACT IS READY FOR SIGNATURE) THE PROCEEDS OF CHECK OR BOND ACCOMPANY- ING THIS BID SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. LICENSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CONTRACTORS LICENSE NO. 239526 ACCOMPANYING THIS PROPOSAL IS BIDDERS BOND (CASH', CERTIFIED CHECK' CASHIERS CHECK OR OND IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL BID.PRICE. 847- 194 1 PHONE NUMBER OCTOBER 18, 1966 DATE A900 ALHAMBRA HUNTINGTON BEACH BIDDERS ADDRESS YODER AND SONS BIDDERS NAME (SEAL) (S) CLARENCE W. YODER . AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CO-PARTNERSH I TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (INDIVIDUAL) CORPORATION2 COPARTNERSHIP) '�. LIST BELOW NAMES OF PRESIDENTS SECRETARYA TREASURER AND MANAGER IF A CORPORATION,' AND NAMES OF ALL COPARTNERS IF A CO- PARTNERSHIP: WALTER C. YODER CLARENCE W. YODER GAILE A. YODER • • PAGE 3 DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT HE HAS USED THE SUB -BIDS OF THE FOLLOWING LISTED CONTRACTORS IN MAKING UP HIS 810 AND THAT THE SUB - CONTRACTORS LISTED WILL BE USED FOR THE WORK FOR WHICH THEY BID, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEERy AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. NO CHANGE MAY BE MADE IN THESE SUB - CONTRACTORS EXCEPT UPON THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. ITEM OF WORK 1. CONCRETE SUB - CONTRACTOR G.L. KELLER ADDRESS SANTA ANA 2. DETECTOR PADS STEINY AND MITCHELL LOS ANGELES 3 AGGREGATE BASE BURR is ORANGE 4. ASPHALT SULLY - MILLER ORANGE 5• 6. 7• 8. 9• 10. II. 12. `YODER AND SONS BIDDERS NAME (S) CLARENCE W. YODER AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE Cn- PARTMCRCNIP TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (INDIVIDUALy COPARTNERSHIP OR CORPCRATION) 7890 ALHAMBRA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA ADDRESS • 0 PAGE 4 (FOR ORIGINAL, SEE CITY CLERK'S FILE) BIDDER'S BOND TO ACCOMPANY PROPOSAL KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT WE, YODER AND SONS , AS PRINCIPAL, AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY , AS SURETY, ARE HELD AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN THE SUM OF TEN PERCENT OF AMOUNT BID DOLLARS ($ 10% ), LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE PAYMENT OF WHICH SUM WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE, WE BIND OURSELVES, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE PROPOSAL OF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55TH STREET AND ORANGE STREET IN TIIE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND IF THE .. ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL SHALL DULY ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR SUCH CONSTRUC- TION AND SHALL EXECUTE AND DELIVER THE TWO (Z) BONDS DESCRIBED IN THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS" WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS (NOT INCLUDING SATURDAY AND SUNDAY),FROM THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF A NOTICE TO THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL BY AND FROM SAID CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH THAT SAID CONTRACT IS READY FOR EXECUTION, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID; OTHERWISE IT BE AND REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, AND THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE FORFEITED TO THE SAID CITY. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PRINCIPAL ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THIS BOND AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IT 15 AGREED THAT THE DEATH OF ANY SUCH PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT EXONERATE THE SURETY FROM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS BOND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 19 66 CORPORATE SEAL (IF CORPORATION) (ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ATTORNEY IN FACT) YODER AND SONS PRINCIPAL (5) BY: CLARENCE W. YODER HARTFORD ACCIDENT AND INDEMNITY COMPANY SURETY (S) BY 0. DOUGLAS NELSON 0. DOUGLAS NELSON, TITLE ATT O1111G Y+J Y -F •rr BOND NO: 3900516 • P &IUM: INCLUDED IN FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE BOND PAGE 5 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS' THAT WHEREAS' THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED NOVEMBER Iii, 1966 HAS AWARDED TO YODER AND SONS 9 HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "PRINCIPAL", A CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55TH STREET AND ORANGE STREET IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. WHEREAS, SAID PRINCIPAL HAS EXECUTED OR IS ABOUT TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND THE TERMS THEREOF REQUIRE THE FURNISHING OF A BOND WITH SAID CONTRACT, PROVIDING THAT IF SAID PRINCIPAL OR ANY OF HIS OR ITS SUBCONTRACTORS, SHALL FAIL TO PAY FOR ANY MATERIALS, PROVISIONS, PROVENDER, OR OTHER SUPPLIES OR TEAMS USED IN, UPON, FOR, OR ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AGREED TO BE DONE, OR FOR ANY WORK OR LABOR DONE THEREON OF ANY KIND, THE SURETY ON THIS BOND WILL PAY THE SAME TO THE EXTENT HEREINAFTER SET FORTH: NOW, THEREFORE, liE YODER AND SONS AS PRINCIPAL, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE CONTRACTOR AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SURETY, ARE HELD FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE SUM OF THREE AND NO /100 TWENTY —THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTYIDeLLAR5 ($23,323.00 ), SAID SUM BEING ONE-HALF OF THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT, FOR WHICH PAYMENT WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE WE BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE PERSON OR HIS 5UBCON- TRACTORS,, FAIL TO PAY FOR ANY MATERIALS, PROVISIONS, PROVENDER, OR OTHER SUPPLIES, OR TEAMS, USED IN, UPON, FOR, OR ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK CONTRACTED TO BE DONE, OR FOR ANY OTHER WORK OR LABOR THEREON OF ANY KIND, OR FOR AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CODE WITH RESPECT TO SUCH WORK OR LABOR, THAT THE SURETY OR SURETIES WILL PAY FOR THE SAME, IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING THE SUM SPECI- FIED IN THE BOND, AND ALSO, IN CASE SUIT IS BROUGHT UPON THE BOND, A REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEE, TO BE FIXED BY THE COURT, AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4204 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. PAGE 6 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND - CONTINUED) THIS BOND SHALL INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY AND ALL PERSONS, COMPANIES, AND CORPOR- ATION ENTITLED TO FILE CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 1192.1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SO AS TO GIVE A RIGHT OF ACTION TO THEM OR THEIR ASSIGNS IN ANY SUIT BROUGHT UPON THIS BOND, AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4205 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AND THE SAID SURETY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES THAT NO CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED THEREUNDER OR THE SPECIFICATIONS ACCOMPANYING THE SAME SHALL IN ANY WISE AFFECT ITS OBLIGATIONS ON THIS BOND, AND IT DOES HEREBY WAIVE NOTICE OF ANY SUCH CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACTOR OR TO THE WORK OR TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PRINCIPAL ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THIS BOND AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IT IS AGREED THAT THE DEATH OF ANY SUCH PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT EXONERATE THE SURETY FROM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS BOND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN DULY EXECUTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AI'I•? SURETY ABOVE NAMED, ON THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 1966 YODER AND SONS (SEAL) BY: jtl // I SEZ (SEAL) CONTRACTOR HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY- M.AL). By �.. �.� y,1.SEAL) ` \ HUGH M. WRSENBACH, ATTORNEY-IN-FACT (SEAL') APPROVED AST /O/ FO M' SURETY CI I ATTOR THIS BOND WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BY MOTION ON DATE ATTEST: ✓2 CITY CLERK STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY CIF. .... ....... jDRAx.Ge_ ...... _ .... ._.... On this ..... 1.!iT H -- -,day of ... No V E MB.E.R-- _- - -._in the year one thousand nine hundred and..... S.I. X.'[ Y-S.I.X_- before me, E57HER H. PAULSO.. ..... ........ P a Notary Public in and for said County, residing therein, duly .. .. commissioned and sworn, personally appeared .... % fi ... M..... 0S E H-B&- y ............. known to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact of the Hartford Accident and Indemnity pun, nnm�nmmwniuiunnn�uin'm'mmawCompany, the Corporation described in and that executed the within instrument, and .t ESTHER HAIPAULSON flsO known to me to be the person...... who executed it on behalf of the Corporation NOTARY PUBIIC . OFFICE RNIA erein named, and ._ --- he------ acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the } mf' PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN e ORANGE COUNTY ,.1 "� ^,,^ na,,,wmn ^xuvuwx'a^�w6tl' -0k WL,t%iQ &JAv 4j I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at my above written. My Commission will Expire-- ER ER H,-- PAULSOR S.A. 56 MY .Co.mm. isslon Expires SP�'Ihbu 121 1975 office, in the said County, the day and year in this certificate first _............. n.2 2 ----- 1 _......... .PnE11C in and for said county, State of Califotoia h Y. • PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT 6OND NO: 3900516 PREMIUM: $350.00 PAGE 7 WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED NOVEMBER 14. 1966 HAS AWARDED TO YODER AND SONS 9 HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "PRINCIPAL",, A CONTRACT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRL'VE BETWEEN 55TH STREET AND ORANGE STREET IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS NOW ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. WHEREAS, SAID PRINCIPAL HAS EXECUTED OR IS ABOUT TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND THE TERMS THEREOF REQUIRE THE FURNISHING A BOND FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF SAID CONTRACT; NOW, THEREFORE, WE, YODER AND SONS AS PRINCIPAL, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "CONTRACTOR", AND HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY AS SURETY, ARE HELD AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE SUM OF THREE AND NO /100 TWENTY -THREE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED TWENTD6LLARS ($23,33 -OO )� SAID SUM BEING EQUAL TO 50% OF THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT, TO BE PAID TO THE SAID CITY OR ITS CERTAIN ATTORNEY) ITS SUCCESSORS, AND ASSIGNS; FOR WHICH PAY- MENT, WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE, WE BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, EXECUTORS AND AD- MINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRE- SENTS. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBL8GAT90N IS SUCH, THAT IF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL, HIS OR ITS HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS, SHALL IN ALL THINGS STAND TO AND ABIDE BY, AND WELL AND TRULY KEEP AND PERFORM THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENTS IN THE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY ALTERATION THEREOF MADE AS THEREIN PRO- VIDED ON HIS OR THEIR PART, TO BE KEPT AND PERFORMED AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER THEREIN SPECIFIED, AND IN ALL RESPECTS ACCORDING TO THEIR TRUE INTENT AND MEANING, AND SHALL INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ITS OFFICERS AND AGENTS, AS THEREIN STIPULATED, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID; OTHERWISE IT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND VIRTUE. PAGE 8 (PERFORMANCE BOND — CONTINUED) AND SAID SURETY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES THAT NO CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED THEREUNDER OR THE SPECIFICATIONS ACCOMPANYING THE SAME SHALL IN ANY WISE AFFECT ITS OBLIGATIONS ON THIS BOND,'AND IT DOES HEREBY WAIVE NOTICE OF ANY CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE TERMS OF THE CON- TRACT OR TO THE WORK OR TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PRINCIPAL ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THIS BOND AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IT IS AGREED THAT THE DEATH ON ANY SUCH PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT EXONERATE THE SURETY FROM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS BOND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN DULY EXECUTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SURETY ABOVE NAMED, ON THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 196 6 . YO DER AND SONS (SEAL) BY: ' (SEAL) EAL) CONTRACTOR HARTFORD ACCIDENT ��"" �^' & INDEMNITY GC(SEAL) BY: vVM_yaQ)prg _ (SEAL) SURETY HUGH M. URSENBACH, ATTORNEY—IN —FACT APPROVED AS TO FORM: C ITiI ATTOR ATE OF CALIFORNIA ss. AUNTY OF. ...... -D R AM G E.- On this ---- 1.4.T.H .... day of ------ iD.V.E.M.8.ER ------- in the year one thousand nine hundred and..... S.I.XT.Y.r.S.t.X............ before me, f._ ---------- ,- --- --- ----- _- ----------- ..... ESTHER, H.- PAULSON--- ,.__..,____._ -_ a Notary Public in and for said County, residing therein, duly r commissioned and sworn, personally appeared............ M U G H_ M U R S e N B. A C,H __ known to me to be the Attorney -in -Fact of the Hartford Accident and Indemnity nonxnnnxuxx "'x " ^u ° ^1pxx "x1p1pO1axOOFFICi At ........... SEAE 1 ," Company, the Corporation described in and that executed the within instrument, and EST H. PAULSON y also known to me to be the person...... who executed it on behalf of the Corporation �e NOTARY VUBIIC . GIIFORNIA� therein named, and ...... he._... acknowledged to me that such Corporation executed the PRINGpAI OFFICE IN t = - ORANGE COUNTY same. wwlwnnnxmmmvnxxuxxwwmxwnuumm�wxxxuxnwiwiwuwwmrx �a� '� `V '_ w ` y w A I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my Official Seal, at my office, in the said County, the day and year in this certificate first . above writt en. ; � My Commission will Expire... - - .EST11ER.IL.PA4)LWM ............ ...... '.S.A. 56 My CAM"sslon Expires September 12, 1970 j Notary Public in and for said County, State of California PAGE 9 NON- COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT THE BIDDERS, BY ITS OFFICERS AND AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT AT THE TIME OF FILING THIS BID, BEING DULY SWORN ON THEIR OATHS SAY, THAT NEITHER THEY NOR ANY OF THEM, HAVE IN ANY WAY, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ENTERED INTO ANY ARRANGEMENT OR AGREEMENT WITH ANY OTHER BIDDER, OR WITH ANY PUBLIC OFFICER OF SUCH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WHEREBY SUCH AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS OR EITHER OF THEM, HAS PAID OR IS TO PAY TO SUCH BIDDER OR PUBLIC OFFICER ANY SUM OF MONEY, OR HAS GIVEN OR IS TO GIVE TO SUCH OTHER BIDDER OR PUBLIC OFFICER ANYTHING OF VALUE WHATEVER, OR SUCH AFFIANT OR AF- FIANTS OR EITHER OF THEM HAS NOT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ENTERED INTO ANY ARRANGE- MENT OR AGREEMENT WITH ANY OTHER BIDDER OR BIDDERS, WHICH TENDS TO OR DOES LESSEN OR DESTROY FREE COMPETITION IN THE LETTING OF THE CONTRACT SOUGHT FOR BY THE AT- TACHED BIDS; THAT NO BID HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN THROUGH ANY BID DEPOSITORY, THE BYLAWS, RULES OR REGULATIONS OF WHICH PROHIBIT OR PREVENT THE CONTRACTOR FROM CONSIDERING ANY BID FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIAL - MAN WHICH IS NOT PROCESSED THROUGH SAID 51D DEPOSITORY, OR WHICH PREVENT ANY SUB- CONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN FROM BIDDING TO ANY CONTRACTOR WHO DOES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BID DEPOSITORY; THAT NO INDUCE- MENT OR ANY FORM OR CHARACTER OTHER THAN THAT WHICH APPEARS UPON THE FACE OF THE BID WILL BE SUGGESTED, OFFERED, PAID, OR DELIVERED TO ANY PERSON WHOMSOEVER TO INFLUENCE THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SAID BID OR AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT, NOR HAS THIS BIDDER ANY AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER, WITH ANY PERSON WHOMSOEVER TO PAY, DELIVER TO, OR SHARE WITH ANY OTHER PERSON IN ANY WAY OR MANNER, ANY OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE CONTRACTS SOUGHT BY THIS BID• YODER AND SONS SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY CLARENCE W. YODER THIS 18TH DAY OF OCTOBER 196_6 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES' ESTHER H. PAULSON (5) ESTHER H. PAULSON Y COMMISSION LxpIRES APTEMB ep 191(0 NOTARY PUBLIC PAGE 10 BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TECHNICAL ABILITY AND EXPERIENCE (THE BIDDER IS REQUIRED TO STATE WHAT WORK OF A SIMILAR CHARACTER TO THAT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED CONTRACT HE HAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED AND GIVE REFERENCE WHICH WILL ENABLE THE CITY COUNCIL TO JUDGE HIS RESPONSIBILITY, EXPERIENCE, SKILL, AND BUSINESS STANDING.) THE UNDERSIGNED SUBMITS HEREWITH A STATEMENT OF HIS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. THE UNDERSIGNED SUBMITS BELOW A STATEMENT OF THE WORK OF SIMILAR CHARACTER TO THAT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED CONTRACT WHICH HE HAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED. COLLINS AVE - ECKHOFT ST. TO MAIN ST - ORANGE COUNTY $33,936.60 DYER ROAD - SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA $80,531.80 GRAND AVE, SANTA ANA CALIFORNIA $59,587.22 SLATER AVE, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA $10,20p3.65 WARNER AVE, HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA $82,578.16 S) CLARENCE W. YODER SIGNED PAGE II C 0 N T.R A C T THIS AGREEMENT' MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS d-l-It DAY OF �p�c�y 196 , BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE CITY, PARTY OF THE FIRST PART, AND YODER AND SONS HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE CONTRACTOR, PARTY OF THE SECOND PART. WITNESSETH. THAT THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS; I. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PAYMENTS AND AGREEMENTS HEREINAFTER MENTIONED TO BE MADE AND PERFORMED BY THE CITY, THE CONTRACTOR AGREES WITH THE CITY TO FURNISH ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 99TH STREET AND ORARGE STREET AND TO PERFORM AND COMPLETE IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER ALL THE WORK PERTAINING THERETO SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR; TO FURNISH AT HIS OWN PROPER COST AND EXPENSE ALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, AND MATERIALS NECESSARY THEREFOR, (EX- CEPT SUCH MATERIALS, IF ANY, AS IN THE SAID SPECIFICATIONS ARE STIPULATED TO BE FUR- NISHED BY THE CITY), AND TO DO EVERYTHING REQUIRED BY THIS AGREEMENT AND THE SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Z. FOR FURNISHING ALL SAID MATERIALS AND LABOR, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT, AND DOING ALL THE WORK CONTEMPLATED AND EMBRACED IN THIS AGREEMENT, ALSO FOR ALL LOSS AND DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF THE NATURE OF THE WORK AFORESAID, OR FROM THE ACTION OF THE ELEMENTS, OR FROM ANY UNFORESEEN DIFFICULTIES WHICH MAY ARISE OR BE ENCOUNTERED IN THE PROSECU- TION OF THE WORK UNTIL ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY, AND FOR ALL RISKS OF EVERY DE- SCRIPTION CONNECTED WITH THE WORK; ALSO, FOR ALL EXPENSES INCURRED BY OR IN CONSE- QUENCE OF THE SUSPENSION OR DISCONTINUANCE OF WORK, EXCEPT SUCH AS IN SAID SPECIFI- CATIONS ARE EXPRESSLY STIPULATED TO BE BORNE BY THE CITY; AND FOR WELL AND FAITHFULLY COMPLETING THE WORK AND THE WHOLE THEREOF, IN THE MANNER SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY WILL PAY AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE IN FULL COMPENSATION THEREFORE THE LUMP SUM PRICE, OR IF THE 810 IS ON THE UNIT PRICE BASIS, THE TOTAL PRICE FOR THE SEVERAL ITEMS FURNISHED PURSUANT TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, NAMED IN THE BIDDING SHEET OF THE PROPOSAL, AS THE CASE MAY BE. 3. THE CITY HEREBY PROMISES AND AGREES WITH THE SAID CONTRACTOR TO EMPLOY, AND DOES HEREBY EMPLOY THE SAID CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE MATERIALS AND TO DO THE WORK ACCORDING TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED AND REFERRED TO FOR THE PRICE AFORESAID, AND HEREBY CONTRACTS TO PAY THE SAME AT THE TIME, IN THE MANNER, AND UPON THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS; AND THE SAID PARTIES FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY AGREE TO THE FULL PERFORMANCE OF THE COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED. 4. THE NOTICE TO BIDDERS, INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS, CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL, AND THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ALL AMENDMENTS THEREOF, WHEN APPROVED BY THE PAR- TIES HERETO, OR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED IN AND MADE PART OF THIS AGREE- MENT. PAGE 12 (CONTRACT - CONTINUED) 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THE DEFENSE OF AND INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY, THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND THEIR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM ALL CLAIMS, LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, AND LIABILITY OF EVERY KIND, NATURE, AND DESCRIPTION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT OR WORK, REGARD- LESS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE; AND FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, AND LIABILITY, HOWSOEVER THE SAME MAY BE CAUSED, RESULTING DIRECTLY OR IN- DIRECTLY FROM THE NATURE OF THE WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF RESPON- SIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE CAUSED THIS CONTRACT TO BE EXECUTED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. ATTEST: J ^ - CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY A ol HEY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA BY: A YOR rONTRACTOR BY: IP d ii ,ill, /�I i NOTICE TO BIDDERS: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH \'N60C,'WIMS D'EPARTiNENT CONTRACT NO. IO66 CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR .. IWROVEMENT OF SEAS"M 'DRIVE FROM 5%TH STREET TO ORANGE STREET ADDENDUM NO. I PLEASE DELETE THE CONTENTS OF SECTION 17 OF THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS AND SUBSTITUTE THE FOLLOWING IN ITS PLACES 17. ADJUSTMENT OF TRAFFIC DETECTOR BOX AND IRAFFIR_UETECTOR: THE EXISTING - TRArrtC- DETECTOR PAD AND ELECTRICAL PULL BOX ON ORANGE STREET SMALL BE ADJUST✓rD.TO CONFORM TO THE LOCATIONS AND GRADE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.' THE FORM AND DIMENSIONS OF BOTH THE EXISTING AND NEW DETECTOR SMALL CONFORM TO THE FORK AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON`THE CALIFORNIA DIVLSI'ON'OF HIGHWAYS STANDARD DETAIL ES -3B-I. AS'SPECIFIED IN SECTIONS 86- 4,.O5A AND 86 -4.05D OF TME,STATE STANDARD - SfECIFI'CATIONS AND THE ENCRJOUNMENT PERMIT ISSUED BY THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS. - THE TWO DETECTORS SHALL BE ELECTRICALLY 'INTERCONNECTED, THE COST OF FURNISHING AND INSTALLING THE NEW DETECTOR WILL BE PAID FOR UNDER ITEM'16 OF THE PROPOSAL. THE COST OF RELOCATING AND ADJUSTING THE EXISTING DETECTOR AND ELECTRICAL PULL BOX WILL BE PAID FOR UNDER ITEM 17 OF THE PROPOSAL. PLEASE SHOW DATE OF RECEIPT OF THIS ADDENDUM ON THE PROPOSAL SHEET OR ATTACH A COPY OF THE ADDMMDUSi1THER_FJTA. BENJAMIN B. NOLAN CITY,ENGINEER 1013166 SPECIAL PROVISIONS CONTRACT NO. 1066 IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55th STREET AND ORANGE STREET 1. Specifications: All work shall be done in accordance with the City of Newport Beach, Public Works Department, Standard Specifications and these Special Provisions. 2. Drawings: The complete set of plans for bidding and construction consist of the following: Drawing No. R- 5059 -S, Sheets 1 through 7 Drawing No. Std -102 -L Curb Sections Drawing No. Std -103 -L Sidewalk Details Drawing No. Std -110 -L Surveyor's Monument Drawing No. Std -112 -L Street Barricades Drawing No. Std -302 -L Catch Basin Bulb Angle Inlet Drawing No. Std -405 -L Reinforced Precast Manhole Drawing No. Std -501 -L Fire Hydrant Installation Drawing No. Std -502 -L Thrust Blocks Drawing No. Std - 503 -1, Water Service Drawing No. Std -507 -L Water Valve Cover 3. Location and Scope of Work: The work to be constructed under this Contract is located in Seashore Drive between 55th Street and a point 150 feet westerly of Orange Street, in Orange Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Seashore Drive, and in the two Public Utility ease- ments between Pacific Coast Highway and Seashore Drive near 58th Street and Walnut Street. The work to be done consists of clearing, grubbing and grading; - 2 - 3, cont Id i construction of concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks, slabs, and asphalt berms; relocation of fire hydrants and water meters; placing of aggregate base and asphaltic concrete pavement; installation of an underground storm drainage system; adjustment of traffic signal detector, manhole covers, water valve boxes and monument covers, and such other work as necessary to complete the work shown on the Plans or included in the Specifications. 4. Time of Completion: The work shall be completed within 75 calendar days after the execution of the Contract by the City. 5. Obstructions: Buildings that are shown on the aerial photo portion of the drawings as within the construction limits will be relocated by others prior to the commencement of work. Fences, walls, concrete slabs, shrubs and other similar obstructions not removed by others prior to the commencement of work are to be removed by the Contractor and included in the clearing, grubbing and grading item. Power and telephone poles, gas meters and services for these utilities obstructing the work will be relocated by others. 6. Clearing, Grubbing and Grading: Clearing, grubbing and grading shall include all of the work specified in Section 10 of the Standard Specifications except ditches and channels. In addition, this item shall include the removal of concrete slabs along the southerly side of Seashore Drive. The slabs shall be removed to a cold -joint or saw -cut as determined in the field by the Engineer. The work of saw - cutting Blabs, when required by the Engineer, will be paid for separately under the bid item "Concrete Saw - Cutting ". The replacement of the concrete - 3 - 6. cont Id slabs will be included in the bid item "Concrete Slabs ". All excess inorganic materials such as concrete, asphalt, dirt, sand, etc. may be disposed of by the Contractor at the City Disposal Site which is located as shown on the vicinity map on Sheet 1 of the drawings. The exact area for dumping within the Disposal Site shall be designated by the Engineer. 7. Concrete Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks and Slabs: Concrete curbs, gutters, sidewalks and slabs shall be constructed in accordance with the form and dimensions shown on the Plans and as specified in Section 15. The transitions at curb returns between type "B" curb and modified type "B" curb shall be paid for at the same unit price bid for type "B" curb. The concrete slabs to be replaced on the southerly side of Seashore Drive shall be scored and marked to match the adjacent undisturbed slabs. 