HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-4037 - PSA for Parking Management PlanPROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
FOR PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this 94day of April, 2008, by and
between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a Municipal Corporation ( "City "), and
Walker Parking Consultants /Engineers, Inc., a Michigan Corporation whose office is
located at 2550 Hollywood Way, Burbank, California, ( "Consultant"), and is made with
reference to the following:
RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws
of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now
being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of
City.
B. City is planning to more effectively manage its parking resources and in keeping
with the goals and policies of the new General Plan establish the appropriate
parking requirements under the Zoning Code.
C. City desires to engage Consultant to assist with the development of
comprehensive plans for the operation and possible expansion of its on- street
parking spaces and municipal off - street parking lots in each of the commercial
villages, specifically the Balboa Peninsula (Balboa Village, Lido and Cannery
Villages /McFadden Square), Balboa Island, West Newport Highway, Mariners'
Mile and Corona del Mar. Further the City is seeking additional expertise in
evaluating all off - street parking standards as part of a comprehensive rewrite of
its Zoning Code to implement the new General Plan
D. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and
knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement.
E. The principal members of Consultant for purposes of Project shall be Carolyn
Krasnow, Ph.D., Steffen Turoff, Richard Raskin, Derek Adamas, Yvette Barbosa,
Mark Linsenmayer and other members of the staff of Walker Parking
Consultants as needed.
F. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed the
previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and desires to
retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement.
9
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as
follows:
TERM
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the above written date, and shall
terminate on the 31 t day of March, 2009, unless terminated earlier as set forth
herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
Consultant shall diligently perform all the services described in the Scope of
Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The
City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Services at its sole
discretion.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of services under this Agreement and
the services shall be performed to completion in a diligent and timely manner.
The failure by Consultant to perform the services in a diligent and timely manner
may result in termination of this Agreement by City.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays
due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of
any such delay in the services to be provided for the Project, each party hereby
agrees to provide notice to the other party so that all delays can be addressed.
3.1 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for
performance in writing to the Project Administrator not later than ten (10)
calendar days after the start of the condition that purportedly causes a
delay. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may
grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are
beyond Consultant's control.
3.2 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall
respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the
circumstances, by either telephone, fax, hand - delivery or mail.
4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
City shall pay Consultant for the services on a time and expense not -to- exceed
basis in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Schedule of
Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
Consultant's compensation for all work performed in accordance with this
Agreement, excluding all reimbursable items and subconsultant fees, shall not
exceed One Hundred Eighty-six Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Dollars
($186,380) without prior written authorization from City. Reimbursable expenses
will be billed at 1.00 times cost and shall not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars. No
2
i
billing rate changes shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the
prior written approval of City.
4.1 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the work
performed the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include the name
of the person who performed the work, a brief description of the services
performed and /or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it
relates, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent
on all work billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any
reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty
(30) days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.
4.2 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses
specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing
in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be
limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by
Consultant:
A. The actual costs of subconsultants for performance of any of the
services that Consultant agrees to render pursuant to this
Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and
awarded in accordance with this Agreement.
B. Approved reproduction charges.
C. Actual costs and /or other costs and /or payments specifically
authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Consultant in the
performance of this Agreement.
4.3 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work performed
without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra
Work" means any .work that is reasonably determined by City to be
necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not
included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not
reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this
Agreement. Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in
accordance with the Schedule of Billing Rates as set forth in Exhibit B.
5. PROJECT MANAGER
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of
the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable
times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated Steffen Turoff to
be its Project Manager. Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project
Manager or any personnel listed herein or in Exhibit A or assign any new or
replacement personnel to the Project without prior written consent of the City.
City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the removal or
assignment of non -key personnel.
3
0 •
Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its
personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.
Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to
complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.
6. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the Planning Department. Leigh M. De
Santis shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for
City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his /her authorized
representative shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the services to be
rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
In order to assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this
Agreement, City agrees to provide access to, and upon request of Consultant,
one copy of all existing relevant information on file at City. City will provide all
such materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's work
schedule.
8. STANDARD OF CARE
8.1 All of the services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and
technical personnel required to perform the services required by this
Agreement, and that it will perform all services in a manner
commensurate with community professional standards. All services shall
be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not
employed by City, nor have any contractual relationship with City. By
delivery of completed work, Consultant certifies that the work conforms to
the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and
local laws and the professional standard of care.
8.2 Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has, shall obtain, and
shall keep in full force in effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and
expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of
whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its
profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business
license during the term of this Agreement.
8.3 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be
responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by
reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or the failure of City
to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consultant's
work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or
governmental agencies.
:1
r !
9. HOLD HARMLESS
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify and hold
harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents,
volunteers, and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties ") from and
against claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or
damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action,
suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees, disbursements and
court costs) (individually, a Claim; collectively, "Claims "), related to any breach of
the terms and conditions of this Agreement, any work performed or services
provided under this Agreement (including, to the extent caused by, the willful
negligence and /or willful acts, errors and /or omissions of Consultant, its
principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, consultants,
subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for
whose acts they may be liable or any or all of them).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require
Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the
negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this
indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorney's fees in any
action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply
to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are
applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of
indemnification to be provided by the Consultant.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis
and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of
conducting the work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent
they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this
Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute approval
for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over
the means of performing the work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with
the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give
City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance or to
exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant
shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the services.
11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated
Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or
interest in the work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the
Consultant on the Project.
5
• •
12. CITY POLICY
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project
direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points
in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals
and policies.
13. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator and/or his/her
duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and
progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that
have been scheduled or are desired.
14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement
of work. Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during
the term of this Agreement, a policy or policies of liability insurance of the type
and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
A. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of
insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance
coverage required herein. Insurance certificates must be approved by
City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance or issuance
of any permit. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with
City at all times during the term of this Agreement.
B. Signature. A person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf shall sign certification of all required policies.
C. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an
insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner
to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders' Rating of A (or higher) and Financial Size
Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of
Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk
Manager.
D. Coverage Requirements.
Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability
Insurance for his or her employees in accordance with the laws of
the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each
subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation
Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with
the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's
employees. Any notice of cancellation or non - renewal of all
A
• 0
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by City at least
thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days written notice of non-
payment of premium) prior to such change. The insurer shall agree
to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents,
employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by Consultant for City.
ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance in an amount not less than two million
dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage, including without limitation,
contractual liability. If commercial general liability insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed
under this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be at
least twice the required occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
automobile insurance covering bodily .injury and property damage
for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for
any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not
less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for
each occurrence.
iv. Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional errors and omissions insurance, which
covers the services to be performed in connection with this
Agreement in the minimum amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000).
E. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance
policy shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with
respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of
the Consultant.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects to
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents
and volunteers as respects to all claims, losses, or liability arising
directly or indirectly from the Consultant's operations or services
provided to City. Any insurance maintained by City, including any
self- insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess
insurance only and not contributory with the insurance provided
hereunder.
7
• 0
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as
though a separate policy had been written for each, except with
respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company.
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City, its elected
or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed
officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended,
voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits, by either
party except after thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar "days
written notice of non - payment of premium) written notice has been
received by City.
F. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claim made or suit instituted arising out of or resulting from
Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
G. Additional Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own
judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of
the work.
15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the services to be
provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or
subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following
shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other
disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of
the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or
cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint- venture or syndicate or cotenancy,
which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty
percent (50 %) or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent (25 %) or more
of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint- venture.
16. SUBCONTRACTING
The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this
Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of
Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the
Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express written
consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be
performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of City.
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
93
M •
Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing
produced (hereinafter "Documents "), prepared or caused to be prepared by
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of
implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and
City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further
compensation to Consultant or any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's
expense, provide such Documents to City upon prior written request.
Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents
for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written
authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to
Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to
Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than
Consultant is waived against Consultant and City assumes full responsibility for
such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received
from Consultant written consent for such changes.
18. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and
communications that result from the services in this Agreement, shall be kept
confidential unless City authorizes in writing the release of information.
19. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
The Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, its agents, officers,
representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for
infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright
infringement, including costs, contained in Consultant's drawings and
specifications provided under this Agreement.
20. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be
performed under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and
any services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum
period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date
of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and
invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of
City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and
invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all
work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a
period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this
Agreement.
•
21. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction
of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be
deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement.
Consultant shall not discontinue work as a result of such withholding. Consultant
shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or his /her designee
with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its
investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts
found to have been improperly withheld. Consultant may withhold services if
Consultant is not paid for services rendered in a timely manner.
22. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional
inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what
would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work
accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and /or
restoration expense shall be borne by Consultant. Nothing in this paragraph is
intended to limit City's rights under the law or any other sections of this
Agreement.
23. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS
City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the
Project.
24. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the
California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act "), which (1) requires such
persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially
affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such
persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably
financially affect such interest.
If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act.
Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate
termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold
harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's
violation of this Section.
25. NOTICES
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under the terms of this
Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served
when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof
10
26.
27.
M
in the United States
hereinafter provided.
Consultant to City shall
mail, postage prepaid,
All notices, demands,
be addressed to City at:
Attn: Leigh M. De Santis
Planning Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA, 92663
Phone: 949- 644 -3207
Fax: 949 - 644 -3224
•
first -class mail, addressed as
requests or approvals from
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from CITY to Consultant shall be
addressed to Consultant at:
Attention: Steffen Turoff
Walker Parking consultants
2550 Hollywood Way, suite 303
Burbank, CA 91505
Phone: 818- 953 -9130
Fax: 818- 953 -9331
TERMINATION
In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of
this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be
deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not
cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar
days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to
give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after
receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the
steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure
the default, the non - defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by
giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.
Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the right, at its sole
discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving
seven (7) calendar days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of
termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for services
satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination
for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of
termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other
information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement,
whether in draft or final form.
COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS
Consultant shall at its own cost and expense comply with all statutes,
ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including
11
• 0
federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted.
In addition, all work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City,
county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be
subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.
28. WAIVER
A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition
contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach
of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether
of the same or a different character.
29. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or
nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations
and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal
agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein.
30. CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement
and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms
of this Agreement shall govern.
31. INTERPRETATION
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning
of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by
reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction
which might otherwise apply.
32. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document
executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
33. SEVERABILITY
If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of
this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
34. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters
relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be
adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange.
12
35. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT
Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not
discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment
because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on
the day and year first written above.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
for the City of Newport Beach
ATTEST:
Bj2k(kX W 2�L�-
LaVonne Harkless,
City Clerk
CITY OF WPO BEACH,
A M ipal rp ra ion
By:
ayor
for the City of Newport Beach
CONSULTANT:
�• • • •'
��
i 040 A
Print Name: LAI* u/- l fLtrac6C2L
By: IdL4' ju,
(
' Offi r)
Title:
Print Name:��«�,
Attachments: Exhibit A — Scope of Services
Exhibit B — Schedule of Billing Rates
F:\users\cat\shared\ContractTemplatesPublishedonintranet\FORM — Professional Service Agreement.doc
Rev: 05-02-07
13
WALKER Walker Parking Consultants
PARKING CONSULTANTS 2550 Hollywood Way, Suite 303
Burbank, CA 91505
Voice: 818.953.9130
Fax: 818.953.9331
www.walkerparking.com
January 31, 2008
Sharon Wood
Assistant City Manager
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA 92663
Re: Proposal to Provide Parking Consulting Services
Parking Management Plan and Zoning Requirements
Newport Beach, California
Dear Ms. Wood:
Walker Parking Consultants appreciates the opportunity to present the following proposal to
develop a Parking Management Plan for the City of Newport Beach. We are very enthusiastic
about the opportunity to be involved in this project!
As the largest and most comprehensive parking consulting firm in the nation, Walker Parking
Consultants is uniquely positioned to provide the City with expertise in all areas of the project
scope. The staff in our Burbank office includes experts in parking management, policy, planning,
operations, code analyses, financing, circulation and layout, and other areas related to parking.
Our team brings an unparalleled breadth and depth to each study.
As part of our broad list of parking consulting services for municipalities, the creation of parking
management and policy plans for commercial districts is an important component of our work.
The goal of the comprehensive nature of our proposed parking study is a plan that will help the
City grow its public and private parking system efficiently and responsibly in order to the balance
the needs of the historic commercial and residential villages that make up Newport Beach with
new land uses such as mixed-use developments.
Many growing municipalities face challenges similar to the City of Newport Beach when trying to
balance the desire to preserve and grow pedestrian -friendly, aesthetically pleasing commercial
areas while providing adequate and convenient parking for the variety of people who drive there.
