HomeMy WebLinkAboutNewport Boulevard, PE Propertyw •
To-
From,
Subject -
UUN -AL:
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH �" zfeZl
CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT
The Honorable Mayor and
City Council
City Attorney
M-
April 10, 1961
Resolution directing eminent domain on the property at
the northwest corner of Newport and 30th Street
Transmitted herewith is a resolution which, if adopted, will author-
ize and direct eminent domain on the real property at the northwest
corner of Newport Boulevard and 30th Street. It will also rescind
Resolution No. 5385 adopted on March 20 declaring eminent domain
to be necessary on this property.
This new resolution is requested because, upon a review of the
property description in Resolution No. 5385, the title company has
suggested some corrections. This proposed resolution contains a
description acceptable to the title company and to the Public Works
Department.
Since we have obtained a deed from the owner of the property at the
southeast corner of Newport Boulevard and 30th Street, it has been
eliminated from the resolution.
WWC -mec
Enc.
cc m City Manager
Public Works Director
City Clerk
4at r W � ara a
City Attorney
I�
WWC*mec
4/10/61
BEACH*
N
RESOLUTION NO. S cl
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR A
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT, PUBLIC STREETS,
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN
PROCEEDINGS THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT
SECTION to The City Council hereby finds and determines
that the public interest and necessity require the construction
and completion by the City of Newport Beach of a public improvement,
including the widening of Newport Boulevard along the westerly side
thereof northerly of 30th Street for a distance of 110 feet, more
or less.
SECTION 20 The City Council hereby further finds and
determines that the public interest and necessity require, for the
construction and completion of said improvement, the acquisition
by the City of Newport Beach of a right-of-way and easement for
street and highway purposes in, over, and on certain real property
situated in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of
California, described as follows, to wit*
That portion of Section 28, Township 6 South, Range
10 West, S. Be BD & Me, in the City of Newport Beach,
County of Orange, State of California, according to
an official plat of said land filed in the District
Land Office, August 4, 1890, described as follows*
Beginning at the intersection of the Northerly prop-
erty line of 30th Street and the Westerly property
line of Newport Boulevard, said point being on a
curve concave to the East and having a radius of
284483 feet and the center of which bears North 78°
30' 28" East; thence Northerly 106.43 feet, through
an angle of 2° 08' 37 ", to a point on said curve the
center of which bears North 80° 39' 05" East; thence
South 520 24' 20" West 1017 feet; thence South 4° 06'
00" East 70.97 feet; thence southerly 29099 feet,
through an angle of 9° 52' 29" along a tangent curve
concave to the West and having a radius of 174.00 feet
to a point of compound curvature with a curve having a
radius of 39,00 feet; a tangent at said point bearing
South 5° 46' 32,5" West; thence Southwesterly 25°60
feet, through an angle of 37° 36' 11 ", to a non - tangent
line, said line being the northerly line of 30th Street;
thence North 52" 44' 45" East 32.70 feet along said
northerly line of 30th Street to the point of beginning.
SECTION 3. The public improvement to be located on the
property described in Section 2 is located in a manner which is com-
patible with the greatest public good and the least private injury.
SECTION 4. The City Attorney of the City of Newport Beach
is hereby authorized, empowered and directed-.
(a) To commence an action or actions in eminent domain in
the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County
of Orange in the name of the City of Newport Beach to acquire the
easement herein declared to be necessary and to secure the right to
immediate possession and use of said right-of-way and easement by de-
positing in court such sum of money as may be required pursuant to the
provisions of Section 14 of Article I of the Constitution of the State
of California to entitle the City to take immediate possession thereof.
(b) To incur in the name of and on -behalf of the City of
Newport Beach all obligations and expenses necessary to acquire said
property and the immediate possession thereof.
(c) To do such further acts and to take such additional
steps as may be necessary or convenient in connection with said ac-
quisition.
SECTION 5. Resolution No. 5385 is hereby rescinded.
This resolution was adopted by at least a two-thirds vote
of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach at a meeting of
said Council on the 10th day of April, 1961, by the following vote,
to wit.
AYES, COUNCILMEN- / (idt._ _ �a
NOES, COUNCILMEN-.
ABSENT COUNCILMEN- �t ATTEST-
City Clerk
Mayor
2.
To:
From:
CITY Of NEWPORT BEACH
City Clerk
City Attorney
CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT
Subject: Deed from Robert H. Reed
0
April 3, 196"
RtAIVED
Hrn 4 196,
GTy CLERK
CITY OF
NEWPORT BEACH
Transmitted herewith is a copy of a grant of easement executed
by Robert H. Reed, the owner of the property at the southeast
corner of Newport Boulevard and 30th Street. The parcel
conveyed is needed for the improvement of Newport Boulevard.
Also transmitted is a resolution by which the Council may
accept this grant.
It is requested that the matter be submitted to the City Council
and a certified copy of the resolution along with the certificate
of acceptance be returned to this office for transmittal to the
County Recorder's office.
WWC:mec
Encs.
cc - City Manager
Director of Public Works
Director of finance
Walter W. Chars
City Attorney
6
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY
DEP RTMENT
To: The Honorable Mayor and
City Council
From: City Attorney
Subject: Resolution No. 5385
0
April 3, 1961
In the above resolution, the City Council declared the necessity
of acquiring a parcel of land at the southeast corner of Newport
Boulevard and 30th Street. Mr. Robert H. Reed, the owner of
that parcel, has executed and delivered a grant of easement over
the property declared to be necessary. He has made the grant to
the City on condition that the City pay him $900 as full compen-
sation for the property being taken. This is within 10% of the
figure stated by our appraiser to be the value of this parcel.
It is, therefore, recommended that the City Council approve the a
payment to Mr. Reed of $900 for this parcel of property. A
resolution is also before the Council for the purpose of accept-
ing the grant and authorizing its recording.
WWC:mec
cc m City Manager
Director of Public Works
Director of Finance
City Clerk
44/l
Walter W. CharamzOf
City Attorney
• 0 �'__-�
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT
Toe The Honorable Mayor and
City Council
From: City Attorney
Subject: Resolution No. 5385
RECEIVED
Coy cteAx
)VEWPOAT BAH
April 3, 1961
Rs393
In the above resolution, the City Council declared the necessity
of acquiring a parcel of land at the southeast corner of Newport
Boulevard and 30th Street. Mr. Robert H. Reed, the owner of
that parcel, has executed and delivered a grant of easement over
the property declared to be necessary. He has made the grant to
the City on condition that the City pay him $900 as full compen-
sation for the property being taken. This is within 10% of the
figure stated by our appraiser to be the value of this parcel.
