HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-1974 - Off-site parking agreementAugust 17, 1977
TO
FROM:
City Council Meeting _August 22, 1977
Agenda Item No. H -2(a)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
City Council
Department of Community Development
SUBJECT:
Off -site Parking Agreement
Request to accept an off -site parking agreement
for the required parking spaces in conjunction
with the expansion of an existing commercial
building in Corona del Mar.
LOCATION:
Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323 (i.e. building site),
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway, on the
southerly side of East Coast Highway between
Marguerite Avenue and Marigold Avenue in Corona
del Mar; Lots 29 and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar
(i.e. off -site parking lot), located at 329 and
331.Marigold- AvEnu_e, on the northwesterly side of
Marigold Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONES:
C -1 and R -1
APPLICANT:
Julius V. Evans, :Corona del Mar
OWNER:
Same as Applicant
Application
This application requests approval of an off -site parking agreement
for the required parking spaces in conjunction with the expansion
of an existing commercial building. In accordance with Section 20.30.
035 D. of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the Planning Commission
shall not recommend and the City Council shall not approve off - street
parking on a separate lot from the building site or sites unless:
(a) Such lot is so located as to be useful in connection with
the proposed use or uses on the building site or sites.
(b) Parking on such lot will not create undue traffic hazards
in the surrounding area.
(c) Such lot and the building site are in the same ownership,
or the owners of the building sites have a common owner-
ship in such lot, and the owner or owners are entitled to
the immediate possession and use thereof (ownership of the
off -site lot must be ownership in fee or a leasehold
interest of a duration adequate to serve all proposed
uses on the building site or sites).
(d) The owner or owners and the City, upon the approval of the
City Council, execute a written instrument or instruments,
approved as to form and content by the City Attorney, pro-
viding for the maintenance of the required off - street parking
on such lot for the duration of the proposed use or uses on
the building site or sites. Should a change in use or addi-
tional use be proposed, the off - street parking regulations
applicable at the time shall apply. Such instruments shall
be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and copies
thereof filed with the Department of Community Development.
0
TO: City Council - 2.
Suaaested Action
41
If desired, adopt Resolution No. , authorizing the execution
of an off -site parking agreement with Julius V. Evans, Corona del Mar.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At its meeting of August 4, 1977, the Planning Commission voted (6 Ayes,
1 Absent) to recommend the approval of the requested off -site parking
arrangement with the findings and subject to the conditions of ap-
proval as follows:
A. FINDINGS:
The off -site parking area is directly across an alley
from the subject commercial site and, therefore, is
so located to be useful to the proposed development.
2. The off -site parking spaces will not create undue
traffic hazards in the surrounding area. In fact,
the proposed parking layout of the subject parking
lot will create better vehicular maneuverability and
automobile storage than now exists.
3. The commercial site and the off -site parking lot are
in the same ownership.
4. The City Traffic Engineer has no objections with the
off -site parking arrangement.
B. CONDITIONS:
1. That an off -site parking agreement shall be approved
by the City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of
fifteen parking spaces shall be provided on Lots 29
and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar, for the duration
of the proposed expanded commercial building located
at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway.
2. That the off -site parking lot shall be improved with
wheel stops and marked with approved traffic markers
or painted white lines not less than four inches wide
in accordance with the approved parking layout.
3. That signs be provided on the rear of the proposed
expanded commercial building indicating the following
statement: "No Parking - Loading Zone Only."
4. That a solid masonry wall with a rounded concrete cap
shall be installed pursuant to Section 20.30.045 B of
the Newport Beach Municipal Code.
Forwarded for the information and review of the City Council is an
excerpt from the draft of the Planning Commission minutes of August 4,
1977, and a copy of the Planning Commission staff report dated July 28,
1977, which fully describes the applicant's request.
Respectfully submitted,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
R. V. HOGAN, Director
By g - #—..
(DANIfS D. HEWICKER
s stant Director - Planning JDH /kk
Attachments for City Council Only:
1) Draft of minutes of Planning Commission Meeting 8/4/77.
2) Planning Commission Staff Report dated 7/28/77 with attachments.
0
COMMISSIONERS
City of Newport Beach MINUTES
Auaust 4. 1977
` L CALL
INORX
6. That a standard subdivision agreement and
security be provided to guarantee satisfactory
completion of the public improvements if it is
desired to record the parcel map before the
improvements are constructed (parcel map must
b ecorded prior to obtaining a building
perms
7. That a minim 15 foot front yard setback shall
be observed alon he Surrey Drive frontage
of the site and sai tback shall be reflected
on Districting Map No.
Motion
X
Motion was made that Planning Commission -rg„ mend
A -498
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
to the City Council the approval of Amendment
Absent
X
X
498.
Item #3
Request to accept an offsite parking agreement for
OFFSITE
the required parking spaces in conjunction with the
PARK NG
expansion of an existing commercial building in
AGAEW NT
Corona del Mar.
APPROVED
Location: Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323 (i.e.
building site) located at 3331 and
3337 East Coast Highway, on the
southerly side of East Coast Highway
between Marguerite Avenue and Mari-
gold Avenue in Corona del Mar; Lots
29 and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar
(i.e. offsite parking lot) located
at 329 and 331 Marigold Avenue, on
the northwesterly side of Marigold
Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
Zones: C -1 and R -1
Applicant: Julius V. Evans, Corona del Mar
Owner: Same as Applicant
Discussion was opened in connection with this
matter and Julius Evans, 4709 Seashore, appeared
before the Commission and concurred with the staff
report and recommendations. He answered questions
Page 5.
COMMISSIONERS 9 gp��8y y�} p j�
n� 9��D 1G C� C� ®t Newport l Bedch
3
F y( vs O�
�O
Au ust 4, 1977
MINUTES
TOLL CALL
UVOLX
of the Commission and advised that the marked name
spaces would probably remain, that the Goodwill
has promised to remove the collection box from the
premises, and that landscaping would be installed.
There being no others desiring to appear and be
heard, the public discussion was closed.
Following discussion of various parking lot stand-
:
ards, and especially those pertaining to wails and
Motion
X
wheel stops, Planning Commission made the following
Ayes
X
X
X
X
X
X
findings:
Absent
X
1. The offsite parking area is directly across an
alley from the subject commercial site, and
therefore, is so located to be useful to the
proposed development.
2. The offsite parking spaces will not create
undue traffic hazards in the surrounding area.
In fact, the proposed parking layout of the
subject parking lot will create better vehicular
maneuverability and automobile storage than now
exists.
3. The commercial site and the offsite parking lot
are in the same ownership.
4. The City Traffic Engineer has no objections
with the offsite parking arrangement.
and approved the offsite parking agreement, subject
to the following conditions:
1. That an offsite parking agreement shall be
approved by the City Council, guaranteeing
that a minimum of 15 parking spaces shall be
provided on Lots 29 and 31, Block 239., Corona
del Mar, for the duration of the proposed
expanded commercial building located at 3331
and 3337 East Coast Highway.
2. That the offsite parking lot shall be improved
with wheel stops and marked with approved
traffic markers or painted white lines not
less than 4 inches wide in accordance with the
approved parking layout.
3. That signs be provided on the rear of the pro-
.
posed expanded commercial building indicating
the following statement. "No Parking - Loading
Zone Only."
4. That a solid masonry wall with a rounded
concrete cap shall be installed pursuant to
Section 20.30.045 B of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code.
Item
Request to create two parcels of land for single
UB-
family residential development where a portion of
ION
one lot now exists.
