The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutC-2621 - Highway Improvement Program for South Coast Plaza/John Wayne Airport AreaCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 -8915 TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR FROM: CITY CLERK (714) 644 -3005 DATE: January 15, 1987 SUBJECT: Contract No. C -2621 Description of Contract Memorandum of Understanding between the Cities of Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Irvine, and Costa Mesa and the County of Orange regarding Financing for Arterial Street Improvements in the Area of South Coast Plaza and John Wayne Airport. Effective date of Contract September 10, 1986 Authorized by Minute Action, approved on September 22, 1986 Contract with Address Amount of Contract (See ee iet-tet Wanda E. Raggio City Clerk WER:pm Attachment 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach Vrterial MOU August 7, 1986 - Z�2-� MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITIES OF NEWPORT BEACH, SANTA ANA, IRVINE, AND COSTA MESA AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE REGARD- ING FINANCING FOR ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA OF SOUTH COAST PLAZA AND JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT 0 �� XjI ORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is entered into this day GRp' t9 6, between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, the CITY OF COS A MESA, 'k, /IRVINE, and the CITY OF SANTA ANA, each of which is a municipal c��ratio("d the State of California and is hereinafter referred to as "Newport Beach," 41 " st "Irvine," and "Santa Ana," respectively, and collectively as "CITIES," and / t q6 of Orange which is s political subdivision and is hereinafter referred to as nge County." RECITALS A. Based on existing and anticipated future traffic volumes and emerging development patterns, the cities of Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Irvine, and Costa Mesa and the County of Orange recognize the need for a coordinated arterial highway improvement program as an integral part of the total circulation system in the area outlined in attached Exhibit A. B. The parties seek hereby to set out an arterial program by means of which the vehicular traffic impacts, resulting from implementation of said development, may be dealt with in such a manner as to make manageable, to the greatest extent possible, the need for public street improvement that will be created thereby. (The "Program "). C. Each of the parties has heretofore participated in a cooperative technical analysis of the nature, extent, and approximate cost of the public street improvements that will be made necessary by reason of the increased vehicular traffic loads, that will be generated within the first five years hereafter by new development within said Primary Study Area. D. Each of the CITIES has heretofore collected development fees within its portion of the Primary Study Area for the cost of the public street improvements that will be made necessary by reason of the increased vehicular traffic loads. E. ORANGE COUNTY intends to utilize Orange County Development Agency funds for public street improvements which are necessitated by or benefit the Santa Ana Heights. F. The arterial highway improvements which are to be funded by this Program are shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. The total cost of said street improvements in current (1986) dollars is presently estimated to be approximately Ten Million Dollars ($10 million), allocated as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. b _ 7 521- 303/ #4 -1- • • UNDERSTANDING 1. Each of the parties will participate in the Program for a period of five (5) years. 2. Each of the CITIES will commit funds to this Program in an amount based on the schedule set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto, as applied to building permits issued by such City for development occurring within its portion of the Primary Study Area. Each of the parties may raise the funds by imposition of a fee schedule conforming to Exhibit C or in any manner deemed appropriate by said party. 3. Orange County will fully fund improvements in County of Orange area as described in Exhibit B including all inflationary costs and other costs not anticipated in the estimated improvement costs. 4. Funds committed by the parties will be used to pay for those improvements identified in Exhibit B, as within the jurisdiction of that party. Each party can rearrange schedules for projects on Exhibit B, but changes will be reported pursuant to paragraph 7. 5. The parties will monitor development and improvement needs included in this Agreement on an annual basis in order to determine timing, priority and feasibility of the projects, and revise the attached Exhibits B and C, if necessary, on an annual basis in accordance with the provisions set forth below in paragraph 9. 6. Each of the CITIES will deposit any and all monies collected by said party under paragraph 2 into a special fund, and cause such monies to be invested prudently until required for purposes of construction of the public improvements contemplated hereby, in order that the present worth of such monies, when collected, shall be reduced as little as possible by the effects of inflation. 7. Each of the CITIES will report to the other parties any and all sums of money committed to the special fund by such party, pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Agreement. Beginning December 31, 1986, and each six months period during the term of the Agreement, each of the CITIES will report to each of the other parties, within fifteen (15) days, the balance(s) of the deposits in the foregoing special fund. 8. Each of the parties will diligently pursue the execution of the projects within their jurisdiction according to the implementation schedule included in Exhibit B, and report to each of the other parties progress made on the projects and any delays encountered in the scheduled execution time of the projects. 