Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-1112(C) - Improvements, Irvine at Tustin Avenue & 22nd Street to University0 3 - COARSE. MEDIUM. FINE. d I,,- Z COARSE. MEDIUM. FINE ❑ 3" 8 PROJECT_ TlJ6TiN— ihVJ.1NL RESIDENT ENGINEER( INSPECTOR) J. JOH SEND REPORT TO. CONSTRUCTION ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 6070 ❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE Orana OWNER OR MANUFACTURER Irdustria nATF SAMPIFn 11-19-68 RY i FOR USE AS: BASE COURSE ❑ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Malarial Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON ASPHALT CONCRETE TYPE B 0 COUNTY PLANT NO. -CON Or IN 40 `tiA!d„ae�0. No. or HFPJ Tf IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM DATE REPTD. AGENCY NEWPORT BEACH JSON IIqq�3-" CONTRACTOR V'T2 AAGENCCY CJ MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 85.100 ® 120150 ❑ LIMITS OF PROJECT Asphalt. Santo Ana _REPRESENTED 700 TONS + Lek Criddle TITLE E. T.1 FINISH COURSE ® RESURFACE • L.\ / V L ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER By RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) Pa011A3.1 BITUMINOUS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMENS SIEVE TIME SPEC. SPEC. No. -' A B C D E F SPECI F. 10: TEMPERATURE 111 MOISTURE BITUMEN GRADE )11 99 9 ;-10 1 BIT. RATIO I11 SP. OR, BRIO. �9 73 I J i 80 J STAB. RESULTS 3 ' 0 b 0 COH. RESULTS B OkJI 16 RT. VAEUE 30 18 15-25 SO 1 1 SUS'. H2O IOO SWELL 124 MRS.) 2� 7 PERMEABILITY Bif. 5. VAPOR BUSC. ' GRADING BIN a OBTAINED BY COMBINING SINS AS FOLLOWS: WT. %BY WT. 8 1 NO. CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. STABILOMETER COHESION 3 1140 q/'u ` FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE CRUSHED PARTICLES = AGGREGATEI % 15 MIN, TT° F. Z 1425 25 FIELD COMP. SP. GR, LAB. SP. GR. RELATIVE COMP. 1 LGLI 2280 0 RECOMMENDED BIT. CONTENT CONSIDERING ALL TEST DATA % REMARKS: EOUIV. GAL. PER SO. YO. FOR I" COMPACTED SURFACE= SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN ORY AGO. COMP. MI% o 3250 3150 eeI • L.\ / V L ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER By RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) Pa011A3.1 BITUMINOUS 6 ®? - COARSE. MEDIUM. FINE p COARSE. MEDIUM. FINE • ❑ 3„ B PROJECT %u 9 (i i r7 Iry RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 607*0❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE f p 7 OWNER OR MANUFACTURER t nst .4 9 i. DATE SAMPLED j /— d �6I' BY_ FOR USE AS BASE COURSE ❑ 0 COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON COUNTY PLANT NO II ASPHALT CONCRETE CONT. No. or TYPE B (W.O. O! P.O. NO. DI AH�FP) IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM DATE REPTD. AGENCY Gi ft' PC SeWlaOr_& / 25e a,<At J r K s0✓1 CONTRACTORR OUTSIDE AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 85100 © 120150 ❑ LIMITS OFC�PRRgO3ECT '1'A 1 s b h a tt, y7ti 13 n a REPRESENTED nz�G TONS 11��qq�° ✓ 5 r, TITLE C . 7_1 1 FINISH COURSE N RESURFACE ❑ O BILLING WILL BE MADE AT ENO OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) F.3011�43,1 BITUMINOUS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMENS SIEVE TIME SPEC. SPEC. NO. A B C D E F SPECIF. TEMPERATURE III, MOISTURE BITUMEN GRADE 9q y-�eo BIT. RATIO SP. DR. BRIO. STAB. RESULTS 3 *' 4 /LQ T3i8 L� do TT30 COH. RESULTS e --4s 6 RT. VALUE 30 1 jd 'iS 50 SUSC, H2O 100 SWELL (24 MRS.) 200 m1 PERMEABILITY Bit 1� BT VAPOR SUSC. GRADING OBTrAINED BY COMBINING BINS AS FOLLOWS: BIN MT- WT. A Its i? fz NO. CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. STABILOMETER COHESION 3 ��tQ ZO FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE AGGREGATE) CRUSHED PARTICLES= o 15 MIN. TT` F. 2 / �p✓ +� FIELD COMP. SP. GR. LAB. SP. OR RELATIVE COMP. V RECOMMENDED BIT. CONTENT CONSIDERING ALL TEST DATA % REMARKS: EQUIV. GAL. PER SO. YO. FOR 1" COMPACTED SURFACE= SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY AGO. COMP. MIM 1 :30 3 i0 31e Sao O BILLING WILL BE MADE AT ENO OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) F.3011�43,1 BITUMINOUS • i - COARSE. MEDIUM, FINE ®2 1 11 - COARSE, MEDIUM, FINE B PROJECT Ia.s'L;.t RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO CONSTRUCTION ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 6070 ❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE 4> , 1 7 OWNER OR MANUFACTURER J N d.,c Y ie- DATE SAMPLED _11- -20-bd BY FOR USE AS BASE COURSE ❑ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON ASPHALT CONCRETE IF TYPE B s,'O TRACT ITEM OUTSIDE AGENCY 85100 FINISH COURSE COUNTY PLANT NO. /j CONT No. or (W.O. or P.O. No. or AHFP) ¢ 0-f- DATE REPTD. / /`'Z/'' _6 -' AGENCY IC ;fy o- /NeW)aor'$ Ze?ac{7 CONTRACTOR M a;-k- 4C40NSG A MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 120150 ❑ LIMITS OF PROJECT fa C}M>& .REPRESENTED oZ?O TONS TITLE RESURFACE ❑ Cl BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER By RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) F- 3011 -43.1 BITUMINOUS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMENS SIEVE TIME SPEC. SPEC. rvD A B C D E F SPECIF. TEMPERATURE I/1 MOISTURE BITUMEN GRADE BIT. RATIO I/1 6 - Y ne! SP. GR. BRIO. wj % STAB. RESULTS 3 4 �p 33�7�` COH. RESULTS B 38 33 11 RT. VALUE p SUSC. H2O 121m SWELL 124 HRS.1 4 PERMEABILITY � VAPOR SUSC. GRADING OBTAINED BY COMBINING BINS AS FOLLOWS: BIN WT. b BY WT. i NO CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. STABILOMETER COHESION 3 ,TOD zb, FILM STRIPPING ION COARSE CRUSHED PARTICLES = AGGREGATE) % IS MIN. T> F. FIELD COMP, SP. GR, LAB. SP, GR. RELATIVE COMP. I > 7d0 J RECOMMENDED BIT. CONTENT CONSIDERING ALL TEST DATA R4 REMARKS: EOUIV. GAL. PER SO. TD. FOR I' COMPACTED SURFACE= SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY AGO. COMP. MIX 8;,x,5' � io 3iv soo Cl BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER By RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) F- 3011 -43.1 BITUMINOUS © - COARSE, MEDIUMI FINE - COARSE, MEDIUM. FINE • ❑ 3.. 8 • 0 PROJECT__ _ TUSTIN- •IRVINE RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J. JOl SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 6070 ❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE Oran EE OWNER OR MANUFACTURER Indus tria- DATE SAMPLED_ 11 -18-68 BY JI FOR USE AS: BASE COURSE ❑ AGENCY NEWPORT BEACH n CONTRACTOR OUTSIDE AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED, ❑ PERMITS ❑ 85100 ® 120150 ❑ LIMITS OF PROJECT halt mta Ana RBYINNITED 00 TONS ± -i adle TITI . I FINISH COURSE RESURFACE ❑ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. GRADING ANALYSIS Material Testing Section TI.E SPEC. REPORT OF TESTS ON COUNTY PLANT NO. B C ASPHALT CONCRETE CONT. No or WO. P.O. No W 405 SPECIF TYPE B or or�HFP) IF CONTRACT USE CONTRACT ITEM DATE REPTD.-11'1q^ 68 PROJECT__ _ TUSTIN- •IRVINE RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J. JOl SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 6070 ❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE Oran EE OWNER OR MANUFACTURER Indus tria- DATE SAMPLED_ 11 -18-68 BY JI FOR USE AS: BASE COURSE ❑ AGENCY NEWPORT BEACH n CONTRACTOR OUTSIDE AGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED, ❑ PERMITS ❑ 85100 ® 120150 ❑ LIMITS OF PROJECT halt mta Ana RBYINNITED 00 TONS ± -i adle TITI . I FINISH COURSE RESURFACE ❑ ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) By F- 3011 -43.1 BITUMINOUS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMENS TI.E SPEC. SPEC. NO. A B C D E F SPECIF SIEVE ♦ 4 TEMPERATURE 111 MOISTURE BITUMEN GRADE �• p I% 9 5-10 BIT. RATIO 1/1 SP. OR. BRIO. 5-�a0 J STAB. RESULTS 3 4 53 45— W COX. RESULTS ` R q wJ 16 RT. VALUE 30 17 50 SUSC. H2O 100 SWELL 126 MRS.) 200 PERMEABILITY Bit 5.2 VAPOR SUSC. GRADING OBTAINED BY COMBINING BINS AS FOLLOWS: BIN � WT. By WT. 4 15 E1' �15 NO. CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. STABILOMETER COHESION 3 1V1 0 20 FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE CRUSHED PARTICLES= AGGREGATEI % 15 MIN. 77 F. 2 l 5 17 1 L FIELD COMP. SP. GR. LAB. SP. Gfl. RELATIVE COMP. 1 22 O LO RECOMMENDED BIT. CONTENT CONSIDERING ALL TEST DATA - % REMARKS: EOUIV, GAL, PER SO, YD, FOR 1" COMPACTED 5URFACE= SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY AGG. COMP. MI% (:46 °2 33 _z NOV PUBLIC WME ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) By F- 3011 -43.1 BITUMINOUS t� ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT "G A5 /q y Material C 6o43 ' 3 Testing Section TES#9. -. , D FIELD NO. / I tests an ® RELATIVE ACTION OR (W .O. OR O. OR PH�PL ` .O. NO P.O. maters materials lS :-a° WET WT. - a it" , entering en}eriny info works. into works. "'�; HIWT. • If contract, use contract item DATE REPTD. _ TARE WEIGHT PROJECT ' '1I/N,E lit YD. AGENCY r ��!�✓;' /eef%�/�l tT ..lam..;! RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR �/�'� - '•�/rT SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIOe I��7II AGENCY i� MAINTENANCE ❑ SUP D. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION /` V' ' / <_ ✓'�/ tl�7 �O1J , RT .A2.T'. OF q STA REPRESENTING LIMITS HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN TYPE MATERIAL .4r --:L t"10/1Jek PT11 - TO '!.3 BELOW FIN)SHED'GRADE DATE / /- " -1--C' 8 - TESTED BY: +' • "¢ -SJ��- WET DENSITY IN_PLACE DENSITY A F— NITIAL WT. TEST SAND. y B WT. SAND RETAINED ' 3 C WT. SAND USED w —_ , D TEST SAND DENSITY WET WT. ROCK E VOLUME SAND USED_ _� DRY WT. ROCK FIVOLUME CONE + RING WET WT. - a G I VOLUME TEST HOLE - HIWT. EXC.:SAMPLE +TARE y I TARE WEIGHT .7,(ep J WET WTXC. SAMPLE . E o K WET DENSITY IN PLACE__ _14 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE (e, METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT.�- --- ..�. —..�.^ 1 DRY WT. ' 3 r MOIST.. M N , SP. GR. ROCK Z •O WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a ! O DRY WT. a� Z, / , / TOTAL DRY %T. " R % ROCK ' > CORR.MWX.DE SITY • MAXI UM DEINSITY RA'THOLE DATA _ MOLD NO. 1 2 '- ' 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT, AT COMPACTION Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. ' R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE - L = K _ (1 00";; + N) Q = 0 + (100% + N) SM. RING _.1667 .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q + S I -G. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F NOV 181968 PU8110 WMI" RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY 13011 -83.1 RELATIVE i B- �I METHOD A ® B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MoiSTURE RC = TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL`% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY MATE LS ENGINEER COMPACTION O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE. TO AWARD OF CONTR O POTENTIAL SOURCE SA ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section AFTER AWARD OF CO I CT C D R E PORT O F TESTS ON CONTROL TESTS ON 125L MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS L-1mr, TRIEATEp SV00�SE O SPECIAL TESTS • I � 21 IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME 'TJAJIIN =G' RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) ,]', TO L{N C NTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO CONSTRUCTION OUTS IDE M TENANCE AGENCY AGENCY: L`1T`I OG IS I"cLLJPoRT SEACN SAMPLE OF L.T5 MOISTURE AT COMPACTION yo • • TEST NO. 6e 15z' FIELD NO. CONT. No. ar ^— IK'.O. or P.O. Nu. pXFP �i(.I' FED. NO. DATE REPTD. II— A —(aPj 1NE M.EaR K SUB'D C _ PERMITS Li DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE 5'T-a., 10 t cjiJ A LOCA. OF SOURCE L•UCEQt.J� �/PI.IEV p A NUFAOCiU RER Ps:IZER _ RUAN7ENTED TY EPRE DATE SAMPLED B'! `.�T 6AFF @IJS TITLE F,A AM RECEIVED FOR USE IN 7U&aA SF GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P S I, I � 21 'L MOISTURE AT COMPACTION yo 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/'U. FT. 21/2 ETABILOMETER VALUE "R 73 i5is,, 2 EXUDATION PRESS, F.S I, l5o Z40 0 II /2 THICK, INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES Its THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. O O ry SP. GR. OVEN DRY S, S. O. APP. SUBBASE I/] FINE BASE 3% COARSE SURFACE 4 L.L. P. L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 CURAB LL I Ty FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD. PRESS 30 J j BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 41 w WET DRY AVG. SPEC. cl AT EpUIL. 'B 1 SPEC, IW INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 5U IU LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY Iry PLACE oPTIM UM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: A ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH ATERIALS ENGINEER r BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section f EST NO. REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO CONT. I w.0. o� Y.O. No � N➢ j �i{J y' LIME TQ FATED SL+6 ®ASE FED. NO. DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM PROJECT NAME TUSIIIJ— ZIZE/rs.jK RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR MAay- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE MAINTENANCE E] SUB'D O PERMITS 1:1 AGENCY: CITY OF ME.u%PbRT BE�Cy -1 SAMPLE OF LT9 DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCA. OF SOURCE LULc2AJ 1 VA LLEy p MANUFACTURER PCIZEQ REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED 11 -5 —(08 BY =;or6AFFEI -•. TITLE E./a. , RECEIVED FOR USE IN �U PBL\SE GRADING ANALYSIS PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SA D AFTER AWARD OF CO*C T SIEVE CONTROL TESTS ON 1b� MATERIALS ACTUALLY AS USED ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS ROAD NO. • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section f EST NO. REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO CONT. I w.0. o� Y.O. No � N➢ j �i{J y' LIME TQ FATED SL+6 ®ASE FED. NO. DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM PROJECT NAME TUSIIIJ— ZIZE/rs.jK RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR MAay- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE MAINTENANCE E] SUB'D O PERMITS 1:1 AGENCY: CITY OF ME.u%PbRT BE�Cy -1 SAMPLE OF LT9 DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCA. OF SOURCE LULc2AJ 1 VA LLEy p MANUFACTURER PCIZEQ REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED 11 -5 —(08 BY =;or6AFFEI -•. TITLE E./a. , RECEIVED FOR USE IN �U PBL\SE GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED I SPEC F. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. 12 Z 1 2 MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 17.5 .5 /o -1 14.2 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /t'U. PT. II/2 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" -'f 32 63 j EXUDATION PRESS. F.S.I. 140 220 .89 405 II /p THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PR 56. IN, G 1. AS 1 -Y BP. GO. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP, SUBBASE I/p FINE BASE �p COARSE SURFACE L.L. I P. L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j B RE55 EfiXUD. 76 30 BY XPANPPRESS . — rs W R WET DRY AVG. SPEC. SPEC. Q AT EOUIL. 7,g IW INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONOS. THICK. F SU I U LART . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: C] BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER r IS RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL _G14 u F- I L • O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTRA SOURCE $A ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section B OPOTENTIAL D E AFTER AWARD OF CON CT TEST NO. (pB_145Z3 CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. MATERIALS ACTUALLY CONT.Nn.O' rv�. A PPy 407 ENTERING INTO WORKS LIME T(ZC.OTE.� 'S:J 38ASL O SPECIAL TESTS FEDD NO. FED. NO. DATE REPTD. I- (3 -(p(j IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM 16,7 ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TJSTIIJ "- r7Z' ✓IwJE RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) Hs.15fiLL1�..) CONTRACTOR 1./IpRS< IDE MAINTENANCE ❑ SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGEN SUB'D PERMITS �I' AGENCY: CI`I OF T 0 Fa..Uk,QI BCgCS SAMPLE OF L1173 DEPTH — LIMITS OF SAMPLE Sr�. (y (p Z-5 L- 'r � 21@ LOCA. OF SOURCE s-LK-E,0NF- .4Meoj,IA VA,"eV OWNER OR MANUFACTURER PFL2.EiZ UAN7ITY EPRES IT DATE SAMPLED 11, Q -(,g BY RID6u+fW TITLE E, T-, i RECEIVED FOR USE IN -Svblts r, GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION ^,'o 16,7 1-7, L I(or Z 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. # /'V. FT. 21@ STABILOMETER VALUE 'E' � ( 7-7 p 8 ,7 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P.5.1. ISO �f L O 390 " 112 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY E XP. PRESS. IN. Z 2,!5 2 SP. GR. I OVEN DRT S.S.D. I APP. SUBBASE I/T FINE BASE �g COARSE SURFACE t L.L. P. L. P.1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX I6 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY E %V D. PR F96 B 3D J BY E %PAN. PRESS '- BD W WET CRY AVG. SPEC. p AT EOUIL. '7e? I SPEC. (b INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 2O SU I II LART - SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: A-Meo. TWdT WAS Ft..oUn EO ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3071 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER e O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTRAC POTENTIAL SOURCE SA ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section C O E TEST NO. �'' �SZg AFTER AWARD OF CON CT CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. MATERIALS ACTUALLY CDNT. No.-, 407 1W.O.o. P.O. NO A FPI ENTERING INTO WORKS LIME FED. NO. O SPECIAL TESTS • DATE REPTD. 11— g -'L'6 IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TU STIAI rIZU IN6 RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR MAQ LG SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OGENICY }'F--" MAINTENANCE Li SUB'D El PERMITS AGENCY: [` 17`I Of: N.]ELrJPO JiT BEOCN SAMPLE OF LTy DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE �j y,ti, Q'3j -�- L'r, 14, LOCA. OF SOURCE LJC VZl E V/ t-LQ-4 MANUFACTURER PF12 E� 21 /} p IytIT REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED it —�— (00 B'! 'S: G.es -pp Gr.,1� TITLE RECEIVED FOR USE IN �J Ea3A'SE STABILOMETER VALUE 'A • • GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPEC IMITS LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P S.1. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % r7- O 15. 1 1413 j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. #1 -U IT 21 /} STABILOMETER VALUE 'A '41 /� pl 40 j EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. lyp 2qo 48I I/2 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. )/j SP. OR. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP, SUBBASE I/1 FINE BASE Na COARSE SURFACE L. L. P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE TRAFFIC INDEX DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. I BY EXUD. PRESS p3v BY EXPAN. PRESS u WET DRY AVG. SPEC. p AT EOUIL. 8 1 SPEC, INDICATED MINIMVM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. SU U LMRT - SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL I TERIALS ENGINEER OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN OPOTENTIAL TO AWARD OF CONTRA SOURCE SA f ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section D E AFTER AWARD OF CON CT "S' NO. E,&_ 5- 47 CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS REPORT OF TESTS ON /-� /9 vse Yq COMPACTOR AIR PREBBURE P.B,1. FIELD NO. CONT. NO. IW.O.o�P.O.Nv.o.gNFP1 q�s • Q SPECIAL TESTS � /", z X ��Mmr FED. NO. DATE REPTD. • ( IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO- PROJECT NAME 772; RESIDENT ENGINEER - (INSPECTOR) [ /„ A _ - - CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO AGENCY: SAMPLE OF LIMITS OF SAMPLE OUTSIDE AGENCY MAINTENANCE mf SUB'D F1 PERMITS DEPTH LOCA.OFSOURCE [J�a p / �.f- NER OR A' p4U I'll Ty MANUFACTURER /.✓ lbd /7 i }7r `./ tY /iJ KEPRESEN7ED DATE SAMPLED BY k/ A tares TITLE f- 7. .7- RECEIVED FOR USE IN ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT ENO OF MONTH 1• MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PREBBURE P.B,1. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /.'U. FT. 21/2 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS- P -S.1. 11/2 q "'ll O— /GL` THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. E. GR. OVEN CRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I12 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE q _ L. L. I P. L P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD, PRESS 30 J j BY EXPAN. PRESS — 50 w WET 10 CJ DRY AVG. SPEC. /� t% " y AT EOUIL. SPEC. OD INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 5U III LART - SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT ENO OF MONTH 1• MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL OPREL;MiNARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTRA SOURCE SA ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section B C I OPOTENTIAL E NO.6* ww,0 AFTER AWARD OF CON CT tQ TEST -Ia ZSSZ ZS.rS� CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. CIw.oONT MATERIALS ACTUALLY "M.D. . �P.o. Nu.o xePl ENTERING INTO WORKS MOISTURE AT COMPACTION 90 O SPECIAL • FED. NO. TESTS �� DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM 21 /p ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME 7vSJ 1 /7 — 1"lIl0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G /e% �o CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION 0 OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE SUB'D 0 PERMITS 0 1 AGENCY: //� { / /_" AGENCY fl SAP LrT OQ DEPTH 011 -- r I • LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCH. OF SOURCE DATE SAMPLED R'f TITLE E"T/ RECEIVED ,1-4f FOR USE IN 0 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • MATERIALS ENGINEER BY • / / / /�� '°�� RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE $SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C I D E SIEVE c��f �SJ� 2��zj)• tQ 15.J¢ MQ SpECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S1. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION 90 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #11U. FT. 21 /p ETABILOMETER VALUE "W 2 OQ EXUDATION PRESS, P.S.I. THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS, IN. -Y, 7 B3 954 9O �+Z�- SP. GR. OVEN DRY S. S. D, APP. SUBBASE IIE FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE �r 4S L.L. P.L P.1. COMEEION VALUE TRAFFIC INDEX DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. BY E%UD. PRESS 0� E42 14o 95 WET -3� -3� ga. pRY AVG. SPEC. d A: AT EOUIL. SPEC. ig) INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. _ LARY. SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO, REMARKS: 0 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • MATERIALS ENGINEER BY • / / / /�� '°�� RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE $SOIL ❑ Prehrrmar tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE ` to award otcanrract. • ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section * TEST NO�C— Y/2 FIELD NO. 3 RELATIVE COMPACTION CONT. NO .OR Control tests on tw.o. oR 0.o. materiois actually • entering into works. r 4 If contract, use contract item DATE TD. r PROJECT /-opVZ6&&;7 13.0 VL% r AGENCY C,'Vf5kJf �^2T Cect4G"�4 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR .3i /e6e/k: SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY 49.: MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 1,eV 1:n/.4t // ART (fD OF OL STA '�--- REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL 1 41 1 /--0 IV /?atr V H —�� TO / T� � BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: -/r IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND �C Ell WT. SAND_ RETAINED O C WT. SAND USED (-b D TEST SAND DENSITY _ E I VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. ROCK F VOLUME CONE +RING t /£f /(5 GI VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. – a H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE (j 1 TARE WEIGHT - -T. --10 J WE-T--WT--E . SAMPLE p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE S METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MOLD NO. FIELD I1f41 WET WT. — O DRY WT. MOISTURE MOIST. M N , SP. GR. ROCK % WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK , WET WT. - e /G, DRY WT. – a /S p TOTAL DRY WT. R % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOISTURE RC = P WET WT. AT COMPACTION % SPECIFICATION: NL_% Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD__ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY I V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A — B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE 1 - L =K= (100"1; +N) Q =0 +(100 % +N) SM. RING _.1667 .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F B- -5 METHOD A JR B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN PLACE OPT. DENSITY i MOISTURE RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA RIA LS ENGINEER F3D11 -63.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. fr..1 Control tests on 11� materials actually • entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST O. C- RELATIVE COMPACTION If contract, use contract item FIELD NO. —3 CONT. NO. O IW.O. OR DATE REPTD. F. PROJECT leVVdA461 AGENCY tIiVIfrT RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) r�q}7g,lNSON CONTRACTOR_.: Cbd.f -, SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ =C"Y [9 MAINTENANCE❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION /B yezy c -51 1^- RT (:CT>OF rL STA K-,S REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL f( oiv. A&e EPTH 4 b TO A�BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE / / -7 - .C. dAmA3 IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND _ pp B C WT. SAND RETAINED _ WT. SAND USED 1:3� - - , D TEST SAND DENSITY , E F VOLUME SAND USED - - --.._ ......_. VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE M H IN . EX C. SAMPLE SP. GR. ROCK I TARE WEIGHT WET WT. ROCK J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE DRY WT. ROCK K WET DENSITY IN PLACE WET WT. _ ? i L _ DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOI A MOISTURE SAMPLE • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 3 4 DRY WT. G 7 MOIST. M N WET WT. AT COMPACTION SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK Q ,,57 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. _ ? i R %MOISTURE _ TOTAL DRY WT. L % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F LJ 140 1 B— METHOD A US B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 2- MOISTURE RC = —_ — % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MAT IALS ENGINEER r3011_e3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ MOLD N0. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT, SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE _ CONDITION OF MOLD__ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN _ T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K = J +G CONE .1667 — L =K +(100 -: +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1610 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F LJ 140 1 B— METHOD A US B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 2- MOISTURE RC = —_ — % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MAT IALS ENGINEER r3011_e3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminor tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award a contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT 6p ` Material Testing Section TEST NO C— S 9o'e p FIELD NO. _3` 3 RELATIVE COMPACTION No aR ��� Control tests on (W.O. OR P.O. oftl N PY materials actually �`- � 96J • entering into works. I I DATE REPTD. If contract, use contract item PROJECT leV/n/.I 43._V AGENCY Gl/V1GS' RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G :,TtyNil/S'6Jt/ CONTRACTOR Aoe,404< SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY � MAINTENANCE,❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION a/ RT 6 OF CL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL -4 zr. t 0/Vr.FOC�r SeL+ PTH TO /BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: X �� Ai - IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND - B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED �•' ,(„y' D __ TEST SAND_DEN_SITY __ e414 :5 E VOLUME SAND USED _ , -T F VOLUME CONE+ RING , /6 /6 G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. — i HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE , 1 TARE WEIGHT 3 „20 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L _ DRY DENSITY IN PLACE% METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB _ WET WT. 66 3 DRY WT. 01 _ `y MOIST. .M N SP. GR. ROCK;> P WET WT. ROCK DRY ­WT. WET WT. _ 3 a Q DRY WT. — i 1 / _ TOTAL DRY WT. , % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY ,P e14.OW7' REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 9- —S METHOD A A B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE / 0 RC = TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY -- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M A>FnALS ENGINEER F3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION. MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD 5 _ HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR-0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J =G CON E .1667 - L =K- (100 °' +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM.RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 9- —S METHOD A A B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE / 0 RC = TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY -- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M A>FnALS ENGINEER F3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION. ❑ P,.hrninort tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award o contract. • ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST NO)C— 7 y FIELD NO. RELATIVE COMPACTION ` ° "` "° ° -- L�1 Control tests on CON OR P.O. OYA�IFP)� — �L materials actually _ �O6 ..• entering into works. DATE REPT . / / -J - if contract, use contract item PROJECT V/0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) _r. 1 11 ell, ,(Ti. i✓ CONTRACTOR te./, SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ n eNCVE•, MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION �RT �>OF (� STA -Z REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL �.A ilS. DEPTH � � TO ��% BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE /-" - Ja' - GS TESTED BY: A, • 044 W-& IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND .4 z pp B WT. SAND RETAINED _LAB C WT. SAND USED/ .TO D TEST SAND DE_N_ SITY__ DRY WT. T No E F _ VOLUME SAND USED _. ._,_...3. VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE g H!WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE += pp I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ?- K L WET DENSITY IN PLACE `�.r:,- DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 136, METHOD A MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOISTURE SAMPLE -- .._...EVE - --. ... MOLD N0. � - -FIELD _LAB 4 WET WT. 909 1 DRY WT. T No MOIST. _ M N WET WT. AT COMPACTION SP. GR. ROCK Z , O WET WT. ROCK Q DRY WT. ROCK -% it WET WT. - a_ 2- R DRY WT. - 20.50 TOTAL DRY WT. .7 Z % ROCK CONDITION OF MOLD___ CORR.MAX.DENSITY C 136 • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA -- .._...EVE - --. ... MOLD N0. - — 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD___ 5 HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K = J G CONE .1667 — L =K+ (100% +N) Q =0+ 000 %, +N) SM. RING_ � .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 140 I B— METHOD A ®. B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE .7 RC = C! L TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY �'--- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 10 MAT IALS ENGINEER .3011.63.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • ❑Preliminory tests prior y to award o4 contract. • 54 Control teats on materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION' It contract, use contract item TEST O. C— FIELD NO. . OR �z CONT. NO. O , IW .O. OR P O aHFPI l DATE REPTD. /I- PROJECT /piV.t° :�`rC Vm�, -AG .Y RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G-r er`•OdN CONTRACTOR_- t�.(�.t SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION El AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION _ F`RT k�T)OF (L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL .27, C&A1.4Oc.( 4144. )) DEPTH F 4 TO /d BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE / - /2 -r8 TESTED BY: ge— IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ° B C D WT. SAND RETAIN_E_D__ Lyi'L� WT. SAND USED TEST SAND DENSITY — VOLUME SAND USED E F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST H I WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE z G I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE :+ p K L WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MO is NE SAMPLE 'FIELD • _ WET WT.LQ LAB -- - 1 DRY WT. 5 3 -. 4 MOISML ?,7 N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK e ID ROCK WE E —WT—,' WT. T a DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT.' L % ROCK CORR. MAX. DENSI TY CONDITION OF MOLD__ REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F B- 1140 • METHOD A R B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 2 MOISTURE .5 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH . • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 10, Z MAT IALS ENGINEER F301143.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ _ _ - MOLD N0. 1 2 3 -. 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD__ S1 HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J= G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100`x, +N) Q= O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1 969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F B- 1140 • METHOD A R B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 2 MOISTURE .5 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH . • BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 10, Z MAT IALS ENGINEER F301143.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior to award o1 contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. TEST SAND p ROAD DEPARTMENT IS o MOIST. —I' -M Material Testing Section TEST I C 599/ C� E 3- — FIELD O. Control tests on ® COMPACTION ONO fONN O R . O R materials actually G VOLUME TEST HOLE entering into works. HIWT. n45 • .fir If contract, use contract item DATE REPTD // . (p ,( J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE PROJECT '.P 1161/ AGEf„"1;..' /JViLSt ` Y RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) %fJ. & A CONTRACTOR. f;9,16 C'" C41- 1/, PT. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ a °cencv AINTENA NCE ❑ ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION S ;.�SUtBD. RT (�OF CL STA �X REPRESENTING LIMITS T TYPE MATERIAL '', LT. O'piV 6AL.C��t.'1:L EPTH .7 , TO i �� BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE //- 17- !e- F_ TESTED BY: -y i!3'ALL- V IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND p B WT. SAND RETAINED MOIST. —I' -M C D WT. TESAND_USED ST SAND_DENSI T_Y__ C� E VOLUME SAND USED�+ 4 F VOLUME CONE + RING 9 C G VOLUME TEST HOLE 7- HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE % ROCK I TARE WEIGHT v t J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE___ �Q L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE / . METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE TIELD WET WT.�0� LAB _ DRY WT. g 3 4 MOIST. —I' -M 71 N I SP. GR. ROCK _ ? , &(0 WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - 4 5.0 0 DRY WT. _ 4 . 0 TOTAL DRY WT. iG % % ROCK Z CORR.MAX.DENSITY v t MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION - 0 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE 1667 - L= K= (100", +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .014_3 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F E 120 i B- METHOD A ® B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY (- MOISTURE J % RC = 9 Z TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA RIAL5 ENGINEER r3aii.ea.I RELATIVE COMPACTION O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CODEPT. O POTENTIAL SOURCE SMaterial *Al Testing Section AFTER AWARD OF ACT O `kiCONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS AS USED • O SPECIAL TESTS AIR PRESSURE P.5.i. IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME,: RESIDENT ENGINEER :(INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR /OE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE AGENCY: AGENCY SAM P LE OE / LIMITS OF SAMPLE MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % LOCA. OF SOURCE • TEST NO. 14'7 FIELD NO. I W.O. or P.O. Nu. pNP �Y cJ FED. NO. DATE REPTD. /� T DEPTH DATE SAMPLED —jo�,S B p CZ,) * 2 TITLE RECEIVED FOR USE IN Q p�fl G PERMITS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C O E AS USED xCOMPACTOR SPECIF, LIMITB SOUGHT AIR PRESSURE P.5.i. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 111/1, DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # //'U FT. SYABILOMETER VALUE "R" EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. THICK. INOIGTEO BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. SP. GR. OVEN ORY 3. S. D, APP, SUBBABE I/1 FINE BASE %B COARSE SURFACE 4 QG) L.L. I P. L. P.1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX I6 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. BY EXVO. PRESS j BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 yj m WET DRY AVO. SPEC. Q AT EOUIL. SPEC. IDO INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 400 5U U LARY - SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH AGGREGATE & SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER • • r1 L J O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTR T ROAD DEPT. . AFTER AWARD OF D TEST NO. CO 1 ACT CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. GONT. N °, o \?SL MATERIALS ACTUALLY - °•;.F,,) ENTERING INTO WORKS LIME TK @.4'T'EO Sii BBASc FED. NP,o.n FED. NO. O SPECIAL TESTS DATE REPTD. 11 -6'6B IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME _ - 'TUSi11J— - L- 1i,U1Nt RESIDENT ENGINEER - (INSPECTOR). ,"1 JOSisJSOi.�1 CONTRACTOR MARK SEND REPORT TO CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE la M ENANCE SUBT PERMITS AGENCY: C1Ty OF oeF jpoan e6e,_ _ SAMPLE OF DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE jA, �j$ �— L— T/MCDrp# -{ A. OF SOURCE LULE2w S_ vvLi.ac.v DATE SAMPLED 10 -5L— 6� BY 2s D&w^,j a ST'sgFFENS TITLE E.T, M 4F, AIIIL RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A D E SIEVE AS SPECIEUED LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P,S,I, 2 nB `I MOISTURE AT COMPACTION °0 A 1Ta,4 16,0 F14, DRY DENSITY OF BRIOV. FT. 212 STABILOMETER VALUE ' W 2 EXUDATION PRESS, P.S.I. ZSO �jq-2^ 3ZO II42 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK, INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. 4 p C p • J 1 III qG SP. GR. OVEN ppY 3.5.0. APP. SUBBASE I/] FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE q L. L.. P.L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXV, PRESS O 30 -I j BY EXPAN, PRESS �1(y / / 50 WET DRY AVG. SPEC. AT EOUIL. SPEC. (b INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS, THICK. OF 200 5U IU LART_ SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: D BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE ✓4 SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTR T OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SA D ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section AFTER AWARD OF CON ACT B TEST NO. 68- /47(:, CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. �C MATERIALS ACTUALLY CONT. No. or w ^C IWA P. . Nu. rANFPI . —O 400 ENTERING INTO WORKS SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT O SPECIAL • LIME T2EATED SL 65A-S1- FED. NO. TESTS 21 DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TOS'T'It.J- 2L2V(NG RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) -T, - JONrJ50h-I CONTRACTOR MA�� SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE MAINTENANCE 0 SUB'D PERMITS 3 AGENCY: C.111Y OF rJ EI.