556
Location: Portion of Lot 28, Newport Hei ts,
;APPROVED
DI -northwesterly
NLLY
located at 647 Irvine Avenue on the
side of Irvi Avenue
between Margaret Drive a Holly
ocvrccrt..
July 28, 1977
9
Planning Commission Meeting August 4, 1977
Item No. 3
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Department of Community Development
SUBJECT: Offsite Parking Agreement (Continued Discussion)
Request to accept an offsite parking agreement for the
required parking spaces in conjunction with the expan-
sion of an existing commercial building in Corona del
Mar.
LOCATION: Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323 (i.e. building site)
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway, on the
southerly side of East Coast Highway between Marguerite
Avenue and Marigold Avenue in Corona del Mar; Lots 29
and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar (i.e. offsite parking
lot) located at 329 and 331 Marigold Avenue, on the
northwesterly side of Marigold Avenue, in Corona del
Mar_.
ZONES: C -1 and R -1
APPLICANT: Julius V. Evans, Corona del Mar
OWNER: Same as Applicant
Application
This application requests approval of an offsite parking agreement
for the required parking spaces in conjunction with the expansion
of an existing commercial building. In accordance with Section 20.30.
035 D. of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, the Planning Commission
shall not recommend and the City Council shall not approve off - street
parking on a separate lot from the building site or sites unless:
(a) Such lot is so located as to be useful in connection with
the proposed use or uses on the building site or sites.
(b) Parking on such lot will not create undue traffic hazards
in the surrounding area.
(c) Such lot and the building site are in the same ownership,
or the owners of the building sites have a common owner-
ship in such lot, and the owner or owners are entitled to
the immediate possession and use thereof (ownership of the
off -site lot must be ownership in fee or a leasehold interest
of a duration adequate to serve all proposed uses on the
building site or sites).
(d) The owner or owners and the City, upon the approval of the
City Council, execute a written instrument or instruments,
approved as to form and content by the City Attorney, pro-
viding for the maintenance of the required off - street parking
on such lot for the duration of the proposed use or uses on
the building site or sites. Should a change in use or addi-
tional use be proposed, the off - street parking regulations
applicable at the time shall apply. Such instruments shall
be recorded in the office of the County Recorder and copies
thereof filed with the Department of Community Development.
Item No. 3
T0: Planning Commission - 2.
Environmental Significance
This project has been reviewed, and it has been determined that it is
categorically exempt under Class 1 (Existing Facilities) and Class 11
(Accessory Structures) from the requirements of the California Environ-
mental Qualities Act.
Conformance with General Plan
The Land Use Element of the General Plan designates the commercial
site for "Retail and Service Commercial" and "Administrative, Pro-
fessional and Financial Commercial" uses. The proposed commercial
use falls within the permitted uses. The area is also designated
for a Specific Area Plan. The question of parking lots in a residen-
tial district adjoining a commercial district is not addressed by the
General Plan.
Subject Property and Surrounding Land Use
A one story building with mixed commercial uses is located on the
property in question. To the north, across East Coast Highway, are
commercial uses; to the southeast, is the Coast Supermarket and the
Coast Barber Shop on a separate lot but also owned by the applicant;
to the south, across a 14 foot wide alley, is an offsite parking
lot on two R -1 lots for the commercial uses fronting on East Coast
Highway and then a single family dwelling; and to the northwest, are
commercial uses, and across a 14 foot wide alley, are apartment build-
ings fronting on Marguerite Avenue.
Analysis
The applicant proposes to expand the existing one story commercial
building on the property in question. Approximately 1,209 square
feet of commercial space is proposed to be added to the rear of the
existing 2,528 square foot ± building. The proposed addition will
encroach to within 18 feet t of the rear property line adjacent to
a 14 foot wide alley. The Code requires that a minimum 10 foot rear
yard setback be maintained in the C -1 District when abutting an alley.
Parking Requirements
The proposed 1,209 square foot ± addition constitutes approximately
47 percent of the existing 2,528 square foot ± structure on the site.
Section 20.30.030 B(3) of the Municipal Code provides that when a
nonconforming use is enlarged by more than 10 percent of its existing
area, the property on which it is located shall be required to comply
with the current parking requirements, unless a waiver or reduction
of said requirement is authorized by use permit.
Fifteen (15) offstreet parking spaces would be required for the expanded
development on the site, based upon one parking space for each 250
square feet of floor area (i.e. 3,737 sq.ft.± t 250 = 15 spaces).
The applicant is requesting the approval of an offsite parking agree-
ment for the required 15 parking spaces in the existing parking lot
to the south of the building site, across a 14 foot wide alley.
Existing Parkins Lot
The subject parking lot has been utilized for vehicular storage for
employees and customers of the commercial uses on the subject property
and the adjoining Coast Market site ever since the buildings were
constructed over 27 years ago. The parking lot use on two R -1 lots
was established prior to the time that a use permit was required for
commercial parking lots in a residential district.
Voluntary Parking Spaces
No parking spaces were required by Code when the commercial uses were
constructed on the subject property. The existing offsite parking
Item No. 3
TO: Planning Commission - 3.
lot has been maintained on a voluntary basis over the years. Therefore,
a single family dwelling could legally be constructed on both of the
R -1 lots and the subject parking lot could be eliminated. The recent
recommended change to the Ordinance noted below would not affect this
situation.
At its meeting of July 7, 1977, the Planning Commission recommended
the approval of Amendment No. 496. If approved by the City Council,
said amendment will provide that when a use, building or building site
is changed or altered to conform or more nearly conform to current
requirements, it may not thereafter be made to less nearly conform with
the requirements of the Zoning Code. In other words, on -site parking
provided on a voluntary basis would be considered to be required park-
ing and the spaces so provided could not be eliminated or used to
satisfy requirements for the enlargement of the use. However, in this
particular case, the parking has been provided on a voluntary basis
off -site across an alley on separate lots from the commercial site and
is not covered by the proposed amendment.
Revised Parking Layout
The applicant proposes to restripe the existing offsite parking lot
with 20 conforming parking spaces. The existing lot now has 29
undersized parking spaces that encourages automobiles to partially
park in the existing alley. The City Traffic Engineer has no objections
with the proposed parking lot design. It appears that a reduction in
the number of parking spaces will not create a traffic problem. A field
survey by staff on Friday, July 8, 1977, at 3:00 P.M. revealed that only
six automobiles were parked in the subject offsite parking lot.
ific Findings and Recommendati
Staff recommends the approval of an offsite parking agreement for the
required parking spaces for the expanded commercial building and
suggests that the Planning Commission make the following findings in
connunction with the applicant's request:
1. The offsite parking area is directly across an alley from
the subject commercial site, and therefore, is so located
to be useful to the proposed development.
2. The offsite parking spaces will not create undue traffic
hazards in the surrounding area. In fact, the proposed
parking layout of the subject parking lot will create better
vehicular maneuverability and automobile storage than now
exists.
3. The commercial site and the offsite parking lot are in the
same ownership.
4. The City Traffic Engineer has no objections with the offsite
parking arrangement.
Approval of the offsite parking agreement is recommended, subject to
the following conditions:
That an offsite parking agreement shall be approved by the
City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of 15 parking spaces
shall be provided on Lots 29 and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar,
for the duration of the proposed expanded commercial building
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway.
2. That the offsite parking lot shall be marked with approved
traffic markers or painted white lines not less than 4 inches
wide in accordance with the approved parking layout.
3. That signs be provided on the rear
commercial building indicating the
"No parking - loading zone only."
of the proposed expanded
following statement.
