HomeMy WebLinkAboutC-5601 - Grant Agreement - Selective Traffic Enforcement Program (PT1409)State of California — Office of Traffic Saf-+v
GRANT AGREEMENT - Page 1
OTS -38 (Rev. 6/13)
GRANT NUMBER
PT1409
1. GRANT TITLE
Selective Traffic Enforcement Program
2. NAME OF APPLICANT AGENCY
City of Newport Beach
4. GRANT PERIOD
From: 10/1/13
3. AGENCY UNIT TO HANDLE GRANT
Newport Beach Police Department
To: 9/30/14
5. GRANT DESCRIPTION
To reduce the number of persons killed and injured in crashes involving alcohol, speed, red light running, and other
primary collision factors, "best practice" strategies will be conducted on an overtime basis. The funded strategies may
include: DUI saturation patrols to apprehend drunk drivers; warrant service operations targeting DUI violators who failed
to appear in court or violate probation; stakeouts, a "HOT Sheet" pr•ogr•am and court stings. The program may also
concentrate on speed, aggressive driving, seat belt enforcement, intersection operations with disproportionate numbers of
traffic crashes and special enforcement operations encouraging motorcycle safety. These strategies are designed to earn
rnedia attention thus enhancing the overall deterrent effect.
6. FEDERAL FUNDS ALLOCATED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SIIALL NOT EXCEED: $ 282,910.00
7. TERMS AND CONDITIONS: The parties agree to comply with the terms and conditions of the following which are by this
reference made a part of the Agreement:
• Schedule A (OTS -38b) — Problem Statement, Goals and • Schedule C (OTS -38g) — Quarterly Evaluation Data Form
Objectives and Method of Procedure (if applicable)
• Schedule B (OTS -38d) — Detailed Budget Estimate and • Exhibit A —Certifications. and. Assurances
Sub -Budget Estimate (if applicable) • Exhibit B* - OTS Grant Program Manual
• Schedule B-1 (OTS -38f) — Budget Narrative and Sub -
Budget Narrative (if applicable)
*Items shown with an asterisk (*), are hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement as if attached hereto.
These documents can be viewed at the OTS home web page under Grants: www.ots.ca.sov.
We, the officials named below, hereby swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that we are duly
authorized to legally bind the Grant recipient to the above described Grant terms and conditions.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed by the parties hereto.
8. APPROVAL SIGNATURES
A. GRANT DIRECTOR B. AUTHORIZING OFFICIAI. OF APPLICANT AGENCY
NAME: Jeffrey Lu PHONE: (949)644-3740 NAME: Jay Johnson PHONE: (949)644-3701
TITLE: Lieutenant FAX: (949)718-1044 TITLE: Chief of Police FAX: (949)644-3700
ADDRESS: 870 Santa Barbara Drive ADDRESS: 870 Santa Barbara Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660 Newport Beach, CA 92660
E-MAIL: jlu@nbpd.org E -MV .. Jj hnson bpd.org
j Signa re) (Date) ignature) (Date)
�i
C. FISCAL, OR ACCOUNTING OFFICIAL D. OFFICE AUTHORIZED TO RECEIVE PAYMENTS
NAJIE: Dan Matusiewicz PHONE: (949)644-3 123 NAIME: Fiscal Services
TITLE: Finance Director FAX: (949)644-3339 ADDRESS: 870 Santa Barbara Drive
ADDRESS: 100 Civic Center Drive Newport Beach, CA 92660
Newport Beach, CA 92660
9. DUNS NUMBER
E -MI AIL. atusiewic newpoitbeachca.gov DUNS 4: 060752482
REGISTERED 3300 Newport Blvd.
j a3"
ADDRESS &
Newport Beach, CA 92663-3816
(Signature) . (Date) ZIP: p
I`J
GME — STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULEA
GaarTNo. PT1409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAGE 1
PROBLEM STATEMENT
In 2011, California's traffic fatalities increased 2.6 percent (2,720 vs. 2,791) -- still one of the lowest levels
since the federal government began recording traffic fatalities in 1975. California 2011 Mileage Death Rate
(MDR) — fatalities per 100 million miles traveled - is 0.87, and marks the third time California has been below
1.0. California is much better than the national I.I I MDR. Fatality rates increased 3 percent from 2010 to 2011,
and are projected to increase an additional 3 percent in 2012.
Alcohol -impaired driving fatalities (fatalities in crashes involving a driver or motorcycle rider (operator) with a
blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.08 grams per deciliter (g dL) or greater) matches our historic low of
774 in 2010 and 2011. The 774 .figure is the lowest DUI death total ever. As a percent of total fatalities, alcohol -
impaired fatalities decreased from 29 percent in 2010 to 28 percent in 2011. This number has remained
virtually unchanged in the past five years and DUI arrests have dropped in 2011 to 180,212 as compared to
195,897 in 2010. The 2011 DUI arrest figure represents the lowest DUI arrests since 2002.
For the second year in row, OTS commissioned an observational survey of cell phone use by drivers within the
state, looking for hand-held and hands-free talking as well as texting and other use of mobile devices while
driving. The overall rate was 10.8 percent of drivers on the road using cell phones at any given daylight time, up
from 73 percent in 2011. Although observed cell phone use increases were seen across all age groups, 16 to 25
year olds showed a dramatic rise, doubling from 9 percent to 18 percent.
