HomeMy WebLinkAboutPV2022-103 - MiscDate:06/08/2022
Project Name:Reed Residence
Project Address:1113 King Rd,Newport Beach,CA 92663
Contractor:SunSolar Energy Solutions
Contractor Address:4085 E La Palma Ave.Suite B Anaheim,CA92807
Attn : To Whom it May Concern
I certify that the capacity of the structural framing that directly supports the additional
gravity loading due to the solar panel supports and modules had been reviewed and
determined to meet or exceed the requirements in accordance with the Design
Criteria
Design Criteria
1.Applicable Codes: 2019 California Building Code
2. Ground Snow Load: 20 psf
3. PV Dead Load: 3 psf
4. Wind Speed: 120 mph
5.Risk Category: II
6.Exposure Category :C
Exp. Date : 3/ 1/2024
Date Certified and
if you have an Signed: 06/08/2022
y y questions or concerns please contact us,
Engineerinc.io
303 N Glenoaks Blvd Suite 200
Burbank,CA 91502
(747) 333 - 5991
new@eneineerinc.io
STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS
PER CBC 2019, ASCE 7-16
NDS 2018, AISC 360-16, ACI 318-14
TMS 402-16(former ACI 530)
Reed Residence
1113 King Rd,Newport Beach,CA 92663
Iba®G1NGC�INC Project Name:ReeOResidence ProJact ID: -
Enginneeeerinc.ie, GG pQ�I333-0991 AEtrue. 1413 KInp RE,Newpod Beach,CA92663 Sheet: 1
303 N Glenwkc Blvd Suite 200 new(aengineerinc.io
Burbank. rA91302 i Structural Calculation Report Date: 6/8/2022
CONTENTS
1 DESIGN DATA......................................................................................... 2
2 STRUCTURAL LAYOUTS.................................................................... 3
3 DESIGN CALCULATIONS .. .................... .................. ........... :................ 4
3.I. WIND CALCULATIONS.................................................................... 4
3,2 WEIGHT ASSESSMENT.
3.3 ROOF BEAM DESIGN....
3.4 UPLIFT CALCULATION.
ItIFmlecNeme:ReadResidencs ProleotID:
Englneenne.io, ryg21333 g9s1 Adtlress:1113 King Rd,Newpad Beaeh,CA 92603 Sheet' 2
303 N Glenoald Blvd Sulte 2M new@engineerindo r
Romaa, rnRsnx 1 StructureI Calculation Report Date: 6/8/2099
1. DESIGN DATA
This report represents the structural assessment of the exiting building with the proposed new
loading arrangement by installing PV panels on roof. These calculations are prepared with the
collected /provided data by the client. All the existing conditions and dimensions should be
verified at site prior to commencing the work.
Design Criteria
Code: 2019 California Building Code
Live Load (psi) _
Basic Wind Speed (mph) _
Exposure Cat =
Ground Snow (psf) _
PV Panel Weight (MIN-3 PSF) _
Roof Loading
Total Roof Dead Load
20
120
C
20
3
Load(psf)
7
Total Dead Load =
7
Live Load (ASCE 07-16) =
20
8 avnge.
Duet*
RgaR,
largeM
11IJwm �Rd Newpuia�
CnM CA 92ebluSl
R"p°�
V •' tMlatmeFlz
crnrscweu
res
_••••,•�"`^+,_�Yhlttiya PutO �+leCa�S�a �yy�Pet6aecn �m
E
w�a�.auor
�
r.tw3srtY&EyC `""•+.�
Ofvbe
'+^—,..