9. Each of the parties will designate and appoint a City Council member or County Supervisor to the Intercity Liaison Committee (ICLC) whose purpose shall be to review the program project progress, and make revisions in the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program subject to the provisions of this MOU. 10. It is mutually understood that this MOU does not bind any party to undertake any particular action, does not contain the necessary elements of a contract, and cannot be the basis for any claim of justifiable reliance, but is intended simply to identify the actions and current understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Memorandum. 521- 303/ #4 -2- 6 /0-6 0 • DATED on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: 1 , CITY OF NEWPORT BEACff APPROVED AS TO FORM: I Y ATTORNEY ATTEST: - • • Lei. ,, ROVED AS �.r� • / CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF IRVINE APPROVED 0 TO FORM: A Cr/CLERK OF SANTA A A APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY A NEY NEWPORT BEACH CITY OF COSTA MESA By i4P6 I.QYOR 4�� 521- 303/ #4 -3- CITY OF IRVINE By Z,11,1/ /ol 0l8b MAYO CITY OF SANTA ANA By k4—' MAYOR A? City Manager 0 APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY 7TEST: ORANGE COUNTY By GG4N- 4 CLERK 0 F tt+E Z CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD APPROVED AS TO FORM: CG C U Y ATTORNEY ATTEST: SIGNED AND CERTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THIS OTH1E CHAIRMAN dF THE BOARDED TO LINDA 0. ROBERTS Clerk of the Board of Supervisors County of Orange, Cali(ornia THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN PSKERTS OFFICE. ATTEST: !ice 'l LINDA 0. , Cf ert of the Board Of Supervisors County of Orange BY (�; jL , DEPUTY 521 - 303/ #4 -4- < 01 co LU LL D ,j 'f 7. d' I kk 61, T-1 oS, cr -j LU C3 Ica if cr D uj c Z 7�l co LLI uj LLJ < 01 co LU LL D ,j 'f 7. d' I kk 61, T-1 EXHIRIT R INTERCITY LIAISON COMMITTEE IMPROVEMENT LIST ARTERIAL FUNDING PROGRAM Program Fiscal Year Funding Programmed for Allocation Construction Improvements in Newport Beach Campus Dr. between Bristol St. and MacArthur Blvd. (a): Install a median in area north of Bristol St. and in area south of MacArthur Blvd. to reduce left -turn opportunities $ 40,000 1987 -88 Campus Dr. at Dove St.: Install a traffic signal 100,000 1987 -88 Quail St. between Birch St. and Campus Dr.: Eliminate parking and restripe to provide one WB left -turn lane and one right /through lane at approach to Campus Drive 20,000 1988 -89 Dove Street between Birch St. and Campus Dr.: Eliminate parking and restripe to provide one WB left -turn lane and one right /through lane at approach to Campus Dr. 20,000 1987 -88 MacArthur Blvd. at Campus Dr.: Add a second EB to NB left -turn lane 152,000 1986 -87 SUBTOTAL - Newport Beach $ 332,000 Improvements in Santa Ana Main St. from north of Warner Ave. to Route 55: Upgrade to six lanes and improve all major intersections $1,411,000 1986 -87 Bristol St. at Warner Ave.: Add additional NB through lane on Bristol St. 744,000 1989 -90 Bear St. between MacArthur Blvd. and Alton Ave.: Construct west side of roadway 100,000 1985 -86 Bristol St. between railroad tracks and MacArthur Blvd.: Add third SB lane 100,000 1985 -86 Warner Ave. at Grand Ave.: Add third lane in each direction on Grand Ave. 234,000 1986 -87 521- 303/ #4 -1- 10-7 Program Fiscal Year Funding Programmed for Allocation Construction Improvements in Santa Ana (Continued) MacArthur Blvd. at Route 55: Add third WB lane on MacArthur Blvd. between SB Route 55 off -ramp terminal to just east of Main St. and lengthen SB Route 55 off -ramp terminal $ 30,000 1985 -86 Grand Avenue between Dyer Road and SB Route 55 off -ramp: Install raised median 55,000 1985 -86 Route 55 at SB Dyer Road off -ramp: Reconfigure ramp to allow left turns onto WB Dyer Road 375,000 1985 -86 Main Street at Sunflower Avenue: Intersection improvements and signalization 200,000 1985 -86 Sunflower Ave. between Susan St. and Fairview Rd: Widen to provide one additional WB lane 60,000 1987 -88 Segerstrom Ave. between Susan St. and Channel: Widen to provide one additional WB through lane 180,000 1988 -89 Dyer Rd. between Halladay St. and Main St: Widen to major standards within 100 ft. of right -of -way 300,000 1988 -89 SUBTOTAL - Santa Ana $3,789,000 Improvements in Costa Mesa Bristol St. between Red Hill Ave. and Baker St.: Construct as 6 -lane major arterial $ 493,000 1988 -89 Baker Street between Bristol St. and Route 73: Widen to provide three WB and two EB through lanes; intersection improvements at Baker St. /Bristol St. 120,000 1987 -88 Sunflower Avenue at Hyland Avenue: Install a traffic signal 100,000 1989 -90 Bristol St. at Sunflower Avenue: Construct NB right -turn lane and eliminate median signals 100,000 1986 -87 Bristol St. at Town Center Drive: Provide WB right -turn lane, extend NB right -turn lane, reconstruct signals 100,000 1985 -86 Bristol St. between Town Center Drive and Anton Blvd: Provide fourth SB through lane 200,000 1987 -88 O (0', 521- 303/ #4 -2- E Improvements in Costa Mesa (Continued) Widen Harbor Blvd. on SB approach at NB I -405 off -ramp at South Coast Dr. Bristol St. between NB I -405 on -ramp and NB I -405 off -ramp: Provide fourth NB lane Bristol St. on SB approach to I -405: Construct overhead lane assignment sign bridge South Coast Drive at Bear Street: Complete South Coast Drive, modify existing traffic signal and construct median modifications to Bear Street south of intersection Fairview Road at I -405 Ramps: Widen Fairview Road overcrossing to provide six lanes Bristol St. at Route 55 Ramp: Add storage area and improve signal coordination Del Mar Ave. at Orange Ave.: Add WB and EB left -turn lane and install traffic signal SUBTOTAL - Costa Mesa Improvements in Irvine Main St. from Route 55 to east of San Diego Creek: Upgrade to six lanes and improve all major inter- sections and widen San Diego Creek Bridge MacArthur Blvd. at Red Hill Ave.: Improve substandard SB right -turn lane Main