Walker has done extensive work with municipalities throughout California and the rest of the
country that are confronting similar issues of wanting to ensure an adequate parking supply and
the efficiency of parking resources.
In addition to performing parking studies of numerous downtowns and commercial areas, we
have recently completed extensive parking policy analyses of commercial and beach areas in San
Diego's Pacific Beach, Phoenix, San Clemente, and Santa Rosa, California, where we specifically
examined a variety of financing options including in lieu fee policies.
WALKER Sharon Wood
PARKING CONSULTANTS Proposal to Provide Parking Consulting Services
City of Newport Beach Parking Management Plan
,January 31, 2008
Page ii of 31
We look forward to working closely with the City of Newport Beach to revise existing parking
policies or, when necessary, put new policies in place that enhance the quality of life while
maintaining parking that is vital for many businesses, residents and visitors.
Walker's proposed project manager for this assignment will be Steffen Turoff. Steffen has been
with Walker for four years and as the Project Manager will oversee the entire project and serve
as the contact person for the City of Newport Beach. Steffen studied with Don Shoup for his
master's degree in Urban Planning at UCLA, and since coming to Walker has worked extensively
in the area of parking policy analysis as well created parking demand studies for small, medium,
and large cities. Steffen works out of our Burbank office. He can be contacted at the address
and phone number above, or by e-mail at Steffen.Turoff@walkerparking.com.
The following proposal is organized in accordance with the format prescribed within the RFP and
includes our project understanding, approach, proposed team members, qualifications to exceed
the City's expectations, and our professional not -to -exceed fee. Our proposed team will be 100%
committed to working with the City of Newport Beach and will commit appropriate resources to
complete the tasks of this Parking Study in a timely and efficient manner.
We acknowledge the breadth this study and, within our scope, have allocated significant
resources accordingly, including a considerable number of hours devoted to meeting with the
community and to field work (data collection). If, after reviewing this document, you feel that
adjustments to the scope are needed, we would be happy to revise our work plan to fully reflect
your approach to this study.
Thank you again for the opportunity to provide you with our qualifications. If we are selected for
this project our goal will be to provide you with the best service you have ever received from a
professional consulting services firm. If you need additional information, or if you have questions
on the information presented in this proposal, please do not hesitate to call us at 818.953.9130.
Sincerely,
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
Carolyn H. Krasnow, Ph.D.
Principal/Director of Study Services
ST/rlp
Enclosure
Z*1 Z_ - �f/
Steffen Turoff
Project Manager/Parking Consultant
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARAj ION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
I. BACKGROUND................................................................ 5
Unique Qualifications.................................................... 2
FirmProfile.................................................................. 2
II. PROJECT APPROACH........................................................ 5
Project Understanding.................................................... 5
Proposed Methodology .................................................. 6
III. CONSULTANTS............................................................... 9
IV. RELATED EXPERIENCE..................................................... 10
Project Experience with References ..............I .................. 10
V. SCOPE OF SERVICES...................................................... 13
VI. PROJECT ORGANIZATION AND STAFFING ...................... 21
Organization Chart ..................................................... 21
StaffBios................................................................... 21
Current Workload and Commitment ............................... 22
Resumes.................................................................... 24
VII. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE ..................................... 27
VIII. COST DATA................................................................ 28
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARHiION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH -0PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
UNIQUE QUALIFICATIONS
L BACKGROUND
We are creating the new methods that other consultants will adopt.
Walker's team members are
What makes Walker uniquely qualified within the field of parking
active in the professional
consulting is the fact that we are not just another business, we are a
organizations that train the rest
learning organization as well. Walker sets aside a percentage of
of the industry. In particular, we
net revenues every year to invest in training and research. We do
have several consultants on the
Parking Consultants Council.
more than other companies to make sure our staff are at the
forefront of the industry.
The added benefits that we provide to our clients include:
• Walker has produced key industry research, including the
important update to the Urban Land Institute's landmark
Shared Parking study. Our research keeps us at the leading
edge of creative parking solutions for our clients.
• Walker's team members are active in the professional
organizations that train the rest of the industry. In
particular, we have several consultants on the Parking
Consultants Council. This group interprets policy for the
entire parking industry, and provides publications that guide
other consultants on issues ranging from right -sizing to
revenue to parking system management to efficient design
guidelines.
• As an organization that invests in research and staff
development, Walker has developed expertise in all areas
of parking, including both planning (shared parking,
financing), design (automated garages, circulation), and
Walker's Parking Consulting
operations (equipment, management).
and Study Services Group
• No matter what questions our clients come up with about
consists of 35 professionals whohave hundreds of years of
their parking system, we have someone within our staff who
combined experience in all
can help.
aspects of the parking industry.
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS PROFILE
In our 42"d year of success, Walker Parking Consultants is the
largest firm in the world that is devoted solely to parking consulting
as well as the design and engineering of parking facilities. The
firm has thirteen offices in the United States and a professional staff
of over 300 planners, architects, engineers, technicians, and
2
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARAgION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
support personnel. Walker Parking Consultants (WALKER) offers
the total spectrum in parking studies, design and operations
consulting.
WALKER'S Parking Consulting and Study Services Group consist of
35 professionals who have hundreds of years of combined
experience in all aspects of the parking industry. They have
produced over a thousand studies for municipal clients that cover a
wide range of topics. A significant number of these studies have
dealt specifically with the challenges faced by municipalities
including:
• Supply and Demand Projections for Downtown Shopping
and Mixed -Use Districts
• Parking Policies from Parking Requirements to Pricing
• Traffic and Parking Management Plans
• Financial Feasibility Analyses
• Specifications for Parking Equipment
• Traffic Engineering
• Operations Assessments
• Consensus Building
• Audits
We recognize that parking issues are not only multidimensional,
but also impact and are impacted by other issues faced by cities.
WALKER is recognized as a leader in parking technology and
innovative policies, and the professional staff of the firm is active in
professional associations related to parking. Our firm has made
significant contributions to parking research and the published
literature on parking.
Most recently, WALKER completed a contract with the Urban Land
Institute (ULI) and the International Council of Shopping Centers
(ICSC) to lead a team of parking and transportation planning
experts to update the landmark publication, Shared Parking,
Second Edition. Our research represents parking characteristics of
91 land uses and is the base for projecting future parking
conditions in mixed-use market areas and is at the forefront of
MINING, USIGN.
(U,SIM9(UCM:
MAIN MAM(i 1 WAR
We wrote the book on Parking.
3
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARAJON OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
maximizing the public benefits of shared parking in business
districts in towns and cities alike.
In addition, the textbook, Parking Structures: Planning, Design,
Construction, Maintenance and Repair, written by five senior
officers of the firm and generally recognized as the state-of-the-art
text, not only for parking structure design and engineering, from
acceptable walking distances for parking facility users to issues of
safety and security.
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
IS
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARE,.. SON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH -0PARMNGCONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
Newport Beach is considering significant changes to how parking
in the City is provided, managed, and financed.
The City seeks parking policies that will maintain the ambience and
economic vitality of its historic villages, which contain a mix of
commercial and residential areas, while introducing the flexibility
that will accommodate mixed uses and designations and promote
balanced economic growth. The City also wishes to explore
whether new parking pricing policies, such as those recommended
in recent years by professor and parking expert Donald Shoup,
could not only improve the management of its parking system but
perhaps provide a source of funding for additional parking
facilities.
The changes being considered are the result of the implementation
of the City's General Plan, which was adopted in 2006, and the
Plan's Land Use and Circulation Elements. These elements provide
for the introduction of a variety of new policies ranging from new
mixed use designations to changes in parking requirements and the
development of shared parking facilities. Many of these changes
are expected to result in revisions to the parking requirements
contained in the City's Zoning Code. Changes in the way the City
provides parking to the public, as well as how that parking is paid
for, are also anticipated as part of an overhaul of the City's
dormant in -lieu fee parking ordinance. All of these issues and
policies must be analyzed by the parking consultant in order to
determine the City's Parking Requirements and Management Plan.
Finally, Walker recognizes that close consultation with the public is
crucial when considering changes to policies in which residents,
business owners, employees and visitors all have a stake. The City
wishes to make sure that stakeholders have adequate opportunity to
make their voices heard as current conditions are analyzed and
new policy is crafted. Meetings and public workshops will be an
important component to the successful development of new parking
policies in the City.
II. PROJECT APPROACH
5
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR,#._iON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 40PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
PROPOSED METHODOLOGY
In order to understand current parking conditions and address
current challenges, we must first quantify them. We begin our
analysis by using Walker's professional field survey staff to quantify
in a detailed manner the current inventory of parking spaces and
(parking) occupancy conditions in the coastal areas and small
commercial villages under study. At the same time, we will engage
in community outreach in order to understand the experiences,
opinions and concerns of the various stakeholders with regard to
parking. Stakeholders with whom we consult will include the
California Coastal Commission as well as members of the local
business and residential communities. We will then look at any
significant development planned for the study area in order to
consider the parking impacts that new development might add to
the existing conditions.
Based on the analyzed data, the goals of the General Plan, and
No other consulting firm has as
input provided by City staff, local stakeholders and the Coastal
extensive a network of
Commission, Walker will create a draft parking plan for managing
consultants and projects to
the parking system and for the implementation of management
educate us and our clients about
recommendations as well. In creating the plan, Walker draws from
what works, what doesn't, and
its decades of experience, research, and best practices in
what's new.
municipal and private sector parking policies and the experts in
every aspect of parking that we have on our staff.
Finally, we will look at what can be done with the zoning code in
order to codify parking policies that will address current problems
and promote future policies in keeping with the intent of City's
General Plan. We will examine the parking standards contained in
the City's Zoning code, comparing them with Walker's standards
for design and our requirements for stand alone and shared uses
contained in the Walker Shared Parking Model.' We will then
make the appropriate considerations and adjustments for Newport
Beach's unique location and historic neighborhoods and building
stock. We will also compare the City's parking standards with
those of comparable cities. In addition, we will evaluate the
introduction of new policies and changes to existing policies in the
code, per the City's expressed interests, ranging from new land use
designations to in -lieu fee policies. We will then make
' The model was developed by Walker in conjunction for the Urban Land
Institute (ULI).
0
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARk. iON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH -0 PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
recommendations to the City and stakeholders regarding revisions
to the code.
Our approach will be to supplement data collection and analysis
with a collaborative process that includes the following:
Stakeholder Input. It is important for consultants to
recognize that the people living in the City and dealing with
the parking every day have a lot of knowledge of what has
been tried, what's worked, what the continuing problems
are, and what they'd like to see. The process outlined in
our scope below calls for significant input from the
community, including:
a. Community workshops that enable us to obtain
feedback from the community as well as "educate"
people on the study process and findings, and on
the reasoning behind our recommendations.
b. A steering committee made up of diverse
representatives of the City to help guide the study
and provide detailed input.
c. A project website to facilitate on-going
communication between the public and the
consulting team.
2. Management and Policy Research. Beyond the local
knowledge of the parking system, there is the local
knowledge of communities across the country. Walker has
done over a thousand municipal studies, and we draw on
our extensive nationwide network of colleagues and project
histories to consider what we think will constitute "best
practices" for a given city. No other consulting firm has as
extensive a network of consultants and projects to educate
us and our clients about what works, what doesn't, and
what's new.
In addition, we research nearby cities to see what kind of
initiatives are being taken in the area, what are considered
appropriate rates in the local market, etc.
Our project management process is geared to ensure that our
consultants have as much collaboration and oversight as possible;
we believe this leads to a more creative, more erudite study.
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARkAON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
The project team includes consultants with specialties in site
selection and design, policy and management. In addition, we
have informal "advisory meetings" that allow thorough input from
others within Walker who have experience with municipal studies
and may have insights to contribute. The project principal is
involved on a daily basis in project discussions, and reviews every
report before it is sent.
The collaboration between the consultants and City staff will require
significant input from the City. In addition to meetings and
feedback listed in the scope, we will need from the City:
■ Input on formation of a steering committee. City staff can
suggest representatives.
■ Input on comparable cities.
■ All background documentation, including previous studies,
traffic analyses, site plans/dimensions of potential
development parcels, and historical information on parking
management plans, rates, etc.
Walker has produced key
industry research, including the
important update to the Urban
Land Institute's landmark Shared
Parking study. Our research
keeps us at the leading edge of
creative parking solutions for our
clients.
0
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARA, iON OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
Walker is not including subcontractors to our team. We maintain
all staff to competently complete the tasks outlined within our
proposed scope of services.
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
III. CONSULTANTS
9
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR', . ION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WALKER
40 PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
PROJECT EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES
IV. RELATED EXPERIENCE
In 2005, Walker provided the City with conceptual layouts for
three-level and four -level (alternate scenarios), above -grade parking
structures proposed for a site at Balboa Blvd. and 23`d Street. The
analysis provided the City with potential parking capacities, heights
and preliminary cost estimates for each of the scenarios.