+-J PORT BkAGYJ SAMPLE OF DEPTH ` LIMITS OF SAMPLE -STLS., LOCA. OF SOURCE LUGERaZ VA LLB( O MANU FACTU PER PFIZER II /y TY OU RES NTED k EPR ESEE DATE SAMPLED 10 -'3 L— &R ES BY 0LDL.xLA4 STF.C,F FFiJS. TITLE G, 1, r tl E, A,-JB:" RECEIVED FOR USE IN lso P>iY0e5E STABILOMETER VALUE "R" • r 1 U GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS US SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S. 1. (J! 21 21 MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %0 J 17 2 14,3 3 r �J•3 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIG.. #11U. FT. II /y STABILOMETER VALUE "R" -78 85 Z EXUDATION PRESS, P.3.1. 2.50 2945 II /1 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK, INDICATED BY E.P. PRESS. IN. /2 5 1015 �i SP. DR. OVEN DRY S. D. APP. SUBBASE I/1 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L. I P. L. P. 1, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY EXUD. PRESS 3D J j BY EXPAN. PRESS � SQ WET DRY AVG. SPEC. al AT EOUIL. �� SPEC. 100 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 210 su U LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTIOR % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: i �aCPq.V3FpIV CyPyE .�..Fl/F A!. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F -3D11 -42.1 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1P MATERIALS ENGINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAD AFTER AWARD OF CONTTTTkkkkACT CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT, Material Testing Section PEST NO. REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. DDNT. No. o. �r 40� I W.O. or P.O. No. r pNPPI LIME- rQEdT'EO Si9$gei.SE FED. NO. DATE REPTD. I IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TUS Imo'— SRVINE RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) S. 40HAJ5wj CONTRACTOR lyp.RK SEND REPORT TO: CON! AGENCY: CI ?-1 SAMPLE OF DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE —5TA. ss+ =Q LT/t4 E D 1A.'/ LOCA. OF SOURCE I,UCERIJE Y/A.LLE4 Pr-1 DATE SAMPLED 10 --?sI -(FHB s( Q1OC l ✓AJ L SYEAFFENS TITLE C, T. T � EA-ME RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS =TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. 2 Z 21 MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % IOr Q 4A j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/'U. FT. 21/l STABILOMETER VALUE "R" AS 63 Ff 68 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. loo ry `6. J 4�pQo Ilia THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY E %P, PRESS. IN. O 3 5.5 3A SP. GR. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I�Z FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE L. L. I P- L- P.1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 OU RABI LITV FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY E %UD, PRESS -I n j BV EXPAN. PRESS L SD W WET 'DRY AVG. SPE, AT EOUIL, SPEC. INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 2DO SU IU LART. SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER a� By RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) �/ 4 F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL • • • OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTR ROAD DEPT ' ac I POTENTIAL SOURCES M T iBi Testin 5 t' OA D AFTER AWARD OF CON ACT ar e 9 on TEST NO. 6G' — 14%8 CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. SIEVE MATERIALS ACTUALLY CONT, No... IW.O.or P.O.N.. A PPI 5 � COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. ENTERING INTO WORKS LIME TKE.aTEp Su6BAgE �1B ` O SPECIAL FED. NO. TESTS DATE REPTD. 11 —(e —✓oB J$ O ' IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM j ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME Ti.7ST1ti1 - L�NN.IE RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) -T JOI{FYp��A77J CONTRACTOR M.taRK SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OOGENIDE IOr.`' MAINTENANCE El SUB'D PERMITS AGENCY: C1 Tom/ O F 1JE4L.%PO21 BGACH SAMPLE OF - DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE 'STA, 15 t'30 L--r/ ME Ds.- 1I J LOCH. OF SOURCE LUaE2.fE veL.L..E-4 DATE SAMPLED tQ- $1'bes BY Rj0dMAjA:( ` ST Ea FFEsJ 7 TITLE E,T;_T �Q�j�. l� RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANA LYSIS:TEST SPECIMEN A C D E SIEVE AB USED SPEC' LIMITS IMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. 21 �1B ` MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % ��� 4 J$ O 14,10 j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. #/'U. FT. z1�1 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" '8ry y2 CI¢ y EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. 260 II/2 THICK, INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS, IN. �• 5.S CC . ✓ -5'v ''`` �1 SP. OR, OVEN DRY S.B.D. APP, SUBBASE 112 FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L, I P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE 8 TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY C.... PRESS 30 1', j BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 IS WET DRY AVO. SPEC. Q AT EOUIL. 8 SPEC, 00 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. W 5U III LART . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO, REMARKS: BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F-301 1-42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL o,. `4 O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE A TO AWARD OF CONTR T SOURCES ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section D E OPOTENTIAL D AFTER AWARD OF CON ACT TEST NO. 169 -147.4 ,n( CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. 7bL MATERIALS ACTUALLY qB G ( CONT x..o. IWa. NU.,I A r 405 ENTERING INTO WORKS LIME - meAT E D SU • O SPECIAL TESTS FED. NO. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % e. ,s 8TQ DATE REP1D. IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME `TL$111J — ,rp-UTAJE RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) J. •JOMAJiO CONTRACTOR M,n.Q LS SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE MAINTENANCE SUB'D PERMITS AGENCY: CI Ty ps= OCcUlJP02T E3c'AGH SAMPLE OF DEPTH STABILOMETER VALUE "R" • LIMITS OF SAMPLE 5TA• 3f1t2•S' �T�ME -J l,ea r,_1 LOCA. OF SOURCE >_ U[ E2AJE VAL_lEJ DATE SAMPLED m-s%-(oPA BY F21DQxAjeAY E STQAGFfUSTITLE E,T, T Ei A.MRECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A C D E SIEVE qB VBED IF H SIM ITS LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P. S.L :01 qB G ( 2 MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % e. ,s 8TQ ry /� S j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/'U. FT. 21h STABILOMETER VALUE "R" gl 95 /� 135 2 EXUDATION PRESS. F.S.I. 105 5 52o 4'o II�1 THICK, INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. Z J 4 �j SP. GR. OVEN CRY I S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I�l FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L, I P.4 P, 1, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 6 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, R I v E %V O. PRESS 64 I 30 j BY E %PAN, PRESS - r50 yj WET DRY AVG. A PEC. I00 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. ZLLART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER BY /V % /�' •� f AGGREGATE & SOIL • • O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTR ROAD DEPT. OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SA D Material Testing Section AFTER AWARD OF CON ACT FEST N0.6� I� ,J� %s=76 CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. MATERIALS ACTUALLY X CONT. Na. orD ,J ENTERING INTO WORKS Iw.O. or P.o. NU. �r wxePl O SPECIAL TESTS S, A,� FED. NO. / (; (� �tt -i �(� 1 ' / / �i% DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME 7-41,yti l/ Jr✓ /he. RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) O h YI 5 e n CONTRACTOR Mark Co- s-t- SEND REPORT TO: ./,CONSTRU/CTION OGENIIDE ® MAINTENANCE Lj SUB'D 0 PERMITS E] II AGENCY: G i L y C.f� A/e V✓ I>hD ✓ - Ge i G�1 SAMPLE OF gg�„ C* ` T DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE See - LOCA. OF SOURCE 1*1 ✓:I Af Gs P_ Z� DATE SAMPLED //- --4- -i f B'! N I Ste ZLJ _ H$ TITLE E- 'q _a RECEIVED FOR USE IN J33 aL,5-e BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.42.1 .. AGGREGATE & SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE © ® iy1 AS USED 6PECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT CO-FACTOR AIR PRE BSDRE P.6.1. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. # /"U FT. 21/2 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 1 Ire EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. II /j /(20 //��' A p /A +/��L' THICK. INDICATED BY STAB, INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. % F y O-± 717 p JM J SP, GR. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE 1112 FINE BASE 3/0 COARSE SURFACE 9 9-� 3 3j JJ �D r "j L L. F. L P.I. COHESION VALUE g TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. BY EXUD, PRESS 30 J / .J A Y U j BY EXPAN. PRESS BD ,J WET�i © jT 3-2- a 29 DRY AVO, 3z -� 310 SPEC. 30 y. AT RQUIL SPEC, IDB INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 2T 6 s =1- a - 9 5 U LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: �' yL„ SB -v �"INaT / a r 64-'t6-6 ., ODB S !TD't me.e4 kv c :3 "i /Or BrceFI as : ;.rE, 5i8 "C. BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.42.1 .. AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTR POTENTIAL SOURCE SA ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section L D O ,_.S -%� ,� 4.,�0 TEST NO. �,y' -j- -., AFTER AWARD OF CON CT ® 2q CONTROL TESTS ON R E P O R T OF TESTS O N FIELD NO. 5CY MATERIALS ACTUALLY B CWNO.wP.O.Na.aeAHFPI 405 ENTERING INTO WORKS O SPECIAL TESTS • p ' � � s /yax FED. NO- DATE DATE REPTD, /I -6 °6 0 IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME T.!9G' l.H — I r b } o C'. RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) L( j p -1 s 4 n CONTRACTOR M a i-k Cy ✓t $ -t. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ®; _: MAINTENANCE ❑ SUB'D El PERMITS ❑ AGENCY: G' , f O !e AGENCy G �a c�t`'L- .� L dC- SAMPLE OF 5 a, @ i DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE 5 e %��+ i>'M �? Y /C6 LOCA. OF SOURCE OWNER CT /'•'_ ;T C+Lk MANUFACTURER C..- G�r�d.✓! ' C p 7 REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED (/ '" .5 �' If p P B t Q a L VL $ TITLE ' RECEIVED FOR USE IN u • GHAUING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A 1 0 L U SIEVE VVW�� ® AS UBED SPEC IE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO„ #I'U. FT. 212 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P. S.1. I I�2 [r ( C —'G•C THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN 'A �� / �'G �) '7 y-, p —•/ SP. OR. OVEN DRY S. S. D, APP. SUBBASE I1I FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE (l �O j/..� ry F�`'� L, L. P.L. P. I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY ESUD. PRESS 30 /122 /% % /. •� f al.�OL J � BY E %PqN. PRESS 50 W i WET_ 30 37 ORY ) AVG. SPEC. d: AT EQUIL. SPEC. INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 4 6 51 x2 SU 1 IU i i LART. SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. 3;7- :I R; s,de ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH /MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL �❑ Proliminaw tee'ts Prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to owa,d o cantruct. � • ROAD DEPARTMENT . i sleTii1 Testing Section. T ca -. F Control tests an REL COMPACTION materials actually ontermy into works. 4 7 rY if contract, use contract item. PROJECT a 'Affil C/` RES1. L}F�NT ENGINEER IINSPECTORI " CONTRAC' SEND�ORT .TO:, CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY Q INTENANCE -❑ LOCAT ,RT 'REPRES ..„.G LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL -- y- DI DATE !% — L SaT STED BY:: IN PLACE DENSITY.. A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ?• 81 WT. SAND RETAINED._, „;,.'., _ C WT. SAND USED '.-*r= /, Q D TEST S. `_ SITY E VOLUME SA �`' F VOLUME CON ._+ RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE 'CORR.MAX. iTy H'WT. EX C. SAMPLE + TARE n r I TARE WEIGHT % MOISTURE J. WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE : Z K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 7, L DRY DENSITY IN PLAC :•.' �- 7MIETHOD A MOI E SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY,RATHOLE DATA AD WET WT. 1 DRY WT. xx' ry, MOIST. tM .N SP: GR. ROCK 0 WET.WT. ROCK ,DRY WT. ROCK WET WT— P TOTAL DRY,WT.'.' TOTAL % ROCK Q 'CORR.MAX. iTy REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F C- s? w 5 P OO. aR ANPPI /i r,Q A/ 5 T. IBD. CJ PERMITS ❑ FINISHED GRADE METHOD A:❑ 8 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC =� TENT. 'RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% i i MAXIMUM DENSITY,RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2p 3 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE ,CTl��,Q e4 °1•S�i CONDITION OF MOLD r l 404.4 �- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V1 DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES,- C.F. C= A— B E= C- D - UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E —F K =G CONE .1667 — L = K _ (100 +N) Q = 0 > (100`7 + N) SM. RING ..0143 .1810. R = (P—Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .196g ",r REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F C- s? w 5 P OO. aR ANPPI /i r,Q A/ 5 T. IBD. CJ PERMITS ❑ FINISHED GRADE METHOD A:❑ 8 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC =� TENT. 'RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% i i Preliminory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. + -- - - - _ .91� IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB .B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED 3 Q , / Q D TEST SAND DENSITY N E _ VOLUME SAND USED_ WET WT. ROCK - F VOLUME CONE +RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE, DRY WT. —_ i H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE I TARE WEIGHT 4"y J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE . 2. K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. - - - -- 3 DRY WT. Of INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN �o MOIST. - M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK - - DRY WT. ROCK:.': WET WT. — s Q DRY WT. —_ i TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK- - - CORR.MAX.DENSITY .� MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 eG 3 - 4 Of INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Q P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD 1/6 e G - S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY Z rh 7 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C I UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E -F K =.J =G CONE .1667 - L= K+00 % + N) (1 O Q =+(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P =Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S - LG. RING .0302, .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • B- I METHOD A IJ B IN J SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE OPT RC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH - BY T MA7 IALS ENGINEER RE$fDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGRJ f3011-43.1 RELATIVE,. COMPACTION I ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Teti ection TEST "Orc —S8. S FIELD NO. -K_ .. Control tests on -RELATIY, _J FACTION NTOR O OR ANFP) materials actually - fl -HFP %LOS entering into works. - -� PATE REPTD. use contract item PROJECT AGENCY ice' err /4 RESIDENT E 5 EER (INSPECTOR) - CONTRACTOR MA.PK QA/J7_ "' SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ourslol=_ OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE ❑ UBD. El PERMITS ❑ LOCATION ��E'!11A"F_ � ZZ RT T;OF rL �STA .1�5 ,: REPRESENTING LIMITS - TYPE MATERIAL ,�,. Z„S DEPTt i�� TO 19' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE // - -�Fi� TESTED BY �'�' _il/ - .e, IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND _ B WT. SAND RETAINED ;2, 6 C WT, SAND USED ?y, JC D TEST SAND DENSITY /, 6_3 E VOLUME SND USED _` A 1 F VOLUME CONE + RING G I VOLUME TEST HOLE /7 7c3 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 6 I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DEWSITY' J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 1) K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 112 T WET DENSITY L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MOLD NO. FIELD LAO_, WET WT. r: 4 -:.`.. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN DRY WT.... TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: P WET WT. AT COMPACTION SP. GR. ROCK - -' WET WT. ROCK-'p. Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - e DRY WT. r _ TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CONDITION OF MOLD CORR.MAX.DEWSITY' • MAXIMUM DENSITY. RATHOL'zDATA -' MOLD NO. C.0 1 C'c' 2 .3 4 -:.`.. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN R C % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: P WET WT. AT COMPACTION a Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE r ,Q CONDITION OF MOLD -T O. S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY /. "T V DRY DENSITY CONV.FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D 1 UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J + G CONE .1667. 1 - L = K + (100% +N) Q = 0 _ (100 %+ N) SM. RING. .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q),-.Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302. .1.969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • I B• METHOD A ❑ B [R SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 1z8 18 MOISTURE 9 L7 '-'A- R C % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: El BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH ,J BY C3 Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to sword o contract" _ ROAD DEPARTMENT 2 Material Testing.Sectie®' TEST 60. C— FIELO NO. 1 ContfOl teS [{ On I` ° "' " .°" W.O. PO OR AII RELATIVE COMPACTION meteflri(,'aafi,o(I yy enronp0 work{. - s'.. O �r .'- DATE KEPT I tOftfNtct Tact item Poor r PROJECT GENCY_T� 'A6e7 4Tec'hge r RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTORI CONTRACTOR�Qp{t M o;ci OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑'. AGENCV ® MAINTENANCES ❑ SUBCS'_ PERMITS O LOCATION /.."�V.•.ti::: ''/�; ,;S,IQl7,ST. !(,�- RT�%OF(L STA c�Le9 ^z+-- REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE TERIAI �C ,7,S -:. DEPTH ?n ~ TO-,.Z:�r BELOW FINISHED GRADE. DATE // —/ . e— 8 • TESTEIkBY: Ad, ASAISE IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB BI WT. SAND RETAINED - C _ WT. SAND_USED INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D _:.'' TEST SAND DENSITY i N E VOLUME SAND USED , WET WT. RO C14 w; F _` VOLUME CONE +RING '. G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE I z I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY' J __ WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE' K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHq #'A MOISTtif§E -MPLE .. • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DA-. F LAB WET WT. /� 2 - DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. RO C14 w; 24 Q 8 DRY WT, RO - WET WT -�,:y Q DRY TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY' REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RECEIVED 0 N01f 121 B- -5 FlELD +5 ( %WET) METHOD A 0 B SUMMARY ._-,REOORQ WHOLE NUMBERS :•. PLACE OPT. DENSITY MOISTURE RC = —_ `Y TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE.AT END OF MONTH p�BLIC WORKS DEPT. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 1Z MAT;�PULS ENGINEER „ 1 0,, 3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DA-. MOLD N0. /� 2 - 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN OG Q Q p - P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 24 Q 8 Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ! 'Q T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x_Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE _ �7 � - L= K- 000% +N)' Q =O= (1007 +N) 5M. RING 43 1 .1810..' R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RECEIVED 0 N01f 121 B- -5 FlELD +5 ( %WET) METHOD A 0 B SUMMARY ._-,REOORQ WHOLE NUMBERS :•. PLACE OPT. DENSITY MOISTURE RC = —_ `Y TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE.AT END OF MONTH p�BLIC WORKS DEPT. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 1Z MAT;�PULS ENGINEER „ 1 0,, 3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. I r ® i;ontrol teats en f materials actually entering into works. PROJE C T I e V 1N.c? . 1441PENT ENGINEER (IN SEND REPORT TO: CC L ION �P y iAJ',C RE Iowa JNG. LIMITS_ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TES,, C —S'8$9 FIELD NO .z —2 j Corer. ao- RELATIVE C@MPRC110N aO: Op !•QyQ ' " DATE REPTD If contract; tract item'. *E° J��IR..• AGENCYFIAIi (�-,!^ 51 t OR) .1161/ 40 �/ CONTRACTOR '44 1 'Z� c oN % NSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ IRT (:L'p OF q STA �ZfS�z- 4; OIAL DEPTH - ,/ TO 7 ,6 h B, OW EL FINI E ' .. IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAS B WT. SAND RETAINED 0 C _ WT. SAND USED ■ % MOIST. EST SAND DENSITY _ G #EVOLUM E SAND USED WET WT. ROCK MIAMI OLUME CONE +RING ■llp: G VOLUME TEST HOLE ./ H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE R i TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J,.WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE : 1 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE,�' \ ■V61 L DRY DENSITY IN: PLACE S �c SH D GRADE. TESTED BY: .d-j� � s = METHOD A 4JRE SAMPLE illeil ■.■nl■I\uet�■ FIELD LAS WET WT. 111111"a ■ ■eieitlr 0 DRY WT. °� per■ _ sue er ■r ■ % MOIST. P 'SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK MIAMI DRY WT ROCK ■llp: WET WT,= _:�- \ ■ri DRY ■i■ TOTAL DRY' R %ROCK 7,49 CORR.MAX.DENSITY AL1�� .. MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DA-;A: illeil ■.■nl■I\uet�■ 1 es WWI" \ ■e11 3. 111111"a ■ ■eieitlr 0 ®Isla °� per■ _ sue er ■r ■ ■r!! P ■se ■ ■ ■. 2 96_ MIAMI rites ■llp: DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. \ ■ri ■i■ R % MOISTURE 7,49 3 AL1�� 9 : 1 CONDITION OF MOLD ■tl \ ■V61 e ■I S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ,$ ... T WET DENSITY 'Z \I1i ® \t1 ■!1 tlatl.tl ■eeee0 ■tl. ■tl eieiieeieee ■.rr. CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q =_ UM ES, C.F. .0 = A - B E =C = D 11. el- \s.�e■■■■.■e■N■i■r■ CONE +UNIT G =E -P' K =J =G r■■rei■■r 167•; - L = K + (100% +N) Q = O + (1.00%.+ N) SM. RING ■urrrll�,(, .1610 R = (P-Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x - Q ='S''' LG. RING tn■u■eru■i■■e A969 etll■i�l\ei5 I( ■ ■i ■l \C! `. +>m�i■ie ■!.k' "no MONO e■seeiue MEN w■s��e�Ati;;- +.snow ■. ®.e�►lo�►1 as ■es"IMr.■ iiiiii.��il�aa�i�s 9" s;�ee i ■er as ■1■ ■■ n�R N ■11 \ii.1 ■ \llia \ \ i ' °k■ r ■■.r ii ■i.u. 'eeiie.iege ■Pie ■E ■r■ i ■� ■!t■■1ti\►\:. r ■�►i��lr ■ile ■r� Erma =rwrrr,as ■m.r=a•anw.3 ate u-,�.�<rs•a•r��ee®n .. MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DA-;A: MOLD NO.. 1 es 2 3. 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN �, Q(J i P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2 96_ rites Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. , ► ■i■ee ®ems R % MOISTURE 7,49 3 AL1�� 9 : 1 CONDITION OF MOLD 6 'e, u ,W e la■ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ,$ ... T WET DENSITY 'Z V1 ^ DRY DENSITY - CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q =_ UM ES, C.F. .0 = A - B E =C = D �'' UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E -P' K =J =G CONE 167•; - L = K + (100% +N) Q = O + (1.00%.+ N) SM. RING .0144g.+ .1610 R = (P-Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x - Q ='S''' LG. RING s[eiii A969 iA ( OR ) 20 METH A.❑ 9 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBER IN REMARKS: PLACE_ 7i. MOt�RE a ' a Test Method Calif. 216 -F TENT. RC SPECIFICATION: NL�% r1 Ri t'tNr. Will RF MADF AT FND OF MONTH ■�� rEese 7G a ii�SSaear ■rte rites i� , ► ■i■ee ®ems ■see■ :::::t AL1�� 9 : 1 ►tease `:o:ietr @ $ e la■ Room mmoiijriab li�► ;,►iii ,f s[eiii elf I( ■ ■i ■l \C! U ■,iR7i ■!.k' iA ( OR ) 20 METH A.❑ 9 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBER IN REMARKS: PLACE_ 7i. MOt�RE a ' a Test Method Calif. 216 -F TENT. RC SPECIFICATION: NL�% r1 Ri t'tNr. Will RF MADF AT FND OF MONTH • GRADING O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN A TO AWARD OF CONTR T ROAD DEPT. D E SIEVE O POTENTIAL SOURCE 5 ED Material Testing Section 0 AS USED .+^ AFTER AWARD OF CO ACi TEST NO.^�' CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. t" 1CX MATERIALS ACTUALLY COST JW.O. oNOP.ox . Nuo A� n0-s— ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS LYL ��IASS s^ FED. NO. DATE REPTD. �� -¢ -� ••. DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/10, FT. IF CONTRACT, USE LONTPACT ITEM +I' ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME Zikr74,;2 —ker e, 212 RESIDENT E INEER '(INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR ) STABILOMETER VALUE "R" SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUT AE MAINTENANCE SUB 'D E PERMITS AGENCY: 2 1 SAMPLE OF T EXUDATION PRESS. P.5.1. DEPTH J LIMITS OF SAMPLE (' O as Z4: .41 I/1 LOCA. OF SOURCE THICK. INDICATED By STAB, INCHES 0 NI k O MANUFACTURER ANTITv EPR ESENTED X38 7 _ I DATE SAMPLED 10-Jo y// / B'T TITLiO�T�[ RECEIVED FOR USE IN / T C- THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN, .... . • GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPECIE. LIMITS BOUGNT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/10, FT. 212 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P.5.1. I/1 THICK. INDICATED By STAB, INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN, OVEN ORY S.S.D. APP, SUBBASE I/t FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L. I P. L. P, 1, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX Ib DURABILITY FINE SPEC. W BY EXUD. PRESS 10 J j BY EXPAN, PRESS SD W 0 WET DRY F SPEC. AT EOUIL. SPEC, I� INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. THICK. OF 200 SU U I LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO, REMARKS: � 9 iF7� o v 7a sasgrsr Z-7-5 r,5 El BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH ATERIALS ENGINEER r BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F•3011.42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL Ely --- SHEET P40.___l CHKO. SY ------ DATE --------- JOB ----------------------------- & nzf ------------------ t ---------- 14 4r, /Z— X 7 2.4 "Z - S, Z 218 z,f_ I Z.-d 1 2.9 -A ZF• Z-6 Z_ c,:; 24— sc. - �F- ol--- .rll,11741 I-Ilzel F3011.47.1 ------ op'Tr-&�z- SUSJCCT�,*-� Ift SHEEI- fqO.--Z ------ OF-2 CHIeD. E;Y --- -- _DATE_- __ -_._ JOB ---------------- ----------------------------- ---- ------- 24— sc. - �F- ol--- .rll,11741 I-Ilzel F3011.47.1 0:"Arl,,�G�I- C(-Illfi� SHEET SUBJECT - -- ----- DATE :,-* CHYD. UY ------ DATE -------- JOB ---------------------------- -------------- ---- 5-/-- j�, -5-7. ' 6/, ,gs, • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT, - Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON L, 7,-5,- IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM LEST NO. 108 -/. le 3. / FIELD NO. CONT. No. or SO� FED. NO. DATE REPTD. ROAD NO. PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR O POTENTIAL SOURCE SAD AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY • O ENTERING INTO WORKS SPECIAL TESTS • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT, - Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON L, 7,-5,- IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM LEST NO. 108 -/. le 3. / FIELD NO. CONT. No. or SO� FED. NO. DATE REPTD. ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME Tu.��_ kk �Lq RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) G_ Jo%Jf3c/1 A CONTRACTOR �jj� - SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY: Gj UTSIDE CONSTRUCTION E] OOGENGY �T �dCh 1W, MAINTENANCE O SUB 'D O PERMITS SAMPLE AS USED SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.T. DEPTH p 11 LIMITS OF SAMPLE a LOCA. OF SOURCE � -� MWNE ANUFAOCTURER MOISTURE AT COMPACTION AS p iI REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED /0 -Zp FOR USE IN f/ini // -6 BY TITLE ,�F- T.1 RECEIVED _ GRADING ANALYSIS . TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE Z AS USED SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.T. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION AS J DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., St /lU. FT, 212 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. II /] 'THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES !'j. ��O0 THICK. INDICATED BY ESP. PRESS, IN, 1 SP. OR. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I/1 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. P- L, P.1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX a DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY EXUD. PRESS 30 -1 j BY EXPAN. PgE33 50 m WET DRY AVG. SPEC. Q I AT EQU1L. SPEC. BD INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 SU #1 ID LART. SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED =' ZZ d % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: 0 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH r r RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE $ SOIL RIALS ENGINEER 1� • • C� OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE RESIDENT ENGINEER TO AWARD OF CONTR POTENTIAL SOURCE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section , O SAO CONSTRUCTION E] T OUTSIDE i AGENCYug' AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT SAMPLE OF AS USED CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON ® MATERIALS ACTUALLY �Yy iS°'sc ENTERING INTO WORKS �g O SPECIAL TESTS OWNER O ANUFACTURER . p S NTED DATE SAMPLED // s ' r"R B'! W IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM T ,2' RECEIVED TEST NO. &g_ FIELD NO, CONT. Hw m 1W.O. a�P.O. NU. or AHFP1 � 40S DATE REPTO. ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME j f. RESIDENT ENGINEER - (INSPECTOR) /j C CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY'. CONSTRUCTION E] T OUTSIDE i AGENCYug' MAINTENANCE O SUB'D 0 PERMITS / SAMPLE OF AS USED S LIMITS MITS SOUGHT DEPTH �- LIMITS OF SAMPLE �r OCA. OF SOURCE �g OWNER O ANUFACTURER . p S NTED DATE SAMPLED // s ' r"R B'! W ,_o T ,2' RECEIVED FOR USE IN 3 GRADING ANALYSIS -- TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE 3 AS USED S LIMITS MITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # %I-U. FT. 21 /1 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 Q EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. - II /1 CO O Oc THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. 3B G —BSS SP. GR. OVEN DRY S.S.O. APP. SUBBASE I/1 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 45 L L. P. L. P, I. COHE51ON VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY EXUD. PRESS Q BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 WET 3S 7 DRY AVG. SPEC. 3DCOVER AT EOUIL. SPEC. I'D INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 5U U LART - SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO, REMARKS: G> TL C Y 4 i RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 Cl BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER BY / AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAD B AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT [a CONTROL TESTS ON I� MATERIALS ACTUALLY Z ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS • • ROAD NO. RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CO AGENCY: . C- A. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. • Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON Z, 7's IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM PROJECT NAME CONTRACTOR TEST NO. 69 -1,539 /4 FIELD NO. 'W.O. Na. ar I W.O. or P.O. N., ANFP DATE REPTO. //- / Z -(v B SUB'D SAMPLE OF 1 DEPTH /3 '�- Zo w LIMITS OF SAMPLE= S7io. // L7/ ' Az /ZfSa L7` Q °xl& 14-x- L71 c�.SYO LOCA.OFSOURCE DATE SAMPLED BT �/04WR�I TITLE �T! RECEIVED .. FOR USE IN ` TS PERMITS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E Z 9 tlelS SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.:. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % R11/2 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. # /IV, FT. STABILOMETER VALUE "R" /� OQ /OO EXUDATION PRESS. P.5.1. THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I 9 5P 1p Q THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. �j SP. DR. OVEN DRY B.S.D. APP, SUBBASE I/2 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE t L L. I P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 6 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD, PRESS 30 j j BY E.PAN. PRESS 50 W ° WET DRY AVG. SPEC. Q I AT EQUIL. SPEC. 100 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK, OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 5U IU LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.421 AGGREGATE & SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER l =i' ........... O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE A SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION Lj AGENCY: C"�✓ a /rl�.vnf Ff`7 TO AWARD OF CONTRf& POTENTIAL SOURCE ROAD DEPT, • Testing Section SUB'D El PERMITS EJ O SA D AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT Material TEST No. 68—/503 t�iiu /S4� LIMITS OF CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. LOCA. OF SOURCE MATERIALS ACTUALLY CONT. OWNER OR MANUFACTURER ENTERING INTO WORKS pUANTI7Y REPRESENTED O SPECIAL TESTS` TITLE E-Tj FED. NO. FOR USE IN / T T T. EC DATE REPTD. [21/2 IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME % 11 • RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G ,� dj - v CONTRACTOR A SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION Lj AGENCY: C"�✓ a /rl�.vnf Ff`7 OUTSIDE AGENCY MAINTENANCE 0 SUB'D El PERMITS EJ SAMPLE O s DEPTH /�'a�ZO+✓ LIMITS OF X SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PR ESS VRE P. S.i. LOCA. OF SOURCE OWNER OR MANUFACTURER pUANTI7Y REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED /,0-30 //� B'! y TITLE E-Tj RECEIVED FOR USE IN / T T GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E s M'! YBGE B X SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PR ESS VRE P. S.i. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION °b [21/2 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. #111J. FT. STABILOMETER VALUE "R" � ��Q 0� O EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INC. ES 9 �� - O THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. Ju SP. R. OVEN DRY B.S.D. APP. ......E 1112 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L. I P. L. P.1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY PINE COARSE SPEC. j By EXUD, POSSE 3 J j BY EXPAN, PRE55 BD YI V WET DRY AVG. SPEC. y: AT EOUIL. SPEC. IDO INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 207 SU IU LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 0 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL r� .-Iii,. O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE OPOTENTIAL TO AWARD OF CONTR SOURCE SA D ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section CONTRACTOR AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT C ®CONTROL TESTS ON, REPORT OF TESTS ON SUB MATERIALS ACTUALLY SAMPLE OF Aa- UafY ENTERING INTO WORKS DEPTH • O SPECIAL TESTS 11 Z4 —L7',- ZBsZ.SLf 69Dzsvm IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM • • TEST NO. Gg— IS-4;- 1�(ru FIELD NO. CONM FED. NO. DATE REPTD. //- /Z-6f3 ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME Zzes: l —ke nm TEST SPECIMEN RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) �' :� �rJC CONTRACTOR B C SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY: Ci �y O� CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDt //AGENCY /yWQ� �pCry MAINTENANCE SUB .PERMITS El SAMPLE OF Aa- UafY x SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE a STD 11 Z4 —L7',- ZBsZ.SLf 69Dzsvm LOCH. OF SOURCE �- MANUFACCTURER MOISTURE AT COMPACTION p Tfly EJA DATE SAMPLED B'I �4'�� TITLE ETA RECEIVED k1112 FOR USE IN r DRY DENSITY OF BRIO,. #/'U. FT. GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E O /% Aa- UafY x SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P, S. 1, MOISTURE AT COMPACTION k1112 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO,. #/'U. FT. STABILOMETER VALUE 'R" zoo OO Op O EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.1, THICK. INDICATED BY STAB, INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP, PRESS. IN, to SP, On. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I/2 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE q L. L. I P. L. P. I, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COAR5E SPEC. BY EXVD. PRE56 jD J j BV EXPAN. PRESS [JD L1 '4 WET DRY AVG. SPEC. i AT EOUIL. SPEC. IDD INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 SU IU LART. spec. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: El BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH e RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL 1. MATERIALS ENGINEER m O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTR ROAD DEPT. OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAD Material Testing Section AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT • resr No.68— /Sc7j�,„ li S� CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO MATERIALS ACTUALLY CONT. No. or .SOS ENTERING INTO WORKS • FED. NO. O SPECIAL TESTS DATE REPTD. IF <ONTnACT, US LSO. NTfl ACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TVSf - /y /iJe RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) „ CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION / OGENCY ® MAINTENANCE SUB'D Cl PERMITS AGENCY: C /✓ ,/I / R �„h SAMPLE O !� _ DEPTH /,7o! 20,1 I• • LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCA. OF SOURCE DATE SAMPLED /o-,Jo BY /� w TITLE 52-1 RECEIVED FOR USE IN Z- T S. GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C I D E yIB� x SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % k1/1' DRY DENSITY OF BRIG.. # /r'U. FT STABILOMETER VALUE "R OO Q {� EXUDATION PRE55. P.S.I. TRICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP, PRESS, IN. SP, OR, OVEN DRY 5. 5. D. APP. SUBBASE I/2 FINE BABE % COARSE SURFACE 4 LL. P.L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD. PRESS 30 J j BY E %PAN. pgE55 51 ui a WET DRY AVG. SPEC. AT EQUIL. SPEC. ( too INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 5U U LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER rx BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTR O POTENTIAL SOURCE SA61) AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT [a CONTROL TESTS ON Sb� MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • Q SPECIAL TESTS • • ROAD NO. RESIDENT ENGINEER SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY: COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. • Material Tasting Section REPORT OF TESTS ON /- 77,5: IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM PROJECT NAME T,..4- / _ . '- _ CONTRACTOR TEST NO.( FIELD NO. CONT (..0. No.ar P 4os' IW�O. oe P,O. NU.o ANFP DATE REPTD. 11-1,2-&;A9 SAMPLE OF- I DEPTH /_ ?'� -2n" PERMITS LIMITS OF SAMPLE - sfe -.i�"� 1� I/� 'St `O/Si�<t - s77�ij .+ Z -LJf TLOI— .S-�cr .SSf3o Lf �i LOCA. OF SOURCE �- OWNER OR UANTIN MANUFACTURER EPR ESENTED DATE SAMPLED /Q 30 f'iiu / / -ID By fil, cl ?(✓ C TITLE T/ RECEIVED FOR USE IN ,: T,S. GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN C D E SIEVE SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P. S.I, MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /r'U. FT. [TAB 2�/2 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 C Qd O� QQ EXUDATION PRESS. P. S, I, II12 THICK, INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK, INDICATED BY EX, PRESS. IN. IK SP. GR. OVEN DRY B.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I/2 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L.L. P.L. P.I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE 1 COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD. PRESS 30 j BY EXPAN. PRESS 5) Ld m WET DRY AVG. SPEC, p AT EOUIL. SPEC. )00 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS, 20 51.1 ID LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER 1 BY AGGREGATE do SOIL E • Pn AA Kl/ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. . Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON PROJECT TEST NO.