St. at Sky Park South: Install traffic signal Jamboree Blvd. at I -405: Provide free right -turn from NB I -405 off -ramp onto NB Jamboree Blvd.; improve Jamboree Blvd. to accommodate free right -turn lane; restripe NB Jamboree Blvd. to provide third through lane SUBTOTAL - Irvine 0 Program Fiscal Year Funding Programmed for Allocation Construction $ 80,000 1986 -87 50,000 1988 -89 20,000 1987 -88 300,000 1987 -88 250,000 1989 -90 100,000 1989 -90 120,000 1989 -90 $2,033,000 $2,115,000 1985 -86 through 1988 -89 50,000 1987 -88 100,000 1986 -87 $ 200,000 1987 -88 $ 2,465,000 521- 303/ #4 -3- /0— 1/ 0 —/' Improvements in County of Orange Area Del Mar Ave. at Santa Ana Ave: Add WB and EB left -turn lanes; install traffic signal Mesa Drive at Santa Ana Ave: Modify WB and EB approaches to be one right /through plus one left -turn lane; install traffic signal Mesa Dr. at Irvine Ave: Modify EB and WB approaches to allow one right /through and one left -turn lane; modify traffic signal University Dr. at Irvine Ave: Modify EB approach to provide two left -turn lanes and one right /through lane Irvine Ave. at Orchard Dr: Install a traffic signal SUBTOTAL - County of Orange Area TOTAL - Arterial Funding Program 10'/ 521- 303/ #4 -4- u Program Funding Allocation $150,000 150,000 150,000 20,000 100,000 $ 570,000 $8,969,000 Fiscal Year Programmed for Construction 1985 -86 1986 -87 1986 -87 1985 -86 1986 -87 0 0 ICLC 5 -YEAR TRANSPORTATION STUDY RECOMMENDED FEE SCHEDULE* Single Family Housing Multiple Family Housing Offices Retails Commercial Hotel Industrial Uses Warehouse Uses 650 / DU 475 / DU 750 / 1000 sq. ft. 2600 / 1000 sq. ft. 700 / Room 2325 / Acre 1750 / Acre *NOTE: The resultant charges from this recommendation equate to $58 per trip, rounded off to the nearest $25. 521- 303/ #4 -I- 113 • • CITY OF COSTA MESA CALIFORNIA 92628.1200 P. 0. BOX 1200 FROM THE OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK Mrs. Wanda Raggio, City Clerk City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92663 Dear Wanda: October 23, 1986 /OC A S NEWPORT CITY BECH, r CAL(f OCT 271986 ► °- RECEIVED CITY C! ERK At its regular meeting of September 15, 1986, the City Council of the City of Costa Mesa approved the Memorandum of Understanding for a five -year Arterial Transportation Program. Attached are seven original agreements which have been executed by the Mayor. Please have these signed by your officials and forward them to the City of Santa Ana. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call this office. EPP:me Enclosures (7) cc: City of Santa Ana Very truly yours, EILEEN P. PHINNEY UU City Clerk /Yh-c- 77 FAIR DRIVE (714) 754 -5223 CITPOF NEWPORT AACH October 29, 1986 OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 -8915 City Clerk City of Santa Ana 20 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92702 (714) 644 -3005 RE: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITIES OF NEWPORT BEACH, SANTA ANA, IRVINE, AND COSTA MESA AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE REGARDING FINANCING FOR ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA OF SOUTH COAST PLAZA AND JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT Attached are seven original agreements which have been executed by the Mayor. Please have these signed and forward them to the Chairman of the Orange County Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, Wanda E. Raggio City Clerk WER:pm Enclosures (7) 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach TO: CITY COUNCIL E September 22, 1986 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA ITEM NO. F -3(a) FROM: Public Works Department /Traffic Engineering GAY Tick CITY COUNCIL CITY OF NEWPORT REACH SEP 2 2 1980 APPROVED SUBJECT: INTERCITY LIAISON COMMITTEE HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to execute the attached agreement among the Cities of Newport Reach, Costa Mesa, Irvine and Santa Ana, as well as the County of Orange. DISCUSSION The Intercity Liaison Committee (ICLC) has been working for several years to identify highway improvements that will be needed over the next five years within the study area. The study area is shown on page 6 of the agreement (Exhibit I) and includes the portion of Newport Beach northerly of Mesa Drive. The culmination of this effort is the attached Memorandum of Understanding, stating that each agency agrees to perform the identified arterial highway improvements within its jurisdiction. It does not address freeway improvements, nor does it propose the pooling of agency funds. Exhibit II is the Executive Summary of the Transportation Study which identified the recommended improvements. The estimated cost of all improvements is $8,969,000, of which $332,000 would be required for those in Newport Beach. Five improvements have been identified within the City. They include the installation of a median at certain locations on Campus Drive; a new traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Drive and Dove Street; parking restrictions on Dove and Quail Streets to provide two westbound lanes approaching Campus Drive; and the addition of a second eastbound left -turn lane from Campus Drive to MacArthur Boulevard. The last improvement has previously been conditioned on two developments under the City's Traffic Phasing Ordinance. Iof2 )s) C 2 a CITY COUNCIL 9 -22 -86 Intercity Liaison Committee Highway Improvement Program is The agreement provides that each agency is free to raise the necessary funds in any manner they choose. Staff has worked under the assumption that no separate fee program would be established in the study area but rather that Fair Share fees would be utilized for the improvements. The current Fair Share fee is $84.85 per daily trip generated. The level of development anticipated in the ICLC study results in a fee of approximately $58 per daily trip to fund the identified improvement program. The agreement is the culmination of considerable effort on the part of the four cities and, more recently, the County. It