Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-1067 - Water main replacement program 1966-67Mail to: City Clerk 3300 Newport . 13480 Newport Beach, Calif. 92660 NOTICE OF CE?PLETION PUBLIC WORKS Boex 8347 racE 83 RECORDED AT REQUEST ORANGE COUNTY, CALIF. 9:05 AM AVG 18 1967 L WYLIE CARLYLE, Counly ROWOW FREE To All Laborers and Material Men and twEvery Other Person Interested: YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on April 28., 1967 , the Public Works project consisting of Water Main Re acement rogram, 1955-67 ) on which ggrronf, Eckhart Envinearina sstractors was, the contractor, and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company was the surety, was:completed. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH I, the undersigned, say: I am the Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach;. the foregoing Notice of Completion is true of my own:knowledge. I declare under penalty, of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 16, 1967 at Newport Beach, California. I, the undersigned, aar. I am the City. Clerk of the City of Newport Beach; the City Council of said City on August 14: 1967 accepted the above described work as completed and ordered that a Notice of Completion be filed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on August 16, 1967 CITY CLEkk' Al NEWPORT Of CAIJF BEACH \� at Newport Beach, California. 2:::L 4 eA cIM y F TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR A�eL e_ /06 7 AUGUST 14, 1967 �,,�` °� 7? G e- iz SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, 1966 -67 (C -1067) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. ACCEPT THE WORK. 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO FILE A NOTICE OF COMPLETION. 3. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO RELEASE THE BONDS 35 DAYS AFTER NOTICE OF COMPLETION HAS BEEN FILED. DISCUSSION: THE CONTRACT FOR THE WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, 1966 -67 HAS BEEN COM- PLETED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BID PRICE WAS: $124,396.80 COST OF UNIT PRICE ITEMS CONSTRUCTED: 126,517.65 AMOUNT OF EXTRA WORK: 5,182.00 TOTAL CONTRACT COST: 131.,699.65 AMOUNT BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT #50- 9297 -o41: 150,000.00 THE INCREASE IN THE COST OF UNIT PRICE ITEMS WAS DUE PRIMARILY TO THE NEED FOR MORE TEMPORARY ASPHALTIC CONCRETE TRENCH PATCHING THAN HAD BEEN ANTICIPATED. ALSO, DUE TO THE CLD CITY RECORDS BEING SOMEWHAT INACCURATE, ADDITIONAL 4 -INCH VALVES WERE REQUIRED AT MANY CONNECTIONS. THE EXTRA WORK WAS PRIMARILY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF MAIN LINE VALVES AND ADDITIONAL PIPE HANGERS UNDER THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE. BOTH OF THESE ITEMS WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY THE COUNCIL. CONSTRUCTION WAS BY BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS OF EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA. ENGINEERING WAS BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ORIGINAL DATE OF COMPLETION WAS APRIL 100 1967. DUE TO THE EXTRA WORK ITEMS AND THE INCREASED DIFFICULTY IN MAKING MANY OF THE CONNECTIONS TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM, SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION or THE WORK WAS.DELAYED UNTIL APRIL 28, 1967- SUBSE- QUENT TO THAT' TIME, SOME SERVICE LEAKS DEVELOPED, THUS DELAYING THE RECOMMENDATION YOSEOFCCEPTANCE OF THE WORK UNTIL ALL LEAKS HAD BEEN CORRECTED. PH T. DEVLIN (33N PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR GPD:NAJ CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. P11iA1. 101 FOR PERIOD ENDING 2n 961t PROJECT: Water Main Replacement Program 1966 -67 BUDGET NO. 50 -9297 -041 CONTRACT NO. tn6� ITEM NO. CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT PRICE ' PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED ii I ORIGINAL -C TRACT �G / EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE AMO511GT EARNED $131,699.65 __-- LESS IC% RETENTION - LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 118,529.68 AMOUNT DUE,THIS REQUEST 13,169.97 HEREBY �.ERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND S IGNED('.. �' NGIN ER Sand payment to: Barron and Eckhart Engineering Contr. 9855 E. Kale E1 Monte, California VALUES ARE CORRECT. SIGNED CONTRACTOR BY BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9898 EAST KALE AVENUE 50. EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91733 GILBERT 8 -4118 C' May 151, 1967 City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 SPest Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Contract No. 1067 Gentlemen: 4e hereby request an extension of time under the captioned contract due to the follow- ing reasons: Six days due to inclement weather Eight days for pouring concrete on p extra work order �Ll � ✓ Two weeks extra for work on }jar.ing �r F° Avenue bridge. HAE:R Very truly yours, BARRON & ECKHART By� REMYED APAY 171961 DI 3JJLJ WORKS D EPT, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3 CONTRACT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 CONTRACT NU( CONTRACTOR: ARRON R< ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 1. ON THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE, AT THE MID -POINT OF EACH SPAN IN- STALL U -BOLT PIPE HANGERS PER THE DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET 2 OF DRAWING W-5033-s- 2. PERFORM ALL LABOR AND SUPPLY ALL EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO REALIGN THE BUCKLED PIPE UNDER THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE. IT IS UNDER- STOOD THAT ANY BROKEN PIPE, COLLARS, ETC. DISCOVERED DURING THE REALIGNMENT SHALL BE PAID FOR SEPARATELY AND IN ADDITION TO THIS CHANGE. THE TOTAL LUMP SUM PRICE FOR THE ABOVE ITEMS 1 AND 2 IS: $2,400.00 SIGNE CONTRACTO�Ris //�nA�/>�'J�JQo.f� DATE BY DATE _Z-�—// -G FI_c:EIVED MAY ' 1967 to wohhs Dur C NEWPORT BrACH :}a+ w N- -Pen nod. o.N July 17..1m 104 9955 S. We Street Soath Sl Meate, Calilerato LNOWM IM POoM WM - !10 garnet Street )) SSttICt IM10" At man -S1y set ea! oreaed )) _ 122 Carol Street Staipaaat Bantu / 5.00 Labor 42.04 50.04 P1aa 20% owabear 10... D so Pat Swaipa 50 "t WO 5504 Please make check payable to City of Newport Beach. Direct all corrsapondencii�-te Finance Director, City of Newport Beach, 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, Ca it �- PENNEY & PENNEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3416 VIA LIDO GEORGE PENNEY JAMES F. PENNEY NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 JOHN C. PENNEY 673 -7120 Mr. Joseph Devlin, Public Works Director, City Hall, 3300 Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Devlin: JUN 29 1967 eUHUG *OKKS DEPT. June 28,1967 Please be advised that our office represents Robert M. Hixson, Jr. of 215 Agate, Balboa Island, California. I understand Mr. Hixson has brought to your attention the difficulty caused by the alley that abutts his property on Balboa Island. The alley has now been completed. However, the present grade of the alley is below the former grade causing a drop from the garage to the alley. This change in grade has caused scraping and damage to the automobiles owned by my client. I would appreciate it if you would take whatever steps are necessary to remedy this matter. Very truly yours, Jolip C.PENNEY JCP /gg cc: Mr. Robert M. Hixson,Jr. JULY 7. 1967 MR. JOHN C. PENNEY PENNEY AND PENNEY ATTORNEYS AT LAW 3416 VIA LIDO NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, 1966 -6 C -1o67 GENTLEMEN: YOUR LETTER DATED JUNE 28, 1967 REGARDING THE ALLEY IN THE REAR OF 215 AGATE AVENUE, BALBOA ISLAND WAS BEEN REFERREO TO MY OFFICE FOR A REPLY. APPROXIMATELY TWO MONTHS AGO MR. HIXSON CONTACTED THIS OFFICE WITH THE REQUEST THAT, IF POSSIBLE, THE GRADE OF THE ALLEY BEHIND HIS PROPERTY BE RAISED TO PREVENT SCRAPING OF THE LOWER REAR PORTIONS OF HIS AUTOMOBILES. IN A MEETING WITH MR. HIXSON AT THE SITE, HE POINTED OUT THAT ALTHOUGH THE PROBLEM HAD EXISTED SINCE THE ALLEY WAS PAVED A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO, THE RESULTS HAD BECOME MORE SERIOUS AS AUTOMOBILES ARE CONSTRUCTED LOWER AND WITH LONGER REAR OVERHANGS. SUBSEQUENT TO THAT MEETING, THE CITY'S SURVEY PARTY CHECKED THE SLOPE OF THE ALLEY AND FOUND THAT IT DRAINED FROM NORTH BAY FRONT TOWARD PARK AVENUE AT A VERY FLAT GRADE. ANY RAISING OF THE FLOW LINE AT MR. HIXSON'B PROPERTY WOULD ENTAIL REDESIGNING AND REBUILDING THE ALLEYS IN THE ENTIRE BLOCK, AND EVEN THIS MIGHT NOT SATISFACTORILY CORRECT THE PROB- LEM. MR. HIXSON WAS ADVISED OF THIS AND THAT POSSIBLY THE ONLY SOLUTION, WOULD BE TO LOWER THE LEVEL OF THE GARAGE FLOOR. A RECENT INSPECTION OF THE TRENCH RESURFACING INDICATES THAT THE FLOW LINE IS AT APPROXIMATELY THE SAME GRADE AS BEFORE WORK WAS STARTED. IT DOES APPEAR THAT THE ALLEY WESTERLY OF THE FLOW LINE HAS BEEN LOWERED SLIGHTLY RESULTING IN A SMALL IMPROVEMENT IN THE PROBLEM. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME AT 673 -2110, EXT. 26. VERY TRULY YOURS, G. P. DUNIOAN, JR. FIELD ENGINEER GPD/LDG 484 CITY Or NEWPORT BEACH 3300 W. Newport Blvd. California Barron & Eckhart Construction Co. 9855 E. Kale Street South E1 Monte, California Date . June 22, 1967 CITY MATERIALS LOANED TO CONTRACTOR, not returned as agreed: Contract Area - Balboa Island 10 3/4" Water Meter Boxes 3 1" Meter Box CI Lids Tax Plus 207 Overhead @ 2.90 $ 29.00 5.35 16.05 45.05 1.80 46.85 9.37 $ 56.22 cc Pat Dunnigan Eng. Dept. DUPLICATE INVOICE Please make check payable to City of Newport Beach. Direct all correspondence to Finance Director, City of Newport Beach, 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, Calif. 148 607 i C- � �= 3300 W. Newport Blvd. 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH California S Date. _ June 206 1967 ......1. larva and lckhart Construction Company 118 8. Day. 111 Diamondt, 108 Purl. 526 Park. 108 Grand Canal 5/31/67 - 6/16/67 479 UTRRILL 26.93 RMAL 26.00 LAM 109.76 162.69 Plus 20% Overhoad 32.54 195.23 cc Pat Dunigaa. lmg. Dept. s WO 8436 50 -908 Please Bake check payable to City of Newport Beach. Direct all correspondence to Finance Director, City of Newport Beach, 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, Calif. 146-607 C IIY O NEWPORT BEACH: d PUBIL iC WOR:4S DE ARJ'MENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REOUES7 'N0, 6 �F) FOR PERIOD E:NDd MAY 15, 1967 PROJECT° WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 BUDGET NO. 50- 9297 -o4i- v CONTRACT 1067 TEM ' N0. I iY CONT;AC? ITEM CJN i HACT PRICE N i COMPLETE AMUUN I EARNED 1 4" A.C.P. $ 5.35/LF 1056 LF $"5,649.60 2 6" A.C.P. 5.85/LF 8997 LF 52,632.45 3 8" C.I.P. 10.00 /LF 304 LF 3,040.00 4 12" C.I.P. 20.00 /LF 576 LF ;,ae° 11,520.00 5 i 4" G.V. 108.00 EACH 3 EACH I 324.00 6 6" G.V. 130.00 EACH 23 EACH 2,990.00 7 12" G.V. 300.00 EACH 3 EACH 900.00 8 4 x 4 T.S. & V. 260.00 EACH 13 EACH I;ti3,380.00 9 6 x 6 T.S. & V. 326.00 EACHI I EACH � 326.00 IO 8 x 6 T.S. & V. 338.00 EACHI 3 EACH 13014.00 11 12 x 6 T.S. & V. 403.00 EACH1 EACH 15209.00 12 FIRE HYDRANT 310.00 EACH O3 8 EACH 2,480.00 13 COPPER SERVICE 45.00 EACH 547 EACH 24,615.00 14 I" TEMP. A.C. PVMT. 0.40 /LF 6530 LF _ 21612.00 15 1 3" AC /4" A.B. TRENCH RESURFACING 1.20 /LF 8718 LF 10,461.60 I 16 6" P.c.c. 2,00 /I_F lk 1392 LF �3784.eG 17 8" G.V. 260.00 EACH I EACH 264.00 CITY9 NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS O'ARTMENT PROGRESS PA'fMENT REQUEST'.NO. 6 (F) FOR PERIOD ENDING MAY I� L 1967 PRWEC'Io WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966_67 BUDGET NO.. 50 -9297 -041 CONTRACT' NO, 1067 ITEM I NO. I _ l CONTRACT ITEM CONTRACT i PRICE_ PERCENT _COVIPL.ETE AMOUNT EARNED 18 6 x 4 T.S. & V. 320.00 EA.1 I EACH 320.00 $126,517.65 j -.0.1. 10" G.V. (SPECIAL) 575.00 EA� 2 EACH I !! 13150.00 12" G.V. (SPECIAL) 700.00 EA, I EACH 700.00 C.O.2 2" SADDLE AND STOPS $125.00 EA." 4 EACH 500.00 2" COPPER PIPE 5.40 /Lr`a' 80 LF 432.00 C.0.3 ADDITIONAL PIPE HANGERS, ETC. L.S. 2,400.00 I I $131,699.65 ORIGINAL CON -RACE 124,396• 7(� 5 z4 G7 EXTRAS Tr DATE 5,182 00 END PAYMENT T0: CONTRACT ro DATE 129,578 80,),. BARRON AND ECKHART ENGINEERING CONT. AMOUNT EARNED 131j699> 9855 E. KALE LESS YOA RE:TP.NTIC:i 1�3j169,;7- SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA,,, LESS PREVICC� 1Ool, =6,O5 ANGUN" D_, -r is REQI,E:sT 13,603.63 1 I hEREBY CERTIFY ;HAT THE ABOVE AMOJNTS AND VALUES ARE C ^PREC- / S IGN!ED�ve � %� _ S P':A,vleG�_Yf BY 0 &- BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9855 EAST KALE AVENUE SO. EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91733 GILBERT 84118 ST ; f- joie �voceT 33/� 7 l\ r V :o [fry rrl:�C.eEti S.PT. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHANCE ORDER NUMBER: 2 CONTRACT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 CONTRACT NUMBER: 067 CONTRACTOR: BARRON AND ECKHART ENG. CONTR. PER SUBMITTAL DATED MARCH 16, 19671 INSTALL 1z -INCH AND 2 -INCH COPPER WATER SERVICES AS DIRECTED AT THE UNIT PRICES OF: SERVICE COMPLETE EXCEPT PIPE: $125.00 EA. COPPER WATER PIPE: 5.40 /LIN.FT. THE FINAL AS -BUILT QUANTITIES ARE: SERVICES: p4 EA. @ $125.00 $500.00 PIPE: W LIN.FT. O° 5.40 432.00 TOTAL $932.00 S IGNED,j/� ,� -r��j r/�' CONTRACTOR:- fEW1022Q 6 he-' DATE: S /D '6 7 BY:� lJ. /9iYLl7�l_ DATE: S j I _ l�etf/!�ca : anupus� cs' liartc A= �wztca FF.. ' 1! rc loss A.ian.z:'xt MT. 2. 1. '44 tat 3ta.tS r : aw "Inn .crud is dlftn _r i. r. 1y .trrnr TO a s« .tr.l WkAC—'- ^. r. l,-st : r 1,24 Ayo3rr s, 71i tSbra «Its . ^x+ A.j:. -1; *1.12. 1,!7 '; *;r.x,, ►s a amtitrretr.:t cr t'1te tf*r f1h"gold tkrt sar.tlal !lou *f ur.iia"e vatot kn tas AL`ty xt loar 6f tzkt 7SakL4rt Zftfiin'v*v:a.j outtactora, 9143I 'l:ev 5,1. -t$ M Irlcxti. rrltfansH► ;.s, rke ctedtzr.tti.ri �.MrktxV Lh thin asst v* tba City loetlr make► seylat.erimn prog:aza ak !96: -o't (C- 1366). ;Litt. ,l wl "*d arb two 64ti :Atra for wopmr. Very tx -m1q ra•ue. L&vra Lagloe Chy elm* City @f Jt urart a4+4e Lg Luel. ccs City Maangor Cl!r Attor+aey k'a;1k¢ iactks Jbpaatr_;gt i 0 0 CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AGAINST THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1. Name of claimant: L. H. Himmelrich 2. Post Office address of claimant:. 1786 Monrovia Ave., Costa Hesa 92627 3. Post Office address to which notices are to be sent: abovd 4. Date, place and other circumstances of the occurrence or transaction which gave rise to the claim asserted: April 21 -22, 193.7, 224 Annl -nn r Balboa Island. Contractor or the City changed the normal flow of 1. A dam of dirt was placed across the Balk-:)a Avenue alley .entrance way to protect a larIXPhole duh nt th- entr1nrrq of thn alley, The water ditch wan threp to fnnr nnh.c helnw the level of the alley, close to the rear of this property. 3. The fence and nnturnI barr node to the water had been damaged and changed by thi:- ditc'i.digggingg. S. General description of the indebtedness, ob7kgafion, injury, damage or loss incurred: 4. TYater backed up by the dam and running into the ditch broke thru and ran into ar_d around the house nt 224 Anolena_ RnnS and pnd,c will ha have to be replaced. Floor tile must be re —glued — On REPLACED, floor cleaned and rewared_ Outside rear and one side cleaned up. two pair of drapes cleaned. 1 Fence underpinning replaced. Loss of rental and general damages 6.1 Name or names of the City employee or employees causing the injury,, damage �j Fireolace chimney hood needs realir_i%,, dislod_;ed iu removin- rums. or loss, if known; 7. The amount claimed as of the date of presentation of the claim, including the estimated amount of any prospective injury, damage or loss, insofar as it may be ]mown at the time of presentation of this claim,.together with the basis of computation of the amount claimed: Signature of claimant or his authorized representative: Date: May 1, 1967 L. H. Himmelrich Telephone number: 646 -2461 _ L x.11 Y f,LtRrd a CITY OF "Fi(TORT 3FACN C7 iF i j��' hone Teiephone 991 642.0051 CARLTON'S LINOLEUM SHOP 135 East 17fh Street COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA Charge to Date JOb Location 22 The following estimate includes all mated, noted and Iabor neauary M Install rams. All .daces to be covered shall be delivered to as broom clean and ready to receive materiel specified. Any p ,. fury work performed by us will M added to estiimmaatted price unlessss specifically included iIs utimeto. �'�.�Z�_ /�!- Zy :7 /•_. h- t..��.•ft.L y� '! LAC "C�C!`LJti V. 71 / EG r q�'J!rptr;� CAD \ tm /Veto Meda Buau q Ma"&a" a CaoLm"g; "We Don't Want All The Business - Just Yours" Bill Fitzgerald P. O. Box 623 - Costa Mesa, California Liberty 8 -8166 May 8, 1967 Mrs. Himmelrich 1786 Monrovia Costa Mesa, California For the sum of $25.00 (twenty —five dollars) the NEW MESA BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMPANY agrees to clean and wag floors in the home at 224 Apelona, Balboa Island, California. Accepted by Yours truly, ALL W. G. F-it , erald, 0 ner NEW MESA BLDG. MAINT CO. l/ BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9855 EAST KALE AVENUE SO, EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91733 GILBERT 8 -4118 March 9,1967 CITY ENGINEER CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH NEWPORT BEACH? CALIFORNIA Re: Water Main Contract No. 1067 Gentlemen: The following items require clarification on the above contract due to a differential between existing field conditions and the proceedure recommended on the plans. Several items require deviation foam the plan designated methods, and such have been discussed with your forces in the field and varying methods recommended to permit installation of the water mains in such manner to overcome the plan discrepancies. We recently wrote to your office regarding numerous items, and lacliing a formal reply to our letter, consider your silence a waiver of protest to any changes that have been effected and installed, and are awaiting your recommendations on those items which require revised drawings. The following are items which require additional consideration due to field variances as against plan designations: 1) Paving- we have been instructed verbally by your forces that the paving may be done by installing 511 of asphalt over smil, in place of the 311 of asphalt over 411 of base material. With the verbal authorization only, we would appreciate your confirmation in writing. Due to the urgency of time on the contract, we will proceed on the verbal authorization unless we hear from you to the contrary. 2) Page Two of Plans -- Alley S/0 Marine Avenue- Bridge tie in - we need a revised drawing and letter of authorization due to the variation of field conditions versus plan requileements. 3) Forth End of bridge- Plans show a 1211 G.V.- cannot connect as per plans due to the fact that the valve is an R% P GV. Need a clarification and instructions on revised connection. 4) Page 3 of Plans- Tie -ins- Park, between Crystal and Jade- Hot Taps are required according to plans -- field conditions show that there are valves on the lines which will require an adjustment on methods to tie -in. The cost of tie -in will involve additional labor, materials and about 26 man -hours of work to make the adjustment. Please advise as to your recommended method of adjustment and pricing. 5) Page 3 of Plans- G.V�,at Park & Alley- e/o Grand Canal- valve does not operate and * valve will have to be replaced. Please provide written instructions. BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9855 EAST KALE AVENUE SO. EL MONTE. CALIFORNIA 91733 GILBERT 8 -4118 March 9, 1967- Newport Beach- Page 2 6) Page 6 of Plans- Alley W/O of Emerald- requires two hot taps on ends of lines- We were advised to use Std. Plan W5050L as modified with penciled notations in the field by your forces. 7) Hydrant, Alley E/0 of Marine- Should be No. 09- 611 tapping sleeve. Existing line is a 411 line- we are told to move the hydrant and install same on our new line, this eliminates the hot tap and will require some additional materials and labor on our adjusting the hydrant to field conditions. We would appreciate your immediate attention to this inquiry and to the items contained in our prior letter. Time is running out on the contract and we feel that all final items take on an urgent classification at this time. Unless we get prompt replys, we will be forced to extend the contract beyond the specified time limit. The special adjustments required on the installation of valves will require materials which have at this writing a 5 weeks order period. We cannot proceed with the related work and final paving until these installations are made. Unless we hear from you promptly, we shall consider your lack of response to be a waiver of the time limitation and penalty provision in the contract, we will proceed as far as our plans, instructions and written modifications shall permit, and then place our men and machinery on Stand -By time until such time as you have been able to provide us with the plan adjustments required. Our principal interest at this time is to completethis cont +:act in the shortest possible time consistent with good wrokmanship, and your immediate cooperation will assist imm easurably in attaining this goal. Since we are not engineers and the standards of the job preclude variations without your written approval, we must rely on your willingness and ability to affect these modifications in the shortest possible time required. Please give this your immediate attention. We would also appreciate your responses to our prior letter inasmuch as that work is being held in abeyance pending your reply. Very truly yours �r 'le� Partner Barron & Eckhart Engineering Contractors BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9855 EAST KALE AVENUE SO. EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91733 J GILBERT 8 -4118 January 25,1967 R E C E I v Mr. Derek White 'JAN 27 1961 Director of Public Works u City of Newport Beach Newport Beach, California vM1 Re: Contract No. 1067 Watermain replacement program- 1966 -1967 Dear Mr. White: In order that we might continue our production schedule in such fashion as to complete the contract within the contract time limitations, we would like to bring to your attention at this time several items which need your attention and advices. . In view of the contents of Section 4, Paragraph 4:03, we feels that wertain matters should be now clarified to avoid delays. Part will iuv&lve Extra Work, while part will require certain plan alterations. To facilitate matters, we will. out line the items in question and await your advices. Item 1- Plan page 6- Tie in , tee, d valve at rear of Lot 8, No. Bay Avenue, between Emerald and Park. Plans Show: Existing 4 x 4 tee and requires installation of increaser And gate valve. Field Investigation: Our investigation indicates that there is a 2" saddle on a 4 " main, with a 90' turn on the 4 " line only. The line extending on No. Bay Avenue is a 2" line. Please advise as to how this connection should now be made, since it it will not be possible to construct same according to plan requirements. Item 2- Plan Page 6- So. Bay Avenue, rear of lots 6d7- A similar problem a in 1 above, with the same requirement evident. Item 3 -- Valve Connections- Park Avenue- Alley between Emerald and Garnet Alley between Garnet d Pearl. Plans Show- 6 " gate valve- requiring connections of new pipe to same with two valves at each location. Field Investigation shows that the existing valves are 2" gate valves. The new 6" line cannot be connected without some alteration in design. Please advise your desires in effecting this connection. Item 4- Park Avenue- Alley west of Emerald- Plans show a 10 x 6 cross connection. Actual field investigation shows a 6 x 6 cross, and the required valve connot be placed per plans. If so done, it will protrude above the surface of the ground. Some adjustment is indicated. • Janu ry 25, 1967 Page 2 Newport Beach Contract 1067 Item 5- As per the many field notations mmo.,wit your inspections forces, there are numerous valves an your existi " ''nes which are not in. operating condition, and Late which we will to make future coppections., We would appreciate yout.haviag the City forces check the +t*tYps and. make whatever adjustments are necessary to prevent any Sncar►ewLance to the City and the water vseis during the Cie -ins. Item 6- Alley between Crystal and Jade and Park Avenue- Plans show a tie -iv required to a 8 x 8 and 6 x'6 het tap. The actual line inspection shows a16 inch gate valve', but of conflicting materials with those being used on our line. We have been advised that theae.10%. aps are being eliminated from the contract price schedule. However se feel that some adjustment is in order due to the extra work invold in adjusting the new live to the existing materials. Item 7- The Standard Drawings, Page STD -503 -L indicate that ,l" services shall be installed between the main and the meter unless otherwise directed. Special Provisions, Page SP -4, ;Section X, indicate that.2" services shall be paid for in a seperate Unit Price. Inasmuch as we have installed several such 2" services, and no Unit Price is indicated in our contract, we would like to meet with you to evolve a Unit Price for this omitted item. We would appreciate you immediate attention to these requests so that delays in completion can be avoided. Simple shop drawings will suffice -for our needs on the several plan changes indicated as necessary so long as. they are satisfactory to your office. Very truly yours BARRON Q ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS Robert N Barron, Partner r CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Laboratory Analysis for March 1967 - Relative Compaction Tests #67-.0 -718 thru 725 4 hrs. 6 5.00 hr- 8 tests 6 11.00 ea. Relative Compaction 2 tests 6 11.00 ea. Tests #76 -C -74B & 749 Field Time 2 hrs. 6 5.00 hr- Relative Compaction 2 tests 6 11.00 ea. Tests #67-C- 777 & 778 1 test 6 2.20 ea. ALLEYS (SEWER) - (ALLEY BTN. MIRAMAR, 70' B/o "M" ST.) Field Tine 1 hr. 6 5.00 hr. Relative Compaction 1 test 6 11.00 ea. Test #67-C -790 BAWCA ISLAND. Field Time 4 hrs. 0. 