�_ /�r—S 9f�iiu /�Z FIELD NO. DONT. Ho. ar 'WO. -P.O. Nu. HFPI �cti� FED. NO, DATE REPTD. //- /Z -/if RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) e -,; tno CONTRACTOR a SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY: Cif p{ PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR OUTSIDE 14 AGENCY IW TO AWARD OF CONTR O POTENTIAL SOURCE SA &D D AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT SIE VE CONTROL TESTS ON LIMITS OF SAMPLE �/ - S'fd MATERIALS ACTUALLY `.$7� S7es.rL�(CJ ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS E • Pn AA Kl/ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. . Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON PROJECT TEST NO.�_ /�r—S 9f�iiu /�Z FIELD NO. DONT. Ho. ar 'WO. -P.O. Nu. HFPI �cti� FED. NO, DATE REPTD. //- /Z -/if RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) e -,; tno CONTRACTOR a SEND REPORT TO: AGENCY: Cif p{ CONSTRUCTION LJ .�[ A/ F�L'OC� OUTSIDE 14 AGENCY IW MAINTENANUI, U wa v u rol�l�llI u SAMPLE Of D E SIE VE DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE �/ - S'fd SL LSD Lf `.$7� S7es.rL�(CJ ".S•�o 33^'L9L (�f! / =.S�b- ��'^'L LOCA. OF SOURCE._ MANUFACTURER `� REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED /p_ e �AI„ / /ems 9'! �j�� TITLE LG'T� RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A C D E SIE VE 21 rez1 f. hS UelB X SPEC IF. L ,MITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTIO ..44N DRY DENSITY OF BRO.. #1 1U. FT rB 211 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 v EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. I/1 THICK, INDICATED BY STAB, INCHES J' i .1149 —_ THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. /j SP. GR. OVEN DRY 5. 5. D. 4PP. SUBBASE IIt FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L.L I P. L6 P.I. COHESION VALUE 8 TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. Wj BY EXUO. PRESS 30 J j BY EXPAN, pR ESE 50 J WET DRY AVO, SPEC. Q AT EQUIL. SPEC. 100 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 SU D LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: El BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH r'T RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER K • • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. • Materiel Testing Section ®= - COARSE, MEDIUM, FINE REPORT OF TESTS ON COUNTY PLANT NO. I ASPHALT CONCRETE CONL TYPE B; NO. O 2 - COARSE, MEDIUM, FINE (W. O. D/ P.O. No. or(AHFP 1'05 ❑ 3.. 8 IF CONTRACT UBE CON ACi ITEM DATE REPTD. 11—i4"68 PROJECT TUSTIN- IRVINE AGENCY NEWPORT BEACH RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J. John ®on ry1�e,1 CONTRACTOR OUTDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AAGE14CY L-I MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 6070 ❑ 85-10091 120150 ❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE Orange LIMITS OF PROJECT OWNER OR MANUFACTURER Tnd.ustrlai Asphalt. LS ^ntA An RaytSYTITY g EPRESENTED 1500TO14S DATE SAMPLED 11-14- By Jank C!ri(;,A1e TITLEE•T•1 FOR USE AS: BASE COURSE FINISH COURSE ❑ RESURFACE ❑ ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIA TESTING ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) BY F- 3011 -43.1 • BITUMINOUS GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMENS o SPEC. SPEC. NO. A B C D E F SPECIF SIEVE [p: n (J V f TEMPERATURE I/} MOISTURE BITUMEN GRADE io C V 0 ° 10 BIT. RATIO SP. GR. BRIO. I1, 72 / 60-- O STAB. RESULTS 3 + 53 40,•e 5 CON. RESULTS B 39 1 27-40 16 RT. VALUE 30 19 12-22 5o SUSC. HEO 12 9 MRS.1 ft tSWELL 3— PERMEABILITY 5. VAPOR BUBC. GRADING OBTAINED BY COMBINING BINS AS FOLLOWS: BIN WT. % By WTr a i .'iL0 2 y8 NO. CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. 6TABILOMETER COHESION 3 1 FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE CRUSHED PARTICLES= AGGREGATE) % 15 MIN. 77' F. Z Ll 2 •2280 r GT FIELD COMP. SP. GR.. LAD. SP. GA. RELATIVE COMP. I 40 RECOMMENDED BIT. CONTENT CONSIDERING ALL TEST DATA % REMARR51 EQUIV. GAL. PER 50. YD. FOR 1" COMPACTED SURFACE= SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY AGG. COM, MIR J L O o 10:1 32 0 2 ? 0 r+ 1: 30 3250 0 0 I ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIA TESTING ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) BY F- 3011 -43.1 • BITUMINOUS R���IVEb ... �nco O PREUMINARY TESTS PRIOR' COUNTY OF ORANGE + TO AWARD OF C T ROAD DEPT. A OPOTENTIAL SOURCE S ED Materiel Testing Section D E AFTER AWARD OF CO ACT TEST NO.,,,-.,,5 CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT O F TESTS ON FIELD NO. MATERIALS ACTUALLY /'t (3dse �% DDNT.No.o. Iw.D. o, e.o. No. or1I XTP1 .n" 4ps ENTERING INTO WORKS OFED. SPECIAL /" '� NO. TESTS _ REPTD. DATE . IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR N,- G , C. SEND REPORT TO: OUTSIDE MAINTE CE SUB'D El PERMITS STABILOMETER VALUE "R" AGENCY: /' /CONSTRUCTION SAMPLE OF A A. DEPTH —_ 2 LIMITS OF SAMPLE n/i2Ffr2 2 Az LOCA. EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.F. NUFACTU Rf —�.R t�C ] c/% c-fto %y.J /his % �!'O C/•r fs 1,2 p 7I REPRESENTED GATE SAMPLED //- f$ - ( fy' BY (�� � Ez,5 f TITLE % 1 RECEIVED FOR USE IN 90 —/C C• THICK. INDICATED BY STAB INCHES 11 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F•3011.42.1 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B G D E SIEVE AS USED S LIMITS MITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.5. 1. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % J DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/'U. FT. 21/1 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 O O EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.F. �� GD 90 —/C C• THICK. INDICATED BY STAB INCHES THICK, INDICATED BY E %P. PRESS IN. N G O — S� SP' OR' OVEN DRY S. S. D, APP. SUBBASE I/I FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE 4 „r L- I- I P, L, PA, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD. PRESS jD / �O _ .2y -I y BY E %PAN. PRESS 50 w WET -7% DRY AVG. SPEC. 3 O p AT EQUIL. SPEC. 00 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK, OF LOVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 _ 9 5U III LART . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F•3011.42.1 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAD C AFTER AWARD OF CONiifRACT E CONTROL TESTS ON Ky MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS • • ROAD NO COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Materiel Testing Section REXQ -RT OF TESTS ON y9 • Base- PROJECT NAME • TEST NO%, FIELD NO. co two. P.O. FED. NO. DATE REPTD. 0 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J /n hn ze.a CONTRACTOR Pgar/c LCV,.c 1f. C, SEND REPORT TO CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE ® MAINTENANCE SURD U PERMITS LJ AGENCY: (� SAMPLE OF Ll �. P DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE / LOCH. OF SOURCE DATE SAMPLED / /- S- -6g B' A m t f TITLE E j r- RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS I TEST SPECIMEN A I B C p E SIEVE AS USED BPECIF, LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. M015TURE AT COMPACTION °o J DRY DENSITY OFLRIO.. #IPD. FT. 212 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" $ /�0 EXUDATION PRESS, P.S,I. Il�r O� LK —TAO THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS, IN, 6 1 SP, OR, OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE Ih FINE BASE y0 COARSE SURFACE 4 z'1 25 L.L. 1 P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE 9 TRAFFIC INDEX I6 DURABILITY FIrvE COARSE 6PEC. j BY EXUO. PRESS ]D �J _ $; -I j BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 Iti WET DRY AVG. SPEC. 3 jj AT EDUIL. SPEC. too INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. z oo 1 Z u su r U I I LART . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NCO, REMARKS: /! %% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 2 Bv� u:RESiDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -42.1 AGGREGATE do SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER ®3 - COARSE, MEDIUM, FINE I ❑I s - COARSE, MEDIUM, FINE • B PROJECT TUSTIN 4 IRVINE RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J. J( SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. 6070 ❑ LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE Oranj OWNER OR MANUFACTURER I . d us trii DATE SAMPLED 11x13 "68 BY!Ti FOR USE AS: BASE COURSE C] • ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MA IA� ESTING ENGINEER J47,8�! �� ::. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) By P- 3011 -43.1 BITUMINOUS COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Meforiaf Tes}ing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON COUNTY PLANT NO. ASPHALT CONCRETE CONT. NO of TYPE B (W.O.., P.O. NO. o(AHFP)) _ IF CONTRACT USE CONTRACT ITEM DATE REPTD. 11- 14--68 AGENCY NEWPORT BEACH hnson yyyyy'3 CONTRACTOR MISIRV- AAGENCY rJ MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 65100 ® 120150 ❑ e LIMITS OF PROJECT � 1 As halt &IIt& Ile REPRESENTED 120QONS + C$. Criddle TITLE L;T.1 FINISH COURSE ❑ RESURFACE ❑ GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMENS TIME SP EC. sPEc. No. A B C D E F SPECIF TEMPERwTVflE MOISTURE [�, BITUMEN GRADE 99 H BIT. RATIO SP. DR. BRIO. 7] 1 71 aye'% STAB. RESULTS 3 0 C2 J 40--55 COW RESULTS B 35 39 27"40 16 RT,VALUE 30 W SUSC. HzO Io SWELL I.. XRS.) 200 3- PERMEABILITY % Bit. 1 5. . - vwPOR sus.. GRApNG OBTAINED BY COMBINING BINS AS FOLLOWS: BIN TWT. %By WT. A 1 y1Y0 ,15 NO. CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. STABILOMETER COHESION 3 V 5 FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE CRUSHED PARTICLES— AGGREGATE) % 15 MIN. T]` F. Z 142 rT FIELD COMP. P. GR. LAB, 5P. DR. RELATIVE COMP. 1 2280 40 RECOMMENDED BIT. CONTENT CONSIDERING ALL TEST DATA % REMARKS: EQUIV. GAL. PER SO. YD. FOR 1" COMPACTED SURFACE= SAND EQUIVALENT SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY AGO. COMP. MIX 8• 3 -3 13-LUO 1:31 32 C] Preliminor tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to word o�centmct. Re74E 5T ROAD DEPARTMENT 0 68 Material Testing Section TEST NO. C— S %¢.f- FIELD NO. �b�Z a Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION W.0. P.ORORO.HFP7 4d.� l materials actually • entering into works. DATE REP —LQ If contract, use contract item PROJECT — u:r;, .� - `(. =IJ.0 l AGENCY- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) iJ e7 CONTRACYOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIDE AGERCV �y MAINTENANCE ❑ sueo. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION T�s'fh- %' ✓���^ RT Q OF (. STA La ioo I REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL TS. DEPTH �3" TO ZO" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATF //- 2 °r•8 TESTED BY: 11 &4-"' i t IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB B C WT. SAND RETAINED WT. SAND_USED Z2.9S' Z bj El F TEST SAND DENSI TYY VOLUME SAND USED _ _m VOLUME CONE + RING ,B, MOIST ._ ^LM N G TEST HOLE / HWT. !VOLUME EXC. SAMPLE + TARE o I TARE WEIGHTLo DRY WT. 3T J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE • FIELO LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 Qj MOIST ._ ^LM N SP, GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION. DRY WT. ROCK ?i 5- b WET WT. - 1 a Qj DRY WT. 3T TOTAL DRY WT. %, ROCK . % MOISTURE CORR.MAX.OENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276-F RFCFIVED I S- 1140 t A r METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X33 MOISTURE Gbl, RC = f4S/} t % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • NOV ' 1968 PUBLIC Din. BY .� RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATE LS ENGINEER F9011.83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • _ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 3 4 Qj INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2cFpp lJO P WET WT. AT COMPACTION. 2 4r, C> ?i 5- b Qj _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD_ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10-83 T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D _ UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K=-j" + G CONE .1667 - L =K= (100x, +N) Q =0- 000%, +N) SM. RING -.0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) - Q V = FACTOR x _ S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276-F RFCFIVED I S- 1140 t A r METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X33 MOISTURE Gbl, RC = f4S/} t % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • NOV ' 1968 PUBLIC Din. BY .� RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATE LS ENGINEER F9011.83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION 0 Preliminory tests prior to .word of contract. G Control tests on materials actually entering into works COUNTY OF ORANGE • ROAD DEPARTMENT Malenai 1 ming JCG119e RELATI4 f COMPACTION ,z � r �.. TEST N . C- FIELD NO. tONT. No. OR IW.O. OR P . 0�S F _ IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND p DATE REPTD. // -4-`g WT. SAND RETAINED WT. SAND USED _ TEST SAND DENSITY gI, grr El f�" retract, use coniroct item VOLUME CONE + RING GI PROJECT %ur AGENCY C't ;eue zd "roa� Bne'r�i I RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR)_ G.i/,(,, .-, CONTRACTOR "d-,0� _ __ __ WET WT. EX C. SAMPLE SEND REPORT TO+: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIDE Ip AGENCY pl MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION %u,'j�ie .. �i ✓inr. -•� +w RT (0 OF rL STA S-le -fo0 REPRESENTING LIMITS -- CO RR. MAX. DEN SITY R TYPE MATERIAL Z' 7-15. DEPT, � TO ZO" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE //- Z - GJ3 TESTED BY: �- s CONDITION OF MOLD _ _ IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND p B C D WT. SAND RETAINED WT. SAND USED _ TEST SAND DENSITY gI, grr El VOLUME SAND USED_ -S'S`8 F VOLUME CONE + RING GI VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. C. SAMPLE + TARE /� — I TARE WEIGHT -T 00 J _ __ __ WET WT. EX C. SAMPLE K L WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IN PLACE_ -1 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE • - FIELD LAB _ WET WT. _ MOLD N0. AP. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 MOIST. ;M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK z4UO WET WT. - 3 <_ DRY WT. - s Q TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK -- CO RR. MAX. DEN SITY R REMARKS: 0Mfs7L Test Method Calif. 216 -F 0 i B- METHOD A ❑ B �I SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 117 /Z9 MOISTURE U RC= 9/ % TENT. RC - % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY T. / /� /'.G�If RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATER LS ENGINEER r3011 -63.I RELATIVE COMPACTION :.......:...:.... .r • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ MOLD N0. AP. 1 .9r 2 `- 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2 q0 a a 4 eilo P WET WT. AT COMPACTION z4UO 2-1 o Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. -- R _ %MOISTURE FIELD Z. CONDITION OF MOLD _ G(, /L,y puav S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN //- UU / T WET DENSITY Z9_ 2 f2 . V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G = E - F K = J + G CONE .1667 - L = K _ (I000% +N) Q = 0 - (1007 + N) SM. RING _ .014_3 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: 0Mfs7L Test Method Calif. 216 -F 0 i B- METHOD A ❑ B �I SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 117 /Z9 MOISTURE U RC= 9/ % TENT. RC - % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY T. / /� /'.G�If RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATER LS ENGINEER r3011 -63.I RELATIVE COMPACTION :.......:...:.... .r ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4z�•p to award o1 contract. . } ROAD DEPARTMENT �" �& C D WT. SAND USED TEST SAND DENSITY Material Testing Section TEST NO. C -5_770 E F VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CONE + RING 'ad FIELD NO. / vv :9 Control tests on 'RELATIVE R COMPACTION ON T. NO OR (W O OR P O O�gOJ I materials actually I .3 Zo J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ",.55 • entering into works. L N• S DATE REPTD. % MOISTURE If item _. contract, use contract CONDITION OF MOLD VAF a PROJECT „gkAGENCY RESIDENT ENGIISER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR '' -��`- Cr✓N��” SEND REPORT TOi' CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCDe k5. MAINTENANCJE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION TLS T,%1/ /$ RT; "CT OF S T A -31e 7S REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL G TIry S DEPTH l !j TO Zg_-,27 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE //- / L 8 TESTED BY: ��+ ' -� /i e.ri• E= C+ D IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4z�•p B WT. SAND RETAINED C D WT. SAND USED TEST SAND DENSITY 36.p 01 E F VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CONE + RING 'ad G I VOLUME TEST HOLE - MITI. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE ,7 I TARE WEIGHT I .3 Zo J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ",.55 K L WET DENSITY IN PLACE - +,Z DRY DENSITY IN PLACE R ",METHOD A MOI -.URE SAMPLE _ -- FIELD LAB — WET WT.-_ DRY WT. _ MAXIMUM.DENSITY RATHOLE DATA '; MOIST. 3 - -, SP. GR. ROCK 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN WET WT. ROCK 'ad DRY WT. ROCK P WET WT. AT COMPACTION _ WET WT. - 23 ¢3 DRY WT. - i Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. TOTAL DRY WT.-.-,. 7, ROCK R % MOISTURE CORR.MAX.DENSITY - REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RECEIVED NOV 61968 140 1 B- _5 METHOD A ❑ B IS SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I MOISTURE Z ' I/G / RC = 3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH CCU 19 BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENG •I MATE LS ENGINEER F3011 -63,1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • _ MAXIMUM.DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO . 3 - -, 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 'ad P WET WT. AT COMPACTION _ - ° cc 23 ¢3 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE - _ CONDITION OF MOLD VAF a S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY I I 2 , z• ! 34, O V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE .1667 - L= K= (100 -1 +N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .014_3 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RECEIVED NOV 61968 140 1 B- _5 METHOD A ❑ B IS SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I MOISTURE Z ' I/G / RC = 3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH CCU 19 BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENG •I MATE LS ENGINEER F3011 -63,1 RELATIVE COMPACTION . 1-1 Preliminary tests prior Ll to A award of contract. LAB ® Control fee Ts "on za-. materials actually C entering into works. /, COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material. Testing Sectitit TES _CIE RELATIVE C1 i ACTT N -w PROJECT RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) T• SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGE �- LOCATION 7►15�`/N •✓i REPRESENTING LIMITS,_ TYPE MATERIAL G /MC T+eEhh W -*;'/L DEPTH DATE TESTED BY: A IN PLACE DENSITY A INIT_ IAL WT. TEST SAND LAB BI WT. SAND RETAINED L = K = (100 , +N) C WT. SAND USED /, D TEST SAND DENSITY N E VOLUME SAND US_ED_T_ WET WTr,.ROCK F VOLUME CONE + RING I .1469. G VOLUME TEST HOLE '/$ H AM WT. EXC. SPLE + TARE ZS- 40. I TARE WEIGHT 3.10 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 22.3p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 1 L _ DRY DENSITY IN PLACE DA`7E' REPJDf - �/� Icf item �:°Ccrv�wEWPO,er- SE�c« _CONTRACTOR %4 ^'A% CO. ST INTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ BEV RT 0 OF (� STA 3*ZS MET,HGD A " �M01 7644E SAMPLE FACTOR x Q = ELD LAB WET WT, K= J+ G L = K = (100 , +N) DRY WT. R= (P —Q)_Q V= FACTOR) Q 4. S ho MOIST. M N SP. GR,. ROCK WET WTr,.ROCK DRY WY:`ROCK <.. `. WET WT. DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK. CORR.MAX'.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATA �. DATA, MOLD N0. I C.C. 1 C. C. 2 '44— " 3. 4 101 INITIAL WT.SPECIM EN p P WET WT. AT COMPACTION ,x,40 Q 1 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. CONDITION OF MOLD /vI S 1 HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /0. CONV.'FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = C= A- B E=C-. D G= E- F K= J+ G L = K = (100 , +N) Q = 0 (1.00% + N) R= (P —Q)_Q V= FACTOR) Q 4. S REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F CONE LG_RI 110 1: A- U MES, C.F. gar. UNIT' CONE +UNIT LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I MOISTURE 7fr RC= TENT. RC = CIO SPECIFICATION: NL_% Aj I Preliminary tests prior Q !o award of contract a L .. .J I Q Control tests on IiA materials actually r entering into works. I COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT t ' Material Testing Secfiq T£s tl. C— S7 7 RELATIVE COMPACTION �N.. N°' OR (W.O. P O J1 > L TS PATE REFtF]�L�QWtG� If contract, use ccntrgst item PROJECT /u- %-wv- 2- /YY /.ve �, Croy /ivEy�pper BsAcN RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SONN50 CONTRACTOR 4111W 12 M. SEND REPORT TQ• CONSTRUCTION ❑ oursl - AGENCY .MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION rWl' :. RT © OF (� STA REPRESENTING LF ITS TYPE MATERIAL [-T. S. DEPTH IX ;, TO 20" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE Il-I'G8 'TESTED By,. & KEQ� a„ . IN. PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND. 38.YS _ WET WT. WT. SAND RETAINED 7 PO DRY WT. _ WT. SAND USED - IEVOLUME TEST SAND DENSITY eC SP. GR. ROCK SAND USED WET WT:.R0CK P VOLUME CONE + RING 7964 G VOLUME TEST HOLE . , f H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 24. Sc I TARE WEIGHT CORR.MAX.DENSITY J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE Z/• /S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE - J: METHOD A 't•URE SAMPLE • VEL_O' LAB _ WET WT. MOLD NO. 12 DRY WT. $ - "1. MOIST. INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN eC SP. GR. ROCK WET WT:.R0CK P DRY WT. p:::,'•'- WET WT. ;;',�; " DRY WT. = Q TOTAL DRY.W1'... % ROCK " CORR.MAX.DENSITY R Test Method Calif. 216 -F METHOD A ❑ B �.. SUMMARY 'kECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY:: M01 STI* 4' RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END:'OF MONTH _ I ,i • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 12 REMARKS: $ 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN eC P WET WT. AT COMPACTION p:::,'•'- ;;',�; " Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE - p CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /p T WET DENSITY / D V DRY DENSITY •- CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x.Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C_ D -`- UNIT GONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE •1667 L = K _ (100% +N) Q = 0 - (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x + S LG. RING .0302 .1969 Test Method Calif. 216 -F METHOD A ❑ B �.. SUMMARY 'kECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY:: M01 STI* 4' RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END:'OF MONTH _ I ,i REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F METHOD A ❑ B �.. SUMMARY 'kECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY:: M01 STI* 4' RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END:'OF MONTH _ I ,i r E k E ii, CALIFORNIA PRELIMINARY'1; -TICE ' a ., Q - S Under our rrqulsr tears of tltihs, P4Yt Is not Yet rky:. This notice 10jillifftrit m re8fot on the :. f:. Integrity of anyone. . cortneolei with this Job, but b'sent In etscordersoa with Sweden 119% . Ceiffornle Code of Chril P1 re OW Section 4210, CslHornis Goverment Core. " '94STRUCTION LENDER or YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT . . puted Construction Lender, if any ,;' , O W N E OWNER or PUBLIC AGENCY Ror Reputed Owner (on public work) (on private work) City of 'ef;rort Beach O 3300 i'iecaport 1vd. i,leitrport 3each, Calif. p L J We1ch's Coastal Concrete Co (name of person or firm furnishing labor, services, equip, P.O. ?3oX 421,Costa Mesa 92627 ment or material) : - (address of person or firm furnishing labor, services, equip- ment or material) has furnished or will furnish labor, services equipment. or materials of the following - general description: Ready Mixed Concrete (general description of the labor, services, equipment.or. material furnished or to be furnished) for the building, structure or other work of improvement.. looatedat:2jrd & Irvine».& Heather (address or description of job site Newport Beach sufficient for identification) The name cf the person or firm who contracted for the pur- chase of such labor, services, equipment or material is: Mark Constniction Co. Y(address of above person or firm) F °` °• "ERE An, estimate of the total price of the labor, services, equip- - 4 ',. t C� ment or materials furnished or to be furnished is: �^ (this must be furnished to construction lender —optional as to owner or contractor) If bills are not paid in full for labor; services, equipment or materials furnished or to be furnished, the improved property may be subject to mechanic's liens. ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR or Reputed Contractor, if any Dated: 4 ar f.p: 'frig ure) title) ' 1.4ark..Conati:, t'iian Co. 1f16�6 sa 'd rove 13AI n v a ❑Pro im pM, .'*ry jests prior to awa of coGtract. ®Control bests ciit moteriol4 actually". • entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION IMP. 8• F, TEST ND. C– •�fl FIELD NO. COOT. NO.- �+N (W.O, OR P.O. O_ aHFPI �• DATE PROJECT 19"Jil J 6 2-3 R01 AGENCY C"1 M. 5. RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) --Cl Uw- ='U14 r-1 CONTRACTOR A C OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTnRUCTION ❑ acENCV ® tvlA1NT ANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION =t?�f N E Di -i1d. 42, K%• RT LT OF q- STA 1$ +7O REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE.,MATERIAI IMP I. K. DEPTH ! G TO 8' BELOW FINISHED GRADE DBsa'F IO'-IE TESTED BY:_��,.Q �y'TE' IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND S B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 - C WT. SAND USED – .g Q D TEST SAND DENSITY____ WET WT. ROCK E VOLUME SAND USED Qf� F VOLUME CONE + RING . ) G —i VOLUME TEST HOLE '° "' HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 1 2 G. I TARE WEIGHT 2- 50 – J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 3 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE ,y L _ DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE - FIELD LAB WET WT. _ j 3 - DRY n M015'�_l_ 0 N SP. GR, ROCK ¢QO WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION____ WET WT. - -� a4-vw DRY WT, – a TOTAL DRY WT. DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. % ROCK CORR. MAX .DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216•F 0 RECFIIt FD C^T 2 1168 120 1 13- METHOD A ❑ B Q" SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 192- lfv MOISTURE 4^"41 DE.P RC = /2c:2 %` TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH PUBLIC Kim, 1, BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGRJ MATERI S ENGINEER F30t1 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 c:.,K' 24: 3 - 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2 Oo ¢QO P WET WT. AT COMPACTION____ ;z pp a4-vw Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD CL yd C'py'? S _ HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 149. V T WET DENSITY I i . d Vi DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C- D - UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L= K= (loo -, +N) Q =O =(100 +N) 5M. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) : Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216•F 0 RECFIIt FD C^T 2 1168 120 1 13- METHOD A ❑ B Q" SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 192- lfv MOISTURE 4^"41 DE.P RC = /2c:2 %` TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH PUBLIC Kim, 1, BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGRJ MATERI S ENGINEER F30t1 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. Fit Conrral tests on iA materials actually entering into works. PFA*rCT ta'4 Ne_-2e xESIDENT ENGINEER ONSPEC SEND REPORT TO: CONSTR LOCATION -TQ V)NE REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIA DATE IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAS B C D WT. SAND RETAINED WT. SAND USED TEST SAND DENSITY_ ! _ E F VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CONE + RING 5607 I Cj G VOLUME TEST HOLE /9f7 HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 12 $, I TARE WEIGHT _ _ , 0 Q J WET WT. EM SA DRY WT. := K WET DENSITY IN PLACE I /Z7, Z L _ DRY DENSITY IN PLACE CORR.MAX.OENSITY COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Seelie RELATIVE COMPACI i✓os- &K Lm TESTED 0 TEST NQ. C�SoTx rttttu � iENCY ® MAINTE CE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ TSID / f 42 "- `C. RT LT OF (� STA 2- 21+(PC) DEPTH 3 fC TO Z/ BELOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAS WET WT. 2 6.5C 3 DRY WT. — +- INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN "? MOIST. I M N SP, GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK 2400 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT.- 4 DRY WT. := TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK R CORR.MAX.OENSITY F /rLd REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216•F Pi 1 9- 1140 METHOD A ❑ EI SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /e2 7 /.3 7 MOISTURE �' O E/P RC = �i'3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL`% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATER LS ENGINEER raa,l.es.t RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 WW 2 6.5C 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN e^400 2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 �j Q 4 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R %MOISTURE F /rLd -- 2•S CONDITION OF MOLD___ u - S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 1,0.-,1-7 /a. 45 T WET DENSITY i /34.4 1 /silo. VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J = G CONE •1667 - L= K= (1001 +N) Q= O= (100 %,+N) SM. RING .014_3 .1810 R = (P -Q) : Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216•F Pi 1 9- 1140 METHOD A ❑ EI SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /e2 7 /.3 7 MOISTURE �' O E/P RC = �i'3 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL`% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATER LS ENGINEER raa,l.es.t RELATIVE COMPACTION .. CALIFOAIA'f PRELIMINARY $0TICE In Acmrdanco With Section 1193, California Code Of Civil Proceduro and Section. 4210, Canld nfe'Oovernment Code - -' r l YOU ARE HEREBY Non( IED THAT - Y ` ' ONSTQLICTION LENDER or Reputed,Construction Lender, if any ' L i me of persdn or firm furnishing labor, services, equip - 'went oi'materian dress of poni mi ...firm furnishing labor, services, equip furnished or will furnish­19-41frIji.fikices equipment or erials of the following generat"a ipt* ��ie 'tstnotcw (general description. of_ the labor, services, equipment or ' -`inateriaf furnished or to be furnished) for the building, structure or other work of improvement ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR or Reputed Contractor, if any 4 OWNER 4 or located at: 130161 ' (address or description of job site OWNER or PUBLIC AGENCY or Reputed Owner (on public work) " - ., su !dent for identification) (on private work) The name of the person or firm who contracted for the pur- chase of such labor,. services, equipment or material is: 330 US& o, . NAN ONUMMON 0014"M �epert Dl�wh• �iforoi.a ��� d �, . _. _ L J - (address of above person or firm) An estimate of the total price of the labor; services, equip- -FOLD NER11 . ment or materials furnished or to be furnished is: (this must be furnished to construction lehder— optional, as ' to owner or contractor) If bills are not paid in full for`istiOF, services; equipment or materials fbrnished or to be furnished, the improved property may be subject to mechanic's liens. ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR or Reputed Contractor, if any 4 OWNER 4 or co "r i CALIFIIA PRELIMIN OTICE 4 re Acgwdm" With Section 1192, California Cede Of Civil P 'n 4210, California Government Cis O 4." _ YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFI CONSTRUCTION LENDER or E Reputed Construction Lender If an—' r V at �$ ly L _ ink FOLD MERE OWNER or or Reputed Owner (on private work) F amr 4W slam► urn L PUBLIC AGENCY (on public work) . FOLD HERE_— ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR or Reputed Contractor, if any '(name of person' or merit or material) ,(address of person rim furnishing labor, services, equip- J "erit or. material) ` has furnished or will furnish, labor,.seivices equipment or materials of the followmg,gene scr(ptlon: , (general description of the labtib _services, equipment or material furnished or to be furnished) for the, buildingstructure or other work of improvement to i000ted at (address or description of job site #teha Oallt sufficient for identification) µ The name of the person or firm who contracted for the pur- 4`' chase of such labor, services, equipment or, material is: rat aaa. '(address of above person or firm) An estimate of the total price of the labor, services, equip- - ment or materials furnished or t4 be furnished is: S (this must be furnished to construction lender— optional as to owner or contractor) OWNER COPY-,.,' If bills are not paid in full for labor, services, equipment or materials furnished or to be furnished, the improved property may be subject to mechanic's liens. oared iitll.,e 4 196 IJ a � 1 (signature) ,(title) 5 r ti� ❑Preliminary tests prior to.owarq aXcontract. Control tests on materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE CMPACTIHIi PROJECT e eVi.vf 1/>6I RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G• '��N13a SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ t3tlYSIDE AGENFY LOCATION REPRESENTING LIMITS _ TYPE MATERIAL AI C, DEPTH DATE 9-1,9-6-S TESTED BY: /L • . IIN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND WET WT.- 0 B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED .S,r D TEST SAND DENSITY -3. o E _ VOLUME SAND USED _ 3.607* F VOLUME CONE +RING 1 . 0 G VOLUME TEST HOLE a ROCK •: H I WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 13 CLN t2 I TARE WEIGHT �r '00 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN.PLACE 3 Y �N6Wif1.e7� .lirer��!['�V _CONTRACTOR NTENAN�5 ❑- SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ �S ALT OF 's-rA rffs't� Y ,TOE a M BELOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A STURE SAMPLE 'FIELD LAB WET WT.- 0 1 DRY WT. �p/ 3 MOIST. / M /}, , N. SP. GR. ROCK p WET WT. ROCK.` -3. o DRY WT. ROCK ;x* WET WT. DRY WT. -"— I $ n 3 TOTAL DRY !SYT. Q a ROCK •: CORR.MAX.DENSI:TY 13 CLN t2 • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ MOLD NO. 1 2 . 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C- D UNIT CONE }UNIT G =E — F K =J =G CONE .1667 — L = K —. (100 0 +N) Q = 0 _ (100`0 + N) SM. RING :0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q + S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 0 RECEIVED SEP 2 61968 I10 i A• METHOD A IR B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. :PLACE DENSITY. t— /3 MOISTURE'/0 RC= /q 7 7 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH PUBLIC V>io�Ks DEPT. BY 'm/ A� M TERIALS ENGINEER ' RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) "y' RELATIVE COMPACTION i ❑Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE ': MOIST. I M G, N BI C to sword of contract. • ROAD DEPARTMENT D TEST SAND DENSITY_ —_� INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Material Testing Section TEST O. C— 96 6;6' .f FIVOLUME CONE+ RING FIELD NO,� - a ICI u[z( Coatral tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION aR ` °NT OR Iw. O. OR P.O. AI HF PD EXC. SAMPLE +TARE materials actually I TARE WEIGHT entering into works. OG SZ ^n E K WET DENSITY IN PLACE If contract, use contract item ATE REPTD. PROJECT XANIW, AGENCY tiUC- C 1AAe Boa [ RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) �+- J 9*A4 S 0iV CONTRACTOR- �Yx SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENC°YE ❑ MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 1.Y'Vi1c -. s` /boo riV.CY' Zr e,:, Y LT OF' STT+ REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL -dr/�. DEPTH —_ r♦ TO /Dy BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE `- - /fi - / B TESTED BY: V • 16SAk _ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ': MOIST. I M G, N BI C WT. SAND RETAINED_ WT. SAND USED - D TEST SAND DENSITY_ —_� INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN E VOLUME SAND USED_ _ -�3 FIVOLUME CONE+ RING 1 4G S G VOLUME TEST HOLE ,S HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE -� I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT EXC. SAMPLE v K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE /jg.- METHOD A_ MO,IS UDRE�S —T ---- rr --LEE F E IZ LAB WET WT. DRY WT. tJ -- ': MOIST. I M G, N SP. GR. ROCK D WET WT. ROCK 4 DRY WT. ROCK INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN WET WT. - 'a DRY WT. - s ^ TOTAL DRY WT. WET WT. AT COMPACTION %, ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION _6 _DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100% +N) Q =O - (I DO% +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q _ 5 LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A a B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 13S" /37 MOISTURE 7q q �U RC = _ —L— % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH By MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) :ryall -es.t RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior C COUNTY OF ORANGE I ❑ ROAD DEPARTMEN. Material Testing Seem T TEST NO C- -S+G 6 ` M FIELD NO. .T --q Control tests on I RELATIVE COMPACTION C CONT NO.OR materials actuolly _ entering into works. r _. ATE REPTD. 