It is, therefore, recommended that the City Council approve the
payment to Mr. Reed of $900 for this parcel of property. A
resolution is also before the Council for the purpose of accept-
ing the grant and authorizing its recording.
WWC :mec
cc - City Manager
Director of Public Works
Director of Finance
City Clerk
Walter W. Charamz
City Attorney
.4
/6 , (g)
i
1'
2 ;;
3 I'
4
6
Gg= OF EASEMENT
For a valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby
ac'Knowledged, ROBERT H. RXED, a married man, as his separate prop"
erty, does hereby grant to the..GITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal
61 corporation, a permanent easement for street and highway purposes
7, over the following- described real property, to wit:
8'JJ:
l
9 "
10
I;
121.
I'
13
141.
15 Dateds
161
17 !'
191
20
21
22
23,
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31 :.
32 !'
I
That portica of Lot 24, Block 230, Lancaster's Addi-
tion to Newport Beach, in the City of Newport Beach,
County of Orange, State of California, as per map
recorded in Book 5, Page 14, of Maps in the office
of the Recorder of said county, described as follows
Bc* ipning at the Northwest corner of said lot, thence
Easterly along said Northerly lot line being also the
Southerly property line of 30th Street 28.377 feet;
thence South fs2° 04' 30" West 25.22 feet; thence
Northwesterly along the Westerly line of said lot
also being the Easterly property-line of Newport Blvd.
13.00 feet to the point of beginning.
22 March , 1961.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
as
CO;IN'TY OF ORANGE )
ROBERT
On this 22nd day of March , 1961, before me, the
undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State,
personally appeared ROBERT H. REED, known to me to be the person
whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknotaledged
that he executed the same.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
ROY R. McCARDLE. /s/
Notary Public in and for
said County and State
ROY R. McCARDLE
My Commission Expires November
1961
i�
• 4/4/(laj
I
f
1
2
3
4
5
0
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
m
19
20
21
22
23
24''.
25I
26',
27i
28!,
29
30
31'
32
�rfSz3 }s 5393
HOMM CFA AC e Z& a "ANT VW EAS
a mod has eiC" Utod A. O$ et61$A°
i Sent sraati to the (ty . sf Amport ftech a pormene at eases
fat stsait a6d h4owsy des over the fate -d sib" r 1
proarty, to nits
That pottUm of Lot. !A, Uock 230, i tastomi** A40ift
t.io a to 5"Potrt Seaeb, iat the city of moopert te"ho
y of image, Stalp� of C.slife mia as per sod
re"rded th �k 30 Page l4, of s & the office
of. flee of acid ca aty, described as fallaoINGt
arfetg at fibs sssthwast Corner of Said 1st, them*
mly alas s"d morthorly lot lime botes also the
*rly p line of h Street 28.3 feet;
s Sorts ". g . 1 3v Wet 153t t feat;. tbsaao
westerly aI6n the 'Nmtosly line of said lot
being the t"taaly ? Una of Seven Slttd.
i feat to the puns off' l a�a�3 1
WMWO it is to the interest of the City to ""opt
said grant of easement fns such purpososp
, t rOU. K IT MOLVED by the City 06mcil of
the City of Seaport Stock that said gent of *"saw& be aecepted
*Ad the City Clark is authorized and directed to oxecuto oad
sttactt a certificate of acc ptame and Consent to the mordiv& of
$Ala great of easomentt La the CAVAnty Recorder's of fUMA
AS OnO t4►1a lifith dsy Mail, 1.
yam'
All : c �
y we,
3/16/6., (1 2)
71
i
8�
9I
101
11
12
1
13,
141
151
1611
171
18iI
19!
201
21
221+
23!
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31'
32;
.'s
ii
�y ��� �y�Tt�S:ifi. t`iz i �r.�✓, �tx3.rpx . �{e �g+(.§� �ay�:
A Egii?L+s+Gpr:.'yRFKs' la'1.wy a�:T \iY4c�ii;rY� -Wit at TIC', i}; >�a`pbpY Sal'
A Aw^'N c-;i +:W �Yp9 _ '�Fi'Kt'LZL La'tk/,
Out ram i`. To 'I'le CM
ate? t, r.:, =w =t has b"a livara4 to the City of art
5 via: an Indvaturs dated the 26th day of Joau"!s 1%1t LA VI Lich
tko SAO ^aern . fteifte Ca gMny, a corporation. drsnsts to. 00 (Atp of
ohs ae WARici al. corporations all that soma -n PLOCO or,
of of I situate in the City of mart S"C1111, Bey of
0y o. +tat* of Califorsdat being as portion of tit cortGo$ a strip
o land 01,00 Ust vide) dascrii*asi in deed to a acifa Ilattari.a Mail-
s &y COWBA79 0866vied is Boolt 735s page 457 of Official Amards,
laa the Office of t :fir of aaaid Goassaty, described as follow;
usmtua at too point of intersection of
tha 64utbarly IUM of laaxad described in 4WW to
the City of OW14Wt Booth recorded is bMI& 3120
Pfte 15 of fteft La the office of said astorder
with a lime parsrelisl with and distant 24.0 fast
terlyo wr04 at
right anise from the
eator; Uni of said -° strip 07. 3sd (Ija ,fad U%
)
t h W42' 30
'East &log slid porsilel
3.9A** 229.15 fon to a poisaii o > hsraatari
4106 0 cur" to the left hanti a radius of 50.9
fort, throvah a rcatr+al aaels of 13'24145:` (a radial
1i o to said oarea at last M"tLoWW -W bons
,
North 70`1.7 "30 "q°�,F,,�au,s�t) as ase^at, soma. of I'll,"
toot; ths3a"3 a North WIN "Is_' W%st, tam to *aid
cur , 35.94 fact tar. a poWt$ tbeacae Merl
411004 a eaaOMM to Lisa right having a radials of 500
ff�e, t� s algal mgla►, of 0'56'19" (a radial
line to Laos s"d caame, at lost as L iaet rs
South .56 "47'45n Weed s an are �� of 46.73 foot
tar a point tea said southwly line distant South 83 "23'
W bests tom, 35.97 !tint faeces the poift of haagist.
thwWo Awth 43`23100` Root At lost Satan
lix%4, 35.97 ton to the point of ;41= 148 cor in-
tx% an aria of 30560 square Beat, awe or Is"*
5►6geet to aasssaE s, r+Btricti"s reset etiona s condi-
tLOW, and C-.9V6tAQt& Of record.