8. Asphalt Concrete Pavement: Asphalt concrete pavement shall be furnished and constructed as specified in Section 12. 2" x 6" redwood headers shall be installed at the locations designated on the drawings and in accordance with Section 12 -08. The cost of installing the headers shall be included in the unit price bid for "Asphalt Concrete Pavement ". The work of adjusting manhole covers, survey monuments and covers, and water valve boxes specified in Section 12 -09, shall not be included in the unit price bid for "Asphalt Concrete ". - 4 - 9. Asphalt Concrete Overlay: Asphalt concrete overlay shall be applied i to the areas designated on the drawings and as specified in Section 12. The purpose of the asphalt concrete overlay is to raise the existing asphalt surfaces of intersecting streets sufficiently to provide adequate drainage. The exact limits of the areas to be covered by the overlay will.be designated by the Engineer. A paint binder of asphaltic emulsion shall be applied to the existing surface at a rate of 0.10 gallons per square yard. The asphalt concrete shall be type "B ", the mineral aggregate shall be No. 4 Max., and the asphalt binder shall be 85 -100 grade paving asphalt. The material shall be placed and shaped by use of hand tools or appropriate mechanical equipment. Transverse edges shall be feathered to form a smooth and neat - appearing joint with the existing pavement. 10. Asphalt Concrete Dike: Asphalt concrete dike shall be constructed to the form and dimensions shown on the drawings. The asphalt concrete shall be as specified in Section 12 except that the amount of asphalt binder used in the asphalt concrete shall be increased not less than one percent by weight of the aggregate. Prior to placing the asphalt concrete, a tack coat of paint binder shall be applied to the surface of the asphalt pavement to be covered by the dike. The dike shall be shaped and compacted with an extrusion machine or other equipment satisfactory to the Engineer that is capable of shaping and compacting the material to the required cross section. 11. Storm Drainage System: The storm drainage system shall be con- structed to the form and dimensions shown on the drawings and as specified in Section 17. - 5 - 11. cont'd The reinforced concrete pipe shall conform to AM Designation C -75. Concrete for the curb inlet structure shall be Class A. All other concrete shall be Class B. Construction of the portions of the drainage system northerly of the southerly right -of -way line of Pacific Coast Highway, shall be done in accordance with the terms of the encroachment permit issued by the Division of Highways. A copy of the permit is available for review in the office of the Public Works Director. The cost of regrading the drainage ditch easterly of the Junction Manhole at Station 3 + 80 to the grades shown on the drawings, the embankment work, and the grading of the ditch northerly of the curb opening near the intersection of Walnut Street shall be included in the unit prices bid for the various items constituting the drainage system. The cost of adjustment to grade of the covers of the two manholes shall be included in the unit prices bid for the manholes and no additional payment will be made therefor. 12. Adjustment of Manhole Covers, Valve Boxes, and Monument Covers: Manhole covers, valve boxes, and monument covers shall be adjusted to grade as shown on the appropriate standard drawing and as specified in Section 12 -09. All valve boxes, monument covers and risers when adjusted shall conform in every respect to the material and dimensions shown on the appropriate standard drawing. The cost of replacing broken or non - conforming boxes and covers shall be included in the unit price bid for the particular item and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. - 6 - 12. cont 'd Particular care shall be taken not to disturb any of the concrete posts in which the bronze survey markers are embedded. Power- operated equip- ment, except that used in placing the asphalt concrete pavement, shall not work within two feet of any monument. The cost of re- setting any monument disturbed by the Contractor's operations shall be deducted from the Contractoros final payment. Due to the change in grade, two or three of the concrete monument posts will need to be lowered. The Contractor shall install new posts and bronze survey markers conforming to Drawing No. Standard 110 -L. The existing monument shall not be disturbed until horizontal ties have been placed by the City's Survey Crew. The Contractor shall position the newly- embedded bronze marker at the intersection of the lines between the ties. The scribing of the exact intersection point on the bronze marker will be done by the City's Survey Crew. The costs of installing new posts due to the change in grade shall be included in the unit price bid for adjustment of monument covers, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. 13. Relocation of Water Meters: All water meters located northerly of the southerly curb line of Seashore Drive shall be relocated to conform to the form and dimensions shown on the drawings. All work of relocating the services shall be done without shutting off the main line. The corporation stop may be shut off at the main or the copper tubing crimped with an approved crimping tool. The occupant of the home shall be notified prior to interrupting service. If service 0 T- 13. cont o d is interrupted for more than one hour, the Contractor shall install an approved jumper service from the nearest fire hydrant. All meter boxes when relocated shall be in good condition and provided with cast -iron traffic covers. Existing undamaged cast -iron covers may be salvaged and reused. The cost of doing all work as shown on the drawings and specified herein, including replacement of damaged material, shall be included in the price bid for "Relocation of Water Meters" and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. 14. Water Service Pipe: Water service pipe shall include the extension between the existing water meter and its new location, and the replace- ment of any non - copper services between the meter and the main line. All pipe shall be Type K copper tubing. Extensions of.existing copper services shall be of the same size (3/4" or 111). Services that are replaced shall be 1 ". The unit price bid for installation of water service pipe shall include the cost of all connectors and adaptors necessary to place the service back in operation. 15. Relocation of Fire Hydrants: Fire hydrants shall be relocated to conform to the form and dimensions shown on the drawings and as specified in Section 19. The exact placement of the relocated hydrants shall be designated by the Engineer. The Contractor, at his option, may salvage and reuse the fitting at the base of the hydrant by removing the concrete thrust block, - 8 - 15. contod or may use a new fitting. Prior to removing the thrust block, the hydrant side of the gate valve shall be adequately blocked to prevent any movement. The cost of adjusting the gate valve cover to grade shall be included in the price bid to "Adjust Water Valve Boxes ". 16. 6" Water Main Connections: 6" water main connections shall be made at the locations shown on the drawings and shall conform to the details shown thereon and on Drawing No. Standard 507 -1. Tapping sleeve tees shall be Mueller H -610 and H -611 for cast iron and asbestos cement pipe respectively. The existing 2" connection to the main is by means of a screwed tee or of a service clamp. In either case, the main line shall be shut down, the 2" connection removed, and a 2" bronze plug screwed into the opening. The time, duration, and method of shutting down the mains must be approved in advance by the Engineer. The Contractor shall plan his operations to minimize the shut -down time. If the bale of any service clamp is not bronze, the entire clamp shall be replaced. The new service clamp will be furnished by the City, but the Contractor shall include the cost of labor in the unit price bid for the 6" water main connections. The unit price bid for 6" water main connections shall include the cost of the complete connection shown on the drawings, reconnection of the existing 2" main, and plugging the existing connection at the main. 17. Adjustment of Traffic Detector and Box: The traffic detector pad and electrical pull box on Orange Street shall be adjusted to grade to conform to the form and dimensions shown on the California Division of Highways Standard Detail ES -3B -1, as specified in Sections 86 -4.05A and 86 -4.05D of the State Standard Specifications and the encroachment permit issued by the Division of Highways. 18. Public Convenience and Safety: The Contractor shall provide for public convenience and safety as specified in Section 7 -10. Access for through vehicular traffic need not be maintained provided adequate advance warning signs have been placed. Portions of Seashore Drive may be closed provided vehicular access to the garages of abutting buildings is available. Access to individual garages may be closed for a maximum of three days to allow construction of curbs and drive approaches. The Contractor shall give the resident 24 hours written notice prior to such closure. Access need only provide for one- way vehicular travel. A temporary service road may be constructed on the property owned by the State of California. No ingress or egress to the temporary service road from Pacific Coast Highway will be permitted. The road shall be at least 18 -feet wide and have a smooth, firm surface. Prior to final acceptance of the work, the area used for the temporary service road shall be restored to its original condition. The Contractor shall maintain continuous dust control on the temporary road, as well as on any unpaved alleys used as detours. In order to maintain access, the Contractor may construct the improve- ments in stages, except that the asphalt surface course shall be placed in - 10 - 18. cont Id one continuous operation. Vehicular access may be blocked entirely for periods of 8 hours or less during the paving operation provided all residents are given written advance notice. The cost of constructing temporary service roads, maintaining detours, and providing for public safety and convenience shall be considered as included in the prices bid for the various items of work, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. 19. Relocation of Mail Boxes: Existing mail boxes shall be removed and replaced in locations southerly of the southerly curb line. Posts and other mountings shall be salvaged and re -used. The new install- ations shall be similar in all respects to the existing. The cost of relocating mail boxes shall be considered as included in the prices bid for the various items of work, and no additional compensation will be allowed therefor. F/ M®NTNDEMNITY COM&Y VANDRUFF & ASSOCIATES 6053 W. 3RD ST. • LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90036 TW 33503 & JE 4 -:6028 WEBSTER 3 -7581 .14211 Beach. BIJ1d. � Westminster, California CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION TO: City of Newport Beach Policy No. Agency: Engineering Department WP 6022 Vandruff & Associates Newport Beaoh, California 14211 Beach Blvd, Westminater, Calif, Employer From: To: coder & Sons 5/7/66 1A/67 7890 E. Alhambra Huntington Beaohq California THIS IS TO CERTIFY that we have issued to the above named employer a valid Workmen's Compensation insurance policy in a form approved by the Insurance Commissioner of the State of California. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS COVERED RECEIVED Dot This policy shall not be cancelled nor reduced in coverage until after ten (10) days' written notice of such cancellation or reduction in coverage shall have been mailed to this certificate holder. COUNTERSIGNED AT Westminster, California this 16th day of November CC- CC- CC- CC- UN ros.; aeu -!sz lg 66nEMO INDEMNITY COMPANY AuTNOw:zco wcvwuc c - i t y' CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE ` -,W Hanfod Fire lw& Company York Underwnoe Company Ranieri f Chy6 DAI D m 6�r �pany Northwestem U �izena Insurance company of New Jerry .. INOJRANCR GROUP `� ® Qazms Inevranee Company of New Jerry cf Ql Twin City Fire lusroeee Company This is to certify .that the company designated C.. c herein by Co. Code has issued to the named insured the policies enumerated below. VANDRUFF & ASSOCIATES TW 3.3503 & JE 46028 14211 Beach Blvd. Westminster, Csfitornls Named Insured and Address Yoder & Sons 7890 Be Alhambra Huntington Beaoh, California The policies indicated herein apply with respect to the hazards and for the coverages and limits of liability indicated by specific entry herein, subject to all the terms of such policies. Hazards Policy Number Effective Date Expiration Date .Coverages and Limits of Liability Hodnr tdarr f'iamry Property Damage Liability each Aron' mrL.Ndmt each amd ®t Aggregate . General Liability Premises- Operations 72 LGX 166665 .. 1/2/66 1/2167 $ 25®oo$ . 05 0,000$ 500 $ $ 1000$ 000$ ,000 XXXX Independent Contractors w w w $ 2250,m$ 5000$ 500, $ 500, Products- Completed Operations w w M $ 25n, m$ Aggregate: 900.000$ $ 500,om 500 XXXX = SOO, aoo XXXX Contractual -as described below N w w $ 250,0005 500 500,000s 500 ,000 Automobile Liability Owned Automobiles w w w $ 250,000= 500,000$ 5M 000 'XXXX Hired Automobiles w w is $ 250,x$ 500,x$ 500,E xxxx Non -Owned Automobiles w w w = 250,000$ 500,000$ r2 00 ,Goo xxxx Workmen's Compensation and Employers' Liability Compensation — Statutory Employers' Liabiliry — $ ,000 Umbrella Liability $ ,000,000 Location and description of operations, automobiles, contracts, etc. (For contracts, indicate type of agreement, party and date.) — If policy is canceled, 10 dogs City of Newport. Beaoh written notice will be given to: sneer ing Department Newport Beach, California Date November 16, 1966 By...... •'•. ......... ,vat Repasewratme .wm G -71K 4 Ptlntad In U. & A. , 6-'6e C /o G AMEN DE CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE r�i,�. . 00 Hartford Fire Imt Company ® New York Underwrite more Company IU HARTFORD [E Hartford Accident demedty Company , ® Northwestern Underw of Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey INSURANCE GROUP ® Citizeas Insurance Company of New Jersey m Twin City Fire Insurance Company This is to certify that the company designated Cc Cede herein by Co. Code has issued to the named insured the policies enumerated below. Named Insured and Address VANDRUFF & ASSOCIATES Yoder & Sons TW 3.3503 & JE 4.6028 7890 E. Alhambra 14211 Beach Blvd. HuntingtonBeaeh, California Westminster, California The policies indicated herein apply with respect to the hazards and for the coverages and limits of liability indicated by specific entry herein, subject to all the terms of such policies. Location and description of operations, automobiles, contracts, etc. (For contracts, indicate type of agreement, party and – date.) – It is hereby agreed and understood that the City of Newport Beach is named Additional Named Insured with respects to work being don Yoder & Sons. R C C e1 V t y 2 1966 If policy is canceled, 10 City of Newport Beach P� written notice will be given to: 3300 Newport (� f Newport Beach Yornia ` Date November 23, 1966 1 By ..... ..L/....Gl�rcr.•c'1 Farm G -21064 Printed in U. S. a 6264 Autborssa Represertwiter Coverages and Limits of Liability Hazards Policy Number Effective Date Expiration Date Bodily Iniury Liability Property Damage Liability each parson each accident each accident aggregate General Liability Premises- Operations 72 LGX 166665 112166— 11;)Z6 250 ,0008 500,0 500.00E 500,00 Elevators $ 000$ ,000E ,000 XXXX Independent Contractors n n e $ 250 ,000E 4 H�000$ gnn,000$ 000 Products - Completed n n n $ 290 ,000$ f1,000$ 'r On 000t ir�rs Kno'- Operations Aggregate: $ n,000 XXXX XXXX Contractual -as described below n n $ 250 ,000E 500,000E 500,000$ 500,E Automobile Liability Owned Automobiles IT n n $ 250 ,000$ 500,000115 rnf1T_000 XXXX Hired Automobiles n n n ;i5 0 ,0 $ 50 1,0001s K00,000 XXXX Non -Owned Automobiles rr Is n $. ;50 ,00o$ 0,000900 ,000 XXXX Workmen's Compensation Compensation — Statutory and Employers' Liability mployers' Liability — $ ,000 Umbrella Liability $ ,000,000 Location and description of operations, automobiles, contracts, etc. (For contracts, indicate type of agreement, party and – date.) – It is hereby agreed and understood that the City of Newport Beach is named Additional Named Insured with respects to work being don Yoder & Sons. R C C e1 V t y 2 1966 If policy is canceled, 10 City of Newport Beach P� written notice will be given to: 3300 Newport (� f Newport Beach Yornia ` Date November 23, 1966 1 By ..... ..L/....Gl�rcr.•c'1 Farm G -21064 Printed in U. S. a 6264 Autborssa Represertwiter AMENDED CERTIFIC ' .8 m Hanford Fire Company THE NH TVRD 1� m Hartford AccidentIMPInderanity Company INSURANCE GROUP u ® Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey This is to certify that the company designated c)rCa6e herein by Co. Code has issued to the named insured the policies enumerated below. VANDRUFF & ASSOCIATES TW 3 -3503 & JE 4.6028 14211 Beach Blvd. Westminster, California ATE OF INSURANCE .8 ® New York Underwrite uranee Company IM Northwestern Undcrw of Citizens Insurance Company of New Jersey w m Twin City Fire Insurance Company Named Insured and Address Yoder & Sons 7890 E. Alhambra Huntington Beach, California The policies indicated herein apply with respect to the hazards and for the coverages and limits of liability indicated by specific entry herein, subject to all the terms of such policies. Location and description of operations, automobiles, contracts, etc. (For contracts, indicate type of agreement, party and date.) `v e4O — It is hereby understood and agreed that the policy Tole this this Certificate refers may not be cancelled, materi:*&singe or the amount of Coverage there of reduced, nor the olicyy,,'� ed to lapse until 10 days after receipt by the City C1e1m ri,Y City Newport Beach, City Hall, Newport Beach, California of a� t0ed written notice of such cancellati n or reduction of e If policy is canceled, written notice will be given to: City of Ne each City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. DateNovember 259 1966 Form C- 7106 -3 Printed in U. S. A. 6-'64 NewportBBeeach, California By.. ,,4 U.... fit ..................................... Authorized Representative Coverages and Limits of Liability Hazards Policy Number Effective Date Expiration Date Bodily Injury Liability Property Damage Liability each pereon each accident each accident aggregate General Liability Premises - Operations 72 LGX 166665 1 2 66 1/2/6? $ 950 ,00E 500 .Goo$ 500 ,000$ 500,000 Elevators S 000s ,000E ,000 XXXX Independent Contractors p p p $ 250 ,000E app ,000EQQ ,000E_5.g0,0oo Products- Completed p p S 250 ,000E 500 ,�E500 ,000E 500,E Operations p Aggregate: $ 000 XXXX XXXX Contractual -as M p p described below $ 250 ,000E 500 ,G00$ 500 ,000$ 500,000 Automobile Liability Owned Automobiles p p a $ 250 ,000$ 500 ,000$ 500 ,000 XXXX Hired Automobiles p n n $ 250 ,000$ 9:00 ,000$ Cnn 000 XXXX Non -Owned Automobiles p p p $ X50 ,000 66 ,000 � 0 XXXX Workmen's Compensation Compensation — Statutory and Employers' Liability Employers' Liability — $ ,000 Umbrella Liability $ 1000,000 Location and description of operations, automobiles, contracts, etc. (For contracts, indicate type of agreement, party and date.) `v e4O — It is hereby understood and agreed that the policy Tole this this Certificate refers may not be cancelled, materi:*&singe or the amount of Coverage there of reduced, nor the olicyy,,'� ed to lapse until 10 days after receipt by the City C1e1m ri,Y City Newport Beach, City Hall, Newport Beach, California of a� t0ed written notice of such cancellati n or reduction of e If policy is canceled, written notice will be given to: City of Ne each City Hall 3300 Newport Blvd. DateNovember 259 1966 Form C- 7106 -3 Printed in U. S. A. 6-'64 NewportBBeeach, California By.. ,,4 U.... fit ..................................... Authorized Representative YODER & SONS GENERAL CONTRACTORS C. W. YODER WALT YODER G. A. YODER 7890 ALHAMBRA HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92647 847.1941 OCT. 18, i ^66 FI?I:NOIAL COINDITION TOTAL -"; SETS -------------------- 3381,326.47 TOTAL LIA_ILI_'IES --------------- 919976.45 INET .ORT:`-- -- ---- ------ -- -- -- -- 3264,431.33 There are no continent liabilities pendinm a.grinst any members of this firm or a.ny of its officers. There his never been filed for labor or materials, a lien a;ainst this firm any-.:.-here. /YODER & �O .,iS TOP SOIL, FILL, SAND & ROCK TRACTOR WORK & DUMP TRUCKS SKIPLOADERS & DOZER LOW BED HAULING CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. Fly l FOR PERIOD ENDI PROJECT BUDGET NO. 'CONTRACT Il ITEM NO. CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT. PRICE RCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED - 3���,_ DLC 3 Z� c� ORIGINAL CONTRACT EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE $[ND PAVMNT TDI 060598.24 AMOUNT EARNED 68 LESS 10% RETENTION yL YjKR AND SOW LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 4� 9 CCcc p AL*MMA AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST 7 M1INTImsm kAs"t CALIFMMIA I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE ,AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. S IGNED SIGNED �. ENGI NE E4C CONTRACTOR BY I r PROJEC' 'BUDGET CITY OF REMW BEACH — PUBLIC ]/'o Io66 , - ..E. CLEAR, GRUB, GRADE "A" CURB AND GUTTER 3 "B" CURB 4 MoDirm "B" cu'as 5 6" A.C. DIKE 6 A.B. 7 A.C. Pyoty, 8 4" P•c*C. SIDEWALK 9 4" P.C.C. SLA133 10 A.C. OVERLAY 11 21" R.C.P.. 12 8' CURB INLET 13 21 DITCH INLET 14 48" MANHOLE 15 60" MANHOLE 16 T . DETECTOR 1,281.60 ]/'o Io66 , - ..E. $5,500-" 10696 $5o500-00 2-2 VF 113 L.F. 248.6o mj/ F 280 L.F. 434-00 1,994 L.F. 30090'70 6-&/LF 806 F. �,244.8o 0 2,599, TON 7,i49.58 607 .,+0 qp049.66 336.00 u 4015F 204 S.F. 1,281.60 o -O.J T3ON 156. 00 14.20/LF 369 L.F. 5,239.80 1000.00 EA. I EA. 10100.00L L L 350-00 EA I EA. . 350.00 320.00,EA I EA. 320.00 390.00 EA I EA. 390-00 575.00 EA I EA. 5750 OO'L '4 L CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH — PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 3 (�� FOR PERIOD ENDING Fcaoliagy h Ic PROJECT: SEASHORE DRIVE. 55TH STREET .TO ORANGE AVENUE BUDGET NO. SEE CONTRACT NO. 1o66 ITEM NO. CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT. PRICE PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED 18 ADJ. M.H. COVER 100.00 EA 5 EA. 500.00 19 ADJ. WATER V.B. 20.00 EA 16 EA. 320.00 20 ADJ. SURVEY MAN. 40.00 EA. 8 EA. 320.00 21 RELOCATE F.H. 200.00 EA 4 EA. $00.00 22 RELOCATE WATER METER 25.00 EA 34 EACH 850.00' 23 1" COPPER 3.60/LF 540 LF 1,944.00 f 24 CONC. SAW CUTTING 0.50 /LF 547.L.F. 273.50 25 6" WATER MAIN COMM. 550.00 EA 6. EACH 3,300.00 26 BARRICADES AND REFLECTORS 395.00 LS 49+% 200.00 ✓ 46,596.24 BUDGET N0: 19- 3356 -0 7: $4,256.24 50-9297-041: 320.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT 46„646.05 --- --_�„\ EXTRAS TO DATE dK Z_�y-67 CONTRACT TO DATE �p SEND PAYMENT TO: AMOUNT EARNED $46.598.24 YpODER AND SONS LESS 10% RETENTION 4f659.82 7890 ALHAMBRA --- LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 37,362.18 HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST 4,576:24 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. S IGNED SIGNED f /' Lme I NetR CONT CT BY i CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT .9(UGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. z 2 FOR PERIOD ENDI JANUARY 13. 1967 PROJECTS SEASHORE DRIVE 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO. 1066 ITEM CONTRACT. PERCENT AMOUNT N0: CONTRACT ITEM PRICE COMPLETE EARNED I CLEAR, GRUB, GRADE - $5,500'00 LS 100% $5,500• - 2 "A" CURB AND BUTTER - - 2.20 /LF 113 L.F. _ 248,60 _ 3 "B" CURB 1.55/LF 280 L.F. 434.00 4 MODIFIED "B" CURB 1.55/LF 1,994 L.F. 3,090.70 5 6" A.G. DIKE 0.80 1LF 6 A.B. 2.75/70 2,599.85 Tom 7,149.58 7 A.C. PYNT. 5.63/70 i,600.40 TON 9,010.25 8 4 ". P.C.C. SIDEWALK 0.40 /SF 840 S.F. 336.00 9, 4" P.c.c. SLABS o.4o /SF 3,174'S.F. I,269.6o 10 A,C. OVERLAY - 6.00 /To II 21" R.C.P. 14.20/LF 369 L.F. 5,239.80 A I 12 81 CURB INLET - I,IOO.00 EA. 100% 1,100.00 13 21 DITCH INLET 350.00 EA 75% 262.50 14 48" MANHOLE 320.00 EA 85% 272.00 15 60" MANHOLE 390.00 EA 95% 370.50 16 T.S. DETECTOR 575.00 EA 17 1 ADJ. T.S. DETECTOR 625.00 EA 10% 62.50 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ..%OGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. X2 FOR PERIOD ENDING JANUARY 12, 1967 PROJECT:, SEASHORE DRIVE, 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE BUDGET NO._ SEE BELOW CONTRACT NO. Io66 ITEM CONTRACT. -PERCENT AMOUNT NO. CONTRACT ITEM PRICE COMPLETE EARNED I$ ADJ. M.H. COVER 100.00 EA 19 ADJ. WATER V.B. 20.00 EA 20 ADJ. SURVEY MAN. 40.00 EA. . 21 RELOCATE F.H. 200.00 EA 4 EACH 800.00 22 RELOCATE WATER METER 25.00 EA 34 EACH 850.00 23 1" COPPER 3.60 /LF 540 LF 1,944:00 24 CONC. SAW CUTTING 0.50AF 547 L.F, 273.50 25 6" WATER MAIN COMM, 550.00 EA 6 EACH 3,300.00 26, BARRICADES AND REFLECTORS 395.00 LIS $4141353.. BUDGET NO: 19-3356 -d7= $19,744.16 50-9297 It 3,350.00 ORIGINAL CONTRACT 46,646.05 . EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE �K I'20 -G� SEND PAYMENT TO: ` AMOUNT EARNED $41 ,5 3 I . 53 YODER AND SONS LESS 10% RETENTION 4,151•35t� 7890 ALHAMBRA LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 14 268.02 .'HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST $23,094.16 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. S 1 GNED S I GNEC . �� NOI R CONTRACT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPART PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 FOR PERIOD END PROJECT: SEASHORE DRIVE, 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE / BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW CONTRACT DECEMBER 1 ITEM NO. CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT PRICE CENT COMPLETE AMOUNT= - EARNED I CLEAR, GRUB, GRADE $52500.00 LS 90% ; 4,95o.00 J" 2 "A" CURB AND GUTTER 2.20 /LF 3 "B" CURB 1.55 /LF 4 MODIFIED "B" CURB 1.55 /LF 5 6" A.C. DIKE 0.80 /LF 6 A.B. 2.75/To 701.95 TOM 1,930.36 7 A.C. PVMT. 5.63/To 8 4" P.C.C. SIDEWALK 0.40 /SF 9 4" P.C.C. SLABa o.40 /SF 10 A.C. OVERLAY 6.00 /To 11 21" R.C.P. 14.20 /LF 365 LF 5083.00 12 81 CURB INLET_ 1,100.00 EA. 13 21 DITCH INLET- 350.00 EA . 14 48" MANHOLE 320.00 EA 15 60" MANHOLE 390.00 E. 16 T.S. DETECTOR 575.00 EA 17 ADO. T.S. DETECTOR 625.00 EA s CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 1 FOR PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 15, 1966 PROJECT: SEASHORE DRIVE; 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE BUDGET 140. SEE BELOW y CONTRACT NO. 1066 18 ADJ. O.H. COVER 100.00 EIA EXTRAS TO DATE 19 AoJ. WATER V.B. 20.00 EA CONTRACT TO DATE 20 AoJ. SURVEY MAN. 40.00 EA. 21 RELOCATE F.H. 200.00 EA 1 EACH $200.00 22 RELOCATE WATER METER - 25.00 EA 34 EACH 850.00 23 1" COPPER 3.60 /LF 540 LF 1,944.00 24 CONC. SAW CUTTING 0.50 /1-F 492 LF 246.00 25 6" WATER MAIN CONN. 550.00 EA 1 EACH 550.00 26 BARRICADES AND RCtLECTGRS 395.00 LS BUDGET N0: 19- 3356 -037: $ 10,724.02 50- 9297 -041: 3,544.00 ORII.NAL CONTRACT 46,646.05 EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE '! ©{� 12 u'V6 SEND PAYMENT TO: AMOUNT EARNED LESS 10% RETENTION 15,853.3 1, 5.34 YODER AND SONS 7890 ALHAMBRA LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS -- HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST 140268.02 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. / SIGNED .,C- NGINE.