HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-2268 - Professional Services, Upper Newport Bay StudyRECORDING REQUES7r, BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Clerk
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, California 92663
' ��• ed � 11
pace Above
L
�I
�"K 14 12 8 PG 15 14,
l✓ `1
-12
s Line for Recorder's Use Only
-1019 AM
JUL 6 T I
LICENSE AGREEMENT LEE A BRANCH, Coon'
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of
1981, by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY," and
MYERS-0. HILL LTD. dba UPPER NEWPORT PLAZA.
A. City owns certain public street rights-of-way (hereafter
"easements") located in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange,
State of California, which easements are more particularly described
in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference incorporated
herein.
B. Owner owns that certain real property located at 1601 Quail
Street, in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of
California, which real property is more particularly described in
Parcel No. 3, Parcel Map 86-33, 34 (Resubdivision No. 529), as shown
on a map filed in Book 139, page 32 of Parcel Maps, Records of Orange
County, California, and which real property is contiguous to the
aforesaid easements. '
C. This easement also contains public utility easements.
D. City has water,'sewer and storm drain facilities located
within said easement.
E. City desires to condition approval of construction of any
nonstandard street improvements over a portion of said street ease-
ment containing said utility facilities.
-1-
sK 14 1 28PG 15 1 5
F. The parties hereto desire to execute an agreement providing
for fulfillment of the conditions imposed by City on Owner as a pre-
condition for the granting of permission to construct the nonstandard
street improvements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promise, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
1. DEFINITIONS.
"Nonstandard street improvements" shall be defined as any
landscaped areas and street or sidewalk surfacing within the public
street right-of-way which is not constructed of asphaltic concrete
or natural colored Portland cement concrete and/or finished in a
customary fashion.
2. TERM.
Rights granted under this agreement shall terminate
twenty (20) years from the date of execution, unless earlier -
terminated as provided herein. In the event that City desires
to use the easement for street purposes, City may terminate this
agreement by giving sixty (60) days' notice of its intention to
do so, specifying in said notice the date of termination. City
shall incur no liability whatsoever in the event of the termina-
tion of this agreement, early or otherwise, and/or consequent
removal of improvements by City.
3. RIGHTS OF OWNER.
Owner may construct, reconstruct, install, maintain,
use, operate, repair and replace said improvements, all in sub-
stantial conformance with plans and specifications therefor on
file in the City's Public Works Department, in, on and across
those certain easements described in Exhibit "A" hereto.
4. OWNER'S DUTIES.
Owner shall properly and regularly maintain the improvements
and shall timely pay all costs and expenses incurred in doing so.
In the event that owners fail to properly and/or regularly main-
tain the improvements, City may at its option, assume the maintenance
-2-
BK 14 12 8 PG 15 1
of the improvements and Owner agrees to pay all costs incurred by
City in maintaining the improvements.
5. REPAIRS.
City has the right to make such repairs to the improve-
ments as it deems necessary for the protection of the public
health, welfare and safety. Owner agrees to promptly reimburse
City for the reasonable costs and expenses incurred by City in
effecting such repairs.
6. RESTORATION.
Should City be required to enter, onto the easements to
construct, maintain, remove, repair, renew, replace or enlarge
the water, sewer or storm drain facilities, the City may remove
all or part of the improvements and in such event:
(A) Owner shall restore the improvements to
their condition prior to removal by the City, said
restoration to be completed within sixty (60) days
from notice to Owner that City has completed its
work;
(B) City agrees to bear the portion of the
costs of the restoration of the improvements to
the extent such costs would have been incurred
had standard street improvements been installed by _
Owner;
(C) Owner agrees to pay any costs of restora-
tion of the improvements in excess of the costs to
be paid by City.
7. INDEMNIFICATION.
Owner agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold City, its
officers, agents and employees harmless from all demands, claims,
losses or liability that arise out of or that are in any way re-
lated to the construction, use, maintenance or restoration of the
improvements.
8. BREACH.
In the event either party breaches any material provision
of this agreement, the other party at its option may, in addition
- 3 -
BK14128po1517
to the other legal remedies available to it, terminate this agree-
ment, and, in the event the breaching party is Owner, City may
enter upon the easement and remove all or part of the improvements
installed by Owner. Termination because of breach shall be upon
a minimum of ten (10) days` notice, with the notice specifying
the date of termination. In the event of litigation commenced
with respect to any term or condition of this agreement, the pre-
vailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and
costs incurred.
