HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-1973 - Parking needs & economic feasibility study, Central NewportTO: FINANCE DIRECTOR
FROM: City Clerk
SUBJECT: Contract No. 1923
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CALIFORNIA
City tlall
3300 W. Newport Hlvd
Area Code 714
Description of Contract Parking Needs 6 Economic Study - Central
Newport Area
Authorized by Resolution No. 9167 , adopted on August 22, 1977
Effective date of Contract October 4. 1977
Contract with Wilbur Smith 6 Associates
Address 5900 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90036
Amount of Contract See contract
City Clerk IQ
0
0
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
(Central Newport Beach Parking Study)
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into day of
1977, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City"
and WILBUR SMITH AND ASSOCIATES, hereinafter referred to as
"Consultant ".
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, City has determined that it is desirable and
necessary to conduct a study of the parking needs and economic
feasibility relative to the Central Newport Beach area, generally
bounded by and including the commercial property along Newport
Boulevard from the Arches Bridge to 19th Street, including
McFadden Square area, the Cannery Village area and the Lido Village
area; and
WHEREAS, the information provided by the Central Newport
Beach Parking Study will supply City with necessary information
regarding parking needs and the economic feasibility of various
parking needs solutions; and
WHEREAS, Consultant is qualified to undertake and
complete such a study for City, and has submitted a written
proposal dated July 29, 1977; and
WHEREAS, City desires to accept said proposal;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
1. General. (A) City engages Consultant to perform
the services hereinafter described for the compensation herein
stated.
(B) Consultant agrees to perform said services
upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth.
•
2. Services to be Performed
E
Consultant. Consultant
hereby agrees to perform the services as outlined in the proposal
dated July 29, 1977, a copy of which is attached hereto and
marked Exhibit "A" and which is incorporated herein by this
reference as if fully set forth. The work to be performed includes
the parking needs study and economic feasibility study.
If conflicts occur between this Agreement and said
proposal, the terms of this Agreement shall control. Consultant
agrees to coordinate its activities with the Community Development
Department of the City of Newport Beach, as needed.
3. Duties of City. City hereby agrees to supply
Consultant with such information, materials and consultation
services as are reasonably necessary to provide Consultant with
data, maps, statistics and other relevant materials owned or
controlled by City for preparation and completion of the work
hereunder.
4. Ownership of Project Documents. All reports, maps,
notes, studies and other documents shall become the property of
City and may be reproduced as deemed necessary by City.
5. Right of Termination. City reserves the right
to terminate this agreement at any time by giving Consultant five
(5) working days prior written notice. Notice shall be deemed
served on Consultant two (2) days after deposit in the United
States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed to Consultant's office
J "C W VS
at 5900 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite - 24110, Los Angeles, California
90036. In the event of termination due to fault of Consultant,
City shall be relieved of any obligation to compensate Consultant
beyond compensation paid to Consultant prior to termination. If
this Agreement is terminated for any reason other than fault of
Consultant, City agrees to compensate Consultant for the actual
services performed to the effective date of the notice of
termination, on the basis of the fee schedule contained in the
proposal.
-2-
0
6. Completion of Work. Consultant agrees to complete
all work described herein in two phases, phase one being the
parking needs study and phase two being the economic feasibility
study. All work herein shall be completed within four (4) months
after notice to proceed.
7. Fee Schedule and Payments. (A) In consideration
of the above described services, City agrees to pay Consultant
an amount based upon the hourly rates set forth in the proposal.
In no event, however, shall the total compensation exceed
Eighteen Thousand, Nine Hundred Dollars ($18,900.00), except as
provided in paragraph 8.
(B) The contract amount shall be paid to Consultant
as follows:
(1) Consultant will submit monthly progress
billings based on a percentage of completion of
each phase of the project and monthly partial pay-
ments shall be based on the amount earned in each
month, as determined by the fee schedule. The sum
of monthly partial payments shall not exeed ninety
percent (90 %) of the maximum fee.