9 - �Q —liFs • e If contract, use contract item PROJECT_ L/zf1/N6 4yZ—,. - - AGTENCY e-% n RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G G 011 ,111&901s -CONTRACTOR- 4 4godillyA SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSID LOCATION �pViy �4T.er1�°' _ _ �G L LT OF(��'STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL + +�'DE PTH ~ TO 4 4 ~ BELOW FINISHED GRADE _ DATE-5 t3 TESTED B �i T IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND Ell WT. S AND RETAINED C WT. SAND USED D TEST SAND DEN_S1 TY E VOLUME SAND _USED F VOLUME CONE + RING , /gGg GI VOLUME TEST HOLE WINT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE z e p I TARE WEIGHT _ 3� 0 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE_ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE —� /..T METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE Flt LAB WET WT. _- 3ab _. DRY WT. . MOIST. I�M ,J3 _ N SP. GR. ROCK I 6a— WET WT. ROCK 4, p DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - s DRY WT. - e ' ), TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK I CORR.MAX.DENSITY •7 C 'F • _ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 - 3 - 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD__ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= 0 UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J _ G CONE .1667 - L= K- (100'": +N) Q= 0-(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: lest Method (-alit. Z16 -t- 0 1 B� 140 y METHOD A a B Cl SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PLACE DENSITY I.3� MOISTURE / O RC= 96 % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) _ MATERIALS ENGINEER - %x3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE Flt LAB WET WT. _- 3ab _. DRY WT. . MOIST. I�M ,J3 _ N SP. GR. ROCK I 6a— WET WT. ROCK 4, p DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - s DRY WT. - e ' ), TOTAL DRY WT. ROCK I CORR.MAX.DENSITY •7 C 'F • _ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 - 3 - 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD__ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= 0 UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J _ G CONE .1667 - L= K- (100'": +N) Q= 0-(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: lest Method (-alit. Z16 -t- 0 1 B� 140 y METHOD A a B Cl SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PLACE DENSITY I.3� MOISTURE / O RC= 96 % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) _ MATERIALS ENGINEER - %x3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • _ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 - 3 - 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD__ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= 0 UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J _ G CONE .1667 - L= K- (100'": +N) Q= 0-(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: lest Method (-alit. Z16 -t- 0 1 B� 140 y METHOD A a B Cl SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PLACE DENSITY I.3� MOISTURE / O RC= 96 % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) _ MATERIALS ENGINEER - %x3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION REMARKS: lest Method (-alit. Z16 -t- 0 1 B� 140 y METHOD A a B Cl SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PLACE DENSITY I.3� MOISTURE / O RC= 96 % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) _ MATERIALS ENGINEER - %x3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Prefiminar tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award aXcontract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST 7 FIELD NO �f —, RELATIVE COMPACTION N` N °R COrltroi tests an IW.O. OR P.O. OR AIK5 mutiriol's actually �- • entering into works. dA! O &A qTE REPT D. �-�Zp —p$ If contra se contract item PROJECT S1gV 11V4—; AV6_ AGENCY Bea c� RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J01YUSO& CONTRACTOR Ma*-& SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIDE -- MAINTENA NCI� ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ ' LOCATION t.6!!V1A6;E ?f; <A z'0'P� �t /mss, 0'9' _Z4 C LT OF(!r�S4FA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL -4,11, e0e'l t'Oele EZZ' DEPTH .y11 TO. f / BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE � - /.I TESTED BY: ,�,• �'S if t' I _ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND �, t,C EI WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. USED N D TEST SAND DENSITY WET WT. ROCK E F G VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CONE +RING VOLUME TEST HOLE I H!WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE DRY WT. - i^ I TARE WEIGHT) DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE CORR.MAX.DENSITY K WET DENSITY IN PLACE_ % MOISTURE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD. LAB WET WT. DO - -- DRY 3 "= MOIST._ M ,o N SP. GR. ROCK too WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. AT COMPACTION WET WT. - e z O. O DRY WT. - i^ 1 TOTAL DRY WT. DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. % ROCK 7 CORR.MAX.DENSITY G * . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE - 1667 - +N) Q =0- (100 .0143 .1810 1 R = (P-Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 276-F • IGE 130 ME METHOD A 0 B ❑. SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY Lgo 137 MOISTURE b a RC = 9 S % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH - RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATERIALS ENGINEER 13011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTR T ROAD DEPT. OPOTENTIAL SOURCE 5 ED Material Testing ection 9 TEST NO.� —I�(93 IIO¢� I /OS� AFTER AWARD OF CON ACT REPORT OF TESTS ON, FIELD NO. CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY P. C. C. Iw.o'.rP.O.N.. . ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS CLASS: 1� SIZE: i a FED. NO. DATE REPTD. yt /2 -de' IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT N^ME RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) JO.NN.SOAI CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE SUB'D� PERMITS AGENCY: �'jTY AGENCY of NE'La /o'.eT ,�iG.lC/il SAMPLE OF LLi45S 'FAq SONG SAMPLE FROM LIMITS OF SAMPLE 2S?dyi LOCA. OF SOURCE • DATE SAMPLED BY JC%ii Ii SON TITLE Jjt/S ®, RECEIVED a' -14Ir-6W FOR USE IN 91 411 B ,^ 0ECFIVE0 SEP 18 1968 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RES j6 *@NhtpI-a jR.) L F- 3011 -.a.1 CONCRETE & MIX DESIGN MATERIALS ENGINEER MENEM 0ECFIVE0 SEP 18 1968 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RES j6 *@NhtpI-a jR.) L F- 3011 -.a.1 CONCRETE & MIX DESIGN MATERIALS ENGINEER • • O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CO NT T SOURCE ROAD DEPT. Material Tefi }ing'Seetion, A QPOTENTIAL S ED C lE57 NO. AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT SIEVE 6B— //9./ . I20--.W A8 USED CONTROL TESTS ON COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. R E P O R T O•F -T,E'S T S O N FIELD NO. corrr. xo. MATERIALS ACTUALLY o. dOS Iw.D. o. e.o. xo. ENTERING INTO WORKS MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % c• FED. NO. O SPECIAL TESTS DATE REPTD. DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /IV, FT .F-CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ' ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME ~ %us�rs - �rvino - I .. RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) !j d k CO NtRACTOR�.� SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION 0 OUTSIDE ® MAINTENANCE SUB'D 'PERMITS I AGENCY r AGENCY : y! ?.�i ---4 SAMPLE OF � DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCH. OF SOURCE Li.-ir- - DATE SAMPLED BY AQ��4E. TITLE EiL RECEIVED - �r ---,: FOR USE IN , L. u • SEP 18 296$ PUBLIC IVOW UtNI. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.121 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL I GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B, C D E SIEVE A8 USED 6PECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /IV, FT 211 STABILOMETER VALUE -R.. Z EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. 112 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. SP. GP. OVEN ORY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I/1 FINE BASE 3j COARSE SURFACE o Q L, L, I P. L. P.1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY EXUD. PRESS 3D J BY E %PAN. PRESS 50 J ° WET DRY AVG. SPEC, p AT E1U1L. 6PEC. 100 Z INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. ZBD SU IU LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: ZZ 0. IRS , L. u • SEP 18 296$ PUBLIC IVOW UtNI. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.121 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER AGGREGATE & SOIL I OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR corm. Na. or TO AWARD OF CONTR T OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SA ED FED. NO. AFTER AWARD OF CONT ACT DATE REPTD. CONTROL TESTS ON - SIEVE MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • -Q SPECIAL TESTS • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON L, Ts IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM TEST NO. ZO FIELD NO. corm. Na. or TEST SPECIMEN IM'.O. or P.O. Nu. ANPP ¢OS FED. NO. C DATE REPTD. E SIEVE ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME J/ /7 — AnZI1C / RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) G / � CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIBE MAINTENANCE SUB'D E PERMITS 13 AGENCY AGENCY: Clo� Z &4W2! SAMPLE OF DEPTH LIMITS OF 5AMPLEmyS ;s O� 1�f QL.S� +f... Rf ®>: Ste. B... /T7� -„j"�p ,,•jfa. iFyf LOCA. OF SOURCE v GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A IS C D E SIEVE .A' Wr LIMITS BMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PR ORE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. #11U. IT 2111l STABILOMETER VALUE "R" Z OB �0� O OQ EXUDATION PRESS. P.9.1. 112 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES - 1 THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. SP. OR. OVEN DRY B.S.D. APP, SUBBASE I/2 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE ,t L. L. I P. L. F. L COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY E%UD, PRESS 30 J j BY E %PAN. PRESS 5B W 0 MEET DRY AVG. SPEC. Q AT EOUIL. SPEC. INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. p3 5U U L. SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE _ OPTIMUM MOISTURE - RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: Rcc,r(vtu SEP 1 81968 PUBLIC W hhs u0s RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F•9011d4.1 AGGREGATE i SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONT T SOURCE S *ED ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section a OPOTENTIAL AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT . _TEST N0. yzacG X207/ TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO ®CONTROL MATERIALS ACTUALLY M• DDNT.N'i';' Iw.o. o. P.o. Nom. �AxeT•1 Q�s- ENTERING INTO WORKS O SPECIAL TESTS FED. NO, DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT. USC CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TsiS /w0— �rF�,AP - RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) IS s�e�n_r - CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION 0 SLIDE MAINTENANCE SUB'D PERMITS AGENCY: C'�)L DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /i'U. FT. SAMPLE OF � DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLEmr Aid G2sa O Rf iL�s 57v IE.� SL, LOCH. OF SOURCE -- —� OWNER OR STABILOMETER VALUE "R" NTI7v EPRESENTED MANUFACTURER DATE SAMPLED �9 B'l.Si��g7�1F.d[j� TITLE RECEIVED FOR USE IN • GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A a C D E SIEVE M• SPEC IT H LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOIST Oft AT COMPACTION % - J DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /i'U. FT. 21/2 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. I1l2 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I yo 97 p4 08 9S - -io0 THICK, INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. 3// SP. OR. OVEN DRY B.S.D. APP. SUBBASE Ill KINE BASE jj COARSE SURFACE A L. L. I P. L. P. I- COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EXUD. PRESS DD <1 BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 ul u WET DRY AVG. SPEC. Q AT EOUIL. SPEC. 100 INDICATED MINI MUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 2DO 51.1 I U LART . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: s' B.L- V1:1vtD • SEP 181968 PUBLIC W0NKs IIlE RESIDENT ENG NEE&ITY ENGR.) ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH F-3011 -42.1 A66REGATE 3 SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAED AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. • Ma}erial TesTing Secfion REPORT OF TESTS ON IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM FEST NO. 40a?-X- ZO %2 20 FIELD NO. cow XG. W.O. or FED. NO. DATE REPTD. ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME %LYS/is �rAI /d RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO:1 CONSTRUCTION OGENIDE ®' 4le MAINTENANCE SUB'D PERMITS SIEVE © Z AGENCY: C� ZftAOT SPECIF, LIMITS COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. SAMPLE OF DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCH. OF SOURCE MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % DATE SAMPLED B'! TITLE FOCI SS RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS ,:'T ST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE © Z AS U SED ,SOUGHT SPECIF, LIMITS COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % j DRY DENSITY OF BRNi.. }RII -U. FT. 211 STASILOMETER VALUE "R" Z Fi QQ EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. II/2 THICK, INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I �Od 'S Q THICK. INDICATED BY E %P, PRESS, IN. *j SP. OR, OVEN DRY S.S,D, APP. SUBBASE II] FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L. P. L. P. L COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 11 DUPABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, W BV E%UD. Pq E56 jD � pY EXPAN. PRESS s W e WET DRY I AVO. SPEC. Q AT EQU1L. SPEC. DD INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 2N SU 11 (ART- BPE0. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: REGFIVED SEP 181968 , PUBL 4 QEE RESM w9INE�R Q IENGRJ ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER F•3011 -I2.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN I TO AWARD OF CONT ROAD DEPT. A B OPOTENTIAL SOURCE 5 ED Materiel Testing Section E SIEVE AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT TEST NO. 6�8' f9;20�,.. 2'¢79,9 .- I (a CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF T E S T S ON FIELD NO. RSJ MATERIALS ACTUALLY cDPT. ro. or aOS IW.O. or P.O. Nu.o PI ENTERING INTO WORKS O SPECIAL TESTS FED. NO. G S DATE REPTD. I R IF CONTRACT, T. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME - RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO CONSTRUCTION �GENCY MAINifNANCE SUB'D PERMITS C3 AGENCY: �'�;L„ /�r� 213 F SAMPLE OF T DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLEdDa, LOCA. OF SOURCE 2 `I • GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN I A B C D E SIEVE M 5PECIF. �/ LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S. I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. JNr'U, FT. 213 STABILOMETER VALUE "R' 2 O 00 00 Otl' /OcT EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. III THICK'., INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES 9 Qd ' 9f /,00 THICK. INDICATED BY E.P. PRESS, IN. 11b SP. OR. OVEN DRY 5 .O. APP. SUBBASE FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE 1 L. L. P. L. P. L COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX Ib DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. W BY EXUD. PRESS J J by EXPAN. PRESS 50 u B WET DRY AV O. SPEC. Q AT EQU1L. SPEC. I� INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 101 SU IU LART• SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: L, . I y C U S EP 181968 PUBLIC Woghs DEPT. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011•4ZT BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH A"REGATE III SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER • • O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTR� ROAD DEPT. OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SA ED Material Testing Section AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT TEST NO. GB -P- ?092-7095" CONTROL TESTS ON R E PORT O F TESTS ON FIELD NO. MATERIALS ACTUALLY : coxT. xo. o. _ ENTERING INTO WORKS Iw.D. a. v.o. x.. ARV- -Slp„$ yyPP�_" FED. NO. 'ir,SPECIAL TESTS L, DATE REPTD. 9- /3 -re 8 _ IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. ^• PROJECT NAMEY: RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) G l A I CONTRACTOR C SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION AGENCY: C OUTSIDE ® AGENCY MAINTENANCE SUB'D C] PERMITS i SA MPIE OF AB• ��� DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE �aStm.33'�,�f aSf 3(.��P>A nsSfo 30� R>< 10=SYb 29 tiAP1 . GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A I Is C D E SIEVE AB• ��� SPECIE. ^ �/ LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P. 5.1, MOISTURE AT OOMPACTION % DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #ICU. FT, i1I1 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 1 O OO m0 Oo EXUDATION PRESS, P.S.I. Dy THICK. INDICATED BY STAB, INCHES 1 '8 ' ff18 S '� �G1Q THICK. INDICATED BY Ex P, PRESS, IN. SP. OR. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP, SUBBASE IIT PINE BASE Yp COARSE SURFACE X L. L. P, L, P.1, COHESION VALUE 8 TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COXRSE SPEC. j BY EXUD. PRESS 30 J BY EXPAN. PRESS SO W 0 WET DRY AVG. SPEC, Q AT EOUIL. OPEC. I- INDICATEO MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. TDD 5U ID LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: am- • SEP l y X9oo RESIDENT ENGINEER (CI A.) F.9011.44.1 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH AGGREGATE it SOIL I MATERIALS ENGINEER O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE ' TO AWARD OF CONT� ROAD DEPT. • Testing Section G OPOTENTIAL SOURCE S ED AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT Materiel FEST NO. I/{j p_ Z /pp ., CONTROL TESTS ON R E P O R T OF TESTS ON FIELD No. coxr.w °. °` SPECIE. SOUGHT MATERIALS ACTUALLY C 40S ENTERING INTO WORKS 1 • Q SPECIAL TESTS FED. NO. ' DATE REPTO. 9L-/g -6$ IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME TU •f• ✓ /I7Q RESIDENT ENGINEER 'IINSPECTOR) CV, IIWAI� .�,e�: CONTRACTOR �' ®r� • AGENCY: carx (l Byr 'w SAMPLE OF DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCH. OF SOURCE 77 TTyy MA F TURER EPRESN7E0 DATE SAMPLED 9 /f B'f /d. 10 ' ,� TITFE EAf�lET/ RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS ST SPECIMEN A B G D E AS USLIMITS SPECIE. SOUGHT AIR PRESSURE P S.;. COMPACTION %b ]Y OF BRIO.. #11U. FT M N1,1 UI ;VALUE "R' 2 O /1QO PREBB. P.S.I. CATED BY'STAG. INCHES 1 As. _ a THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. SP. GW OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE L. L P. 4. P. I. COHESION VALUE g TRAFFIC INDEX IQ DURABILITY FINE COARSE BPEC. M BY E%UD. PRESS 3 J j BY E %PAN. PRESS SD y ^ WET DRY AVG. SPEC. C A{ EOUIL, SPEC. I 10, INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. ZDO Su- lu LARY . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED; % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS; • RECEIVED SEP 18 1968 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER ���piF NG Naff ITY ENGR.) Iii AGGREGATE 3 SOIL ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE FIELD to award of contract. ' ROAD DEPARTMENT S ry ., Material Tesiing_Section TEST N oC- D _� TEST SAND DENSITY FIELD NO. OL Z Control tests on RELATIVE COMRACTION CONT. NO. OR �� A f W'O. OR P.O .O NlA FP) J 7K% materials actually entering into works. .: � DATE KEPT D, Q If contract, use contract item EXC. SAMPLE +TARE PROJECT r /.f'WAI& /9'.'. '_=�. AGENCY C�it/tu//�(LYT f ✓- :1C -// �f RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) V i1,::WdSCA/ CONTRACTOR lYYe/` /l SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑- w4OUTSIDE ENCV MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION- PU�it/� i1 Vim' x LT OF STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL LTS. t-0— DEPTH /.3 ' TO ZV" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 5?- / i -- €'a} TESTED BY: L- ./TN S IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND FIELD B WT. SAND RETAINED! S C WT. SAND USED 3 1 D _� TEST SAND DENSITY M E F VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CONE + RING ` WET WT. ROCK G VOLUME TEST HOLE HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE DRY WT. a I TARE WEIGHT_ _ J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE CO RR.MAX.DENSITY: K WET DENSITY IN PLACE x L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE • FIELD LAB E WT. MOLD NO. 1 r/ /J WT. 3 1 4 IST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - i. DRY WT. a Q TOTAL DRY WT. _ % ROCK CO RR.MAX.DENSITY: R REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F 0 RECEIVED SEP 191M Nall VYQnn F . RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) rsall.ea.l RELATIVE 140 I a- -S METHOD A ❑ B Iff SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PLACE DENSITY I IJ7 MOISTURE t3 /m V'6e RC = 9r�i % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY , - MAT ALS ENGINEER COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 r/ /J 2 3 1 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN r P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - R % MOISTURE / �- CONDITION OF MOLD V S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN p, 9 T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTO R=0.592 FACTOR x Q c VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C D UNIT CONE +UNIT G = E — F K = J -: G CONE .1667 — L = K (100^, +N) Q = 0 ; (1 Do � + N) RN G— SM. RG __01 43 .1810 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG. RfNG .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F 0 RECEIVED SEP 191M Nall VYQnn F . RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) rsall.ea.l RELATIVE 140 I a- -S METHOD A ❑ B Iff SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N OPT. PLACE DENSITY I IJ7 MOISTURE t3 /m V'6e RC = 9r�i % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY , - MAT ALS ENGINEER COMPACTION ❑PreI minory tests prior to award o contract. • ® 'q anti, Rr • t into- COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testi "�Oa RELATIVE` 6ACTION .,) contract, use contract item OAT ' B PROJECT Z�eie, -,V,C ---- 1 '1"`. - AGENCY ��•t<G'BdL� °rQT .C� RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) Q...?'-` X CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION '_WGIII GENCY 1� MAINTENANCES❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ;:07: LOCATION lB i4M LT OF q- STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL Z. 7-zs' n en' p'0_ DEPTH- •. �3 ' TO 2D ' 'BELOW NISHED GRADE DATE Qi- /3 -(aB TESTED BY: IN PLACE Di A fNITIAL WT. TEST SA), B WT. SAND RETAINED C WT, SAND USED D TEST SAND DENSITY E F VOLUME_ SAND U_ SED_ VOLUME CONE +RING GI VOLUME TEST HOLE HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + T I TARE WEIGHT 7 WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLAC L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2.,1-4, 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN , P WET WT. AT COMPACTION ,z a O=�- I DRY WT. COMP. SPEC.. - R % MOISTURE ,6 CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV.FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = Vdt�YMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D ` NIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J - G CONE .1667 - L= K= (1 Do- +N) Q =0 = (100 % +N) SM.RING .0143 :1810 R = (P-Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 1 ..1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F METHOD. A ❑ 6 RL.... SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY z MOISTURE MCA RC =__T % ' TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ P'.Ii ardoof tests Prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TEST O. C— yh G FIELD NO. /- `Y RELATIVE COMPACTION CON. NO.OR G11 Control tests On (W O OR P O. OR FP L1 materials actually entering into works. r , DATE REPTD. 1E -- tract, use contract item PROJECT , AGENCY�4� /. w4d,87 /T.f�cAC RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) o"/ CONTRACTOR ,ti 'Le&- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ Gursla AGENCY " MAINTENANCE P SUED.- ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION /.P Vlevoz5 .ova --, 1`� ^® LT OF (L STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL 7: S. (U !:A DEPTH /3 / TO ZO BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE /_Z -G& TESTED BY: Z, ASH'E METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FI0 ! EL WET WT. I .. EL LAB -- -- DRY WT. '� MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK 4 WET WT. ROCK INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN DRY WT. ROCK Z14 C-y WET WT. - .a DRY WT. - n WET WT. AT COMPACTION TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216•F 1 B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE .DENSITY .3 s 9e MOISTURE c.,yAW- RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % R E C F I V E D ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH SEP 18 1968 RESIDENT ENGINEER ( f MA RIALS ENGINEER Fag „ -ls.l RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO 1 U.eg 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Z14 C-y P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY ! CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L Q = 0 - (1000/., + N) SM. RING . 01 43 .181 0 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING 1 .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216•F 1 B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE .DENSITY .3 s 9e MOISTURE c.,yAW- RC = % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % R E C F I V E D ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH SEP 18 1968 RESIDENT ENGINEER ( f MA RIALS ENGINEER Fag „ -ls.l RELATIVE COMPACTION E:1 Prelirlfinory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. • ROAD DEPARTMENT . Material Testing Section TEST Nd C— ys�Gz _ FIELD NO. — v CON T. NO. O Control ia tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION W'O. OR P O. O NF ) entering actually • entering info works. DATE REPT D. If contract " '- "oittract item PROJECT `AGENCY 5Z44dikmlA °'PT 66sltAt RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G, iTvwvs 1VV CONTRACTORT SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY © MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 1,42virv_,kz ^4D> LT OF (� STA A, REPRESENTING LIMITS - TYPE MATERIAL _4 Ce, -DEPTH Z " TO .4.0 BELOW FINISHED - -GRADE DATE 9- /r -1 -/9 TESTED BY:, 4, 'Au%fle _ IN PLACE DENSITY__ A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND tj EI C WT. SAND RETAINED, WT. SAND USED /o DI TEST SAND DENSITY INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN E FIVOLUME VOLUM_E__S_AN_D USED CONE + RING 7 GI VOLUME TEST HOLE WET WT. ROCK HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE I TARE WEIGHT DRY WT. - a J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE___ CORR.MAX.DENSITY L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE -i —" METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 - -- DRY' WT. 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ' MOIST. M N • __ SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - i Q DRY WT. - a TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 3,e,4e, 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN by P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD 'p VAE51e S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY Vi DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J+ G CONE .1667 - L = K . (100 -1 +N) Q = 0 _ (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q - S LG. RING .0302 .1469 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F E 140 I B- METHOD A ❑ 6 90 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY �Z. S S � }e MOISTURE e TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH c BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA IA LS ENGINEER F3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION -111~1 s.. �•:: Y TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TEST SPECIMEN OF CONTFlT ROAD DEPT. C SOURCES ED Material Tasting Section SIEVE LARD OF CONTRACT resT No. REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. It TESTS ON Z/ ALS ACTUALLY M. Ma, oe COIw.oT. o. P.o, Nu.' S' AG INTO WORKS _Reel ' FED. NO. ' AL TESTS I% DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT, USE OONTRACT ITEM ] PROJECT NAME %USfrA —� ✓ //s _ - - ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) 5S, CONTRACTOR 'ORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE ® MAINTENANCE SUB'D 0 PERMITS AGENCY AGENT Y: Grf �it/w Beu�S 21�i SAMPLE OF DEPTH /x2 247 �✓ LIMITS OF SAMPLE SfCJ. 6s, '�rf zp LOCH. OF SOURCE �.-- 54 MANUFACTURER NTI EPRESE �� TED DATE SAMPLED 9 -9 ./ R'(S��tf�C•ir F •�•�L.tewl TITLE E/JIdET/ RECEIVED FOR USE IN EXODATION PRESS, P.S,I. E BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -44.1 AGGREGATE 3 SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS U6ED SPEC IF . LIMITS 8000HT COMPACTOR Atk-PRESSURE P.S,I. Z/ MOISTURE AT COMPACTION ] DRY DENSITY OF BRIO„ # /'U. FT. 21�i 6TABILOMETER VALUE "R" 54 p EXODATION PRESS, P.S,I. 111x THICES,diNDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK, INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS, IN. 6P. Gp. OYEN DRV B.S.D. APP. SUBBASE I1E FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L. P: L. P. 1, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX I6 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. W BY EXUO. Pp E86 3D j BY EXPAN. PPE66 50 Y a WET DRY AVG, SPE0. y. AT EOUIL, SPEC. IM INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. O COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONSF . IRO SU ID LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: 'l. I. . BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011 -44.1 AGGREGATE 3 SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR FIELD NO. TO AWARD OF CONTR O POTENTIAL SOURCE SAD N. AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT ®CONTROL TESTS ON DATE REPTD.',:9 MATERIALS ACTUALLY AGENCY: ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS ROAD NO. • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON IF CONTRACT, USE COMfl1ACT ITEM PROJECT NAME rEST NO. &R- / = ,04,2 f'&3 FIELD NO. M,fAe _j -- CONY. No, oe re' 40 N. ar AHPPI FED. NO. AGENCY DATE REPTD.',:9 I_17 -rib N RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) / i- :y aoN CONTRACTOR M,fAe _j -- SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE.,C& MAINTENANC SUB'D O PERMIT$ D AGENCY SIEVE AGENCY: Z AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT SAMPLE OF -1 r. .• .7 DEPTH �-- LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCH, OF SOURCE DATE SAMPLED =) i i / %�(+ B7 f /�Ii fi ��"YT TITLE 1+-' 7- ,L RECEIVED _ FOR USE IN.y S'[sc Tiyw RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 9011-2.1 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH A"RECRATE A SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE Z AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.1. - MOISTURE AT COMPACTION yo 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #I'V. IT 21�] STABILOMETER VALUE "W- 2 G EXUDATION PRESS. P,SA. II/3 Zoo i0o G<i THICK, INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. N 78 8-7 SP, OR. "OVEN DRY S. S, D. APP. SUBBASE I/I FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE OPEC. M By EXUD. PRESS 30 Id < BY E %PAN. PRESS 50 W 2 WET " DRY AVG. SPEC, © yl AT EQUIL. SPEC. IW INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS, 2oo 4 3 3 5u III LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE 'OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: DIIDlkr Car. RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 9011-2.1 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH A"RECRATE A SOIL OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TEST SPECIMEN TO AWARD OF CONTR 1 O POTENTIAL SOURCE SAD D AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT SIEVE TESTS ON ®CONTROL MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS ROAD NO, • • COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section ' fE5fF0. GS —//99 i REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. CONT. No. or FED. NO. L. T. S,. DATE REPTD. PROJECT NAME RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) + r�e�nsary •:" CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSI4FtT17 k. JAAINTENANCE SUB'D El PERMITS AGENCY` AGENCY: .CAS SAMPLE OF a DEPTH %3 ZOee LIMITS OF SAMPLE Sf0 SSA+ fTt. LOCH. OF SOURCE —� B'! FOR USE IN RECEIVED C. f RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 9011 -/21 AGGREGATE A SOIL ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A IS C D E SIEVE AS USED SPECIE. LIMITB SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. ti r/ MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % B DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., # /lU IT 212 STABILOMETER VALUE "R- 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. zzs- S BOO II�2 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB, INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. 3A SP. OR, OVEN DRY S. S. D. APP. SUBBASE I/2 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE t L. L. I P, L, P. L COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX Ib DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, j BY EXUD. PRES6 J BY EXPAN. PRESS SD W O WET DRY AVO. SPEC. y: AT EpUIL. SPEC, Iw INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. SU NI LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: SEP 20 1968 PUBLIG Y DERL C. f RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 9011 -/21 AGGREGATE A SOIL ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER • TEST NO. 69-.)!!/20 FIELD NO. COOT, No. or °� IW.O. or P.O. NO. FP �f FED. NO. DATE REPTD. W,.1r„98 SEN T{AF, PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE SUB'D u PERMITS U ,., .;.: L _ TO AWARD OF CO POTENTIAL SOURCE SAD ROAD DEPT. Metarial Testing Section • O AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT SIEV[ SAMPLE OF CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON DEPTH Af = Zo - LIMITS OF SAMPLE SY:r MATERIALS ACTUALLY 2� Z" LOCA. OF SOURCE ENTERING INTO WORKS -. O SPECIAL TESTS S NTI7Y MANUFACTURER MOISTURE SIT, COMPACTION % IF CONTRACT. U8E CONTRACT ITEM EPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED y .J BY sj� f!fnW TITLE Ee�lIi -� RECEIVED '- NO. PROJECT' NAME _ ENGINEER (INSPECTOR). e�;_ �/�� �_ CONTRACTOR TEST NO. 69-.)!!/20 FIELD NO. COOT, No. or °� IW.O. or P.O. NO. FP �f FED. NO. DATE REPTD. W,.1r„98 SEN T{AF, CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE _ MAINTENANCE U SUB'D u PERMITS U ,., .;.: L _ A AGENCY C AGENCY: - C),[. &0dZ" d-W X SIEV[ SAMPLE OF i A$ us[D SOUGHT DEPTH Af = Zo - LIMITS OF SAMPLE SY:r 7� f7t 2� Z" LOCA. OF SOURCE NTI7Y MANUFACTURER MOISTURE SIT, COMPACTION % EPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED y .J BY sj� f!fnW TITLE Ee�lIi -� RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEV[ A$ us[D SOUGHT SPEC IF LIMITS COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.IS 2� Z" Z / MOISTURE SIT, COMPACTION % 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #I1U. FT. II /1 STABILOMETER VALUE "R' b'J Z EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. Z�S I/r THICK. INDICATED BY STAN. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN, 4, s- 4 8 SP. OR. OVEN DRY S.S.O. APP. SUBBASE I/T FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE t - L. L. I P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX Ia DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY EEUD. PRESS 7,? � � BY E %PAN. PRE88 jD IJ a WET DRY AVG. SPEC. _ y: AT EpUIL. 'S SPEC. 100 INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. THICK, OF 100 SU I II LART - SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: - WE S DEMO VOUDLIV ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 9011 -l27 AGGREGATE A SOIL OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONTRJJ ROAD DEPT. B O POTENTIAL SOURCE SA D Material Testing Section . E AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT - TEST NO. 68 —�2p0 TESTS ON - R E P O R T O F T E S T S ON FIELD NO. ®CONTROL MATERIALS ACTUALLY COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.L CON'T.N.." QO.s IW.O. —P.O. N..o NRP ENTERING INTO WORKS Z • O SPECIAL TESTS 7- FED. NO. DATE REPTD. (rm $ IF COWlI1A<T. UBE CONTRACT ITEM - ',:ROAD NO. PROJECTNAME TUS! /tl— �/' ✓ /9B /401/ IDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) G F�m s�B CONTRACTOR $gf _ 5 `7EPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OOGENIDE ® - MAINTENANCE SUB'D PERMITS , J AGENCY`- -C /� ✓/ T .�Ba `] /1 SAMPLE Of DEPTH /36 ZC r LIMITS OF SAMPLE 1. LOCA. OF SOURCE �— 21 /, - N6ITTII77yy pp EPRESENTED MANUFACTURER -- R DATE SAMPLED 91 B'/sfty fy`p =y_ "�✓ lITT LE E��tcr/ RECEIVED ' FOR USE IN L_�'_ • • ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER wY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F•3011.42.1 - AGGREGATE 'dl SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E 61EVE - AS USED SPECIE. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.L '`D/ Z MOISTURE AT COMPACTION %. /401/ 012 3 DRY DENSITY OF BRIO_ # /rU. FT. 21 /, STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. SOQ Ilia THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. 5 s Yj SP. OR. -OVEN DRY S.S.D. 1 APP. SUBBASE - I1I - FINE BASE % - COARSE SURFACE 6 L I. I P. L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. W BY EXUD. PRESS 8 D 30 J K BY EX PAN PRESS 50 pl B WE DRY AVG. SPEC. G AT EOUIL. 84 SPEC. IOD INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. 200 5U III LART . SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. - - REMARKS: o ISO DEK OR Ow ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER wY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F•3011.42.1 - AGGREGATE 'dl SOIL OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONT SOURCE ROAD DEPT, • Materiel Testing Section OPOTENTIAL S ED AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT': C D E' REPORT OF TESTS ON CONTROL TESTS ON %D% MATERIALS ACTUALLY COMPACTOR Alfl PRESSURE P. S.1. ENTERING INTO WORKS • Q SPECIAL TESTS IF CONTRACT. USE CON"AGT ITEM ROAD NO PROJECT NAME u • RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) . SEND REPORT TO: CON TEST NO. / fj_p_ ze-7 FIELD NO. CONT.N y�R�{�P�J ION or P.O. No, a(�!{®PIl ¢o 1 FED: NO. ' ~•J DATE REPTD. CONTRACTOR 'W NTENANCE SUB'D PtXM l l S DATE SAMPLED 9 -/3 B'! /Q��OW TITLE 4rT/ RECEIVED FOR USE IN R GRADING ANALYSIS - TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E' SIEVE T SPECIE LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR Alfl PRESSURE P. S.1. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #11U. FT. 2Ih STABILOMETER VALUE "R" $ EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. 112 OO THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED BY EAP, PRESS. IN. d.d- as— P. on. OVEN DRY B. 9, D. APP. SUBBASE I1I FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 1 Zi L. L. I P. L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC, W BY EXUD, PRESS J 10 '8 � z> J BY EXPAN. PRESS j 50 W m 'WET 37 DRY AVG. SPEC, �O Q AT EGUIL. SPEC. 100 INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. zoo z— 9 SU III LApT- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: SEP 20 1 968 0 BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (C)TY ENGR.) F- 3011.121 AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE TO AWARD OF CONT ROAD DEPT. O POTENTIAL SOURCE SAVED Materiel Testing Section SIEVE AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT ,[� CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON I0 MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS L, T S. IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME • • TEST NO. 6g–/27 $ FIELD NO corer. x,. or U. AHFP QOS IW.o. or P.O. N DATE REPTD. RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) f`r_t ;, UUNIKACwK SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE`ISA MAINTENANCE SU B'D PERMITS El AGENCY. AGENCY: G' �� �Of Bra' � - SMPLF DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE SfA. 3 /•r _R� LOCH. OF SOURCE DATE SAMPLED 0-/Z BY 06 4ae!'. TITLE FdA1CT/ RECEIVED FOR USE IN GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS USED SPEC'F. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. Z/ MOISTURE AT COMPACTION 40 j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #I r'U. FT. 211 STABILOMETER VALUE "R" Z Q j EXUDATION PRESS. P. S. 1. IIIT THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK, INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. Bj SP. OR. OVEN DRY S.S.D. APP. SUBBASE II2 FINE BASE COARSE SURFACE L L. I P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. BY EXUD. PRESS iD J j BY EXPAN. PRESS 50 y S WET DRY AVG. 5PEO. Q I AT EOUIL. Cl I SPEC. I(b INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. THICK. OF 200 SU IU LART. SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: RECEIVED SEP n I ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH `� \ s - / —i RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F•301 1d21 AGGREGATE 8 SOIL C MATERIALS ENGINEER OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE OPOTENTIAL TO AWARD OF CONTR SOURCE SAED ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section B AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT O ®CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY AS USED ENTERING INTO WORKS COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. • O SPECIAL TESTS L::- IF cOrvTgwCT, USE fOTRACT ITEM R E TEST NO. 68 -/22S FIELD NO. Cons Nw or W.O. ar P.O. Nw A PP �..s- DATE REPTD. f /C, -G IS ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME T f7 1r✓/ RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) IS, CONTRACTOR �. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION AGENICY MAINTENANCE SU B'D PERMITS AGENCY: Cat✓ .v Bea IJr SAMPLE O DEPTH Z LIMITS OF SAMPLE std 73 ti �� fLOCA. OF SOURCE -� DATE SAMPLED y-/� BY ��Ci��O�EE� TITLE EAOpX -_y- RECEIVED FOR USE IN L T.S ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F-3011-42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEbr SPECIMEN A B C O E SIEVE AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. /Q MOISTURE AT COMPACTION qy j DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #11U FT. 2Y: STABILOMETER VALUE "R Jrp 6l Z EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. 