Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-3 - Approving Major Site Development Review No. SD2020-006, Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2020-002, Affordable Housing Implementation Plan No. AH2020-003, and Traffic Study No. TS2020-001 for the Residences at 4400 Von Karman Project Located at 4400 VonRESOLUTION NO. 2021-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MAJOR SITE DEVELOPMENT REVIEW NO. SD2020- 006, LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LA2020-0029 AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN NO. AH2O20-003, AND TRAFFIC STUDY NO. TS2020-001 FOR THE RESIDENCES AT 4400 VON KARMAN PROJECT LOCATED AT 4400 VON KARMAN AVENUE (PA2020-061) WHEREAS, Section 200 of the City of Newport Beach ("City") Charter vests the City Council with the authority to make and enforce all laws, rules and regulations with respect to municipal affairs subject only to the restrictions and limitations contained in the Charter and the State Constitution, and the power to exercise, or act pursuant to any and all rights, powers, and privileges, or procedures granted or prescribed by any law of the State of California; WHEREAS, an application was filed by TPG (KCN) Acquisition, LLC., ("Applicant") with respect to property located at 4400 Von Karman Avenue, generally bounded by Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue, legally described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference ("Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicant is requesting approvals for the development of 312 apartment units atop an 825 -space parking structure, a separate 284 -space free-standing parking structure, an approximately one -acre public park, and reconfiguration of existing surface parking lots serving existing office buildings ("Project") which require the following approvals from the City: • Planned Community Development Plan Amendment (PD2020-001) ("PCDP Amendment") - An amendment to Planned Community Development Plan #15 (Koll Center Newport Planned Community) for the creation of a residential overlay zone and park overlay zone to allow for residential use and a public park within the Koll Center Newport Professional and Business Office Site B ("Office Site B' ); • Major Site Development Review (SD2020-006) ("SD") - A site development review in accordance with the amended Koll Center Newport Planned Community and Section 20.52.080 (Site Development Reviews) of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NBMC") for the construction of the Project; Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 2 of 26 • Traffic Study (TS2020-001) ("TS"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and incorporated herein by reference - A traffic study pursuant to Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NEMC, which is required for projects that generate in excess of 300 new average daily trips; • Lot Line Adjustment (LA2020-002) ("LA") - To adjust the lot lines of two (2) underlying parcels that comprise the Project; • Affordable Housing Implementation Plan (AH2020-003) ("AHIP"), which is attached hereto as Exhibit "D" and incorporated herein by reference - A program specifying how the Project meets the City's affordable housing requirements, in exchange for a request of 20 percent increase in density and meets the criteria for a development concession related to the mix of affordable unit types pursuant to Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) and Government Code Section 65915 et seq.; • Development Agreement (DA2020-002) ("DA") - An agreement between the Applicant and the City, which would provide vested rights to develop the Project, while also providing negotiated public benefits; and • Addendum No. ER2020-003 to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Reports and the 2008-2014 City of Newport Beach Housing Element Update Initial Study/Negative Declaration ("Addendum") - Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Addendum will address reasonably foreseeable environmental impacts resulting from the Project; WHEREAS, the Property is designated MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2) by the City of Newport Beach General Plan ("General Plan") Land Use Element and located within the Airport Business Area, and the Airport Business Area Integrated Conceptual Development Plan ("ICDP") which allocates a maximum of 260 residential units to be developed on the Property; WHEREAS, the Property is currently located within the PC -15 (Koll Center Newport Planned Community Office Site B) Zoning District; WHEREAS, the Project is not located in the coastal zone; therefore, amending the Local Coastal Program or a coastal development permit is not required; Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 3 of 26 WHEREAS, a telephonic public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on November 5, 2020, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with Government Code Section 54950 et seq. ("Ralph M. Brown Act"), and Chapter 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the Planning Commission at this public hearing; WHEREAS, at the hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2020-040 by a unanimous vote (4 ayes, 0 nays) recommending approval of the Project, and the land use entitlements referenced above, to the City Council; WHEREAS, due to the proposed amendment to the Property's zoning regulations, California Public Utilities Code Section 21676(b) requires the City to refer the Project to the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC") for a determination of the Project's consistency with the Airport Environs Land Use Plan ("AELUP") for John Wayne Airport; WHEREAS, on November 19, 2020, the ALUC found the Project to be consistent with the AELUP for John Wayne Airport; WHEREAS, telephonic public meetings were held by the Parks, Beaches and Recreation ("PB&R") Commission on December 1, 2020 and January 25, 2021, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California, due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearings were given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act and by providing written notice to property owners within a 300 foot radius of the Project; WHEREAS, the PB&R Commission determined that the proposed amenities to be provided within the proposed public park for the Project are practical, useable and feasible for the general public, and provided additional recommendations to the City Council; WHEREAS, at the January 12, 2021 City Council meeting, the City Council continued the public hearing to February 9, 2021. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act; and Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 4 of 26 WHEREAS, the continued public hearing was held telephonically by the City Council on January 26, 2021, in the City Council Chambers located at 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, California, due to the Declaration of a State Emergency and Proclamation of Local Emergency related to COVID-19. A notice of time, place and purpose of the public hearing was given in accordance with Public Utilities Code Section 21676(b), the Ralph M. Brown Act, and Chapters 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance), 15.45 (Development Agreements), 19.76 (Lot Line Adjustments), 20.56 (Planned Community District Procedures), and 20.62 (Public Hearings) of the NBMC. Evidence, both written and oral, was presented to, and considered by, the City Council at this public hearing. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Newport Beach resolves as follows: Section 1: The City Council has considered the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the Parks, Beaches and Recreation Commission and determined that modifications to the Project made by the City Council, if any, are not major changes that require referral back to either commission for consideration and recommendation. Section 2: The City Council hereby approves Major Site Development Review No. SD2020-006, Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2020-002, Affordable Housing Implementation Plan No. AH2020-003, and Traffic Study No. TS2020-001, subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Section 3: In accordance with Section 20.52.080(F) (Site Development Reviews — Findings and Decisions) of the NBMC, the findings and facts in support of Major Site Development Review No. SD2020-006 are set forth as follows: Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(F)(1) The proposed development is allowed within the subject zoning district. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(F)(1) The Property is located within Koll Center Newport Professional and Business Office Site B which permits professional and business offices, hotels and motels, retail, restaurants and entertainment, a courthouse, private clubs, auto detailing and service stations. Currently, Office Site B only allows professional and business offices, restaurants, and support commercial uses. The Project provides the adoption of Residential Overlay Zone with provisions for residential development consistent with the MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2) land use designation and the ICDP. With approval of the amendment to PC -15, the Project would be allowed within the Residential Overlay Zone of PC -15. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 5 of 26 With the adoption of the PCDP Amendment, the Project, which meets the development requirements, will be permitted by right. Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(F)(2) The proposed development complies with the criteria identified in Section 20.52.080(C) (2) (c) (i) which requires compliance with this section, the General Plan, this Zoning Code, any applicable specific plan, and other applicable criteria and policies related to the use or structure. Facts in Support of Finding of Compliance with the General Plan 1. The Property is located in the Airport Business Area under the General Plan and has a City of Newport Beach General Plan Land Use Element designation of MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2), which provides for a horizontal intermixing of uses that may include regional commercial office, multifamily residential, vertical mixed-use buildings, industrial, hotel rooms, and ancillary neighborhood commercial uses. The MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2) designation applies to a majority of properties in the Airport Business Area outside the high noise levels from John Wayne Airport. The MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2) designation allows a maximum of 2,200 residential units as replacement of existing office, retail, and/or industrial uses at a maximum density of 50 units per net acre. Any eligible density bonus allowed by Government Code Section 65915 (Density Bonus Law) and Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC, are not included in the 2,200 allowance or the 50 dwelling units per acre standard. Of the 2,200 residential units, a total of 550 of these units are identified as additive units meaning they are not replacement units that would replace existing development. These 550 units may be constructed as infill on existing surface parking lots or areas not used as occupiable buildings on properties within the Conceptual Development Plan Area ("CDPA"), located east of MacArthur Boulevard, as depicted on Figure LU22 Airport Area of the General Plan Land Use Element. Prior to any residential development within the Airport Business Area, General Plan Land Use Policy LU 6.15.11 requires the preparation of an ICDP. In September of 2010, the City approved the Koll-Conexant ICDP to provide a framework for the redevelopment of the 25 -acre Uptown Newport site (formally known as Conexant), and for the redevelopment of a 12.7 -acre portion of the Koll Center Newport office park between Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue with new residential development and open space, carefully integrated within the existing office buildings and parking structures. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 6 of 26 The ICDP allocates 1,504 new residential units: 1,244 of which have been approved and are being developed on the Uptown Newport property and the remaining 260 on the Koll Center Newport office park. All 260 of the new residential units on this Property would be "additive" units since no existing office uses would be removed. Together, the two (2) properties would use all of the 550 additive units prescribed for the ICDP area by the General Plan. The General Plan contains a number of policies that provide for the orderly development of the MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2) properties in the Airport Business Area, from a business park, to a mixed-use district with cohesive residential villages integrated within the existing fabric of office, industrial, retail, and airport - related businesses. Residential opportunities are to be developed as clusters of residential villages centering on neighborhood parks and interconnected by pedestrian walkways. These would contain a mix of housing types and buildings that integrate with ground level retail and residential uses at a sufficient scale to achieve a complete neighborhood. 2. The Project is consistent with the following General Plan policies that establish fundamental criteria for the formation and implementation of new residential villages in the Airport Business Area in general, and in the CDPA (additional policy analysis is included in Addendum No. ER2020-003. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 2.3 Land Use Element Policy LU 2.3 - Range of Residential Choices: Provide opportunities for the development of residential units that respond to community and regional needs in terms of density, size, location, and cost. Implement goals, policies, programs, and objectives identified within the City's Housing Element. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 2.3 The PCDP Amendment establishes a Residential Overlay Zone to allow for multi -family residential uses, including affordable units that can respond to market needs and diversify the City's housing stock. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 3.8 LU 3.8 Project Entitlement Review with Airport Land Use Commission -. Refer the adoption or amendment of the General Plan, Zoning Code, specific plans, and Planned Community development plans for land within the John Wayne Airport planning area, as established in the JWA Airport Environs Land Use Plan (AELUP), to the Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) for Orange County for review, as required by Section 29676 of the California Public Utilities Code. In addition, refer all development projects that include buildings with a height greater than 200 feet above ground level to the ALUC for review. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 7 of 26 Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 3.8 The Project is within the boundaries of the Airport Environs Land Use Plan ("AELUP"). The overseeing agency, the Orange County Airport Land Use Commission ("ALUC"), reviewed the Project on November 19, 2020, and found it consistent with the AELUP. pursuant to California Government Code Section 65302.3 and Public Utilities Code Section 21670 et seq. The purpose of the review is to determine the Project's consistency with the AELUP prior to the City Council taking action on the Project. The Project is located outside of the 60 -dB CNEL noise contour and located within JWA Safety Zone 6. Consistent with the AELUP, the PCDP Amendment requires posting of signs related to noise levels in the outdoor common areas and proposed one -acre public park. The Project is located in JWA Safety Zone 6 and the AELUP allows residential uses in that zone. The PCDP Amendment does not introduce any new noise -sensitive uses that are inconsistent with AELUP Noise Impact Zones or compatibility qualities of the AELUP Safety Zones. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.5 LU 6.15.5 Residential and Supporting Uses. Accommodate the development of a maximum of 2,200 multi -family residential units, including work force housing, and mixed- use buildings that integrate residential with ground level office or retail uses, along with supporting retail, grocery stores, and parklands. Residential units may be developed only as the replacement of underlying permitted nonresidential uses. When a development phase includes a mix of residential and nonresidential uses or replaces existing industrial uses, the number of peak hour trips generated by cumulative development of the site shall not exceed the number of trips that would result from development of the underlying permitted nonresidential uses. However, a maximum of 550 units may be developed as infill on surface parking lots or areas not used as occupiable buildings on properties within the Conceptual Development Plan Area depicted on Figure LU22 provided that the parking is replaced on site. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.5 The proposed residential units would be "additive" units because no existing development would be removed, other than surface parking lots and common landscape areas within Office Site B. The Project would replace onsite parking through a combination of structure and surface parking. The Project would provide 559 onsite parking spaces for its residential units, and replace 635 parking stalls to serve the existing office buildings in the free-standing parking structure located at the southeast corner of the Property and within the residential parking structure. Findinq of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.6 LU 6.15.6. Size of Residential Villages. Allow development of mixed-use residential villages, each containing a minimum of 10 acres and centered on a neighborhood park Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 8 of 26 and other amenities (as conceptually illustrated in Figure LU23). The first phase of residential development in each village shall encompass at least 5 gross acres of land, exclusive of existing rights-of-way. This acreage may include multiple parcels provided that they are contiguous or face one another across an existing street. At the discretion of the City, this acreage may also include part of a contiguous property in a different land use category, if the City finds that a sufficient portion of the contiguous property is used to provide functionally proximate parking, open space, or other amenity. The "Conceptual Development Plan" area shown on Figure LU22 shall be exempt from the 5 -acre minimum, but a conceptual development plan described in Policy LU 6.15. 11 shall be required. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.6 The Property is approximately 13 acres that currently consists of common surface parking lots and landscaped areas that serve office uses within Koll Center Newport. The residential development is proposed as a single-phase, together with adjacent commercial parcels and their surface parking and landscaped areas, will create a residential village consistent with ICDP. The Project is designed to be adjacent and proximate to existing office, commercial, and transit uses to facilitate a mixed-use environment where future residents could walk or bike to work, retail locations, and the transit. The Project would include a one -acre public park centrally located between the existing office developments and new residential structure with a pedestrian linkage system to provide a convenient connection throughout the project site and to adjacent Uptown Newport Planned Community. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.7 LU 6.15.7. Overall Density and Housing Types. Require that residential units be developed at a minimum density of 30 units and maximum of 50 units per net acre averaged over the total area of each residential village. Net acreage shall be exclusive of existing and new rights-of-way, public pedestrian ways, and neighborhood parks. Within these densities, provide for the development of a mix of building types ranging from townhomes to high-rises to accommodate a variety of household types and incomes and to promote a diversity of building masses and scales. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 9 of 26 Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.7 The Project consists of 260 additive units allocated at the same location as identified in the ICDP. The Project has a net developable residential area of 5.9 acres which includes 4.51 acres of the Project site and 1.39 acres of the free-standing parking area. Dividing the 260 base units over the 5.9 acres results in a base density of 44 units per net acre (260 units) which is consistent with a maximum of 50 du/acre allowance. This base density does not include the 20 -percent density bonus of 52 units that is allowed by the State Bonus Density law in exchange for the 5 -percent or 13 units set aside for affordable housing. Altogether, the Project has an overall density of 53 units per net acre. The Project is considered a mid -rise podium style, for -rent apartment development. Although the residential development is limited to one particular housing product, the 312 apartment units include a mix of unit types, ranging from studio to two-bedroom units, accommodating a variety of household types and income. Of the 312 residential units, 13 units will be affordable to low-income households and 299 units will be market -rate housing. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.8 LU 6.15.8. First Phase Development Density. Require a residential density of 45 to 50 units per net acre, averaged over the first phase for each residential village. This shall be applied to 100 percent of properties in the first phase development area whether developed exclusively for residential or integrating service commercial horizontally on the site or vertically within a mixed-use building. On individual sites, housing development may exceed or be below this density to encourage a mix of housing types, provided that the average density for the area encompassed by the first phase is achieved. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.8 The Project is located in the ICDP which is exempt from this specific density requirement, but is subject to the minimum density of 30 dwelling units per net acre and a maximum density of 50 dwelling units per net acre. With a density of approximately 44 dwelling units per net acre, the Project is in compliance with these criteria. Findinq of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.9 LU 6.15.9 Subsequent Phase Development Location and Density. Subsequent phases of residential development shall abut the first phase or shall face the first phase across a street. The minimum density of residential development (including residential mixed-use development) shall be 30 units per net acre and shall not exceed the maximum of 50 units per net acre averaged over the development phase. Facts in support of Findinq of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.9 The Project would be developed in a single phase and have a density of 44 dwelling units per acre. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 10 of 26 Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15. 10 LU 6.15. 10 Regulatory Plans. Require the development of a regulatory plan for each residential village, which shall contain a minimum of 10 acres, to coordinate the location of new parks, streets, and pedestrian ways, set forth a strategy to accommodate neighborhood -serving commercial uses, and other amenities, establish pedestrian and vehicular connections with adjoining land uses, and ensure compatibility with office, industrial, and other nonresidential uses. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.10 The Project includes an amendment to PC -15 (Koll Center Planned Community) to include provisions allowing for residential development consistent with the City's General Plan and ICDP. The overall Project development site is approximately 13 acres, which consists of the project site, the existing office developments, and common open spaces and parking facilities, exceeds the minimum 10 -acre for each residential village. The Project is adjacent and proximate to office, commercial, transit, and open space within a mixed-use environment. The Project would incorporate pedestrian connections with Uptown Newport and other properties within PC -15. Additional vehicular connections will continue to be provided by the five driveways that currently exist, which include the three driveways off of Birch Street and the two driveways off of Von Karman. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.11 LU 6.15. 11 Conceptual Development Plan. Require the development of one conceptual development plan for the area depicted on Figure LU22, should demonstrate the compatibility and cohesive integration of new housing, parking structures, open spaces, recreational amenities, pedestrian and vehicular linkages, and other improvements with existing nonresidential structures and uses. To the extent existing amenities are proposed to satisfy Neighborhood Park requirements, the plan shall identify how these amenities will meet the recreational needs of residents. Each residential village in the Conceptual Development Plan Area shall also comply with all elements required for regulatory plans defined by Policy 6.15.10. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.11 The Project is consistent with the intent of ICDP. The Project's General Plan Land Use designation is MU -H2 (Mixed -Use Horizontal 2) and consists of 260 additive units, together with 52 density bonus units for a total of 312 residential units to create a mixed- use community adjacent to and surrounded by office, commercial, open space, and transit uses. This mix of land uses would foster the ICDP's vision of a compatible mixed-use community. The residential uses would be linked to adjacent office and commercial uses through pedestrian connections, sidewalks, and open space. The proposed one -acre park is centrally located and accessible to residents and office users. Adequate parking for the proposed residential units and replacement office parking will be provided within Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 11 of 26 the Property. The parking garage will be screened through landscaping and articulated facades. The Project will include a pedestrian -scale street and pedestrian walkways that foster a village atmosphere. Ground level residential uses will promote active and engaging street fronts through balconies, landscaping, and building features. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.12 LU 6.15.12. Development Agreements. A Development Agreement shall be required for all projects that include infill residential units. The Development Agreement shall define the improvements and public benefits to be provided by the developer in exchange for the City's commitment for the number, density, and location of the housing units. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.12 The Project includes a development agreement which will be implemented as part of the project approval. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.13 LU 6.15.13 Neighborhood Parks Standards. To provide a focus and identity for the entire neighborhood and to serve the daily recreational and commercial needs of the community within easy walking distance of homes, require dedication and improvement of at least 8 percent of the gross land area (exclusive of existing rights-of-way) of the first phase development in each neighborhood, or % acre, whichever is greater, as a neighborhood park. This requirement may be waived by the City where it can be demonstrated that the development parcels are too small to feasibly accommodate the park or inappropriately located to serve the needs of local residents, and when an in -lieu fee is paid to the City for the acquisition and improvement of other properties as parklands to serve the Airport Area. In every case, the neighborhood park shall be at least 8 percent of the total Residential Village Area or one acre in area, whichever is greater, and shall have a minimum dimension of 150 feet. Park acreage shall be exclusive of existing or new rights-of-way, development sites, or setback areas. A neighborhood park shall satisfy some or all of the requirements of the Park Dedication Ordinance, as prescribed by the Recreation Element of the General Plan. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.13 The Project includes the dedication of a one -acre public park exclusive of existing and new right-of-way, development sites and setback areas. The park would serve the Project's future residents, existing offices and businesses within the Koll Center office park as a recreation and relaxation area. Park amenities include a fenced dog park, outdoor plaza, active and game lawn areas, community social area with benches, shade structures, a unisex restroom, water station with dog bowl and bottle filler, and pedestrian Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 12 of 26 trail. Additionally, five (5) 60 -minute time limit parking spaces will be provided for park users. Fig of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.14 LU 6.15.14 Location. Require that each neighborhood park is clearly public in character and is accessible to all residents of the neighborhood. Each park shall be surrounded by public streets on at least two sides (preferably with on -street parking to serve the park), and shall be linked to residential uses in its respective neighborhood by streets or pedestrian ways. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.14 The one -acre park will be developed as a neighborhood park, and it would be accessible to the public during daylight hours. The proposed park will be dedicated to the City but improved and maintained by the property owner of the Project. The park is surrounded by Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue and linked to the Project and existing office developments by pedestrian walkways. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.15 LU 6.15.15. Aircraft Notification. Require that all neighborhood parks be posted with a notification to users regarding proximity to John Wayne Airport and aircraft overflight and noise. Facts in Support of Findinq of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.15 The park will be posted with a notification to users regarding proximity to John Wayne Airport and aircraft overflight and noise. Fig of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.16 LU 6.15.16 On -Site Recreation and Open Space Standards. Require developers of multi- family residential developments on parcels 8 acres or larger to provide on-site recreational amenities. For these developments, 44 square feet of on-site recreational amenities shall be provided for each dwelling unit in addition to the requirements under the City's Park Dedication Ordinance and in accordance with the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan. On-site recreational amenities can consist of public urban plazas or squares where there is the capability for recreation and outdoor activity. These recreational amenities may also include swimming pools, exercise facilities, tennis courts, and basketball courts. Where there is insufficient land to provide on-site recreational amenities, the developer shall be required to pay cash in -lieu that would be used to develop or upgrade nearby recreation facilities to offset user demand as defined in the City's Park Dedication Fee Ordinance. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 13 of 26 The acreage of on-site open space developed with residential projects may be credited against the parkland dedication requirements where it is accessible to the public during daylight hours, visible from public rights-of-way, and is of sufficient size to accommodate recreational use by the public. However, the credit for the provision of on-site open space shall not exceed 30 percent of the parkland dedication requirements. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.16 The Project exceeds the 13,728 square -foot (44 square feet x312 unit) on-site recreational amenities by providing a total of 19,768 square feet or 63 square feet per dwelling unit. These are outdoor courtyards with swimming pool and spa, and BBQ areas, and a roof deck. In addition to the on-site recreation amenities, the Project also features private balconies in most of the units, along with 7,700 square feet of recreational amenities for residents, including a fitness center, clubroom, dog wash facility and bike shop/storage. Findinq of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.17 LU 6.15.97 Street and Pedestrian Grid. Create a pattern of streets and pedestrian ways that breaks up large blocks, improves connections between neighborhoods and community amenities, and is scaled to the predominantly residential character of the neighborhoods. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.17 The Project includes an internal street that will traverse the Property and connect Von Karman to Birch Street approximately halfway through the block. Pedestrian walkways will facilitate connections between the proposed residential development, adjacent office uses and public sidewalks and streets. Additionally, the public park will provide pedestrian access to/from Von Karman and Birch Street. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.19 LU 6.95.99 Connected Streets. Require dedication and improvement of new streets as shown on Figure LU23. The illustrated alignments are tentative and may change as long as the routes provide the intended connectivity. If traffic conditions allow, connect new and existing streets across Macarthur Boulevard with signalized intersections, crosswalks, and pedestrian refuges in the median. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.19 See finding LU 6.15.17 Street and Pedestrian Grid above. Findinq of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.20 LU 6.95.20 Pedestrian Improvements. Require the dedication and improvement of new pedestrian ways as conceptually shown on Figure LU23. The alignment is tentative and may change as long as the path provides the intended connectivity. For safety, the full Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 14 of 26 length of pedestrian ways shall be visible from intersecting streets. To maintain an intimate scale and to shade the path with trees, pedestrian ways should not be sized as fire lanes. Pedestrian ways shall be open to the public at all hours. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.20 See finding LU 6.15.17 Street and Pedestrian Grid above. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.22 LU 6.15.22 Building Massing. Require that high-rise structures be surrounded with low - and mid -rise structures fronting public streets and pedestrian ways or other means to promote a more pedestrian scale. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.22 The proposed five -story apartment building would be compatible with surrounding structures and would provide a variety of building mass and scale similar to the nearby one to four story office buildings. Walkways would be provided within the Project and would connect to existing sidewalks on Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue. Other pedestrian scale features include landscaped areas surrounding the apartment building and a one -acre public park. Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.23 LU 6.15.23 Sustainability Development Practices. Require that development achieves a high level of environmental sustainability that reduces pollution and consumption of energy, water, and natural resources. This may be accomplished through the mix and density of uses, building location and design, transportation modes, and other techniques. Among the strategies that should be considered are the integration of residential with jobs -generating uses, use of alternative transportation modes, maximized walkability, use of recycled materials, capture and re -use of storm water on-site, water conserving fixtures and landscapes, and architectural elements that reduce heat gain and loss. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.23 The Project must comply with the provisions of the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards set forth in Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations ("CCR"), Parts 6 and 11 and the Green Building Standards Code set forth in Title 24 of the CCR, Part 11. Additionally, the Project would implement water -efficient landscaping, electric vehicle charging stations in the parking structures, water quality best management practices to treat surface runoff from the project site, and low impact development practices. The Project is also adjacent to office developments in the Airport Business Area and would provide housing near employment opportunities. The Project includes a one -acre public park and pedestrian linkage system that would provide connections throughout the site and to adjacent and surrounding uses, thereby providing an alternative mode of public Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 15 of 26 transportation for the residents and their visitors. The Project would also provide alternative forms of transportation to residents by locating close to the existing Orange County Transportation Authority ("OCTA") bus routes provided along Von Karman Avenue, Birch Street, Campus Drive, Jamboree Road, and MacArthur Boulevard. Findina of Consistencv with General Plan Policv LU 6.15.24 LU 6.15.24 - Airport Compatibility. Require that all development be constructed in conformance with the height restrictions set forth by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR) Part 77, and Caltrans Division of Aeronautics, and that residential development be located outside of the 65 dBA CNEL noise contour specified by the 1985 JWA Master Plan. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with General Plan Policy LU 6.15.24 The Project is located outside the 65 dBA CNEL contour as that noise contour is mapped by the 2008 AELUP that accounts for the most recent update to the JWA Master Plan. The Property is entirely outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contour. Additionally, the proposed PCDP Amendment limits future construction to 75 feet above ground level. Finally, the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") conducted an aeronautical study of the Project pursuant to applicable Federal regulations and has determined no hazard to air navigation for the Project. Therefore, the Project satisfied LU 6.15.24. Findinq of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(ii) The proposed development is in compliance with the criteria identified in Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(ii) which requires the efficient arrangement of structures on the site and the harmonious relationship of the structures to one another and to other adjacent developments; and whether the relationship is based on standards of good design. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(ii) 1. The Project dictates the location and configuration of residential development, private driveways/streets, pedestrian ways, and locations of park and open space. The Project also identifies pedestrian connectivity between the Koll Center Newport business park and Uptown Newport planned community, vehicular and pedestrian access to Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue. 2. The proposed 5 -story residential building would be at 71 feet including architectural elements, rooftop mechanical equipment, elevator shafts, and emergency staircase. The architecture would be high-quality and would incorporate neutral colors with stone/tile, metal, and glass features. The Project's building mass is comparable and compatible to the existing surrounding office developments, where these buildings are ranging from single -story to ten -story, or up to 154 feet in height. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 16 of 26 3. The proposed 5 -story free-standing parking structure inclusive of roof -top parking, would be approximately 45 feet tall with a 59 -foot elevator tower and smaller in size compared to the adjacent 5000 Birch office's parking structure. It would include neutral colors and materials to ensure compatibility with surrounding office developments. 4. The placement of the residential building would allow for views through the Property to the surrounding office buildings. The massing breaks will add visual interest and reduce long obstructive building facades. The placement of the residential building is aligned with the internal street so it would be the least impactful to the surrounding office buildings and provided maximum pedestrian connections between these buildings. 5. The Project includes a variety of enhanced amenities including private balconies for most of the units, pool and garden courtyards, a clubroom, a fitness center, a dog wash room, and a bike storage. The one -acre public park will be improved and maintained by the applicant. Additionally, open spaces and their connecting walkways will be provided throughout the Property for further benefit of office tenants and residents. Lastly, three (3) pedestrian connections will be provided to connect the Project to Phase 2 of the Uptown Newport project. Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iii) The proposed development is in compliance with the criteria identified in Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iii) which requires compatibility in terms of bulk, scale, and aesthetic treatment of structures on the site and adjacent developments and public areas. Facts in Support of Findinq of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iii) See facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(ii). Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iv) The proposed development is in compliance with the criteria identified in Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iv) which requires adequate, efficient, and safe pedestrian and vehicular access, including drive aisles, driveways, and parking and loading spaces. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iv) The Project includes 559 onsite parking spaces for its residential units and a total of 635 replacement parking stalls to serve the existing office buildings. Therefore, upon completion of the Project, there would be adequate onsite parking exceeding the minimum required residential standard and replacement office parking. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 17 of 26 Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(v) The proposed development is in compliance with the criteria identified in Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(iv) which requires adequate and efficient landscaping and open space areas and the use of water efficient plant and irrigation materials. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(v) The Project includes a public -accessible park and passive open space with landscaping surrounding the proposed residential building. The park and open space would feature a pavilion with a signature tree and a multi-purpose lawn. In addition to the public open space areas, the project features private open space, such as balconies and a rooftop deck. The Project would incorporate water -efficient landscaping where feasible and would comply with the provisions of the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and the Green Building Standards Code. Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(vi) The proposed development is in compliance with the criteria identified in Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(vi) which requires the protection of significant views from public right(s)-of-way and compliance with NBMC Section 20.30. 100 (Public View Protection). Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(C)(2)(c)(vi) The Project is generally flat and is bordered by existing office buildings and developed roadways. The City's General Plan does not identify any scenic vistas or view points on or proximate to the Property. The nearest public view point to the Property identified in the City's General Plan is approximately 1.14 miles south of State Route (SR) 73 at Bayview Park. The nearest coastal view designated portion of Jamboree Road is approximately 0.6 mile south of the Project. Due to the distance and highly urbanized nature of the Project area, public coastal views along this view corridor would not be impacted by the Project. Findinq of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(F}(3) The proposed development is not detrimental to the harmonious and orderly growth of the City, nor will it endanger, jeopardize, or otherwise constitute a hazard to the public convenience, health, interest, safety, or general welfare of person residing or working in the neighborhood of the proposed development. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 20.52.080(F) 1. The Project would facilitate orderly growth of the City and the Airport Area and within planned growth contemplated in the ICDP. 2. The Project has been designed to ensure that potential conflicts with surrounding land uses are minimized to the extent possible to maintain a healthy environment for both Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 18 of 26 businesses and residents by providing an architecturally pleasing project with articulation and building modulations to enhance the urban environment. 3. The proposed residential building has been designed to accommodate and provide safe access for emergency vehicles, delivery trucks, and refuse collections vehicles, as determined by the City Traffic Engineer. Refuse collection is accommodated via two (2) on-site staging areas within the loading zones in front of the building to ensure safe maneuvering by refuse vehicles. Emergency vehicles will have access via Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street and along the spine street. 4. The proposed free-standing parking structure has been designed to accommodate and provide adequate parking for the office users. Adequate signage and lighting will be provided for ease of use and safety of the users. 5. The Property is located approximately 0.44 mile east of the southernmost John Wayne Airport runway and is within the notification area of the AELUP for John Wayne Airport. However, the Project is below the maximum transitional imagery surface heights, and thus the Project is within the building height limits of the AELUP. The Property is located within the 60dBA CNEL noise contours for John Wayne Airport and Safety Zone 6 (Traffic Pattern Zone), where the likelihood of an accident is low. Consistent with the proposed residential overlay, the Project has been conditioned to provide notice to all future residents of potential annoyances or inconveniences associated with residing in proximity to airport operations. Also, a notice is required to be provided in the public park and designated outdoor common and recreational areas advising of aircraft noise 6. Through the building permit process, all plans for construction will be reviewed and approved in compliance with all Building, Public Works, Fire Codes, City ordinances, and all conditions of approval. Section 4: In accordance with Section 19.76.020 (Procedures for Lot Line Adjustments) of the NBMC, the following findings and facts in support of Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2020-002 are set forth as follows: Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(1) Approval of the lot line adjustment will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use or be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the City, and further that the proposed lot line adjustment is consistent with the legislative intent of the title. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 19 of 26 Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(1) 1. The General Plan Land Use Designation of MU -H2 (Mixed Use Horizontal 2) will be maintained for the two (2) proposed parcels involved. 2. The lot line adjustment is consistent with the purpose identified in Section 19.76 (Lot Line Adjustments) of the NBMC. The lot line adjustment constitutes a minor boundary adjustment involving the Property (Parcel 1) and the adjacent parcel (Parcel 2). The original number of lots will remain unchanged after the adjustment. 3. The lot line adjustment does not negatively impact surrounding land owners, and will not in itself be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort, and general welfare of persons residing or working in the Koll Center Newport business complex, as the adjustment is necessary to align the subject property lines to be consistent with the Project's development boundaries. Finding Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(2) The number of parcels resulting from the lot line adjustment remains the same as before the adjustment. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(2) The proposed lot line adjustment will adjust the property lines between two (2) contiguous parcels. The number of parcels remains the same as before the lot line adjustment. Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(3) The lot line adjustment is consistent with applicable zoning regulations except that nothing herein shall prohibit the approval of a lot line adjustment as long as none of the resultant parcels is more nonconforming as to lot width, depth and area than the parcels that existed prior to the lot line adjustment. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(3) 1. Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 would remain within the PC -15 (Koll Center Newport Planned Community Office Site B) Zoning District and no changes are proposed to create more nonconforming as to lot area required by PC -15 than the parcels that existed prior to the lot line adjustment. 2. The lot line adjustment allows the property lines of Parcel 1 to be consistent with development footprints. Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(4) Neither the lots as adjusted nor adjoining parcels will be deprived legal access as a result of the lot line adjustment. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 20 of 26 Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.0201}(4) There would be no changes proposed to Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 as both of these parcels will maintain their existing legal accesses via existing driveways and an internal street within Office Site B. Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(5) That the final configuration of the parcels involved will not result in the loss of direct vehicular access from an adjacent alley for any of the parcels that are included in the lot line adjustment. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(5) There are no public alleys adjacent to the proposed parcels; therefore, this finding does not apply. Finding of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(6) That the final configuration of a reoriented lot does not result in any reduction of the street side setbacks as currently exist adjacent to a front yard of any adjacent key, unless such reduction is accomplished through a zone change to establish appropriate street site setbacks for the reoriented lot The Planning Commission and City Council in approving the zone change application shall determine that the street side setbacks are appropriate, and are consistent and compatible with the surrounding pattern of development and existing adjacent setbacks. Facts in Support Findinq of Consistency with Section 19.76.020(1)(6) The final configuration of the proposed parcels does not result in any reduction of the street side setbacks as the adjustments are within the interior of the existing parcels in question. Section 5: In accordance with Section 15.40.030 (Standards for Approval - Findings -Exemptions) of the NEMC, the following findings and facts in support of Traffic Study No. TS2020-001 are set forth as follows: Finding of Consistency with Section 15.40.030(A)(1) That a traffic study for the project has been prepared in compliance with this chapter and Appendix A [NBMC Chapter 15.40]. Facts in Support of Findinq of Consistency with Section 15.40.030(A)(1) Traffic Study No. TS2020-001 entitled Residences at 4400 Von Kaman Analysis, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., dated October 2020, was prepared for the Project in compliance with Chapter 15.40 (Traffic Phasing Ordinance) of the NBMC. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 21 of 26 Finding of Consistency with Section 15.40.030(A)(2) That, based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including the traffic study, one of the findings for approval in subsection (B) jNBMC Section 15.40.030(B)(1)j can be made: Section 15.40.030(B)(1) (Findings for Approval) of the NBMC states: Construction of the project will be completed within sixty (60) months of project approval, and a. The project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection, or b. The project including circulation improvements that the project proponent is required to make and/or fund, pursuant to a reimbursement program or otherwise, will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection, or c. The project trips will cause or make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at one or more impacted primary intersection(s) but the project proponent is required to construct and/or fund, pursuant to a reimbursement program or otherwise, circulation improvements, or make contributions, such that: 1. The project trips will not cause or make worse an unsatisfactory level of traffic service at any impacted primary intersection for which there is a feasible improvement, and 2. The benefits resulting from circulation improvements constructed or funded by, or contributions to the preparation or implementation of a traffic mitigation study made by, the project proponent outweigh the adverse impact of project trips at any impacted primary intersection for which there is (are) no feasible improvement(s) that would, if implemented, fully satisfy the provisions of Section 15.40.030 (B)(1)(b). In balancing the adverse impacts and benefits, only the following improvements and/or contributions shall be considered with the greatest weight accorded to the improvements and/or contributions described in subparagraphs (a) and (b) below: a. Contributions to the preparation of, and/or implementation of some or all of the recommendations in, a traffic mitigation study related to an impacted primary intersection that is initiated or approved by the City Council, Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 22 of 26 b. Improvements, if any, that mitigate the impact of project trips at any impacted primary intersection for which there is (are) no feasible improvement(s) that, if implemented, would satisfy the provisions of Section 15.40.030(B)(1)(b), c. Improvements that mitigate the impacts of project trips on any impacted primary intersection in the vicinity of the project, d. Improvements that mitigate the impacts of project trips on any impacted primary intersection operating, or projected to operate, at or above 0.80 ICU, or d. The project complies with (1) (b) upon the completion of one or more circulation improvements, and. 1. The time and/or funding necessary to complete the improvement(s) is (are) not roughly proportional to the impacts of project -generated trips, and 2. There is a strong likelihood the improvement(s) will be completed within forty- eight (48) months from the date the project and traffic study are considered by the Planning Commission, or City Council on review or appeal. This finding shall not be made unless, on or before the date of approval, a conceptual plan for each improvement has been prepared in sufficient detail to permit estimation of cost and funding sources for the improvement(s); the improvements) is (are) consistent with the circulation element or appropriate amendments have been initiated, an account has been established to receive all funds and contributions necessary to construct the improvement(s) and the improvement is identified as one to be constructed pursuant to the five year capital improvement plan and as specified in Appendix A, and 3. The project proponent pays a fee to fund construction of the improvement(s). The fee shall be calculated by multiplying the estimated cost of the improvement(s) by a fraction. The fraction shall be calculated by dividing the "effective capacity decrease" in the impacted primary intersection attributable to project trips by the "effective capacity increase" in the impacted primary intersection that is attributable to the improvement. The terms "effective capacity increase" and "effective capacity decrease" shall be calculated in accordance with the provisions of Appendix A. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 23 of 26 Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 15.40.030(A)(2) Based on the weight of the evidence in the administrative record, including Traffic Study No. TS2020-001, and the conditions of approval, all of the findings for approval in Section 15.40.030(B)(1)(a) can be made in that: 1. The Project is anticipated to be complete within 32 -month period, well within the 60 -month criteria. Therefore, Traffic Study No. TS2020-001 addresses the entire project development. 2. The Traffic Study provides an evaluation of morning and evening peak hours at 25 existing intersections that are located in the City and the adjoining City of Irvine, and two interstate free ramp intersections that are controlled and maintained by the Caltrans. 3. The Project is projected to generate an additional 1,697 trips, 112 AM trips and 137 PM trips. When these trips distributed to these studied intersections, the analysis concludes that there is no significant impact as the project will neither cause nor make worse an unsatisfactory level of service at any impacted primary intersection, and all intersections are forecasted to continue to operate at acceptable Levels of Service. Fig of Consistency with Section 15.40.030(A)(3) That the project proponent has agreed to make or fund the improvements, or make the contributions, that are necessary to make the findings for approval and to comply with all conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Section 15.40.030(A)(3) The development plans for the Project includes the recommended improvements to the existing driveways and are included in the resolution of approval. The Project also will be required for the payment of Fair Share fees in accordance with Chapter 15.32 that will be used to fund future planned improvements to the City's circulation system. Additionally, the Project will be required to pay any applicable fees for the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program. Section 6: The Affordable Housing Implementation Plan No. AH2O20-003 is consistent with the intent to implement affordable housing goals within the City pursuant to Government Code Sections 65915-65918 (State Density Bonus Law), and Title 20 (Planning and Zoning) including Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC for the following reasons: Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 24 of 26 Facts in Support of Finding of Consistency with Government Code Sections 65915-65918 (State Density Bonus Law), and Chapter 20.32 (Density Bonus) 1. Consistent with the requested twenty -percent density bonus, five percent (13 units) of the project's base units (260) would be set aside as affordable units to very -low income households. Very -low income households are defined as households earning 50 percent or less of the area median income, adjusted for family size for minimum term of 55 years. 