The problem of drugged driving continues to rise. Based on data from the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 30 percent of all drivers who were killed in motor vehicle crashes in California in 2011 tested
positive for legal and/or illegal drugs, a percentage that has been increasing since 2006.
Motorcycle fatalities increased 15 percent from 352 in 2010 to 414 in 2011. Projections indicate a similar
number were killed in 2012.
OTS -38b (Rev. 6113)
GME — STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULE A
GRAN -r No. PT1409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAG>, 2
Primary Collision Factor: Over the years, approximately 60 to75 percent of fatal and injury -combined
collisions involved various Primary Collision Factors (PCF)
such as, DUI, speed, right-of-way,
traffic signals
and signs, pedestrian violations, and improper turning.
Statewide Primary Collision
2010
3. Speed
394
Factors
Fatal
362
5,4b0
1. Improper Turning
512
21,764
Total
2. Driving Under the Influence
113,597
Total Fatal and Injury Collisions
162,569
Using local data (not OTS Rankings or S WITRS), complete
the table below.
Collision Type 2010
2011
2012
Collisions
Victims
Collisions
Victims
Collisions
Victims
Fatal 1
I
4
6
5
5
In ur 453
614
430
569
426
564
Fatal
Injured
Fatal Injury
Killed Inured
Fatal
Injury
Killed
Injured
..InjuryKilled
Alcohol Involved 0 67
0 90
1 58
1 81
0
0
74
Hit & Run 0 25
0 27
0 28
0 32
1
I
30
Nighttime 0 38
0 51
0 48
0 76
0
0
58
(2100-0259
hours)
Top 3 Primary Collision Factors
Fatal
Killed
Injured
#1-
Unsafe Speed
0
0
183_
#2-
Improper Turning0
0
73
#3-
DUI
0
33
0
44
OTS -386 (Rev. 6/13)
470
12,477
3. Speed
394
48,999
4. Traffic Signals &Signs
362
5,4b0
5. Right of Way
3 67
24,$97
Total
1,905
113,597
Total Fatal and Injury Collisions
162,569
GME — STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULE A
Gp-kNTND. PTI409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAGE 3
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY -2010 RANKINGS
The OTS Rankings provide individual cities a way to compare their city's traffic safety statistics to those of other cities
with similar -sized populations. Cities can use these comparisons to see what traffic safety areas they may have problems
in and which they were doing well in. Identifying emerging or on-going traffic safety problem areas help cities plan how
to combat the problems. It should be noted that OTS rankings are only indicators of potential problems; there are many
factors that may either understate or overstate a city/county ranking that must be evaluated based on local circumstances.
The OTS Rankings are determined by the following: (1) Victim and collision data for the rankings is taken from the latest
available California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) data; (2) Victim and
collision rankings are based on rates of victims killed and injured or fatal and injury collisions per "1,000 daily -vehicle -
miles -of -travel' (Caltrans data) and per "1,000 average population" (Department of Finance data) figures. This more
accurately ensures proper weighting and comparisons when populations and daily vehicle miles traveled vary; (3) DUI
arrest totals and rankings are calculated for cities only and are based on rates of non -CHP DUI arrests (Department of
Justice data). This is so that local jurisdictions can see how their own efforts are working; and (4) Counties are assigned
statewide rankings, while cities are assigned population group rankings.
NOTE: City rankings are for incorporated cities only, County Rankings include all roads — state, county and local — and
all jurisdictions — CHP, Sheriff, Police and special. OTS Rankings are calculated so that the higher the number of victims
or collisions per 1000 residents in a population group, the higher the ranking. Number I in the rankings is the highest, or
`'worst." So, for Group B, a ranking of 1/53 is the highest or worst, 27/53 is average, and 53!53 is the lowest or best. The
same methodology also applies for DUI arrest rankings.
AGENCY NCIC COUNTY GROUP POPULATION (AVG) DVMT
Newport Beach 3014 ORANGE COUNTY C 85,278 1,166,078
VICTIMS RANKING BY RANKING BY
KILLED AND DAILY VEHICLE AVERAGE
TYPE OF COLLISION INJURED MILES TRAVELED POPULATION
Total Fatal and Injury ....................... 597 251103 6/103
Alcohol Involved .............................. 85 11 H 03 11103
HBD Driver G21 .................................. 3 611103 48/103
HBD Driver 21-34.............. ............ ..... 14 39M03 211103
Motorcyclists . ........ .......... - .......... ..... 30 91103 31103
Pedestrians._. ............. - ..................... ..... 36 441103 15/103
Pedestrians 8 391103 181103
Pedestrians 6 251103 13/103
Bicyclists .... ................... _........ ......... .,........ 102 61103 31103
Bicyclists 11 14/103 3/103
Composite . ... ................... .............. ____ .......... ............... 201103 31103
COLLISIONS
Speed Related .................................. 135 171103 41103
Nighttime.,... ... .............. 38 50/103 151103
Hit and Run ..............»........................ 23 561103 331103
DUI ARRESTS 596 1.16 % 102/103
OTS -38b (Rev. 6/13)
GME—STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULEA
GRANT NO. PT1409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAGE 4
PERFORMANCE MEASURES
GRANT GOALS
1. To reduce the number of persons killed in traffic collisions.
2. To reduce the number of persons injured in traffic collisions.
3. To reduce the number of persons killed in alcohol -involved collisions.
4. To reduce the number of persons injured in alcohol -involved collisions.
5. To reduce the number of persons killed in drug -involved collisions.
6. To reduce the number of persons injured in drug -involved collisions.
7. To reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in traffic collisions.
8. To reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in traffic collisions.
9. To reduce the number of motorcyclists killed in alcohol -involved collisions.
10. To reduce the number of motorcyclists injured in alcohol -involved collisions.
11. To reduce hit & run fatal collisions.
12. To reduce hit & run injury collisions.
13. To reduce nighttime (2100 — 0259 hours) fatal collisions.
14. To reduce nighttime (2100 — 0259 hours) injury collisions.
GRANT OBJECTIVES
I. To issue a press release announcing the kick-off of the grant by November 15 of the first grant year. The
press releases and media advisories, alerts, and materials should be emailed to the OTS Public Information
Officer at pigQots.ca.r ov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the issuance
date of the release.