E1
ry
aerosae.y+e�en� rr _
l
VICINITY MAP
Figure LI: Site Location
E
ILzr4wr4m; 1Nc Preied Name:Reed Residence P2-j ID:
Engineerincla. pg3)333J991 Address:Nl3 King RgNewport Beach,CA 92663 Sheet: 3
303 N Glsnoaka BNd S.Re 300 new@engineennc.io
Budmank.a!11602 Structural Calculation Report Date: 618I2022
2. STRUCTURAL LAYOUTS
Figure 2.1:Structural Arrangement & Mounting Plan
NGINCG;ZINC PmjectName:Reedscaldence Project ID:
Engineerindc, (747)3334991 Address:1113 King Rd.Newpod Beach,CA 92663 Sheet: 4
303 N Glemaks Blvd Suite 2M new@engineerinc.io
.-I,..t I Structural Calculation Report Date: 6/8/2022
3. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
3.1. WIND CALCULATIONS
Analytical Values
V : Basic Wind Speed per Sect 26.5-1 or 2
Roof Slope Angle
Occupancy per Table 1.5-1
Exposure Category per 26.
MRH : Mean Roof Height
Length of Building
Width of Building
User specified minimum design pressure
Velocity pressure exponent coef(Table 26.6-1) Kd
Topographic Factor Kzt per 26.8 ( not Significant)
Guest Effect Factor Gr
Velocity pressure equation;
Design Velocity Pressure
120 mph
0 degrees
B All Buildings and other structures except those listed
as Category I, III, and IV
Exposure B ,Enclosed Buildings
15 R
60 ft
46 ft
15 psf
0.85
1
0.85
q= 0.00256 x K. K. x Kd x V2
Z
Kt (Table 26.10-1)
gz(psf)
15
0.57
17.9
20
0.62
19.4
25
0.66
20.7
30
0.7
21.9
40
0.76
23.8
50
0.81
25.4
Ext Pressure Coefficient Cpe(max +ve) 0.8
Ext Pressure Coefficient Cpc (min -vc) -0.9
Net Pressure P ( uplift) -16.1 pgf
Net Pressure P (Downward) 14.3 psf
Design Pressure on Roof 16.1 pal
4
a[A. GIN ffE;11V
�Y
Protect Name:Rend Residence
Project ID: -
Sheet: 5
Engineerinc.io, p47)333-499`3
303 N Glenaaks Blvd Beite --- new@engineerinc B,
Burbank, CA M02
Address:1113 King Rd,Nevp ft Beach,cA 92663
1 Structural Calculation Report
Date: 6/8/2022
3. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
3.1. WEIGHT ASSESSMENT
Exterior We
Weight =
14 psf
Height =
8 It
Length =
212 ft
Total Weight =
23.7 kips
Roof
Weight =
10 psf
Area =
2976 ft2
Total Weight =
29.8 kips
Existing Seismic Weight =
53.5 kips
Ballast PV
Weight =
3 psf
Area of Panels =
396 ft'
Total Weight =
1.188 kips
New Seismic Weight =
54.7 psf
% Of Weight Increase =2.22 %, Hence seismic force resisting system of the building is permitted
to remain unaltered.
-
Hence, Seismic Assessment is not required
Gravity Weight Assessment
Roof Dead Load = 7
psf
PV Load = 3
psf
% Of gravity load increment on roof rafter elements =42.86 %, Hence gravity structural system of
the building should be evaluated.
