HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-1098 - Redistricting consultantTHS
aem
2/6
b7 (7)
1
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES
_ ( Councilmanic Redistricting)
2
3
THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this & zr day of
4
, 1967, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT
5
BE�L. herAnafter called "City", and DR. LEROY C. HARDY, herein-
6
after called "Consultant ";
7
WITNESSETH•
I
8
WHEREAS, Section 1005 of the Newport Beach City :Charter
9
requires that the City, Council appoint a committee every :dour
10
years to study and report to the City Council on the advisability
ZZ
of redistricting the City's councilmanic districts; and
12
WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed such a committee
13
composed of three Councilmen to study the matter of redistricting
14
and to report its findings to the Council during the year 1967;
15
and
16
WHEREAS, said Councilmanic Redistricting Committee is
17
in.need of technical assistance in performing its assignment; and
18
WHEREAS, Consultant is well qualified to act as tech -
79
nical consultant to said Councilmanic Redistricting Committee and
20
has submitted.a proposal to the City Council to furnish the
21
services hereinafter described;
22
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
23
I. Scope of work
24
(a) Consultant agrees to prepare a comprehensive
25
councilmanic redistricting analysis and report which takes
26
into consideration present and projected future populations
27
within the present and anticipated future boundaries of the City.
28
Such analysis and report shall include a set of ideal councilmanic
29
districts.
30
(b) Consultant agrees to meet with and discuss his
31
analysis and report upon request with the Councilmanic
32
Redistricting Committee and individual members of the City
^t
i
1
3
4i
5
6'
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
321
I Council.
(c) Consultant agrees to .make such recommendations
concerning redistricting as may be requested by the Council-
manic Redistricting Committee.
2. Time for performance
Consultant shall deliver his initial analysis and report
to the Chairman of the Councilmanic Redistricting Committee on or
before March 1, 1967.
3. Fees
In consideration of the services hereinabove described,
City agrees to pay Consultant at the rate of ten dollars ($10.00)
per hour upon the receipt of itemized statements; provided, how-'
ever, that the total amount to be paid shall not exceed $250.00,
unless the City Council shall authorize an additional amount.
4. Independent contractor relationship
In carrying out the terms of this agreement Consultant,
his agents and employees shall at all times be indepeadentcon•
tractors and not employees of the City.
5. Termination clause
City may terminate this contract at any time on 10 days'
written notice of termination addressed to Consultant at California
State College, Long Beach, California 90804. If the contract is
so terminated, City shall be obligated to pay to Consultant only
the reasonable value of the services performed by him up to the
time of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant
will deliver to City copies of all written materials contained.in
his files pertaining to the services provided for herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant has executed this contract
as of the date first above written, and the City Manager of City
has executed the same as of the same date pursuant to the authority
2.
+ �. .. . T• 9'a$S[`4ti�M,� csx ._. .-..�i 3.s _ -f -.3cr% c, _w w'� +vt ...[..
.111
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
of ,he City Council at its regular meeting on January 23, 1967.
CITY OF NEWFQRT BEACH
APPR,WD AS To ARM:
By
-/City Manager
Tully Ot Seymoc, C ty Attorney
CITY
3.
4
2 .
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
to
11
12
13
14
15
r .
(7)
AGRIMNT _ t+ouxicilmat�Q���tr�3�ia�t} —
?
ITS AGUIMM made and entexwinto this day of
by and between the OF NEWPORT
EE400 hereinafter called "City", and DR. LIM.t. HARDY. hsVein-
a €ter called "Consultant " ;.
WI 9xa:
WHILIWO Section 1005 of the Newport City Charter
requites that.the City Council appoint a com ttoe every four
yearn to study and report.to the City Council on the advisability
of redistricting the City's councilmanic districts;
ad
i the City Council has appoints4 such a coaaaittee
composed or three Councilmen to study the matter of redistricting
and to report its findings to the Council during the year 1%7;
and
16 Wi!&Ri►dj said Councilmania sedistriatisg Ccwsni.ttee is
17 in need of toohoicai assistance in petfousing its assignment; and
18 + WliA.S, Consultant is Well qualified to act as tech -
19 I nical consultant to said Councilwanic Redistricting Co mittee amd
i
zo ! has submitted a proposal to the City Council to furnish the
21 ! services hereinafter described;
22 NOW y THEREFORE* the parties agree as follows:
23 I. Scofie Of work
24 (a) Consultant agrees to prepare a comprehensive
25 councilmanic redistricting analysis and report whiah takes
26 i into consideration present and projected future populations
27 within the present and anticipated future boundaries of the City.