'9. SEVERABILITY.
The provisions of this agreement are independent and
severable, and the invalidity or partial invalidity or unenforce-
ability of any one provision or portion thereof shall not affect
the validity or enforceability of any other provisions hereof.
10. RECORDATION.
Each of the parties hereto specifically consents to the
recordation of this License Agreement in the Office of the County
Recorder of Orange County, California, and the covenants, restric-
tions and charges hereunder, and all their benefits and burdens,
shall run with the land, pursuant to Section 1468 of the Civil
Code of the State of California.
11. ASSIGNMENT.
The terms and conditions of this agreement shall be
binding upon the successors and assigns of Owner, and shall also
be binding upon owners who take title to the property by reason
of foreclosure, trustee's sale, or otherwise.
12. NOTICE.
When notice is to be given pursuant to this agreement,
it shall be addressed as follcjs:
CITY
City of Newport Beach
Office of City Attorney
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
-4-
OWNER
Myers -0. Hill Ltd. dba
Upper Newport Plaza
250 Newport Center Drive, M-100
Newport Beach, CA 92663
BK 14 12 8 pG i 5 8
Notice shall be deemed given as of the date of mailing when notice
is properly addressed and mailed with first class postacge prepaid.
EXECUTED the day and year first above written at Newport
Beach, California.
ATTEST:
Z,//"" Q
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City- Attorney
TO 447 C
(Individual)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
} SS.
COUNTY OF J '
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
A Municipal Corporation
B
Mayor
MYERS-0. HILL LTD., dba
UPPER NEWPORT PLAZA
By
ROBERT • w Ets Gefl-e-i��Otner
0
Oil _ Before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said
State, personally appeared
W _
It — --
w
2
W
J
ato be the person _ whose name_ _ subscribed
W to the within instrument and acknowledged that_
executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
Name (Typed or Printed)
known to me
(This area Yor official notarial seal)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF
Orange
ss. BK 14 12 8 PG 15 1 9
ON June 23 19 81
t
before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared
Jacqueline E. Heather, known to me to be the Mayor of
City of Newport Beach and Wanda E- Andersen, known to
to he the City Clerk of City of NPwpnrt R ch known to me,
Os E&; AL SEAL to be the persons_ whose names are subscribed to the within Instrument,
iA
®OROi�'� L. t`t�^ and acknowledged to me that —t—he-y- executed the same.
NOTARY PJFQ 1-41 C.,' :A >
PRINCIPAL
OrAN": G4atrr:j"d WITNESS my hand and official seal.
„.> my COmm;ssion�Expires �:F^I 5, IBESNot Public in and for said State.
Dorothy L. Palen
nreNnwi cnru9NT_r--l—WM,.++� cn,M 71a—P— I -AA
C
m
CL
E
0
U
d
i=
E
Q
a
L
N
m
7
0
co
E
o`
LL
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF OPANGTE
ss.
On -= 4 r 1981 _ , before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for
said State, personally appeared ROBERT 0. HIL_L� General Partner of
LL
MYERS-0. HILTD
known to me to be QDe. of the partners of the partnership
that executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
such partnership executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Signature
anet Crowther
Name (Typed or Printed)
OFFICIAL SEAL
JANET CROWTHER
-® NOTARY PUBLIC - CALIFORNIA
s PRINCIPALCFFICEIN
ORANGE COUNTY ti
My Comm. Expires Nov. 27, 1S31
(This area for official notarial seal)
mel
�Llz
Y CO
O �
19
I- T-
�1 �, �l �✓ ,� � f'L�CE
i.59. /3'
!�"-c NORTN BRfs7'D� STn�E�.T
5MEE7 d O WrMar.N rsop
x --
�-
9
�_ _ I NOeTN 8.P/.57OL STP.SET
&EEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL OVICES
v
Environmental Impact Report: Early
Action and Interim Sedimentation
Control Plan, Upper Newport Bay.