Item No. 3
0
TO: Planning Commission - 4.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
R. V. HOGAN, DIRECTOR
By••
William R. LaycokV,
Senior Planner if
i
WRL /sh
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Assessor's Parcel Map
Letter from Applicant dated July 20, 1977
Plot Plan
Floor Plans, Elevations
Item No. 3
t)
a
,f
WWI PARKING Lor S037ECT pRppfltTY
If j
C
.fir .ay /• /n,'. / ATP /!f roles w ♦ !nu /rv, !Y�
IN �p wow wwun ><wMew W ✓>n M F (.� >I
a w aN lo/ { ao.v [!.If:LC /Th' Ri A Caq
FEET
AAR
C
.9'./
m \9y
,< u
O
s
v R -/
4
O
N./ LP ry
\, qY
V.
=4 fPv
-I
� - t
DISTRICTING MAP
NEWPORT BEACH — CALIFORNIA
AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL R^I MULTIPLE REwe FIAL
ANGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL D —I LIONT CC - .EKINAL
—E DUPLEX RESIDENTIAL C -1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL
—3 1 RmbL MULTIPLE FAMILY RESILfNTIAL
_— UXCIJSSIFI CONS, , p M . Ifp Is
CDM&IXD DISTRICTS
nL Yad pf Eh In FAf SMa=n 7h ED [ow ,
OFF5ITE. PARKING Actf -rMENT
YAP N0.
io
3A1yo 301 SAVO
l '
7o
W
21 Q
2e
18
13 =
c
W
W
7e '
• _ 62
z
1 1
1Sypp
� 29
O
31
2
28
27
er
Po
19
_ 6
20
14
O
/Y
24
17
B
O DEL 6
: 25
a
° O
3
. 63 yg
i
N
5��SCT � I
.09 .s9
/z o
0 ~
v
T.
JLDT
15
� 29
O
31
2
28
27
er
Po
19
_ 6
20
14
O
/Y
24
17
B
O DEL 6
: 25
a
° O
3
. 63 yg
i
N
5��SCT � I
.09 .s9
SOS
j
Q
Q
ti
M
O
0
so
OFFSITE QA'RKING- AGREEMENT
o�ft�T�t tA�tKr
JLDT
15
°
M
27
zs
14
12
1
!T
'Z
h
it
13
10
q
It
O
c
9
[
MAR
4 7
SOS
j
Q
Q
ti
M
O
0
so
OFFSITE QA'RKING- AGREEMENT
c� cam\ • cS�zou�
OUILDINO CONTRACTOR
716 MARIGOLD AVENUE
CORONA DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA 92625
Phone: Area (714) 640 -7960 License *2001
July 20. 1977
Planning Commission
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Blvd.
Newport Beach, Calif. 92660
Gentlemen:
I recently purchased the property at the Southwest corner of East Coast
Highway and Marigold Avenue.
I wish to upgrade and improve a portion of the property at 3331 and 3337
East Coast Highway, AKA Lot 3, Blk, X, Tract 323, according to the plans
submitted. The intent is to add 1209 sq. ft. The existing first floor
is 2526 sq. ft., making a total of 3737 sq. ft. This total area would
require 15 parking spaces. We have an available 20 spaces.
These changes will eliminate a hazardous condition which now exists
between the alley and the existing structures. The steep, slippery
asphalt surfaced area will be replaced with a concrete loading area,
walks and steps with handrails.
We intend to tie the existing parking across the alley to the proposed
addition by an off -site parking agreement. The parking is on two R -1
lots located at 329 and 331 Marigold Avenue, AKA, lot 29 and 31, Block 239,
Tract 3/41, 42. At present I observe that these parking spaces are used
to about 50% capacity.
Thank you for your consideration of this proposal.
0
Sincerely yours,
1 '
�. �(41">
JW ius V. Evans
RESOLUTION NO. 9170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN OFF -SITE PARKING
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AND JULIUS V. EVANS FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN
EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 3331
AND 3337 EAST COAST HIGHWAY, CORONA DEL MAR
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach a certain Off -site Parking
Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and Julius V.
Evans for the expansion of an existing commercial building
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway, Corona del Mar;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the terms and
conditions of said Off -site Parking Agreement and finds them
to be satisfactory and that it would be in the best interest
of the City to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
said Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach that said Off -site Parking
Agreement above described is hereby approved, and the Mayor
and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the same
on behalf of the City of Newport Beach.
ADOPTED this 22nd
ATTEST:
City Clerk
day of August , 1977.
DDO /bc
8/18/77
City Council Mlting March 10, 1980
i
Agenda Item No. H- 2fdj'�
T,
MAR 10 1980
By '*a CITY CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY OF NjWpa r o r� r 1/� .r��
March 5, 1980
MAR 24 1980
B 6a QTY COUNCIL c
City Counci&TY OF NViX*T MACH
R 1.:;(4 Planning Department
By jhj LI8jjj LCpUNCIL Bequest to amend the conditions of approval in
HITyQFN`�MRTV1;A conjunction with an approved Off -Site Parking
�-T
LOCATION: Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323 (i.e., building site),
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway, on the
southerly side of East Coast Highway between Mar-
guerite Avenue and Marigold Avenue in Corona del Mar;
Lots 29 and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar (i.e., off -
site parking lot), located at 329 and 331 Marigold
Avenue, on the northwesterly side of Marigold Avenue
in Corona del Mar.
ZONES:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Application
C -1 and R -1
Julius V. Evans
Same as Applicant
This is a request to amend the conditions of approval as they apply
to a previously approved off -site parking agreement. Off -site parking
procedures are set forth in Section 20.30.035D of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code.
SUQQested Action
If desired, adopt Resolution No. authorizing amendment to the
conditions of approval of the existing off -site parking agreement.
Planning Commission Recommendation
At its meeting of February 7, 1980, the Planning Commission voted
(4 Ayes, 1 No, 2 Absent) to amend the conditions of approval on the
existing off -site parking agreement as follows:
T0:
City Cecil - 2.
0
That all remaining applicable conditions of approval
as set forth by the Planning Commission on August 4,
1977 be fulfilled.
2. That the applicant shall a ter i -into an agreement with
the City guars teeing that masonry wall will be
installed betwe \arovision isti parking lot and the
adjoining res1dt to he south at such time
as the title to dentia property is transferred.
It shall be the ibility f the applicant to
notify the City transfer i title. Said agree-
ment shall contvision tha a waiver of the
wall requiremens time doe s t constitute a
waiver forever. eement may be made without
bond.
3. That the applicant be authorized to remove the wheel
J stops adjacent to the alley on parking spaces
numbered 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12( [411(*,(711 S-0
4. That the parking lot lights shall be shielded from
adjoining residences or removed.
5. That employees shall be required to park in the
parking lot.
Attached for the information and review of the City Council is a copy
of the Planning Commission staff report which describes the background
of this particular problem and outlines the nature of the applicant's
request. Also attached is a copy of the Planning Commission minutes
and items of correspondence received just prior to or subsequent to
the Planning Commission's consideration of this request.
If the City Council should desire to modify the Planning Commission's
approval, the following changes are suggested:
Change Condition No. 2 to read as follows:
2. That a masonry wall with a rounded concrete cap shall
be installed between the off -site parking lot and the
adjoining residential lot as required under Section
20.30.0458 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Con-
struction of said wall shall commence within four weeks
from the date of this approval.
Change Condition No. 4 to read as follows:
4. That the parking lot lights shall either be shielded
from adjoining residences within two weeks from the
date of this approval or removed.
