HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-3240 - MacArthur Boulevard Rehabilitation from Jamboree Road to Campus DriveC(_ njgj4S
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 9t' day of November, 1998, by and between
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH , a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "),
and KFM Engineering, Inc., whose address is 18 Technology, Suite 165, Irvine,
California, 92618, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant'), is made with reference to the
following:
RECITALS
A. City is a Municipal Corporation duly organized and validly existing under the
laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is
now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the
Charter of City.
B. City is planning to implement Improvements to MacArthur Boulevard
(`Project').
C. City desires to engage Consultant to provide professional engineering
design services for street rehabilitation of MacArthur Boulevard from
Jamboree Road to Campus Drive upon the terms and conditions in this
agreement.
D. The principal member of Consultant for purpose of Project is Rick Kreuzer,
P.E., President.
-1-
E
0
E. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed
the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant and
desires to contract with Consultant under the terms of conditions provided in
this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned
parties as follows:
1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the 9`" day of November. 1998, and shall
terminate on the 301" day of June, 1999, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
Consultant shall diligently perform all the duties set forth in the scope of services,
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
3. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
City shall pay Consultant for the services in accordance with the provisions of this
Section and the scheduled billing rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. No rate changes shall be made during the term of this
Agreement without prior written approval of City. Consultant's compensation for all work
performed in accordance with this Agreement shall not exceed the total contract price of
thirty-seven thousand, two hundred seventy -five Dollars ($37,275.00).
-2-
0
3.1 Consultant shall maintain accounting records of its billings which includes
the name of the employee, type of work performed, times and dates of all work which is
billed on an hourly basis and all approved incidental expenses including reproductions,
computer printing, postage and mileage.
3.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City payable by City within thirty
(30) days of receipt of invoice subject to the approval of City.
3.3 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for extra work without prior
written authorization of City. Any authorized compensation shall be paid in accordance
with the schedule of the billing rates as set forth in Exhibit "B ".
3.4 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses which
have been specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in advance
by City. Such cost shall be limited and shall include nothing more than the following costs
incurred by Consultant:
A. The actual costs of subconsultants for performance of any of the services
which Consultant agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement which have
been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
B. Approved computer data processing and reproduction charges.
C. Actual costs and /or other costs and /or payments specifically authorized in
advance in writing and incurred by Consultant in the performance of this
Agreement.
%I
P
3.5 Notwithstanding any other paragraph or provision of this Agreement,
beginning on the effective date of this Agreement, City may withhold payment of ten
percent (10 %) of each approved payment as approved retention until all services under
this Agreement have been substantially completed.
4. STANDARD OF CARE
4.1 All of the services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical
personnel required to perform the services required by this Agreement and that it will
perform all services in a manner commensurate with the community professional
standards. All services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who
are not employed by City nor have any contractual relationship with City. Consultant
represents and warrants to City that it has or shall obtain all licenses, permits,
qualifications and approvals required of its profession. Consultant further represents and
warrants that it shall keep in effect all such licenses, permits and other approvals during
the term of this Agreement.
4.2 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be
responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes,
lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or the failure of City to furnish timely information or to
approve or disapprove Consultant's work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City,
contractors, or governmental agencies, or any other delays beyond Consultant's control
or without Consultant's fault.
0 0
5. INDEPENDENT PARTIES
City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not
an employee of City. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the
control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation
and the expressed terms of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed
to constitute Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents to be the agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over the
details in means of performing the work provided that Consultant is in compliance with the
terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement which may appear to give City the
right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance of the services or to
exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean that Consultant shall follow the
desires of City only in the results of the services.
6. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated
Project Administrator, and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction or interest in
the work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with Consultant on Project.
7. PROJECT MANAGER
Consultant shall assign Project to a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all
phases of Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times
during term of Project. Consultant has designated Rick Kreuzer, P.E., to be its Project
Manager. Consultant shall not bill any personnel to Project other than those personnel
10
0 0
identified in Exhibit "B ", whether or not considered to be key personnel, without City's prior
written approval by name and specific hourly billing rate. Consultant shall not remove or
reassign any personnel designated in this Section or assign any new or replacement
person to Project without the prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld with respect to removal or assignment of non -key personnel.
Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from Project any of its
personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.
Consultant warrants it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete
Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.
8. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of the services under this Agreement
and the services shall be performed by Consultant in accordance with the schedule
specified in Exhibit "A ". The failure by Consultant to strictly adhere to the schedule may
result in termination of this Agreement by City, and the assessment of damages against
Consultant for delay. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible
for delays which are due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in
the case of any such delay in the services to be provided for Project, each party hereby
agrees to provide notice to the other party so that all delays can be addressed.
8.1 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for performance
in writing to the Project Administrator not later than ten (10) calendar days after the start
of the condition, which purportedly causes a delay, and not later than the date upon which
in
0
performance is due. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may
grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays, which are beyond
Consultant's control.
8.2 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall
respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the circumstances, by
either telephone, fax, hand delivery or mail.
9. CITY POLICY
Consultant will discuss and review all matters relating to policy and project
direction with the Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to
ensure that the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals and policies.
10. CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT
All work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable city, county, state and
federal law, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project
Administrator and City Council.
11. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible to keep the Project Administrator and /or his /her duly
authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the
work, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or
are desired.
12. HOLD HARMLESS
Consultant shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless City, its City Council,
-7-
0 0
boards and commissions, officers and employees from and against any and all loss,
damages, liability, claims, allegations of liability, suits, costs and expenses for damages of
any nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury,
property damages, or any other claims arising from any and all acts or omissions of
Consultant, its employees, agents or subcontractors in the performance of services or
work conducted or performed pursuant to this Agreement, excepting only the active
negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers or employees, and shall include
attorneys' fees and all other costs incurred in defending any such claim. Nothing in this
indemnity shall be construed as authorizing, any award of attorneys' fees in any action on
or to enforce the terms of this Agreement.
13. INSURANCE
Without limiting consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of
work, Consultant shall obtain and provide and maintain at its own expense during the
term of this Agreement policy or policies of liability insurance of the type and amounts
described below and satisfactory to City. Certification of all required policies shall be
signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf and must be
filed with City prior to exercising any right or performing any work pursuant to this
Agreement. Except workers compensation and errors and omissions, all insurance
policies shall add City, its elected officials, officers, agents, representatives and
employees as additional insured for all liability arising from Consultant's services as
described herein.
M
0
i
All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company certified to do
business in the State of California, with original endorsements, with Best's A VII or better
carriers, unless otherwise approved by the City Risk Manager.
A. Worker's compensation insurance covering all employees and principals of
Consultant, per the laws of the State of California.
B. Commercial general liability insurance covering third party liability risks,
including without limitation, contractual liability, in a minimum amount of $1
million combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury
and property damage. If commercial general liability insurance or other
form with a general aggregate is used, either the general aggregate shall
apply separately to this Project, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the occurrence limit.
C. Commercial auto liability and property insurance covering any owned and
rented vehicles of Consultant in a minimum amount of $1 million combined
single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
D. Professional errors and omissions insurance which covers the services to
be performed in connection with this Agreement in the minimum amount of
One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00).
Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days' prior notice has been given in
writing to City. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claim made or suit
0 0
instituted arising out of Consultant's operation hereunder. Consultant shall also procure
and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its
own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
Consultant agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has
agreed to provide comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance, that
Consultant shall look solely to its insurance for recovery. Consultant hereby grants to
City, on behalf of any insurer providing comprehensive general and automotive liability
insurance to either Consultant or City with respect to the services of Consultant herein, a
waiver of any right of subrogation which any such insurer of said Consultant may acquire
against City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
14. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS
Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate or transfer this Agreement or
any of the services to be performed under this Agreement, directly or indirectly, by
operation of law or otherwise without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so
without consent of City shall be null and void.
The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint
venturer or syndicate member or co- tenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint- venture
or syndicate or co- tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall
be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty percent (50 %) or
more of the voting power, or twenty -five percent (25 %) or more of the assets of the
-10-
0 0
corporation, partnership or joint venture.
15. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record and other document
reproduced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to or in
connection with this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of City.
Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by
City or others on any other project. Any use of completed documents for other projects
and any use of incomplete documents without specific written authorization from
Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Further, any and
all liability arising out of changes made to Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement
by City or persons other than Consultant is waived as against Consultant and City
assumes full responsibility for such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice
and has received from Consultant written consent for such changes.
Consultant shall, at such time and in such forms as City may require, furnish
reports concerning the status of services required under this Agreement.
16. CONFIDENTIALITY
The information, which results from the services in this Agreement, is to be kept
confidential unless the release of information is authorized by City.
17. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
In order to assist Consultant in the execution of his responsibilities under this
-11-
Agreement, City agrees to provide the following:
A. City will provide access to and upon request of Consultant, provide one
copy of all existing record information on file at City. Consultant shall be
entitled to rely upon the accuracy of data information provided by City and
the review of field conditions by Consultant. City will provide all such
materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's work
schedule.
B City staff will provide usable life of facilities criteria and provide information
with regards to deficient facilities.
18. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. Bill
Patapoff, City Engineer, shall be considered the Project Administrator and shall have
the authority to act for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his /her
authorized representative shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the services to
be rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
19. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be
performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate
records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be
clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business
hours to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records. Consultant shall
Qit;•2
• •
allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to the
Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this
Agreement.
20. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute
with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a
failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue
work for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of withholding as a result of such
withholding. Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or
his designee with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
interest on any withheld sums at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date
of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld.
21. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional
inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than would have
resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work accomplished by Consultant, the
additional design, construction and /or a restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant.
Nothing in this paragraph is intended to limit City's rights under any other sections of this
Agreement.
22. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with Project.
-13-
0 0
23. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
A. Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the
California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act "), which (1) requires such
persons to disclose financial interest that may foreseeably be materially
affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits
such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will
foreseeably financially affect such interest.
B. If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act.
Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for termination
of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless
City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's violation
of this Section.
24. SUBCONSULTANT AND ASSIGNMENT
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the services included in
this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted
without prior written approval of City.
25. NOTICES
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement
shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered
personally or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail,
postage prepaid, first class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided.
SEE
L]
0
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Consultant to City shall be
addressed to City at:
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
P. O. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA, 92658 -8915
(949) 644 -3311
Fax (949) 644 -3318
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Consultant shall be
addressed to Consultant at:
Attention: Rick Kreuzer, P.E.
President
KFM Engineering, Inc.
18 Technology, Suite 165
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453 -7970
Fax (949) 453 -7971
26. TERMINATION
In the event either part hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions
hereof at the time and in the manner required hereunder, that party shall be deemed in
default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period
of two (2) days, or if more than two (2) days are reasonably required to cure the default
and the defaulting party fails to give adequate assurance of due performance within two
(2) days after receipt by defaulting party from the other party of written notice of default,
specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, the
nondefaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting
-15-
0 0
party written notice thereof.
