Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-2713 - General Plan Update Environmental Impact Report (EIR)v • 0 CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK P.O. BOX 1768, NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92658 -8915 (714) 644 -3005 TO: FINANCE DIRECTOR /� -/3 -9T FROM: CITY CLERK DATE: October 13, 1988 SUBJECT: Contract No. C -2713 Description of Contract Agreement for General Plan Update EIR Effective date of Contract July 27, 1988 Authorized by Minute Action, approved on July 25, 1988 Contract with The Butler Roach Group Address 1660 North Hotel Circle Drive, Suite 606 San Diego, CA 92108 Amount of Contract $56,460 "1� s 4e Wanda E. Raggio City Clerk WER:pm Attachment 3300 Newport Boulevard, Newport Beach 0 TO: 6 6 Ov City Council Meeting July 25, 1988 Agenda Item No. F -3(d) C - a7/3 City Council CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FROM: Planning Department SUBJECT: General Plan Update EIR Agreement BY THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF NEWPORT BEAM JUL 2 5 1988 APPROVED Approval to award contract for $56,460 to The Butler Roach Group for Environmental Impact Report Services in connection with the General Plan Update. SUGGESTED ACTION If desired, approve the award of a contract for the preparation of the General Plan Update EIR to The Butler Roach Group. The traffic study being prepared for the General Plan Update is under a separate contract to Austin -Foust for $50,000. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By Odn�t29� ROBERT P. LENARD Advance Planning Manager • RPL:jm C \CCSR \GPEIRl.rpl Attachment for City Council Only: Agreement BACKGROUND • The attached contract is for professional services to prepare the Environ- mental Impact Report for the General Plan Update. The proposed contract amount is $56,460. The City Council has budgeted $50,000 for this project, however it is expected that savings on other Planning Department capital projects will offset this cost overun. If not, a budget amendment will be processed later in the year. The traffic study being prepared for the General Plan Update is under a separate contract to Austin -Foust for $50,000. Respectfully submitted, PLANNING DEPARTMENT JAMES D. HEWICKER, Director By Odn�t29� ROBERT P. LENARD Advance Planning Manager • RPL:jm C \CCSR \GPEIRl.rpl Attachment for City Council Only: Agreement r • • C- z715 THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of G 1988, by c and between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal or' poration (hereinafter referred to as "City "), and THE BUTLER ROACH GROUP. INC. whose address is 1660 North Hotel Circle Drive, Suite 606, San Diego, California 92108 (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant "), is made with reference to the following: RECITAIS: A. The City has determined that it requires an Environmental Impact Report for the General Plan Review. B. Consultant agrees to prepare said report. C. City desires to have said report prepared by Consultant. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. GENERAL Consultant agrees to prepare the subject study in accordance with the requirements set forth in Paragraph 2 of the Agreement. City agrees to remit to Consultant the amounts set forth in Paragraph 3 of this Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in this document. 2. SCOPE OF WORK The subject study will be prepared in accordance with the Califor- nia Environmental Quality Act, (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, the Consultant proposal dated April 22. 1988, and designed as Exhibit "A" attached; and City Policy respectfully; and by reference incorporated herein at this point as if fully set forth. 3. BILLING AND PAYMENT Consultant shall be paid under this Agreement on a time and material basis and shall not exceed fifty -six thousand, four hundred sixty dollars and no cents ($56,460.00). Partial payments shall be made by City to Consultant upon Consultant's presentation of statements verifying the time and material costs incurred by it in connection with this Agreement. 4. STANDARD OF CARE Consultant agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the community professional standards and agrees that all - 1 0 0 services will be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City nor have any contractual relationship with the City. 5. INDEPENDENT PARTIES City and Consultant intend that the relation between them created by this Agreement is that of employer- independent consultant. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Consultant's services. None of the benefits provided by City to its employees, including but not limited to unemployment insurance, worker's compensation plans, vacation and sick leave are available from City to Consultant, its employees or agents. From any fees due Consultant, deduc- tions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer - employee relationship. Payments of the above items, if required, are the respon- sibility of Consultant. 6. SUBCONTRACTOR APPROVAL Unless prior written consent from the City is obtained, only those people and subcontractors whose names and resumes in this Agreement and any attachments thereto shall be used in the performance of this Agreement. 