HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-03-16 _EQUAC_AgendaCITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AFFAIRS
COMMITTEE
DATE /TIME:
LOCATION:
Roll Call
Monday, March 16, 2009
7:00 p.m.
Police Department Auditorium
870 Santa Barbara Drive
1. Minutes of February 23, 2009 (attachment)
2. Review of Marina Park Subcommittee assignments and questions
3. Recommendation to City Council on leaf blower regulation (attachment)
4. Report on additional smoking prohibitions
5. Appointment of subcommittee to review Banning Ranch Notice of Preparation and Draft
Environmental Impact Report
6. Task Force on Green Development Representatives' Report
7. Coastal /Bay Water Quality Committee Representatives' Report
8. Economic Development Committee Representative's Report
9. Report from Staff on Current Projects
10. Public Comments
11. Future Agenda Items
12. Adjournment
NEXT MEETING DATE: April 20, 2009
'Attachments can be found on the City's website http: / /www.citV.newport- beach.ca.us. Once there, click on
Agendas and Minutes then scroll to and click on Environmental Quality Affairs. If attachment is not on the web
page, it is also available in the City of Newport Beach Planning Department, 3300 Newport Boulevard, Building C, 2n,
Floor.
�EWPO
Nancy Gardner, Council Member
X
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH
X
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE
C91FOR�,P
Laura Curran
DRAFT MINUTES 2 -23 -09
Draft minutes of the Environmental Quality Affairs Committee held at the City of Newport
Beach City Council Chambers, 3300 Newport Boulevard, on Monday, February 23, 2009.
Members Present:
X
Nancy Gardner, Council Member
X
Barbara Thibault
X
Michael Henn, Council Member
X
Laura Curran
X
Kenneth Drellishak, Chair
X
Vincent Le ore
X
Kimberly Jameson
X
Sandra Haskell
E
Kevin Kelly
X
Arlene Greer
X
Michael Pascale
Barry Allen
E
Michael Smith
X
Kristine Adams
X
Jeff Herdman
X
Timothy Stoaks
X
Nick Roussos
Joan Penfil
X
Charles McKenna
E
Bruce Asper
X
Ray Halowski
X
Merritt Van Sant
X
Michael Alti
Staff Representatives:
Guests:
X I Sharon Wood, Assistant City Manager
Chairperson Ken Drellishak called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. New members Vincent
Lepore and Charles McKenna introduced themselves.
1. Minutes of January 26, 2009
Sandra Haskell moved to approve the minutes of January 26, 2009. Barbara Thibault
seconded the motion.
Motion passed unanimously
2. Report from Membership Subcommitee, and Committee recommendations to
City Council on appointments to fill vacancies in Community Association
category
The Subcommittee recommended Sandra Haskell be re- assigned to the Community
Association category because of her experience on the Shorecliffs Homeowners Association
board and the Corona del Mar Residents Association, and that Kevin Nolen be appointed to
the District 6 at -large position. Arlene Greer moved and Merritt Van Sant seconded that the
Committee forward the recommendation to the City Council.
Motion passed unanimously
3. Appointments to Marina Park Subcommittee, and review assignments
Chairperson Drellishak reviewed and confirmed appointments and assignments.
4. Report on leaf blower regulation research, and discussion of possible next
steps
Chairperson Drellishak presented a draft report to the City Council. The Committee
discussed alternate approaches to regulation, e.g., noise, air quality, complete ban.
Consensus of the Committee was to recommend that the City Council consider a complete
ban, and to provide options for the Council's consideration. Chairperson Drellishak and
Michael Pascale agreed to finalize the report for the Committee's action at the March
meeting.
5. Report on smoking bans, and discussion of possible next steps
Sharon Wood presented information on smoking bans in other California cities. The
Committee discussed areas in which a smoking ban might be appropriate, and reached
consensus to recommend that the City Council consider a ban on smoking in public areas
and facilities, include outdoor dining areas, but not in residential areas.
6. Task Force on Green Development Representative's Report
Council member Gardner reported that the City Council would hold a study session on
outreach efforts of the Task Force on February 24, 2009.