26.1 City shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of
terminating this Agreement by giving seven (7) days' prior written notice to Consultant as
provided herein. Upon termination of this Agreement, City shall pay to Consultant that
portion of compensation specified in this Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the
effective date of termination.
27. COMPLIANCES
Consultant shall comply with all laws, state or federal and all ordinances, rules and
regulations enacted or issued by City.
28. WAIVER
A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition
contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the
same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein whether of the same or a
different character.
29. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or
nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and
agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or
implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereon. Any modification of this
Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Consultant.
-16-
0 0
30. OPINION OF COST
Any opinion of the construction cost prepared by Consultant represents his /her
judgment as a design professional and is supplied for the general guidance of City. Since
Consultant has no control over the cost of labor and material, or over competitive bidding
or market conditions, Consultant does not guarantee the accuracy of such opinions as
compared to contractor bids or actual cost to City.
31. CADD DELIVERABLES
CADD data delivered to City shall not include the professional stamp or signature
of an engineer or architect. City agrees that Consultant shall not be liable for claims,
liabilities or losses arising out of, or connected with (a) the modification or misuse by City,
or anyone authorized by City, of CADD data; (b) the decline of accuracy or readability of
CADD data due to inappropriate storage conditions or duration; or (c) any use by City, or
anyone authorized by City, of CADD data for additions to this Project, for the completion
of this Project by others, or for any other project, excepting only such use as is
authorized, in writing, by Consultant. By acceptance of CADD data, City agrees to
indemnify Consultant for damages and liability resulting from the modification or misuse of
such CADD data.
32. PATENT INDEMNITY
Consultant shall indemnify City, its agents, officers, representatives and
employees against liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters
-17-
0
patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in Consultant's
drawings and specifications provided under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
on the day and year first written above.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Ro in Clauson
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
LaVonne Harkless
City Clerk
\\mis_t \sys\ users \pbw\shared\agmt\99\kfinengr.doc
sm
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
A Municipal Corporation
By:
Th as . Edwards, Mayor
City of Newport Beach
CONSULTANT
KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
By: �
Rick Kreuzer, . .
President
• ffiIBIT "A" •
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The City of Newport Beach is proposing to rehabilitate MacArthur Boulevard from
Jamboree Road to Campus Drive, an approximate distance of 1 mile.
MacArthur Boulevard is a six lane roadway. Painted median exists along a majority of the
project reach with some raised median at the southerly end of the project limits. The
existing pavement along this section of MacArthur Boulevard is in fair condition. There are
some localized areas exhibiting signs of distress in the form of rutting and alligator
cracking.
The object of this project is to complete a thorough pavement analysis to determine the
optimum improvement strategy for the roadway and then prepare final plans, specifications
and estimates for construction.
A key aspect of this project will be the consultant teams ability to implement an
improvement strategy which not only achieves the design -life objective for the roadway,
but also takes into consideration the budget for the project. As stated in the RFP, this
project is budgeted at $630,000 for design and construction. This figure will be considered
when KFM/Labelle Marvin are developing the various roadway improvement strategies for
MacArthur Boulevard.
Based upon KFM's thorough site review, the following represent what we believe will be
the key design issues to be addressed on the project.
• Proper construction joins to the northerly and southerly limits of the project.
• Vehicular mrideability" on the finished product. All joins and transverse grade
breaks will be done at lane lines to eliminate longitudinal irregularities in the
pavement. Particular attention will be paid to the rideability through the major
intersections. As discussed in our scope of work herein, KFM is proposing to
complete intersection grid plans at the major intersections to ensure optimum
rideability through the intersections is achieved.
♦ Traffic control considerations need to be considered when proposing pavement
altematives. For instance, deeplift A.C. sections should be considered in
reconstruction areas in lieu of AC /AB sections to expedite construction and
minimize lane closure durations.
0
0
• Close coordination with City staff will be stressed to develop the pavement
rehabilitation/reconstruction strategy once pavement deflection results are
available. KFM/Labelle Marvin will provide City staff with various improvement
alternatives and discuss their relative cost effectiveness, impact on local traffic, and
expected design life.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 - Data Collection
KFM shall collect and review all record information including, but not necessarily limited
to, the following:
• As -built drawings
• Utility record drawings
• Right -of -way record maps
• Assessors parcel maps
• Benchmark information
• Pertinent in- progress drawings, if any
• Centerline intersection ties
Task 2 - Field Survey
Field survey work shall consist of the following subtasks:
a) grid surveys at the major intersections. Elevations will be taken at 10 foot
intervals at MacArthur /Campus, MacArthur/Birch and MacArthurNon Karman
intersections. The MacArthur /Jamboree intersection was recently improved
and will not require any improvement as part of this project.
b) survey cross sections will be taken at 500 intervals. Additional sections will
be taken if trouble spots (i.e., low points, irregular cross falls, etc.) are
encountered.
Task 3 - Base Mapping
KFM shall prepare project base maps using existing as -built drawings collected from the
City of Newport Beach and Caltrans. Field reviews will be conducted, as necessary, to
ensure accuracy.
0
Task 4 - Geotechnlcal Investigation
0
Based upon a visual review of the existing roadway and discussions with City staff, the
project will require a thin overlay (I1/ to 2 inches) and localized reconstruction. In order
to establish the proper replacement section for the dig -out areas, Labelle Marvin (LM) will
conduct a geotechnical analysis consisting of the following subtasks:
• Prior to initiation of field activities, sample locations will be marked and
Underground Service Alert contacted to notify concerned utilities. Sample locations
which may interfere with buried lines or pipes will be relocated.
• Coring and/or boring will be performed at six to eight (6 -8) separate locations,
identified as areas of removal/replacement by KFM Engineering to determine the
thickness of the existing structural section. Borings will be extended a maximum
depth of four (4') feet from the surface to obtain samples of the subgrade. Samples
will be placed in plastic bags, sealed, and transported to our laboratory for further
analysis. Prior to leaving the site, all sample locations will be backfilled and
patched.
• Upon receipt in the laboratory, samples will be visually classified and the in -situ
moisture content of each determined. Individual and /or composite samples which
represent the materials encountered will be selected and subsequent to R -value
determination for use in alternate structural section replacement design.
• A Registered Civil Engineer shall supervise all activities, review results of testing
and prepare a report of his findings, presenting recommendations for alternate
methods of rehabilitation and /or reconstruction for specific areas identified by the
Client as required.
Task 5 - Utility Coordination
Utility coordination will be ongoing throughout the duration of the project and will generally
consist of the following tasks:
• Obtain plans showing location and size of all utility lines and appurtenances
within the project area.
Plot utility lines on base maps (Task 3).
• Cross check plotted locations above with field review information to insure
that existing lines are shown in the proper location.
• Upon finalizing the proposed roadway improvements, determine where
potential utility conflicts exist and where utility modifications are warranted.
• 0
• Coordinate with affected utility companies regarding conflicts, relocations
and improvements. Two (2) full sets of plans will be submitted for comment
to each utility agency concurrent with all KFM submittals to the City for plan
check.
Task 6 - Final PS & E
This task involves the completion of construction bid documents in the form of final plans,
specifications and estimates (PS & E). We envision the following plan set will be
developed:
DESCRIPTION
# OF SHEETS
`Title Sheet ........... ............................... 1
' Typical Sections and Details ............................ 1
' Roadway Plans ....... ............................... 3
' Intersection Plans ..... ............................... 3
'Cross Sections ....... ............................... 2
TOTAL ............................. 10 Sheets
Roadway plan sheets will be prepared at 1 " =40' in double plan format. All reconstruction
areas will be depicted. All underground utility lines and at -grade appurtenances will be
shown.
Intersection plans will be completed at a scale of 1 " =20' for the MacArthur /Campus,
MacArthur /Birch and MacArthurNon Karman intersections. Existing and proposed
elevations will be shown on a 10 foot grid.
Cross sections will be plotted at 500 foot intervals at 1 " =10' horizontal, 1" =1' vertical scale.
Existing and proposed elevations and cross falls will be shown.
Traffic Control plans are not included in the scope of work. We suggest that the City
request the Contractor to submit traffic control plans prior to construction in conformance
with the requirements (i.e., lane requirements, access, etc.) which KFM will summarize in
detail in the project specifications.
NOTE: The City may elect to bid the project with an alternate
for Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM). Inclusion of this
bid alternate into the final PS &E is included in our
scope of work.
4
0
Specifications will be prepared in conformance with the City of Newport Beach's desired
format. Quantities and cost estimates shall be completed.
This task will also include the preparation of all permit applications required for the project.
All permit fees will be the responsibility of the City of Newport Beach.
In conformance with the Request for Proposal, project submittals will be made at the 70 %,
100 %, and final approval stages of the project Final mylars and specification originals will
be provided to the City upon project approval.
Task 7 - Project Coordination and Meetings
KFM shall provide all necessary coordination activities and attend all project related
meetings for the duration of the project.
Task 8 - Bidding and Construction Services
KFM shall assist the City during the bidding and construction periods by preparing
necessary addenda and clarifying plan and specification items, as required.
Task 9 - As -Built Drawings
Upon completion of construction, KFM shall complete as -built drawings based upon
information provided by the City.
Task 10 - Reimbursables
KFM shall provide all reimbursables (mileage, printing, etc.) for the duration of the project,
excluding the reproduction of project bid sets which will be the responsibility of the City.
3.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
This project schedule is depicted graphically on Exhibit A on the following page. This
schedule has been developed based upon the stated agency review duration of one (1)
week each for the 70% and 100% PS & E submittals. As depicted on the enclosed
schedule, KFM shall complete the subject project within 11 weeks of receiving the Notice
to Proceed on the project from the City of Newport Beach.
ro
t
x
w
17
V
m
s
N
r
m
�o
L
a
N
N
Z
w
2
w
_>
Q
wa
a.
mg
�o
3:>
w w
Z —j
LL
Om
v�
Q
Q
8880= �OBBOBB�
r
i
p
8880= �OBBOBB�
u
e
r,
c .
T
61
C
X00
C
1 , i
p
o
3
y
m
acf6iwo
>Qu0
>as
2
:1
'-
E
c
0�;
E
c
m
w
._
ca
Zaiim0Ein¢WU3¢cra
u
e
r,
c .
T
61
C
X00
C
1 , i
0 0
4.0 PROJECT TEAM
KFM Engineering, Inc. has assembled a Project Team which is knowledgeable and
experienced in all aspects of the subject project. The Project Team structure is illustrated
on Exhibit B herein. Personal resumes of the key team members identified are enclosed
in the Appendix of this proposal.
The Project Manager for the project will be Mr. Rick Kreuzer, P.E. Mr. Kreuzer is a
Registered Civil Engineer in California with 16 years of civil engineering experience,
including three years with the Orange County Environmental Management Agency as a
construction inspector, one year as a Project Engineer for a major Orange County
contractor and the last ten years as a consultant As the Project Manager, Mr. Kreuzer will
have overall technical responsibility for the project and will be the client's primary contact.
He will also have hands -orr involvement in the day to day design of the project. His
experience is well suited to this project, as summarized below:
• 12+ years as a consultant with an emphasis in public works design.