Respectfully submitted
Y*wA ,9 •1
uirector
J
T0: City Caci 1 - 3. •
Attachments for City Council only:
1. Planning Commission staff report with attachments
2. Planning Commission minutes
3. Letter from Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce
4. Petition
5. Letter from Bill and Donna De Mayo
i
Planning Commission Meeting February 7, 1980 _
Agenda Item No. 3 _
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
February 1, 1980
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: Request to amend the conditions of approval in
conjunction with an approved Offsite Parkin A ree-
ment Discussion
LOCATION: Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323 (i.e., building site)
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway, on the
southerly side of East Coast Highway between Mar-
guerite Avenue and Marigold Avenue in Corona del
Mar; Lots 29 and 31, Block 239, Corona del Mar
(i.e., offsite parking lot) located at 329 and 331
Marigold Avenue, on the northwesterly side of Mari-
gold Avenue, in Corona del Mar.
ZONES: C -1 and R -1
APPLICANT: Julius V. Evans
OWNER: Same as Applicant
Back rg ound
At its meeting of August 4, 1977,. the Planning Commission approved a
request for an offsite parking agreement in conjunction with a proposed
1200 sq.ft. expansion of the commercial building located at 3329.thru
3337 East Coast Highway being space currently occupied by Persian
Treasure Rugs, Wit Travel, Rochelle Robers Real Estate and the Flower
Seller. The offsite parking lot is located at 329 and 331 Marigold
directly behind the businesses noted above and Wells Market located
on the corner of Marigold and East Coast Highway. The off -site parking
arrangement was approved with the findings and subject to the conditions
of approval noted below:
FINDINGS:
The off -site parking area is directly across an alley from the
subject commercial site and, therefore, is so located to be
useful to the proposed development.
2. The off -site parking spaces will not create undue traffic hazards
in the surrounding area. In fact, the proposed parking layout of
the subject parking lot will create better vehicular maneuverability
and automobile storage than now exists.
- 1 -
)A • 4
'j T0: Inning Commission - 2.
•
3. The commercial site and the off -site parking lot are in the same
ownership.
4. The City Traffic Engineer has no objections with the off -site
parking arrangement.
CONDITIONS:
1. That an off -site parking agreement shall be approved by the
City Council, guaranteeing that a minimum of fifteen parking
spaces shall be provided on Lots 29 and 31, Block 239, Corona
del Mar, for the duration of the proposed expanded commercial
building located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway.
2. That the off -site parking lot shall be improved with wheel
stops and marked with approved traffic markers or painted
white lines not less than four inches wide in accordance with
the approved parking layout.
3. That signs be provided on the rear of the proposed expanded
commercial building indicating the following statement: "No
Parking - Loading Zone Only."
4. That a solid masonry wall with a rounded concrete cap shall be
installed pursuant to Section 20.30.045 B of the Newport Beach
Municipal Code.
The off -site parking arrangement was subsequently approved by the
City Council on August 22, 1977.
The Coastal Commission approved the request on November 28, 1977.
The Coastal Commission approval required that "prior to issuance
of permit, applicant shall submit a deed restriction for recording
that no less than 20 on -site parking spaces shall be maintained at all
times to support the development intensity permitted by the subject
so parking spaces shall not be altered in number, size, location; or
orientation without express written permission from the California
Coastal Commission."
The Coastal Development Permit was issued on April 11, 1978 (A -9 -26-
77- 1970).
Building permits were issued for the proposed expansion on August 10,
1978, construction was completed and the space occupied. However, several
required inspections were not obtained and the building permits were
cancelled on August 14, 1979. In addition, the applicant failed to
comply with the conditions of approval placed upon the project by the
City and the Coastal Commission (see attached letters dated August 14,
and December 27, 1979).
J
b TO: Panning Commission - 3. •
The applicant has made subsequent attempts to correct the deficiencies,
however, the following corrections are still outstanding:
1. Required heating and plumbing inspections have been obtained
and the permits have been reinstated. However, the building
permit will not be finaled until all zoning requirements have
been fulfilled.
2. The parking lot has been restriped, however, the striping
does not comply with the approved layout and the configuration
of the two landscaped areas located adjacent to the intersecting
alley perpendicular to the Coast Highway have been reversed.
3. Mercury vapor lights have been installed without proper shielding.
The original copy of the required off -site parking agreement has
not been executed.
5. The required masonry wall between the off -site parking lot and the
adjoining single family dwelling has not been installed.
Required Masonry Wall
Condition No. 4 of the off -site parking arrangement requires that a
masonry wall with a round concrete cap shall be installed pursuant
to Section 20.30.045 B of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. Section
20.30.045 B is set forth as follows:
B. BOUNDARY WALL. Where the boundaries of parking lots or parking
area adjoin property in an R -1 or R -2 District, a wall shall be
constructed along such boundaries in such a manner as will provide
protection to the public and owners and occupants of adjoining
property from noise, exhaust fumes, automobile lights, and other
similar sources of disturbance. Such wall shall be constructed
of solid masonry to a height of 3 feet from the from the front of
the property to a depth equal to the required front yard setback
established for adjoining property in a residential district. The
remaining portion of the wall shall be 6 feet in height, the lower
4 feet of which must be of solid masonry construction.
The applicant, on behalf of the adjoining property owner, has requested
that this condition be deleted (see attached letter dated January 7,
1979). The staff would note, however, that the municipal code does
not require that the entire wall be of solid masonry construction and
that the top 2 feet behind the required front yard setback could be
of open masonry block. This would still provide protection from
noise, exhaust fumes, automobile lights, and other similar sources
of disturbance and at the same time would do little to interfere
with existing light and air to the bedroom, kitchen, and dining room
of the adjoining residence.
TO: nning Commission - 4. •
If the Commission concurs with the applicants request, the staff would
suggest the following recommendations to the City Council:
I. That all remaining applicable conditions of approval as set forth
by the Planning Commission on August 4, 1977 be fulfilled.
2. That the existing wooden fence be allowed to remain.
3. That the parking lot lights shall be shielded from adjoining residence:
or removed.
4. That employees shall be required to park in the parking lot.
If on the other hand the Commission feels that the requirement for the
block wall should remain, the Commission should reaffirm its action of
August 4, 1977 and add the following conditions:
5. That the parking lot lights shall be shielded from adjoining residence!
or removed.
6. That employees shall be required to park in the parking lot.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, DIRECTOR
By �GC�r
am D. Hewicker
ire for
JDH /dlt
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Site Plan
Letter to Mr. Evans dated 8/14/79
Letter to Mr. Evans dated 12/27/79
Letter from Mr. Evans dated 1/7/80
Letter from Stossel and Grace Baida
��ti `mob
L
', 3N1f0 301S.�dH
2z n,
2! _
2C �
Jr
f9
R s
CJ
B
t
b--
tu
Q -.
a
a
W
• - J
� 29
z
OFFSIrr. ?ri�xP {!t4 "r
3/
29
I-OT
O
I
31
2f1�
Ile
.h
28
f
1
_ 2a
27
22
19
Y
/F
20
--
/a
0
/2
24
�'
W
J
Ca
ti
�I
z
OFFSIrr. ?ri�xP {!t4 "r
3/
29
I-OT
l:i b
n
27
... _
<;
.h
f
1
I
,S.