represents a cooperative approach to dealing with anticipated traffic problems on a sub - regional basis. The ICLC has reviewed the agreement and recommends its adoption by the participating agencies. Richard M. Edmonston Traffic Engineer RME: bb Attachments: Exhibit I -- ICLC Memorandum of Understanding Exhibit II -- Executive Summary of ICLC Study 2 o 2 Arterial MOU August 7, 1986 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITIES OF NEWPORT BEACH, SANTA ANA, IRVINE, AND COSTA MESA AND THE COUNTY OF ORANGE REGARD- ING FINANCING FOR ARTERIAL STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE AREA OF SOUTH COAST PLAZA AND JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is entered into this day of 1986, between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, the CITY OF COSTA MESA, the CITY OF IRVINE, and the CITY OF SANTA ANA, each of which is a municipal corporation of the State of California and is hereinafter referred to as "Newport Beach," "Costa Mesa," "Irvine," and "Santa Ana," respectively, and collectively as "CITIES," and the County of Orange which is a political subdivision and is hereinafter referred to as "Orange County." RECITALS A. Based on existing and anticipated future traffic volumes and emerging development patterns, the cities of Newport Beach, Santa Ana, Irvine, and Costa Mesa and the County of Orange recognize the need. for a coordinated arterial highway improvement program as an integral part of the total circulation system in the area outlined in attached Exhibit A. B. The parties seek hereby to set out an arterial program by means of which the vehicular traffic impacts, resulting from implementation of said development, may be dealt with in such a manner as to make manageable, to the greatest extent possible, the need for public street improvement that will be created thereby. (The "Program "). C. Each of the parties has heretofore participated in a cooperative technical analysis of the nature, extent, and approximate cost of the public street improvements that will be made necessary by reason of the increased vehicular traffic loads, that will be generated within the first five years hereafter by new development within said Primary Study Area. D. Each of the CITIES has heretofore collected development fees wit +in its portion of the Primary Study Area for the cost of the public street improvements that will be made necessary by reason of the increased vehicular traffic loads. E. ORANGE COUNTY intends to utilize Orange County Development Agency funds for public street improvements which are necessitated by or benefit the Santa Ana Heights. F. The arterial highway improvements which are to be funded by this Program are shown on Exhibit B attached hereto. The total cost of said street improvements in current (1986) dollars is presently estimated to be approximately Ten Million Dollars ($10 million), allocated as shown on Exhibit B, attached hereto. EXHIBIT I 521- 303/ #4 -1- 3 UNDERSTANDING 1. Each of the parties will participate in the Program for a period of five (5) years. 2. Each of the CITIES will commit funds to this Program in an amount based on the schedule set forth in Exhibit C, attached hereto, as applied to building permits issued by such City for development occurring within its portion of the Primary Study Area. Each of the parties may raise the funds by imposition of a fee schedule conforming to Exhibit C or in any manner deemed appropriate by said party. 3. Orange County will fully fund improvements in County of Orange area as described in Exhibit B including all inflationary costs and other costs not anticipated in the estimated improvement costs. 4. Funds committed by the parties will be used to pay for those improvements identified in Exhibit B, as within the jurisdiction of that party. Each party can rearrange schedules for projects on Exhibit B; but changes will be reported pursuant to paragraph 7. 5. The parties will monitor development and improvement needs included in this Agreement on an annual basis in order to determine timing, priority and feasibility of the projects, and revise the attached Exhibits B and C, if necessary, on an annual basis in accordance with the provisions set forth below in paragraph 9. 6. Each of the CITIES will deposit any and all monies collected by said party under paragraph 2 into a special fund, and cause such monies to be invested prudently until required for purposes of construction of the public improvements contemplated hereby, in order that the present worth of such monies, when collected, shall be reduced as little as possible by the effects of inflation. 7. Each of the CITIES will report to the other parties any and all sums of money committed to the special fund by such party, pursuant to paragraph 2 of this Agreement. Beginning December 31, 1986, and each six months period during the term of the Agreement, each of the CITIES will report to each of the other parties, within fifteen (15) days, the balance(s) of the deposits in the foregoing special fund. 8. Each of the parties will diligently pursue the execution of the projects within their jurisdiction according to the implementation schedule included in Exhibit B, and report to each of the other parties progress made on the projects and any delays encountered in the scheduled execution time of the projects. 9. Each of the parties will designate and appoint a City Council member or County Supervisor to the Intercity Liaison Committee (ICLC) whose purpose shall be to review the program project progress, and make revisions in the Five -Year Capital Improvement Program subject to the provisions of this MOU. 10. It is mutually understood that this MOU does not bind any party to undertake any particular action, does not contain the necessary elements of a contract, and cannot be the basis for any claim of justifiable reliance, but is intended simply to identify the actions and current understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Memorandum. 