• Numerous roadway widening/reconstruction, storm drain, sewer and water projects
completed for various cities in Orange County over the past ten years.
• Extensive experience coordinating with utility companies.
• 3 years with OCEMA as field inspector on public works project. He has a strong
understanding of the construction elements to be considered on a project of this
type.
U
CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
RICK KREUZER, P.E.
Project Manager
0
` LABELLE MARVIN I JEFF LUND TED KRULL, L.S.
Ceotechnical Project Engineer Field Survey
Investigation
•DENOTES SUBCONSULTANT
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT TEAM CHART
0
Recent street improvement project similar in nature to the subject project which Mr.
Kreuzer has managed include:
Project
Client
Construction Cost
Tustin Avenue
Orange
$2,000,000
Yorba Linda Boulevard
Placentia
$1,400,000
Katella Avenue
Anaheim
$18,000,000
Imperial Highway
La Habra
$30,000,000
Lincoln Avenue
Anaheim
$800,000
University Drive
Irvine
$600,000
Lake Forest Drive
OCEMA
$3,000,000
Beach Boulevard
Huntington Beach
$1,100,000
Avenida Pico
San Clemente
$400,000
Marguerite Parkway
Mission Viejo
$700,000
Pacific Coast Highway
Newport Beach
$5,000,000
Annual Resurfacing Program
94 -95
Dana Point
$500,000
Annual Resurfacing Program
95 -96
Dana Point
$600,000
Annual Resurfacing Program
94 -95
San Juan Capistrano
$600,000
Detailed descriptions of these projects and others are included in Section 5.0 of this
proposal.
Mr. Kreuzer will be assisted by Jeff Lund who will be responsible for the day to day
technical design and plan production on the project. Mr. Lund =s main area of expertise
is in the design of streetwidening and rehabilitation projects. He was the Project Engineer
for the Lincoln Avenue, University Drive, Beach Boulevard, Marguerite Parkway and
Annual Resurfacing projects listed above.
LaBelle Marvin (LM) will complete the pavement deflection study /materials report for the
project. KFM staff have worked extensively with LM on previous rehabilitation design
projects.
Arrowhead Mapping of Riverside will provide the aerial mapping for the project. They also
have worked extensively with KFM on past projects.
-7a
0
L
The time commitments of the project team members, as a percentage of the total project
manhour requirement, are summarized as follows:
Project Manager .... ............................... 17%
Rick Kreuzer
Project Engineer .... ............................... 25%
Jeff Lund
CADD Drafter ...... ............................... 35%
Labelle Marvin ...... ............................. 17%
Geotechnical Investigation
Field Survey Crew .... ............................... 6%
TOTAL ............................ 100%
5.0 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
The following represents a summary of the most recent street improvement projects
completed or underway by the KFM team proposed for this project. We strongly
encourage you to contact the listed references regarding our performance.
Project: Tustin Avenue Rehabilitation
Client: City of Orange
Contact: Mr. Jerry Bailey (714) 744-5531
Construction Cost: $2,000,000
KFM is currently preparing final plans, specifications and estimates for the
rehabilitation of Tustin Avenue from Fairhaven Street to Collins Avenue, a total
distance of 3 miles. This project is divided into 2 separate bid packages and is being
funded under the AHRP program.
Project: Yorba Linda Boulevard Rehabilitation
Client: City of Placentia
Contact: Mr. Chris Becker (714) 993 -8245
Construction Cost: $1,400,000
KFM is currently preparing final plans, specifications and estimates for the
rehabilitation of Yorba Linda Boulevard from Kraemer Boulevard to Jefferson Street,
a distance of 1.5 miles.
8
0 0
Project: Imperial Highway Smart Street
Improvements
Limits: Los Angeles County Line to Rose Drive
Client: City of La Habra
Contact: Mr. Majdi Ataya (562) 905 -9720
Construction Cost: $30,000,000
KFM staff are currently completing the preparation of final PS &E documents for an
eight mile stretch of Imperial Highway in the Cities of La Habra, Fullerton, Brea,
Placentia and Yorba Linda. The project includes geometric design, storm drain
improvements, traffic signal modifications, intersection widening, sound - wail /retaining
wall design, utility relocation and hazardous waste/lead contamination remediation.
This project also includes dose coordination with Caltrans District 12 Right -of -Way for
the numerous right -of -way acquisitions on the project. The plans are being produced
in metric.
Project: Katella Avenue Smart Street Improvements
Limits: I-5 to Walnut Avenue
Client: City of Anaheim
Contact: Mr. Ralph Harp (714) 765 -5175
Construction Cost: $18,000,000
KFM staff completed the preparation of the final design for the widening of 3 miles of
Katella Avenue from Interstate 5 to Ninth Street in the vicinity of Disneyland in the City
of Anaheim. This project includes the design of street, storm drain, sewer, water,
landscaping and traffic signal improvements. Right -of -way acquisition documents in
the form of legal description and plats were prepared by KFM staff for approximately
200 partial takes of e:asting parcels.
Project: 15th Street Improvements
Limits: Old Newport Boulevard to Irvine Avenue
Client: City of Costa Mesa/City of Newport Beach
Contact: Mr. Maher Nawar (714) 754 -5248
Mr. Lloyd Dalton (714) 644 -3311
Construction Cost: $660,000
KFM staff completed drainage study and prepared final plans, specifications and
estimate for the construction of mainline storm drain and pavement rehabilitation of
15th Street from Old Newport Boulevard to Irvine Avenue, a distance of approximately
4,200 feet.
-'- I
0
Project: Lincoln Avenue Improvements
Limits: Beach Boulevard to Western Avenue
Client: City of Anaheim
Contact: Mr. Richard Garcia (714) 765-4433
Construction Cost: $800,000
Completed a drainage study and prepared final plans, specifications and estimate for
the construction of mainline storm drain and pavement rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue
from Beach Boulevard to Western Avenue, a distance of approximately 2,800 feet.
This project was processed for federal ISTEA funds.
Project: University Drive Rehabilitation
Limits: 600" E/O Campus Drive to MacArthur Blvd.
Client: City of Irvine
Contact: Mr. Mark Carroll (949) 724 -6410
Construction Cost: $600,000
Prepared final plans, specifications and estimate for the rehabilitation of University
Drive from 600 feet east of Campus Drive to the west city limits (7,000 I.f.). The project
included the application of an Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) along with a Stress
Absorpting Membrane Inner Layer (SAMI) product over the existing pavement surface.
Project: Beach Boulevard Rehabilitation
Limits: Pacific Coast Highway to Ellis Avenue
Client: City of Huntington Beach
Contact: Mr. Doug Kato (714) 536-5431
Construction Cost: $1,100,000
Designed and prepared plans for 3 miles of roadway rehabilitation improvements on
Beach Boulevard from Ellis Avenue to the Pacific Coast Highway, a distance of 3 miles.
The project included removal and replacement of distressed roadway sections and
capping the entire roadway with an A.C. overlay.
Project: Marguerite Pkwy. Pavement Rehabilitation
Limits: Via Escolar to Crown Valley Parkway
Client: City of Mission Viejo
Contact: Mr. Loren Anderson (714) 582 -2489
Construction Cost: $700,000
Designed and prepared plans, specifications and estimates for pavement rehabilitation
on Marguerite Pkwy. from Via Escolar to Crown Valley Parkway, a distance of 2 miles.
The project included replacement of failed sections, a 0.15 foot rubberized AC overlay,
restriping and preparation of traffic control schemes for the four lane arterial highway.
10
77
0 0
Project: Avenida Pico Rehabilitation / Los Molinos Storm Drain
Limits: 1-405 to Los Molinos Drive
Client: City of San Clemente
Contact: Mr. Ben Parker (714) 498 -2533
Construction Cost: $400,000
Designed and prepared plans, specifications and estimates for storm drain
improvements at Avenida Pico and Los Molinos to eliminate existing cross gutters and
generally improve drainage at the intersection. The project involved a hydrology study,
identification of catch basin locations, design of a storm drain system including
connection to an ebsfing Orange County Flood Control District Channel, and
rehabilitation and regrading of the existing streets with an A.C. pavement overlay.
Project: Lake Forest Intersections
Limits: 1-5 to Trabuco Road
Client: Orange County Environmental Management Agency
Contact: Mr. Grant Anderson (714) 834 -5034
Construction Cost: $3,000,000
Prepared final plans, specifications and estimates and right -of -way documents for the
widening of four (4) intersections on Lake Forest Boulevard in south Orange County.
The plan set included roadway plan and profile, storm drain plan and profile, five traffic
signal modification plans and various detail and typical section sheets.
Project: 1994 -95 Roadway Rehabilitation Projects
Limits: Miscellaneous locations
Client: City of San Juan Capistrano
Contact: Mr. Brian Perry (949) 443.6353
Construction Cost: $600,000
KFM staff was retained by the City of San Juan Capistrano to complete the preliminary
and final design of four (4) roadway rehabilitation projects, summarized as follows:
El Camino Real- Ortega Highway to La Zanja Street (2,100')
• Del Obispo - Aguacate to Paseo de la Paz (4,400')
• Mission Hills Tract - Local Street Rehabilitation (3,200')
• Junipero Serra - Rancho Viejo Road to 1 -5 NIB Ramps (400)
I
E
Appendix
Resumes
RICK KREUZER, P.E.
EDUCATION:
AFFILIATION:
REGISTRATION:
EXPERIENCE:
0 0
KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 1983
Certificate Program in Construction Management,
American Society of Civil Engineers, 1987
American Society of Civil Engineers
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Registered Civil Engineer (California)
Project Management assignments have included:
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Tustin Avenue from Fairhaven Street
to Collins Avenue in the City of Orange. This project is funded by the AHRP
program.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Yorba Linda Boulevard from Kraemer
Boulevard to Linda Vista Drive in the City of Placentia.
• Precise alignment, final design and right -of -way engineering for the widening
of Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, including roadway, storm drain, sewer,
water and traffic signal improvements.
• Precise alignment and final design for the Imperial Highway Smart Street
Improvements form the Los Angeles County Line to Rose Drive, a distance of
8.5 miles. This project traversed through the Cities of La Habra, Fullerton,
Placentia, Brea and Yorba Linda.
• Project Manager for the Annual Roadway Resurfacing Project (Fiscal Year
1994 -95) in the City of Dana Point.
• Project Manager for the University Drive Rehabilitation project in the City of
Irvine. This project was constructed using AHFP funds.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation/reconstruction of Beach Boulevard from
Pacific Coast Highway to Ellis Avenue (3 miles) for the City of Huntington
Beach.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Marguerite Parkway from Crown Valley
Parkway to Via Escolar (2 miles) in the City of Mission Viejo.
I--
RICK KREUZER, P.E.
0
KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Marguerite Parkway from Alicia
Parkway to Santa Margarita Parkway (2 miles) in the City of Mission Viejo.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Avenida Pico /Calle de los Molinos in
the City of San Clemente.