This Agreement is made and entered into this
C -2268 Culbertson, Adcc
Inc.
day of , 1981,
by and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal corporation, herein-
after referred to as "NEWPORT BEACH ", and Culbertson, Adams, Inc., herein-
after referred to as "CONSULTANT"
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, the PROPOSED PROJECT shall consist of deepening the San
Diego Creek Channel, installation of drop structures, and dredging in the
Upper Bay, described as Alternative 1 in the Technical Memorandum for Sub -
task 1 -B, Early Action and Interim Plan for the Newport Bay Watershed,
which CONSULTANT has read and has a copy; and
WHEREAS, NEWPORT BEACH has determined that implementation of the
PROPOSED PROJECT could result in significant environmental impacts; and
WHEREAS, an environmental impact report (EIR) will be required pur-
suant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
and
an EIR,
WHEREAS, CONSULTANT has submitted a proposal to prepare said EIR;
WHEREAS, NEWPORT BEACH has reviewed the proposal; and
WHEREAS, NEWPORT BEACH desires to accept the proposal to prepare
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto
agree as follows:
I. General
A. AGENCY engages CONSULTANI to perform the services
hereinafter described for the compensation herein
is
•
stated.
B. CONSULTANT agrees to perform such services upon
the terms hereinafter set forth and to accept
the compensation herein stated as full compen-
sation for said services.
C. Work shall be conducted in two (2) phases.
CONSULTANT shall not commence either phase of
work until authorized to do so by the CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH.
D. Standard conditions listed on CONSULTANT'S
Schedule of Fees (attached) shall be observed.
II. Services to be Performed by the Consultant.
A. Phase 1
CONSULTANT hereby agrees to perform the follow-
ing services under Phase l:
1. Prepare a Screencheck and Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report for the PROPOSED
PROJECT. The following topics will be
addressed:
Land Use. This section shall contain
an overview of the existing Land Use
Element and Zoning designations for
the area of the alternative selected
as well as alternatives 2 -5 project
areas. The discussion shall include
any relevant adopted policies pertain-
ing to all project areas. A prelimi-
nary assessment of consistency with
all elements of the General Plan shall
OFade following consultat0 with
other than the City of Newport Beach,
such as the Department of Fish and
Game Master Plan for Upper Bay, shall
also be presented, and shall be ac-
companied by a preliminary assessment
of compatibility with such plans. The
assessment shall also include land use
impacts of the dredge disposal site.
Geology and Soils. Information for
this section shall be derived from a
survey of existing sources, to include
U.S. Department of Mines and Geology
exhibits and sedimentation Control
Plan reports.
Hdroloa . This seciton shall be
based upon data from Subtask I -A and
I -B Technical Memorandums, which con-
tain extensive information and refer-
ences on flow character and velocities.
Water Qualms. An inventory of exist-
ing water quality data for San Diego
Creek and the Upper Bay will be con-
ducted. The discussion shall take
advantage of a considerable base of
monitoring data available at the Orange
County Environmental Management Agency.
Of particular concern will be informa-
tion on nutrient concentrations in re-
1 ion to standing water in Oe
basins and possible vector and algae
problems.
Biological Resources. The sensiti-
vity of this issue requires that bio-
logical resources be examined in depth.
The recent removal of all resources
from the creek channel between Mac-
Arthur Boulevard and Michelson Drive
reduces impact potential in this area,
and thus the primary effort will be
directed toward examination of the
Upper Bay, and to a lesser extent,
the dredge disposal site.
The areas of the project alternatives
will aslo be examined, although in
less detail than the chosen alterna-
tive. It is anticipated, however,
that the information prepared for
these latter areas would provide an
adequate foundation for future en-
vironmental determinations. The
study shall place special emphasis
on mitigation programs appropriate
for ameliorating biotic environments
affected by the project.
Traffic and Circulation. A traffic
study will be presented as a part of
this EIR evaluating the traffic impacts
of the construction of the posed
project. Primarily these impacts will
be associated with removal of excava-
ted materials. As a part of this
study, mitigation measures will be pro-
posed which will serve to minimize an-
ticipated impacts.
Noise. A brief evaluation of noise
impacts shall be made. The short dura-
tion of excavation activity, combined
with the distance from residential or
other noise sensitive land uses, reduces
the potential for significant adverse
impacts.