521 - 303/ #4 -2- a `i DATED on the day and year First above written. ATTEST: CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH . By CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: CITY OF COSTA MESA APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF IRVINE APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF SANTA ANA APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY C 521 - 303/ #4 -3- CITY OF COSTA MESA By MAYOR CITY OF IRVINE By MAYOR CITY OF SANTA ANA By MAYOR APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY ATTEST: COUNTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY ATTEST: 6 521- 303/ #4 -4- ORANGE COUNTY By CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD cr < Z w 0 m < CL, LU LLJ CC z LLI Lu 0 i.. -�u2 1"T!i T-1 -1 Z 0 C3 Ld r X Z 0 C3 Ld EXHIBIT B RCITY LIAISON COMMITTEE IMPROVEMENT LIST ARTERIAL FUNDING PROGRAM Improvements in Newport Beach Campus Dr. between Bristol St. and MacArthur Blvd. (a): Install a median in area north of Bristol St. and in area south of MacArthur Blvd. to reduce left -turn opportunities Campus Dr. at Dove St.: Install a traffic signal Quail St. between Birch St. and Campus Dr.: Eliminate parking and restripe to provide one WB left -turn lane and one right /through lane at approach to Campus Drive Dove Street between Birch St. and Campus Dr.: Eliminate parking and restripe to provide one WB left -turn lane and one right /through lane at approach to Campus Dr. MacArthur Blvd. at Campus Dr.: Add a second EB to NB left -turn lane SUBTOTAL - Newport Beach Improvements in Santa Ana Main St. from north of Warner Ave. to Route 55: Upgrade to six lanes and improve all major intersections Bristol St. at Warner Ave.: Add additional NB through lane on Bristol St. Bear St. between MacArthur Blvd. and Alton Ave.: Construct west side of roadway Bristol St. between railroad tracks and MacArthur Blvd.: Add third SB lane Warner Ave. at Grand Ave.: Add third lane in each direction on Grand Ave. 521- 303/ #4 Ir -I- Program Funding A ltnn o4inn $ 40,000 100,000 20,000 20,000 152,000 $ 332,000 $1,411,000 744,000 100,000 100,000 234,000 Fiscal Year Programmed for Construction 1987 -88 1987 -88 1988 -89 1987 -88 1986 -87 1989 -90 ELY 1985 -86 1986 -87 Improvements in Santa Ana (Continued) MacArthur Blvd. at Route 55: Add third WB lane on MacArthur Blvd. between SB Route 55 off -ramp terminal to just east of Main St. and lengthen SB Route 55 off -ramp terminal Grand Avenue between Dyer Road and SB Route 55 off -ramp: Install raised median Route 55 at SB Dyer Road off -ramp: Reconfigure ramp to allow left turns onto WB Dyer Road Main Street at Sunflower Avenue: Intersection improvements and signalization Sunflower Ave. between Susan St. and Fairview Rd: Widen to provide one additional WB lane Segerstrom Ave. between Susan St. and Channel: Widen to provide one additional WB through lane Dyer Rd. between Halladay St. and Main St: Widen to major standards within 100 ft. of right -of -way SUBTOTAL - Santa Ana Improvements in Costa Mesa Bristol St. between Red Hill Ave. and Baker St.: Construct as 6 -lane major arterial Baker Street between Bristol St. and Route 73: Widen to provide three WB and two EB through lanes; intersection improvements at Baker St. /Bristol St. Sunflower Avenue at Hyland Avenue: Install a traffic signal Bristol St. at Sunflower Avenue: Construct NB right -turn lane and eliminate median signals Bristol St. at Town Center Drive: Provide WB right -turn lane, extend NB right -turn lane, reconstruct signals Bristol St. between Town Center Drive and Anton Blvd: Provide fourth SB through lane 521- 303/ #4 -2- i 0 Program Fiscal Year Funding Programmed for Allocation Construction $ 30,000 1985 -86 55,000 1985 -86 375,000 1985 -86 200,000 1985 -86 60,000 1987 -88 180,000 1988 -89 300,000 1988 -89 $3,789,000 $ 493,000 1988 -89 120,000 1987 -88 100,000 1989 -90 100,000 1986 -87 100,000 1985 -86 200,000 1987 -88 Program Fiscal Year Funding Programmed for Allocation Construction Improvements in Costa Mesa (Continued) Widen Harbor Blvd. on SB approach at NB I -405 off -ramp at South Coast Dr. $ 80,000 1986 -87 Bristol St. between NB I -405 on -ramp and NB I -405 off -ramp: Provide fourth NB lane 50,000 1988 -89 Bristol St. on SB approach to I -405: Construct overhead lane assignment sign bridge 20,000 1987 -88 South Coast Drive at Bear Street: Complete South Coast Drive, modify existing traffic signal and construct median modifications to Bear Street south of intersection 300,000 1987 -88 Fairview Road at I -405 Ramps: Widen Fairview Road overcrossing to provide six lanes 250,000 1989 -90 Bristol St. at Route 55 Ramp: Add storage area. and improve signal coordination 100,000 1989 -90 Del Mar Ave. at Orange Ave.: Add WB and EB left -turn lane and install traffic signal 120,000 1989 -90 SUBTOTAL - Costa Mesa $2,033,000 Improvements in Irvine Main St. from Route 55 to east of San Diego Creek: Upgrade to six lanes and improve all major inter- $2,115,000 1985 -86 sections and widen San Diego Creek Bridge through 1988 -89 MacArthur Blvd. at Red Hill Ave.: Improve substandard SB right -turn lane 50,000 1987 -88 Main St. at Sky Park South: Install traffic signal 100,000 1986 -87 Jamboree Blvd. at I -405: Provide free right -turn from NB I -405 off -ramp onto NB Jamboree Blvd.; improve Jamboree Blvd. to accommodate free right -turn lane; restripe NB Jamboree Blvd. to provide third through lane $ 200,000 1987 -88 SUBTOTAL - Irvine $ 2,465,000 521 - 303/ #4 10 -3- Improvements in County of Orange Area Del Mar Ave. at Santa Ana Ave: Add WB and EB left -turn lanes; install traffic signal Mesa Drive at Santa Ana Ave: Modify WB and EB approaches to be one right /through plus one left -turn lane; install traffic signal Mesa Dr. at Irvine Ave: Modify EB and WB approaches to allow one right /through and one left -turn lane; modify traffic signal University Dr. at Irvine Ave: Modify EB approach to provide two left -turn lanes and one right /through lane Irvine Ave. at Orchard Dr: Install a traffic signal SUBTOTAL - County of Orange Area TOTAL - Arterial Funding Program 521 - 303/ #4 -4- Program Fiscal Year Funding Programmed for Allocation Construction $150,000 150,000 150,000 20,000 100,000 $ 570,000 $8,969,000 1986 -87 1985 -86 1986 -87 0 EXHIBIT C ICLC 5 -YEAR TRANSPORTATION STUDY RECOMMENDED FEE SCHEDULE* Single Family Housing Multiple Family Housing Offices Retails Commercial Hotel Industrial Uses Warehouse Uses 650 / DU 475 / DU 750 / 1000 sq. ft. 2600 / 1000 sq. ft. 700 / Room 2325 / Acre 1750 / Acre *NOTE: The resultant charges from this recommendation equate to $58 per trip, rounded off to the nearest $25. 