(2) The balance of the total amount earned shall
be paid upon acceptance of the final report by the
City, acceptance will not be unreasonably withheld.
8. Amendments. The scope of the services to be
furnished by Consultant may be changed and the maximum fee
revised upon prior written approval of the Community Development
Director, if the increase in the maximum fee does not exceed
One Thousand Eight Hundred and Ninety Dollars ($1,890.00). If
any proposed revision of the scope of services results in an
increase in the maximum fee exceeding said amount, an amendment
to this Agreement providing for such revision shall be processed
and executed by the parties hereto.
-3-
0 0
9. Additional Work. Any additional work, beyond
the work outlined in this Agreement and the proposal shall be
authorized by City, based upon the fee schedule as set out in
said proposal.
10. Hold Harmless. Consultant shall indemnify and
hold harmless City, its officers and employees, from any damage
or liability arising from the errors, omissions, or negligence
in Consultant's performance of this Agreement or in the consulting
services herein provided.
11. Prior Services. By letter from the Director of
the Community Development, dated August 11, 1977, Consultant
has commenced and undertaken the initial phase of the "parking
needs and economic feasibility study" for the Central Newport
area, including the Parker Interview Task only, in accord with
page 8, item B of Consultant's proposal. The consideration
for said phase of the work was not to exceed $3,000.00, and
said $3,000.00 is included in and is a part of the maximum
consideration for all work under this Agreement, as set forth
in Paragraph 7 above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused
this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above
written.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, A
Municipal.Corporation
` 7
By c. �.
Mayor \
ATTEST:
/Ll' WILBUR SMITH AND ASSOCIATES
Cit�r
By 4S,��
-4-
V it LLN Smith & —,44dociatei,, JzG
CA.LE, .WIL5MITM CONSULTING ENGINEERS AND PLANNF-RS CALIFORNIA
TELEX 97 -0489 59O WIIANIRR BOULXWARO, BUIT 2130. L211) 9304100
July 29, 1977 Zw ea1.1 90036
Mr. Fred Talarico
Senior Planner
Department of Community Development
City of Newport Beach
Newport Beach, California 92663
Mr. Paul E. Carlson
Chairman
Central Newport Parking Committee
3475 Via Oporto
Newport Beach, California 92663
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit our proposal for professional
engineering services.relative to the Parking Study for the
Central Newport Beach area. The proposal documents our
approach and insights into the study, our experience in similar
projects, the qualifications of our proposed study staff, and
estimated project schedule and fee requirements.
The scope of services we have defined for the study is based
upon our interpretation of the City's brief request for proposals,
and conversations with you. We would not hesitate to revise our
work scope and-fee if it is not totally responsive to the City's
needs and objectives.
We feel that our past involvement with parking planning for
the City in our 1968 Parking and Traffic Study, coupled with our
extensive experience in Cities throughout the State, provides
us with valuable insights into the proposed study program. Our
staff has the necessary expertise and experience to provide the
City with a realistic, implementable parking program.
Respectfully submitted,
WILBUR. ,SMITH T &.ASSOCIATES
William V. Sheppard
Western Region Vice President
WVS:dk
" �V HAVEN, CONN. COLUMBIA, S.C. NEW YORK, N.Y. - PHILADELPHIA, PA. _ MIAMI, FLA,
/)A'HINGTON, D.C. - RICHMOND, VA. - SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. - WINSTON•SALEM, N.C.
0"TON, MASS, DALLAS, TEX. HOUSTON, TEX. - DENVER, COL - TORONTO, ONT.
H NG KONG _ LONDON SINGAPORE - - ATHENS MELBOURNE
EXHIBIT "A"
- ATLANTA. GA.
KANSAS CITY, MO.
PITTSBURGH, PA.
BRISBANE
INTRODUCTION
11
The City of Newport Beach has long been noted as one of
California's premier coastal communities. The City provides
iboth residents and visitors with an environment which combines
excellent beach and water related recreational opportunities
with a sophisticated and balanced urban structure. Newport
Beach has retained its resort community atmosphere while success-
fully emerging as a major center of business and commercial activity.
