Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutX2022-0858 - CalcsSTRUCTURAL CALL IN marcn As, cucc PREPARED BY: tltl �) 1 of 13 07 S IDIP VOW)OW Rk. ULATIONS BUILDING DIVISION 1 o cyo�` �� MAR 22 S4784 BY. YT DAVID CHOI & ASSOCIATES, INC. JOB # 19-294 P Cis RETAINING WALL KEY PLAN - - RETAINING WALL 2 2 of 13 Project Title: 3 of 13 RETAINING WALL 1 Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 1 Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 1 4 of 13 DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 1 Design Summary Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 2.71 OK Sliding = 2.20 OK Global Stability = 3.41 Total Bearing Load = 3,148 Ibs ...resultant ecc. = 8.45 in Soil Pressure @ Toe = 1,792 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 1,800 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,509 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psf Footing Shear @ Toe = 0.0 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 0.7 psi OK Allowable = 75.0 psi Sliding Calcs Lateral Sliding Force = 960.0 Ilia less 100% Passive Force - 853.1 Ilia less 100% Friction Force =_ - 1,259.0 Ibs Added Force Req'd = 0.0 Ibs OK ....for 1.5 Stability = 0.0 Ibs OK Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the calculation of soil bearing Load Factors Building Code Dead Load 1.200 Live Load 1.600 Earth, H 1.600 Wind, W 1.600 Seismic, E 1.000 Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: Stem Construction Bottom Design Height Above Pig it= Stem OK 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Concrete Design Method = SD Thickness = 6.00 Reber Size _ # 4 Reber Spacing = 16.00 Reber Placed at = Center Design Data fb/FB+fa/Fe = 0.841 Total Force @ Section Service Level Ibs = Strength Level Ibs = 936.0 Moment.... Actual Service Level dt#= Strength Level ft-#= 1,620.0 Moment..... Allowable = 1,925.4 Shear..... Actual Service Level psi = Strength Level psi= 26.0 Shear..... Allowable psi= 82.2 Anet (Masonry) in2 = Reber Depth 'd' in'= 3.00 Masonry Data fm psi= Fs psi= Solid Grouting = Modular Ratio'n' _ Wall Weight psf = 75.0 Short Term Factor = Equiv. Solid Thick. _ Masonry Block Type = Masonry Design Method = ASD Concrete Data fc psi= 3,000.0 Fy psi= 60,000.0 SD 5 of 13 SD SD SD DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 1 Concrete Stem Rebar Area Details Bottom Stem Vertical Reinforcing As (based on applied moment) : 0.1343 in2ift (413)' As: 0.179 in2lft 200bd/fy : 200(12)(3)/60000 : 0.12 in2lft 0.0018bh : 0.0018(12)(6) : 0.1296 Wilt Required Area: 0.1343 in2lft Provided Area: 0.15 in2fft Maximum Area: 0.48771n21ft Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: Horizontal Reinforcing 6 of 13 Min Stem T&S Reinf Area 0.648 in2 Min Stem.T&S Reinf Area per It of stem Height: 0.144 in2/ft Hodzontal Reinforcing Options : One layer of: Two layers of: #4@ 16.67 in #4@ 33.33 in #5@ 25.83 in #5@ 51.67 in 06@ 36.67 in #6@ 73.33 in Footing Data Footing Design Results Toe Width = 0.00 It Toe dul Heel Width = 3.75 Factored Pressure = 2,509 0 psf Total Footing Width = 3.75 Mu': Upward = 0 3,254 ft-# Footing Thickness = 18.00 in Mu': Downward = 0 5,493 ft-# Mu: Design 0 2,238 ft-# Key Width = 0.00 in _ phiMn 27,933 29,913 ft-# Key Depth = 0.00 in Actual 1-Way Shear = 0.00 0.75 psi Key Distance from Toe = 0.00 ft Allow 1-Way Shear = 0.00 75.00 psi fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Toe Reinfordng = # 6 @ 12.00 in Footing Concrete Density = 150.00 pcf Heel Reinforcing = # 6 @ 12.00 in Min. As % = 0.0018 Key Reinforcing = None Spedd Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm. 3.00 in Footing Torsion, Tu = 0.00 ft-Ibs Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu = 0.00 ft-Ibs If torsion exceeds allowable, provide supplemental design for footing torsion. Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Heel: Key: Min footing T&S reinf Area 1.46 in2 Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.39 in2 4t If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars: #4@ 6.17 in #4@ 12.35 in #5@ 9.57 in #5@ 19.14 in #6@ 13.58 in #6@ 27.16 in Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 1 7 of 13 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs ft ft-# Ibs It ft-# HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) HL Act Pres (be water tbl) Hydrostatic Force Buoyant Force = Surcharge over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Added Lateral Load = Load @ Stem Above Soil = 720.0 2.00 1,440.0 240.0 3.00 720.0 Total = 960.0 O.T.M. = 2,160.0 Resisting/Overturning Ratio = 2.71 Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 3,147.5 Ibs Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the calculation of Sliding Resistance. Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the calculation of Overturning Resistance. Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) Soil Over HL (bel. water tbl) Weirs Table Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem = Axial Live Load on Stem = Soil Over Toe = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) _ Earth @ Stem Transitions= Footing Weighl = Key Weight = Vert. Component = 1,608.8 2.13 2.13 357.5 2.13 337.5 0.25 843.8 1.88 3,418.6 3,418.6 759.7 84.4 1,582.0 Total= 3,147.5 Ibs R.M? 5,844.7 Axial live load NOT included in total displayed, or used for overtuming resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation. Tilt Horizontal Deflection at Too of Wall due to settlement of soil (Deflection due to wall bending not considered) Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci Horizontal Dell @ Top of Wail (approximate only) 0.060 in The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing oressure exceeds that of the toe because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil RETAINING WALL 2 DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall Project Title: 8 of i3 Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: 623# i N 6. W 4l r Lateral earth pressure due to tht DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 2 Project Title: Engineer: 9 of 13 Project ID: Project Descr: z^ • • V-z" DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 2 Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: Code Reference: Calculations per IBC 20181807.3, CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16 Criteria Retained Height = 2.00ft Wall height above soil = 5.50 It Slope Behind Wall = 0.00 Height of Soil over Toe = 0.00 in Water height over heel = 0.0 It Surcharge Loads Surcharge Over Heel = 0.0 psf Used To Resist Sliding & Overturning Surcharge Over Toe = 0.0 NOT Used for Sliding & Overturning Axial Load Applied to Stem Axial Dead Load = 0.0 lbs Axial Live Load = 0.0 lbs Axial Load Eccentricity = 0.0 in Soil Data Allow Soil Beadng = 1,800.0 psf Equivalent Fluid Pressure Method Active Heel Pressure = 102.4 psf/ft Passive Pressure = 325.0 psi/ft Soil Density, Heel = 110.00 pot Soil Density, Toe = 110.00 pof FootingllSoil Friction = 0.400 Soil height to ignore for passive pressure = 12.00 in Lateral Load Applied to Stem Lateral Load = 20.0 #/ft ...Height to Top = 7.50 ft ...Height to Bottom = 2.00 ft Load Type = Wind (W) (Service Level) Wind on Exposed Stem = 0.0 psf (Strength Level) 10 of 13 Adjacent Footing Load Adjacent Footing Load = 0.0 lbs Footing Width = 0.00 it Eccentricity = 0.00 in Wall to Ftg CL Dist = 0.00 ft Footing Type Spread Footing Base Above/Below Soil = 0.0 ft at Back of Wall Poisson's Ratio = 0.300 DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 2 Design Summary Wall Stability Ratios Overturning = 1.79 OK Slab Resists All Sliding I Global Stability = 0.72 Total Bearing Load = 1,585 Ibs ...resultant sec. = 12.36 in Soil Pressure @.Toe = 1,776 psf OK Soil Pressure @ Heel = 0 psf OK Allowable = 1,800 psf Soil Pressure Less Than Allowable ACI Factored @ Toe = 2,486 psf ACI Factored @ Heel = 0 psi Footing Shear Q Toe = 0.0 psi OK Footing Shear @ Heel = 0.6 psi OK Allowable = 75.0 psi Sliding calks; Lateral Sliding Force = 623.4 Ibs Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the calculation of soil bearing Load Factors Building Code Dead Load 1.200 Live Load 1.600 Earth, H 1.600 Wind, W 1.600 Seismic, E 1.000 Project Title: 11 of 13 Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: Stem Construction Stem OK Design Height Above Ftg ft= 0.00 Wall Material Above "Ht" = Concrete Design Method = SD Thickness = 4.00 Reber Size = # 4 Reber Spacing = 12.00 Reber Placed at = Center Design Data fblFB+fa/Fa = 0.632 Total Force @ Section Service Level Ibs= Strength Level Ibs= 503.7 Moment.... Actual Service Level ft-#= Strength Level - ft-f= 1,054.5 Moment..... Allowable = 1,667.3 Shear..... Actual Service Level psi= Strength Level psi= 21.0 Shear..... Allowable psi= 94.9 Anet(Masonry) in2= Reber Depth 'd' in= 2.00 Masonry Data fm psi= Fs psi= Solid Grouting Modular Ration' _ Wall Weight psf = 50.0 Short Tenn Factor = Equiv. Solid Thick. _ Masonry Block Type = Masonry Design Method = ASD Concrete Data fc psi= 4,000.0 Fy psi = 60,000.0 SD SD SD Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 2 Concrete Stem Rebar Area Details 12 of 13 Bottom Stem Vertical Reinforcing Horizontal Reinforcing As (based on applied moment) : 0.1394 in2/ft (4/3) * As: 0.1858 in2/11 Min Stem T&S Reinf Area 0.720 in2 200bdlfy : 200(12)(2)/60000 : 0.08 in2/ft Min Stem T&S Reinf Area perft of stem Height: 0.096 in2/ft 0.0018bh : 0.0018(12)(4) : 0.0864 in2/ft Horizontal Reinforcing Options: One layer of : Two layers of Required Area: 0.1394 in2/ft #4@ 25.00 in #4@ 50.00 in Provided Area: 0.2 in2/ft #5@ 38.75 in #5@ 77.50 in Maximum Area: 0.4335 in2/ft #6@ 55.00 in #6@110.00 in Footing Data Footing Design Results Toe Width = 0.00 ft IN HRM Heel Width = 3.25 Factored Pressure = 2,486 0 psf Total Footing Width = 3.25 MY: Upward = 0 711 ft-# Footing Thickness = 14.00 in Mu': Downward = 0 2,016 ft-# Mu: Design 0 1,305 ft-# Key Width = 0.00 in phiMn 14,400 15,795 ft-# Key Depth = 0.00 in Actual 1-Way Shear = 0.00 0.62 psi Key Distance from Toe = y 0.00 ft Allow 1-Way Shear = 0.00 75.00 psi fc = 2,500 psi Fy = 60,000 psi Toe Reinforcing = # 5 @ 12.00 in Footing Concrete Density = 150.00 pcf Heel Reinforcing = # 5 @ 12.00 in Min. As % = 0.0018 Key Reinforcing = None Spec'd Cover @ Top 2.00 @ Btm= 3.00 in Footing Torsion, Tu _ 0.00 ft4bs Footing Allow. Torsion, phi Tu = 0.00 114bs If torsion exceeds allowable, provide supplemental design for footing torsion. Other Acceptable Sizes & Spacings Toe: Heel Key: Min footing T&S reinf Area 0.98 in2 Min footing T&S reinf Area per foot 0.30 1n2 i t If one layer of horizontal bars: If two layers of horizontal bars: #4@ 7.94 in #4@ 15.87 in #5@ 12.30 in #5@ 24.60 in #6@ 17.46 in #6@ 34.92 in Project Title: Engineer: Project ID: Project Descr: 13 of 13 LION: KW-06016949, 9uild:20.22.3.16 David Choi & Associates DESCRIPTION: Retaining Wall 2 Summary of Overturning & Resisting Forces & Moments (c) ENERCALC INC 1983-2022 .....OVERTURNING..... .....RESISTING..... Force Distance Moment Force Distance Moment Item Ibs it ft-# Ibs it ft-# HL Act Pres (ab water tbl) 513.4 1.06 541.9 Soil Over HL (ab. water tbl) 641.7 1.79 1,149.7 HL Act Pres (be water tbl) Soil Over HL (bet. water tbl) 1.79 1,149.7 Hydrostatic Force Watt Table Buoyant Force = Sloped Soil Over Heel = Surcharge over Heel = Surcharge Over Heel = Surcharge Over Toe = Adjacent Footing Load = Adjacent Footing Load = Axial Dead Load on Stem= Added Lateral Load = 110.0 5.92 650.8 "Axial Live Load on Stem = Load @ Stem Above Soil = Soil Over Toe = = Surcharge Over Toe = Stem Weight(s) = 375.0 0.17 62.5 Earth @ Stem Transitions= Total = 623.4 O.T.M. = 1,192.8 Footing Weight = 568.8 1.63 924.2 Key Weight = ResistinglOvertuming Ratio = 1.79 Vert. Component = Vertical Loads used for Soil Pressure = 1,585.4 be Total = 1,585.4 Ibs R.M = 2.136.4 • Axial live load NOT included in total displayed or used for overturning resistance, but is included for soil pressure calculation. Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the calculation of Sliding Resistance. Vertical component of active lateral soil pressure IS NOT considered in the calculation of Overturning Resistance. Tilt Horizontal Deflection at ToD of Wall due to settlement of soil (Deflection due to wall bending not considered) Soil Spring Reaction Modulus 250.0 pci Horizontal Dail @ Top of Wall (approximate only) 0.114 in The above calculation is not valid if the heel soil bearing Pressure exceeds that of the toe because the wall would then tend to rotate into the retained soil