2. To include, when appropriate, that an at -fault driver was suspected of or was in fact drug impaired (if
possible note the drug involved, e.g., marijuana, prescription drugs, etc.) when reporting to the media the
details from a crash or crash investigation.
3. To send all grant -related activity press releases, media advisories, alerts and general public materials to the
OTS Public Information Officer (PIO) at piona,ots.ca.eov, with a copy to your OTS Coordinator. If an OTS
template -based press release is used, the QTS PIO and Coordinator should be copied when the release is
distributed to the press. if an OTS template is not used or is substantially changed, a draft press release
should first be sent to the OTS PIO for approval. Drafts should be sent for approval as early as possible to
ensure adequate turn -around time. Optimum lead time would be 10-20 days prior to the operation. Media
communications reporting the results of grant activities such as Enforcement Operations are exempt from
the recommended advance approval requirement. Activities such as warrant service operations, probation
sweeps and court stings that could be compromised by advanced publicity are exempt from pre -publicity,
but are encouraged to offer embargoed media coverage and to report the results.
OTS -38b (Rev. 6113)
GME -- STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULE A
GRANT No, PT1409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAGE 5
4. To use the following standard language in all press, media, and printed materials. Funding for this program
was provided by a grant from the California Office of Traffic Safety, through the National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration.
5. To issue a press release prior to each motorcycle safety enforcement operation to raise awareness about
motorcycle safety in general and to draw attention to the motorcycle safety enforcement operations. If an
OTS template is not used, the draft press releases, media advisories, alerts, and materials should be emailed
to the OTS Public Information Officer at pioCS.ots.ea.czov, and copied to your OTS Coordinator, for approval
14 days prior to the issuance date of the release.
6. To email the OTS Public Information Officer at uio@,ots.ca.gov, and copy your OTS Coordinator, at least
30 days in advance a short description of any significant grant related traffic safety event or program so
OTS has enough notice to arrange for attendance and/or participation in the event.
7. To submit a draft or rough -cut of all printed or recorded material (brochures, posters, scripts, artwork, trailer
graphics, etc.) to the OTS Public Information Officer at pio@ots.ca.¢ov, and copied to your OTS
Coordinator, for approval 14 days prior to the production or duplication.
8. To include the OTS logo, space permitting, on grant funded print materials: consult your QTS Coordinator
for specifics relating to this grant.
9. To develop and/or maintain a "Hot Sheet" program to notify patrol and traffic officers to be on the Iookout
for identified repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions by
December 31. Updated Hot Sheets should be distributed to patrol and traffic officers monthly.
10. To submit (not required but encouraged by OTS) a California Law Enforcement Challenge application to
CHP according to instructions on the CHP website http://wcvw.chn.ca,aov/features/clec.html and submit a
copy of the application to the Office of Traffic Safety by the last Friday of March.
11. To send 1 law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA-certified Standardized Field Sobriety Testing (SFST)
training by January 31.
12. To send 2 law enforcement personnel to the NHTSA Advanced Roadside Impaired Driving Enforcement
(ABIDE) 16 hour POST -certified training by January 31.
13. To send I law enforcement personnel to the IACP-certified Drug Recognition Expert (DRE) training
program by March 31.
14. To conduct 125 DUI Saturation Patrols.
15. To conduct 5 Distracted Driving enforcement operation(s) targeting drivers using hand held cell phones
and texting.
16. To conduct 20 Traffic Enforcement operation(s), including but not limited to, primary collision factor
violations.
17. To conduct 3 highly publicized Motorcycle Safety enforcement operation(s) in areas or during events with
a high number of motorcycle incidents or collisions resulting from unsafe speed, DUI, following too closely,
unsafe lane changes, improper turning and other primary collision factor violations by motorcyclists and
other drivers.
OTS -38b (Rev. 6/13)
GME — STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULE A
GRA\TNo. PT1409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAGE 6
I& To conduct 1 Warrant Service operation(s) targeting multiple DUI offenders who violate probation terms
or fail to appear in court.
19. To conduct 1 Stakeout operation(s) that employ police officers to observe the "worst of the worst" repeat
DUI offender probationers with suspended or revoked driver licenses.
20. To conduct 1 Court Sting operation(s) to cite individuals driving from court after having their driver's
license suspended or revoked.
21. To participate in the National Distracted Driving Awareness Month in April.
22. To participate in the statewide Click It or Ticket mobilization period in May.
23. To collaborate with the county's "Avoid DUI Coalition" by: participating in all planning and scheduling
meetings and MADD/Avoid DUI Seminars; providing your county Avoid Coordinator (Host) with your
agency's schedule of operations that occur during any Avoid operational campaign period; and reporting
daily, during holiday Avoid efforts, to the county Avoid Coordinator your agency's DUI arrests & DUI
fatality information for the Avoid media campaign.