7. Coastal /Bay Water Quality Committee Representative's Report
1►rem
8. Economic Development Committee Representative's Report
Chairperson Drellishak reported that EDC had received presentations from the Banning
Ranch Conservancy, which is working to acquire the land as permanent open space, and
Newport Banning Ranch, the property owners /developers, at their February meeting.
9. Report from Staff on Current Projects
Sharon Wood reported that several DEIRs are under preparation and will be coming to EQAC
in the coming months.
10. Public Comments
Laura Curran announced that there will be a LEED presentation to the Environmental Nature
Center on March 17, 2009.
11. Future Agenda Items
• Questions on Marina Park DER and review assignments
• Leaf blower regulation update
• Smoking ban update
12. Adjournment
Chair Drellishak adjourned the meeting at 8:40 p.m.
To: City of Newport Beach Mayor and City Council March 2009
From: Environmental Quality Affairs Citizens Advisory Committee (EQAC)
Subject: Potential Ordinance to Ban Leaf Blowers in Newport Beach
BACKGROUND
Gas - powered and electrically - operated leaf blowers, vacuums and mulchers are
widely used and have been this subject of significant objections by residents who
experience the noise, combustion products and fugitive dust produced by such
equipment. The California Air Resources Board (Ref. 1) recognized the potential health
impacts of using this equipment by the operators and others in the vicinity. They
recommended use of safety equipment by the operators (e.g. filtered masks, earplugs,
safety glasses), but suggested further study on the potential hazards beyond the operator.
Other environmental groups including ZAP (Zero Air Pollution, Ref. 2) have encouraged
more restrictions on such equipment because of the potentially harmful and nuisance
effects to nearby non - operators due to noise, combustion- product air pollution and
fugitive dust (containing PM 10 and PM2.5 particulates, garden chemicals, fungi etc.), all
of which are felt well beyond the immediate area of operation.
AIR POLLUTION ISSUES
Casual observations of operations make it obvious that leaf blowers (gas or
electric powered) are significant producers of local air pollution. EPA reports warn of
dust clouds consisting of particulate matters, fecal matter, pesticides, fungi, chemicals,
fertilizers, spores and street dirt (containing lead and organic and elemental carbon).
Such clouds are evident everywhere leaf blowers are used. In addition, gas powered
machines produce unusually high concentrations exhaust emission products
(hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide and particulates). While industry groups claim that
these emissions average less that 1% of emissions pollution in a typical long -term
scenario, other studies show that local, short term exposures can be 10 -100 times the long
term averages. The combination of these leaf blower exhaust emissions and the
associated dust cloud contaminants represents a significant nuisance and potential health
hazard to those in the vicinity of their operation.
NOISE ISSUES
Leaf blowers from all manufacturers produce objectionable levels of local noise.
This problem has been addressed by most manufacturers of newest models (see Table
below), but they all operate at noise levels that exceed Newport Beach and other city
municipal code noise allowable levels as discussed below. Even though their use is
intermittent, while in operation, these devices produce objectionable local noise levels.
TYPICAL LEAF BLOWER CHARACTERISTICS
(2009 Models)
BRAND TYPE/POWER
WT -LB
Toro 51599 Handheld/Electric
7.3
Black &Deckerbv4000Handheld /Electric
8.1
Husgvarna 125B Handheld /Gas Eng.
9.4
Stihl BG55 Handheld/Gas Eng. 9.0
AIR
SOUND
VEL -MPH
LEVELdb(A)
112 -235
63 -67
230
65
170 70
[LII l 9
Stihl BR380D Backpack/Gas Eng. 20.5 181 73
Echo PB -265LC Backpack/Gas Eng. 13.3 135 65
NOTES: 1. Sound levels measured at 50 -ft. per ANSI B 175.2.
2. NB Municipal Code 10.28.045 defines allowable noise levels of
55- 60db(A).