Air Quality. Calculations shall be
provided in this section which evaluate
the effect of the short - term - excavation
operation. Special emphasis shall be
placed on mitigation for fugitive dust
impacts. Potential odors from dredged
materials will be examined.
Cultural Resources. Impacts to these
resources are not anticipated as a re-
sult of the implementation of the
selected alternative. Discussion in
the section shall focus primarily on
mitigation measures for archaelogical,
paleontological and historical re-
sources.
thetics. This section s l deal
with the visual changes occurring in
San Diego Creek as a result of the
proposed project.
Energy. An evaluation of impacts to
energy resources shall be made con-
sistent with the Guidelines for Im-
plementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Admin.
Code S 15000 et. seq.).
Project Maintenance. Maintenance of
the proposed project will be necessary
and will generally consist of removal
of material deposited in drop struc-
ture and in the basin. Impacts asso-
ciated with project maintenance will
be similar to those associated with
initial project implementation, though
on a smaller scale. These will gener-
ally consist of impacts on noise, dust,
water quality /erosion, haul traffic,
and newly- established biological re-
sources. These factors will be exa-
mined in the project EIR.
2. Submit ten (10) copies of a Screencheck
EIR by April , 1981.
3. Prepare the Draft EIR in photo ready form
within one week of receipt of comments on
the Screencheck EIR from NEWPORT BEACH.
s •
4. Attend one meeting with the Environmental
Affairs Committee and one general meeting
with Staff.
B. Phase 2
CONSULTANT will not proceed with any portion of
Phase 2 without authorization from NEWPORT.BEACH.
CONSULTANT hereby agrees to perform the following
services under Phase 2:
1. Print 75 copies of the Draft EIR.
2. Prepare distribution and notification
lists for the Draft EIR.
3. Respond to Comments on the Draft EIR.
4. Prepare and print thirty (30) copies
of the Final EIR.
5. Attend the following meetings accom-
panied by technical consultants as
required:
a. Four meetings with City Staff.
b. Two meetings with Planning Com-
mission.
c. Two meetings with citizens or
other groups.
d. Two meetings with City Council
III. Compensation
A. Phase 1
Compensation for Phase I shall be $23,£300.00.
Fifty (50) percent of this amount shall be
s 6
payable after receipt of the Screencheck EIR
by NEWPORT BEACH. The remaining fifty (50)
percent shall be payable after acceptance of
the Draft EIR by NEWPORT BEACH.
B. Phase 2
Compensation for Phase 2 shall be on a time
and materials basis at CONSULTANT'S regular
billing rates (attached) and shall not exceed
the following figures unless authorized in
writing by NEWPORT BEACH.
Printing (75 copies of $1700.00
the Draft EIR, 30
copies of the Final)
Response to Comments $6800.00
Attendance at Meetings $2400.00
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement
as of the day and year first written above.
ATTEST
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM
i
c'
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF NE14PORT BEACH
MAYO /W
AN DI ADAMS ��
t
rj
TO: City Council
City Council Meeting
Agenda Item No.
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
FROM: Planning Department
SUBJECT: 208 Early Action Plan EIR
Suggested Action
March 23. 1981
F -8(a)
If desired, authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to execute an agree-
ment for professional services between the City of Newport Beach and
Andi Adams for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for
the 208 Early Action and Interim Plan.
Background
On March 19, 1981, the State Water Resources Board will be making
final decisions regarding the award of Clean Water Bond Funds. It is
currently anticipated that the City of Newport Beach will be awarded
$1 million for the implementation of the City's Early Action and
Interim Plan for the control of sedimentation in Upper Newport Bay.
Before construction of sedimentation controls commences, an Environ-
mental Impact Report will be required.
Andi Adams, environmental consultant, has submitted a proposal to
prepare an EIR on the Early Action and Interim Plan for a fee not to
exceed $34,700. The fee is broken down as follows:
Preparation of the Draft EIR $23,800
Printing (75 copies of the
DEIR, 30 copies of the Final) 1,700
Response to Comments 61800(1)
Attendance at Meetings 2,400(2)
TOTAL $34,700
(I} This figure is tentative and is a "best estimate" of the
consultant based on similar experience. The precise
amount of work required will depend on comments received
during the public review period.