2. The State Density Bonus Law and the City's Density Bonus Code provide for an increase in the number of units above General Plan and zoning limits for projects that include a minimum of five percent of the base units affordable to very -low income households earning 50 percent or less of area median income. The project's inclusion of 13 very -low income units, which is 5 percent of the General Plan limit of 260 units, makes the project eligible for 52 additional units for a Project total of 312 units. 3. In addition to the 52 density bonus units and pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(d)(1) and Section 20.32 (Density Bonus) of the NBMC, the Project is entitled to receive one incentive or concession that would result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions. The Applicant requests a concession for the proposed affordable unit mix that does not meet Section 20.32.070 (Design and Distribution of Affordable Units) of the NBMC. Section 20.32.070 requires affordable units in a density bonus project reflect the same range of unit types in the residential development as a whole. In this case, the Project provides a higher percentage of affordable studio units and fewer affordable two-bedroom units compared to market rate units. Granting this incentive will result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual project cost reductions by reducing the long-term rental subsidy costs associated with the two-bedroom units and affording additional rental income for the project to ensure financial feasibility. Section 7: The recitals provided in this resolution are true and correct and are incorporated into the operative part of this resolution. Section 8: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this resolution is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this resolution. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this resolution, and each section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases be declared invalid or unconstitutional. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 25 of 26 Section 9: Environmental Impact Report Addendum No. ER2020-003 was prepared for the Project in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") set forth in California Public Resources Code Section 2100 et seq.; CEQA's implementing regulations set forth in CCR Title 14, Division 6, Chapter 3 ("CEQA Guidelines") and City Council Policy K-3 (Implementation Procedures for the California Environmental Quality Act) to ensure that the Project will not result in new or increased environmental impacts. On the basis of the entire environmental record, the Project will not result in any new significant impacts that were not previously analyzed in the PEIR for the General Plan 2006 Update (SCH No. 2006011119) and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. The potential impacts associated with this Project would either be the same or less than those described in either the PEIR and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration that have been appropriately mitigated. In addition, there are no substantial changes to the circumstances under which the Project would be undertaken that would result in new or more severe environmental impacts than previously addressed in either the PEIR and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration, nor has any new information regarding the potential for new or more severe significant environmental impacts been identified. In accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-2, thereby adopting an addendum to the previously adopted PEIR and the City of Newport Beach Housing Element Initial Study/Negative Declaration. Resolution No. 2021-2, including all findings contained therein, is hereby incorporated by reference. Section 10: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon the effective date of City Council Ordinance No. 2021-1 adopting Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PD2020-001, and City Council Ordinance No. 2021-2 adopting Development Agreement No. DA2020-002. The City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. Resolution No. 2021-3 Page 26 of 26 Section 11: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption by the City Council, and the City Clerk shall certify the vote adopting the resolution. ADOPTED this 26th day of January, 2021. r Ave ry Mayor ATTEST: l � , Leilani I. Brown City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE jc'," C. �'---- Aaro C. Harp City Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A - Legal Description Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Traffic Impact Study Exhibit D - Affordable Housing Implementation Plan and Density Bonus Application Exhibit "A" Legal Description PARCEL 1: THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 266, PAGES 16 THROUGH 22 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 49021'34" WEST 584.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 41005'02" WEST 54.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04016'29" EAST 257.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85043'31" WEST 685.70 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 1.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VON KARMAN AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO 91-155; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 06°59'31" WEST 296.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 549.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE NORTHEASTERLY 90.98 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09029'40" TO THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LABELED N.A.P. OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155 HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF "NORTH 49021'34" WEST 204.00 FEET"; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID N.A.P. PARCEL AND ITS NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THROUGH THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 49021'34" EAST 274.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40038'26" EAST 156.94 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LABELED N.A.P. OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155 HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF "NORTH 49021'34" EAST 204.44 FEET"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID N.A.P. PARCEL AND ITS NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THROUGH THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 49°21'34" EAST 166.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4003826" EAST 284.73 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 49°21'34' EAST 157.28 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 4.51 ACRES, MORE OF LESS. PARCEL 2: THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BEING THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK2661 PAGES 16 THROUGH 22 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 82-713 AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF, FILED IN BOOK 181, PAGES 13 THROUGH 19 OF PARCEL MAPS, BOTH IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT CERTAIN PARCEL DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE THEREOF NORTH 49021'34" WEST 584.54 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 41005'02" WEST 54.87 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 04016'29" EAST 257.91 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 85043'31" WEST 685.70 FEET TO A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 1.00 FEET EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF VON KARMAN AVENUE AS SHOWN ON SAID PARCEL MAP NO 91-155; THENCE ALONG SAID PARALLEL LINE NORTH 06°59'31" WEST 296.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 549.00 FEET; THENCE ALONG SAID CURVE NORTHEASTERLY 90.98 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 09029'40" TO THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LABELED N.A.P. OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155 HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF "NORTH 49021'34" WEST 204.00 FEET"; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY PROLONGATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID N.A.P. PARCEL AND ITS NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THROUGH THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 49021'34" EAST 274.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40038'26" EAST 156.94 FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN PARCEL LABELED N.A.P. OF SAID PARCEL MAP NO. 91-155 HAVING A BEARING AND DISTANCE OF "NORTH 49021'34" EAST 204.44 FEET"; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE AND THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF SAID N.A.P. PARCEL AND ITS NORTHEASTERLY PROLONGATION THROUGH THE FOLLOWING COURSES: SOUTH 49021'34" EAST 166.34 FEET; THENCE NORTH 40038'26" EAST 284.73 FEET TO SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF PARCEL 2; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHEASTERLY LINE SOUTH 49°21'34' EAST 157.28 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 20.09 ACRES, MORE OF LESS. SUBJECT TO ALL COVENANTS, RIGHTS, RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD. Exhibit "B" Conditions of Approval (Project -specific conditions are in italics) Planning Division 1. The development shall be in substantial conformance with the approved site plan consistent with the changes attached to the January 25, 2021, City Council supplemental report, floor plans, landscape plans, and building elevations stamped and dated with the date of this approval (except as modified by applicable conditions of approval). 2. The Project is subject to compliance with all applicable submittals approved by the City of Newport Beach ("City") and all applicable City ordinances, policies, and standards, unless specifically waived or modified by the conditions of approval. 3. Site Development Review No. SD2020-006, Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2020-002, Affordable Housing Implementation Plan No. AH2020-003, and Traffic Study No. TS2020-001 shall expire unless exercised within twenty four (24) months from the date of approval as specified in Section 20.54.060 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code ("NEMC"), unless an extension is otherwise granted by the City for a period of time provided for in the Development Agreement pursuant to the provisions of California Government Code Section 66452.6(a). 4. The proposed residential development shall consist of 312 apartment units, inclusive of 260 base units and 52 density bonus units. 5. A minimum of 420 on-site parking spaces shall be provided for residents and guest parking to be located within the residential parking structure and in designated parking areas in front the residential building. 6. Parking for office uses within Professional and Business Office Site B shall be provided in accordance with the Koll Center Newport Planned Community Development Regulations. All parking spaces displaced by the Project shall be replaced and accommodated within the proposed residential building, existing and reconfigured surface parking lots, and within the proposed free-standing parking structure. Approximately 635 spaces may be removed and replaced as follows: approximately 284 to be located within the new free-standing parking structure, approximately 276 spaces will be located within the residential parking structure, and the remaining 75 spaces (approximate) will be located within the nearby surface parking lots as illustrated on the approved site plan. 7. A minimum of 13 apartment units shall be made affordable to very -low income households consistent with the approved Residences at 4400 Von Karman Affordable Housing Implementation Plan (AH2020-003) dated October 2020. 8. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the residential structure, an affordable housing agreement shall be executed in a recordable form as required by the City Attorney's Office. 9. On-site recreational amenities: private balconies, a clubroom, a fitness center, podium courtyards, a roof terrace, a dog wash, and a bike shop/storage as illustrated on the approved plans shall be provided and maintained for the duration of the Project. 10. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for park improvements, use, and on-going maintenance, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Department, Recreation and Senior Services Department, and City Attorney's Office. 11. A Signage Plan for the park which includes the monument signs on Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street, signage for dedicated parking spaces, and directional signs to the park shall be required. The design and location of the park signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City Recreation and Senior Services Department and Community Development Department prior to fabrication and installation. 12. Prior to the issuance of Final Certificate of Occupancy for the residential structure, the improvements to the one -acre park shall be completed by Applicant and the park parcel shall be deeded to the City. In addition to the improvements, a unisex restroom and five (5) 60 -minute limited parking spaces shall be provided and maintained. 13. Maximum height of the residential structure shall be 79 feet. No building or any portion of structure, architectural feature or mechanical equipment shall exceed 79 feet. 14. Maximum height of the free-standing structure shall be 45 feet. No building or any portion of structure, mechanical equipment or elevator shafts shall exceed 59 feet. 15. The residential/office parking garage and free-standing parking structures shall have the following features: a. A safe, secure and well lighted and signed pedestrian paths for all users. b. Adequate and uniform lighting throughout each parking level. c. Panic alarms and two-way communication systems in prominent locations on each parking level. 16. In addition to the required design features stated in the previous condition, the free- standing parking structure shall have the following features. a. A wall system that would partially obscure vehicle lights and reduce noise from within the structure. b. The lighting for upper (roof) level shall be limited parking lot lighting standards not in excess of 25 feet above the driving surface. 17. At least three pedestrian connections, as shown on the approved plans, shall be provided and maintained by the property owner or its assignee. The connections shall be improved with sidewalks and canopy trees and may include enhanced pavement, seating areas or other amenities to create a convenient, safe and pleasant walkway subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Director. All pedestrian connections shall be improved, completed, and inspected by the Community Development Department, prior to the issuance of Final Certificate of Occupancy for the residential building. 18. Prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit for the residential structure an acoustical analysis report, prepared by an acoustical engineer, shall be submitted to the Planning Division describing the acoustical design features of the residential structure that will satisfy the exterior and interior noise standards. The Project shall be attenuated in compliance with the report. 19. Prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit, Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2020-002 shall be recorded. 20. The Applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of NBMC Chapter 15.38, Fair Share Traffic Contribution Ordinance, and Chapter 15.42, Major Thoroughfare and Bridge Fee Program. Prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit, Fair Share and Transportation Corridor Agency fees shall be paid. 21. Prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit for the residential structure, the Applicant shall pay applicable school fees. 22. Prior to the issuance of a buildinq permit, Applicant shall pay applicable property development tax as required pursuant to NBMC Chapter 3.12 (Property Development Tax). 23. The property management company shall distribute a written disclosure statement prior to lease or rental of any residential unit. The disclosure statement shall indicate that the occupants will be living in an urban type of environment and that the noise, odor, and outdoor activity levels may be higher than a typical suburban residential area. In addition, potential annoyances or inconveniences associated with residing in proximity to airport operations such as noise, vibration, and odor may occur. The disclosure statement shall include a written description of the potential impacts to residents of both the existing environment and potential impacts based upon the allowed uses in the zoning district and proximity to airport. Each and every lessee or renter shall sign the statement acknowledging that they have received, read, and understand the disclosure statement. The Applicant shall covenant to include within all deeds, leases or contracts conveying any interest in the Project. (1) the disclosure and notification requirement stated herein; (2) an acknowledgment by all grantees or lessees that the property is located within an urban type of environment and that the noise, odor, and outdoor activity levels may be higher than a typical suburban residential area; and (3) acknowledgment that the covenant is binding for the benefit and in favor of the City of Newport Beach. 24. Prior to the issuance of Final Certificate of Occupancy, signage shall be installed within the one -acre park informing the public of the presence of operating aircraft at the John Wayne Airport. The final design and location of the signage shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to installation. 25. Any substantial modification to the approved Site Development Review plans, as determined by the Community Development Director, shall require an amendment to this Site Development Review application or the processing of a new application. 26. A copy of the Resolution, including conditions of approval Exhibit "G" shall be incorporated into the Building Division and field sets of plans prior to issuance of the building permits. 27. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit to the Planning Division an additional copy of the approved architectural plans for inclusion in the Site Development Review file. The plans shall be identical to those approved by all City departments for building permit issuance. The approved copy shall include architectural sheets only and shall be reduced in size to 11 inches by 17 inches. The plans shall accurately depict the elements approved by this Site Development Review and shall highlight the approved elements such that they are readily discernible from other elements of the plans. 28. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, Applicant shall submit a detailed landscape and irrigation plan prepared by a licensed landscape architect for the one -acre park, all open space areas, private courtyards, and three pedestrian connections to Uptown Newport project. These plans shall incorporate drought tolerant plantings and water efficient irrigation practices, and the plans shall be approved by the Community Development Department and Fire Department. 29. All landscape materials and irrigation systems shall be maintained in accordance with the approved landscape plan. All landscaped areas shall be maintained in a healthy and growing condition and shall receive regular pruning, fertilizing, mowing and trimming. All landscaped areas shall be kept free of weeds and debris. All irrigation systems shall be kept operable, including adjustments, replacements, repairs, and cleaning as part of regular maintenance. 30. The site shall not be excessively illuminated based on the luminance recommendations of the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, or, if in the opinion of the Director of Community Development, the illumination creates an unacceptable negative impact on surrounding land uses or environmental resources. The Director may order the dimming of light sources or other remediation upon finding that the site is excessively illuminated. 31. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall prepare photometric study for the residential building and free-standing parking structure in conjunction with a final lighting plan for approval by the Planning Division. All outdoor lighting fixtures shall be designed, shielded, aimed, located, and maintained to shield adjacent properties and to not produce glare onto adjacent properties or roadways. Parking lot light fixtures and light fixtures on buildings shall be full cut-off fixtures. 32. Prior to the issuance of Final Certificate of Occupancy for each individual building residential building and free-standing garage,), the Applicant shall schedule an evening inspection by the Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division to confirm control of light and glare specified in conditions of approval. 33. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Applicant shall pay any unpaid administrative costs associated with the processing of this application to the Planning Division. 34. All noise generated by the proposed use shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 10.26 and other applicable noise control requirements of the Newport Beach Municipal Code. The maximum noise shall be limited to no more than depicted below for the specified time periods unless the ambient noise level is higher: 35. Should the property be sold or otherwise come under different ownership, any future owners or assignees shall be notified of the conditions of this approval by either the current business owner, property owner or the leasing agent. 36. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which restricts hours of noise -generating construction activities that produce noise to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Noise -generating construction activities are not allowed on Sundays or Holidays. 37. Refuse collection shall comply with the Waste Management Plan included in the approved plans. The Applicant's property management company shall contract with a franchised hauler on the City list of authorized companies. 38. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash enclosure (three walls and a self -latching gate) or otherwise screened from view Between the hours of TOOAM and 10:OOPM Between the hours of 10:OOPM and TOOAM Location Interior Exterior Interior Exterior Residential Property 45dBA 55dBA 40dBA 50dBA Residential Property located within 100 feet of a commercial property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Mixed Use Property 45dBA 60dBA 45dBA 50dBA Commercial Property N/A 65dBA N/A 60dBA 35. Should the property be sold or otherwise come under different ownership, any future owners or assignees shall be notified of the conditions of this approval by either the current business owner, property owner or the leasing agent. 36. Construction activities shall comply with Section 10.28.040 of the Newport Beach Municipal Code, which restricts hours of noise -generating construction activities that produce noise to between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on Saturday. Noise -generating construction activities are not allowed on Sundays or Holidays. 37. Refuse collection shall comply with the Waste Management Plan included in the approved plans. The Applicant's property management company shall contract with a franchised hauler on the City list of authorized companies. 38. All trash shall be stored within the building or within dumpsters stored in the trash enclosure (three walls and a self -latching gate) or otherwise screened from view of neighboring properties, except when placed for pick-up by refuse collection agencies. 39. The Applicant shall ensure that the trash dumpsters and/or receptacles are maintained to control odors. This may include the provision of either fully self- contained dumpsters or periodic steam cleaning of the dumpsters, if deemed necessary by the Planning Division. Cleaning and maintenance of trash dumpsters shall be done in compliance with the provisions of NBMC Title 14 (Water and Sewers), including all future amendments (including Water Quality related requirements). 40. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Applicant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City, its City Council, its boards and commissions, officials, officers, employees, and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, damages, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, liabilities, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorney's fees, disbursements and court costs) of every kind and nature whatsoeverwhich may arise from or in any manner relate (directly or indirectly) to City's approval of Residences at 4400 Von Karman including, but not limited to, Planned Community Development Plan Amendment No. PD2020-001, Site Development Review No. SD2020-006, Lot Line Adjustment No. LA2020-002, Affordable Housing Implementation Plan No. AH2O20-003, Traffic Study No. TS2020-001, Development Agreement No. DA2020- 002, and Addendum to the 2006 General Plan Update Program Environmental Impact Reports No. ER2020-003 (PA2020-061). This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages awarded against the City, if any, costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other expenses incurred in connection with such claim, action, causes of action, suit or proceeding whether incurred by Applicant, City, and/or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The Applicant shall indemnify the City for all of City's costs, attorneys' fees, and damages which City incurs in enforcing the indemnification provisions set forth in this condition. The Applicant shall pay to the City upon demand any amount owed to the City pursuant to the indemnification requirements prescribed in this condition. Fire Department 41. The drive aisle adjacent to the free-standing parking structure shall be a 20 -foot minimum drive aisle with proper turning radius to be used for fire access only. Final design of the drive aisle shall be approved by the Fire Marshall and the City Traffic Engineer. 42. A fire apparatus access road shall be provided as per Newport Beach Fire Department Guideline C.01. The fire apparatus road shall extend to within 150 feet of all the facility and all portions of the exterior walls of the residential building's first story unless alternatives are approved by the Fire Marshal. 43. A fire apparatus access drive shall be placed in between the two existing buildings to provide access to the rear of the proposed apartment building. The access way shall be designed to the requirements of the Fire Marshal. 44. A fire hydrant shall be installed within 400 feet of the fire department access way serving the rear of the proposed apartment building. The precise location of the proposed fire hydrant will be approved by the Fire Marshal. 45. Wall mounted standpipe connections shall be installed adjacent to Stair Well #2 and #3 to provide water for fire operations to the rear of proposed apartment building. 46. Standpipes shall be provided on the roof of the proposed apartment building near the termination of Stair Well #2 and #3 to support fire operations on the roof of the structure. 47. Standpipes shall be provided at the rear of the proposed apartment building when combustible construction begins at grade level. Temporary water lines, as approved by the Fire Marshal, may be used to supply these stand pipes until permanent fire water lines are established. 48. A fire flow shall be required per Newport Beach Fire Department (NBFD) Guideline B.01 "Determination of Required Fire Flow." The fire flow shall also determine the number of fire hydrants requirement for the Project. 49. Emergency responder radio coverage shall be required to comply with NBFD Guideline D.05 "Public Safety Radio Coverage" and CFC Section 510. 50. Emergency power and Standby Power System shall be required as per CFC Section 604.2.14. 51. An automatic sprinkler system shall be installed in accordance with CFC Section 903.2 amendment shall be provided throughout all buildings. 52. A standpipe system shall be required and installed as per CFC Section 905.3.1. 53. Fire Alarm system shall be provided as per CFC Section 907.2.9. 54. Emergency Power Outlets shall be required (120 -volt Duplex) and shall be connected to the emergency generator circuitry/system when a generator is required by Section 604.2 of the CFC in every fire control room and in other areas as may be designated by the Fire Code office, per CFC Section 604.2.15.2.2 Amendment. The electrical outlets shall be provided in the following locations: a. In the main exit corridor of each floor, adjacent to each exit enclosure; b. In each elevator lobby; c. On every level in every stairwell; d. In public assembly areas larger than 1,500 square feet; e. In every fire control room; and f. f. In such other areas as may be designed by the fire code official. 55. Elevators shall be gurney sized and equipped as a medical emergency elevator as CBC Section 3002. 56. Fire Department Connections shall be located on the address side of the building and a minimum of 30 feet from beginning of the radius for the driveway approach; arranged so they are located immediately adjacent to the approved Fire Department's access road so that hose lines can be readily and conveniently attached to the inlets without interference from nearby objects including building, fence, posts, or other fire department connections per NBFD Guideline F. 04. 