The central Newport Beach area, in dramatic contrast with most
city centers, is experiencing unprecedented levels of economic
activity. The key to the continued vitality of the center area is
the diversity and the quality of the civic, commercial, cultural,
and recreational activities which are served by the central city.
The consolidation of all these activities on the narrow
Newport Peninsula has resulted in the constraint availability of
parking in central Newport Beach. The 1968 assessment of parking
needs conducted by Wilbur Smith and Associates revealed a major
deficiency of over 1,500 parking spaces in the area. In order to
reduce these deficiencies the City has extensively developed a
curb system and off - street parking facilities. Several major
issues, however, must be addressed before the City can effectively
increase its downtown resources:
1. The City has no formal means, such as a parking
authority, or parking assessment district, of
developing and managing the central area parking
supply. Similarly, no organized plan of parking
development exists.
2. Central area employees must compete for parking
with the shoppers and visitors they are intended
to serve. Employees, shoppers,.tourists, beach goers
and other visitors to the central area all compete
for a limited parking supply.
3. The central area consists of a mix of major civic,
retail, industrial,, restaurant, cultural, and
} recreational land uses with dramatically different
parking needs.
4. The older retail and industrial development in the
area was constructed without adequate off- street
parking.
5. The central area is in a period of major growth and
transition. Future parking requirements may differ
drastically from current parking needs.
6. The existing parking demand is well in excess of the
current supply. The current number of parked vehicles
in the study area is not representative of the full
magnitude of the actual demand for parking.
The City of Newport Beach and the Central Newport Parking
Commission (CNPC), in recognizing these issues, have called for
the preparation of a comprehensive parking development plan.
The study area would encompass the entire central area retail,
commercial, and industrial area.
FA
The Parking Program Development Process
The preparation of an effective parking development program
requires the completion of ,a multiple stage planning and engineer-
] ing process which consists of the following key elements:
1. An assessment of existing and future parking needs.
2. The preparation and evaluation of alternative parking
development concepts.
1
3. The 'selection of a prefered parking development concept.
4,. The evaluation of the economic feasibility of the
selected concept.
5. The formalization of the concept plan into an implement -
able parking plan.
6. Plan adoption, approval, and environmental review.
7. The development and implementation of a parking finance
program.
8.. The design and construction of specific parking
facilities.
It is essential that the entire parking plan development
process be undertaken to ensure that adequate program financing
is available, and that the development plan is directed to satis-
3
•
E
fying the most significant parking needs. The parking study must
present the parking needs and financial feasibility analysis in
the manner required to, provide the documentation which must accompany
bonding and all other financing program proposals.
Study Approach and Scobe
The previous Newport Beach parking study conducted by Wilbur
Smith and Associates in 196E coupled with land use and parking
inventory studies conducted by the City, will provide an analytical
basis for the proposed 1977 Parking Study. in addition, the City
of Newport Beach monitors the utilization.levels and revenues
generated by the City's metered parking facilities. Past and on-
going studies relative to study area development plans and design
themes will provide a future land -use plan for the study area.
The availability of this information significantly reduces the
data collection and field study requirements of the proposed park-
ing study.
The study approach proposed by Wilbur Smith and Associates
recognizes this potential for simplifying the scope of the study.
Accordingly, however, the study approach recognizes that the
previous parking study efforts are now a decade old, and the
assumptions and conclusion which underly the recommendations of
these studies must be critically evaluated. Thus, a limited parker
interview survey and related field studies are included in the
i study scope. Essentially, the study approach involves all the
necessary elements of a comprehensive parking study,, recognizing
that in many cases completion of these elements requires only a
t
review or simple updating of available data.