9S Z�S Q II/T THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INOICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. O Ei 6 .w SP. GR. OVEN DRY S.S.O. APP. SUBBASE I12 FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 L. L. I P. L. P. I. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. j BY E%UO. PRESS 76 J w BY E %PAN. PRESS BD I IJ R WET DRY AVO. SPEC. Q AT EOU IL. 7r0 SPEC. IW INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. THICK. OF TID SU IU I LART- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F-3011-42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL • • O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAD AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY ENTERING INTO WORKS ­0 SPECIAL TESTS ROAD NO. RESIDENT ENGINEER '(INSPECTOR) COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Materiel Testing Section REPORT OF TESTS ON IF CONTRACT, USE, CONTRACT PROJECT NAME Ti�]i• /_ TEST NO. 48-22 FIELD NO. co". NN m Iw.O.m P.O. Nu. FPI 40S FED. NO. DATE REPTO. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION U OUTSIDE ICI MAINTENANCE U SUB'D U PERMITS U AGENCY: C/f O{ Ai �FIeTGI SAMPLE O DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE ,StO IS�sd .Pf _ LOCH. OF SOURCE —..E .T DATE SAMPLED 9 -/2 BY A61,;,— 9', AV,-'I—,_ „- TITLE RECEIVED FOR USE IN �-T ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH •/J MATERIALS ENGINEER / Z- ' BV ��- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F-3011 42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A B C D E SIEVE AS u5E0 B LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. L� MOISTURE AT COMPACTION H1- 3 DRY DENSITY OF S%jr ° YY . III � U. FT. Iyr STABILOMETER VALUE "R" 7 PZ p2z. j EXUDATION PRESS, P.S.I. z4Q OQ II�> THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES I THICK. INDICATED RY EXP. PRESS. IN. Q 4 MQ �j SP. OR. OVEN DRY S. S. D. APP, SUBBASE II} 'FINE BABE COARSE SURFACE X L.L. 1 P. I. P.1, COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. BY EXVD. PRE66 J � BY E %PAN. PREBS So Y WET DRY AVG. SPEC. AT EOUIL. SPEC. I� INDICATED MINIMUM COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS. THICK. OF 200 5U IU LA RT- SPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: go 1968 pulinc (\t\ S �-T ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH •/J MATERIALS ENGINEER / Z- ' BV ��- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F-3011 42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR ` 1AGENCY: C TO AWARD OF CONi O POTENTIAL SOURCE SAG ED LIMITS OF SAMPLE AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT COCA. OF SOURCE CONTROL TESTS ON ®' MATERIALS ACTUALLY DATE SAMPLED p ENTERING INTO WORKS • O SPECIAL TESTS ROAD NO. • SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTI� 1AGENCY: C 1 f l ; SAMPLE OF .5.8 J'%7 LIMITS OF SAMPLE D COCA. OF SOURCE 0 rd h � O NER OONUFACR TURER CID n. DATE SAMPLED p -I y FOR USE IN Rg S IP COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. Material Testing Section PEST NO. O (! REPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. �r1Y� AMP) T G ✓ /+ y� / •r FED. NO. l-- SS iJ DATE REPTD. IF CONTRACT. USE CONTRACT ITEM PROJECT NAMc. rHS�; kI - Irvine 1Z Y} CONTRACTOR Mark ] OUTSIDE ® MAINTENANCE Lj SUB 'D [3 V - PERMITS AGENCY l awr,,Dr'tt T�ea�h DEPTH S. r TITLE 4 R--Z1 RECEIVED GRADING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A I B C D E SIEVE AS USE. SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIR PRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % J DRY DENSITY OF BRIO., #/'U. FT. 2I /1 STABILOMETER VALUE °R" 2 p 0 EXUDATION PRESS. P.S.I. 11 /1 CC Q �. /dQ THICK. INDICATED BY STAB. INCHES THICK. INDICATED BY EXP. PRESS. IN. 'A 5'D"p.Jr SP. GR. OVEN DRV S.B.D. APP. SUBBASE I/} FINE BASE % COARSE SURFACE 4 ,Z �4. L. L. I P. L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE B TRAFFIC INDEX 16 DURABILITY FINE COARSE SPEC. BY EXUD. PRESS 30 J rt l J BT EKPAN. PRESS - SQ IY m WET O v DRY 1�"f/ ¢O AVG. p / SPEC, A v AT EOUIL SPEC. IQD INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS, 200 yy sL �. SU IU LART. ISPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % M/D CURVE NO. REMARKS: nrov IBI o BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER C / By RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F- 3011.42.1 AGGREGATE & SOIL Prohminar tests prior to award' arc o.t,.ct. ®Control gists on mater101Y actually 'CbUNTY OF ORANGE Rt L ST ROAD DEPARTMENT _ Material Testing Section TEST No. C- 4 7 I E ELD:.Nq RELATIVE COMPACTI4' CUNT. NO OR 1W O OO..P Q Off A'HFIN "`ax:.:. - �R gKTEsHEP /S � oa If 8t t; use contract Item PROJECT I 1 A;._�.. AGENCY G�N L C'4 RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) S, JOHr;.SotJ CONTRACTOR tr, Ae t. OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCV ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ RMITS ❑ LOCATION I RU I N F_ 142. 7:..� ygv. iVF ST/14� REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL L T' S- DEPTH I j, TO I q. • BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE Ci— I'i - TESTED BY: VA p San, W o J'.A'N'.iv IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND C. O B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT, SAND USED INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN D TEST SAND DENSITY N E _ VOLUME SAND.USED _ 37 0 F VOLUME CONE + RING PT E GI VOLUME TEST HOLE '7 3 H WT: EXC. SAMPLE + TARE L1 9 D 1 TARE WEIGHT 3 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE r , K WET DENSITY CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA FIELD LAB WET WT. C.C,2 3 DRY WT. 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN "`. MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK P 'WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. — .Q DRY WT. — s TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.OENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. se RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) RELATIVE I a- METHOb A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY IQ4 ' 3 9 2 a7 0 MOISTURE RC= g9 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY MATE_ LS ENGINEER �a MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. C.Q,.1 C.C,2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION .Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE — 3• CONDITION OF MOLD E m S _ HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /0-9 T WET DENSITY 13, (e. 1 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C = A — B E = C = D- UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 =G CONE .1667 — L = K _ (100 - +N) Q = 0 _ (1 007 + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P—Q) + Q - V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 - .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. se RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) RELATIVE I a- METHOb A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY IQ4 ' 3 9 2 a7 0 MOISTURE RC= g9 % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY MATE_ LS ENGINEER �a 1 i� COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT, Material Testing $eciiort 1 3 - COARSE. MEDIUM, FINE L? 1 a REPORT O F TESTS O N COUNTY PLANT NO. SPHALT CONCRETE CONT. No COARSE, MEDIUM. FINE TYPE B . Dr ��..� ❑ 2 IW.O. Dr P.O. No, Dr AHFP)_405' - ❑3' p 8 IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM DATE REPTD. PROJECT 7esi/� �/�'iyr` AGENCY C':r eF NEIL ^year RESIDENT ENGINEER INSPECTOR) E% L,,'A1.Cev CONTRACTOR MHRK Cr 81���J,./� ew/cT L e SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION C1 AAGENCY ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ PAVING GRADE ASPHALT PEN. /� 6070 ❑ 8510019 / 120150 ❑ ( LOCATION OF AGGREGATE SOURCE (r.^N h�CG![ ORs4 MG6 C Al , LIMITS OF PROJECT "� /! CO�LL�3ANTITY OWNER OR MANUFACTURER 1.V✓J•'s r&jD,4 4�Pj�Nl9« { e,L�¢» $�REPRESFNTED TONS ' DATE SAMPLED S�i �h A BY /A A. C :` TITLE L= 7' 2 FOR USE AS: BASE COURSE ❑ FlN154 COURSE ® RESURFACE ❑ • I � ILJ 1 )44c` Sts REMARKS: SAND EQUIVALENT 1 ECIMENS C I D E SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY ADS. F SPECIF, 15 MIN. 77° F. COM, MIX ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER I BY ' u- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) ' F. 3011 -an. I BITUMINOUS GRADING ANALYSIS �C VAPOR SUSC. TEST SIEVE TIME SPEC. SPEC. NO. A B MOIST. ABSORB. TEMPERATURE I I%a 3 C MOISTURE FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE AGGREGATE) BITUMEN GRADE iC0 S— /LC BIT. RATIO I�I SP. GR. BRIO. ' � 7. %C� C'r G STAB, RESULTS 3 13*7 COH. RESULTS 0 b RT. VALVE 30 94 c so SUSC. H2O IW SWELL (26 HRS.) 400 1 PERMEABILITY 1 )44c` Sts REMARKS: SAND EQUIVALENT 1 ECIMENS C I D E SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY ADS. F SPECIF, 15 MIN. 77° F. COM, MIX ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER I BY ' u- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) ' F. 3011 -an. I BITUMINOUS �C VAPOR SUSC. % GRADING OBTAINED BY COMBINING BINS AS FOLLOWS: Blry WT. %BV WT. A S T / I- J NO. CYCLES MOIST. ABSORB. STABILOMETER COHESION 3 C S -j FILM STRIPPING (ON COARSE AGGREGATE) 1 )44c` Sts REMARKS: SAND EQUIVALENT 1 ECIMENS C I D E SPECIF. TEMPERATURE TIME BITUMEN DRY ADS. F SPECIF, 15 MIN. 77° F. COM, MIX ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS TESTING ENGINEER I BY ' u- RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGINEER) ' F. 3011 -an. I BITUMINOUS Preliminory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award at contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT ;. Material Testing Sectism_ Q TEST �N O. C— 445 FIELD NO. o�� - qq•• C °terials ntrol t iactually sort ma RELATIVE COMPACTION W.OTOR P.ORO PP 4oS 1�• . entering into works. L 7 5 _ ,�� � If contract, Use contract Item DATE REP ^' PROJECT 7U.97`/�- �I'!/i07B AGENCY - RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSP '4 CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENGy OUTSIDE C�^ MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. - PERMITS ❑ LOCATION S71a, Ge /g sy 7aII2�:o Z %z�T OF rL STA REPRESENTING LIMITS C:�_ 2 TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH /3 TO 292" BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 9 /l% TESTED BY:� _ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 36.5 B WT. SAND RETAINED _ Z� C WT. SAND USED 2 e3 D TEST SAND TOTAL DRY WT. E _DENSITY _ VOLUME SAND USED_, F VOLUME CONE + RING Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. _ G VOLUME TEST HOLE „',:/ H WT. EX C. SAMPLE +TARE_ F /FCo I J TARE WEIGHT WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K L WET DENSITY IN PLACE DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A. MOISTURE SAMPLE ".=FIELD 'LAB WET WT. --- '- -i - - -- DRY WT. n MOIST. ±M — N__ SP. GR. ROCK MOLD N0. WET WT. ROCK 2 DRY WT. ROCK 4 WET WT. - c'ooc DRY TOTAL DRY WT. P WET WT. AT COMPACTION a ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN_ c'ooc P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2Q� Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. _ .. R % MOISTURE F /FCo CONDITION S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN /oSo T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C- D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J -G CONE .1667 1 - L= K +(t00 % +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 I ABIO R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) r301 t -83.1 RELATIVE 140 1 B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE RC = TENT. RC = " 7 % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY MATER LS ENGINEER COMPACTION i Prel iminory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ;s to award of aontmct. ROAD DEPARTMENT • (as,2 28.% Material Testing Section TESTO C- 4+ 4 (Am 7 E FIELD NO.L pf� °nt,al tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION Co.T "'. 6. P OROIY::�P71 QOM materials actuu Hy VOLUME TEST HOLE entering into works. I p I If contract, use contract .item DATE REPTD. J ..�. ` /g, K PROJECT 76d -X's'' AGENCY_ !21 'e' L RES1DE41T,_ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) a a.. CONTRACTORi�/IAr SEND Rli� T TO: CONSTRUCTIO AGENCGYE ,�' MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION �• ,_ LT OFD STA 5_,Z1 P& REPRESENTING LIMITS S TYPE MATERIAL L TS DEPTH /�' TO Z10 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 's-- /O TESTED BY: IN_ PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 94 BJ C WT. SAND RETAINED WT. SAND USED (as,2 28.% D ___ TEST SAND DENSITY 7 E VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CONE + RING al F x/9(09 G VOLUME TEST HOLE HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARES, I TARE WEIGHT DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. J WET WT EXC. SAMPLE /g, K WET DENSITY IN PLACE _ /-L-Zl L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOt STVlRE SAMPLE FIELD WET WT. --.._...— LAS - --- DRY WT. `? MOIST_ 1 "' L ;_t N SP. GR, ROCK 3 WET WT. ROCK 01 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a _ DRY WT. P TOTAL CRY WT. - ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY Q REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 19011_634 RELATIVE 140 t METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 117 130 MOISTURE HOPI% RC = 90 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL,% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY h— MATER I 5 ENGINEER COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ _ 2 6..4 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN Z bb P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R _ %MOISTURE - - - CONDITION OF MOLD _ �• ,_ u O AE S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN O T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C O UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K = J +G CONE .1667 — L= K= (100% +N) Q =O- (100 % +N) 5M. RING _ .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q + S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 19011_634 RELATIVE 140 t METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 117 130 MOISTURE HOPI% RC = 90 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL,% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY h— MATER I 5 ENGINEER COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award o aontre&. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section TESTi C- Q•9•¢� FIELD NO. 3 RELATIVE COMPACTION CONT NO .OR Control tests on tw.O. OR P. . ) .�O.s materials actually • entering into works. DATE REPTO. - 9_ g � ct, ontract item PROJECT RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ouTSIOE AGENCY LOCATION REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL Li'S DEPTH DATE /O TESTED BY:_-Zd IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND T -1r.7,3 B WT. SAND RETAINED) 3 C WT. SAND_ •O D DEUSED __ TEST SAN D_NSITY E VOLUME SAND USED_ WET WT. -� F VOLUME CONE + RING GI VOLUME TEST HOLE 'Z ROCK H!WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE I TARE WEIGHT % MOISTURE J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE _ CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE GENCY RAC MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. PERMITS U /AL<n) LT OF CL STA TO 2d:'" BELOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD- LAB _ WET WT. 1G, //, DRY WT. I 3 ::"::m OIST. j M - N SP. GR. ROCK o WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK P WET WT. -� DRY WT. - e TOTAL DRY WT. Q 'Z ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA J MOLD NO. 1G, //, 26, 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN o D& P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE RyCfi iZ,s CONDITION OF MOLD 0�•o S _ HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN O.Ga 6. b T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =.G CONE - L = K _ (100 -Y +N) Q = 0 _ (1007, + N) SM. RING _.1667 .0143 AB10 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 1 B• 1140 s-- METHOD A ❑ 8 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY .Z. J-9 / 9. MOISTURE RC = 9 3 q TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH RESIDEN "TFNIE- 9%IT�1''ENOFT.j MATE R: 5 ENGINEER P301143.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION l� r CALIFO' FWIA PRELIMINARY @OTICE Acs4"g W4b Section 1193, California Code Of Civil Procedure and Section 4110, C+Iifomra:Gsvemment Cede YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT . . CONSTRUCTION LENDER or Reputed Construction Lender, if any Bonding AS=% OrOLO HERE e w •� N E OWNER or PUBLIC AGENCY Ror Reputed Owner (on public work) (on private work) F C City of Newport Beach Director of yublic Works 0 M00 Newport Blvd. P L Newport B 00*0 Calif. Y FOLD HERE RFCFIVED SEP 101968 PUBLIC Woh-, DEPT„ ORIGINAL CONTRACTOR or Reputed Contractor, if any PA"ftuo ram Vme of person Or firm furnishing labor, services, equip- . V • lox i," ment or material) Lakewaed.y ftlif. (address of person or firm furnishing labor, servicos, equip- ment or material) has . furnished or will furnish labor, services equipment or materials of the following general description: sseaul x4190M a self lease (general description of the labor, services, equipment or material furnished or ro be furnished) for the building, structure or other work of improvement located at: Iryi.tm am of l W St- A (address or description of job site �on1 Z !ff1Ce!kfw* Identification) y e o �t or firm who contracted for the pur- chase of such labor, services, equipment or material is: haa3, Ceastrn�sBie�a Lae. P_ 0. Bo= &A J d•rd+te�rT Felice (address of move person or nnn) An estimate of the total price of the labor, services, equip- ment or materials furnished or to be furnished is: # f t .x (this must be furnished to construction render — optiona( as to owner or contractor) If bills are not paid in full for labor, services, equipment or materials furnished or to be furnished, the improved property may be subject to mechanic's liens. Dated: Be", 6._2813$ d.t� ' Secreltar�r T (r ature) (title) This form is recognised by the following organisations: BUILDING MATERIAL DEALERS CREDIT ASSOCIATION CALIFORNIA BUILDING MATERIAL DEALERS ASSN. CALIFORNIA LICENSED CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION LUMBER ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA' 'p Preliminory tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT } Material Testing Section TEST No C— FIELD NO. p>� RELATIVE COMPACTION CON T. NO.OR ® Control tests on 1��®*-aH' -829! R AHFP) Q� materials actually .. entering into works. /V DATE REPTO. If contract, use contract item / PROJECT IRVfn:E AGENCY C�NEhOf��Or ' r o4c�+' y RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) T. TOW NS On/ CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTfON ❑ OUTSIDE A6ENCV MAINTENANCE SUED. ❑ PERMITS LOCATION IQ VAN L° E'n e3F N►G to AC A/ /S� ,17--j oN rE STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL �`� -5 DEPTH 0 rr TO r� BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 111q � 5 - %8 TESTED BY: L" c JA M N -r At vA.d,&'C IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4 B WT. SAND RETAINED A.77 D ___ _{- WT. SAND USED TEST SAND_DENSITY I Z„(o_ , 1 D E __�$� VOLUME SAND USED _ LSZ FIVOLUME CONE + RING ' I 1.1 8 (G _ G VOLUME TEST HOLE '2 HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE O I ITARE WEIGHT _ J IWET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE - 1 -` -` -` METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE �_ FIELD LAB WET WT. 2 ____3_F DRY WT. O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN M01ST M N SP. GR. ROCK P WET WT. ROCK DRY ROCK _WT, WET WT. - 3 Q DRY WT. - 3 TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK R CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F i B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B CR SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 17—Y J41 MOISTURE D RC = $ g % TENT. RC — % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • BY �2 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATERI s ENGINEER F301143.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA i MOLD N0. 1 a 2 ____3_F 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN QQ ,Z QQ P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE O CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C. F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E — F K = J +G CONE .1667 — L =K. (I DO -) +N) Q= 0:(IC)O% +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) . Q V = FACTOR x Q + S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F i B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B CR SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 17—Y J41 MOISTURE D RC = $ g % TENT. RC — % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • BY �2 RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATERI s ENGINEER F301143.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION „�..❑Preliminory tests prior to award o contract. } Control tests on materiols actually . entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT - Material Testine Section RELATIVE COMPACTION item TEST (0O. C— FIELD NO CONT. NO. W OR I.O. OR P O. ORiA DATE REPTD. PROJECT GENCY `,i '•:- "Gt,5�:1.f'7 :sirltt/�/ RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) ,d/ dt 1h� j :E it.�' CONTRACTOR /y,Oi?'i� SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OW f' MAINTENANCE ❑ SUED. ❑ PERMITS LOCATION /.P v/N ri'yyitA . ^i >-NT ! ! /1'S1L+ _'s.-- ptr- f�.STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL iVX' _ DEPTH Q� TO l BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 9 -3r -6g TESTED BY: WOd./f //V T IlZlz Yily IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND B WT. SAND RETAINED _... . -. C WT. SAND USED 5ry Ti' D E FEST TEST SAND_DEN51TY __ VOLUME_ SAND USED_ _ "RING 0T 7, ., Sp F VOLUME CONE + 00 G VOLUME TEST HOLE ,1 : 0 T. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I 7 TARE WEIGHT WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE ,� Ike L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE j METHOD_A MOISTURE SAMPI,.E FIELD ;._�' WET WT. LAB _... . -. DRY WT. __..,I.�. M01`5T.M N SP. GR. ROCK 3 WET WT. ROCK O -P DRY WT. ROCK 00 WET WT. -? DRY WTI TOTAL DRY ROCK :P"4 4 a CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 1140 i B� -S METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 1 1 9 � 6 MOISTURE 1 o U r dL`r' RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: N= ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATE ALS ENGINEER FWI.63.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA __ MOLD NO. 1 co 2 CO 3 4 O -P INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 00 x,¢00 -WE WT. AT COMPACTION :P"4 4 a Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R _ % MOISTURE f A.0— 1 r I EL 0 CONDITION OF MOLD cl_. OV Eij C1.UNv S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10. 5'S 1 1 O, - T WET DENSITY I 134. -7 _1 Vi DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C+ D I UNIT GONE +UNIT G= E- F K= J+ G CONE .1667 1 - L =K +(100^:; +N) Q= 0- 000 %, +N1 SM.RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q + S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 1140 i B� -S METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 1 1 9 � 6 MOISTURE 1 o U r dL`r' RC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: N= ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATE ALS ENGINEER FWI.63.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION Prellminory tests prior C COUNTY OF ORANGE .❑ P ROAD DEPARTMENT . . Material Testing Section T TEST NO. C— FIELD NO. a "y Control RELATIVE COMPACTION W W DTDR P.ORO AHFP A&S71 ia t .,, . entering into work,;. 1 1 m P Die r s A& 0 . - -G If contract, use contract item D .. . PROJECT VI N _ AGENCY /NEwGoR T T w IF`A c rr RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) J _ A SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ OUTSIDE ��ppII ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION 1LZVIN )~ a•v:�'cL'. S SINE: R RT LT OF®STA- jA -Q°--� REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL A LS D DEPTH TO 1 8 8 � BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE -1 - 3- 6 8 TESTED B BY: W 0 J NA1 t$ M U U P_ k A K IN PLACE DENSITY METHOD A A INITIAL W7. TEST SAND ����yyy ~y(D n MOISTURE SAMPLE H WT. SAND RETAINED So _ _FIELD LAS^ C WT SE . SAND UD WET WT. D TEST SAND DENSITY - j O DRY WT. ..�. E VOLUME SAND USED �4 "- MOIST. M N _-.._.._.._.._.. __ F VOLUME CONE + RING _ �, i $ 1 b SP. GR. ROCK 2 V TEST HOLE WET WT, ROCK H!WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE c DRY WT. ROCK I TARE WEIGHT WET WT. - e J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 9 p DRY WT. _ 4 K WET DENSITY IN PLACE _ , t 1 TOTAL DRY WT. L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE "i_- '7 ROCK CORR. MAX. DENSITY ^ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. r I,U1 ArvJ 2 3 4 Qj INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN O O 00 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION A p Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD YU_ _e 9- C11 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN O Q T WET DENSITY aA,S V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. T C=A B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 =G CONE _.1667 - L = K (100';,, +N) Q = 0 (1001, + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) ° Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING 1 .0302 .i 969 REMARKS: Test Method Colif. 216 -F 190 110 1 LA- S. METHOD A ❑ 13 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY p� 1 MOISTURE ^Q N RC = `7 .f+ 7 TENT. RC = %< SPECIFICATION: NL_%, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • BY T RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M ERIALS ENGINEER 0011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ^ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. r I,U1 ArvJ 2 3 4 Qj INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN O O 00 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION A p Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD YU_ _e 9- C11 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN O Q T WET DENSITY aA,S V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. T C=A B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 =G CONE _.1667 - L = K (100';,, +N) Q = 0 (1001, + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) ° Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING 1 .0302 .i 969 REMARKS: Test Method Colif. 216 -F 190 110 1 LA- S. METHOD A ❑ 13 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY p� 1 MOISTURE ^Q N RC = `7 .f+ 7 TENT. RC = %< SPECIFICATION: NL_%, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • BY T RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M ERIALS ENGINEER 0011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION REMARKS: Test Method Colif. 216 -F 190 110 1 LA- S. METHOD A ❑ 13 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY p� 1 MOISTURE ^Q N RC = `7 .f+ 7 TENT. RC = %< SPECIFICATION: NL_%, ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH • BY T RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) M ERIALS ENGINEER 0011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION Prelimirt( rests prior to award of contract. ®' Control tests on materials actually • entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE • ROAD DEPARTMENT /,. < Material Testing Section TEST No.-C— FIELD NO �� (�.FA Q RELATIVE COMPACTION WA ? OR P ORO AR HFe� ' ~ DAT.EREPTD.. If contract, use contract item PROJECT eW,L- ^ A ��WFo.E'7 METHOD MOISTURE SAMPLE R.E,IC -f/ RESIDENT ENGINEER (INS PECTORI i/ %. •%ifySp CONTRACTOR /`j.A66e SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ouiEo. ace RCsir E j� ry MAINTENA NCE ❑ SUBD. E) PERMITS El LOCATION s'L "t/< 6' �'w' /i' ` RT LT OF rt STA /VfiS REPRESENTING LIMITS I WET WT. AT COMPACTION E VOLUME SAND USED r- VOLUME CONE + RING TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH �� TO .:f'6 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE '-7- �'' -/'G TESTED BY: L✓i�. /aJY�I:' :' iA '�i,':f'�i/ G —A IN PLACE DENSITY `iV� MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA METHOD MOISTURE SAMPLE A INITIL WT. TEST SAND 9 ii- B WT. SAND RETAINED _ J ./_ /�_ INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN FIELO WET WT. DRY WT. °s MOIST. I M LA8 C D WT. SAND _USED TEST SAND DENSITY -� r'� I WET WT. AT COMPACTION E VOLUME SAND USED r- VOLUME CONE + RING I , //a /,,> N F SP. GR. ROCK r G VOLUME TEST HOLE 3 % MOISTURE WET WT. ROCK HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TAREI 7/Q DRY WT. ROCK spry 1 TARE WEIGHT _ S WET WT. - 3 a _WT_ J WET WT. EXC_ . S_AMPLE T DRY a K WET DENSITY IN PLACE TOTAL DRY WT. DRY DENSITY ' L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE t'- `Yo ROCK FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. CORR.MAX.DENSITY E= C D • `iV� MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 00 00 P I WET WT. AT COMPACTION Qj _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD__ spry C�.- -•� ' S I HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY ' CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =! +G CONE .1667 1 - L= K+(1 DOT. +N) Q =0 +(100'', +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) Q x V = FACTOR q S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216•F 1 B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS N PLACE OPT. DENSITY I l f 10a MOISTURE !o �If�e RC = %O TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL —% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) NA 1101, IALS ENGINEER r3aI1 -a).t RELATIVE COMPACTION O . O PRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR POTENTIAL SOURCE SA AFTER AWARD OF CON ACT CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS ACTUALLY COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPT. / _ MaMrie! T.Nlg SocBon REPORT OF TESTS ON P. C. C. c - ENTERING INTO WORKS O. SPECIAL TESTS CLA$S: d 11 SIZE: I - IF CONTRACT. WE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD JIp, - PROJECT MIME C 1 TEST NO. FIELD NO. COMP. No. IN.O.mP.O.No. AtlJ c - FED. NO. DATE REPTD. .tWurnl CR61NEER (INSPECTOR) � p`J,{.T � - .e? _ CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: - CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDEMAI NTENANCE O SUB'D� PERMITS AGENCY AGENCY: NJ Ty 06 �LC'W I�r'�.P7 IS',�/QGA� SAMPLE OF LX� ti B CONI.CQ.iT�' SAMPLE FROM LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCH. OF SOURCE 1• �. v t 1 T L V ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH (�E SEP 0 4 1969 ��J /' / / / / / // /JT / /�/�MATERIALS ENGINEER iw� By T RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) jor F- 3011 -65.1 CONCRETE 8 MIX DESIGN M®®®® 1• �. v t 1 T L V ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH (�E SEP 0 4 1969 ��J /' / / / / / // /JT / /�/�MATERIALS ENGINEER iw� By T RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) jor F- 3011 -65.1 CONCRETE 8 MIX DESIGN Prellminv tests prior to award of contract. I I �• ® Control tests an materials actually entering info works. r- PROJECT 23 RD- ST• . w. / SKV/ RESIDENT ENGINEER ONSPI`CTOR) i SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ LOCATION 23 RD. aT. REPRESENTING LIMITS COUNTY OF ORANGE A B ROAD DEPARTMENT 4 o Material Testing Section TEST rC- WT. SAND USED TEST SAND DE_NSIT_Y__ 1 E FIELD NO. 2 CATIVE COMPACTION_ _USED_ __ VOLUME CONE + RING ° ° "T "° ° UA.O, OR P. H P C A - G. ei`?w cC o iv 2 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE �7, 6 If contract, use contract.item ATE REPTD. FJ -^{(j --GB K �. CORR. MAX .DENSITY N � NEw�:;RT ,EAC - —SC_NN AGE J• CONTRACTOR MA2k CON � T. OWSID AGENCYE I��I��ajjr'. MAINTENANCE SUED. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 3` 147 CRT LT OF rL STA 12`5 TYPE MATERIAL A. 6. COAT RK. OR- 'W',) DEPTH DATE S -?`1 — G 8 TESTED BY:_ i IN PLACE DENSITY A B _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND WT. SAND RETAINED 4 o C D WT. SAND USED TEST SAND DE_NSIT_Y__ 1 E VOLUME SAND ,3 F _USED_ __ VOLUME CONE + RING . Le —7(L C VOLUME TEST HOLE 2 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE �7, 6 I J TARE WEIGHT '— WET WT. E)C. SAMPLE _�`2rJ� 2- .4 G K WET DENSITY IN PLACE CORR. MAX .DENSITY L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 13 1 METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA LAS WET PV 00 1 DRY M __ MM 5^"•`u�`� N SP. GR. ROCK INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. e_ WET WT. AT COMPACTION DRY WT. n 3 _— TOTAL DRY WT. 3 z ROCK _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. CORR. MAX .DENSITY REMARKS: (.44) Max Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 1 B- 1140 r LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A W B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE .6 RC= //iUt % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA7 IA LS ENGINEER r3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO.- 1 2 3 4 Oil INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION O _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R . % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR=0.592 FACTOR x Q = °VOLUMES, C.F. C= A– B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E – F K = J > G CONE .1667 – L =K_(100"; +N) Q= 0(100 % +N) SM,RING .0143 .1810 R = (P –Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: (.44) Max Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 1 B- 1140 r LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A W B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE .6 RC= //iUt % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA7 IA LS ENGINEER r3011 -83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION F P relwaanrd o d a � tests prior Jwto a contract. ® Control tests on materials actually . aWaring into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPAC` contract TEST eC— 47-;0 FIELD NO. 2 OF Z. DATE REP,Til. PROJECT- _ SZ- -We /jc'V /N� AGE` "'^` -`F C/ �'tlO.faT fYLr�C: -% RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) G W. dA.ifil/ -CONTRACTOR „LYE✓ 'w' CoN.STIZ. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ourslo¢ �- AGENCY Aii AINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. El PERMITS El LOCATION %' -:'. ts� T =41971 1,'` /lfL -Z RT LT OF CL STA dr-10465' REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL oh ..O DEPTH .T# TO c%4 BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE fj- 7_9 -r68 TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND LAB BI C WT. SAND _RETAINED WT. SAND USED 1 D El TEST SAND DENSITY VOLUME SAND USED VOLUME CON E+ RING SP. GR. ROCK F G VOLUME TEST HOLE DRY WT. ROCK HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE P I T TARE WEIGHT6tZ WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE TOTAL DRY WT. p K WET DENSITY IN PLACE__ /37 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE —_ : -.fit ELD LAB WET WT. -. &fl DRY WT. i O&Y 1 " -. MOIST. tM „sue N SP. GR. ROCK 01 WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - 3 e P DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT. p % ROCK 01 CORR.MAX.DENSITY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 1 B� METHOD A 0 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I / 3L MOISTURE '7 RC= % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY -�-� MATE LS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 130„ -e3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA _ MOLD NO. 1 2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 01 DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD_ S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR -0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J =G CONE - L= Ka(I Dox., +N) Q= 0_(100 % +N) SM. RING _.1667 .014_3 .1810 R = (P -Q) = Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 1 B� METHOD A 0 B ❑ SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY I / 3L MOISTURE '7 RC= % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL % ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY -�-� MATE LS ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) 130„ -e3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Prelim ary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award al contract. ROAD DEPARTMENT Material_ Testing Section TEST No C— FIELD NO. ,rr"^.'0q Control tests on RELATIVE COMPACTION W.O. OR P. OROR IL NF FL 4C 9 materials actually entering into works. e R 105 DATE REPTD. If contract, use contract item T PROJECT 410p E AAENCY C051L [jt '' .4_•' -; ��' % RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) Gd.6eX —CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ A OUTSIDE GENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION L3.i° s-l.F-F' .eif%o4'. GGL f /E'/ J' :' RT (� OF6STA REPRESENT ING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH -' TO q"gir ELOW FINISHED GRADE DATF .. - SQ- /}Y TESTED BY:�; IN P"CE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND _ Ell WT. SAND RETAINED zu- CFWT - _ . SAND USED SP. GR. ROCK D TEST SAND DENSITY V E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. - a FVOLUME CONE +RING _ G VOLUME TEST HOLE i `yo ROCK H!WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT' J WET WT. EXC.SAMPLE— K L WET DENSITY IN PLACE__ DRY DENSITY IN PLACE /7t METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE WET WT. FIELD LAB DRY" WT. __ _ _ MOLD N0. 12 MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - a P DRY WT. TOTAL DRY WT. `yo ROCK Q CORR.MAX. DENS] TY REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F I B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B la SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE ? DENSITY I3's" .r/ O MOISTURE O!i' RC = ZZ -% TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH PIBlC y ,wu,h7W U>� BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) st TERI S ENGINEER I30II -e3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA F __ _ _ MOLD N0. 12 t 3 4 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J +G CONE 11667 1 - L= K= (100- +N) Q = (100 17, +N) SM. RING .014_3 .1610 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q = S LG. RING .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F I B- 140 METHOD A ❑ B la SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE ? DENSITY I3's" .r/ O MOISTURE O!i' RC = ZZ -% TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH PIBlC y ,wu,h7W U>� BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) st TERI S ENGINEER I30II -e3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ORANGE CONY ROAD DEPARTMENT Materials Testing Laboratory ADVANCE R T OF CO RESSIVE STRENGTH OF C�ETE CYLINDERS PROJECT: C /7y NEW Rr BERCH LOCATION: 74VI -VE 4� 7- &S7/A/ iSY/! Z.5"PO ). ,IJSE: /P C. R DATE CAST: 8-/S -68 _ AGE WHEN TESTED: 7 1>4 TEST NO. 68-1103 V CJ V r D STRENGTH PSI:_ 11?¢0 AUG 2 .' 1968 REMARKS: _- .- .,___.. __ PHONE: 834 -3488 /fv7e A- -JAI AREA CODE 774 J. KRIZAN F 301 -112 Materials Engineer U. S. POSTAGE Mr. Joseph T. Devlin Public Works Director City of Newport Beach City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blve. Newport Beach, Calfornia 0 PRELIMINARY TESh PRIOR COUNTY OF ORANGE A I B TO AWARD OF CCONTR POTENTIAL SOURCE SA ROAD DEPT. Material Testinq Section I O D AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT lE57 NO. fp�1j -4 - ��; r f 8�~ ®CONTROL TESTS ON REPORT OF �TESTS ON FIELD NO. MATERIALS ACTUALLY L�4 .(Jl95ti coNT. rva o. 4 I w.0. or P.O. Nu. or AHPP ENTERING INTO WORKS - I • O SPECIAL TESTS " �/ :r FED. NO. <' DATE REPTD. 8 -zj -GB i IF CONTRACT, USE CONTRACT ITEM ROAD NO. PROJECT NAME RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) CONTRACTOR V siVri•A✓ / /i4r4K c il`� yS 21I: SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE SUB'DPERM7T5 AGENCY: AGENCY STAB ILOMETER VALUE "R" SAMPLE OF � ;;s DEPTH LIMITS OF SAMPLE LOCA. OF SOURCE Ai gip, f,_' ( •9 . , r EXUDATION PRESS. F.B.I. OWNER OR /- p NT T MANUFACTURER t •' +.