{'.. B /J /J CONT11Af TOR R4T STATEMENT RAUB, BEm, FROST & ASSOCIATES ENGINEERS & SURVEYORS PRONE S -"23 P. O. SO% 117 136 ROCHESTER STREET ' COSTA MESA. CALIFORNIA TO: City of Newport Beach - City Hall DATk3_yr; 30th 196_ 3300 Newport Boulevard 4354 Newport Beach California. YOUR ORDER Attention': Pat Donigan: 9773 Joe No STATEMENT DUE WHEN RENDERED •INTEREST CNARDED ON PART DUE ACCOUNTS Construction Staking for Improvement of Seashore Drive - 56th Street to Orange Avesieti_... Supervs. & Cale. 14 Hours @ $15.00 per hour Survey Party 95 Hours Q $31.00 per hour Billed in Triplicate: A-4 210.00 U! i FORM P.2 RF�,FIVED F DEPAR' MENT @F PUMIC OORRS JAN 9 1961.. DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS RIDER PUBUC WOES � -�:. To be attar Jo and made a part of XKWUPOUMMIEncroachment Permit No._-- 7k6::-1K=76613A - - - -,_ To City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attn: B.B. Nolan, City Engineer H. Cook, Project Engineer J Complying with your request of -- -- ------------------------------ --- Janua.ry -3,F -- 1967--------------------- we are hereby amending above numbered permit as follows: Date of completion extended to ------------------ ------------- ----------- ---- March-- 6 -, --- 1967---------------- LOCATION: South side of Coast Highway, 07 -ORA- 001 - 20.9/21.7, and within the Route 001 Freeway right of way (located between Coast Highway and Seashore Drive), between Orange and 56th Streets. Except as amended, all other terms and provisions of the original permit shall remain in effect. This rider must be attached to the original permit. Dated at ------ Los_Angeles ----------- Calif ........ January 6. 1967 07 -ORA- 001 - 20.9/21.7 RJ:cy cc: JCW Robertson Huseby Hewes Substr. Dept. ry t t a j DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Hedrick DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS L.R. Smith A. _ HIMELHOCH___ ________ ___ i fli D met Engineer BY- - ---- --- -- -- -- / - - - -- - - 1 Robert J an, Asst Engineer i n..o . PURCHASE ORDER 1 C OF NEWPORT BEAH 3300 W. NEWPORT BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TELEPHONE 673 -2110 VENDOR C Raub, Bein, Frost & Associates 136 Rochester Street Costa Mesa, California SHIP TO No' - 4354 - INVOICE IN DUPLICATE THIS ORDER NUMBER MUST APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, SHIP- PING NOTICES, BILLS OF LAD- ING, EXPRESS RECEIPTS AND PACKAGES. DELIVERY TICKETS SHALL IN- CLUDE UNIT PRICE. DATE November 28, 1966 DEPARTMENT Public Works QUANTITY DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES OR SERVICES REQUIRED UNIT PRICE TOTAL As Requested Perform Construction Surveying & Office Computations For The Improvement of Seashore Drive From 55th Street To Orange Avenue at the Std. Hourly Rates. MAXIMUM COST 4,500.00 'r. RECEIVF0 UAN 311961 pUBUC WORKS UM FOR CITY USE ONLY I M P O R T A N T CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CODE AMOUNT 19 -3356 -037 4,500.00 Show as a separate item any retail sales tax, use tax MAXIMUM- or Federal tax applicable to this purchase. 'J �I ' This order subject to 4% sales tax. All allowable transportation charges must be prepaid PURCHASING AGENT and shown as a separate item on the invoice. Do not include Federal transportation tax, r VENDOR'S COPY rote OFFICE OF COUNTY SURVEYOR AND ROAD COMMISSIONER 4'1 DAM January 17, 1966 REPORT SUPERVISION: H. J. Krisan SUBMITTED BY: F. F. Is Boll*, Katerials Engineer SUMITTE) TO: Joseph T. Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach I. SAL This report presents the findings of a Resistance 'R' Value test performed on a sail sample obtained by the City of Newport Beach. The sample was labeled Seashore Drive, West Newport, representative soil @ 1$'. Seashore Drive is not on the Arterial Highway Master Plan of Orange County. This report has been prepared to satisfy.the Materials Report requirements of the Collier -Unruh Act. II. AUTHORIZATION The investigation was authorized by the City of Newport Beach per letter dated December 29, 1965. III. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION OF MCUUING FACILITY It is proposed to widen Seashore Drive. IV. BASM40T $OILS The soil sample is classified as sand. The maehanical analysis and Resistance "R" Values for the native soil* are tabulated in detail on the attached report sheet. ' V. LABORATORY ANALYSIS As may be noted on the attached report shoat, the Resist- ' ance "R" Value of the native soil is 70 with 0% passing the number 200 sieve. VI. TRAFFIC INDEX A Traffic Index (T.I.) of 7.0, which was recommended by the City of Newport Beach per letter dated December 29, 1965, has been used in determining the structural section. VII. COMPARABLE SECTION "R" Value Gravel Ecuivalent Comparable Section 70 5.3" 3 "AC /NS i I.� !� VIII. R1rCd�l�=D A. ceded Section ' Recommended etieag ' Native Project VAC /4 "A1 i R. Discussion ' Al^tbough no An is required to satisfy teed gravel equivalent, 4 11AS has been recommended to provide ' a suitable working table for AC operations and to per-_ ' vide a suitable base material in the event field 104, ures or isolated areas of unsuitable material +seuld ' produce stability problems. IX. R 2929 `,A=NATIM.1►0R CORTIAL - ;INERIM ' The speetfisations herelsefter referred to shall be State ' of Califoanaia, Division of Hijirays Standard 8pecificatI401.. dated July, 1964, and Orange County Standard Special Provisions. X. RZCMMMXD L OXCIAL MOMS FOR . W M&UIMM 1. Bartbwork, Section 19.2, 8 -7 -65. ' 2. Aggregate Base, Section 24, 8 -7 -65. ' 3. Aiphalt Concrete, Section 39, 8 -7 -65. REPORT PRUARATI@it R. Silbaugh LABORATORY 8tiMVISIONt D. Dixon A� ® PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE OWNER OR TO AWARD OF CONTRACT ROAD DEPT. D OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAMPLED Material Testing Section RET. CR. JA�1.1�.IR . GRADE AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. CONTROL TESTS ON P' R.;.R T OF TESTS ON • +.- :O MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS Seashore Drive O SPECLAL TESTS MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME e Drive ] RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 'CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ® -Y AINTENANCE Lj (IGENCY AGENCY: 1f61aLsn City Of rt DRY DENSITY O'f MID., iFI CU. FT. �VV�LE p SAMPLE OF qat Ve SOLI I. 1 I� I I TEST NO. 65 -2087 FIELD NO. - CONT. Na m I W.O. ar P.O. Nam AHFP1 FFII Nr1 .. DEPTH RECEIVED GRADING ANALYSIS LIMITS OF SAMPLE TEST SPECIMEN LOCA, OF SOURCE OWNER OR B MANUFACTURER D DATE SAMPLED BY SIEVE FOR USE IN Sub Grade RET. CR. JA�1.1�.IR . GRADE I. 1 I� I I TEST NO. 65 -2087 FIELD NO. - CONT. Na m I W.O. ar P.O. Nam AHFP1 FFII Nr1 .. DEPTH RECEIVED GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A I B C D E SIEVE �FO T S ' �^O RET. CR. JA�1.1�.IR . GRADE AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. 21 21 MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % ] DRY DENSITY O'f MID., iFI CU. FT. �VV�LE 21/2 STAWLOMETER "1 1 68 66/3 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. 5 _5w_ __o w6 II /2 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES 50 5.9 1 / A2 I THICK. INDICATED BY E.P. PRESS. IN. 0 O O �j SP. OR OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I/} FYtrE BASE % COARSE SURFACE t L. L, I P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX Id DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY E%UD. PRESS 30 -I E %PAN. PRESS r50 16 u1 M WET DRY AVG. SPEC. AT EOUIL. SPEC, '00 COVER MINIMUM THICK, OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 3"AC /NS 200 0 SU _ IU LART, SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % 'DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/O CURVE NO. REMARKS: Saimc-lon ti X11 0 BILLINWWILIE DE A T END OF MONTH ATE ALS INEER BY PLANT FILE F 90t 1 AE AGGREGATE 3 SOIL 7 Return to: 9059 Laura Lagios, City Clerk City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 ior a, ,x "'°'NOTICE OF COMPLETION PUBLIC WORKS BOOKS .179 PACE 37 . To All Laborers and Material Men and to Every Other Person Interesteid: AW`- YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on February 2, 1967 the Public Works project consisting of improvement of Seashore Drive from 55th Street to Orange Avenue on whichas was. the contractor, and Har*tfnrd Arririant And Tnd mnit r EmpA r was the surety, was completed. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH D .� A ublic rks Director VERIFI TI N I, the undersigned, say: I am the Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach; the foregoing Notice of Completion is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on February 15, 1967 at Newport Beach, California. I, the undersigned, I am the City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach; the City Council of said City on FPhrnary " 19fi7 accepted the above described work as completed and ordered that a Notice of Completion be filed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and.correct. Executed. on Fpbnia 7 l5- 14F7 at Newport Beach, California. FREE RECORDED AT REQUEST OF CITY Of NEWPORT am" IN OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COVNTY, CALIF. 9:05AM FEB 1.7 1967 k KLIE CARLYLE, Camfy Remder rj - �1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA- HIGHWAY TRANSPORT N AGENCY RONALD REAGAN, G...,..r DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 07- Ora- O -NptB ro P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 90054 October 17, 1967 Project SS 6�� MA 0 -3700 Fiscal Year:l965 6 ;1966 -67 Section: 186.1 Mr. Ben Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: We have completed the cribed as Seashore Drive - audit of the project noted above, des- The work performed in accordance with the Collier -Unruh Act under 0 Section 186.1 in the amount of $ 46,995.22 = Section 186.5 in the amount of $ is approved. Approval is based on the following exceptions to the project as submitted for review: 1965 -66 F.Y. $ 4,168.98 1966 -67 F.Y. $ 42,826.24 This does not complete the fiscal audit. The financial records of the project are subject to examination by the auditors of the State Controller's office for the purpose of ascertaining that the requirements of the Act have been met. Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy Distr ct^Engineer BY A. A. SMITH Assistant District Eng er cc: CTLedden Controller's Office 7 -cc -614 DEC 66 REV • � �/v lr�i o CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD ATTENTION: A SUBJECT: s^r` —r,. WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: DATE 7--Z/-(, N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2- C Acu - �¢c� Cam- SG 2�� ANil Cos. �QePYnow�t �Ql>.t uCT S4 REMARKS: ,r,2 Vou2 2tau , �c-� .on+ P-,> pn u � COPIES TO: BY: r: 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS I PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST N0. 3 (F) FOR PERII PROJECT: SEASHORE DRIVE,,55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW CONTRACT ;.! CLEARS GRUBp GRADE •. '. 2 OA" CURB AND GUTTER - 3 B CURB 4 MODIFIED "Bn CURB 5 6" A.C. DIKE 6 ` A.B. 7 A.C. PVNT• 8 4" P.C.C. SIDEWALK' 1 9 4" P.C.C. SLABS 10 A.C. OVERLAY 11 21" R.C.P.. 12 81 CURB INLET 13 21 DITCH INLET -� 14 48" MANHOLE 15 60" MANHOLE 16 T.S. DETECTOR 17 ADJ. T.S. DETECTOR /1RTMENT F ES i �I l9Sy ENDppr jIFj&mpRy 6, 1967 a m iguna a-pr X.. $5,500.00 LS l00% 2.20 /LF 113 L.F. 1.55 /LF 280 L.F. 1.55 /LF 12{994 L.F. mO ^� =,59 TON 4015E i .. V .40/sr 3,201: S. F. ... :I 6. �T Go O CO.� iON E14.20 /LF 369 L.F. 1 .'I.,100.00 EA. I EA. 350.00•EA I EA. 320.00.EA I EA. 390.00 EA I EA. 575.00 EA I EA. 625.00 EA I EA. $5,500.00 248.6o 434.00 3,090.70 2,244 8o 7,149 58 9,049.6b 336.00 1,281.60 156.00 5,239.80 1..100.00 350.00 320.00 390.00 575.00 625.00 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 'PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST N0. (M) FOR PERIOD ENDING_. FPR"IIA"Y 6 Iq ,- PROJECTt_ SEASHORE DRIVE, 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE BUDGET NO. SEE BELOW CONTRACT N0. 1o66 :- ITEM CONTRACT. PERCENT AMOUNT N0. CONTRACT ITEM PRICE COMPLETE EARNED IS Aod. M.H. COVER 100.00 EA 5 EA. 500.00 19 ADJ. WATER V.B. 20.00 EA 16 EA. 320.00 20 ADJ. SURVEY MAN. 40.00 EA. 8 EA. 320.00 ' 21 RELOCATE F.H. 200.00 EA 4 EA. 'o- 800.00 ' 22 ti RELOCATE WATER METER 25.00 EA 34 EACH 't'850.00 23 1" COPPER 3.60/LF 540 CF n.944.00 24 COMC. SAW CUTTING 0.50/LF 547 L.F. 273.50 25 6" WATER MAIN CONN. 550000 EA 6, EACH X3,300.00 l/ 26 BARRICADES AND REKLECTORS 39rj.OD L'S 200.'00 ✓ I 46,598.24 i BUDGET Not 19-3356-037, $4,256.24 -9297 50 -041: 320.00 �eS— 1g�, 1 ��s,•,39,364.z�1 p ons CZ7Nk c. ORIGINAL CONTRACT 46I,646.o5 EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE AMOUNT EARNED $46.598.24 LESS 10% RETENTION 4,659.82 LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 37,362.18 AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST 4,576:24 5ra-Lo tuL OK SEND PAYMENT TOt YpODER AND SONS 7890 ALHAMBRA 'HUNTINGTON BEACHjq CALIFORNIA I HEREBY CERTIrT THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. /. SIGNED__ SIGNED C/ y�� NOIN ER CONT. CT Y .— t O �l U 0 0 N U Q �zr W E O W W Q H F h 0 P4 d �H] Q' O a x 0 A; D i W W H a 0 U a , it m to A b O 4 m M 0 a.. o. 0 0 43 O+ Z . to 0 ri q� to O 43 U a+ .� n to t2 A m U s. m Y I t0. a ri U U m N H W w ww° V) 11 7 � .-1 m m wa 43 V) '4 N a� .ty d c. m a N U a m J�1{ d Q Adbk N w - o� oZ I.- w w�l1 M �� M V) N ow 0 w a x N W N N W a 2 ID w m x oa N 7k 7 K W U Z W W Z ~ O J W Q } V U � m Q O m u00 M �� M' w?W V M O F Q w 2 \ t V a H1 U aO pi m L) N XN y� �ro OD W — W a , -zF 0 N 4 V 0 cr m G p W 03131dx00 xv3l �\ - ONO x1NOw .� r axo0 w tsxid d null - • ' ON, xtxow .s, V \ 1 ' '^1 A/0 //a 0 .w /a STIIW 001 /I Q HIONTI a o 4 a o 0 N Q o® a J 1 m z a) J m v1 } az0 UU to – a: H d Uwa Sri x waz #N O pia 3 F o W 4) O Y Oa o z 03 L• O LLGd K I .� O mp 3000* V 0. N U W W W V Nmaz O W U w . .x FORM CU -5*-Rev. 0 O H O ,o ti 43 OH It 44 'd 01 9.0 x 0 . 3 \0 co ca a� O m w e U m �x .0 iy O � z R # R a bo t4 V 6 :i "P: O A W b0 O l0 m e�y 0 fr .i a m' 0 m 4 mb b 7 O m H l0 # m O •i 41 9 go m t» H N m R J I BY'- If 146 .. CHKO. BY ----------- DATE ---- -------- ---------------------------------------- sCA e� : yFer. /'-- Z'- v J4 56cr 04 -® 5E C 7-- Q —© SUBJECT. 5C 7-H ELj-=✓9-7eoA) 61 1,3� AIOTrz-,, Ro57- 5 0 PROM DaTWECAI ST�K + S9 rk SECT (o) — CD) gcncK S? 7-H f 56 vy 64 -5 ecr (-<, -(-r) o +w -rrzs� Ste. 0 it F1 V-0 PLO r, K- , : ti CV nj ''�--,rOaC- 6F SX(57(AI6 PWINC V-415 -011-176,VsloN lo 15wo? S17-A7 720 BY. �� �+.. ....DATE �- ���G�9UBJECT SEASHORE OR /!/rr SHEE7 nig CHKD, BY DATE.- -..... �dEjuJ. COLTGA/ gr CIJfILN!! .. -.Kid '~N� VFv / 2-0 m NoJ _ Zo -� N fi✓.4L l/UT sQ �OL jv0%L ; SFG PLAN a m Fop- 5-muc7 v p Vi 3N-. n� SECT ® ".� GAR•f< f — ��_ i N � V n Z S EGT — (5� C7AK' FL N Y SEC -T J — �G Li AR -FL: UNE� --� f1PPROXIM9'rl�- EDGE OF EXIST /A,,G P19VYN6 I ArRIL 6, 1967 MRS. MARK J. JORDAN 2165 FERN DELL PLACE HOLLYWOOD# CALIFORNIA 900225 SUBJECTS SEASHORE DRIVE IMPROVEMENT (C -1066) DEAR MRS• JOROANI REFERENCE IS MADC TO YOUR LETTER OP JANUARY 200 1967, REGARDING THE MATER LINE ON YOUR PROPERTY AT 6:SEASHORE DRIVE. ACCORDING TO OUR FIELD INSPECTOS# THE WATER NETEN PfNI YOUR !RO►ERTY WAS RELOCATED AND REComeTCD GY THE CONTRACTOR ON DCCCNSER 120 19666 THE PIPE ON YOUR PROPERTY APPARENTLY BRUCN ABOUT kcEMSER 220 1660 SOME 10 GAYS LATER. IT 16 THEREFORE DIFFICULT TO ASSUME THAT THE WCTCR RELOCATION COULD HAVE BEEN THC CAUSE OF THE FAILURE. IN CHECKING THC ITEM$ ON THE BILL PROM SCHAFFER PLUNGING,, IT WAS NOTED THAT $04 W PEST OP NEW PIPE,, PITTINGG# SNUT-Wf VALVED ETC.O HAD BEEN INSTALLER• TO MERELY REPAIR A LEAK IN THE LINE WOULD NAVE REQUIRED ONLY A $MALL REPAIR CLAMP. SIM:E THE LINE WAS RCPIACCD ENTIRELY# IT MUST BE ASSUMED THAT IT WAS SEEM IN SUCH A BADLY DETERI- ORATED CONDITION AS TO MAKE REPAIRS IWRACTICAL. I CERTAINLY AGREE THAT DAMAGE TO PROPERTY CAUSED AS A DIRECT RESULT OP OUR CONTRACTORS OPERATIONS SHOULD DE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO TK[ ►RO►ERTY OWNCR. HOWEVER# BASED ON THE INFORMATION GIVEN TO ,K BY OUR FIELD INSPECTORS, 1 OU NOT TECL TWAT THE CITY IN THIS CAGE WOULD RE JUSTIFIED IN ASSUMING THE COST OF YOUR PLUMBING SILL• VERY TRULY YOURS# PH . DEVLIN IC ORKS DIRECTOR Oct MR. MARK ENGELKE GPDINAJ R F r F I V F D ! 0 JAN 23.1967 '.. --- P_llBllC--- 1NORKS DEPT. � G ---- � ----- --- _- �t `i i "� c.��/ t+li / ✓vim' G."t//�/ �.� /i- 2.�Z�. �T s � -��- �...._ _. � -"�.�' - -- -� � �.�..�.�G�__, -� �_,.�% � -� -- -� � �� �� �� � �- - �c-� --, t��- - __ / _ / -� � Wig/ _; -� � � -- f ___.....__. _. q-14-F I 61C f E KJT j ,->T" LAS J/ y 3; ZY r-�- e-r-- 27.,e4 23.3ed CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA Insurance Company,of North America P. O. Box 085 Orange, California 912668 ' Intention: Mr. J. 1. Molitor Gentlemen: March 21, 1967 . Enclosed is claim of Southern Counties Gras Company for damage by Sanitary Pipeline Co. to pipeline at 6501 Seasheve Drive, Newport Beach on December 22, 1966. Sanitary Pipeline Co. was operating as a sub - contractor for Yoder and Sons, prime contractor, on City Contract No. 1065, 4pproverient of Seashore Drive from 35th Street to Orange Avenue. Also enclosed is copy of a latter from Sanitary Pipeline Co. to Southern Counties Gas Company and an invoice from Southern Counties Gas Company in the amount of $114.75. Very truly yours, Laura La`ios City Clerk City of Newport Beach LL-dg Encl. (3) cc: City Manager City Attorney Public Works Director ' Southern Counties Gas Company i CLAIMS BAFCTY INSURANCE OFFICE 1801 S. ATLANTIC BLVD. MONTEREY PARK March 170 1967 City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California Dear Sire; SOUTH ERN COUNTIES Lu COMPANY P. O. 13OX 2736 TERMINAL ANNEX. LOO ANGELES 90084 6020 LETTER NO. f� PILE NO, 33938 Sanitary Pipeline Company has referred us to you for pay- ment of the enclosed statement in the amount of $114.75. The date and location of the accident are included on the statement, and we will give you any other information you may need. We have also enclosed a copy of the letter from Sanitary Pipeline for your records. We have set our file for 30 days in anticipation of your check. Thank you for your cooperation. Very truly yours, M. Quintana Field Representative Enclosures (2) ' MOVED CITY CLERK 011M bT .� ._ 1 i A rli: ACGOUNTNO DEPARTMENT SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA.. DR. BOX 2736, TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90034 .. City of Newport Beach Newport Beach/ California . PLEASE DETACH AND REMIT WITH CHECK IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE ------------------------------------------------------------- STATEMENT OF SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, BOX 2796. TERMINAL ANNEX. Los ANGELES 04 33938 PLEASE RO[R TO CLAIMS DEPARTMENT FILE NO. Total cost of repairs to our 1" steel main inside our 2" steel conduit at 6501 Seashore Dr., Newport Beachp which was damaged on 12 -22 -66 by operations under your control; ITEMIZATION: Labor 104.00 Equipment 10.75 TOTAL $114.75 FORM 05.5 2M 12 -63 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA $114.75 ell%.i..(iV"vl�jtlL� t C3 LI�AK Ylr O OTY Or a"ghi�BEACN, ul i -lo -67 INVOICE DATE' 34 -OC -10521 ACCIDENT REPORT NO. 33938 CLAIMS DEFT. IIL� 114.75 AMOUNT 12 -22 -66 DATE of ACCIDENT Cal. ' WORK ORDER NO. PLEASE DETACH AND REMIT WITH CHECK IN THE ENCLOSED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE ------------------------------------------------------------- STATEMENT OF SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, BOX 2796. TERMINAL ANNEX. Los ANGELES 04 33938 PLEASE RO[R TO CLAIMS DEPARTMENT FILE NO. Total cost of repairs to our 1" steel main inside our 2" steel conduit at 6501 Seashore Dr., Newport Beachp which was damaged on 12 -22 -66 by operations under your control; ITEMIZATION: Labor 104.00 Equipment 10.75 TOTAL $114.75 FORM 05.5 2M 12 -63 SOUTHERN COUNTIES OAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA $114.75 ell%.i..(iV"vl�jtlL� t C3 LI�AK Ylr O OTY Or a"ghi�BEACN, ul i x 1" J.4. BARKER President SAN, I'ARY PIPELINE CO. 768b SPEER AVEi•.;U 17f6YlAGQUEt4N-b�NF RENTAL EQUIPMENT HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA March 13,1967 Southern Counties Gas Company P.O. Box 2736, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90054 Attention: F.J. Lancy, Field Representative Dear Sir: Kbnbnly S. Ana Code 71, With reference to your File No. 33938 (damage done December 22,1966 ), we are submitting the following information to you. This project was done for Yoder 8 Sons Contracting Company, 7890 Alhambra, Huntington Beach, California. The plans for subject project did not show the existing water line, therefore the City of Newport Beach was called out to locate this line for us. The City of Newport Beach Indicated to Sanitary Pipeline Co. that this line was a water line. Thus, this firm, believing this line to be a water line, cut into it with the Intentions of tying into the line. Due to the above circumstances, we, as well as the Inspector for the City of Newport Beach, do not feel it is the responsibility of Sanitary Pipeline Co., Inc. to pay for the repairs. It is the opinion of this firm that the repairs should be paid by the City of Newport Beret: HLG:jj ' cc; City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Carroll i nsurai ...; P.O.Bx 2008, Ar:aneim Very tru+. :rs, SANITARY Pi :c CO., INC, �� herGer7 Ge .� *� Vice- Pre4ident y •mac •::1 Southern Counties Gas Company ' P..Or @ox,2736, Terminal Annex t Los Angeles, Califcrrla 40054 Attenti_= F J L<ncy, Field Representative Gear ,Sir . rrith roferance to yot,r File No 3y,tt (lama a dorms Qecember.22.,1966 )- wQ 11 are _:ubmittIgii t`,� -,c lowing:lnformatlor to you. {_ This pr ,-t za, done for Yod r 3 Sons>,Contra'cting Company, 789'' Alhambra, Huntlr.ct - ,n 3each, GaiIf'ornla The pl_ans.for subject project did not Show the e.xi s 'ir.; water Iirn th;n .,fore. tli` City of Newport ('each kss.called out tc Incat +his Idr.e for us. The City of Newport Beach Indtcsted to Sanit:,ry Pipoline;Co, that Aida .line was a water line. Thus, th'i.s.firm, ' believing lrjs line to ba a wator Lino, cut Into it with the Intentions of tying Int: the .line. Due. to the above circumstances; we, as well as the Inspector for the City of Newport 3each, do not feel it is the r8spocsiblIIty of Sanitary Plpellne Co., Inc. to pay for the repairs. It is the opinion of. this firm th at- :tha repairs should be (raid by the City of t+awport 11,ach . Very truly yours; , SANITARY PIPELINE M i INC. Hierbert L. Galegly, Vice- President HLG:jj j cc: City of Newport Beach '3300 Newport Blvd. Carroll Insurance P.O.Bx 2008. Anaheim i e yy -� DEPARTMENT ;. COUNnE5 GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, DR. .,-o TRrMNAL ANNIEX LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 60054 Sauitbry Pipe'_ir.P Company ' 7668 Speer d.c:,,ce Huntington Beach, California 92547 PLEASE DETACH AND REMIT WITH CHECK IN THE ENCL ^r3ED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE _. STATENSNT OF SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Box 2736. TERMINAL ANNEX. Lo@ ANbaib 64 .- 33958 PLEA% REFER To CLAIM@ DEPARTMENT FILE NO.-_ 14 Total cost of repairs to our ' steel main inside our 2° steel. conduit at: 650: Seashore Dr., Nevport Beach, uhieh was damaged on 12- 22 -0k, n, operations under your control: T1 AT-, if a' t 11"4 rVs Equipment 10.75 .. Y S_.1 Phl -Z-' 5OUTHERN CGVNTIES GAS COMV.NV UFCAL.YURN'A IM'• -t• .. �. "`� '.v 1 �i. _'A+1'q''°S'`.s6", J�^$`�'T.z" ee"�, xsllka�SEi>f '4 a rr ;'s: 1 -10-67 INVOICE DATE--- 34-OC -10521 ACCIDENT REPORT NO._ 33938 CLAIMS DE-T. FILE $114.75 ANOUNT 12- 22-66 DATL OF ACCIDENT Cal. WORK ORDER NO PLEASE DETACH AND REMIT WITH CHECK IN THE ENCL ^r3ED SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE _. STATENSNT OF SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Box 2736. TERMINAL ANNEX. Lo@ ANbaib 64 .- 33958 PLEA% REFER To CLAIM@ DEPARTMENT FILE NO.-_ 14 Total cost of repairs to our ' steel main inside our 2° steel. conduit at: 650: Seashore Dr., Nevport Beach, uhieh was damaged on 12- 22 -0k, n, operations under your control: T1 AT-, if a' t 11"4 rVs Equipment 10.75 .. Y S_.1 Phl -Z-' 5OUTHERN CGVNTIES GAS COMV.NV UFCAL.YURN'A IM'• -t• .. �. "`� '.v 1 �i. _'A+1'q''°S'`.s6", J�^$`�'T.z" ee"�, xsllka�SEi>f '4 a rr ;'s: FEBRUARY Ili, 1967 C_ivd 6 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT OF SEAAME DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE .(C -Io66) RECOMMENDATIONS: I. ACCEPT THE WORK. ,�( 3 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. oO�� 3. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO RELEASE THE BONDS 35 DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF COMPLETION HAS BEEN FILED. DISCUSSION% THE CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE HAS BEEN COMPLETED TO THE SATISFACTION of THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE 810 PRICE WAS% $46,6116.05 AMOUNT OF UNIT PRICE ITEMS CONSTRUCTED% 46,598.24 AMOUNT OF CHANGE ORDERS% HON! E TOTAL CONTRACT COSTS $1+6,598.24 ENGINEERING, STAKEOUT, AND TESTING (APPROXIMATE). 