M
_ I
I
Of key importance in the total study will be the determination
of the sort of parking management tool, an assessment district, a
parking authority, or other organization would allow the most
effective development and operation of the proposed parking facili-
ties. The study recommendations must represent realistic long -term
solutions to the needs, legal constraints, and resource availability
of the central area. The study will fully evaluate,--in terms of
parking demand and financial feasibility, the following alternatives:
a. Development of currently owned public lands as
parking facilities.
b. The development of "remote" parking lots outside
the study area.
j
c. The "recycling" of existing parking facilities
i
through the conversion of existing surface parking
to structure parking.
d. Modifications of existing parking rate structures
i
and collection techniques.
e. Innovative financing options such as private leasing
of public parking, use of air rights, tax increment
finance, loans from public agencies, etc.
The study will produce a short and long -range program of
staged parking system development. The functional design develop -
ment costs, construction schedule requirements, revenue character-
istics, and implementation priorities of each recommended parking
5
I
•
facility will be fully documented. The final project report will
serve as the technical foundation for the financing of the recom-
mended.plan.
Firm Qualifications
Wilbur Smith and Associates is the recoginzed authority in
parking planning, financing, and management both in the United
States and throughout the world. Our past involvement in parking
planning for Newport Beach is characteristic of the services we
have provided cities and communities throughout California; cities
such as Los Angeles Laguna Beach, Anaheim, San Jose, Santa Monica,
and Beverly Hills. The professional staff proposed for this
project consists of individuals with extensive parking
planning, parking economics and engineering experience in a broad
variety of cities and areas. The value of this experience is best
measured.by the continual successful implementation of our project
recommendations. We feel that our previous work in Newport Beach,
combined with the experience of our study staff, provides insight
into the proposed Newport Beach Parking Study which will ensure
successful implementation of a comprehensive parking plan. The
Wilbur Smith and Associates project team also has. the expertise
to prepare the environmental documents, and the parking example
design specifications and design plans to provide actual project
implementation. Historically, the firm has worked directly with
the City's bond councils and financial consultant to ensure plan
financing.
11
0
I
WORK PROGRAM
i Tile proposed Work Program for the Central Newport Beach
Parking Study was developed under the study approach that a
total parking study program will be required. The work Program
recognizes that (A) the City maintains comprehensive parking data
files relative to all public and off- street parking facilities,
(B) other studies and development plans will provide specific
i
definitions of future study area land use and traffic circulation
patterns, and that (C) an evaluation of the management, finance, and
i
parking rate system is a major element of the study.
The Work Program
A schematic flow chart (See Figure 1) has been prepared for
the proposed central area Parking Study. Each major study task
is shown, and once the final scope of work is established, it would
be possible to form a critical path timetable for each work item.
It is anticipated that the final project scope of work would be
developed with City staff at a work session at the onset of the
study. The work Flow Diagram represents all the elements of a
comprehensive parking study. Many of the specific work tasks will
primarily involve an update of previous work or incorporation of
the City's data and other study efforts into the project program.
The study would be conducted in two major phases: (I) parking needs
assessment and (II.) financial feasibility determination.
7
COUYIir11
LRANEurut(O RE F[M. A'ALYSIS L4'Y VX
��Ii R CVRPEJIT AREA IPD aRWYf0
SE p1RCIW ]pK[ L:RRL9 pARY+Ni EKII+TII
}NO OEf1CIC.YCiEi Ab ..RRWEVfX'
AREA CVRAENP TOMFIC
GADATX PARNI.W NEEDS CKMiIONAI
PPdfCT10X3 I4PgiYEYEPII
FUTUPE IYTI'PC
PARNIK OE4\N0 FYALT91] PPRMrIW 9PKS
KlT 1195 LDeW PANE
PARNIN9 XEE01 IRRAI.W REE69- NIP.1W XEf05-
TNC MEVIORI THE NCMFONT" TNC XCMb.T
CCxiRal \R_A lixiR4 A _ CCXiR \l CTC1
RVNIN\A,
C R' LUATIOY
WE
MUTE pfR1EIDNlL
TGE CN \R4CTE.%]M]
Pte.