NOTE: Nothing in this "agreement" shall be interpreted as a requirement, formal or informal, that a
particular police officer issue a specified or predetermined number of citations in pursuance of the
goals and objectives hereunder.
METHOD OF PROCEDURE
Phase 1 — Program Preparation, Training and Implementation (15` Quarter of the Grant Year)
• The police department will develop operational plans to implement the "best practice" strategies
outlined in the objectives section.
• A draft news release will be submitted to OTS to announce the grant program.
• All training needed to implement the program should be conducted this quarter.
• All grant related purchases needed to implement the program should be made this quarter.
• In order to develop/maintain the "Hot Sheets," research will be conducted to identify the "worst of the
worst" repeat DUI offenders with a suspended or revoked license as a result of DUI convictions. The
Hot Sheets may include the driver's name, last known address, DOB, description, current license status,
and the number of times suspended or revoked for DUI. Hot Sheets should be updated and distributed to
traffic and patrol officers at least monthly.
• Implementation of the STEP program will be accomplished by deploying personnel at high collision
locations.
OTS -38b (Rev. 6113)
GME—STEP
(Overtime)
SCHEDULE A
GR.ANTNo. PTI409
GRANT DESCRIPTION PAGE 7
Phase 2 — Community Awareness (Throughout Grant Period)
The police department will work to create media opportunities throughout the grant period to call
attention to the innovative program strategies and outcomes.
Phase 3 —Data Collection & Reporting (Throughout Grant Period)
The police department will submit a Quarterly Performance Report (QPR) and a separate quarterly
Schedule C within 30 days following each calendar quarter.
The final QPR, Schedule C, Claim and Executive Summary are due to OTS 30 days following the end
the grant period.
Reports shall be completed and submitted in accordance with OTS requirements specified in the Grant
Program Manual.
METHOD OF EVALUATION
Using the data compiled during the grant, the Grant Director will prepare the Executive Summary to accompany
the final QPR. The Executive Summary will: (1) briefly state the original problem; (2) specify the most
significant goals and objectives; (3) highlight the most significant activities that contributed to the success of the
program and the strategies used to accomplish the goals; and (4) describe the program's accomplishments as
they relate to the goals and objectives.
ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT
This program has full support of the City of Newport Beach. Every effort will be made to continue the
activities after the grant conclusion.
OTs -386 (Rev. 6/13)
SCHEDULE B
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
GRANT NO. PT1409
FUND NUMBER -
CATALOG NUMBER (CFDAj
FUND DESCRIPTION
TOTAL COST
TO GRANT
Minimum Penalties for Repeat Offenders
164 AL
20.608
for Driving While intoxicated
State and Community Highway
402 PT
20.600
Safety
COST CATEGORY
FISCAL YEAR ESTIMATES
TOTAL COST
TO GRANT
FY -1
CFDA
10/1/13
tlu u
A. PERSONNEL COSTS
9/30114
Positions and Salaries
Overtime
DUI Saturation Patrols
20.608
$
200,000.00
$
200,000.00
Warrant Service Operations
20.608
$
4,900.00
$
4,900.00
Stakeout Operations
20.608
$
2,500.00
$
2,500.00
Court Sting Operations
20.608
$
2,500.00
$
2,500.00
Benefits @ 1.45%
20,608
$
3,110,00
$
3,110.00
Traffic Enforcement Operations
20.600
$
30,000.00
$
30,000.00
Distracted Driving Operations
20.600
$
1.0,000.00
$
I
10,000.00
Motorcycle Safety Enforcement
20.600
$
5,400.00
$
5,400.00
OTS -38d (Rev. 6/13) Page 1 of 2
SCHEDULE B
DETAILED BUDGET ESTIMATE
GRANTNO. PT1409
E. OTHER DIRECT COSTS
None
�,
$
Category Sub -Total
$
$
F. INDIRECT COSTS
None
$
Category Sub -Total
$
$
GRANT TOTAL
$ 282,914.44
$ 282,914.44
OTS -33d (Rev. 6113) Page 2 of 2
SCHEDULE B-1
GRANT NO. PT1409
BUDGET NARRATIVE Page 1
PERSONNEL COSTS
Overtime
Overtime for grant funded law enforcement operations may be conducted by personnel such as a
Lieutenant, Sergeant, Corporal, Deputy, Officer, Community Services Officer, Dispatcher, etc.,
depending on the titles used by the agency and the grantees overtime policy. Personnel will be deployed
as needed to accomplish the grant goals and objectives.
Costs are estimated based on an overtime hourly rate range of $2$05/hour to $112.52/hour.
Overtime reimbursement will reflect actual costs of the personnel conducting the appropriate operation
up to the maximum range specified.
Overtime Benefit Rates
Medicare
1.45%
TOTAL BENEFIT RATE
1.45d
TRAVEL EXPENSE
Costs are included for appropriate staff to attend conferences and training events supporting the grant
goals and objectives and/or traffic safety. Local mileage for grant activities and meetings is included.
Anticipated travel may include the Vehicular Homicide Seminar and the OTS Leadership and Training
Seminar. All conferences, seminars or training not specifically identified in the Schedule B-1 (Budget
Narrative) must be approved by OTS. All travel claimed must beat the agency approved rate. Per Diem
may not be claimed for meals provided at conferences when registration fees are paid with OTS grant
funds.