— N Y
O` J
Y
ti
�I
<;
f
T E rl
------------------------
A
gg"
'Tl
F-r
Vi
ON
r. jIOrJI F&Frr
T E rl
------------------------
A
gg"
'Tl
F-r
Vi
ON
August 14, 1979
Mr. J. V. Evans
4709 Seashore -
Newport Beach, CA 92660
(714) 6'13- -2130
Re: 3341 East Coast High;wpy
Dear Mr. Evans
It has been brought to the attention of the Co�rmjnity Development Department
that you have occupied the structure at 3341 East Coast HigNway prior to.
obtaining final approvals from the City.
A review of the project indicates you have failed to comply with require-
ments established by the Newport Beach Planning Division and the California
Coastal Commission. These requirements are in connection with required
parking facilities for the referenced project. Several required inspections
to verify compliance with the various building codes have not been complied
with.
This matter was discussed with you by telephone several days earlier. Due
to the fact that you have not supplied a proper solution to the problem, -
we have cancelled your permits.
We must also request that the use of the structure be abandoned untill these-
problems are properly remedied.
Sincerely
DEPARTMENT OF COMMiUWITY DEVELOPMENT
BOB F ILER
Assistant Director- Building
jw
xc: Harold Sproul
.1,.,.11 1 . ..
4�4W�pRT jl
p fj
December 27, 1979
CITY OF \ FAN - PORT
Mr. Julius V. Evans
4709 Seashore
Newport Beach, CA 92660
G46- Gb37
RE: Existing building at 3329 -3337
site parking lot at 329 and 331
Dear-Mr. Evans:
640 =22.66
I ,AC c
East Coast Highway and off -
Marigold
In..August_of thiq -year you .were contacted by both Bob Fowler .and
myself regarding your failure to comply with the requirements
placed upon you by the City of.Newport Beach and the California
Coastal Commission, to wit:
1. You have not executed the required off -site parking agreement
with the City;
2. The off- site,parking lot has not been improved with the re-
quired landscaping, wheel stops and narkings in accordance
with the parking layout approved by the City;
3. The required "No Parking - Loading Zone Only" signs have not
been installed;
4. • The solid masonry wall between the off -site parking lot and
the adjoining residence at 337 N,arigold ha:, not been installed,
and g, .,
5. You have occupied the structure without obtaining the required
final approval from the City.
On August 14, 1979, a letter was sent to you by Bob Fowler request-
ing that the use of the structure be abandoned until these problems
are properly remedied and informing you that your permits have been
cancelled.
On August 16, 1979, I received a letter fron you requesting that
I delete the requirement for the wall between the parking lot and
the adjoining residence. As you are aware, this is a matter over
which I have no authority and over which the Planning Commission and
City Council have jurisdiction.
City 11x11 • 3300 Newport Boulevard, \ewport li.:, h, Ca11foin1 ;t 9260:,
�tZ•, 1lr . Jnl i us v. EAs
Decc,�rber 27, 1979
Page 2
To date, I have had no further contact fror you and I do not kno+:;
what your plans are in this regard. I ar+, therefore, requesting
that you either vacate the premises, take the necessary steps to
meet the requirements noted above or file a request %%,ith the
Planning Commission to amend the previously approved off -site
parking arrangement. The next filing deadline is January I1, 1980
for the Planning Commission meeting of February 7, 1980.
If I do not hear from
have no choice but to
for appropriate legal
Very truly yours,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
you on or before January 11, 1980, I will
turn this ratter over to the City Attorney
action.
James D. Hewicker
irector
JDH /J9
cc Bob Wynn, City Manager
Hugh Coffin, City Attorney
Bob Fowler, Building Director
Persian Treasure Rugs, 3329 East Coast Highway, Corona del Mar
Flit Travel, 3331 East Coast Hiahway, Corona del Mar
Rochelle Robers Real Estate, 3333 East Coast Highway, Corona
del Mar
The Flower Seller, 3337 East Coast Highway, Corona del Mar
January 7, 1980
City Planning Conuni scion
� 9
RE: Property located at 3331 E. Coast Hwy Corona Del Mar, California.
Dear Sir:
As per our telephone conversation I am requesting that you delete
the wall between our above mentioned property and the property of Mr.
& Mrs. Stossel Baida of 337 Marigold Ave. in Corona Del Mar.
They have asked that I do not install the block wall between the
parking lot and their property as they feel that it will block off most
of the air circulation and they would not like the look of it. This wall
would affect the air in their bedroom, kitchen and dining room. They have
requested that we leave the wooden fence keeping it painted and in good
repair at all times. As these people are elderly and very pleasent I
feel that if at all possible I would like to adhere to there wishes.
We do have an• option on their house should they decide to sell and
at that time 'I would be more than willing to install the block wall.
I am enclosing a letter from Mr. & Mrs. Baida as to the above matter.
JVL /Ch
Enc.
Thanking you in advance,
/ Julius V. Evans
G
Planning Commission
City ball
Newport Beach, California 92GG3
Re: Property located at 3331 E. Coast Hwy. Corona Del Mar
Parking lot in the rear
Dear Sirs:
The subject of this letter is the fence between the parking
lot of the above mentioned property and Tay property..
We as•otners of this property would like to have the white
wooden fence left as i.t is. We do not want a block wall errect.ed
between our } roperty and the parking lot.
Thank you,
//�� r
February 7, 1910 • „`v �J
DR
TI �� n�
A i6 o� W iD Y AfT
City of Newport Beach
,Ui i rte
. `... cro. - ,:..y.cr.�� ��: _ a- ea`�-ax� -� ;�..�v�-�.,�^c c- .�....- •.�r*s
s ni i I _I 1 INDEX
... ^`. ..1 ^ %:' J•pgL ^3'�{LTi - -T iJT!i lrYLx... -" 1 s.a:..taL. .
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Thomas, James Hewicker, Planning Director, replied
that the use of the modular building is only to
be during the construction stage of the permanent
structure and that the modular building will be
removed when the permanent structure is complete.
In response to another question posed by Commis -
s ner Thomas, Mr. Hew
icker replied that by defi
-
nite a modular building is a relocatable build-
ing, o uilding which can be moved from one site
to anothe nd that when a modular building is
placed on th round, the Building Dept. will renu re
that it be put a permanent foundation, contin-
uous footing, or t it be tied down.
The Public Hearing was o ed regarding this item
and John Lumis, 30th Street chitects, appeared
before the Planning Commission nd stated that the
owner concurs with the conditions s indicated in
the Staff Report.
,Motion Y Motion was made that the Planning Commiss make
Ayes x x x the Findings as indicated in Exhibit "A" of e
Absent * Staff Report and approve Resubdivision No. 649,
subject to the Conditions as indicated in Fxhibit
"A" of the Staff Report.
Request to amend the conditions of approval in
conjunction with an approved Offsite Parking
Agreement.
LOCATION: Lot 3, Block X, Tract No. 323
(i.e., building site) located at
3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway,
on the southerly side of Fast Coast
Highway between Marguerite Avenue
and Marigold Avenue in Corona del
Mar; Lots 29 and 31, Block 239,
Corona del Mar (i.e., offsite park-
ing lot) located at 329 and 331
Marigold Avenue, on the northwest-
erly side of Marigold Avenue, in
Corona del Mar.
-3-
Item k3
OFFSITE
PARKING
AGREF_MEN"
APPROVED
!6
Al. `c ni i
in
t•t?
V•
I.
February 7, 1980
r n.