57. The FDCs shall be located no more than 100' from a public hydrant. The FDCs may be located within 100' of a private hydrant if the FDC is connected to the fire sprinkler system by a dedicated pipe that connects on the system side of the sprinkler system check valve per NBFD Guideline F. 04. 58. The landscape plans shall be reviewed by the Fire department prior to installation of trees that may interfere with potential fire ladder operations at the rear of the proposed apartment building. Building Division 59. The Applicant is required to obtain all applicable permits from the City's Building Division and Fire Department. The construction plans must comply with the most recent, City -adopted version of the California Building Code. The construction plans must meet all applicable State Disabilities Access requirements. 60. The Applicant shall employ the following best available control measures ("BACMs") to reduce construction -related air quality impacts: Dust Control • Water all active construction areas at least twice daily. • Cover all haul trucks or maintain at least two feet of freeboard. • Pave or apply water four times daily to all unpaved parking or staging areas. • Sweep or wash any site access points within two hours of any visible dirt deposits on any public roadway. • Cover or water twice daily any on-site stockpiles of debris, dirt or other dusty material. • Suspend all operations on any unpaved surface if winds exceed 25 mph. Emissions Require 90 -day low-NOx tune-ups for off road equipment. • Limit allowable idling to 30 minutes for trucks and heavy equipment Off -Site Impacts • Encourage carpooling for construction workers. • Limit lane closures to off-peak travel periods. • Park construction vehicles off traveled roadways. • Wet down or cover dirt hauled off-site. • Sweep access points daily. • Encourage receipt of materials during non -peak traffic hours. • Sandbag construction sites for erosion control. Fill Placement • The number and type of equipment for dirt pushing will be limited on any day to ensure that SCAQMD significance thresholds are not exceeded. • Maintain and utilize a continuous water application system during earth placement and compaction to achieve a 10 percent soil moisture content in the top six-inch surface layer, subject to review/discretion of the geotechnical engineer. 61. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and Notice of Intent (NOI) to comply with the General Permit for Construction Activities shall be prepared, submitted to the State Water Quality Control Board for approval and made part of the construction program. The Applicant will provide the City with a copy of the NOI and their application check as proof of filing with the State Water Quality Control Board. This plan will detail measures and practices that will be in effect during construction to minimize the project's impact on water quality. 62. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the Applicant shall prepare and submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the Project, subject to the approval of the Building Division and Code and Water Quality Enforcement Division. The WQMP shall provide appropriate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to ensure that no violations of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements occur. 63. A list of "good housekeeping" practices will be incorporated into the long-term post - construction operation of the site to minimize the likelihood that pollutants will be used, stored or spilled on the site that could impair water quality. These may include frequent parking area vacuum truck sweeping, removal of wastes or spills, limited use of harmful fertilizers or pesticides, and the diversion of storm water away from potential sources of pollution (e.g., trash receptacles and parking structures). The Stage 2 WQMP shall list and describe all structural and non- structural BMPs. In addition, the WQMP must also identify the entity responsible for the long-term inspection, maintenance, and funding for all structural (and if applicable Treatment Control) BMPs. Residential Structure and Parking Garage 64. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit. grading bonds shall be required to be submitted and reviewed by Building Division staff and approved by the City Attorney. 65. The required wall and opening protection requirements for the existing building adjacent to proposed building shall be maintained. (503.1.2, Table 508.4, Table 705.8 and 705.3). 66. Story/rooms/spaces with a common path of egress travel exceeding 125 feet for R2 Occupancy shall have two separate and distinct means of egress. (1006.2.1). 67. Openings in interior exist stairways shall be limited to those necessary for exit access to the enclosure from normally occupied spaces and for egress from the enclosure. 68. Exits shall be separated by one-third the diagonal dimension of the building or area served when the building is equipped with fire sprinklers throughout in accordance with NFPA 13. (1007.1.1). 69. Exterior balconies, stairways and ramps shall be located at least 10 feet (3048 mm) from adjacent lot lines and from other buildings on the same lot unless the adjacent building exterior walls and openings are protected in accordance with Section 705 based on fire separation distance. (1027.3). 70. Horizontal exit shall not serve as the only exit from a portion of a building, and where two or more exits are required, not more than one-half of the total number of exits shall be horizontal exits. (1026.1). 71. Exit discharge shall not cross interior property lines; must be located within its own property. 72. Emergency egress for sleeping rooms below the fourth story above grade plan in accordance with Section 1030.1 shall be provided. 73. The required low -emitting, fuel-efficient, electrical, and carpool/van pool vehicle(s) per CALGreen shall not occupy the same space as for the required accessible stall(s). 74. Elevators shall be protected with lobbies or acceptable alternative per CBC. 75. The residential dwelling units and their common use areas shall comply with Housing Accessibility per Chapter 11A. 76. The nonresidential portion of the development shall comply with the public accommodation requirements per Chapter 118. Free-standing Parking Structure 77. The free-standing parking structure shall be equipped with NFPA 13 sprinklers. 78. Exterior walls fire rated construction and allowable openings of the free-standing parking structure shall comply with Sections 601, 602, & 705.8. 79. Accessible path of travel from the free-standing parking structure connecting to other building served shall be provided. 80. The free-standing parking structure's elevators shall be required for accessible path of travel. 81. Two-way communication system complying with Section 1009.8 shall be provided at the free-standing parking structure's elevator landings on floors that is one or more stories above or below the level of exit discharge when vehicular ramps do not comply with Section 1012. 82. Standard and Van accessible parking stalls shall be provided within the free- standing parking structure, in accordance with Section 118-208.2. 83. Clean Air Vehicles shall be provided within the free-standing parking structure, in accordance with Section 5.106.5.2 of Ca/Green. These stalls shall not be counted as providing required accessible stalls. Public Works Department 84. All improvements shall be constructed as required by Ordinance and the Public Works Department. 85. All existing broken and/or otherwise damaged curb, gutter and sidewalk along the Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street Project frontages shall be reconstructed. 86. The Von Karman Avenue sidewalk along the Project frontage is designated for bicycle riding per Resolution 82-148. A bicycle sidewalk along Von Karman Avenue, from the main Project entry to the intersection of Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue, shall be constructed. The final design of the sidewalk, including the sidewalk width, shall be reviewed and approved by City Traffic Engineer. 87. At the west entrance to the free-standing parking structure, a turn -around space shall be provided, or signage indicating the height restrictions for the first level of the structure shall be installed, as approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 88. The Project's driveway approaches per City Standard 161-L (Commercial Driveway Approach Type ll) shall be reconstructed. The Project's driveways shall accommodate one inbound lane and two outbound lanes (one left -turn only and one right turn only lane). 89. The internal roadway shall comply with City Council Policy L-4 with a minimum curb to curb width of 32 -feet wide, with parking on one side or no parking. 90. The Applicant shall provide water and sewer demand studies for review. Water demand study shall be reviewed and approved by Irvine Ranch Water District. All required improvements shall be the sole responsibility of the development. 91. All water improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Irvine Ranch Water District. 92. All unused sewer laterals to be abandoned shall be capped at the Project's property line. If the sewer lateral to be abandoned has an existing cleanout, abandonment shall include removal of the cleanout riser, the 4TT box and the wye. Sewer lateral shall then be capped where the wye used to be. 93. All improvements shall comply with the City's sight distance requirement per City Standard 110-L and Municipal Code 20.30.130. 94. In case of damage done to public improvements surrounding the development site by the private construction, additional reconstruction within the public right- of -way shall be required at the discretion of the Public Works Inspector. 95. All on-site Project drainage shall comply with the latest City Water Quality requirements. 96. The Project's parking lot and parking structures shall be per City Standards 805- 9- A and 805-L-8. All dead-end drive aisles shall provide a dedicated turn -around area and 5 -foot minimum drive aisle extension. 97. A new sewer cleanout shall be added to all existing sewer laterals servicing the Project site. A sewer manhole shall be placed on public side of the property line within the Von Karman Avenue driveway. 98. A sewer system management plan shall submit for review and approval by the Utilities Department. Plan shall be approved prior to the issuance of buildinq ermit. 99. All gated entries for the parking structures and surface lots shall provide a minimum three (3) vehicle stacking area prior to the gate. The vehicle stacking shall not impact or block the sidewalks or street area. All gated entries shall provide a turn -around area prior to the gate, or provide other means that allow drivers to exit that is acceptable to the City Traffic Engineer. 100. The final Project parking layout and on-site circulation shall be reviewed and approved by City Traffic Engineer prior to the issuance of building permit. The Project parking lots and parking structures shall be per City Standards STD -805- L -A and STD -805 -L -B. All dead-end drive aisles shall provide a dedicated turn- around area and 5 -foot minimum drive aisle extension. 101. The gate adjacent to the ramp on Basement Level BI shall be relocated to eliminate conflict and queuing on the ramp. 102. The City recommends that the free-standing parking structure to be relocated to another area of the Project or relocated the existing City's storm drain line and associated easement to an area outside of the free-standing parking structure. If the developer and/or property owner wishes to build the stand-alone parking structure over the existing storm drain, the City requires the following items to be reviewed and approved prior to the issuance of building permit for the free-standing parking garage: a. Execution of an agreement to transfer the risk and liability away from the City and to the developer and property owners, b. Provide a detailed inspection and conditions assessment of the existing storm drain line and repairs, c. Reconstruction of the storm drain line under the proposed new parking structure to provide a new service life that matches the proposed new parking structure; d. Add additional inspection manholes on both sides of the proposed parking structure; e. Hydraulic analysis of the storm drain system and pipe; f. Hydrology analysis of the area; and g. Review other potential engineering solutions. 103. Prior to the issuance of building permit, the Applicant shall submit a parking management plan for the Project, including a narrative of the entry gate operations, queuing, internal gates, users, grace period, assigned parking, etc. Parking Management Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer. 104. Prior to the issuance of building permit, the Applicant shall submit a construction management and delivery plan to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development, Fire and Public Works Departments. Upon approval of the plan, the Applicant shall be responsible for implementing and complying with the stipulations set forth in the approved plan. The plan shall include the followings: a. Discussion of Project phasing; b. Staging areas for construction trailer(s) and materials and equipment; c. Parking arrangements for construction workers for both sites during each phase of the construction; d. Anticipated haul routes for all construction phases; e. Emergency vehicle access and staging area(s) during all construction phases; f. Wayfinding signage to assist office users to the available parking locations for each phase of construction; and g. Pedestrian access plan to demonstrate safe and walkable pedestrian paths during each phase of construction. Exhibit "C" RESIDENCES AT 4400 VON KARMAN PROTECT Traffic Impact Study Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 765 The City Drive, Suite 200 Orange, California 92868 rumley)))Horn Expect More. Experience Better. October 2020 This Page Intentionally Left Blank WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1 2.1 Project Location.........................................................................................................................1 2.2 Existing Land Uses and Access....................................................................................................2 2.3 Proposed Project and Access......................................................................................................2 3 METHODOLOGY 9 3.1 Study Area.................................................................................................................................9 3.2 Analysis Methodology..............................................................................................................10 3.3 Performance Criteria................................................................................................................13 3.4 Significance Thresholds............................................................................................................14 Cityof Newport Beach.............................................................................................................14 Cityof Irvine............................................................................................................................14 Caltrans...................................................................................................................................15 3.5 Study Scenarios........................................................................................................................15 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENT/AREA CONDITIONS 15 4.1 Existing Transportation System................................................................................................15 RoadwayCharacteristics..........................................................................................................15 ExistingTransit Service.............................................................................................................17 5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 21 5.1 Existing Traffic Volumes...........................................................................................................21 5.2 Existing Intersection Analysis...................................................................................................21 6 PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC 27 6.1 Project Trip Generation............................................................................................................27 6.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment.................................................................................27 7 FUTURE CONDITIONS 33 7.1 Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) Analysis.................................................................................33 TPO1% Analysis.......................................................................................................................34 TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project..................................................................................38 TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project........................................................................................39 Imley)# ®rn Page I i WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 7.2 CEQA Analysis................................................................................. CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project................................................................................45 CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project.....................................................................................53 8 GENERAL PLAN COMPARISON 59 9 OTHER ISSUES 67 9.1 ANALYSIS OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY FACILITIES .......................................................................67 Intersections on Interstate Highway Facilities.................................................................................67 TrafficImpact Criteria.....................................................................................................................67 Interstate Highway Intersection Analysis........................................................................................69 ExistingConditions...................................................................................................................69 CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project................................................................................69 CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project.....................................................................................69 9.2 CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM COMPLIANCE...........................................................70 9.3 SITE ACCESS AND SITE CIRCULATION ........................................................................................70 9.4 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC............................................................................................... ConstructionPhasing...............................................................................................................74 10 CONCLUSIONS 75 FIGURES Figure1— Vicinity Map............................................................................................................................ 3 Figure2 — Existing Project Site................................................................................................................. 5 Figure3 — Project Site Plan...................................................................................................................... 7 Figure4.— Study Intersections................................................................................................................11 Figure 5 — Existing Transit Routes..........................................................................................................19 Figure 6— Existing Lane Configuration and Traffic Control..................................................................... 23 Figure 7 — Existing Peak Hour Traffic Volumes........................................................................................ 25 Figure 8 — Project Trip Distribution........................................................................................................ 29 Figure 9 — Project -Related Peak Hour Traffic Volumes........................................................................... 31 Figure 10 — TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes .................................... 35 Figure 11— TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ......................................... 43 Figure 12 — Location of Cumulative Projects.......................................................................................... 49 Figure 13 — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ................................. 51 Figure 14 — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ....................................... 55 KIMIepMorn Page I ii WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Figure 15 — Post -2030 General Plan Buildout Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ............................................... 61 Figure 16 — Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ........................... 63 Figure17 — Existing Site Access.............................................................................................................. 72 TABLES Table 1: Summary of Intersection Operation Existing Conditions........................................................... 21 Table 2: Summary of Project Trip Generation........................................................................................ 27 Table 3: Summary of City of Newport Beach Committed Projects.......................................................... 34 Table 4: Summary of 1% TPO Analysis................................................................................................... 37 Table 5: Intersection Operations —TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Conditions ......................... 39 Table 6: Intersection Operations — TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project Conditions .............................. 41 Table 7: Summary of Cumulative Projects..............................................................................................47 Table 8: Intersection Operation — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Conditions ........................ 53 Table 9: Intersection Operation — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project Conditions ............................. 57 Table 10: Summary of Delta Project Trip Generation............................................................................. 60 Table 11: Intersection Operation — Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project Conditions ............... 65 Table 12: Summary of Interstate Highway Intersection Operations........................................................ 69 APPENDICES Appendix A —Traffic Data Collection Worksheets Appendix B — Intersection Analysis Worksheets B-1— Existing Conditions B-2 — TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project B-3 — TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project B-4 — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project B-5 — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project B-6 — Post -2030 General Plan Buildout B-7 — Post -2030 General Plan Buildout Plus Project Appendix C — Future Conditions Information C-1— Newport Beach Committed and Cumulative Project Information C-2 — City of Irvine ITAM Forecasts Appendix D —1% Analysis Worksheets — TPO Analysis lmlep Orn Page I iii WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Appendix E — Intersection Analysis Worksheets — Interstate Highway Analysis E-1— Existing Conditions E-2 — TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project E-3 — TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project E-4 — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project E-5 — CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project Appendix F — CMP Compliance Appendix G — Map of Irvine Business Complex (IBC) Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Imnact Studv Appendix H — Excerpts from the City of Newport Beach 2006 General Plan Transportation Study I IMIlEy)OHorn Page I iv WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv KlMley) orn Page I v WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 1 INTRODUCTION This Traffic Impact Study has been prepared to evaluate the potential traffic -related impacts associated with the proposed Residences at 4400 Von Karman ("Project"). This report has been prepared in accordance with the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) traffic impact study requirements, County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP) requirements, and in support of the environmental documentation for the Project, perthe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements. This analysis has been undertaken to analyze whether the proposed Residences at 4400 Von Karman Project would result in any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts as compared to the conclusions in the City of Newport Beach General Plan Update Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (2006). The purpose of this analysis is to document whether any new traffic -related impacts would occur compared to the City's General Plan EIR, based on the proposed Project (described below) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .1 Project Location The project site is located at the southeast corner' of Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue in the Airport Area of the City of Newport Beach. A vicinity map is provided on Figure 1. The approximately 13.00 -acre site is relatively flat at an approximate elevation of 46 to 52 feet above mean sea level (msl). The project site is an irregularly shaped property generally bordered by Birch Street to the northeast, Von Karman Avenue to the west, and existing office uses and associated surface parking lots and parking structures to the east and south within Koll Center Newport. The Property currently provides a common pool of structured and surface parking to serve office tenants within the Koll Center Newport. Koll Center Newport is an approximately 154 -acre mixed-use development area generally bordered on the northeast by Campus Drive, on the southeast by Jamboree Road, and on the west by MacArthur Boulevard. Regional access to the site is from State Route 73 (SR -73) via Jamboree Road to the south and Interstate 405 (1-405) via Jamboree Road to the north. Vehicular access to the site is provided from Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue. Currently, there are three driveways on Birch Street and two driveways on Von Karman Avenue. The site is approximately 0.5 mile southwest of John Wayne Airport, 0.5 -mile northwest of the San Joaquin Freshwater Marsh Reserve, and 1.5 miles northwest of the University of California, Irvine (UCI). 1 As shown on Figure 1, the streets adjacent to the project site are oriented on a diagonal. For purposes of this report, Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard, and Von Karman Avenue are considered to be the north -south streets, and Birch Street is an east -west street. imley*Hor Page I 1 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Existing2.2 Land Uses and Access The project site is located within the surface parking areas serving the existing Koll Center Newport office park. Proximate to the project site, Koll Center Newport consists of general office buildings with surface parking and a parking structure; the parking structure is for the 5000 Birch office building. The existing office buildings located within the boundaries of the project site (4440 Von Karman, 4490 Von Karman, and 4910 Birch), or immediately contiguous to the site (5000 Birch, 4340 Von Karman, and 4350 Von Karman) are not a part of the proposed development. Access to Koll Center Newport is currently provided by two driveways on Von Karman Avenue, and three driveways on Birch Street. All driveways are currently unsignalized and gated. The existing Koll Center Newport site is shown on Figure 2. 