8,700.00 TOTAL PROJECT COST% $55,298.24 AMOUNT BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT #19- 3356-037: $60,000.00 THE BARRICADE ACROSS LUGONIA STREET AT SEASHORE DRIVE WAS DELETED PENDING COUNCIL ACTION, RESULTING IN A C'EDIT FROM THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE. THE CONTRACTOR IS YODER AND SONS OF HUNTINGTON BEACH' CALIFORNIA. DESIGN ENGINEERING FOR THE PROJECT WAS PERFORMED BY DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING ENGINEERS OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA. THE ORIGINAL DATE OF COMPLETION WAS FEBRUARY 3, 1967. ALL WORK WAS COMPLETED BY FEBRUARY 22 1967- COUir�(L: Is:NAJ EPH . DEVLIN FILE: L I C R S D I I{FCTOR 0910 G U FEBRUARY 14, 1967 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVES, C -1066; BARRICADE CONSTRUCTION ON LUGONIA 4T SEASHORE RECOMMENDATION: ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THAT LUGONIA STREET BE BARRICADED AT THE ENTRANCE TO SEASHORE DRIVE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE ENCROACHMENTS CREATING AN UNSAFE CONDITION AT THE INTERSECTION ARE REMOVED. DISCUSSION: PLANS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO Oj ANGE STREET WERE APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 260 1966• THE COUNCIL WAS ADVISED AT THAT TIME THAT: "ACCESS TO AND FROM SEASHORE AT LUGONIA WILL BE PROHIBITED AS A SAFETY MEASURE DUE TO THE EXTREMELY POOR SIGHT DISTANCE WHICH WILL PREVAIL AT THE INTERSECTION." THIS WAS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MEANS OF CONSTRUCTION. OF'A BARRICADES, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. FURTHER CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS DISCLOSED THE ADVISABILITY OF ADDITIONAL COUNCIL ACTION BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BARRICADE. THE RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION HAS THEREFORE BEEN PREPARED FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION. A. COPY OFA MEMO FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING THE MATTER IS ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE. THE NEED FOR THE BARRICADE HAS BEEN RE- CHECKED WITH THE TRAFFIC ENGIPE ER IN THE FIELD AFTER COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING WORK. IT IS STILL FELT TO BE NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THE SIGHT'DISTANCE PROBLEM. AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION OF DESIGNATING LUGONIA ONE-WAY•SOUTHBOUND WAS ALSO CONSIDERED. THIS ALTERNATE WAS FELT TO BE NOT SATISFACTORY BECAUSE THE EXTREMELY SHORT LENGTH OF THE STREET WOULD MAKE OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE ONE -WAY REQUIREMENT EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. THE BARRICADE CAN BE REMOVED WHEN:THE STRUCTURES ENCROACHING 'INTO THE.SEASHORE DRIVE RIGHT -OF -WAY ON EITHER SIDE OF THE INTERSECTION HAVE BEEN REMOVED. rBL• DEVLIN KS DIRECTOR BBN:NAJ ATT: JIV�I�• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY Y � 0 February 9, 1967 To: City Clerk From: City Attorney Subject: Barricading of Lugonia Street at Seashore Drive The attached resolution, if adopted by the City Council, will authorize the Public Works Director to erect a barricade for the purpose of preventing vehicular access to and from Sea- shore Drive at its intersection with Lugonia Street. We are advised by the Public Works Director that an explanatory memo to the Council will be furnished by their department. It is requested that copies of the resolution be included in the agenda packages, THS:mec Atts. cc - City Manager Public Works Director � �J Tully Seym�rylll� City Attorney dz� ._ THS:mec 2/8/67 i .: RESOLUTION NO. is A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ERECT A BARRICADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AND FROM SEA- SHORE DRIVE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH LUGONIA STREET WHEREAS, the City has awarded a public works contract for the widening and improvement of Seashore Drive between 55th and Orange Streets; and WHEREAS, because of certain encroachments extending into Seashore Drive on each side of Lugonia Street, a hazardous condition will exist upon completion of the improvement project due to the inadequate sight distance for motorists attempting to enter Seashore Drive from Lugonia Street; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has recommended to the City Council that it authorize the erection of a barricade across Lugonia Street at its intersection with Seashore Drive in order to prevent vehicular access to Seashore Drive from Lugonia Street as a necessary measure to protect the safety of the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the City Attorney to take legal action to compel removal of said encroachments which, if successful, will result in the elimination of the hazardous condition at said intersection, at which time said barricade could be safely removed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to erect a barricade across Lugonia Street at its intersection with Seashore Drive in order to prevent vehicular access to Seashore Drive from Lugonia Street. ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 1967. ATTEST: Mayor City er J • FEBRUARY 1$, 1967 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVES C -1066; BARRICADE CONSTRUCTION ON LUGONIA AT SEASHORE RECOMMENDATION: j_ Z/ ADOPT A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THAT LUGONIA STREET BE BARRICADED AT THE ENTRANCE TO SEASHORE DRIVE UNTIL SUCH TIME AS THE ENCROACHMENTS CREATING AN UNSAFE CONDITION AT THE INTERSECTION ARE REMOVED. DISCUSSION: PLANS FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE STREET WERE APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL ON SEPTEMBER 26, 1966. THE COUNCIL WAS ADVISED AT THAT TIME THAT: "ACCESS TO AND FROM SEASHORE AT LUGONIA WILL BE PROHIBITED.AS A SAFETY MEASURE DUE TO THE EXTREMELY POOR SIGHT DISTANCE WHICH WILL PREVAIL AT THE INTERSECTION." THIS WAS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY MEANS OF CONSTRUCTION OF'A BARRICADEq AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. FURTHER CONSULTATION WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY HAS DISCLOSED THE ADVISABILITY OF ADDITIONAL COUNCIL ACTION BEFORE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BARRICADE. THE RECOMMENDED RESOLUTION HAS THEREFORE BEEN PREPARED FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION.- A COPY OFA MEMO FROM THE CITY ATTORNEY REGARDING THE MATTER IS ATTACHED FOR REFERENCE. THE NEED FOR THE BARRICADE HAS BEEN RE- CHECKED WITH THE TRAFFIC ENGIPE ER IN THE FIELD AFTER COMPLETION OF THE STREET WIDENING WORK. IT 13 STILL FELT TO BE NECESSARY BECAUSE OF THE SIGHT DISTANCE PROBLEM. AN ALTERNATE SOLUTION OF DESIGNATING LUGONIA ONE- WAY'SOUTHSOUND WAS ALSO CONSIDERED. THIS ALTERNATE WAS FELT TO BE NOT SATISFACTORY BECAUSE THE EXTREMELY SHORT LENGTH OF THE'STREET WOULD MAKE OBSERVANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE ONE -WAY REQUIREMENT EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. THE BARRICADE CAN BE REMOVED WHEN,THE STRUCTURES ENCROACHING INTO THE.SEASHORE DRIVE RIGHT-OF -NAY ON EITHER 51•DE OF THE INTERSECTION HAVE BEEN REMOVED. t lVLIN S DIRECTOR NAJ ATT: 1 M.... T APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL. PATE FEB 1 4 1967 Q/j To: Froms Subjects The facts are as fo• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT January 30, 1967 i Public Works Director City Attorney Proposal to barricade Lugonia Street in connection with, the project for the improvement of Seashore Drive as indicated in your memorandum dated January 20, 19679 Llowst The plans for the Seashore Drive improvement project include con- struction of a barricade across Lugonia Street at its intersection with Seashore Drive. The mason for erection of the barricade is to prevent vehicles from entering Seashore Drive by way of Lugonia Street because of the hazardous condition caused by the poor sight distance at the intersection. Tbxe sight distance problem is the result of the structures encroaOing into the Seashore Drive right of way on either side of Lugonia Street. You have indicated that in your opinion the barricade could safely be removed at such time as the encroaching structure, are removed from the right of way. You have asked us to advise you a3 to whether or not we feel that any additional Council acE4-pn, besides approval of the plans for the .project which was done on September 26; 1966, is necessary; and, secondly, you raise the question as to whether the closure of Lugonia Street as contemplated could giva rise to any claims for damages based upon inverse condemnation against the City. With respect to the question of the proper Council procedure au- thorizing closure of the street-:it is my opinion that the mere approval of the plans for the a ject is imau:ficient. If the closure of the street were intended to be permanent, it would be possible to proceed under the >,rebt Vacation Act of 1941 (Secs. 8300, et seq., Streets an( Highways Code) or the Street Opening Act of 1889 Secs. 3200, at seq., Streets and Highways Code). Under both of the foregoing procedural acts, the vaca- tion or closure of a str t must be on a permanent basis, there being no provision for t, iorary or indefinite closures or vacations. In view of the fact that this office is preparing 4 , To. Public Works Director -2- January 30, 1967 i a lawsuit to compel removal of the encroaching structures in the vicinity of Seashore Dr#4e and Lugonia, it is our expects - tion that the sight distance problem created by the encroach - ments will be remedied within a year or two, thus making it possible to remove the barricade and reopen the street. The only.statutory authority for temporary closure which our research has revealed is provided in the Vehicle Code under Section 21101(f), which reads as follows: "Local authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution.on the following matters: (f) Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction such closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing." By its terms, this section does not appear to be applicable to . the problem under consideration. My recommendation is that a resolution be prepared for Council consideration which would recite the compelling safety considerations which indicate a need that Lugonia Street be temporarily barricaded until such time as the offending encroachments can be eliminated. Although there is no statutory procedure established by state law to support the approach we are suggesting, it seems to be the only realistic method of establishing interim protection for the public during the time that we are litigating the question of the encroach -. ments. The final question raised by your memorandum is whether the barri- cading of Lugonia would give rise to any claims for inverse condemnation by property ownera'in the vicinity of the barricade. Our research indicates that the owners of the two lots on each side of Lugonia adjacent to the proposed barricade would have a claim against the City in inverse condemnation based upon impair- ment of their right of access to Seashore Drive via Lugonia. The established rule in California is that a property owner has a right of access to the next intersecting streets in both directions from his property and that the impairment of this right of access entitles him to compensation in damages based upon inverse con- demnation from the public agency responsible for the impairment of such right of access. Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal, 2d 343; Beals v. City of Los Xng2les, 23 Cal. . It seems . a,. To; Public Works Director -3- January 309 1967 likely that,if either or both of the two owners which could fils a claim against the City based upon the closure of Lugonia were to do so such claims would be adjudicated prior to the completion of the litigation between these a#me owners and the City with respect to the encroachments extending in front of their prop- erties into the Seashore Drive right of way. if the City is sue - cessful in compelling removal of the encroachments, the sight distance problem will be resolved and the barricade will no � longer be needed. Of course, thereAs:no assurance that the City will be successful in the action to compel removal of the encroachments. Therefore, it seems to me that-the matter should be presented to the City Council on the basis that the City may have to respond in damages if the.City insists on maintaining the proposed barricade. THSsmec Tully H. Seymour City Attorney ct THS:mec 2/8/67 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CW COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORMWG THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR TO ERECT A BARRICADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF PREVENTING VEHICULAR ACCESS TO AND FROM SEA- 77- SHORE DRIVE AT ITS INTERSECTION WITH LUGONIA _J STREET WHEREAS, the City has awarded a public works contract for the widening and improvement of Seashore Drive between 55th and Orange Streets; and WHEREAS, because of certain encroachments extending into Seashore Drive on each side of Lugonia Street, a hazardous condition will exist upon completion of the improvement project due to the inadequate sight distance for motorists attempting to enter Seashore Drive from Lugonia Street; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Director has recommended to the City Council that it authorize the erection of a barricade across Lugonia Street at its intersection with Seashore Drive in order to prevent vehicular access to Seashore Drive from Lugonia Street as a necessary measure to protect the safety of the public; and WHEREAS, the City Council has directed the City Attorney to take legal action to compel removal of said encroachments which, if successful, will result in the elimination of the hazardous condition at said intersection, at which time said barricade could be safely removed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Public Works Director is hereby authorized to erect a barricade across Lugonia Street at its intersection with Seashore Drive in order to prevent vehicular access to Seashore Drive from Lugonia Street. ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 1967. ATTEST: Mayor City C er i 0 i rITY,. F ..- ...,FORT P7 A, �_ ............... . .. i La.borato - ? rg Aralysis Yor "r_ua:ry 1967 - SEASHORE DRIVE Field Time i?..rr, @ 5.00 hr. 15.00 Relative Compaction 2 ter-.i. @ 11.00 ea, 22.00 9. SC-03? Teets #67 -C -87 & 88 I rTT4 ,;,r.P'�r?' I,� 4o' z .9 iddT „R T.T1S'G`R <itF4iG'R R. :�T[?RN� P.RA TN .,•. 37.00 OCrAN FRONT ALL'3Y Field -irne - hrs. 5.00 hr. - 20.00 Field Time ^c ?el-tive Compaction 3'tests 5,00 hr. 11,00 ea. 33.00 2 teats Tentative; Compaction 4 22.00 6.60 ea, 2.6.40 Tests ,"' -131 thru 737 32.00 ALLZY'3TN. GRAND CANAL & ABALONE & ALLEY BTN_. JADE & CRYSTAL 79•40 Field Time 16TF ST -q,f :T� W.hT''R? & S`l'ORti L`:fUTN '.. 2 5.00 hr. 10.00 5U +297 1 "� l.a.tive Compaction 2 F+�1" Tim-I 4 hr s. @ 5. CC hr. 20.00 3016 Relati e :o.rpectio : 8 t .,:, ±s (9 11.0^ Asa. 88.oc T.-a 'f""7-C-211 thru 218 Field Time 3 hre. 108.00 5.00 hr. 16TH ^T '?. STORM DRAIN, #1:,F �pl� Res 4 tests @ 2.00 ea., 8.00 Fielc Time 3 hre, 4 15 .00 hr. 15.00 1jcib ?al %`ive Conn ^ction 3 tests 11.00 ea. 33.00 Cce.rse Grading Te,,ts ;;`6'l -� -255, 256 & ^57 3.30 ea.. 3.30 48.00 OCrAN FRONT ALL'3Y Field Time ^c bye, @ 5,00 hr. 10,00 02-55`12- 14ORelative Comr2.ction 2 teats Z 11.00 ea. 22.00 Tests ,T67 -C -261 & 262 32.00 ALLZY'3TN. GRAND CANAL & ABALONE & ALLEY BTN_. JADE & CRYSTAL Field Time 2 hrs. 2 5.00 hr. 10.00 5U +297 1 "� l.a.tive Compaction 2 tests Z 11.00 ea. 22.00 Testy #67_0 -295 & 296 32.00 16TH STREET Field Time 3 hre. @ 5.00 hr. 15.00 �pl� Res 4 tests @ 2.00 ea., 8.00 Tests #67 -C -286 thr -) 2nd 23.00 16TH: GTRT Cce.rse Grading 1 test 3.30 ea.. 3.30 Fine Grading 1 test 6.60 ea. 6.60 3011 Sand Equivalent 3 tests s 2.20 ea. 6.60 Tests x#67 -P -125 16.50 OCILN FRONT ALLEY Field Time 1 hr. IO.CC hr. 10.00 Relative Como`i.ction 1 test @ 11,00 ea. 11.00 02 -9S9?- No u 1 t e:st @ 13.20 ea .. 13.20 Tests :'167 -C -32'" & 323 _ 34.20 (Ccnt:.':.cLued �n Pace 2) - p8ty 1 PI F ❑ P,eliminory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE / to award of contract. I /4' ROAD DEPARTMENT �1 Material Testing Section TEST•NO: C -67 ''__4,TP _ FIELD NO. © RELATIVE COMPACTION caNT. NO.OR Control tests on (W. 0. OR P 0. OR A H F P) 424 —.r materials actually entering into works. • S. DATE RE PT D.pZ % If contract, use conStact. item PROJE?ICT SE., 3.✓O�' D� 53 —� TO .P,OI . R�... L' N• C7 RESID � ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G - ''��/ -%w/_ r CONTRACTOR 42a— OUTSIDE SEND R : TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AceNcr MAI TENANCE ❑ ,SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION" 1V .�rpf�E ���% �f^�7. r'• (^moo' P. U. 6'. � "RT CT OF CL STA . REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL STQUC /N< NiF' DEPTH '.49 TO ZA " - BELOW FINISHED ,GRAt)4. DATE TESTED BY: f%= IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND,�� LAS B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED 27.yo D TEST SAND DENSITY 'o /•r7 E VOLUME SAND USED •3.309 F VOLUME CONE + RING. GI VOLUME TEST HOLE /SS H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE �/• 71° I ITARE WEIGHT S "Q, J IWET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /S. 75 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A M0T$TJRE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAS WET WT: 2 3 DRY WT:' 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN :MOIST. M SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK 2a4g- DRY WT. ROCK WET WT, Q DRY WT. — s TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY f26 . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA SUMMARY MOLD NO. . 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Zaop - 2aoo % TENT. RC = P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2a4g- 249 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE f26 r 410 - CONDITION OF MOLD /u voct' clove,-e S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN i/.84 /A T WET DENSITY i2i•S- V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE .1667 L = K _ (1.00- + N) Q = 0 - (I 00�, + N) SM. RING .0143 .181 0 R = IP —Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F FEB B 1967 NAM WORKS �P� 0 BILLING WILL � RESIDENT r B� L METHOD A ❑ B El SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY MOISTURE 3% R RC = `i cg % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL5'-6--% MONTH CITY NEWPORT BEACH CITY'ATTORNEY —DEPARTMENT " January 30, 1967 Tot Public Works Director From: City Attorney Subject= Proposal to barricade Lugonia Street in connection with the project for the improvement of Seashore Drive The facts as indicated in your memorandum dated January 20, 1967, are as follows: The plans for the Seashore Drive improvement project include con- struction of a barricade across Lugonia Street at its intersection with Seashore Drive. The reason for erection of the barricade is to prevent vehicles from entering Seashore Drive by way of Lugonia Street because of the hazardous condition caused by the poor sight distance at the intersection. The sight distance problem is the result of the structures encroaching into the Scasho :e Drive right of way on either side of Lugonia Street. You have indicated that in your opinion the barricade could safely be removed at such time as the encroaching structures are removed from the right of way.. You have asked us to advise you as to whether or not we feel that" any additional Council action, besides approval of the plans for the project which was done on September 26, 1966, is necessary; and, secondly, you raise the question as to whether the closure of Lugonia Street as contemplated could give rise to any claims for damages based upon inverse condemnation against the City. With respect to the question of the proper Council procedure au- thorizing closure of the street, it is my opinion that the more approval of the plans for the project is insufficient. If the closure of the street were intended to be permanent, it would be possible to proceed under the Street Vacation Act of 1941 (Seca. 8300, of seq., Streets and Highways Code) or the Street Opening Act of 1889 (Secs. 3200, ct seq., strsets and Highways Code). Under both of the _oreSoing procad::cal acts, the vaca- tion or closure of a street riust: -be on a p:. ,anent basis, there being no provision for temporary or indn'.irr5.ta closures or vacations. In view of the fact that this cffice is preparing _ f rM 1 • e To: Public Works Director Y2- January 30, 1967 a lawsuit to compel removal of the encroaching structures in the vicinity of Seashore Drive and Lugonia, it is-our expecta- tion that the sight distance problem created by the encroach- ments will be remedied within a year or two, thus making it possible to remove the barricade and reopen the street. The only statutory authority for temporary closure which our research has revealed is provided in the Vehicle Code under Section 21101(f), which reads as follows: "Local.authorities may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution on the following matters: ... . (f) Temporarily closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes when in the o�i.nion of local authorities having jurisdiction such closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons are to use that portion of the street during the - c_m7-,or,ry closing." By its terms, this section does not appear to be applicable to the problem under consideration. My recommendation is that a resolution be prepared for Council consideration which would recite the cormelling safety considerations which indicate a need that Lugonia Street be temporarily barricaded until such time as the offending encroach.u3nts can be eliminated. Although there is no statutory procedure established by state law to support the approach we are suggesting, it seems to be the only realistic method of establishing interim protection for the public during the time that we are litigating the question of the encroach- ments. The final question raised by your memorandum is whether the barri- cading of Lugonia would give rise to any claims for inverse condemnation by property owners in the vicinity of the barricade. Our research indicates that the owners of the two lots on each side of Lugonia adjacent to the proposed barricade would have a claim against the City in inverse condemnation based upon impair- ment of their right of access to Seashore Drive via Lugonia. The established rule in California is that a property owner has a right of access to the next intersecting streets in both directions from his property and that the impairment of this right of access entitles him to compensation in damages based upon inverse con- demnation from the public ageen�ccy responsible for the impairment of such right of access. Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal.. 2d 343; Beals v. City of Los nge es, 23 Cal. . It seems • t To; Public Works Director -3- January 30, 1967 i likely that,if either or both of'the two owners which could file a claim against the City based upon the closure of Lugonia were to do so such claims would be adjudicated prior to the completion of the litigation between these same owners and the City with respect to the encroachments extending in front of their prop- erties into the Seashore Drive right of way. If the City is suc- cessful in compelling removal of the encroachments, the sight distance problem will be resolved and the barricade will no longer be needed. Of course, thereAs:no assurance that the City will be successful in the action to compel removal of the encroachments. Therefore, it seems to me that the matter should be presented to the City Council on the basis that the City may have to respond in damages if.the City insists on maintaining the proposed barricade.. Tully H. Seymour THS:mee City Attorney Ronald Reagan CALIFORNIA— NIGNWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Cewrnor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 January 24, 1967 P. O. SOX 234 LOS ANGELES 90054 Permit No. 766 - -E- 766134 City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attn: B.B. Nolan, City Engineer R. Cook, Project Engineer Gentlemen: Our- records- #ndicate that- -No.- -2766-E- 766131. _ ...... _. was issued to you on September 27. 1966 to install storm drain catch basin and construct street work at Orange St. and east of S,>maxtad Orange St. and Coast Highway. A Field check revealed that you have not com acted backfill over storm drain, and it is necessary to raise signal to grade at It is requested that the above - indicated work be performed as soon as possible so that we can consider this work as satisfac- torily completed. By telephone please notify Mr. E. N. Nusebv , State Permit Inspector, prior to starting the.above- mentioned work. Phone Number &: 542 -4739 between = $:00 A.M. & 9:00 A.M. ONLY. Your cooperation and prompt attention will be appreciated. 7- MP -6o6 Nov 66 Rev very truly yours, � DistrictePermit E C E I V E D Engineer JAN 23 196Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPTe PUBLIC wOtY1CS i • 'x.31 Pm le woRXs DIREtTM JANUARY 2D+ 1967 IWMNEMENT OF SEMiIORE DRIVE FROM +55TH STREET TO ORANGE STREETS CONTRACT to66 Toot ►LAMS PON TNt ABOVC PM49T INC►UDt CONSTRUCTION or A sam icADt ACROSS LUOMIA STRctT AT IT: INTCR0cCT10N wiTm StASom DRivt. Tmis sammocAOt to Nctete To PRtVENT vENSeLES room awgitime SEASNORt DRIVE room LUOONIA STREET KCAUSE Or TUC 9XTKNELV OAIMSOUS SITUATION CAUSED BY Tot 000 OISNT DFSTANCt AT TNt iNYtRKCTtOR. Tug SISNT 0111TANC9 PRSBLEm IS CAWU BV Tut tXISTENCt Or "It STRUCTURES CKCROACNINO INTO TNC StASNOW DRIVt RIGHT-OrWAT ON ttTNER B Nt Or Lv"HJA STREET. THE sARRICAve COULD RL Rtmewto wNtN Tug t11ess"wiNS STRUCTURCS Alit RENOVEO. wt NAVE ELM commiDERto Tut POSSIBILITY Or PACVCNTiNG ENTRANCE TO SCASNORt DRIVE Pacts LUOOmIA OV w aiSNATINO LUOONIA " A ONEWAT STRttT SOUTHBOUND* HOIKVCR# THIS NCTNOD WAS MY Ft LT TO Bt SATISFACTORY DECAUSt THt CXTREMELY SNORT LEHSTm Or LUBBNiA womo mARt RCOUL.ATORV S1ONive AND tNFORCtIKNT vtov DirricwLv. Ir TWc OMRICAOt is fAteTto RtsiotNTS or TNt ARIA WILL IIAVt ACCESS TO SEASNORt DRIVE VIA A IS -FOOT wiDt ALLtY PARALLEL TO AND ho rttT SouvoicaLY Or StASmoRt DRIP! EIITENDImS in sm o1RteT1ONS ram LUOSNIA. TNt LtNSTN Or TIM ALLEY TO not MticT CRoss STRttT IN tITNtR DIRECTION E1ITiR11111 SCASMONC DRIVE 10 180 ritT. NO PERSON WOULO NAVE TO TRAVEL A OREATER DISTANCt TO REACH NIB REStOtNCt VIA AN ALTERNATE ROUTS THAN TNEV WMOL VIA LUOOMIA STREET• Tog PLANS FOR Tut PwojccT,, INCLUDINS Tllc SARRICADtr WERE APPRoVEo BV Tot COUNCIL AT TIK IKm me Or StPTt11SER 26, 10. IN THE HIM PROM TNt PUSLIC wOOXS DEPARTWIllp TO TIRE COUNCIL RECOIBKMDINS APPROVAL Or TOO PLAMSp TIK FOLLOWtNO WORM /NO IS CMTAIIicat MACCCOS TO AM FROM SEASNMt AT LUSONIA WILL K PROHIBITED AS A SArtTV MASONIC OUE TO TUC CXTRpKLV POOR 9140T OISTANCt WHICH WILL PRCVAIL." PAGE 2 A PRINT Of SWEET b Of THE PLANS SHOVING THE AREA INVOLVED IS ATTACHED FOR REftRENCE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE STREET SOUTHERLY Of SEASHORE IS NOT CLOStD TO VEHICLES BY THE BARRICADES OUT MERELY THAT ACCESS TO AND FROM SKASNORK AT THE INTERSECTION IS PREVENTED. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING TWAT THIS TYPE Of SITUATION HAS GLEN ADJUDICATED MANY TINES WHERE CONSTRUCTION OF FREEWAYS HAS CAUSED THE CLOSING OF STREETS AND THt COROLLARY ADJUSTMENT Of TRAVEL PATTERNS UCEDtPp WITH THE FINDING THAT NO TAKING Of VESTEO RIGHTS WAS INVOLVED. PLEASE ADVISE US AS TO WMETMKR OR NOT YOU rC9L ANY ADDITIONAL COUNCIL ACTION IS NEEDED TO AUTNORIIE CONSTRUCTION Of THE BARRICADE AND If THERE ARK ANY OTHER LEGAL PROBLEMS INVOLVED. JOSEPH T. DEVLIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CCI CITY MANAGER ATTI WOO: MA \� ��ary tests prior Y� _ rd of contract. f? ®Control tests on /� materials octually �+ entering into works._,,.� PROJECT %J.P RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTO SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUC LOCATION REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DATE / - / -G7 IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND .3G 75 B WT. SAND RETAINED 9.8s C WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY ai. 7V E VOLUME SAND USED .'Tory F VOLUME CONE + RING zS2 G VOLUME TEST HOLE • /479 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE Zp I TARE WEIGHT .3•iS J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE f- 5:/ K WET DENSITY IN PLACE I t . L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION If contract, ust contract item PA t TEST NO. C -'-7- C- .7 FIELD NO. /- "NT. NO. OR (W Q. OR P.O. OR AHF PI�iG�iF -�Y DATE TD. /- 5? �7 AGENCY .CZN kle �0= R) ✓f-.etv,,. .lns/i.icoiv CONTRACTOR YoQE.o d ie l OUTSIDE 1E rION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ S B ❑ RMITS El D. i " ST�sero 1J.�4i"e� . RT LT OF rt STA 3,TEPTH - � TO 41T BELOW: -µ. �-�HED GRADE — TESTED BY: /% - METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 °15 MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK zS2 WET WT. - DRY WT. - a Q TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 240o pgpv P WET WT. AT COMPACTION zS2 Zse Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE f- 5:/ - ,c..7,8 CONDITION OF MOLD 'C' VV. S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN j2,154 tO. 3 T WET DENSITY I wa.s 1 11421 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = V, OLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -F K =J =G' CONE .1667 - L = K = (100% +N) Q = 0 s (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= 5 LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: I B- Test Method Calif. 