"aci w
),
City of Newpoir t Beach
ZONES: C -1 and R -1
APPLICANT: Julius V. Evans
OWNER: Same as Applicant
James Hewicker, Planning Director, commented brief
ly regarding this item, stating that in 1977 the
Planning Commission and the City Council permitted
the 1200 sq. ft. extension of the commercial space
next to the Coast Market on East Coast Highway in
Corona del Mar, subject to the approval of an
offsite parking agreement which would tie down
formally the use of the two residentially -zoned
lots behind the Coast Highway frontage. lie com-
mented that prior to that time, although the park-
ing lot was being used for the commercial busi-
nesses, it was not formally tied to those commer-
cial businesses by any mechanism that the City had
He added that this particular offsite parking
agreement was reviewed by the Planning Commission
and approved by the City Council, subject to cer-
tain findings and conditions. He added that the
owner of the property then proceeded to secure
his building permits and the construction was com-
pleted, but that they never called for any final
inspections, no occupancy permit was given and
there were several conditions placed on the off -
site parking area that were not fulfilled. He
stated that this problen finally came to staff's
attention and staff implemented procedures at-
tempting to get conformance with the conditions
of approval as given by the City and State Coastal
Commission. He further stated that these condi-
tions require the restriping on the lot, the re-
placement of the wheel stops, the construction of
a concrete block wall between the parking lot and
adjoining residence, the installation of the land-
scaping and the posting of signs. He commented
that just recently Post of these conditions of
approval have finally been taken care of, but that
there are still some iters to be taken care of,
such as parking lot lighting and striping.
-4-
hebruary /, 1 1,180
61
•
t Beach
INDEX
He added that the Planning Cor:.rission has receiv-
ed two items of correspondence relating to this
item, including a petition and letter from the
Corona del Mar Chamber of Cor,erce stating their
concern about the requirer:ients inposed on the ap-
plicant. He explained that in the event that the
Planning Commission decides that they would like
to see the parking lot striped in a different
fashion, the applicant will not only have to gain
approval of the City Council, but will also have
to go back to the Coastal Commission to get the
conditions changed on their approval. He further
explained that one of the difficulties in this
area of Corona del Mar is the fact that there is
a one -way alley 14' wide, and the space behind
the travel services is being used for parking and
as a result, the area set aside for loading is
not available and as a consequence the trucks stop'
in the alley, which means that the cars exiting
the parking lot can only turn in one direction,
taking them through the residential area. tie ex-
plained that the second problem is that there are
utility poles that may present a problem; however,
the dimensions of the parking lot that has been
approved meets the City standards. He stated that
the former arrangement of the oerking lot would
permit a car going eastbound through the alley
to pull off the alley into the narking lot.
He explained that it became a problem when a truck
coming along.and stoppino in the alley to unload
would pull behind the car parked in the stall. lie
expressed his feeling that the present arrangement
would probably work better than it has before.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Allen, Mr. Hewicker replied that there are 11
stalls striped on the row next to the single -
family dwelling where there should be 10 and as
result of having 11 stalls, each one of those
ends up being a little more narro.i than they
should be.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Allen, Don Webb, Assistant City Engineer, replied
that the City standard drawings indicate that 35'
would be required for the spaces if they are
-5-
r n!
S3 iJ
ic'
i>
cAIf1,7
hebruary /, 1 1,180
61
•
t Beach
INDEX
He added that the Planning Cor:.rission has receiv-
ed two items of correspondence relating to this
item, including a petition and letter from the
Corona del Mar Chamber of Cor,erce stating their
concern about the requirer:ients inposed on the ap-
plicant. He explained that in the event that the
Planning Commission decides that they would like
to see the parking lot striped in a different
fashion, the applicant will not only have to gain
approval of the City Council, but will also have
to go back to the Coastal Commission to get the
conditions changed on their approval. He further
explained that one of the difficulties in this
area of Corona del Mar is the fact that there is
a one -way alley 14' wide, and the space behind
the travel services is being used for parking and
as a result, the area set aside for loading is
not available and as a consequence the trucks stop'
in the alley, which means that the cars exiting
the parking lot can only turn in one direction,
taking them through the residential area. tie ex-
plained that the second problem is that there are
utility poles that may present a problem; however,
the dimensions of the parking lot that has been
approved meets the City standards. He stated that
the former arrangement of the oerking lot would
permit a car going eastbound through the alley
to pull off the alley into the narking lot.
He explained that it became a problem when a truck
coming along.and stoppino in the alley to unload
would pull behind the car parked in the stall. lie
expressed his feeling that the present arrangement
would probably work better than it has before.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Allen, Mr. Hewicker replied that there are 11
stalls striped on the row next to the single -
family dwelling where there should be 10 and as
result of having 11 stalls, each one of those
ends up being a little more narro.i than they
should be.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Allen, Don Webb, Assistant City Engineer, replied
that the City standard drawings indicate that 35'
would be required for the spaces if they are
-5-
s q n (D
N [e y
• February 7, 1900 0
of Newport Beach
staggered. He further commented that these fi-
gures are based primarily on a standard size car
which would fit into an 18' - 19' length.
MIND i is
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Beek, Mr. Hewicker replied that a setback from
the alley would have been required, but that this
was the layout as presented and approved in 1977,
and at the present time a 5' setback would be re-
quired on an alley 15' or less in width.
In response to another question posed by Commis-
sioner Beek, Mr. Hewicker replied that there are
two lots, that they are under one ownership and
that the assessor has
assessed them as one parcel
he Public Hearing was opened regarding this item
nd Julius Evans, Applicant, appeared before the
lanning Commission and stated his concurrence
ith the conditions as indicated in the Staff Re-
ort.
r. Evans then commented that Mr, Wells, the ten -
nt and owner of Wells I,erket, objected to out=
ing the parking bumpers along the alley, block -
ng off the elderly customers' exit into the al-
ey.
e further commented that the City had required
0 parking spaces for the extra amount of build-
P9 and that they arranged the parking lot to ac-
ommodate the City. He added that the residents
ext door do not want the cenent block wall,
hich they felt would block off all the air to
heir homes.
n response to a question posed by Commissioner
alalis, Mr. Evans replied that the tenant and
ustomers would prefer to leave the parking lot
onfiguration as it has been for years.
n response to a question posed by Commissioner
llen regarding the necessity of the bumpers; Mr.
ewicker replied that the City Council has adopted
resolution which requires that parking lots be
mproved with wheel stops to keep cars from en-
—A —
INIXX
lq
O
c a C) m
C) co W
R n.L (IN i
MIivU I L-S
February 7, 1980
of Newport Beach
INDEX
crouching into the alley and to provide a mecha-
nism to keep cars fron rolling forward.
In response to a second question posed by Commis-
sioner Allen, Mr. Hewici:er expressed his feeling
that with traffic crossing Marguerite, this alley
is one of the prime access ways paralleling Coast
Highway and cars encroaching into the alley would
present a problem.
ommissioner Balalis suggested removing the plant -
r next to the alley at the end. Mr. Evans re-
lied that he had removed it the previous day and
eplaced it that day and that there is a telephone
ole in the middle of that corner.
ommissioner Balalis commented that-the petition
tates that there are several spaces eliminated
ecause of the City's requirements, but that there
re in reality no spaces eliminated.
r. Evans expressed h.is feeling that there was
ever a problem in the alley or street, as Mr.
ells has always patrolled the area.
d Wells, the applicant's tenant, appeared before
he Planning Commission and suggested that the
arking lot be left as is, as there were no pro -
lems until the wheel stops were required. .
r. Hewicker stated tr.at there is a change in elev+
ion between the parking lot and the residential,
s the lots are higher lots to the west and there
of the horizontal space in which to maneuver as ii
ther alleys.