521- 303/ #4 12 -I- INTER CITY LIAISON COMMITTEE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND Inter -City Liaison Committee: In the spring of 1982 the ICLC five year transportation study was initiated by the cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach and Santa Ana for the purpose of analyzing short term (5 year) transportation needs in an area encompassing approximately 15 square miles in the area surrounding John Wayne Airport, Irvine Business Complex, and South Coast Metro. In June of 1985 the four cities undertook another reevaluation of the ICLC study, specifically to assess the desirability of inviting the county to participate in the fee program. John Wayne Airport EIR 508: The Board on February 26, 1985 adopted the JWA Master Plan and Land Use Compatibility. Plan (LUCP). In certifying EIR 508 the Board adopted a number of ground transportation mitigation measures ranging from intersection improvements to a freeway access system providing direct freeway connections to the new terminal. Implementation of these mitigation measures over the next 10 to 15 years will require approval of the affected local state and federal agencies. All of the county required improvements identified in the ICLC transportation improvement program which are planned for implementation by 1990, are also required as mitigation measures for EIR 508 or are required to be constructed as part of airport master plan or Santa Ana Heights development. In addition, one project listed under the city of Newport Beach is also identified as an EIR 508 mitigation measure. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS The ICLC five year transportation improvement program identifies a cost of $21,164,200 for arterial and freeway improvements between now and 1990. This 21 million dollars would be raised through various funding mechanisms within each jurisdiction which amounts to a fee equivalent to $58 per trip end generated by new development. Each member city of ICLC collects revenues by a different mechanism; for example, Santa Ana collects fees based on 1% of the building permit value, Irvine collects $4.75 per square foot for new development in the Irvine Business Complex. The county's contribution to the improvements (based on an increase in trip end growth in SAH) would be $1,374,600 of which $570,000 would be required for arterial highway improvements with the balance ($804,600) for freeway improvements, (Page IV -4 of ICLC Transportation Study). It was estimated that fees would only be collected from future development in Santa Ana Heights area since John Wayne Airport Master Plan implementation will offset circulation deficiencies identified in the airport area. IMPLEMENTATION In all cases implementation of the arterial highway improvements could be implemented by each participating agency through an agreement Memorandum of Understanding (MOU); however, since some participating agencies are capital donor cities for regional freeway improvements at the MacArthur and Jamboree interchanges at I -405, a more legally binding Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) has been suggested. EXHIBIT II 13 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT Table 1 identifies the ICLC improvements and Figure 1 the location of the improvements that would be required of the county, in addition, Table 1 contains a cross reference to EIR 508 traffic mitigation measures or improvements of the Master Plan. These EIR 508 mitigation measures are shown in entirety in Table 2. As can be seen from the ICLC improvement list all items are attributable to EIR 508 mitigation measures or to the actual improvements contemplated as part of the Airport master Plan or Santa Ana Heights Land Use Compatibility Plan (LUCP). Table 1 also identified funding responsibility by either John Wayne Airport or the Santa Ana Heights Development Agency. In summary, the county's contribution to ICLC would require a commitment to spend an estimated $570,000 (income from a redevelopment agency) for arterial highway improvements for Santa Ana Heights development. The remainder of $804,600 (Page IV -4 of ICLC Study) that would be required for regional freeway improvements could be financed out of airport funding programs since there was a commitment to make improvements to the MacArthur /I -405 interchange (EIR 508 mitigation measure #'s 7 and 8). John Wayne Airport would be also responsible for implementing $795,00 worth of additional transportation improvements to arterial highways that will be implemented as part of development of the Master Plan. The total commitment by the county would be $1,599,600 by John Wayne Airport and $570,000 by the Santa Ana Heights Development Agency. BP:bw(11 -1) -2- M 15 v M M A xM 6 m O C 0 m v a C O M O O O O O O u u O O O O O O m •.� O O O p O O u .+ o •.+ vi vi o 0 0 0 6 3 m 'l G u O m PL yr O m U W a W W a a ti d u O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O z N N O O O O O N u'f vl vl N Vl O H m E- < O U E ar H F H %v U W H 00 U K k W O C i4 w n W W o rn w w m 4 .0 w 7 .+ F iai W W z W a a O w n 6 F a H W W u F s+ A U 0 U W B W H w 7 W 2 o a a w w 0 F En n H m A a d •.Ci W a v b 7 G b •o U V N L b W W > C H W I m O W u u co > u u G 1.7 .-+ W V u m w >\ go m H .0 M w G m i u W w .. > m m m W w H H A Y1 .� .ti W u .� O 3 W u W m q .WI B O GO O O W '+ W m w 7 C U u W W W C 0. L m W G P. G A W 0 U s+ W m w >' w m O p m W s. 00 B A u B u m 0 70. z 0 O •• H •.