10.00 hr. Relative Compaction 8 tests ® 11.00 ea. Tests #67 -0-820 thru 827 BAYSIDA am I Field Time 5 hrs. 6 5.00 hr. Relative Compaction 8 tests 6 11.00 ea. Tests #67-C -848 thru 855 BAYSIDE DRIVE Coarse Grad nr 1 test ® 3.30 ea. Fine Grading 1 test 6 6.60 ea. Sand Equivalent 1 test 6 2.20 ea. Test #67 -P-443 JAMBOREE ROAD BRIDGE Cone. Cylinder 1 test a 2.20 ea. 20.00 88.00 108.00 Z 15.00 22.00 37.00 (Continued on Next Page) - i' a 10.00 22.00 32.00 5.00 11.00 16.00 40.00 88.00 128.00 25.00 88.00 113.00 3.30 6.60 2.20 12.10 2.20 2.20 Page 2. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Laboratory Analysis for Nareh 1967 (Contd) Field Time Relative Compaction Tentative Compaction Tests #67 -CJ371 thru 876 LINE 2 - SO. HAY ALLEY LI18E No. BAY ALLEY a 1 BTN. RUBY & DIAMOND LINE 19 - BTN. APOLENA & AMETHYST LINE 1 - M. APOLENA & ANETAYST Field Time Relative Compaction Tests #67-C -902 thru 906 BAIBOA ISLM Field Time Relative Compaction Test f67- .C_959 SEWER RF'PLACEMENT PROJECT 66-67 Field Time Relative Compaction Tests #67 -C -970 & 971 4 hra. 5 tests 1 test 5 hrs. 5 tests 1 hr. 1 test 2 hrs. 2 tests IRV M /TUST311. 22ND STREET - UNIVERSITY An a 5.00 hr. 11.00 ea. a 6.60 ea. a 5.00 hr. 0 11400 sa. 0 10.00 hr. ® 11.00 sa. Drill Rig (Oper. & 2 men)- Sampling 2 hrs. s Drill Rig (Operator & 2 men) 2 hrs. 0 Ber_kcanan Beam Studys Drill Rig (Oper. & 5 men) 2 hrs. 0 Resistance Values 5 tests 0 Tests #67 -3.8, 19, 21 & 67 -167 & 169 Resle-tance Values 4 tests 0 Tests #67- 167 -L2, 167 -L3, 67- 169-12, 67- 169 -L3 Mechanical Analysis 10 tests 0 Tests #67 -16 thru 67 -23, 67 -167 a. 67 -169 Moistures 10 tests Tests #67 -a.6 thru 67 -23, 67 -167 & 67 -169 Offices Drafting, Report Preparration & Analysis, 16 hra. s 5.00 hr- 11.00 ea. 15.00 hr. 13.00 hr. 30.00 hr. 27.50 ea. 38.50 ea. 11.00 as. 1.10 ea. 5#00 hr. (Continued on Page 3) - 20.00 56.60 17.� 25.00 55.00 80.00 10.00 11.00 21.00 10.00 22.00 32.00 30.00 26.00 60.00 137.50 154.00 ]10.00 11.00 80.00 608.50 Page 3- 0 CITY OF NEWPORT SUCH i Laboratory Analysis for ',arch 1967 (Contd) WATER LIM REPLACEMENT Piold Time Relatim Cammaction Tests #67- b..1o65 thra 1067 3 hrs- s 5.00 hr- 15.00 3 teats 0 11.00 ea- 33.00 Total - $ 1319.40 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 5. FOR PERIOD ENDI a Ap "iL IF_ 1- -TTY PROJECTt WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 ; BUDGET N0. CONTRACT 1o67 NO. GONTRAGT ITEM:. PKIGL bVWLLIL CAKKLU 4" A.C.P. $5.35/LF 1050 LF 5,617.50 2. 6" A.C.P. 5,85/LF 8800 LF 51,480:00 3 8" c.t.p. 10.00 /LF 250 LF 2,500.00 4. 12" C.I.P...: 20.00 /LF 487 LF 9740.00. 5- 4" G.V. ,;..:.., I08.00 EACH 3 EACH ` 324.00 6. 6" G.V. 130.00 EACH 23 EACH 2s990•oO 7. 12" G.V. 300.00 EACH I EACH 300.00 ' 8. 4 x 4 T.S. & v. 260.00 EACH 13 EACH 3,38.00' 9. .6 x 6 T.S. & V. 326.00 EACH t EACH 326.00 ' 10. 8 x 6 T.S. & V. 338.00 EACH 3 EACH I,o14.00 II. 12 x 6 T.S. & V. 403.00 EACH 3 EACH 1,209:00 12. FIRE HYDRANT - �- 310.00 EACH: 3 EACH 1,550.00. 13- a• COPPtR SERVICR' 45.00 EACH 546 EACH 24,570.00 14. 1 ",TcMP A.C. PVMT. 0.40 /LF •6240 LF 20496.00 15. A 3" AC/4 "A.89 TRCNCN RESURFACING 1.20 /LF 3355 LF 4,o26.00 16. 6" P.c.c. 2.00 /LF 980 LF 1,96o.00 17. 8" G.V. 260.00 EACH low • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH — PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 5 FOR PERIOD ENDING APRIL 152 1967 PROJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM, 1966 -61 BUDGET NO. 50-9297 -041 CONTRACT NO. 1067 18 6 x 4 T.S. & V. 320.00 EA. I EACH 320.00 $113,802.50 C.0.1 10" G.V. (SPECIAL) 575.00 EA. 2 EACH 11,150.00 12" G.V. (SPECIAL) 700.00 EA. I EACH 700.00 C.O. 2 2" SADDLE AND STOPS 125.00 EA. 4 EACH 500.00 2" COPPER PIPE 5.40/LF 80 LF 432,00 $116,584.5o ORIGINAL CONTRACT 124,3 6.80 EXTRAS TO DATE 2,702.00 CONTRACT TO DATE 12 ,I 8. END PAYMENT TO: 7 7 �K tq /- z�6 '�Ct � AMOUNT EARNED I16,j .550•7Ti? ARRON AND ECKHART ENGINEERING CONT. LESS 10% RETENTION 11,65 45 E. 9855 KALE LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 86,479. SOUTH EL MONTE, CAUFORNIA AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST 18,446.63 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. / S I GNEDZ� —�/ S I GNEDAjZ ,, c 4f fC46 �rii 7• c j- f;;;., ENO INEE �� TR /�� PURCHASE ORDER OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 PHONE: (714) 673 -2110 : -- � VENDOR Barron & Eckhart'Esgr. Cast. E. Kale South El V"te. calif"Ma E No. 5280 INVOICE IN DUPLICATE THIS ORDER NUMBER MUST 1 APPEAR ON ALL INVOICES, SHIP- PING NOTi_ES. DILLS OF LAD• 1 INd� EOP 4E5S RECEIPTS ANO 1 FACNA =ES. DELIVERY TICKETS $HAL% IN- CLUDE UNIT PRICE. d DATE April 24. 196e7 {{. ' rPARTMENT Public' Works it G.S. !I _.;:4� . QUANTITY DESCRIPTION OF ARTICLES O• :•ICES REQUIRED UNIT PRICE TOTAL kvrox. 3000 sf 6' O.C.C. Pavement Patch - Including Saw Catting and Reseval of Existing Pavement - Per Attached List .95 /sf 2850.49 FOR CITY USE ONLY .. .IMPORTANT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CODE AMOUNT . )- 9297-041 — ��t 360.00 Show as a separate item any retail sales tax, use tax 3316 2490.00 or Federal tax applicable to this purchase. This order subject to 4% sales tax. All allowable transportation charges must be prepaid PURCHASING AGENT and shown as a separate item on the invoice. Do not include Federal transportation tax.., ...� DEPARTMENT COPY ❑Preliminory tests prior to award of contract. Control tests on materials actually • entering into works. i COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- 67- C 5 —Ip6 FIELD No- �] /L'Y' 3 `RELATIVE COMPACTION w oroa P.O OR AHFP7 r— DATE REPTD. -3— SLX-47 If contract, use contract item PROJECT b':L/+l c1GENCYcZti /rwLA "] RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) ^RYLS1 c A/ ' '.. CONTRACTOR fj'n'i.;✓ t,SC1C/j�'n, i SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION El AAGErsicv,._� ' MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 1,nZZ I E "fi L /AF_ BEZPAID AU G'N IX1K RT LT OF Ct STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIALS. L{F DEPTH 40 TO 16' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3-2,"—,C i TESTED BY: I- Rir%iCS 7-BAZ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 43.35- B WT. SAND RETAINED 1 C WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED Z / F VOLUME CONE + RING Z GI VOLUME TEST HOLE JS H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT S J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE I j, K WET DENSITY IN PLACE_ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK Z WET WT. - i DRY WT. Q TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSI TY R . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE.DATA MOLD NO. 1 2:, r 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z % 5 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE ; "1< Z L 2 If?,) CONDITION OF MOLD AL'E- W S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN , c' c. 1 T WET DENSITY 9. V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q =_ VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -F K =1 =G CONE .1667 - L = K = (166% +N) Q = O = (100 %, + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.1 1140 ITIF I B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 12 a 137- MOISTURE r' 94 RC =7% TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE.MADF AT END OF MONTH BY ALS GINEER RELATIVE COMPACTION ... Wit... . ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. TEST SAND tward o contract. o ROAD DEPARTMENT T. SAND RETAINED 7 -;- Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— �7c- x—/066 22AO D FIELD NO. Dr 3 s �^ tests On RELATIVE VOLUME SAND USED COMPACTION COOT. NO OR (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFPI y> materials actually materials G VOLUME TEST HOLE 47a —A entering into works. • "' 'F M DATE REPTD. —.�L v —C7 If contract, use contract item -_7 PROa'.CT FA/T Ar�NI{rCY G/NEW P!h'T BE "'P /-/ RESIT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) !` ^rNS -�A. sr;' CONTRACTOR BAARO/V d A-'A 6�4RT_ ;^ SEND T TO: CONSTRUCTION ouTSIOE " ❑ AGENCY `MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATIOIV�N //JE ,6!/A/D ,[/2 C/'7BA RT LT OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIALN -S B -F- vJ4rEl7 kiAtAl DEPTH 6ii TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3 -? 7 -G / TESTED BY: T 241,4T WET DENSITY IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB E" T. SAND RETAINED 7 -;- C WT. SAND USED 22AO D TEST SAND DENSITY N El VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. -4 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT 35- J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE I�, K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /�'`'•? L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA ., FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 3 DRY WT. O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK a C DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - e, Q DRY WT. -4 - TOTAL DRY WT, % ROCK R CORR.MAX.OENSITY -}' 71 . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 ' 2 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION a C z Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE -}' 71 '1716 CONDITION OF MOLD -(r"' S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q =/?' 4C.C1 VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J - G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100 % +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG.-RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.1 I B- 140 IIE y METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC - :L % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY M A GIN R a z RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- 67 -C -10 7 r FIELD NO. 12,2f '_ . RELATIVE COMPACTION CONT. NO.OR �j Control fasts On IW.O. OR P.O. OR AMFPI jW materials actually �zt� —tom p entering into works. - - DATE REE PT D. • If contract, use contract item PROJECT. _ AG NCYC - /NEw PnRT G6ntc f! RESIDENT ENGI (INSPECTOR) V/,R '�Al CONTRACTOR 4&TA'//V P h -4WQ!T SEND REPORT TO: - 'CONSTRUCTION E) AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION - — F W57 ffrMjNO //IL RT LT OF FL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS .'TYPE MATERIAL,'V. �'3a= LINE DEPTH �� TO /Z // BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATF'3-2Z &7 TESTED BY: T 9QL57_C -n, -IL PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND .,Z - 8 WT. SAND RETAINED - 1 C WT. SAND USED z, D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED - s ,2LZ F VOLUME CONE + RING Z4 G VOLUME TEST HOLE / H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC.`SAMPLE t4 S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE ..L L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE G /OPT_ METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE .FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 'f. MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK _ WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK - Z4 WETWT,_a - DRY WT. - 3 Q TOTAL DRY WT. -- % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 230 ??Jpo _ P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z4 tarp - Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE t4 S tG.6 CONDITION OF MOLD G /OPT_ Fw% S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN jr /. / -30 - - T WET DENSITY I V DRY DENSITY I -- CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C- D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J -G CONE .1667 - L = K . (100% +N) Q = 0 - (100`7 + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) . Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG. NG RI .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.1 i B� G1 METHOD A ❑ B.® SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PL ACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC = � % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE.MADE AT END OF MONTH BY — 'i' j 1 4 E ALS E ER RELATIVE COMPACTION P�2K F4v`= -lv�ti i= tai °c2,+1iv'cc? zo 9 A m a m j r d l��rATC B ?% t 1 Ribii7 V(,&z r fit. H AAi.f`wAj P+`t2K Y'rVeQ "�f 'r- A-N,Q iS Ac,A7d AV,-:-. 0 a m J 0 a m ❑Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. Cl /job �Conerol tests on materials actually • entering inta works: PROJECT'_ RESIDENT ENGIN i SEND REPORT TO: .0 LOCATION L1t. -L 21 REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL 1` DATE COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTIo P-51 a F. iLgNJJ TOR)k` )I [J CE. OENSITY A INITIAL W -> `AND $, J EI WT. SAND RETAINED LAB ' Cl WT. SAND USED 2-840 D TEST SAND DENSITY 4 E.VOLUME SAND USED N F VOLUME CONE +RING WET WT. ROCK G VOLUME TEST HOLE 8 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 23 I TARE WEIGHT 5.10 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE _ 2 p, C' C K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /g L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE DEI _TESTED BY:! AAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ RT LT OF rL STA TO J4' t BELOW FINISHED GRADE ;=FAETHOD A M ,PRE SAMPLE_ ".ELD LAB ' _ WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK 2,420 WET WT. - 34 DRY WT.) Q TOTAL DRY.WT. %, ROCK CORR.MAX.DE, vY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 7300 3cc, P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2,420 2360 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE c,'7 2, CONDITION OF MOLD', F:W- OV, UNDER S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY 120•. 1 2 L _ VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = 1361.6 VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 =G CONE .1667 - L = K _ (100% +N) Q = 0 - (100 %'+ N) .SM. RING .0143 .181'0 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RtFuElvFD n�f 1 1140 METHOD A Cl B 9 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY i g 23 MOISTURE 9'O7° vNDE RC = % G % TENT. RC = %. SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. 2 I9 67 BILLING WILL E � PUBLIC ,.;...�rT, ,hEAT D 7ON TH � BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR,) tnnreelnls a eg F30I1-83.1 & RELATIVE COMPACTION 0 4 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 4 FOR PERIOD EPA PROJECTt WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 BUDGET NO. 02- 3097-50 CONTRACT 2. 3• 4. 5• 6. 7• 8. 9• 10. 11. 12. 13. 4" A.C.P. 6" A.C.P. 8" C.I.P. 12" C.I.P. 4" G.V. 6" G.V. 12" G.V. 4 x 4 T.S. & V. 6 x 6 T.S. & V. 8 x 6 T.S. & V. 12 x 6 T.S. & V. FIRE HYDRANT COPPER SERVICE $5.35/LF 5.85/LF 10.00 /LF 20.00 /LF 108.00 EACH i30.00 EACH 300.00 EACH! . 260.00 EACH 326.00 EACHI 338.00 EACH 403.00 EACH 310.00 EACH 45.00 EACH 1050 LF 8575 LF 215 LF 487 LF 5 EACH I EACH 13 EACH 1 EACH 3 EACH 3 EACH 5 EACH 350 EACH 14. 1" TEMP A.C. PVMT. 0.40 /LF 1 5365 LF 15. 3" AC %4 "A.B. TRENCH RESURFACING I 1.20 /LF 1 150 LF 16. 6" P.C.C. 2.00 /LF 9 796 LF 17. 8" G.V. 26o.00 _„,:.; 18. 6 x 4 T.S. & V. 320.00 c EACH ORIGINAL CONTRACT 0 $124,596.8D EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE AMOUNT EARNED �I j? jjI II END'PAYMEHY �r96,00000825 //% ��- /(y(0.,•. TOT 15. 1 $ 5,617.50 50,i63.75 z,15o.00 9,74o.00 650.00 300.00 3,380.00 326.00 1,o 14.00 1,209.00 1,550.00 15,750.00 2.146.00 180.00 1,592.00 320.00 $96,o88.25 LESS IO,b RETENTION 9 • 3 BARRON AND ECKHART ENO. CONTR. LESS ?REVIOUS PAYME.. �(- ,910•'2 9855 E. KALE AMOv., .i UE THIS RECVC:. -3,56960 SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA . HEA,'. CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT. SIGNED =:� SIGNED DL NOINE I CONTRACTOR BY - ❑ Preliminary tests prior to award of contract f' Control taste oeF materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing SeWle RELATIVE COM ACTION TEST NO. C- .FIELD NO 1 It contract, Use contract item PROJECT L- ug. 19 - OIL�'jX "'AGENCY _ 7 — RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) ri s" " CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ Ac- c °v D MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD ❑;; LOCATION R LT OFrE'ST REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL wJ- tRs v C DATE -5 -8 -4i 7 TESTED BY IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 44.70 EI WT. SAND RETAINED - IR.56, ' C WT. SAND USED 27.70 D TEST SAND DENSITY gl.7q E .VOLUME SAND USED �J F VOLUME CONE + RING .1810 G VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT, EXC. SAMPLE + TARE /q• 50 { TARE WEIGHT 2,75 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /o .7 T K WET DENSITY IN PLACE p , co L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 0114 MOI' WET WT... DRY WT. M04ST. SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - DRY WT. - TOTAL DRY W1 % ROCK CORR.MAX.DED nom+ r F' ;WERMI7S ❑ • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 220 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION zzocJ Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE f LD CONDITION OF MOLD 0114 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMENp T WET DENSITY 2- J 7 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C. F. C= A- B E= L+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE :1667 - L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 - (1 OOH + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING.'.. .0302 ,;:1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276 -F (DENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGRJ -83.1 METHOD A ❑ B 0 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN 'i .. OPT. PLACE DENSITY O MOISTURE f "o t-4 12. RC '= % T. RC = 8(. `i % SPE 'IEICATION4 NL_7 A. ❑ Prei minory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE t to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTME� , s, Material Testing Section TEST o. C— B7z FIELD NO. Z� RELATIVE COMPACTION C.0. NO OR ® Control tests On Iw.O. OR P O OR AHFP)4�4-k' materials actually .. entering into works. f= - _ DATE REPTD. • If controcS, use roct item PROJECT -'NCY C.Iti�urt�¢r,:. C33xr� -"•+ RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) ��' - CONTRACTOR. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTR CTION ❑ 0u'sID "x _ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUB - 7> RMITS ❑ LOCATION Lrk)c 19 %40 PAV i,: _ - -RT LT OF REPRESENTING LIMITS°' TYPE MATERIAL .ts P. s= DEPTH )Z" TO ZC­ BELOW" (SHED GRADE DATE = - S -G'7 TESTED BY: lj¢¢e.�" IN PLACE DENSITY A,j INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 46 B WT. SAND RETAINED 14. C WT. SAND USED , D TEST SAND DENSITY N' E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING ! I GI VOLUME TEST HOLE . /6S H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 2 , I TARE WEIGHT ? y5 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE , 7 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE a: - FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. M N' SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK g WET WT. -j -.. DRY WT. - n Q TOTAL DRY WT.. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DEN ":rX. R • MAXIMUM DENSITY,- RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN oo . P WET WT. AT COMPACTION g Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD F S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ev //, T WET DENSITY i •Z V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT G =E - F K =J -G CONE 1667 ICONE+UNIT - L = K _ 1100 -3 +N) Q = O = 0! 00% + N) SM. RING .0143' ..1810 R = (P -Q) = Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING 1 .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) /3011 -33,f ❑ BILLI BY 0 IPA ­V -S METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY G `/e MOISTURE RC = f! % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% RELATIVE COMPACTION ter. s f ' L.J Preliminary tests prior t to award of comroct. ® Control tests on materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE . ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testine Section RELATIVE COMPA UA rE KEPT U. :� — 'mow• / If :contract, use contract item PROJECT -L e AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 12c -. •.0 CONTRACTOR, -mot SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ A'AGENCG'ES, • Y '-�" MAINTENANCE ❑ AlliU6D: ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION. LIKM i-7 t ILA K RT LT OF (L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL- wl.n.I4,.G DEPTH 12" TO_.�,� —BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3 —E— &7 TESTED BY:���-� IN PLACE DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND -01 i; B WT. SAND RETAINED d FIELD 'LAB C WT. SAND USED _L2_10 AS- Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. WET WT. " D TEST SAND DENSITY 81.74 DRY WT. E VOLUME SAND USED 3q.- % MOIST. M N F VOLUME CONE + RING .(8/0 I SP. GR. ROCK G VOLUME TEST HOLE G WET WT. ROCK E= C D H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE lq - DRY WT. ROCK K = J G I TARE WEIGHT 2.� WET WT. - 7 0 = 0 = (I00 % +N) J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE .1810 R = (P-Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /p2. a7 TOTAL DRY WT:' L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 200 °oo P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J G CONE .1667 - L= K= (t00 % +N) 0 = 0 = (I00 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216•F i a- y METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 102 72 MOISTURE aw. RC = <2j % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL,% ❑ BILLING WILL BE M DE A END OF 7AH f BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary rests prior u to award o1 contract. s Control tests on ice,- materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION If co f'�u ikx- Ct item TEST 00 C— C FIELD NO. CONT O. NO. OR (W.O. R P.O. OR ANFPI 4Zg -✓ DATE REPTD. 