• Technical Advisor for the pavement analysis of all primary and secondary
highways and the development of a maintenance program for the City of
Mexicali, State of Baja, Mexico.
• Project Manager for review of OCUTT and FAU funding applications for street
reconstruction /rehabilitation projects in Orange County for OCTC. Duties
included review of preliminary plans for construction feasibility, review of
quantities, cost estimates, etc.
• Project Manager for the pavement rehabilitation and storm drain improvements
on 15th Street in the City of Costa Mesa.
• Project Manager for six roadway rehabilitation /reconstruction projects in the City
of Irvine.
• Project Manager for four roadway rehabilitation/reconstruction projects in the
City of San Juan Capistrano.
• Project Manager for the widening and pavement reconstruction of Gale Avenue
in the City of Industry.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
• Project Engineer for a four mile widening and reconstruction of Pacific Coast
Highway in Newport Beach. Responsibilities included design of highway
geometries, channelization, drainage, sound wall, mechanically stabilized
embankment wall, 30 inch water line, street lighting, and right of way
documents. This was a FAU project under review by Caltrans, with an
estimated construction cost of $7,500,000.
Project Engineer for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for
the construction of Main Street roadway improvements through the Village of
Westpark in Irvine. This project included the design of approximately 6000 feet
of arterial highway improvements, as well as the design of a reinforced concrete
box drainage facility adjacent to the proposed roadway.
0 0
RICK KREUZER, P.E. KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
• Project Engineer for street reconstruction /rehabilitation project on Main Street
in the City of Santa Ana.
• Senior plan checker for street, storm drain, water and sewer improvement plans
for the Village of Westpark in the City of Irvine. Plan check also involved review
of hydrology and hydraulics for the development.
• Plan check of development plans for the City of Camarillo on an as- needed
basis. Required review of street, storm drain, sewer and water improvement
plans as well as detailed checks of parcel and tract maps.
• Design Engineer for the overlay of 4,000 lineal feet of roadway (Park Place) in
the City of Laguna Beach.
• Project Engineer for the alignment study and final design of three miles of new
arterial highway in Canyon Country for the County of Los Angeles.
• Project Manager responsible for the preparation of plans, specifications, and
estimates for approximately 6000 lineal feet of street, storm drain, sewer and
water improvement plans in the City of San Marcos. This project also included
hydrological mapping of a drainage area approximately 500 acres in size.
• Conceptual planning and design for a one mile widening of MacArthur
Boulevard in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road in Newport Beach. The
project plans were reviewed and approved by Caltrans District 7 and the project
was constructed in 1987.
• Design of street improvements for Jamboree Road from Pacific Coast Highway
to Backbay Drive in the City of Newport Beach. This project was constructed
in 1986 at a cost of $940,000.
• Project Engineer for preliminary and final design of Tustin Ranch Road in the
City of Tustin, including design of storm drain and soundwall improvements.
0 0
JEFF LUND KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
EDUCATION: Civil Engineering, Olympia Tech., Washington -1984
REGISTRATION: NICET Level II, No. 079621, 1994
EXPERIENCE:
Jeff Lund is a Project Engineer with KFM Engineering, Inc. He has over 10 years
experience in roadway. Past assignments have included:
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Tustin Avenue from Fairhaven Street
to Collins Avenue in the City of Orange. This project is funded by the AHRP
program.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Yorba Linda Boulevard from Kraemer
Boulevard to Linda Vista Drive in the City of Placentia.
• Design Engineer for the Annual Roadway Resurfacing Project (Fiscal Year
1994 -95) in the City of Dana Point.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of University Drive in the City or Irvine.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Marguerite Parkway in the City of
Mission Viejo.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
• Design Engineer for six roadway rehabilitation projects in the City of Irvine.
• Design Engineer for four roadway rehabilitation projects in the City of San Juan
Capistrano.
• Design Engineer for the project report and PS &E for the upgrading of four major
intersections on Lake Forest Drive in Orange County, including right of way
engineering and utility coordination.
• Design Engineer for the Los Molinos Driye Rehabilitation project in the City of
Son Clemente.
0 0
THEODORE M. KRULL - PARTY CHIEF KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
Licensed Land Surveyor, State of California; 1976 graduate of the Southern California
Surveyors Joint Apprenticeship Committee =s Four -Year Training Program. Certified
Survey Party Chief, also certified for hazardous waste operations, in compliance with
O.S.H.A. 29 C.F.R. 1910.120. Member California Land Surveyors Association,
American Congress of Surveying and Mapping, American Association of Geodetic
Surveying and the National Society of Professional Surveyors.
Mr. Krull is field operations manager, estimator, office advisor and survey. consultant.
A second generation surveyor with 20 years of full time experience, he has supervised
numerous projects, including Rancho San Clemente - A 1900 acre, 56 million cubic
yard master planned, mixed use community; Wildomar - A 5000 acre G.P.S. /aerial
mapping project in Riverside County; Design Survey for widening of approximately six
miles of California State Highway 55; and many single family subdivisions.
EXHIBIT "B"
• KFM •
ENGINEERING, INC.
October 21, 1998
Mr. Bill Patapoff, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
RE: Revised Cost Proposal for Preparation of Plans, Specifications and
Estimates for the Rehabilitation of MacArthur Boulevard from Jamboree
Road to Campus Drive
Dear Mr. Patapoff:
Our proposed fee to complete the subject project is $37,275. A detailed breakdown of
manhours and fees by task are depicted on the fee schedule enclosed herein as
Exhibit A. Exhibit B represents KFM's Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates.
We trust this information is complete. If you have any questions, or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to call.
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Kreuzer, P.E.
President
RK/dm
Encl.
18 Technology Suite 165 Irvine California 92618 Ph: 949.453.7970 Fax: 949.453.7971
"
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
14ACART M BLVD. REHABH,ITATION
0
FEE SCHEDULE
TASK
KFM STAFF
LUMP
SUM
TOTAL
($105)
Pad
(S75)
PE
($65)
CADD
(135)
VEY
1. DATACOLLEC17ON
1
4
4
5665
2. FIELD SURVEY
-Grid Surveys
20
S2 d05
-Cross Sections
1
B
$1I95
3. BASE MAPPING
4
6
40
$3,620
4. GF-OIECH NICAL INVFSUGATION
1
/
$5,440
$6.160
5. UTILITY COORDINATION
4
8
$
SI
6. FINALPSA.E
• Title Sheet 1
1
2
4
$515
• Typwd Sections & Denlis 1
2
d
12
$1 90
Roadway Plain 3
16
40
40
S7 W
- lotesecUm Plain 3
6
24
20
$3,730
-Cress Secions 2
1
4
6
$925
S
8
$840
.Fefmam
2
6
$810
7. PROJECT COORDINATION/AEETINGS
16
4
$1,9&0
d. BTDDINGR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
d
4
4
$1400
9. AS43UILT DRAWINGS
2
4
8
$1030
10. REIOURSABLES
$1.2 00
$1100
TOTAL MANHOURS
TOTAL COSTS
77
$8,085
122
$9,150
148
$9,620
26
53,780
$6,640
$37,275
/ 11
0 0
KFM
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Rates Effective through December 31, 1998
OFFICE PERSONNEL:
Typists, Word Processors .......................... ..............................$ 30.00/Hr.
Technician ............................................ ............................... $ 40.00/Hr.
CAD Operator ......................................... ..............................$ 60.00/Hr.
Design Engineers ..................................... ..............................$ 65.00/Hr.
Project Engineers .................................... ..............................$ 75.00/Hr.
Project Managers .................................... ..............................$ 90.00/Hr.
Senior Project Managers ...... ............................... ....................$105.00 /Hr.
FIELD PERSONNEL:
Two -Man Survey Party,
including Truck and Equipment .......................... ....................$135.00 /Hr.
Three -Man Survey Party,
including Truck and Equipment .......................... ....................$170.00 /Hr.
SUPPORT & MISCELLANEOUS COSTS:
C.A.D.D. Work Station / Plotter .............. ............................... $ 25.00/Hr.
Computer time ........................................ ..............................$ 16.00/Hr.
Telefax................................................. ............................... $ 2.00/Pg.
Electronic Distance Measuring Equipment(E.D.M. ) ....................$55.00 /Day
SurveyTrucks ......................................... ..............................$ 0.50/Mile
Other Vehicles ......................................... ..............................$ 0.30/Mile
Outside services and consultants are billed at direct costs plus 15 %.
Blueprints, reproduction, messenger service, subsistence, travel and other
expenses are billed at direct cost plus 10 %. Terms are net 30 days with 1 '/x%
per month interest charges. The above schedule is for straight time hours.
KFM
ENGINEERING. INC.
w�
H�
zw
�O
O�
�d
�O
wJ-
�z
OQ
wd
I h�
V
z�
�d
�d
0
Z
\ O\x
J �J FIA GAR THUR
0
November 9, 1998
• CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEM NO. 12
TO: MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
APPROVED
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR
MACARTHUR BOULEVARD REHABILITATION FROM JAMBOREE
ROAD TO CAMPUS DRIVE — CONTRACT NO. 3240
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve a Professional Services Agreement with KFM Engineering, Inc. of Irvine,
California, for professional engineering services for a contract price of $37,275.
DISCUSSION:
As a part of the City's adopted FY 98 -99 Capital Improvement Program, staff invited six
• (6) engineering firms to submit their proposal for providing engineering design services for
approximately 1 mile of MacArthur Boulevard from Jamboree Road to Campus Drive.
The scope of the professional services include the research of available records, data
collection, field survey, geotechnical investigations, utility coordination, development and
analysis of roadway rehabilitation strategies, preparation of project plans and
specifications, pre- construction coordination and meetings, bidding and construction
assistance, and the preparation of as -built plans after construction completion.
Five (5) firms responded to our request for proposals. Staff reviewed the firms'
qualifications, past experience on similar projects, and availability; and ranked KFM
Engineering, Inc. of Irvine as the most highly suitable for the project design work. Upon
selection, staff negotiated with KFM to provide the necessary scope of services for a fee
of $37,275.
KFM has completed engineering services on similar rehabilitation projects for our City and
other local agencies in Southern California.
SUBJECT: MacArthur Isevard Rehabilitation From Jamboree RO *o Campus Drive — Consultant
Agreement With KFM — Contract No. 3240
November 9, 1998
Page 2
Fundin
Funds for this project are available in Account No. 7181- C5100464, PAVEMENT
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM FY 1998 -99 MAJOR MAINTENANCE, MacArthur Boulevard
Pavement Overlay, Jamboree /Campus.
Respectfully submitted,
0 (Vk
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Don Webb, Director
By.
Fong fse, P.E.
Associate Civil Engineer
Attachment: Professional Services Agreement — KFM Engineering, Inc. •
Exhibit "A" Scope of Services
Exhibit "B" Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates
Project Location Map
\ \mis_1 \sys \users \pbw\ shared \council \fy98- 99 \nov- 9 \kfm.doc
1
0
9
. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 9`h day of November, 1998, by and between
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH , a Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City "),
and KFM Engineering, Inc., whose address is 18 Technology, Suite 165, Irvine,
California, 92618, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant'), is made with reference to the
following:
RECITALS
A. City is a Municipal Corporation duly organized and validly existing under the
laws of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is
now being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the
Charter of City.