E=rrM AMD RMRVVRG ado Grantor, its stweessors and
assigns fe rwoert than title ead ant lWaive right to ail.. of the
ainerals, �a l agar and products of ever+ triad vithin or
e1 ri�l.as tend below a � of foots lacludixag..
ins the generality of the foresoifts all -
lou%* arl1, asasturd l ,g" and hydrocarbon oa bstea i TV=aR
WLTH the right of 1ABresa and egreoaa heteath the surface of
said UrA tea rloro fats extract mine eaad romwe the sa
SU4 t�o rlgbc tva voiaatatn well ;;is* through a&id land for th;
3
4
5 II
6
7
91;
10
is
121
141:
15 Ii
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
a a4
•
•
a of rompwigg "stAtwxwa Free othm IsadIs 0 wbother such
1 6 " n P " " a r e . 44joial" or romwedo & a d every r14;ht and am most-
eery o r e seful to such rights. which u#4► my iwmtludw lateral
Or OLWM drUU-.A&* cirri di"ing or 01* king of W4106
shafts or tannals; =wd hawavary that OrdritArp its
swacesoors add azSLWOO thall not use or enter Wwn t-w our-
f4ed, of said load If $10AII VAC dist-aft Say tXPtQvOm&At8
thereaft SWA shah not penetrate or rearm #Ubstancas within
501; feat of the surface.
ALSO RMAVISS VATO OR4,WM the risht of aurfma aces"
G"r t4a above deaftlbod proparty is ovZor to piwide ingress
w�d ogre V&MVW4�
." avor "J4 property Co the odjoiai% ----�Y of
Qrantow uatu such tizal an said Property is boiw#w as at A�
PubIU street. Thewaft
aer Grailtor shOU ha" aces" to 8^10
st2vot subject to App! table raguUtjoas of the public body
havuw jurledixt.ton thereof.
SU$J9GT IT�s. avA In accordeace with* all applicable State
acid local laws;
S, said indenture is in accovdaiwe with the tae"
Ment to purchase asid Property;
MWO, TjJW-.FO=j, NZ LT RUMVED that said indonture be
ace"tod and the City Clw#. Is autborLsed wed diz*otad to execute
aQ4 attach a eartm"to Of "Captam* and eons*at to Cr record-
L4 of **Ld fl ea in the County ascorder4a office.
ADD?= at an adjourned regular wastiag this Ifth day of.
PArepo 1%1,
city Meriz-
2.
Zoe
3/16/�l
1
A54=100 w, Z5322
A i L�rl Lak
ACWTIX-GAS INDURM
TO rM 11,11TV
= GITV OF
4MATING
WMiXiL�IRt t'here has been 4taitterad to the C11:7 *f UrdPOrt
6 ji 3evch an indenture the l6tb day of Deeav6ar, 1960, in which
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32J
the Pacific nectric a4ilvey G=04ayt a 4Mp"Atieft, grain" to the
City of gewport z6acht as WAMicipal corparatioat AU the fallowift
doacrtiakod property #,
A portion of that cortain strip of l 100 fast in
vi the situate ia t.lw City of Newport leach, C4x=ty of
(Pr~* Stoto of CaliforaU. d"cribed La dead to the
Southern Pacific comany s ilvoord C4w*any recorded ta
&ook 4055 page 250 of Official PAtords, in tba Office of
the Asem4ex of said cotgays and inwe partiwalarLy d"cr
" follom I
Beginning wet tho point of intorsection of tits north-
easterly I",* of said strip of land 100 feet in width with
the northeasterly proloMation of the southeasterly Lim
of 30th Street (30 fast vida)40" a"
p&:;htm of tM
13
3 O=
Lake Tract,, "corded in book, M 0 140so'"
maps in the Office of the Aecorder of said orange C4unty#
said P044* of intersection aloe being the Mat vest*rly
oomw of Lot 2� &a *hwioa an map of Sub&vigion of Block
227,, Section A$ Meeport beacho rocaw4od in Miscellaneous.
?%Lp Book &V Pass 369 ii rde of said crar4ke couayt a
radial lirm ter said point bows 'A 77 40*3V% 1- tbAoct
Southeasterly Am% the Wrtheastarly line of said 100 foc4
strip on at cut" concave to the east a" havin a radius aj
2,114.63 toot. an are distance of 109.28 feet. to an Later-
oactii� vith- the northeastarl Vveloftation of the center"
line of the allay. 14 zloc<v. I29, * " sbamm upon "L4 OW of
Lake Tr"t, a. rastiml Lit* throw
gh said point of Latersocti4
bears a ?5 27%03" L� theace 8 52 , 43142" V, al" said imrtl
easterly prolvageticm as distance of 64,03 fast to an Later-
$active with a Liu& Lying Westerly of S parouel tol, *ad
distant 60 -feet measured radially ftm the uort-Seastarly
line of Gaid 100 foot strip,, a radial liao through said
Point of intersect -Loa beers R 14'057004`" 9; thence northorl
on a tansent cut" concave to the east and %MIA& a radius
of 2674.33 foots an are diataw.* of 70.54 feet to as paten
of conpouaid ca.mv4v a radial line through *aid point b"ra
a 76'21125"t 'r.4 theme northwesterly on a tan&4eat a, tiave
ewacave to the *OutW~t and haviqu a radius of 25.W feet
throug)i a central angle of I13 ° 36 V"44 $, an are distance of
49.57 foot to a poLat of ta%sucy to the *foremwitiesad
southoastarly Line of 30th Street; thom* M 52444145! V.
along said southeasterly line a distance of 104.51 feet to
the point of he sin"
Sukdect to eas~nts,, raastrict oR .%*. roservationsl coadi.-
tI.CrAM &ftd COVOU&IAtO Of
4
5
6�
V.
i
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18;
1
19i
201
211
221
23
24
25
26
27!
281
29.II
30
31.