216-F • ,DENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 40' BILLING WILL 81 BY ` RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY y14r 11 MOISTURE 670 U OEM TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION:NL`,2 %. AT END OVAMONTH \' P- inar tests prior �' COUNTY OF ORANGE and or cannnct. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NOS C- 47- C — 88 FIELD No. 2 © Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION (w O ?OR P.Q. AHFP)¢!�Z -'e moterials actually p entering info Worlts: DATE REPTD. �� - /. - 6 % • If can t, us item PROJECT ,Q.- A A7G< Cl.�/EwY°e�T fc.0 - GENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTORI -kQel 71- CONTRACTOR -r;�•te.i5 SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ❑ MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD,, Q PERMITS ❑. LOCATION - sEo.�s/o! -a'" �,p, �/" ���-P� -i yct/'w RT LT OF (L':STA 07`SA' - I REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL �%�s'. �3.� DEPTH TO �' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE /- 6 - G7 - TESTED BY: Y✓��?'E. IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 40�-96 B WT. SAND RETAINED 1 C WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED QGO F VOLUME CONE + RING /eSio G VOLUME TEST HOLE ALSO H WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE aA,SJ 1 TARE WEIGHTi,� CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /B •,d'S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE UN ER METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 '7o MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P1 DRY WT. ROCK 24soO, WET WT. — ;. DRY WT. - a Qj TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN IZ P1 WET WT. AT COMPACTION 24soO, 2,T10 Qj DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE +2 CONDITION OF MOLD UN ER C:C.. ON, S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 12. 2. T WET DENSITY I ) V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E —F K =J =G CONE L= K= (100 % +N) Q= 0.,=(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) = Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: /6' P21— E. Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 a- 1120 ■rrl rmt.s r —S METHOD A ❑ B JA SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE I OPT: DENSITY MOISTURE 4' /o UNOE RC =--9—% TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL .S % ❑ BILLING WILL MAT ND 0 MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR:) ATE ALS EER rsa,i.ea.l RELATIVE COMPACTION JAN P) 67 JAN . 67 a A.L. H INNc LN10CN DIVISION OP HIGHWAYS P.O. Box 2p4# TERMINAL ANNEX LOS AMOCCES# CALIPORNIA ATTENTIONI MR. RBBERT JORDAN 0 C'' -/oc'G JANUARY 3, 1967 SuBJECTl ENCROACHMENT PERMIT N0. 766-E -134 NOR MARK SILT or COAST HIGHWAY BETWEEN ORANGE AND 56TH STREETS (074RA- 001 -249 -21.7) DEAR SIRS DUE TO CIRCUMSTANCES BEYOND OUR CONTROL, AS OUTLINED TO YOU BY MR. DUNIGAH OP THIS 0/PICE ON JANUARY 3, 1967, THE WORK COVERED BY THE SUBJECT PERMIT WAS NOT COIPLETED BY THE EXPIIIATION.DATE, DECEMBER 28, 1966. PLEASE ISSUE A PERMIT EXTRIIBION Of XISTY DAYS TO ALLOW COMPLETION or WORKALREADY UNDERWAY. If YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THIS MATTERi PLEASE CONTACT ME. VERY TRULY YOURS# Huw cR T. COOK PROJECT EMGIMccR HTCIMAJ I 6 AIL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT C.C.O. No . / Amount Authorized $ =Report No DAILY E)C[#A WORK REPORT Previous Expenditure $ Date Work Performed IZ' 2% ' to Today $ Date of Report 7 / _ To Date : Project Name`- �i _ �6 C.. r�•C.{�' Contract No. 1046 Description-,9f Workc��,,.-/ elm ��' � J -HOURLY RATE SHALL INCLUDE ACTUAL WAGES PAID PLUS PAYMENTS REQUIRED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND COLLECTIVE DARGAINING AGREEMENTS JW tVU1rMtNT LABOR im . LICC /l' i0.O C'C Total Cost of Equipment MATERIALS and /or WORK DONE BY OTHER THAN CONTRACTOR'S FORCES ...�.�� Total Cost of Labor -HOURLY RATE SHALL INCLUDE ACTUAL WAGES PAID PLUS PAYMENTS REQUIRED UNDER STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS AND COLLECTIVE DARGAINING AGREEMENTS JW tVU1rMtNT im . LICC /l' i0.O C'C Total Cost of Equipment MATERIALS and /or WORK DONE BY OTHER THAN CONTRACTOR'S FORCES TOTAL Cost of Materials The above record is complete and correct ONTRACTOR' RPRESENTAT. A Sub -Total 'F 15% )See. 9 -03 Std. Specs.) Total this report For office use only White to Inspector Pd. on Est. No Yellow to Public Works Department Checked by Pink to Contractor CITY OF NEjPPQ BEACii' Laboratory Analysis December 1966 22.00 SEASHORE DgiVE 32.00 20.00 . Field Time 1 hr. L 10.00 hr. Relative Compaction 2 tests 11.00 ea. (9a3:3St 03-) Tests #C -5496 & 97 3.30 6.6o SEASHORE DRIVE 2.20 17..10 Field Time 2 brs.. 10.00 hr. Relative Compaction 2 t uts @ ;, 'll.CC ea. Ig 935'i -o3> Tests #C -5498 & 99 42.00 EASTBLUFF DRIVE: k Field Time 2 hrs. 10.00 hr. �o„ Relative Compaction 2 tests 0 11.00 ea. Tests #e -5519 & 20 EASTELUFF DRIVE Field Time 1 hr 9 5.00 hr. Coarse Grading 1 test (9 3.30 ea. Fine Grading 1 test 4 6.60 ea. Sand Equivalent i test ® 2.20 ea. Test #66 -P =2646 EASTELUFF DRIVE (AT THE TENTNIS COURT Field Time 2 hrs. @ 5.00 hr. f` H20 2 tests 4 2.00 ea. Tests #C -.5525 & 26. MAR VISTA TR. 6227 Field Time 2 hrs. t 10.00 hr. Relative Compaction 2 tests 11.00 ea. Tests #C -5630 & 31 EASTBLUFF TENNIS CLUB - PARR ING LOT Coarse Grading 1 test a 3.30 ea. Fine Grading 1 test a 6.60 ea. Sand Equivalent 2 tests 1� 2.20 ea. Tests #66 -P -2710 # ( %- 3i SL- 43) b�: 3ora X74, po d'll9. to 3.30 6.60 4.4o Total - 14.30 203.40 10.00 22.00 32.00 20.00 . 22.00 42.00 20.00 22.00 42.00 5.00 3.30 6.6o 2.20 17..10 10.00 4.00 14.00 20.00 22.00 42.00 3.30 6.60 4.4o Total - 14.30 203.40 COUNTY OF ORAN '-C ATE JSMU&ry 23, 1044'. AUDITOR- CONTROLLER P.O. BOX 567 ..SOLD TO SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA - -- NUMBER NAME CITY OF NEWPORT B�&AGH ADDRESS 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, California.,. INVOICE NO, 03636 CUSTOMER EXTRA COPY F 850 -5 ACCOUNTING CODE FUND DEPT. OBJT. SUB -OBJ. 112 0001 -, I CUSTOMER EXTRA COPY F 850 -5 QUANTITY D E S C R I P T I O N PRICE AMOUNT laboratory Analysis for Deeember 1966 per itsmisatien - 203.40 lX1 jl 4y 3/m / 29: Yo TOTAL DUE CUSTOMER EXTRA COPY F 850 -5 r' Pre1' inary tests prior n� COUNTY OF ORANGE ❑ to ardJytcontroce - ROAD DEPARTMENT jd (� Material Testing Section'' TE4T NO. C —S,f TIap; (/ FIELD NO. t —a �CONT. NO. OR .. a,; ,'I teact�ally RELATIVE COMPACTION M.OiOR P.O OR.AHFP) ' `entering into works. PRb3F,CTf • nil -InS2 Z. RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ' A LOCATION REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPEMATERIAL 1,11 DATE !- i TESTED B IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND gp.y'p E1 WT. SAND RETAINED 1i, c C WT. SAND USED - -�,q p D TEST SAND DENSITY 6":Re- E VOLUME SAND USED . 34E,4 F VOLUME CONE + RING I I G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. -.14 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I IGHT 7 -- J EXC. SAMPLE d K SITY IN PLACE NDRYDENSITY L IN PLACE DAT REPTD./:2 ntract item y C�tJFwAoc_T C- ,F�� -ia +wi CONTRACTOR Y�bn Ie*- Sn�1,c MAINTENANCE 0 SUB —I PERMITS ❑ " r (RT/ LT O TA 1 TO 13 � BELOW FINISHED GRADE ir L — —4,V —-v— METHOD A MQt$'TURE SAMPLE FIELO LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. Cc' 1 DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. M N SP, GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P ,DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - : DRY WT. -.14 Q TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR,MAX. DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. Cc' 1 CSC 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN A400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 9 4 (6r,2 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE d CONDiTiONOFMOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN K 4 /. T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C:F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100% +N) Q =DO 0Ow0 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1610 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F I a- 1140 r METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY AX 426 MOISTURE /.-9'o `ten �✓ RIC = �� TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL— %. nFG 14 IM ❑ BILLING WILL BE' DE AT END OF MONTH PUWC WORKS nEP ►,. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) BY NA ERt clNecR F301 I -q RELATIVE COMPACTION 9. �.. ,. y ❑ Preliminor tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE J to award a contract..- / ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section sesT No. C— 9 + -FeeLo No. '_ Control ia tests ct on ar RELATIVE COMPACTION-.: CONT N° °R KK °'•i W. OR P.O. OR AHFP) 4LG 'r materials actually entariny into works. If Contract, USE Contract Item DATE KEPT D. h 6(Z PROJECT ° a^ - - _� AGENCY C>�aJ T+e�RT C- �e.tac.0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) p CONTRACTOR "L'r)oeea e SIDE, SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ y � MAINTENANCE ❑ BD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION_ SoASUnQ= C7a, Ilr .RTLT'OI�,STA liTr. REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL. t -j DEPTH `�a TO va BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE i. 17.::.C. TESTED BY: m CL0-,*X IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 3Z•�O S WT. SAND RETAINED 1 C WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY gt.BL E VOLUME SAND USED _ 3567 F VOLUME CONE + RING Z449 G VOLUME TEST HOLE - 1757 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY T WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 23,CGb K WET DENSITY IN PLACE g , L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE C /Ovs METW A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD_ LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 a MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK Z449 WET WT. -a - DRY WT. - s Q TOTAL DRY WT. a ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 - 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 24Gb 24 Od`::, . P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z449 2400 - Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE +2.0 FIEL+ -7 CONDITION OF MOLD C /Ovs S /umv" -4 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 11.0Z - In e'6 T WET DENSITY 1 129 .9 1 ISO's V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = - VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C- D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE .1667 1 - L= K- (IOO�+N) Q= O= (too ox, +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q e S LG. RING .0302 .1969` REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F B- 1140 METHOD A ❑ B ®" SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 131 X32 MOISTURE V 'OF-C- RC = ':Iq 7. TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL'_% I ❑ BILLING WILL M E T END OF MONTH • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ATE EER RELATIVE COMPACTION.. ti Preliminarl• tests prior to award o contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 3 _ 8 WT. SAND RETAINED ! 1. 1 O C WT. SAND USED 2 6 F/ C D TEST SAND DENSITY - c E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. RGO� : F VOLUME CONE + RING _ p G VOLUME TEST HOLE ,i 7 6 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE -Z 3, Q I TARE WEIGHT R J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 7 0 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 3' L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE F W OV. METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE:' F E ti LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 7o MOIST. :M_, -` N - SP. GR. I;K,.,'L WET WT. RGO� : P DRY WT. ROCF� _ p WET WT. — DRY WT. — Q TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOL:E DA* ' MOLD NO. 1 2. 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2400 2_+00 - P WET WT. AT COMPACTION _ p Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC.. R % MOISTURE L 42. $ CONDITION OF MOLD - GLG.S1= F W OV. S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN . - O. .- 1• 1 '- T WET DENSI TY - 2 9. - 2 , Q V1 DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES. C.F. C= A— 8 E= C= D G =E — F K =J =G CONE L K (100°' +N) Q 0 (100% N) SM. RING 4m. R = {p —Q) �� Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S -LG. RING REMARKS: &J I. 8' I r METHOD A ❑ 8 13' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUM ERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY -�c )3 MOISTURE i (° UI"D!✓12 RC= IoOi- i% Test Method Calif. 216 -F TENT. RC = q> RECEIVE D SPECIFICATION: NL,% DEC 14 to 19 BILLING WILL BE WDEE", LOFTH PUBLIC WORKS DEPT- 8Y RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY'ENGR.) N .30,;.83.11. RELATIVE COMPACTION J ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. f ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— S C�DNT, NO I Cont'of teats on RELATIVE W.O. OR P.O. R AHF I materiola actually COMPACTION �/J �) r entering into works. �` T.Z4 — DATE REPTO. • If contract us , "e controct item L: PROJECT SE.A� HGR1= D2, AGENCY CC /N•S. RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) -zy0 CONTRACTOR OUTSIDE r� SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY LJ MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION SEPF SH0eE L) IC`s RT LT OFCL STA C+On REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL lV• r- hJD DEPTH y / TO 3 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE ••� — �c %:. TESTED BY: G•Iy��..R I'J 9' �. O IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 3C)• f (� B WT. SAND RETAINED ' C T. SAND USED 25 .0C) D TEST SAND DENSITY 81, g E VOLUME SAND USED .354-3 F VOLUME CONE + RING . 18 10 G VOLUME TEST HOLE . 1'7 33 H WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE 2 (a I TARE WEIGHT �_ ) J _ WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ? � , c' K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 35. C. L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 'flese- METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD N0. Fe 1 DRY WT. ' 3 4 .. MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK .p P WET WT. - .n DRY WT. - 3 Q TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA.,. MOLD N0. Fe 1 C.C. 2 3 4 .. O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 00 0 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION .p P a2Q b6 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD 'flese- 0~ F /u/ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /A // 1,7 T WET DENSITY -7.f'T 1 12c7- V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q VOLUMES, C.F. ,. C= A- 6 E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J+ G CONE .1667 - L =K= (100% +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q ='S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: E- Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ❑ BILLI BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) raa „-aa.r RELATIVE COMPACTION i 8• 1140 1-: METHOD A ❑ B (� SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 1 3 (1 3 MOISTURE 1 '7e ✓,NIQG RC = J O G7 +- /DY TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% I /1 D CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH (� PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Date Nov. 16, 196 NO. TO: FIELD ENGINEER FROM: PROJECT ENGINEER SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH TO ORANGE (c -1o66) THIS CONTRACT IS BEING FUNDED FROM SEVERAL DIFFERENT SOURCES. LISTED BELOW IS A BREAKDOWN OF THE FUNDING AND THE BUDGET NUMBERS WHICH PERTAIN TO EACH PARTICULAR ITEM. EACH TIME A PROGRESS PAYMENT IS SENT TO THE FINANCE DIRECTORS PLEASE INCLUDE A BREAKDOWN OF HOW IT SHOULD BE CHARGED. BID ITEM BUDGET NO. AMOUNT 19) ADJ. W.V. BOXES 50- 9297 -041 $280.00 21) RELOCATE FIRE HYDRANTS it 800.00 22) RELOCATE WATER METERS it 800.0O 23) 1 SERVICES Mo.DO 25) 6:: V WATER MAIN CONN. U3 50.00 TOTAL $7170.00 THE REMAINING ITEMS ARE TO BE CHARGED TO BUDGET ACCOUNT N0. 19- 3356 -037• HUNTE . COOK PROJECT ENGINEER CC: FINANCE DIRECTOR HTC:NAJ Li66 (U) i 1 RRSOLEIlID 6458 2 A RESOLUTION OF TAX _ GOt�CIL OF TU CITY Ol► NEWPORT BEACH A COST, TSC 3 iWROVEM NT OF SKAA8 Dar" FROYt STREET TO allJCE AV== (CONTRACT NO.. 1966) 4 5 WU EAB, pursuant to the notide inviting btda for work 6 consisting of the improveomt of Seashore Drives #en 55th Street 7 to Orange Avenue, in accordance with the plans and specifications 8! heretofore adopted, bids were received on the 18th day of 6cosbeer, 9 19660 and publicly opened and declared; and 10 WEEKS, it appears that the lowest responsible bidder. 11 therefor is Yoder and Eons; and 12 VWWAS, Yoder and Sons did not have a valid State con- 13 tractores license to perieoms the Construction work at the time it 14 submitted its bid to the City Mark, but subsequently acquired such 15 a license prior to the award of contract; and 1611 SAS, the City Council desi:res.to waive said irregu- 17 larity in accordance with the authority to waive irregularities con - 18 tained in Sec. 2*03 of the City standard Specifications; 19 NW. TfUMFORS. RE IT %$SOLVBO that the bid of Toder and 20 Sons in the amount of X1469646.05 be accepted and that the contract 21 for the construction work be awarded to said bidder. 22 BE IT FUitTWR 143OLVBD that the City Council hereby waives 23 the irregularity. in connection with the bid of Yoder and Sons tort 24 listing of the failure of said bidder to have a valid State con- 25 tractor's license to do the work at the time its bid was originally 26 27 28 29 li submitted to the City Clock. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and City Clerk are horeby authorised and direst*# to execute a contract in accordance with the speecifications, bid and this award on behalf of the City of Newport Saaah, and that firs City Clerk be directed to furnish an executed copy to the successful bidder. ADOPTED this 14th day of Noweeber 1966 ATTEST: fi:. T0: CITY COUNCIL* i FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR NOVEMBER 14, 1966 SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55TH STREET AND ORANGE STREET (C -1066) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. WAIVE THE IRREGULARITY OF YODER AND SONS NOT HAVING THE PROPER LICENSE AT THE TIME THE BIDS WERE OPENED. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO YODER AND SONS FOR $46,646:05 AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. DISCUSSION: SIX BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:00 A.M. ON OCTOBER 18, 1966. BIDDER TOTAL YODER AND SONS $46,646.05 HUNTINGTON BEACH SULLY - MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY. $50,494.00 ORANGE GRIFFITH COMPANY $56,293.50 COSTA MESA S. J. COOK AND SONS $62,098.90 COSTA MESA R. W.. MCCLELLAN AND SONS $65,206.0o COSTA MESA E. L. WHITE COMPANY $68,689.45 GARDEN GROVE ALTHOUGH YODER AND SONS HAVE SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED SIMILAR STREET IMPROVEMENT WORK FOR OTHER ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC AGENCIES, A CHECK OF THE CONTRACTORS LICENSE NUMBER DISCLOSED THAT THE LICENSE HELD AT THE TIME OF RECEIVING BIDS WAS FOR BUILDING CONTRACT- ING ONLY. AT THE MEETING OF OCTOBER 24, 1966, THE COUNCIL APPROVED THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND DEFERRED THE AWARD OF THE CONTRACT UNTIL NOVEMBER 14. THE LOW BIDDER HAS NOW OBTAINED THE REQUIRED LICENSE. THE YODER BID IS $3,x+7.95 (7.6,%) LESS THAN THE SECOND LOW BID, AND IS 14.4% LESS THAN THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF $59,000. THE AMOUNT BUDGETED FOR THE PROJECT IN ACCOUNT No. 19-3356 -037 Is $60,000. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CONTRACT BE AWARDED TO THE LOW BIDDER. THE ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION IS JANUARY 15, 1967• )jdc,TPH DEVLI ` COUNCIL: LIC KS DIRECTOR DI : v R��� ATTEST TO OPENING OF BIDS: LAURA LAGIOS, 'ACT'ING Y CLERK To: 9 6 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council From: City Attorney Subject: Competitive bidding requirements f November 4, 1966 rowl-1 271 C, -144 INTRODUCTION: At the City Council meeting on October 24, 1966, the Council con- sidered the award of a public works contract for the improvement of Seashore Drive between 55th and Orange Streets. Six bids had been received by the City Clerk in response to the advertised notice inviting bids. The low bid in the amount of $46,646.05 was submitted by Yoder and Sons of Huntington Beach. The bid of Yoder and Sons is $3,847.95 (7.6 %) less than the second lowest bid in the amount of $50,494.00 which was submitted by the Sully - Miller Company of Orange. The Notice Inviting Bids contains the following language concern- ing state contractors licensing requirements: "No bid will be accepted from a contractor who has not been licensed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 9, Division III, of the Business and Professions Code." The bid proposal form furnished by the City contains a blank for the bidder to insert the number of his state contractor's license. This blank was filled in with a license number on the bid proposal submitted by Yoder and Sons. The bids were opened on October 18, 19662 by the City Clerk. Subsequently, the Public Works Department, in checking the bid proposals, discovered that the license number inserted in the proposal by Yoder and Sons referred to a Type A - General Build- ing Contractor's License which does not authorize the performance of street work. Upon being informed that he did not have a proper license, the low bidder immediately filed application for a Type B -1 General Engineering Contracting License with the State Contractors' License Board. Meanwhile, the Public Works Director, after discussing the matter with the undersigned, prepared a written report for the City Council recommending that the award of the contract be deferred for two weeks in order to allow the low bidder an opportunity to obtain the proper license. The low bidder was successful in obtaining a Type B -1 license on October 24th. This fact was confirmed by Hunter Cook of the Public Works Department in a telephone conversation with the State Contractors' License Board office in Sacramento in the late afternoon on the 24th. The recommendation of the Public Works Director was based 0 • To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council -2- November 4, 1966 upon the authority of the City Council to waive irregularities con- tained in the City Standard Specifications at Section 2 -03 which was referred to in the Notice of Inviting Bids. Sec. 2 -03 provides as follows: "Rejection of E1:2 osals: Proposals may be rejected if they show an— y alterations o form, additions not called for, con- ditional or alternative bids, incomplete bids, erasures or irregularities of any kind. The City reserves the right to reject any and all bids or waive any irregularity or informality in the bid process." The Council deferred the matter of the award of the contract to the meeting of November 14, 1966, and requested that the City Attorney prepare a legal opinion on the following questions: (1) Was the low bidder a qualified bidder at the time of the bid opening? Answer: No. The bid as originally submitted did not comply with the Notice Inviting Bids. Furthermore, Section 7028 of the Business and Professions Code provides that it is a misdemeanor to contract without a license. (2) If the answer to the first question is no, could the City Coun- cil legally award a contract to the low bidder at a subsequent date if he obtained an appropriate license to do the work prior to the award of the contract? Answer: Yes. Sec. 3 -01 of the City's Standard Specifications pro- vides that the award of contract will be made within 30 days after the opening of bids. Sec. 2 -03 of the Standard Specifi- cations authorizes the City to waive any irregularity or informality in the bid process. Therefore, since the low bidder obtained the necessary contractor's license prior to the time set for award of the contract, the City Council may award it the contract. (3) If the low bidder refused to enter into a contract after it was awarded, would the City be able to enforce a forfeiture of the bid bond? Answer: Yes. Since the original defect in the bid proposal has —Seen corrected, the bid bond could be enforced by the City in the event that the low bidder refused to enter into a contract. 0 To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council -3- DISCUSSION: 0 T November 4, 1966 The general rule on irregularities in bids has been stated as fol- lows: "There must be a substantial compliance with the proposal to warrant the consideration of the bid, else bidding would not be on equal terms and the advantages of competition would be lost. Unless the bid responds to the proposal in all material respects it is not a bid at all, but a new proposition. However, mere irregularities in the form of the bid will not justify its rejection, for these may be corrected after being opened on entering into the contract. An important question, therefore, sometimes arising, is whether the municipality is in duty bound to reject a bid not in compliance with the proposal or whether it may, in its discretion, overlook the insufficiency and notwithstand- ing its existence award the contract to one who is the lowest but has not strictly complied with the request for bids. In some cases it has been held that the municipality may accept such a bid. The rule supported by reason would seem to be that if the omission or irregularity is merely technical it may be overlooked, but that if it is a sub- stantial requirement affecting the amount of the bid, or the like, the municipality must reject such bid notwithstand- ing it is the lowest bid.' McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, Sec. 29.78, p. 364. The courts have held that minor variations and irregularities that do not give one bidder an unfair advantage over other bidders or add to the cost to the city may ordinarily be waived. The follow- ing cases indicate some specific applications of the foregoing rule: Cameron v. City of Escondido, 138 C.A. 2d 311 (1956). This case involved a public works contract for the construction of a sewer project pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911. The 1911 Act provided that all bids must be accompanied by a certified check payable to the city or a bond in the amount of 10% of the aggregate of the proposal. On August 3, 1955, the date the bids were opened, it was learned that the low bid was accompanied by a personal check in the sum of 10% of the bid rather than a certified check. Immedi- ately after the opening of the bids, as was the custom, the city council ordered that all bids and security furnished therewith be referred to the engineer of work for examination and report on • To; The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council -4- i qpp' November 4, 1966 August 10, 1955, On August 4th, the low bidder deposited with the City Clerk its certified check in the proper amount to accom- pany their bid, and on August 10th the city council by resolution made a finding that the certified check was on deposit with the city clerk; that it was in the proper amount; and that the council waived the informality in said bid. Thereafter the engi- neer of work recommended acceptance of the low bid and by resolu- tion that bid was accepted and all others were rejected. The next lowest bidder subsequently brought suit against the city seeking a rescission of the award of contract and asking the court to order the council to award it the contract. The court sustained the city council's action in awarding the contract to- the low bidder, stating "... we are convinced, from the authori- ties cited, that the presentation of the personal check in the sum of 10% of the bid and the substitution of a certified check in said amount the following day, by consent of the city council, and before the bids were formally declared and accepted, was not a jurisdictional defect or invalidity about which the petitioners can now complain ..." on Pacific - Murphv Corporation v. Durkee. 