3 =' L - ✓7 PROJE de !G EiTVJ CQ9ZlAL - fill'"' ` - r- {AI AT- t�[<p,� -A" ._ .. - GENCY RES,tjjtNT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION ULK 11�- 9�ea Pace RT LT OF (� STA REPRESENTING LIMITS ^3 TYPE MATERIAL - Ura BF DEPTH '.'; TO �Z�` ' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE '3 -$ -G7 TESTED BY:`f IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND jg, 00 BI WT. SAND RETAINED � -4C C WT. SAND USED Z6.Cor, D TEST SAND DENSITY 1,74 E VOLUME'SAND.USED WET WT. ROCK.`"4x. F VOLUME CONE +'RING.'''. .1Q1 G VOLUME TEST HOLE i. "' TRY WT - s H WT. EXC. SAMPLE -S ARE 1-, rI TARE WEIGHT Z -TS R WE7 WT. EXC. SAMPLE 141 - K WET DENSITY IN PLACE , 8 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE Uv aL ? METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT.' MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN N - SP. GR. ROCK` WET WT. ROCK.`"4x. P DRY WT. ROCK 2 3 WET WT. -,' TRY WT - s "" TOTAL DRY WT. %ROCK - CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATN04E..DATA MOLD NO. 1 2,qK 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Z Z O 2. ZED C) P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2 3 z 3 83 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - R % MOISTURE - f 5. O + 8. 3 CONDITION OF MOLD Uv aL ? W vC- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x -q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE 1667 - L =K= (100 % +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY'ENGR) r3a11 -83.1 1 B• METHOD A ❑ S SUMMARY RECORD WHOLEt IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY h0i //2— MOISTURE 7 "o U RC % TENT. RC % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE DE- E D OF MONTH BY MA 3 ENGI .RELATIVE COMPACTION s ❑ PreliminarY tests prior - COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT • c j - Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— /Ci %\S_ .. FIELD NO. 7 —T /_. RELATIVE COMPACTION °R -_. Control tests on IW.O. OR P.O. OA ANFP) 424 -1[ - materials actually �� _ entering into works. -.'7 G 7 • If contract, use Ca aft,mo item PROJECT &ATW RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) ,�i( �1 CONTRACTOR- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENC°1. MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD'RMITS ❑ LOCATION L-'r E G 5/� P++.ee - vim` -.RT LT OF CL S REPRESENTING LIMITS - TYPE MATERIAI w?6 P,P DEPTH I7" TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 3 -R -4.7 TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4-.40 B WT. SAND RETAINED 20.40 C WT. SAND USED Z7.. Co' .. D TEST SAND DENSITY VI-744 E VOLUME SAND USED 3 F VOLUME CONE + RING - G VOLUME TEST HOLE , lag3 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE - I TARE WEIGHT 2.715 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 17.90 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE - METHOD =_ MOISTURE SAM LE FIELD -- LAB. WET WT.- MOLD NO. - - DRY WT. 3 - - % MOIST. I M1 I N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK - WET WT. DRY WT. — Q TOTAL DRY WT:, - - % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.1 1 B- -5 - FIELD +S ( %WET) METHOD A ❑ B 4 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE A! RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL - %, ❑ .BILLING WILL BE DE E OF MONTH - BY RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA - MOLD NO. 1 2 - 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2200 - P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. -- R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ! .6 T WET DENSITY i,q I , - - V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q =r,3O2� VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 + (100% + N) SM. RING, ,,',- .:01' - -43_ .1810 R = (P-Q) = Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LGRINU:... ,:_:,:0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.1 1 B- -5 - FIELD +S ( %WET) METHOD A ❑ B 4 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE A! RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL - %, ❑ .BILLING WILL BE DE E OF MONTH - BY RELATIVE COMPACTION Preliminary tests prior l!. to award of contract, Control tests on _ '1110'Oriels Octao,ry • entering into works. PRO EC7 RESIDENT E ....: R ONSPECTORI_ SEND REPORT TO CONSTRaU'C_TIC LOCATION REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAI I!, aI= DATE -7 .: T IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND - -4 .; -, BI WT. SAND RETAINED. (S-Les 11 C1 WT. SAND USED 26, D TEST SAND DENSITYgf,74 +N E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F1 VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT..'- 3. H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT 0.7115 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Sectie DATIVE tMPACI 46T WC- 87G 'FIELD NO (W.O. OR P.O OR ANF PI b7b -1[ 1 DATE REPTD. _. -- CONTRACTOR yy MAINTENANCE ❑. SUBD. [I PERMITS El RT LT OF CL STA EPTH f'a'd TO 02f BELOW FINISHED GRADE TI `.METHOD A �I' T_URE SAMPLE NIQ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA °� lO LAB WET WT. . 2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M '°. +N SP. GR. ROCK _ WET WT. ROCK 2 0 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - ; Q DRY WT..'- 3. TOTAL DRY NYk:: " % ROCK ' R CORR.MAX.DEN '-T Y. REMARKS 9� I nmf L= Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ❑ BILLING WILL BE ADE Tll BY 1 . RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) I RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY ' /ZJ MOISTURE O. RC = 90 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% D OF MONTH MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 . 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ,:, -�dn CD z- LO0 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2 0 Q DRY WT. COMP, SPEC. R % MOISTURE Z , CONDITION OF MOLD e fe tV UCR S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 2 G T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100 % +N) Q= O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 1 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING. .0302 .1969 REMARKS 9� I nmf L= Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ❑ BILLING WILL BE ADE Tll BY 1 . RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) I RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY ' /ZJ MOISTURE O. RC = 90 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% D OF MONTH IN PLACE DENSITY ❑ Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE • .I '` • ROAD DEPARTMENT % - A;t' 0 Material Testing Section TEST NO. C —o 81.7C E VOLUME SAND USED FIELD NO. ( -5 F Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION ` ° "T "° °R (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFP)G.Z4 -1`' VOLUME TEST HOLE . materials actually � H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 20.10 entering into works. , 3,10 • WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE If contract, use contract item DATE REPTD. WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE PROJECT Lup- L T�.. E:a,- GL('r:,- _;..: AGENCY_ :c,rnfipai 5 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR �•o SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTIOj OUTSIDE ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERWTS ❑ WET DENSITY LOCATION ) �• +e _ 7 'STIw9 • .eke - ::�c.eu�D - RT LT OF (L 'STA REPRESENTING LIMITS DRY DENSITY TYPE MATERIAL t.9S BP DEPTH. +2" TO 20." BELOW FINISHED GRADE,.;. FACTOR x Q = DATE S ct -G 7 TESTED BY: U"SEE- E= C+ D IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND .I B WT. SAND RETAINED 18.50 C WT. SAND USED A;t' 0 D TEST SAND DENSITY 81.7C E VOLUME SAND USED 33 F VOLUME CONE + RING 1810 G VOLUME TEST HOLE 5- H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 20.10 I TARE WEIGHT 3,10 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 18.0 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 ,% MOIST. I M I N'., SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - DRY. WT. - s DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY %MOISTURE • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 220o P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE 18.0 CONDITION OF MOLD 5 HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN f �•o T WET DENSITY I( , V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE .1667, - L = K + (100% + N) Q =O- (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q S LG. RING .0302 ..1969 REMARKS Test Method Colif. 216 -F C J BILLI BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR -) RELATIVE A F9011431 TION ,r� I METHOD A Q B ftz( SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /O MOISTURE TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL ^% N IN PLACE DENSMY" ❑ Preliminary tests prior to award of contract.. • �J COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT ' f SAND RETAINED• Material Testing Section TEST"tke C -- , WT. SAND USED - D FIELD NO. "� 1,7 ® Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION 1 �0. R P.OROR AHFP1242 -J -PC F materials actually Leto G VOLUME TEST HOLE entering into works. K)C, G - I Z= 5p I I ntract,, use. contract'item DATE'REPTD. J . PROJECT -- 3 - AGENCY C�Z:F1ur rare nc.H RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR)v` _. -" CONTRACTOR ,let/ SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION otsfbiz ❑ AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE 0 SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION LruE _34 Pi,2tc i emeRAL-o RT LT OF (L STA I I REPRESENTING LIMITS T WET DENSITY TYPE MATERIAL s sl3F DEPTH ` 12 '! TO 20 ' ' BELOW FINISHED GRADE I DATE = 5 -4 -17 TESTED BY: J111 IN PLACE DENSMY" Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND' LAS t B.WT. SAND RETAINED• 1 C WT. SAND USED .i 5.. D TEST SAND DENSITY 1,7 E VOLUME SAND USED 13-11 j F VOLUME CONE + RING Leto G VOLUME TEST HOLE IL09, H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +,TARE I Z= 5p I TARE WEIGHT I 3.10 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE' K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ,let/ METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE . *% FIELD LAS t WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 `:% MOIST. M N SP: GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK Z-Z 12, WET WT. - a DRY WT. -:a Q TOTAL DRY WT. - % ROCK CORR. MAX. DENS Y R . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ZZ 2420 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z-Z 12, ZZ55' Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD ,let/ c usJoe2 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN .q T WET DENSITY ,9 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F.': C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G = E - F K = J'= G CONE ..1667 - L = K = (100% +N) Q O a (100 %+ N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x 0- S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F C� J RESIDENT ENGINEER (CIiY ENGR4 F3011 43.1 ❑ BILLI BY RELATIVE COMPACTION 1 a- L ^= V METHOD A B QI SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY / / fZ 7 MOISTURE --?, uN C.e RC _ X15' % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, 1 0 P' COUNTY OF ORANGE ❑ Preliminary tests prior - _ to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT W J Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— FIELD NO.' Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION w O.OR P 0. OR 4HFP)4Z4 -K materials actually entering into works. - +3 F - - DATE REPT D. — S — G % If Contract, Use totoRJlmlrh PROJECT - a.nws.O`i,�`aENCY RESIOENT IL'"i IGINEER (INSPECTOR) Q.n . CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ A"', GNCY s ®. MAINT.ENANCE El SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ :LOCATION L,i) 1- A. - RT LT OF (L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS .TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH 12^' `TO �'" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE � -9 -67 TESTED BY: l�c'Rld�L IN PLACE DENSITY ,A-.INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 7 .B WT.. SAND RETAINED 1 s.SU C WT. SAND USED 97,15- D TEST SAND DENSITY 13(,74 E VOLUME SAND USED 3 F VOLUME CONE + RING . 1$(a G VOLUME TEST HOLE Zril H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 20.80 I TARE WEIGHT 8.f0 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE % L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE - METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE , FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 hK DRY WT.' 3 4 `o MOIST: M N 5P: GR. ROCK` CK P CK .� Z (o U-' Q WT. ENSiTY R REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ra°j�ead , .., ❑ BILLING WILL BE 1' B. BY L� RELATIVE; COMfA,j. Q. 1. . I.= nMETHIOD.''` A ❑ B SUMMARY. REC ORD WHOLE:NUMBERS . IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY 1i7 9 io MOISTURE - RC:= % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: OF' MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 hK 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN god P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Z (o Q DRY WT. COMP, SPEC. R % MOISTURE p CONDITION OF MOLD. - S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J+ G CONE .1667` - .L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 + (100% + N) SM. RING. .0143 1 .1810 R = (P-Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ra°j�ead , .., ❑ BILLING WILL BE 1' B. BY L� RELATIVE; COMfA,j. Q. 1. . I.= nMETHIOD.''` A ❑ B SUMMARY. REC ORD WHOLE:NUMBERS . IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY 1i7 9 io MOISTURE - RC:= % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: OF' * ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE 7:. ..,� B WT. SAND RETAINED to award at contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT " SAND USED ,Z 9, 70 D TEST SAND DENSITY Material Testing Sectias' TEST No C— 24215— VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING ,FIELD NO,. 4­.s' G VOLUME TEST HOLE tests an RELATIVE COMPACTION WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE - I ` =ORT. RO. OR IW O OR P10. OR -n HFP) .dO6 -1( WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE materials materials actually K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ..; - entering into works. 1=: HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN: . T %con »act, u . 'Matt item DATE REPTI +� y, PROJECT - :.s .,.t•NCy <211-..1.'!aimz( DRY DENSITY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ oursm AcENcy MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ • LOCATION Lnu>_ tPa_►� /n Paper _ - RT LT OF q. STA '.1667 f0NE+UNIT REPRESENTING LIMITS Q =Os (100 % +N) SM.RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) + Q TYPE MATERIAL r,9c Fsv _,,,DEIPTH Lezi _. TOL, Pte` BELOW FINISHED GRADE .1969 DATE TESTED.�$ti`N I. i IN PLACE DENSITY : Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 7:. ..,� B WT. SAND RETAINED . 4g; CWT. SAND USED ,Z 9, 70 D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING Y>� G VOLUME TEST HOLE 70 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE - I TARE WEIGHT OORR.MAX.DEkQ$jT+Y J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE , K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE HOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 ', 4 % MOIST. '. I M N SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. DRY WT„ — 3 Q TOTAL 00 Wt. o ROCK OORR.MAX.DEkQ$jT+Y R REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F ❑ BILLI BY RESIDENT 96i0R {CI1?l" FJV6R ) :3a11 63 1 _ RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A Q B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY SSo " MOISTURE RC TENT:. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% i MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 ', 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN o� 2. P WET WT. AT COMPACTION - Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC.,;;' R % MOISTURE , p - CONDITION OF MOLD - S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN: D T WET DENSITY V1 DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = " wwMES, C.F. C= A- 8 E= C+ D UNIT G= E- F K= 1+ G CONE '.1667 f0NE+UNIT L =K +(100;0 +N) Q =Os (100 % +N) SM.RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING' .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F ❑ BILLI BY RESIDENT 96i0R {CI1?l" FJV6R ) :3a11 63 1 _ RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A Q B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY SSo " MOISTURE RC TENT:. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% i Pr.hn,inory tests prior to sword of contract. p.A I ®Control tests on materials actually ,. entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT - - - Material Testing Section TEST O�C— ivG FIELD NO-.. A5' RELATIVE COMPACTION OOTgRA.K OR AHFP),4Z4 -A' oatj R &fsD. If contract, use contract item *i. PROJECT Lam, 16 Z,7tA) . DP �&IA $ t1;'.'.' 1:a5T AGENCY �IA.,o.up1� 1�.A� RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) �s>I?�� =��-i- CONTRAC'rnR OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION El AGENCY ® MAINTENAIV99 D. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION Lt�I= 1t77, ° - RT LT OF (L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS �CT-f -A TYPE MATERIAL h F DEPTH I T2A ;>'0- BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: 14�-: IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED 14.90 C WT. SAND USED 26.70 D TEST SAND DENSITY . 81.74 E VOLUME SAND USED 32 F1 VOLUME CONE + RING .-1Sto G VOLUME TEST HOLE Myg HiWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE I TARE WEIGHT �,Ib J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE... O .8 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2.C..._ 3 DRY WT. DENSITY late 11, INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M .. .N SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK .. g DRY WT. ROCK % WET WT. Q DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY ,p • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA SUMMARY MOLD NO. 1 2.C..._ 3 4 DENSITY late 11, INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN -Zoo 00 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION g SPECIFICATION: NL % - Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE ,p CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN '"- T WET DENSITY - V DRY DENSITY ` CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q: _ VOLUMES, G.F. C= A— B E= C_ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J - G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100% +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 1 R = (P-Q) ' Q V = FACTOR x'Q - S LG. RING .03:02 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • ❑ BILLI BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.I RELATIVE COMPACTION , -- 1 I B- 1140 y METHOD A ❑ B QZ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE , DENSITY late 11, G %m MOISTURE TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % `'I ❑inory tents Briar o awa )o award: of contract. Control tests on 1 . materials actually entering into works. PROJECT GA L 130A M: =; L RESIDENT ENGINEER ONSPEC' SEND REPORT TO: CONSTR LOCATION L %NE ,� C RE TY DA OLUN G VOLUN H WT. E; I TARE J WET N K WETD L DRY DI COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST o7C- o FIELD NO. - - - IW O ?OR P.O. OR A FP .ATIVE COMPACTION ��_ DATEDATE RF=Sp� —G�_ fe;F�use contract item �.,.__.- ND ( N2 =_ AGENCY OUTSIDE U L L INS AGEN' S® N gINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ �/ #1 1�J - RT LT OF (L STA . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 iY LP 2 3 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Z C , Z200 _ P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 1. S4 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE + e70 +i a CONDITION OF MOLD 'O S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 11,6Z 113 T WET DENSITY 11 5. 1 1 1113. Z V1 DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = 1301. VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E=,C - D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J= G CONE .1667 - :L = K _ (100% +N) Q = 0 = (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 10 CO 1 1 MOISTURE Gw70 V 1.1pCR; RC = 91 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL —% ® BILLING WILL BEM DE AA END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) raatl -e3.t_ RELATIVE :COMPACTION - - KIN:ITIA WT. S WT. S JEVOLUN EST. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST o7C- o FIELD NO. - - - IW O ?OR P.O. OR A FP .ATIVE COMPACTION ��_ DATEDATE RF=Sp� —G�_ fe;F�use contract item �.,.__.- ND ( N2 =_ AGENCY OUTSIDE U L L INS AGEN' S® N gINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ �/ #1 1�J - RT LT OF (L STA . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 iY LP 2 3 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Z C , Z200 _ P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 1. S4 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE + e70 +i a CONDITION OF MOLD 'O S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 11,6Z 113 T WET DENSITY 11 5. 1 1 1113. Z V1 DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = 1301. VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E=,C - D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J= G CONE .1667 - :L = K _ (100% +N) Q = 0 = (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 10 CO 1 1 MOISTURE Gw70 V 1.1pCR; RC = 91 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL —% ® BILLING WILL BEM DE AA END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) raatl -e3.t_ RELATIVE :COMPACTION - - REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 10 CO 1 1 MOISTURE Gw70 V 1.1pCR; RC = 91 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL —% ® BILLING WILL BEM DE AA END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) raatl -e3.t_ RELATIVE :COMPACTION - - ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY.OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. -:TEST SAND to award of contract. ._ ROAD DEPARTMENT„ te% WT. SANWRETAINED �, •' Material Testing SCCt10R TEST NO. - _ COat101 tests on D RELATIVE COMPACTION FIELD N _ `.0. n C O OR P FP - me}ers0ls actually P F VOLUME CONE + RING ente►#rtg into works. G1 .N p.. L'- GATE ISEPiS —5— G7 WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE ,1 3 s contract item r ,Q PROJECT B "-BO =STAND !,' G N.. AGENCY < -- - RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) rc� }, t�' �%�N CONTAAAGlTOR oursme _ SEND REPORT TO: CO ' - LOCATION �.iti' l 'A.L`1 STRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTEN NCEA— * SUED. ❑ -E� 1i7��, ru l'�E AL.p +a NEST LT OF q STA PE MITS ❑.t N� :. REPRESENTING LIMITS- S TYPE MATERIAL N.S '= DEPTH TO 6 � BELOW FINISH ADE DATE 3— 3 -G-7 TESTED BY:— IN:PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. -:TEST SAND LAB B WT. SANWRETAINED )f}•L). C WT. SAND USED 4'' D TEST SAND DENSITY )� _ E VOLUME SAND USED P F VOLUME CONE + RING WET WT, - q ' G1 VOLUME TEST HOLE TOTAL DRY WT -. H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 1 TARE WEIGHT ,Q J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE (0 s K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISSIFRE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. LP 1 DRY WT. 3 4'' a MOIST. - M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT, - q ' DRY WT. - - Q TOTAL DRY WT -. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. LP 1 2 3 4'' 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2G0 zz 00 ' P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE -A- ' °?a + 7 CONDITION OF MOLD y - S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10.40 1 T WET DEN SI TY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = �,5�„9 VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L =K= (100 % +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .1969 ) REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F j Liq METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 11.3 IZS.Z MOISTURE 4 07o c)A1DEQ RC = �� TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: Kit Of ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE ATAEND OFMONTH 1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) "A-Tgt n°`s E� r9011 -ss.l - RELATIVE COMPACTION zo { I ❑ Preliminorl tests prior to award o contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT - Pi, IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT, SAND RETAINED 1 Lt? C WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY $ ), E VOLUME SAND USED r F VOLUME CONE + RING WET WT. -;- G VOLUME TEST HOLE r 3 HI WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE % ROCK I TARE WEIGHT Ito J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 1 5 „30 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE g L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE OvEQ METHODA MOISTURE;�SIPLE Fl$O LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 Lt? DRY WT. 3 4 MOIST: -M. INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK. P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. -;- DRY WT. - i Q TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY - . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA -- MOLD NO. 1 Lt? L 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN C P WET WT. AT COMPACTION r-:1 1 O Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE } °io t 5`ie °` -- - CONDITIONOFMOLD N OvEQ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN IO- ro g to T WET DENSITY - 122. S I 1 ZZ. V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0:592 FACTOR x Q = 13OZ. VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 1 - L= K= (100% +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM.RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q -' S LG. RING .0302 .1969 I REMARKS: I Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F301 1 43.1 . ❑ BILLI BY RELATIVE COMPACTION ; 1 B- L ^� �I METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY Ito IZ4 MOISTURE 4 u4DEE RC = B9 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. Control tests on x.. materials actually entering into works. PROJECT BOA S S 1 A RESIDENT EN ''I INSPECTOR)_ SEND REPORT NTO CONSTRUCTI( LOCATION L.) E C)jALL1;� REPRESENTING LIMITS COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT^ Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION 7a .N.S. .a F. It' t_umse contract item NO 1 AGENCY Cf 1V TYPE MATERIAL N• -� • • DE DATE '3-2-4-7 TESTED.QY:_ IN PEACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAS B WT. SAND RETAINED 1 . Q C1 WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY N SP. GR. ROCK' E VOLUME SAND USED .3 F I VOLUME CONE +RING WET WT. - a G VOLUME TEST HOLE S G H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I Il 7. SO I TARE WEIGHT ) Q J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE' IN METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE .FIELD LAS WET WT. MOLD NO. I'<W, DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. I M N SP. GR. ROCK' WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK pzaan 123 WET WT. - a DRY WT. - Q TOTAL DRY WT. %n ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. I'<W, 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN pp P WET WT. AT COMPACTION pzaan 123 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %, MOISTURE z6ef r CONDITION OF MOLD G`. S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UN IT CONE +,UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE .1667 - L,= K - (100%7 +N) Q = 0 + (100% + N) SM. RING .01 43 .1810 ' R = (P -Q) =. Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 I REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 B• FCTOR ❑ SUED ❑ P(%j ER��,� T RT LT OF q STA •_L A BELOW FINISHED GRADE, 1 146 Lam r IS —111 I ETHOD A ❑ B aa SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS kPLACE OPT, MOISTURE DENSITY RC = BB % TENT, -,RC = SPECIFICATION: Nt_%. ❑ BILLING WILL BEM DE &T END OF MONTH • BY . RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) .3011.83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. F Donon tr!a,zi.l3 actually . ent"7 Into workf PROJECT. =S RESIDENT EN IINSPE SEND REPORT TO: CONST LOCtAT10 N. ALLEY BT1A REPRESENTING LIMIITS�, TYPE.MATERIAL N•s DATE 3_ 3- (&'% 0 IN PLACE DE SITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAN a.. LAB .B WT. SAND RETAINED_" 1 ,�¢. C WT. SAND USED 'L$•.' D TEST SAND DENSITY N IE VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. — ' H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE � - J, I -TARE WEIGHT QQ S IWET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT:., -�; Material Testing Sec - !: RELATIVE COMPACTION N S. & If. tract, tr ct item L'1 DEPT TESTED M OD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB _ WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 ,�¢. DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. I M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK - WET WT. - a DRY WT. — ' Q TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE -DATA I. MOLD NO. 1 ,�¢. 2y/ It, 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Z�oO P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = 10ylZ VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D I UNIT ICONE +UNIT G = E - F K = J : G -- CONE .1667 1 - +N) Q =Oa (100 %, +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .03a 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 a• ICTOR - 011:i -SUBD. ❑ RT LT OF CL STA TI AR -2 FINISHED GRA METHOD A ❑ B Rl SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY s� MOISTURE RC = % % % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE A END OF MONTH • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR -) MAr IA L3 EN EE ., a X3011 -83.1 AELATIVE.. COMPACTION - Y OPreliminary tests prior to award o! contract. �Cantrol tests on materiols actually entering into works. '% REP BAL80A 2SLgN NT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) F SE PORT TO: CONSTRUCTLON Lo ,iNE I_LE REP __ _ ..LIMITS TYPE MA DATE_ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND,,. Q B WT. SAWRETAINED - iVI 1,.5 C WT. SAND USED' ^;z;;,, ;slZ I Z S Q D TEST SAND DENSI' g E VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE + RING DRY WT. 4 G VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 24.30 1 TARE WEIGHT '3. Q J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE imj- j2 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE CZOSE COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section • .resT —C" FIELD No. �.r ATIVE COPACTI " _ °°?°Rnj FP DATE REPTD. 3'G f c ct, use contrad item G N.S. �Bi1S' A CONTRACTOR TESTED BY' M 7 THOD A` Mots SAMPLE` IELD LAB WET WT. MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLL:°DATA MY.WT. MOLD NO. Gc, 1�'-- ��„c.2 "•: MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN WET WT. ROCK 220 !'.. DRY WT. ROCl WET WT. - a. WET WT. AT COMPACTION DRY WT. 4 2 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F I• RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ,soil e3.t ® \I ■111 ■ \I ■L oil tCl�. 1120 LIE AT OF��TA PE AR114 LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A 0 B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I 10 CJ 2 MOISTURE S °°/0 UNOE RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_7 ❑ BILLING WILL BE A A END MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLL:°DATA MOLD NO. Gc, 1�'-- ��„c.2 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2 220 !'.. P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2295 2 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %. MOISTURE {.e);. . CONDITION OF MOLD CZOSE GL. Off/. S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN )O, , T WET DENSITY ) �j, 2, 2 0. V DRY DENSITY CONV.. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = poz. O VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C' D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =! +G CONE 67 - LcK +(100% +N) Q =0 (100 % +N) SM. RING 43 14. .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q+ 5 LG. RING 02 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F I• RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ,soil e3.t ® \I ■111 ■ \I ■L oil tCl�. 1120 LIE AT OF��TA PE AR114 LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A 0 B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I 10 CJ 2 MOISTURE S °°/0 UNOE RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_7 ❑ BILLING WILL BE A A END MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION Preliminary ests prior to award of contract. .:.: INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 5, �Conirol tests on " - moterials oStpaHq C entering in*� Z11 0 Q D TEST SAND DENSITY PROJECT sAL-80A :;SL- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTI LOCATION 4- JNE 20, ALL QV REPRESENTING LIMITS WET WT. TYPE MATERIAL N• S' IR r DATE 3-3-4-7 H IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 5, B 1 WT. SAND RETAINED_ 7. C WT. SAND USED Z11 0 Q D TEST SAND DENSITY • E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING WET WT. G VOLUME TEST HOLE r /6 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE J9. 1 TARE WEIGHT •, J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ^ p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ' COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPIC710 N'S. B. R (f controcl, use contract item 0. ` ° ".AGENCYS d ESTED BY: ® TEST NO. FIELD N.9 g - N (W.0. NO. CON OR P. �R NFP 4 -K DATE REPTD. f� B `:METHOD A. MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. �. 1 'DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. IMI N SP. GR. ROCK . WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. DRY WT. - Q TOTAL DRY WT... '• % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE (] ^ p CONDITION OF MOLD e A/d- ' S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN „z' T WET DENSITY ///,o I .G V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q =/y-6/' G VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -F K = J +G CONE .1667 - L = K + (10 % +N) Q = 0 + (100`7 + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q + S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -s 3,I ' RACTOR_�, E ❑ SUED. ❑ ITS ❑ RT LT OF rL STA Q —T —BELOW FINISHED GRADE or 130 IL a --+. METHOD A ❑ BID SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBER IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /O / MOISTURE RC = !r 3 q TENT. RC SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to aw ord of contract. i .ROAD DEPARTMENT / E Material Testing Seet)ed_ _� TEST NO. FIELD NO p f� ea��rlrjyss� RELATIVE CBMPACTtON CaN4 NO. 2 OR R r (W.O. OR O. R AHFP) entering into works._ - N. S. . F. " T'}j}[• If Contract, use contract item DATE REPTD. PRO' JPC'T - �• ,.f a S, N O A, >ZA A ENCY G N••� RESIDENT ENGlitlF>INS PECTOR) S _> CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT fb:�-- LOCATION 1s.JW F . REPRESENTiNG'LIMI TYPE MATERIAL ,TESTED BY IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED Q C WT. SAND USED 2740 D TEST SAND DENSITY 81• E VOLUME SAND USED Z F VOLUME CONE + RING GI VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY: WT. - i H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE C= A- B .I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE .¢ 0 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /G G LL DRY DENSITY IN PLACE MA MOLD N0. O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIME MAI METHOD_ }?t::'. MOISTURE '. T F LAB WET WT. DRY WT. �� MOIST.' M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK ' DRY WT. RO WET WT. FACTOR x Q = )3e, DRY: WT. - i TOTAL DRY WT. C= A- B % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY CONE +UNIT MUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA G.C. 1 G. C, - 2_.QWW71 3 ❑ SUBj9,r'❑ r 4 RT LT. O STA —BELOW FII Test Method Calif. 216 -F C] RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) i `x3011 -E3,1 1 _ GRADE METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS "` IN OPT. w PLACE DENSITY tool H 0 MOISTURE a% UNpF' RIC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% .. ❑ BILLING WILUBE IAADE &T END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION T �.y T WETDENSITY )Q$.9 O$•Z �� V1 DRY DENSITY , A- CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = )3e, (S VOLUMES, C. F. C= A- B E= C . D UNIT CONE +UNIT i G =E - F K = J . G CONE .1667 - L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 . (100 %+ N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 . R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F C] RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) i `x3011 -E3,1 1 _ GRADE METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS "` IN OPT. w PLACE DENSITY tool H 0 MOISTURE a% UNpF' RIC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% .. ❑ BILLING WILUBE IAADE &T END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION T �.y Cm G'�A�� CITY OF PE WPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 CONTRACT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAMO 1966 -67 CONTRACT NUMBER: 1067 CONTRACTOR: BARRON AND ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTR. 1. INSTALL I EA 12 —INCH GATE VALVE IN THE PARK AVENUE MAIN APPROXIMATELY 20 FEET WEST OF THE CENTERLINE OF APOLENA AVENUE. 2. INSTALL I EA 10 —INCH GATE VALVE IN THE PARK AVENUE MAIN APPROXI- MATELY 20 FEET EASTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF OPAL AVENUE. 3. INSTALL I EA 10 —INCH GATE VALVE IN THE PARK AVENUE MAIN APPROXI- MATELY 30 FEET WESTERLY OF THE CENTERLINE OF OPAL AVENUE. THE ABOVE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED PER APPLICABLE PORTIONS OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS., THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONTRACT IO67, AND THE ATTACHED DRAWING N0. W- 5050 -L. THE AGREED UPON COMPLETE IN PLACE COST FOR THE ABOVE IS: 1 -12 INCH VALVE @ 700.00 $700.00 2= Y2'INCH VALVES @ 575.00 1 1 0.00 TOTAL IA 50.00 t:: l SIGNED`. / DATE. — c°,_G7 CONTRACTOR: DATE: NOTE: APPROVED BY CITY COUNCILS FEBRUARY Ili, 1967 ❑ Preliminory tests prior to award o controcri�0 I�l Control teats on .IesJ meteria I&,vctvgIIY entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE., ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION item TEST NO. C— 67 -C' FIELD NO. CONT. NO. OR (W.O. OR P.O. OR AHFPI 4$4(W.O. OR P.O. OR —Ar D REPTD. —1 — 6 7 PROJECT -,4 a: Adc• AGENCY, —Z— PECT � ;� ^•ter RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY -F MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION M,44TC,o >` ?-S 6e9 '.. �/ f /� ? <� /a RT LT OF (� STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH i - <•" TO le" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: ��•«T= r= IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4 .00 B WT. SAND RETAINED /745 C WT. SAND USED Z3. SS D TEST SAND DENSITY 8 %,q E - VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I ITARE WEIGHT n475 J IWET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ,< .p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE �, I.�/; METHOD A MOIS RE SAMPLE ELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 - 4 %MOIST. M SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. -j3 Q TOTAL DRY WT.: . % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 - 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMENjp Z �� P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE ,< .p �-J,gr CONDITION OF MOLD �, I.�/; `& S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 11134; / T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J . G CON£ .1667 - L=K +(100% +N) Q =0- (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RECEIVED • U.M.- a 61967 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.1 1140 i B- METHOD A ❑- B ED SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY //w MOISTURE 3� RcPP RC = r/3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING.WILL BE DE A END OF MONTH BY - MA GIN E RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award at contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT , ''- Material Testing Section TAT N&X- 47-a -7/9 ® RIATIYE COMPACTION] )- Control tests on O OR ANFPI I materials actually � entering into works. If conk PROJECT U/,OTffa- L RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) P6',AAS SEND REPORT TO: iCONSTRUCTION ❑ AGE .,LOCATION PL �Sa .JZ P.9.Pr `REPRESENTING ITS TYPE MATERIAL iv -S'.A �- C DATE TESTED BY,; IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT.. TEST SAND 4 /•GS BI WT. SAND REVAINED /3,B C WT. SAND USED av: 30 D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED ..JJ F VOLUME CONE + RING 'DRY WT. ROCK `°'�'" G VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE TOTAL DRY WT.. I TARE WEIGHT % MOISTURE J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /e,a5 K WET DENSITY IN .PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE " is7 Ise cunt -`:.item .. CONTRACTOR" MAINTENANCE, ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS .❑ RT LT OF rL STA H 42 TO �8^ BELOW FINISHED GRADE 0 ML HOD A. x; MOISTURE SAMPLE -" ....FIELD LAB WET WT 2.,, -• 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT- SPECIMEN % MOIST. - 'M. N SP. GR. RO ; - -, WET WT. AT COMPACTION WET WT. ROCK" ¢3�lO' " -'; 'DRY WT. ROCK `°'�'" WET WT. - a DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT.. % ROCK,, % MOISTURE CORR.MAX:DENSITY G • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2.,, -• 3 4 01 INITIAL WT- SPECIMEN 23ac, P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2420 ¢3�lO' " -'; 'Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE G CONDITION OF MOLD OaEF 51-"a" S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /, ///8 T WET DENSITY / /, .` / /. V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0:592 FACTOR x,Q = .VOLUMES, C. F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J =G CONE .1667 - L =K +(1000 +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q - V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • M) =THOD A ❑ El SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT'. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC = �/Q % TENT. RC =T_% SPECIFICATION: NL_% vs ❑ BILLING WILL BE MfADE A-h END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGRa rau; RELATIVE. COMPACTION IN PLACE DENSITY ❑ Preliminary tests prior INITIAL WT. TEST SAND COUNTY OF ORANGE B Y to award otYcoritra<t. i/.sep ROAD DEPARTMENT ? o?7 90 D Material Testing Section TEST NO. C- C7- C- 7.10 - E VOLUME SAND USED FIELD NO.'S F ® Coa1ro1 m as •i�,� w o ?OR P OROR ANFPI RELATIVE COMPACTION VOLUME TEST HOLE materials att actua Hy H . entering into works. TARE WEIGHT -:� - • WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE y- _. -. E' i DAT.REPTD. -� .? -/ G] IE.:�nfract, use contract item 1 WET DENSITY IN PLACE PROJECT I..LA%LO L Y�A- 1FT...1fir�aT'.rR RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR)�,�.3iti1�©yl S "x.. CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TOc CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY ®;..� MAINTENANCE ❑ SURD. El END El LOCATION ¢'/� /.S/l 'n RT LT OF �, STA 1 ii REPRESENTING LIMITS VI `TYPE MATERIAL _dl S. a -F DEPTH /-A TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE .DATE ? -_;I R -L7 CONV. FACTOR =0.592 TESTED BY: Av/Fe=6E7— .1. - i IN PLACE DENSITY Al INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ,y+y,SC B WT. SAND RETAINED i/.sep C WT. SAND USED o?7 90 D TEST SAND DENSITY - E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING •i�,� G VOLUME TEST HOLE /6/9 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE y- K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 V DRY WT. O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK ,?3ip DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. Q DRY WT. - n TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY ><-5 0 . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO.Y 1 2 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 5.9 00 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION ,?3ip a3GS` Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE ><-5 0 -A >. S CONDITION OF MOLD O u,v0 rP S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN //. T/ T WET DENSITY 1 ii 113.2 VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT GONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J= G CONE .1667 - L = K (too- +N) Q = 0 _ (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING 1 .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 11 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 1 B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /O /a MOISTURE O'le,v E<' RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE M E A END OF MONTH BY `' MAT ALS ENGI EER r3a „ -9G.t RELATIVE COMPACTION.::.... Preliminary tests prior - to award of contract . ® Control testcon materials actually enWing rnfh works ! PROJECT" - t RESIDENT ENGI DER (INSPECTOF SEWk PORT TO: CONSTRUCT REPmR NG LIMITS - TYP PlAI DATE >' 1/S -C7 - IN PLACE . " A:.INIT(AL WT. TEST S BWT. SAND RETAINEE cl WT. SAND USED D TEST SAND 'DENSIT) El VOLUME SAND USED COUNTY OF- ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT `' %Material Testing Section E$T NO C— 67s!P-. 7a� e ... FIELD NO -.4 - - I TIVE- COMpA�TION (11"T6140 .O R ;.I OROR ANFPf L y �y R DAYE REPTD 7— [9 , If t; uga 't item P NCY c+1. iwil, 44ka= • CONTRACTOR I El ON AGENCY MA1NT tNCE ❑, SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ RTy LT OF,(L STA DEPTH 11" TQ -`�.BELOW FINISHED GRADE TESTED. •.91Y Ali�=E< - MPTHOD A T 43 S� MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD .17;20. WET WT, .._s'_ 2Y /.4 DRY WTI. r. - .333 % MOIST. ' -['ti `. N •/ �o .. SP. GR. ROCK -+ 1228 I .WET WT. ROCK I� H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I DRY WT. ROCK,?-,, . 5 I TARE WEIGHT Z.vs- WET WT. - ; J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /5.70 DRY WT. K WET DENSITY IN PLACE "'' /O . 7 TOTAL DRY WT. - L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE" % ROCK: * RR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOL'E DATA. 7/ MOLD N0. 1 2_; - 3 4 - - 101 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q I DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - R %MOISTURE I "c 8 - V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VO'LUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C_ D {UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J- G CONE -- -.1667 - L= K +(100�o +N) Q =O= (100 %+N) SM.RING -.61- 43 .1810 R = (P -Q) . Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S I LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F ❑ BILLING WILL BE METHOD A ❑ El SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS. IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY le& 1,07 MOISTURE 1, 146 ell Q6G TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_04 END OF MONTH r t d i I Preliminnry tests prior to .word or contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section • TEST NO. C— (67 -4 i'IELD NO... ^- RELA.TIVE COMPACTION w oTOa P.O. AHFP/ Sao —r • _.._ ti_ ` $. �.P DATE REPTd —7—/ X47 ct, use cwtlo Ct item PROJECT GENCY "ENE »e'erP�✓ RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR t'z"•� OUTSIDE - K - SEND REPORT TO: CONSTFfi,t TfON ❑ AGERCV .