✓ S(;d . '�:i "'�'D i7 k pe Oi ' -` C � t REPRESENTED DATE SAMPLED 8-/- l - y> e BY � /f� Z ° 9 � • T TITLE j RECEIVED FOR USE IN 8"Is ` '- Z- -- -1-1,6 /V F- I I • GRAUING ANALYSIS TEST SPECIMEN A I B SIEVE AS USED SPECIF. LIMITS SOUGHT COMPACTOR AIICPRESSURE P.S.I. MOISTURE AT COMPACTION % i DRY DENSITY OF BRIO.. #I-U. FT. 21I: STAB ILOMETER VALUE "R" 2 EXUDATION PRESS. F.B.I. II/2 THICK. INDICATED BY STAB, INCHES I �f7L THICK. INDICATED BY E %P. PRESS. IN. 'Y1 [7� /QO °'1 i' ` /O ✓' SP. GR. OVEN DRY 3. S. D. APP. SUBBASE 2112 FINE BASE 'Ye / 7-Y COARSE SURFACE 1-77 L. L. P. L. P. 1. COHESION VALUE $ TRAFFIC INDEX Ib DURABILITY 1 FINE COARSE SPEC. w BY E %UD. PRESS 30 jZ �l J J 4 BY E %PAN. PRESS r- W m Z WET Q� DRY AVG. SPEC. �Q i AT EQUIL. 8PEC. ,Do INDICATED MINIMUM THICK. OF COVER FOR ABOVE CONDITIONS, 200 S 5U I U LART - iSPEC. MOISTURE CONTENT AS RECEIVED: % DENSITY IN PLACE OPTIMUM MOISTURE RELATIVE COMPACTION % MID CURVE NO. REMARKS: I r ` RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) JF- 3011.421 ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AGGREGATE & SOIL MATERIALS ENGINEER 0 r1 • • OPRELIMINARY TESTS PRIOR TO AWARD OF CONTR OPOTENTIAL SOURCE SAMWD AFTER AWARD OF CONTRACT CONTROL TESTS ON MATERIALS. ACTLi ENTERING INTO WORKS O SPECIAL ROAD NO. RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTIOI AGENCY: LOCA. OF SOURCE MANN FACTURER 6 DATE SAMPLED FOR USE IN 1 COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEFT. Dp MRMriel Teafing $scliun TEST NO. % / ��-- 8 p p , (� 0 Bbl tEPORT OF TESTS ON FIELD NO. P. C. C. FED. NO. .(9- _ /T9 SIZE: DATE REPTD. PROJECT N^ME VJAw e CONTRA J OUTSIDE MAINTENANCE' AGENCY AlEiyi,i f SAMPLE FROM Ai PERMITS RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.I p.901 I.45.I CONCRETE E MIX DESIGN ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER iCOMPRESSION ® ®® ®�I !M®® ®® RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.I p.901 I.45.I CONCRETE E MIX DESIGN ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH MATERIALS ENGINEER Preliminary tests prior to award o contract. ® Conti mate, • enter PROJECT RESIDENT SEND REF LOCATIOt REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE` `RIAL IMP- S3vlcl Z-F. DEPTH A c TC COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMFNT AW DATE Av6U -0 %O. TESTED BY: LA,'AZ t'{ P \SHE - IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 43.35 B WT. SAND RETAINED 3 C WT. SAND USED DRY WT. ROCK D TEST SAND DENSITY E F I VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE+ RING ! _ 0,1810 G VOLUME TEST HOLE HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 31.55 I TARE WEIGHT 3.0 5 J WET ­WT. SAMPLE R K WET DENSITY PLACE L --IN DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. DRY WTt MOIST. M -- --- N SP. GR. ROCK 3 WET WT. ROCK 0 DRY WT. ROCK WET WT, _ DRY WT. _ P TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY Q • _ MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD N0. 1 Qap 3 4 0 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN G;.` P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. -' R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD_ K. FWa S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN lln3 le9j T WET DENSITY V1 DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE - L = K - (100-1 + N) Q = O = (10017, + N) SM. RING _.1667 . 01 43 .181 0 R = (P -Q) _ 0 V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F 0 RECEIVED AUG 2 31968 ILPj i B- LOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY MOISTURE 3610 !IA19 RC =--Ea—% TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH PC;B! !C ,AIm /k- lioew Ij BY ` RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MATE ALS ENGINEER Ir .3011_83.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑ Preliminary tests prior to award o of contract. I Control tests onx _ materials actually - _ COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT g Material TestingSeetiera - TEST NO NT N . T NO OR RELATIVE COMPACT11 OR P O.OR AHFI ,-�d.t oi+ rim /.i -- on or ng rnto war s. _ I -- e - If contract use controct ite PROJECT 1121//�l/.r`v l3.0 ✓d• ,'x;.,. .. - /i✓�5 "i ��oe T" RE T. ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) $f$r> .>_:qy' � e CONTRACTOR .tee,PA.' SEND REPORT TO:. CONSTRUCTION ❑ A INTENANCE ❑ SUBO. ❑ PERMITS ❑ LOCATION- r�LT OF rt_ STA L ♦-76� REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL n1, Si A*Ze-1 DEPTH -Z r TO a2 7G BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE TESTED BY: r • z2,1' l _ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND jo .£+ EI WT. SAND RETAINED C WT. SAND USED t_AA _ DI TEST SAND DENSITY E I VOLUME SAND USED 331e3 F VOLUME CONE +RING I U G VOLUME TEST HOLE , H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE -p ) TARE WEIGHT g RD J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE a K WET DENSITY IN PLACE _ L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ME7HOD;A` "v ` MOISTURE SA FIECa'!'a's WET WT. `— DRY WT. °b MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. -a DRY TOTAL DRY WT.. .; % ROCK CORR.MAX. DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. pew 1 --w2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2-Ak O 40.2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE (rf P 2 CONDITION OF MOLD v4p ovirk- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10 , T WET DENSITY i3 V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES,.C.F. I C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE :1667 - L =K +(100 +N). Q =0 +(100, +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • r— METHOD A ❑ B.R SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 37 MOISTURE ( u7Na RC = 3 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA 7ER IA LStaGINEER _- r3aI1 ,3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ME7HOD;A` "v ` MOISTURE SA FIECa'!'a's WET WT. `— DRY WT. °b MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. -a DRY TOTAL DRY WT.. .; % ROCK CORR.MAX. DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. pew 1 --w2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2-Ak O 40.2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE (rf P 2 CONDITION OF MOLD v4p ovirk- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10 , T WET DENSITY i3 V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES,.C.F. I C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE :1667 - L =K +(100 +N). Q =0 +(100, +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • r— METHOD A ❑ B.R SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 37 MOISTURE ( u7Na RC = 3 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA 7ER IA LStaGINEER _- r3aI1 ,3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. pew 1 --w2 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2-Ak O 40.2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE (rf P 2 CONDITION OF MOLD v4p ovirk- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10 , T WET DENSITY i3 V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES,.C.F. I C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J +G CONE :1667 - L =K +(100 +N). Q =0 +(100, +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) + Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • r— METHOD A ❑ B.R SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 37 MOISTURE ( u7Na RC = 3 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA 7ER IA LStaGINEER _- r3aI1 ,3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • r— METHOD A ❑ B.R SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 37 MOISTURE ( u7Na RC = 3 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) MA 7ER IA LStaGINEER _- r3aI1 ,3.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests pn or COUNTY OF ORANGE. to award o contract. - -' ROAD- DEPARTMEN'G�.�;; Material Testing S'el ran TESTo &C— control tut.aR RELATIYE := ACTIOIL N. °R AHPPI _ meq 1, tally • a.A O%5' •� rrn(rirr Prks. as . rs?'DATE REPTD. se contract item PROJECT AGENCY- ".1Pdr.oax RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) = CONTRACTOR _ OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY MAINTENANCE,- SU PERMITS _�� i/�.y c� Q e ilQ - •rG ®, LT OF tL �STA ,T7 z� REPRESENTING LIMIT =" -*YPE MATERIAL n1.-'$ �%C� DEPTH TO -•. ��� BELOW FINISHED GRADE I g <. BATE 2 — ZO ^GS TESF.¢`D-9Y:� On/ -- L ACE DENSITY A INITIAL T. TEST SAND p BI WT. SAND RETAINED 11,16, C _ WT. SAND USED _ j D TEST SAND DENSI T_Y_ VOLUME SAND USED El F1 ___ VOLUME CONE + RING � JA 10 G VOLUME TEST HOLE - 7 HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 3 �O I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE., K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE MET _ MOISTU PLE -: FIELD 'LAS WET WT. DRY WT, ' MOIST. M NJ WET DRY -CK WET W -'a DRY WT, 3 .TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX. DENSI TY:.' -"" MAXIMUM DENSIT MOLD NO. 1 O INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ZA0 c P WET WT. AT COMPACTION L4 D _ Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. 777777 R % MOISTURE F1'rt CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 1O.So T WET DENSITY ) VI DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = - C_ A- B E_ C= D G =E - F K =J - G L = K + (1 OOT. + N) Q = 0 - (1 00 lz, + N) R= (P -Q) . Q V= FACTOR x Q+ S REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F IATHOLE e VOLUMES, C.F. -- UNIT CO CONE 1667 �jCjlr] ea�las ii:111Y METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN - OPT,:- PLACE DENSITY Z i MOISTURE �P RIC TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% .. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY _7 MATE LS ENNER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) r9ali -83,1 RELATIVE COMPACTION - i .:• ❑ Preliminary te¢s prior to award o1 contract. p(t iOntrol 1!115 on COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT- - Material Testing Section 0 TEST o8C— Gs FIELD No "4 - -01 j RELATIVE COMPACTION °' °FON "N40s PROJECT ,-RVI -' E 1°� :%. -A t) -° RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR)_S2 SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ LOCATION SRVtNE BLVp RE.P�,RESENTING LIMITS TYP *ERIAL N.S. [�FILL .DATE AVGUST :201 \ /tp E� TESTE _ IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND -_A,8 00 B WT. SAND RETAINED C WT.. SAND USED 30.OS D TEST SAND DENSITY E VOLUME SAND USED WET WT. AT COMPACTION F VOLUME CONE +RING GI VOLUME TEST HOLE _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. HIWT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 2G, 1 TARE WEIGHT 3.0 p T WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE ;k.I K WET DENSITY IN PLACE . CONDITION OF MOLD L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE F \L DATE REPTD. B 2/ m'1 �7cantract item - AGENCY C / tQ PGC -7 4AA CONTRACTOR kiA ST . oursioe AGENCY MAINTENANCE ❑ ,SU.,BD. [:1 PERMITS ❑ LT ',OF.� STA 3'Z- -j - TO I = r OW FINISHED GRADE "•. CARL tiADS01.1 - LAM' ASHE • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA ,' MOLD NO. I1 c..✓. 2 a,v 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 2400 2QOo P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2000 "¢a Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE Fr-[O .y P. p CONDITION OF MOLD S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN i0. 3/ T WET DENSITY 1 /37.8 /8¢.S V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G = E — F K = J + G CONE .1667 — L =K +(100 -11 +N) Q =O+ (100°! +N) SM. RING _ .0143 .1810 R = (P —Q) + Q V - FACTOR is Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY /3S MOISTURE RC = 9O % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: [—]BILLING WILL BE MADE AT,END OF MONTH - - • r BY RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) Mnr IA LS ENm NEE6 I 13011_93.1 RELATIVE COMPACTION IN PLA A . ❑ reliminar tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE --r Fo award at contract. R n D ROAD DEPARTMENT .: . . C F Material Testing Sectieits> >:. Car an AUG _ Y.N z I 196 ECOMP , r materials aitually VOLUME SAND I F VOLUME CONE G VOLUME TEST f HIWT. 1 entdnnq rato works. • v. �( ontroct, usa contract item - `I1fj PROJECT 'GENCY C E RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) _ ' - O CO TRAC I. SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGEN Y EI MAINTENANCE C LOCATION - - i�C REPRESENTING LIMITS Ad TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH 3'0" T0. 3t DATE F_,�- i6 -aC) TESTED BY: POLEN IN PLA A _ INITIAL WT. TE 13 WT. SAND RETA C WT. SAND USE[ D TEST SAND DEN E VOLUME SAND I F VOLUME CONE G VOLUME TEST f HIWT. EXC. SAMP_ I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. K WET DENSITY II L DRY DENSITY II, • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 2 gly 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION _ Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE .f CONDITION OF MOLD S .HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN Ad T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =1 =G CONE .1667 1 - L = K = (100- +N) Q = 0 _ (100% + N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q= S I LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F METHOD' A ❑ B .SUMMARY RECORD .W HOLE. NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY Z3 f, � �38 M01$TURE RC : =' TENT.' RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH I - e ❑Preliminc y tests prior - COUNTY OF ORANGE to award of contract. ROAD, DEPARTMENT /� Mateetal Testing Secti TEST N C— ' contra, tee,. on RElA1 EVE .tTtriteneu auy PROJECT S..R V I!V (- RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) - �^ SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ LOCATION V %V i REPRESENTING LIMIT TYPE MATERIAL�1t DATE IN PLACE DENSIT` A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND B WT. SAND RETAINED C WT. SAND USED D _ TEST SAND DENSITY E F VOLUME_ SAND USED _ VOLUME CONE +RING ti GI VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. EXC. SAMPLE +TARE 1 TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K L -DRY WET DENSITY IN PLACE t DENSITY IN PLACE A REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) r3011-63.1 4:y METHOD A ❑ B 2Z SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY l MOISTURE 3 -.0 P6 RC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLI14G WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 FIELD NO. ) -_ 1 ON COOT. NO. O CON on P.O. OA ^t 1 21.E 7­ 3 4 - DATE REPTD. INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN contract item p - - GENCY i -__ - A/ C NTRACTC - oNJ MAINTENANCE�,❑ SL '= °``PERMITS ❑ ' . X15 �.J� - -LT O STA I4"Y `-fir REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) r3011-63.1 4:y METHOD A ❑ B 2Z SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY l MOISTURE 3 -.0 P6 RC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLI14G WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 . MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE,.DATA MOLD N0. 1 L-V 21.E 7­ 3 4 - 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 03 410 -e p - P WET WT. AT COMPACTION gj Q _ DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - R % MOISTURE ss °%O ,9 - CONDITION OF MOLD cL pN,pE� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ZIP. So O.S - T WET DENSITY VI DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, -C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G = E - F - K =J + G CONE .1667 - - L z K - (100 0 +N) Q = 0 _ (1.00 %+ N) - SM. RING. .4143 .1810 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) r3011-63.1 4:y METHOD A ❑ B 2Z SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY l MOISTURE 3 -.0 P6 RC % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_% ❑ BILLI14G WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH 1 ❑ Preliminary tests prior COUNTY OF ORANGE to award o contract. iT ROAD DEPARTMENT o r< Material Testing SectLI TEST c .. .. FIELD NO. ® materialspctaally RELATIVE COM TL _ entering into works: '� tf contract uat:confract item PROJECT - # „AGENCY CozN RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) sc CONTR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ ® MAINTENANCE J - LOCATION ! REPRESENTING LIMITS M. TYPE MATERIAL S. DEPTH tt '' * „•, DATE TESTED BY: t'o LE.M --- IN PLACE DENSITY - AINITIAL _ WT. TEST SAND 3 O 81 WT. SAND RETAINED WET WT. ROCK C _ WT. SAND _USED p D _' TEST SAND_DE_NSI T E F VOLUME SAND USED_ _ VOLUME CONE + RING -� ! v G VOLUME TEST HOLE _ c H T. EX C. SAMPLE +TARE _ 1 TARE WEIGHT 5O . WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE % MOISTURE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE 3 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE CONDITION OF MOLD H _ MET _ MOISTURE SPINPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. DRY WT. "£. MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK 2' WET WT. ROCK 4 DRY WT. ROCK INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN WET WT. — 0 0 DRY WT. — e TOTAL DRY WT. WET WT. AT COMPACTION % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY - -- REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 40' 120 or 1L SUED. ❑ F ,LT, OF CL STA METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 1 M01 STURE RC = /r'JOt % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_%. [].BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY �— RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) w +rena eNClNeex .) r3atl RELATIVE COMPACTION ql c;) • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 &4�p 2' 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 6d) 0 0 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. - R % MOISTURE Fl LL IJ 4 - U CONDITION OF MOLD ate ,pEle a S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN t/, O - T WET DENSITY `/, 1-33,3 V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C = -A - B E= C+ D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L= K- (100% +N) Q =O- (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 1 .1810 R = IP -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q= S LG. RING 1 .0302 1 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 40' 120 or 1L SUED. ❑ F ,LT, OF CL STA METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 1 M01 STURE RC = /r'JOt % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_%. [].BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY �— RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) w +rena eNClNeex .) r3atl RELATIVE COMPACTION ql c;) Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. i ® Control tests on mate,iols:octually. entering info. works.. 1. PROJECT 7'VV.(. 7 -"cL COUNTY OF ORANGE �.. ROAD DEPARTMENT'" Material Testing Section " T NeC- +�.:;'. 18'LO NO. O. E COMPAC { •l•r:NT. NOP 0- O _ DATE REPTD �• If contract, use cont item + ` s e?'ix -mmu F.'I�.i[H:�t��•�lrl -ems• ' 1�=. I.. Prir:7S.71c•L"�✓�sstt�r.7.r7 ®�I SEND REPORT T CO S LOCATION L11" S REPRESENTING LIMITS �--- TYPE MATERIAL ;TF DATE C- 2UCTION ❑ AGENC E' MAINTENANCE. ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ RT 'LT OF rL STA Oy.,90 DEPTH ��TO BELOW FINISHED GRADE .� —TESTED BY: �cL.�N ` IN PLACE DENSITY A _ INITIAL WT. TEST SAND , 9 81 WT. SAND RETAINED ) ( , a5 C WT. SAND USED 27. 95- D TEST SAND DENSITY s 3 Ej _ VOLUME SAND USED _V J F VOLUME CONE + RING - I , 1e>/0 G VOLUME TEST HOLE .% HI WT. EXC. SAMPLE " TARE WEIGHT 3,60 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE 2 , K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE ct METHOD A :SAMPLE ' D LAB WET WT. DRY WT. % MOIST. �M N SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK ayao DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - P DRY. WT. - AIJ,00 TOTAL DRY WT, % ROCK Q CORR.MAX.DENSIt -V " REMARKS: Test Method Calif. ZT6 -F 19- -5 FIELD +S (%WET) METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY J-u 13C7 MOISTURE 170 RC = TENT. RC = •% SPECIFICATION: NL —% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OFMONTH BY '.MATE AU @ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) !' . RELATIVE COMPACTION F301 14311 ' • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 3 ,; is =', 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN ayao 00`" P WET WT. AT COMPACTION AIJ,00 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. " R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD ct Lv S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN ,R T WET DENSITY .Z DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A— B E= C- D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K = J -G CONE .1667 - L =K +(1 O0 % +N) Q =0 +(1,00 % +N) SM. RING. .0143 .1810 R = (P -Q) - Q V = FACTOR x Q- S LG..RING -,, .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. ZT6 -F 19- -5 FIELD +S (%WET) METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY J-u 13C7 MOISTURE 170 RC = TENT. RC = •% SPECIFICATION: NL —% ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OFMONTH BY '.MATE AU @ENGINEER RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) !' . RELATIVE COMPACTION F301 14311 ' ❑ Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. VIA ��. Control tests on materials actual lA COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION • enter ng Into war s. / DATE REPTD.'/,;$ -G8 Ifcoatract, Use contract item . PROJECT'`/ AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) /. CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY- MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. C7� ) =RMITS ❑ LOCATION S•ELi...�� .4'vt.� ®T LT OF�STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL ^/ S. F /GL DEPTH io£/ TO /1 -° BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 8 -��- .: -^ TESTED BY: .4rNE It ,•/t.a»cL IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ,yam „to B WT. SAND RETAINED 8. �n C WT. SAND USED -IS. n D TEST SAND DENSITY S;b.T E VOLUME SAND USED 9¢9/ F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE • /48/ EXC. SAMPLE + TARE Fa. 76' 1 TARE WEIGHT 2700 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /. ?S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /Z y,4 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD - LAB WET WT. DRY WT. % MOIST I M I N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - DRY WT. - a TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1G.Al 2G.A4 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 74o0 2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 2340 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD OPT, VN:JEq� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN i0' ?'g T WET DENSITY /3r. 5 /g V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =JAG - CONE .1667 - L= K= (1 DO,. +N) Q= 0:-(100% +N) S %1W .0143 .1110 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F301143 . 130 I B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X29 MOISTURE �j° RC = 43 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION �OrEST N NOf'. C— I FIELD NO / CONT. NO. OR IW.O. OR P.O. OI AHF 1 10S III C enter ng Into war s. / DATE REPTD.'/,;$ -G8 Ifcoatract, Use contract item . PROJECT'`/ AGENCY RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) /. CONTRACTOR SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGENCY- MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD. C7� ) =RMITS ❑ LOCATION S•ELi...�� .4'vt.� ®T LT OF�STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL ^/ S. F /GL DEPTH io£/ TO /1 -° BELOW FINISHED GRADE DATE 8 -��- .: -^ TESTED BY: .4rNE It ,•/t.a»cL IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND ,yam „to B WT. SAND RETAINED 8. �n C WT. SAND USED -IS. n D TEST SAND DENSITY S;b.T E VOLUME SAND USED 9¢9/ F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE • /48/ EXC. SAMPLE + TARE Fa. 76' 1 TARE WEIGHT 2700 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE /. ?S K WET DENSITY IN PLACE /Z y,4 L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD - LAB WET WT. DRY WT. % MOIST I M I N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - DRY WT. - a TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1G.Al 2G.A4 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 74o0 2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 2340 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD OPT, VN:JEq� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN i0' ?'g T WET DENSITY /3r. 5 /g V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =JAG - CONE .1667 - L= K= (1 DO,. +N) Q= 0:-(100% +N) S %1W .0143 .1110 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F301143 . 130 I B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X29 MOISTURE �j° RC = 43 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD - LAB WET WT. DRY WT. % MOIST I M I N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. - DRY WT. - a TOTAL DRY WT. % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1G.Al 2G.A4 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 74o0 2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 2340 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD OPT, VN:JEq� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN i0' ?'g T WET DENSITY /3r. 5 /g V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =JAG - CONE .1667 - L= K= (1 DO,. +N) Q= 0:-(100% +N) S %1W .0143 .1110 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F301143 . 130 I B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X29 MOISTURE �j° RC = 43 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1G.Al 2G.A4 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN 74o0 2400 P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 2400 2340 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD OPT, VN:JEq� S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN i0' ?'g T WET DENSITY /3r. 5 /g V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =JAG - CONE .1667 - L= K= (1 DO,. +N) Q= 0:-(100% +N) S %1W .0143 .1110 R = (P -Q) Q V = FACTOR x Q _ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F301143 . 130 I B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X29 MOISTURE �j° RC = 43 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) F301143 . 130 I B- METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY X29 MOISTURE �j° RC = 43 TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION: NL_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY RELATIVE COMPACTION ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section Control tests on RELATIVE. C materials actually • - entering into works. If Contra Ct PROJECT L VU RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) 2,- ��N4 NQ�C SEND REPORT TO: ' CONSTRUCTION ❑ AGEN OE AGENCY LOCATION =PVItVG- �51-Vi7. REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL N1, 5 DEPT,H. DATE IW1` -e- - CP TESTED BY: IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIALWT. TEST SAND - 170 B WT. SAND - ?RETAINED - C WT. SAND USED 2 o G D TEST SAND DENSITY ( - -7 E VOLUME SAND USED - NO 1-1 F VOLUME CONE + RING O G VOLUME TEST HOLE - H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE 26 p I TARE WEIGHT 3 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE? 7 , K WET DENSITY IN PLACE _ L- DRY DENSITY IN PLACE � TE6T NO. C--390 PACTION ( .OTOR P.OROf P item CY— C C MAINTEN r C - /// z DATE REP �/JEtN Ao,PT �EA� N � NTRACTOR t —\R K C.DNST NCE ❑ SUBD. ❑ PERMITS ❑ 2L CRT) LT OF rL STA 2/ •1'4(] - TO 1 OI G II BELOW FINISHED GRADE METHOD A MOISTURE SAMPLE FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 14-6tr DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST, M N SP. GR. ROCK - WET WT. ROCK - DRY WT. ROCK O WET —WT.—.' - Q TOTAL DRY WT. - %a ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R I_. • - MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 14-6tr 2L 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION O 3 Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE p CONDITION OF MOLD � p S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN 10.31 p,ZO T WET DENSITY J,3 3 V DRY DENSITY - CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C+ D - UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J =G CONE .1667 - L =K +(100% +N) Q =O +(100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1610 R = (P -Q) _ Q V = FACTOR x Q..= S° LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS RECEIVED Test Method Calif. 216 -F • 140 1L METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT. PLACE DENSITY 107 MOISTURE d RC = % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: NL_ %, .p WORIMS DEPTH BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH BY MATERIALS ENGINEER - RESIDENT; ENGINEER (CITY ENGR.) F3011. -e3 RELATIVE -- ❑Preliminary tests prior to award of contract. Control tests on materials actually entering into works. COUNTY OF ORANGE A ROAD DEPARTMENT o. Material Testing Section" 'TEST C— 3" ., FIELD NO RELATIVE COMPACTION, -id w OTOR NO. AN F _S VOLUME SAND USED J LS 1 DATE KEPT D. 8+:9 68 T =contract, use contract item. VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE PROJECT 'CRV/n/E Z'L"/J, G RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION LOCATION ZRVWC 13LW- REPRESENTING LIMI TYPE MATERIAL -1. DATE El - E - IN PLACE DENSI' A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND B WT. SAND RETAINED C WT. SAND USED D TEST SAND DENSITY E VOLUME SAND USED F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE I TARE WEIGHT J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE K WET DENSITY IN PLACE L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE AGENCY .� OIJ ONTRACTO A AG Icy~ ® MAINTENANCE El SUIB' ❑ PERMITS ❑ R C P RT LT OF r STA • MAXIMUM DENSITY RATHOLE' ATA MOLD NO. J.M. 1 .:.. A.R 2 .. 3 " 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION 22S<t Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE CONDITION OF MOLD GL AA1 S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN O, y T WET DENSITY / 7. V DRY DENSITY CONY. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C° D I UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J G CONE •1667 1 - L = K _ (100% +N) Q = 0 = (100% + N) SM -RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) > Q V = FACTOR x Q+ S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS: Test Method Calif. 216 -F • RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGR) s3011 -83 SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS IN OPT, PLACE ". DENSITY 117 laff MOISIURE�7o and RC = 4l % TENT. RC = SPECIFICATION: ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH / r BY MAT RELATIVE COMPACTION ENGINEER ❑Preliminary tests prior to award at contract. RI cewYral� beta on .. materials onoall entering into works. .. COUNTY OF ORANGE ROAD DEPARTMENT Material Testing Section RELATIVE COMPACTION LL DATE.REFQD . If contract, use contract item x. PROJECT 71ZVItQ4= AGENCY NMI C• RESIDENT ENGINEER (INSPECTOR) �• W �1n�N �.nIJ ONTRACTOR OUTSIDE SEND REPORT TO: CONSTRUCTION ❑ AaENCV ® MAINTENANCE ❑ SUBD.� ^� PERMITS LJ LOCATION Zt \ \� /,VL i ".'�.L�r LT OF 4, STA REPRESENTING LIMITS TYPE MATERIAL DEPTH'h �I a TO CQ BELOW FINISHED GRADE' DATE TESTED BY: Dps,U`,otQ DoL-EN IN PLACE DENSITY A INITIAL WT. TEST SAND 4t,50 B WT. SAND RETAINED p C WT. SAND USED 4 D TEST SAND DENSITY R E VOLUME SAND USED 3 F VOLUME CONE + RING G VOLUME TEST HOLE 5 H WT. EXC. SAMPLE + TARE p 1 TARE WEIGHT -3,30 J WET WT. EXC. SAMPLE . O K WET DENSITY IN PLACE a L DRY DENSITY IN PLACE 6 ve METHOD A 'MOISTURE SAMPLE 'FIELD LAB WET WT. MOLD NO. 1 DRY WT. 3 4 % MOIST. M N SP. GR. ROCK WET WT. ROCK P DRY WT. ROCK WET WT. -4 DRY WT. — 3 Q TOTAL DRY WT.- % ROCK CORR.MAX.DENSITY R • MAXIMUM DENSITY'RATHOLE DATA MOLD NO. 1 3 4 01 INITIAL WT. SPECIMEN P WET WT. AT COMPACTION Q DRY WT. COMP. SPEC. R % MOISTURE . O D CONDITION OF MOLD 6 ve C R- S HT. COMPACTED SPECIMEN T WET DENSITY V DRY DENSITY CONV. FACTOR =0.592 FACTOR x Q = VOLUMES, C.F. C= A- B E= C= D UNIT CONE +UNIT G =E - F K =J -. G CONE .1667 - L = K � (100% + N) Q =O= (100 % +N) SM. RING .0143 .1810 R = (P-Q) = Q V = FACTOR x'Q= S LG. RING .0302 .1969 REMARKS Test Method Calif. 216 -F • METHOD A ❑ B SUMMARY RECORD WHOLE NUMBERS lN.:' .. .. OPT. PLACE:': DENSITY MOISTURE �O ND RC = _ % TENT. RC = % SPECIFICATION :_ %. ❑ BILLING WILL BE MADE AT END OF MONTH''' BY MATER'IAt.S ENP RESIDENT ENGINEER (CITY ENGIQ F3011!a9 RELATIVE COMPACTION u •._.r.!.re —rn e.nrwr_z...Y. ... " "..�..Pl�l. .i1 A 4n.. ¢i�6 b ti CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FINAL REPORT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE AND TUSTIN AVENUES FROM 22ND STREET T6 NIVERSITY DRIVE City Contract Number 1112 AHFP - Project 405 Type of Improvement: Realignment and widening of existing two -lane road to four -lane with median and construction of underground drainage system. Description of work performed: Clearing and grubbing, removal of existing pavement and base, excavation and embankment, construction of storm drainage system, construction of curb and gutter, median curbs, and sidewalk, and construction of base and pavement sections. Length im miles: Contractor: Engineer in charge Date Work Began 1.08 Mark Construction Company, Inc. Benjamin B. Nolan City Engineer RCE 12806 June 1968 Date Work Accepted: March, 1969 0 0 CHANGE ORDERS 1. Provided for change in type of catch basin on 22nd Street. 2. Provided for change in estimated quantities due to error in original estimate. 3. Permitted use of "Gunite concrete" for the warped wingwalls and headwall at the outlet of the 84 -inch R. C. P., Station 25 + 001' 4. Provided for modifications to City water system at various locations on Irvine Avenue. 5. Provided for deletion of 95 LF of curb and gutter (Sta 211) to accomodate construction of subdivision street entrance on Irvine Avenue. Provided for resurfacing of Santa Isabel Avenue, Irvine to Tustin Avenues. 6. Certified quantity of stockpiled material (Sect. 11 -2, Special Provisions). Added this quantity to roadway excavation item. 7. Provided for welding of reinforcing bars at 84 -inch R. C. P. outlet structure. 8. Provided for removal of existing sunken curb and gutter between 23rd Street and Heather Lane. 9. Provided for realignment of existing 12 -inch storm drain on 22nd Street. 10. Provided for excavation necessary to substitute 7 -inch A. B. in lieu of 7 -inch L. T. S. around existing water main near Granada ''lay. 11. Provided for relocating existing water meters to accommodate proposed grade and alignment. Water Company had prior rights in easement. C7 r� This contract was a combination of two separate projects. The major project was the reconstruction and widening of Irvine and Tustin Avenues and the construction of an underground drainage system. The work was engineered by Williamson and Schmid, Consulting Engineers, and is represented in the contract by proposal items 1 through 46. Part of the work was constructed outside the City Limits in county territory under a cooperative agreement entered into with the Orange County Road Department. Work under the terms of this agreement has been charged 15% overhead on City labor. Work constructed within the City which was A.H.F.P, eligible has been charged 18% overhead on City labor. The second project was the reconstruction of 23rd Street from Irvine to Tustin Avenues,including the replacement of the water main in 23rd Street. This project was designed by the City staff and financed entirely by City funds. Engineering costs for 23rd Street are not included in this report. The work is represented in the contract by proposal items 101 through 115. The cost of "Other Work" has been shared as follows: I. Design Engineering pro -rated on the basis of items 1 through 46 only. II. Construction Engineering, which includes inspection and testing, pro -rated on the basis of the total contract. i OTSg R WORK I. Design Engineering 1. Williamson 6 Schmid 2. O.C.R.D. (billed direct) 3. City 18% Overhead on City Labor 15% Overhead on City Labor Total Design Engr. (18X) Total Design Engr. (15x) II. Construction Engineering 1. County (Testing, etc.) 2. City Labor 18% Overhead on City Labor 15% Overhead on City Labor 3. Equipment (Transportation) Total Const. Engr. (18X) Total Const. Engr. (15%) 0 City and AHFP Eligible OCRD Eligible $21,408.83 608.50 1,407.98 253.43 $23,678.74 $ 3,508.28 10,591.56 1,906.48 741.40 $16,747.72 NOTE: See preceding page for project description and method of apportioning "Other Work ". $ 211.19 $23,635.50 1,588.73 $16,429.97 COMPUTATION OF PRO -RATA SHARE OF "OTHER WORE" City General Fund I Design Engineering (9,219.00/280,508.77) 23,678.74 $ 778.21 II Construction Engineering (22,766.24/301,860.57) 16,747.72 1,263.10 TOTAL $ 2,041.31 City Water Fund I Design Engineering (8,920.00/280,508.77) 23,678.74 $ 752,97 II Construction Engineering (15,948.75/301,860.57) 16,747.72 884.86 TOTAL $ 1,637.83 Gas Tax (Non A.W.F.P.) I Design Engineering (53,170.48/280,508.77) 23,678.74 $ 4,488.31 II Construction Engineering (53,278.27/301,860.57) 16,747.72 2,955.96 TOTAL $ 7,444.27 A.H.F.P. Eligible I Design Engineering (158,893.10 /280,508.77)23,678.74 + $ 13,412.73 II Construction Engineering (158,893.10/301,860.57) 16,747.72 8,815.65 TOTAL $ 22,228.38 a 0 O.C.B.D. (County Territory) I Design Engineering (47,318.83/280,508.77) 23,536.50 $ 3,987.23 II Construction Engineering (47,986.85/301,860.57) 16,429.97 2,611.87 Total 6,599.10 Property Owners I Design Engineering (2,987.36/280,508.77) 23,578.74 ' $ 252.18 II Construction Engineering (2,987.36/301,860.57) 16,747.72 165.74 Total $ 417.92 i 0 RIGHT OF WAY The widening and realignment of Irvine and Tustin Avenues required 2.44 acres of additional right of way. This property was obtained by the City from The Irvine Company at a cost of $36,500 per acre. The additional right of way was entirely within the City limits. r I� 1101FRIM PROJECT FUNDING AHFP Eligible Costs (const.) Right of Way Total Less 50% by City County Cost Expended by County to 3/21 Billed to.County 3/24 Balance Due from County II O. C. R. D. 0. C. R. D. Costs Paid to Date Balance Due III City Gas Tax Funds AHFP Non - eligible Costs 50% of AHFP Eligible Costs Total IV Other Funds (City) General Water Property Owners 0 $181,121.48 89,060.00 270,181.48 135,090.74 135,090.74 - 60,167.02 - 57,769.95 17,153.77 54,585.95 0.00 54,585.95 60,722.54 135,090.74 195,813.28 135,090.74 54,585.95 195,813.28 24,807.55 17,586.58 3,405.28 88 V5o in N000h 4000 a 88 JNOOOn.+OOO o n J V1 O O. O n h n v1 O O. V1 u'f N w1 O rt •O p .Y V1 .-� •O P C 0 J O. N .•� M N A N V% a0 Vf rl ww ara 00 Go 40 0 000 V5o in N000h 4000 J J 000+00 JNOOOn.+OOO N i V1 O O. O n h n v1 O O. V1 u'f N w1 O rt •O U� D .-� •O N .O N �O l+1 n .+ a7 N 9D O .-� .+ a7 n J O. N .•� M N N N a 0 H W 0I P. as P. P. P. a m m Mrt W r7 ►10 93 Oa0 a0W W O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n 0 N 0 0 0 V1 an O O O An -R 0 0 0 OOOJOO a1 OnO�0000JNOOOI�.+OOO in 0 0 (n O a0 O n in O O n to O 0% N w (.4 Ln O V1 plrj� O V1 •O it O O V1 m 0 0 n 0 J d J O yl' 4 en .+ n Ch .+ N N O In V1 ut O. .O in •O N •O O O m m N aD aD . N M Cl; a1 V1 J .O 00 O N V1 a) N + N ti Co N �14 014 td G R O O J NP7 W..7 WI2U w Kaktamaatt to as Wn W O F- 0000J'+O aO N On.-�Ol* +MOOOa0 -fn"� I— V1 N .O 00 b J in O. M •0 wt N N N q{ O1W iQNi+a m w►. mP• m0.wofP,N O O m �p y F riWW\WaW r -7lW�w \tea \aP1 P70 V 0 0 0 Vt O O V1 V1 O O V1 0 0 0 ^ fn O coo V1 V1 0 0 0 p46 W O O O M O O a 0 0 0 O J 0 0 0 0. n O V 1 0 N a t O O O F M O V1 V1nO000 V1 OO V1 .O C; O V C; V5 V1 V V5 OOO. OO �+ O %n %O J of .O V1 N O M N a1 N7 vt V1 a1 .O N ti N en U a) •O N � N C M al w 'O .O w J Y i v .+ q u u W O m O Y Vf N F uB 0 z wN Y AC u .+ awi awi ut O w m a n. 0 d w< Y LY y >u u a mw t 91 gtn`�ym w C� 3 go%* m W q o 4 u m O V Y a+ •!1 a Y K K w Y of w u v 41 01 Y u W W F U> .•+ {,� a+ a0'+ V to 0 W N w :1 w w i0 0 6 Fi to tl W Y Yid► O m to Y 6c� 144 O W eV OD a0 fA U 04 Hy- pYG9pY6 co `ODUV M W wCCdde�4 u OI w0%d J.Ni m4 W% .o OOOOOOOOO�••+r+• -+4 •+ � M .7•i N N N N .-1 e•i N ti .� ra .-1 .r .-I .y n1 O n O M Y u M ^COm JM b M+ o Ld) V1r n n N CO t() n J n n O 00 NN N VI N O Ow O Lnn nr- J P5 .•1 1+1 V1 V1 � �J OO m nJ.o NN M e•/ 'J 0 .`1 c� u u A w m U 11 G w O U� D UMN N .. m .b .+ w .+ N V1 O O h 000n O 4 O V1 O J V1 N N O. en It W+ 0~ ON W m aaw h M O n N co O J in JNn to N ca a FO O O F F °D. In L i N N N Ln V1 %D 04 a0 n h .ontutn 'n 000o 000000000003 O V1w W W a 0 N 0 0 O O O O O V1 �y 4 r+1n v! n n J �+ O N fn a J eV •a of N 0 0 x1 0 0 kn O O 0^ p V1 w J N m 1+1 J 01 V1 co � F F N 4000000 U n v1 .O T • .-� •O .N- .•1 en kn D en N .