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
None
EE UI�NT
1 Changeable Message Sign Trailer with Radar(s) - fully equipped changeable message sign trailer(s)
with a radar device and digital display that is portable and fully programmable and will determine and
display the speed of vehicles or post traffic safety information and messages during OTS funded operations.
OTHER DIRECT COSTS
None
INDIRECT COSTS
None
PROGRAM INCOME
There will be no program income generated from this grant.
CAWORNIA
OFFICE t:,F TRAFFIC SAFETY
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Failure to comply with applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives may subject Grantee Agency officials to
civil or criminal penalties and/or place the State in a high risk grantee status in accordance with 49 CFR §18.12.
The officials named on the Grant Agreement, certify by way of signature on the Grant Agreement signature page, that
the Grantee Agency complies with all applicable Federal statutes, regulations, and directives and State rules, guidelines,
policies and laws in effect with respect to the periods for which it receives grant funding. Applicable provisions include,
but are not limited to, the following:
+ 23 U.S.C. Chapter 4 - Highway Safety Act of 1966, as amended
+ 49 CFR Part 18 - Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and
Local Governments
+ 23 CFR Chapter 11 - (§§1200, 1205, 1206, 1250, 1251, & 1252) Regulations governing highway safety programs
+ NHTSA Order 462-6C - Matching Rates for State and Community Highway Safety Programs
+ Highway Safety Grant Funding Policy for Field -Administered Grants
NONDISCRIMINATION
The Grantee Agency will comply with all Federal statutes and implementing regulations relating to nondiscrimination.
These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (88), which prohibits discrimination on the
basis of race, color or national origin (and 49 CFR Part 21); (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as
amended (20 U.S.C. 1681-1683 and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. 794), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (101), as
amended (42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disabilities (and 49 CFR Part 27); (d)
the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U,S.C. 6101-6107), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
age; (e) the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (100), which requires Federal -aid recipients and all subrecipients to
prevent discrimination and ensure nondiscrimination in all of their programs and activities; (f) the Drug Abuse Office and
Treatment Act of 1972 (92), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of drug abuse; (g) the
comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act of 1970 (91), as amended,
relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism; (h) Sections 523 and 527 of the Public Health
Service Act of 1912, as amended (42 U.S.C. 290dd-3 and 290ee-3), relating to confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse
patient records; (i) Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act of 1968, as amended (42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq.), relating to
nondiscrimination in the sale, rental or financing of housing; (j) any other nondiscrimination provisions in the specific
statute(s) under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and (k) the requirements of any other
nondiscrimination statute(s) which may apply to the application.
I
I Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 2073)
CALRORNIA
OFFICE of TRAFFIC SAFETY
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
BUY AMERICA ACT
The Grantee Agency will comply with the provisions of the Buy America Act (49 U.S.C. 5323(j)), which contains the
following requirements:
Only steel, iron and manufactured products produced in the United States may be purchased with Federal funds unless
the Secretary of Transportation determines that such domestic purchases would be inconsistent with the public interest,
that such materials are not reasonably available and of a satisfactory quality, or that inclusion of domestic materials will
increase the cost of the overall project contract by more than 25 percent. Clear justification for the purchase of non-
domestic items must be in the form of a waiver request submitted to and approved by the Secretary of Transportation.
POLITICAL ACTIVITY (HATCH ACT)
The Grantee Agency will comply with provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. 1501-1508) which limits the political activities
of employees whose principal employment activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING FEDERAL LOBBYING
Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Cooperative Agreements
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal
contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement.
2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of
Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or
cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub -
award at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grant, loans, and cooperative agreements)
and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was
made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction
imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to
a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
.Certifications and Assurances(Rev, 2013) � ���,.• �,� ,�� . � � .. ,•����.��• „ ...,,..,,� �,
CALOORN1A
OFFICE as TRAFFIC SAFETY
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
RESTRICTION ON STATE LOBBYING
None of the funds under this program will be used for any activity specifically designed to urge or influence a State or
local legislatorto favor or oppose the adoption of any specific legislative proposal pending before any State or local
legislative body. Such activities include both direct and indirect (e.g., "grassroots") lobbying activities, with one
exception. This does not preclude a State official whose salary is supported with NHTSA funds from engaging in direct
communications with State or local legislative officials, in accordance with customary State practice, even if such
communications urge legislative officials to favor or oppose the adoption of a specific pending legislative proposal.
CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION
Instructions for Primary Certification
1, By signing and submitting this Grant Agreement, the Grantee Agency official is providing the certification set out
below.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below will not necessarily result in denial of
participation in this covered transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation of why it cannot
provide the certification set out below. The certification or explanation will be considered in connection with the
department or agency's determination whether to enter into this transaction. However, failure of the Grantee
Agency official to furnish a certification or an explanation shall disqualify such person from participation in this
transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when the
department or agency determined to enter into this transaction, If it is later determined that the Grantee Agency
official knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal
Government, the department or agency may terminate this transaction for cause or default.