B. City is planning to implement Improvements to MacArthur Boulevard
('Project').
C. City desires to engage Consultant to provide professional engineering
design services for street rehabilitation of MacArthur Boulevard from
Jamboree Road to Campus Drive upon the terms and conditions in this
agreement.
D. The principal member of Consultant for purpose of Project is Rick Kreuzer,
P.E., President.
0
-1-
0 0
E. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed 0
the previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant and
desires to contract with Consultant under the terms of conditions provided in
this Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned
parties as follows:
1. TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the 9" day of November. 1998, and shall
terminate on the 30" day of June, 1999, unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
Consultant shall diligently perform all the duties set forth in the scope of services, 0
attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference.
3. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
City shall pay Consultant for the services in accordance with the provisions of this
Section and the scheduled billing rates set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference. No rate changes shall be made during the term of this
Agreement without prior written approval of City. Consultant's compensation for all work
performed in accordance with this Agreement shall not exceed the total contract price of
thirty -seven thousand, two hundred seventy -five Dollars ($37,275.00).
-2-
0
E
0 3.1 Consultant shall maintain accounting records of its billings which includes
the name of the employee, type of work performed, times and dates of all work which is
billed on an hourly basis and all approved incidental expenses including reproductions,
computer printing, postage and mileage.
3.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City payable by City within thirty
(30) days of receipt of invoice subject to the approval of City.
3.3 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for extra work without prior
written authorization of City. Any authorized compensation shall be paid in accordance
with the schedule of the billing rates as set forth in Exhibit "B ".
3.4 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses which
have been specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in advance
. by City. Such cost shall be limited and shall include nothing more than the following costs
incurred by Consultant:
A. The actual costs of subconsultants for performance of any of the services
which Consultant agrees to render pursuant to this Agreement which have
been approved in advance by City and awarded in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement.
B. Approved computer data processing and reproduction charges.
C. Actual costs and /or other costs and /or payments specifically authorized in
advance in writing and incurred by Consultant in the performance of this
Agreement.
0
-3-
11
•
3.5 Notwithstanding any other paragraph or provision of this Agreement,
beginning on the effective date of this Agreement, City may withhold payment of ten •
percent (10 %) of each approved payment as approved retention until all services under
this Agreement have been substantially completed.
4. STANDARD OF CARE
4.1 All of the services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and technical
personnel required to perform the services required by this Agreement and that it will
perform all services in a manner commensurate with the community professional
standards. All services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who
are not employed by City nor have any contractual relationship with City. Consultant
represents and warrants to City that it has or shall obtain all licenses, permits, 0
qualifications and approvals required of its profession. Consultant further represents and
warrants that it shall keep in effect all such licenses, permits and other approvals during
the term of this Agreement.
4.2 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be
responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by reason of strikes,
lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or the failure of City to furnish timely information or to
approve or disapprove Consultant's work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City,
contractors, or governmental agencies, or any other delays beyond Consultant's control
or without Consultant's fault.
C9
•
5. INDEPENDENT PARTIES
• City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis and Consultant is not
C�
an employee of City. The manner and means of conducting the work are under the
control of Consultant, except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation
and the expressed terms of this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed
to constitute Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents to be the agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over the
details in means of performing the work provided that Consultant is in compliance with the
terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement which may appear to give City the
right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance of the services or to
exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean that Consultant shall follow the
desires of City only in the results of the services.
6. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated
Project Administrator, and any other agencies which may have jurisdiction or interest in
the work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with Consultant on Project.
7. PROJECT MANAGER
Consultant shall assign Project to a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all
phases of Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable times
during term of Project. Consultant has designated Rick Kreuzer, P.E., to be its Project
Manager. Consultant shall not bill any personnel to Project other than those personnel
-5-
0
0
identified in Exhibit "B ", whether or not considered to be key personnel, without City's prior
written approval by name and specific hourly billing rate. Consultant shall not remove or
reassign any personnel designated in this Section or assign any new or replacement
person to Project without the prior written consent of City. City's approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld with respect to removal or assignment of non -key personnel.
Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from Project any of its
personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.
Consultant warrants it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to complete
Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.
8. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of the services under this Agreement
and the services shall be performed by Consultant in accordance with the schedule .
specified in Exhibit "A ". The failure by Consultant to strictly adhere to the schedule may
result in termination of this Agreement by City, and the assessment of damages against
Consultant for delay. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible
for delays which are due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in
the case of any such delay in the services to be provided for Project, each party hereby
agrees to provide notice to the other party so that all delays can be addressed.
8.1 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for performance
in writing to the Project Administrator not later than ten (10) calendar days after the start
of the condition, which purportedly causes a delay, and not later than the date upon which
•
L
performance is due. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may
• grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays, which are beyond
Consultant's control.
8.2 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall
respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the circumstances, by
either telephone, fax, hand delivery or mail.
9. CITY POLICY
Consultant will discuss and review all matters relating to policy and project
direction with the Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points in order to
ensure that the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals and policies.
10. CONFORMANCE TO APPLICABLE REQUIREMENT
. All work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable city, county, state and
federal law, regulations and permit requirements and be subject to approval of the Project
Administrator and City Council.
11. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible to keep the Project Administrator and /or his /her duly
authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and progress of the
work, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that have been scheduled or
are desired.
12. HOLD HARMLESS
Consultant shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless City, its City Council,
-7-
boards and commissions, officers and employees from and against any and all loss,
damages, liability, claims, allegations of liability, suits, costs and expenses for damages of
any nature whatsoever, including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury,
property damages, or any other claims arising from any and all acts or omissions of
Consultant, its employees, agents or subcontractors in the performance of services or
work conducted or performed pursuant to this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply
even in the event of negligence (active or passive) of City, or its employees, or other
contractors, excepting only the sole negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers or
employees, and shall include attorneys' fees and all other costs incurred in defending any
such claim. Nothing in this indemnity shall be construed as authorizing, any award of
attorneys' fees in any action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement.
13. INSURANCE 0
Without limiting consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement of
work, Consultant shall obtain and provide and maintain at its own expense during the
term of this Agreement policy or policies of liability insurance of the type and amounts
described below and satisfactory to City. Certification of all required policies shall be
signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf and must be
filed with City prior to exercising any right or performing any work pursuant to this
Agreement. Except workers compensation and errors and omissions, all insurance
policies shall add City, its elected officials, officers, agents, representatives and
employees as additional insured for all liability arising from Consultant's services as
•
. described herein.
All insurance policies shall be issued by an insurance company certified to do
•
business in the State of California, with original endorsements, with Best's A VII or better
carriers, unless otherwise approved by the City Risk Manager.
A. Worker's compensation insurance covering all employees and principals of
Consultant, per the laws of the State of California.
B. Commercial general liability insurance covering third party liability risks,
including without limitation, contractual liability, in a minimum amount of $1
million combined single limit per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury
and property damage. If commercial general liability insurance or other
form with a general aggregate is used, either the general aggregate shall
apply separately to this Project, or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the occurrence limit.
C. Commercial auto liability and property insurance covering any owned and
rented vehicles of Consultant in a minimum amount of $1 million combined
single limit per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
D. Professional errors and omissions insurance which covers the services to
be performed in connection with this Agreement in the minimum amount of
One Million Dollars ($ 1,000,000.00).
Said policy or policies shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be
canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days' prior notice has been given in
0
writing to City. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely notice of claim made or suit
instituted arising out of Consultant's operation hereunder. Consultant shall also procure
and maintain, at its own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its
own judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of the work.
Consultant agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has
agreed to provide comprehensive general and automotive liability insurance, that
Consultant shall look solely to its insurance for recovery. Consultant hereby grants to
City, on behalf of any insurer providing comprehensive general and automotive liability
insurance to either Consultant or City with respect to the services of Consultant herein, a
waiver of any right of subrogation which any such insurer of said Consultant may acquire
against City by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
14. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS •
Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate or transfer this Agreement or
any of the services to be performed under this Agreement, directly or indirectly, by
operation of law or otherwise without prior written consent of City. Any attempt to do so
without consent of City shall be null and void.
The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and
outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or joint
venturer or syndicate member or co- tenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint- venture
or syndicate or co- tenancy, which shall result in changing the control of Consultant, shall
be construed as an assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty percent (50 %) or
0
-10-
•
more of the voting power, or twenty -five percent (25 %) or more of the assets of the
corporation, partnership orjoint venture.
15. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record and other document
reproduced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant to or in
connection with this Agreement shall be the exclusive property of City.
Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for reuse by
City or others on any other project. Any use of completed documents for other projects
and any use of incomplete documents without specific written authorization from
Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Consultant. Further, any and
0 all liability arising out of changes made to Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement
11
by City or persons other than Consultant is waived as against Consultant and City
assumes full responsibility for such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice
and has received from Consultant written consent for such changes.
Consultant shall, at such time and in such forms as City may require, furnish
reports concerning the status of services required under this Agreement.
16. CONFIDENTIALITY
The information, which results from the services in this Agreement, is to be kept
confidential unless the release of information is authorized by City.
-11-
17. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES 0
In order to assist Consultant in the execution of his responsibilities under this
Agreement, City agrees to provide the following:
A. City will provide access to and upon request of Consultant, provide one
copy of all existing record information on file at City. Consultant shall be
entitled to rely upon the accuracy of data information provided by City and
the review of field conditions by Consultant. City will provide all such
materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's work
schedule.
B. City staff will provide usable life of facilities criteria and provide information
with regards to deficient facilities.
18. ADMINISTRATION !
This Agreement will be administered by the Public Works Department. Bill
Patapoff, City Engineer, shall be considered the Project Administrator and shall have
the authority to act for City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his /her
authorized representative shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the services to
be rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
19. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be
performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate
records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement. All such records shall be
-12-
s
. clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of City during normal business
hours to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records. Consultant shall
allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to the
Agreement for a period of three (3) years from the date of final payment under this
Agreement.
20. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment of any disputed sums until satisfaction of the dispute
with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be deemed to constitute a
failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement. Consultant shall not discontinue
work for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of withholding as a result of such
withholding. Consultant shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or
• his designee with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
interest on any withheld sums at the rate of seven percent (7 %) per annum from the date
of withholding of any amounts found to have been improperly withheld.
21. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional
inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than would have
resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work accomplished by Consultant, the
additional design, construction and /or a restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant.
Nothing in this paragraph is intended to limit City's rights under any other sections of this
Agreement.
-13-
22. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS 0
City reserves the right to employ other consultants in connection with Project.
23. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
A. Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the
California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act "), which (1) requires such
persons to disclose financial interest that may foreseeably be materially
affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits
such persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will
foreseeably financially affect such interest.
B. If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act.
Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for termination
of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold harmless •
City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's violation
of this Section.