Other relevant work that Walker has done includes parking
demand, management and policy studies for beach cities that
include Pacific Beach (San Diego), San Clemente, Laguna Beach,
Redondo Beach, Carpinteria, Carmel, and Santa Monica.
PACIFIC BEACH PARKING PLAN AND POLICY ANALYSIS
PACIFIC BEACH BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
2007-2008
Benjamin Nichols
Walker was retained by the business improvement district and
Executive Director
Discover Pacific Beach Business
community parking district in San Diego's Pacific Beach to
Improvement District
recommend policies and create a parking plan that would manage
Tel: (858) 273-3303
and balance the high demand for parking generated by the area's
Email: Benjamin@pacificbeach.org
businesses, residents and beach goers. Pacific Beach hosts millions
of visitors every year and experiences particularly sharp spikes in
seasonal parking demand. However, there are no City -owned
public parking lots in the area. On -street parking (including along
residential streets) and a few private lots handle virtually all of the
area's parking demand. Walker created a parking plan to
manage demand and supply as well as the influx of visitors' cars
on residential streets. We then presented the plan in a series of
public meetings in which members of the community were educated
about parking policies while providing input for the plan.
COPPER SQUARE PARKING STUDY
PHOENIX ARIZONA
2005
Brian Kearney
Walker was retained by Downtown Phoenix's business
President and CEO
improvement district, Copper Square, for the purpose of providing
Downtown Phoenix Partnership, Inc.
parking policy recommendations that would facilitate the area's
(602) 744-6406
transformation into a vibrant mixed of uses and accommodate new
Email: BKearney@downtownphx.org
development. No minimum parking requirements were in place for
the Copper Square district and the area was anticipating the
10
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARP., ION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WALKER
AW PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
creation of millions of square feet of new commercial and
residential development in the near future. The purpose of the study
was to make sure that adequate parking was provided while
maintaining a pedestrian friendly district that would not be
overwhelmed with new parking facilities.
CITY OF SAN CLEMENTE, CA
2002-3, UPDATE 2006
San Clemente experiences crowded parking conditions on and
Jim Pechous
near its main street, particularly during the summer season. In
Principal Planner
Planning Division
addition, new commercial tenants in the area are attracting
City of San Clemente
increasing numbers of cars. The City hired Walker to study parking
Tel. 949.361 .6195
conditions in the area and to project parking demand as the area
Email: pechousl@san-clemente.org
continues to revitalize. Walker also studied parking management
options, including private/public parking ventures, to help relieve
crowded parking conditions on key blocks. In addition, we
analyzed sites for potential parking developments.
CITY OF NAPA, CA
2002, UPDATE 2004
Jennifer La Liberte
Downtown Napa has experienced considerable growth in recent
Project Coordinator
years, with popular restaurants and retail destinations generating
City of Napa
new demand in an area already busy with commercial and
Redevelopment/Economic
Development
Development Department
Department
government office employees and visitors. Walker was retained to
Tel. 9502
recommend management options to improve the efficiency of the
Email: jlaliberte@ciyofnapa.org
parking system under current conditions, and to project future
demand after some downtown buildings are redeveloped.
CITY OF REDONDO BEACH, CA
2000-1
Walker was part of an urban design consulting team that created
an award-winning redevelopment plan for the Harbor area of
Redondo Beach. Walker provided the following:
o Examined the impact of different kinds of development
scenarios on parking,
o Projected parking demand generated by proposed mixed-
use developments;
o Recommended changes to the city's parking code for
stand-alone developments;
o Created a shared parking model for the city to use to
determine parking requirements in mixed-use areas;
11
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARr. ION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
o Analyzed several sites that had been identified for
possible parking development and advised the city on
which sites would be best for garage construction. The
analysis projected capacity and evaluated ingress/egress
issues, walkability, and construction constraints to arrive
at a recommendation.
o Estimated construction costs for proposed garages
o Provided management recommendations for existing and
the potential future garages, to maximize efficiency.
The team effort included several community workshops and
briefing sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council.
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
FA
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARE. i ION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4qWPARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
TASK ONE: PARKING MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
Meet with City staff to finalize project parameters, discuss
background issues related to the project area, and obtain
previous studies, documents and other data regarding the
study areas including the 2006 General Plan. Previous studies
and data may also include the necessary data available from
the City's parking meters and PARCS (parking access and
revenue control) equipment where available within the study
areas. (Meeting 1)
2. The following items in Tasks One through Tasks Three will be
performed separately for each of the following five study
areas. The exact areas will be defined in more detail during
public meetings, but roughly defined as:
A. Corona del Mar - along Coast Highway from Avocado
Avenue to Poppy Avenue, including the residential areas
one block west of Coast Highway and two blocks east of
Coast Highway.
B. Mariner's Mile - along Coast Highway from Newport
Avenue to Dover Drive, including the residential street
located within one block (north) of and above Coast
Highway in the western part of Mariner's Mile.
C. Balboa Peninsula - the entire area referred to as "the Fish"
including McCadden Square, Cannery Village, Lido
Village as well as potential parking "spillover" areas
within one block of "the fish." Also the McFadden Beach
Lots and Balboa Village and potential parking "spillover"
areas within one block of these locations.
D. Balboa Island
E. West Newport - along Coast Highway from the
Huntington Beach city line to Balboa Blvd, including
ungated residential streets within one block of Coast
Highway.
3. Inventory the parking supply located within the areas of study.
The parking inventory will include:
2 In keeping with the format of the RFP, we do not include meetings with
City staff within Tasks 1 — 4, but instead include all public meetings
together in Task 5.
SCOPE OF SERVICES
13
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR,,flON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 40PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
• On street spaces in commercial and recreational
(primarily beach) areas
• On street spaces in residential areas located adjacent
to commercial and recreational areas
• Public off-street spaces
• Private non-residential off-street parking facilities'
• Indication of time restrictions, user restrictions, hours
of operation, and rates.
4. Review parking operations data provided by the City to
understand utilization patterns including:
A. the peak parking occupancy rates for the City's public
parking facilities
B. trends in parking facility occupancy including peak months
for parking demand, provided that data is available from
parking access equipment to do so.
C. the length of stay and rate of turnover of cars parked in
selected public parking facilities.
5. Conduct parking occupancy counts of the spaces inventoried in
Item 2 for which operations data cannot be used to determine
the peak parking demand on the design day (such as public
on -street spaces).` These occupancy surveys will be conducted
on one weekday and one weekend day, to be determined in
conjunction with City staff. Counts are expected to take place
four times throughout the day at 10:00 AM, 12:00 noon, 2:00
3 It should be noted that some private parking facilities and spaces
may not be available to the public and /or inaccessible to Walker
survey staff. Walker staff will make every reasonable effort to
count all private, non-residential spaces in the designated study
areas but will note parking facilities that are not accessible when
counting spaces.
' We note that for the purpose of this scope, scheduling and budgeting, we have
assumed that the size of the study consists of roughly 40 square blocks on Balboa
Peninsula, 15 square blocks in Mariner's Mile and Balboa Island respectively, and
roughly 28 square blocks in the Corona del Mar and West Newport Highway
areas. In many cases, we assume a larger number of blocks than is indicated
within the "sub -area" maps within the City's General Plan. We do so in order to
survey parking occupancies along the (typically residential) blocks located
adjacent to these commercial districts and the beach areas. Should we be
requested to study a larger or smaller area, we would adjust our scope and fee
accordingly.
M
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARw.ION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
PM, and 7:00 pm unless City staff in consultation with local
represents determines that other hours would provide better
snapshots of parking demand peaks and patterns.
6. If counts are conducted during an off-peak month, make
adjustments for seasonality to project results for peak months of
the year.
7. Using a license plate inventory method (LPI), measure the
length of stay of parkers in public parking spaces in selected
parking spaces in each of the study areas on one day selected
in consultation with City staff. LPI surveys will either be of
entire blocks for on -street parking spaces or of parking facilities
containing significant (i.e. recommended no less than 40
spaces for off-street spaces) in order to maximize the number of
cars that can be counted.
8. Review the parking pricing policies (including hourly fees) for
public parking in effect in Newport Beach and at five
comparable cities in the region.
9. Combine the parking occupancy rates obtained using City
operations data with those obtained through on- street
occupancy counts in order to determine parking occupancy
rates at designated hours throughout the design day.
10. Create a map of each of the study areas that shows peak -hour
parking demand on a block -by -block (and lot -by -lot) basis for
the existing conditions observed.'
11. Determine the extent to which general or localized parking
shortages currently are occurring in commercial and
recreational as well as residential areas.
12. Using the Walker Shared Parking modeling process, project
the amount of additional parking demand that is expected to
occur based on future growth projections and program data
for new development planned for the areas of study. Growth
projections and program data on new development will be
provided by City staff.
13. Combine the projected additional demand for parking resulting
from new development and intensification of existing land uses
to the existing parking demand observed during occupancy
counts in order to determine the demand for parking spaces on
' Such information will be demonstrated for private parking
facilities to the extent possible, but may be limited should less data
be available for private facilities.
15
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR,,,.ION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4W PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
the determined design day, up to seven years in the future.
The modeling process may include breakdowns into sub -areas
(to be determined through discussion with City staff), so that
localized surpluses or shortages can be evaluated.
14. Review the City's and Coastal Commission's existing policies
regarding the establishment and operation of residential
parking permit districts.
15. In light of the findings from items 1 — 12, the goals of the
General Plan, and existing parking policies evaluate current
parking conditions and make recommendations for the purpose
of maximizing the efficiency of the non-residential parking
supply while, to the extent legally and practically possible,
minimizing parking impacts on residential streets located in
close proximity to commercial and recreational areas.
Recommendations will be made in the areas of:
A. Parking fees, including market rate pricing for the purpose
of managing parking demand and maximizing the
efficiency of the parking system.
B. Structuring rates based on location and associated level of
demand.
C. Structuring rates based on peak seasons, days and time of
day.
D. Hours in which parking fees and parking regulations should
be in effect.
E. Time limits.
F. Appropriate parking technology for the purpose of
effectively implementing policies.b
G. Residential parking permit policies, districts and programs.
H. Residential and commercial parking benefit districts.
I. Other appropriate parking tools and parking management
strategies.
Discussions of parking technology and equipment will include general
recommendations only and will not go into details with regard to cost or
installation.
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR.,.JON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
TASK TWO: PUBLIC PARKING SUPPLY AND NEEDS
1. Based on the findings from items 1 — 12, the projected
efficiencies from policies discussed per item 13, and the goals
of the General Plan, quantify the amount of any parking
surplus or deficit in each of the study areas.
2. If a parking deficit exists or is projected to occur in the future,
determine whether or not the deficits warrant the creation of
additional parking facilities, including parking structures and a
general discussion of whether automated parking structures
would be a reasonable option to address the parking deficits
in question.
3. If it is determined that additional parking facilities are
warranted, discuss available options for financing new
parking. Options will include parking revenue from parking
system users, in lieu fee programs, public-private partnerships
and other alternatives.
4. Evaluate the City's current in lieu fee program and discuss
considerations for setting rates.
5. Technical Memorandum: For each of the five study areas,
prepare a separate draft technical memorandum outlining
parking demand and management study findings and
recommendations, covering Tasks 1 and 2 above.
6. Incorporate one consolidated set of comments from City staff
into each draft technical memorandum to create a final
Technical Memorandum, which will be incorporated as the first
section into a final report.
TASK THREE: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
1. Prioritize the recommendations made in Tasks 1 and 2 above
based on maximizing the efficiency of parking spaces, using a
cost benefit approach and other approach as appropriate.
Discuss the timing of how recommendations should be
implemented in terms of whether recommendations should be
made piecemeal, sequentially or concurrently.
2. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of implementing
policies one -by -one in each study area.
17
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR#..i' ION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
3. If a market based parking pricing policy is recommended,
outline policies and procedures necessary to establish an
effective pilot program in two of the study areas.
TASK FOUR: ZONING CODE — PARKING STANDARDS
Discuss "best practices" for parking codes, including minimum
parking requirements and policies, which are appropriate to
the needs of Newport Beach. The study will use the following
resources:
A. Parking generation rates for stand alone and shared land
uses, using data contained in Walker Parking Consultants'
Shared Parking Model and adjusted for the specific
conditions in each of the study areas.
B. An examination of five cities selected in consultation with
City staff and deemed reasonably comparable to Newport
Beach.
C. A review of literature, case studies and other discussions
of best practices regarding parking codes.
D. A review of the parking standards contained within
Newport Beach's zoning code and recommendations for
changes.