32 il
M12,
-jww
U=nlx An RNMMM Uww: Greacro Us. swe"am "d
al"Sm, farwnw the titlw'4qOA emIustwo-ClOt to 41 Ot the
6 844 a 4 kuw wftbin or
IMINOW-U we �_ -very
fly mid id lz:ardl b4i�� a' depth of 500 fasto jw1U4i"&6 wi
Ut* -unit !Te 9cleralli-ty of the fomoiv4o. All petrolamt
*14-TAture a svA tWdrocarben swbeteaces; VOdFTWM WMI
61 "id lm�
to 4ttwffor
earaWtv "" "d rmwoo ttA *am* &%A,Vw rig
to sawtoin Wet, Load ftr t
&� .40WOMOU Maid of
4WJQLni% or xamov*4' Od every right ArA %A* usemmaty or
wb*W to Such rigft 114ich uses my imlwb- Utoftl CC 416-At
4ftUifta WWifts, 441z, cm winkilu of "llem shafts at tummls;
PTOOJ&d homvw tb&t ftantM * its *U%1*WWWM Sad 0"4pw shall
rwat we ev mWex up= tht Ow" of "Id lead, and WOU 000
diet; cab mW Uqrwvcwa" thmmm, and Ohall not
'CMXr#Q S%*WtMCSS 1,01thiCk M 166t Of tb*
ALSO ="V l%; we G$MMM the ri,%Ikt of surfiwe a"*" O"r.
the Abovs d"-Cruwd Pseparty to or to "f ". ir4mew a"
QSXW" over void proowty to the adjoiab* -property of ftiimcor
uiitlt sua-h t4we ai8 G"d roperty to iwpcw#od so a 06JU - strwa
Thereafter . . A61 have sece" to "Id str4m**sUbject to
appl Icabloo regulaticio of Ow publU body* MY1% j mtU4ictioa
SUVIRCT TO -4d LA M*Wd*Md With# 9111 appliCA16 UAtO
aad local lmm;
lwn%%W& said tudeature is in accardazwo vith the agre*w
mwm to trurchaso said property;
MW* TAMT�v At IT RRMVEM tbAt as" UWWaturo be
4Cc*Pted aud the Clt)( Ctw-,-, is Outharised and directed to emecuto
and stmh a certiftcet* of acceptance and conosat.to tho record-
Lug of "id indenture LA the CC %=y recorder, office,
ADO.D iRt = adleurped regular untift th" 20th day of
M.Ara'al,
mayor
AMST:
E;Lty Clerk
20
City Attorney Walter `W. _ Charamza
V Citr.Clerk Margery Schrouder
ImWAMOMent of Newport Boulevard
For your recosda..1 am atkacbing a certified copy of
Resolution No. SAS: . "authorizing eminent domain
p =oceedingsin the acquisition of property necessary
fc €fbe improvement of Newport Boulevard.
MS-em
Att.
Margery Schrouder
City Clerk
CITY OF NEWPOST BEACH
ILTY
IL:
3 -a-
I,- ..:«mac <.�,
March 15, 1%1
To: Director of Public V&rks
From: City Attorney
Subject: Resolution authorising eminent domain proceedings
Attached is a copy of the proposed subject resolution to be
substituted for the previous draft dated 3/9/61. This resolu-
tion has been.redrafted to include the revised description of
Parcel 1 supplied by your office.
It is requested that the descriptions of both parcels be re-
checked to verify that they accurately describe the property
sought to be acquired.
WWC:mec
Enc.
Walter W. Charamza
City Attorney
cc - City Manager
City Clerk (Add11. copies)
To
From:
Subject
0
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT
The Honorable Mayor and
City Council
City Attorney
March 10, 1961
Resolution authorizing eminent domain proceedings
Forwarded is a resolution which; if adopted by the City Council,
will declare the necessity of acquiring a parcel of property on
the northwest corner of 30th Street and Newport Boulevard and a
smaller parcel on the southeast corner of 30th Street and Newport
Boulevard for the purpose of widening Newport Boulevard and con-
structing the southbound lanes on the Pacific Electric property
also being acquired.
This resolution is necessary to enable me to file an.action in
eminent domain and acquire immediate possession of these two
parcels.
Negotiations are still being carried on with both property owners
and it is possible that the actual filing will not be necessary.
WWC:mec
Enc.
cc - City Manager
Director 'of Public Works
City Clerk
�J 0 er W. Charam a
City Attorney
0
L
'L- l,_
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CITY ATTORNEY
DEPARTMENT
To: The Honorable Mayor and
City Council
From: City Attorney
March 10, 1961
Subject: Resolution authorizing eminent domain proceedings
Forwarded is a resolution which, if adopted by the City Council,
will declare the necessity of acquiring a parcel of property on
the northwest corner of 30th Street and Newport Boulevard and a
smaller parcel on the southeast corner of 30th Street and Newport
Boulevard for the purpose of widening Newport Boulevard and con-
structing the southbound lanes on the Pacific Electric property
also being acquired.
This resolution is necessary to enable me to file an.action in
eminent domain and acquire immediate possession of these two
parcels.
Negotiations are still being carried on with both property owners
and it is possible that the actual filing will not be necessary.
WWC:mec
Enc.
cc - City Manager
Director of Public Works
City Clerk
'Wa er OW). Chara ga
City Attorney
.. a
WWC.mec
3/15/61
BEACH,
BEACH -
0
0
RESOLUTION NO. 539S-
39s
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF NEWPORT BEACH FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR A
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT, PUBLIC STREETS9
AND AUTHORIZING.AND DIRECTING EMINENT DOMAIN
PROCEEDINGS THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE -CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT
SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines
that-the public interest and.necessity require the construction
and completion by the City of Newport Beach of a public improvement,
including the widening of Newport Boulevard along the westerly side
thereof northerly of 30th Street for a, distance of 110 feet, more
or less, and the widening of 30th Street.along the southerly side
thereof easterly of Newport Boulevard for a distance of 28 feet,
more or less,
SECTION 2. The City Council hereby further finds and
determines that the public interest and necessity require, for the
construction and completion of said improvement, the acquisition
by the City of Newport Beach of a rightmof -way and easement for
street and highway purposes in, over, and on certain real property
situated in the City of Newport Beach, County of Orange, State of
California, described as follows, to wit
Parcel 1.
That portion of Section 28, Township 6 South, Range
10 West, S. B. B. & M., in the City of Newport Beach,
County of Orange, State of California, according to
an official plat of said land filed in the District
Land Office, August 4, 1890, described as follows-
Beginning at the intersection of the Northerly prop-
erty line of 30th Street and the Westerly property
line of Newport Boulevard, said point being on a
curve concave to the East and having a radius of
2844.83 feet and the center of which bears North 780
30' 28" East; thence Northerly 106.43 feet, through
an angle of 20 08' 37 ", to a point on said curve the
center of which bears North 800 39' 05" East; thence
South 520 24' 20" West 1.17 feet, thence South 40 06'
00" East 71.15 feet; thence southerly 29.99 feet,
through an angle of 90 52' 29" along a tangent curve
concave to the West and having a radius of 174.00 feet
to a point of compound curvature, a tangent at said
point bearing South 5° 46' 32.5" West; thence South -
westerly 25.60 feet, through an angle of 37° 36' 11 ",
to a non - tangent line, said line beinj the northerly
line of 30th Street; thence North 52 44' 45" East
32.70 feet along said northerly line of 30th Street
to the point of beginning.