24. SUBCONSULTANT AND ASSIGNMENT
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the services included in
this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred, contracted or subcontracted
without prior written approval of City.
25. NOTICES
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under this Agreement
shall be given in writing and conclusively shall be deemed served when delivered
•
-14-
E
personally or on the third business day after the deposit thereof in the United States mail,
postage prepaid, first class mail, addressed as hereinafter provided.
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from Consultant to City shall be
addressed to City at:
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
P. 0. Box 1768
Newport Beach, CA, 92658 -8915
(949) 644 -3311
Fax (949) 644 -3318
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from City to Consultant shall be
addressed to Consultant at:
Attention: Rick Kreuzer, P.E
President
KFM Engineering, Inc.
18 Technology, Suite 165
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453 -7970
Fax (949) 453 -7971
26. TERMINATION
In the event either part hereto fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions
hereof at the time and in the manner required hereunder, that party shall be deemed in
default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not cured within a period
of two (2) days, or if more than two (2) days are reasonably required to cure the default
and the defaulting party fails to give adequate assurance of due performance within two
(2) days after receipt by defaulting party from the other party of written notice of default,
-15-
9 0
specifying the nature of such default and the steps necessary to cure such default, the
nondefaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by giving to the defaulting •
party written notice thereof.
26.1 City shall have the option, at its sole discretion and without cause, of
terminating this Agreement by giving seven (7) days' prior written notice to Consultant as
provided herein. Upon termination of this Agreement, City shall pay to Consultant that
portion of compensation specified in this Agreement that is earned and unpaid prior to the
effective date of termination.
27. COMPLIANCES
Consultant shall comply with all laws, state or federal and all ordinances, rules and
regulations enacted or issued by City.
28. WAIVER .
A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition
contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach of the
same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein whether of the same or a
different character.
29. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or
nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and
agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or
implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereon. Any modification of this
-16-
• •
Agreement will be effective only by written execution signed by both City and Consultant.
30. OPINION OF COST
Any opinion of the construction cost prepared by Consultant represents his /her
judgment as a design professional and is supplied for the general guidance of City. Since
Consultant has no control over the cost of labor and material, or over competitive bidding
or market conditions, Consultant does not guarantee the accuracy of such opinions as
compared to contractor bids or actual cost to City.
31. CADD DELIVERABLES
CADD data delivered to City shall not include the professional stamp or signature
of an engineer or architect. City agrees that Consultant shall not be liable for claims,
liabilities or losses arising out of, or connected with (a) the modification or misuse by City,
• or anyone authorized by City, of CADD data; (b) the decline of accuracy or readability of
CADD data due to inappropriate storage conditions or duration; or (c) any use by City, or
anyone authorized by City, of CADD data for additions to this Project, for the completion
of this Project by others, or for any other project, excepting only such use as is
authorized, in writing, by Consultant. By acceptance of CADD data, City agrees to
indemnify Consultant for damages and liability resulting from the modification or misuse of
such CADD data.
32. PATENT INDEMNITY
Consultant shall indemnify City, its agents, officers, representatives and
employees against liability, including costs, for infringement of any United States' letters
_17_
I
0
patent, trademark, or copyright infringement, including costs, contained in Consultant's
drawings and specifications provided under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed
on the day and year first written above.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
Robin Clauson
Assistant City Attorney
ATTEST:
By:
LaVonne Harkless
City Clerk
\Mis_1 \sys\users \pbWShared\a gmt199\kfinengr.doc
5 .�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
A Municipal Corporation
By:
Thomas C. Edwards, Mayor
City of Newport Beach
CONSULTANT
KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
By:
Rick Kreuzer, P.E.
President
•
I
0 EXHIBIT "A" 0
1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The City of Newport Beach is proposing to rehabilitate MacArthur Boulevard from
Jamboree Road to Campus Drive, an approximate distance of 1 mile.
MacArthur Boulevard is a six lane roadway. Painted median exists along a majority of the
project reach with some raised median at the southerly end of the project limits. The
existing pavement along this section of MacArthur Boulevard is in fair condition. There are
some localized areas exhibiting signs of distress in the form of rutting and alligator
cracking.
The object of this project is to complete a thorough pavement analysis to determine the
optimum improvement strategy for the roadway and then prepare final plans, specifications
and estimates for construction.
A key aspect of this project will be the consultant teams ability to implement an
improvement strategy which not only achieves the design -life objective for the roadway,
but also takes into consideration the budget for the project. As stated in the RFP, this
project is budgeted at $630,000 for design and construction. This figure will be considered
when KFM/Labelle Marvin are developing the various roadway improvement strategies for
MacArthur Boulevard.
Based upon KFM's thorough site review, the following represent what we believe will be
the key design issues to be addressed on the project.
• Proper construction joins to the northerly and southerly limits of the project.
• Vehicular - rideability" on the finished product. All joins and transverse grade
breaks will be done at lane lines to eliminate longitudinal irregularities in the
pavement. Particular attention will be paid to the rideability through the major
intersections. As discussed in our scope of work herein, KFM is proposing to
complete intersection grid plans at the major intersections to ensure optimum
rideability through the intersections is achieved.
t Traffic control considerations need to be considered when proposing pavement
alternatives. For instance, deeplift A.C. sections should be considered in
reconstruction areas in lieu of AC /AB sections to expedite construction and
minimize lane closure durations.
0
Close coordination with City staff will be stressed to develop the pavement
rehabilitation/reconstruction strategy once pavement deflection results are
available. KFM/Labelle Marvin will provide City staff with various improvement
alternatives and discuss their relative cost effectiveness, impact on local traffic, and
expected design life.
2.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Task 1 - Data Collection
KFM shall collect and review all record information including, but not necessarily limited
to, the following:
As -built drawings
• Utility record drawings
• Right -of -way record maps
• Assessors parcel maps
• Benchmark information
a Pertinent in- progress drawings, if any
• Centerline intersection ties
Task 2 - Field Survey
Field survey work shall consist of the following subtasks:
a) grid surveys at the major intersections. Elevations will be taken at 10 foot
intervals at MacArthur /Campus, MacArthur/Birch and MacArthur/Von Karman
intersections. The MacArthur /Jamboree intersection was recently improved
and will not require any improvement as part of this project.
b) survey cross sections will be taken at 500 intervals. Additional sections will
be taken if trouble spots (i.e., low points, irregular cross falls, etc.) are
encountered.
Task 3 - Base Mapping
KFM shall prepare project base maps using existing as -built drawings collected from the
City of Newport Beach and Caltrans. Field reviews will be conducted, as necessary, to
ensure accuracy.
•
0
Task 4 - Geotechnlcal Investigation
Based upon a visual review of the existing roadway and discussions with City staff, the
project will require a thin overlay (1 % to 2 inches) and localized reconstruction. In order
to establish the proper replacement section for the dig -out areas, Labelle Marvin (LM) will
conduct a geotechnical analysis consisting of the following subtasks:
• Prior to initiation of field activities, sample locations will be marked and
Underground Service Alert contacted to notify concerned utilities. Sample locations
which may interfere with buried lines or pipes will be relocated.
• Coring and /or boring will be performed at six to eight (6 -8) separate locations,
identified as areas of removal/replacement by KFM Engineering to determine the
thickness of the existing structural section. Borings will be extended a maximum
depth of four (4') feet from the surface to obtain samples of the subgrade. Samples
will be placed in plastic bags, sealed, and transported to our laboratory for further
analysis. Prior to leaving the site, all sample locations will be backfilled and
patched.
• Upon receipt in the laboratory, samples will be visually classified and the in -situ
moisture content of each determined. Individual and /or composite samples which
represent the materials encountered will be selected and subsequent to R -value
determination for use in alternate structural section replacement design.
• A Registered Civil Engineer shall supervise all activities, review results of testing
and prepare a report of his findings, presenting recommendations for alternate
methods of rehabilitation and /or reconstruction for specific areas identified by the
Client as required.
Task 5 - Utility Coordination
Utility coordination will be ongoing throughout the duration of the project and will generally
consist of the following tasks:
• Obtain plans showing location and size of all utility lines and appurtenances
within the project area.
• Plot utility lines on base maps (Task 3).
• Cross check plotted locations above with field review information to insure
that existing lines are shown in the proper location.
• Upon finalizing the proposed roadway improvements, determine where
potential utility conflicts exist and where utility modifications are warranted.
-,
9 0
• Coordinate with affected utility companies regarding conflicts, relocations
and improvements. Two (2) full sets of plans will be submitted for comment
to each utility agency concurrent with all KFM submittals to the City for plan
check.
Task 6 - Final PS & E
This task involves the completion of construction bid documents in the form of final plans,
specifications and estimates (PS & E). We envision the following plan set will be
developed:
DESCRIPTION
# OF SHEETS
'Title Sheet ........... ............................... 1
Typical Sections and Details ............................ 1
• Roadway Plans ....... ............................... 3
Intersection Plans ..... ............................... 3
'Cross Sections ....... ............................... 2
TOTAL ............................. 10 Sheets
Roadway plan sheets will be prepared at 1 " =40' in double plan format. All reconstruction
areas will be depicted. All underground utility lines and at -grade appurtenances will be
shown.
Intersection plans will be completed at a scale of 1 " =20' for the MacArthur /Campus,
MacArthur /Birch and MacArthur/Von Karman intersections. Existing and proposed
elevations will be shown on a 10 foot grid.
Cross sections will be plotted at 500 foot intervals at 1 " =10' horizontal, 1 " =1' vertical scale.
Existing and proposed elevations and cross falls will be shown.
Traffic Control plans are not included in the scope of work. We suggest that the City
request the Contractor to submit traffic control plans prior to construction in conformance
with the requirements (i.e., lane requirements, access, etc.) which KFM will summarize in
detail in the project specifications.
NOTE: The City may elect to bid the project with an alternate
for Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM). Inclusion of this
bid alternate into the final PS &E is included in our
scope of work.
4
0
n
,1 < f
Specifications will be prepared in conformance with the City of Newport Beach's desired
format. Quantities and cost estimates shall be completed.
• This task will also include the preparation of all permit applications required for the project.
All permit fees will be the responsibility of the City of Newport Beach.
In conformance with the Request for Proposal, project submittals will be made at the 70 %,
100 %, and final approval stages of the project Final mylars and specification originals will
be provided to the City upon project approval.
Task 7 - Project Coordination and Meetings
KFM shall provide all necessary coordination activities and attend all project related
meetings for the duration of the project.
Task 8 - Bidding and Construction Services
KFM shall assist the City during the bidding and construction periods by preparing
necessary addenda and clarifying plan and specification items, as required.
Task 9 - As -Built Drawings
Upon completion of construction, KFM shall complete as -built drawings based upon
information provided by the City.
Task 10 - Reimbursables
KFM shall provide all reimbursables (mileage, printing, etc.) for the duration of the project,
excluding the reproduction of project bid sets which will be the responsibility of the City.