28 I Such analysis and report shall include a set of ideal councilmanic
29 districts.
30 (b) Consultant agrees to meet with and discuss his
31 analysis and report upon request with the Councilmanic
32 Redistricting Committee and individual members Of the City
1II Cotsacil.
2 (c) Cmsultant gees to make such sscouamandations
3 concerning redistricting as may be requestei by the Council -
4 manic Redistricting
5 2. Tits for Performance
6 Consultant shall deliver his LrAtial analysis and report
7 to the Chairman of the Counailmoic Redistricting Committes 02 or
8 be €ore Marsh 1, 1967,
9 3. Fees
10 In consideration of the services hereinitwve described,
11
his agents and employees shall
City agrees to
pay
Consultant
at the
rata of tea
dollars ($10.00)
12,
per hour upon
the
receipt of
itemized
statements;
provided, fir-
13 ever, that the total AVA'UnL to ue paid shall not exceed $250.00,
14 unless the City Council shall autherixe are additional amount.
15 4. Indacendent coptrsaw- r relatzonshla
16 In carrying out the terms of this agreement Consultants
17
his agents and employees shall
at
all times be iudepeadent con-
18
tractors and not employees of
the
City.
19 5. Term nation clause
20 City may terminate this contract at My time OR 10 days'
21 written notice of termination addressed to Ckmaultent at California
22 State College, Long Beach, California 94804. if the contract is
23 so terminated, City shall be obligated to pay to Consultant only
24 the reasonable value of the services performed py him up to the
25 time of termination. in the event of such termination, Consultant
26 will deliver to City copies of all written materials contained in
27 his files pertaining to the services provided for herein.
28 IN WrMSS WHEREOF, Consultanc has executed this contrac
29 as of the data first above written, and the City Manager of City
30 has executed the same as of the same dace pursuant to the authorit
31 11
3211 2.
3.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
3.
tur ;- Mroy C - Y
CMULTANT
1� 67 (7)
ads
1 I A6RRtilO VT FOR OMULTAM SZ&VIC"
,iCou + zitc: iscz3¢tin, _
2 �1
3 THIS AGRF NZ sip ge anti catered into this day of
4 1961, by aid betwee:. the CITY OF N£WPOR7
5 WACHO hereinafter Balled "City", and DR. LEM C. HAWyo herein-
6I after called "Consultant";
7 6?,UMSST
8I WIM�0, Sectioa 1005 of the Newport Beach City Charter
9 requires that the city Coun-.il appoint a committee every four
to i years to study and report to the City Council on the advisability
11 c€ redistricting the City's couacilmanic districts; and
121; WHEREAS, the City Council has appointed such a comm
1
13 I composed of three Councilmen to study the matter of redistricting
1411 and to report its findings to the Council during the year 1467;
15 I and
16 I WHEREAS. said Councilmanic Redistricting Committee is
17 in need of technical assistance in performing its assignment; and
18 WHERUS, Consultant is well qualified to act as tech -
19 nical consultant to said Councilmani. Redistricting Committee and
20 j has submitted a proposal to the City Council to furnish the
21 services hereinafter described;
22 ! DIW9 THEREFORE: the parties agree as follows:
23 1. Sca„pe of agork
i
24 (a) Consultant agrees to prepare a comprehensive
25 counciimanic redistricting analysis and report which takes
26 I into consideration present and projected future populations
27 within the present and anticipated zuzura boundaries of the City.
28 Such analysis and report shall include a sat of ideal councilmani
29 districts.
30 (b) Consultant agrees to meet with and discuss his
31 analysis and report upon request with the Councilmanic
32 Redistricting yo=ittee and individual members of the City
zI
3
4
5'
6
7
8',
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
231
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Gem�sS1.