2. As part of the analysis of best practices discussed in item 1
above, evaluate specific policies with regard to how parking
requirements are determined for private property, particularly
with regard to the sharing of parking for the purpose of
maximizing parking efficiencies and eliminating the
overbuilding of parking as much as possible. This analysis
would include an evaluation of:
A. New land use designations, particularly in mixed use
areas, using shared parking concepts.
B. Whether different policies regarding the City's providing
public parking could allow for a reduction in off-street
requirements.
C. Whether private property owners should be given the
option of paying a fee in lieu of providing off-street
parking spaces.
D. The policy objectives that must be considered when
determining how in -lieu fees are set.
L
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARw.iION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
E. Whether a policy of allowing on street spaces to "count"
when determining the number of spaces required for new
uses is reasonable in all, some or no instances.
F. Whether it is reasonable to eliminate all minimum parking
requirements for some land uses or locations.
G. Whether maximum parking requirements are productive.
H. The advantages and disadvantages to designating some
parking spaces for car sharing programs, alternative fuel
vehicles, or allowing bicycle parking spaces to meet
minimum parking requirements.
3. Prior to the completion of the parking inventory and supply
analysis described in Tasks One and Two, prepare an initial
technical memo which contains an evaluation of the City's
parking codes and policies based on the discussion included
in items 1 and 2 (Task Four) above.
4. Upon the completion of Tasks One and Two, update the initial
evaluation of the parking code using the findings from the
parking inventory and supply analysis, in order to create a
draft of a comprehensive Parking Policy and Management Plan
for the City of Newport Beach.
5. Submit draft report for review by the Coastal Commission and
obtain one set of consolidated comments from the Commission
for the purpose of revisions.
6. Submit revised (per the Coastal Commission) draft report to the
City for review.
7. Incorporate one consolidated set of comments from City staff
into the draft report in item 6 above to create a final
comprehensive Parking Policy and Management Plan for the
City.
rue
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 40FAMING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
TASK 5: PUBLIC MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
(Underlined items indicated revised scope in Task 5.)
Items 1 — 7 below include seven meetings for each of the five
separate study areas in which we will conduct parking analyses
These seven meetings per study area include one meeting with the
Coastal Commission for each of the five study areas The result is a
total of 35 meetings, for the purposes set out below.
One kick off meeting with the public will be held for each
study area for the purpose of obtaining the community
input. Some specifics may include parking patterns within
the community including
A. times and locations of peak and impacted demand
for parking
B. identifying the parking characteristics of the various
parking user groups including customers, residents
and employees
C. issues of parking "spillover" demand
D. identifying the design day for which the parking
system should accommodate demand
One meeting with the steering committee selected for each
of the study areas including representatives of the
Economic Development Committee and General Plan, Land
Use. and Circulation Plan Committees This meeting will be
held following Walker's counts of parking inventories and
occupancies for the study area. The meeting will be used to
present initial findings from the parking counts and obtain
feedback on findings from members of the steering
committee.
One meeting with City staff to discuss findings and
proposed recommendations contained in a draft report
memorandum, which will be submitted to staff prior to the
meeting.
A second meeting with the steering committee for the
purpose of presenting the recommendations for addressing
parking issues contained in the draft report memorandum
The meeting will be used to receive feedback on
recommendations and discuss parking r)olicv and glannina
issues, as well.
20
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARA ION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 4WPARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
5. A second meeting with the public for the purpose of
presenting findings and recommendations discussing
parking policy and planning issues, and finalizing input
before creating a final report.
6. One meeting, i� ncluding a presentation of findings and
recommendations from the finalized report, before the
Newport Beach ON Council.
7. One meeting with the California Coastal Commission to
discuss the recommended parking policies contained in the
final report.
8. Up to three meetings with City staff, community and/or the
Council with regard to recommended zoning code changes
and/or the City's parking in lieu fee program Meetin.�qs
separate from those included in items 1 — 7 above will be
billed separately (see fee schedule.
21
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 1W
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
At Walker Parking Consultants, we achieve our project goals by the
proven excellence of our people, their technical expertise, their
ability to communicate and to listen, and their proficiency in
managing your project. The Walker team members who will be
assigned to this project are as follows:
PROJECT MANAGER
Steffen Turoff
PRINCIPAL IN CHARGE
Carolyn Krasnow, Ph.D.
PARKING CONSULT
Richard Raskin
PARKING ANALY;
Derek Adams
VI. PROJECT
ORGANIZATION AND
STAFFING
LEAD FIELD SURVEYOR
Yvette Barbosa
STEFFEN TUROFF............................................ Project Manager
Steffen Turoff will serve as the Project Manager for the project.
Steffen has been in the redevelopment and parking industries for
eight years. Steffen has an M.A. in Urban Planning from UCLA,
where he studied the nexus between transportation and land use,
as well as parking policy, with well-known parking expert Don
Shoup. Before joining Walker, Steffen worked on the
redevelopment of historic buildings in Los Angeles. Since coming
to Walker four years ago, he has concentrated on municipal and
mixed-use studies, as well as parking policy and smart growth.
Significant projects include: Pacific Beach and Commercial District
Parking Policy Analysis and Management Plan, City of Santa Rosa
Downtown Parking Policy Analysis, Downtown Phoenix (Copper
Square) Business Improvement District Parking Policy Analysis, City
of Ojai Downtown Parking Supply and Demand Study, City of
Napa Downtown Parking Study, City of Sacramento Downtown
22
PROPOSAL FOR PREPAR'.fION OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH "FEWPARKiNGCONSUITANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
Garage Feasibility Study, City of Beverly Hills Financial and
Demand Analysis for Neighborhood Parking Facility.
CAROLYN KRASNOW.................................. Principal In Charge
Carolyn Krasnow has been with Walker for ten years and is a
Principal with the firm. She is the Director of Study Services, and
directs the majority of the planning and financial studies conducted
in the western U.S. As Principal -In -Charge she will serve as an
advisor to the project team, providing quality control and being
integrally involved in creating management recommendations.
Significant projects include: City of Sunnyvale Downtown Parking
Study, City of Napa Downtown Parking Study, City of San Diego
Parking Demand and Financial Feasibility Analysis, City of San
Clemente Downtown Parking Demand and Management Study,
City of Sacramento Parking Demand and Financial Analysis.
RICHARD RASKIN.......................................... Parking Operations
Richard Raskin joined Walker in 2000 following a career as
Director of Guest Services at a major Hotel where his duties
included the operation of the valet parking department and a 500 -
space self -park garage. Prior to that, Richard worked with a
parking operator in Los Angeles, where he developed extensive
experience with parking management, finances and equipment.
Significant projects include: parking operations analyses for the
Port of Oakland, the City of Modesto, the City of Tampa, the City
of Raleigh, operations and PARCS implementation program for
Raleigh-Durham Airport, and an on -street meter study for City of
Kansas City.
CURRENT WORKLOAD AND COMMITMENT
WALKER provides consulting services throughout the United States.
The uniqueness of each project requires the proper mix of
engineers, architects, technicians, and support personnel from our
firm. We have assessed the projected workload for each of the
team members assigned to this project to make sure that they will
have the appropriate amount of time in which to properly address
your project requirements.
Because of the size of our group, we have the ability to respond to
unforeseen and unfortunate events such as serious illness or
23
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARftfION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14 AND APRIL 10, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
accident that may remove key personnel from this project. If that
occurs, we will be able to replace that team member with a person
of equal or greater expertise, skills, and experience. This will
minimize the downtime that would occur and allow your project
and WALKER to remain on schedule.
In all cases, our approach is to schedule team members that will
remain with this project from beginning to end.
Complete resumes are included within this section.
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
24
STEFFEN TUROFF
PROJECT MANAGER/PARKING CONSULTANT
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
Steffen Turoff is a consultant with Walker Parking Consultants in Burbank,
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS:
where his focus is on parking policy and planning in commercial districts
and town centers. He is a member of Walker's internal Municipal Task
Pacific Beach
Force, whose members research the parking issues faced by cities. Steffen
San Diego, CA
has performed parking policy studies for a number of cities throughout
Discover Pacific Beach
California. His analyses frequently deal with the relationship between
Business Improvement District
Parking Management and Implementation
parking policy and related issues such as economic development, the cost
Plan and Policy Analysis
of real estate, transportation alternatives and "smart growth." He also
2007-2008
works on studies for mixed-use developments, universities, airports and
other land uses as well.
Copper Square Business Improvement
District
Steffen has a Master of Arts in Urban Planning from UCLA, where he
Phoenix, AZ
Downtown Phoenix Partnership, Inc.
studied with parking expert Professor Donald Shoup. Subsequently Steffen
Parking Policy Analysis
was a planning analyst at Gilmore Associates in Los Angeles, the
2006
development firm that championed the City's Adaptive Reuse Ordinance,
North Park
which allows for the conversion of historic buildings into multifamily uses.
Commercial District,
The firm is credited with sparking the residential renaissance in the City's
San Diego, CA
Historic Core neighborhood.
Parking Policy Analysis
and Community Consultation
In Progress
EDUCATION:
Downtown Santa Rosa
Master of Arts in Urban Planning, University of California, Los Angeles
City of Santa Rosa, CA
Bachelor of Arts, University of California, Berkeley
Downtown Parking Policy and Financing
Analysis
ADDITIONAL:
2006
Chair, West Los Angeles Neighborhood Council Committee on
Downtown Ojai
Transportation, Traffic, and Development 2004-2005
City of Ojai, CA
Parking Supply and Demand Analysis
2006
Pioneer Blvd Commercial District
City of Artesia, CA
Parking Supply and Demand Analysis
2006
Magnolia Park Neighborhood
Burbank, CA
City of Burbank
Supply and Demand Study
2005, Update in Progress
Proposed Neighborhood Parking Facility
Beverly Hills, California
Private Property Management and
Development Firm
Financial and Demand Analysis
2006
Downtown Garage Feasibility Study
Sacramento, CA
City of Sacramento
Parking Demand and Financial Analysis
2004-2005
CAROLYN H. KRASNOW, PH.D.
PRINCIPAL/DIRECTOR OF STUDY SERVICES
Dr. Krasnow joined Walker Parking Consultants' Burbank office in
1997, and is the Director of Study Services within the firm's Parking
Consulting and Study Services Group. She has performed more than 150
parking studies since coming to Walker, specializing in parking supply
and demand studies, financial analyses, and parking management plans.
Her clients have included large and small municipalities, airports, private
corporations and developers, non -profits, colleges and hospitals.
Her analyses have helped clients determine the best size for their parking
systems, understand the finances associated with operating a parking
system, and institute management procedures that help their systems run
smoothly. Key projects have included master planning for Universal
Studios and The Scripps Hospitals, demand and management studies for
McCarran and Denver Airports, and financial studies for the City of Santa
Fe and the Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles.
Prior to joining Walker, Ms. Krasnow taught courses on contemporary
American culture at the University of Minnesota and at Dartmouth College.
EDUCATION:
B.A., University of Pennsylvania
Ph.D., University of Minnesota
PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS:
Dorsett, John and Carolyn Krasnow, "The Parking Crunch Myth", Today's
Facility Manager, May 1998.
Development Advisory Panel, Urban Land Institute Young Leaders Group,
March 2007
Panelist, "The New Science of Parking," American Institute of Architects
Los Angeles Chapter, September 2007.
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS:
Downtown Parking Study
City of San Clemente, CA
Parking Demand and Management Study
2003, Update 2006
Downtown Parking Analysis
City of Escondido, CA
Parking Demand Study
2002, Update 2005
City of Redondo Beach
Redondo Beach, CA
Parking Management Planning, Shared -Use
Analysis
2002
Downtown Parking Study
City of Sunnyvale, CA
Shared Parking Analysis
2003-2004
Railyard Garage
City of Santa Fe, NM
Financial and Management Analysis
2003, Updates 2004, 2005
Downtown Garage Feasibility
City of Sacramento, CA
Parking Demand and Financial Analysis
2004-5
Downtown Parking Study
City of Napa, CA
Parking Demand and Management
Analysis
2002, Update 2004
Civic Center Garage
City of Santa Fe, NM
Parking Demand Financial Analysis
2003
Parking Plan
City of Carpinteria, CA
Parking Demand and Management
Analysis
2001
RICHARD RASKING
PARKING CONSULTANT
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
Richard joined Walker in April 2000. He had, immediately prior,
REPRESENTATIVE
worked for the Beverly Hilton Hotel in the capacity of Director of Guest
PROJECTS:
Services for the previous five years. Among his various duties of the
overall day-to-day hotel management was the operation of the valet
RDU Airport
parking department and a 500 -space self -park garage. The valet
Raleigh-Durham, NC
operation was responsible for hotel guest parking, as well as valet parking
Operations and Services Analysis
for over 250 events a year. These events included The Golden Globe
2002
Awards, and the Carousel of Hope — the largest charity ball in the world.