Parcel 2.
That portion of Lot 24, Block 230, Lancaster's Addi-
tion to Newport Beach, in the City of Newport Beach,
County of Orange, State of California, as per map
recorded in Book 5, Page 14, of Maps:,in the office
of the Recorder of said county, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said lot, thence
Easterly along said Northerly lot line being also the
Southerly property line of 30th Street 28.37 feet;
thence South 62° 04' 30" West 25.22 feet; thence
Northwesterly along the Westerly line of said lot
also being the Easterly property line of Newport Blvd.
13.00 feet to the point of beginning.
SECTION 3. The public improvement to be located on the
property described in Section 2 is located in a manner which is
compatible with the greatest public good and the least private
injury.
SECTION 4. The City Attorney of the City of Newport Beach
is hereby authorized, empowered and directed:
(a) To commence an action or actions in eminent domain
in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
County of Orange in the name of the City of Newport Beach to acquire
the easement herein declared to be necessary and to secure the right
to immediate possession and use of said right -of -way and easement by
depositing in court such sum of money as may be required pursuant to
the provisions of Section 14 of Article I of the Constitution of the
State of California to entitle the City to take immediate possession
thereof.
(b) To incur in the name of and on behalf of the City of
Newport Beach all obligations and expenses necessary to acquire said
property and the immediate possession thereof.
(c) To do such further acts and to take such additional
steps as may be necessary or convenient in connection with said ac-
quisition.
2.
0 0
This resolution was adopted by at least a two - thirds vote
of the City Council of the City of Newport Beach at a meeting of
said Council on the ,2ot� day of March, 1961, by the following vote,
to wit:
AYES, COUNCILMENo
/ o
NOES., COUNCILMEN-. Lh w
ABSENT COUNCILMEN: �1�y.•—
ATTEST:
City Clerk
3.
yiZeep
Mayor
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
CALIFORNIA
March 7, 1961
C!P' CLERK
C! [Y OF
Mr. Noel Singer NEWPORT BEACH
260 South Beverly Drive
Beverly H:Lllso California
Dear Mr. Singer:
As you knows the design for Newport
Boulevard imrOvements provide for traffic
signals at A-th Street, not at 26th Street.
w
At our last Meeting with Warren Turner
and Jerry DrawdY I misinformed you. The
location had been shifted a Couple of tLjfts'
during the design stage and as a consequence
I got OY signals cross;. Sor that it
caused You the inconveniencje Of ry the letter
of February 25 and various contacts with
Members of the Council.
RS: Mm
CC: City Clark
Public Works Dir.
Sinc rely,
ROBERT SHELTON
City Manager
City Council
City of Newport Beach
Newport Beach, Califgrnia
• • 260 South Beverly Drive
Beverly Hills, Calif.
Attention r. Robert Shelton, City Manager
Gentlemen:
February 25, 1961
�.
With reference to the plans for widening of Newer Eoulevard, it was suggested
that we call your special attention to the importance of maintaining the original
condept of installing traffic signals at 28th Street, as recommended by the report
of Mr. Gallagher, traffic consultant and as set forth in the plans adopted by the
City Council. It was brought out in the public hearings that signals at 28th Street
would be important for the following reasons:
(a) 28th Street would be logical and practical means of making left
hand turns for the reversal of traffic direction between 30th and
23rd Streets. It was the opinion of the traffic consultant that
a U turn at 26th Street would be prohibitive.
(b) The signals at 28th Street would serve to eliminate pedestrian
hazards in crossing Newport Boulevard. In addition to this important;__
safety factor, other purposes would be served as follows
(1) If the city owned property comprising two important," f i'(EQ
corner lots at 28th Street are ever to be sold, the/
signals at this corrxr should contribute to maintain
maximum values of these properties, and
rlr
(2) If, in the alternate, the lots are maintained for n=m�L�r eE,C.i
metered public parking, the signals will become
important for access to both sides of the Boulevard.
If it is ever deemed advisable to install signals at 26th Street to slow down
the rate of traffic flow, this can always be added at a later date. As an
economy measure, 26th Street perhaps should . be wired for signals in any event.
28th Street, according to the plans, will be eventually open to Balboa Boulevard
(as soon as the P E tracts are removed), and when that is done, 28th Street will
be the logical way to take traffic through from Newport Boulevard to Balboa
Boulevard from both North and South bound traffic.
I am sure the property owners in the adjoining blocks are very much concerned with
the importance of maintain^_ng these original plans and would appreciate being
notified of any changes that would involve the signals at 28th Street.
If, in making any changes, you are not placing the traffic signals at 23th Street,
would you please advise us accordingly so that we may have the opportunity of
consulting with you further in the matter.
1
Rgspectfull�'r submitted,
i', l O j 1
NS :S noel Singer
cc 2:r. Donald C. Simpson, Director of Public Works
MEMO TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: Public Works Director and City Manager
SUBJECT: Widening of Newport Boulevard between 23rd Street and 30th
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Approve plans and specifications.
2. Authorize the City Clerk to advertise for bids upon approval of the
plans and specifications by the Division of Highways. Bids to be opened at a
time and date set by the City Clerk, but not less than 20 days from the pub-
lishing of the advertisement for bids.
Plans and specifications have been.submitted to the Division of High-
ways for review. Final approval is expected within the next week.
The revised estimated cost of the project is as follows:
I. Right of Way
II. Construction
Signals and Lighting
Storm Drainage
Water System changes and additions
Sewer System .changes and additions
Road Construction
Subtotal
Engineering of 10%
Total Construction
Total Project
$222,367
$22,540
26,647
12,639
1,255
43.255
$106,336
10.694
S116.970
$339,337
Funds previously budgeted amount to $291,275-, It is suggested that
a budget amendment be deferred until the bids have been received. At that time
the additional amount required could be made available from a combination of
Water, Capital Outlay and General Finds.
The specifications provide for the work to be completed within
70 calendar days.