`O + N d F J0 cn 0 b 0 04-4 n h O N OU u1N J ca a FO O O F F °D. In L i N N N Ln V1 %D 04 a0 n h 0 [n O O •O co W N r N D w O 00 .O H 4 r+1n v! n n J �+ O N U O 00 00 .D go /+1 N C C C V1 N O F F N 4000000 [[rr H W a V1 00 J 0%%D'A hnkm F J0 cn 0 b 0 04-4 n h O N OU u1N J .-1 N 0 w co W a�naa9.0 l01 i3O aP. w 0 N .-/ .w .•N rN T LM OS N Ln n �� O N V1 DD N 00 M O go N %a V1 N O 00 4000000 14 C4 N p 000 0%%D'A hnkm 00 .D cn C'1 .-1 ••i rl N O O J di to w a a`0a m o`du n`tli aitli n a0 W a .D N N O V 1 0 O n 0 0 V1N0 0000 � 00NO anO O� O O. *%%D .•+ J � T •D 00 h N nTY1 W Or W it a � n� Ow w aaa tnV1aa J co On o .+ n ao .+ V1 CO X00 0 0n0 0 OJ n O O 000 O 00000 nOIJhN O 000 .+ O O of 00 O 0000 V1 14 00 n O e^1 O O. 00 �e-1 N0�0� �� J C; C; Ne+1 m O .r J•+os n � V1 t+1 m fn N C C O O A. py py a1o�0oaa avP4i w W C3 `aww w a.aa4a. of ,• � w lnaa a v, �naa J V1 O N N N .D P1 0 1 N !+1 PI N r1 � V .-1m.+ h TO. V1N V1 N r1 b l+1 01 N 4n r•1 .^I P1 • a v1 W H Y •O a H Y Y B 'O M u a L Q Q Qi Cl u Yx a V aam °o °o °o °o U w $4 v1 O O ao u W .+ 3 c i -- Y w a3 U Y •+ui •+.+ M w a w oo u u u oo ao 00 �Y 0 ° a )N w n mmmn •• •.• v.. n n n� W O. W aawoaa W 04 um�md,•�661'iUnae�ua~i0 •. �r1e•1Na333z °4�v4�eiQveieieiei u W p Do e ti3 � ci o w < x ai ai oe of 0G 07 m a ae 4100 WU.dU J•OU r+•�U�U 04 p C7W Rl 10 Rf Ri PI- - b co O O O O O O O N u1 J W co W z a 0 0 0 rN T T O� V1 N O N `aww w a.aa4a. of ,• � w lnaa a v, �naa J V1 O N N N .D P1 0 1 N !+1 PI N r1 � V .-1m.+ h TO. V1N V1 N r1 b l+1 01 N 4n r•1 .^I P1 • a v1 W H Y •O a H Y Y B 'O M u a L Q Q Qi Cl u Yx a V aam °o °o °o °o U w $4 v1 O O ao u W .+ 3 c i -- Y w a3 U Y •+ui •+.+ M w a w oo u u u oo ao 00 �Y 0 ° a )N w n mmmn •• •.• v.. n n n� W O. W aawoaa W 04 um�md,•�661'iUnae�ua~i0 •. �r1e•1Na333z °4�v4�eiQveieieiei u W p Do e ti3 � ci o w < x ai ai oe of 0G 07 m a ae 4100 WU.dU J•OU r+•�U�U 04 p C7W Rl 10 Rf Ri PI- - b co O O O O O O O N u1 J W co W z a 0 0 0 O O N N O go J %a V1 N a� O O O O O O O N u1 J 0 W co W z a 0 0 0 O O N N O go J %a V1 N a� 0 W co W m a 0 0 0 O O N N O go J %a V1 N N 04 W co W m a w a 0 O V1 V1 V1 F e!J J N V100 •a �n nOO N00•D 00000000 O01n OONOOO h00 ZZ. . 6 Cn V1 N 01 m 01 4 00 n n O 0 N1 0 0 O1 N O o O V1 0 0 0 0 •+ m V1 N 0 N %D w 00 n 0% n M J 0 n h 4n 00 % N 4 0 N V1 u'1 n 0 N N O N t^1 N T aO J N 00 w 0 T O Cn V1 0 .O ra V1 %O .D .-1 J n 1+1 .••1 .-I ap %O N ^+ O% O n of 00 T N J 3 00 .-� M n .-1 OD .+ v1 N .D r+ V1 N .•a .a N .� N N n N .� 00 C. _ .-� a C C } 199 F P4 �F nJannvfayaaaiwaaaiwaHawwwwwa� �c���n.a.�iaa.waaaa.n"a n N n n N 0%0 n O O% ao N .O to 0 N1 J N .+ .+ .+ J Y .O V1 C4 N o m V1 J m .-1 •D N 00 �O 000 t'1n BOO U1 aD .-� Nn Jvt .-1 Y .a w O w w N w 0% O V1 N N V1 O0 •� 0'1 J .� 00 N •-� .•'1 N n .-1 P1 m n Y a7 1+1 V1 00 .� R1 .-1 Cl W W W W W W W W W.4 Pr W 04 .4 W Or W 04 A F wwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaa U a a C W \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w O O o a+ W ca .4 A P. P. W W rA r. W .4 U) W 00000000000 V1 V1000 V100 v HH Fya�naaywwy a�na00000000000nh000NVlln OG V1 V1 V1 O X000 V1 V1n000000n0000 V100 V1000�0�OO1O a1NJO0D O P4 fn N . f+1 . . V1 . . . O t+1 N b V1 V1 n V1 CO n N Ln U p ....i .-1 r�00 .DNT V1h V1 N O O, O r in .-� .-+ O VI V1 O .•� cn O V1 N %O N N :+ J O lV eV CO d �i�CO P.UdUU W ddwad'�"1 a0 C)UUUUUUCJ ,'i', .+.+.- �NNNt+1JJJ O 6 W U q M'Z m .O n00T� �m It Ln �0�00, NNNNN NNNNN I•i t�1 /+1 N1 tJ�1 P1 P1 t.1 J 0 V. CONTRACTOR'S PERFORMANCE • September 26, 1969 The general contractor, Mark Construction Company, performed their work very well with the exception of the surface paving which, though rather rough, was acceptable. There were three sub - contractors on the project: 1. Dale Casada (storm drain, water, sewer) - excellent 2. G. L. Keller (drainage structures, curbs, etc.) - acceptable 3. E. D. Johnson (electrical) - excellent QUALITY OF WORK As noted above, the finish paving was somewhat rough, particularly at the longitudinal joints, but was acceptable. The remainder of the work was of excellent quality. CERTIFICATION. I hereby certify that the above is a true and correct statement of the work performed and the costs incurred on the above project. Date ' enjam n B. Noian City Engineer K f _ t r.. l r � - �� -ti- � vq,r � �•.. x l ej1. '���. � �/'�r-w"—"ppm';-^y:` —rtf owe T t' l MEEZ" modik k"41 ur 4 I _ !-a :All, w 46 w .BEFOle6r LOOM/NG A 1 Z Y (P 8¢'' R. C. P OCITLET .4ND rZ4A16/7-1ON STAPIiC 7'Z1.PE - STA. 04 *,5O ,4FTE.2 � qo�. `74 BEFO/?E ,4FTE',2 I r ' �'; _ - _ %� - � � .•.fin, .� .. ?_.f :a'�'rf'. !,.e •�,� -tri. v'•. - ..... . J` r J Y. "r • s - - _ !r ,BEFO,PE L OD,C�1,41a N LY )c;eow STA. ?2f00 4FTE.2 1 ' l III law I.Z LOOZINS NEL r FZO f 67-4. 55-A50 4FTE.2 AM- P440-ra'5 i AK -F-' .l lA - 22-6 8 CW i au l ij E pgl V wt 'lam R" p x� , _ * _ 1'�a�2uAr—P P-uif NE AoEr, A c,4 - 043c9ALEO C-iliL September 25, 1969 Orange County Road Department 400 West 8th Street Santa Ana, California Attention: Mr. Brent Muchow Subject: Final Report - Irvine/Tustin Avenue, 22nd Street to Uai:wrsity Drive - AHFP Project No. 40. Gentlemen: Enclosed are two copies of the subject reports. The final accounting included in the report shows the amounts due to the City from the AHFP and the Road Department under the terms of agreement dated October 10. 1967. Invoices for the following amounts are also enclosed: Due from AHFP $17,163.17 Due from O.C.R.D. 54,585.95 If you have any questions concerning the report please contact myself or Mr. Pat Dunigan of this office. Very truly yours. Don Webb Project Engineer DW /bg Encl. r • j. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH moo W. Wwpwt avd' California :km!}P a v w4masm P o-Do-Ulsimi z 1 1 � BALANCE DDS ON AGREEMENT NO. C - 1112 -C1 156 • o.a._..SERtember..23, -.1969 g 54,585.95 25 -807 Please make cheek payable to City of Newport Beach. Direct all correspondence to Finance Director, City of Newport Beach, 3300 A. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, Calif. NO-607 0 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH moo W. N' po" aw. California 155 oaf*._..... -Sep tember_23.,._.19.69 I (1R AN(:F. MITN'1'P R(1An T1TiPARTMA.NT LM W Ath Atrnut Santa Ana, California ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM No. 405 BALANCE DUE CITY ON PROJECT $ 17,153.17 25 -807 Please make check payable to City of Newport Beach. Direct all correspondence to Finance Director, City of Newport Beach, 3300 W. Newport Blvd., Newport Beach, Calif. tkk September 25, 1969 TO: FINANCE MARTIIENT ,FROM: Public Works Director SUBJECT: IRVINE /TUSTIN IMPROVEMENTS ':, C -1112 V ' Please prepare final bills to, the t, ppty in the following amounts: W. AHFP Project No. 405 =17.153.17 Orange County Road Department 540585.95 (Agreement No. C- 1112 -0) I will transmit these bills to the County along with the final report. . zz "`-' Donald L. Webb Project Engineer 0 ! 0 -11T22 TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: Public Works Department September 8, 1969 NAM SUBJECT: BUDGET AMENDMENT FOR THE MODIFICATION TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE C- 1112 -E1 RECOMMENDATION: Approve a budget amendment to the Gas Tax Fund in the amount of $1780 and to the Gas Tax Contribution Fund in the amount of $1700. DISCUSSION: On July 14, 1969 the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute an agreement modification for the subject project. The modification to the agreement provides for an increase in fee of $3480.00 to cover additional costs caused by a change in the scope of the design work. The project was completed in February of 1969 and excess funds for the project were returned to surplus at the end of the fiscal year. The City's share of $1780 will come from Gas Tax Funds. The remaining $1700 will come from the County A.H.F.P. Fund. in ii rector /°t d i DATE " CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH REQUEST FOR FUNS DATE September 8, 1969 TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: Public Works Deparment SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FUNS REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS $ 3,480.00 FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE IN THE CURRENT BUDGET. ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION TO ACCOUNT # sea below IS REQUESTED. ADDITIONAL FUNDS ARE NEEDED FOR: Modification of Agreement for .- Engineering Services for the Improvement of Irvine /Tustin Avenue., C -1112 El. Acct # 20- 3378 -043 $1780 Acct # 25- 3378 -100 �r 4 REQUEST FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS, TRANSFER FROM ACCOUNT # TO # FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN THE CURRENT BUDGET. TRANSFER OF FUNDS IS NEEDED FOR: On July 14, 1969 the City Council authorized the City Manager to execute the agreement modification mentioned above. The project was completed in February of 1969 and excess funds for the project were returned to surplus at the end of the fiscal year. APPROVED: CITY MANAGER FINANCE DIRECTOR Z EPARTMENT HEAD CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH Date August 26, 1969 TO: Public Works Department FROM: City Clerk SUBJECT: Contract No. 1112E1 (Modification of this agreement) Project Lmrovement of Irvine /Tustin .kvenue(frpm 99n(3 Street to University Drive) Attached are executed copies of subject contract for your files and for transmittal to the contractor. Contractor: Williamson and Sdvnid Address: 1535 E M 1st Street, Santa Ana Additional Amount: $ 3,480 Effective Date: Resolution No. adopted on i iii /Ii_ LL:dg Att. cc: Finance Department ED 10 August 21. 1969 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS. Attached for your signature4tfour copies of the subject agreement which have been executed by the Engineer. The Council authorized the modification agreement July 14, 1969. A copy of the Council memo requesting the modification is also attached. Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant Public Works Director DLW /em Atts. C 111 L August 21, 1969 TO: CITY MANAGER FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: MODIFICATION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS. Attached for your signature are four copies of the subject agreement which have been executed by the Engineer. The Council authorized the modification agreement July 14, 1969. A copy of the Council memo requesting the modification is also attached. Benjamin B. Nolan Assistant Public Works Director DLW /em Atts. 1 i 2 3� 41 51 7 II 8� 91 101 I 11 12 j, i lv i� 14: 15 16 j� 17! 18 19, 20; 211 22! 23� 24 25! I 26 271 I 281 29I 30I i 31' 321 MODIFICATION OF AGREEMM (Improvement of Irvine /Tustin Avenue from 22nd Street to University Drive) i THIS MDDIFICAT10N OF ,AGREL4W is made and entered into this ZZNp day of Aye-V5 1969, by and between Williamson and Schmid, Civil Engineers,.a California corporation, herein referred to as "Engineers," and the City of Newport Beach, a municipal corporation herein referred to as "City." RECITALS An agreement for engineering services in connection with the improvement of Irvine and Tustin Avenue from Twenty - second Street to University Drive in the City of Newport Beach was previously entered into by and between Engineers and City on April 10, 1967. Engineers have completed the engineering services required by the contract. Said services entailed considerable redesign and redrafting in accordance with the request of the City. The prior agreement contains no provision for an increase in engineering fees due to changes in the scope of the project. City has determined that an increase in eng*n"jing fees as submitted by Engineers is fair and reasonable. City agrees to pay Engineers the additional amount of $3,484 for additional services rendered by Engineers in / 21 31 4 511 7 ii 10 121 13 141: 16. 17j 18 19 201 211 22: 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 connection with the impgovemnts of Irvine/Tustin Avenue# IN WITNESS WHEREOF,, the parties hereto hgve executed this agreemnt as of the day and year first he above written, APPROVWAS TO FORM: Z44 Tny H. Seymour City Attorney CITY OF XMTORT BEACH By N . 45;7, city manager Attest a. CITY WILLLMSON AND SCH CIVIL EMINK112 By': By ENGINEER WILLIAMSON and SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS 1593 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 547 -5721 City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Gentlemen: Mr. Don L. Webb, Project Engineer August 20, 1969 Re: Engineering Services for Irvine /Tustin Improvements C -1112; Our Job No. 67 -27 We have reviewed the modification of the agreement for the design of Irvine /Tustin Avenue improvements, which provides for an increase in fee of $3,480 for additional services rendered, and find it to be acceptable. Accordingly, enclosed are four executed copies of the agreement. BWW:kal Enclosures (4) Sincerely yours, WILLIAMSON and SCHMID Bob W. Williamson &6' C F 47, cf��O,r JB�H y9 STRUCTURES • HYDRAULICS • SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING • HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS tit-2 August 19, 1969 Williamson and Schmid Civil Engineers 1535 East First Street Santa Ana, California 92701 Attention: Mr. B. W. Williamson Subject: Engineering Services for Irvine/Tustin Improvements C -1112 Deatlemen: Enclosed are four copies of the modification of the agreement for the design of Irvine /Tustin Improvements. This modification provides for an increase in fee of $3,480 for the additional services rendered during the design of the project. If the conditions of the agreement are acceptable, please execute all copies and return them to this offise. The date on Page One of the agreement will be filled in when the City Manager executes the agreement. A fully executed copy of the agreement will be returned to you for your files. Very truly yours, Don L. Webb Project Engineer DLW /bg Att. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CITY ATTORNEY Department TO: Don Webb DATE: August 11, 1969 Public Works FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Modification of Agreement with Williamson & Schmid Attached is the modification of the agreement between the City and Williamson and Schmid requested in your memo of July 22, 1969. TLW:eg Tully H. City Att By nvvuiuit t City Attorney 0 a TO: CITY COUNCIL July 14, 1969 FROM: Public Works Department E - I SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE FROM 22ND STREET TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE (C -1112) RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute a modification to the subject agreement to provide for an increase in fee of $3,480 due to design changes. DISCUSSION: The engineering services agreement with Williamson and Schmid, Engineers, provides for a maximum fee of $17,500 for the design of the Irvine /Tustin Avenue improvements. No provisions were made in the agreement for an increase in fee due to a change in the scope of the project. During the design of the project several items were changed which appreciably changed the scope of the project and increased the design engineering time. The primary change was in the structural section of the roadway. This required a redesign of the roadway profile and redrafting of several sheets of plans. Since this project is a cooperative project with the AHFP and the County Road Department, approximately 60% of the additional cost will be paid by the County. The City's portion will come from Gas Tax Funds. eph Devlin lic W rks Director ldg Nr£ Jot July 22, 1969 TO: CITY ATTOf44EY FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE FROM 22ND STREET TO UNIVERSITY DRIVE (C- 1112 -E) Attached is a copy of the subject agreement and the council memo explaining an increase in fee. Please prepare a modification to the subject agreement increasing the engineers fee by 539480.00. The agreement is to be executed by the City Manager. 6/ Don Webb Project Engtneer DW /em Atts. WILLIAMSON and SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS 1535 EAST FIRST STREET 00 SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 PHONE 5475721 Mr. Benjamin Nolan Director of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Mr. Don Webb Dear Mr. Nolan: July 8, 1969 Re: Irvine /Tustin Avenue Our Job No. 67027 Reference is made to our letter of June 21, 1968, concerning extra work and preparation of plans and specifications for Irvine/ Tustin Avenue between 22nd Street and University Avenue. As requested by your office this date, we have enclosed the following breakdown of charges concerning work outside the scope of our contract. 1. The extra work caused by the change in the Orange County Materials Laboratory report amounted to $3,480.00 and is detailed hourly below: 0) Principal Engineer 37.5 hrs. @ $18.00 = $675.00 Office Engineer 52.5 hrs. @ $14.00 = 735.00 Assistant Engineer 60.0 hrs. @ $12.00 = 720.00 Draftsman 135.0 hrs. @ $10.00 = 1,350.00 TOTAL ....................... ......................$3,480.00 2. Revised curb and gutter by removing everything outside the 24 -foot line within the Irvine portion, and then replacing that portion from 22nd Street to a point northerly of 23rd Street amounted to $796.00, and is detailed hourly below: Principal Engineer 8.5 hrs. @ $18.00 = Office Engineer 19.5 hrs. C $14.00 = Assistant Engineer 10.0 hrs. @ $12.00 = Draftsman 25.0 hrs. @ $10.00 = TOTAL .... ............................... $153.00 273.00 120.00 250.00 ...........$796.00 STRUCTURES • HYDRAULICS • SURVEYING • LAND PLANNING • HIGHWAY CONSULTANTS 0 Mr. Benjamin Nolan City of Newport Beach July 8, 1969 Page Two 3. Revised 23rd Street curb and gutter from 18 feet to 20 feet amounted to $199.00, and is detailed hourly below: Principal Engineer 4.0 hrs. @ $18.00 = $72.00 Office Engineer 5.5 hrs. @ $14.00 = 77.00 Draftsman 5.0 hrs. Cal $10.00 = 50.00 TOTAL ..................... ........................$199.00 4. Revised plans to show curb and gutter and paving between Station 25 and Station 33 + 80 amounted to $359.00, and is detailed hourly below: Principal Engineer 10.5 hrs. C $18.00 = $189.00 Office Engineer 2.5 hrs. @ $14.00 = 35.00 Draftsman 13.5 hrs. @ $10.00 = 135.00 TOTAL ..................... ........................$359.00 5. Extra work caused by storm drain which was not contemplated in the proposal, between 22nd Street and 23rd Street, including the storm drain in 23rd Street, amounted to $1,205.00, and is detailed hourly below: Principal Engineer 30.5 hrs. C $18.00 = $549.00 Office Engineer 26.5 hrs. eQ $14.00 = 371.00 Draftsman 28.5 hrs. @ $10.00 = 285.00 TOTAL ..................... ......................$1,205.00 vl^ If you need any additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, WILLIAMSON and SCHMID Bob W. Williamson BWW:kal Enclosures WILLIAMSON and.SCHMID CIVIL ENGINEERS< 1538 EAST FIRST STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFEIRNIA 92701 i PHONFJ�; 4m: July 8, 1969 Mr, Benjamin Nolan Director of Public works City of Newport Beach 3300 west Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attentions Mr. Don Webb Rat Irvine /Tustin Avenue Our Job No. 67027 Dear Mr. Nolan: Reference is wade to our letter of June 21, 1968,'concerning, extra work and preparation of plans and specifications for Irvine/ Tustin Avenue between 22nd Street and University Avenue. As requested by your office this date, we have enclosed the following breakdown of charges concerning work outside the "scope Dof our contract. 1. The extra work caused by the change in the Orange County Materials Laboratory report amounted to $3,480.00 and is detailed hourly below; Principal Engineer 37.5 hrs. 0 $18.00 s $675.00 ." Office Engineer 52.5 hrs. @ $14.00 = 735.00 Assistant Engineer 60.0 hrs. 0 $12.00 = 720.00 Draftsman 135.0 bra. 0 $10.00.= 1,350.00 TOTAL....................... ......................$3,480.00 2. Revised curb and gutter by removing everything outside the 24 -foot line within the Irvine portion, and then replacing that portion from 22nd Street to a point northerly of 23rd Street amounted to $796.00, and is detailed hourly belowt Principal Engineer 8.5 hrs. @ $18.00 - $153.00 Office Engineer 19.5 hrs. 0 $14.00 - 273.00 Assistant Engineer 10.0 hrs. 0 $12.00 - 120.00 Draftsman 25.0 hrs. ® $10.00 - 250.00 TOTAL ....................... ........................$796.00 STRUCTURES •,:HYDR-AUL•.ICS= SUR'Y E ING •. LAND ,$:L A N N I N G •` HIGHWAY- CONS, I,LTAN;TS M=, Benjamin Nolan . i City x��.N ®wport Beach T July 8,.i$69 Page Two'.,. 3. Revised .v33rd.Street curb and gutter from 18 feet to 30 feet amounted`to.$199.00, and is Zed hourly below: Principal EngiAeor 4.0 hra. @11$1 m $72.00 Office Engineer 5.5 bra. @ $14.00 =` 77.00 Draftsman 5.@ 71ra..(P $10.00 50.00 TOTAL.- .................. :.,... ................$199.00 4. Revised plans to show curb an&Vtter and paving between station 25 and Station 33 + 80 amounted to $359.00, and is detailed hou.tly below: Principal.Enginear 10.5 hrs: 0 $18.00 = $189.00 Office Engineer . 2.5 hrs. @ $14.00 = 35.00 Draftsman 13.5 hrs..@ $10.00 - 135.00 - TOTAL..........'... .......... ........................$359,00 5. Extra work caused by storm drain which`'o7as not contemplated in the proposal, between 22nd Street. and 23rd Street,, including the storm drain in 23tilr$tr'eet, amounted to $1,20500,:aYid is detailed hourly below: Principal Engineer 30,5 bra. ! $18.00 = $549.00 Office Engineer' -. 26.5.hre. 0 $14.00'= 371.00 Draftsman 28.5 hrs. ® $10.00 285.00 TOTAL....... ......... ...........:..........$1,205.00 If you need any additional information, please call. Sincerely yours, WILLIAMSON and sCHMID 8ob_W. Williamson SWW:kal Enclosures k' 2? /dim /1onTJ — 1 ... s7/"�Cl ..LM�IOrIE�JF �ijS ,cFV�ttd sfj- uc�ur<i /.rrc�iv.o dFcuFr ���vove ��F,� %r1 23 4,f,7' n01 G/OArf 0 � �orr irrCj� Lost �J'S�ma�E 2 5G "/1�cJ %/ /NfYJ �jcPE ✓; 472,d� ;¢B4G 01 � /2aS I�e/2 7, 009 "00 The City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attentions Mr. taunter Cook Dear Mr. Cooks June 21, 1968 Res Our Job No. 67 -27 Enclosed is our statement totaling $16,178.83, less $13,110.55 previously paid, for an amount due of $3,068.28. This brings our charges to 900/a of the maximum $17,500.00, plus blueprints and fees, as detailed in our agreement. The final payment of $1,750.00, according to the agreement, will be due upon acceptance of the construction work by the city council. Sincerely yours, WILLIAMSON AND SCHMID Bob W. Williamson BWW /dg Encs. 1 ', -r_ r June 21, 1968 The City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Attentions Mr. Hunter Cook Res our Job No. 67 -27 Dear Mr. Cooke Reference is made to our agreement for engineering services to prepare plans and specifications for Irvine Tustin Avenue be- tween 22nd Street and University Avenue. The man -hours our firm has expended to date charged at the rates contained in our agreement amounts to $23,653.00, which ex- ceeds the agreed maximum of $170500 by $6,153.00. We respectfully request that we be compensated for extra work in the amount of $6,153.00 caused by delays and changes which were beyond our control. Our proposal to the city contained a maximum figure of $19,000 which was reduced to $17,500 at your suggestion. A number of events caused our costs to exceed our estimates which are listed below. 1. Our estimate of engineering costs was based on attack- ing the job and completing the work within 90 days as outlined in the agreement. We had the majority of the work completed in July of 1967. You were unable to - �urnish decisions on right -of -way, utilities, and storm drain concerning the Irvine Company so the job was filed. We had to complete the job during April and may of 1968 which caused considerable extra re- search and back - tracking to pick up all the loose ends. We were also very busy with other work during April and May of 1966. 2. A considerable portion of the extra work was caused by a change in the materials report. The materials report dated March 21, 1967 called for capping every- thing but 2200 feet. We spent considerable time carefully designing a lis -inch cap for the existing pavement to provide an acceptable riding surface. Mr. Hunter Cook -2- June 21, 1968 City of Newport Beach Our Job 67 -27 The revised materials report dated June 23, 1967 re- moved all but 150 feet of the capping. Good design practice made it absolutely necessary to redesign all the profiles. 3. Removal of curb and gutter on the easterly side from Station 33 + 88 to University Avenue in April of 1967 changed part of the drainage system and caused considerable changes to the plans. ` 1L` , The low bid on the contract by Mark Construction amounted to $284,542.98,.which makes our engineering costs roughly 8.33% of the construction costs including topo surveying. The American Society of Civil Engineer's Manuals and Reports on Engineering Practice No. 45, labeled "A Guide for the Engage- ment of Engineering Services ", indicates the median compensation for basic services is 6.84% of construction costs on a job of $300,000 in the not too difficult category. Basic services do not include "special services" which include land surveys, boundaries, monuments, and related office computations and drafting. Our original estimate for the field work and related work amounted to $6,890.00, which is 2.42•% of the construction costs. The combined basic and special services as recommended in the A.S.C.E. manual would come to 9.26% of the construction costs. We generally do not contract for work as a percentage of the construction costs but try to prepare actual estimates of the work involved. Our original proposal for the work involved was $19,000. I feel we could have performed the work at this cost had the work proceeded to completion in a normal manner, and had we not had the change in the materials report. We have also suffered increased costs due to Union contracts and an overall increase in wages which went into effect in August of 1967. Our standard fee schedule was revised in August of 1967 showing a considerable increase. A copy is included for your reference. We are now staking the construction for Mark Construction, and will do all we can to keep the job running smoothly to your satis- faction. Sincerely yours, WMLIAMSON AND SCHMID Bob W. Williamson BWW /dg Enos. • 0 a t f July 3, 1969 Williamson and Schmid 1535 E. First Santa Ana, California 92700 Attention: tor. Williamson Subject: Irvine /Tustin Improvements. C -1112 GentAamen ; The draft of the final report for Irvine /Tustin project will be submitted to the County for their review and comments next week. This report covers all of the costs on the project including engineering. If you intend to submit a bill from the change in roadway section, week. Once the report to the County be closed. Very truly yours, Donald Webb Project Engineer DW /em for additional work resulting it should be done early in the is finalized all accounts will CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMO 12""', ,} TD nil/ L'C /f t � DATE FROM: 1�, _ ^!'f/ r�GbY115t7 `� ✓ll�O_ SUBJECT: � /<' > /V' �El��'/ (J,z / % /.�Z 'l/iG 71&70 PUT IT IN WRITING . . . . . WRITTEN MESSAGES SAVE TIME AND AVOID ERRORS I � ZZ01- HEATHER 4. N, f �( Pr` COW. PAr[O ll _I ICON L� / //^�� _ • I C,05 77 SCteg wALL /72 �ePP J C1 41) .a1) 1^ � K .nc o vc ,CriSTiNG Cohsfrucfion /\/ofes (D— RemovE ono' rep/oce 4/f74171ck Concrete ,drive, and opprooch• -► :��• �� \ -,,, O2 _Remove and replace concrete ''S V o sidewo /k• — Remove and rep lace concrete ,` r curb and #'—Remove ond•rep/ace s /ructt/rol section w.• /h 3ff.4.018`4,6. Z a_,411 work to .conform wi'ffi Ci•fy ,tq of NeWoorf Beach S /ondorll"sf Wf?lCavotC % O�-07'17 of S19 Zt-/ow 7'117e517' l grade, Com t Ir upper 2�f of nofurrr/ grrt rte/ Y0 9D of ,, b:r/o c/ i/ de �sr fy. BacsC 6reotrr1 /oil rv/fh 1,Wl- saw s /carry CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Santo /sabe/ S/orm Ch oe?o Repoir DRAWN (2,6_6/ DATE V-4 - toCC4 APPROVED ,✓[ /il /l�� ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR R.E. NO. L?.2_eSP DRAWING NON 44 - 5 / 0 & - /.. l Sc3 ? rr C[3yn.�/ m fC:IAVWr M*44 ,eleWIr - /j CABCES e sr, ar• 4,o#r EX/ . EXPAN. ✓o/Nr. .. Cohsfrucfion /\/ofes (D— RemovE ono' rep/oce 4/f74171ck Concrete ,drive, and opprooch• -► :��• �� \ -,,, O2 _Remove and replace concrete ''S V o sidewo /k• — Remove and rep lace concrete ,` r curb and #'—Remove ond•rep/ace s /ructt/rol section w.• /h 3ff.4.018`4,6. Z a_,411 work to .conform wi'ffi Ci•fy ,tq of NeWoorf Beach S /ondorll"sf Wf?lCavotC % O�-07'17 of S19 Zt-/ow 7'117e517' l grade, Com t Ir upper 2�f of nofurrr/ grrt rte/ Y0 9D of ,, b:r/o c/ i/ de �sr fy. BacsC 6reotrr1 /oil rv/fh 1,Wl- saw s /carry CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Santo /sabe/ S/orm Ch oe?o Repoir DRAWN (2,6_6/ DATE V-4 - toCC4 APPROVED ,✓[ /il /l�� ASST. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR R.E. NO. L?.2_eSP DRAWING NON 44 - 5 / 0 & - /.. TO: CITY COUNCIL FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR 0 March 10, 1969 — 6 SUBJECT: ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUES AND 23RD STREET (C -1112) RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Accept the work. 2, Authorize the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion. 3. Authorize the City Clerk to release the bonds 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been filed. DISCUSSION: The contract for the improvement of Irvine /Tustin Avenues and 23rd Street has been completed to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department. The bid price was: $285,718.66 Amount of unit price items constructed: 300,136.01 Amount of extra work orders: 1,724.56 Total contract cost: $301,860.57 The major cost of the extra work was due to the addition of a water main stub for a future service to undeveloped property to the east of the road and the replacement of the line serving an existing fire hydrant. The increase in the quantity of unit price items constructed was due to: 1. Poor native soil conditions necessitating an increase in the quantities of.the asphalt concrete and aggregate base. 2. An error in the engineer's estimate of quantities. 3. Additional removal and replacement of existing improvements in order to better accommodate the new construction. The project was financed from a number of different accounts and agencies. Upon receipt of the cost figures from the participating agencies, a financial summary will be submitted. The contractor was Mark Construction Co., Inc. of Garden Grove, California. Engineering was by Williamson and Schmid of Santa Ana, and by the Public Works Department (23rd Street). The contract date of completion was November 10, 1968. The work was substantially completed with the road open to traffic by November 20, 1968. The delay was due to rain and very difficult conditions encountered in construction of the storm drain. seph .Devlin APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL P blic o ks Director DATE WAR 1 0 1969 „ 0 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA March 24, 1969 ^Bark Construction Company, Inc. P. 0. Box E. A. Carden Grove, California 92640 Subject: Surety United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Bonds :'do. 14198-12-6017-58 Project Improvement of IrvinelTustin Avenue from 22nd St. to University Drive. Contract No: 1112 Gentlemen: The City Council on Ptarch 10, 1969 accepted the wort: of subject project and authorized the City Clerk to file a I otice of Completicn and to release -the bonds 35 days after Notice of Completion has been filed. Notice or Completion was filed with the Orange County Recorder on Parch 12, 1969, in Book No. 8897, Pape 414. Please notify your surety oompany that bonds may be released 35 days after recording date. ih cc: Public Works Department v' Very truly yours, Laura Lagios City Clerk City of Newport Beach md'l�'6A 1a, l yd 9 5 q�� NOTICE OF COMPLETION PUBLIC WORKS To All Laborers and Material Men and to Every Other Person Interested: YOU WILL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on November 20, 1968 the Public Works project consisting of improvement of.Irvine /Tustin Avenue from 22nd Street to University Drive (C -1112) on which Mark Construction Company, Inc. was the contractor, and United States Fidelity And Guaranty Company was the surety, was completed. I, the undersigned, say; I am the Public Works Director of the City of Newport Beach; the foregoing Notice of Completion is true of my own knowledge. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March 11, 1969 I, the undersigned, __, - at Newport Beach, California. I am the City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach; the City Council of said City on March 10, 1969 accepted the above described work as completed and ordered that a Notice of Completion be filed. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on March I1, 1969 at Newport Beach, California. ,/ ICZutaiLLtt �cc -a• c,o� -o WILLIAMSON and SCHMID CIVIL s6al9ulla 1666 EAT' FIRST STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 PRONG 647.6721 February 11, 1969 Mr. Hunter Cook Department of.Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: Our Job No. 67 -27; Irvine - Tustin Avenue Dear Mr. Cook: Enclosed is a Xerox copy of our engineering cost estimate for Irvine- Tustin Avenue per your request. Pardon the delay. I had expected this to go out to you Thursday, February 6th. It was inadvertently overlooked. BWW:kal Enclosure Sincerely yours, WILLIAMSON and SSCHMID Bob W. Willimson, 4k 4 _. RWIM FEB 13M • SURVEYING LAND PLANNING • H15HWAY CONS STRUCTURES HYDRAULICS SURYE +`� Y. �_' Z ;7'OO IpOC-� 0 odo rlbA��HVUTS Zi�7 — 14,00v �oLmu�� -u < <r Zot>c� Sincerely yours, WILLIAMSON and SSCHMID Bob W. Willimson, 4k 4 _. RWIM FEB 13M • SURVEYING LAND PLANNING • H15HWAY CONS STRUCTURES HYDRAULICS SURYE +`� Y. �_' January 31, 1969 TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUES AND 23RD STREET ( �� Upon submittal to and approval by the County of the final report for the subject project, we will be reimbursed in the amount of approximately $125,000. In order to prepare this report, we will need the following information. 1. The amount expended for wages subsequent to March 7, 1967. (Cost Center k20 -30- 7800). Please note if the amount is "base wage" or includes overhead (if so, how murh). 2. A tabulation of the amounts paid and to whom under the following budget numbers (subsequent to 3- 7 -67). 25- 3378 -100 -1 25- 3378 -100 -2 25- 3378 -100 -3 20- 3378 -043 50- 9297 -048 The Contractor was Mark Construction Co. and the Engineer was Williamson and Schmid. G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Field Engineer GPD /ldg Approved: S Ben . Nolan Assistant Public Works Director a i 0 UNTY OF 43E ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA E DZTD, January 23, 1969 Mr. Pat Dungan Department of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: TELEPHONE: 034.3456 AREA CODE 714 R E 0 F I V r7 D JA 3. mg PUBLIC WORA6 OLPT, Re: AHFP #405 - Irvine Avenue Attached hereto is itemized list of costs incurred by the County of Orange in connection with the subject AHFP project. It will be appreciated if you will take these costs into consider- ation in submitting your final report and billing. You will note that certification is made that no costs have been included prior to the March 7, 1967 date shown in the agreement. You will please make such certification in your final report relative to City charges. ASK: DB :le Encl. Very truly yours, A. S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor By�iz -f 4f1 D. Barrett Administrative Services Officer A. S. KOCH ROPD COMMISSIONER AND COUNTY SURVEYOR L. MCCONVILLE R. V. WISE p55T. ROAD COMMISSIOry ER DEPUTY COUNTY SURVEYOR ANO 3URV EYOR W.L. ZAUN T.P. O'BRIEN DIVISION ENGINEER— OPERATIONS REFUSE DISPOSAL [NGIM [C• M. I. STORM DONIS BARRETT DIVISION ENGINEER — ENGINEERING p DMINISTRATIVE SERVICES OFFICER ROAD DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING BUILDING 400 WEST 8TH STREET SANTA E DZTD, January 23, 1969 Mr. Pat Dungan Department of Public Works City of Newport Beach 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Dear Sir: TELEPHONE: 034.3456 AREA CODE 714 R E 0 F I V r7 D JA 3. mg PUBLIC WORA6 OLPT, Re: AHFP #405 - Irvine Avenue Attached hereto is itemized list of costs incurred by the County of Orange in connection with the subject AHFP project. It will be appreciated if you will take these costs into consider- ation in submitting your final report and billing. You will note that certification is made that no costs have been included prior to the March 7, 1967 date shown in the agreement. You will please make such certification in your final report relative to City charges. ASK: DB :le Encl. Very truly yours, A. S. KOCH Road Commissioner & County Surveyor By�iz -f 4f1 D. Barrett Administrative Services Officer .. e 0 0 EXPENDITURES BY THE COUNT &OF ORANGE for the IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE AVENUE Tustin Avenue - 22nd Street to University AHFP #405 Item 48e - Construction - Inspection Labor 644.82 Equipment 69.20 Overhead 270.15 984.17 Item 48f - Soil Test Labor 2,116.36 Equipment 123.12 Overhead 824.06 3,063.54 4,047.71 L,e :9: Item 62 - Directional Signs Labor 27.00 Equipment 3.66 Materials & Supplies 2.25 Signs 20.00 Overhead 10.72 63.63 63.63 4,111.34 Less overhead in excess of 18% of Labor - 603.06 3,508.28 Deposit paid to City 56-658.74 TOTAL AMOUNT EXPENDED BY COUNTY 60,167.02 This will certify that no charges incurred prior to March 7, 1967 are included in the above figures. D. Barrett Administrative Services Officer 0 0 January 22, 1969 TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT, Attention: Lee MacDonald FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: DEPOSITS FOR SIDEWALKS, DRIVES AND CURBS ON C -1112 IRVINE /TUSTIN Work has been completed and the amount deposited was final construction costs. The following amounts should be transferred to revenue: Arrigo 2001 Irvine Avenue $175.00 Stuckey 2009 Irvine Avenue 175.00 Payne 2453 Tustin Avenue 130.00 Collins 2455 Tustin Avenue 180.00 Stone 2459 Tustin Avenue 140.00 Whitcomb 2471 Tustin Avenue 131.411 Endogram Corp. 2451 Tustin Avenue Miller 2485 Tustin Avenue 411.74 Robertson 2495 Tustin Avenue 708.99 Hafley 2549 Tustin Avenue 651.30 Don L. Webb Cooperative Projects DLW /ldg Engineer CITY DE NEWPORT BEACH R E C Fl. V Q ", CALIFORNIA SEP 18196$ c iris /�� PO4 wow bir 1e; BID DAMAGE PROPOSAL FOR THE REPAIR OF SETTLEMENT OVER CHANNEL Item _Approximate Item Unit Amount uantit Price 1 Each Remove existing 685.00 685,00 ex:. improvement (paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk and drive). v' 2 �36--Lf Construct curb and 2.75 --+. 82.50 c ... gutter. r 3 ;11 3 X68 Sf jam',,. 4r y� Construct drive approach, 0.48 364 80 . drive and sidewalk 4` 4 Asphalt concrete 19.25 231.00 . 5 Sn,49 30-Tins- Aggregate base Szl 4 x 1 0.90 = 3� 6 /r�. 100- -CY Excavate compact bottom 21-29 > p X r- _ nn i/ _ & backfill with one sack_,. _42-5 sand slurry. k' .7 /te�`6 1 Each Remove, plug and replace 225 225.00 61'_A.C, waterline. — TOTAL . "" ". j ' 4040.30 ` ;7 , 5"—.' �1os r j MARK CONSTRUCTION G0. .•P ❑ 80X. EA fJ _ h e�:5%uecia fc s'Aj:' �rv5 , OARD_EN GROVE,CALIE . 92642. .. /,✓' %532 , Cl�ya�i�: z . ... 1. y,�� �� r�6�s;ti SURVEY OF If r7, iz if VIA I Z., LO -4"!o VI: m 7! If, G:r t 7- . ......... . -�� :J-EtL II mil, if m v i e9 1• 0 U k k I s .I ev • � i :,4 S 6 ._.E /4 r 6.. $ z¢ it �r J � a of SN 4t ii a� Ill - - -_ //d b7 �i Dece4)er 2. 