ECONCNIC E(x4xCrx0
ANJLYII] ALUR.ATIYE
PHASE I
PARKING NEEDS
PHASE It
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
IuPACT] ANiLY91f AND DEYEWY[NT
-1D Ax0 pgfR }Y9
" SINRT R >N0E
Pua.0
PRODRAY
LORC 1AY61 '
.A...
FAdIIAY
4YE.Y0\iION ] IYPPKppT C OglR p CRY1I 1 1RE CMIIRUINRp
IF "OWN ,, E0 R A
W DAER
URPF
NIT LIT
NO
PROERAY TRAVaL 'AMAW DPERATICNV. pIINRAN9
SCHEMATIC (FLOW CHART
Central Area Parking Study
Newport Beach, California
W,t -- Zd Ax.[ 1! :.tP, Figure 1
FIELD
INVE9L10\1:O '
STUOY 00CL1
.10
AND
LAW USE
0WCU."Es
c4Rf ]vN!
INVENMPY
WVCNIORY
N?NEP
INiEPV1E+H
O;RMEYT
v }PNIK >vA[(
USA6!
EIt-D SIUD1
ANO
00LA 4lNiNTION
GI WENT
P.bTLV SIYCF
r.YYENTONf
Oa /- 9TRLlT
PCCLUUUYIM
bFPENr
/JCRrTr!]
AYJ Y':PgVlR
srcmE]
M+rE :NE 6W
� +t +aRUnDV eF
_
P uaw Dom.
..
t�
COUYIir11
LRANEurut(O RE F[M. A'ALYSIS L4'Y VX
��Ii R CVRPEJIT AREA IPD aRWYf0
SE p1RCIW ]pK[ L:RRL9 pARY+Ni EKII+TII
}NO OEf1CIC.YCiEi Ab ..RRWEVfX'
AREA CVRAENP TOMFIC
GADATX PARNI.W NEEDS CKMiIONAI
PPdfCT10X3 I4PgiYEYEPII
FUTUPE IYTI'PC
PARNIK OE4\N0 FYALT91] PPRMrIW 9PKS
KlT 1195 LDeW PANE
PARNIN9 XEE01 IRRAI.W REE69- NIP.1W XEf05-
TNC MEVIORI THE NCMFONT" TNC XCMb.T
CCxiRal \R_A lixiR4 A _ CCXiR \l CTC1
RVNIN\A,
C R' LUATIOY
WE
MUTE pfR1EIDNlL
TGE CN \R4CTE.%]M]
Pte.
ECONCNIC E(x4xCrx0
ANJLYII] ALUR.ATIYE
PHASE I
PARKING NEEDS
PHASE It
ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY
IuPACT] ANiLY91f AND DEYEWY[NT
-1D Ax0 pgfR }Y9
" SINRT R >N0E
Pua.0
PRODRAY
LORC 1AY61 '
.A...
FAdIIAY
4YE.Y0\iION ] IYPPKppT C OglR p CRY1I 1 1RE CMIIRUINRp
IF "OWN ,, E0 R A
W DAER
URPF
NIT LIT
NO
PROERAY TRAVaL 'AMAW DPERATICNV. pIINRAN9
SCHEMATIC (FLOW CHART
Central Area Parking Study
Newport Beach, California
W,t -- Zd Ax.[ 1! :.tP, Figure 1
N
i •
Parking Needs Assessment
This study phase would determine the existing and future
parking needs and requirements of the central area. A preliminary
j evaluation of alternative parking plans would be conducted. To
develop objective plans and recommendations, the original project
field data files developed in our 1968 studies will be updated
from City files, other studies., and through any necessary field
investigations.
Investigations will include the following=
A. Updated Parking Space Inventory - Inventories of all
parking facilities will be included in the study for
the defined study area. Inventories available will
be. updated, and full use will be made of inventory
data available from various city departments. It is
anticipated that the task will require only a review
of available city files. The type of parking, restrictions,
fees charged, and operational characteristics of all
parking facilities, both curb and off- street will be
determined.
B. Parker Interview,
volving personal
typical curb and
These interviews
the magnitude of
central area.