Prepared by:
Donald C. Simpson Robert Shelton
Public Works Director City Manager
RS :DCS:vs
1 -9 -61
0
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
;ic;: 'v c A ay
E
SUBJECT: ESTIMATED COSTS OF SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS IN CONNECTION WITH WIDENING OF
NEWPORT BOULEVARD BETWEEN 26TH STREET AND 30TH STREET
THE SUPPLEMENTARY ITEMS, AND THEIR ESTIMATED COST, DISCUSSED AT THE
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION ON NOVEMBER 21, 1960, ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1. ACQUISITION FROM P.E. AND IMPROVEMENT OF ADDITIONAL
26 FEET OF RIGHT -OF -WAY ON 26TH STREET, BETWEEN NEWPORT BLVD. AND
BALBOA BLVD.
(A) ACQUISITION
(B) IMPROVEMENT COSTS
2. ACQUISITION OF TRIANGULAR PARCEL AT SOUTHEAST
CORNER OF NEWPORT BLVD. AND 30TH STREET
3. MINIMUM IMPROVEMENT OF LAFAYETTE STREET, BETWEEN
28TH STREET AND 26TH STREET, CONSISTING. OF A 24 FT. WIDE PAVE-
MENT, WITHOUT CURBS AND GUTTERS
4. IMPROVEMENT OF 28TH STREET THROUGH THE CITY -OWNED
PARCEL, INCLUDING CURBS, GUTTERS AND PAVEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS:
$11,000
$ 2,500
$ 1,200
$ 3,500
$ 3,000
I. AUTHORIZE THE INCLUSION OF ITEMS 1 AND 2 ABOVE IN THE INITIAL STAGE
OF THE PROJECT.
2. AUTHORIZE THE INCLUSION OF EITHER ITEM 3 OR ITEM 4 ABOVE, BUT NOT
BOTH, IN THE INITIAL STAGE OF THE PROJECT.
RS :DCS:EK
11 -25 -6o
/RRESP ^EECCTT /FULLY SUBMITTED,
x
ROBERT SHELTON
CITY MANAGER
ONALD C•SIMPSON
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
W�
street to twenty- third street and
W'- !ERE.45, the undcrsicnrid are owners of properties or residents of the
City of Newport Beach, and vitally interested in the proper development
theredf and
WHE:E ",S, plan "C" for the improvement of Newport Boulevard was net prop-
erly analyzed and was adopted without consideration of future traffic
patterns 2nd development of the area and would make tre;nendbusly
exp-- -nsive changes necessary in the not tow distant future.
THEREFORE, we petition this Honorable Body to stay execution, of
said Flan "C" until plans "A" and "B" or some other, different, more
forward looking, realistic sn: u7.ti : :; -1 less ;x; ±ensive plan can be
developed and fully considered.
Res.,ectfully submitted,
,\I
A-'(
6^
r
so.vf
COLS + -1��
A PETITION OF
PRCTEST T:- THE
HONORABLE CITY
COUNICIL OF THE CITY
O {L`
NE, -" -rT 5EACH,
STATE OF `LTFC'RNIA.
ITNESSETH:
TP+',T WhiE %iE.�S,
the Honorable
Council has adopted a
plan
for the improvement
of Newport
Boulevard
southerly from thirtieth �
street to twenty- third street and
W'- !ERE.45, the undcrsicnrid are owners of properties or residents of the
City of Newport Beach, and vitally interested in the proper development
theredf and
WHE:E ",S, plan "C" for the improvement of Newport Boulevard was net prop-
erly analyzed and was adopted without consideration of future traffic
patterns 2nd development of the area and would make tre;nendbusly
exp-- -nsive changes necessary in the not tow distant future.
THEREFORE, we petition this Honorable Body to stay execution, of
said Flan "C" until plans "A" and "B" or some other, different, more
forward looking, realistic sn: u7.ti : :; -1 less ;x; ±ensive plan can be
developed and fully considered.
Res.,ectfully submitted,
,\I
A-'(
6^
r
so.vf
• •
/-7
ka-7
0,
o
22
'44(
71
YlAD-
� •
�• .. 1
t �.�
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: RETENTION OF ENGINEERING FIRM FOR DESIGN OF NEWPORT BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT
BETWEEN 23RD STREET AND 30TH STREET
RECOMMENDATION: THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE RETENTION OF RICHARD GALLAGHER,
CONSULTING ENGINEER, TO DESIGN AND PREPARE THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR
THE NEWPORT BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN 23RD STREET AND 30TH STREET]
INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY TRAFFIC STUDIES..
THE ENGINEERING DIVISION. DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PERSONNEL AT THE
PRESENT TIME TO PROCEED WITH THE PREPARATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. IN
ORDER TO ADVERTISE THE PROJECT FOR .BIDS IN JANUARY, 1961 IT WILL BE NECESSARY
TO EMPLOY AN OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FIRM.
RICHARD GALLAGHER 15 BEING RECOMMENDED SINCE HIS FIRM SPECIALIZES IN
TRAFFIC DESIGN. THE SUCCESS OF THE PROJECT DEPENDS, TO A LARGE EXTENT, UPON
ARRIVING AT SATISFACTORY INTERCHANGE. DESIGNS FOR THE 26TH STREET AND 30TH STREET
INTERSECTIONS.
THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE ENGINEERING WORK IS $5,000 TO $6,000. THE
FEE WILL BE BASED ON A PERCENTAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST WHICH MAY VARY
CONSIDERABLY DEPENDING UPON WHETHER OR NOT TRAFFIC SIGNALS WILL BE REQUIRED AT
THE TWO INTERSECTIONS. FUNDS FOR THE ENGINEERING ARE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL
AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED.
DCS.EK
9 -8°60
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
DONALD C. SIMPSON
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ROBERT SHELTON
CITY MANAGER
/ _, .
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR AND CITY MANAGER
0
SUBJECT: RETENTION OF ENGINEERING FIRM FOR DESIGN OF NEWPORT BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT
BETWEEN 23RD STREET AND 30TH STREET
RECOMMENDATION: THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZE THE RETENTION OF RICHARD GALLAGHER,
CONSULTING ENGINEER, TO DESIGN AND PREPARE THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR
THE NEWPORT .BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN 23RD STREET AND 30TH STREET,
INCLUDING ALL NECESSARY TRAFFIC STUDIES-
THE ENGIMEERING DIVISION DOES NOT HAVE SUFFICIENT PERSONNEL AT THE
PRESENT TIME TO PROCEED WITH THE PREPARATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. IN
ORDER TO ADVERTISE THE PROJECT FOR BIDS IN JANUARY, 1961 IT WILL BE NECESSARY
TO EMPLOY AN OUTSIDE ENGINEERING FIRM.