7. HOLD HARMLESS Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers and employees from and against any and all loss, damage, liability, claims, suits, costs and expenses what- soever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, regardless of the merit of any such claim or suit arising from or in any manner connected to Consultant's negligent performance of services or work conducted or performed pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers and employees from and against any and all loss, damage, liability, claims, suits, costs and expenses what- soever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, accruing or resulting to any and all persons, firms or corporations furnishing or supplying work, services, materials, equipment or supplies arising from or in any manner connected to the Consultant's negligent performance of services or work conducted or performed pursuant to this Agreement. M 0 0 8. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint venture or syndicate or contenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty percent (508) or more of the voting power of the corporation. 9. PERMITS AND LICENSES Consultant, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement, all appropriate permits, licenses and certifi- cates that may be required in connection with the performance of services hereunder. 10. REPORTS Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record and other document reproduced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of the City. No report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by the Consultant pursuant to this Agreement shall be made available to any individual or organization by the Consultant without prior approval by the City. Consultant shall, at such time and in such form as the City may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services required under this Agreement. 11. RECORDS Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. 3 - 0 Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consul- tant shall provide free access to the representatives of the City or its designees at l^ er times to such books and records, and gives the City the right to examine and audit same, and to make transcripts therefrom as necessary, anallow cti�on of all work, data, documents, proceedings -f-• 1 ji� i"-B*.u.J -, tyci✓. %c�ords,� a�.�u- /'- lice_ /° and ac ivi es related to this Agreement n Such r cords, together with�� supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. 12. NOTICES All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement, shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered personally or on the second business day after the deposit therof in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified, addressed as hereinafter provided. Newport Beach City Hall 3300 Newport Boulevard P.O. Box 1768 Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915 Attention: Patricia Temple All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from City to Consul- tant shall be addressed to Consultant at: The Butler Roach Butler Roach Grou�Inc 1660 North Hotel Circle Drive Suite 606 San Diego, CA 92108 Attention: Trish Butler 13. TERMINATION In the event Consultant hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions hereof at the time and in the manner required hereunder, Consultant shall be deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period of two (2) days after receipt by Consultant from City of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, City may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the Consultant written notice thereof. - 4 - 0 0 The City shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement by giving seven (7) days' written notice to Consultant as provided herein. Upon termination of this Agree- ment, each party shall pay to the other party that portion of compensation specified in this Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the effective date of termination. 14. COST OF LITIGATION If any legal action is necessary to enforce any provisions hereof or for damages by reason for an alleged breach of any provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all costs and expenses in such amount as the court may adjudge to be reasonable attorneys' fees. 15. COMPLIANCES Consultant shall comply with all laws, state or federal and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by the City. 16. WAIVER A waiver by the City of any breach of any term, covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained herein whether of the same or a different character. 17. INTEGRATED CONTRACT This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto and all prelim- inary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature ar merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Consultant. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have entered into this Agreement as of the date and year first above written. - 5 - 0 0 ATTEST: A2 \PLT \BUTLER.CON Attachment: Exhibit "A" CONSULTANT - 6 - TheBuder Roach Group • April 22, 1988 • • • EXHIBIT "A" The 8utlerlRoach Group, Inc. Planners 1660 North Hotel Circle Drive .Spite 606 San biego, California 92108 16191298 -7127 Ms. Patricia L. Temple, Principal Planner Planning Department City of Newport Beach 3300 Newport Boulevard Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915 SUBJECT: PROPOSAL TO PREPARE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 87 -1 Dear Ms. Temple: Thank you for this opportunity to present a proposal to provide the necessary environmental consulting services for the proposed General Plan Update. The Butler/Roach Group, Inc. is well qualified to provide the necessary professional services for preparation of the EIR and assistance at public meetings and hearings. We understand that time is of the essence and are prepared to assist the Planning Department to meet the schedule described in the enclosed proposal. Please accept this proposal as an expression of our sincere interest in providing these services for you. This proposal constitutes