The valet department at the Beverly Hilton was consistently judged to be
City of Raleigh
one of the most courteous and efficient operations in the nation. The
Raleigh, NC
Supply/Demand, Operations and
parking department earned in excess of $5,400,000 in annual gross
Services Analysis
revenue.
2003
Richard had worked for Standard Parking as a Senior Manager from
Logan Airport
1991 through 1997. He ran several large office building parking
Boston, MA
facilities, before assuming the task of managing the valet operation, which
Operations and Services Analysis
numbered over 100 employees, at the Century Plaza Hotel in Los Angeles.
2003
Richard's parking experience includes:
City of TampaTampa,
■ The selection and installation of parking access and revenue
FL
Operations and Services Analysis
control systems,
2004
■ Auditing and maintaining cash controls,
■ Preparing annual forecasts, as well as due diligences,
City of Modesto
■ Personnel selection and training, and customer service
Modesto, CA
development
Operations and Services Analysis
■ Operations analysis,
2005
■ Facility maintenance,
Port of Oakland
■ Self -park, attendant -assist and valet operating environments,
Oakland, CA
■ Office, hospital, retail, hospitality and event demands,
Parking Operations Analysis
■ On -street parking and enforcement;
2002
■ Traffic flow planning.
Wake County
Richard's acknowledged expertise in the parking industry has led to expert
Raleigh, NC
Supply and Demand Study
testimony engagements in a variety of legal disputes such as: parking
2002
lease interpretations, personal injury and financial loss law suits.
Richard has co-authored an article on customer service as it is related to the
San Diego Housing Commission
San Diego, CA
parking industry, and contributed a chapter about valet parking management
Operations Analysis and RFP,
to the International Parking Institute's parking manual, "Parking Management —
2004
The Next Level".
Salem Hospital
Richard has appeared as a speaker for the Association of Airport Internal
Salem, Oregon
Auditors and at the Parking International Exposition (P.I.E) In 2005.
Supply/Demand, Operations and
Services Analysis
PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS:
2005-6
Association of Airport Internal Auditors
California Public Parking Association
City of Kansas City
Kansas City, KS
EDUCATION:
Meter Study and Analysis
University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA)
2007
27
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARftnON OF PARKING STUDY WALKER
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH 40PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
We believe that the project schedule outlined in the RFP will be
unattainable due to the need for extensive fieldwork, data analysis,
community feedback and City/Coastal Commission meetings. Our
proposed alternative schedule is shown below.
Tasks 1 - 3, and 5
Corona del Mar
Mariners Mile
Balboa Peninsula
Balboa Island
West Newport
Task 4: Zoning Code and Parking
Standards
VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
4/1- 4/16- 5/1- 5/16- 6/1- 6/16 7/1- 7/16- 8/1- 8/16- 9/1- 9/16 10/1- 10/16- 11/1- 11/16- 12/1- 12/16 1/1- 1/16
4/15 4/30 5/15 5/31 6/15 6/30 7/15 7/31 8/15 8/30 9/15 9/30 10/15 10/30 11/15 11/30 12/15 12/30 1/15 /130
■
m
Legend: ■ = Community Meetings
■ = Meeting with City Staff
= Analysis and Report Preparation
= Field Work and/or Data Collection
F_ = City Council and Committee Meetings. = Report Deliverables
Coastal Commission Meetings ■ = City or Coastal Commission Feedback
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WALKER
PARKING CONSULTANTS
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
REVISED 3/14/08
We propose to provide the above-described Scope of Services on VIII. COST DATA
a not -to -exceed basis as described in the following table. Our
standard hourly billing rates for each team member who will be
directly involved in this project are included in the table.
PHASE PRINCIPAL SR. DESIGNER CONSULTANT ANALYST SURVEYOR ADMIN TOTAL
CHK PA ST/RR DA YB
$ 290 $ 225 $ 225 $ 185 $ 80 $ 70
Task 1
Task 1
Task 2
Task 2
Task 3
Task
Task 4
Task 4
Task 5
Task 5
4
0
39
96
734
0
873
$ 1,160 $ $ 8,775 $ 17,760 $ 58,720 $
$86,415.00
3 0 37 37 0 0
77
-
4 0 20 4 0 0
28
1,160 4,500 740 -
6,400.00
8 0 72 34 4 6
124
2,320 16,200 6,290 320 420
25,550.00
0 0 231 0 0 0
231
$ - $ $ 51,975 $ $ - $ -
$51,975.00
otal Hours
Total Budget
$ 5,510 $
$ 89,775
$ 31,635
$ 59,040 $
420
$ 186,380
Walker will submit monthly invoices based on work completed plus
reimbursable expenses. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at
1.15 times the cost of travel and living expenses, purchase or rental
of specialized equipment, photographs and renderings, document
reproduction, postage and delivery costs, long distance telephone
and facsimile charges, additional service consultants, and other
project related expenses. Payment is due upon receipt of invoice.
3TANDARD BILLING RATES~ 2008 WALKIM
CONSULTING SERVICES
PRINKC/P/ LS
SeniorPrincipal ... ...................................... ........... ................ ............... —.........................
$34O.OU
Principal................ ............. ....... —....... ....... —..................................................... ........ '''$290'00
PROJECTMANA("'3EMEINIT
Senior Project Manager .............................. —..................... __,.,...__,_................... ........
$255.00
ProjectManager. ....... ...................... —....... ---......................................................... —......
$225.0O
Assistant Project Manager .... ...................................... .'............................... --............ ....... ..$185J]0
PAWNG CON@ULTA\NT",'
Senior Parking Consultant ... --......................... ........ '--'................ —..............
$255. 00
ParkingConsultant .................... ....... —....... ----........... —............ ...... —......................
$225.00
Parking Analyst / Planner .............. ---...... ........... ......... ............................. ................ —�$18G�00
DESIGN
Senior Engineer / Senior Architect ........... ....................................................... ---....... ... ---.$235.00
Engineer/AJrchitect..... .---...... ........ ...................................... .......... ....... ........... ....... ...
$165.00
Designer--..------------,..--.~..~'..---_,-----------......—.---$155.00
TE CMNAC�
SeniorTechniciao------........... .................................................. .................. .............
$135.00
Technician— ............... ....... ...... '—.............................. ...................................................... .....
$ 120,00
FieldAuditO[—.... ---_,...................................... _.,.,..^,^.,,.,,........................................
$85.00
SUPPORT
Senior Admin Assistant / Business Mgr .............................................. ............ ........... ....... --$
9U0
0 P43% • 37//QD
• CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
"+nnn+rr
Agenda Item No. 7
April 8, 2008
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Planning Department
Leigh M. De Santis, Economic Development Administrator, 949 - 644 -3207,
Idesantis@city.newport-beach.ca.us
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement with Walker Parking Consultants
for a Parking Management Study and Parking Code Analysis
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Walker Parking Consultants
. for a not to exceed cost of one hundred ninety six thousand, three hundred eighty
dollars ($196,380).
2. Authorize the Mayor and City Clerk to sign the Agreement.
DISCUSSION:
Background:
The Strategic Plan for Fiscal and Economic Sustainability sets as its first goal the
revitalization of older commercial areas. Objective 1.3 Action step 1 directs the hiring
of a "parking management consultant to review and update parking standards and
policies, including the potential implementation and possible impacts of market pricing;
prepare a study of programs that encourage the development of shared use. parking
facilities; and identify and prioritize areas where parking facilities are needed or might
be needed in the near future.° Following that directive an RFP was developed and sent
to four top -rated parking consultants.
Two firms responded. The responding firms were interviewed by a committee
consisting of two members of the City Council's Economic Development Committee, the
Assistant City Manager, the Transportation Services & Development Principal Engineer,
the Economic Development Administrator and the Economic Development Coordinator..
It was a unanimous decision to. select Walker Parking Consultants.
LJ
PSA Aer Parking Consultants
April 8, 2008
Page 2
•
Walker demonstrated the best understanding of the scope of work and offered an
unparalleled breadth and depth of experience. Walker Parking Consultants is the
largest and most comprehensive parking consulting firm in the United States. It has
done numerous downtown and commercial studies and worked for a number of other
beach communities. The project manager assigned to Newport Beach studied with Dr.
Donald Shoup at UCLA as part of his masters program. Walker Parking wrote the
update to the Urban Land Institute's landmark Shared Parking Study. Walker's
expertise includes planning (shared parking, parking codes, financing, in -lieu fees,
market pricing), design (lots, structures, automated garages, circulation), and operations
(equipment, management). After selecting Walker, staff worked with the consultant to
refine the scope of services, including public meetings, and negotiated a not -to- exceed
fee of one hundred eighty six thousand, three hundred eighty dollars ($186,380) plus up
to an additional $10,000 for reimburseables.
Work Pro rq am:
The areas to be studied, as established by the Strategic Plan, are:
• Corona del Mar
• Mariners' Mile
• Balboa Peninsula
o Balboa Village
o Lido /Cannery/McFadden Square •
• Balboa Island
• West Newport.
Staff is suggesting that the areas be looked at in the order listed for two reasons. First;
so that those areas impacted the most by summer season traffic can be studied during
the summer. Second, Corona del Mar has already been working on parking related
issues and will be able to start the process fastest. After the first two areas are
completed the orderttiming may be revisited if necessary to catch beach goers.
The proposed PSA with Walker Parking Consultants is Attachment A. Incorporated into
the PSA is a nine page scope of work outlining the process to be followed and the
products to be produced by Walker for each area, as well as a two part approach to
parking code revisions.
It had been hoped that the parking management study would be completed ahead of
the zoning code so that its findings could be incorporated. However, the absence of
staff in economic development slowed the parking management study. Since it is now
likely that the zoning code will be completed first, adjustments have been made. Walker
will perform a review of the existing and draft parking code provisions evaluating them
against "best practices" for parking codes, including minimum parking requirements and
policies, which are appropriate to the needs of Newport Beach. Following the
completion of the six area studies and based on what is learned, Walker will then revisit •
the City's parking code with an eye to refining speck sections based on special
0
PSA Walker Parking Consultants
April 8, 2008
Page 3
Newport Beach conditions. Three meetings are included in the scope of work for
parking code issues.
As regards the parking management studies, the scope of work for each area includes:
• Reviewing previous studies
• Inventorying parking
• Reviewing parking operations data
• Conducting parking counts
• Evaluating conditions and making recommendations to maximize parking
resources
• Determining where and how to create additional parking
• Developing an implementation plan
The scope includes seven meetings for each study area. Staff and the consultants are
proposing the creation of steering committees for each of the six areas, with 6 to 8
members maximum. Steering Committee members would be selected from area
businesses, area residents, one EDC member and the City Council member for that
area. In areas with a BIDs or HOAs they could be drawn from to fill the business and
resident slots. The steering committees will supplement the public review process by
being available for consultation between public meetings.
• 1. A public kick -off to obtain community input
2. A steering committee meeting after traffic counts to present initial findings and
obtain feedback
3. A meeting with staff on the first draft report
4. A second steering committee meeting to present the draft and receive feedback
5. A second public meeting to present findings and recommendations and discuss
parking policy
6. A public presentation to the City Council of the final report
7. Participation in a staff meeting with the Coastal Commission to discuss
recommended parking policies from the final reports.
Should the City Council approve this PSA, work will begin before the end of the April.
Environmental Review:
Approval of the PSA is not a project as defined by CEQA.
Funding Availability:
Funding for this project exists' in 2720 -8080. It was one of the projects envisioned at the
time of adoption of the Strategic Plan and the budget amendment of $350,000 for its
• phase 1 implementation.
• PSA Aer Parking Consultants
April 8, 2008
Page 4
Prepared by:
,,4
Leigh M. De Santis,
Economic Development Administrator
Submitted by:
Z'4'tir-T--
Wood, Assistant CWwanager
Attachments: A. Professional Service Agreement
•
F- -I
LJ
•
•
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
FOR PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this _ day of April, 2008, by and
between the CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a Municipal Corporation ( "City "), and
Walker Parking Consultants /Engineers, Inc., a Michigan Corporation whose office is
located at 2550 Hollywood Way, Burbank, California, ( "Consultant "), and is made with
reference to the following:
RECITALS
A. City is a municipal corporation duly organized and validly existing under the laws
of the State of California with the power to carry on its business as it is now
being conducted under the statutes of the State of California and the Charter of
City.
B. City is planning to more effectively manage its parking resources and in keeping
with the goals and policies of the new General Plan establish the appropriate
parking requirements under the Zoning Code.