RICHARD GALLAGHER iS BEING RECOMMENDED SINCE HIS FIRM SPECIALIZES IN
TRAFFIC DESIGN. THE SUCCESS OF THE PROJECT DEPENDS, TO A LARGE EXTENT, UPON
ARRIVING AT SATISFACTORY INTERCHANGE DESIGNS FOR THE 26TH STREET AND 30TH STREET
INTERSECTIONS.
THE ESTIMATED COST OF THE ENGINEERING WORK is $5,000 TO $6,000. THE
FEE. WILL BE BASED ON A PERCENTAGE OF THE CONSTRUCTION COST WHICH MAY VARY
CONSIDERABLY DEPENDING. UPON WHETHER OR NOT TRAFF -0C' SIGNALS WILL BE REQUIRED AT
THE TWO INTERSECTIONS. FUNDS FOR THE ENGINEERING. ARE INCLUDED IN THE TOTAL
AMOUNT PREVIOUSLY BUDGETED.
DCS :EK
9a8_6o
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
DONALD C. SIMPSON
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ROBERT SHELTON
CITY MANAGER
TOs CITY COUNCIL
FROMs City Manager and Public Works Director
SUBJECTS PROGRESS REPORT ON WIDENING OF NEWPORT BOULEVARD BETWEEN 23RD STREET
AND 32ND STREET
In accordance with the Council's
determine the feasibility of Plan A,
in financing it,
request, a further study was made to
and the use of an Assessment District
A review of the subject indicates the following steps should be
completed to arrive at any accurate determinations
1. Obtain the values of existing buildings from an appraiser.
2. Obtain moving and remodeling costs from a contractor.
3. Tentatively apportion the total project cost among the
City, property owners, and an Assessment Districts
4. Determine proposed boundaries of the Assessment District.
5. Draft agreements with individual owners to provide fors
a. Exchange of Newport Boulevard frontage for equal
area of P. E. property.
b. Purchase of surplus P. E. property.
6. Commence agreement negotiations. (Successful negotiation
is contingent upon execution of 100% of the agreements)
7. Institute Assessment District.
8. Proceed through Public Rearing.
Considerable delay may be encountered in the execution of agreements as
well as in the establishment of the Assessment District. On the west side
of Newport Boulevard, property owners will have to be convinced that the
long-range advantages of Plan A will outweigh their revenue losses during
the period of constructions Some of these owners have already expressed
preference for Plan D. Even under Plans B, C or D a portion of the cost
could be defrayed by assessing these properties.
To induce the east side property owners to participate, cost of their
assessments (under Plan A) must outweigh any hypothetical disadvantage of
a one —way street. Under Plan B, C or D these properties would probably not
be encumbered with assessments.
The success of the Assessment District is tied to participation by a
majority of the properties on both sides of Newport Boulevard.
•
•
Page 2
Since our last report to Council, it has come to our attention that P.E.
can convey only Parcels 1, 2 and 3 (see attached map) but cannot convey Parcel Q
without prior consent of the Lessee.
The Lessee, Mr. Cagney, is perfectly willing to cooperate on area needed
for street purposes but intends to retain the balance of the parcel for private
use. The City Attorney advises that only that portion of the Cagney parcel
required for street Purposes could be taken under Eminent Domain proceedings.
Thus, Plan A would apparently require outright purchase of the Harbor Investment
Company's land and improvements with a resultant cost increase.
Until a precise plan has been adopted, the purchase of any area for street
purposes in Parcel /+ is inadvisable. Undue delay, on the other hand, may
complicate the acquisition due to change of price or development by the Lessee.
With this new information at hand, the Council may wish to weigh the merit
of adopting a'less involved plan. Although Plan A may have certain planning
advantages, just the determination of feasibility of this plan will require
considerable time delay, additional investigative cost and the cooperation of
a majority of property owners.
.Ultimate best land use and availability of parking is difficult to project
irrespective of the plan chosen, therefore, is the far greater cost of Plan A
a justifiable investment?
Is Plan A a reasonable "risk" of public funds in the uncertain interest of
land use, remembering that the City's first and basic obligation is to move
traffic safely and efficiently?
Respectfully submitted,
Donald C. Simpson
Public Works Director
Robert Shelton
City Manager
Note: See reports dated 3/11/60 and 3/23/60
for previous information.
DCSoek
5 -5 -60
I
(ZI
_C
C a�
1 �' C
I�j
Ilk
Q)
'u Lu
LAI 41
.0 1 �,
tj
COUNCIL MOTION RE PE
BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
CO_UNCiL'
rte. S -y'4o'
OISP.4SIT�N
NEWPORT 'ri"' q
MOTION: The City Council considers Plan "A" not feasible, and requests
that the Planning Commission re- examine alternative plans, The City
Council must act promptly to accomp�sh purttho.aa of Pacific Electric
right of way, and adoption of a atr4ok improvement plan must precede the
purchase.
A report dated May 5, 1960 from the City Manager and the Public
Works Director is transmitted for the information of the Commission.
The Council requests early review and recommendations from the
Planning Commission including specifically the Commissions conclusions
regarding both Plan "B" and Plann "C ", l y
NJ
a e
Y�ts.e Wet So
�U .C, 4s1.`t1t A
tA v rti u
� ' p v� vi'� �:;, l- •6��r� uR b.�.cr -� -�- 1'.�. a.. c. fi-�Ft� � S' N.O tv< t�-.
��(} 'Y�e�y. \fib � -L•: �� ;, }r
e S.
�ES'dir� j ",. `z \.,��+ . �y�•e,, w C " ,.
"�+ t ,.: Aix,"
. � s
COUNCIL MOTION RE PE ACQUISITION AND NEWPORT
BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
MOTION: The City Council considers Plan "A" not feasible, and
requests that the Planning Commission re- examine alternative plans.
The City Council must act promptly to accomplish purchase of
Pacific Electric right of way, and adoption of a street improvement
plan must precede the purchase.
A report dated May 5, 1960 from the City Manager and the
Public Works Director is transmitted for the information of the
Commission.
The Council requests early review and recommendations from
the Planning Commission including specifically the Commissions
conclusions regarding both Plan "B" and Plan "C"
The Council suggests that the Commission meet this week
so that Council action may be taken at an adjourned Council meeting
May 16. The Planning Commission meeting should be publicized so
that the public, and particularly property owners in the vicinity,
may be present to express their views.