- A limited sample size survey in-
interviews with parkers utilizing
off - street spaces will be conducted.
are essential to the estimation of
the actual parking demands in the
9
i
,j
J
1
1
1
.i
i
,.7
The interview with parkers will provide the following in-
formational items relative to par'r.--r characteristics:
1. Origin of trip before parking.
2. Primary Central Area destination after parking, (detail
land use at destination).
3. Principal purpose of trip.
4. Distance walked from parking location to primary
destination.
5. Time of arrival and departure.
6. Next destination after unpacking.
7. Trip and parking generation characteristics of downtown
land uses.
Field personnel would also note type of vehicle (car, truck,
taxi, etc.,) and car occupancy. Interviews would be made between
10:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. on a normal business day, except where
special weekend and evening demands exist, such as the pier and
restaurant areas.
These data will yield information necessary to determine
future parking demands and effects of transportation improvements.
0
C. Parking Accumulation and Turnover
I
and limited field surveys will be
parking accumulation and turnover
i
recognized that the City currentl
j for all public off - street parking
- City data files
utilized to measure
rates. It is
collects this data
lots.
D. Update Site Generation Characteristics - A special
field study to sample pedestrian volumes at major
Ibuildings in the study area would be conducted.
Control counts would be made at buildings and counts
collected of all persons entering the buildings. The
sample counts would be correlated with the parker
interview survey results.
E. Land Use Review - A thorough examination of land use
in the study area for both present year and projection
years would be made. All significant proposed projects
Would be reviewed and considered in the study. Present
and future land uses, including floor area and employ-
ment, will provide essential information for the pro -
jection of short -range and long -range parking demands.
Full use will be made of the parking -land use data
contained in past parking, transit, and comprehensive
transportation studies, including the specific plan
study for the Cannery Village area and the Citywide
Transportation Study.
F. Anticipated Parkinq Changes - Estimates of parking
spaces, both curb and off- street, which might be
eliminated in the future would be reviewed with city
staff. These estimates are essential to the accurate
projection of total parking needs.
10
i • i
G. Parking Administration - Fully realizing the importance
of reportiny on the orgnization and administration,of-
the City's parking program, we would expect to review
and relate the advantages and disadvantages which the
present program has produced. This would be done by
detailed discussions with all of the public bodies
concerned with transportation and parking and by dis-
cussions with the CPNC and other business and civic
groups. Close coordination with City staff would be
especially important in these discussions: The organiz-
ations and administrative practices will also be assessed
in relation to those cities of comparable size with
acknowledged successful parking programs. All of the
inquiries and studies in this phase of the work will
be aimed at making sound recommendations for a future
organization and administrative program for parking in
Newport Beach.
H. Legal and Financial Elements - The studies should include
an evaluation of alternate financial and /or legal mechan-
isms that.would be employed to achieve the same goals at
less expense to the City in terms of tax incentives, and/
or less impact on the City's borrowing authority. The
practices of supporting parking developments.through
public funding will be thoroughly reviewed. The attitudes
and view ,of the public and private agencies involved will
be ascertained. The full economic implications of the
present program of financing parking facilities in Central
Newport Beach will be developed.
11
1]
0
This phase of the Work Program would also involve the review,
analysis, and evaluation of the parking land use, traffic, trip
generation, and financial data compiled, updated, and tabulated
i,i the initisl por.Lion of the study. The analysis would
obviously include necessary planning and engineering evaluations
and application of judgment to determine final parking demand
values in the study projections for 1976, 1980 and 1985. These
demand forecasts would be compared with the existing supply to
determine actual parking needs.
The parking demands and needs would be estimated for 1977,
1980 and 1985. In the analysis, full use would be made of all
pertinent data including land use data, parking inventories, and
economic studies. All materials will be analyzed to integrate
with planning data for the study area. The demands for parking
will be related to the parking supply on a block -by -block basis
to determine parking surpluses and deficiencies. In this manner,
any desired grouping of blocks can be analyzed. Land use informa-
tion, including floor area and employment available from the city,
will be correlated with parking demands. Parking projections will
be based on floor area, employment, and other economic and land
use factors; future demands will be. developed on a block and
total study area basis. A preliminary evaluation of alternative
parking programs would be conducted to allow the selection of a
preferred development concept.