144 C.A. Judson Pacific - Murphy Corporation brought suit to prevent the State Director of Public Works from awarding a steel contract for the Carquinez Bridge to the American Bridge Division, United States Steel Corporation, the lowest bidder, and to compel the director to award the contract to Judson Murphy, the second lowest bidder. The main contention of Judson Murphy was that American Bridge Division was not properly licensed and qualified to bid on the work. The contractor's license number listed in the low bid was held in the name of the United States Steel Corporation. The evidence showed that prior to the award of the contract the American Bridge Division, which was formerly a separate corporate entity, had been merged into the United States Steel Corporation as an operating division. The court held that the contract had been validly awarded to the United States Steel Corporation, stating that any question as to the correct identity of the low bidder had been cleared up prior to the award of the contract. The court made the following comment regarding the purpose of licensing requirements: "It must be remembered that competitive bidding statutes, and those requiring licenses for bidding on public work, are for the benefit of the public and not for the benefit of bidders or licensees. It certainly would amount to a 0 0 To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council -5- November 4, 1966 disservice to the public if a losing bidder were to be permitted to comb through the application of the low bidder the low bid on minor technica securing acceptance of his, a struction would be adverse to public and contrary to public CONCLUSION: bid proposal or license after the fact, cancel Lities, with the hope of higher bid. Such con - the best interests of the policy." The issue to be determined is whether the City Council may permit - the low bidder to correct the defect in its original bid proposal; after the bids were opened but prior to the award of the contract, by establishing that it had obtained the necessary state contractor's license to do the work. Bearing in mind that the purposes of public bid requirements are to invite competition, to guard against favoritism, fraud and corruption and to secure the best work at the lowest price, it is my opinion that the City Council in the ex- ercise of its discretion may legally award the contract in question to the low bidder. Under the circumstances in this case, I can find no basis on which it could be successfully argued that the low bid- der would be gaining an unfair advantage over the other bidders or that the Council would be acting contrary to sound public policy. THS :mec cc - City Manager City Clerk Public Works Director / - /V�(6 Tully . "Seymo City torney e��4yG,(VV oSi OCTOBER.24, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL PROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55TH STREET AND ORANGE STREET RECOMMENDATION: DEFER AWARD OF THE CONTRACT UNTIL THE COUNCIL MEETING OF NOVEMBER 14, 1966. DISCUSSION: SIX BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:00 A.M. ON OCTOBER 18, 1966. BIDDER TOTAL YODER AND SONS HUNTINGTON BEACH $460646.05 SULLY - MILLER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY ORANGE $50,494.00 GRIFFITH COMPANY COSTA MESA_ $56,293.50 S.J. COOK AND SONS COU CtL: COSTA MESA $62,098.90 f�� r� (� L R.W. MMESA AN AND SONS a PC$ COSTA MESA $65,206.00 ��' I-A E: E.L. WHITE COMPANY A '/��X l GARDEN GROVE $68,6$9.45 ALTHOUGH YODER AND SONS HAVE SATISFACTORILY PERFORMED SIMILAR STREET IMPROVEMENT WORK FOR OTHER ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC AGENCIES, A CHECK OF THE CONTRACTOR'S LICENSE NUMBER DISCLOSED THAT THE LICENSE HELD AT THE TIME OF RECEIVING BIOS WAS FOR BUILDING CONTRACTING ONLY. WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED BY MR. YODER THAT HE EXPECTS TO SECURE THE ISSUANCE OF A PROPER CONTRACTING LICENSE WITHIN 2 WEEKS. INASMUCH AS THE QUALIFICATIONS OF THE FIRM FOR PERFORMING WORK OF THIS TYPE ARE NOT IN QUESTION, IT IS FELT THAT DEFERRAL OF AWARD UNTIL THE LICENSE oM,A.TTER IS RESOLVED WOULD BE IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY. THE YODER BID IS $3,847.95 (7.6{xm) LESS THAN THE SECOND LOW BID, AND IS 14.4% LESS THAN THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF $59,000. THE AMOUNT BUDGETED FOR THE PROJECT a SUBJI• IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 55TH STREET AND ORANGE STREET PAGE 2 IN ACCOUNT N0. 19- 3356 -o37 Is $6o,000. DEFERRAL OF AWARD WILL NOT RESULT IN ANY SCHEDULING PROBLEMS INSOFAR AS THE DATE OF COMPLETION OF THE WORK IS CONCERNED. )P:BLIC PH EVL IN WORKS DIRECTOR BBN:NAJ J �� G • Old A :� Iw ^ ed • 1 _ Y1. C) O A Ph ti P DO q °a° Rl 75 IE r 4 V _ I• 4LUG0NQ m C-- a � � • � . I nt 1 8 Ts p i wQC ur 5A V, d w�75 Ark 16 o � CA a y4 d v C QQQ 4o 4 � f � i 1•y �N I �F 0 8 M A M x ' T m SEPTEMBER 26, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL U�- 1O FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE RECOMMENDATIONS: APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS- 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED AT 60:00 A.M. ON OCTOBER 18, 1966. DISCUSSION; THIS PROJECT WILL PROVIDE FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF THE SECTION OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM A POINT JUST WESTERLY OF 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE. THIS SECTION OF 3T REET IS ESSENTIALLY ONE LANE AT THE PRESENT TIME. IT WILL BE WIDENED TO PROVIDE TWO TRAVEL LANES PLUS A PARKING LANE. CURBS AND DRAINAGE FACILITIES WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. ORANGE AVENUE WILL BE WIDENED AND RESTRIPED TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL TRAVEL LANE BETWEEN SEASHORE DRIVE AND COAST HIGHWAY. THE ROADWAY WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AROUND THE MAJOR ENCROACHMENTS BETWEEN WALNUT STREET AND COLTON STREET. IN THIS AREA PARKING WILL BE RESTRICTED, PER - MAMENT BARRICADES 'LACED AND TRAFFIC WILL BE ROUTED AROUND THE ENCROACHMENTS. ACCESS TO AND FROM SEASHORE AT LU+80NIA WILL BE PROHIBITED AS A SAFETY MEASURE DUE TO THE EXTREMELY POOR SIGHT DISTANCE WHICH WILL PREVAIL AT THE INTERSECTION. CURB WILL BE STOPPED AT THE EDGE OF THE PROPERTY WITH MAJOR ENCROACHMENTS. WHEN THE ENCROACHMENTS ARE REMOVED THE REMAINING CURB AND PAVEMENT WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. MINOR ENCROACHMENTS WILL BE REMOVED AS NECESSARY TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION TO PROCEED. THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE PROJECT IS: CONSTRUCTION 57,000 ENGINEERING 61,500 FIELD ENGINEERING 24500 ,000 UI\ ;tf �-r iP SITION:I � join A.M SUBJ: IMPROVEMENT OF SEASHORE-DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE PAGE 2 FUMDIN& WILL BE AS FOLLOWS: ESTIMATED EXPENDITURE BUDGETED SECTION 186.1 GAS TAX 53,OOO 60,000 WATER FUND 9,000 90000 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATING BUDGET (INSPECTION) 2 000 2 000 $64,'000 $71, WATER FUNDS WILL BE USED TO PROVIDE 6" WATER MAIN CONNECTIONS FOR FUTURE EXPANSION AND TO RELOCATE WATER VALVES AND FIRE HYDRANTS. SUFFICIENT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT AND BETTERMENT PROGRAM. (BUDGET NUMBER' 50 °9297 -041) INSPECTION WILL BE PROVIDED AS A ROUTINE OPERATING EXPENSE OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE REMAINDER OF THE PROJECT WILL BE FINANCED FROM GAS TAX FUNDS. THE ESTIMATED DATE OF COMPLETION IS DECEMBER 152 1966. EPH . DEVLIN LIC R S DIRECTOR :NAJ u C- roc.cP STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Gonroor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 P. O. BOX 2301, LOS ANGELES 9NU MA 0 -3700 August 25, 1966 07- Ora- 0-NptB SS Project 56 Section 186.1 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: The construction drawings and other information forwarded with your letter of August 16, 1966,relative to the improvement of Seashore Drive, have been reviewed, and your proposal is satisfactory. We understand that a delay in removing existing im- provements has occurred and you plan to route traffic around the obstruction in the vicinity of Lugonia Street by eliminating parking and utilizing the roadway to pro- vide one 10 -foot and one 112 -foot traffic lanes. The modification of geometric section is temporary, and the City will construct the full roadway section as soon as the right of way can be cleared. Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer By aJjX _ A. A. SMITH Assistant District Engineer RECEIVED SEP 011966 ?08LjC WORKS DEPT. i" t AUGUST 16, 1966 Hit, A. C. DIRNIE DIVISION Or HIGHWAYS P. 0. Box 2304, TERMINAL LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA' ATTENTIONt MR. A. A. SMITH SUBJECTI SELECT SYSTEM PROJECT #% - SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE DEAR SIRt TWO SETS OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR THE SUBJECT PROJECT WERE SUBMITTED TO YOU FOR REVIEW WITH OUR LETTER OF.MAY 27, 1966. WE INDICATED CONSTRUCTION WOULD PROBABLY START IN OCTOBER. THIS SCHEDULE WAS PREDICATED ON THE ASSUMPTION THAT SOW MAJOR ENCROACH - MCUTS WITHIN THE RIOMT Or WAY WOULD BE REMOVED BY THE PRIVATE OWNERS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AT THIS TIME IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THE ENCROACHMENTS WILL BE REMOVED BY OCTOBER. NEVERTM6LESS, THE PROJECT IS CONSIDERED URGENT ENOUGH THAT WE AMC PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUC- TION. THE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE BUILT AROUND THE ENCROACH- MENTS; CURB WILL BE INSTALLED TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES AND PAVING WILL BE PLACED UP TO AND AROUND THE ENCROACHMENTS. TRAFFIC WILL BE ROUTED AROUND THE ENCROACHMENTS BY ELIMINATING PARKING AND SHIFTING THE TRAVEL LANES TO THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF THE STREET. ONCE THE ENCROACHMENTS ARC REMOVED, THE RC14AINING SECTIONS OF ROADWAY AND CURD WILL BE CONSTRUCTED. DRAINAGE WILL NOT BE AFFECTED. A REVISED FORM CU -3 SNOWING THE ENCROACHMENTS AND THE PROPOSED ROUTING OF TRAFFIC IS ATTACHED FOR YOUR INFORMATION. PLEASE REVIEW THE PRO- POSAL AND RETURN YOUR APPROVAL AND/OR COMMENTS. IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION is R6OUIREO, PLEASE CONTACT HE AT YOUR CONVEHIEHCE. VERY TRULY YOURS, HUNTER T. COOK PROJECTS EMOINEER HTC7vR ENCLI 2 COPIES FORM CU -3 j;-r i' Form CU -3 COLLIER -M* LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DE0OPMENT ACT PROJECT STATEMENT OR REQUEST FOR DEVIATION AUTHORIZATION State of California Project No. 56 Department of Public Works Division of Highways From: City P County ❑ of (Through District Engineer) NEVPORT BEACH Date : 8/t5/66 Your concurrence or approval is requted in the use of 1.04¢ funds or re- ceipt of matching credit for the following project which: ❑ is designed in accordance with approved standards. W nvolves a deviation from approved standards. s designed to meet approved standards.through "stage construction." DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road SEASHORE DRIVE Termini WALNUT STREET TO COLTON STREET Length 0.08 Miles.' The proposed work consists of: ® Gradin ❑ Bridge ❑ Signals D Curbs • Prel. Engr. ❑ Constr. Engr. ❑Paving U R/W O Lighting ❑ Drainage • Landscaping ❑ Other (explain) and will be performed by: 0 Day Labor Wcontract D Subdivider O other (explain) under the direction of: ® City O County O State ❑ (other-explain) TRAFFIC ADT upon completion NA DESIGN ADT NA (Est. tota in all anes O 10 years after completion ❑ 20 years after completion) GEOMETRIC SECTION VARIES - SEE ATTACHED SKETCH STRUCTURAL SECTION Traffic Index NA Note: Explain rea- Thickness and Type sons fo lg&s than Surfacing standards widths and g thicknesses, special Base construction features, Subbase ltWhoske chesei ide. necessary. Existing Proposed Ultimate R -Value NA ❑ Other Method(see note) Existing LEFT SIDE MEDIAN ma e RIGHT SIDE �, Ii � R/W NOT APPLICABLE Lane Lane o Q) a) .2 �, s Width o p Width q >4 P O ti.a o cav 4� ca Wa) o ca3oW I,10 ro a c aro �� U 0 id r_1 -H, 4� r 1 a) U) a) 0 'd bD a) 3 bO ro a) by d ro y, d p O N •rl x z O ro a) a) o •ri a) N ro O O •rl cd 3-3 m s, rl r. i r i ro ri •ri 3 ro H •ri •ri 9 U) $ r i C f. 4 ro 0 x rn rn ro •.a a3 •r-I 'd 0 x cn ro x 0 -P fl •d +-1 ai P. f~ +� ro rn _P m ro 4 id La d-) ro s+ r-1 ro O d r4 d rl c O c c H �5 .c O cd 0 •rl :.c +i (4 P. 0 O F I H P H z O Pi 0 a W H� c) w � -- - - - I 0 121 8 STRUCTURAL SECTION Traffic Index NA Note: Explain rea- Thickness and Type sons fo lg&s than Surfacing standards widths and g thicknesses, special Base construction features, Subbase ltWhoske chesei ide. necessary. Existing Proposed Ultimate R -Value NA ❑ Other Method(see note) Existing Propose ma e NOT APPLICABLE Q. z. o� La LA - lk LA r y I Ln o Ld Ld L STATE OF CALD'OAo DEPAITMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS No._7_66 =.a -__7_6 .6134 DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS ENCROACHMENT PERMIT To City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attn: B.B. Nolan, City Engineer H. Cook, Project Engineer Permittee J eles �$___�_______________ California September 27 19__6_6 In compliance with your request of --------- ___MaY__2Z______ ------------ _ ------------- 19_66__ and subject to all the terms, conditions and restrictions written below or printed as general or special provisions on any part of this form PEKIKISSIONISHEREBYGKANTEDTo perform the following work within the Div- ision of Highways' right of way, on the south side of Coast Highway, 07 -Ora -001- 20.9 -21.7, and within the Route 001 Freeway right of way (located between Coast Highway and Seashore Drive), between Orange and 56th Streets: A. To install and maintain a 21" diameter R.C.P. 1350 D min. storm drain, catch basin and junction manhole as per Drawings #R- 5059 -S, Sheets 5 and 7 of 7 Sheets and grade to drain as necessary and to the satisfaction of the Division of Highways' Representative. B. Relocate and install traffic signal detector, as per attached Traffic Signal Modification Plan, approved 2/66. C. Re- stripe Orange Street as per attached Striping Sketch, dated 1/25/66. D. Construct a temporary detour and temporarily store equipment and materials on the Rte 001 Freeway right of way. It is understood that n ingress or egress from or onto Pacific Coast Highway.throuah the detour The above -noted work shall be performed subject to the following special terms and conditions: (Continued on page 2) This permit is to be strictly construed- and no work other than that sbecifically mentioned above is authorized hereby. This permit shall be void unless the work herein contemplated shall have been completed before ----- December --28 ------------------------ 19 --- 66 07 -Ora -001- 20.9 -21.7 RJ:cy cc: JCW Robertson Hedrick Huseby Hewes L.R. Smith Substr.Dept. A. �' - HOCH __-" : E .r By - -� -Per - ---- - - - - -- -- Robert Jo `t �: DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. Definition. This permit is issued under Chapter 3 of Division 1 of the Street, and Highways Code. The term encroach. men[ is used in this permit as defined in the said Chapter 3 of said code. Except as otherwise provided for public agencies and franebi,a holders, this permit is revucible on five days notice, 2. Acceptance of Provisions. It is understood and agreed by the Permitta that the doing of any work under this permit shall constitute an acceptance of the provisions. 3. No Precedent Eitablisbed. This permit is granted with the understanding that this action is not to be considered as establishing any precedence on the question of the expediency of permitting any certain kind of encroachment to be erected within right Of way of State highways. 4. Notice Prior to Starting Work. Before starting work on which an inspector is required, or whenever stated on the face of this permit, the Permittee shall notify the District Engineer or other designated employee of the district in which the work is to be done. Such notice shall be given as least three days in advance of the date work is to begin. f. Keep Permit on the Work. This permit shall be kept at the site of the work and must be shown to any representative of the Grantor or any law.enfofecment officer on demand. 6. Permits from Other Agencies. The party or parties to whom this permit is issued shall, whenever the same is required by law, secure the written order or consent to any work hereunder from the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California, or any other public board having jurisdiction, and this permit shall be suspended in opericion unlem and until such order or consent is obtained. 7. Protection of Traffic- Adequate provision shall be made for the protection of•the traveling public. Barncada sball be placed with red lights at night, also flagmen employed, all as may be required by the particular work in progress. 8. Minimum Interference With Traffic. All work shall be planned and carried out so this there will'be the least possible inconvenience to the traveling public except for the specific work permitted. 9. Storage of Material. No material shall be stored within eight (8) feet from the edge of pavement or traveled way or within the shoulder line where the shoulders are wider than eight feet, 30. Clean Up Right of Way. Upon completion of the work, ales brush, timber, script and material shall be entirely removed and the right of way left in as presentable condition as before work started, 11. Standards of Construction. All work shall conform to recognized standards of construction. 12. Supervision of Grantor. All the work shall be done subject to the supervision of, and to the satisfaction of, the grantor. 13. Future Moving of Installation. It is understood by the Permittee that whenever construction, reconstruction or maintenance work on the highway may require, the installation provided for herein shall, upon request of the Grantor, be immediately moved by, and at the.sole expense of, the.Permittee. 14. Expense of Inspection. On work which requites the presence of an employee of the Grantor as inspector, the salary, travel- , mg expense and other incidental expense of such inspection during the work shall be paid by the Permitta upon presentation of a bill therefor. Is. Dalnht} for Damages, The Permittee is responsible for all liability for personal injury or property damage which may.arise out of. work herein permitted, or which may arise out of failure on the Permitter's part to perform his obligations under this permit in respect to maintenance. in the event any claim of such liability is made against the State of California, or any departments officer, or employee thereof, Permittee shall defend, indemnify and hold them and each of them harmless from such claim. This permit shall not be effective for any purpose unless and until the above named Permittee files with the Grantor, a surety bond in the form and amount required by said Grantor, unless specifically exempted on the face hereof. The requirement that a bond be filed does not apply in the event the Pernittee is a governmental board which derives its revenue by taxation. 16. Making Repairs. If the Grantor shall so elect, repairs to paving which has been disturbed shall be made by employees of the Grantor and the expenses thereof shalt be borne by the Permittee, who shall purchase and deliver on the road the.materials necessary for said work as directed by the Grantor. All payments to laborers, inspectors, etc., employed by said Grantor for or on account of the work herein contemplated, shall be made by said Permittee forthwith on receipt of written orders, pay stills of vouchers approved by Grantor. Or the Grantor may elect to require a deposit before starting repairs, in an amount sufficient to cover the estimated cost thereof. The Grantor. will give reasonable notice of its election to make such repairs. If the Grantor does not so elect, thePennittee shall make such repairs promptly£In every case the Permittee shall be responsible for restoring any portion of the highway which .has been excavated or otherwise disturbed to its former condirion as nearly as may be possible except where the Grantor elects to make repairs to paving as above provided in this paragraph and except where provision to the contrary is made in the typewritten portion of the permit. 17. Care of Drainage. If the work herein contemplated shall interfere with the established drainage, ample provision shall be made by the Permittee to provide for it as may be directed by the Grantor. 18. Submit Location Plan. Upon completion of underground or surface work of consequence, the Permittee shall furnish plan to the Grantor's District Office showing location and details. 19. Maintenance. The Permittee agrees by the acceptance of this permit to exercise reasonable care to maintain properly any encroachment 'placed by it in the highway and to exercise reasonable care in inspecting for and immediately repairing and making good any injury to any portion of the highway which occurs as a result of the maintenance of the encroachment in the highway or as a .result of the work done under this permit, including any and all injury to the highway which would not have occurred had such work or been done or such encroachment con-placed therein. .. PIPES, CONDUITS, GAS PUMPS, ETC. 20. Crossing Roadway. Service and other small diameter pipes shall be jacked or otherwise forced underneath pavement without disturbing same. Pavement or roadway shall not be cut unless specifically permitted os the face hereof. Service pupa will not be permitted inside of metal culvert pipes used as drainage structure, be specified. 21. Limit Ezaavation. No excavation is to be made closer than eight (8) fen from the edge of the pavement except as may 12. Tunneling. No tunneling will be permitted except on major work as may be specifically sn forth on the face hereof. 23. Depth of Pipes. There shall he a minimum of two (2) fen of cover over all pipa or conduits. ' 24. Backfilling. All backfilling is to be moistened as necessary and thoroughly hand tamped, there being not ]as than one tamper to each shoveler. Whenever required by the grantor, a trench crossing the roadway shall be backfilled with gravel or crushed rock. 25. Preserve Surfacing Material. Whenever a gravel or crushed rock surface is trenched; such material shall be placed at one side and when backfilling is started the rock material shall be replaced to its original position. 26. Maintain Surface. The Permittee shall maintain the surface over structures placed hereunder as long as necessary. 27. Pipes Along Roadway. Pspn and utilities paralleling the pavement shall be located at the distance from traveled way and at such depth as specifically directed on the face hereof;- Cutting of era more will not be permitted. , . Page 2 41 City of Newport Beach 07 -Ora -001- 20.9/21.7 766 -E- 766134 September 27, 1966 (1) All existing traffic lanes in each direction along the State Highway shall be open to traffic at all times. (2) Backfill material shall attain a sand equivalent value of 30 as determined by California 217F Method and shall becom- pacted to a minimum relative compaction of 95 percent using the California Method 216F. (3) By acceptance of this permit, the Permittee agrees to pay all laboratory costs in connection with the necessary tests as may be required by the Division of Highways' Engineer to determine the sand equivalent value of the backfill material and the trench back- fill compaction. It is further understood that the frequency of such tests shall not exceed one test per 1500 feet of trench at elevations of not less than every 2 feet of backfill depth. Prior to starting the trench backfill, the Permittee shall make the necessary arrangments twith the Division of Highways' laboratory or a private materials testing laboratory to conduct these tests. (4) The Permittee shall be responsible for any temporary wiring necessary to keep signals in effective operation during the modi- fication work. (5) As a condition of this permit the City shall provide "NO PARKING" restrictions along the east side of the south leg and the west side of the north leg of Orange Street. This permit shall be kept at the site of the work and must be shown to any representative of the Grantor or any law enforcement officer on demand. Should the Division of Highways' Representative find work in progress prior to his notification, he shall stop said work for a period not less than the remainder of that working day. Should there be any discrepancy between the terms of this permit and the plans attached hereto, the terms of the permit shall prevail. Special attention is directed to General Provisions 2, 3, 5 & 6 printed on this form. The attached Substructure, Roadside Improvement and Signal Sheets are part of this permit. -------------------------------------------------- -- ------------- - - - - -- r' SPECIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS (SUBSTRUCTURES) TO BE ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF ENCROACHMENT PERMIT N0. 766 -E- 766134 A. - Inspection Requirements 1 - It is imperative least 48 hours prior Inspector Mr. E. N that the Permittee notify the State Inspector at to starting any work under this permit. State Huseby phone 714 -542 -4739 between a.m. ONLY or if no answer phone --- - - - - -- 2 - All inspection costs incurred incidental to this work shall be borne by the Permittee, unless otherwise specified on the face of the permit. 3 - All work shall be performed within the hours designated by the Division of Highways. B - Specifications Unless otherwise detailed and authorized on the face of this permit all work shall be done in accordance with the Division of Highways' Standard Specifications dated July, 1964, to the satisfaction of the Division of Highways representative and the following special provisions: 1 - SAFETY AND TRAFFIC CONTROL: A minimurm ofSeePermit lanes shall be provided for traffic in each direction. In a on, minimum clearances of two feet ad)acent to any surface obstruction and a five -foot clearance between the excavation and the traveled way, shall be maintained. Provision shall be made for barricades, lights, and flagmen to adequately protect the traveling public during construction operations. When necessary for public safety, flagmen shall be on duty 24 (twenty - four) hours a day at no expense to the State. When the permit authorizes installation by the open -cut method, not more than one lane of the highway pavement shall be open -cut at any one time After the pipe is placed in the open section, the trench is to be back - filled, in accordance with Specifications, permanent repairs made to the surfacing and that portion opened to traffic before the pavement is cut for the next section. 