Page 5
C_NGINEEZINC
Prolect Name:Reed Resldenca
ProlectlD:
Sheet: 6
Engineednc.lo, (147)3334991
Address:1113 Kong Rd,Ne,sual Beach,CA92663
303 N Glenoaks Blvd Suite 200 new@engineednc.lo
Burbank, CA 9150E
Structural Calculation Report
Date: 6/8I2022
3. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
3.2. ROOF RAFTER DESIGN
Maximum Span of the roof rafter was taken as 6.5 ft for the existing loading condition. Loadings acting on the roof
rafter were mentioned in design loadings in this report
Wood Beam
ASCE 7-16, ASD Douglas Fir -Larch, Grade: #I&Better
Fb+ = 1200
psi
Fb- = 1200
psi
Fc-Prll = 1550
psi
Fc-Perp = 625
psi
Fv = 180
psi
Ft = 800
psi
E: Modulus of Elasticity
Ebend-xx = 1800
ksi
Eminbend-xx = 660
ksi
Density = 31.2
ksi
2x4 @ 2ft .O.0 Span 6.5 ft
Applied Loads
Beam self Weight calculated and added to loads
Uniform Load: D=0.01, Lr-0.02 W=0.12 ksf, Tributary Width=2 ft
Beam Size 2x4
DesiBR Summary
DeslgdOK
Maximum Bending Stress Ratio:
0.95 OK
Section Used for this Span
fib: Actual =
2154.48 psi
FB:Allowable =
2265 pSi
Maximum Shear Stress Ratio:
0.29 OK
Section Used for this Span
fv: Actual =
64.5 psi
Fv:Allowable =
225 psi
Page 6
6'�epp '�C■��t�� Project Nems:Read Residanea Project ID: -
Engineerinclo. G pp2)333-0991 Atltlresr.1113 KIng Rd,Newpon Beach,CA 92663 Sheet: 7
3D3 N Gienaaks Blvd Suite 200 new@enginaerinc.la
Burbank. CA92507 Structural Calculation Report Date: 6/8/2022
3. DESIGN CALCULATIONS
3.3. PV UPLIFT CALCULATION
SDLARFoor
Met alto Wood:
V4-14Type 17 AS Milled Pont
1-1/2'to2-l/2"
Back Lou Front Ran,
0 Win ao7 --wm,.«u
tfn .,. n_
�g=j
Ganeral Nales:
Applied Loads
Tan f4a10i,-„J
PV Panel Ana
Wind Uplift Pressure
Wind Uplift Farce
Capacity Assessment
=
=
=
18 sq.ft
16.1 pelf
289.3 IN
SolarFoot"' P1)'woa0
19(32'PlyweaC.
!/� t1 r 1-L3 Z4iPR4E
4
Y115
B
372.
N/A
p.6-tr:a tsje"ES':.,I
Sout
SoletFoo[^'
.055'G<lvan�ze0
]!<.q 1l-YIt?c=_=tM1
4
1560
C
Sio
N/A
Detk
Steel
Otl;; l3/H'9;yty
Steel
SotarFaot^'
D55'Galvaniied
=Drl'.L{=J$-"-'''�`)
2
1268
C
422
N/A
Deck
S[el
WOEd
2si Timb<r (2'
3Ady a'! ]J2 ZACr(pe
SetartootT" Rirtin
Verticalsimsiders
,mil l� u
r��v4t2Yj
4
3229
C;D
409
N/A
on opposire sitles)
Nnce
3olarPoo[^'
2x4Timber(4'
FE
4
1554
C
538
N/A
Pullin
Horiordon
K`H?fin/e'"iX,
SolarFoat^' Weak
152-DSB
3 5
e,D
128
N/A
0
notF3[^'{E•
STaeeng
Solartm[`"'
A2mm Steel
_5—,
4
399
a,C,D
132
N/A.
only
nirj H=mY=_a0 v:'.nrubaer
saauog resn
Hence, Uplift Capacity is sufcientfor the PV Panets
7
POWERWALL 2
ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A:2019 Fourth Edition
Test Report Supplemental Guide
INTRODUCTION
Tesla Powerwall 2 was tested by Right Testing Lab, LLC, an ISO 17025 accredited laboratory, and
witnessed by CSA Group, also ISO 17025 accredited and Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL).
Testing was conducted in March 2021 in accordance with ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A:2019 Fourth Edition, Dated
November 12, 2019 - Test Method for Evaluating Thermal Runaway Fire Propagation in Battery Energy Storage
Systems.
This supplemental guide is intended to aid Authorities Having Jurisdiction (AHJs) in the application of the test results to
determine compliance with applicable codes. Specifically, where building and/or fire codes require large-scale fire test
data to support deviations from the minimum requirements set forth in those codes.
The Tesla Powerwall 2 has met the unit level performance criteria outlined in ANSIICAN/UL 9540A when
installed as follows:
• The Powerwall must be installed in accordance with accompanying Powerwall 2 mounting bracket as detailed in
the installation instructions. No additional non-combustible substrate is required.