The City Manager is directed to attend the Planning
Commission meeting to discuss financial aspects of the matter.
COUNCIL MOTION RE PE ACQUISITION AND NEWPORT
BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENTS
MOTION: The City Council considers Plan "A" not feasible, and
requests that the Planning Commission re- examine alternative plans.
The City Council must act promptly to accomplish purchase of
Pacific Electric right of way, and adoption of a street improvement
plan must precede the purchase.
A report dated May 5, 1960 from the City Manager and the
Public Works Director is transmitted for the information of the
Commission.
The Council requests early review and recommendations from
the Planning Commission including specifically the Commissions
conclusions regarding both Plan "B" and Plan "C ".
The Council suggests that the Commission meet this week
so that Council action may taken at an adjourned Council meeting
May 16. The Planning Commission meeting should be publicized so
that the public, and particularly property owners in the vicinity,
may be present to express their views.
The City Manager is directed to attend the Planning
Commission meeting to discuss financial aspects of the matter.
�Z ?gip iiw
•'� r - �2 ��.vt a ti
tw
y k v O
0.a 4
z v _
/Y
7
2.
j9
0 .i
N �b
1
. Q i
h• >OOO� do 0C
N
.000
tj
tj
��-
h ?O ! J
•eO j
< \ OO-
vt
TA
�` • °ODO r
h
i
0.
8
s. �� •oo
uMy tt o
rS:
:. '`th b:
Y�
- - - -•
f`
° °o
a
is
y ✓
3 SP
j9
0 .i
N �b
1
. Q i
h• >OOO� do 0C
N
.000
tj
tj
��-
h ?O ! J
•eO j
< \ OO-
vt
TA
�` • °ODO r
h
i
0.
8
s. �� •oo
uMy tt o
rS:
:. '`th b:
TO: CITY COUNCIL
q
FROMs City Manager and Public Works Director
SUBJECT: NEWPORT BOULEVARD IMPROVEMENT BETWEEN 23RD STREET AND 30TH STREET
(Amending Report Dated March 11, 1960)
Following is an analysis of the four plans under consideration
and their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Description of Plans
PLAN As Widen existing street to four lanes.
Construct service road on westerly side P.E. right -of -way.
PLAN Bs Restrict existing street to two -lanes northbound travel.
Construct new street for two - lanes southbound travel (westerly side
P.E. right -of -way).
PLAN Cs Restrict existing street to two -lanes northbound travel.
Construct new street for two -lanes southbound travel (easterly side
P.E. right -of -way).
PLAN Ds Restrict existing street to two -lanes northbound travel.
Construct new street for two -lanes southbound travel (westerly side
P.E. right -of -way and continuing southerly through P.E. depot property).
Cost Comparison
Item
Plan A
Plan B
Plan C
Plan D
28th St.
1. P.E. R/W
$248,800
$2592100
$259,100
$283,900
- -
2. Additional R/W
1582000
212000
212000
21,000
$ 54'800
3. Remodeling and /or
Moving Buildings
1501000
- -
- -
- -
- -
4. Construction
63.400
67,000
67.000
68.500
8.600
Gross Cost
$6202200
$3472100
$3472100
$3732400
$ 63,400
Revenue From Resales
230,000
150.000
170,000
166,700
13.600
Net Cost
$390,200
$1972100
$1772100
$206,700
$ 49,800
Source of Cost Fieures
Items 1 & 2: P.E. Appraiser's report plus estimate of service station
improvements and severence damage.
E
•
Page 2
Item 3: Three - fourths of market value derived from assessed values.
Item /+: All plans include curbs, gutters, paving, drainage and lighting.
Plan A includes sidewalks for entire length of improvement.
Plan B, C and D includes sidewalks between 23rd and 26th Streets plus
two signalized intersections.
Plan Preference
Factors Preference
Traffic Volume
B
C D
Traffic Pattern
A
Iand Use
B
C D
Cost
B
C D
Resale Revenue
C
Street Parking
B
C D
Inconvenience
B
C D
Earliest Completion Date
B
C D
Traffic Volume: Internal frictions will be minimized and, ultimately,
three southbound and /or northbound lanes can be provided by use of Plan B,
C or D.
Traffic Pattern: Standard intersections developed under Plan A will minimize
conflicting traffic movements.
Land Use: If we use Plan A, there will be little increase in desirable business
frontage.
Plan C creates additional desirable commercial parcels.
The parcels created by Plan B or Plan D will be less desirable than those from
Plan C.
Cost: Plan A requires additional right -of -way acquisition, relocation and
reconstruction of buildings. No such cost is involved in either Plan B, C or D.
Resale Revenue: Information is available for a realistic determination of the
resale revenues under Plan C.
This information is not available for portions of either Plan A, B or D.
If the surplus rear properties involved should not be purchased by adjacent
owners then the resale revenues for Plans A. B and D would be reduced considerably.
Street Parking: No additional parking spaces under Plan A.
Available parking space will be almost doubled under Plans B. C and D.
Inconvenience: During construction, maximum traffic congestion will be created
and all fronting business establishments disrupted by Plan A.
Plans B, C and D minimize traffic problems and inconvenience the least number of
businesses.
Earliest Completion Date: Start of construction under Plan A will have to be
delayed for the summer months and until additional right -of -way can be acquired
and the existing buildings relocated.
Most phases of Plan B, C and D can be constructed during the summer months.
The service station property will be the only parcel requiring negotiation.
IL
Page 3
Since, in our opinion none of these plans should adversely affect the business
houses on the easterly side of Newport Boulevard, this factor has not been listed.
It has been our experience that when one -way traffic plans are proposed, the
first reaction from adjacent businesses is negative. However,-in other cities where plans
similar to B, C and D were put into effect, subsequent studies revealed the results to be
beneficial to all concerned.
Mr. William MacKenzie Brown, the Assessment Attorney, has stated that all or
portions of the acquisition and improvement costs could be assessed against a district.
The assessment district could include properties remote from the improvement that would
be benefited.
Prior to making a plan selection, if the City Council desires more accurate
information on the costs of building relocation and acquisition and the revenues from
resale, it is recommended that a qualified appraiser be retained.
Mr. J. A. Mann, an appraiser from Los Angeles, has reviewed the project and
is prepared to provide services as outlined in the attached copy of his letter.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert Shelton, City Manager
Donald C. Simpson, Public Works Director
DCS:ek
Amended 3 -23 -60