2 - CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: Unless otherwise authorized pipes and conduits shall be installed in a manner to provide at least a minimum clearance of 42 inches between the top of pipe and surface. Except in cases where the ,perimeter of pavement removal will be less than 30 feet, P.C.C. pavement shall be scored to a depth of 12 inches by means of a concrete saw to provide a neat and straight pavement break along both sides of trench also, provide an unfractured pavement joint and rigid bonding of pavement replacement patch. A.C. pavement shall be scored as per R.C.C. pavement except where in the opinion of the State Inspector the pavement has boen cut neat and straight along both sides of trench to provide an unfractured and level pavement joint for bonding existing pavement and replacement patch. (OVER) Repairs to P.C.C. pavement shall be made of Portland Cement concrete containing a minimum of 7 sacks of cement per cubic yard. Replacement of P.C.C.. pavement shall equal existing pavement thickness. The concrete shall be satisfactorily cured and protected from disturbance for not less than 48 hours. High early cement may be required at the discretion of the Division of Highways'. representative. Repairs to A.C. pavements shall be made with asphaltic c6ncre'te' meeting State specifications, with every effort made to match the existing pavement as to color and surface texture. Replacements of A.C. pavement shall equal existing pavement thickness but not less than 3 ". Rock base will be required. Structure backfill within the roadbed area shall be compacted in horizontal layers not exceeding 8 inches in thickness, using approved hand, pneumatic or mechanical type tampers, to obtain a "relative compaction" of 95 percent using California Test Method 216F. Structure backfill outside of slope lines and not beneath any roadbed shall be compacted to a relative compaction of 90 percent. Backfill material shall have a "Sand Equivalent" value of not less than 30, as determined by the California Test Method 217F, if the excavation falls within the existing or proposed roadbed. In such areas consolidation by ponding and jetting will be permitted when, as determined by the engineer, the backfill material is of such character that it will be self draining when compacted and that foundation materials will not soften or be otherwise damaged by the applied water and no damage from hydrostatic pressure will result. Ponding and jetting of the upper 4 feet below finished grade is is not permitted. hen ponding and jetting is permitted, material for use as structure backfill shall be placed and compacted in layers not exceeding 4 feet in thickness. Ponding and jetting methods shall be supplemented by the use of vibratory or other compaction equipment when necessary to obtain the re- quired compaction. Repairs to asphalt shoulders shall be made with SC -800 Asphalt Plant Mix Surfacing . (See second paragraph, third and fourth line) Concrete sidewalks or curbs shall be cut to the nearest score marks and replaced equal in dimensions to that removed, with score marks matching existing score marks. When installation is to be made by boring or jacking under the traveled way, excavations on either side of the road shall be sufficiently distant from the edge of pavement to insure pavement stability and minimum obstruction to traffic as determined by the Division of Highways' representative. If considered necessary by the Division of Highways' representative, the permittee shall, at his expense, pressure grout from within the casing and /or from the top of pavement, the area between the pavement and the casing, in order to fill any voids caused by the work as covered under this permit. Service connections must be installed at an angle of 90 degrees from the centerline of the State Highway which the main line traverses. Form VII -SS -Rev. 8 -22 -66 . j SPECIAL PROVISIONS (Roadside Improvements) S . TO BE ATTACHED TO AND MADE A PART OF PERMIT NO. 766 H- 7661 4. I. INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS It is imperative that the permittee notify the following. State Inspector at least 48 hours prior to starting any work under this permit. State Inspector: Mr. S. N. Huseb ` phone 714-542-47'1 between a.m..an :OOa.m�or if no answer phone - - - - - -- between-M.00 and 4:00 _ P.PC. All inspection costs incurred incidental to this work shall be borne by the permittee. II CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS Unless otherwise detailed and authorized on the face of this permit, all work shall be done in accordance with the Division of Highways Standard Specifications dated July 1964, and the following special provisions: (Only items pertaining to the applicable construction work will apply.) A. Sidewalk shall be constructed with Class "A" Portland Cement Con- cre a tb ree (3) inches in depth except at residential and com- mercial driveways where four (4) inch and six 6) inch depths respectively, will be required. (For three (3) inch depths, a standard 2" x 4" header board will be required.) Back edge of sidewalk shall be placed on the right -of -way line. The finished grade of sidewalk shall have a cross fall of 1/4 inch per foot. Concrete shall be scored in accordance with the Standard Spec ifiegtioris or so-that scoring will *match adjoining. existing concrete. B. Concrete curbs and gutters shall be constructed gracles or, in con ormance with existing curb fo: grade. (State Standard type curb and gutter is and alignment of portions of curb- returns lying Division of Highways right of way the city or county involved. to authorized plan alignment and required.) Grade outside the approval of the Prior to the construction of new curbs, the permittee shall relocate surface obstructions (such as utility poles, trees, etc.) to locations back of the proposed curb, also continuation of curb line within the following limits: Fifty (50) feet back from beginning of curb construction and one hundred and fifty (150) feet beyond the end of curb construction for safe traffic movement. Removal or relocation of surface obstructions shall be done without expense to the State. C. Sections of existing concrete curbs and sidewalks to be removed shall be cut on tHe nearest score mars beyond the limits of re- moval. This concrete shall be removed to full depth and disposed of outside the Division of Highways right of way. Unless a neat cut is made without damage to remaining concrete, additional con- crete shall be removed to the next score line, using a concrete saw if considered necessary by.the State Inspector. (OVER) 9 r D. (1) Concrete driveways shall be constructed in accordance with 4 the FtYa-c-F-eU Regulations for Standard Driveways. (2) Concrete driveway shall be�" .ated to provide not less than 2 fee o ufheignt curb be n permittee's property line and driveway. In those cases where the lot line does not intersect the highway right -of -way line at 90', the extension of the pro- perty line within the Division of Highways' right :of way for purposes of determining driveway locations, sha13 be on a line at right angles to the curb or edge of traveled way and passing through permittee's lot corner. E. Temporary driveways when authorized shall be constructed with Asphalt s" u� i goo a depth of not less than three (3) inches. The edge of driveway shall be not less than five (5) feet from permittee's side property line when curbs are not constructed. Driveways shall be constructed at right angles to and shall join existing surfacing. Radius of flared sections placed between edges of pavement and driveway shall not exceed ten (10) feet, unless a larger radius is authorized on face of permit. Finished grade of surfacing placed between traveled way and curb shall conform to existing shoulder grade. This construction shall not interfere with the existing drainage in any way. The permittee understands and agrees that asphalt- concrete surface driveways are temporary; at such time as concrete sidewalks are constructed, asphalt- concrete surface driveways shall be replaced with standard driveways of Portland Cement Concrete. F. Roof drains, when authorized, must be restricted in use for the exc u— -sFve purpose of draining rain water from the roof of permittee's building and /or paved parking lot. Roof drains if used for any other purpose, such as draining waste water or domestic supply water onto the highway, will be summarily plugged at curb face outlet by State forces. F Removal and replacement of concrete curb and sidewalk sections for the installation of roof drains shall be done in accordance with F provisions of Paragraph "C" above. G. Roadside landscaping, when authorized, shall conform with require- ments given -on--t Neace of the permit and /or the State's Landscaping Regulations. Form S.P.R.I. - Rev. 3 2/3/� 9. SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. 766 -E- 766134 HIGHWAY FACILITIES: THE PERMITTEE SHALL NOTIFY THE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS' SIGNAL LABORATORY AT 213 - 723-1373, AT LEAST 72 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY EXCAVATION WITHIN 500' OF A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION OR IN THE VICINITY OF STATE LIGHTING FACILITIES. THE PERMITTEE AND /OR HIS CONTRACTOR ASSUME THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PAYMENT OF ALL COSTS INCURRED BY THE STATE IN REPAIRING FACILITIES DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION. REQUESTS FOR RELOCATION OF FACILITIES FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S CONVENIENCE MUST BE MADE IN WRITING WITH THE CONTRACTOR ASSUMING COSTS, VII -EP- SIG -100 Rev. 10 -29-64 108 -2000 C -1066 See Contract File for Traffic Signal Modification Plan Pacific Coast Highway at Orange Street ,.... _�:" ., , . �r �.'. �. _d x..:... �.�3. ..c•.;x . �.a,��� .. __ �.. < �.,. _::_s . N z�, � a,�.c._ x:U.�.a ... _ . �. _ ,.. f POLES, WIRES, CABLES AND OVERHEAD STRUCTURES P e 28. Location Pole Lines, etc. Pole lines shall be located one fast from the property line unless otherwise specified on the fa$yhereof. 29. Public Utilities Commission Orders. All clearance and type of construction shall be in accordance with the applicable order of the Public Utilities Commission of the Staff of California. 30. Permission from Property Owners. Whenever noessury to secure permission from abutting property owners, such authority must be secured by the permitter prior to starting work. 31. Clearance of Treat. Polo most be of such height u to permit clearance over a tree 40 fee in height, where quick growing tree are in place. At locations where slow growing rr= are in place, normal comouction standard may be followed at the option of the pole line company, with provision to ultimately clear a 40 -foot tree. 31. Guy Wires. No guy wires are to be attached m treat inept on specific authority and is no event shall they be an attached as to girdle the tree or interfere with its growth. Guy wires shall be kept at a minimum elevation of ti: feat above the ground whenever so directed. 33. Clearing Around Poles. The Permitter shall remove and keep clot all vegetation from within a radius of at Issue five fat of the polo. . 34. Painting or Visibility Strips. All polo are to be painted for a distance of six feet above the ground using white lead and oil or aluminum paint or in lieu thereof, when Rola have erewoted hum, wood, metal or other approved type of visibility strips may be placed. Wood strips are to be Douglas fir in is 3 —3' long placed on 6" centers about the ban of pok and painted with white lad and oil or aluminum paint. If metal strips an used such strips may be placed either vertically or horizontally. Paint is to be renewed u often as may be required to maintain a satisfactory covering. If not painted when installed or renewed as the grantor may consider necessary, the tight is reserved to have this painting done and the Permitter hereby age= ro bear the cat thereof under the terms of this permit. Pole, she, do use p.as • pa ild. tra6e harerd ill be gives aaaddr %'. foe ones is true thou apes .ritun ssqumt of Pe..kne seeomp.Wed by pertinent data a a pok location, dideaeaoe in deveda, ate. The arsatw's deddaa will be goal io this rysrd. 35. Remosw• Old Poles, Guys aced Stubs. The entire length of such timbers shall be removed from the grouud and the holes backfilled and thoroughly tamped. PLANTING TREES 36. Location and Species. The location and kind of trees to be planted shall be specified on the face of this permit. 37. Planting and Maintenance Cost. The Permitter must bear the cost of planting the trees. The arrangement as to maintenance of the trees shall be specifically set forth on the face of the permit. In particular cases arrangements may be made for the Grantor to do this work upon deposit of a certain sum for each tree which is to be planted. The Grantor reserves the right to assume the maintenance or to decline to do so as conditions justify. 38. Group Planting. The cost of group plantings and similar special work which may be agreed upon with the Grantor shall be borne by the Permittee. Land-for such plantings shall be secured in fee by the Permitter and turned over to the State. Plantings for parking and picnic grounds will not be considered in this connection. REMOVAL OR TRIMMING OF ROADSIDE TREES 39. Removal of Trees. When permit is granted fee removal of a true u an independent operation or u a part of other work, the entire stump shall be taken out for a depth of at lent two f= blow the ground surface. - 40. Clearing the Site. All timber and debris shall be removed from the right of way. The hole left by the stump shall be backflled and thoroughly tamped and the site left in a presentable condition. 41. Trimming of Trees. In general, only light trimming of branches two inches or less in diameter will be permitted and only when specifically so stated on the face hereof. The shapeliness of the tree must be preserved. 42. Inspection. If the permit requires inspection by the Grantor during progress of the work the cost of inspection shall be borne by the Permitter. No charge will be made for occasional routine inspection. Road Approaches, Connecting Pavements and Minor Work 43. Grades and Spedpratfons. Grades and types of co ntructioo shall be as detailed by plane or stated em the face of this permit. 44. Borrow and Wage. Only such borrow and watt wig be permitted and within the limits as see forth on the face of this permit. 43. Minor Work. Grading down of small banks, small ditches, plating of awnings, and other similar minor weak shall be governed by the general provisions and m detailed co the face hereof. Signs 46. Clemanare of Sigar. The minimum clearance from the sidewalk shall be twelve fat. Railroad Crossings 47. Safety and Csnvenienre. The for= safety and conveuienee of the traveling public shall be given every consideration in the location and type of construction. 48. Meet Highway Grade. The grade and superelevation of the track most conform to the grade of the highway at point of crossing. 49. Width of Paving. The crossing shall be planked or paved u may be specified on the face of this permit fee the full roadway and shoulder widrh. Nov. ma..1.1. r -ea .. A vo STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT,6F PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 7 P. O. BOX M04, LOS ANGELES 90054 MA 0 -3700 June 22, 1966 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport 3300 W. Newport Newport Beach, Dear Sir: Beach Boulevard California EDMUND G. BROWN, Govwwr 07- Ora- 0-NptB SS Project 56 Section 186.1 In response to your request, the plans for SS Pro- ject 56 were superficially reviewed, and the following are our comments. Our determination of eligible items of work.is usually accomplished by reviewing a listing of contract items. However, in this case, we have reviewed the plans and the work indicated appears to be eligible, subject to the following exceptions. 1. The six -inch water main connection and other work involving the domestic water supply would be in- eligible. 2. The eligibility of base and surfacing at the intersection with non - select system streets will be limited to the width of the right of way of Sea Shore Drive and Orange Avenue, unless it can be shown that the additional paving is necessary to correct drainage or vertical alignment difficulties. 3. The geometric section for Orange Avenue pro- vides for a 36 -foot width. In order to be eligible, parking must be prohibited on at least one side of the street and the street striped and posted accordingly. The 21 -inch R.C.P. and inlet struftture ap�ep C �s�7�� percent eligible. R E Very truly youSW 21. r96 A. C. BIRNIE Deputy D�_s IB"U%Q5nW�er By Ili - ,yrL�"' A. A. SMITH Assistant Distriel Engineer -w � t CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. NEWPORT BOULEVARD DATEy� 1w6�______ To: Divial M or NIewMTS ""� 27, 19" Ptw1Ts St4T /D/I PAO em 2.09 TtlwlMU AM19X lDS A069Lts ;A• CAL a rmst A ATTENTION: RMgltr JMOM SUBJECT: StAa"m DDIYt hommiKalm WE ARE TRANSMITTING THE FOLLOWING: N0. COPIES DESCRIPTION 2 EWIIIII SNa PtFAIT AMLItAT11N 5 CO ftAWI MS 0"".. SMttfi 5 i 7 REMARKS: rammmD r011 Taw mmmAL* COPIES TO: BY: 0 0 No Applicant will a.t All 0 Application for Encroachment Permit Date MAY 27r 1966 TO the DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS Gentlemen: The undersigned hereby applies for permission to excavate, construct and /or otherwise encroach on State Highway right of way by performing the following work: }. CONSTRUCT JUNCTION MANHOLE TO CONNECT WITH SOUTHERLY END OP EXISTING Applic..t will deeetibe hve fall, has he wubm on do wing tevvm aide as es.n ahvta if ,,.•..,vy 211e DRAINAGE CULVERT Br HEATH COAST HWY AS sNOYN OM ATTA[NrD QE T DRAW INCA *►MQ-a3>, SNrrrn 5 L 7. Z REtrl rise nClEerngt anAyGrurNT GN QuAMGr AyratUr LEG Or SIGNAL ® PCH ► ORANGE INTERSECTION PER DETAILS ON SNEET S. �. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY DETOUR AND TEMPORARILY STORE MATERIALS AND • 1 EOUIPMEMT IN AREA BOUNDED BY PCHO $ ASNO r DR.10 ORANGE Ave, Amp 55TH SPACE FOR SKETCH, SUBMIT DETAILED PLANS IF AVAILABLE ST. EXTENDED. No INGRESS oR EGREBS PROM OR ONTO PCH THROUGH THIS AREA WILL BE PERMITTED. on the State Highway in the county of ORANGE 07e.M -(*1- 20.9.21.7 Applicant will ante bem ....tei, the bassi.. of the work which he desires to do, giving dm Snte Highway rovoe, section and eosin se's stations, if passible and agrees to do the work in accordance with your rules and regulations and subject to your inspection and approval. CITY nr Ng +RORT Br ArN ' l��w will print or type nae // a Sign.t. of applicant �aT�oRT�anILEr�RD lkwrm kamp Cn.tromu Permit iuued Past ofiee addrw FORM P -t REV. Nora: This form must be signed by Applicant or Authorized Agent ..v. aa... aeee. a -.g W. "nlv, unl. OF NEWPO T BEACH . OF PUBLIC WORKS NEWPORT BLVD. DRT BEACH, CALIF. DEAR MR. DUNNIGAN: a NEWPORT BEACH, MAY 25,1966 I HAVE ENCLOSED A LETTER OF AGREEMENT CONFIRMING OUR DISCUSSION OF MARCH 18 1966 REGARDING THE SEASHORE DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT. IT WAS AGREED THAT NO PERMANENT REPAVING WOULD BE REQUIRED OF THE TELE- PHONE COMPANY IN THE TENTATIVE BURIED PORTION OF THE RELOCATION, THIS IS BECAUSE OF THE PROXIMAL LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED TRENCH WITH THE SUBSEQUENT CURB LINE. IT WOULD BE APPRECIATED IF YOU WOULD SIGN THE ORIGINAL OF THE LETTER AND RETURN IT TO THIS OFFICE SO THAT I MAY ASSOCIATE IT WITH OUR FILE. THE DUPLICATE IS FOR YOUR RECORDS. THANK YOU. ENCLOSURE WT /AM AVM 1.1 � YOURS TRULY, WAYNE OSCAS ENGINEER RECEIVED VAY 26 m TA 1/ 0 e THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE COMPANY 311 EAST BALBOA BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA op CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC. WORKS 3300 "NEWPORT BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. MAY 251 1966 IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC TELEPHONE THAT PERMANENT REPAVING OF TRENCHfNG ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLACING OF TELEPHONE FACILITIES UNDERGROUND ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 56TH STREET AND 61ST STREET SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED OF THE TELEPHONE COMPANY. THIS WORK IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH RELOCATION REQUIRED FOR THE SEASHORE DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT. A DETAILED PLAN IS ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UNDER PERMIT NUMBER 522. YOURS TRULY, BY DATE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS 3300 NEWPORT BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. MAY 25, 1966 THE PACIFIC TELEPHONE COMPANY 311 EAST BALBOA BLVD. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFOt;NIA IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND PACIFIC TELEPHONE THAT PERMANENT REPAVING OF TRENCHING ASSOCIATEU WITH THE PLACING OF TELEPHONE FACILITIES UNDERGROUND, ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 56TH ST"--ET AND 61ST STREET SHALL NOT BE REtUIRED OF THE TELEPHONE COMPANY. THIS WORK IS IN CONJUNCTION WITH RELOCATION REQUIRED FOR THE SEASHORE DRIVE STREET IMPROVEMENT. A DETAILED PLAN IS ON FILE WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UNUER PERMIT NUMBER 522. YOURS TRULY, BY D,JE DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 3348 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA • OR 8 -1431 INVESTIGATIONS G REPORTS WATER - SEWERAGE DRAINAGE - STREETS STAFF ENGINEERING May 9, 1966 Re: Order ¢#1573 City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. Attn: Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer Engineering Services in connection with widening of Seashore Drive between 55th Street and Orange Avenue, from January 1, 1966 through May 7, 1966: Previous Invoices: $4116.40 Project Engr 8 hrs 0 $15 /hr 120.00 Draftsman 9 hrs @ $10 /hr 90.00 Typist 8 hrs 0 $6 /hr 48.00 Subtotal .................$4374.40 Maximum fee per Contract $4100.00 Previous payments - 3690.00 Amount due and payable .............8 410.00 �F�,FIVED MAY 111966 PUBLIC *URM DEPT. APRIL 4, 1966 CQ*M&TINO CIVIL ENGINEER 33%5 NCWPONT BLVD. NtW►a1T BLACK, CALIFORNIA Swims SLASNORt DRIVC ENCROACHMENT PERMIT DEAR SIR$ COMMENTS ON THC PROPOSED [NCROACNNENTS NAVC KEN KCCIVED FROM THE DIVISION or HIGHWAYS AS SHOWN ON TUC CUCLOSLD LETTER DATED MAuu,922. TIE iNFORHATION CONTAINED TNtRtIN IS IN KmcmALS, SELF - LX►LANATORV. IT SNOULD K USED IN COMPLETING TUC ENGINECRINO ►OR TUC SEASHORE DRIVE WIDENING PROJECT. WITH RESPECT TO COMMENT NURSER ONES, IT 10 SUGOEGTLD THAT THE DRAINAK DITCH at ELININATEDS, AND THE RESULTING WATER DUIM[D DIMECTLY ON THE SAID ON THE NORTH SIDE or StADNORt DRIVC. IN ORDER TO AVOID EROSION AT THE POINT OF ouTFALLO IT IS SUGGESTED AN ASPHALTIC APRON at PROVIDED. YOM COMMENTS REGARDING STATE COMMENT NYNSCM TWOS, ARIL INVITED. IF YOU HAVE ANY FURTHEM QUESTIONS REGARDING THE STATES LETTER OR ANY OTHER ITCH REGARDING THIS PROJECTS, PLEASE CONTACT HE AT YOUR COHW[N IENCE. VERY Tft"Y YOURSS, WINTER T. COOK PROJECT EIM/NEER HTC$NAJ ENCL. Vesta 22, 1966 (g) tit- �rm�tS3 -2Ci.9 -21.7 j.:Yd 4a\r 4ioleM� V� v.5�S"g4'.I ztNew!f-yWAA3R�4M1�VW LN�rMAeisfYFard Zo Oho caliYQAaa rear M ' 1ep PavQ sietod 70ur p»*Uatn ryt px=, Pro a , ana detens Mj 'At"I a yVi yvi. w I e.teY Wi sy i 298 relst to the C'•C�Ei",J' yr�T.a"i.'. +� "v.T..Fw*i1 C..q�?�..SSfii'4p��it,�s era EaTIVA�� S�a�c"�o L"U "POW+1�" ntt43y��lorcj" tra e�� _. l{{m�V:f7:wW�i :((wQyy��yy���S,r{�. i1��i.�":�I�:1�.1c W't74$a�gq��!y�.(rbFi �w,rY'�a'Yip�lQx F.'oi+Tr- pWOa91&21*7 Op betva4ft rr's�C�,.a :.�i7a Uorj9b 10 r"°iative to t"O �°�L"'j9C =4 *Drairw�' * I'?IW%*a at 92484. � ives to rej iCV6 ." L^ wre hive or po2x31ir At4a malnRy tw= ar Vw =, r In tJi�at:oh It outletrr on P�i , Mla Coast l.er., cwazl.ng ecrawntraticra %;hero It dorm not e .'.wty taaorUnV$ to roar jettev. atatad 414ru x, 29" - — `*Me rx ur.".:i drab.., tae of Vie ax^ a is $rva the b .%% toinvd F cf�Ac Ga 7at tsX sy,g. Ir c=h Is tr4 cesev the sw1or a frxa �,. 4r?w�a tai xo6h x twl zs:;tzea2ld 9,10W tour! MOU1c3 c�amat Uishww F3 in a A wet floss forms 1th h.4Z peroolatim Into the *and aama prior to itawhirZ Fa4da''la Caant J:1Z+ • Mt cap the Sa;Seml schwro by you Is to It on ttf t.?°i�+ zo a4„a W-do of 7-nos.rlo cc* t ill eyr y €sr4 allou it to #psi eazterly° rid per".ola'tse Into Vhe Swi at the G&VO Us, to ras arrect c2 ♦♦.mId�s:..e�,a�por,fy:,�yIblo spit:/a�cu�,.tq,�.�,��„:,.tmlhya�azx the6tun"x�a�fyr dicer tly 4 -It'o fto- -10 Coast J?.L�;i�M��4 A lliib` e$ a i�YF OW V 1fiould be graded In the 9L^ 4 raffia w4 a mt&4 easterly. 20 - "81zt15* to the PXVVW4 UaOt structure, at Statlors 3+55, Nam St�sa:;toep�ciT�T,,'O G-p1 lnlweetp�M10 the - rNs�g�eapis�l�wAII.yGO& 13^4" &"=U Ld be some Y/�L�'1.yf4�..4n�m ^�r��.aa iapyN.-{'s��e��fy n two prevent Wvent the Iraet from be r�tit" o P11 r° Ant'er eed ower+.' to pis *Ar4d have a =11U= 4. It v.%12 to percle albie to utilI no the lCtrrwr rel2rcad rxcxt of vay ter a detour at-4 for storage for your oontractarrsl cgkLtw=t, I.xvv94UV nacre le no its ar egregs frm the Pazlflo Cout: it ahwaye Mr. Joseph T. Devlin -2- March 22, 1966 07 -Ora- 001 - 20.9 - 21.7..___ 5. Attached are one copy of traffic signal modification plan and striping plan which you may want to incorporate into your final plans. It is requested that you provide "No Parking" restrictions along the east side of the south leg and the west side of the north leg of Orange Street. f Fu_rt -har consideration will be given your request men we receive five sets of the signed and revised plans and details. Very truly yours$ R. J. WILSON Assistant. District Engineer, Maintenance BY Original Signed by P. R. Reed P. R. REED District Permit Engineer RJteu attach. cc3 Rime Huseby Ke Kellam N� - a y` a� r6 4 4 L, J - Fel c / t' /C r, i FEORUARY li MI!• A. C. SiRHifi DEPUTY DISTRICT ENGINEER it AWIMISTRATiON DIVISION OP HIGHWAYS�, P. 0. BOX 230, TERMINAL ANNE% LOS ANGELES 544 CALIFW IA ATTENTION: MR. TARCO YOOMOVA14A SUOJCCT: DRAINAGE INFORMATIN FOR PROPOSED ENCROACHMENTS SCTWECH SEASIMIRE DRIVE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGWAY DEAR SIR: THE ATTACHED DRAINAGE MAP AND CALCULATION SMCCT PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL iNFORNATION YOU RCOUCSTED TO Alt YOU IN PREPARING COMMENTS ON THE SUSJECT ENCROACHMENTS. TIK NATURAL DRAINAGE OF THE AREA 13 FROM THE *EACH TOWARD PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. IF YOU NAYE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR IF 1 CAN K OF ASSIST- ANCE IN ANY WAYj PLEASE CALL HE AT YOUR CONVCNIENCC. VERY TRULY YOURS HUNTER T. COOK PROJECT ENGINEER q HTCIVR ENCLS. r� i FEORUARY li MI!• A. C. SiRHifi DEPUTY DISTRICT ENGINEER it AWIMISTRATiON DIVISION OP HIGHWAYS�, P. 0. BOX 230, TERMINAL ANNE% LOS ANGELES 544 CALIFW IA ATTENTION: MR. TARCO YOOMOVA14A SUOJCCT: DRAINAGE INFORMATIN FOR PROPOSED ENCROACHMENTS SCTWECH SEASIMIRE DRIVE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGWAY DEAR SIR: THE ATTACHED DRAINAGE MAP AND CALCULATION SMCCT PROVIDE THE ADDITIONAL iNFORNATION YOU RCOUCSTED TO Alt YOU IN PREPARING COMMENTS ON THE SUSJECT ENCROACHMENTS. TIK NATURAL DRAINAGE OF THE AREA 13 FROM THE *EACH TOWARD PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. IF YOU NAYE ANY FURTHER QUESTIONS OR IF 1 CAN K OF ASSIST- ANCE IN ANY WAYj PLEASE CALL HE AT YOUR CONVCNIENCC. VERY TRULY YOURS HUNTER T. COOK PROJECT ENGINEER q HTCIVR ENCLS. i O g W J a U N [TO I � IhI 1 i 1 'a 1 � A� 1 vi .► VI`s � 1 1 to 1 } I \ 1 � 171 1 I 7 44 V n l 1 NDd'O - - -� 1 \ -/ ANA SANTA 0 0 0 YS oYfS 1 Q i rl,.�ss o I � ff 1✓C„1 V C� C C� C� 1 .LSN1L9 V 1SM18S' 1S „AOf I El I ,7 I 1 C� C CJ Cl[ Cl! RISER Ned 1 awlJ/9 /N _Z9 Y~.§, l {jest 4 , 3 Is tk L rl Ni t'a Y+ G s � � x 111 .