4. The prospective primary participant shall provide immediate written notice to the department or agency to which
this Grant Agreement is submitted if at any time the Grantee Agency official learns its certification was erroneous
when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
5. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person,
primary covered transaction, principal, Grant Agreement, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the
meaning set out in the Definitions and coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the department or
agency to which this Grant Agreement is being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
6. The Grantee Agency official agrees by submitting this Grant Agreement that, should the proposed covered
transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is
proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9 subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency entering
into this transaction.
n ,e ro ,w
aCertificatio.nsanBAsstfrances{Rev.2Oi3)
"LIVONNA
OFFICE.oe TRAFFIC SAFETY
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
7. The Grantee Agency official further agrees by submitting this Grant Agreement that it will include the clause titled
"Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion -Lower Tier Covered
Transaction," provided by the department or agency entering into this covered transaction, without modification, in
all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower tier covered transactions.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier
covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9 subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended,
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A
participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each
participant may, but is not required to, check the list of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Non -
procurement Programs.
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to
render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not
required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 6 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction
knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR
Part 9 subpart 9.4, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in
addition to other remedies available to the Federal Government, the department or agency may terminate this
transaction for cause or default,
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters -Primary Covered Transactions
(1) The Grantee Agency official certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that its principals:
(a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded by any
Federal department or agency;
(b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this Grant Agreement been convicted of or had a civil judgment
rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain,
or performing a public (Federal, State or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or
State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of record,
making false statements, or receiving stolen property;
(c) Are not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or
Local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this certification; and
(d) Have not within a three-year period preceding this application/Grant Agreement had one or more public transactions
(Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default.
(2) Where the Grantee Agency official is unable to certify to any of the Statements in this certification, such prospective
participant shall attach an explanation to this Grant Agreement.
4TUr f ations and Assurances (Rev. 2013)
oattraavis,
OFFICE of TRAFFIC SAFETY
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
Instructions for Lower Tier Certification
1. By signing and submitting this Grant Agreement, the prospective lower tier participant is providing the certification
set out below.
2. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this
transaction was entered into. If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant knowingly rendered
an erroneous certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or
agency with which this transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or
debarment.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate written notice to the person to which this Grant
Agreement is submitted if at any time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certification was
erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances.
4. The terms covered transaction, debarred, suspended, ineligible, lower tier covered transaction, participant, person,
primary covered transaction, principal, Grant Agreement, and voluntarily excluded, as used in this clause, have the
meanings set out in the Definition and Coverage sections of 49 CFR Part 29. You may contact the person to whom
this Grant Agreement is submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations.
5. The prospective lower tier participant agrees by submitting this Grant Agreement that, should the proposed covered
transaction be entered into, it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction with a person who is
proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9 subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this covered transaction, unless authorized by the department or agency with which
this transaction originated.
5. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting this Grant Agreement that it will include the
clause titled "Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier
Covered Transaction," without modification, in all lower tier covered transactions and in all solicitations for lower
tier covered transactions. (See below)
7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification of a prospective participant in a lower tier
covered transaction that it is not proposed for debarment under 48 CFR Part 9 subpart 9.4, debarred, suspended,
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the covered transaction, unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. A
participant may decide the method and frequency by which it determines the eligibility of its principals. Each
participant may, but is not required to, check the List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Non -
procurement Programs.
8. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require establishment of a system of records in order to
render in good faith the certification required by this clause. The knowledge and information of a participant is not
required to exceed that which is normally possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
dealings.
S�,
Certifications and Assurances (Rev. 2013)
CALIFOWNIA
QFFICE of TRAFFIC SAFETY
EXHIBIT A
CERTIFICATIONS AND ASSURANCES
9. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph 5 of these instructions, if a participant in a covered transaction
knowingly enters into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is proposed for debarment under 48 CFR
Part 9 subpart 9A, suspended, debarred, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction, in
addition to other remedies available to the Federal government, the department or agency with which this
transaction originated may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment.
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion—Lower Tier Covered
Transactions
1. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this grant agreement, that neither it nor its
principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency.
2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such
prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this grant agreement.
6 Certifications and Assurances(Rev. 2013)
State of California — Offs_ - of Traffic Safety
GRANT AGREEMENT
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTO NEY'S OFFICE
Date: 3
By:
Aa on C. Harp
City Attorney
ATTEST:(�
Date: I
B l U►
y.
Leilani I. Brown
City Clerk
'%6URNIA
Grant Number
PT1409
CIN OF
NEWPORT BEACH
City Council Staff Report Agenda Item No. 16
September 10, 2013
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Police Department
Jay R. Johnson, Chief of Police
949-644-3701,JJohnson@nbpd.org
APPROVED:
Jeff Lu, Lieutenant
949-644-3740..d#;g
TITLE:cceptanc&�of 2013/2014 State of California, Office of Traffic
�
Safety, DUI Enforcement and Awareness Program Grants #PT1409
and #SC14284
ABSTRACT:
The Police Department seeks acceptance of two grants totaling $358,410, both granted
from the State of California, Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) to fund a Driving Under the
Influence (DUI) Enforcement and Awareness Program, traffic safety enforcement, and
DUI Sobriety Checkpoints.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Authorize the City Council to accept a $282,910 "Selective Traffic Enforcement
Program" (STEP) award granted to the Newport Beach Police Department by
the OTS per Council Policies F-3 and F-25. Therefore, to comply with Council
Policy F-3, City Council must formally accept the award of $282,910 and create
a new appropriation to expend the money.
2. Approve a Budget Amendment increasing Police revenue estimates and
expenditure appropriations by $282,910.
3. Authorize the City Council to accept a $75,500 "Sobriety Checkpoint Grant
Program" award granted to the Newport Beach Police Department by the OTS
per Council Policies F-3 and F-25. Therefore, to comply with Council Policy F-3,
City Council must formally accept the award of $75,500 and create a new
appropriation to expend the money.