® 1dAINTENA NCE SUiC 0 PERMITS ❑. €` LOCATION /� .45'�'$�io.Ae� -R'F LT OF' _ STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE- TE'RIAI . N.S. /3 .F .DEPTH /�" TO 7d" BELOW FINI'iHE[%�iRADE - DATE Z_ it 7. TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY �Aj INITIAL WT. TEST SAND q1. B WT. SAND RETAINED /3, C WT. SAND USED 4A46_``- D TEST SAND DENSITY N :E .VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. FVOLUME CONE + RING ..18io G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE - I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 'K WET DENSITY IN PLACE ,4 -DRY DENSITY IN PLACE •THO;D A MOISTURE? MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA<g. LAB WET WT. 2 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN % MOIST. ';M N SP. GR. ROCK`:. •ir . . WET WT. 2365 DRY WT. RO...! WET WT. - Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT. - ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY �- >•S • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA<g. MOLD NO. 1 2 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2'oa P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2365 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE �- >•S 4. S CONDITION OF MOLD uAlaaK, S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSI TY /O :Z. /07.7 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR = 0.592. FACTOR x Q =, VOLUMES, C. F. - C = A — B E = C = D UNIT CONE+UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - 1 L = K - (100% + N) Q = 0 _ (1 00% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q - ;S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 21'6 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.). F3011 -63 Y MOW. 140 IL METHOD A 0. B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE G% RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. END OF MONTH ' 1 q ❑P ' eliminary tests prior to o.a,d of contract. S, Co trol tests on RE n' materials actually entering into works. PROJECT "Z-AAE Zel-1,-- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ LO&A T POT4,4-- rw,;r REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIA1 A.44Swa Ir DATE TESTS i. IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND -a-4-jro 13 WfP1QiIIIID,RETAINED /4p.0'0 C ED MT SW 4 6 TEST S DENSITY MN.R CK- E VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE + RING TOTAL VOLUME TEST HOLE -� CORR.MAX.. , ITY SAMPLE + , A E I TARE WEIGHT TWET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN ..PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE iwtolg� COUNTY OF ORANGE. ROAD DEPARTMENT laterial, Testing Section 0 Ow C60ACT101t, useo!nIaxl itern PTH IgTIHOD A SAMPLE ELD WET WT. LAB .DRY WT. MOLD NO. 1 N SP. GR. ROCK 4 WET WT. ROCK INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MN.R CK- W 3 DRY WT:.'. -: -a...- ld TOTAL % ROCK:4� -� CORR.MAX.. , ITY DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276-F DATE REPT D. *fit 7 I SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ T Lr�'OF CL STA BELOW FINISHED GRADE LAI METHOD A'D B EJ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS PLACE OPT. DENSITY 141 //6 MOIRE OZIA ,TENT. RC = % ISPE0174CATION: NL—%. 0 BILLING WILL BE M UDEA END� BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.) RELATIVE COMPACTION J MAXIMUM I M DENSITY RATHOLE D-M MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P W W COMPACTION CTI 0 WET WT. AT COMPACTION 0 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. FRI �S70M Mo E % MOISTURE _7. 5- C-77 CONDITION OF MOLD iwtolg� 9- K/ COMPACTED SPECIMEN 11,417 T WET DENS] TY V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x Q VOLUMES, C.F.., C = A - B E = C - D UNIT CONE+-u4.' G = E - F K = J + G CONE 1 .1667 L = K - (100-1 + N) Q = 0 ' (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .181-0 R = (P-Q) - Q V - FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 A 969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276-F DATE REPT D. *fit 7 I SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ T Lr�'OF CL STA BELOW FINISHED GRADE LAI METHOD A'D B EJ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS PLACE OPT. DENSITY 141 //6 MOIRE OZIA ,TENT. RC = % ISPE0174CATION: NL—%. 0 BILLING WILL BE M UDEA END� BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011 -83.) RELATIVE COMPACTION J ❑Pre" ninary tests prior to award of contract. Central tests on x. materials actually entering into works. • COUNTY OF ORANGE • ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section J.,AELATIVE COMPACTION 17cin TEST NO. C— 47w,Q..7,14 FIELD No. 7- CO�T OR 1 No 0. ;.O%R A1111) mmecaw=',!/ DATE REPTD. 3 —/— 67 PROJECT v✓�714i,� `w= 7 AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION 0,.' AGENCY IDE j@ EI MAINTENANCE ❑ SUD:—❑ PERMITS El LOCATION led 7 -11e6Q ' A,1 loca2AM- A- RT Lt OF FL' STA REPRESENTING LIMIT TYPE MATERIAI 5-60" ow DEPTH 46t;" TO -le— BELOW. FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY -�JINITIAL �WT TEST SAND LAB B WT. SAND RETAINED DRY WT. WT. -SAND USED p 7.00 % MOIST� TEST SAND -DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE + RING DRY WT..ROCK G VOLUME TEST HOLE H IWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE TOTAL DRY WT. I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN f LACE //G.7. L DRY DENSITY IN.PLACE I METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST� A N SP. GR. ROC ,W WET WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION DRY WT..ROCK WET WT. 3 DRY WT. DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK- CORR.MAX.DENSITY % M61STURE m LREMARKS: Method Calif. 216•F 1 METHOD A: ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHO E.NUMBERS 14. ' PLACE OPT. DENSITY RC % TENT. RC % SPECIFICATION: NIL 7, MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE� TA MOLD NO. 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % M61STURE L) CONDITION OF MOLD e%u4vV S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ns 1A 09 T WET DENSITY /ZZ' V DRY DENSITY WNV. FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x Q V .91LUMES, C. F. C= A- 6 E= C= D UNIT CON E+UNIT G = E - F K =J G CONE L K - (100%, + N) Q 0 00% + N) Sm. Ril R = (P-Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 LREMARKS: Method Calif. 216•F 1 METHOD A: ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHO E.NUMBERS 14. ' PLACE OPT. DENSITY RC % TENT. RC % SPECIFICATION: NIL 7, I _ '❑ Preliminary tests prior Illf to award of contract. . �. Control tests on moteriols actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE J _ ROAD DEPARTMENT f Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— -V11tL6 tJD. RE TIVE COMPACTION W -0 4 P.OROR AHFP) Q24 —r DAT@Rt�PTD. If contract, Use contr ac tte . . - ,; .I pJ Ft.:.- PROJECT G 'e7- -- EG•—, RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTORI ` "��� NTRSY OR oursmE y>'� '. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY s Nr•NCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION r K " R OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS y TYPE MATERIAI it1Sr r DEP ;H 7" TO I'V BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE .,J TESTED BY: GPiS" IN PLACE DENSITY jyarS- ___ FIELD INITIAL WT. TEST SAND WET WT. B WT. SAND RETAINED / , C WT. SAND USED .LO D TEST SAND DENSITY „y:t E VOLUME SAND USED 7p F VOLUME CONE + RING 7 ip GI VOLUME TEST HOLE B H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT 2. 5 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /p , L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ...14ETHOD A M - . LURE SAMPLE ___ FIELD LAB WET WT. DRY WT. 1 % MOIST. M _ N' SP. GR. ROCK 01 WET WT. ROCK°'. °:.; DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. _ As P DRY WT, _ a x'7350 TOTAL DRY WT. ., ROCK .,�... Q CORR. MAX. DENSITY . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ?apo 3 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION x'7350 a3>S Q DRY WT. COMP.. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD 5 HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN .94 T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F.. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K = J +G CONE .1667 — L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 -: (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 B METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS ^ ,IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X04 �-7 MOISTURE 69 t/ RC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY iL RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) s RELATIVE COMPACTION JP : T 0 • 0 - GATE VAL M53 - :eensse /aer List 134 cr, e?aa/. Non - .2isin9 Sten,l Nab Enos ,user.... yoei.STV. -Sd7 :L J a I�I2 MO X. - SLEEI/E CDUPL/NG - .._.L'osf.. /.-0��.5foin /es's`Sfeef 8 /fs-. - NOTE: fi// .wafeiio /s a4al o�eiations sv6ject 1d :S- fono�o� -c✓ .S/oecifi'co % ions and .S�xio/ Pid✓isions of Coriltrw,' 1067. CI C- /067 H DRAWN aH. W DATE 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT APPROVED . IY/wA41 A /-M AE, IIAZ Vir 5 PUBLIC WORRE. DIRECTOR WAtG°ie.../eEPLi9G�iY1E/VT �.eOG.eAM DRAWING NO.WS0S0-L. EjPreliminary tests prior Preliminary award of contract. r. Control tests on materials actually entering into works. REI-3111111111111111111IRFtINIGI NEER (INSPECTOR: SEND REPORT TO:.,..:.CONSTRUCTl LOCATION RE PRESENTING, LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DATE IN PLACE DENSITY T� INITIAL F W:- TEST SAND GA 8 B WT. SAND RETAINED 2 C WT. SAND USED 01 6 TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. RO�K F, VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. - 43 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE -z /, yp I TARE WEIGHT 47 J WET WT. EXC. SA� K WET DENSITY IN PLACE jo4A - L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 46a vege COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section 5ELAT.IVE COMPACTION. x PTH D:A MOfg SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOL FIELD GA 8 WET WT. 1 2 DRY WT. 4 01 % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. RO�K WET WT. AT COMPACTION DAY, WT. ROCK WET WT. _ 3 4 DRY WT. - 43 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CO RR.MAX; DENS ITY I • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOL ATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN A.Z. PI WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD e�lv, 46a vege S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN &, !!0 0 � //.go T WET DENSITY DRY-DENSITY CONV..'FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x Q VOLUMES, CaF.', C = A -. B E =:C- :UNIT Colkle+UNIT G = E - F K = J CONE .1667 - L fK - (12 2% + N) Q 0 (100% + N) SM. RING 43 0143 R _Q) . Q V FACTOR x Q S LG. RING 02 .0302 +181 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216-F t. ,❑ SUEIDL. ❑ PERMITS ❑ RT... LT OF q. STA. 0W LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A-0 B SUMMARY: RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN P far. D LACE 0 DENSITY MOISTURE RIC % TENT RC %L e SPECIFICATION: NIL BILLING WILL&DE AT END OF M ONTH BY, RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) '3011 -93.1 RELATIVE.: COMPACTION ❑Preliminary rests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE . to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT i Material Testing SecfiN TEST FIELD N NO. O - O 1?_. -Z_ caNT. ® Control tests on IW.O. OR P.O. OR AHFP! materials actually : RELATIVE COMPACTION entering into works,,.., - - • - DA^yTE REPTD. iZ -rZ/p -G% If'n' ct, use cont _ m -.i PROJECT � � ,A `. � /N, 31 . . RES4DENT ENGIN - R (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR ZZ66P2 v nE-� Z- `SEN PORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIDE' - AGENCTINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCA'1¢, _ C Al RT LT OF. OL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS T' E MATERIAL �✓ -.ty ff��F. DEPTH `/ =T OE,; ��! BELOW.FINISHED GRADE DA..c 7 - f TESTED 6Y:- <. -✓ c,5/� -v_ A IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND - LAB - -' WET. WT. WT. SAND RETAINED;:,:::. _0 C WT. SAND USED .BO Q. TEST SAND DENSITY - IE.:VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE + RING ,/ ba :VOLUME TEST HOLE 38... H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE TOTAL DRY I TARE WEIGHT" z✓ T WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE Z 15 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD - TH0D A Mot!SI E SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY FIELD LAB - -' WET. WT. .DRY. WT. - ❑ BILLING WILL BE o MOIST: M - SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P -DRY WT. ROCK - 22 77 WET WT. M DRY WT. - Q TOTAL DRY RELATIVE COMPACTION ROCK " CORR.MAX.DENSW R REMARKS: . METHOD .A [I 6.1S SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN - OPT. PLACE DENSITY JuO/Z I MOISTURE- :lp.G'2'.'�- RC 7 TENT. RC'= SPECIFICATION: NL_�, Test Method Calif. 216•F MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. . - ❑ BILLING WILL BE 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN p p P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 22 77 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M TERIAL ENGINEER Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. RELATIVE COMPACTION '30114i.1 R %MOISTURE j- CONDITION OF MOLD p- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY I /0,3� -- p, VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR= (Y.592 FACTOR x Q = 13oM VQL LIMES, C.F. C = A - B E = C = D.: NI'f CONE +UNIT G = E -- F . - K = J = G- - CONE .1667 - L = K _ (100`io +N) Q = 0 _ (100% + N)- - . SM. RING .0143 x810 R = (P -Q) - Q - V: = FACTOR x Q+ 77, LG:.RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: . METHOD .A [I 6.1S SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN - OPT. PLACE DENSITY JuO/Z I MOISTURE- :lp.G'2'.'�- RC 7 TENT. RC'= SPECIFICATION: NL_�, Test Method Calif. 216•F . - ❑ BILLING WILL BE AD AT END OF MONTH - J� , BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M TERIAL ENGINEER - RELATIVE COMPACTION '30114i.1 • cv LLI Lo CQ • CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT_'' PROGRESS PAYMENT REQUEST NO. 3 FOR PERIOD END PROJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 BUDGET NO. 02-3097-1 CONTRACT ITEM NO. 41 CONTRACT ITEM. CONTRACT. PRICE PERCENT COMPLETE AMOUNT EARNED 1 4" A.C.P. $5.35/LF i,oSa,LF $5,07.50 : 2. 6" A.C.P. 5.85/LF 82575 L 50,163.75 . 3. 8" C.I.P. 10.00 /LF 4. 12" C.I.P. 20.00 /LF 288 LF 5,760.00 5. 4" G.V. 10$.00 EACH 6. 6" G.V. 130.00 EACN 3 EACH 390'00 70 12" G,V. 300.00 EACH 8. 4 x 4 T.S. & V. 260.00 EACH 6 EACH 1,560.00. 9. .6 x 6 T.S..& V. 326.00 EACH I EACH 326.00 10. 8 x 6 T.S. & v. 338.00 EACH 3 EACH 1,014.00 11. 12 x 6 T.S. & Y. 403.00 EACH 3 EACH -. 1,209.00 12• FIRE HYDRANT; 310.00 EACH 3 EACH: 13• COPPER SERVICE 45.00 EACN 259 EACH 11,655.00 14. 1" TEMP A.C. PVMT. o.4o /LF 5,165 LF 2,o66.00 15. 3" AC/4 "A.B. TRENCN RESURFACING 1.20 /LF 16. 6" P.C.C. 2.00 /LF 17. 8" G.V..' 260.00 EACH 18. x 4 T.S. & V. 320.00 EACH I EACH $81,011.25 vn 11 -.AL -UN i nA41 .; IZ4,391%•OO. . EXTRAS TO DATE CONTRACT TO DATE �4 Z -23-C% END 'PAYMENT -0' AMOUNT EARNED $81,011.251 . ,�� �97 (� LESS 10% RETENTION 8,101,13 �(.!j• /1r.. ARRON AND ECKHART ENO. CONTR. LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENTS 42,614.10 r. I" / 9$55 E. KALE AMOUNT DUE THIS REQUEST 3o,z96.o2 '-- "� ',SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AMOUNTS AND VALUES ARE CORRECT- S I GNED // � ` -�''' SIGNED 0' io LNaINFEA C ACTOR R' BY C] Pre I iminag tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to . word ROAD DEPARTMENT /J Material Testing Section Control tests a. materials actually RE. , COMPACTION: entering into works. PROJECT 4Z1oe&r- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) U SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION'* El AM LOCATION c&.dr u1117 REPRESENTING EPRESENTIN'G LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL 'tl 057- DATE TESTED By IN PLACE DENSITY AINITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAS Z WT. SAND RETAINED /v./j- C WT. SAND USED I MOIST. D TEST SAND DENSITY SP. GR. �QCK ,E VOLUME SAND USED. 32 i F VOLUME CONE + RING WET WT. ,G VOLUME TEST HOLE .1421 HjWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE %1X.40 1 TARE WEIGHT 3-10 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /3• /U K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /J-4. a �L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN use TEST N6 C (5 FIELD NO. /—;Z (WO 1O."ROIA111) DATE RFPTD. CONTRACTOR INTENANCE[j SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ RT LT OF (. STA LLL�� METHOD A RE SAMPLE 1 ELD LAS WET WT. 01 DRY WT. I MOIST. M' P SP. GR. �QCK 280 WET WT. ROCK 2 398 DRY WT. ROCK Q WET WT. DRY WT TOTAL DRY R ROCK t.5.o CORR.MAX.DENt& 9, MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 -A 1- 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN —4 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 280 ¢ 2 398 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE t.5.o 9, RESIDENTM (CRY ENGR.). CONDITION OF MOLD r301 1 -83.1 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /A drA ///ZA 41.8rj WET DENSITY IT V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x.Q VOLUMES, C. F. C= A- 9 E= C D UNIT CONE+UNIT G = E - F K = J G CONE 1667 - L = K - (100% +N) Q = 0 - (100 %+ N), 5M: RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q S, LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: -1 i. qprt-v✓) Test Method oCjpJif.,27.6-F LOW FINISHED- METHOD A ❑ B la, ' ".' SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /01�1 MOISTURE RC % TENT. RC = —% SPECIFICATION: NL _% 4 F, ❑ BILLING WILL B)MAII MAD END OF MONTH • 5%t4 231961 iA B, RESIDENTM (CRY ENGR.). r301 1 -83.1 RE L ATIV E,,.�, 60 ACTION T.10K W. 2 1 Ar 4 F, ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to.oward of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Secti 1rEs' } 'CON ® mater ollseactually RELATIVE C#NtPACTii'V entering into works. _ PIR RESID ENGINEER (INSPECTORI`c.G :SEND REPORT TO. CONSTRUCTION ❑ LOCATION - 7 REPRESENTING. LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DATE /- /A -G➢ TESTS IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT-.-TEST SAND -;e' -1 B WT. SAND RETAINED i, ,q0 C WT. SAND USED 24.SD D TEST SAND DENSITY 8l.2s E VOLUME SAND USED . Awz F VOLUME CONE + RING /$/O G VOLUME TEST HOLE /43z H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT. 6 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE .0 1117 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE , z 'L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE - use contra& -item . 4 T_ CONTRACTOR _ Gu v," .., INTENA NCE ❑ SUBD ❑ PERMITS ❑ AGE!(C �N RT. LT OF rL STA 'DEPTH /� TO- !.s BELOW FINISHED GRA REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1. • METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUM ERS IN PT, PLACE DENSIfiY // /O8 MOISTURE v RC = % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL, %. ❑ BILLING WILL BF MADE AT END OF MONTH C BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) , ♦3011 +8�;1, RELATIVE COMPACTION 4 MAXIMUM DENSITY ,RATHO]Lk DATA MOLD NO. 1.4A, 2..tA., 3 4 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC, R % MOISTURE t3 "> '- CONDITION OF MOLD °�• �' - " "'' S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ZZ : //. T WET DENSITY le-itS- Vi DRY DENSITY - CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q VOLUMES, C. F. C = A — B E = C = D '•::. _ UNIT. CONE +UNIT - G = E - F K = J _ G CONES .1667 - L =Ke (100 % +N) 'Q =0. (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 :1.810 R,= (P-Q) _ Q V -= FACTOR x Q. S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1. • METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUM ERS IN PT, PLACE DENSIfiY // /O8 MOISTURE v RC = % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL, %. ❑ BILLING WILL BF MADE AT END OF MONTH C BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) , ♦3011 +8�;1, RELATIVE COMPACTION 4 f °� " CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH "'" °" 1-6- C7 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT fit, APPROVED M, . W4TER 4 /N CONSTRUGTIO�) PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR "WRIAAF *ENUE" BR /OGE R.E. NO. MING NM W- 5033 -L CITY 4WPORT BEACH - P,UBL I C WORKS DEMENT ESTIMATING FORM "NO. t9'r�L6'oA QUANTITY /.SGf�ry✓r p PREL 1 M I NARY DIVISION DATE /o- /. Cg--FINAL "NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT ./ /00 6 "GAS Y /tee 2/ �R, ro.00 23io 7 /2 "GAlew, o 9, S. go ZA.;0 /D 8" •S. 6'G 1! ¢ 37500 Soo / • /2 "TS. ' 'G ✓. 3 ea, ,5000 BO o o z.,eoo 5 -Z4 17 e:5)! /8. ' jS 4"�1/ tea• 32.5oo S05 Tor.9G /3336a r TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 (c -Io67) RECOMMENDATION: MAY 8, 1967 APPROVE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORS ISSUANCE OF CHANGE ORDER 3. DISCUSSION: SECTION 4 -03 OF THE CITY'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS REQUIRES CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ALL CHANGE ORDERS IN THE AMOUNT OF 500 OR MORE. IN THE DESIGN OF THE 12-INCH WATER MAIN UNDER THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE, THE MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS REGARDING SUPPORT OF THE PIPE WERE FOLLOWED. IN PARTY THESE RECOMMENDATIONS CALLED FOR PIPE SUPPORTS 18 FEET ON CENTER. AS THE PILE BENTS UNDER MOST OF THE BRIDGE ARE ON APPROXIMATELY 18 FOOT.CENTERS, THE PIPE WAS SUPPORTED ON THESE BENTS WITH NO INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS. INTERMEDIATE SUPPORTS WERE USED ONLY AT THE 3 LONGER SPANS WHICH OCCUR IN THE CENTER PORTION OF THE BRIDGE. DURING PRESSURE TESTING, THE NEW MAIN DEFLECTED IN A HORIZONTAL PLANE BETWEEN THE SUS BENTS. ADDITIONAL SUPPORTS FOR THE MAIN WERE DESIGNED.AND ON MAY Z, 1967, THE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR ISSUED CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 3 TO THE SUBJECT PRO- JECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $2.400 TO COVER THE COST OF THESE SUPPORTS. A TOTAL OF 16 ADDITIONAL PIPE SUPP ORTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNDER THE LUMP SUM EXTRA WORK ORDER. THE PRICE OF $150 PER SUPPORT, INCLUDING STRAIGHTENING OF THE PIPE, HAS BEEN ANALYZED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT AND IS FELT TO BE A FAIR PRICE FOR'THE WORK INVOLVED. SUFFICIENT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE ORIGINAL APPROPRIATION FOR THIS PROJECT AND NO BUDGET AMENDMENT WILL BE NECESSARY. 4U J SE PH EVLIN BLIC WO 5 DIRECTOR GPD:NAJ cOUKIL: DISPOSITION: 3 FILE: FEBRUARY 14, 1967 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM of 1966 -67 (C -1067) RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE EXTRA WORK IN THE APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF $15900 FOR THE INSERTION OF 3 VALVES IN THE EXISTING MAIN IN PARK AVENUE. (BALBOA ISLAND) DISCUSSION: C SECTION 4 -03 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC WORKS IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REQUIRES COUNCIL APPROVAL OF EXTRA WORK AMOUNTING TO $500.00 OR OVER. Utf 1 'Z�_ / THE ABOVE CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF ALL REMAINING 2-INCH DIAMETER STEEL WATER LINES ON BALBOA ISLAND. THESE LINES. ARE GENERALLY LOCATED IN THE NORTH -SOUTH ALLEYS, AND CONNECT TO THE EXISTING 10-INCH AND 12 -INCH DIAMETER CAST IRON MAIN IN PARK AVENUE. THE OLD CITY RECORDS INDICATED THAT SOME OF THE VALVES AT THE CONNECTIONS WERE 2-INCHES IN DIAMETER, AND SOME WERE 6- INCHES IN DIAMETER. DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION, IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT 5 OF THE VALVES DESIGNATED AS 6 -INCH WERE ACTUALLY Z --NCH, THUS INCREASING ACCORDINGLY THE NUMBER OF VALVES TO BE REPLACED WITH THE LARGER SIZE. EACH OF THE CONNECTIONS WHERE THERE ARE EXISTING 2-INCH VALVES WILL REQUIRE THAT A PORTION OF THE WATER SYSTEM BE SHUT DOWN TO ENABLE REMOVAL OF THE STEEL NIPPLE AND 2-INCH VALVE$ AND INSTALLATION OF THE NEW 6 -INCH VALVE. BECAUSE OF THE AGE OF THE EXISTING VALVES AND BECAUSE THE EXISTING MAIN IN PARK AVENUE IS DEFICIENT IN LINE VALVES$ THE SHUT -DOWNS WOULD INVOLVE UNUSUALLY LARGE AREAS, AND WOULD CAUSE A GREAT DEAL OF INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC. INSERTION OF THE RECOM- MENDED MAIN LINE VALVES WOULD ENABLE A SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF INCONVENIENCE CAUSED BY THE SHUT - DOWNS$ AND WOULD IMPROVE THE RELIABILITY AND OPERATIONAL FLEXIBILITY OF THE WATER SYSTEM IN THE FUTURE. - SUFFICIENT FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE TO ACCOMPLISH THE EXTRA WORK, IF APPROVED] AND NO BUDGET AMENDMENT WILL BE NECESSARY. i °H . DEVLIN IC KS DIRECTOR BBN:IH CONTRACT NO. 1o67 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CONTRACT DOCUMENTS FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM OF 1966 -67 APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS 10TH DAY OF OCTOBERy 1966 - Z6244 A 12 LAURA LAG1059 AC NG CITY CLERK I CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA i NOTICE OF INVITING BIDS SEALED BIDS WILL BE RECEIVED FOPERFORMING WORK FOR THE. WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM-OF 1966 -67 (CONTRACT NO. 1o67) AT THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK) CITY HALL) NEWPORT BEACH) CALIFORNIA) UNTIL 10-30 A.M. ON THE 1ST DAY OF NOVEMBER) 1966. - AT THAT TIME THEY WILL BE PUBLICLY OPENED AND READ IN THE CHAMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. NO BID WILL BE RECEIVED UNLESS IT IS MADE ON A PROPOSAL FORM FURNISHED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. EACH BID MUST BE ACCOMPANIED BY CASH) CERTIFIED CHECK) OR BIDDER'S BOND MADE PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH') FOR AN AMOUNT EQUAL TO AT LEAST 10 PER- CENT OF THE AMOUNT BID. THE DOCUMENTS INCLUDED WITHIN THE SEALED BIDS WHICH REQUIRE COMPLETION AND EXECUTION ARE THE FOLLOWINGS 1. - PROPOSAL 2. PAGE 3 - DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS 30 PAGE BIDDERS BOND [F PAGE 9 - NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT 5. PAGE 10 - CONTRACTORS FINANCIAL STATUS THE DOCUMENTS SHALL BE AFFIXED WITH THE APPROPRIATE AND CORRECT SIGNATURES AND SEALS OF THE CORPORATION, PARTNERSHIP, JOINT VENTURE AND /OR INDIVIDUAL. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 1770 OF THE LABOR CODE) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH HAS ASCERTAINED THE GENERAL PREVAILING RATE OF PER DIEM WAGES IN THE LOCALITY IN WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED FOR EACH CRAFT OR TYPE OF WORKMAN OR MECHANIC NEEDED TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT AND IS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION No. 6258. A COPY OF SAID RESOLUTION IS AVAILABLE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. ALL BIDS ARE TO BE COMPARED ON THE BASIS OF THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF THE QUANTITIES OF WORK TO BE DONE. NO BID WILL BE ACCEPTED FROM A CONTRACTOR WHO HAS NOT BEEN LICENSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 9) DIVISION III OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS} CODE. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, FORMS OF PROPOSALS) BONDS) AND CONTRACT MAY BE OBTAINED AT THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT) CITY HALL) NEWPORT BEACH) CALIFORNIA. A NON - REFUNDABLE CHARGE OF $2.00 WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF STANDARD SPECI- FICATIONS OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. A REFUNDABLE DEPOSIT OF $5.00 WILL -BE REQUIRED FOR EACH SET OF PLANS, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. UPON RETURN OF THE SET OF PLANS) SPECIAL PROVISIONS, ANC CONTRACT DOCUMENTS TO THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT) THE $5.00 DEPOSIT WILL BE REFUNDED BY MAIL. NO REFUNDS WILL BE MADE LATER THAN 60 DAYS AFTER AWARD OF THE CONTRACT. THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY OR ALL BIDS AND TO WAIVE ANY INFORMALITY IN SUCH BIDS. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA + LAURA LAGIOS, ACTING CITY CLERK i 4 PROPOSAL FOR CONTRACT NO. 1067 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966-1967 TO;THE HONORABLE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA THE UNDERSIGNED DECLARES THAT HE HAS CAREFULLY EXAMINED THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK AND HAS READ THE NOTICE 114VITING'BIDS, THAT HE HAS EXAMINED THE PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR CONTRACT N0. 10679 AND HEREBY PROPOSES TO FURNISH "ALL MATERIALS AND DO ALL WORK REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH S416 PLANS, THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH9 AND THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS,.AND THAT HE WILL TAKE IN FULL. PAYMENT THEREFOR THE FOLLOWING UNIT PRICES FOR EACH ITEM 'COMPLETE IN PLACE, TO WITS ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT - TOTAL. N0. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE 1,100 4" DIAM. A.C.P. WATER MAIN LINEAR FEET @ FIVE DOLLARS AND THIRTY -FIVE CENTS $ 5-35 $-52§§5-00 PER LINEAR FOOT 2 9,096 6" DIAN. A.C.P. WATER MAIN LINEAR FEET @ FIVE .DOLLARS EIGHTY FIVE AND CENTS $ 5.85 $.53,211.60 , PER LINEAR FOOT - - 3 284 p U" DIAN. C.I.P..WATER MAIN LINEAR FEET TEN DOLLARS No AND CENTS $ 10.00 $ 29840.00 PER LINEAR FOOT - 4 543 I2" DIAM. C.I.P. WATER MAIN LINEAR FEET @ - TWENTY DOLLARS No AND CENTS $ 20.00 $ 10960.00 • PER LINEAR FOOT - 5 4 4" DIAN. GATE VALVES EACH ONE HUNDRED 8•. EIGHT DOLLARS No AND CENTS $ 108.00 $432.00 EACH - - C pR -2 ' ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL No. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE 6 21 6" DIAN. GATE VALVES EACH ONE HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS AND No CENTS $ 130.00 $ 2 0.00 EACH 7 2 12" DIAN. GATE VALVES EACH THREE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND No CENTS $ 300.00 $ 600.00 EACH 8 6 4" TAPPING SLEEVE AND 411 GATE VALVE EACH TWO HUNDRED & SIXTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS $ 2 0.00 $ 1,560.00 EACH 9 3 6" TAPPING SLEEVE AND 6" GATE VALVE EACH THREE HUNDRED TWENTY -SIX DOLLARS AND NO CENTS $326.00 $ 978.00 EACH 10 4 8" TAPPING SLEEVE AND 6" GATE VALVE EACH ® THREE HUNDRED, THIRTY EIGHIDOLLARS AND No CENTS $ 338.00 $ t, 352.00 EACH 11 3 12° TAPPING SLEEVE AND O" GATE VALVE EACH FOUR HUNDRED AND THREE DOLLARS AND No CENTS $403.00 $1,209.00 EACH 12 8 FIRE HYDRANTS EACH Q. THREE HUNDRED & TEN DOLLARS AND No CENTS $10.00 $ 2,480.00 EACH 13 550 COPPER WATER SERVICES EACH FORTY -FIVE DOLLARS AND No CENTS $45.00 $ 240,00 EACH J DOLLARS AND FORTY CENTS $ .4O $ 756.40 PER LINEAR FOOT 15 8,729 3" A.C. /4« A.B. PERMANENT TRENCH LINEAR RESURFACING FEET ONE DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS $ 1.20 $ 10.474.80 PER LINEAR FOOT 16 1,849 6^ THICK CONCRETE TRENCH RESURFACING LINEAR PR-3 ITEM QUANTITY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL ND. AND UNIT UNIT PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS PRICE PRICE NO p CENTS $ 2.00 $ 3.698.00 14 1,891 1" THICK Q.C. TEMPORARY TRENCH 17 1 LINEAR RESURFACING EACH FEET DOLLARS AND FORTY CENTS $ .4O $ 756.40 PER LINEAR FOOT 15 8,729 3" A.C. /4« A.B. PERMANENT TRENCH LINEAR RESURFACING FEET ONE DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS $ 1.20 $ 10.474.80 PER LINEAR FOOT 16 1,849 6^ THICK CONCRETE TRENCH RESURFACING LINEAR FEET Q° TWO DOLLARS AND NO p CENTS $ 2.00 $ 3.698.00 PER LINEAR FOOT 17 1 p 8 " DIAM. GATE VALVES EACH ® TWO HUNDRED & SIXTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS $ 260.00 $ 260.00 EACH 18 1 6^ TAPPING SLEEVE AND 4^ (MATE VALVE EACH Q THREE HUNDRED & TWENTY DOLLARS AND NO CENTS $ 320.00 $320.00 EACH TOTAL PRICE WRITTEN IN WORDS NINETY -SIX ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTYFOUR THOUSAND, THREEHUNDRED & DOLLARS AND EIGHTY CENTS TOTAL $ 124,396.80 y. ALL BIDS ARE TO BE COMPUTED ON THE BASIS OF THE GIVEN ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF WORK, ,AS - INDICATED IN THIS PROPOSAL, TIMES THE UNIT PRICE AS SUBMITTED BY THE BIDDER.. IN CASE OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN WORDS AND FIGURES, THE WORDS SHALL PREVAIL- IN CASE OF AN ERROR IN THE EXTENSION OF A UNIT PRICE, THE CORRECTED EXTENSION SHALL BE CALCULATED AND THE BIDS WILL BE COMPUTED AS INDICATED ABOVE AND COMPARED ON.:THE BASIS OF THE CORRECTED TOTALS. THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES OF WORK INDICATED IN THIS PROPOSAL ARE APPROXIMATE ONLY, BEING GIVEN SOLELY AS A BASIS FOR COMPARISON OF BIDS. THE UNDERSIGNED HAS CHECKED CAREFULLY ALL OF THE ABOVE FIGURES AND UNDERSTANDS THAT THE CITY WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ERRORS OR OMISSIONS ON THE PART OF THE UNDERSIGNED IN MAKING UP THIS BID- THE UNDERSIGNED AGREES THAT IN CASE OF DEFAULT IN EXECUTING THE REQUIRED CONTRACT WITH NECESSARY BONDS WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS, NOT INCLUDING SUNDAY, AFTER HAVING RECEIVED NOTICE THAT THE CONTRACT IS READY FOR SIGNATURE, THE PROCEEDS OF CHECK OR BOND ACCOMPANY- ING THIS BID SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. LICENSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STATUTES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA PROVIDING FOR THE REGISTRATION OF CONTRACTORS, LICENSE N0. 237155 ACCOMPANYING THIS PROPOSAL IS BOND ASH,. ERTIFIED CHECK, CASHIERS CHECK OR BOND IN AN AMOUNT NOT LESS THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL BID PRICE- 213-448-4118 HONE NUMBER 11 -1 -66 ATE 9855 E. KALE SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA BIDDERS ADDRESS . BARRON & ECKHART ENG. CONTR. BIDDER'S NAME (SEAL) (S) ROBERT M. BARRON AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE (S) H.A. ECKHART AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CO- PARTNERSHIP TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (INDIVIDUAL, CORPORATION, CO- PARTNERSHIP) fi* .. LIST BELOW NAMES OF PRESIDENT, SECRETARY, TREASURER AND MANAGER IF A CORPORATION,` AND NAMES OF ALL CO- PARTNERS IF A CO- PARTNERSHIP: ROBERT M. BARRON H.A: ECKHART 4 i .,� • PAGE 3 DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS THE UNDERSIGNED CERTIFIES THAT HE HAS USED THE SUB -BIDS OF THE FOLLOWING LISTED CONTRACTORS IN MAKING UP HIS BID AND THAT THE SUB - CONTRACTORS LISTED WILL BE USED FOR THE WORK FOR WHICH THEY 810, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE CITY ENGINEER, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. NO CHANGE MAY BE MADE IN THESE SUB - CONTRACTORS EXCEPT UPON THE PRIOR APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER. ITEM OF WORK SUB- CONTRACTOR ADDRESS I. 2. 3-' 4. 5• 6. 7• 10. H. 12. BIDDER'S NAME AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TYPE OF ORGANIZATION (INDIVIDUAL, COPARTNERSHIP OR CORPCRATION) ADDRESS I 0 0 PAGE 4 (FOR ORJGINAL SEE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE) BIDDER'S BOND TO ACCOMPANY PROPOSAL KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT WE, BARRON- ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR , AS PRINCIPAL, AND UNITED STATES FIDELITY 1v. GUARANTY COMPANY , AS SURETY, ARE HELD AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, IN THE SUM OF TEN PERCENT OF AMOUNT BID DOLLARS ($ 10% ), LAWFUL MONEY OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE PAYMENT OF WHICH SUM WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE, WE BIND OURSELVES) JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE PROPOSAL OF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 CONTRACT 106 IN TIIE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IS ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF SAID CITY, AND IF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL SHALL DULY ENTER INTO AND EXECUTE A CONTRACT FOR SUCH CONSTRUC- TION AND SHALL EXECUTE AND DELIVER THE TWO (Z) BONDS DESCRIBED IN THE "NOTICE INVITING BIDS' WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS (NOT INCLUDING SATURDAY AND SUNDAY),FROM THE DATE OF THE MAILING OF A NOTICE TO THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL BY AND FROM SAID CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH THAT SAID CONTRACT IS READY FOR EXECUTION, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID; OTHERWISE IT BE AND REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND EFFECT, AND THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED HEREIN SHALL BE FORFEITED TO THE SAID CITY. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PRINCIPAL ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THIS BOND AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IT IS AGREED THAT THE DEATH OF ANY SUCH PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT EXONERATE THE SURETY FROM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS BOND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, WE HEREUNTO SET OUR HANDS AND SEALS THIS IST DAY OF NOVEMBER , 1966 . CORPORATE SEAL (IF CORPORATION) BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS PRINCIPAL (S) (ATTACH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF BY: ROBERT M. BARRON ATTORNEY IN FACT) UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY SURETY (S) BY IRENE M. RECOR TITLE IRENE M. RECOR, ATTORNEY -IN -FACT PAGE 5 LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT WHEREAS, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED NOVEMBER 14, 1966 HAS AWARDED TO BARRON AND ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9 HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE "PRINCIPAL" A CONTRACT FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM CONTRACT NO. 1067 IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK. WHEREAS, SAID PRINCIPAL HAS EXECUTED OR IS ABOUT TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND THE TERMS THEREOF REQUIRE THE FURNISHING OF A BOND WITH SAID CONTRACT, PROVIDING THAT IF SAID PRINCIPAL OR ANY OF HIS OR ITS SUBCONTRACTORS, SHALL FAIL TO PAY FOR ANY MATERIALS, PROVISIONS, PROVENDER, OR OTHER SUPPLIES OR TEAMS USED IN, UPON, FOR, OR ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK AGREED TO BE DONE, OR FOR ANY WORK OR LABOR DONE THEREON OF ANY KIND, THE SURETY ON THIS BOND WILL PAY THE SAME TO THE EXTENT HEREINAFTER SET FORTHZ NOW, THEREFORE, liE AS PRINCIPAL, HEREINAFTER DESI- dNATED AS THE CONTRACTOR AND W MN STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY compA Ny AS,SURETY, ARE HELD FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN THE SUM OF y4(pL( Q DOLLARS SAID SUM BEING ONE -HALF OF THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT PAYABLE BY THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH UNDER THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT) FOR WHICH PAYMENT WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE WE BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS, EXECUTORS AND ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRESENTS. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, THAT IF THE PERSON OR HIS SUBCON- TRACTORS, FAIL TO PAY FOR ANY MATERIALS, PROVISIONS, PROVENDER, OR OTHER SUPPLIES, OR TEAMS, USED IN, UPON, FOR, OR ABOUT THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK CONTRACTED TO BE DONE, OR FOR ANY OTHER WORK OR LABOR THEREON OF ANY KIND, OR FOR AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THE UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE CODE WITH RESPECT TO SUCH WORK OR LABOR, THAT THE SURETY OR SURETIES WILL PAY FOR THE SAME, IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING THE SUM SPECI- FIED IN THE BOND, AND ALSO, IN CASE SUIT IS BROUGHT UPON THE BOND, A REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEE, TO BE FIXED BY THE COURT, AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4204 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. 0 t (LABOR AND MATERIAL BOND ° CONTINUED) PAGE 6 THIS BOND SHALL INURE TO THE BENEFIT OF ANY AND ALL PERSONS, COMPANIES, AND CORPOR- ATION ENTITLED TO FILE CLAIMS UNDER SECTION 1192.1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SO AS TO GIVE A RIGHT OF ACTION TO THEM OR THEIR ASSIGNS IN ANY SUIT BROUGHT UPON THIS BOND, AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 4205 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. AND THE SAID SURETY, FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES THAT NO CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED THEREUNDER OR THE SPECIFICATIONS ACCOMPANYING THE SAME SHALL IN ANY WISE AFFECT ITS OBLIGATIONS ON THIS BOND, AND IT DOES HEREBY WAIVE NOTICE OF ANY SUCH CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, ALTERATIONS OR ADDITIONS TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACTOR OR TO THE WORK OR TO THE SPECIFICATIONS. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PRINCIPAL ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THIS BOND AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IT IS AGREED THAT THE DEATH OF ANY SUCH PRINCIPAL SHALL NOT EXONERATE THE SURETY FROM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS BOND. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN DULLY EXECUTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SURETY ABOVE NAMED, ON THE fp; DAY OF 196_x. i (SEAL) - /i/ /�/ti Gtiti� (SEAL) U ' /r/ Z� . (SEAL) CONTRACTOR APPROVED jn�AASSLT /O FORM: �!l.& ,v• CI ATTOR Y U/ HiH STATES FIDELITY AND GUAAANTYCCOOMPANT (SEAL) a,v (SEAL) _ Irene M. Recor, Attorney-In-Fact (SL -AL) SURETY THIS BOND WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH BY MOTION ON TE ATTEST: CITY CLERK iATTORNEY -IN -FACT AFFIDAVIT tq STATE OR COMMONWEALTH A COUNTY OR CITY 9F___1as_AwIttv______ Before me, a Notary Public, personally known to me, and known to be the Attorney. Maryland Corporation, which executed the a ture and the corporate seal of said United and authority of said Company's Board of D free act and deed of United States Fidelity Given under my hand and seal cited States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a as surety, who deposed and said that his sigm- a and Guaranty Company were affixed by order that the execution of the attached bond is the y Company. My Commission expires LW Ju& 676 (W) . era...' ' V'.. a s �_ ..:'�- .� .1 .'d: '.L_a .... .. ,...:�,.�. ». _. .ai:...... �..: _L.�.c;, aeu:a..'�. xw...,= s..vi�s : uns�� .w.�._��rr•..a'_..+�w.:uV's' 0 PERFORMANCE BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS) THAT PAGE 7 WHEREAS) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BY MOTION ADOPTED—Nov EMBER 14, 1966 HAS AWARDED TO BARRON AND ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS y HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE Ii PRINCIPAL", A CONTRACT FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 (CONTRACT ND. 1067) IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, IN STRICT CONFORMITY WITH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFI- CATIONS AND OTHER CONTRACT DOCUMENTS NOW ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. WHEREAS) SAID PRINCIPAL THE TERMS THEREOF REQUIRE THE SAID CONTRACT; NOW, THEREFORE) WE, HAS EXECUTED OR IS ABOUT TO EXECUTE SAID CONTRACT AND FURNISHING A BOND FOR THE FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE OF AS PRINCIPALVHEREINAFTER DEY✓IGNATED AS THE "CONTRACTOR" AND UMFISSTATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANT AS SURETY) ARE HEL[a AND FIRMLY BOUND UNTO THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH) IN THE SUM OF LLARS ($ tea, //a , SAID SLIP BEIN4fEQUAL TO 50% OF THE ESTIMATED AMOUNT OF THE CONTRACT, TO BE PAID TO THE SAID CITY OR ITS CERTAIN ATTORNEY) ITS SUCCESSORS) AND ASSIGNS; FOR WHICH PAY- MENT, WELL AND TRULY TO BE MADE) WE BIND OURSELVES, OUR HEIRS) EXECUTORS AND AD- MINISTRATORS) SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS, JOINTLY AND SEVERALLY, FIRMLY BY THESE PRE- SENTS. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH) THAT IF THE ABOVE BOUNDEN PRINCIPAL, HIS OR ITS HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS, OR ASSIGNS, SHALL IN ALL THINGS STAND TO AND ABIDE BY, AND WELL AND TRULY KEEP AND PERFORM THE COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND AGREEMENTS IN THE SAID CONTRACT AND ANY ALTERATION THEREOF MADE AS THEREIN PRO- VIDED ON HIS OR THEIR PART, TO BE KEPT AND PERFORMED AT THE TIME AND IN THE MANNER THEREIN SPECIFIED, AND IN ALL RESPECTS ACCORDING TO THEIR TRUE INTENT AND MEANING, AND SHALL INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ITS OFFICERS AND AGENTS, AS THEREIN STIPULATED, THEN THIS OBLIGATION SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID; OTHERWISE IT SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND VIRTUE. i (PERFORMANCE BOND - CONT:NJED) t 8 fi PAGE 8 AND SAID SURETYy FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HEREBY STIPULATES AND AGREES ?'HAT NO CHANGE' EXTENSION OF TIMEy ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE TERMS OF THE CONTRACT OR TO THE WORK TO BE PERFORMED THEREUNDER OR THE SPECIFICATIONS ACCOMPANYING THE SAME SHALL IN ANY WISE AFFECT ITS OBLIGATIONS ON THIS BOND, AND IT DOES HEREBY WAIVE NOTICE OF ANY CHANGE, EXTENSION OF TIME, .ALTERATION OR ADDITION TO THE TERMS OF THE CON- TRACT OR TO THE WORK. OR TO THE SPECIFICATlONS. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PRINCIPAL ABOVE NAMED EXECUTED THIS BOND AS AN INDIVIDUAL, IT IS AGREED THAI' THE DEATH ON ANY SUCH PRINCIFAL SHALL NOT EXONERATE THE SURETY FROM ITS OBLIGATIONS UNDER THIS BOND, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THIS INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN DULY EXECUTED BY THE PRINCIPAL AND SURETY ABOVE NA.M EDy ON THE Z2a a=d9 DAY OF N APPROVED AS TO FORM: 7 9TY A T RNEY (SEAL) (SEAL) /lK_ 2 i 0(Y� — (SEAL) CONTRACTOR 411"M STATES FIDELITY AND GORANT1 COMPANI (SEAL) (SEAL) �!7 SURE ?' "Y Irene M. Recor, Attomeyln•Fact ATTORNEY -IN-FACT AFFIDAVIT t STATE OR COMMONWEALTH COUNTY OR CITY OF - -_ -- Los A ng e Les as : Before me a Not Public base N. Recor , Notary ,Personally came----- ---- ____— _-------- �_�--- __ - -- -- known to me, and known to be the Attorney -in -Fact of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a itaryland Corporation, which executed the attached bond as surety, who deposed and said that his signa- e and the corporate seal of said United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company were affixed by order r d authority of said Company's Board of Directors, and that the execution of the attached bond is the ee act and deed of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Given under my hand and seal this 22nd —_�— da o _____November 1966. r� — - -% - Notary ublic. Commission expires — 76 (9,-a7) .w. 0 0 PAGE 9 NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT THE BIDDERS, BY ITS OFFICERS AND AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES PRESENT AT THE TIME OF FILING THIS BID, BEING DULY SWORN ON THEIR OATHS SAY, THAT NEITHER THEY NOR ANY OF THEM, HAVE IN ANY WAY, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ENTERED INTO ANY ARRANGEMENT OR AGREEMENT WITH ANY OTHER BIDDER, OR WITH ANY PUBLIC OFFICER OF SUCH CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH WHEREBY SUCH AFFIANT OR AFFIANTS OR EITHER OF THEM, HAS PAID OR IS TO PAY TO SUCH BIDDER OR PUBLIC OFFICER ANY SUM OF MONEY, OR HAS GIVEN OR IS TO GIVE TO SUCH OTHER BIDDER OR PUBLIC OFFICER ANYTHING OF VALUE WHATEVER, OR SUCH AFFIANT OR AF- FiANTS OR EITHER OF THEM HAS NOT DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, ENTERED INTO ANY ARRANGE- MENT OR AGREEMENT WITH ANY OTHER BIDDER OR BIDDERS, WHICH TENDS TO OR DOES LESSEN OR DESTROY FREE COMPETITION IN THE LETTING OF THE CONTRACT SOUGHT FOR BY THE AT- TACHED BIDS; THAT NO BID HAS BEEN ACCEPTED FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN THROUGH ANY BID DEPOSITORY, THE BYLAWS, RULES OR REGULATIONS OF WHICH PROHIBIT OR PREVENT THE CONTRACTOR FROM CONSIDERING ANY 610 FROM ANY SUBCONTRACTOR OR MATERIAL- MAN WHICH 15 NOT PROCESSED THROUGH SAID BID. DEPOSITORY, OR WHICH PREVENT ANY SUB- CONTRACTOR OR MATERIALMAN FROM BIDDING TO ANY CONTRACTOR WHO DOES NOT USE THE FACILITIES OF OR ACCEPT BIDS FROM OR THROUGH SUCH BED DEPOSITORY; THAT NO INDUCE- MENT OR ANY FORM OR CHARACTER OTHER THAN THAT WHICH APPEARS UPON THE FACE OF THE BID WILL BE SUGGESTED, OFFERED, PAID, OR DELIVERED TO ANY PERSON WHOMSOEVER TO INFLUENCE THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE SAID BID OR AWARDING OF THE CONTRACT, NOR HAS THIS BIDDER ANY AGREEMENT OR UNDERSTANDING OF ANY KIND WHATSOEVER, WITH ANY PERSON WHOMSOEVER TO PAY, DELIVER TO, OR SHARE WITH ANY OTHER PERSON IN ANY WAY OR MANNER, ANY OF THE PROCEEDS OF THE CONTRACTS SOUGHT BY THIS BID. BARRON AND ECKHART ENG. CONTRACTORS 9655 E. KALE S. EL MONTE (S) ROBERT M. BARRON SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME BY THIS 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 1966 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES' MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FES, 9, 1969 (S) DOROTHY L. PALEN NOTARY PUBLIC ti 0 6 BIDDER'S STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY TECHNICAL ABILITY AND EXPERIENCE PAGE 10 THE BIDDER IS REQUIRED TO STATE WHAT WORK OF A SIMILAR CHARACTER TO THAT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED CONTRACT HE HAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED AND GIVE REFERENCE WHICH WILL ENABLE THE CITY COUNCIL TO JUDGE HIS RESPONSIBILITY) EXPERIENCES SKILL) AND BUSINESS STANDING.) THE UNDERSIGNED SUBMITS HEREWITH A STATEMENT OF HIS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY. THE UNDERSIGNED SUBMITS BELOW A STATEMENT OF THE WORK OF SIMILAR CHARACTER TO THAT INCLUDED IN THE PROPOSED CONTRACT WHICH HE HAS SUCCESSFULLY PERFORMED. L A COUNTY WATER WORK, LANCASTER 207,000 YUCCA VALLEY COUNTY WATER WORKS 139,000.00 ROBERT M. BARRON SIGNED Y PAGE II C O N T R A C T THIS AGREEMENTS MADE AND ENTERED INTO THIS ;-T DAY OF /{y �iy� 196., BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE CITY, PARTY OF THE FIRST PART, AND BARRON AND ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS HEREINAFTER DESIGNATED AS THE CONTRACTOR, PARTY OF THE SECOND PART. WITNESSETH: THAT THE PARTIES HERETO DO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS; I. FOR AND IN CONSIDERATION OF THE PAYMENTS AND AGREEMENTS HEREINAFTER MENTIONED TO BE MADE AND PERFORMED BY THE CITY, THE CONTRACTOR AGREES WITH THE CITY TO FURNISH ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 AND TO PERFORM AND COMPLETE IN A GOOD AND WORKMANLIKE MANNER ALL THE WORK PERTAINING THERETO SHOWN ON THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS THEREFOR; TO FURNISH AT HIS OWN PROPER COST AND EXPENSE ALL TOOLS, EQUIPMENT, LABOR, AND MATERIALS NECESSARY THEREFOR, (EX- CEPT SUCH MATERIALS, IF ANY, AS IN THE SAID SPECIFICATIONS ARE STIPULATED TO BE FUR- NISHED BY THE CITY), AND TO DO EVERYTHING REQUIRED BY THIS AGREEMENT AND THE SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. FOR FURNISHING ALL SAID MATERIALS AND LABOR, TOOLS AND EQUIPMENT, AND DOING ALL THE WORK CONTEMPLATED AND EMBRACED IN THIS AGREEMENT, ALSO FOR ALL LOSS AND DAMAGE ARISING OUT OF THE NATURE OF THE WORK AFORESAID, OR FROM THE ACTION OF THE ELEMENTS, OR FROM ANY UNFORESEEN DIFFICULTIES WHICH MAY ARISE OR BE ENCOUNTERED IN THE PROSECU- TION OF THE WORK UNTIL ITS ACCEPTANCE BY THE CITY, AND FOR ALL RISKS OF EVERY DE- SCRIPTION CONNECTED WITH THE WORK; ALSO, FOR ALL EXPENSES INCURRED BY OR IN CONSE- QUENCE OF THE SUSPENSION OR DISCONTINUANCE OF WORK, EXCEPT SUCH AS IN SAID SPECIFI- CATIONS ARE EXPRESSLY STIPULATED TO BE BORNE BY THE CITY; AND FOR WELL AND FAITHFULLY COMPLETING THE WORK AND THE WHOLE THEREOF, IN THE MANNER SHOWN AND DESCRIBED IN THE SAID PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY WILL PAY AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE IN FULL COMPENSATION THEREFORE THE LUMP SUM PRICE, OR IF THE BID IS ON THE UNIT PRICE BASIS, THE TOTAL PRICE FOR THE SEVERAL ITEMS FURNISHED PURSUANT TO THE SPECIFICATIONS, NAMED IN THE BIDDING SHEET OF THE PROPOSAL, AS THE CASE MAY BE. 3. THE CITY HEREBY PROMISES AND AGREES WITH THE SAID CONTRACTOR TO EMPLOY, AND DOES HEREBY EMPLOY THE SAID CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE MATERIALS AND TO DO THE WORK ACCORDING TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS HEREIN CONTAINED AND REFERRED TO FOR THE PRICE AFORESAID, AND HEREBY CONTRACTS TO PAY THE SAME AT THE TIME, IN THE MANNER, AND UPON THE CONDITIONS SET FORTH IN THE SPECIFICATIONS; AND THE SAID PARTIES FOR THEMSELVES, THEIR HEIRS, EXECUTORS, ADMINISTRATORS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, DO HEREBY AGREE TO THE FULL PERFORMANCE OF THE COVENANTS HEREIN CONTAINED. 4. THE NOTICE TO BIDDERS, INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS, CONTRACTOR'S PROPOSAL, AND THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND ALL AMENDMENTS THEREOF, WHEN APPROVED BY THE PAR- TIES HERETO, OR WHEN REQUIRED BY THE CITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, ARE HEREBY INCORPORATED IN AND MADE PART OF THIS AGREE- MENT. (CONTRACT - CONTINUED) 0 0 PAGE IZ 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME THE DEFENSE OF AND INDEMNIFY AND SAVE HARMLESS THE CITY, THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, AND THEIR OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES, FROM ALL CLAIMS, LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, AND LIABILITY OF EVERY KIND, NATURE, AND DESCRIPTION, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING FROM THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CONTRACT OR WORK, REGARD- LESS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE; AND FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, LOSS, DAMAGE, INJURY, AND LIABILITY, HOWSOEVER THE SAME MAY BE CAUSED, RESULTING DIRECTLY OR IN- DIRECTLY FROM THE NATURE OF THE WORK COVERED BY THE CONTRACT, REGARDLESS OF RESPON- SIBILITY FOR NEGLIGENCE. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE CAUSED THIS CONTRACT TO BE EXECUTED THE DAY AND YEAR FIRST ABOVE WRITTEN. ATTEST' CITY CL RK APPROVED AS TO FORM: ITY ATT EY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA BY: f MAY 0 CONTRACTOR (SEAL) TITLE Br: G / r/ // , %� TITLE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 1067 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM OF 1966 - 67 I. SCOPE OF WORK THE WORK TO BE DONE UNDER THIS CONTRACT CONSISTS OF CONSTRUCTING NEW WATER MAINS AND APPURTENANCES AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL LABOR, EQUIPMENT, TRANS- PORTATION, WATER, AND MATERIALS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL WORK AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH DRAWING N0. W- 5033 -S,AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DRAWINGS OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND THESE SPECIAL PROVISIONS. 11. TIME OF COMPLETION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE WORK WITHIN 130 CALENDAR DAYS FROM THE DATE OF EXECUTION OF THE CONTRACT BY THE CITY. 111. PIPING MATERIAL ALL WATER MAINS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, SHALL BE ASBESTOS CEMENT WATER PIPE CONFORMING TO SECTION 19 -02 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. THE PIPE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 30° COVER, EXCEPT AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. IV. CAST IRON PIPE AND FITTINGS (MODIFIED PARA. 5, SECT. 19 -02 OF STD. SPEC.) CAST IRON PIPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, SHALL BE CLASS 150, FEDERAL SPECIFICATIONS NC. WW- P -421P, STANDARD WEIGHT, THIN CEMENT -LINED WITH BELL AND SPIGOT END CONNECTIONS. CAST IRON FITTINGS SHALL BE SHORT BODY, CEMENT LINED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ASA STANDARD A21.11 WITH RUBBER RING OR HUB ENDS, AND SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIRE- MENTS OF ASA STANDARD A.21.10. ALL RUBBER RING JOINTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PIPE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE FREE FROM ROUGH SPOTS AND SHARP EDGES. FLANGED FITTINGS SHALL CONFORM TO ASA STANDARD B16.1. V. BRIDGE CROSSINGS THE WATER MAINS BENEATH THE BRIDGES SHALL BE CEMENT LINED CAST IRON MECHANICAL JOINT PIPE BETWEEN THE LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE NEW P!PES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN THEIR NEW ALIGNMENTS AND ALL WORK THAT CAN BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO INTERRUPTING THE EXISTING SYSTEM IN THESE AREAS MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED PRIOR TO SHUTTING DOWN THE OLD SYSTEMS AND CONNECTING THE NEW. DURING THE REPLACEMENT OF THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE PIPE, THE 12 -INCH SUBMARINE WATER MAIN FROM WASHINGTON STREET ON THE PENINSULA TO OPAL AVENUE ON THE ISLAND WILL SUPPLY WATER TO BALBOA ISLAND. THIS SITUATION MUST BE IN EFFECT FOR THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE TIME AND ARRANGEMENTS THEREFOR MUST BE FINALIZED r Y • *V. BRIDGE CROSSINGS (CONTD) 0 SP -2 WITH THE ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE. AT NO TIME MUST THE WATER MAIN ACROSS THE PARK AVENUE BRIDGE BE SHUT DOWN WHILE THE WATER MAIN ACROSS THE MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE 15 NOT IN SERVICE EXCEPT AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. DURING THE REPLACEMENT OF THE PARK AVENUE BRIDGE PIPE) LITTLE BALBOA ISLAND WILL BE SUPPLIED WITH WATER BY THE 8-INCH SUBMARINE WATER MAIN FROM MARINE AVENUE TO CRYSTAL AVENUE. ALL ARRANGEMENTS FOR THIS CONDITION MUST BE FINALIZED WITH THE ENGINEER AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION IN THE VICINITY OF THE BRIDGES MUST BE ACCOMPLISHED SO AS TO CREATE A MINIMUM OF INCONVENIENCE TO THE PUBLIC AND AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC MUST BE MAINTAINED ACROSS EACH BRIDGE AT ALL TIMES AND SUFFICIENT FLAGMEN MUST BE UTILIZED AT EACH LOCATION 50 AS TO INSURE THE SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC. THE 12 -INCH MARINE AVENUE BRIDGE PIPE SHALL SPAN THE 19'-7" SPANS AND BE SUP- PORTED AT THE MID POINTS OF THE 26, -4" SPANS BY USE OF ADJUSTABLE U BOLTS) AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. HOLES THROUGH THE BRIDGE DECK FOR THE U BOLTS SHALL BE DRILLED WITH A ROTARY CORE DRILL. HOLES THROUGH THE CONCRETE HEADERS AT THE BRIDGE BENTS SHALL BE AS NEAR ROUND AS POSSIBLE AND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM DIAMETER EQUAL TO THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE PLUS 3 INCHES AND A MAXI- MUM DIAMETER EQUAL TO THE OUTSIDE DIAMETER OF THE CONNECTIONS PLUS 2 INCHES. THESE HOLES SHALL BE CLEANED AND THE BOTTOM ONE -THIRD LINED WITH A I -INCH ELASTOMERIC BEARING PAD) OR EQUAL) SECURED TO THE HEADER PRIOR TO PRESSURE TESTING THE PIPE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST OBTAIN PRINTS OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OF THESE BRIDGES _. PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF HIS OPERATIONS IN THESE AREAS. THE 8 -INCH PARK AVENUE BRIDGE PIPE SHALL SPAN BETWEEN THE PIER BENTS WHERE IT SHALL REST ON 2 -INCH THICK BY 6- INCHES SQUARE ELASTOMERIC PADS) OR EQUAL) SECURED TO THE BENTS PRIOR TO PRESSURE - TESTING THE PIPE. AFTER THE NEW PIPES ARE IN SERVICE) THE OLD PIPES BENEATH THE BRIDGES SHALL BE REMOVED AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY YARD AS EXPLAINED IN XIX HEREOF. SPECIAL CARE MUST BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGE THE EXISTING UTILITIES BENEATH THE BRIDGES) AND THE CONTRACTORS ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE POSSIBLE PRESENCES OF FLAM- MABLE AND EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES. THE PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT OF U AND 12 INCH C.I.P. SHALL INCLUDE CONCRETE REMOVAL) HANGERS) PRESSURE VALVES) AND ALL OTHER FIXTURES AND CONSTRUCTION PROCEDURES REQUIRED FOR THE INSTALLATION THEREOF. VI. VALVES AND FITTINGS ALL 4 ^) 6% AND 81, VALVES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH ALL INTERNAL WORKING PARTS OF BRONZE INCLUDING SOLID BRONZE DISCS; ALL 12" VALVES SHALL BE FURNISHED WITH INTERIOR WORKING PARTS OF BRONZE EXCEPT DISCS) WHICH SHALL BE CAST IRON WITH BRONZE FACING. VALVE STEMS SHALL BE CAST OR FORGED OF BRONZE CONTAINING NOT MORE THAN 7% ZINC NOR MORE THAN 2% ALUMINUM. y • • SP -3 • VI. VALVES AND FITTINGS (CONTD) ALL VALVES AND FITTINGS SHALL OTHERWISE CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, EXCEPT THAT NO CAULKED JOINTS WILL BE PERMITTED WITH ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE. RUBBER RING ENDS SHALL CONFORM TO THE PIPE MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. ALL DEAD -END OUTLETS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A BLIND FLANGE, CAP OR PLUG. VII. FIRE HYDRANTS THE PRICE PAID PER FIRE HYDRANT INSTALLED SHALL INCLUDE HYDRANT, CONNECTOR PIPE, AND ANCHOR BLOCK, ALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD DRAWING STD - 501 -L. SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THE VALVE. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ALL STAND PIPES BEING REPLACED BY FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE SALVAGED AS DESIGNATED BY THESE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, ITEM XIX. VIII. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MAINS SHALL BE MADE EITHER BY MEANS OF A SLEEVE -TYPE COUPLING OR TAPPING SLEEVE, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. CONNECTIONS BETWEEN NEW MAINS AND EXISTING LATERAL MAINS SHALL HAVE ALL FLANGED JOINTS BETWEEN THE NEW MAIN AND THE VALVE WHEN A NEW VALVE IS CALLED FOR ON THE PLANS. INTERFERING PORTIONS OF EXISTING WATER FACILITIES SHALL BE REMOVED AS REQUIRED. AT THE LOCATIONS WHERE THE CONTRACTOR IS INSTRUCTED TO CUT AND PLUG AND REMOVE EXISTING GATE VALVES, ANY SHORT NIPPLES SHALL BE REMOVED, A PLUG INSTALLED IN THE EXISTING TEE OR CROSS, AND A CONCRETE THRUST BLOCK PLACED BEHIND THE PLUG. NO SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INFORM, IN WRITING, THE ENGINEER AND ALL RESIDENCES AFFECTED TWO DAYS IN ADVANCE, WHEN IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO SHUT DOWN ANY PORTION OF THE EXISTING SYSTEM IN ORDER TO CONNECT NEW MAINS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EXISTING MAIN AND HOUSE CONNECTIONS IN SERVICE UNTIL THE NEW MAIN HAS BEEN PRESSURE - TESTED, CHLORINATED, AND APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER FOR USE. IX. HOT TAP CONNECTIONS HOT TAP CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY MEANS OF FACTORY MANUFACTURED MECHANICAL TAPPING SLEEVES. THE CONTRACTOR PERFORMING THE HOT TAP OPERATIONS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 5 YEARS" EXPERIENCE IN THAT TYPE OF WORK AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY. THE PRICE PAID FOR THE TAPPING SLEEVE AND GATE VALVE WILL INCLUDE ALL WORK FOR THE ITEM COMPLETE IN PLACE. X. WATER SERVICES THE WORK INCLUDED IN THIS ITEM INVOLVES RECONSTRUCTING SERVICES TO THE NEW MAIN AT ALL EXISTING SERVICE LOCATIONS. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARD DRAWING STD -503 -L OR STD - 513 -L. THE PRICE PAID FOR WATER SERVICES SHALL INCLUDE PERMANENT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE ALL NEW MATERIAL BETWEEN THE NEW MAIN AND EXISTING METERS. THE EXISTING 3/4 " METERS SHALL BE RECONNECTED AND THE METER BOX RE -USED. THE SERVICE PIPE SHALL BE 1 " DIAMETER TO THE EXISTING METER (INCLUDING ANGLE STOP) UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SILVER- SOLDERED 0 X. WATER SERVICES (CONTD) 0 sP -4 CONNECTIONS FOR 1 -, DIAMETER OR LARGER WATER SERVICES AND FOR ALL COPPER SLEEVE TYPE CONNECTORS WHERE. NEW PIPE JOINS THE EXISTING COPPER TUBING. FLARED FIT- TINGS SHALL BE USED FOR 1" DIAMETER OR SMALLER WATER SERVICES. THE PRICE PAID FOR WATER SERVICES 1" DIAMETER OR SMALLER WILL BE MADE FOR I" WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS. FOR lgi OR 211 WATER SERVICE, PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR Z" WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS. XI. TESTING RUBBER RING JOINTS IN ASBESTOS CEMENT PIPE NEED NOT BE EXPOSED DURING TESTING. ALL OTHER TYPES OF JOINTS AND ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL BE LEFT EXPOSED DURING TESTING OPERATION. XII. TRENCH EXCAVATI THE SECOND SENTENCE OF THE SECOND PARAGRAPH TO SECTION 16 -O4 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS IS MODIFIED AS FOLLOWS: "EXCEPT AS ALLOWED BY THE ENGINEER, THE TRENCH AT THE END OF EACH DAY SHALL NOT BE EXCAVATED MORE THAN 25 FEET IN ADVANCE OF THE PIPE LAYING NOR LEFT UNFILLED FOR MORE THAN 25 FEET WHERE THE PIPE HAS BEEN LAID -" SPECIAL CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT TRENCH CAVING. UNDERMINED PAVEMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. SPECIAL CARE SHALL BE TAKEN WHEN EXCAVATING ACROSS LANDSCAPED MEDIANS, TO PROTECT THE EXIST- ING CURB, SPRINKLING SYSTEM, AND LANDSCAPING AND TO LEAVE THE LATTER IN A CONDITION ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER. XIII. TRENCH BACKFILL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPACT THE TRENCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 16 -07 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFSCATIONS, USING WATER AND/OR WHATEVER SUPPLEMENTARY MEANS ARE NECESSARY, SUCH AS VIBRATORY COMPACTORS OR ROLLERS, MECHANICAL TAMPERS, CON- CRETE VIBRATORS, ETC., TO ACHIEVE A UNIFORM COMPACTION OF NOT LESS THAN 902v AND TO POSITIVELY PREVENT ANY TRENCH SETTLEMENT. XIV. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT - TEMPORARY IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILLING THE TRENCH, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL'PLACE A TEMPORARY 1 -INCH MINIMUM THICKNESS BITUMINOUS SURFACE IN STREET AREAS AND AT OTHER LOCA- TIONS AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. THIS TEMPORARY PAVEMENT, WHEN PLACED, SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH A SMALL ROLLER OR OTHER MEANS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEERI AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SAFE AND NEAT CONDITION UNTIL THE PERMANENT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED. THE PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT FOR TEMPORARY PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SHALL INCLUDE FULL COMPENSATION FOR THE PLACEMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND REMOVAL OF THIS PAVEMENT. s a s XV. PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT - PERMANENT SP -5 ALL TRENCHED AREAS WHICH REQUIRE PERMANENT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT SHALL BE CON- STRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE W9TH SECTION 16 -O8 OF THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS FOLLOWSZ A. SEPARATE PAYMENT WILL BE MADE FOR THE MAIN LINE PERMANENT PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT. B. THE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENTS IN STREET AREAS SHALL BE RE- PLACED WITH 6° THICK, CLASS A CONCRETE. XVI. TRAFFIC CONTROL AND WORK SCHEDULING THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MEET WITH THE ENGINEER TO SCHEDULE HIS WORK IN ORDER TO MINIMIZE OBSTRUCTING ACCESS TO ALLEYS AND DRIVEWAYS. BARRICADES MUST BE PROVIDED ACROSS BOTH ENDS OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WITHIN AN ALLEY UNTIL BACKFILL, AND TEMPORARY PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ARE COMPLETED. RESIDENCES AFFECTED BY SUCH ALLEY AND/OR DRIVEWAY OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE NOTIFIED, IN WR3TINGO 24. HOURS IN ADVANCE OF THE PLACING OF THE OBSTRUCTIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ONE LANE OF TRAFFIC ON ALL STREETS AND BRIDGES AT ALL TIMES. FLAGMEN SHALL BE PROVIDED, DURING CONSTRUCTION, ON ANY STREET WHEN, IN THE OPINION OF THE ENGINEER, THEY ARE REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC SAFETY OR CONVENIENCE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE HIS WORK SO THAT NO CONSTRUCTION IS PERFORMED IN COMMERCIAL AREAS, AS DESIGNATED BY THE ENGINEER, DURING THE EASTER HOLIDAYS. XVII. SEWER CROSSINGS WHERE THE. WATER MAIN TRENCH CROSSES AN EXISTING SEWER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE FOR THE CONTINUOUS FLOW OF SEWAGE ;N BOTH MAIN SEWERS AND HOUSE SEWERS. SEWAGE SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED TO ENTER THE WATER TRENCH AT ANY TIME, AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE, AT HIS OWN EXPENSE, ALL SEWERS DAMAGED DURING CON- STRUCTION. XVIII. EXISTING UTILITIES THE LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD AT TIME OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL. REQUEST EACH UTILITY COMPANY TO LOCATE THEIR UNDERGROUND LINES PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. THE CITY DOES NOT GUARANTEE THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE OF UTILITIES IN ANY LOCATION. IT WILL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE AND UNCOVER THE EXISTING UTILITY LINES SUFFICIENTLY IN ADVANCE OF THE WORK TO DETERMINE THEIR LOCATION AND TO WORK AROUND THE UTILITIES AT HIS OWN EXPENSE. IF THE LOCATION OF AN EXISTING UTILITY POLE INTERFERES WITH THE ALIGNMENT OF THE MAIN LINE AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, THE ALIGNMENT SHALL BE MODIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. IF THE LOCATION OF AN EXISTING METER BOX INTERFERES WITH THE ALIGN- MENT OF THE MAIN LINE, THE BOX SHALL BE RE -SET AT THE DIRECTION OF THE ENGINEER. sP -6 XIX. SALVAGE OF EXISTING FACILITIES EXISTING VALVES AND STANDPIPESP AND THE PIPES BENEATH THE BRIDGES THAT ARE TO BE REPLACED SHALL BE CAREFULLY REMOVED AND DELIVERED TO THE CITY CORPO- RATION YARD,592 SUPERIOR AVENUE, NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA. XX. CONDUCT OF WORK THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE JOB SITE IN A NEAT AND ORDERLY CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. ANY EXCESS SPOIL SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REMOVED FROM THE JOB SITE. BACKFILLING AND CLEAN -UP SHALL FOLLOW IMMEDIATELY BEHIND PIPE LAYING EXCEPT AS REQUIRED FOR CHLORINATION AND TESTING. SPECIAL ATTENTION SHALL BE PAID TO DUST CONTROL. XXI. MEASUREMENT FOR THE BASIS OF PAYMENT, THE PIPE LENGTHS SHALL BE MEASURED AS FOLLOWS: 1. CENTERLINE OF COUPLING TO CENTERLINE OF COUPLING AND/OR VALVE Z. CENTERLINE OF VALVE TO CENTERLINE OF VALVE; 3. CENTERLINE OF VALVE TO CENTERLINE OF FIRE HYDRANT. XXII. PAYMENT WHERE APPLICABLE) THE PRICES BID FOR THE VARIOUS ITEMS OF WORK SHALL INCLUDE FULL COMPENSATION FOR ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR NECESSARY FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE ITEM COMPLETE IN PLACE. PAYMENT FOR INCIDENTAL ITEMS OF WORK NOT SEPA- RATELY PROVIDED FOR IN THE PROPOSAL SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE PRICE BID FOR OTHER ITEMS OF WORK. XXIII. GUARANTEE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR, AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF THE CONTRACT BY THE CITY COUNCILS ALL MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP AGAINST ANY DEFECTS WHATSOEVER. ANY SUCH DEFECTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY REPAIRED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. ® The ,,Etna Casualty and Surety Company ❑ The Standard Fire Insurance Company R n Hartford, Connecticut TO CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 W. NEWPORT BLVD., NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. Date DECEMBER 19, 1966 Gentlemen: This is to certify that insurance policies, subject to their terms, conditions and exclusions, are at present in force in the Com- pany indicated above by ®, as follows: Name of Insured BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS Covering 9855 E. KALE, EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91733 KIND OF INSURANCE LIMITS OF LIABILITY POLICY NO. EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION Workmen's Compensation 33C101790CC(P ) 11 -1 -66 11 -1 -67 Manufacturers' & Contractors' Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Owners' or Contractors' Protective Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Comprehensive General Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate in event ofcancellation, vK inA ICKI AL vKIAIVbG um HPNVNI yr uvvanmgG nGuuu Cui 1L1\ un i 1 1-1 J I LIAlu written notice will be given to the party WRITTEN NOTICE. to whom this certificate is addressed. The /Etna Casualty and Surety Company �,/��� /y /,�' The Standard Fire Insurance Company By ....