In response to a question, posed by Commissioner
Balalis, Mr. Uebb replied that the traffic en-
gineer has been allowinn a reduction of about
in stall length for each additional foot of width.
atty Uells expressed her feel ina that the loading
one is net adeouate to acconr..od ?te the large
rucks and before the wheel stops were installed,
ars could go around the truck.
-7-
s
P�
iu N
�a 0 CD D
3 zi xm u.=
°POU c nU'I
Motion
Ix
February 7, 1980 0
City of Newport Beach
Commissioner Thomas suggested putting the stops
on halfway down and not putting them near the
loading area.
MINUTES
Commissioner Balalis suggested recommending to
the City Council that this particular parking lot
not be required to meet all the requirements of
offsite parking.
In response to a question posed by Commissioner
Allen, Mr. Hewicker explained that the first dis-
cretionary action is with the City and should
their action be different than the diagram, then
it will have to go back before the Coastal Com-
mission.
Commissioner Balalis suggested that staff meet
with the applicant and the tenant and put together
a diagram that would work better.
Commissioner Thomas expressed his feeling that
the brick ball should be a requirement.
Mr. Hewicker explained that it would be allowable
to have a wall 4' high in solid masonry with 2'
of open masonry construction.
Commissioner Beek stated his understanding that
the objection is to the inconvenience of this la,y-
out with the planter getting in the way and with
the wheel stops and that the number of parking
spaces are adequate if the inconvenience is re-
moved. He then suggested taking out the wheel
stops adjacent to the alley and the planter.
Evans expressed his feeling that Commissioner
k's suggestion would eliminate the problems.
Motion was made to authorize the applicant to
remove all the wheel stops adjacent to the alley.
Motion I I I I Ix I 111 to the Motion teas made that the appli -
cant be authorized to remove all the wheel stops
adjacent to the alley through parking space number
INDEX
Zi
Ayes
Abstain
Absent
Motion
z
(, n V3
'1 j.
February 7, 1980
0
City of Newport BeCI h
MINUTES
12, leaving the wheel stops at parking space num-
bers 14, 16, 18 and 20.
Commissioner Beek accepted Com:issioner Allen's
Amendment to the Motion to be included as his
Motion.
Motion was then voted on, which MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Beek inquired regarding the cost of
a bond, to which Mr. Hewicker replied that for a
concrete block wall, the cost of a bond would be
about $2,500.00.
Motion was made that the wall be 4' of solid ma-
sonry with 2' filigree or open brick above it to
provide light and air.
Mr. Evans stated that the homes have quite a few
flowers that would be destroyed if a block wall
were required.
Commissioner Haidinger expressed his concern re-
garding the advisability of requiring a block
wall when the people who own the lot don't want
a wall and the people next to the lot don't want
a wall.
Commissioner Haidinger suggested that the appli-
cant be allowed to go without the wall now and
that he be required to post a bond.
Commissioner Beek suggested that the applicant
not be required to post a bond and that the re-
quirement for the wall be deleted.
Commissioner Balalis expressed his feeling that
the requirement for the wall is a good one and the
fact that the applicant has an option on the pro-
perty at the present time gives the Planning Com-
mission the opportunity to say that he may pur-
chase that property; however, if another indivi-
dual buys.the property, there are good reasons
why block walls are required adjacent to parking
lots. He stated his preference that if the re-
INDLIX
K February 7, 1960
o -y t
j ° x " N m City of Newport Beach
ro -
.
INLAX
quirement is given now, there should be some mech-
anism to impose it at the time of transfer of the
property.
Bob Burnham, Assistant City Attorney, commented
that the bond requirement is preferential to the
deed restriction and the premium would not be ex-
cessive.
Commissioner Haidinger suggested that Mr. Evans
agree to build the wall at the time the title of
the adjacent property is transferred, and without
bond.
Motion x Substitute Motion was made that the applicant
agree to build the wall at the time the title of
the adjacent property is transferred, and that a
bond not be required.
Ayes
Noes
Absent
Mr. Burnham explained that action on the condition
can be waived at the present time but enforced at
a later date and it can be included in the agree-
ment that a waiver at any one time does not con-
stitute a waiver forever.
Commissioner Thomas expressed his feeling that if
intensification of use along Pacific Coast Highway
comes about, there will be a need for more parking
and this area may be used for parking, which he
did not feel was a compatible use with the area, -
and said wall would be a necessary barrier.
Substitute Motion was then voted on, which MOTION
CARRIED.
Request to permit the temporary use of a modular
building for a California Savings E Loan branch
facility in the P -C District.
LOCATIOIL\ A portion of Block 93, Irvine's
Subdivision, located at 2370 East
ast Highway, on the northerly
side East Coast Highway, wester
ly of I1a hur Boulevard.
-10-
I tem F4
USE PER. -
ru- N (1
1921
CONTINUE[
TO MAFM
6, 1980
e)-13. •
h� r nr. EfYery
„ rr
`nme,f g
? Ncr��G�1980"'. A unique blend of people andplace
n'c
Corona del Mar
CHAMBER of COMMERCE
February 5, 1980
TO: The Planning Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
F&ON: The Corona del Mar Chamber of Commerce
SOBJECT: Parking Lot at 3334 E. Coast Highway
The Board of Directors of the Corona del Mar Chamber of
Commerce appreciate and understand the desire of the ow-
ner of the property at 3334 E. Coast Highway malting every
effort to comply with the City's parking ordinance. The
Corona del Mar Chamber has been on record requesting ad-
ditional off - street parking throughout the business dis-
trict, therefore, we are alarmed when any parking is de-
leted.
Just a few months ago, our Chamber requested that no off -
street parking at Albertson's market be eliminated, and
this was granted. Therefore, we feel that
a. the loss of 14 parking spaces back of Wells Market;
h. the loss of access from a one -way alley;
c. poor traffic circulation;
d. traffic conjestion as a result of traffic pattern;
e. no access from alley when loading of merchandise
at the market or for other tenants,
needs to be correcta4.
Th_� ^eerd of Directors of the Corona del Mar Chamber of
Commerce respectfully requests the removal of concrete
bumpers and the restoration of parking to the original
layout at the parking lot located behind Wells Market.
Respectfully,^ --
Jerry Stewart
President
JS:jh
2855 East Coast Highway - Post Office Box 72 * Corona del Mar, California 92625 • 714/673 -4050
,t
Feb. 3, 1980
:_. To.
City of Newport Beach
Planning Commission
Attn: Jim Hewicker
3300 Newport Blvd.
::. Newport Beach, Ca. 92663
Dear Mr. Hewicker:
8 NF,,perr,. Y(904, 2
Pile City has required certain changes in the parking lot
located behind Wells Super Market at 3347 E. Coast Hwy.,
Corona del Mar. These changes include narrowing the driveway,
'redtriping the parking spaces, putting in planters and parkin g
bumperss,
This has created some major problems for both businesses
s.in the area and residents of the area, which are as follows:
t
1. The entry driveway has been narrowed making entry
difficult for all except compact cars.
2. The exit is now onto a narrow alley and it is impossible
fur very large cars or vans to negotiate the necessary
turns.