Economic Feasibility
The economic feasibility of the preferred parking development
plan will be evaluated in this major phase of the study. Potential
sites for parking facilities will be located and costed. The
12
type of parking facility required on each site will be developed
in terms of capacity, functional design, operational features,
and construction cost requirements. An economic analysis which
compares annual par':ing revenues with the debt service and
operating cost requirements of each facility will be conducted.
The financing alternatives which would be available to fund any
operating deficit would be identified.
In
-this manner, a
financial feasibility
analysis
of each.
proposed.facility
and
the total parking plan
would be
conducted.
Draft Report
Upon completion of all field studies and analyses, a pre -
liminary report of findings and recommendations will be prepared
and submitted:
i
A_ The report will contain the parking inventory and parker
i
i characteristics, including trip purpose, origin and
destination, occupancy, turnover rates, hourly accumu-
lation of cars and walking distances. Complete analyses
and discussions of these data will be presented.
B. Supply versus demand will be analyzed on a block -by -block
basis based upon field survey and floor area data.
Existing and future (1977, 1980, and 1985) deficiencies
(and surpluses) in parking will be evaluated by type
and location.
C. Alternate methods of achieving a balanced parking supply
and demand will be explored, and the most efficient plan
for developing an adequate parking supply will be presented.
13
-i
i D. Existing and proposed sites for off - street parking
development will be evaluated. This will include
various types of facilities, consisting of those that
could be developed as long -term employee. parking, as
i
well as short -term, high - turnover parking facilities.
E. A complete economic feasibility analysis for each of
the recommended parking sites will be prepared. These
analyses will include development costs, operating
costs, and gross income. From cost - income summaries,
I
1 it will be possible to determine the extent to which
each of the facilities can be developed as self- liquida-
ting projects. it will also be possible to relate the
economic data to various methods of financing. Total
project costs would be provided, as well as estimated
project initiation and completion dates.
F. A long -range (1985) parking program and management plan
will be prepared. The plan will delineate a program
of parking site acquisition, development, and management
necessary to accommodate the long term needs of the study
area.
Presentation and Reports
The consultant team would make formal presentations of the
project recommendations to City Staff, to the CNPC, the Planning
'Commission and to the City Council. A presentation of interim
project findings would be made to City Staff at the end of the
inventory and analysis phase of the study. After review and
approval of the project recommendations the consultant would
14
provide the City with fifty (50) copies of the final report, as
well as with the report originals and graphics. Consultant team
members would be available to attend all meetings and work
sessions dictated by the work program requirements, to ensure
that all study products are developed in full coordination with
City Staff and other involved interests. The Consultant would
also assist bond counsel in the preparation, of any required bond
sale prospectus.
Supplemental Studies
The Consultant Team would be prepared to conduct any environ-
mental assessments or impact analysis, as required by program
recommendations. Members of the team are fully familiar with
the requirements of the State Environmental Quality Act as
related to .environmental impact reports of transportation related
projects.
The Team is also experienced in the preliminary design, and
the development of construction specifications and construction
plans for parking lots and structures of all types. Team members
would be available to conduct these studies on an as- needed basis.
15
STUDY COSTS
The.scope of work defined in this proposal for Phase I,
the Parking Needs Assessment, and Phase II, the Economic Feasibility
Analysis, would require approximately 420.professional manhours.
Table 1 presents a project cost estimate, delineating the estimated
costs of both Phases, which total $ 18,900. Cost estimates include
time and material expenses for attendance at presentations and
hearings at the conclusion of Phases I and II_ Conduct of the
supplemental project requirements, such as preparation of necessary
environmental documents, or preparation of detailed parking facility
design- construction plans are not included. At this time the scope
of these supplemental requirements is not sufficiently defined to
allow a detailed cost estimate. We would plan to conduct these
supplemental efforts, using our standard schedule of hourly per
diem rates as shown in Table 1.