• For stacked installations, the Powerwall 2 stack kit accessory must be installed to provide adequate clearances
for preventing unit to unit propagation.
® Where applicable, a minimum clearance of 6" on the side(s) of the unit is required to prevent side -to -side
propagation to adjacent units and walls.
Page and Section numbers referenced from the test report are presented in bold type. For example,
verification that the Testa Powerwa/l 2 has met the performance criteria outlined in ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A
can be found on pages 4 through 6 of the report.
For ease of use, this guide is arranged to follow the sequence used in the report issued by CSA Group titled UL 9540A
Checklist and Test Result. The scope of the report includes the performance criteria outlined in Section 9 - Unit Level
Testing of ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A:2019 Fourth Edition. The report also includes a summary of data acquired at the cell
and module levels during prior testing.
All Section numbers in the report are references to ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A:2019 Fourth Edition, Dated November 12,
2019.
T =_ � i-. n ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT 2
PRODUCT DETAILS
The device under test (DUT) in the attached report is the Tesla Powerwall 2, model 3012170-XX-Y, which is also
the ESS included as part of the Powerwall+ all -in -one Solar PV and Storage solution (1850000-XX-Y). Full product
specifications and certifications are available on request from all Tesla authorized installers.
General product details are outlined on Page 2 of the CSA Group Checklist and Test Result document.
UNIT CONSTRUCTION
Figure 1 below illustrates the location of the battery module with in the unit as noted on Page 3 of the report.
Coolant System
(V�nPower Electronics
Battery Module
Fig. 1 - Powerwall 2 Internal Component Layout
"f a :3 '._ F, ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT 3
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
A comprehensive summary of the test results for each installation layout and test configuration is
provided beginning on page 3. This section provides important information needed to determine
residential and fire code compliance where reduced minimum separation distances are permitted, and
where the unit is intended to be installed on a combustible substrate.
Final verification that the Tesla Powerwall 2 has met the performance criteria outlined in ANSI/CAN/UL
9540A can be found beginning on page 4 through 6 of the report. This portion of the report can be
used as a checklist to aid in the verification of the unit's conformance to the performance criteria for
each installation configuration.
In the unit level test it was demonstrated that:
The Powerwall 2 mounting bracket provides adequate clearance from the wall surface on which it is
mounted. Wall surface temperatures did not exceed 97°C (175°F) of temperature rise above
ambient per Section 9.2.15. No additional substrate is needed.
® The Powerwall 2 stack kit provides adequate clearances to prevent unit -to -unit propagation when an
internal fire condition is established in an initiating unit.
• The recommended clearance of 6" on the side of the Powerwall 2 unit, as specified in the installation
manual, is also adequate to prevent side -to -side propagation to adjacent units.
CELL AND MODULE LEVEL TESTS
Pages 7 through 9 of the report provide background information and data collected during cell and module -level
testing previously conducted. This data does not directly correlate to residential or fire code requirements, rather it is
used to document and compare the characteristics of different cell chemistries and designs. One important value
recorded is the temperature at which thermal runaway occurs. This temperature of 185.8°C is used to verify that an
internal fire condition has been established during the Unit Level test.
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA - CELL LEVEL
Application of heat using film heater methodology did result in a thermal runaway condition, therefore
module level testing was required,
PERFORMANCE CRITERIA - MODULE LEVEL
Application of heat using film heater methodology did result in a thermal runaway condition, and the
resulting event was not contained by the module design, therefore unit level testing was required.
The Powerwall is intentionally designed without a module -level enclosure. This allows vent gases to be
routed in such a way that adds to the overall propagation resistance of the module, and prevents a
dangerous buildup of gases that may lead to an explosion or deflagration hazard.
'r ! i_ n ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT
UNIT LEVEL TEST - GENERAL
Section 9 Unit Level Testing information begins on page 10 of the report. In additional to providing
greater detail on the test setup and unit performance, this portion of the report can also be used as a
checklist to aid in the verification of the testing laboratory's conformance to the test procedure
SAMPLE AND TEST CONFIGURATION
ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A provides for several configurations:
• Residential and non-residential use cases
• Wall and floor mounting
• Indoor and Outdoor locations
The Tesla Powerwall 2 is intended to be installed in any of the configurations noted in Section 9.1, so testing is
representative of each, and aligns with installation requirements established in the product installation manual.