� � � •. } 1 day � '�3 Ql. Cri 'v, � f� t�. t .. - tY \ �# •,y. � P � _ ' 1 :2 it 3 a,e� I to (soo)C '700)(1.2s)= 3So0,0 0 0 (I,zs) ti �jl.S,, Ts > 7 w, Cab IU +o � 5 'f'�- e,�....�..ol ,;,_ �J.•.JGw"- -�i h�a...v... CITY* NEWPORT TO: `L oh �7— FROM SUBJECT: r •— 4 BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS WRTMENT MEMO -- DATE 1—g COPIES T0: it /� IGNED PUT IT IN WRITING . . . WRITTEN MESSAGES SAVE TIME AND AVOID ERRORS ✓- .�"Oi/ SG �� � DiCA.I/.lL�.. GL/!>' � ✓A(Jci' C., SL -'yJ G -/ COPIES T0: it /� IGNED PUT IT IN WRITING . . . WRITTEN MESSAGES SAVE TIME AND AVOID ERRORS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I.ITY OF NEW RT DE "d IK-lfflFDATr I ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIR. UTILITY SUPT. TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR: CO -OP. PROD. ENGR. FIELD ENGR. SECRETARY - PLEASE: 1JOR I. HANDLE 5. REVIEW R COMMENT � � 2. SEE P.W.D. 6. PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT READ [7� PREPARE REPLY . FILE O. POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS: l UNT 4 RA 5 4 A. S. KOCH ROAD COMMISSIONER ANO COUNTY SURVEYOR L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE ASST. ROAD COMMIS510 N ER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR Y O F AND sURRV EB. VAILE W. L. ZAUN DIVISION ENGINEER — OPEPATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL ENGINEER M. I. STORM 0ONI5 BARRETT NG P— DIVISION ENGINEER — ENGINEERING BUSINESS MANAGER TELEPHONE: 547 -0547 AREA CODE 714 ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 9TH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 January 17, 1966 Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: Attached is the Materials Report for Seashore Drive from 56th Street to Orange Street. It is hoped this information will fulfill your needs. An itemized statement will be forwarded at the end of the month by the Orange County Road Department Accounting Office. ASK:FFL:jb attach. Very truly yo s, A. S. KOCH Road Commissioner and County Surveyor RECEIVED JAN ?4,1966 PUBLIC W t s O&T r 0 MR. DONALD SIMPSON 33+5 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BrACKS CALIFORNIA DEAR SIRI 5c.,vsi.o.cE �� JANUARY 250 19" THE ENCLOSED MATERIALS REPORT# PREPARED BY THE DRANK COUNTY MATERIALS LABORATORYS IS FORWARDED FOR YOUR USE IN PREPARINQ THE FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEASHORE DRIVE. THE DESIGN STRUCTURAL SECTION SHOULD BE NODtF1E0 TO INCLUDE 3" OF A.C. RATHER THAN 2 "j WHICH WE HAVE BEEN CONSIDERING TO DATE. COMMENTS FROM THE STATE REGARDING ENCROACHMENTS HAVE NOT YET BEEN RECEIVED. YOU WILL BE ADVISED AS SOON AS I HAVE AN IN- DICATION OF THEIR THOUGHTS IN THIS MATTER* VERY TRULY YOURSp HUNTER T. COOK PROJECT ENGINEER HTCtBE ENCL. 0 DATE Tr. AHFP ESTIMATED VALUES Equivalent 5000# Wheel Loading 4- 7 her e Based Upon: Actual Volume Court Estimated Volume Count S D o D Percentage of Trucks by 10th Year Future A.D�T. Estimate / d 10th Year Design E.W.L. Truck Factor X 5 (lot Year Volume + 10th Year Volume) 51 S X S, vvo _ �, 0 00 000 T.I. w G. 3G . � 77/ .a 78 a -j, �i�icrci�s NO. TO: FROM: SUBJECT- CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DEPARTMENT Date / / G!o Ile cz, Gc"�c c 3G—Y Ci,ri°, �mGlei.sy� .r9srdre*rJ+/ rs 3A C- 3 �y r' m u Yoll fob e'er pU �itn� it ��'crrr �r w a,w- Z5 , -"ewe fGSae'Ac Ltd f 6 DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 9843 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA • OR 5 -1421 January 5, 1966 City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. Attn: Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer INVESTIGATIONS a REPORTS WATER - SEWERAGE DRAINAGE - STREETS STAFF ENGINEERING Engineering Services in connection with widening of Seashore Drive between 55th Street and Orange Avenue, through December 31, 1965. Previous Invoice 12409.24 Principal 1/2 hr ?a $20 /hr $ 10.00 Project Engineer 15 hrs 1 $15 /hr 1225.00 Draftsman 80 hrs ! $10 /hr $800.00 Survey Party 21-2'-hrs ! $30 /hr $645.00 $1707.16 Total ...................$4116.40 Maximum fee per Contract $4100.00 104 Retention 96410,00 Previous payment $2168.32 Total Deductions $2578.32 r- oesi.l.. m�'� vNGILN�GN HfA /T �.0 a�v.�ner ov au.e. 4 .Os- .O43e J�CO4i 0te Sbi4 TtS3% 3. . �mc..ViJ' ,a ..7oi.V6 GuO2.t -moo SN e[.ad JjfS ..i VO4C �-O lwlN�C1I� Amount due & payable .... $1521.63 RECEIVE17 JAN 6 1966 PIKE: �rDtiFiS DEPT, • PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I Y OF INL WUNI U .N N I ATE ACTION P.W. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIR. UTILITY SUPT. TRAFFIC ENGR. ASST. CITY ENGR. SUBDIV. ENGR. DESIGN ENGR. CO -OP. PROJ. ENGR. FIELD ENGR. SECRETARY PLEASE: 1. HANDLE 5. REVIEW & COMMENT 2. SEE P.W.D. 6. PREPARE WRITTEN REPORT READ PREPARE REPLY FILE 1 . POST ON ATLAS MAPS REMARKS. C� ya- 1' DECEMBER 29, 1965 MR. A. C. BIRNIE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS P. 0. BOX 2304 - TERMINAL ANNEX LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 9005: ATTENT;ONC MR. Boa JORDON - PERMIT " SECT ION SUBJECT: PROPOSED ENCROACHMENT INTO SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY DEAR SIR: ENCLOSED ARE TWO SETS OF PRELIMINARY PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT OENF SEASHORE DRIVE IN THE WEST NEWPORT AREA OF NEWPORT BEACH. THE IMPROVEMT INCLUDES SEVERAL ITEMS WHICH WILL AFFECT HIGHWAY INSTALLATIONS. THE GRADES OF SEASHORE DRIVE WILL BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE. THE RUNOFF WILL BE COLLECTED AT TWO LOCATIONS AND CARRIED VIA NEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO THE DRAINAGE DITCH RUNNING ALONG ENE SOUTHERLY EDGE OF PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. DETAILS or THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE STRUCTURES ARE SHOWN ON SHEETS 4, % AND 7 OF THE ENCLOSED PLANS. IT WILL BE NECESSRRY TO LOWER THE EXISTING TRAFFIC DETECTOR IN ORANGE AVE- HUE TO MATCH THE NEW STREET GRADE SEE SHEET 5). NO OTHER PORTION OF THE EXISTING SIGNAL INSTALLATIONS WILL BE INVOLVED. DURING CONSTRUCTION,, ACCESS MUST BE PROVIDED FOR RESIDENTS OF THE AREA. IN MANY CASES THE ONLY ACCESS PRESENTLY AVAILABLE IS ALONG SEASHORE DRIVE. IF THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MAJOR PORTION OF SEASHORE DRIVE OPEN TO TRAFFIC DURING CONSTRUCTION IT IS PROBABLE THAT THE CONSTRUCTION COST WILL INCREASE. VARIOUS METHOBB OF MAINTAINING SATISFACTORY ACCESS ARE BEING CONSIDERED, ONE OF THESE IS TO ALLOW THE CONTRACTOR TO CONSTRUCT ONE OR MORE TEMPORARY ACCESS ROADS ACROSS THE UNDEVELOPED LAND BETWEEN SEASHORE DRIVE AND PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. SIQNING WOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE CON- TRACTOR TO CONTROL EGRESS ONTO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY. IT IS REQUESTED THAT YOU REVIEW THE ENCLOSED PLANS AND SUBMIT YOUR COMMENTS ON THE ABOVE PROPOSALS TO THIS OFFICE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE IN ORDER THAT DESIGN CAN BE FINALIZED• fill6 "1, VERY TRULY YOURS, JOSEPH T. DEVLIN PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 4 HTCIBE Y t1 . DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 3345 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA • OR 5 -1431 INVESTIGATIONS 6 REPORTS WATER - SEWERAGE December 20, 1965 DRAINAGE - STREETS STAFF ENGINEERING SEASHORE DRIVE 54th ST. to ORANGE ST. PRELIMINARY COST ESTITITATE - 1 - QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL ITEM & UNIT PRICE PRICE 1. Clearing, Grubbing and Grading..... 1 L.S. 16800.00 $6800.00 2. Type "A'1 Concrete Curb & Gutter.... 133 L.F. 2.50 332.50 3. Type "B" Concrete Curb ............. 210 L.F. 2.00 420.00 4. P,Todified Type "B" Concrete Curb .... 2,170 L.F. 1.35 2929.50 5. 611 Asphaltic Concrete Berm......... 2,700 L.F. 1.50 4050.00 6. Class 2 Aggregate Base .............2,160 TON 4.00 8640.00 7. 211 Asphaltic Concrete Pavement..... 1,080 TON 6.50 7020.00 8. 4" Concrete Sidewalk ............... 840 S.F. 0.45 378.00 9. 411 Concrete Slabs ..................4,730 S.F. 0.60 2838.00 10. Asphalt Concrete Overlay.......... 24 TON 15.00 360.00 11. 51 Wide Concrete Drainage Channel. 1 EA. 650.00 650.00 12. 2111 R.C.P. Storm Drain............ 380 L.F. 15.00 5700.00 13. 81 Drainage Curb Inlet Structure.. 1 EA. 1000.00 1000.00 14. 21 Drainage Ditch Inlet Structure. 1 EA. 200.00 200.00 15. 48" I.D. Concrete 1J.H ............. 1 EA. 500.00 500.00 16. 6011 I.D. Concrete M.H ............. 1 EA. 700.00 700.00 17. Adjust Traffic Detector and Box... 1 EA. 200.00 200.00 18. Adjust M.H. rovers ................ 5 EA. 60.00 300.00 19. Adjust Water Valve Boxes.......... 14 EA. 40.00 560.00 - 1 - C PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE cont'd — Page 2 i TOTAL $46,758.00 QUANTITY UNIT TOTAL ITEM & UNIT PRICE PRICE 20. Adjust Survey Monument Covers..... 13 E.A. 40.00 520.00 21. Relocate Fire Hydrants............ 5 EA. 200.00 1000.00 22. Relocate Water Meters ............. 32 EA. 50.00 1600.00 23. Sawing of Concrete Slabs.......... 200 Z.F. 0.30 60.00 TOTAL $46,758.00 • • DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 3343 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA • OR 81431 December 6, 1965 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Attn: Benjamin B. Nolan, City Engineer INVESTIGATIONS & REPORTS WATER • SEWERAGE DRAINAGE • STREETS STAFF ENGINEERING Engineering Services in connection with widening of Seashore Drive between 56th Street and Orange Avenue through November 30, 1965. Project Engineer 11 hre 1� ?$15 /hr ... t165.00 Draftsman 21.32hrs 1) ?$10/hr..82135.00 Aerial Photos .....................4$ 88.40 Blueprinting ......................BR 20.84 Total to Date .....................12409.24 less 1011� Retention ................ — .$240.92 Amount Due and Payable ....... S2168.32 12..i1,. DEC 8 1961 Wpb S. Ur, PUBLIC WORKS DEPAPNT CITY OF NEWPORT B CH NO. INIT. DATE ACTION P.W.. DIRECTOR ASST. P.W. DIR. ( -/ ASST. CITY PKG. METER DIV. ELECTRICAL DIV. WATER & SEWER DIV. FIELD ENGINEER CITY MANAGER SECRETARY REMARKS: y'Y NOVEMBER S, 1965 MR. DONALD C. SIMPSON 3345 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA SUBJECTS CONTRACT i'OR.ENOINEERIMO SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF SEASHORE DRIVE DEAR MR. SINPSON: TRANSMITTED FOR YOUR FILES IS ONE FULLY EXECUTED COPY OF THE ABOVE CONTRACT, BERT TRULY YOURS J* BENJAMIN B. NOLAN CITY ENGINEER BBNIBE MWA GO'S (8) POA SEEMS 3 THIS A ed La made and enter ltto this �� � day . 4 of Octobet, 40630 by and between the CITY 0 WBWMT SEACHs, s 5) 0=144al corporation, herein referred. -4o as "City ", ant DOMAU C. 61 SIMPSOt.3 ;.licensed civil engineer, harsta referred to as 7 "Engineer "'. 8 WHF.USV d!*r -lea to widen Seashore Drive ietvsen 9 Stith Street and Orange Avenue; and 10 WHEMS, engineering services are rAlcossary in connectic 11: with said project consisting of design, plans and specifications 12 for the entire project; and 13 WHUMA3, Engineer has submitted a proposal to perform 14 said engineering services dated August 14, 1965; 15 NOW, THEREFORE,, the parties agree as follows: 16 1. Engineer shall provide services consisting of the 17j following items: i 18 (a) hold conferences with representatives of the 19; City, the Division of Highways, and others to review and 20 I discuss all aspects of the project. 21 (b) Mane field surveys to supplement existing 22 photogrammetry. 23+ (c) Make necessary soils tests and investigations 241 to determine structural section. 251 (d) Prepare preliminary engineering studies and 26 i designs for review and approval. 27 (e) Prepare engineering data for applications 28 required by the Division of Highways. 29 (f) Prepare detailed contract drevings in ink an 30 mylar, special provisions and contract doetuents typed on 31 stencils, and cost estimates. 32 j (g) Assist City in securing bids; tabulate and I analy =e bid results; furnish recommendations oe the 4100rd 2 of construction coetracts. 31 (h) furnish consultation and advieo to City during 4 construction. 5j (i) Prepare elementary sketches and supplementary 61 sketches required to resolve actual field cm ditions- 7 I (j) furnish "as built" drawings pade from notes 8 submitted by the construction inspector. 9 2. Engines shall, at no additional cost to City, be 10 available for consultations with the Public works Director and 11 his staff regarding interpretation of the plans and specifications 12 and other problems which may from time to time arias. 13 s. Original drawings, reports, notes, maps, and other 14 documents shall become the property of the City and may be repro - 15 duced as deemed necessary by the Public works Director. 16 4, City reserves the right to terminate this contract 17 at any time by giving Engineer three days' prior written notice 181 either by personal service or by placing said notice in the United 191 States mails, postage prepaid, addressed to Engineer's business 2011 office. In the event that City shall terminate this contract, the 21, amount of the final fee due and payable will be subject to wegotia- 2211 tion. 23I 5. All plans, specifications, and other documents for 24!i 11 the project shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Public 251 Works Director of City and delivered to him within 90 calendar j 2611 days following the execution of this agreement by the City. (i l 27! 6, In consideration of the performanea of the above 28 described engineering services, City agrees to pay Engineer an 29 amount based upon the fee schedule contained in Engineer's proposal 30� dated August 14, 1965, but in no event shall. said amount be greater 31 than $40104. The amount to be paid to Engineer shall be payable in 32 monthly partial payments, each payment being equal to ninety per 11, 2 3 4 5, 6 7 8 91 l0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 JI " cent ,) of the amount earadd as determined by the fee 14hsutsle. The balatkce of the total #fsunt shall be paid upon "O" tance of the construction work by the City Council. T. Engineer shall.a#rsW the defense of and indPWMify a" saw harmless the City, am* its officers and smployees, from all eU1"9 loss, damage, injury and liability of scary kiAd, nature and description, directly or indirectly &rising fras the Performance of this contract for engineering services, TOSAtdlass o responsibility for negligence. Iii WjTtMS WREOyO the parties have executed this :cm- tract as of the day and year first above written. CITY or Io OMT CH Attests city er CITY 3. i 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 8'. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 is STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII P. O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 9OW4 MA 0 -3700 October 7, 1965 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City Engineer City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: MLIND G. BROWN, Governor EWA 07- Ora- O -NptB SS Project 56 Section 186.1 Reference is made to your letter of August 17, 1965, submitting project documents pertaining to the improvement of Seashore Drive between 55th Street and Orange Avenue. The 32 -foot geometric section within a 40 -foot right of way appears acceptable as a stage of construction. It is understood that the 32 feet of pavement will be used for two traffic lanes and a single parking lane. It is under- stood that the present design provides for future widening, but the present unavailability of additional right of way makes the time and nature of the future plan uncertain. Therefore, acceptance of the future geometric section will be deferred until the nature of this improvement is more certain. JAH /jc Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNIE Deputy District Engineer 0. V. JANEWAY Assistant District City and County Projects Engineer RECEIVED OCT 8 1965 pgg��C WVAKS DEPT. 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA— HIGHWAY TRANSPORTATION AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, Governor DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT VII, P.O. BOX 2304, LOS ANGELES 54 October 7, 19190 07-Ora-i)-NPtB W Project 56 section 186i1 Nr# Benjamin Nolan Gif ,Ay Engineer GJJW of Newport Reach 3W W. Nevo*rt Boulevard Re*ort Beach, California Dear Sizo Reference is made to year letter of August IT# 1965, submitting project documents pertaining to the Improvement or Seashore Drive between 55th Street and Orange Avenue. The 32•foot geometric section within a 40•foot riot of way appears acceptable as & stage of construction. It is understood that the 32 foot of pavement will be used for two traffic lanes and & single, parking Isao. It to under- stood that the present design pwavides for future widening, but the present unavailability of additional right or way makes the time and nature of the future plan uncertain. Therefore, acceptance of Vo future geometric "etim will be deferred until the nature of this improvement in more certain. JAR/j C Very truly yours, A. C. BIRNZE Deputy District Engineer 7. .7:x11 jr BY O. Vs JANEWAT Assistant District City and County Projects Engineer Az: TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SEPTEMBER 13, 1965 Z -1 �Es SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 56TH STREET AND ORANGE AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: AUTHORIZE PREPARATION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER, FOR PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WIDENING OF SEASHORE DRIVE. DISCUSSION: $30,000 HAS BEEN INCLUDED IN THIS YEARS PRELIMINARY GAS TAX BUDGET FOR THE WIDENING OF SEASHORE DRIVE IN WEST NEWPORT. IN ORDER THAT STREET DESIGN CAN BE COORDINATED WITH THE CURRENT LIGHTING DISTRICT PROJECT, IT WOULD BE DESIRABLE TO PROCEED WITH THE DESIGN AT THIS TIME. A PROPOSAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED FROM DONALD C. SIMPSON TO PERFORM THE WORK FOR A MAXIMUM FEE OF $4,100. THE ACTUAL COST WOULD BE BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF TIME REQUIRED FOR THE WORK, THE MAXIMUM FEE IS I 3-ffl% OF THE ESTIMATED COST AND IS WITHIN THE FEE SCHEDULE RECOMMENDED BY THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS FOR PRO- JECTS OF THIS SIZE AND TYPE. BECAUSE OF MR. SIMPSON'S FAMILIARITY WITH THE AREA, GAINED IN CONNECTION WITH THE LIGHTING DISTRICT, WE FEEL HIS EMPLOYMENT FOR DESIGN OF THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS WOULD BE ESPECIALLY ADVANTAGEOUS TO THE CITY. IN ADDITION TO THE STREET IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED, IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT STORM DRAINAGE FACILITIES. THE PRELIMINARY ESTIMATES INCLUDED FUNDS ONLY FOR MINIMUM DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT FINAL DESIGN WILL SHOW A NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FACILITIES. IF SO, ADDITIONAL FUNDS WOULD BE NEEDED FOR CON- STRUCTION COSTS AND FOR ENGINEERING. BECAUSE OF THE FLAT GRADES IN THE AREA, IT IS DIFFICULT TO PREDICT DRAINAGE NEEDS WITHOUT OBTAINING TOPOGRAPHY AND PROCEEDING WITH DETAILED DESIGN. BECAUSE OF THE LIMITED RIGHT OF WAY AVAILABLE, THE STREET WIDTH PROPOSED IS LESS THAN STATE STANDARDS. APPLICATION HAS BEEN MADE TO THE DIVISION OF HIGH- WAYS FOR PROJECT APPROVAL BASED ON THE PROPOSED WIDTH. ACTUAL EXECUTION OF THE ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT WOULD BE CONTINGENT ON RECEIPT OF STATE APPROVAL. PFI� DEVLIN IC \W RKS DIRECTOR BE °0 -m CU-3 . Exhibit G COILIx'R- UNRTJH LOCAL TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT REQUEST FOR DMATION AUTHOPTZATI0 *' Project No, 36 _ From: City XD County of State of California Department of Public Works IEWPORT Division of Highways KACH (Through District Engineer) Date, AUGUST 16, 1* Authority is requested to use 1,04¢ or Matching Funds to finance the following project which: ® involves a permanent deviation approved standards. M is designed to meet approved standards through "stage construction," DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Name of Street or Road SEAaHrraE DRIVE Termini 55TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE Length 0. Miles. The proposed work consists of GRADING, PAVING, CONSTRUCTING CURDS Alb DERMS AND (Grading, pav ng, constructing our s an UCTING DRAINAGE FACILITIES , etc., or the purchase o -way and will be performed by CONTRACT under the direction of the contract or day labor ci y, coon y, e a e. TRAFFIC ADT upon completion 2.500 DESIGN ADT 5,000 (Est. total in all lanes 20 years after completion) GEOMETRIC SECTION Number and width of traffic lanes Width of curb parking lanes or usable shoulders Kedian Width Total width between exterior curbs or outside of usable shoulders Width of Right -of -way STRUCTURAL SECTION Existing Proposed Project Planned Ultimate 2- 10 2- 12 2- 12 Lt, Rt, Lt. Rt. Lt. Rt, 0 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 0 20 3 4o 110 uNRNOMM Traffic Index 5.O R-value N (TO DE fWDTANTIATED) Surface thickness and type; Base thickness and type' 'Types: BS- bituminous seal, AC- asphaltic concrete, PCC- Portland cement concrete, Other Note: Explain reasons.for less than desirable widths and thicknesses, special con- struction features, etc., on reverse side. Attach sketches if necessary. Existing ProT>osed It mat 2" A.C. " A.C. " BEACH SAND 6" A.B. 6" A.B. RMAS- roadmix asphaltic surface CTB- cement- treated base AB- aggregate base AS- aggregate subbase SJgna ure authorized o 3'icfeT PUDtIC WORKS DIRECTOR ficial Title 1. EXISTING RIGHT OR WAY WIDTH 18 ho FEET. EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE SOUTH SIDE LOCATED ON LOTS THAT ARE ONLY CIO FEET DEEP AND FREEWAY RIGHT OF WAY ON TIN: NORTH MANE IT IMPRACTICAL TO ACQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL RIGHT Or WAY AT THIS TIME. HOW9V9Rp THE DESIGN WILL PROVIDE FOR FUTURE WIDENING SHOULD RIGHT OF WAY SE• COME AVAILABLE. 2. PARKING WILL BE PROHIBITED ON ORE SIDE BY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL. �V Oo 0 0 Q 9 a . ;"Aoe ,6 -CuB4O UN G / G � 1�,• •r• � A.C. � ro ";Q• B. Ova �t/C.v S,D.t/O V V D .�0�6.BTY �2000SEQ C.C-705 5 5EC 7 /O/t/ = STPI/CTUecj� ��CT /ON iV /LL 6E Sup5rG,vriorEp B Y SOiL, TEST. 5. �`, ice' - 7t' 'IC�uJ+ DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 3345 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT BEACH, OALIrORN1A • OR 6.1471 REC 'E IVE'D' Benjamin B. Nolan AUG 17 1965 Asst. Public Works Director City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Newport Beach, Calif. Dear Mr. Nolan: INVESTIGATIONS G REPORTS. WATER • BEWERAGE DRAINAGE • STREETS BTArr ENGINEERING August 14, 1965 In accordance with your letter dated August 10, 1965, we hereby submit this proposal for performing engineering services for the widening of Seashore Drive from 56th Street to Orange Avenue. I. SCOPE OF PROJECT: The project is to include the widening of the street within the existing right -of -way together with an offsite underground drainage system near the easterly end of the work. All other drainage not tributary to this system is to be disposed of by surface means. If this is not feasible, additional underground drainage facilities will be investigated. The engineering services required for the design of these additional drainage facilities will be considered as outside the scope of this proposal. II. ENGINEERING SERVICES: A. Hold conferences with representatives of the City, the Division of Highways, and others to review and discuss all aspects of the project. B. Make field surveys to supplement existing photogrammetry. C. Make necessary soils tests and investigations to determine structural section. D. Prepare preliminary engineering studies and designs for review and approval. E. Prepare engineering data for applications required by the Division of Highways. F. Prepare detailed contract drawings in ink on mylar, special provisions and contract documents typed on stencils, and cost estimates.. II. Cont Id G. Assist City in securing bids; tabulate and analyze. bid results; furnish recommendations on the award of construction contracts. H. Furnish consultation and advice to City during construction. I. Prepare elementary sketches and supplementary sketches required to resolve actual field conditions. J. Furnish "as built" drawings made from notes submitted by the construction inspector.. III. FEES: It is proposed that our fee for the services in (I) above be the actual cost of outside services such as soils tests and investigations, photogrammetric reproductions, blueprinting, etc. plus labor costs at the following hourly rates: Principal Project Engineer Design Engineers and Draftsmen 3-Man Survey Party Typist $20.00 per hour $15.00 per hour $ 7.50 to $12.50 per hour $30.00 per hour $ 6.00 per hour The fee determined on the above basis is not to exceed a total amount of $4100. IV. PAYMENT OF FEE: It is requested that our fee be paid in monthly partial payments. Each payment would be equal to 90% of'the amount earned as determined in (III) above. The final 10% of the fee would be due and payable upon completion of the construction project. In the event of abandonment of the project, or unusual delay, due to right -of -way clearance, the amount of the final fee due and payable will be subject to negotiation. 2 - • � l V. COMPLETION TIME: In order to coordinate this project with Street Lighting Assessment District No. 49, final grades and sections will be established within 45 days after receipt of authorization to proceed. Final plans and specifications shall be submitted within 90 days after receipt of authorization to proceed. Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal. please contact me if you have any questions. Very truly yours, Donald C. Simpson DCS:c - 3 - TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Wjgr� /3X9 F JULY 26, 1965 SUBJECT: REMOVAL OF UNAUTHORIZED ENCROACHMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY ON SEASHORE DRIVE BETWEEN 56TH STREET AND ORANGE AVENUE RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: THAT THE STAFF BE AUTHORIZED TO INITIATE PROCEEDINGS TO CLEAR ENCROACHMENTS FROM THE RIGHT OF WAY ON SEASHORE DRIVE. WIDENING OF SEASHORE DRIVE FROM 56TH STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE HAS BEEN BUDGETEO FOR THE 1965 -1966 FISCAL YEAR. SINCE THE AVAILABLE RIGHT OF WAY WIDTH IS ONLY 40 FEET, IT WILL.BE NECESSARY FOR EXISTING ENCROACHMENTS TO BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE STREET WIDTH. THE ENCROACHMENTS CONSIST PRIMARILY OF FENCES AND MASONRY WALLS. HOWEVER, THERE ARE ALSO AT LEAST 3 HOUSES AND GARAGES WHICH PROJECT INTO THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR DISTANCES OF UP TO 14 FEET, IT IS EXPECTED THAT THE PROCESS OF CLEARING THE MAJOR ENCROACHMENTS WILL TAKE CONSIDERABLE TIME. THEREFORE IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROCEDURE BE COMMENCED AT ONCE SO AS NOT TO UNDULY DELAY THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. SOME CONCERN HAS BEEN EXPRESSED THAT WIDENING ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF SEASHORE DRIVE WHERE THE ENCROACHMENTS EXIST MIGHT NOT BE NECESSARY IF ADDITIONAL RIGHT OF WAY ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE SHOULD BECOME AVAILABLE IN THE FUTURE. IT IS UNLIKELY THAT SEASHORE DRIVE COULD EVER BE WIDENED SUBSTANTIALLY ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE BECAUSE FURTHER REDUCING THE NARROW WIDTH OF THE STRIP BETWEEN COAST HIGHWAY AND SEASHORE WOULD SEVERELY RESTRICT ANY PRACTICAL USE, SUCH AS PARKING, WHICH COULD BE MADE OF THE PROPERTY. EPH LIC BBN:vR DEVL IN KS DIRECTOR PROJECT CITY O&WOffr BEACH - PMBL I C. Wass . M&DIENT I l H 1�i F, 139F PRELIMIN�" FINAL ..• ... l ®M ilr,r III ,., i � �- I � � r • Vii► � � � Y �.. � � ®-- C7 • . t vs .� �. t r • Yi. r s �s