4. Approve a Budget Amendment increasing Police revenue estimates and
expenditure appropriations by $75,500.
Acceptance of 2013/2014 State of California, Office of Traffic Safety, DUI Enforcement
and Awareness Program Grants #PT1409 and #SC14284
September 10, 2013
Page 2
FUNDING AVAILABILITY:
The first Budget Amendment records and appropriates $282,910 in additional revenue
from the OTS STEP grant and $282,910 in increased expenditure appropriations. The
revenue will be posted to the OTS STEP FY 14 account, 127-492A, and the expenditure
appropriations will be posted to the various expenditure accounts in division 1276 of the
OTS Fund, according the following breakdown:
1276-7041
Overtime: Safety
$ 255,300
1276-7425
Medicare Fringes
$ 3,769
1276-8100
Travel & Meetings
$ 3,841
1276-9100
Rolling Equipment
$ 20,000
Total FY 14 STEP Grant
The second Budget Amendment records and appropriates $75,500 in additional
revenue from the OTS Sobriety Checkpoint grant and $75,500 in increased expenditure
appropriations. The revenue will be posted to the OTS Sobriety Checkpoint FY 14
account, 127-4928, and the expenditure appropriations will be posted to the various
expenditure accounts in division 1277 of the OTS Fund, according to the following
estimated breakdown:
1277-7041 Overtime: Safety $ 73,900
1277-7425 Medicare Fringes $ 1,100
1277-8250 Special Dept Expense, NOC $ 500
Total FY 14 Sobriety Checkpoint Grant
DISCUSSION:
Background:
The City of Newport Beach has been awarded two grants from the State of California,
OTS, to increase DUI Enforcement and Awareness and to fund additional traffic safety
enforcement, in the City of Newport Beach. Grant number PT1409 ("Selective Traffic
Enforcement Program") and grant number SC14284 ("Sobriety Checkpoint Grant
Program") will both become effective October 1, 2013, and expire September 30, 2014.
This combined $358,410 in grant funds will pay for overtime costs for officers
specifically assigned to DUI enforcement and awareness programs, including six DUI
checkpoint operations, additional traffic safety saturation patrols, and the purchase of a
new Changeable Message Sign Trailer with Speed Radar.
Acceptance of 2013/2014 State of California, Office of Traffic Safety, DUI Enforcement
and Awareness Program Grants #PT1409 and #SC14284
September 10, 2013
Page 3
In 2010, the latest OTS statistics available, OTS rated 103 California cities with
population in the 50,000 to 100,000 range. At that time Newport Beach ranked as
follows:
Category
Rankin
Persons killed or injured in alcohol -involved collisions
6
Total alcohol -involved collisions
1
Alcohol -involved collisions with drivers between thea es of 21 and 34
21
Alcohol -involved collision with drivers under 21
48
The Police Department, in an effort to improve our DUI programs, and to reduce the
number of deaths and injuries involving alcohol-related driving, speed, red-light running
and other primary collisions factors, applied for and was awarded two OTS grants in the
total amount of $358,410, pending approval of the City Council. Both are reimbursable
grants, in that funds are repaid after the City incurs the overtime expense. Claims for
reimbursement are made quarterly, and payments are processed by the State
thereafter.
The "Selective Traffic Enforcement Program" grant ($282,910) allows for the funding of
overtime associated with 125 DUI saturation patrols, 20 primary collision factor
saturation patrols, 5 distracted driving saturation patrols, 3 motorcycle safety saturation
patrols, and a Warrant Service operation, Stakeout operation and Court Sting operation,
all three of which target multiple or repeat DUI offenders. This STEP grant also
provides funding ($20,000.00) for the purchase of a new speed radar trailer, to
supplement those already in-service in the City. The "Sobriety Checkpoint Grant
Program" grant ($75,500) allows for the funding of overtime associated with six DUI
checkpoint operations and $500.00 for the purchase of OTS -approved checkpoint
supplies.
This year, OTS has, again, separated the "Selective Traffic Enforcement Program" grant
funds from the "Sobriety Checkpoint Grant Program" funds and that is the reason for
two separate OTS grants for the upcoming FY. Prior to last year, one OTS grant funded
both programs.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff recommends the City Council find this action is not subject to the California
Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will
not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the
environment) and 15060(c)(3) (the activity is not a project as defined in Section 15378)
of the CEQA Guidelines, California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3, because it
has no potential for resulting in physical change to the environment, directly or
indirectly.
3
Acceptance of 2013/2014 State of California, Office of Traffic Safety, DUI Enforcement
and Awareness Program Grants #PT1409 and #SC14284
September 10, 2013
Page 4
NOTICING:
The agenda item has been noticed according to the Brown Act (72 hours in advance of
the meeting at which the City Council considers the item).
Submitted by:
(240�'-
Jay nso
Chid6f of Police
Attachments: OTS Award Letter, STEP Grant
OTS Award Letter, Sobriety Checkpoint Grant
Budget Amendments
a
STATE. OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
2208 KAUSEN DRIVE. SUITE 300
ELK GROVE, CA 95758
www.ots.ca.gov
(916)509-3030
(800) 735-2929 (TTITDD-Referral)
(916) 509-3055 (FAX)
May 16, 2013
Jeff Lu, Lieutenant
Newport Beach Police Department
870 Santa Barbara Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Dear Lieutenant Lu:
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVERNOR
r-
„
r A,,
oC erne)
Or TIIC MIITT
Grant No. PT 1409
Congratulations! Through a competitive process, the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has tentatively
approved your funding request for the proposal titled "Selective Traffic Enforcement Program" in the
amount of approximately $282,910.00.