C.' City desires to engage Consultant to assist with the development of
comprehensive plans for the operation and possible expansion of its on- street
• parking spaces and municipal off - street parking lots in each of the commercial
villages, specifically the Balboa Peninsula (Balboa Village, Lido and Cannery
Villages/McFadden Square), Balboa Island, West Newport Highway, Mariners'
Mile and Corona del Mar. Further the City is seeking additional expertise in
evaluating all off - street parking standards as part of a comprehensive rewrite of
its Zoning Code to implement the new General Plan
D. Consultant possesses the skill, experience, ability, background, certification and
knowledge to provide the services described in this Agreement.
E. The principal members of Consultant for purposes of Project shall be Carolyn
Krasnow, Ph.D., Steffen Turoff, Richard Raskin, Derek Adamas, Yvette Barbosa,
Mark Linsenmayer and other members of the staff of Walker Parking
Consultants as needed.
F. City has solicited and received a proposal from Consultant, has reviewed the
previous experience and evaluated the expertise of Consultant, and desires to
retain Consultant to render professional services under the terms and conditions
set forth in this Agreement.
•
b
0
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed by and between the undersigned parties as
follows:
1. TERM •
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the above written date, and shall
terminate on the 31t' day of March, 2009, unless terminated earlier as set forth
herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED
Consultant shall diligently perform all the services described in the Scope of
Services attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. The
City may elect to delete certain tasks of the Scope of Services at its sole
discretion.
3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE
Time is of the essence in the performance of services under this Agreement and
the services shall be performed to completion in a diligent and timely manner.
The failure by Consultant to perform the services in a diligent and timely manner
may result in termination of this Agreement by City.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, Consultant shall not be responsible for delays
due to causes beyond Consultant's reasonable control. However, in the case of •
any such delay in the services to be provided for the Project, each party hereby
agrees to provide notice to the other party so that all delays can be addressed.
3.1 Consultant shall submit all requests for extensions of time for
performance in writing to the Project Administrator not later than ten (10)
calendar days after the start of the condition that purportedly causes a
delay. The Project Administrator shall review all such requests and may
grant reasonable time extensions for unforeseeable delays that are
beyond Consultant's control.
3.2 For all time periods not specifically set forth herein, Consultant shall
respond in the most expedient and appropriate manner under the
circumstances, by either telephone, fax, hand - delivery or mail.
4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT
City shall pay Consultant for the services on a time and expense not -to- exceed
basis in accordance with the provisions of this Section and the Schedule of
Billing Rates attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by reference.
Consultant's compensation for all work performed in accordance with this
Agreement, excluding all reimbursable items and subconsultant fees, shall not
exceed One Hundred Eighty -six Thousand Three Hundred Eighty Dollars •
($186,380) without prior written authorization from City. Reimbursable expenses
will be billed at 1.00 times cost and shall not exceed Ten Thousand Dollars. No
2 (O
•
billing rate changes shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the
• prior written approval of City.
4.1 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the work
performed the preceding month. Consultant's bills shall include the name
of the person who performed the work, a brief description of the services
performed and/or the specific task in the Scope of Services to which it
relates, the date the services were performed, the number of hours spent
on all work billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any
reimbursable expenditures. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty
(30) days after approval of the monthly invoice by City staff.
4.2 City shall reimburse Consultant only for those costs or expenses
specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in writing
in advance by City. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be
limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by
Consultant:
A. The actual costs of subconsultants for performance of any of the
services that Consultant agrees to render pursuant to this
Agreement, which have been approved in advance by City and
awarded in accordance with this Agreement.
B. Approved reproduction charges.
• C. Actual costs and /or other costs and/or payments specifically
authorized in advance in writing and incurred by Consultant in the
performance of this Agreement.
4.3 Consultant shall not receive any compensation for Extra Work performed
without the prior written authorization of City. As used herein, "Extra
Work" means any work that is reasonably determined by City to be
necessary for the proper completion of the Project, but which is not
included within the Scope of Services and which the parties did not
reasonably anticipate would be necessary at the execution of this
Agreement. Compensation for any authorized Extra Work shall be paid in
accordance with the Schedule of Billing Rates as set forth in Exhibit B.
5. PROJECT MANAGER
Consultant shall designate a Project Manager, who shall coordinate all phases of
the Project. This Project Manager shall be available to City at all reasonable
times during the Agreement term. Consultant has designated Steffen Turoff to
be its Project Manager. 'Consultant shall not remove or reassign the Project
Manager or any personnel listed herein or in Exhibit A or assign any new or
replacement personnel to the Project without prior written consent of the City.
• City's approval shall not be unreasonably withheld with respect to the removal or
assignment of non -key personnel.
3 1
0 •
Consultant, at the sole discretion of City, shall remove from the Project any of its
personnel assigned to the performance of services upon written request of City.
Consultant warrants that it will continuously furnish the necessary personnel to •
complete the Project on a timely basis as contemplated by this Agreement.
6. ADMINISTRATION
This Agreement will be administered by the Planning Department. Leigh M. De
Santis shall be the Project Administrator and shall have the authority to act for
City under this Agreement. The Project Administrator or his/her authorized
representative shall represent City in all matters pertaining to the services to be
rendered pursuant to this Agreement.
7. CITY'S RESPONSIBILITIES
In order to assist Consultant in the execution of its responsibilities under this
Agreement, City agrees to provide access to, and upon request of Consultant,
one copy of all existing relevant information on file at City. City will provide all
such materials in a timely manner so as not to cause delays in Consultant's work
schedule.
8. STANDARD OF CARE
8.1 All of the services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant's
supervision. Consultant represents that it possesses the professional and •
technical personnel required to perform the services required by this
Agreement, and that it will perform all services in a manner
commensurate with community professional standards. All services shall
be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not
employed by City, nor have any contractual relationship with City. By
delivery of completed work, Consultant certifies that the work conforms to
the requirements of this Agreement and all applicable federal, state and
local laws and the professional standard of care.
8.2 Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has, shall obtain, and
shall keep in full force in effect during the term hereof, at its sole cost and
expense, all licenses, permits, qualifications, insurance and approvals of
whatsoever nature that is legally required of Consultant to practice its
profession. Consultant shall maintain a City of Newport Beach business
license during the term of this Agreement.
8.3 Consultant shall not be responsible for delay, nor shall Consultant be
responsible for damages or be in default or deemed to be in default by
reason of strikes, lockouts, accidents, or acts of God, or the failure of City
to furnish timely information or to approve or disapprove Consultant's
work promptly, or delay or faulty performance by City, contractors, or
governmental agencies. •
4 9
•
0
9. HOLD HARMLESS
is To the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify and hold
harmless City, its City Council, boards and commissions, officers, agents,
volunteers, and employees (collectively, the "Indemnified Parties ") from and
against claims (including, without limitation, claims for bodily injury, death or
damage to property), demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action,
suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses
(including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees, disbursements and
court costs) (individually, a Claim; collectively, "Claims"), related to any breach of
the terms and conditions of this Agreement, any work performed or services
provided under this Agreement (including, to the extent caused by, the willful
negligence and /or willful acts, errors and /or omissions of Consultant, its
principals, officers, agents, employees, vendors, suppliers, consultants,
subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or for
whose acts they may be liable or any or all of them).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing herein shall be construed to require
Consultant to indemnify the Indemnified Parties from any Claim arising from the
negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnified Parties. Nothing in this
indemnity shall be construed as authorizing any award of attorney's fees in any
action on or to enforce the terms of this Agreement. This indemnity shall apply
to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are
• applicable. The policy limits do not act as a limitation upon the amount of
indemnification to be provided by the Consultant.
10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
It is understood that City retains Consultant on an independent contractor basis
and Consultant is not an agent or employee of City. The manner and means of
conducting the work are under the control of Consultant, except to the extent
they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the expressed terms of this
Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute approval
for Consultant or any of Consultant's employees or agents, to be the agents or
employees of City. Consultant shall have the responsibility for and control over
the means of performing the work, provided that Consultant is in compliance with
the terms of this Agreement. Anything in this Agreement that may appear to give
City the right to direct Consultant as to the details of the performance or to
exercise a measure of control over Consultant shall mean only that Consultant
shall follow the desires of City with respect to the results of the services.
11. COOPERATION
Consultant agrees to work closely and cooperate fully with City's designated
Project Administrator and any other agencies that may have jurisdiction or
• interest in the work to be performed. City agrees to cooperate with the
Consultant on the Project.
5 q,
12. CITY POLICY
E
Consultant shall discuss and review all matters relating to policy and Project •
direction with City's Project Administrator in advance of all critical decision points
in order to ensure the Project proceeds in a manner consistent with City goals
and policies.
13. PROGRESS
Consultant is responsible for keeping the Project Administrator and/or hisiher
duly authorized designee informed on a regular basis regarding the status and
progress of the Project, activities performed and planned, and any meetings that
have been scheduled or are desired.
14. INSURANCE
Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of City, and prior to commencement
of work. Consultant shall obtain, provide and maintain at its own expense during
the term of this Agreement, a policy or policies of liability insurance of the type
and amounts described below and in a form satisfactory to City.
A. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall provide certificates of
insurance with original endorsements to City as evidence of the insurance
coverage required herein. Insurance certificates must be approved by
City's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance or issuance •
of any permit. Current certification of insurance shall be kept on file with
City at all times during the term of this Agreement.
B. Signature. A person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its
behalf shall sign certification of all required policies.
C. Acceptable Insurers. All insurance policies shall be issued by an
insurance company currently authorized by the Insurance Commissioner
to transact business of insurance in the State of California, with an
assigned policyholders' Rating of A (or higher) and Financial Size
Category Class VII (or larger) in accordance with the latest edition of
Best's Key Rating Guide, unless otherwise approved by the City's Risk
Manager.
D. Coverage Requirements.
I. Workers' Compensation Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
Workers' Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability
Insurance for his or her employees in accordance with the laws of
the State of California. In addition, Consultant shall require each
subcontractor to similarly maintain Workers' Compensation
Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance in accordance with •
the laws of the State of California for all of the subcontractor's
employees. Any notice of cancellation or non - renewal of all
6 Jv
Workers' Compensation policies must be received by City at least
thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days written notice of non-
payment of premium) prior to such change. The insurer shall agree
to waive all rights of subrogation against City, its officers, agents,
employees and volunteers for losses arising from work performed
by Consultant for City.
ii. General Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain commercial
general liability insurance in an amount not less than two million
dollars ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal
injury, and property damage, including without limitation,
contractual liability. If commercial general liability insurance or
other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed
under this Agreement, or the general aggregate limit shall be at
least twice the required occurrence limit.
iii. Automobile Liability Coverage. Consultant shall maintain
automobile insurance covering bodily injury and property damage
for all activities of the Consultant arising out of or in connection with
work to be performed under this Agreement, including coverage for
any owned, hired, non -owned or rented vehicles, in an amount not
less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit for
each occurrence.
• iv. Professional Errors and Omissions Insurance. Consultant shall
maintain professional errors and omissions insurance, which
covers the services to be performed in connection with this
Agreement in the minimum amount of one million dollars
($1,000,000).
E. Endorsements. Each general liability and automobile liability insurance
policy shall be endorsed with the following specific language:
i. The City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees,
agents and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds with
respect to liability arising out of work performed by or on behalf of
the Consultant.
ii. This policy shall be considered primary insurance as respects to
City, its elected or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents
and volunteers as respects to all claims, losses, or liability arising
directly or indirectly from the Consultant's operations or services
provided to City. Any insurance maintained by City, including any
self- insured retention City may have, shall be considered excess
insurance only and not contributory with the insurance provided
• hereunder.
7
iii. This insurance shall act for each insured and additional insured as
though a separate policy had been written for each, except with
respect to the limits of liability of the insuring company. •
iv. The insurer waives all rights of subrogation against City, its elected
or appointed officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers.
V. Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall
not affect coverage provided to City, its elected or appointed
officers, officials, employees, agents or volunteers.
vi. The insurance provided by this policy shall not be suspended,
voided, canceled, or reduced in coverage or in limits, by either
party except after thirty (30) calendar days (10 calendar days
written notice of non - payment of premium) written notice has been
received by City.
F. Timely Notice of Claims. Consultant shall give City prompt and timely
notice of claim made or suit instituted arising out of or resulting from
Consultant's performance under this Agreement.
G. Additional Insurance. Consultant shall also procure and maintain, at its
own cost and expense, any additional kinds of insurance, which in its own
judgment may be necessary for its proper protection and prosecution of
the work. •
15. PROHIBITION AGAINST ASSIGNMENTS AND TRANSFERS
Except as specifically authorized under this Agreement, the services to be
provided under this Agreement shall not be assigned, transferred contracted or
subcontracted out without the prior written approval of City. Any of the following
shall be construed as an assignment: The sale, assignment, transfer or other
disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Consultant, or of
the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member or
cotenant if Consultant is a partnership or joint- venture or syndicate or cotenancy,
which shall result in changing the control of Consultant. Control means fifty
percent (50 %) or more of the voting power or twenty -five percent (25 %) or more
of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint- venture.