+ M u U u M M O Y4 W 0. u G m t d i. .. m 7 I m m ti d> $+ B o a W m u ra v v u m u 0 0 w M o m u B u W .. W > m W u G ti, m $. •.4 0 6 U H p o 0 W0. F7 A C u 7 .G >. W PG m m ty W W L W $4 V O W O CO m W M O W C W u v u M u M aW z m 1 o m v ra q •.+ 3 3 N-0 u •.r d m u m -V to W W W ++ C W u s' W >. , ca G C W G • '0 G W A B m M N u m H a W O M W�r M b O .•+ M -0 C O A A u G C m s+ m H > M V u > V W m L > m u 0 1+ 0 m C B •m a u w m m O O u W 0. C > U m u s• > r-i G W u q W OCp O W s, m~ A p, 3 W 14 B W $a CO *0 W M m i4 u m 0 •.� rl •'1 U {4 m .� "] m 7 G 7 W B 7 a M P. e q m C u P. O P. s. m q u W W G O 0. C O S4 m C W C 0 S+ > u 7 W z y s❑ 3 v H �--� O m ,a s+ m u 00 U W '�W m C m a 66 u 60 aam 8 and 9) m m t0. s0+ aH t m Uy B H ca z £ U U 15 v 0 0 0 0 0 0 u o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ci o C M O O O O O O 6 m U C O ai 4} y I a 0 +� o .a M V1 P � 6 •a n 3 m O va m w a H u O O O O O m O O O O O d O O O O O O rn U v O M O O O O O C N �/1 V1 vl N O --� N M C w w u w C •• m ro O C •.� w m H ur w C V M1 O C 3+ S p N N N N P4 w E 0 H W 7 w eel z a N w V C s co o+ a w a V w E H W � w Z a w u w •• O M C O m u W w w M C w w 7 v w C •• m ro m C •.� w m v ro C w ro .+ w m O •^ M. -O O ro E 0 > O m .+ 7 0 p w w C m C w C d C ca i. F C C O ro bo w u a.� u w a u ro ro M u •0 M o¢ C W m ,b M G A 4 u w M V F' w ro V a E w Od m w W 00 0 w fA OD w H m W W 0 V M u M C 0 M u O w M 3+ u V ro O W H u Cv 1+ C > •.+ 0 C.0 ro 0 OO Ww ro W W ro C ,G ro M C w 0 u W M w C• 4 00 u L w ro 4] ro u r1 H ty w W > ro 7 0 ro u 0 O w ro M u 0 O 0 .+ L {. pq y. w ro ro ro W 30 u O W u C T w '+ 00 .j w u 0 > •+ w T M u .+ w T .+ C T T T w N N u ¢ > L mp > u % m .0 7 u M u M cc M M M~ ¢ Iwv m wv ww d0 l -0 vv my 0y00 m VI U ro v C O O C w M O O O C O i+ 0 3 M w C S d M Z o . m z u 0 E Z u 4 H to ca > M + m m > A I(O 2 S O H o • L O C A I� x •.+ In 6 m G O u} m w a w 00 u o G w w w 00 w A N W 7 w w z a w O O L O O u N A O rn •w ao In 3 G U O w H O m w a m U w e o 0 0 0 0 U H W 7 �O O H n m os T vl u O c+1 u1 E m v> yr w 00 u o G w w w 00 w A N W 7 w w z a w u G w U O w 00 a w A U w e H W 7 � z m ,c L c w m co m O 0 D w m m w m w > m pq x w H u v t w H Co w u u m 00 G u - O w' 1-4 •'1 G U G G co � u m w G G w> 3 m •w m • m m m w w w w z P O N G u G EE H Z U G v e w G u u w G C m m mum 4) 0) u s. E u o u u u u m w u m 4 u u 3 +1 •.+ +r o w '+ 1/1 > G O w 00 G N 3 3 3 m o w 0 o w .0 1 ++ w u m m S G G w 'C G A u u u u cy — 1 Vl " 11 O •M M GO u 0 u u • V H O m 00$ co M w w w w mw M d u In C w b w • • • •0 u .+ u 1 W O •.I •- w m a O O O O 0 0 0 G z ++ m N w � 3 w w u m w w w w w A W > 1 +> I o e G w .+ G m w w a w a a + -u u G .+ H .� M w m w G '• C O iC W 4 c OH u u u L mG w co W 1 1 w w G G G G G> o e H> P wwow w G> -A 14 w e w p9 u 0 7 w w .1 z w .•1 •C cp 0 O 0 O O O w O O w U L$4 ,G W H 00 O 1J m W M w w 7 m w O w w w w U w c a w 0 G M u G W U e u 0 u y m'C'C • w'C a W Pz AAAA w to n N w U> ty G M I w 7 H w L m M .'i M M u U 'C O O 11 d .G m F m m m m m (d '0 w G w C w G co u G O 0 0 0 w 3 w d aowazA -+ cn z w F P. wawa gtin.7 ww.c w u 0 w 0 5 G O w m A u b W z u 0 A u .. v... .. v 11 u'1 0 3 P w W 10 L LI NORTH FEET: T 15W 3DW Funding Responsibilities JWA* SAH I* ■ SURVEY y :d L NORTH FEET: T 15W 3DW Funding Responsibilities JWA* SAH I* ■ SURVEY TABLE 2 HIE 508 TRAFFIC MITIGATION MEASURES REFERENCE NUMBER Phase I Mitigation. A peak hour limit of 12 scheduled departures per hour will be imposed as discussed in Section 4.15.7.7. Phase II Mitigation. In order to reduce or eliminate the tra is impacts from implementation of the JWA Master Plan and LUCP, and also improve traffic access to the airport, a group of mitigation measures is proposed to be implemented. The objective of these mitigation measures is to do one of the following: o Reduce the V/C ratio to 0.90 or less o reduce the V/C ratio (with project) to at least the "no project" level, if without the project the V/C ratio is already above 0.90. Transportation /circulation improvements required to fully mitigate the traffic impacts from the project are described below: Freeway Access Ramp Additions. The John Wayne Airport Freeway Access Study prepared for the Orange County Environmental Management Agency by PRC Engineering in May, 1984 included preliminary plans and profiles for alternative ramp improvements and recommended five new access ramps to /from the airport site (illustrated in Figure 4.10 -8). Each of the proposed ramps would have appropriate signing to'direct motorists to the Airport. o Ramp A - -A direct entrance ramp linking eastbound (I) SR73 to the airport on the south. o Ramp E - -An airport exit ramp to westbound SR73. (2) o Ramp Fl--An entrance ramp from southbound SR55 to (3) the airport terminal building. o Ramp B - -An entrance ramp from northbound I -405 to (4) the airport terminal building. o Ramp D1 - -An exit ramp from the airport to south- (5) bound I -405. (I)(A) a ZO Ramps B, F1 and Airport Way South shall be operational prior to or concurrent with Phase II implementation. Detailed terminal design shall provide for all ramp connections as identified in Figure 4.10 -6. Ramps A, B and D1 shall be operational as target year need is identified through the annual traffic monitoring program. Preliminary design and construction phasing shall be approved by the Board of Supervisors prior to or concurrent with Phase II implementation. Surface Street Improvements o Main /MacArthur _intersection a- -Add eastbound and westbound (Main) right turn lanes. o MacArthur /I -405 NB intersection- -Add northbound through lane and westbound left turn lanes. o MacArthur /I -405 SB intersection a- -Add southbound left turn lane. o MacArthur /Michelson intersectiona - -make both westbound and eastbound approaches 4 lanes; with one right only; one through only; and two left only lanes. Add northbound left turn and southbound right turn lanes. o MacArthur /Campus intersection- -Add eastbound and westbound left turn lanes. o MacArthur /Birch intersection - -Add eastbound through lane and