--- -"" ""''1- --'--`-- "�-- /---------------------- Authorized Rept rive (C- 106 -P) 3-65 Gen. 221 hoes) ,I I I I M z Z 4*0 UNITED STATES FIDEL UARANTY COMPANY B Tj ALTI ND e. Name and Address To Whom Issued This is to certify that the policies CERTIFICATE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH listed )>slow. subject to their OF CITY HALL terms, conditions and exclusions, INSURANCE 3300 W. Newport Boulevard have been issued by this Com- Newport Beach, California pony to the Insured named below: Named Insured and Address BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9855 E. Kale, El Monte, California 91733 Type of losmance Policy Number Policy Tom Limits of Liability Bodily Injury Property Damage Compensation Statutory $ 000 Each Person Employers' Liability 000 Each Accident E b4 Medical—Each Person $ lf)(),000 Each Person $ Each Accident 000 I) 3/1/66 300,000 ",!,'Aggregate Operation s $ 000 Comprehensive General CLP 119344 3/1/67 Aggregate Protective Liability $ 300,000 Aggregate Products --i—,000 z Aggregate Contractual $ 000 $ 100,000 Each Person Automobile Liability $ 300,000 Each Accident 100,000 $ 000 Each Person Manufacturers' and $ .000 Each Accident $ '000 Contractors' Liability : Aggregate $ l 000 Owners', Landlords' and Tenants' Liability 000 Each Person kem "'. , $ 000 Each Accident $ .000 $ 000 Each Person X 777#7 1 000 Each Accident !1; '000 $ 000 Aggregate $ '000 Liability aa Description mid location of operations and automobiles covered: ALL OPERATIONS AND AUTOMOBILES OF NAMES INSURED. It is hereby understood and agreed that the policy to which this certificate refers may not be cancelled, materially changed, nor the amount of coverage thereof reduced, nor the policy allowed to lapse until ten days after receipt by the City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach,City Hall, Newport Beach, Calif., of a registdred written notice of such cancellation or reduction in coverage." It is agreed that the City of Newport Beach shall be named as additional insured under the policy covering all operations of the insured under contract with the City. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY will )e1MXX00 notify the holder of this Certificate of any material change in or cancellation of these policies, Date 11/29166 By Peter L. Majich Gen. 221 hoes) ''UIEtt & Upawfuld . CERTIFICATE, OF )RANCE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 WEST NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA THIS IS TO CERTIFY as to the existence of insurance with. Horborinsurance- C6mpany, as described below Name of Assured: BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS I .. .. Address of Assured: 9855 EAST KALE, SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA' Location of Risk Kind of Insurance: BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE Policy No. 104436 period from NOVEMBER 1, 1966' to NOVEMBER 1, 1967 limits: Bodily Injury. each person . S NOT COVERED ' each accident $ NOT COVERED aggregate s NOT COVERED ' occurrence Property Damage_eacfydtsiWt $ $100,000,00 aggregate $ 250,000.00 $250.00 DECUCTIBLE THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SHALL BE NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED AS REGARDS THE ACTIVITY OF BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS ON CONSTRUCTION Kind of Insurance: CONTRACTS WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, Policy No, period from to Limits: Bodily Injury each person $ • each accident S aggregate $ Property Damage —each accident $ aggregate $ Kind of Insurance-. Policy No. period from , to Limits: It is hereby understood and agreed that the certificate holder will be given ten (10) days written notice before any reduction of coverage or Cancellation or this insurance is effective. Dated at LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA this 28th day of NOVEMBER, 1966 SW ETT & CRAW FORD BY U 6082*ds 25M 5-44 Pd. d ki ,q:S.iI I BALTIIvIy ..a9 LAND It;F. IE?3 Name and Address To Whom Issued ��rr CITY OF NEStPORT BRACH This is to certify that the policies CERTIFICATE CITY HALL OF listed below, subject to their terms, f' 4'a 3300 W. Newport Boulevard conditions and exclusions, INSURANCE Newport Beach, California have been issued by this Com- Insured pany to the named below: Named Insured and Address BARRON b ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS 9855 E. Kale, E1 Monte, California 91733 Type of Insurance Policy Policy Limits of Liability : Number Term Bodily Injury Y rY Propert Damage Y 4e " rsW Worl: en's Compensation Statutory i $ ,000 Each Person EmplAors' Liability $ ,000 Each Accident ir'rj Medical —Each Person $ DU,000 Each Person =' $ 000 Each Accident $ 000 " 3/l/66 Comprehensive General CLP 119344 3 1/67 Aggregate Operations p $ ,000 e fiat: Aggregate Protective $ ,000 Liability $ 300,000 Aggregate Products $ ,000 IFS Aggregate Contractual $ ,000 Automobile Liability $ LUU,000 Each Person - $ ,000 Each Accident $ ,000 Each Person '1f Manufacturers' and Contractors' $ 000 Each Accident $ ,000 Liability Aggregate Owners', Landlords' and $ ,000 Each Person Tenants' Liability $ ,000 Each Accident $ ,000 $ ,000 Each Person _ $ ,000 Each Accident $ ,000 Liability $ ,000 Aggregate $ ,000 tvs Description and location of operations and automobiles covered: imii +� ALL OFE14TIONS AND AUTOMOBILES OF NAMES INSURED, it is tereby understood and agreed that the policy to which this certificate refers may not Ae cancelled, materially changed, nor the amount of coverage thereof reduced, �- nor the � lie allowed t4; until ten days after receipt by the City Clerk of the City of Newport Beaeh,City Hall, Newport Beach, Calif., of a registered written notice ih of such cancellation or reduction in coverage." It is agreed that the City of Newport Beach shall be named as additional i6sured under the policy covers all operations of the insured under contract with the City!' Po Y nR P Y'. nke. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY will notify the holder of this Certificate of any material change in or cancellation of these policies?. Date 11/29/66 By after L. fajich <?a I Gen. 221 po -ez) #tuett & Qlawf* CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY HALL 3300 WEST NEWPORT BOULEVARD HEMRT BEACH, CALIFORNIA THIS IS TO CERTIFY as to the existence of insurance with Harbor Insurance Company, as described below: Name of Assured: BARRON & ECRHART Address of Assured: 9855 EAST KALE, SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA Location of Risk Kind of Insurance: BROAD FORK PROPERTY DAMAGE Policy No. 104436 period from NOVEMBER 1, 1966 to NOVEMER 1, 1967 Limits: Bodily Injury each person s NOT COVERED each accident s NOT COVERED aggregate $ NOT COVERED Occurrence Property Dome each llL[ s $100,000.00 aggregate $ 250,000.00 $250.00 DYCUCTIBLE THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SHALL BE NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED AS REGARDS THE ACTIVITY OF BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS ON CONSTRUCTION Kind of Insurance: CONTRACTS WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. Policy No. period from to Limits: Kind of insurance: Policy No. Bodily Injury each person $ each accident s aggregate s Property Damage —each accident $ aggregate $ period from to Limits: It is hereby understood and agreed that the certificate holder will be given ten (10) days written notice before any reduction of coverage or cancellation or this insurance is effective. Dated at LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA U 6002Hds 25M 564 Printed in U.S.A. this 28th day of NOVEMBER, 1966 SW ETT & CRAW FORD BY `. v� 4tuett & Ugawival CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE CITr OF NEWPORT BRACH CITr HALL 3300 WEST NPA!"ORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT MACH, CALIFORNIA THIS IS TO CERTIFY as to the existence of insurance with Harbor Insurance Company, as described below: Name of Assured: BAUM 6 ECKHART EIiGIBMERIHG CONTRACTORS Address of Assured: 9855 BUT KALE, SOUTH EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA Location of Risk Kind of Insurance: BROAD FORM PROPERTY DAMAGE Policy No. 104436 period from MOVS!$ER 1, 1966 to HOVERER 1, 1"7 Limits: Bodily Injury each person S HOT CERED ' each accident $ MOT QED aggregate $ )NOT COVERED oc r enc Property Damage —_each _" c 4 $100,000.00 aggregate $ 250,000,00 $250.00 DECOCIIBLE THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH SHALL BE NAMED AS AN ADDITIONAL INSURED AS REGARDS THE ACTIVITY OF BARRON d ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS ON CONSTRUCTION Kind of Insurance: CONTRACTS WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH. Policy No, period from to Limits: Bodily Injury each person $ each accident $ aggregate $ Property Damage —each accident $ aggregate $ Kind of Insurance: Policy No. period from In Limits: It is hereby understood and agreed that the certificate holder will be given ten (10) days written notice before any reduction of coverage or cancellation or this insurance is effective. Dated at LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA this 28th day of NOVEMBER, 1966 SW ETT 8 CRAW FORD BY— U 6082H f, 25M 5 -64 Printed in U.S.A. J y f ® The (Etna Casualty and Surety Company ❑ The Standard Fire Insurance Company Hartford, Connecticut !tiF To CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, Calif. Date November 23, 1966 Gentlemen: This is to certify that insurance policies, subject to their terms, conditions and exclusions, are at present in force is the Com- party indicated above by ®, as follows: Name of Insured BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS Covering 9855 E. Kale, El Monte, Calif. 91733 KIND OF INSURANCE LIMITS OF LIABILITY POLICY NO. EFFECTIVE EXPIRATION Workmen's Compensation 33C1O179OCCFr 111116 1111167 Manufacturers' & Contractors' Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Owners' or Contractors' Protective Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Comprehensive Automobile Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Comprehensive General Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Thousand Dollars Each Person Bodily Injury Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate Property Damage Liability Thousand Dollars Each Accident Thousand Dollars Aggregate nr mn grin - c nnnp nr nmourt . Olt cotmrace educed. written notice will be given to the party by r e g i t t e re d written t LAuthorized to whom this certificate is addressed. The (Etna Casualty and Surety Company The Standard tare Insurance Company By ....... ... .� Represenwtive (C- 206 -P) 1.65 1 1/ 4166 (12) 1 USOMION X&P 6461 2 A RESOLUTION OF �, COUNCIL OF THR CITY OF tMWFUT BL %Ck1 A A CONTRACT FOR � WATER 3 MU RU1As;F. VNT R&K OF 1%6-67 (CCWXMCT NO. 106 7) i 4 5 WitF,.`Zat purstemat to the notice iuviein6 bids for work 6 Consisting a L 11-il : water mal, %p1placewsat program of 1966 -670 in 7 m"ordanao wi&ih the plans anu specifications heretofore adopted, 8 bids ware V*ceived an the 1st day of November, 1%6, and publicly 9 opener and dealarae:d; and 10 14 s it appears that the lorasst responsible bidder 11 therefor is 3ztr'tea & Bokbart ineeriui; Contractors; and 12 WHEAW# Barron & Rckbart Engineering Contractors did 13 not complete and include within the sealed proposal the forms of 14 ;4si'Z;natioe Of Sub- €:oatrsetoza, Non- Callusicsn Affidavit, and 15 Bidder's Statement of Financial Responsibility, Technical Ability, 16 and Experience at the time it submitted. its bid to the City Clark, 17 Wt subsequently furnished such forces prior to the award of con- 18 tract; and 19 I i WHW, the City Council desires to waive said irr+egu. 20 tarity in accordance with the authority to waive irregularities con" 21 rained in Sec. 2 -33 of the City Standard Specifications; 22.1 NEhi, THEREFOOO BE IT USCLUP that the bid of Barrow & 23 Eckhart Engineering Contractors in the amount of $1243,396.40 be 24 accepted and that the contract for the construction work be awarded 25 to said bidder. 26 BE IT YURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council baareby waives 27 the irregularity in connection with the bid of Barron & &4khtrc 28 Engineering Contractors consisting of the failure of said bidder to 29 coWlete and include wittiin the sealed proposal the forms mentimard 30 above at the time its bid was crigiaal.lg submitted to the City Clarb 31 BE IT FURTHEk BESMYID that the Mayor and City.6lark are 32 hereby authorised and directed to execute a contract in accordance 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22' 231, 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 31 32 i • 6 .J �.I with the sptuifica` ions, .WA ao4 this sward on behw of the City of l p"Ort Beach, snd thait the City Clark be dtseeetsd to *W"sh an a x6outeed 00" to the successful biddor. AMPM this 14th day of November. 1966. ",r AT`rEST II a. NOVEMBER 14, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 (CONTRACT NO. 1067) RECOMMENDATIONS: I. WAIVE THE IRREGULARITY OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS NOT BEING COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SEALED PROPOSAL: A. DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS. B• NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT. C. BIDDERS STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, TECHNICAL ABILITY, AND EXPERIENCE. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS FOR $124,396.8o, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. DISCUSSION: ELEVEN BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:30 A.M., NOVEMBER 1, 1966. BIDDER TOTAL BARRON & ECKHART $ 124,396.8o SOUTH EL MONTE A.Q.A. CONSTRUCTION CO. 127,591.30 FONTANA FAR WESTERN PIPELINE 131,94o.30 ANAHEIM CABILDO CORPORATION 133,o16.61 SANTA FE SPRINGS BEJAC CONSTRUCTION CO. 133,900.08 ATWOOD 137,235.08 { ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC. 144,702.76 BELLFLOWER R. L. THIBODO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 146,056.02 VISTA J. E. YOUNG PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 151,299.02 BREA INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 152,543.90 LOS ANGELES G. R. McKERVEY 152,561.37 SOUTH LAGUNA L. CASTILLO & SONS 202,910.30 V15TA *THE TOTALS,AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSAL, WERE REVISED BECAUSE OF ERRORS IN THE MULTIPLICATION OF UNIT PRICE. 4.y v TO: CITY COUNCIL 11 -14 -66 SUBJ: CONTRACT NO. l0 7 - 2. THE FORMS WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL HAVE SINCE BEEN COM- PLETED AND RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK. ALTHOUGH THIS CONTRACTOR HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY DONE WORK FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CHECKS WITH OTHER AGENCIES, INCLUDING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY WATER .WORKS DEPARTMENTS INDICATE SATISFACTION WITH THIS CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS. THE LOW BID IS 6.7% LESS THAN THE TOTAL AMOUNT BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT NO. AND BETTERMENT IS $150000.00. THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE OF $133,300.00• 50- 9297 -041 FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT THE PROPOSED WORK 1S PART OF THE CONTINUING PROGRAM TO REPLACE THE EXISTING INADEQUATE 2 -INCH STEEL WATER MAIN SUPPLY LINES IN ORDER TO IMPROVE SYSTEM RELIA- BtL1TY, AND TO INCREASE WATER PRESSURES FOR BETTER DOMESTIC AND FIRE FLOWS. THIS CONTRACT WILL ESSENTIALLY COMPLETE THIS PROGRAM FOR BALBOA ISLAND. THE RESIDENTS WILL BE NOTIFIED, BY LETTER, OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION AND EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE INCONVENIENCE TO THE RESIDENTS AFFECTED. THE WORK WILL BEGIN THE LATTER PART OF NOVEMBER AND IS SCHEDULED FOR COM- PLETION IN MARCH OF 1967. THE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDE THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN COMMERCIAL AREAS DURING EASTER VACATION. i )CB SEPH EVLIN LIC R DIRECTOR DW:VR ATTEST T,0 OPENING OF BIDS: 7� f /%wA.a ?l /3,n L�23?L LAURA LAGIOSY ACTING C T CLERK vcJ . NOVEMBER 14, 1966 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM 1966 -67 (CONTRACT NO. 1067) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. WAIVE THE IRREGULARITY OF THE FOLLOWING FORMS NOT BEING COMPLETED AND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SEALED PROPOSAL: A. DESIGNATION OF SUB - CONTRACTORS. B. NON - COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT. C. BIDDERS STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY, TECHNICAL. ABILITY, AND EXPERIENCE. 2. ADOPT A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO BARRON & ECKHART ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS FOR $124,396.8o, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THE CONTRACT. DISCUSSION: ELEVEN BIDS WERE RECEIVED AND OPENED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK AT 10:30 A.M., NOVEMBER 1, 1966. BIDDER BARRON & ECKHART SOUTH EL MONTE Q.A.A. CONSTRUCTION CO. FONTANA FAR WESTERN PIPELINE ANAHEIM CABILDO CORPORATION SANTA FE SPRINGS BEJAC CONSTRUCTION CO. ATWOOD �JA TOTAL 124,396.8o 127,591.30 131,94o.30 �— 133,o16.61 133,940.08 137,235.08 ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, INC. 144,702.76 BELLFLOWER R. L. THIBODO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. 146,056.02 VISTA J. E. YOUNG PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 151,299.02 BREA INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION 152,543.90 LOS ANGELES G. R. MCKERVEY 152,561.37 SOUTH LAGUNA CASTILLO & SONS 202,910.30 ISTA *THE TOTALS,AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSAL, WERE REVISED BECAUSE OF ERRORS IN THE MULTIPLICATION OF UNIT PRICE. S .- TO: CITY COUNCIL � 11_14 -66 SUBJ: CONTRACT NO. 1067 - 2. THE FORMS WHICH WERE NOT INCLUDED WITH THE PROPOSAL HAVE SINCE BEEN COM- PLETED AND RECEIVED BY THE CITY CLERK. ALTHOUGH THIS CONTRACTOR HAS NOT PREVIOUSLY DONE WORK FOR THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CHECKS WITH OTHER AGENCIES2 INCLUDING THE LOS ANGELES COUNTY WATER WORKS DEPARTMENT, INDICATE SATISFACTION WITH THIS CONTRACTORS PERFORMANCE ON SIMILAR PROJECTS. THE LOW BID IS 6.7% LESS THAN THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE OF $133,300.00• THE TOTAL AMOUNT BUDGETED IN ACCOUNT NO. 0- 9297 -041 FOR WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT AND BETTERMENT IS $150,000.00.'""'" THE PROPOSED WORK IS PART OF THE CONTINUING PROGRAM TO REPLACE THE EXISTING INADEQUATE 2 -INCH STEEL WATER MAIN SUPPLY LINES IN ORDER TO IMPROVE SYSTEM RELIA- BILITYP AND TO INCREASE WATER PRESSURES FOR BETTER DOMESTIC AND FIRE FLOWS. THIS CONTRACT WILL ESSENTIALLY COMPLETE THIS PROGRAM FOR BALBOA ISLAND. THE RESIDENTS WILL BE NOTIFIED, BY LETTERS OF THE NEW CONSTRUCTION AND EVERY EFFORT WILL BE MADE TO MINIMIZE THE INCONVENIENCE TO THE RESIDENTS AFFECTED. THE WORK WILL BEGIN THE LATTER PART OF NOVEMBER AND IS SCHEDULED FOR COM- PLETION IN MARCH OF 1967. THE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDE THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN COMMERCIAL AREAS DURING EASTER VACATION. J SEPH EVLIN P BLIC •R DIRECTOR DW:VR ATTEST TO OPENING OF BIDS: /w A /.11 -12 1 LAURA LAGIOSP ACTING C Y CLERK APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL DATE H- (- . 196 Ift TO: CITY COUNCIL to OCTOBER 10, 1966 FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM OF 1966 -67 (CONTRACT NO. 1067) RECOMMENDATIONS: / 1. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 2. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED AT 10:30 A.M. ON NOVEMBER 1, 1966. DISCUSSION: THE AMOUNT BUDGETED FOR THE SUBJECT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCOUNT No. 02- 3097 -50 IS $150,000. THE ENGINEERS ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION IS $135,000. THE PRINCIPAL WORK IN THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF APPROXI- MATELY 110000 FEET OF 2 -INCH STEEL WATER MAINS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF 570 WATER SERVICES LOCATED ON BALBOA AND COLLINS ISLANDS. THE WORK ALSO INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF THE WATER MAINS BENEATH THE MARINE AVENUE AND PARK AVENUE BRIDGES. THIS CONTRACT WILL ESSENTIALLY COMPLETE THE 2 -INCH STEEL MAIN REPLACE- MENTS ON BALBOA ISLAND AND THEREBY ALLOW FOR THE INCREASE IN WATER PRESSURES TO PROVIDE BETTER DOMESTIC AND FIRE FLOWS. THE WORK WILL BEGIN THE LATTER PART OF NOVEMBER AND IS SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION IN MARCH OF 1967. THE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDE THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN COMMERCIAL AREAS DURING EASTER VACATION. VLIN DIRECTOR f APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL ��CIL DATE 196 'n: .o� nom M0 J t �R Y � ml f2 a m m V ao r �I� Qin ' � v a .. 1 �i .�i .r —rte fik�;ob� Ib��io8�o0l0l0 y�1 �� !it �Q o ��' .I N l; l l I' 1 ;�i`�bl000,�Ioo1Q,oh;olob;ooi 4�''.N�1VNpl� "_, i ljUy�UUahhC�i � � I 'n: .o� nom M0 J t �R Y � ml f2 a m m V ao r �I� Qin ' � v a .. 1 �i .�i .r N c� mn-t zoo �zr m> m� °Im D m �p �a ,Iv y \mss 6 Ell � J mo -:r A\ I ' r �I 1 n; I CIRt"i'yFciC� I i l l N- Ai I' i 4 I i l >! i I 1 INA �h� LN> � �1 i 1 i I 1! i �'•� I l' Vy �� :p'OlObpl$QI °'Q 4 ZI Q -' 1�ti'tV 1 ! mb?����i i I I -kills 0\ VN u1Q)1JM�i�v c I A�lno4,v110 �i1n bo\_ r�`► th °h. Qbo b�b�l�ti NI— \o 63 6 p° O l� O .gyp •. Ja n1. r6 J W I I I I � I I' I! l i trjpO��uN�nn�b\t �rNL AX,1o��b ol0'n��1� r mn-t zoo �zr m> m� °Im D m �p �a ,Iv y \mss 6 Ell � J mo -:r A\ I ' r �I 1 n; I till I' mo-t zoo zm mD :0 0 � y m z �i co o �I .D.q m 0 v mo-sr {> o mm>i O Z 1 O m m n r �I NK I� 'fan I lV I Nl\n�'�� IN�:Umi�- s III, I I I ; I Oy I mo-t zoo zm mD :0 0 � y m z �i co o �I .D.q m 0 v mo-sr {> o mm>i O Z 1 O m m n r ���W��urltl8�' @a5n0�A'aai ■iweuvumwi� m 0 -i 6) Z it Z�m mD n N I y O -Di m Im C') -1 z 74 zxm my -\ MC.) m 2! U) 0 m V4 O Ilk X viii, I � Hill o Im C') -1 z 74 zxm my -\ MC.) m 2! U) 0 m V4 O zo i c� z r —i m zx mD mC.) mz W C) t 2- m D 0 J V 1 ' r N. f I D ' � � � ����• r � I ' �� Ir Ire �' � Z C .. o� z 1 O i I MV' V I io j I ! z 1 zo i c� z r —i m zx mD mC.) mz W C) t 2- m D 0 J V 1 ' r oov or O 0 z '.. x - v � I 0 --I m OCTOBER 10, 1900 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SUBJECT: WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT PROGRAM OF 1966 -67 (CONTRACT NO. 1067) RECOMMENDATIONS: / 1. APPROVE THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Z. AUTHORIZE THE CITY CLERK TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS TO BE OPENED AT 10:30 A.M. ON NOVEMBER 1, 1966. DISCUSSION: THE AMOUNT BUDGETED FOR THE SUBJECT CONSTRUCTION IN ACCOUNT NO. 02- 3097 -50 IS $150,000. THE ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF CONSTRUCTION IS $135,000. THE PRINCIPAL WORK IN THIS CONTRACT PROVIDES FOR THE REPLACEMENT OF APPROXI- MATELY 11,000 FEET OF 2 —INCH STEEL WATER MAINS AND THE REPLACEMENT OF 570 WATER SERVICES LOCATED ON BALBOA AND COLLINS ISLANDS. THE WORK ALSO INCLUDES REPLACEMENT OF THE WATER MAINS BENEATH THE MARINE AVENUE AND PARK AVENUE BRIDGES. THIS CONTRACT WILL ESSENTIALLY COMPLETE THE Z —INCH STEEL MAIN REPLACE- MENTS ON BALBOA ISLAND AND THEREBY ALLOW FOR THE INCREASE IN WATER PRESSURES TO PROVIDE BETTER DOMESTIC AND FIRE FLOWS. THE WORK WILL BEGIN THE LATTER PART OF NOVEMBER AND IS SCHEDULED FOR COMPLETION IN MARCH OF 1967. THE SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDE THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT DO ANY CONSTRUCTION IN COMMERCIAL AREAS DURING EASTER VACATION. EPN UEVLIN LIC S DIRECTOR VR OUNCII: // G�D_'��O IISPOSITION: aG