26
a H�
E p
o �
H
>4 H W
q E
P4
W
E
H
E+
U)
O
U
I
u
0
o
o
H O
0
0
0
Fl V
H
o
0
H
H
[A
H
M
�r
>1
W
m
�L
rC
[-7
C
O
�
aJ
O
W
U
H
0
6
N
0 ul
%4
OU
u
a
x
H
O
w
F
N
P4
N
N
H
H
C
u
lO
,4 n
�
u
N
Q V
A U
E
O
a
H
2 rQ
E
hr�
3
F
a
�
w
d 4
C
e,
H
O
x
i
U
>4 H W
q E
P4
W
E
H
E+
U)
O
U
I
u
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
o
�r
o
0
o,�
O
N
o
0
0
0
N
d'
d'
0
H
t0
1-0
(9
N
N
O
H
lO
N
N
H
cr
i
N
O
O
O
'
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
d'
0
[
k0
CO
O
v1
1-1
O
O
cj'
N
H
lO
N
N
i
N
�
b
C
N
�O
N
C)
O
O
O
O
Ln
O
-
S4
.i
I,
CO
[
l0
CO
0
Q)
O
O1
u
.rq
w
w
O
O
O
o
o
O
O
O
O
O
o
O
O
O
d'
O
1
Q
N
in
01
O
O
N
r-
H
M
M
U •
O
-.i Sa
w o
w �+
•
� t/�
C U
-
N N
R v+
. u
N 1
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
U 0
O
N
';t,
;i
N
W
,1 i
.i
rl
H
H
N'
N 04
.--i
N
N C
N
�N U
N
1 �4
tt.
C O
V>
H i
N
#
N
m
ro
c
r+
.rA
Cl)
rn
+
c
w
m
W
Lo
4
H
N
C
N
f!1
N
H
N
N
C
O
.0
N
[a
•rl
N
H
$4
U
6p
u
N
W
-.Ni
-04
(1)
-a
Lo
.0
E
r-t
U
•rt
C
r-
.0
•,�
N
U
N
U
1�
l
O
C
.{
w
s4
�4
[�
>
•,
c
U
u
-,
m
U
N
N
U
N
44
•�
cn
Ul
I4
C
47
}-1
.-1
N
H
Y4
w
1-4
P�
C�
W
W
F
q
V
U]
Q
F
O
W
W
a
H
27
CVfY OF NEWPORT ftACH
MEMORANDUM: From ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
TO .. .. ........
DORIS . . . . .... GEORGE ., .... CITY . .... CLERK Seem
ptber__30 1877.,,
.............. .. ........ ............
RE: Agreement for Professional Services
Wilbur Smith and Associates
Attached hereto is an original and two copies of an Agreement
for Professional Services between the City of Newport Beach
and Wilbur Smith and Associates. Please obtain the appropriate
signatures and return two copies to this office.
Thank you for your cooperation. �-
HRC:yz
Attachment
P40y wanted ❑
RGOY not neceaaary ❑
HI-M
WG COFFIN
Assi an Attorney
By................................. ...............................
0 0
RESOLUTION NO. 9 167
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH AND WILBUR SMITH AND
ASSOCIATES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A "PARKING
NEEDS AND ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR THE
CENTRAL NEWPORT AREA"
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach a certain Agreement between the
City of Newport Beach and Wilbur Smith and Associates for the
preparation of a "Parking Needs and Economic Feasibility Study
For The Central Newport Area "; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the terms and
conditions of said Agreement and finds them to be satisfactory
and that it would be in the best interest of the City to
authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach that said Agreement above described
is hereby approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are authorized
and directed to execute the same on behalf of the City of
Newport Beach.
ADOPTED this 22nd day of August , 1977.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
DDO /bc
8/18/77