2.3 ProposedProject and Access The proposed Project would allow for 312 residential apartments with structured parking, a 0.5 -acre public park, a free-standing parking structure, and the reconfiguration of some of the existing parking areas. The 312 apartment units would include 299 market -rate units and 13 very -low income affordable units. The Project would include 55 studio units, 149 one -bedroom units, and 108 two-bedroom units. The residential building is proposed as a five -story podium building with three levels of structured parking (one level on -grade and two levels below ground). The proposed 0.5 -acre public park would be centrally located to the project site and would be approximately equidistant from Birch Street and Von Karman Avenue. The conceptual site plan is shown on Figure 3. As noted, access to the Koll Center Newport is currently provided via three driveways on Birch Street and two driveways on Von Karman Avenue. Upon completion of the proposed Project, access to the project site, as well as existing office buildings, would be provided via two full -movement locations on Birch Street and one full -movement location on Von Karman Avenue. To allow for the construction of the proposed Project, some of the existing surface parking areas and the common landscape areas would be demolished. All residential parking would be provided in the residential building's parking structure. Office parking displaced by the Project would be provided in a new, free-standing parking structure, in the residential building's parking structure, and surface parking. Visitors to the publicly -accessible park can use surface parking east of the residential building. The Project will provide 565 parking spaces for its residential units and 626 parking spaces for office uses, including 275 parking spaces in the free-standing parking structure. KlmleYV orn Page 12 N NOT TO SCALE FIGURE 1 VICINITY MAP WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman -r—Mr Imran+ CF...J.. Kimley)))Horn Page 14 FIGURE 2 EXISTING PROJECT SITE NOT TO SCALE WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman -r—Mw I—......a —.J.. KlmleylMorn Page 16 FIGU PRO.,r—%o 011 C rLAN WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Kimley»)Horn Page 18 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 3 METHODOLOGY .1 Study Area This traffic analysis provides an evaluation of morning and evening peak hour intersection at 25 intersections. The study intersections consist of a combination of intersections in the City of Newport Beach and the adjoining City of Irvine. The study area and study intersection list reflect input received from the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine. The locations of the study intersections are shown on Figure 4. Of the 25 study intersections, 8 are controlled and maintained by the City of Irvine and 15 are controlled and maintained by the City of Newport Beach. The two Interstate 405 (1-405) freeway ramp intersections at Jamboree Road are controlled and maintained by the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). Study Area Intersections No. Intersection Jurisdictions Traffic Control 1 MacArthur Boulevard at Campus Drive 1 Irvine Signal 2 MacArthur Boulevard at Birch Street Newport Beach Signal 3 MacArthur Boulevard at Von Karman Avenue Newport Beach Signal 4 MacArthur Boulevard at Jamboree Road 1,2 Newport Beach Signal 5 Von Karman Avenue at Michelson Drive Irvine Signal 6 Von Karman Avenue at Campus Drive 1 Irvine Signal 7 Von Karman Avenue at Birch Street Newport Beach Signal 8 Teller Avenue at Birch Street Newport Beach 2 -way Stop 9 Jamboree Road at 1-405 NB Ramps 2 Caltrans Signal 10 Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps 2 Caltrans Signal 11 Jamboree Road at Michelson Drive Irvine Signal 12 Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 1 Irvine Signal 13 Jamboree Road at Birch Street 1 Irvine Signal 14 Jamboree Road at Fairchild Drive 1 Irvine Signal 15 Jamboree Road at Bristol Street N Newport Beach Signal 16 Jamboree Road at Bristol Street S Newport Beach Signal 17 Jamboree Road at Bayview Way Newport Beach Signal 18 Jamboree Road at University Drive Newport Beach Signal 19 University Drive at Campus Drive Irvine Signal 20 Bristol Street N at Campus Drive Newport Beach Signal 21 Bristol Street S at Irvine Avenue / Campus Drive Newport Beach Signal 22 Irvine Avenue at Mesa Drive Newport Beach Signal 23 Birch Street at Bristol Street N Newport Beach Signal 24 Birch Street at Bristol Street S Newport Beach Signal 25 Bayview Place at Bristol Street S Newport Beach Signal 1 For "shared" intersections on the boundary between the two cities, the city listed indicates the city that maintains and controls the signal. Freeway ramp intersections are maintained and operated by Caltrans. z Designated County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP) intersection. r ley») Orn Page 19 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Each intersection has been analyzed using the methodology and parameters employed by the city in which the intersection is located. For "shared" intersections on the city boundary, the intersection analysis is based on the methodology used by the City that controls and maintains the signal. 3.2 Analysis Methodology Intersection analysis for all signalized intersections has been conducted using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology, which is the methodology utilized by both cities, as well as the Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP). Intersections that are located at an Interstate Highway intersection are also analyzed in accordance with Caltrans requirements, using a separate methodology, as discussed later in this report. The ICU methodology provides a comparison of the theoretical hourly vehicular capacity of an intersection to the number of vehicles actually passing through that intersection during any given hour. The ICU calculation assumes an hourly per -lane capacity for each lane through the intersection, and a clearance factor to account for the effect of yellow and red signal phases. Variations in analysis input parameters between the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine have been accounted for in the analysis. The following presents the ICU parameters for each of the cities. ICU Parameter City of Newport Beach City of Irvine Saturation Flow Rate / Lane 1,600 vehicles per hour (vph) 1,700 vehicles per hour (vph) Clearance Interval 0 .05 of cycle length Right -turn -on -red allowed i NA Yes ATMS Credit 2 NA .05 Critical Movement/ ICU calculation 3 decimals for each critical 2 decimals for each critical movement, summed and rounded to movement and final ICU 2 decimals for the final ICU for the TPO analysis, and 3 decimals for the CEQA analysis 1 Right -turn -on -red is allowed from exclusive right -turn lanes. For the City of Irvine, "unofficial" right -turn lanes (known as a de facto right - turn lane) are assumed in the ICU calculation if 19 feet of travel lane exists from lane stripe to edge of roadway, and curbside parking is prohibited during peak periods. 2 ATMS is an advanced traffic signal management system employed by the City of Irvine to allow the control of signal operations in real-time response to traffic conditions at the intersection. Intersections with the ATMS equipment installed are given a 0.05 capacity credit. The ATMS credit is not applied to intersections located within the Irvine Business Complex (IBC). One study intersection (University Drive at Campus Drive) has the ATMS equipment installed. The ATMS credit is applied in all study scenarios. Intersection analysis for unsignalized intersections has been conducted using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, which returns a delay value, expressed in terms of the average seconds of delay per vehicle. Operating conditions for both ICU and HCM methodologies are expressed in terms of "Level of Service" which is also referred to by its acronym, LOS. The ICU calculation returns a volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio that translates into a corresponding Level of Service, ranging from LOS A, representing uncongested, free- flowing conditions; to LOS F, representing congested, over -capacity conditions. Kimley*Horn Page 110 FII Sl-- - -----------•-•-- _11 _ 1 Kimley)))Horn WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Kimlej/»? orn Page 112 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study A summary description of each Level of Service and the corresponding V/C ratio or delay is provided below. LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS A 0.00-0.60 _<10 EXCELLENT — No vehicle waits longer than one red light, and no approach phase is fully used. B 0.61-0.70 > 10 and -< 15 VERY GOOD -An occasional approach phase is fully utilized; drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.71-0.80 > 15 and:5 25 GOOD - Occasionally, drivers may have to wait through more than one red light; back-ups may develop behind turning vehicles. FAIR - Delays may be substantial during portions of the rush hours, D 0.81-0.90 > 25 and -< 35 but enough lower volume periods occur to permit clearing of developing lines, preventing excessive back-ups. POOR - Represents the most vehicles that the intersection E 0.91-1.00 > 35 and -< 50 approaches can accommodate; may be long lines of waiting vehicles through several signal cycles. FAILURE - Back-ups from nearby locations or on cross streets may F > 1.00 > 50 restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the intersection approaches. Tremendous delays with continuously increasing queue lengths. LOS = Level of Service; ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; HCM = Highway Capacity Manual; V/C = volume -to -capacity 'Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition 3.3 Performance Criteria The City of Newport Beach target Level of Service (LOS) for peak hour operation of signalized intersections is LOS D or better, except for designated intersections within the Airport Area shared with the City of Irvine, where LOS E is acceptable. The shared Airport Area intersections applicable to the proposed Project are as follows: No. Intersection 1. MacArthur Boulevard at Campus Drive 1 4. MacArthur Boulevard at Jamboree Road Z 6. Von Karman Avenue at Campus Drive 1 12. Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 1 13. Jamboree Road at Birch Street 1 14. Jamboree Road at Fairchild Road 1 ' Will be analyzed using the City of Irvine ICU parameters 2 Will be analyzed using the City of Newport Beach ICU parameters KI Bey)»Horn Page 1 13 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv In the City of Irvine, the target Level of Service is LOS D, except where the intersection is located within the Irvine Business Complex (IBC) or the Irvine Spectrum area. A map of the IBC is provided in Appendix G. For these intersections, the target Level of Service is LOS E. The following study intersections are located in the IBC: No. Intersection 1. MacArthur Boulevard at Campus Drive 1 4. MacArthur Boulevard at Jamboree Road 2 5. Von Karman Avenue at Michelson Drive 1 6. Von Karman Avenue at Campus Drive 1 9. Jamboree Road at 1-405 Northbound Ramps 1,3 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 Southbound Ramps 1,3 11. Jamboree Road at Michelson Drive 1 12. Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 1 14. Jamboree Road at Fairchild Road 1 1 Will be analyzed using the City of Irvine ICU parameters 2 Will be analyzed using the City of Newport Beach ICU parameters 3 Will be analyzed using Caltrans HCM parameters 3.4 SignificanceThresholds City of Newport Beach To determine whether the addition of project -generated trips at a signalized study intersection results in a significant impact, the City of Newport Beach has adopted the following thresholds of significance: ■ A significant impact would occur when the addition of project -generated trips causes the Level of Service at a study intersection to deteriorate from an acceptable (LOS D, except for intersections on a CMP facility, or designated intersections in the Airport Area, where LOS E is acceptable) to a deficient Level of Service. ■ A significant impact would occur when the addition of project -generated trips increases the ICU at a study intersection by one percent or more (v/c increases by 0.010 or more), worsening a projected baseline condition of LOS E or F. For unsignalized intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service, a signal warrant analysis will be conducted to determine if a signal is warranted. The signal warrant analysis will be conducted according to the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). City of Irvine All of the study intersections in the City of Irvine are signalized. To determine whether the addition of project -generated trips at a signalized study intersection results in a significant impact, the City of Irvine has adopted the following significance threshold: lmley* ®rn Page 1 14 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study ■ A significant impact would occur when the intersection exceeds the acceptable Level of Service (LOS D except for intersections located in the IBC or on a CMP facility, where LOS E is acceptable) in the baseline condition and the impact of the development is greater than or equal to two percent (v/c increase by 0.02 or more), or; ■ The Project increases the ICU by one percent or more (v/c increases by 0.01 or more) at a study intersection, causing it to become deficient. Caltrans A separate analysis of the Intersection Highway intersections using the analysis methodology and significance thresholds specified in the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies is provided in a separate section of this report. 3.5 Study Scenarios Each of the study intersections has been analyzed for the following scenarios: ■ Existing Conditions ■ TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project ■ TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project ■ CECIA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project ■ CECA Analysis Year 2025 With Project ■ Post -2030 General Plan Buildout 1 ■ Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project 2 1 The Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM) Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) 1405, where the project site is located, consists of 128 apartment units, 128,610 square feet of general commercial use, and 695,137 square feet of office use 2 This "With Project" scenario assumes an additional 184 dwelling units, for a total of 312 dwelling units, as proposed by the Project. 4 EXISTING TRAFFIC ENVIRONMENT/AREA CONDITIONS 4.1 ExistingTransportation System Roadway Characteristics Regional access to the project site is provided by the Corona del Mar Freeway/San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor (SR -73), located less than one mile to the south of the project area, and by 1-405, located approximately 1.5 miles north of the project area. The proposed development would take access to the surrounding street system via connections to Von Karman Avenue and to Birch Street. Michelson Drive is a four -lane divided east -west arterial in the City of Irvine, located approximately one- third mile south of 1-405. Michelson Drive is divided by a painted median and has a posted speed limit of 40 miles per hour (mph) west of Jamboree Road and 45 mph east of Jamboree Road. East of Dupont Drive, Class II bike lanes are provided on both sides of the roadway. Michelson Drive is designated as a Commuter Highway in the City of Irvine Master Plan of Arterial Highways. KlMley)Morn Page 115 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Campus Drive is a six -lane divided arterial that extends north -south between Bristol Street and MacArthur Boulevard, then turns and extends as a four -lane undivided arterial in an east -west orientation between MacArthur Boulevard and Carlson Avenue, then two-lane undivided between Carlson Avenue and University Drive. Class II bike lanes are provided on both sides of Campus Drive. The posted speed limit on Campus Drive ranges from 45 mph to 50 mph within the study area. Campus Drive is designated on the City of Newport Beach Circulation Element as a Major Arterial between Bristol Street and MacArthur Boulevard, and as a Secondary Arterial between MacArthur Boulevard and University Drive. Birch Street is a four -lane undivided roadway, designated as a Secondary Arterial on the City of Newport Beach Circulation Element. Birch Street extends in a north -south direction from south of SR -73 to MacArthur Boulevard, and then turns and extends in an east -west direction from MacArthur Boulevard to Jamboree Road. Birch Street is divided by a painted median, and on -street parking is prohibited in the vicinity of the Project. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Fairchild Road is a four -lane collector in the City of Irvine that extends in a northwest -to -southeast arc from Jamboree Road to McArthur Boulevard. Fairchild Road is divided by a painted median. The speed limit is 45 mph. MacArthur Boulevard is a six- to eight -lane divided arterial that extends through the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine. MacArthur Boulevard is divided by a raised or painted median and has a posted speed limit of 55 mph south of Campus Drive and 45 mph north of Campus Drive. MacArthur Boulevard is classified as a Major Arterial in both cities' Circulation Elements. Bristol Street North is part of the Bristol Street couplet that runs along either side of SR -73. Bristol Street North is a three- to four -lane one-way arterial that extends from Jamboree Road in a northwest direction north of and parallel to SR -73. It crosses over SR -73 and connects with Bristol Street at Santa Ana Avenue/Redhill Avenue. Bristol Street is classified as a Primary Arterial on the City of Newport Beach Circulation Element. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Bristol Street North provides a Class II bike lane. Bristol Street South is the southbound portion of the Bristol Street couplet. Bristol Street South is a four - lane one-way Primary Arterial that extends from Santa Ana Avenue/Redhill Avenue to Jamboree Road in a southeast direction south of and parallel to SR -73. The posted speed limit is 45 mph. Bristol Street South provides a Class II bike lane. Von Karman Avenue is a four -lane north -south Primary Arterial that starts at MacArthur Boulevard in the City of Newport Beach, and extends northward into the City of Irvine. Von Karman Avenue is divided by a painted median and has a posted speed limit of 40 to 45 mph. Von Karman Avenue is classified as a Primary on the City of Newport Beach Circulation Element. On the City of Irvine Circulation Element, Von Karman Avenue is classified as a Secondary Highway between Campus Drive and Michelson Drive and as a Major Highway north of Michelson Drive. Kimley)#Horn Page 1 16 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Jamboree Road is a six- to eight -lane divided arterial that extends through both Irvine and Newport Beach in a north -south direction. Within the Newport Beach city limits, Jamboree Road is mainly a six -lane divided arterial with three lanes in each direction, except for the segment between Birch Street and Fairchild Road, where there are four southbound travel lanes. Jamboree Road transitions into a seven - lane arterial north of the Newport Beach city limits. Jamboree Road is divided by a raised landscaped median and has a posted speed limit of 55 mph south of Campus Drive and 50 mph north of Campus Drive. Jamboree Road is classified as a Major Arterial in both cities' Circulation Elements. Class II bike lanes are provided on both sides of Jamboree Road. University Drive is a four -lane to six -lane divided arterial. University Drive extends eastward from Jamboree Road in the City of Newport Beach across the SR -73 into the City of Irvine, and through UCI) University Drive transitions from four to six lanes at the SR -73 southbound ramps. University Drive is divided by a raised landscaped median and has a posted speed limit of 50 mph within the Study Area. University Drive is classified as a Primary Arterial on the City of Newport Beach Circulation Element and a Major Arterial on the City of Irvine Circulation Element. Class II bike lanes are provided on both sides of University Drive. Existing Transit Service Transit service in the vicinity of the project site is provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) bus lines. The bus routes currently operated by OCTA through the study area in the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine are shown on Figure S. The following OCTA routes serve the project site and vicinity. OCTA Route 59 operates between the cities of Anaheim and Irvine via Kraemer Boulevard/Glassell Street/ Grand Avenue and Von Karman Avenue. The Route 59 stop closest to the project site is east of Campus Drive and University Avenue. Route 59 operates in full -route mode on weekdays from 5:50 AM to 10:30 PM with 50- to 60 -minute headways (the time interval between bus arrivals). On Saturdays, Route 59 does not offer service to UCI; it only operates to Pullman Street and Dyer Road from approximately 5:50 AM to 9:20 PM with 50- to 60 -minute headways. Route 59 does not operate on Sundays. OCTA Route 76 operates between the cities of Huntington Beach and Newport Beach via Talbert Avenue/ MacArthur Boulevard. The Route 76 stop closest to the project site is at the corner of Michelson Drive and Dupont Drive. Route 76 operates on weekdays, from approximately 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM, with 1 -hour headways. Route 76 does not operate on weekends. OCTA Route 79 operates between the cities of Tustin and Newport Beach via Bryan Avenue/ Culver Drive/ University Avenue. The Route 79 stop closest to the project site is at the corner of Michelson Drive and Culver Drive. Route 79 operates every day from 6:10 AM to 9:00 PM with 1 -hour headways. OCTA Route 167 operates between the cities of Orange and Irvine via Hewes Street/ Irvine Boulevard/ Jeffrey Road. The Route 167 stop closest to the project site is at the corner of University Drive and Harvard Avenue. Route 167 operates weekdays from approximately 5:15 AM to 9:25 PM with 1 -hour headways. Route 167 does not operate on weekends. Komley»)Horn Page 117 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study OCTA Route 178 operates between the cities of Huntington Beach and Irvine via Adams Avenue, Birch Street, and Campus Drive. The Route 178 stop closest to the project site is located at the corner of Birch Avenue and Von Karman Avenue. Route 178 operates on weekdays from 5:10 AM to 9:50 PM with approximately 1 -hour headways. Route 178 does not operate on weekends. OCTA Route 213 operates between the cities of Brea and Irvine via SR -55. The Route 213 stop closest to the project site is located at the corner of Michelson Drive at Riparian View. Route 213 operates on weekdays from 5:30 AM to 7:00 PM with 30 -minute headways. Route 213 does not operate on weekends. OCTA Route 472 operates between the cities of Tustin and Irvine via Edinger Avenue, Red Hill Avenue, Campus Drive and Jamboree Road. The Route 472 stop closest to the project site is located at the corner of Jamboree Road and Birch Street. Route 472 operates on weekdays from 6:10 AM to 9:10 PM with 30 - minute to 1 -hour headways. Route 472 does not operate on weekends. OCTA Route 473 operates between the cities of Tustin and Irvine via Edinger Avenue/ Harvard Avenue. The Route 473 stop closest to the project site is located at the corner of Harvard Avenue and Bridge Avenue. Route 473 operates on weekdays from approximately 6:10 AM to 9:20 PM with 20- to 30 -minute headways. Route 473 does not operate on weekends. Kiley»#Horn Page 1 18 \oma NEWPORT BEACH BaYbjewWY University or FIGURE 5 EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES W IRVINE LEGEND: 59 = Route 59 76 = Route 76 X79 = Route 79 Route 167 978 = Route 178 213 = Route 213 72 = Route 472 73 = Route 473 -19- Kimley»>Horn 4�2 NOT TO SCALE ��oy o e8\JOHN c / WAYNE dc'� AIRPORT , ?�.. 72 , l � sf T os , o � 472 4 m rs oop IRVINE f a^�s'°ids PROJECT SITE 8 °yoo� c .P�cO a \oma NEWPORT BEACH BaYbjewWY University or FIGURE 5 EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES W IRVINE LEGEND: 59 = Route 59 76 = Route 76 X79 = Route 79 Route 167 978 = Route 178 213 = Route 213 72 = Route 472 73 = Route 473 -19- Kimley»>Horn WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman T-ffir I--+ C+..A . 1%111ncy-'n wiar Page 120 WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 5.1 ExistingTraffic Volumes Field observations of all study intersections were conducted to document the number of through and turning lanes, traffic control, and other existing traffic conditions at each intersection. Existing lane configurations and intersection traffic control at the study intersections are shown on Figure 6. Existing morning and evening peak hour intersection turning movement counts were provided by the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine. Intersection counts that were not provided by either city were collected in either 2018 or 2019. The traffic counts provided by the cities of Newport Beach and Irvine were conducted between 2017 and 2019. For City of Newport Beach intersections, traffic counts older than one year have been grown at 1 percent per year on certain major roadways, per direction from City staff, to grow the counts to Year 2020. For City of Irvine intersections, traffic counts were grown at 2 percent per year, based on direction from City staff, to grow the counts to Year 2020. The resulting peak hour turning movement volumes are shown on Figure 7. Copies of peak hour traffic data collection sheets are provided in Appendix A. 5.2 Existing Intersection Analysis Peak hour intersection analysis was conducted for the signalized study intersections using the applicable intersection analysis methodology and parameters for each city, as discussed previously in this report. Unsignalized intersections were analyzed using the HCM methodology for unsignalized intersections. Existing AM and PM peak hour intersection operations are summarized on Table 1. All study intersections are currently operating at an acceptable Level of Service (LOS D for all intersections, except LOS E for intersections in the Airport Area or the IBC area, and CMP intersections). Intersection Level of Service worksheets are provided in Appendix B. Table 1: Summary of Intersection Operation Existing Conditions Traffic AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Intersection Control ICU/Delay I,OS NCU/L1eMay . I,QS99 1 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr* S 0.50 A 0.82 D 2 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St S 0.34 A 0.52 A 3 MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave S 0.55 A 0.52 A 4 MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd* S 0.58 A 0.67 B 5 Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr* S 0.54 A 0.68 B 6 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr* S 0.52 A 0.70 B 7 Von Karman Ave at Birch St S 0.32 A 0.42 A 8 Teller Ave at Birch St U 12.2 B 13.5 B 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps* S 0.76 C 0.85 D 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps* S 0.96 E 0.95 E 11 Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr* S 0.63 B 0.88 D 12 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr* S 0.62 B 0.63 B KlMley>>) ®rn Page 121 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Table 1: Summary of Intersection Operation Existing Conditions 13 Jamboree Rd at Birch St* S 0.52 A 0.53 A 14 Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Dr* S 0.57 A 0.69 B 15 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N S 0.37 A 0.46 A 16 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S S 0.67 B 0.62 B 17 Jamboree Rd at Bayview Way S 0.43 A 0.44 A 18 Jamboree Rd at University Dr S 0.62 B 0.53 A 19 University Dr at Campus Dr 1 S 0.79 C 0.79 C 20 Bristol St N at Campus Dr S 0.54 A 0.68 B 21 Bristol St S at Irvine Ave/Campus Dr S 0.68 B 0.52 A 22 Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr S 0.48 A 0.64 B 23 Birch St at Bristol St N S 0.64 B 0.55 A 24 Birch St at Bristol St S S 0.48 A 0.48 A 25 Bayview PI at Bristol St S S 0.51 A 0.50 A S = Signalized; U = Unsignalized; ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; LOS = Level of Service Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at LOS E or F per City standards. For signalized intersections, intersection operation is expressed in volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio using the ICU methodology. For unsignalized intersections, LOS is expressed in average seconds of delay per peak hour vehicle, based on the methodology outlined in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual. * Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection. ' A 5% capacity credit is applied at this intersection to reflect implementation of the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) 1Mlel * H o r n Page 122 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd 5. Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr ¢a F F 9 IJI lfff}I' D---' lff}I' lff}t'=j _ 11fffr –r► OVL lffl' lff(' Campus Birch Von Kansan ` h tre. Michelson F Campus 7. Von Karman Ave at Birch St 8. Teller Ave at Birch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramp 10. Jamboree Rd at 1405 SB Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr 11II PIl i pEp r F q F 1y111 f—:= ,,dill � 7 e F1111 J1111 on.Ramp+ € F �F J1111 �Y. S 1 �1 L :;F lff Birch �— `f' Birth —On-Ramp tttr F 1405 NB ffff�' F 1-405 SB 1ffffl' Michelson Vtf- F Campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 16. JamboreeRd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayvlew Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr +On-Ramp J�{��1� NRJ���� F_ One-Way + liri rfFI If— —�ORF F lf}f- �' lfff- -One-Way �f}f-I' ffff� =, '►ffff� �ffft' Birch Fairchild BrFsNI Bristol Bayview Eastblufl University 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S a1t1 Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St J��l. �D JJJi��I II�\ One.Way 11a1tI JIII\ € 19 JJ 11 m II\\ One-Way—m D �Dne.WayMiff fffff-� ifffr —One-Way -Til IV Campus Bristo Bristol Mesa Bristol Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI e: One-Ways rin Bristol FIGURE 6 EXISTING LANE CONFIGURATION AND TRAFFIC CONTROL -23- LEGEND: Q Newport Beach intersection Q Irvine Intersection ®x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary F Free Movement OVt. Right -Turn Overlap D Defacto Right -Turn Lane NROR No Right -Turn On Red M Signal — Stop Sign WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman T—;;;, I.........a 01....J.. 1%111 ucy "f I nn o o Page 124 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Korman Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd 5. Von Korman Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Korman Ave at Campus Dr 119 1� f y F —40/9 55� 55 t9 o g1 r27 6« a ti t r m9/zn.a X1i 1 txo�9 10 _/0 17/96 a R t r 7x/u4� 1 .7AI{LrFzO/°° D�6� .24/x60 4 t r ton/946,] F308 155h129477 > f1nY r�34JFD 6z/122 1511/427-4 $ tF92,7/1 11DxW 469/321 J n4/sxs� t t r ���ppp1 7x/0.7 �{ g�� 64/42-, � � aa8 32/194-1 461/01 ; 4ps- 0i O2} Campus Birch Von Kerman Jamboree Michelson Campus 7. Von Korman Ave at Birch St 8. Teller Ave at Birch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramp 10. Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr F157 60/10x a ,69/190-� i t r fF1n1-�{i~ 00/76 a 130/289y ti t- �7ot/47a -4601/79] t r 1x42 1x70 s / t r t39� /2_ 19%lx�by 1 t r € -to2/165 -M-46/4 � 17 t r D4/xo�� zo/J,�C t4efiryw3 n 20/79 x0/50 /D9 y 01ry90S oCF Birch Bireh1405 NB 1-405 8D �zip� Michelson pp Campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 16. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayview Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr q Hap qmq 1� ]`0/1 i Y R 92/206 1 t r 1� qiq274/434 '-i sl i tr 17/43 o�y 1 t r @C 1i F1 1l Y t f p i i 1228/061 t f s p� \ 13_ 1� -44_3°/60 e. 0 i 4 L —12/20 DD ,J� �p r g $ 1�i70�d6 i t r D]ryel ii r'� �a§^ yy]3�n D��n"rr=iC'_ip g a 02]9°-a 1296/'Oi9� 1J� y pt 90ry JD �1 CFs 1W�Oy 44/xl�gap Bimh Felfchllfl �h4yKy d Bristol g�F Bristol BsYAM Eastblu5 UnW.Ity 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St Ps i11 1y � �-2e/174 :5 2,3801//210894 � S L=n r'23a/111 1 r 5cc t per♦ � i L 960/460 a ,9,9/400,--/ gpt g r m 484/556 yip Cm 1L2/18 r' ,44/40 .+r x46 ,-i i r 128/719��occ ICC: ''/e�' Q mB i L 1IU - t N 4. y � i 700/238 s t r 1z2°92� 119/366 a Z460-/ 187/118�$�C R 1 g t gr Campus Bristol Bristol Mesa Brstol pCe Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI e: � x� 3064/2487- 371/134y $ Bristol FIGURE 7 EXISTING PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -25- LESENQ: Q Newport Beach Intersection Qx Irvine Intersection Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary XXIYY AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Tr�FFir Imn. n� N...J.. Iml 111%. Y ",- I Jul I I Page 126 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 6 PROPOSED PROJECT TRAFFIC • Project Trip generation estimates for the proposed Project were developed using the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition) publication. The proposed project components and trip generation estimates for the Residences at 4400 Von Karman are as follows: ■ Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) (Land Use 221) Daily, morning peak hour, and evening peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are shown on Table 2. The Project (312 units) would generate approximately 1,697 daily trips, with 112 morning peak hour trips (29 inbound and 83 outbound) and 138 evening peak hour trips (84 inbound and 54 outbound). The project site is located in traffic analysis zone (TAZ) 1405 of the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM). The City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study (March 2006) includes 128 apartment units. Because the Project proposes 312 multi -family rental units, the Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project scenario adds 184 additional multi -family units. Table 2: Summary of Project Trip Generation Mult11 ifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) I 221 I DU I 5.44 10.094 10.266 10.36 10.268 10.172 1 0.44 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 2 I 312 I DU 11,697 I 29 I 83 I 112 I 84 1 54 1 138 Total Project Trips 11,697 I 29 I 83 I 112 I 84 I 54 138 I Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition 2Trip generation estimates shown in Table 2 have been used for TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project and CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project analyses. Trip generation for Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project is shown on Table 10. 1.2 Project Trip Distribution and Assignment Project trip distribution assumptions for the project site were developed based on likely origins and destinations of project residents and visitors, and the transportation network available for those trips. Distribution assumptions were submitted to City staff for review and concurrence. Trip distribution assumptions for the Project are shown on Figure 8. The resulting project -related traffic volumes at each study intersection are shown on Figure 9. KlMley* ®rn Page 127 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv RIMIleyVillorn Page 128 15% 5% 5% 5% N NOT TO SCALE �mg � c a.. s8o FwY JOHN WAYNE 20% AIRPORT i ,oc CO, ) IRVINE a ° oA � mry s caaa �a'°� 15% O4V ,e a o m M ,e a�aP ,rad e^�sfoip` IRVINE s air ery '� sf sfo�S � PROJECT SITE �e fs s s a0„ 8 NEWPORT BEACH 84YvieW 5°/ U Wy s N� university Or d LE END: FIGURE 8 a. XX% Trip Distribution Percent PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION ---- City Boundary 10% 10% 10% a AID )) Horn WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman 7-4rn I-- C. ... J.. Page 130 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Kerman Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd S. Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Karmen Ave at Campus Dr T T 3/a 4/II 4/,1� �� c Campus Birch Von Karman Jamboree e Michelson Campus 7. Von Karman Ave at Birch St 8. Teller Ave at Birch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramp 10. Jamboree Rd at 1.405 SS Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr it e/ISy �2/I3 re/�Ir T r 4-4/N F l rr7/1t IJ/!—a a T r 1� E i _4/13 ' 1 p= 8 d �r T r q E '� In 8 2/1 3/9_, 5e=i= Birch 3/air h� Blmh IZ, 1105 NB 1.ZS 1405 SB Michelson Campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 16. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayview Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr Z. le/9 a e B e� e 8 E B E e 8 I 14/91 Birch Fairchild Bristol Bristol Bayview EastbluR unwrsity 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St nam § man—. E f-17/It E ^+ In a h rl/I e 1 r'7/9 1f L e L Campus Bristol C 2 Bristol Ct Mesa c Bristol c Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI Bristol FIGURE 9 PROJECT -RELATED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES mm LEGEND: Q Newport Beach Intersection �x Irvine Intersection ®x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary xxnv AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes nom Nominal Volume WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Kimlep Horn Page 132 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 7 FUTURE CONDITIONS The project Opening Year is Year 2024. Per the City's TPO analysis guidelines, the Future Year analysis is one year after Opening Year, therefore Year 2025 was used in the Future Conditions analysis. Near-term future traffic forecasts have been developed for two analysis conditions: Future Year with Existing plus Growth plus Committed Projects, representing analysis of the conditions required by the City of Newport Beach Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) Future Year with Existing plus Growth plus Committed plus Cumulative Projects, as required by CEQA. A discussion of each is provided in the following sections. 7.1 Traffic Phasing Ordinance (TPO) Analysis The City of Newport Beach TPO first requires a determination of whether project trips will increase traffic volumes on any leg of a Primary Intersection by one percent (1%) or more during either the morning or evening peak hour one year after project completion, or that portion of the Project expected to be constructed within five years (sixty months) of project approval, which would be Year 2025. The TPO then requires a Level of Service analysis of the project impact at any Primary Intersection that exceeds the one percent threshold. For TPO purposes, traffic forecasts for study intersections in the City of Newport Beach are developed by applying an ambient growth rate of one percent per year on primary roadways (Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard and Irvine Avenue), plus traffic from Committed Projects in the vicinity of the project site. For study intersections in the City of Irvine, a growth factor of two percent per year is applied to develop Year 2025 forecasts. Committed projects consist of projects in the City of Newport Beach that have been approved but are not yet fully constructed and occupied. Committed Projects information was provided by the City of Newport Beach Staff. A copy of the Approved Projects data sheets provided by the City of Newport Beach is included in Appendix C. A summary of the Newport Beach Committed Projects is provided on Table 3. Traffic volumes generated by the Committed Projects in the study area were added to existing peak hour volumes plus ambient growth to develop the TPO Analysis Year 2025 forecast traffic volumes. The resulting peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 10. I ley)))orn Page 133 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Table 3: Summary of City of Newport Beach Committed Projects Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study 148 Fashion Island Expansion 40% 154 Temple Bat Yahm Expansion 65% 945 Hoag Hospital Phase III 0/ 949 St. Mark Presbyterian Church 77/ 955 2300 Newport Boulevard 15% 958 Hoag Health Center 95/ 959 North Newport Center 0/ 962 328 Old Newport Medical 0/ 965 Mariner's Pointe 82% 968 Uptown Newport (Phase 2) 0/ 969 Uptown Newport (Phase 1) 5% 971 Back Bay Landing 300 E. Coast Highway 0/ 974 Newport Executive Center 70/ 975 Ebb Tide Residential 20/ 976 ENC Nature Pre-school 0/ 977 Balboa Marina West 0/ 979 Newport Crossings 0/ 980 Vivante Senior Center 0/ Source: City of Newport Beach —Traffic Phasing Ordinance Data —Includes approved projects less than 100% complete. TPO 1% Analysis In accordance with City of Newport Beach traffic study requirements, the project traffic contribution at the Primary Intersections was evaluated to determine the extent of the Traffic Impact Study required of the Project. The Primary Intersections identified through the 1% Analysis will be evaluated for the LOS Analysis. For the TPO Analysis, the project -related morning and evening peak hour traffic volumes were compared to the TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project peak hour volumes on each leg of each Primary Intersection to determine whether the Project would result in a 1 percent increase. The results of the analysis are summarized on Table 4. The 1% Analysis Worksheets for the TPO Analysis are provided in Appendix D. Table 4 shows that the project traffic will exceed 1 percent on at least one approach in one or both peak hours at each of the Newport Beach Primary Intersections, except at the following intersections: 6. Von Karman Avenue at Campus Drive 12. Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 17. Jamboree Road at Bayview Way 18. Jamboree Road at University Drive 21. Bristol Street South at Irvine Avenue/ Campus Drive 22. Irvine Avenue at Mesa Drive 24. Birch Street at Bristol Street South 25. Bayview Place at Bristol Street South KI ley* OCn Page 134 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd 5. Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Karmen Ave at Campus Dr c �' 4—t°Je3�ie2 r44/� c S '�u,�/soe7 s rz7/tac � tiy? r �t s f L r,ee/e,z 17/98 — t r 32/1°4 g � � / „ e2i'1�°� ; S i r IW/93� p 0 € ,�1,t;,� ti? r 47/87 :9 �3 / € r 3/137 2 /�.� ? r °°/aye C °asses—moi W/72 -u`X S T r campus Birth p� Von Kerman mboree Michelson+ campus 7. Von Karman Ave at Birch St 8. Teller Ave at Birch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 1405 NB Ramp 10, Jamboree Rd at 1405 SB Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr $ A Cg ,��/67 x '� 4-txx22//zsY > r 4e/14 4. 1!i/161-� r �C '—za/1t_ pp 1-za4//x]9 1i d -12/3 T 130/28..::Wr '�na/127 t+ 1 r.}naa/87e ? r C ii 1372/14o].J� f r g�R •' 1� E id n 1s_ 497/1129 -10, L r,S3704 JII° 5 r 1 , C S x g 113/171 j 1 L r -4a. �o 12/167 �r i r nnI 84/x0 m 20/3 �= y r. Y`y 1643/aa°� = e74 �4-, 3]/07 pa 'g�g7 xx2/000-4 1 04/".'— Birch Bimh 41405 NB 1-4058B iiy33 N Michelson C ^ campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd atBristolSt N 1 16. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayview Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr Cy=y S p E �`0/I SgC E e_ 7i X302/47° i --]/11 1 4 Y 18/47 100;/°;,,,, i? r r 100/97 � � GG E pp 711 Y 1 t r �_ 8 E a E S - 1255/„2a s ,427,AAoe0� n� 4 L E r1$_1 11 1a 9, Y 1 L —1/2/0240/900 00/rtY Jr y 41, E p F 4 -1_1 16 L'170/130 ' i Y—'227/'/245 431 0 s /x1 �9 148/2/,-� 66/171 s r r = C 88 Birch Bg n F Fauchiltl gg �:d Brstol 99 S Bristol _cS - Bayview S9cs9i9 Eastblua UnNersity 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St �F 1 4-149/335 c F292/609 cz a 4-,218 1174 -219/211 5 ♦ i �gg E Yy �' y 004/46a a sp ��ppr 18 � FI a1 7 T 4--28/233 Y V y -1]Y/511 1,4/40 Jr R gT r ,1 e'Z �1G= I t-1480'1515 y r]YD/18{ 5 1ggq4441... GV - 701/211 Jr pc1�r 12 123/11153 °y C\ 130/407 -• YB� T /r c $ Campus F Bristol _ R Bristol i0 Mesa na., Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI 3141/2069-4 37,/134 C $ Bristol FIGURE 10 TPO ANALYSIS YEAR 2025 WITHOUT PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -35- LEGEND: Q Newport Beach Intersection �x Irvine Intersection ®x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary xxnY AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman fVImcy,vnu l Page 136 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study The analysis will proceed with a TPO Traffic Impact Study at the remaining Newport Beach Primary Intersections. It should be noted that the 1% Analysis was not conducted for the study intersections entirely in the City of Irvine because the TPO requirement only applies to the City of Newport Beach Primary Intersections. All study intersections in the City of Irvine, including study intersections located on the border of Irvine and Newport Beach, have been analyzed for all study scenarios in this report. Table 4: Summary of 1% TPO Analysis Northbound Southbound Eastbound ' Westbound' Approach Approach Approach Approach No. intersection Condition AM,, PM ANi PM AM PM AM PM 1% of projected pk hr volume 9 16 16 20 14 9 3 16 1 MacArthur Blvd/ project peak hour volume 17 11 6 17 0 0 0 0 Campus Dr Project traffic less than 1%? N Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 8 11 10 12 5 7 2 9 2 MacArthur Blvd/ Birch St Project peak hour volume p 0 0 6 17 3 8 30 20 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y N Y x N= 1% of projected pk hr volume 17 12 7 11 1 5 3 8 3 MacArthur Blvd/ Von Karman Ave project peak hour volume 7 19 0 0 0 0 19 12 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y MacArthur Blvd/ 1% of projected pk hr volume 17 14 8 21 18 14 17 18 4 Jamboree Rd Project peak hour volume p 6 17 18 12 8 22 14 9 Project traffic less than 1%? Y N Y Y " N Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 8 8 7 13 7 8 5 9 6 Von Korman Ave/ Campus Dr project peak hour volume 4 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 18 20 23 21 4 12 8 9 12 Jamboree Rd/ Campus Dr project peak hour volume 15 9 6 17 2 1 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 19 19 24 22 2 7 0 2 13 Jamboree Rd/ Birch St project peak hour volume 7 20 5 15 29 18 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y N N Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 34 35 15 19 0 1 0 1 Jamboree Rd/ 15 Bristol St N Project peak hour volume p 8 22 15 10 0 0 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y N Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 20 21 8 11 32 29 0 0 16 Jamboree Rd/ Bristol St S Project peak hour volume p 3 8 1 8 5 5 13 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y N ::. Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 19 21 23 22 2 3 1 2 17 Jamboree Rd/ Bayview Wy project peak hour volume 3 8 8 5 0 0 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Jamboree Rd/ 1% of projected pk hr volume 17 20 22 22 6 4 5 6 18 University Dr project peak hour volume 3 8 8 5 0 0 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Kimley*Horn Page 137 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study Table 4: Summary of 1% TPO Analysis Northbound Southbound Eastbc►untl Westbound Approach Approach Approach . Approach ' No,. Intersection Condition AM PM AM PM AM PM. .AM PM 1% of projected pk hr volume 21 11 5 22 0' 0 17 22- 20 Bristol s r Campus Dr Project peak hour volume 2 6 3 2 0 0 17 11 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 15 10 5 13 33 20 0 __. 0 21 Bristol St S at Irvine project peak hour volume 1 3 3 2 1 3 0 0 Ave /Campus Dr Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 20 9 7 18 5 3 2 8 22 Irvine Ave at Project peak hour volume 2 4 3 2 0 0 1 1 Mesa Dr Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y YY Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 12 5 2 11 0 0 21 21 23 Birch Stat Bristol St N Project peak hour volume 1 1 10 7 0 0 7 5 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 8 5 5 10 22 15 0 0 Birch Stat 24 Bristol St S Project peak hour volume 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 1% of projected pk hr volume 1 3 0 0 35 26 0 0 25 Bayview PI at Bristol St S Project peak hour volume 0 0 0 0 5 13 0 0 Project traffic less than 1%? Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Intersection analysis was conducted for the TPO Analysis Year 2025 (Existing plus Growth plus Committed Projects) Without Project peak hour traffic conditions. Intersection worksheets are provided in Appendix B. The results of the intersection analysis are summarized on Table 5. Review of the table shows that the following study intersection would operate at an unacceptable Level of Service under TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Conditions: 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps: AM — LOS F; PM — LOS F Kiley* ®rn Page 138 WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Table 5: Intersection Operations - TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Conditions 1 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr* S 0.56 A 0.90 D 2 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St S 0.37 A 0.55 A 3 MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave S 0.57 A 0.55 A 4 MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd* S 0.65 B 0.73 C 5 Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr* S 0.59 A 0.74 C 6 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr* S 0.59 A 0.77 C 7 Von Karman Ave at Birch St S 0.32 A 0.42 A 8 Teller Ave at Birch St U 12.2 B 13.5 B 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps* S 0.83 D 0.93 E 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps* S 1.07 F 1.04 11 Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr* S 0.69 B 0.97 E 12 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr* S 0.70 B 0.71 C 13 Jamboree Rd at Birch St* S 0.59 A 0.62 B 14 Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Dr* S 0.68 B 0.79 C 15 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N S 0.42 A 0.51 A 16 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S S 0.70 B 0.68 B 19 University Dr at Campus Dr i S 0.88 D 0.86 D 20 Bristol St N at Campus Dr S 0.56 A 0.69 B 23 Birch St at Bristol St N S 0.68 B 0.57 A Notes: - Bold values indicate intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service - Intersection operation is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for signalized intersections, and average delay for unsignalized intersections. - Delay values for unsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach. * Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection. ' A 5% capacity credit is applied at this intersection to reflect implementation of the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project In this scenario, project -related peak hour traffic volumes are added to the TPO Analysis Year 2025 Without Project traffic volumes. TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project peak hour volumes are shown on Figure 11. The results of the intersection analysis are summarized on Table 6. Review of this table shows that the following study intersection would operate at an unacceptable Level of Service under TPO Analysis Year 2025 with project conditions: 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps: AM - LOS F; PM - LOS F KimlepMorn Page 139 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffir Imnart rturiv KimleylMorn Page 140' WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Table 6: Intersection Operations - TPO Analysis Year 2025 With Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Wour<' . Int. Without Project': With Project Sig Without Project with Project Sig # Intersection iCU%Delay; COS , ICU/W'y ! 105 Change- Impact? ICU/Delay l05 iCU/Delay LOS Change Impact?; 1 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr* 0.56 A 0.56 A 0.00 No 0.90 D 0.90 D 0.00 No 2 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 0.37 A 0.38 A 0.01 No 0.55 A 0.56 A 0.01 No 3 MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 0.57 A 0.58 A 0.01 No O.S5 A 0.55 A 0.00 No 4 MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd* 0.65 B 0.66 B 0.01 No 0.73 C 0.74 C 0.01 No 5 Von Karman Ave at Michelson DO 0.59 A 0.60 A 0.01 No 0.74 C 0.75 C 0.01 No 6 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr* 0.59 A 0.59 A 0.00 No 0.77 C 0.78 C 0.01 No 7 Von Karman Ave at Birch St 0.32 A 0.33 A 0.01 No 0.42 A 0.43 A 0.01 No 8 Teller Ave at Birch St (unsignalized) 12.2 B 12.7 B 0.5 No 13.5 B 14.8 B 1.3 No 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps* 0.83 D 0.83 D 0.00 No 0.93 E 0.93 E 0.00 No 10 Jamboree Rd at I-405 SB Ramps* 1.07 i= ..', 0.00 No 1.04 F = 1:04 P ! 0.00 No 11 Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr* 0.69 B 0.69 B 0.00 No 0.97 E 0.97 r E 0.00 No 12 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr* 0.70 B 0.70 B 0.00 No 0.71 C 0.71 C 0.00 No 13 Jamboree Rd at Birch St* 0.59 A 0.60 A 0.01 No 0.62 B 0.64 B 0.02 No 14 Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Dr* 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.00 No 0.79 C 0.79 C 0.00 No 15 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 0.42 A 0.42 A 0.00 No 0.51 A 0.52 A 0.01 No 16 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 0.70 B 0.70 B 0.00 No 0.68 B 0.69 B 0.01 No 19 University Dr at Campus Dr 1 0.88 D 0.88 D 0.00 No 0.86 D 0.86 D 0.00 No 20 Bristol St N at Campus Dr 0.56 A 0.57 A 0.01 No 0.69 B 0.69 B 0.00 No 23 Birch St at Bristol St N 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.00 No 0.57 A 0.57 A 0.00 No Notes: - Bold values indicate intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service Intersection operation is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for signalized intersections, and average delay for unsignalized intersections. Delay values for unsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach. 1 A 5% capacity credit is applied at this Intersection to reflect implementation of the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) *Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection. ItlMley)))Horn Page 141 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffir Imnart CtiAv Ki lleyvimiOf n Page 142 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd 5. Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Korman Ave at Campus Dr $k Cg�g� ]`0.7/242 tl 14 € c I 108/1314] Si 112/318 - 364/42y €€ A t - 3 184/2412-7/3S0 20/89 X6/e0 17/99 I € fmacm$ rz41'r1k_ 72 420/019 /2 21 1 4- r e/1 2/4 90/162- 5 f r j€ -123/01 3 2/3r-415/[49 Q9/13]9 R gg II,� 40�2y €1 NC F $ I sx%1o�--0 in 112�0w1257� a / C p\p 17-/471-a 47/87., r�i 3o% -i 1 09/a9� �F Campus Birch Karman 2Jamboree �'S Michelson Campus 7. Von Karman Ave at Birch St 8. Teller Ave at Birch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 4405 NB Ramp 10. Jamboree Rd at 1405 SB Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr c Tn x 4-114433 /fix >9 f y ~48,7 7� 44 02y S 1 94/210_..0 F' p�p� 4 2 26.Azs2 j y roe/4 4. INS ]-i I of 1R F1 779/627 -'. 1(y 1772/9a8 r ?p� 8 " ' 'E0 f l 1372/1403 J1 } r I EC. a_ s X497/1128 9. 4-350/274 r 101/71 I 444... 114/717 13 5 r 144x/1/87, a g_ L113/m 11 1 ~319/3/8 n i y r 370/239 84/194 s 47/2� F 23/12_ �^ .2F p I"3/"G_, 131 Spy `5 Birch Birch 1405 NB 1-405 BB �i ^ Michelson Campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 16. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayview Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr II p 7� IW/318/1- 1 f 27 8 X302/479 3j 11 1-J/11 f i it R-11.82/147 1�8y-a 1 1 1 Y R 1 7 r g s$ 67 1201/[1141 .J� T'T I �_ a X40/80 / 1 /6 i s 4�7h0 00/79- �y I p S "-170/136 9 1 f i Rr 1ZZJ�/240 � 6� 1 T 73/IQ7y ais i'v g1 1e0/97��F� p ;T2 �`.�R 14276/1aaa� 90/130 ^3 C$Q\ �`� 114/17-a iS , Birch Fairchild Bristol Bristol C Bayview jq EastbluR Unwersity 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St 1 1 y (-292/308 ~149/334 $S E S `� :-1233 18813 1 ~239/241 F eT y §gg E Y g I W/471 - 6 7 � .6 L it f "220//1 Y 1$� C F217 f y� ~-W/set 116 e11 I 4 e pp G� a 4-1487/1400 m ,r.39e/ies $Y 9 m � n i 15/1s,- 21h 16, C r 130/407 - 207 29, �� .- Campus Bristol - Bristol x d Mesa a Bristol Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI 3141/26a1 371/134-, C $ Bristol FIGURE 11 TPO ANALYSIS YEAR 2025 WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -43- LEGEN : Q Newport Beach Intersection Qx Irvine Intersection ®x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary xxiYY AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Tmffir Imnwrt Ctivly Page 144 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study CECIA requires that a Cumulative Conditions analysis be conducted. The Cumulative Conditions analysis includes traffic from Cumulative Projects in the vicinity of the project site. Cumulative Projects consist of the Committed Projects (approved projects in the City of Newport Beach), as well as other projects that are in various stages of the application and approval process but have not yet been approved. These projects are considered to be "reasonably foreseeable" projects and must therefore be analyzed for CEQA purposes. The Cumulative Projects list includes the projects identified by the City of Newport Beach as Committed Projects, plus pending projects in the City of Newport Beach, as well as approved and pending projects in the City of Irvine. A summary of Cumulative Projects is provided on Table 7. The location of the Cumulative Projects in relation to the project site is shown on Figure 12. Cumulative Projects information and data provided by the City of Newport Beach and the City of Irvine are provided in Appendix C. The CEQA Cumulative Conditions analysis was conducted for the following scenarios: ■ CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project ■ CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project Future Year Cumulative Conditions peak hour traffic volumes for the City of Newport Beach intersections were developed by adding an ambient growth rate of one percent per year to existing volumes on primary roadways and then adding peak hour traffic volumes from both the Committed and Cumulative Projects. For the City of Irvine intersections, City of Irvine transportation planning staff provided peak hour traffic forecasts from the Irvine Traffic Analysis Model (ITAM) which is maintained and operated by the City of Irvine. The ITAM forecasts include the effects of ambient traffic growth and traffic from Cumulative Projects; the ITAM forecasts are in Appendix C. ITAM forecasts represent year 2023 traffic volumes; therefore, City of Irvine staff recommended applying a growth factor of 2 percent per year to develop Year 2025 forecasts. The westbound approach at the intersection of Jamboree Road at Birch Street will be widened to one left -turn lane, one shared left -through lane, and a dedicated right -turn lane to account for the traffic generated by the UCI North Campus Child Health. The modified westbound approach was a recommended improvement in the UCI North Campus Child Health Traffic Study. CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project CECIA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project peak hour traffic volumes for all study intersections are shown on Figure 13. CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project intersection operations are summarized in Table 8. All study intersections are forecasted to operate at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours with the exception of the following: 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps: AM — LOS F; PM — LOS F 11. Jamboree Road at Michelson Drive: PM — LOS F KI le`!