(2} Attendance at additional meetings will be on a time and
material basis.
i
TO: City Council - 2.
The EIR will address those issues discussed in the following sections:
Land Use. This section shall contain an overview of the existing
Land Use Element and Zoning designations for the area of the alterna-
tive selected as well as Alternatives 2 -5 project areas. The discus-
sion shall include any relevant adopted policies pertaining to all
project areas. A preliminary assessment of consistency with all
elements of the General Plan shall be made following consultation
with City staff. An inventory of any existing plans of agencies
other than the City of Newport Beach, such as the Department of Fish
and Game Master Plan for Upper Bay, shall also be presented, and shall
be accompanied by a preliminary assessment of compatibility with such
plans. The assessment shall also include land use impacts of the
dredge disposal site.
Geology and Soils. Information for this section shall be derived
from a survey of existing sources, to include U.S. Department of Mines
and Geology exhibits and Sedimentation Control Plan reports.
Hydrology. This section shall be based upon data from Subtask I -A
and I -B Technical Memorandums, which contain extensive information and
references on flow character and velocities.
Water Quality. An inventory of existing water quality data for San
Diego Creek and the Upper Bay will be conducted. The discussion shall
take advantage of a considerable base of monitoring data available at
the Orange County Environmental Management Agency. Of particular
concern will be information on nutrient concentrations in relation to
standing water in the basins and possible vector and algae problems.
Biological Resources. The sensitivity of this issue requires that
biological resources be examined in depth. The recent removal of all
resources from the creek channel between MacArthur Boulevard and
Michelson Drive reduces impact potential in this area, and thus the
primary effort will be directed toward examination of the Upper Bay,
and to a lesser extent, the dredge disposal site.
The areas of the project alternatives will also be examined, although
in less detail than the chosen alternative. It is anticipated, however,
that the information prepared for these latter areas would provide an
adequate foundation for future environmental determinations. The study
shall place special emphasis on mitigation programs appropriate for
ameliorating biotic environments affected by the project.
Traffic and Circulation. A traffic study
of this EIR evaluating the traffic impacts
proposed project. Primarily these impacts
removal of excavated materials. As a part
measures will be proposed which will serve
impacts.
will be presented as a part
of the construction of the
will be associated with
of this study, mitigation
to minimize anticipated
Noise. A brief evaluation of noise impacts shall be made. The short
duration of excavation activity, combined with the distance from resi-
dential or other noise sensitive land uses, reduces the potential for
significant adverse impacts.
i •
T0: City Council - 3.
Air Quality. Calculations shall be provided in this section which
evaluate the effect of the short - term - excavation operation. Special
emphasis shall be placed on mitigation for fugitive dust impacts.
Potential odors from dredged materials will be examined.
Cultural Resources. Impacts to these resources are not anticipated
as a result of the implementation of the selected alternative. Dis-
cussion in the section shall focus primarily on mitigation measures
for archaelogical, paleontological and historical resources.
Aesthetics. This section shall deal with the visual changes occur-
ring in San Diego Creek as a result of the proposed project.
Energy. An evaluation of impacts to energy resources shall be made
consistent with the Guidelines for Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Cal. Admin. Code S 15000 et. seq.).
Project Maintenance. Maintenance of the proposed project will be
necessary and will generally consist of removal of material deposited
in drop structure and in the basin. Impacts associated with project
maintenance will be similar to those associated with initial project
implementation, though on a smaller scale. These will generally
consist of impacts on noise, dust, water quality /erosion, haul traffic,
and newly - established biological resources. These factors will be
examined in the project EIR.
Respectfully submitted,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director
by
SANDRA L. NIS
Associate Planner
SLG /kk
�ITY OF NEWPORT F#ACH
C UNCIL MINUTES
0
March 23_ 1981 INDEX
8. STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS: - For information
and approval:
(a) Report from the Planning Department regarding
20B /Interim
the selection of a consultant for the 208
Cntrl /EIR
Interim Control Plan EIR. (Attached)
(68) (-�S)
C- 2Z.W
(b) Report from the Airport Aviation Committee
Airprt /Avia
establishing a time and date for Town Hall
Comte
Meeting. (Attached)
(58)
(c) Report from the City Manager concerning the
Finance/
appropriations limit under Proposition 4.