make dual left turn lanes; make single westbound left turn lane with two through only lanes. o MacArthur /Jamboree intersection - -Add southbound (MacArthur) left turn lane. o Michelsonljamboree intersection a- -Add a southbound (Jamboree) through lane. o Campus /Jamboree intersection -- Revise westbound lanes to provide a right turn lane, a through lane, a left /through combination land, and a left turn lane. a Indicates intersections affected by the City of Irvine IBC Project where mutual circulation improvements will be coordinated through ICLC. (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) 2t o Campus /Airport(S) intersection - -Make two eastbound (15) and westbound lanes, a right turn only and a through /left on each approach. o Traffic impacts at all of the intersections along (16) Bristol Street north and south were mitigated through development of optimal lane configurations in conjunction with the Corona del Mar Freeway (SR73) improvements being made. o Red Ilill /Main intersections- -Add southbound and (17) eastbound (Main) left -turn lanes, and northbound and southbound through lanes. 0 Red Hill /MacArtbur intersectiona- -Add eastbound (18) and westbound (MacArthur) through lanes, and another southbound right -turn lane. o Jamboree /I -405 NB intersection - -Add northbound (19) and southbound (Jamboree) through lanes. o Irvine /Mesa intersection - -Widen the eastbound and (20) westbound (Mesa) approaches to allow for right - through, through, and left turn lanes. o Irvine /- University intersection -- Modify eastbound (21) (University) approach to be one right- through, one through, and one left -turn lane; and the westbound approach to one right- through, one through, and two left -turn lanes. o Irvine /22nd and Irvine /20th intersections -- Modify (22) eastbound and westbound approaches to be one right - through and one left -turn lane; add northbound and southbound through lanes. o Irvine /19th intersection -- Modify westbound (19th) (23) approach to be one right -only, one through and one left -turn lane. o Irvine /17th intersection -- Convert existing (24) eastbound (17th) right -only lane into an eastbound right- through lane. o Santa Ana /Del Mar (University) intersection - -Add (25) westbound and eastbound (Del Mat) left -turn lanes; add northbound and southbound through lanes. eIndicates intersections affected by the City of Irvine IBC Project where mutual circulation improvements will be coordinated through'ICLC. 2t o Santa Ana /Mesa intersection -- Modify eastbound and (26) westbound (Mesa) approaches to be one right - through lane, and one left -turn lane. o Santa Ana /Bristol intersection - -Add a northbound (27) (Santa Ana) through lane. Phased and coordinated implementation of the traffic (26) mitigation measures will be achieved via a monitoring program and interagency coordination. Annually, the EMA /Transportation -Flood Program Office shall evaluate existing conditions on the road system and recommend to the Board appropriate phasing of transportation mitigation measures which JWA shall be required to implement. The Annual evaluation shall ensure that mitigation is being and will be achieved. The annual evaluation shall also be prepared in coordination with interested agencies as discussed below. The County (John Wayne Airport) shall participate in a joint (29) local agency transportation improvement district in order to effectively and efficiently construct arterial and intersection improvements. Such inter - agency coordination could be accomplished through the Inter -City Liaison Committee (ICLC), composed of the cities of Irvine, Costa Mesa, Santa Ana, and Newport Beach. The traffic monitoring program should also in conjunction with the Inter -City Liaison Committee. Improvement costs would be assigned on a pro rata share based on contributions of new traffic generated by the JWA -LUCP project. Other mitigation measures include the following: 1. Irvine Avenue, from Bristol Street to Del Mar Avenue, (30) shall be upgraded from a primary to a major arterial highway on the Master Plan of Arterial Highways. (II) (A) 2. Improved public transportation services to John Wayne (31) Airport shall be promoted as an alternative to private vehicle access by providing terminal area and frontage dedicated to buses, limousines aIndicates intersections affected by the City of Irvine IBC Project where mutual circulation improvements will be coordinated through ICLC. 22 and taxis as part of the project's airport layout plan and retaining the option of accommodating light rail or other HOV approaches as proposed by OCTD. The Orange County Transit District will be consulted as to the design and location.of terminal transit facilities. (I,III)(B) 3. The list of recommended freeway access and surface (32) street improvements can be amended by interagency agreement so long as the objectives of the mitigation program are maintained (page 4.1047), and improvement costs are assigned on a pro -rata share based on contributions of new traffic generated by the combined John Wayne Airport expansion and LUCP project. 4. Initial development within the LUCP project area shall (33) be limited to a trip generation rate that does not exceed the 58,300 daily trips forecast for the currently adopted general plans for the County and City of Newport Beach. Continued development within the LUCP project area will be permitted only after the traffic /circulation mitigation measures recommended above are constructed or when sufficient capacity exists in the local arterial network as identified through the annual traffic monitoring program. (I)(B,C) 5. The potential for limited on -site parking and other (34) demand management techniques to reduce ground access impacts and substitute for transportation improvements listed above shall be investigated in coordination with the ICLC prior to approval of terminal construction plans; and be implemented as appropriate in conjunction with realted ACMP tactics L2, L31 and I25 and the LUCP TSM plans. (I)(A) 23