Your OTS Coordinator will contact you, to discuss your proposal and explain the Grant Agreement
process. It is our goal to have all new grants start no later than October 1, 2013. If approval from a
City Council or the Board of Supervisors is required, you should begin that process now. Do not incur
grant reimbursable costs prior to the receipt of your official approval packet from OTS or before your
grant start date.
OTS will initiate a statewide media news release regarding 2014 proposals selected for funding. Your
agency should not publically announce this tentative award until the grant agreement is fully
negotiated and signed by OTS.
Again, congratulations on the success of your proposal. If you have any questions, please contact
Julie Schilling, Regional Coordinator, at (916) 509-3018 or a -mail at julie.schilling@ots.ca.gov.
Sincerely,
4'`w(;
CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY
Director
JS:kn
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
OFFICE OF TRAFFIC S"ETY
2208 KAUSEN DRIVE. SURE 300
ELK GROVE. CA 95758
www.ots.ca.gov
(918)509-3030
(800) 735-2929 (TTITDD-Relemal)
(918) 509-3055 (FAX)
May 24, 20,13
Jeffrey Lu, Lieutenant
Newport Beach Police Department
870 Santa Barbara Drive
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Dear Lieutenant Lu:
EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVERNOR
�rf
cw urowx1• FOA, 11.1 er rewrn< urrr<♦
Grant No. SC14284
Congratulations! Through a competitive process, the Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) has tentatively
approved your funding request for the application titled "Sobriety Checkpoint Grant Program" for
the amount of $75,500.00. This award includes a maximum of $500.00 for the purchase of OTS -
approved checkpoint supplies. The approval is for the operation of six checkpoints in
Newport Beach in the period, October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2014. The maximum allowed cost
per checkpoint is $12,500.00.
The University of California Berkeley Safe Transportation Research and Education Center
(SafeT.REC), who is administering the grant funds for OTS, will e-mail a grant contract to the
contact listed on the application. Please have the Authorizing Official and any additional
individuals authorized to sign claims sign the contract. Send the contract to SafeTREC no later
than September 3, 2013. It is our goal to have all new grants start no later than October I, 2013.
The SafeTREC will issue you a copy of the signed, fully executed grant contract.
If approval from your City Council or Board of Supervisors is required, you should begin that
process now. Do not incur costs prior to the date of the signed, fully executed contract from
SafeTREC.
Again, congratulations on the success of your application. If you have any questions, please contact
Shar Rauch, SafeTREC Program Coordinator at (5 10) 643-1774 or by e-mail at
checkpoint@berkelev.edu.
Sincerely, A
OL
t,�2;
CHRISTOPHER J. MURPHY
Director
CM:kn
cc: Shar Rauch
City of Newport Beach
BUDGET AMENDMENT
2013-14
EFFECT ON BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE:
�X Increase Revenue Estimates
X Increase Expenditure Appropriations AND
Transfer Budget Appropriations
SOURCE:
from existing budget appropriations
X from additional estimated revenues
from unappropriated fund balance
EXPLANATION:
NO. BA- 14BA-012
AMOUNT: 535e,a1o.00
Increase in Budgetary Fund Balance
Decrease in Budgetary Fund Balance
Ij No effect on Budgetary Fund Balance
This budget amendment is requested to provide for the following:
To increase revenue estimates and expenditure appropriations to accept two State of California, Office of Traffic Safety (OTS)
Grants (PT1409 & SC14284) for increasing DUI Enforcement and Awareness and funding additional traffic safety enforcement.
Funds will be used to pay for overtime costs for officers specifically assigned to these programs, related travel & training costs,
as well as a new radar trailer for program use.
ACCOUNTING ENTRY:
BUDGETARY FUND BALANCE Amount
Fund Account Description Debit Credit
REVENUE ESTIMATES (3601)
Fund/Division Account Description
127 492A OTS Grants - FY 14 OTS Selct Traffic Enfrc $282,910.00
127 492B OTS Grants - FY 14 OTS Sobriety Chckpt $75,500.00
EXPENDITURE APPROPRIATIONS (3603)
Description
Division Number 1276 FY14 OTS Select Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)
Account Number 7041 Overtime, Safety & 1/2 Time $255,300.00
Division Number 1276 FY14 OTS Select Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)
Account Number 7425 Medicare Fringes $3,769.00
Division Number 1276 FY14 OTS Select Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)
Account Number 8100 Travel & Meetings NOC $3,841.00
Division Number 1276 FY14 OTS Select Traffic Enforcement Program (STEP)
Account Number 9100 Rolling Equipment $20,000.00
Division Number 1277 FY14 OTS Sobriety Checkpoint Program
Account Number 7041 Overtime, Safety & 1/2 Time $73,900.00
Division Number 1277 FY14 OTS Sobriety Checkpoint Program
Account Number 7425 Medicare Fringes $1,100.00
Division Number 1277 FY14 OTS Sobriety Checkpoint Program
Account Number 8250 Special Dept Expense, NOC $500.00
Autmatic System Entry. p p.
Signed: s2/
O._ .- 3
anci I nan rector Date
Signed: I
mi strative Approval: City Manager ate
City Council Approval: City Clerk Date