/>fflOrn Page 145 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study K' 'ey) orn Page 146 WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Table 7: Summary of Cumulative Projects City of Newport Beach Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study 1 Drive Shack Golf Driving Range 102 Driving 1,392 25 16 41 57 70 127 5 Newport Coast Mixed Residential 1,518 Position 14,778 413 932 1,345 926 557 1,483 2 Newport Airport Multi -family 225 Room 1,881 62 43 105 69 66 135 6 Village Housing (Mid -Rise) 329 DU 1,790 31 88 119 88 57 145 3 UCI North Campus Hospital (City of 150.000 KSF 1,461 150 24 174 28 145 173 7 Hospital Irvine) 350.000 KSF 3,752 212 100 312 109 231 340 8 UCI North Campus Medical -Dental N/A N/A 1 2,832 139 69 1 207 1 102 148 251 4 Child Health Office Building 168.000 KSF 5,846 364 103 467 163 418 581 Hotel 386 Room 3,227 107 74 181 118 113 231 10 Landmark General Office (City of Irvine) 448.000 KSF 4,364 447 73 520 82 433 515 5 Newport Coast Mixed Residential 1,518 DU 14,778 413 932 1,345 926 557 1,483 Fast -Food 225 Room 1,881 62 43 105 69 66 135 6 Westcliff Restaurant Restaurant w/out 11.953 KSF 4,002 180 120 300 101 102 203 drive-through 150.000 KSF 1,461 150 24 174 28 145 173 7 Garden Restaurant Quality Restaurant 10.987 KSF 971 6 2 8 55 29 84 8 Newport Village Mixed Use N/A N/A 1 2,832 139 69 1 207 1 102 148 251 9 Bayside Family Resort Hotel Hotel 275 Room 1,796 64 49 113 67 67 134 City of Irvine Hotel 386 Room 3,227 107 74 181 118 113 231 10 Landmark General Office r le * ®rn Page 147 Building 448.000 KSF 4,364 447 73 520 82 433 515 11 Trilogy Residential Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise) 876 DU 4,765 82 233 315 235 151 386 Hotel 225 Room 1,881 62 43 105 69 66 135 12 Banc & Office Hotel General Office Building 150.000 KSF 1,461 150 24 174 28 145 173 13 Park Place Office General Office Building Building 199.000 KSF 1,938 199 32 231 37 192 229 14 Towneplace Hotel Business Hotel 165 Occupied 838 49 43 92 41 33 74 Room 15 17850 Von Karman General Office Building 240.856 KSF 2,346 240 39 279 44 233 277 16 15 Degrees South Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise) 150 DU 816 14 40 54 40 26 66 17 2525 Main Street Multi -family Housing (Mid Rise) 272 DU 1,480 26 72 98 73 47 120 18 2055 Main Street Multi -family Housing (Mid Rise) 178 DU 968 17 47 64 48 31 79 19 Pistoia Apartments Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise) 371 DU 2,018 35 99 134 99 64 163 20 Milani Apartments Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise) 287 DU 1,561 27 76 103 77 49 126 Multi -family 21 Central Park West Housing (Mid Rise) 1,560 DU 8,486 147 415 562 418 268 686 Shopping Center 10.016 KSF 378 6 4 10 18 20 38 22 Main & Jamboree Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise) 288 DU 1,567 27 77 104 77 50 127 23 17821 Gillette Multi -family Housing (Mid -Rise) 39 DU 212 4 10 14 10 7 17 r le * ®rn Page 147 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Table 7: Summary of Cumulative Projects Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study 24 17811 Gillette Multi -family 44 DU 239 4 12 16 12 8 20 Housing (Mid -.Rise) 25 17822 Gillette Multi -family 137 DU 745 13 36 49 37 24 61 Housing (Mid -Rise) 26 360 Fusion Multi -family 280 DU 1,523 26 74 100 75 48 123 Housing (Mid -Rise) 27 2602 McGaw Multi -family 120 DU 653 11 32 43 32 21 53 Housing (Mid -Rise) Total Project Trips 78,625 3,127 1 3,034 6,160 3,338 3,708 7,047 DU = Dwelling Unit, KSF =1,000 square feet, KI ley))) ®rn Page 148 F LOCATION OF CUMULATIVE PROJECTS -49- Kimley»>Horn WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Kimley)))Horn Page 150 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Karmen Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd 5. Von Karmen Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr Fi cycs tx/20 11x/318 -+J�T 3 /!—+ 77/61I z az98o//ee9° 32/104-1 17/9e aVrm teS i1f a r(-n7e/mt7 464/272 428/1155 tae/01- �r ts%eti 1d _Lr{-3!3le6//{67zz{ 181/206 a 1 T�r 277/44ey 43/82-+ j€ rt151/147R21/220 423//777no a!/7o i Ct72/141-+ 398/2QmF e02/70 59/0"', 5117/393 1132 a!/II r b Campus Birch K Jamboree Michelson Campus 7. Von Karman Ave at Birch St 8. Teller Ave at Birch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 1405 NB Ramp 10. Jamboree Rd at 1.405 SB Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr 8 FES 1 ` a (—�135[ioe >° Y b/l{ _ A p 1Y 4-ziaLxn ~ 11 L BV+ �� B� ^ 777/672 A I�+ j i r 103/072 s E I i g B g L673/1155 11� i L r 34 B X143/278 1' 400 Y r //2T3 Rr 272/215-+ 1 1 f Rr 1640/303-+ 1 T f T f II90/1710 a 1 r zei/7ee a 5 1 r x20/736—+ 130/2e3 s 5 1 r !4/x0 m ' g 20/7, Ci IAC lae7/11 xe� a7/120.y =� axe/615-+ 1Z'/215 pppg��� BinhBirch I-005 NB E I-405 SB Michelson & F n Campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 16. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayview Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr 1:4 a a "1 /23a18 y r 67/374 "7/442 37/IOy S T r g g g rjT7 1 -74eZn 4 y rr 2S/i 6e�y 1 T f 1f 11�� r� 1 1 r yi' 10.N/8e7y T r F 1m X40 eo i y —12/20 /79 lte3/10y 1 T r p R_ 1_ r`177/177 i ::.117 f y 2R{�'47 1 r e!/16a-y g n 1ez/°!.y S � 1427/106!--+ $ tro/We, ryg- Cn g I0.7/°Oy 44/2t, s Bimh �1=g d Fairchiq A Brstcl F Bristol g Bayviav 2Cgg Easthlue 3 Unirersey 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine at Mesa Ave Dr 23. Bristol St St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St FA 1�3e/2oo r7 1 4-4°7/677 f l 4 rt°t/316 S$� '�2a/m 1^ 4-188[ 2 y r602120 x4x1= 5cE+ q 1g d d L g $Y d 1 S, /30 141/!92 "L-210/128 i i r 1 218 rt i Y r1 y t r 7//x140-+ Trf le6s8x4//l4o828oy T II : f 755/258—i f�01/390 144//40 x T r , 6r� -+a 7/6914 1251/1182-+ cp 217/123 c\ Campus Bristol Bristol Mesa Bristol Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI s; � 3306/2703-+ 7r 371/134 3` Blstol . FIGURE 13 CEQA ANALYSIS YEAR 2025 WITHOUT PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 51- LEG.EN : Q Newport Beach Intersection Qx Irvine Intersection ®x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary xxny AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Trnffir 1--+ C*..A, rumey mmunj Page 152 WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study Table 8: Intersection Operation - CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project Conditions AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour .' intersection ICU/flay LOs ICU/Delay... LQS ; ................. _...... 1 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr* 0.667 B 0.959 E 2 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 0.401 A 0.583 A 3 MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 0.572 A 0.572 A 4 MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd* 0.723 C 0.837 D 5 Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr* 0.676 B 0.785 C 6 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr* 0.740 C 0.860 D 7 Von Karman Ave at Birch St 0.337 A 0.435 A 8 Teller Ave at Birch St (unsignalized) 12.5 B 14.2 B 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps* 0.828 D 0.922 E 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps* 1.060 I" 1.013 11 Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr* 0.823 D 1.050 I' 12 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr* 0.808 D 0.811 D 13 Jamboree Rd at Birch St* 0.728 C 0.899 D 14 Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Dr* 0.776 C 0.548 A 15 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 0.440 A 0.590 A 16 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 0.734 C 0.715 C 17 Jamboree Rd at Bayview Way 0.473 A 0.491 A 18 Jamboree Rd at University Dr 0.675 B 0.601 B 19 University Dr at Campus Dr i 0.871 D 0.853 D 20 Bristol St N at Campus Dr 0.581 A 0.737 C 21 Bristol St S at Irvine Ave / Campus Dr 0.691 B 0.560 A 22 Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 0.507 A 0.669 B 23 Birch St at Bristol St N 0.694 B 0.632 B 24 Birch St at Bristol St S 0.496 A 0.507 A 25 Bayview PI at Bristol St S 0.551 A 0.539 A Note: - Bold values indicate intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service - Intersection operation is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for signalized intersections, and average delay for unsignalized intersections. - Delay values for unsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach. * Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection. ' A 5% capacity credit is applied at this intersection to reflect implementation of the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project In this scenario, project -related peak hour traffic volumes were added to the CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project traffic volumes. The resulting CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project peak hour volumes are shown on Figure 14, and the resulting intersection operations are summarized on Table 9. The following intersections would continue to operate at a deficient Level of Service under CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project conditions: 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps: AM - LOS F; PM - LOS F 11. Jamboree Road at Michelson Drive: PM - LOS F Based on the significance criteria set forth in this traffic study, the Project's incremental increase does not exceed the significance threshold at the deficient intersections and would not result in a significant impact with the addition of project trips. All other intersections would operate at an acceptable Level of Service in both peak hours. I ley* orn Page 153 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study K! ley))) orn Page 154 1. MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr 2. MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 3. MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 4. MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd 5. Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr 6. Von Kerman Ave at Campus Dr g�r�r�gC R d if 1 y €€ 5 "-911/107 E 4-427/t1eY -101/149 it€ S g "-108/237 i 4-t4o/529 y 4-27 09 11"-/3111 a 1 4. r Saa/JO7� 1 77/51 CCS €@ �t S S "-x0/110 ��eija24 r 2/1 a .Jr I r 72 41...) y 32/194-1gc ^ "-20.5/259 i 1 F11e1/ts20 Y L t4- ue/13135 -a - 1 r 14301133...9 1911/Ott As € FCi $ "-3011/422 s3e/57d > 1 1 1 Il./ ,( .y y .}I Bi/2Dx 151/209 5 5 1 r 2]]/NBy u/e2� ��� •_ € 6 "-151/147 4-42 /7137 /70 395/247 ti t r e02/7ax-a y 59/95� �l;C 537/303 a 1132//307 e5/114.y 5} r I �6 �g Campus 3 Birch s ^VXon Kaman ^Co Jamboree Michelson Campus 7. Von Karmen Ave at Birch St 8. TelAve at B(rch St 9. Jamboree Rd at 1.405 NB Ramp 10. Jamboree Rd at I-005 SB Ramp 11. Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr 12. Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr 1_1'x 4-150/7/]19 > i 4 -48/15 237/210-9 r y\�1 1-�7! 290 ~ S 1 4-40.9/4 177//7]Iely 5 1 ^ IFIi "-737/572 i i 4-,357/985 f r II p f i 1190/1310 .a � r $ 4-549 J 4 4-M9/418 201% 011 - 5 � r ygp♦ 1^„ 4-]43/278 4 00 J i. 4-372/225 132/2134 -a r� � r 57/29 � 5 �+r xih2'y ^\ $ 10e7/1125� C $7/120." r4 i /ie'!, ` Birch such $�$i I7 �I405 NB ��I-d055B Michelson �n Campus 13. Jamboree Rd at Birch St 14. Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Rd 15. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 16. Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 17. Jamboree Rd at Bayview Wy 18. Jamboree Rd at University Dr q! C�{C �'• 1 1 1 y i y g -./2. f -/]e 9• r 97/374 @ if 1x �313Z1t s$ J L .21/ ::X2 90/DS JI 10/4-a114- 102/95 S�R SR g .S F �. 5?r �$ C 9 g -� 1]0 s 00�tr 0702//ee1313]y ?r 1427/IOW.S a a �` 1m x'40L00 9 1 L (--3/O -12/20 � �ti7r 90/1313 Blyi ,�$� CC 8 E p 10 $ "-173/137 -9 4-147/111 - 724/2p 14 w/210J'�?r µ 7-'9 g /2Z�i7 x22/u 3^5ly- 09 ny� $� Birch q , Fairchild R3,dg A Bristol F Bristol Bayview Eastblu5 UnNemiry 19. University Dr at Campus Dr 20. Bristol St N at Campus Dr 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St Sg r & � -./200 7 4-{43/537 f b Ir �^41.9t/3t9 91/350 Jr t 1 r 422/099-9 1 g E 4_,300f213, 4-252 z90 3/14.)4- r� 7/20--9 r �p E 7 g .l i 995/471 Jr 1852/1020-9 r aT 1 4_25/23) i y -142/503 144/10 a 210/71-9 f r "-- r� f-;'Sb/'1309 7 1 4-3911/jµ 1 3'9-9 1 T r f-7 9 j 4� r4� �rrr...r 232/114y s$ qqf 104/005 \ 120/170y / 1251/1182 217/123 =p Campus ��� Bristol S Bristol Mesa Bristol` Bristol 25. Bristol St S .,Bristol PI 3]74/277, 371/134- C 8 Bristol FIGURE 14 CEQA ANALYSIS YEAR 2025 WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -55- LEGEND: Q Newport Beach intersection Qx Irvine Intersection Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary XXIYY AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman ImI I ney "r a'v" I Page 156 WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Table 9: Intersection Operation - CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project Conditions AM,Peak'Hour. PM Peak Hour; Without Piroject With Project Without Project With Project ICUj Change Sig ICUj ICUj Change Sig Int. #• #ntersection ICUj Delay LOS Delay L05 Dela..y Impact? .11 DI'lle.."l I LOS !: Delay Impact? 1 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr* 0.667 B 0.669 B 0.002 No 0.959 E 0.961 E 0.002 No 2 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 0.401 A 0.410 A 0.009 No 0.583 A 0.587 A 0.004 No 3 MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 0.572 A 0.582 A 0.010 No 0.572 A 0.575 A 0.003 No 4 MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd* 0.723 C 0.725 C 0.002 No 0.837 D 0.842 D 0.005 No 5 Von Karman Ave at Michelson Dr* 0.676 B 0.678 B 0.002 No 0.785 C 0.786 C 0.001 No 6 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr* 0.740 C 0.741 C 0.001 No 0.860 D 0.861 D 0.001 No 7 Von Karman Ave at Birch St 0.337 A 0.331 A -0.006 No 0.435 A 0.443 A 0.008 No 8 Teller Ave at Birch St (unsignalized) 12.5 B 13.0 B 0.5 No 14.2 B 15.7 C 1.5 No 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps* 0.828 D 0.829 D 0.001 No 0.922 E 0.925 E 0.003 No 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps* 1.060F 1.061 F „ 0.001 No 1.013 F 1.014 F " 0.001 No 11 Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr* 0.823 D 0.826 D 0.003 No 1.050 i« ;.: 1.052 0.002 No 12 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr* 0.808 D 0.809 D 0.001 No 0.811 D 0.814 D 0.003 No 13 Jamboree Rd at Birch St* 0.728 C 0.732 C 0.004 No 0.899 D 0.902 D 0.003 No 14 Jamboree Rd at Fairchild Dr* 0.776 C 0.777 C 0.001 No 0.548 A 0.549 A 0.001 No 15 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 0.440 A 0.441 A 0.001 No 0.590 A 0.592 A 0.002 No 16 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 0.734 C 0.736 C 0.002 No 0.715 C 0.719 C 0.004 No 17 Jamboree Rd at Bayview Way 0.473 A 0.474 A 0.001 No 0.491 A 0.492 A 0.001 No 18 Jamboree Rd at University Dr 0.675 B 0.677 B 0.002 No 0.601 B 0.603 B 0.002 No 19 University Dr at Campus Dr 1 0.871 D 0.871 D 0.000 No 0.853 D 0.853 D 0.000 No 20 Bristol St N at Campus Dr 0.581 A 0.585 A 0.004 No 0.737 C 0.738 C 0.001 No 21 Bristol St S at Irvine Ave / Campus Dr 0.691 B 0.691 B 0.000 No 0.560 A 0.560 A 0.000 No 22 Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 0.507 A 0.508 A 0.001 No 0.669 B 0.669 B 0.000 No 23 Birch St at Bristol St N 0.694 B 0.696 B 1 0.002 No 0.632 B 0.634 B 0.002 No 24 Birch St at Bristol St S 0.496 A 0.496 A 0.000 No 1 0.507 A 0.508 A 0.001 No 25 Bayview PI at Bristol St S 0.551 A 0.552 A I 0.001_1 No 1 0.539 A 1 0.541 A 0.002 No Notes: - Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service Intersection operation is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for signalized intersections, and average delay for unsignalized intersections. Delay values for unsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach. * Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection. A 5% capacity credit is applied at this intersection to reflect implementation of the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) KlM1eYVHorn Page 157 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Trmffir 1--+ C+.,rh, rummy»lr um Page 158 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 8 GENERAL PLAN COMPARISON A comparison analysis has been conducted to determine whether the proposed Residences at 4400 Von Karman ("Project") would result in any new or substantially more significant environmental impacts as compared to the conclusions discussed in the City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study (March 2006). The project is located in traffic analysis zone (TAZ)1405 of the Newport Beach Traffic Model (NBTM), used in the 2006 General Plan traffic analysis. The NBTM TAZ 1405 consists of 128 Apartment units, 128,610 square feet of general commercial and 695,157 square feet of office. The "Residences at 4400 Von Karman" project proposes 312 apartment units. To provide a conservative analysis, the traffic from the additional 184 units (312 units -128 units) were added on to Post -2030 General Plan Buildout traffic to determine 2030 General Plan Buildout With Project traffic. The following study scenarios were analyzed for the comparison analysis: ■ Post -2030 General Plan Buildout 1 ■ Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project 2 'This scenario assumes the following quantities for NBTM TAZ 1405, where the project site is located: 128 apartment units, 128,610 square feet of general commercial use, and 695,137 square feet of office use z This "With Project" scenario assumes an additional 184 dwelling units (delta) to NBTM TAZ 1405, for a total of 312 dwelling units, as proposed by the Project. The Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project ICU was compared with the Post -2030 General Plan Buildout ICU at the following study intersections analyzed in the 2006 General Plan Transportation Study: 1 MacArthur Boulevard at Campus Drive 2 MacArthur Boulevard at Birch Street 3 MacArthur Boulevard at Von Karman Avenue 4 MacArthur Boulevard at Jamboree Road 6 Von Karman Avenue at Campus Drive 12 Jamboree Road at Campus Drive 13 Jamboree Road at Birch Street 15 Jamboree Road at Bristol Street N 16 Jamboree Road at Bristol Street S 17 Jamboree Road at Bayview Way 18 Jamboree Road at University Drive 20 Bristol Street N at Campus Drive 21 Bristol Street S at Irvine Avenue / Campus Drive 22 Irvine Avenue at Mesa Drive 23 Birch Street at Bristol Street N 24 Birch Street at Bristol Street S 25 Bayview Place at Bristol Street S KlmlepMorn Page 159 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Daily, morning peak hour, and evening peak hour trip generation estimates for the proposed Project are shown on Table 10. The Project (184 additional units) would generate approximately 1,001 daily trips, with 66 morning peak hour trips (17 inbound and 49 outbound) and 81 evening peak hour trips (49 inbound and 32 outbound). Table 10: Summary of Delta Project Trip Generation Trip Generation Rates 1, AM'Peak Hour. PM Peak.Hour Land Use ITE Cade :Unit Daily Ln, Out" Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 221 DU 5.44 0.094 0.266 0.36 0.268 0.172 0.44 Trip Generation Estimates AM Peak Hour. .' PM Peak.Hour. Land Use Quantity Uinit Daily (n. Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 2 184 DU 1,001 17 49 66 49 32 81 Total Delta Project Trips 1,001 17 49 66 49 32 81 1 Source; Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition z This "With Project" scenario assumes an additional 184 dwelling units (delta) to NBTM TAZ 1405, for a total of 312 dwelling units, as proposed by the Project. The Post -2030 General Plan Buildout and Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project volumes are shown on Figure 15 and Figure 16, respectively. Excerpts from the 2006 General Plan Transportation Study are provided in Appendix H. The results of the Post -2030 General Plan Buildout Plus Project ICU compared to the Post -2030 General Plan Buildout ICU shown in the General Plan Transportation Study and are shown on Table 11. Based on this comparison, the proposed Project would not result in any new traffic related impacts compared to those identified in the 2006 City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study. The proposed Project would not result in a significant Project impact at the study locations; therefore, no mitigation measures at the study locations are required. KimlepMorn Page 160 1. MacArthur Blvd 2. MacArthur Blvd 3. MacArthur Blvd 4. MacArthur Blvd 5. Von Karman Ave 6. Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr at Birch St at Von Karman Ave at Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr at Campus Dr �tiR @@ 710/46o.a 670/480—s 1 ? r 6070 $ $ @@ $ $L �_rM/110 4—,a/2,°o �° 14a a 170%270—a i g? mh00-, R CRCCRL rL�ttxa//1et°0 670/2 a 1766/1a460 tig ? 180 /70y CCpEp NOT ANALYZED FOR THIS SCENARIO f [G$ tao/t400a t.m> a° 20- ti ? s/10r m/7°� $ R no/aso a 220/700 zoohioy T r $ 9�� $ 8 Campus Birch =Von Karman F e Jamb.. Michelson 3g� d Campus 7. Von Karman Ave S. Teller Ave 9. Jamboree Rd 10. Jamboree Rd 11. Jamboree Rd 12. Jamboree Rd at Birch St at Birch St at 1405 NB Ramp at 1-405 SB Ramp at Michelson Dr at Campus Dr 8 8 E NOT ANALYZED ' NOT ANALYZED NOT ANALYZED NOT ANALYZED NOT ANALYZED f j L t170/b30 --i ri°'0ao/xo FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO �pro,0 a z/~ ti T r $ R C Birch Birch 1405 NB 1405 SB Michelson 8 C ' I A Campus 13. Jamboree Rd 14. Jamboree Rd 15. Jamboree Rd 16. Jamboree Rd 17. Jamboree Rd 18. Jamboree Rd at Birch St at Fairchild Rd at Bristol St N at Bristol St S at Bayview Wy at University Dr p@ g 1 C -,170/,° 9, 4 4-76/60 r80/40 @ 1 � NOT ANALYZED CC E s f ''; I .9 G`t $ o -60/140 4-10/10 f j ,r10/40 15 L,76/2,6 � 4—,tomo f L-340/540 2p/660 aFOR ao/x� 5 T r THIS SCENARIO ? 2160/1160 -s a7o/,aoo� T r 40 .a toho� 5 T 510/2W — 12ort°� 5 1 r 10/420 8 ggp f? ,0x0/10,0, ,0/170, S$$ 10/10, SH Birch Fairchild g' Bristol 8$ F Bristol 4 Bayview Eastblu° University 19. University Dr 20. Bristol St N 21. Bristol St S 22. Irvine Ave 23. Bristol St N 24. Bristol St S at Campus Dr at Campus Dr at Campus Dr at Mesa Dr at Birch St at Birch St F NOT ANALYZED E 260/140 =80-610.%40030 E e `g'�L1o/10 z� e �e2°/leo m r iso 17s° $ Q m j FOR THIS SCENARIO 1670/iso a T r a t690/1420��mo/8o� 340/90 a 5 T r ti T aso/3eo a T r lxao/1wo� i T C 670/83oy �` Co 40/220y � $(pqq a 210/1- Campus Bristol Bristol Mesa Bristol 1 Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayvlew PI 3650/3310—► 8r 120/1. C $ Bastol FIGURE 15 POST -2030 GENERAL PLAN BUILD -OUT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -61- LEGE�IQ: Q Newport Beach Intersection Qx Irvine Intersection ®x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary xxm AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv Page 162 1. MacArthur Blvd 2. MacArthur Blvd 3. MacArthur Blvd 4. MacArthur Blvd 5. Von Karman Ave 6. Von Kerman Ave at Campus Dr at Birch St at Von Karman Ave at Jamboree Rd at Michelson Dr at Campus Dr gg r� q8 fN jifi AL 0 gg S is 0 0!0 f046 3 j L rm $ e�04 fre1/e7 jL OR � ^rRiZ j„72Ha0 f l r�2,/p2{ 3> NOT ANALYZED ffi01 reo �5 720/5300 a titr 1roo/7ao� 710/uo 1 972/{61 titr a/140 a qtr 572/20 .a qtr ne160/70 FOR THIS SCENARIO 3�e�w �, qtr Zoo/teo� R�g eo/ro� 8$S 60/27o-. eo/too.y R� � 190/70 x]00 750-1/70—a y R�R �gR — Campus g�4 ' Birch R�A ^'=Von Kerman - mboree Michelson Campus 7. Von Karman Ave 8. Teller Ave 9. Jamboree Rd 10. Jamboree Rd 11. Jamboree Rd 12. Jamboree Rd at Birch St at Birch St at 1405 NB Ramp at 1405 SB Ramp at Michelson Dr at Campus Dr A EB E E E E11 R �11 E NOT ANALYZED NOT ANALYZED NOT ANALYZED NOT ANALYZED 4 NOT ANALYZED f j rem FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIO FOR THIS SCENARIOleo/sw-1 ze1/e11 �, ter 30/30 S I Birch Birch 1-405 NS 1-405 SB Michelson 8�g ^ 1 3 Campus 13. Jamboree Rd 14. Jamboree Rd 15. Jamboree Rd 16. Jamboree Rd 17. Jamboree Rd 18. Jamboree Rd at Birch St at Fairchild Rd at Bristol St N at Bristol St S at Bayview Wy at University Dr s \ � -170110 E 4-700 eo ,rao/50 NOT ANALYZED l 33 f-10/10 a g� s` $ � o _ _ _ '`60/140 -a f j r1o/4o s t L R no/210 =° :—Ilo/tto f j �, ae9 aee.a R / 1 t r ao/3o—. FOR THIS SCENARIO ■ 1 t 21,3/1159 t r 0700/t000y 40� - t r to//110y ,r3w/34o ,10/200 — 1 t r 120/110—� r 1e/12,� 1020/1010 = 10/170.y g $ 10/10 Y Birch Fairchild H Bristol F Bristol Bayview $ EastbluR University 19. University Dr at Campus Or 20. Bristol St N at Campus Or 21. Bristol St S at Campus Dr 22. Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 23. Bristol St N at Birch St 24. Bristol St S at Birch St NOT ANALYZED E 70 `xou/&2ee6� 3t5/sro j L i g' g 8 e 4 "o f j rn1 No /at y_ a m 620/150 `e FOR THIS SCENARIO 1 t 300/80 a 1 t r 3to//88o� , r I 550/380 Jr t r 1200/1490—+o 1371/552 1500/1420.-.i t r p x 670/630 ^ — 40/'120 904 Y Y 210/1305r Campus Bristol Bristol sF` Mesa ii Bristol if Bristol 25. Bristol St S at Bayview PI 3633/3315—♦, 120/10 Bristol FIGURE 16 POST -2030 GENERAL PLAN BUILD -OUT WITH PROJECT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES -63- Q Newport Beach Intersection Q Irvine Intersection �x Caltrans Intersection ---- City Boundary xxfYY AM/PM Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv KimlepMorn Page 164 WORKING DRAFT -NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach Table 11: Intersection Operation - Post -2030 General Plan Buildout With Project Conditions Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study 1 1 MacArthur Blvd at Campus Dr* 0.81 D 0.81 D 0.00 No 1.24 F 1.24 I" ; 0.00 No 2 MacArthur Blvd at Birch St 0.79 C 0.80 C 0.01 No 0.90 D 0.90 D 0.00 No 3 MacArthur Blvd at Von Karman Ave 0.54 A 0.54 A 0.00 No 0.65 B 0.65 B 0.00 No 4 MacArthur Blvd at Jamboree Rd* 0.93 E 0.94 E 0.01 No 1.02 z , 1.02 i" , 0.00 No 6 Von Karman Ave at Campus Dr* 0.73 C 0.73 C 0.00 No 0.97 E 0.97 E 0.00 No 12 Jamboree Rd at Campus Dr* 0.93 E 0.93 E 0.00 No 1.18 t* 1.18 I" : i 0.00 No 13 Jamboree Rd at Birch St* 1.00 F ,• :. 1.01 is °, 0.01 No 0.83 D 0.84 D 0.01 No 15 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St N 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.00 No 0.67 B 0.67 B 0.00 No 16 Jamboree Rd at Bristol St S 0.94„ 0.94 0.00 No 0.87 D 0.87 D 0.00 No 17 Jamboree Rd at Bayview Way 0.45 A 0.45 A 0.00 No 0.66 B 0.66 B 0.00 No 18 Jamboree Rd at University Dr 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.00 No 0.67 B 0.67 B 0.00 No 20 Bristol St N at Campus Dr 1.02 1.03 F 0.01 No 1.06 1.06 F 0.00 No 21 Bristol St S at Irvine Ave / Campus Dr 0.89 D 0.89 D 0.00 No 0.77 C 0.78 C 0.01 No 22 Irvine Ave at Mesa Dr 0.98 E z 0.98 Ew 0.00 No 1.19 F 1.19 F 0.00 No 23 Birch St at Bristol St N 0.92 h a ........... 0.92 1= ::..;. 0.00 No 0.81 D 0.81 D 0.00 No 24 Birch St at Bristol St S 0.55 A 0.55 A 0.00 No 0.54 A 0.54 A 0.00 No 25 Bayview PI at Bristol St S 0.60 A 0.60 A 0.00 No 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.00 No Notes: Bold and shaded values indicate intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service - Intersection operation is expressed in volume -to -capacity (v/c) ratio for signalized intersections, and average delay for unsignalized intersections. Delay values for unsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach. * Level of Service E is acceptable at this intersection. A 5% capacity credit is applied at this intersection to reflect implementation of the Advanced Transportation Management System (ATMS) 25ource: 2006 General Plan Transportation Study. Excerpts are provided in Appendix H ofthis report. 3 This scenario assumes the following uses for NBTM TAZ 1405, where the project site is located: 128 apartment units, 128,610 square feet of general commercial use and 695,137 square feet of office use 4 This "With Project" scenario assumes an additional 184 dwelling units (delta), for a total of 312 dwelling units, as proposed by the Project. Ki ley>»Horn Page 165 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv Kimleylftrn Page 166 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study 9 OTHER ISSUES 9.1 ANALYSIS OF INTERSTATE HIGHWAY FACILITIES Intersections on Interstate Highway Facilities Intersections on Interstate Highway facilities, which are controlled by Caltrans, are also analyzed using the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology, as required by the Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (State of California Department of Transportation, December 2002). In the vicinity of the project, the 1-405 and SR -73 freeways are Caltrans facilities. Therefore, the following study were analyzed using the HCM intersection analysis methodology: 9. Jamboree Road at 1-405 NB Ramps 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps The HCM methodology measures average seconds of delay per vehicle based on a number of technical parameters, such as peak hourly traffic volumes, number of lanes, type of signal operation, signal timing, and signal phasing in the calculations. A description of each Level of Service, based on delay parameters, per the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) is provided in the chart on the following page. For State-controlled intersections, Level of Service standards and impact criteria specified by Caltrans will apply. The Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies states that "Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target Level of Service at the transition between LOS C and LOS D on State highway facilities. If an existing Interstate highway facility is operating at less than the target LOS, the existing Level of Service is to be maintained." The Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies does not establish a threshold of significance for Interstate Highway intersections. This traffic analysis uses the following traffic threshold of significance: A significant project impact occurs at an Interstate Highway study intersection when the addition of project -generated trips causes the peak hour level of service of the study intersection to change from acceptable operation (LOS A, B, or C) to deficient operation (LOS D, E, or F). lmlep ®rn Page 167 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Study LOS A describes operations with a control delay of 10 seconds per vehicle or less and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned A :510 when the volume -to -capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable, or the cycle length is very short. If it is due to favorable progression, most vehicles arrive during the green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. LOS B describes operations with control delay between 10 and 20 seconds per vehicle and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically B > 10 and _< 20 assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is low and either progression is exceptionally favorable, or the cycle length is short. More vehicles stop than with LOS A. LOS C describes operations with control delay between 20 and 35 seconds per vehicle and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the progression is favorable, and the cycle length is moderate. C > 20 and <_ 35 Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear at this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. LOS D describes operations with control delay between 35 and 55 seconds per vehicle and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically D > 35 and _< 55 assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either progression is ineffective, or the cycle length is long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. LOS E describes operations with control delay between 55 and 80 seconds per E > 55 and _< 80 vehicle and a volume -to -capacity ratio no greater than 1.0. This level is typically assigned when the volume -to -capacity ratio is high, progression is unfavorable, and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 6t" Edition Kimley*Horn Page 168 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Peak hour intersection analysis was conducted using the HCM methodology for the following Interstate Highway study intersections: 9. Jamboree Road at 1-405 NB Ramps 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 SB Ramps Intersection analysis worksheets for all HCM analysis of Interstate Highway intersections are provided in Appendix E. Existing Conditions Existing peak hour intersection operations for the Interstate Highway study intersections are summarized on Table 11. Each of the Interstate Highway study intersections currently operates at an acceptable Level of Service using the HCM delay analysis methodology. CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project peak hour operation for the Interstate Highway study intersections are summarized on Table 11, previously referenced. The intersection of Jamboree Road at the 1-405 Southbound Ramps would operate at LOS D in the morning peak hour under CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project conditions. CEO.A Analysis Year 2025 With Project CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project peak hour operation for the Interstate Highway study intersections are summarized on Table 11, previously referenced. With the addition of project traffic, the intersection of Jamboree Road at the 1-405 Southbound Ramps would continue to operate at LOS D in the morning peak hour. The project traffic would not cause the Level of Service at this intersection to worsen, and therefore would not result in a significant impact. The intersection of Jamboree Road at the 1-405 Northbound Ramps would continue to operate at an acceptable Level of Service. Table 12: Summary of Interstate Highway Intersection Operations AM Peak Houir PM Peak Hour Intersection ©elay LOS Delay Las: Existing Conditions 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps 18.3 B 10.9 B 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps 25.6 C 20.9 C CEQA Analysis Year 2025 Without Project 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps 19.5 B 13.7 B 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps 54.0 p s= 22.9 C CEQA Analysis Year 2025 With Project 9 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 NB Ramps 19.5 1 B 1 13.9 B 10 Jamboree Rd at 1-405 SB Ramps 54.2 Lld ......