The unit level test begins with the application of heat at a specific site selected to present the greatest amount of
thermal exposure to adjacent cells within the module. This application of heat must result in an internal fire
condition in accordance with the module level test previously conducted. This was verified by laboratory staff
using temperature data recorded during initiation of the event, compared against the cell surface temperature at
thermal runaway during the cell level test. This temperature was determined to be 185.8°C. (See Section 5.1.1
and Section 9.1).
Beginning with the indoor floor -mounted unit test, Section 9.2 on page 11 the report goes into more detail on
each test setup and installation configuration.
T =_ 5 L F, ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT
UNIT LEVEL TEST - INDOOR FLOOR MOUNTED
Section 9.2 begins on page 11 by outlining conformance to the physical test layout and data captured
during the test. An example test layout graphic has been reproduced from ANSI/CAN/UL 9540A on page 13
for cross reference with the actual layout represented in the 3D graphic provided. A summary of the recorded
dimensions is included below for clarity, along with the corresponding dimension callouts from the table on
page 14.
The units in this test configuration were installed according to the installation instructions using the Tesla
supplied support bracket and optional stack kit. The layout was chosen to represent a worst -case installation
with the minimum recommended clearances specified in the installation instructions.
Pages 11 through 17 demonstrate that the test layout, wall constructions, placement of the cheesecloth
indicator and instrumentation fully conformed to the test standard methodology.
Figure 2 - Indoor Floor Mount Dimensions
ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT
UNIT LEVEL TEST - OUTDOOR GROUND MOUNTED
In accordance with Section 9.1.2 the indoor floor mounted test is also considered representative of outdoor
ground mounted installations, with the addition of a 1-ft wide horizontal soffit instrumented in accordance with
Section 9.3.3. Tesla does not require an additional installation substrate, so this was omitted during testing.
Pages 17 and 18 demonstrate that the test layout, wall constructions, placement of the cheesecloth indicator
and instrumentation fully conformed to the test standard methodology.
Figure 3 - Outdoor Ground Mount Dimensions
7, = S L- 'n ACPW21 TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT
UNIT LEVEL TEST - INDOOR WALL MOUNTED
The indoor wall mounted test was performed in accordance with Section 9.2 except as modified by Section
9.4, which specifies a standard NFPA 286 fire test room and additional instrumentation placements.
Pages 18 through 20 verify that the test layout, wall constructions, placement of the cheesecloth indicator
and instrumentation fully conformed to the test standard methodology.
Figure 3 - Indoor Wall Mount Dimensions
(Door opening omitted for clarity)
.T = 5 L- ri ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT
UNIT LEVEL TEST - OUTDOOR WALL MOUNTED
The outdoor wall mounted test was performed in accordance with Section 9.2 except as modified by
Section 9.5, which again adds the 1-ft wide soffit and associated instrumentation.
Pages 20 through 22 verify that the test layout, wall constructions, placement of the cheesecloth
indicator and instrumentation fully conformed to the test standard methodology.
Figure 5 - Outdoor Wall Mount Dimensions
T m 5 E. `-i ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT
UNIT LEVEL TEST - REPORT DETAILS
Beginning on page 22, an overview table of each test is provided including a timestamped outline of
observations noted. The data provided in the graphs in this section is intended to be used as a means of
characterizing and comparing different ESS products in a standardized way.
Another use is for evaluating non-residential installations, or ESS that exceed the aggregate quantities
established in codes. The design of room construction and/or fire suppression for those systems based on
this data is beyond the scope of this guidance document.
We would like to answer any questions you have. Please feel free to email codecompliance@tesla.com.
1- :_ Ei L_. i= ACPW2 I TEST REPORT SUPPLEMENT 10