3.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE
This project schedule is depicted graphically on Exhibit A on the following page. This
schedule has been developed based upon the stated agency review duration of one (1)
week each for the 70% and 100% PS & E submittals. As depicted on the enclosed
schedule, KFM shall complete the subject project within 11 weeks of receiving the Notice
to Proceed on the project from the City of Newport Beach.
r1
LJ
lil
X
w
W
75
wV
^W
i
co
W�
wV
W
.�1
L
N
H
Z
w
Q LL
ma
�o
as
�w
w w
Z J
LL
0
U�
a
I
aBBBNUMBBCBBC
C
I
u
c
on
c
�L
d
6�
FA
r�H
i
i
I
1 , n
0
°0
0�
>
(D
a�wo
>06o
>
o
0o
=MtM°�a
°man
UU�
tea•
d'-'
vQ
v
d
O
E
c
!�
E
c
N
w
06
�.
.-.
-
CU U)
N>
N>
Z0i-
m0iiinQwU)Q
a
I
u
c
on
c
�L
d
6�
FA
r�H
i
i
I
1 , n
• 0
4.0 PROJECT TEAM
• KFM Engineering, Inc. has assembled a Project Team which is knowledgeable and
experienced in all aspects of the subject project. The Project Team structure is illustrated
on Exhibit B herein. Personal resumes of the key team members identified are enclosed
in the Appendix of this proposal.
The Project Manager for the project will be Mr. Rick Kreuzer, P.E. Mr. Kreuzer is a
Registered Civil Engineer in California with 16 years of civil engineering experience,
including three years with the Orange County Environmental Management Agency as a
construction inspector, one year as a Project Engineer for a major Orange County
contractor and the last ten years as a consultant As the Project Manager, Mr. Kreuzer will
have overall technical responsibility for the project and will be the client's primary contact.
He will also have ^ hands -on" involvement in the day to day design of the project. His
experience is well suited to this project, as summarized below:
• 12+ years as a consultant with an emphasis in public works design.
• Numerous roadway widening/reconstruction, storm drain, sewer and water projects
completed for various cities in Orange County over the past ten years.
• Extensive experience coordinating with utility companies.
• 3 years with OCEMA as field inspector on public works project. He has a strong
understanding of the construction elements to be considered on a project of this
type.
—, -
0
` LABELLE MARVIN
Ceotechnical
Investigation
*DENOTES SUMONSULTANT
CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
RICK KREUZER, P.E.
Project Manager
JEFF LUND
Project Engineer
0
•
TED KRULL, L.S.
Field Survey
EXHIBIT B
PROJECT TEAM CHART
•
-?-,7
•
0
n
Recent street improvement project similar in nature to the subject project which Mr.
Kreuzer has managed include:
Project
Client
Construction Cost
Tustin Avenue
Orange
$2,000,000
Yorba Linda Boulevard
Placentia
$1,400,000
Katella Avenue
Anaheim
$18,000,000
Imperial Highway
La Habra
$30,000,000
Lincoln Avenue
Anaheim
$800,000
.University Drive
Irvine
$600,000
Lake Forest Drive
OCEMA
$3,000,000
Beach Boulevard
Huntington Beach
$1,100,000
Avenida Pico
San Clemente
$400,000
Marguerite Parkway
Mission Viejo
$700,000
Pacific Coast Highway
Newport Beach
$5,000,000
Annual Resurfacing Program
94 -95
Dana Point
$500,000
Annual Resurfacing Program
95 -96
Dana Point
$600,000
Annual Resurfacing Program
94 -95
San Juan Capistrano
$600,000
Is Detailed descriptions of these projects and others are included in Section 5.0 of this
proposal.
Mr. Kreuzer will be assisted by Jeff Lund who will be responsible for the day to day
technical design and plan production on the project. Mr. Lund =s main area of expertise
is in the design of street widening and rehabilitation projects. He was the Project Engineer
for the Lincoln Avenue, University Drive, Beach Boulevard, Marguerite Parkway and
Annual Resurfacing projects listed above.
LaBelle Marvin (LM) will complete the pavement deflection study /materials report for the
project. KFM staff have worked extensively with LM on previous rehabilitation design
projects.
Arrowhead Mapping of Riverside will provide the aerial mapping for the project. They also
have worked extensively with KFM on past projects.
7
Fz.,
0 0
The time commitments of the project team members, as a percentage of the total project
manhour requirement, are summarized as follows:
Project Manager .... ............................... 17% •
Rick Kreuzer
Project Engineer .... ............................... 25%
Jeff Lund
CADD Drafter ...... ............................... 35%
Labelle Marvin ...... ............................... 17%
G eotech n i ca I Investigation
Field Survey Crew .... ............................... 6%
TOTAL ............................ 100%
5.0 RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
The following represents a summary of the most recent street improvement projects
completed or underway by the KFM team proposed for this project. We strongly
encourage you to contact the listed references regarding our performance.
Project: Tustin Avenue Rehabilitation
Client: City of Orange
Contact: Mr. Jerry Bailey (714) 744 -5531
Construction Cost: $2,000,000
KFM is currently preparing final plans, specifications and estimates for the
rehabilitation of Tustin Avenue from Fairhaven Street to Collins Avenue, a total
distance of 3 miles. This project is divided into 2 separate bid packages and is being
funded under the AHRP program.
Project: Yorba Linda Boulevard Rehabilitation
Client: City of Placentia
Contact: Mr. Chris Becker (714) 993 -8245
Construction Cost: $1,400,000
KFM is currently preparing final plans, specifications and estimates for the
rehabilitation of Yorba Linda Boulevard from Kraemer Boulevard to Jefferson Street,
a distance of 1.5 miles.
s
?r,
Project:
. Limits:
Client:
Contact:
Construction Cost:
0 0
Imperial Highway Smart Street
Improvements
Los Angeles County Line to Rose Drive
City of La Habra
Mr. Majdi Ataya (562) 905 -9720
$30,000,000
KFM staff are currently completing the preparation of final PSBE documents for an
eight mile stretch of Imperial Highway in the Cities of La Habra, Fullerton, Brea,
Placentia and Yorba Linda. The project includes geometric design, stone drain
improvements, traffic signal modifications, intersection widening, sound - wall /retaining
wall design, utility relocation and hazardous waste/lead contamination remediation.
This project also includes close coordination with Caltrans District 12 Right -of -Way for
the numerous right -0f - -way acquisitions on the project. The plans are being produced
in metric.
Project: Katella Avenue Smart Street Improvements
Limits: 1.5 to Walnut Avenue
Client: City of Anaheim
Contact: Mr. Ralph Harp (714) 765 -5175
Construction Cost: $18,000,000
KFM staff completed the preparation of the final design for the widening of 3 miles of
Katella Avenue from Interstate 5 to Ninth Street in the vicinity of Disneyland in the City
of Anaheim. This project includes the design of street, storm drain, sewer, water,
landscaping and traffic signal improvements. Right -of -way acquisition documents in
the form of legal description and plats were prepared by KFM staff for approximately
200 partial takes of existing parcels.
Project: 15th Street Improvements
Limits: Old Newport Boulevard to Irvine Avenue
Client: City of Costa Mesa/City of Newport Beach
Contact: Mr. Maher Nawar (714) 754-5248
Mr. Lloyd Dalton (714) 644 -3311
Construction Cost: $660,000
KFM staff completed drainage study and prepared final plans, specifications and
estimate for the construction of mainline storm drain and pavement rehabilitation of
15th Street from Old Newport Boulevard to Irvine Avenue, a distance of approximately
4,200 feet.
iI
0 0
Project: Lincoln Avenue Improvements
Limits: Beach Boulevard to Western Avenue
Client: City of Anaheim .
Contact: Mr. Richard Garcia (714) 765 -4433
Construction Cost: $800,000
Completed a drainage study and prepared final plans, specifications and estimate for
the construction of mainline storm drain and pavement rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue
from Beach Boulevard to Western Avenue, a distance of approximately 2,800 feet.
This project was processed for federal ISTEA funds.
Project: University Drive Rehabilitation
Limits: 600' E/O Campus Drive to MacArthur Blvd.
Client: City of Irvine
Contact: Mr. Mark Carroll (949) 724 -6410
Construction Cost: $600,000
Prepared final plans, specifications and estimate for the rehabilitation of University
Drive from 600 feet east of Campus Drive to the west city limits (7,000 l.f.). The project
included the application of an Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix (ARHM) along with a Stress
Absorpting Membrane Inner Layer (SAMI) product over the existing pavement surface.
Project: Beach Boulevard Rehabilitation
Limits: Pacific Coast Highway to Ellis Avenue
Client: City of Huntington Beach
Contact: Mr. Doug Kato (714) 536 -5431
Construction Cost: $1,100,000
Designed and prepared plans for 3 miles of roadway rehabilitation improvements on
Beach Boulevard from Ellis Avenue to the Pacific Coast Highway, a distance of 3 miles.
The project included removal and replacement of distressed roadway sections and
capping the entire roadway with an A.C. overlay.
Project: Marguerite Pkwy. Pavement Rehabilitation
Limits: Via Escolar to Crown Valley Parkway
Client: City of Mission Viejo
Contact: Mr. Loren Anderson (714) 582 -2489
Construction Cost: $700,000
Designed and prepared plans, specifications and estimates for pavement rehabilitation
on Marguerite Pkwy. from Via Escolar to Crown Valley Parkway, a distance of 2 miles.
The project included replacement of failed sections, a 0.15 foot rubberized AC overlay,
restriping and preparation of traffic control schemes for the four lane arterial highway.
ro
�z
Project: Avenida Pico Rehabilitation / Los Molinos Storm Drain
Limits: 1-405 to Los Molinos Drive
Client: City of San Clemente
Contact: Mr. Ben Parker (714) 498 -2533
Construction Cost: $400,000
Designed and prepared plans, specifications and estimates for storm drain
improvements at Avenida Pico and Los Molinos to eliminate existing cross gutters and
generally improve drainage at the intersection. The project involved a hydrology study,
identification of catch basin locations, design of a storm drain system including
connection to an existing Orange County Flood Control District Channel, and
rehabilitation and regrading of the existing streets with an A.C. pavement overlay.
Project: Lake Forest Intersections
Limits: I-5 to Trabuco Road
Client: Orange County Environmental Management Agency
Contact: Mr. Grant Anderson (714) 834 -5034
Construction Cost: $3,000,000
Prepared final plans, specifications and estimates and right -of -way documents for the
widening of four (4) intersections on Lake Forest Boulevard in south Orange County.
The plan set included roadway plan and profile, storm drain plan and profile, five traffic
signal modification plans and various detail and typical section sheets.
Project: 1994 -95 Roadway Rehabilitation Projects
Limits: Miscellaneous locations
Client: City of San Juan Capistrano
Contact: Mr. Brian Perry (949) 443 -6353
Construction Cost: $600,000
KFM staff was retained by the City of San Juan Capistrano to complete the preliminary
and final design of four (4) roadway rehabilitation projects, summarized as follows:
El Camino Real - Ortega Highway to La Zanja Street (2,100 )
• Del Obispo - Aguacate to Paseo de la Paz (4,400`)
• Mission Hills Tract - Local Street Rehabilitation (3,200)
• Junipero Serra - Rancho Viejo Road to 1 -5 NIB Ramps (400')
11
RICK KREUZER, P.E.