Prop 4
(Attached)
(40)
9. PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULING: - None.
10. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS IN RESUBDIVISION NO.
Resub 623
623 - Acceptance of the public improvements con-
(84)
structed in conjunction with Resubdivision No. 623;
authorization to the City Clerk to release the
Faithful Performance Surety (Certificate of Deposit
No. 55- 1052 -996); and authorization to the City
Clerk to release the Labor and Material Surety
(Certificate of Deposit No. 55- 1052988) in six
months provided no claims have been filed). (A
report from the Public Works Department)
11. RESUBDIVISION NO. 538 - Authorization to the City
Resub 538
Clerk to release the Faithful Performance Bond
(84)
(Bond No. 2621009); and authorization to the City
Clerk to release the Labor and Material Bond (Bond
No. 2621009). (A report from the Public Works
Department)
12. ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS IN TRACT NO. 10587 -
Tr 10587
Accept the public improvements constructed in
conjunction with Tract No. 10587; authorization to
the City Clerk to release the Faithful Performance
Bond (Bond No. B391513); and authorization to the
City Clerk to release the Labor and Material Bond
(Bond No. B391513) in six months provided no claims
have been filed. (A report from the Public Works
Department)
13. AUTHORIZATION TO STAFF - To retain an appraiser to
Prop /Acq
determine the fair market value of the southwester)
205 -39th St
7.15 feet of 205 -39th Street. (A report from the
(73)
Public Works Department)
14. BUDGET AMENDMENTS: - For approval:
(25)
BA -060, $950.00 increase in Budget Appropriations
and Revenue Estimates for Donations from Pacific
Mutual Life Insurance Company for the purchase of
Library Books; Library Fund.
Volume 35 - Page 89
C UNCIL
ral 1
z
v��
Rnl I Je
(QTY OF NEWPORT BVCH
Marrh 23. 1981
MINUTES
I finry
BA -061, $5,700.00 transfer of Budget Appropriations
for purchase of a 60" lawn mower; Park and Recrea-
tion Fund.
BA -062, $7,500.00 transfer of Budget Appropriations
for construction of a log boom debris barrier at
Upper Newport Bay; Services - Professional, Technical,
etc., Fund.
BA -063, $692.00 increase in Budget Appropriations
from Contingency Reserve for purchase of dictaphone
transcribing unit for City Attorney's Office;
Office Equipment.
G. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
1. A letter from David B. Anderson, which was referred
Armstrong
to staff for reply, requesting reconsideration of
Pet /Oil
the City's cancellation of the Armstrong Petroleum
(73)
Contract, was presented.
Motion
x
The foregoing letter was referred to staff for
All Ayes
reply, with a copy of the response to Council.
2. Proposed Ordinance No. 1878, being,
PB &R /Rcrtn
0 -1878
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
(62)
AMENDING SECTION 11.08.040 OF THE NEWPORT
BEACH MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SLEEPING IN
VEHICLES OR ON BEACHES,
was presented for introduction and pass to second
reading on April 13, 1981.
A report from the Police Department was presented.
Motion
x
Motion was made to delete "private piers and
docks," with the specific understanding that, if
said deletion proves to be unsatisfactory, recon-
sideration will be given at a future date for .
an amendment to the ordinance.
Police Chief Charles Gross addressed the Council,
stating they would prefer that "private piers and
docks" be retained in the ordinance; however the
department will enforce whatever the City Council
enacts.
Ayes
x
x
x
x
The motion was voted on, and carried.
Noes
x
x
x
3. Resolution No. 81 -239 of the Orange County Board of
Res /Other
Supervisors, regarding Santa Ana Heights Specific
(77)
Plan and ANCLUC Implementation Monitoring Program,
Planning
and requesting one representative of the City of
(68)
Newport Beach be appointed to the Planning Advisory
Group, was presented and referred to staff for
inclusion in the records.
Motion
x
Council Member Maurer was appointed as the City's
OC /Ping Adv
All Ayes
representative to the Planning Advisory Group.
Group
Volume 35 - Page 90