a formal offer by The Butler/Roach Group, Inc. to provide environmental consulting services according to the scope of services, performance schedule and cost estimate described herein. This offer is valid for a period of six months from the date of this proposal. I will be the principal -in- charge and project manager, Ms. Marion Bacon will be the associate project manager. If you have any questions regarding this proposal, please call me. Thank you again for inviting The Butler/Roach Group to assist you with this most interesting assignment. We very much look forward to working with you and the project team. Yours truly, THE BUTLER/ROACH GROUP, INC. f ia A. Butler dent PAB /mew enclosure The Butler Roach Group • April 22, 1988 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 87 -1 City of Newport Beach The Butler/Roach Group, Inc. will provide the necessary environmental planning services to prepare the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the proposed amendments to the Land Use and Circulation Elements of the Newport Beach General Plan, and the Land Use Plan of the Local Coastal Program, known collectively as General Plan Update 87 -1. We believe it would be appropriate for the project description to also indicate that the EIR addresses related rezonings to implement the General Plan Update. We will prepare the necessary documentation for compliance with the City of Newport Beach's procedures for implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State CEQA Guidelines, and City policy. This proposal describes the anticipated scope of services, performance schedule and cost estimate for The Butler/Roach Group's services to prepare the • Screen Check Draft EIR, the published Draft EIR, and the Final EIR. Scope of Services Our basic scope of services will follow the City of Newport Beach's procedure for preparing EIRs. We will prepare a Screen Check of the Draft EIR for your review and comments. We will then make any necessary revisions and resubmit it for final approval before it is actually issued by the City as a Draft EIR. At the end of the public review period, we will assist the Planning Department with preparation of the responses to comments received during the public review. The Final EIR will consist of the the Draft EIR and the Attachment, containing the comments received during public review, the City's responses, and any additional material to be included in the EIR as a result of the public review. We will assist the City with preparation of the necessary candidate findings for the City Council's certification of the Final EIR (i.e., Statement of Facts and Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations). Finally, we will prepare the file copies of the Final EIR for the Planning Department. The services necessary to accomplish these tasks will include regular meetings with the Planning Department and traffic consultant staff, and attendance at public meetings/hearings for the Draft and Final EIR. A more specific description of the anticipated scope of services follows. Notice of Preparation (NOP) We will assist the Planning Department in preparation of the NOP, which should be sent out in • early May. We propose.to assist in preparation of the content (text) of the NOP, and understand that the Planning Department will develop the mailing list for the NOP and Notice of Non - Statutory Advisement (Note: the combined list can serve as the mailing list for the Notice of Completion for the Draft EIR).. It would probably also be most efficient for the Planning Department to take care of mailing the notices. Consequently, we have not included the actual mailing costs for the NOP, NOC and NNSA in our cost estimate. Draft EIR The Butler/Roach Group will prepare the EIR as a "Program" EIR, as described in Section 15168 of the State CEQA Guidelines. As such, the EIR for General Plan Update 87 -1 will serve as the base environmental document for subsequent review of specific development The Butler Roach Group • April 22, 1988 Ms. Patricia L. Temple, Page Two proposals and amendments to other elements of the General Plan. The contents of the EIR will address the necessary topics identified by the State CEQA Guidelines, as described in the "Scope of Services" section of the City's February 19, 1988 Request for Proposals. The most significant portion of our efforts will, of course, be devoted to the analysis of significant impacts that may be associated with the land use and circulation system alternatives. In order to facilitate accomplishment of the accelerated schedule requested by the Planning Department, it is understood that the following information will be provided to The Butler/Roach Group: 1. definition and description of the land use and circulation system scenarios will be provided by the Planning Department; 2. evaluation of the circulation system impacts generated by the land use alternatives and circulation system alternatives will be provided by Austin -Foust Associates; • 3. Austin -Foust Associates will assist The Butler/Roach Group in preparation of the appropriate summary of traffic impacts for inclusion in the EIR text; and, 4. the existing land use base developed by the Planning Department and appropriate base maps for use in the EIR will be furnished by the Planning Department. Based on our meeting on April 6, 1988 and review of the RFP dated February 19, 1988, this proposal and cost estimate are based on the assumption that the environmental impact analysis will address five (5) land use scenarios and five (5) circulation system alternatives. At our April 6th meeting, we discussed evaluation of five land use scenarios, including the Existing (base) case, build -out at Trend Growth, build -out at 0.5 FAR modified by certain existing conditions, and two other scenarios with different FAR conditions. These land use scenarios will be tested by Austin -Foust Associates against the following circulation system alternatives: existing system (for Existing case only), all planned regional growth and ultimate circulation system configuration without the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor ( SJHTC), and with the SJHTC with certain modifications. It is anticipated that Austin -Foust will also provide evaluation of the traffic and circulation effects of specific local street system alternatives, including possible grade separations at major intersections on Coast Highway, and possible deletion of the widening of Coast Highway through Manners Mile. We are assuming that all future build -out scenarios will refer to the year 2010 for analysis purposes. • We anticipate using two subconsultants to assist The Butler/Roach Group in preparation of the environmental analysis. We will use Gordon Bricken & Associates to prepare a programmatic environmental noise analysis for the alternative land use /circulation scenarios,. providing CNEL noise contours for the major roadways (i.e., Newport/Balboa Boulevard, Coast Highway, Jamboree, MacArthur and Irvine Avenue). Mr. Hans Giroux will assist us with preparation of the programmatic air quality analysis, providing an evaluation of total emissions and carbon monoxide "hot spots" for the major critical intersections near sensitive receptors (residential populations). We have worked with these consultants for many years, including on our recent preparation of the Master EIR for the Centre City Redevelopment Projects in San Diego. 1 [i The Butler Roach Group • April 22, 1988 Ms. Patricia L. Temple Page Three In order to publish the Draft EIR within the desired timeframe, it will be important to follow the schedule described in the following section of this proposal regarding completion of the definition of the land use alternatives, and completion of the necessary traffic impact analysis. This cut -off date is necessary to give The Butler/Roach Group adequate time to complete the related environmental analyses (i.e., land use, air quality and noise) and to incorporate the analyses into a complete first Screen Check EIR. We will assist the Planning Department with preparation of the Notice of Completion, but as stated above, anticipate it may be more efficient for the Planning department to actually distribute the NOC and Draft EIRs. The Butler/Roach Group will deliver 190 copies of the Draft EIR to the Planning Department for distribution, and we will be responsible for delivering 10 copies to the State Clearinghouse. (Note: If it becomes obvious that it will be more expeditious for The Butler/Roach Group to mail the NOC and copies of the Draft EIR, we can accomplish that task and treat the mailing cost as a reimbursable, for direct reimbursement from the City.) . • Final EIR The Butler/Roach Group will assist the Planning Department in preparing responses to the comments received during the public review of the Draft EIR. We will also advise you if any additional material should be included in the Final EIR as a result of any of the comments received on the Draft EIR. We will prepare the candidate findings for the City Council's consideration at the public hearing when the Council certifies the Final EIR. We expect the candidate findings to be reviewed by the City Attorney before they are sent to the City Council. Finally, we would suggest that the Planning Department be responsible for filing the Notice of Determination with the County Clerk and State Clearinghouse. Meetines We anticipate attending biweekly project team meetings with Planning Department staff and representatives from the traffic engineering consultant, starting next Thursday, April 28, 1988, through publication of the Draft EIR. We would also expect some more frequent meetings at the end of June as we are completing the Draft EIR for publication in early July. We have assumed a total of eight (8) such project meetings for the purpose of the cost estimate. In addition, we anticipate The Butier/Roach Group will provide support for Planning Department staff at the Planning Commission and City Council hearings in July through October, with an estimated total of eight (8) such meetings. • Performance Schedule The following description of our proposed performance schedule is prefaced by the understanding that time is of the essence, and, considering the goal that the Draft EIR be completed by early July (Planning Department schedule dated April 5, 1988), time is very short for preparation of an adequate EIR for the comprehensive General Plan Update. We have prepared the following schedule which we believe is reasonable and realistic, although it is very accelerated for the task at hand. It provides for a Draft EIR to be released for public review during the week of July 11, with a start date for the 45 -day public review no later than July 15, 1988. While this is slightly later than the date assumed in the April 5, 1988 schedule, 0 • C7 The Buder Roach Group. April 22, 1988 Ms. Patricia L. Temple Page Four we believe it is the minimum achievable schedule given the tasks to be accomplished, and should provide the most realistic schedule for planning purposes. TASK DATE Publish NOP (1) Final description of land use and circulation system alternatives to be addressed in EIR given to BRG and Austin -Foust Associates Provide final version of traffic impact analysis of alternatives to BRG BRG delivers fast Screen Check to CNB Screen Check review