0 EDUCATION:
AFFILIATION:
REGISTRATION:
EXPERIENCE:
• •
KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
University of California, Irvine, CA 1983
Certificate Program in Construction Management,
American Society of Civil Engineers, 1987
American Society of Civil Engineers
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Registered Civil Engineer (California)
Project Management assignments have included:
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Tustin Avenue from Fairhaven Street
to Collins Avenue in the City of Orange. This project is funded by the AHRP
program.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Yorba Linda Boulevard from Kraemer
Boulevard to Linda Vista Drive in the City of Placentia.
• Precise alignment, final design and right -of -way engineering for the widening
of Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, including roadway, storm drain, sewer,
water and traffic signal improvements.
• Precise alignment and final design for the Imperial Highway Smart Street
Improvements form the Los Angeles County Line to Rose Drive, a distance of
8.5 miles. This project traversed through the Cities of La Habra, Fullerton,
Placentia, Brea and Yorba Linda.
• Project Manager for the Annual Roadway Resurfacing Project (Fiscal Year
1994 -95) in the City of Dana Point.
• Project Manager for the University Drive Rehabilitation project in the City of
Irvine. This project was constructed using AHFP funds.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation/reconstruction of Beach Boulevard from
Pacific Coast Highway to Ellis Avenue (3 miles) for the City of Huntington
Beach.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Marguerite Parkway from Crown Valley
Parkway to Via Escolar (2 miles) in the City of Mission Viejo.
RICK KREUZER, P.E.
0
KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Marguerite Parkway from Alicia
Parkway to Santa Margarita Parkway (2 miles) in the City of Mission Viejo.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Avenida Pico /Calle de los Molinos in
the City of San Clemente.
• Technical Advisor for the pavement analysis of all primary and secondary
highways and the development of a maintenance program for the City of
Mexicali, State of Baja, Mexico.
• Project Manager for review of OCUTT and FAU funding applications for street
reconstruction /rehabilitation projects in Orange County for OCTC. Duties
included review of preliminary plans for construction feasibility, review of
quantities, cost estimates, etc.
• Project Manager for the pavement rehabilitation and storm drain improvements
on 15th Street in the City of Costa Mesa.
• Project Manager for six roadway rehabilitation/reconstruction projects in the City
of Irvine.
• Project Manager for four roadway rehabilitation/reconstruction projects in the
City of San Juan Capistrano.
• Project Manager for the widening and pavement reconstruction of Gale Avenue
in the City of Industry.
• Project Manager for the rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
• Project Engineer for a four mile widening and reconstruction of Pacific Coast
Highway in Newport Beach. Responsibilities included design of highway
geometries, channelization, drainage, sound wall, mechanically stabilized
embankment wall, 30 inch water line, street lighting, and right of way
documents. This was a FAU project under review by Caltrans, with an
estimated construction cost of $7,500,000.
Project Engineer for the preparation of plans, specifications and estimates for
the construction of Main Street roadway improvements through the Village of
Westpark in Irvine. This project included the design of approximately 6000 feet
of arterial highway improvements, as well as the design of a reinforced concrete
box drainage facility adjacent to the proposed roadway.
•
-?,
0 10
RICK KREUZER, P.E. KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
• Project Engineer for street reconstruction /rehabilitation project on Main Street
in the City of Santa Ana.
• Senior plan checker for street, storm drain, water and sewer improvement plans
for the Village of Westpark in the City of Irvine. Plan check also involved review
of hydrology and hydraulics for the development.
• Plan check of development plans for the City of Camarillo on an as- needed
basis. Required review of street, storm drain, sewer and water improvement
plans as well as detailed checks of parcel and tract maps.
• Design Engineer for the overlay of 4,000 lineal feet of roadway (Park Place) in
the City of Laguna Beach.
• Project Engineer for the alignment study and final design of three miles of new
arterial highway in Canyon Country for the County of Los Angeles.
• Project Manager responsible for the preparation of plans, specifications, and
estimates for approximately 6000 lineal feet of street, storm drain, sewer and
water improvement plans in the City of San Marcos. This project also included
hydrological mapping of a drainage area approximately 500 acres in size.
! Conceptual planning and design for a one mile widening of MacArthur
Boulevard in the vicinity of San Joaquin Hills Road in Newport Beach. The
project plans were reviewed and approved by Caltrans District 7 and the project
was constructed in 1987.
• Design of street improvements for Jamboree Road from Pacific Coast Highway
to Backbay Drive in the City of Newport Beach. This project was constructed
in 1986 at a cost of $940,000.
• Project Engineer for preliminary and final design of Tustin Ranch Road in the
City of Tustin, including design of storm drain and soundwall improvements.
C�
• •
JEFF LUND KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
EDUCATION: Civil Engineering, Olympia Tech., Washington - 1984
REGISTRATION: NICET Level II, No. 079621, 1994
EXPERIENCE:
Jeff Lund is a Project Engineer with KFM Engineering, Inc. He has over 10 years
experience in roadway. Past assignments have included:
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Tustin Avenue from Fairhaven Street
to Collins Avenue in the City of Orange. This project is funded by the AHRP
program.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Yorba Linda Boulevard from Kraemer
Boulevard to Linda Vista Drive in the City of Placentia.
• Design Engineer for the Annual Roadway Resurfacing Project (Fiscal Year
1994 -95) in the City of Dana Point.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of University Drive in the City or Irvine.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Marguerite Parkway in the City of
Mission Viejo.
• Design Engineer for the rehabilitation of Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim.
• Design Engineer for six roadway rehabilitation projects in the City of Irvine.
• Design Engineer for four roadway rehabilitation projects in the City of San Juan
Capistrano.
• Design Engineer for the project report and PS &E for the upgrading of four major
intersections on Lake Forest Drive in Orange County, including right of way
engineering and utility coordination.
• Design Engineer for the Los Mlolinos Driye Rehabilitation project in the City of
ben Clemente.
7 -
• •
THEODORE M. KRULL - PARTY CHIEF KFM ENGINEERING, INC.
. Licensed Land Surveyor, State of California; 1976 graduate of the Southem California
Surveyors Joint Apprenticeship Committee =s Four -Year Training Program. Certified
Survey Party Chief, also certified for hazardous waste operations, in compliance with
O.S.H.A. 29 C.F.R. 1910.120. Member California Land Surveyors Association,
American Congress of Surveying and Mapping, American Association of Geodetic
Surveying and the National Society of Professional Surveyors.
Mr. Kruil is field operations manager, estimator, office advisor and survey. consultant.
A second generation surveyor with 20 years of full time experience, he has supervised
numerous projects, including Rancho San Clemente - A 1900 acre, 56 million cubic
yard master planned, mixed use community; Wildomar - A 5000 acre G.P.S./aerial
mapping project in Riverside County; Design Survey for widening of approximately six
miles of California State Highway 55; and many single family subdivisions.
EMBIT "B"
KFM •
ENGINEERING, INC.
October 21, 1998
Mr. Bill Patapoff, P.E.
City Engineer
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92658 -8915
RE: Revised Cost Proposal for Preparation of Plans, Specifications and
Estimates for the Rehabilitation of MacArthur Boulevard from Jamboree
Road to Campus Drive
Dear Mr. Patapoff:
Our proposed fee to complete the subject project is $37,275. A detailed breakdown of
manhours and fees by task are depicted on the fee schedule enclosed herein as
Exhibit A. Exhibit B represents KFM's Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates.
•
We trust this information is complete. If you have any questions, or require additional
information, please do not hesitate to call. .
Respectfully submitted,
Rick Kreuzer, P.E.
President
RK/dm
Encl.
18 Technology Suite 165 1 rvine California 92618 Ph: 949.453.7970 Fax: 949.453.7971
0
0
0
E
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
MACARTHUR BLVD. REHABILITATION
FEE SCHEDULE
TASK
KIM STAFF
LUMP
SUM
TOTAL
($105)
P.M.
($75)
PE
(f65)
CADD
(135)
SURVEY
1. DATA COLLECTION
1
4
4
$665
2. FIELD SURVEY
' Giid Swveys
1
20
$2905
-Cm Sections
1
8
$1185
3. BASE MAPPING
4
d
40
$3 620
4. GEOTECWCAL INVESTIGATION
4
4
$5140
$6160
S. UTILITY COORDINATION
4
d
8
f l
6. FINAL P S k E
-Tidc Sbea 1
1
2
1
$515
.Typical SecWw& DcMils 1
2
d
12
SI 90
•Roedws Places 3
16
10
40
f7 80
' Inlasection Plans 3
6
24
20
S3 730
-Coss Scctious 2
1
4
8
$925
-S ficabm
8
$840
-Esti=ld
2
8
$810
7. PROJECT COORDINATION/MMTINGS
16
4
fl 80
S. BIDDING R CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
8
4
4
S1 400
9. AS -BUILT DRAWINGS
2
4
d
51030
10. REMURSA13LES
$1 00
$1 00
TOTAL MANHOURS
TOTAL COSTS
77
$8,085
122
(9,150
148
$9,620
29
$3,780
$6,640
537,275
/r(
KFM
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES
Rates Effective through December 31, 1998
OFFICE PERSONNEL:
Typists, Word Processors .......................... ..............................$ 30.00/Hr.
Technician ............................................ ............................... $ 40.00/Hr.
CAD Operator ......................................... ..............................$ 60.00/Hr.
Design Engineers ..................................... ..............................$ 65.00/Hr.
Project Engineers .................................... ..............................$ 75.00/Hr.
Project Managers .................................... ..............................$ 90.00/Hr.
Senior Project Managers ............................... .......................... $105.00 /Hr.
FIELD PERSONNEL:
Two -Man Survey Party,
including Truck and Equipment .......................... ....................$135.00 /Hr.
Three -Man Survey Party,
including Truck and Equipment .......................... ....................$170.00 /Hr.
SUPPORT & MISCELLANEOUS COSTS:
C.A.D.D. Work Station / Plotter .............. ............................... $ 25.00/Hr.
Computer time ........................................ ..............................$ 16.00/Hr
Telefax................................................. ............................... $ 2.00/Pg.
Electronic Distance Measuring Equipment(E.D.M. ) ....................$55.00 /Day
Survey Trucks ......................................... ..............................$ 0.50/Mile
Other Vehicles ......................................... ..............................$ 0.30/Mile
Outside services and consultants are billed at direct costs plus 15 %.
Blueprints, reproduction, messenger service, subsistence, travel and other
expenses are billed at direct cost plus 10 %. Terms are net 30 days with 1 '1s%
per month interest charges. The above schedule is for straight time hours.
KFM
ENG WEEPING. INC.
9
0
0
U
d�
W d
U
H �
zw
�O
q
OQ
�w
E
>. O
�z
oQ
�1
zQ
w,
Qq
z�
�Q
Q¢
0
7
x
F
C
0
Z
0
�ACARTHUR ��� ^\
r?