(e) Consultant,aggrees to make such V*cQ=Wadations
concerning redistrictifig as way be requested by the Council -
manic Redistricting Committee.
2. Time for perfarsence
Consultant shall deliver his initial analysis road report
to the Qpaisman of the Councilmanic itedistricting Committee on or
before March It 1%7.
3. Fe es
In consideration of the services hereinabove described,
City agrees to pay Consultant at the rate of ten dollars ($10.00)
per hour upon the receipt of itemized statements; provided, how-
ever, that the total amount to be paid shall not exceed $250.009
unless the City Council shall authorize an additional amomt.
4. Lg&EWdenr contractor relationship
In carrying out the terms of this agreement Consultant,
his agents and employees shall at all times be independent con -
tractors and not employees of the City.
S. Termination cause
City may terminate this contract at any time on 10 days'
written notice of termination addressed to Consultant at Californi
State College, Long Beach, California 90804. If the contract is
so terminated; City shall be obligated to pay to Consultant only
the reasonable value of the services performed by him up to the
time of termination. In the event of such termination, Consultant
will deliver to City copies of all written materials contained in
his files pertaining to the services provided for herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Consultant has executed this contract
as of the date first above written, and the City Manager of City
has executed the same as of the same date pursuant to the authority
2.
1
2
3'
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
of the City Council At :Ltgl Vogular meeting on Jawj&7 23, 1967.
a,
CZ.Ly OF ySWp'?W BEACH
AIPROVED AS TO FORM
by tY ger
Tully R. Seymour, City Cterftov, CITY
3.
rj :�inayZ�:
CONSULTANT
February 6, 1967
To: City Clerk
From: City Attorney /09b
Subject: Agreement. for consulting services with Dr. Leroy
Hardy in connection with councilmanic redistricting
Transmitted are three copies of subject agreement. The ordinal
and two copies were sent to the City Managers office in orer
that they might be executed by both parties.
%G(
Tull
City
THS:aem
Attachs.
y ftevp M
CITY CjER'T
FtE 196Ia�, .
C11y
NEl1FORT BEq %/
S, .GILIF,
A
1.,
I'
•
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
January 23, 1967
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Redistricting Committee
SUBJECT: REPORT OF ACTIVITIES AND RECOMMENDATIONS / — } 3 - %
Since appointment of the Council Committee on Redistricting, discussions
and study have indicated the following: L
1. There is disparity of ample magnitude in both population and 1
voter registration between some of the existing Councilmanic
Districts to indicate that redistricting should be undertaken
at this time.
2. The use of an outside consultant would be desirable in the
light of a realistic need for an educated and objective ap-
proach to the problems of redistricting.
3. That redistricting initially be approached by the consultant
with the general criteria set forth in the City Charter modi-
fied only by a guideline that a fair and equitable districting
should not be based on population (census) alone, but should
be based on both population and voter registration.
4. Should the Council Committee ascertain there will be difficulty
in presenting plans submitted by the consultant directly to
the Council, a Citizens Committee, approved by the Council, be
formed to undertake further study of the districting making such
use of the consultant as they deem desirable.
S. That of the two consultants, i2r,-Lerov C. Hardy, Chairman of the
Political Science Department at California tate College, Long
Beach, presents three distinct advantages to the City.
1) Availability to start immediately
2) Cost to City ($10.00 per hour on an estimated 25 hours)
3) Direct experience in redistricting
It is respectfylly requested that the City Council approve the above ap-
proach to the matter of redistricting and that the Council authorize expenditure of
up to $250.00 to retain the services of Dr. Hardy.
Councilman Howard Rogers, Chairman
Councilman Al Forgit
Councilman Robert Shelton
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
January 16, 1967
TO: Ernest Mayer, Jr.
FROM: Daren Groth
SUBJECT: Population of Councilmanic Districts
According to the April 1st Special Census print -out
sheets, the following is the distribution of population
by Councilmanic Districts: p�PV�Af�Od RE,GrVoZERs
District
1
5,886
,2(,09
District
2
4,250
1 s 3
District
3
6,286
3 1 Z2
District
4
7,573
3I 10
District
5
6,485
0 3
District
6
3,808
2.0 q
District
7
4,064
2;3
38,352
1 g
Daren Grot
Planning A sociate