16. SUBCONTRACTING
The parties recognize that a substantial inducement to City for entering into this
Agreement is the professional reputation, experience and competence of
Consultant. Assignments of any or all rights, duties or obligations of the
Consultant under this Agreement will be permitted only with the express written
consent of City. Consultant shall not subcontract any portion of the work to be
performed under this Agreement without the prior written authorization of City. •
17. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS
8 la
• •
Each and every report, draft, map, record, plan, document and other writing
IS produced (hereinafter "Documents "), prepared or caused to be prepared by
Consultant, its officers, employees, agents and subcontractors, in the course of
implementing this Agreement, shall become the exclusive property of City, and
City shall have the sole right to use such materials in its discretion without further
compensation to Consultant or any other party. Consultant shall, at Consultant's
expense, provide such Documents to City upon prior written request.
Documents, including drawings and specifications, prepared by Consultant
pursuant to this Agreement are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by City or others on any other project. Any use of completed Documents
for other projects and any use of incomplete Documents without specific written
authorization from Consultant will be at City's sole risk and without liability to
Consultant. Further, any and all liability arising out of changes made to
Consultant's deliverables under this Agreement by City or persons other than
Consultant is waived against Consultant and City assumes full responsibility for
such changes unless City has given Consultant prior notice and has received
from Consultant written consent for such changes.
18. CONFIDENTIALITY
All Documents, including drafts, preliminary drawings or plans, notes and
communications that result from the services in this Agreement, shall be kept
• confidential unless City authorizes in writing the release of information.
19. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY INDEMNITY
The Consultant shall defend and indemnify City, , its agents, officers,
representatives and employees against any and all liability, including costs, for
infringement of any United States' letters patent, trademark, or copyright
infringement, including costs, contained in Consultant's drawings and
specifications provided under this Agreement.
20. RECORDS
Consultant shall keep records and invoices in connection with the work to be.
performed under this Agreement. -Consultant shall maintain complete and
accurate records with respect to the costs incurred under this Agreement and
any services, expenditures and disbursements charged to City, for a minimum
period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date
of final payment to Consultant under this Agreement. All such records and
invoices shall be clearly identifiable. Consultant shall allow a representative of
City to examine, audit and make transcripts or copies of such records and
invoices during regular business hours. Consultant shall allow inspection of all
work, data, Documents, proceedings and activities related to the Agreement for a
• period of three (3) years from the date of final payment to Consultant under this
Agreement.
9 13
0
•
21. WITHHOLDINGS
City may withhold payment to Consultant of any disputed sums until satisfaction •
of the dispute with respect to such payment. Such withholding shall not be
deemed to constitute a failure to pay according to the terms of this Agreement.
Consultant shall not discontinue work as a result of such withholding. Consultant
shall have an immediate right to appeal to the City Manager or his/her designee
with respect to such disputed sums. Consultant shall be entitled to receive
interest on any withheld sums at the rate of return that City earned on its
investments during the time period, from the date of withholding of any amounts
found to have been improperly withheld. Consultant may withhold services if
Consultant is not paid for services rendered in a timely manner.
22. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS
In the event of errors or omissions that are due to the negligence or professional
inexperience of Consultant which result in expense to City greater than what
would have resulted if there were not errors or omissions in the work
accomplished by Consultant, the additional design, construction and /or
restoration expense shall be bome by Consultant. Nothing in this paragraph is
intended to limit City's rights under the law or any other sections of this
Agreement.
23. CITY'S RIGHT TO EMPLOY OTHER CONSULTANTS •
City reserves the right to employ other Consultants in connection with the
Project.
24. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The Consultant or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the
California Political Reform Act of 1974 (the "Act "), which (1) requires such
persons to disclose any financial interest that may foreseeably be materially
affected by the work performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such
persons from making, or participating in making, decisions that will foreseeably
financially affect such interest.
If subject to the Act, Consultant shall conform to all requirements of the Act.
Failure to do so constitutes a material breach and is grounds for immediate
termination of this Agreement by City. Consultant shall indemnify and hold
harmless City for any and all claims for damages resulting from Consultant's
violation of this Section.
25. NOTICES
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to be given under the terms of this •
Agreement shall be given in writing, and conclusively shall be deemed served
when delivered personally, or on the third business day after the deposit thereof
10 }`�
0 0
in the United States mail, postage prepaid, first -class mail, addressed as
hereinafter provided. All notices, demands, requests or approvals from
. Consultant to City shall be addressed to City at:
Attn: Leigh M. De Santis
Planning Department
City of Newport Beach
3300 Newport Boulevard
Newport Beach, CA, 92663
Phone: 949 -644 -3207
Fax: 949 - 644 -3224
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from CITY to Consultant shall be
addressed to Consultant at:
Attention: Steffen Turoff
Walker Parking consultants
2550 Hollywood Way, suite 303
Burbank, CA 91505
Phone: 818- 953 -9130
Fax: 818 - 953 -9331
26. TERMINATION
• In the event that either party fails or refuses to perform any of the provisions of
this Agreement at the time and in the manner required, that party shall be
deemed in default in the performance of this Agreement. If such default is not
cured within a period of two (2) calendar days, or if more than two (2) calendar
days are reasonably required to cure the default and the defaulting party fails to
give adequate assurance of due performance within two (2) calendar days after
receipt of written notice of default, specifying the nature of such default and the
steps necessary to cure such default, and thereafter diligently take steps to cure
the default, the non - defaulting party may terminate the Agreement forthwith by
giving to the defaulting party written notice thereof.
Notwithstanding the above provisions, City shall have the .right, at its sole
discretion and without cause, of terminating this Agreement at any time by giving
seven (7) calendar days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event of
termination under this Section, City shall pay Consultant for services
satisfactorily performed and costs incurred up to the effective date of termination
for which Consultant has not been previously paid. On the effective date of
termination, Consultant shall deliver to City all reports, Documents and other
information developed or accumulated in the performance of this Agreement,
whether in draft or final form.
27. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LAWS
• Consultant shall at its own cost and expense comply with all statutes,
ordinances, regulations and requirements of all governmental entities, including
11 (5
federal, state, county or municipal, whether now in force or hereinafter enacted.
In addition, all work prepared by Consultant shall conform to applicable City,
county, state and federal laws, rules, regulations and permit requirements and be •
subject to approval of the Project Administrator and City.
28. WAIVER
A waiver by either party of any breach, of any term, covenant or condition
contained herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any subsequent breach
of the same or any other term, covenant or condition contained herein, whether
of the same or a different character.
29. INTEGRATED CONTRACT
This Agreement represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or
nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations
and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal
agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions herein.
30. CONFLICTS OR INCONSISTENCIES
In the event there are any conflicts or inconsistencies between this Agreement
and the Scope of Services or any other attachments attached hereto, the terms
of this Agreement shall govern.
31. INTERPRETATION •
The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning
of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by
reason of the authorship of the Agreement or any other rule of construction
which might otherwise apply.
32. AMENDMENTS
This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a written document
executed by both Consultant and City and approved as to form by the City
Attorney.
33. SEVERABILITY
If any term or portion of this Agreement is held to be invalid, illegal, or otherwise
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions of
this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
34. CONTROLLING LAW AND VENUE
The laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement and all matters •
relating to it and any action brought relating to this Agreement shall be
adjudicated in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Orange.
12 J('P
•
•
0
35. EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYMENT
Consultant represents that it is an equal opportunity employer and it shall not
discriminate against any subcontractor, employee or applicant for employment
because of race, religion, color, national origin, handicap, ancestry, sex or age.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be. executed on
the day and year first written above.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
for the City of Newport Beach
ATTEST:
LaVonne Harkless,
City Clerk
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
A Municipal Corporation
By:
Mayor
for the City of Newport Beach
CONSULTANT:
M_
(Corporate Officer)
Title:
Print Name:
By:
(Financial Officer)
Print Name:
Attachments: Exhibit A — Scope of Services
Exhibit B — Schedule of Billing Rates
F:luserslcat\ shared\ ContractTemplatesPublishedonlntranet \FORM —Professional Service Agreement.doc
Rev: 05.02 -07
13
►1
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WALKER
0 `'R04G CONMAHM •
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
SCOPE OF SERYICESz
TASK ONE: PARKING MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Meet with City staff to finalize project parameters, discuss
background issues related to the project area, and obtain
previous studies, documents and other data regarding the
study areas including the 2006 General Plan. Previous studies
and data may also include the necessary data available from
the City's parking meters and PARCS (parking access and
revenue control) equipment where available within the study
areas. (Meeting 1)
2. The following items in Tasks One through Tasks Three will be
performed separately for each of the following five study
areas. The exact areas will be defined in more detail during
public meetings, but roughly defined as:
A. Corona del Mar — along Coast Highway from Avocado
Avenue to Poppy Avenue, including the residential areas
one block west of Coast Highway and two blocks east of
Coast Highway.
B. Mariner's Mile — along Coast Highway from Newport
Avenue to Dover Drive, including the residential street
located within one block (north) of and above Coast
Highway in the western part of Mariner's Mile.
C. Balboa Peninsula — the entire area referred to as "the Fish"
including McCadden Square, Cannery Village, Lido
Village as well as potential parking "spillover' areas
within one block of "the fish." Also the McFadden Beach
Lots and Balboa Village and potential parking "spillover"
areas within one block of these locations.
D. Balboa Island
E. West Newport — along Coast Highway from the
Huntington Beach city line to Balboa Blvd, including
ungated residential streets within one block of Coast
Highway.
3. Inventory the parking supply located within the areas of study.
The parking inventory will include:
In keeping with the format of the RFP, we do not include meetings with
City staff within Tasks 1 — 4, but instead include all public meetings
•
together in Task 5.
13
'a
i
F- -I
i-J
i
0
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CffY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
• On street spaces in commercial and recreational
(primarily beach) areas
• On street spaces in residential areas located adjacent
to commercial and recreational areas
• Public off- street spaces
• Private non - residential off - street parking facilities'
• Indication of time restrictions, user restrictions, hours
of operation, and rates.
A. Review parking operations data provided by the City to
understand utilization patterns including:
A. the peak parking occupancy rates for the City's public
parking facilities
B. trends in parking facility occupancy including peak months
for parking demand, provided that data is available from
parking access equipment to do so.
C. the length of stay and rate of turnover of cars parked in
selected public parking facilities.
5. Conduct parking occupancy counts of the spaces inventoried in
Item 2 for which operations data cannot be used to determine
the peak parking demand on the design day (such as public
on- street spaces).' These occupancy surveys will be conducted
on one weekday and one weekend day, to be determined in
conjunction with City staff. Counts are expected to take place
four times throughout the day at 10:00 AM, 12 :00 noon, 2:00
PM, and 7:00 pm unless City staff in consultation with local
represents determines that other hours would provide better
snapshots of parking demand peaks and patterns.
' It should be noted that some private parking facilities and spaces
may not be available to the public and /or inaccessible to Walker
survey staff. Walker staff will make every reasonable effort to
count all private, non - residential spaces in the designated study
areas but will note parking facilities that are not accessible when
counting spaces.
' In many cases, we assume a larger number of blocks than is indicated within the
.sub-area' maps within the City's General Plan. We do so in order to survey
parking occupancies along the Itypically residential) blocks located adjacent to
these commercial districts and the beach areas_ Should we be requested to study
a significantly forger or smaller area than assumed for the proposal, we would
adjust our scope and fee accordingly.
10
WALKER
enwcc uv
'14
iq
•
0
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WALKER
° INGCO SM 4M •
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
6. If counts are conducted during an off -peak month, make
adjustments for seasonality to project results for peak months of
the year.
7. Using a license plate inventory method (LPI), measure the
length of stay of porkers in public parking spaces in selected
parking spaces in each of the study areas on one day selected
in consultation with City staff. LPI surveys will either be of
entire blocks for on- street parking spaces or of parking facilities
containing significant (i.e. recommended no less than 40
spaces for off - street spaces) in order to maximize the number of
cars that can be counted.
8. Review the parking pricing policies (including hourly fees) for
public parking in effect in Newport Beach and at five
comparable cities in the region.
9. Combine the parking occupancy rates obtained using City
operations data with those obtained through on- street
occupancy counts in order to determine parking occupancy
rates at designated hours throughout the design day.
10. Create a map of each of the study areas that shows peak -hour
•
parking demand on a block-by-block (and lot- by-lot) basis for
the existing conditions observed!