3• Tile exit from the parking lot is into a narrow alley
lin(.'od with .arages. Any activity In there tiara c,:, such
aL; mar washinv;, cleanin -, or moving ul. oks the uxlt and
';. iurl:.� t:,e week delivery trucks _.._v t., u:llu.,i beaInd
t .,: sturec, blocking the alley for thr.:u,,:. truffiC, aad
new narkln6 bumpers prevent cars' fru,:, ,;oink around
e trucks.
fr;e elimination of 13 parking spaces has caused many
j)euple to shop elesewhere where there is enough parking,'
wi,icil is a real hardship to the businesses here.
n. Pit,ny people have already driven tneir cars over the
bum,,ers and into the planters and required assistance or
towing to free their cars.
t,lerefure we feel that the city saould allow �, v:,rlance
in t;,;., Aricln;; lot su that we can restore ti,,- +rkln
-2—
to Its orl,,,inal layout.
foliowln- I)eoplu support this .osltlon und would
11're to gef- this proposal seriously considered In tfe best
latel•ustu Of the local businesses ::ad convenience to the
dftl ty .
Olacerely,
Address:
"I �Aj
Ala
L
-Aki i\'-'
r
C�
jA
X,
A
3.
le,
V
D 21 \_tx
(44—
3 k1
C
!Jii 2:3. Pop's tola'o& 'lliATLL
Yaw
�10
.,
.13
H< A4,1,0
lo
;p2ow 1.
3.33/
C, /)
C/l/Ll
It
Jul..
eA
f
fA C� I V� ZA i
llje Ai
eA
f
fA C� I V� ZA i
`#►` • •
game Address
� a 1 l c -"i's rite' C
7
•-�� , �� -i11. %��, Ott � 't /�Y" i -�'` .(:
1y \1
•.. fir,,.,: ,`,l�,nh �'A1(t�. � /�%>3'3..Qa /�o,rsl�y/ (. ,J i�
l;.
,
.:.c`•l_�
/ 7J lcicit.d��`�c:e�
id
I . /
i;
� 7
r:. %(dirk. o_�x
7A
d
f /II"
q
:. g;.tA`l' >t. ,A dj .S.S ir.C1�n..� cCU•l� .�i'�....._— �.._
k' A
. ..
C2
L ,
F•��i.i: i��r ;: ,La.. �. .f <�t . ,.��k: L ._����+' ��r�f. � y � �,...� l�1
66
i
•3: ,ilk j� N(_ � ..
(,i
v
.`'r- ;lug //
V_ ,.'c i —ic',
lee
lo
.c±, �/ .— nom✓/ - - - - -..
o- �..�...L�r ? ✓�- �Ltv�vrL. S ! �� 1�OPP %A vr: C D�-'i
(�L1
-�
•
!
- ��:� - >�• _• tl' ��2�'�.a..__._.. .--- -.._.. �!�`ho�, -tip., (;L�t,�. ��',� �' `� /}
f+
Al
e- ell,
I/- L 37' Y'° 41
L-3
y.
'7,A77 -V
21,( xv
k�t Al�o
C
L't t e(
1.0
'71k
---- - -----
1 ICA
4
�A
,3,916-A gAaaza-v a-,-
7 zo AM.c-Lr
,uo C -v, ,
Corona del Mar, CA
February 7, 1980
Planning Commission
City Hall
Newport Beach, CA
Res Parking lot adjacent to Yell's Super Market, also
used by other businesses on that block
Dear Commissiono
This is to protest the action taken in making wide- spread changes
in this parking lot.
It is now extremely difficult to find a parking place, and the
addition of cement "tire bumpers" between the lot am the door of
the market has created a definite hazard to those walking through
the lot. Gone is any choice of ingress or egress.
Not only is the judgment used in requiring these changes open to
debate, but more important is the implication that someone other
than the owner knows what is best for his property.
In this case, the owner, who footed the bill, and those who use
the lot are losers right along with the people who operate the
businesses that they support.
When work was to be done on our property we had to post a notice
by the street for a period of time to allow anyone who wished to
dispute our request to boring it before your group. If such a
notice had been posted about this change, it seems that the newly
existing errors might have been averted.
Very truly yours,
$11 Hazel Drive
Corona del Mar, CA
640 -7027
Section 20.30.
as it applies
lots adjoining
G uR 2 8 1980
CITY +he CITY COUNCIL
OF NEWpt)R7 BEACt;
045B of the
to walls on
property in
Newport Beach
the boundaries
an R -1 or A -2
11
Municipal Code
of parking
District
B. BOUNDARY WALL. Where the boundaries of
parking lots or parking areas adjoin property in
an R -1 or R -2 District, a wall shall be construc-
ted along such boundaries in such a manner as
will provide protection to the public and owners
and occupants of adjoining property from noise,
exhaust fumes, automobile lights, and other
similar sources of disturbance. Such wall shall
be constructed of solid masonry to a height of
three feet from the front of the property to a
depth equal to the required front yard setback
established for adjoining property in a resi-
dential district. The remaining portion of the
wall shall be six feet in height, the lower
four feet of which must be of solid masonry
construction.
MAR 24 1980
March 18, 1980
By the CITY COUNCIL
CITY OR NIiWPOBT By the Gait COUNCIL
BfeACH ' ;TY Q0 xa
City Council
3300 Newport Blvd. APR 28 1980 � 1
Newport Beach, California 92663
By the CITY COUNCIL
C;TY OP NpWP914T REACH
Re: Off Site Parking agreement 329 & 331 Marigold Corona Del Mar
W" `
Dear Sirs:
I am asking that you reconsider your reccomendation to
install a block wall between our parking area and the property
at 337 Marigold.
Mr & Mrs Baida of 337 Marigold have asked that we don't
install the block wall as they feel it would greatly cut down
on their ventilation thruout their house. It also would cause
problems for their landscaping.
On March S. 1980 the Planning Commission agreed that the
wall was not necessary in their opinion.
I am therefore asking that you reconsider your recomendation
for the block wall.
I am attaching a copy of a letter from Mr & Mrs Baida in
regard to the above mentioned matter.
Sincerely,
Julius V. Evans
JVE /be
enc.
����m- `/�� �" G'e"`"•� � CrR��� /OFD
NFtiRT oFf�
_ a. �IIFe"wi
0
MAR 10 1 900
By the Gi I y COUi QiL
CITX OP. "ro-W SAAB
•
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE CON-
DITIONS OF APPROVAL OF AN EXISTING OFF -SITE
PARKING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT
BEACH AND JULIUS V. EVANS (3331 East Coast
Highway)
WHEREAS, there has been presented to the City
Council of the City of Newport Beach a certain amendment to
the Conditions of Approval of an existing Off -Site Parking
Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and Julius V.
Evans; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the terms
and conditions of said amendment and finds them to be satis-
factory and that it would be in the best interest of the
City to execute said amendment,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach that the amendment above
described is approved, and the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby
authorized and directed to execute the same on behalf of the
City of Newport Beach.
ADOPTED this 10th day of
ATTEST:
City Clerk
March
1980.
kv
3/7/80
ROY
RESOLUTION NO. 9170
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN OFF -SITE PARKING
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
AND JULIUS V. EVANS FOR THE EXPANSION OF AN
EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING LOCATED AT 3331
AND 3337 EAST COAST HIGHWAY, CORONA DEL MAR
WHEREAS, there has been pXesented to the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach a certain Off-site Parking
Agreement between the City of Newport Beach and Julius V.
Evans for the expansion of an existing commercial building
located at 3331 and 3337 East Coast Highway, Corona del Mar;
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the terms and
conditions of said Off -site Parking Agreement and finds them
to be satisfactory and that it would be in the best interest
of the City to authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
said Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of Newport Beach that said Off -site Parking
Agreement above described is hereby approved, and the Mayor
and City Clerk are authorized and directed to execute the same
on behalf of the City of Newport Beach.
ADOPTED this 22nd day of August , 1977.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
DDO /bc
8/18/77