CURRENT SITUATION
Newport Beach and other densely populated areas are particularly susceptible to
the secondary effects of the use of portable leaf blowers /mulchers. As a result, it is
estimated (Ref. 3) that up to 100 California cities have imposed bans or restrictions on
their use in their communities. These have taken the form of total and complete bans (as
in Laguna Beach) or stringent restrictions (as in Palo Alto and Los Angeles). Other
actions include ordinances requiring training and use of safety equipment by operators,
relief for use in industrial/commercial areas versus residential areas and allowance for use
of electric but not gas- powered equipment.
These municipal controls have led to objections by equipment suppliers and user
groups and there have been unsuccessful attempts in Sacramento to prevent
municipalities from imposing bans or restrictions.
In addition, user groups have raised concerns regarding potential economic impact
of bans on the use of such equipment. To date, we have found no specific data (anecdotal
or formal) to quantify this objection.
EXAMPLES
EQAC has performed a limited internet search to determine current status of some
ordinances. Apparently because of the difficulty in quantifying the air pollution and
fugitive dust components of the problem, all existing controls are focused on the health
hazards or nuisance concerns of noise and are contained within the Municipal Codes
related to residential noise control.
Los Angeles: Has had existing ordinance No. 171890 since 1998. Refer to Los
Angeles Municipal Code Chapter XI (Noise Regulation, Article 2, Special Noise
Sources), Section 112.04 (Distance Restrictions). The last change code for this was dated
6/10/2005. Equipment cannot operate within 500 feet of a residence if the equipment
exceeds 65 db(A) at 50 feet from the equipment. We have obtained no input on
compliance /enforcement issues.
Palo Alto: Has had an ordinance since 2005 amending Municipal Code Title 9
(Peace, Morals and Safety), Chapter 9.10 (Noise), Item 9.10.030 (Residential Property
Noise Limits). It bans gas - powered and electrically- operated equipment with noise level
more than 6db above local ambient, but allows electrically operated blowers powered by
gas powered electrical generators which are compliant with local noise ordinances.
Enforcement has been more complicated and expensive than desired according to an
August 7, 2006 status report by the Palo Alto City Manager (Ref. 4).
Laguna Beach: Ordinance 1259 amended Municipal Code Title 7 (Health and
Sanitation), Section 7.25.071, Item D to now read as follows:
The use of electrical gas powered blowers, such as used by gardeners and other
persons for cleaning lawns, yards, driveways, gutters and other property is prohibited at
any time within the city limits ",
This is the most complete, least equivocal position we have seen. Compliance
Officer, Joe Trujillo (949- 497 -0301) stated in a telephone interview that "in two years on
the job I have had no more than 3 or 4 complaints. We have had negligible compliance
problems and good community support. If we see a potential problem while on patrol,
we hand out a copy of the ordinance and it is solved then and there."
RECOMMENDATION
Research shows that ordinances to ban or control leaf blowers have been
successfully implemented in residential areas in other communities in California.
Compliance enforcement experience varies widely among communities, with the most
successful compliance apparently occurring in the city with the most restrictive ordinance
— Laguna Beach. EQAC recommends that the city of Newport Beach take steps needed
to evaluate whether a similar residential leaf blower ban is feasible here. The following
steps are recommended:
1. Direct staff to confirm above findings and expand the database with
other communities as needed.
2. Conduct an outreach activity to quantify the perceived economic
impacts (i.e. increased labor costs) on the affected residential property
owners.
3. Conduct outreach to determine residential community reactions
(positive and negative) to such an ordinance.
4. Based on above, decide whether to proceed with a complete ban,
limited ban, imposition of more restrictive standards (noise and air
pollution) or continue with the current ordinance (10.28.045).
REFERENCES
1. California Air Resources Board, "A Report to the California Legislature on the
Potential Health and Environmental Impacts of Leaf Blowers ", Feb. 2000
2. Zero Air Pollution web site: zapla.org
3. Citizens for a Cleaner, Better Lincoln web site: ccblincoln.com (other cities and
towns heading).
4. Palo Alto City Manager Interim Report to City Council, "Gas- Powered Leaf
Blower Ban Enforcement — One Year Status Report", Aug. 7, 2006