11. Determine the extent to which general or localized parking
shortages currently are occurring in commercial and
recreational as well as residential areas.
12. Using the Walker Shared Parking modeling process, project
the amount of additional parking demand that is expected to
occur based on future growth projections and program data
for new development planned for the areas of study. Growth
projections and program data on new development will be
provided by City staff.
13. Combine the projected additional demand for parking resulting
From new development and intensification of existing land uses
to the existing parking demand observed during occupancy
counts in order to determine the demand for parking spaces on
the determined design day, up to seven years in the future.
The modeling process may include breakdowns into subareas
s Such information will be demonstrated for private parking
facilities to the extent possible, but may be limited should less data
•
be available for private facilities.
15
�6
1�1
•
0
0
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
(to be determined through discussion with City staff), so that
localized surpluses or shortages can be evaluated.
IA. Review the City's and Coastal Commission's existing policies
regarding the establishment and operation of residential
parking permit districts.
15. In light of the Findings from items 1 — 12, the goals of the
General Plan, and existing parking policies evaluate current
parking conditions and make recommendations for the purpose
of maximizing the efficiency of the nonresidential parking
supply while, to the extent legally and practically possible,
minimizing parking impacts on residential streets located in
close proximity to commercial and recreational areas.
Recommendations will be made in the areas of:
A. Parking fees, including market rate pricing for the purpose
of managing parking demand and maximizing the
efficiency of the parking system.
B. Structuring rates based on location and associated level of
demand.
C. Structuring rates based on peak seasons, days and time of
day.
D. Hours in which parking fees and parking regulations should
be in effect.
E. Time limits.
F. Appropriate parking technology for the purpose of
effectively implementing policies.°
G. Residential parking permit policies, districts and programs.
H. Residential and commercial parking benefit districts.
I. Other appropriate parking tools and parking management
strategies.
Discussions of parking technology and equipment will include general
recommendations only and will not go into details with regard to cost or
installation.
0
16
�k
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
TASK TWO: PUBLIC PARKING SUPPLY AND NEEDS
1. Based on the findings from items 1 — 12, the projected
efficiencies from policies discussed per item 13, and the goals
of the General Plan, quantify the amount of any parking
surplus or deficit in each of the study areas.
2. If a parking deficit exists or is projected to occur in the future,
determine whether or not the deficits warrant the creation of
additional parking facilities, including parking structures.
3. If it is determined that additional parking facilities are
warranted, discuss available options for financing new
parking. Options will include parking revenue from parking
system users, in lieu fee programs, public - private partnerships
and other alternatives.
A. Evaluate the City's current in lieu fee program and discuss
considerations for setting rates.
5. Technical Memorandum: For each of the five study areas,
prepare a separate draft technical memorandum outlining
parking demand and management study findings and
recommendations, covering Tasks 1 and 2 above.
6. Incorporate one consolidated set of comments from City staff
into each draft technical memorandum to create a final
Technical Memorandum, which will be incorporated as the first
section into a final report_
TASK THREE: IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
1. Prioritize the recommendations made in Tasks 1 and 2 above
based on maximizing the efficiency of parking spaces, using a
cost benefit approach and other approach as appropriate.
Discuss the timing of how recommendations should be
implemented in terms of whether recommendations should be
made piecemeal, sequentially or concurrently.
2. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of implementing
policies one -byone in each study area.
3. If a market based parking pricing policy is recommended,
outline policies and procedures necessary to establish an
effective pilot program in two of the study areas.
•
WALKER
vNeaNSax+aaurars •
•
U
Aa
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
. PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
TASK FOUR: ZONING CODE — PARKING STANDARDS
1. Discuss "best practices" for parking codes, including minimum
parking requirements and policies, which are appropriate to
the needs of Newport Beach. The study will use the following
resources:
A. Parking generation rates for stand alone and shared land
uses, using data contained in Walker Parking Consultants'
Shared Parking Model and adjusted for the specific
conditions in each of the study areas.
B. An examination of five cities selected in consultation with
City staff and deemed reasonably comparable to Newport
Beach.
C. A review of literature, case studies and other discussions
of best practices regarding parking codes.
D. A review of the parking standards contained within
Newport Beach's zoning code and recommendations for
• changes.
2. As part of the analysis of best practices discussed in item 1
above, evaluate specific policies with regard to how parking
requirements are determined for private properly, particularly
with regard to the sharing of parking for the purpose of
maximizing parking efficiencies and eliminating the
overbuilding of parking as much as possible. This analysis
would include an evaluation of:
A.
New land use designations, particularly in mixed use
areas, using shared parking concepts.
B.
Whether different policies regarding the City's providing
public parking could allow for a reduction in off-street
requirements.
C.
Whether private property owners should be given the
option of paying a fee in lieu of providing off- street
parking spaces.
D.
The policy objectives that must be considered when
determining how in-lieu fees are set.
E.
Whether a policy of allowing on street spaces to "count"
when determining the number of spaces required for new
uses is reasonable in all, some or no instances.
F.
•
Whether it is reasonable to eliminate all minimum parking
requirements for some land uses or locations.
0
WALKFIR
M
2
Z
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
WALKER
P'MMIr, CONSrAM$ •
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
G. Whether maximum parking requirements are productive.
H. The advantages and disadvantages to designating some
parking spaces for car sharing programs, alternative fuel
vehicles, or allowing bicycle parking spaces to meet
minimum parking requirements.
3. Prior to the completion of the parking inventory and supply
analysis described in Tasks One and Two, prepare an initial
technical memo which contains an evaluation of the City's
parking codes and policies based on the discussion included
in items 1 and 2 (Task Four) above_
A. Upon the completion of Tasks One and Two, update the initial
evaluation of the parking code using the findings from the
parking inventory and supply analysis, in order to create a
draft of a comprehensive Parking Policy and Management Plan
for the City of Newport Beach.
5. Submit draft report for review by the Coastal Commission and
obtain one set of consolidated comments from the Commission
•
for the purpose of revisions.
6. Submit revised (per the Coastal Commission) draft report to the
City for review.
7. Incorporate one consolidated set of comments from City staff
into the draft report in item 6 above to create a final
comprehensive Parking Policy and Management Plan for the
City.
•
3
A
0
•
•
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY ( WAUUM
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH "sr""GcomwNes
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008 I
MARCH 14, 2008 {II
SCOPE REVISED
TASK 5: PUBLIC MEETINGS AND WORKSHOPS
(Underlined items indicated revised scope in Task 5.)
Items 1 — 7 below include seven meetings For each of the five
total of 35 meetings, for the purposes set out below.
One kick off meetina with the ayblic will be held-for each
study area for the ouraose of obtoinina the community
input. Some specifics may include parking_pgtterns within
the communiy including_
A. times and locations of peak and impacted demand
for ggrking
B. identifying the Rarking _characteristics of the various
parking user groups including customers, residents.
and employees
C. issues of parking "spillover r demand
D. identifying the design day for which the parking
system should accommodate demand
2. One meetina with the steerina committee selected for each
of the study areas, including representatives of the
Economic Development Committee and General Plan Land
Use and Circulation Plan Committees. This meeting will be
held following Walker's counts of parking inventories and
occupancies for the study area. The meeting will be used to
present initial findings from the aarking counts, and obtain
feedback on findings from members of the steerina
committee.
3. One meeting with Ciy staff to discuss findings and
proposed recommendations contained in a draft report
memorandum. which will be submitted to staff prior to the
meeting.
A. A second meetina with the steerina committee for the
purpose of presenting the recommendations for addressing
parking issues contained in the draft report memorandum.
The meeting will be used to receive feedback on
recommendations and discuss oarkina oolicv and olonnina
issues. as well
',25
0
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARrJNG REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN
5. A second meeting with the public
presenting findings and recomme
parking policy and planning issues
before creating o final report.
JANUARY 31, 2008
MARCH 14, 2008
SCOPE REVISED
for the purpose of
ndations. discussing
and finolizing inRut
6. One meeting, including a presentation of findings and
recommendations from the finalized report, before the
Newport Beach City Council.
7. One meeting with the California Coastal Commission to
discuss the recommended parking policies contained in the
final rel2ort.
8. Up to three meetings with Ciy staff. community and /or the
Council with regard to recommended zoning code changes
and /or the City's parking in lieu fee program. Meeting;
separate from those included in items 1 — 7 above will be
billed separately (see fee schedule),
E
wAE.MER
rccornwruns •
r1
LJ
•
0
E
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
We believe that the project schedule outlined in the RFP will be
unattainable due to the need for extensive fieldwork, data analysis,
community feedback and City/Coastal Commission meetings. Our
proposed alternative schedule is shown below.
1]
WALKIER
PAPJC240 CONSLIUMM
VII. PROJECT SCHEDULE
Tasks 1 -3, and 5
4/1- 41165/1- 5/166/1- 6/167/1- 7/16B11- 8/16911- 9/16 1011- 10/1611/1- 11/1612/1- 12/161/1- 1/16
4115 4/30 5/15 5/31 6/15 6/30 7115 7/31 8/15 8/30 9115 9/30 10/15 10130 11 /15 11130 12/15 12/30 1/15 /130
Carona del Mar
-.
Mariners Mile
= _
Balboa Peninsula
Balboa Island
■
West Newport
Task 4: Zoning Code
Standards
and Parking
■
'
i".l7■
.
j >.'j .:
Legend:.
= Community Meetings
= Analysis and Report Preparation
■
= Meeting with City StalF ®
- Field Work and /or Data Collodion
®
= City Councll and Comminee Meefi4M
- Report Deliverables
®
= Coastal Commission Meetings `
- City or Coostal Commission Feedback
•
h +
I'
off'
PROPOSAL FOR PREPARATION OF PARKING STUDY
PREPARED FOR CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND MANAGEMENT PLAN JANUARY 31, 2008
REVISED 3/14/08
We propose to provide the obovetlescribed Scope of Services on
a not -to- exceed basis as described in the following table. Our
standard hourly billing rates for each team member who will be
directly involved in this project are included in the table.
0
PAR?" PAILKIER
Vlll. COST DATA
PHASE
PRINaPAL
SR. DESIGNER
CONSULTANT
I ANALYST
SURVIYO
ADJMN
TOTAL
$ 1,160
CHK
PA
ST/RR
I DA
I YB
$86,415.00
3
0
$ 2901$
22S
I$ 2251$
18S
l$ 801$
70
Task
Task 1
Task 2
Task 2
Task 3
Task
Task 4
Task 4
Task 5
Tasks
6
73A
0
873
$ 1,160
S
$ 8,775
$ 17,760
$ 58,720
$
$86,415.00
3
0
---3T—
37
0
0
4
20
0
0
28
1,160
,5
740
6, .00
8
0
72
34
4
124
2,320
16,200
6729
320
420
25 550.00
0
0
231
0
0
0
231
$
I $
1 $ 51,9751$
$
$
$51,975.00
olo
olal Bud
$ 5,510
$
$ 89,775
1 $ 31,635
1 $ 59,040
1 $ 420
3 786,380
Walker will submit monthly invoices based on work completed plus
reimbursable expenses. Reimbursable expenses will be billed at
1.00 times the cost of travel and living expenses, purchase or rental
of specialized equipment, photographs and renderings, document
reproduction, postage and delivery costs, long distance telephone
and facsimile charges, additional service consultants, and other
project related expenses. Payment is due upon receipt of invoice.
ON
F-1
LJ
n
L�
E
•
•
0
STANDARD BILLING RATES - 2008 WAI JCM
CONSULTING SERVICES PAM3 GCONSL4tWS
PRINCIPALS
Senior Principal .................
Principal ...............................
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Senior Project Manager.....
Project Manager ................
Assistant Prcjed.Manager.
PARKING CONSULTANTS
Pettft Analyst l Planner .......... ...............................
T>r ie
r rr
r rr
.............. $255.00
'vr rr
0
.... I .............. 255.00
...... :.: ...... ... $125:00
.........:........ $185.0
Seciiel 6inel SeniorArehit ........ : ................................. .................................... ..............
ttgin1At iiteet .........................................................:................................. .........................$14W,00
l3igr> �t ..:....... .............. ........................ ........................ .. ....................................................... .... $155..00
TECHNICAL
Sof ii r .......:.......... ............ ;,............. , ............. ,...................................... 1 ...... .... ....... 4 136.00
1; O7. .............................................._.....:................. .,............................. ...,..,................$.120:00
FlstdAtita....._ ................................:.....:............:...................................... ..................:.:......:... $ e5.110
SOPP?RT
t}iar Pt�nNltant I:Btw:mess I�Agr
Adm9nisf a tveAssistard ............ : .........
.
Subject to annual agust >errt en January i each year
sr e•e
1 99
d1J