Final review of Draft EIR Print and distribute Draft EIR Start 45-day Public Review of DEIR Prepare and review candidate Findings (2) End 45 -Day Public Review of DEIR Prepare Responses to Comments Review and finalize Attachment to DEIR and Findings Print and distribute Attachment to DEIR and Findings Week of May 9 May 16 May 30 June 20 June 20 - July 1 Week of July 4 Week of July 11 No later than July 15 During public review of DEIR No later than August 29 August 29 - Sept. 9 (3) Week of September 12 Week of September 19 NOTES: (1) Publication of NOP requires definition of "the project" which should include a description of the land use and circulation system alternatives; however, these definitions can continue to be refined until May 16, 1988. (2) Preparation and initial in -house review of the draft Statement of Facts and Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations can be accomplished during the public review of the Draft EIR, thus requiting only final review after completion of the responses to comments. The But /er Roach Group • April 22,1988 Ms. Patricia L. Temple Page Five (3) The Butler/Roach Group will prepare responses to comments on the Draft EIR as they are received by the City; however, it is acknowledged that the majority of comments are usually received at the end of the public review period. Cost Estimate Our estimated cost for completion of the scope of services within the performance schedule described herein is Fifty Six Thousand Four Hundred Fifty Dollars ($56,450.00). The attached cost estimate shows the estimated distribution of direct labor costs, subconsultants and related direct expenses for completion of the Draft EIR and the Final EIR. This estimate reflects the relative level of effort anticipated, based on our current understanding of the scope of services as described herein. We request your understanding that a subsequent budget amendment may be necessary if the actual scope of services differs significantly from that described in this proposal. • Direct Expenses Anticipated direct costs associated with completion of the scope of services include material costs for production of the EIR (i.e., photos, maps); printing costs for the various documents; delivery of the Draft EIR to the State Clearinghouse; long distance phone; and, transportation costs for meetings and delivery of materials to the Planning Department. The expected total budget for direct costs is Four Thousand Four Hundred Thirty Four Dollars ($4,434.00), with the anticipated distribution shown in the attached cost estimate. Printing costs are estimated for the following quantities: • 15 (total) Screen Check EIRs • 200 Draft EIRs and 50 Technical Appendices (excluding the Traffic Study Report which we understand will be printed separately) • 35 Attachments to the Draft EIR • 4 Final EIRs The Butler/Roach Group, Inc. will invoice the City on a monthly basis for costs incurred during the preceding 30 days, according to the terms and hourly rates shown on the attached schedule. Invoices are payable upon receipt. • ,a The Butter Roach - Group • COST ESTIMATE FOR PREPARATION OF EIR FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 87 -1 City of Newport Beach TASKISTAFF HOURS RATE AMOUNT • is PREPARE DRAFT EIR Senior Planner /Principal Associate Environmental Analyst/P.M Assistant Environmental Analyst I Assistant Environmental Analyst II Administrative AssistanVintern 112 $65.00 $7280.00 120 $50.00 $6000.00 160 $40.00 $6400.00 136 $35.00 $4760.00 144 $28.00 $4032.00 SUBTOTAL DRAFT EIR 672 PREPARE FINAL EIR (Including Findings) Senior Planner /Principal Associate Environmental Analyst/P.M. Assistant Environmental Analyst I Assistant Environmental Analyst II Administrative Assistant/intern 40 $65.00 $2600.00 48 $50.00 $2400.00 60 $40.00 $2400.00 24 $35.00 $840.00 48 $28.00 $1344.00 SUBTOTAL FINAL EIR 2 2 0 MEETINGS (16 meetings @ 6 hours each) Senior Planner /Principal 84 $65.00 $5460.00 Associate Environmental Analyst/P.M. 60 $50.00 $3000.00 SUBTOTAL MEETINGS 144 TOTAL DIRECT LABOR SUBCONSULTANTS Gordon Bricken & Associates (Noise) Hans Giroux (Air Quality) SUBTOTAL SUBCONSULTANTS 1036 $3300.00 $2200.00 TOTAL $28472.00 $9584.00 $8460.00 $46516.00 $5500.00 i The Butler Roach - Group • COST ESTIMATE (Continued) FOR PREPARATION OF EIR FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 87 -1 City of Newport Beach 10 DIRECT EXPENSES Printing, as described in BRG Proposal, dated 4122/88 (See Attachment for itemized estimate) Mileage (16 trips to CNB @ 150 miles ea. @ $.22/mi.) Mailing and Deliveries Long Distance Phone Misc. Production Costs and Copying TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES TOTAL ESTIMATED COST COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY Total Direct Labor Total Subconsultants Total Direct Expenses TOTAL ESTIMATED COST $3270.00 $528.00 $270.00 $126.00 $240.00 TOTAL $4434.00 $56450.00 $46516.00 $5500.00 $4434.00 $56450.00 April 22, 1988 The Butler /Roach Group, Inc. 10% Administrative Costs $297.25 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRINTING EXPENSE $3269.75 0 April 22, 1988 The Butler /Roach Group, Inc. lb I • The Butter • Roach - - Group: COST ESTIMATE ATTACHMENT • C FOR PREPARATION OF EIR FOR GENERAL PLAN UPDATE 87 -1 City of Newport Beach UNIT $ A AMOUNT T TOTAL .PRINTING EXPENSES 15 Copies of Screen Check EIR $8.00 $ $120.00 200 Copies of Draft EIR $11.00 $ $2200.00 50 Copies of Technical Appendix $6.50 $ $325.00 (Excluding Traffic Study Report) 35 Copies of Attachment to Draft EIR $6.50 $ $227.50 4 Copies of Final EIR $25.00 $ $100.00 TOTAL ESTIMATED PRINTING COSTS $ $2972.50 0 April 22, 1988 The Butler /Roach Group, Inc. lb I