_ ; 23.0 C Note: - Bold values indicate intersections operating at an unacceptable Level of Service - Delay values for unsignalized intersections represent the average vehicle delay on the worst (highest delay) intersection approach. Kimley»> or Page 169 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study The Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) was established in 1991, to reduce traffic congestion and to provide a mechanism for coordinating land use and development decisions. Compliance with CMP requirements ensures a city's eligibility, to compete for State gas tax funds for local transportation projects. A copy of the County of Orange CMP Highway System is provided in Appendix F. Within the project study area, the CMP Highway System includes two arterials: Jamboree Road north of MacArthur Boulevard, and MacArthur Boulevard south of Jamboree Road. CMP intersections in the vicinity of the Project consist of: 4. MacArthur Boulevard at Jamboree Road 9. Jamboree Road at 1-405 Northbound Ramps 10. Jamboree Road at 1-405 Southbound Ramps The Orange County CMP states that "a TIA will be required for CMP purposes for all proposed developments generating 2,400 or more daily trips," and that "for developments which will directly access a CMP Highway System link, the threshold for requiring a TIA should be reduced to 1,600 or more trips per day. The Project is estimated to generate approximately 1,697 daily trips but does not directly access a CMP Highway System Link. Base on CMP criteria, a separate CMP analysis is not required of the Project. 9.3 SITE ACCESS AND SITE CIRCULATION Vehicular access to Koll Center Newport is currently provided by three driveways on Birch Street, and two driveways on Von Karman Avenue. Cross access throughout the site currently allows drivers to access any parking area within Koll Center Newport from any of the site driveways. All driveways are unsignalized and gated. Drivers access the site either by a key card or by pressing the button and pulling a parking ticket. To exit the site, key card users use their card to raise the gate. Visitors must insert a validated ticket or pay at the gate in order to exit. For discussion purposes, the driveways have been numbered 1 through 5, as shown on Figure 17. The following provides a brief description of each of the existing driveways. Existing Driveway 1: The westernmost driveway on Birch Street is located approximately 300 feet east of Von Karman Avenue, and is a full -movement driveway. It is 30 feet wide and provides one inbound lane and one outbound lane. The entry gate on Driveway 1 is set back approximately 95 feet from Birch Street. This driveway leads directly to a surface parking area at the north end of the Koll Center Newport site. Existing Driveway 2: The middle driveway on Birch Street is located approximately 600 feet east of Von Karman Avenue, and is a full -movement driveway. It is 36 feet wide, and provides one inbound lane and one outbound lane, with a narrow, raised median. The entry gate is set back approximately 165 feet from Birch Street. This driveway intersects with the spine street that runs through the Koll Center Newport site and connects Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street in an east -west orientation. Kimley))> orn Page 170 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Existing Driveway 3: The eastern driveway on Birch Street is located approximately 1,100 feet east of Von Karman Avenue and approximately 750 feet west of Jamboree Road and is a full -movement driveway. It is 36 feet wide and provides one inbound lane and one outbound lane. Driveway 3 is connected to Teller Avenue. This driveway connects in a T -intersection to the spine street approximately 85 feet from Birch Street. Entry gates are located on the main spine street, approximately 50 feet to the west, and approximately 100 feet to the east of the T -intersection. Existing Driveway 4: The northern driveway on Von Karman Avenue is located approximately 350 feet south of Birch Street and is an exit -only driveway. It is approximately 15 feet wide, and provides one outbound lane only, from which drivers can make both left and right turns. Existing Driveway 5: The southern driveway on Von Karman Avenue is located approximately 900 feet south of Birch Street and is a full -movement driveway. It is 36 feet wide and provides one inbound and one outbound lane. The entry gate is set back approximately 90 feet from Von Karman Avenue. This driveway is the western end of the spine street that connects Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street in an east -west orientation. As part of the proposed Project, the five existing site driveways for Koll Center Newport will remain in their current locations, with several changes to the access provisions for the site, as follows: ■ The main drive aisle that runs from Von Karman Avenue to Birch Street will become an open - access internal street through the site. All gates to the Koll Center Newport parking areas and to the new residential buildings will be located off the internal street. ■ A free-standing parking structure will be constructed prior to construction of the residential building. This parking structure will be provided for office users because of surface parking removed as a part of the Project. When completed, the parking structure will provide 275 spaces for office uses. ■ Access to the residential parking will be via a gated entrance directly off the spine street, which will be accessible from Driveways 2, 3, and 5. The following addresses any changes proposed as a part of the Project: Driveway 1 With Project: No changes are proposed for Driveway 1. However, as a part of the Project, office parking displaced by the Project would be provided in the residential building's parking structure, in a new, free-standing parking structure, and in surface parking areas. An entry to the residential parking structure for office parking would be provided near the 4910 Birch Street office building using this driveway. Driveway 2 With Project: The entry gate on Driveway 2 will be removed. A gated entry to the residential portion of the residential development parking structure will be provided off Driveway 2. Drivers entering Driveway 2 will be able to access all parking areas of Koll Center Newport, except the surface parking areas immediately accessed by Driveway 1. Driveway 2 will be reconfigured to provide one inbound lane and two outbound lanes, with one left -turn and one right -turn lane. imlep orn Page 171 FIGURE 17 EXISTING SITE ACCESS NOT To SCALE _72_ Kimley»)Horn WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION City of Newport Beach This Page Intentionally Left Blank Residences at 4400 Von Karman Traffic Impact Studv Kimlep Horn Page 173 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Driveway 3 With Project: The Koll Center Newport entry gates on the main drive aisle on either side of Driveway 3 will be removed. A new office parking gate for the parking areas to the east of the driveway will be provided approximately 80 feet to the southeast. Drivers entering Driveway 3 will be able to access all parking areas of Koll Center Newport, except the surface parking areas immediately accessed by Driveway 1.. Driveway 4 With Project: Driveway 4 will remain an exit -only driveway and will be accessible only from the surface parking areas immediately accessed by Driveway 1. Outbound movements will be restricted to right turns only. Driveway 5 With Project: The entry gate on Driveway 5 will be removed. A new office parking gate for the parking areas to the east of the driveway will be provided on the first intersecting drive aisle. Driveway 5 will be reconfigured to provide one inbound lane and two outbound lanes, with one left -turn and one right -turn lane. Construction of the proposed Project would add construction -related trips to and from the site during construction activities. These trips are associated with construction activities, including construction workers, grading, and construction of structures and site features. Large construction equipment such as bulldozers, loaders, scrapers, and pavers would be required during various construction phases. Large equipment is generally brought to the site at the start of the construction phase and kept on site until its term of use ends. A staging area would be designated on-site to store construction equipment and supplies during construction. Throughout construction, the size of the work crew reporting to the site each day would vary depending on the construction phase and the different activities taking place at the time. Parking for workers would be provided on-site during all phases of construction. Construction workers will not be allowed to park on local streets. If needed during the peak construction periods, off-site parking will be provided, and workers will carpool or be shuttled to the worksite. The Applicant will be required to prepare a Parking Management Plan for construction parking. The Applicant will be required to prepare a construction management plan to identify the timing of construction activities, and the movement of construction vehicles. There will be no dirt hauling activities allowed to and from the site during the peak hours during any of the construction phases. Construction Phasing Free -Standing Parking Structure Construction of the free-standing parking structure requires the demolition of approximately 106 surface parking spaces and associated landscaping. A free-standing, 275 -stall parking structure would be constructed prior to breaking ground on the remainder of the Project in order to replace surface parking temporarily and permanently displaced by site development. The parking structure would have three levels of above -ground parking, including rooftop parking. Construction activities are anticipated to occur over an approximate six-month timeframe. imley* ®rn Page 174 WORKING DRAFT—NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION Residences at 4400 Von Karman City of Newport Beach Traffic Impact Study Residential Structure Upon completion of the free-standing parking structure, approximately 443 surface parking spaces would be demolished to allow for the construction of the Project. At the completion of this phase of the Project, there would be 1,645 parking spaces with parking for the Project residences and guests, as well as 275 spaces in the structure for office users. The proposed Project's site grading and foundation excavation would require the removal of approximately 112,000 cubic yards (cy) of material. It is anticipated that all 112,000 cy will be exported from the site. Construction activities are anticipated to occur over a 24 -month time period. The Project includes the demolition of 75 additional surface parking spaces to allow for the reconfiguration of on-site surface parking and access. No grading is assumed. Construction activities would run concurrently with the residential structure over an approximate 3 -month time period. Construction Traffic Management Heavy vehicles associated with construction of the Project would use the existing regional and local truck route network to approach the site, getting as close to the destination site as possible before turning off the designated truck route. Impacts from construction traffic would be occasional and temporary delays to traffic, during the movement of heavy equipment or transport of heavy loads to and from the site. The Applicant will be required to provide a construction management plan, and to identify planned travel patterns for haul vehicles, and obtain a Haul Route Permit from the City. Approach and departure routes for construction vehicles will be via Jamboree Road, MacArthur Boulevard, Von Karman Avenue and Birch Street. Depending on the origin/destination (the nearest landfill, or the deposit site identified for cut material), trucks will either arrive and depart via 1-405, to the north of the site; or via SR -73, to the south of the site. No heavy vehicle traffic will be permitted during peak commute hours. 10 CONCLUSIONS A comparison analysis has been conducted to determine whether the proposed Residences at 4400 Von Karman (Project) would result in any new significant environmental impacts as compared to the conclusions discussed in the City of Newport Beach General Plan Transportation Study (March 2006). Based on the comparison analysis, the proposed Project would not result in any new traffic -related impacts compared to those identified in the City of Newport Beach 2006 General Plan Transportation Study. The Traffic Impact Study finds that the traffic -related potential impacts associated with the proposed Project would either be the same or not substantially greater than those described in the 2006 General Plan Update EIR. lmley»> ®rn Page 175 Exhibit "D" RESIDENCES AT 4440 VON KARMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION RESUBMITTED OCTOBER 26, 2020 Prepared by � rin brook L ! _._.. Realty Advisors, Inc. RESIDENCES AT 4440 VON KARMAN AFFORDABLE HOUSING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND DENSITY BONUS APPLICATION OCTOBER 26, 2020 Project Description & Affordability Level TPG (KCN) Acquisition, LLC ("Picerne") is proposing the 312 unit Residences at 4440 Von Karman development ("Project") on a site located in Planned Community Development Plan #15 (Koll Center Newport Planned Community). The Project site is irregularly shaped and is bounded by Birch Street, Von Karman Avenue, and the existing surface parking lot for the Jazz Semiconductor facility. Although the total Project site is approximately 13.0 acres, that is inclusive of existing surface parking serving existing office buildings as well as a proposed parking structure which is planned to replace existing surface parking on the residential development site serving the existing office buildings. The net development area, including parks, landscaped walkways, access drives, the replacement parking structure, and existing parking totals approximately 8.7 acres. The balance of the Project site (approximately 4.3 acres) consists of an existing access easement, parking lots, and offices. The Newport Beach General Plan designates the Project site as Mixed -Use Horizontal 2 (MU - H2) and the zoning is Planned Community 15, Koll Center (PC 15). The site is currently developed as a surface parking lot serving existing office uses. Those parking spaces will be replaced in a proposed parking structure to be located in the southeast corner of the Project site as well as in the parking garage for the proposed residential Project. As part of the Project, Picerne intends to develop and dedicate a 1.1 -acre Public Park to the City of Newport Beach. The Project is planned to consist of a total of 312 units: 260 units based on the current remaining additive residential units ("Base" units) per the Airport Business Area Integrated Conceptual Development Plan for Koll and Conexant Properties ("ICDP") and 52 density bonus units (i.e., 20% of the 260 Base units). In accordance with Government Code Section 65915, five percent of the Base units (i.e., 13 units) will be made affordable to Very Low Income households. Very Low Income households, as defined in California Health and Safety Code Section 50105, are households earning 50 percent or less of area median income, adjusted for family size. Eligibility for Density Bonus Picerne will be providing 13 units (i.e. 5% of Base units) affordable to Very Low Income households ("Very Low Income units"). This will comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 65915 and Section 20.32 of the City's Zoning Code applicable to a 20% density bonus. Rents for the Very Low Income units will be computed in accordance with Health and Safety Code Sec. 50053, as required by Government Code Section 65915(c)(1). 1 Residences at 4440 V (:-)ti arnian AR)rd able tloushig lmpietnentation. Plan a.1.1 ...")e sity : 01111S .A.ppli ,atio n. October 26, 2020 Density Bonus Computation and Term of Affordability The density bonus computation for the Project per Government Code Section 65915 is shown below: Table 1 Density Bonus Computation Remaining Units Per ICDP (Before Density Bonus) Density Bonus Utilized (20%) 260 52 Total Units 312 Picerne intends to operate the apartment Project as a rental community. The 13 Very Low Income units will remain rent restricted for a minimum of 55 years, per Government Code Section 65915(c)(1). Reduction in Parking The Project meets the criteria of subdivision (b) of Government Code Sec. 65915 and Section 20.32.030 of the City's Zoning Code by providing at least five percent (5%) of the total units of a housing development (excluding any units permitted by the density bonus awarded pursuant to that section) for Very Low Income households. Government Code Section 65915(p) and Section 20.32.040 of the City's Zoning Code provide the following: (1) Upon the request of the developer, no city, county, or city and county shall require a vehicular parking ratio, inclusive of handicapped and guest parking, of a development meeting the criteria of subdivision (b), that exceeds the following ratios: a. Zero to one bedrooms: one onsite parking space. b. Two to three bedrooms: two onsite parking spaces. (2) If the total number of parking spaces required for a development is other than a whole number, the number shall be rounded up to the next whole number. For purposes of this subdivision, a development may provide "onsite parking" through tandem parking or uncovered parking, but not through streetparking. Table 2 on the next page is a summary of Government Code Sec. 65915 parking requirements vs. spaces to be provided: 2 Affin,dab e:..:i0U.SifI i'llan ,i.n [)ejasity Bori.US .Appli ;afi.cni October 26, 2020 Table 2 Parking Requirements Studio 55 1.0 55 1 BR 149 1.0 149 2 BR 108 2.01 216 TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED - 312 1.3 420 RES IDENTIAL UNITS Studio 55 lA 55 1 BR 149 1 A 149 2 BR 108 2.0, 216 TOTAL PARKING STALLS REQUIRED - 312 Pr 1.3 420 RES IDENTIAL UNITS TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED - 559 RES IDENTIAL UNITS PARKING PROVIDED IN EXCESS OF ...... .. ........ 139 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OFFICE PARKING PROVIDED IN .... ........................... ........................ ..... 276 RES IDENTIAL STRUCTURE .. .... } TOTAL PARKING STALLS PROVIDED IN i RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE 835 Picerne requests that parking requirements be calculated in accordance with Government Code Sec. 65915(p). The project is currently planning to provide 559 onsite parking spaces for its residential units, subject to changes pending approval of final building plans. Development Incentive Request Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(d)(1) and Section 20.32 of the City's Zoning Code, Picerne is entitled to one concession or incentive as a result of providing at least five percent (5%) of the units as affordable for Very Low Income households. Picerne requests the following development incentive: Section 20.32.070 of the City's Zoning Code provides that "Affordable units [in a density bonus project] shall reflect the range of numbers of bedrooms provided in the residential development project as a whole." Picerne requests that the 13 Very Low Income units be 3 1Z.esklences all October 26, 2020 provided utilizing the unit mixes as shown below rather than a unit mix proportional to the development as a whole: Table 3 Unit Mix As required by Government Code Sec. 65915(d)(1)(A), this incentive will result in additional rental income for the Project as well as construction cost reductions for the affordable units, which will enable the affordable rents to be set in accordance with Government Code Sec. 65915(c)(1). Income Limits and Examples of Eligible Tenants for Affordable Homes Very Low Income Households are defined as households whose gross income does not exceed 50% of area median income, adjusted for household size. Table 4 on the following page shows the maximum income limits as determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development and the California Department of Housing and Community Development ("HCD") for Very Low Income households with household sizes appropriate for Residences at 4440 Von Karman: Table 4 Maximum Income Limits zu 1 Person $44,850 2 Person 51,250 3 Person 57,650 4 Person 64,050 5 Person 69,200 Higher income limits apply to larger families of 6 or more persons; however those families are not considered to be a target market for Residences at 4440 Von Karman, where the unit mix consists of studios, one -bedroom, and two-bedroom apartment homes. 4 October 26, 2020 The Project's 13 affordable homes will be rented to eligible Very Low Income households. As shown in Table 4, Very Low Income households include incomes ranging from $44,850 per year for a one-person household to $69,200 per year for a five -person household. As such this could include service industry employees (waitresses, retail managers, hotel receptionists etc.), school district employees, health care employees, and other occupations which provide needed services to our community. While household size, overtime pay, summer jobs, or second jobs may affect eligibility, the income limits above are reflective of pay to many public or health care sector workers, as shown in Table 5 below: Table 5 Examples of Qualifying Salaries A Very Low Income household must have household income which does not exceed a range of $44,850 to $69,200, depending on household size. Following are examples of positions available at the City, at Newport -Mesa Unified School District, and at Hoag Hospital which may be representative of future residents in affordable units at the Residences at Uptown Newport North. Information Position Pay Range Source Comments Library Clerk I or Library Clerk 11 $38,896-$60,590 State Will qualify. Police Comm. Service Officer 44,158-68,494 State Will qualify Newport -Mesa School District Custodian/Head 42,768-56,472 NMUSD Will qualify Custodian Newport Mesa School District Administrative Asst. 49,764-60,936 NMUSD Will qualify Hoag Hospital Administrative Asst: 44,000-51,000 Glass Door Will qualify The pay ranges shown above are as of 2018 through 2020 (depending on source) and are subject to periodic update. Retired persons or couples or young business professionals starting their careers may also qualify to rent the affordable homes. In order to provide opportunities to workers to live in one of the affordable homes, the City could provide guidelines providing for acceptance of applications on a priority basis from classes of individuals who qualify under the income limits in effect. The guidelines could provide for priority treatment for City employees, employees of the local school district, and employees of major health care institutions or other categories identified by the City for priority treatment. Rental Rate Limits for Affordable Homes The 13 Very Low Income units shall be rented at an affordable rent calculated in accordance with the provisions of Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code. Section 50053 of the Health and Safety Code limits affordable rent to 30% of total income for a Very Low Income household, as calculated in Table 6 below. That section also requires that the rent for a studio unit assumes a one-person household for rent calculation purposes, a one -bedroom unit assumes a two -person household, and a two-bedroom unit assumes a three-person household. The rents calculated are then adjusted by a utility allowance as determined annually by the County of Orange Housing & 5 1Z.esi(Ictices at 4440 V,,.-ni A°1ordab e 1 -lousing irnperneiritation F'hin ,.m ::)en. ity 13ornis .Ap_p ication October 26, 2020 Community Services Department. As of October 1, 2019, the reduction for the utility allowance is $119.00 per month for a studio unit, $132.00 per month for a one -bedroom unit, and $171.00 per month for a two-bedroom unit. The utility allowance utilized assumes gas cooking, gas space heating, gas water heating, as well as water, and sewer, and trash fees which will be paid by the tenant. Table 6 Maximum Rents by Bedroom Count Very Low Studio $10,815 $901 $119 $782 1 Bedroom 12,360 1,030 132 898 2 Bedroom 13,905 1,159 171 988 IUtility allowances will be updated prior to commencement of leasing activities to reflect updated utility allowances and final utility configurations. Picerne will enter into an affordable housing agreement, in recordable form, with the City prior to obtaining the first building permit for any residential unit within the Project. That agreement will ensure that the maximum rents for the affordable apartment homes will be calculated using the methodologies as utilized in Table 6. The rental rates shown will be updated prior to the commencement of rental activities and on an ongoing basis to reflect then current income limits, utility allowances, and any changes in applicable regulations and statutes. Unit Mix, Design, and Location of Affordable Homes While the exact location of each of the affordable homes within the Residences at 4440 Von Karman has not yet been determined, the affordable homes will be spread throughout the development to avoid concentration of affordable homes in any area. The affordable homes shall be comparable in the quality of construction and exterior design to the market rate homes. The affordable homes will be marketed concurrently with the market rate homes and will be released for occupancy roughly proportional to release of the market rate homes for occupancy. All affordable homes will have access to the facilities and amenities offered by the development. C.1 October 26, 2020 Requested City of Newport Beach Assistance Financial Assistance Picerne is not requesting any direct financial assistance from the City of Newport Beach for the Project. STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE ss. CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH I, Leilani I. Brown, City Clerk of the City of Newport Beach, California, do hereby certify that the whole number of members of the City Council is seven; the foregoing resolution, being Resolution No. 2021-3 was duly introduced before and adopted by the City Council of said City at a regular meeting of said Council held on the 261h day of January, 2021, and the same was so passed and adopted by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Mayor Brad Avery, Mayor Pro Tem Kevin Muldoon, Council Member Noah Blom, Council Member Joy Brenner, Council Member Diane Dixon, Council Member Duffy Duffield NAYS: None RECUSED: Council Member Will O'Neill IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed the official seal of said City this 271h day of January, 2021. c c Leilani I. Brown City Clerk Newport Beach, California