1968 Mr. Jtto A. Jacobs 2202 Private Road Aewport Beach, California bear Mr. Jacobs: Referen.::e is made to your letter of November 19, 1968 regarding the widening of Irvine Avenue. There appears to be a basic misunderstanding regarding the ownership of the property between the travelled way on Irvine Avenue and your retaining wall at 2202 Private Road. According to the City records the area in question is public right of way. It is customary in major construction projects of this type to allow the contractor to utilize the full right of way for his construction operation. This is particularly true when the road is being constructed under traffic conditions and large diameter substructures are involved as was the case on the Irvine Avenue project. We regret the inconvenience and the disruption of the planting, however, we feel that it was necessary to expedite the work. The contractor will be required to dress up the area before final acceptance. Generally speaking, we are very satisfied by the work done by the contractor on this job and we feel that the project will be a big improvement to the area. The City's policy is to respect private property in its construction projects. If you have any information that this is not public right of way, we would be interested in reviewing it with you so that we can correct our official records if necessary. We are returning your pictures as requested. We are also including a photo taken by the City showing the sight obstruction caused by the arbor vitae adjacent to your retaining wall. This matter was previously mentioned in a letter dated October 2, 1968 to Mr. Potter, and also in a letter dated October 18, 1963 to ;4r. Tarbox, Secretary of the !Homeowners' Association. The City has devoted a great deal of time and expense towards improving the sight distance at the intersection of Private Road and Irvine Avenue. The cooperation of the homeowners in the further improvement of the sight distance would be appreciated. Very truly yours, HARVEY L. HURLBURT City Tanager HLH /JTD:ldg d IISEJZ'icC TIC .J �.- �Jp -l�ATF 2.�ri0 £�. i2.v;i�i'r_ i�tJ'c. 0 C- J� +5!'" TPK.F-Cl PAgapl 23 A'—( V A 7p— A Qb AO F, A cA4- is 0 -1 Ate- OTTO A. JACOBS ROBERTH.JACOSS M. LYLE NELSON PAUL B. WITMER.JR. JAMES M.DODDS ROBERT J. SMITH 6 46 JACOBS, JACOBS, NELSON & WITMER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 317 WEST EIGHTH STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 52701 November 19, 1968 Harvey L. Hurlburt City Manager City of Newport Beach City Hall Newport Beach, California 92660 Re: Widening of Irvine Avenue Dear Mr. Hurlburt: TELEPHONE 542 -3527 I live at 2202 Private Road, which is on the northwest corner of Private Road and Irvine Avenue. During the widening of Irvine Avenue the following acts have occurred involving my property: 1. Steel posts and debris were piled and have been left for three to four weeks on my junipers planted between the retain- ing wall and the former curb. 2. Approximately three weeks ago, while trying to cor- rect a water problem caused by springs under the properties in the Private Road cul -de -sac, they removed adobe to a depth of eight to ten feet and piled it on my junipers in a strip thirty to forty feet long and three to five feet high. 3. Approximately two weeks ago when I requested a representative of the Engineer's office to have the posts and adobe removed from my property, he stated, "What do you want me to do about it ? ", shrugged his shoulders and walked away. 4. Approximately two weeks ago a worker operating heavy scraper equipment started removing the adobe and I asked him to remove it in some manner other than driving onto my junipers. I was gone two days and when I returned I found that he or someone had driven the heavy equipment onto the junipers, uprooting some of them, and spread the adobe eight inches to two feet thick over them, which will no doubt kill them. I am enclosing three pictures showing the present condition. Pictures II and III show that the adobe completely covers my juniper planting, which was solid to the former curb line, and also show that the present ground level is eight inches to two feet higher than the original ground level and present new curb which was installed approximately ten days ago. Please return the pictures to me as I may need them in the future. '— --- ° ° - Harvey L. Hurlburt November 19, 1968 Page 2 I have cooperated with the contractor and the Engineer's office in connection with this project and have called the Engineer's office three or four times requesting them to remove the debris and adobe, but have obtained no results. I see no reason why it is necessary to deliberately destroy my property and leave it in its present condition. I kindly ask that you contact the engineer- ing department and have this condition corrected. Rest assured that I am making no threats against the City, but if this condition is not remedied, it will be necessary for me to institute proceedings for the damage I have sustained. Thanking you for your cooperation in this matter, I am Yours very truly, Otto A. Jacobs OAJ:CMC CC: City Council City Engineer Mr. D. T. Tarbox, Secretary Seaview Company 2322 Private Road Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Tarbox: • October 18, 1968 In response to your September 27, 1962 letter, I have again discussed your problems with Mr. .7affe, our Traffic Engineer. The following points seen to Jae significant. The fact has been recognized that peo:le leaving your area on Private Road have been experiencing difficulty due to tho lirited vier* of oncoming, traffic. This condition results from the curve: in Irvine Avenue ana the erbankr ent on the northwest cor:.e-- rxoperty. 7:r. Jaffe tells re has has also suggested to You that several shrubs planted along the retaining wall tern to further complicate the view and had offered the thought t;;at they could be replaced with low plantings. Zf you wish, one of the landscape architects in our Parks, Beaches i Re- creation. Department might give you some help in regard to suit- able choices. Becauf;e we have been aware of this basic problem, we did redeoign the Irvine Avenue alignment. Ilowever, as you know, Private Road does not exist by itself. It was necessary to have Irvine AvF:nUe connect, not only with Private Road, but also with 23rd Street and leather Lane. The design finally estaLlished,not only accomplished this basic purpose, but also provided a better situation at the Private Road intersection. I have been advisrd that this realignment has increased the line of sight from a safe speed of 30 riles per hour on Irvine to a safe speed of 40 miles per hour. Since this is hi?hcr than the poster: speed limit it should represent a significant inmrovement. Paced with the existing pattern of subdivision ana land use, I think the engineers exhibited proper judgment with the balanced design which they achieved. Short of cutting baci: the e:.-�barucraent at Private Road or creating serious align - m:nt complications at 23rd Street and heather Lane, the cur- rent design is the best solution. To protect the added advantage provided by the new design, the City will paint a barrier stripe approxirately 8 feet 9 Page •-2•- out from the curb along- the curve north of Private Road to guide traffic away from the curb. I believe you were advised of this when wIr. Jaffe and Mr. Webb visited with you recently. The double yellow line mentioned by for. Potter cannot be used because, in California, vehicles must drive to the right of such a marking. Iowever, your suggest- ion that some devices be added to cause a rumbling noise when crosses does seem to have merit. Air. Jaffe has been instructed to implement this idea. Because of the extremely low volume of traffic leaving Private Road, I understand that an advance flashing beacon could be expected to exert little or no effect on Irvine Avenue traffic beyond that developed by the T intersection sign which will be in place north of Private Road. The ec- onomies of such an installation must also be considered in licht of the value to be received. We appreciate your concern and apprehension. However, I repeat, the City has taken steps to improve the problem created by the original subdivision design. In addition, you can be sure that our Police Department is aware of the nature of the situation here and will provide surveillance in keeping with the need. Because I sense a degree of misunderstanding of the nature of the improvements being constructed, I have at- tempted to respond directly to the points you raise in your letter petitioning for help and hope that you do recognize our efforts to bring about improvement. However, because it is not possible in a letter to fully cover everything, I think it might be mutually beneficial to call a meeting with your entire group. At your convenience, our staff is pre- pared to discuss the situation again in detail. If this idea meets with your approval, please contact Mr. Jaffe in order that he might set up such a meeting. Very truly yours, HARVEY L. HURLBURT 111,11:mrs City Manager CC: Councilman Paul Gruber Air. Angus Potter Air. Robert Jaffe, Traffic Engineer "Mirabile dictut " He stated that nothing could be done. But we demand that something be done, and quickly. May we hear from you. Very truly / I September 27, 1968 City Manager City of Newport Beach California Dear Sir: We, the seventeen undersigned property owners and /or residents of Private Road in this city, again protest the perils presented by the Irvine Avenue intersection of the highway being constructed, and.demand that certain devices be installed for the alerting of south bound drivers as to-the hazards presented by the intersection, not only to themselves, but to the drivers and vehicles emerging from Private Road. We suggest three means of warning them: 1. A "DANGEROUS CROSSING" sign with red flashers to be suspended from an existing electrolier which is approximately 100 feet north of the intersection. 2. Painting a double yellow avement markin extending for 200 feet from the intersection out far enough rom the western curb so that drivers obey the State traffic laws which would enable southbound drivers to sooner see vehicles emerging from Private Road, and for the latter to sooner see themi 3. That bumper blocks be placed between the double lines which, if touched by automobile wheels, would produce audible sounds as well as producing vibrations and /or bumping of the car trespassing. within the'confines of the double line. We hoped that when the.new roadway was built all hazards would have been con- sidered by the engineers, but the hazards still remain. There have been several collisions at this intersection, and many other have been only narrowly averted. We have talked with Mr. Jaffe and all we got was conversation, and the in- formation that accidents were unavoidable. "Mirabile dictut " He stated that nothing could be done. But we demand that something be done, and quickly. May we hear from you. Very truly / I 0 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA October 2, 1968 Mr. Angus Potter 2217 Private Road Newport Beach, California Dear Mr. Potter: city Hau 8800 Newport Blvd (714) 878 -7110 It was a pleasure for Mr. Webb and me to meet with you and your neigh- bors (Mrs. Willis, Mr. Tarbox, and Mr. McIntyre) last Friday to discuss the design and construction of the Irvine Avenue improvement near your street. We mentioned, in addition to improving the general condition of the road and correcting some drainage problems, this project will offer a safer situation at the Private Road intersection. Specifically, the new alignment will provide not only southbound drivers and those exiting from Private Road a better view of each other, permitting more time to react and maneuver, but also northbound drivers turning left into Private Road a separate refuge area out of the through traffic lanes. Incidentally, as we were leaving we noticed the row of arbor vitae along Irvine, to the north of Private Road, partially obscuring the view. It seems to me that some consideration might be given to replacing some of them with lower growing shrubs to assure the best possible sight conditions for drivers entering Irvine Avenue. Although I hesi- tate to suggest such a radical course, what could be said if the related view obstruction should contribute to an accident? I hope Mr. Webb and I were able to add to your understanding of this important public improvement project. If any other questions come to mind please give a call. Very truly yours, Robert L. Jaffe Traffic Engineer RLJ /em cc: Public Works Director Project Engineer igrHa�F r„ grid Fx MARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR POST OFFICE BOX E. A. GARDEN GROVE, CALIFORNIA 42642 PHONE: (714) 534 -8610 City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd, Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan City Engineer Gentlemen, November 25, 1968 Re: Improvement of Irvine /Tustin Avenue (C -1112) As per my letter dated November 20, 1968, requesting extension of completion time for the above project, I am forwarding the letter our Company received from Ampac. As outlined in our schedule of explanation requesting said extension, the attached letter sub- stantiated the delay in installing the R.C.P. due to a one week delay in delivery. KLO /lr Very truly yours, MARK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Kenneth L. Oliver RECEIVED NOV 21 1968 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. AMERICAN PACIFIC CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, INC. P.O. BOX 426 • UPLAND, CALIFORNIA 91786 November 21, 1968 Mark Construction Co., Inc. P. O.Box E.A. Garden Grove,California 92642 Gentlemen: Telephone 71498.1839 6249911 Our Company furnished the reinforced concrete pipe on the Irvine Street Improvement- Newport Beach to the Dale Casada Co., one of your sub - contractors. On receipt of this order from Casada, we were given a delivery schedule to follow and regret to acknowledge that we were a week late in meeting this schedule. Very truly yours, AMERICAN PACIFIC CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY, INC. Charles O'Brien, Jr. President CWO /rw ;a�Er 7 MARK CONsTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR POST OFFICE BOX E. A. G A R D VNCOtEA SIFN 92642 41 City of Newport Beach 3300 W. Newport Blvd. Newport Beach, California 92660 Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan City Engineer Gentlemen: NOV 21 1968 November 20, 1968 PUBLIC W0KK5 Re: Improvement of Irvine /Tustin Avenue (C -1112) I respectfully submit a request for 32 days extension for comp- letion of the improvement of Irvine /Tustin (C- 1112). Please find the following conditions that will substantiate the request for the extension. DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION NO. OF WORKING DAYS REQUESTED FOR EXTENSION 1. Decision on what to do with the partially 4 days N Placed R.C.B. bottom slab at Sta. 25 +00 + (Irvine Ave) 2. Contract change order #4 and #2 (item 39 & 41) 1 day 3. Contract change order #2 Item 11,12 1 day Item 26 & 27 1 day 4. Repair of Settlement damage at 2201 Heather Lane 2 days 5. Legal Holidays 2 days,(.�U July 4, 1966 & November 11, 1968 6. Rain during requested extension period 1 day November 15, 1968 7. Removal & Replacement of 18 manhole cones, to 2 days facilitate mixing of lime 8. House connections off water main on north end of 2 days job prior to mixing of lime 9. Additional excavation on the west side of Irvine 4 days N o 10. Extreme ground water conditions encountered jf.14T,4.59 5 days ,u o installation of pipe work, page 2 • 11. Delay in receiving RCP an j.absite( letter 5 days Y� from supplier to follow) 12. Removal of Stockpile east side of Irvine S/0 23r4 2 days Po TOTAL DAYS REQUESTED FOR EXTENzION. 32 days OF COMPLETION It has been our intention and desire to complete the construction of this project at the earliest possible time. To illustrate our efforts to obtain completion of the project within the prescribed time limit and as a matter of record and information, the follow- ing is the number of Saturdays and Sundays Mark Construction Co., Inc. and our Sub - contractors have worked on this project. Mark Construction Co., Inc. Mark Construction Co., Inc. G.L. Kellar Co. Dale Casada Construction Co. KLO /lr 10 Saturdays 1 Sunday 6 Saturdays 2 Saturdays Very truly yours, MARK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Kenneth L. Oliver .. • ,... ors.. ... ,+.rf , � �°.'.'.,..z+�'• . �ct,ryt.`.3- �3e's" -:�... �•��r:.•f. >, : >I u , i J I CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92828 P.O. BOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS October 2, 1968 Mr. Don Webb City of Newport Beach Newport Beach City Hall 3300 West Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, California Subject: Purchase Order for Repair of Heather Lane Dear Mr. Webb: Enclosed please find the purchase order to Mark Con- struction Company for Costa Mesa's share of the repair of Heather Lane due to the subsidence of the storm drain. As was agreed and is noted on the purchase order, please note that our maximum amount on this is $2,000. Actually, we need to stay under the $2,000 figure to be within our legal limits for a purchase order. It is our understanding that the City of Newport Beach will handle all construction and inspection on this pro- ject and that this should eliminate any further expense by the City of Costa Mesa for repairs on this storm drain. GEM:me Enclosure Very truly yours, GEORGE E. MADSEN DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS I RECEIVFn1 OCT � �� ►fir CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA To 032170 MARK CONSTRUCTION CO P 0 BOX EA GARDEN GROVE CALIF 92642 CITY OF COSTA MESA P 0 BOX 1200 COSTA MESA CALIF AL PURCHASE ORDER ORDER No.880 -024 I DATE 10/0168 VENDOR MUST SHOW PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER ON ALL SHIPPING PAPERS. INVOICES. AND CORRESPOND. ENCE. THIS MUNICIPALITY IS EXEMPT FROM FEDERAL EXCISE TAX BUT CALIFORNIA SALES OR USE TAX MUST BE ADDED. IF VENDOR 15 UNABLE TO SHIP AT PRICES SHOWN - ADVISE BEFORE SHIPPING. SEND INVOICE IN DUPLICATE TO: FINANCE DEPARTMENT P. 0. BOX 12 0IOB P. O. BOX 1200 COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92626 ACCOUNT NO. OUANTI TY 8 UNIT FILL ORDER EXACTLY AS SPECIFIED ONLY UNIT PRICE DISCOUNT AMOUNT )1804850 03 ENCUMBRANCE AMOUNT 2000.00 MOUNT rO BE LESS THAN L REPAIR of seem+,e tge at 000.00 2000.00 2201 H,e ther`;Lane )over S6'nta Isabel Storm:Gfiannel; 'as shown on drawing M- 5106 -L from the,. City.of :'Newport.Beach - Final cost shall be based on 5C per_ e t of the bid proposal submitted "two the City of Newport Beach dated", September 18, 1968., Payment is not to be made until final.costs are determined ,.. TOTAL INCLUDING SALES OR 000.00 IMPORTANT DELIVERY CHARGES MUST BE PREPAID u5E TAx INVOICES MUST STATE COMPLETE OR PARTIAL DELIVERY. ROBERT A OMAN IF DELIVERY IS NOT COMPLCTE WITHIN SIX MONTHS, UNFILLED PORTIONS ARE CANCELLI'D UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED PORN PI.100 GM 9.67 �I j� .Cf O! IndnCB I'ul(LU wy,NU w(iE NT 0 4 September 26, 1468 TO: General Service- FRO',',: Puhlic 'Jork- Department Attn: klade Reyeler SUBJECT: REPAIR OF SETTLEVIT DAMAGE AT 2201 HEATHER LANE Enclosed is a copy of the Purchase Requistion issued to cover the subject repairs. Mark Construction iii11 do the re *,airs in conjunction wit'', thn construction of Irvine /Tustin lvenuPs. If you have any questions concerning this matter please contact me. Don 'Webb Project Engineer DL`d /melt 0 Mark Construction Co. P.O. Box EA Garden Grove, Calif. 92642 September 25, 1968 Attn: iir. Carl Post Subject: REPAIR OF SETTLEMENT DAMAGE AT 2201 HEATHER LANE (IRVINE /TUSTIN C -1112) Dear Mr. Post: The prices submitted in your bid proposal for the subject project are acceptable to the City. A change order for this work will not be issued as mentioned in our previous letter. A purchase order will be issued by the City of Costa Mesa for 50% of the work up to $2,000.00 with the remainder being paid by purchase order from the City. To confirm the information given to you in our phone conversation, the bid items discuessed are more fully explained below. Item 2. The 30 LF of curb and gutter excludes the drive depression. Item 3. The 760 SF for drive approach, etc. includes the drive depression. item 6. The final quantity for this item will be the total yards of one sack sand slurry used to fill the excavation to subgrade elevation. When this project has been scheduled for construction, notify Mr. Jerry Johnson, the Resident Engineer, of the approximate starting date. 48 hour notice must be given to the property owner and if possible ingress and egress to the garage should not be interupted for longer than 5 days. If you have any questions concerning the project or the billing for the project contact me or Mr. Pat Dunigan. Very truly yours, Donald L. Webb Project Engineer DLW /meh r Mark Construction Co., Inc. P.O. Sox EA Garden Grove, California Attn: Mr. Carlton A. Post Subject: IMPROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE (C -1112) Gentlemen: 0 September 24, 1968 Reference is made to your leter dated September 18, 195E regarding the prime and tack coats on the subject project. Section 12 of the City Standard Speci- fications and the last paragraph of Section 11 -4 of the Special Provisions both require that prime coat and paint binder (tack coat) be applied. The phase quoted from the State Specifications "when ordered by the Engineer" implies new or unforseen work as determined in the field, not a requirement clearly called for in the job specifications. Your statement that "The job inspector has directed us to apply a prime coat...." is somewhat misleading. You were so directed because the prime coat was specifically called for as mentioned above. With regard to payment for the prime coat, paragraph 6 -1 of the Special Provi- sions states "Compensation for work shown on the plans and described in the specifications. but not separately provided for.in the bid proposalg shall be included in the prices bid for the various items of work listed in the bid proposal ". Based on the above, your request for a change order must be denied. Very truly yours, G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Assistant Civil Engineer GPD /meh 0 Mr. George Madsen Director of Public Works City of Costa Mesa P.O. Box 1200 Costa Mesa, Calif. 92626 September 24, 1968 Subject: REPAIR OF SETTLEMENT DAMAGE AT 2201 HEATHER LANE OVER SANTA ISABEL STORM CHANNEL Dear Mr. Madsen: Enclosed are the following: 1. Copy of Drawing No. M- 5106 -L showing the repair of settlement damage over Santa Isabel Storm Channel. 2. Copy of the Contractor's Bid Proposal for the repair of settlement damage over Santa Isabel Storm Channel. This will confirm the information given to you in our phone conversation last week. The City will construct the subject repairs in conjunction with its construction of Irvine /Tustin Avenue. The Contractor for this project has submitted a bid proposal (enclosed) which appears satisfactory to the City. If this Proposal is satisfactory to you please issue a purchase order in the amount of $2,000.OD to Mark Construction Co., P.O. Box EA. Garden Grove, California,92642. . The final cost to Costa Mesa will be fifty per cent of the project cost based on the quantity of material actually used. Per your request this cost will not exceed $2,000.00. The contractor should complete this project before November 10, 1966. If any further information is required, please contact me. Very truly yours, ZCe> Donald L. Webb Project Engineer DLW /meh Enc. f CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH .- R.E.C. E;L.V E D -. CALIFORNIA SEP 18 196 PUBW WOMB VO4, BID PROPOSAL FOR THE REPAIR OF SETTLEMENT. SANTA ISABEL STORM CHANNEL DAMAGE OVER Item Approximate _ Item Unit Amount uantit Price • 1 1 Each Remove existing 685.00 685.00 , improvement (paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk and drive). 2 30 LF Construct curb and _ * 2.75_ .� ,' 82.50 gutter. 3 760 SF Construct drive approach, 0.48 364.80 drive and sidewalk 4 12 Tons Asphalt concrete 19.25 231.00 5' 30 Tons Aggregate base 10.90 327.00 6 100 CY Excavate, compact bottom 2125.00 & backfill with one sack— sand slurry. 7 1 Each. Remove, plug and replace 225.010 225.00 6" A.C. waterline. TOTAL _.. 4040.30 " MARK CONSTRUCTION CO.: P BOX EA' '. „ .0 GARDEN GROVE, CALIF. , 92642. 0 0 EWP011-1,T BEACH CALIFORNIA city F .0 - ......_. 3300 Kawport Blvd. (713) 6i3ti110 September 20, 1968 Dear Resident: Our letter of August 20, 1968 described the construction taking place in front of your home. It was stated that traffic would be routed onto the northbound lanes of Irvine and Tustin Avenues during the construction of the southbound lanes. The northbound lanes will be completed Friday, September 20, 1963 and opened for traffic that evening. Monday, September 23, 1968 the southbound lanes will be closed to through traffic and the contractor will begin pavement removal at 22nd Street and proceed northerly to University Drive. In the process of constructing the southbound lanes there will be.several periods of time that vehicular access to your driveway cannot be maintained. During these periods it will be necessary for you to park your cars on the street. The newly completed northbound lanes will be striped to allow for two lanes of traffic and one parking lane. If you don't wish to park on Irvine /Tustin Avenues then it is suggested that you park on the side streets at either end of you block. The periods that access cannot be maintained are: 1. 1 day during the removal of existing pavement. 2. 2 to 3 days during the preparation of the subbase. 3. 1 day prior to paving. 4. 5 days during the construction of curb and gutter and drive approach. The longer period of time is necessary to allow the concrete to cure and attain sufficient strength to support vehicular traffic. You will be notified the day before your drive is to be closed. After the paving has been removed ramps will be provided at each drive approach. These will be maintained through- out the day except for short periods when the contractor is working in the vicinity of your house. it o-rI , probably take 4 to 5 weeks to construct curb and gutter, storm drains, and pave the sou ,pound lanes. The overall project is still -- heduled for completion the first week i:' November. If you have any questions regarding the project, please call me at 673 -2113, Ext. 26 or contact our Resident Engineer, Mr. Johnson on the project. Very, trullv yours Donald L. Webb Project Engineer ni W /mph CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA 92w City Han 3300 Newport Blvd. (714) 673 -2110 September 20, 1968 Dear Resident: Our letter of August 20, 1968 described the construction taking place in front of your home. It was stated that traffic would be routed onto the northbound lanes of Irvine and Tustin Avenues during the construction of the southbound lanes. The northbound lanes will be completed Friday, September 20, 1968 and opened for traffic that evening. Monday, September 23, 1968 the southbound lanes will be closed to through traffic and the contractor will begin pavement removal at 22nd Street and proceed northerly to University Drive. In the process of constructing the southbound lanes there will be.several periods of time that vehicular access to your driveway cannot be maintained. During these periods it will be necessary for you to park your cars on the street. The newly completed northbound lanes will be striped to allow for two lanes of traffic and one parking lane. If you don't wish to park on Irvine /Tustin Avenues then it is suggested that you park on the side streets at either end of you block. The periods that access cannot be maintained are: 1. 1 day during the removal of existing pavement. 2. 2 to 3 days during the preparation of the subbase. 3. 1 day prior to paving. 4. 5 days during the construction of curb and gutter and drive approach. The longer period of time is necessary to allow the concrete to cure and attain sufficient strength to support vehicular traffic. You will be notified the day before your drive is to be closed. After the paving has been removed ramps will be provided at each drive approach. These will be maintained through- out the day except for short periods when the contractor is working in the vicinity of your house. It will probably take 4 to 5 weeks the southbound lanes. The overall week in November. If you have any 673 -2110, Ext. 26 or contact our R Donald L. Webb Project Engineer to construct curb and gutter, storm drains, and pave project is still scheduled for completion the first questions regarding the project, please call me at asident Engineer, Mr. Johnson on the project. MARK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. yep,$ GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR POST OFFICE BOX 402 r PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA 92670 PHONE: (714) 524 -1823 September 18, 1968 City of Newport Beach Re: Improvement of Irvine/ 3300 Newport Blvd. Tustin and 23rd Street Newport Beach, California 92660 (C -1112) Attention: Mr. Benjamin B. Nolan City Engineer Dear Sir: Reference is made to the last paragraph in Section 11 -4, Special Provisions,regarding the application of prime coat and paint binder. Neither the Special Provisions nor the City Standard Specifications, section 12, state that the unit price bid for asphalt concrete, shall include the cost of furnishing and applying prime coat or tack coat. This is clearly stated in the Special Provisions for Improvement of 23rd street, section 12 -12. Therefore, we could only determine that if prime coat and /or paint binder were ordered by the Engineer for Irvine Avenue, they would be paid for as provided in the California State Standard Specifi- cations dated July, 1964. The third paragraph on page 185, section 39 -8.02 PAYMENT,states that "Quantities of prime coat and paint binder will be paid for at the contract price per ton for the des- ignated grade of liquid asphalt (prime coat), and at the contract price per ton for asphaltic emulsion (paint binder). When there are no contract items for this work and such work is ordered by the Engineer, the cost thereof will be paid for as extra work as provided in Section 4- 1.03D." We are sure you are aware that specifications must clearly state that work which is not set up as a bid item shall be included in a designated bid item or included in the various items of work. We have furnished and spread the oil required on 23rd Street which was stated in Section 12 -12. The job inspector has directed us to apply a prime coat, which will be spread today, to the entire east side of Irvine Avenue. RECEIVED SEP 191969 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Page 2 • We have estimated the cost to prime coat and tack coat Irvine Avenue to be 41020.00 for prime and $350.00 for tack. We respectfully request that you issue a contract change order for the above lump sum amounts, or for a force account basis of payment. Very truly yours, MARK CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. Carlton A. Post CAP /lr cc: G.P. Dunigan, Jr. 0 September 4, 1968 "lark Construction Company, Inc. P.O. Box 402 Placentia, Calif. 92670 Attn: Mr. C. A. Post Subject: REPHIR OF SETTLEMENT DAMAGE AT 2201 HEATHER LANE (IRVINE /TUSTIN C -1112) Dear Mr. Post: Enclosed are the following: 1. Copy of Drawing "io. M- 5105 -L showing the repair of settlement damage at 2201 Heather Lane, over the Santa Isabel Storm Channel. 2. Bid proposal for the subject repairs. The City feels that the subject repairs could be most economically accomplished in conjunction with the Irvine /Tustin project. It is requested that you prepare the enclosed bid proposal and submit it to this office. Upon acceptance of the proposal, a change order will be issued authorizing the repairs. The 6" A.C. waterline running through the excavation may be turned off at the valve near the intersection of Irvine Ave. and Heather Lane, plugged on the northerly side of the excavation and removed as necessary. The Santa Ana Heights 'Water Company has requested that this waterline not be out of service for longer than 36 hours. There is a possibility that the Santa .Ana Heights Water Company will be able to do the re-" quired work, but please include a price for the removal and replacement in your proposal. The underground telephone cable and street light cable will have to be protected in place. The gas service for 2201 Heather is from Irvine Avenue and the gas main in Heather Lane is on the northerly side of the street. If any questions arise concerning this matter, please contact me or Mr. Pat Dunigan. Very truly yours, 0z� Donald L. Webb Project Engineer DLW /meh j r I 220/• NirA r"ER 'EN15T /N6. FfOUSi — I caNC. Pgrra � rCOx L� I I rvuxr[41 `` EKlST. EXPAN Jo/"r -� .OARAGL EKI37 'Lo Nc. EX/sZ BKrGK 'wAL.L f 72 "PPPJ I. �'\ 6 r� _ —�j s / xP07fCT Tr4 d L /G✓/l `r � C'•48LES (Gnarl! IZ't i5T. r,-Z. 44[/C T OUT ACOrVG EOlaf OF 40yL�f/ �L sT, ST. L /6Hr \)(r . ,ex PAN. JoiNr ©_ RemovE and replacQ concrete ,drive onod approach, -A `• �� \.�� (2 )_Remove ,and reploce concrete s'de wo /k, k,E�)— Remove o id reploce concre curb On,- 9u7�1er. ®'—Remove orno',reploce s�ruc�ura/ i ©_,411 work to 'conform with Ciir o7' AleWporl Seach S�ondords. ® E,rcnvot<2 fo d( ?pfh of 511 Ln /ow f /JL517 p1-n0'e, 03MICx't upper 2 -f o7l li( tvrz -// bra rr / -10 90% de'r7sry. Bo�� / /�r�o�� o/ w /fh CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH I DRAWN c><- 1Y DATE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I APPROVED 4 // ASST; PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR R.E. NO. 12tiP(s DRAWING NO. JJ/f - 5 % Q l0 - L 50nf0 /sabe- / S510r'm Ch ann e/ Re / r' CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA BID PROPOSAL FOR THE REPAIR OF SETTLEMENT DAMAGE OVER SANTA B Item Approximate Item' Unit Amount uantit Price 1 1 Each Remove existing improvement (paving, curb & gutter, sidewalk and drive). 2 30 LF Construct curb and gutter. 3 760 SF Construct drive approach, drive and sidewalk 4 12 Tons Asphalt concrete 5 30 Tons Aggregate base 6 100 CY Excavate, compact bottom & backfill with one sack sand slurry. 7 1 Each Remove, plug and replace 6" A.C. waterline. TOTAL TO: 40 CITY OF NE14PORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 14. Newport Boulevard "lark Construction Company, Inc. Box E. A. Garden Grove, California ATTENTION: SUBJECT: LISP "C1r_f1f9lT OF IF.YINE /TUSTIN AVENUE 0 {C -1112) Date August 29, 1969 We are Transmitting the following: No. Copies Description 3 Remarks: Change Order No. 6 Please sign original and 1 copy and return to our office. Retain one for your files. Copies to: By: LI CITY OF NE14PORT BEACH PUBLIC 14ORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. Newport Boulevard 0 Date August 29, 1968 TO: Mark Construction Company, Inc. Box E. A. Garden Grove, California ATTENTION: SUBJECT: IAPROVL: "2 'r OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUE (C -1112) We are Transmitting the following: No. Copies Description 3 Remarks: Change Order No. 6 Please sign original and 1 copy and return to our office. Retain one for your files. Copies to: A H By: TO: 0 CITY OF NE14PORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 !J. Newport Boulevard stark Construction Company P.O. Box E.A. Garden Grove, California ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Improvement of Irvine /Tustin Avenue We are Transmitting the following: No. Copies 3 Remarks: 0 Date..,,,,,, 22, 1969 C -1112 Descrioti Change Order No. 5 Sign original and one copy and return to this office. Retain one copy for your files. Copies to: lsg By:AW G. P. Dunigan, Jr. Field Engineer 0 6 August 20, 1968 TO: Finance Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: I14PROVEMENT OF IRVINE /TUSTIN AVENUES (C -1112) (AHFP 405) Please invoice the urange County Road :Department in the amount of ,16,544.45 for progress billing for tite subject project. Please include the attached progress payment sheets with the invoice. G. P. D" uniigan, Jr. Field Engineer GPD /meh REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEERS ._ JENNINGS • HALDERMAN • HOOD _ A CORPORATION J 1 6 8 8 EAST S E V E N T E E N T H STREET, S U I T E 2 0 0 , SANTA A N A, CALIFORNIA • 6 4 7 - 4 1 6 6 21 AUGUST 1968 MR. BENJAMIN B. NOLAN PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 3300 NEWPORT BOULEVARD NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA TRACT NO. 6689 - CURB DELETION - IRVINE AVENUE R E C F I V E D AUG 2 2 1968 PUBUG uLr1. WE HAVE ENCLOSED TWO PRINTS OF THE PRELIMINARY STREET IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR IRVINE AVENUE FOR YOUR INFORMATION. WE REQUEST THAT THE CONSTRUCTION OF CURB AND GUTTER FROM STATION 20 + 90.56 TO STATION 21 + 86.22 BE DELETED FROM YOUR CURRENT REALIGNMENT AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT ON IRVINE AVENUE IN ORDER TO AVOID HAVING TO REMOVE IT ALMOST IMMEDIATELY AFTER COMPLETION TO MAKE WAY FOR THE CUL DE SAC IN TRACT NO. 6689. THE STATIONING ON THIS PLAN CORRESPONDS TO YOUR IRVINE AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PLANS. RAH: JI ENC. CC: PANAMINT CONSTRUCTION CO. ASSOCIATES: JenNINOS ENO. Co., Log Angeles • JeNNINCa- MCDeamm & Heim ENO. Co., San Jose • JENNINGS- HANSEN ENO. Co., Ventura C- 1112(C) See Contract File for Street Improvement Plan for Irvine Avenue t 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH CALIFORNIA City Hall 3300 W. Newport Blvd Area Code 714 673 -2110 August 20, 1968 Dear Property Owners and Resident: On June 20, 1968 the City awarded a contract to Mark Construction Company of Garden Grove, California for the construction of Irvine Avenue and Tustin Avenue from 22nd Street to University Drive and the construction of 23rd Street from Tustin Avenue to Irvine Avenue. The project includes the reconstruction and widening of Irvine and Tustin Avenues to a four lane divided roadway; construction of curb and gutter on the westerly side of Irvine /Tustin Avenue, portions of the easterly side of Irvine Avenue and on both sides of 23rd Street; construction of a storm drain system in • Irvine Avenue and 23rd Street; construction of an 8" water main in 23rd Street; capping Santa Isabel Avenue from Irvine Avenue to Tustin Avenue; and the construc- tion of water and sewer laterals to eliminate the need for pavement cuts in the future, A breakdown of construction costs follows: Engineering, inspection & testing Signing and striping Roadway construction Irvine /Tustin Avenue 23rd Street Storm drains and subdrains 8 inch water main in 23rd St. Water and sewer laterals $ 24,000. 2,000. 179,100. 12,600. 90,000. 6,100. 12,200. Total $326,000. The work is being financed by the following agencies and funds: City General Fund City Water Fund Orange County Road Department Arterial Highway Financing Program Gas Tax Funds Property Owners $ 18,100, 10,300. 50,000. 134,600. 110,000. 3,000. • Total $326,000. 0 August 20, 1968 Page 2 F To date the Contractor has completed most of the storm drains, sewer and water lines and is presently constructing 23rd Street and the northbound lanes of Irvine/ Tustin Avenue, It is anticipated that 23rd Street will be paved by the first of September and that the northbound lanes of Irvine /Tustin Avenue will be paved be- tween mid- September and the first of October. At this time traffic will be routed onto the newly paved lanes and the southbound lanes will be constructed. The project should be completed by the first week in November. The Contractor will be required to reasonably maintain ingress and egress to driveways adjoining the work except during the construction of new driveway approaches. Residents will be given 48 hour advance notice before work commences on the new drive- way approaches. We regret the inconveniences that such a project imposes, and trust that you will assist us in helping the Contractor to expedite the completion of the work. If at any time you have any questions regarding the project, please call me at 673 -2110, Extension 26 or contact our Resident Engineer, Mr. Johnson on the project. Very truly yours, Donald L. Webb Project Engineer DLW /meh CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 3300 W. Newport Boulevard TO: Mr. Jacobs 317 W. 8th Street Santa Ana, California ATTENTION: SUBJECT: Improvement of Irvine/Tustin Avenues - 22nd Street to University Drive and 23rd Street from Tustin Avenue to Irvine Avenue C -1112 We are Transmitting the following: No. Copies Description 1 Remarks: Per your request Construction Drawings Copies to: By:�, Derek H. White Design Engineer dhw /ldg S -la � 4--��-� 1(4f JC ,e (-- F A��_..j,`!v'4� � X71-. .. .,''J.�•_` � _ �. _ _ J , �;,/'-.fir. - � ���__ �•� ��78- .IN - .ri;-� J - •L i; _. u e' q � .'.3 <.+ ilii '� � ✓ �.c� 9 C3 m J&vi 'S4� 2- Z,-3 r 0 (t.Y CK"P _tt e L� ic," dl e &E .141.- J&7 loo � , o �, A) E i 13 KEEP mmllool -RIGHTI 0 1 f� e)p � re iLA, tA.,e �, [A �J c� i rad